HE'S ROASTING EVERYBODY! *JORDAN PETERSON: BEST COMEBACKS* | (REACTION!)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 тра 2024
- Welcome back to the channel! I see you couldn't get enough.
TODAY'S VIDEO
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
HE'S ROASTING EVERYBODY! JORDAN PETERSON: BEST COMEBACKS | (REACTION!)
👕BUY SOME DOPE ASS MERCH👕
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Click Here: teespring.com/stores/have-a-d...
🎸UP & COMING BAND? WANT ME TO REACT TO YOUR SONG?🎸
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Send me an email: alex.hefner@yahoo.com
LINK TO THE ORIGINAL VIDEO
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Click Here to Watch:
SOCIAL MEDIA & DISCUSSIONS
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Twitter: / alex_hefner
Facebook: / itscontro
Tik Tok: www.tiktok.com/@alexhefner?la...
Instagram: / alex_hefner
Patreon / alexhefner
BUSINESS INQUIRIES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Please email me: alex.hefner@yahoo.com
COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. This video and UA-cam channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, and is not an infringement of copyright. This video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
Special thanks:
The Band for making this awesome music
Every one of you guys watching this now
I love yall! :)
jordan peterson best comebacks alex hefner reaction ben shapiro #jordanpeterson #best #comebacks
When he said "gotcha" I felt he was letting her off the hook and defusing the situation. It was good to see him take the high ground after the aggressive and on-sensical interview questioning.
Yea that's how I took it as well. Like a comedic jab to satyrize the modern debating circle of "owning" and "destroying" your opponent. It felt nice, it released a bit of the tension that was present.
When he said "gotcha" I thought of Dave Chappelle gotcha b*tch! 😂
Same. It wasn't a Chappelle show "gotcha b*tch" it was more of a light "You're starting to see things from my point of view". It was tame and not overly eager.
Same sentiment here. He saw her awkward pause and hesitancy and he lighten the conversation with a comedic “gotcha”.
Ya know, I never thought of it that way, but makes sense. Thanks.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again because it bears repeating. "In order to be able to think you have to risk being offensive" is possibly the most important sentence uttered in the last decade.
More importantly he should have said. 'Since when has anyone ever had the right not to be offended.'
@@jimc3786 agreed 100%. However, I believe in both countries from which these two originate (Canada for sure, not sure about the UK), freedom of speech is not a constitutional right.
I think "great nations don't fight endless wars" is a good one too
The only side you should be apart of without fail is the side of truth
@@jhawkk2004 I think you're wrong about freedom of speech being not a constitutional right in Canada. Canada has something called Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and one of the section defines that you have "freedom of expression", that supposed to be a higher form of "freedom of speech". Yea sure you probably wouldn't call it "constitutional right", but that just how different countries has different names for the same thing.
The clip montages of Dr. Peterson can be entertaining and include some great "gotcha" moments for reacting, but they hardly scratch the surface of what he is really about and how he really thinks. His long form lecture series and podcasts are by far the most interesting content he produces. Unfortunately 2 hour lectures don't necessarily make for great react content. I would encourage anyone to listen to them if they are even remotely interested in psychology or analytical thinking. If you could make entertaining react content on his lectures I would be very impressed.
I would love reactions to his lectures, yes.
@@Lunumbrus Damn that would be boring, hahahaha. Maybe a highlight reel of lectures?
Totally agree. I've been watching Jordan since 2016 and I've consumed all of his online talks and lectures. Well worth it!
@@ams914 carefull.. you’ll binge those lectures like it was the latest Netflix hit. At least I did. Fascinating insight into the human experience
Peterson is a charlatan - and the fact that he managed to fool so many people is really terrifying.
as someone whose life was changed by this mans speeches, lectures, interviews and books; i cant tell you how happy it makes me to see all these reaction channels exposing people to his work. thanks alex.
Jordan Peterson is the most calm, blatantly honest, searing, and precise person with common sense alive today. We are all privileged to hear this man speak.
He is also very dodging in this argumentation. "Oh, you called me out on the thing I just said? Well, I didn't mean it exactly like that, I meant in a more general meaning". Does it all the time.
@@kristoferdahlstrom2137 there was nothing about any of his responses that were "dodging". I think his intention is to clarify his statements so they are crystal clear and exact.
@@KSGomez88 Maybe not so much in this video, but you can have a look at this video, dissecting how he argues: ua-cam.com/video/HfW7weauVv4/v-deo.html
@@kristoferdahlstrom2137 I saw nothing wrong with what he said there. A 19 year old girl has no clue about life. Especially declaring that she doesn't want to have children, because, reasons. He calls out how selfish and self-centered our society is. And there is nothing wrong with that.
@@KSGomez88 Are 35-year old women without children regretful for it?
He's definitely very "matter of fact" and that's what makes him so brilliant.
