THE MOST INSANE CALL IN THE HISTORY OF POKER!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 лип 2024
- You won't believe your eyes when you see this hand! Fortunately, there is video evidence and multiple witnesses that it truly happened on Live at the Bike last week. Doug plays an epic hand against Alec Torelli, who makes a completely mind-blowing play to close the action. This might be the most incredible moment in the history of tabletop games.
As always on Poker Hands, Doug breaks down each street of action and shares his thoughts on how each player made their decisions.
Check out Doug's training website Upswing Poker: www.upswingpoker.com/
FOLLOW DOUG:
Snapchat ► / wcgrider
Twitter ► / dougpolkpoker
Instagram ► / dougpolkpoker
Facebook ► / dougpolkpoker
Twitch ► / dougpolkpoker
#GrindNation
My title+thumbnail game is always gonna be ridiculously over the top and trolly. it's the way to succeed on the platform, and also it's super lol
Photoshop breasts on yourself and I guarantee you get about 10k more clicks.
Doug Polk Poker, loving your analysis Doug. Top class!
Yep, I liked it.
Doug Polk Poker Your troll game is the stone cold nuts. Latest example: 17:11 spoofing Alec Torelli's style of shooting videos at the end of this video. I did a legit spit take from laughing so hard. What did it was including yourself dancing sarcastically during the dubstep montage of Alec. That was so funny I legit couldn't breath for a minute there.
But if you're going to clickbait with every single title, you're gonna have waaaaaaaay too many clickbaits in your range.
Have you ever thought about moving up the stakes where they respect your raises?
Eimantas Venckus lol
Eimantas Venckus hahaha
ahhahahhahhahahaaaa
some retards don't even get a joke.
Anus Bananus wat?
Am I the only one who actually wanted to see that QQ hand till the end?
Ben 86 shut up
Ben 86 I hate people who look like you
THE MOST INSANE CALL IN THE HISTORY IN THE HOOD GONE SEXUAL ALMOST DIED
Lol those thumbnails tho
*EMOTIONAL*
Did the announcer just say "the best player in the world"? Respect.
He wanted to "keep you honest."
lmao best editing so far. wp doug. the troll of AT's vlog style made me srsly rofl
Lol oh yeah... shit was stellar
That player signed as "DOUG" in a video is clearly a massive fish, I want that guy on my table ! 😁
His Name is actually "DAN" Polk
I agree!
Hey Doug, dont you think the guy tanking pre flop helped Alec to make the turn and river decision? Because i think he realized the guy could have ATs, AJ+, so by the river your range was much more polarized
Caio thats smart!
We'll see if Torrelli offers his own version. Keep this to yourself in the meantime. We don't want him telling polkies.
no.
That's too speculative. There are just way too many variables to make reads based on one of your opponents taking a little longer to fold preflop.
Caio ryt
I thought Doug must've been randomly spazzing and overbluffing so I plugged the hand in pokersnowie. It by far prefers betting flop 100% of time. It does check turn but EV for betting is close and Doug explains it makes sense to bet in his strategy (which is better than Snowie's anyways lol). I will never doubt Doug again.
I must admit,this is one of the most entertaining and educational live hands i 've evere seen on youtube.You and Alec are my favorite poker youtubers.I have learned a lot from both of you.Your videos are more hillarious though
lol well done. Love the intro troll.
Alec Torelli I actually love your intro lol
Alec Torelli Doug Polk put my seat to good use!
i dont understand Alec.. I think you called down because it was Doug.. my perception of you has always been you are a nit... you fold a set when negreanue represents a flush when the third club gets there on the turn.. but u dont fold jacks in a 3bet pot vs crazy aggression
Alec please do your review.
with the original intro ;)
Man I was dying at the end when Alec is tanking to the rounders soundtrack and then you're headbanging to his intro track. hahahaha
He was thinking about Vegas and the fucking Mirage. :D
I never laughed so hard!
I really want to hate Doug, but it’s so hard!