Not just matter of fact but also very sincere in his intent to help others. Even with the people he debates he seems to genuinely want bring out the best of them, only sinking into own and destroy mode when it becomes apparent that his opponent isn’t debating in good faith and is perfectly willing too resort to mud flinging if it will score points with the audience.
Here is what Jordan Peterson does . He is so well read . Taught for 30 years . Never once does he tell you what to think . He can put in words every one can understand huge arguments that calls out BS
You need to watch the video of him on his daughter's podcast. He's talking to a black woman who for the longest time hated him because it was popular to do so, then she actually started listening to him and researching him and HEARING what he has to say, instead of just blindly hating him. It's an absolutely fantastic chat, and his reaction to her is incredible.
ua-cam.com/video/v8v7ueICWuU/v-deo.html
Her name is Africa Brooke.
@@paul_romero_ yeah I posted the link to that video above. Couldn’t remember her name because it’d been a bit since I’d seen the video/
That would be my recommendation as well. Here is a long version: ua-cam.com/video/qU7iXtHTVtI/v-deo.html
Yes, Jordan Peterson is the best Teacher out there.
He encourages you to research what he is saying.
I love it.
Anyone who’s offended by Dr. Peterson is being unreasonable. I don’t really care about their delusions about him. He’s one of the most important academics in the last century.
I don't normally comment on videos, but I thought I would make a suggestion.
I have been a long term Jordan Person fan, and one of my favorite videos is of him discussing the Disney cartoon movie Peter Pan. This is a video is recorded during one of his lectures where he talks about the symbolism in the movie. It's absolutely fascinating.
That sounds really cool!!
After Skool made a narrative cartoon of that talk. So cool.
the one on Pinocchio was also amazing
@@AlexHefner "...and tickle your gooch."
Yess! But my favorite is when he talks about Pinocchio!
When “Logic” is absent from the argument, “Emotions” are all that’s Left.
That is why there is so much anger from the Left, while the Right remains calm.
@Soyel show me where the Right is burning rioting and looting.
Trying to be evenhanded is laudable, but “The Truth” is Always where our attention must be directed, to achieve any Good.
I also love the “gotcha” moment, simply because it seems like Jordan was just having fun in that moment. He was clearly enjoying the discussion.
When I watched it, I wondered if he would regret it for kinda “stooping down to her level.”
He says what he's thinking and isn't rude about it. He's just honest.
Must listen to the GQ interview of Dr. Peterson. The host was just like Cathy Newman but better prepared. And it was such a great interview.
A must watch
I commented that on another vid too. I want to see Alex' reaction to that as well.
Absolutely. Really great interview!
The greatest thing about the GQ interview?
How badly JP schooled her. She got so schooled, JP should have charged her a full semester's tuition for the education he gave to her for free.
@@MLPDethDealr32 let's keep posting this on his videos till he watches the comment.
His goal isn’t to be correct.. it’s to make you think alongside him because you may raise a point he hasn’t thought of. It’s conversation he wants.
Yes exactly, if that's not the goal then you aren't having a conversation you know?
This is too simplistic. Of course this is commonly his goal, but a discussion isn’t a discussion if you aren’t making at least some points with the goal to be correct
1) What I've always appreciated about him is that he calmly yet firmly delivers facts and demonstrable data and he never lowers himself to name calling or insulting his opponents.
2) unfortunately the reason that any of his followers or fans get labeled alt right is an attempt to discredit their opinion as publicly unworthy. In other words, if you think differently than I do, and I know that my argument is flimsy with no facts behind it, I'll call you an alt-right conspiracy theorist to discredit your point
So basically it's a strawman intertwined with argumentum ad hominem. You don't directly argue with the person's arguments, nor you try to attack the person's views; at this point you're not even attacking a strawman but the views of the supporters of said strawman. I mean geez, is there a way to go any deeper into that rabbit hole to prove yourself wrong?
Jordan is always very specific in his word choice. His debate style is such that the other person also has to be very specific. Jordon is also very good at getting people to realize that whatever they're talking about is WAY more complicated than the other person wants things to be. You can't solve a problem unless you can fully define the actual problem and the conditions around it.
>specific in his word choice
he's notorious for setting up motte & baileys for easy backpedalling lol
@@JadeIsBunny Can you give an example?
@@vladtheinhaler8940 ask him whether he believes in god, whether he thinks gay marriage should be legal, whether same sex couples should be allowed to adopt children, whether discrimination against LGBTQ people should fall under the same legal umbrella as sex-based discrimination, whether we should do something about work place discrimination, etc. and watch him squirm.
he's gone on record defending every single injustice in our society, but takes great care not to make prescriptive claims. He's just "asking questions". He will however occasionally slip up and say shit like "it is hypocritical of women who wear make-up to work to complain about sexual harrassment" or "i'm against gay marriage if it was backed by cultural marxists" or "you cannot produce art without belief in god". His vice interview is probably the most clear display of this tactic where he word for word says "i'm not saying people shouldn't use sexual displays in the workplace, i'm not saying that. but that is what they're doing"
The motte being "i'm just making descriptive claims i'm a confused little bean uwu" and the bailey "women who get sexually harrassed at work were asking for it".
@@JadeIsBunny I'm not so sure you're giving an accurate analysis of what Jordan Peterson believes for himself. I am accusing you of building a strawman argument of Jordan Peterson's actual beliefs and using that strawman to confuse yourself of his actual beliefs.
@@FreeSalesTips Good one.
Three things I hate, over speaking and putting words in someone’s mouth, and interrupting an answer to a question. There is also a problem with labeling people and how they believe or think.
You're a good man Alex... Thank you for having a rational mind.
to women in history: im with jordan, everyone had it bad and for different reasons and its enfuriating how this is ignored
1) voting rights: women were allowed to vote the exact same time men where allowed to vote. how? cause the first votes were only open to landowners - regardless of gender, you owned land, you got to vote.
-- the second model was based on military service - you served, you could vote, yes if you were a woman and served, say as nurse, in the army you got to vote just like the men.
--- the third model was based on conscription and the early feminists wanted women to be enlisted just like the men, THUS giving all women a vote. But other women didnt want to be enlisted and would gladly give up their voting right for that privilege, ended up getting the vote without being enlisted, meanwhile TODAY men who dont enlist....cant vote in many countries, women can...
2) women were in positions of power across cultures and times. from ancient egypt rulers like nofretete and cleopatra to a truckload of queens all across europe, people forget that even when there were only male rulers, women did have a big say in things, usually it was the mothers and lovers of powerfull men who dictated their policies. A good example is charlemagne the great. His mom decided who he married, which policies he enacted and on whom to declare war. The second his mother died, he divorced his wife and changed all his policies 180°
In france it got so bad that ling lois xiv BANNED mistresses from court because he found that these women ruled the country and not his appointed ministers and advisors.
3) yes most women, like all commoners, were treated like dirt. Now how would you like to be treated, as priced posession like an animal, or like an expandable ressource to exploit? cause men were sent to die in wars and work themselves to death in mines. You do realise, that for most of medieval history there was about twice as many women around than males cause males DIED a lot in work and warfare. If you could choose, would you rather be forced to stay home, raise kids, do houesework and bend over when your husband wants, or would you rather work 16 hours a day in a hazardous environment in constant pain and die at 35? your pick
Exactly! Great comment!
@@Lof_Lof- thanks ^^ needed to add that factually women in medieval times were allowed to work - there were few female craftsmen who ran their own shops, but they did exist. London had one of the most famous armor smiths in all the world back then and it was a female one.
In norse society, while there were strict gender roles, women enjoyed almost the same rights as men - they could vote, they could be voted into power, they could inherit, get a divorce and actually owned all money her husband made - they usually would give him some pocket money - of money he earned - so he can drink and have fun with that while keeping the rest for he family.
the sad thing is for most of history it was men and women versus the world. now it seems to be men versus women.
They also seemed to forget that one, feminism was actually started by men. And two, few women were actually feminist. They were aware of the draft law and so most women NEVER wanted the vote in the first place. They also like to gloss over the many facts of history. One, work was much more labor intensive back in the day. Machines never existed and so everything had to be done by hand which was exhausting and usually came with the risk of death. Women weren't signing up to do these jobs, so men built society and so why would they respect women as equals? They were above them in every way possible at the time in everything but childcare. As you said, the dudes were dropping like flies, there were WAYYY more women alive than men at those times because men did all the dangerous sh*t. Would you respect the group that build society risking life and health or the group that looks after a few rugrats and cooks dinner? They also seem to forget that there were societies that DID treat women almost as equal to men. It is funny that ALL of those societies have something in common, the women were actually doing sh*t. Ancient Egypt, Scandinavia, Mongolia, the Celts, ALL of the women were much more integral in running society and thus were treated more fairly.
First of all I am 100% a liberal. JP is coherent, intelligent and well educated. He speaks with knowledge and not emotion. He’s able to speak on points many people are afraid to speak on and viewpoints people are afraid to voice. Its completely true that too many people let emotion run the debates and leave logic and truth behind.
"I am 100% a liberal" -- I doubt it :-)
-- Do you believe that almost every viewpoint (barring things like threatening physical violence, for example) has a right to speak?
-- Do you believe that there are only two sexes (barring a few very rare genetic abnormalities)?
-- Do you believe that if I am, say, 'black' that I have a duty to support "progressive" politics?
Bullshit.
@@fewwiggle Man shut up ain’t no one care for your questions because you doubt a commenter on UA-cam
@@fewwiggle 2 and 3 literally have nothing to do with liberalism.