IIIrandomIII You probably shouldn’t want to hate anybody
@@castlehill6717 I hate hitler
this why you're the man dougie. most ppl with an ego problem would worry about someone finding this clip and posting it but here you are posting it yourself and helping us learn from it. thx
easily my favourite hand review of all time. considering the relevance, analysis and entertaining edits, nice work doug!
its classy to give props to opponents who made good decisions or outplayed you. In my career, I remember the hands I lost more than the hands I won.
Great vid!
16:55 "I want him to think that I am pondering a call, but all I'm really thinkin' about is Vegas and the fuckin' Mirage."
"You were supposed to fold there"
i want that on my tombstone.
you were always really good at this("pokerhands" are the funniest and strategically strongest poker hand analysis there is), but you getting even better and better...thumbs up
Love this video!! And the kid with the "wow" comment was a classic polker show highlight for me. Great content as always, keep up the great work!!
2:55 Is this fucking SOFLO ANTONIOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO????
I won't lie, that is definitely him.
Everyone's playing checkers, but he's been playing poker for years.
yep
How did he get there LOL
looool
Hey Doug! I'm a long time viewer of your channel, and first time poster. I tried to make this as concise as possible.
First and foremost: we (I speak on behalf of your entire fan-base) we love your content. It's hilarious. The editing is solid, and the comedic genius references that you make are humorous enough to make us all "roflcopter." I'm impressed, but not surprised, by how quickly this channel has grown in just a few short months! Secondly, your ability to convert complex poker strategies into layman's terms is definitely refreshing. Not every UA-camr has the ability to do that (I won't mention any names). It's awesome for a high stakes grinder, such as yourself, to produce such intelligible material. Thank you!
I do have a few important questions though. In your videos, I notice that you spend the bulk of your time focusing on optimal lines for the "heroes" range - provided that we are operating under optimal game theory as well as exploitative theory. But you don't often mention what your thoughts are on your opponents holdings. What did you think Alec had here at the time? How did your perception of range change considering his actions pre-flop, on the flop, turn, and river? How often did you expect him to fold TT-KK? How often does he fold Ax (single pairs)? I know that "hand reading" is a major factor in any poker game. Could you try to shed some more light on this important concept in the future?
Thanks Dewd - and thank you (all) for reading if you made it this far!!
Game Theory states no matter what your opponents do, you will win. He has video about math behind it. Doesn't matter if the opponent call here too much or too little. He will be profitable on the long term. At the very worst, assuming that your opponent is playing perfect gto, hero will break-even.
Starwood Graham Agreed however not to say that there is no merit in knowing an opponents tendencies over no information at all, assuming your opponent is able to be exploited, that is.
This is by far the best poker video I've ever seen! From the analysis to the troll at the end! Thanks Doug!
Loved the way you started the video, knew everyone would loved to know and see the analysis on this hand! 2 of the best players collide!
Got a question Doug - Howcome when the K comes on the river the logic used is that the K doesn't help you so much as you now have less combo's of AK. However with the 7 and 2 on the flop you don't say you are less likely to have A-2/7 cos of the less combo options, you say you could have A-2/7 etc..? I know its a small point but with you re-raising on the button and betting flop and river - surely AK is a defite possibility?
I'm asking cos often I watch hand analysis videos - and sometimes when the card hits the turn/river the argument used is that it is less likely to have hit because of the fewer possible combos. Where as sometimes when the hero bets following the card on the river/turn the argument is that he must have that card cos he's continued to bet.
Also I'm not some idiot troll thats won a tenner and now thinks he knows more than you. Ive recently got into the game and wanna try and learn.
he consistently stated his amount of A2s combo's (being 3). A7 is a bit tricky because we don't know if that is getting 3bet preflop or not. Since Doug would be 3betting all 16 combos of AK pre, but only 4 combos of A2 (only suited), the 2 on the flop has less of an effect on his value range compared to the K on the river.