@@sageoverheaven Where did I say they did? I just asked some questions. Interesting that he wouldn't respond -- so maybe he is a "liberal".....
Anyone who shows slight interest in JP gets labeled “alt-right” and that lady questioning him about “alt-right fans” was a clear example of someone doing that.
Right. She just saw that the comments didn't agree with Cathy Newman, that Cathy was arguing from an authoritarian leftist perspective, therefore the commenters must surely not have been on the left at all and if they're not on the left, they must be alt-right, lol. I was a left-leaning centrist at the time. Right-leaning centrist now. Aka a part of the alt-right either way, apparently...
@@VelkanAngels Yea lots of things over the last few years taught me I'm definitely right of center, not left of center as I once believed (several political quizzes proved it too haha). People on both sides have this "oh you don't agree with me so clearly you're an extreme radical" attitude but I see it more prevalent on the left. It's a divisive mindset and prevents any kind of decent discussion.
When you see those labelers comment on things, you often see them responding multiple times in every single thread because of how underrepresented they are. It tells you how much rarer these people are in actuality, and that the ratio that agree with JP is probably even more than what you see.
@@VelkanAngels Well yeah, these days anyone who is even slightly to the right of chairman Mao is considered alt right, so...
They attach labels in an attempt to scare people away from Jordan Peterson.
Because liars always seek to silence truth
It’s “Punch and Judy” a puppet comedy duo from the 90’s in England where two puppets used to argue and beat each other with frying pans and bats 😂😂
Thank you, Oliver, you saved me the job of writing this. Not from the 90s, however, it's an old seaside traditional entertainment. Goes way back, probably to the 17th century. Thought to have originated in Italy.
Not a Punch and Judy expert just saying from what I can remember being a small child growing up in a seaside town
@@ollieparr1826 No expert here either, just a whole lot older. Plus I googled the facts to find the extra info! :-D
@@lauraroberts2250 thank you for the clarification, I only assumed it was English since all my foreign friends have no clue what I’m on about.
I'm a Communications major and I nerd out on these videos. Thank you and keep up the great work👍👍
He’s such a good person, people get upset over a fake idea of him. The man is honest and caring.
What I like about Jordan Petersen is that he is very well-read. He knows and understands not just psychology, but also history and philosophy. He knows how to connect those three things in the political spectrum, which is why he gets the controversy he does, and why the Neo-Progressives, the Marxists, the Traditional Progressives, and those on the Left that aren't centrist try and cancel JP. He speaks the truth, articulates his thoughts before speaking, and as he says, "They went all the way back to the early 1990s, 1992 I think, in an effort to find something I said to come after me with. And they failed to take me out."
JP is the kind of intellectual warrior that reminds me of Rocky Marciano -- a boxer that is one of the few that ever retired that had no losses, let alone no knock-outs, on his record.
12:55. Yeah man, he makes you want to learn. He's a professor, and that's a testament to his prowess. Teaching you what you need to know isn't the ultimate goal. Instilling the want to understand why that thing is as such is what we're looking for.
I admire JP for his calmness and composure.. imagine that you have been a clinical psychologist for 25 years, you had many patients, read tons of books on this topic, wrote a few of your own and then you sit down to debate with someone who says: "well maybe, but I THINK that.." - if I were Jordan I would have thought "aw shit, here we go again.."
I believe Dr Peterson regretted saying ‘gotcha’ is because it brings ego into it. Part of the reason he can stay so calm and focused is he leaves ego at the door to keep arguments based on facts, not emotions or personal feelings. He wins, without braggadocio or being condescending. He’s a truly great thinker and everything we’ve lost as an “enlightened”society.
I believe he said that it was ungracious of him or something along those lines. That he should've just let it sit.
I think it was rather mild and playful given the insanity facing him. I congratulate him on everything, even the "gotcha" which really drives his victory home.
@@jeskaaable : I agree actually. He said he regretted it but he deserves to celebrate! He’s a perfect example of common sense and decency.
I believe you're right, but I'd have said a hell of a lot more in his position than 'gotcha'.
@@notcrazy6288 I’m way too petty to have just said gotcha
I admire people who are being attacked verbally and still keep their cool
Jorden is a Master at it.
Destroy them with facts!
His tone is a serious person talking about silly things that should be common sense. Like how a parent talks to their child when their child has an idea that conflicts with reality. You don't necessarily yell at your children in that situation. You don't let them get away with nonsense either.
Yeah. It's basically the tone I have, when someone keeps challenging something I'm saying, that I know with 100% certainty to be an established fact and not a matter of opinion. Something truly basic. It's a combination of agitation that something rudamentary is being so thoroughly denied, a kind of boredom from having to just state the obvious for the 58th time now and defeat from knowing you'll have to state it numerous times more in the future and that you stating it now won't even make a difference anyway, cause the person you're stating it to doesn't actually care what's true or false.
@@VelkanAngels I'm pretty stubborn so I don't give up. The thing that is more important in my opinion is focusing on one thing at a time until it is exhausted. Most people who don't know what they are talking about change the subject frequently and without warning. The correct tactic is to not chase them down the rabbit hole and keep them on the subject at hand. I don't even repeat myself much I put the burden of proof on the other person when I sense them being unreasonable and make them repeat themselves until it becomes obvious how silly they sound.
Stoic, matter of fact, brilliant. Thank you for doing these Alex, Peterson is a boss!
I would recommend watching Steven Crowder's Change My Mind series. Crowder tries his best to have a civil conversation while still backing up his points with research. A lot of good conversations happen throughout the videos. I would just choose a topic of interest and see what you think.
Yes! This^
Alex you're good because you break it down and Jordan Peterson does make you think and I don't know what's so wrong about it he's not the evil man
I'm sorry him I'm talking into the phone
They are interesting but Crowder is a comedian so his goal of civil conversation gets undercut by his desire to mess with the people who talk to him. He does it with the most unreasonable people so it's mostly fair game. Just saying he's not up to JPs level of arguing in good faith.
@@Thesteadfast He doesn't have a desire to mess with people during Change My Mind. I've watched the series, and it's obvious his goal is to inform his viewers and those debating him, and only cracks jokes to break any tension, or when someone is being absolutely unreasonable or dishonest.
You saying “punch and doody??🤔” made me just spit my drink out I laughed so hard. Idk why. Best pet of this video 😆😆
The word for his style is...... Accurate. He says exactly what he means to say when he means to say it. He only asks for the same courtesy from those he's engaging with in return. That's what makes his speech so fascinating because his vocabulary is such that he can express details in a way most people do not do in conversation. They use broad stroke descriptions and exaggerations. Most people never actually say what they mean to say, let alone even know how to articulate it. This is why so many are in awe of his accuracy in speech. What a wonderful wordsmith.
Love Peterson reactions, but would prefer something where he gets to talk at length rather than the short clip videos
I hear you loud and clear!
Seconded
Thirded
Unpack 😀
@@AlexHefner his interview with Krauss ( origin project) is nice, maybe too long for content tho. But atleast there are two highly intelligent people talking rather than 1 and another emotional baboon.
I am STILL trying to process "their right to not be offended" and have to admit, I haven't made much progress, even after all these years!
Peterson has said that he was hoping that the conversation would be more about the ideas after the "Gotcha!" moment, with her going after him less, and listening more to the points he was making - a more open, two-way conversation. However, he was disappointed because after the brief pause, it went back to pretty much how it was before.
saying that Jordan Peterson is alt right or speaks to the alt right because some alt right people listen to him is like saying "if you like the movie Iron Man 2 then you're alt right because my neighbor is alt right and he really liked the message of that movie"
I credit the Biblical Series of Peterson as one of the most insightful and interesting lectures I've ever seen, brought me to peace with religion.
Really recommend them, you have a wonderful experience awaiting for those curious about our world and our purpose in life.
His biblical series made me understand and believe in Christianity.
@@travisfaulkner3224 exactly the same. I didn't understand and was very critical of the "stupid" stories, involving sacrificing your child for an old man in the sky. What a fool I was... It was really eye-opening and made me understand the educational value of the Bible
Jordan Peterson is quite foolish when it comes to religion. But then, it’s quite foolish to believe in religion in the first place. There’s no reason to believe in them, after all.
@@cajunking5987 you missed the educational value of the series. It's not about belief, it's about understanding.
@@jeskaaable 🤨
Dude I'm loving these JP videos, keep em coming! You're smashing it!
Dr. Peterson is precise not only in his thinking, but also in his speach
JP is the GOAT. a living legend. Appreciate while he's still around.
As long as the YT Lords are okay with it, you should check out the “After Skool” videos with JP. They’re just his lectures that have been animated. Very good stuff. Keep it up man 🤙🏻❤️
Afterskool is good
I fuck with them and couple more such channel including a channel where a German sounding dude talks about psychology
I love the way this man's mind works and the wondrous depths of his knowledge.
The pussy/balls thing you mentioned sounds very much like a Trevor Noah stand up bit I've seen a few times.
And I would describe JP's voice, tone, cadence etc. eloquent, fecund and sometimes can appear magniloquent when heard against those sententious, fervid and usually antagonistically pugnacious voices of his opponents.
Jordan is frequently out numbered in debates so his tone is perfect! Jordan is the man…,,so is Alex!!!! 🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻
Mr. Hefner, I wish I could meet you brother. Your channel and content is amazing, and there’s wayyyyy more Dr. Peterson to dive into!!! You’re my hero, cheers
Everyone knows that they are gonna get shut up, so they always try to interrupt him and don't let him finish
You really need to review some of Steven Crowder's "Change My Mind" segments. He is UA-cam's number one target of cancelation.