Also if there were no 2 on the flop, A2s is definitely not triple barreling as it is top pair weak kicker, whereas AK is a lot of the time used as a triple barrel because it's kicker is strong enough
I dunno if this is relevant after two years but here I am. The hands that doug will play here that beat jacks with big pairs are AQ and AK. Since the ace of spades is on the board doug can only have 12 combos of AK and AQ (I hope this is clear). The king on the river means that doug will only have 9 possible comboes of AK in his hand, and since AK was already beating jacks it doesn't help doug any. So the big value hands go from 12 of AK and AQ to 9 of AK and 12 of AQ.
For a very simple illustration, if a flop comes AAA then your opponent can only have 4 combos of AK since three aces are on the board. If the turn is an ace your opponent can't have any AK at all since there are no aces in the deck. Hopefully this illustration wasnt too simple :/
Doug always preaches about picking the right hands to bluff with. Come on Doug you know you are over bluffing here.
No he isn't. Did you not watch the whole video?
Chris Wilson exactly what I was thinking also. He preaches about choosing good hands too bluff with, where in this spot he has basically zero equity all the way through the hand. I guess when he does it it's ok...
Learning It Quietly Yes I did and yes he is. How is not over bluffing? lol He has total air just about.
Padraigh Cody-Lally Well he paid for it didn't he lol He got hero called and got stacked.
Gut shots are so much more sexy of a KQ to remove value -.-
This was a 10/10 video Dog Plok. Great editing too. Have you ever considered calling it Polker hands?
why bothering bluffing with that garbage when u could 3-bet with K4o?
you are the king dude... :)
"If the turn comes a 10,9, 5 or 4 im gona have a strait draw that i can keep barreling."
Turn comes 3
BAZZERS
7:07-9:37 My brain totally flatlined! It was like listening to the architect of the matrix.
Not sure how you managed to discuss this hand with such detail yet an honest critique of Alec's line with humility and crediting him at the same time. You're a grade A player and grade A dude.
Keep up the good work, man. I wanna see you live more.
Who else noticed that Doug refuses to call this segment Polker Hands (he calls it Poker Hands), but when he did anaylsis of a PLO hand he called it "PLOker Hands"? lmao Doug be trolling us :D
That was Joe Ingram. Doug doesn't analyze PLO.
It was a joke partially as a tribute to Joey. But Doug definitely did it earlier this week lol He called a hand PLOlker Hands to troll us hahaaha
"at the end of the day" Torelli may have chased a hero call in order to increase youtube notoriety - lol
Same could be said for Doug trying to bluff him for views. Eitther way both win.
This is your best video to date. On a side note, I love turning over my hands, like I have the best of it, when 3 bet bluffing and getting called. The looks on their faces is priceless...or my stack, whatever.
YOU ARE SOOOOOO FUNNY DOUG!!! Kinda amazed I'm laughing at a freaking poker vlog. Keep those videos coming!
Please do a weight loss challenge after your bankroll challenge. You are only 28, please get your body in shape.
For an American he's not that out of shape.
You should try the ''don't be a piece of shit challenge'' but you would fail miserably. Good Luck!
Leggo My Ego haha that's true.
Seconding the don't be a piece of shit challenge.
He looked a little bigger because he had a lot of cash strapped to his body. You know this was intentional to stir up people like you. #owned.
Alec clearly had your number in this hand. If I was Doug I'd be heavily studying the video for a physical tell.
+Leggo My Ego If I was Doug, I'd stick to microstakes
More than anything it's your attitude to everything that makes me come back and watch and read more of stuff. Did watch, would watch again, 5 bluffs out of 5 :-)
you make me laugh all the time thanks...even these little comments and jabs, I can't help it :D
Thanks, Doug! Your videos are the best there are for free.
That Alec intro troll was too hilarious! Nice work as always Doug!
is that SoFlo?
yes
Márton Lukács he should've been arrested on the spot
Yeap losing his facebook money from stolen content :)))))
that's craaaaaaaaaazy
Márton Lukács definitely a fish
Is... Is that SoFlo? Antonio?
?????
Mrwutevah looks like it is
Awesome video, loved the analisys (although it's pretty tricky) and the ending.
man....ive been playing poker for over ten years and doug makes me feel like ive learned nothing the whole time.. lol keep up the good work man. subed!
Alec played like zero hands the next day
lol you faked us out in the beginning.
Very Nice video. Probably the best one you have done so far that i have seen. I especially love the ending with all the wows, and what was Alec Thinking. lmao well done Doug
I legit thought he was going to do 2 hands.
good analysis and funny stuff in the video, good job once again!
Gotta respect the video of being owned. Good job!! Thanks for balancing your range
Alec torelli is not making this call if the pot is over 100k. But then again is doug ever 3 barelling with 86suited when the pot is over 100k either? The stakes you are playing vs the $bankroll you have to play is a very important factor here. Also the fact that this hand is televised and you 2 both have channels factors in to your decision. Alec torelli would rather call and lose on the river then fold and be bluffed because alec can justify a call even if doug did have AA or AK or Axs (2 pair) by suggesting that there are suited connectors and suited gappers in doug's 3bet button range and he could be firing a missed FD or just complete air. **The stakes vs your guys's bankrolls is a huge factor here.**
Completely disagree about the stakes, but Alec is certainly one good misclick away from destroying all future nit jokes, and that *definitely* is a factor for *him*. For Doug, he plays micro stakes as a challenge and folds gut shot straight flush draws if the price is off by a penny all the time, but will 3 barrel bluff in a 1 million dollar BUY-IN tournament, so you are completely off there %100. The fact that it's televised creates much more incentive to make plays that are closer to what is considered good poker, not necessarily to call or fold more than that, and when the stakes are higher, the best players lean more towards taking the better play than the lower variance play, since it makes more money. High stakes is not an excuse to play bad poker, and the players that are good enough to win up there consistently are aware of it.
You are saying they get less bluffy and less stationy as they move up, but both can't be true. If higher stakes creates more folds, then there will be more bluffs (Doug will absolutely 3-barrel the 86 for 100k pot here), but if higher stakes creates less folds since there are more bluffs, then there will be more calls. It's neither, it's absolutely neither, that's what my comment is saying above, but if it *was* one of those things (less stationy or less bluffy), it can't be both at the same time, because it doesn't make a ton of sense. Bankroll management is a strategy dealt with before the game starts, not during the game. Once the chips are in play, they turn into units, and stay that way until they are cashed out.
Live 2Learn nothing to do with stakes at all. They would both play the same way regardless of stakes - they are trying to make good decisions and win long-term. Stakes are largely irrelevant to these players with their respective rolls.
Live 2Learn i disagree with you 100%. You have the proof on a video in which Doug Polk bluffed like 200k or 300k US $ on the river against Patrick Antonius (i don't remember exactly the amount of the bluff, but it was huge).
Who else thought this would be Doug and Alec video?
fkkkkkkk
haha he got you good :D
LOL loved that you did the Torelli intro parody Doug. Great video!
That ending though! LOL good stuff, Doug! Keep it up!!!
I strongly disagree with your analysis here Doug, although granted I'm not a pro but I'll try to explain my thought process, you can point me out where I go wrong which would be awesome. Alec called a 3b pre oop from ep, then x/c flop and turn. He knows you are capable of 3 barrelling. He's got all the aces in the world in his range, and he's gonna call you down with any ace on the river, pretty much always. Your hand not blocking low aces on the river is not relevant, if Alec is capable of hero calling with jj we know any ace would call you as well. All the scarecards he could possibly hate haven't come, and the K is a relative brick. He's an elite player like you, so we know that he knows that for him x/c x/c x/f would be horrible here. Flush draws are not in his x/c x/c range, that would likely go x/c x/r, or x/r b/f. Low and mid pairs would either fold or 4b bluff preflop...I understand that you want to balance your range, but in this situation you are (by your own admission in the video) completely ignoring what your opponent is up to in order to achieve said balance, which ironically makes you exploitable since you are bringing joy and glory to bluffcatchers and hero calls plus your image at the table gets too maniac after showdown, which screws any future fold equity, we don't want that if we are loose do we....I liked trying one barrel on the flop, but turn and river were too much (specially river), we wanna have less bluffs on turns and even less on rivers, plus by your own admission you would already put 3 barrels into any missed draws of yours, that's more than enough bluffing imo.