I still find it absolutely crazy how Queen Elizabeth has been the Queen of England longer than my dad has even been alive…he’s 60 years old. 60 YEARS OLD!!! What a wild ride life must’ve been for her, like damn yo!
7:39
He talks in a very calm & calculating tone. I love it. My grandma has the same speech pattern & tone. Ironically, she is from fairly close to the same place as Peterson. He is from Edmonton Can & my Grandma is from Prince Alberta Can.
The phrase “don’t be such a girl” has been so very misinterpreted. I had a therapist tell me that from when he was a young boy that he always took that to mean that boys were better than girls. “You throw like a girl” and such. But it’s due to the social design of our species. Men and women are not the same, and typically both desire the other. Manly men are what women deeply want. And in the earliest years of a boys life he is primarily cared for and taught by his mother. As he matures he needs, in some sense, unlearn what he was taught and learn to be a man. He needs to “stop being such a girl.”
I had a conversation with my wife once. She told me that a family friend (and my younger sister’s ex-boyfriend) was taking her and a friend of hers to Vegas for the weekend, while she was engaged. He also happened to elicit some “gay” behaviors. He was fun, she said, but not someone she’d date. “The gay ones are so fun.” I told her that if he really wanted to bet married and start a family, that he needed to stop squandering his money and start putting food effort into bettering his situation. And if he wanted a woman to be seriously, sexually interested he needed to adopt more many behaviors. But he’s never been told that. The schools and media would never tell him how to actually be a “man.” And it costs boys in the long run when they’re not taught to “stop being such a girl.”
How about we stop gendering behaviors and just let people be who they want to be and find who they want to find. If he has to change himself to find love, it's not truly love. It's playing along to get along. That's not a life worth living.
@@Nonya12608 Why do you think we should doing that? Is there something wrong with gendering behaviors? and How can we stop that from happening?
@@Nonya12608 is everyone perfect? No? Then how can you say we should just stay as we are and what happens happens. “Where have all the good men gone?” They’ve been told not to become good men. “Where have all the good women gone?” They’ve been told not to become good women. Why should anyone in prison change their behaviors to just get along in society? It’s who they are!
Take your logic and apply it anywhere. You want a dream job? Don’t become the employee they want! Just stay the person they don’t want. You want to a happy, successful family? Don’t learn to become a good parent and spouse! You’re already perfect. Why should you change? Who are you to presume the scope of your wellness?
The very notion that no one should change is ludicrous. Ideas are only gendered because it’s what people look for. Figure out what you want, and become the person who would chosen for that. Become the person who would succeed in that so that your marriage and your “love” doesn’t have a fifty percent chance of ending, splitting a family in a nasty way. Let’s not pretend like terrible husband or a terrible wife should to be better. All people should always be learning ways they can improve.
But I suppose the abandonment of millennia-built logic and sound methodology is worth a few years of emotional happiness.
I consider myself to be pretty liberal on social stuff and leftist when it comes to economics, but I really enjoy listening to Peterson speak. It’s kinda interesting if I ever mention his name around friends because my liberal friends will always recoil in disgust and call him some name and my conservative friends will have nothing but high praise. So I don’t know if his content attracts a certain political viewpoint or if my liberal friends are merely parroting what they think their opinion should be or if they’ve even actually listened to him speak before. I’d really like to know.
I met JP in February in Cincinnati after his show (which was absolutely incredible). He is my personal hero and when it was my turn to meet him and get a picture taken, my heart started pounding because I got a little emotional. The guy completely changed my life for the better. I'm a disabled veteran with a mutilated body. Before Jordan Peterson, I was a depressed alcoholic with zero hope motivation, or self-respect. I got addicted to painkillers. I say myself as a victim. I slept 20 hours a day and became obese. Now I'm in shape, married and in helicopter flight school.
When I saw him, I choked up and said "Dr. Peterson, my heart is pounding. You're my hero."
He looked at me, smiled, and asked me my name. The man genuinely cares about all of us.
His tone is real and honest. He’s met with people looking for answers and discussing reality. So he’s not catering to any emotions or beating around the bush.
It's just a small point, but I noticed a couple of times (the later from a fellow Brit) that people complained about historic female injustice and Peterson points out that there was injustice everywhere across both genders. This is a spot on observation from Peterson. And I don't want to sound like I'm denying that women were looked down upon as lesser. They had barriers that men didn't. But especially in my own countries history, Britain was oppressive to almost everyone. When women got the vote in Britain, so too did men. And I say this because the truth is that women could vote, they just had to be land owners. There were very few women who were land owners, hence very few women voters. But millions of men also were not land owners and also could not vote. It wasn't a privilege only awarded to men, and the equality gained in voting rights wasn't just a win for women. And to further expand on this, most people were not land owners because they had no safety nets. Most people would be born into poverty and have to work for very little wages and they would die in poverty too. I don't know about America but Britain used to have work houses where people would agree to work very long hours for a place to sleep and some food (and that place to sleep could be a cold room they would have to share with multiple other families and the food might be a bit of mouldy bread and cheese.) Work houses were as close to slavery as you can get without being enslaved. And then you had debtors prisons. If people could not pay their debts, they would be put in a prison until they could repay their debt. The obvious problem being that when in prison, they cannot earn a living and thus cannot pay to get out. History has been appalling to both men and women. And to make one final point. Something I've always taken issue with is when women complain about how bad women had it in the early twentieth century. And yes it was horrible and I would not like to be oppressed. But they forget that men had a very major denial of their own freedom (at least in Britain.) If I (a 29 year old male) was alive in 1944. I would be shipped off against my will to potentially die on a battlefield in France. I would be subjected to the horrors of war. If I was alive in 1844, I would probably be sent down a mine to dig for coal. A job with long hours, no access to health care and a job guaranteed to kill me from breathing in coal dust. I'm sorry women couldn't vote, but at least they wouldn't be forced to work or fight themselves to death. Men had their own oppression and challenges. Many people on the left tend to think of history as 50% of the world (men) being privileged and oppressing the other 50% (women). In reality, it was more like 1% of the world (the upper classes, including their wives and daughters) oppressing 99% (everyone else, men and women alike.) Anyway that was a bit of a rant. But I just can't abide people acting like men had it so good in the past. They worked themselves to death to provide for their families and very few had any privileges.
Very well said, friend!!!
This was very well thought-out, so thank you. I enjoy reading a well-written post like this.
I also wanted to add some American history to your comment.
In the US, we used to have workhouses as well. It's the main reason why child-labor laws, and labor laws in the general sense, exist. Second, debtor's prisons still exist, sadly. They just now exist for those who don't pay child support or miss payment on a fine. I am one of the few that points this out in America, given that just because they aren't called "debtor's prisons," doesn't mean that the idea of jailing someone for non-payment of debt has gone away; it's that the names and language has changed. It is still in present society, and still as pernicious, for every reason you gave.
WHITE SPACE
It's what's for dinner.....
The things we agree on should unite us more than the things we disagree that divide us.
The "gotcha" was superbly placed because it drives his victory home for all viewers
Love your work man! Keep it up!
I'm enjoying these videos, but there's a part of Jordan Peterson's work that nobody looks at because of all the political controversy. A channel called Success Chasers posts a lot of excerpts from talks he's done and even his psychology lectures he's taught. If you want to know more about who he is and what he believes in, you could do worse than starting there.
On a personal note, THAT is the content that helped get me off the road to suicide in 2020. If it wasn't for those lessons from Jordan Peterson, I wouldn't have bothered taking the steps that turned my life around and kept me alive.
Well i am glad you found the content and it helped you trough a rough time.
We are glad you are here with us.
"True (insert ideology here) has never been tried" is the excuse adherents of that ideology use to dismiss any critiques, especially when previous attempts have been catastrophic.
From what I've heard from people who've made that argument, it's basically that the catastrophic consequences are (to them) in and of themselves proof, that what was tried wasn't REALLY their ideology. After all, they know for a fact, that their ideology is good and would result in peace, harmony and prosperity, so if it HAD been their ideology, that would've been the result. That surely the people before them who proclaimed to be of the same ideology must've done something unrelated at the same time and that unknown "something" is what actually caused the catastrophies.
So for them, it basically seemed to come from that human self-delusion we all have to varying extends, that we know ourselves to be good and smart people at the base of it all. Even if not everything we've done is good, we either meant well or were justified and while we may not be a smart in the classical sense, we're at least "street smart" or "smart in our own way". Some just build a larger house on that sandy hill than others do.
Long form university lectures, debates, podcasts. That's the gold.
Haha! I love the 'allergy' look! Flame up brother! Thx for the content!!!
what is this song on the intro ?
Jordan Peterson has mastered the art of blurring the line between blunt honesty and rudeness
I have a cousin that reminds me very much of Dr. Peterson. He has his values and beliefs but is willing to hear anyone out. It takes longer to have a conversation with him because he thinks deeply about what he says before he says it. You'll never catch him with his foot in his mouth.
Loved the vid, need an update on this guitar journey my guy
Anyone trying to outsmart JPP ends up outsmarting themselves and looks like an absolute buffoon.
They often assert points without a basis in fact. Thus end up looking dumb. They don’t have well founded opinions. Its really hard to argue with someone when you don’t even have a basic understanding of the human psyche and the world. I can’t even watch the news anymore because the newscasters are just so misinformed on everything.
You need to watch that whole Munk debate. Jordan got called a mean, angry white man by the black gentleman of the left. One of the few times I've seen Jordan angry during a debate. Stop chopping up the clips, overlapping them and showing close-ups of your eyes going back and forth, makes it hard to follow either sides argument. School isn't irrelevant, however, if you get a degree that isn't in a STEM field, then your degree might be irrelevant. You didn't quite get it right, an ideologue is someone who believes their ideology is right and everyone else is wrong, think uncompromising or dogmatic.
That debate was good but WOW that one guy was a frickn airbag
@@janelleg597 Yea, he is known for using a lot of verbiage without saying anything or ever addressing the topic under discussion.
I haven't watched in a while and always watched for your music reactions but glad you seem to be waking up now.
I would refer to Dr.Peterson's tone as Instructional. He's not trying to demean the opposing view, he's trying to educate and bring forth knowledge as an accomplished physiologist and scholar.
Which is something that is lost in todays day and age in the political debates and debates in general debates should be tools for people of different views to argue a topic and answer questions to further education and views of a topic, not to be used as stages to name call defame and ridicule opposing views to one’s own which is what seems to be happening more and more
Love this guy, agree with everything the comes out of his mouth. He's standing up for the white man in an age where we are predominantly portrayed as the devil.
No he isn’t.
He's standing up for individuals.
He stands up for individuals as well, but after following him for many years I feel he is one of the few public figures that says its okay to be a white man. Everyone else in the public eye makes us out to be the bad guys at most opportunities. Jordan stands up and says it's not the case.
Being on the receiving end of what white men have dished out for centuries. Poor baby. 🙄
@@Nonya12608 that doesn't help either. unless you wanna just start imprisoning white babies when they are born for crimes against humanity.
JP sounds like he can ruin a cookout because his onions on his burger were either under, or overcooked. He's a complete tool.
Its so funny seeing you adapt these new words in your sentences ever since you wanted the first Jordan Peterson video, saying how you wish you used more of his speaking style lol
keep up the great work man!
Yyyyaaaasssss I was waiting for you to find this one. It's hilarious.
Loving your videos man! Keep it up :D
Just went on a binge of your videos lol love your content
also the jordan peterson interview on joe rogans podcast is a really good one you could probably get some clips from
That introduction was amazing! 😂😂😂
Been watching him since 2016. He changed my life. I’ll spare you the details. Love ya Dr. Peterson!
They say we shouldn't talk about Religion or Politics... But that's the problem. We are here as a result of not discussing these things. We need to talk out the disagreement and discover whether or not we are wrong... Unless we understand what is wrong, how can we trust that what we understand and believe is correct...?
Love it brother!!! 👊😎
Agreed. I've had people tell me not to argue on Facebook and UA-cam because it's meaningless and no one will ever be convinced except those who already agree. Not true. I have had my mind changed many times and I've changed the minds of others as well. And even if that doesn't happen at all, that doesn't mean that nothing can be learned from the discussion. Discussion is extremely important, EVEN (gasp) on the internet.
this is the first time i have seen one of your videos. I am hooked
That quote is from the late great Betty White, I don't know if she originated the quote but she definitely used it.
I'm late for this video but I will be subscribed you make watching these fun bruv keep it up. By the way absolutely supurb belch 🤙
Ayyyyyy, just what I’ve been waiting for
They're trying to manipulate and win the argument even if they're wrong.
Rather than a convo and seeing who's right it's an argument to win and step on the other.
Whats amazing is that the people being upset are upsetting themselves and blaming you. Never back down.
Started following your channel yesterday because of your Jordan Peterson reactions. Now this?! You sir, have earned a new sub!
I appreciate that you are sharing these videos.
I love listening to Jordan Peterson I learn something new every time, his classes are especially interesting.
When you burped, Alex, you purged an emotional demon. Always enjoyable to see your reactions.
What is crazy is that Jordan had identified himself as left, but throughout his emergence, he was castigated as alt right. Amazingly Jordan is the absolute epitome of human society. He is both left and right. He is human and for truth, no matter your proclivities, it is what the truth reveals. At some time in the future his body of work will be dissected, and it will prove that this man is a top tier human psychologist and philosopher.
Dude Alex, you are really awesome, thoughtful and intelligent. I appreciate your thoughts. Thank you!! ❤🙏
Found this channel because I appreciate and enjoy Peterson. Your input is sharp respectful and thoughtful. Subscribed...
Dude. Alex/Peterson/Ronnie in one video. It's like all the corners of my life are finding each other and becoming one thing. Scary.
his lectures u classes ( that he has all on video at his yt page) are where the real stuff is. "reality and the sacred" is one of my personal faves
Lmfao! You're so entertaining to watch!
Let’s just establish that getting emotional in a debate is strongly correlated with having a view not based on facts and therefore having a view not based on truth.
That debate with Stephen Fry is excellent. Well worth a watch
Jordan Peterson has publicly talked about how he is high in agreeableness as one of his personality traits and he dislikes conflict - but he obviously works through his distress to challenge and respectfully debate important issues that he is passionate about - tremendous respect for him.