That was a terrible analysis. None of what you said was even remotely true or even makes any sense.
1. Being capable of triple barreling is completely irrelevant, just because Doug can bluff, doesn't mean you call down with terrible hands which have reverse blocking power.
2. The fact he has all aces in his range is even more of a reason to not call down. He can simply call a portion of his aces without being exploited. He doesn't HAVE to call down with jacks to avoid getting fucked. In fact even if he calls all aces here, he's possibly still over calling.
3. x/c x/c x/f is not horrible here, in fact it's a necessity, if Alec fucks he's frequencies by never folding on the river, Doug can exploit him to the literal maximum and print money as If he was playing against a micro-stakes player.
4. Fd's are in his x/c x/c range, low fd's are not. kqss,kqdd, can and should both x/c twice.
5. Low and mid pairs should not 4b bluff or fold. They should mainly call and sometimes fold dependent on stack size. If your 4b gets called, you're oop at a ridiculous equity disadvantage. If doug 5bet shoves, you HAVE to fold.
6. Balance makes you the opposite of exploitable, Alec's play makes him exploitable. If Alec calls down with JJ ESPECIALLY with the spade, he's going to get roasted in the long term. If doug shows up with a bluff 30% of the time in this situation, and Alec (given that his calling jj with the spade, he's basically calling 100% of his range) calls 100% of his range, the pots going to Doug 70% of the time. As doug now knows Alec to be overcalling to the max, he can also underbluff to further increase his edge in this spot.
Bob Bob well I guess i agree to disagree, with pretty much every point you said, since you are analizing what Alec's play should be for balance and I was thinking more on the line of how Doug could bluff less to counterexploit Alec's exploitation of Doug's tendencies, he has too many bluffs on that spot and Torelli exploits that. x/c x/c x/f is always horrible btw, if you are gonna fold on river blanks, Polk said so himself. You putting that line as a necessity is laughable when you can just fold weak hands on turns and call w both strong ones and bluffcatchers. Furthermore, distinguishing on how to play between low and high fd's for these lines doesn't balance them, ironically it's probably better to x/r high fd's and x/c low ones that might be dominated. And why on Earth would you wanna call preflop with mid and low pairs oop vs a polarized 3b range and then win small or middle pots once in a moonlight (best case scenario vs elite players) or fold postflop escapes me....sorry mate I don't agree w you at all.
+Fede A idek what to say when you make a comment like that. What i said wasn't something to be disagreed with, in fact most of what I said wasn't my opinion and rather an explanation of why what you said was objectively incorrect. I was discussing the implications of math theory in exploitative play, and explaining how doug is in a WIN WIN situation. As he explained, he's not overbluffing since hes picking his bluff combinations in a particular way to maximize fold equity vs villians range.
All doug needs to do is drop a portion of his bluff combinations that block alec's bluffs to exploit his play to the maximum.....Alec is already being exploited by overcalling with one of the worst possible hands to call with.
You're probably correct though, doug who's played millions of hands of poker and broken the game down to it's analytical core whilst competing with the best players in the world is probably over bluffing and losing to a high-stakes live player in a standard 3 bet pot on a standard run out. He's probably just weak in these spots -.-.
you do know doug is analysing this had in terms of balance and GTO. it doesnt matter alec is calling you down with JJ or not, or how many A he has to call you, if Doug is playing part of a GTO strategy which 86 is PART OF, and I dont think hes going out of his way to exploit a solid player like Alec, it doesnt matter what Alec is calling him with. No strategy Alec take will increase his EV against a balanced 3 barrel. Remember, if Alec is calling wide, Doug just makes more money with his value to compensate for his bluff's extra loss.
jeremy lin my problem is that I don't think Doug is playing gto here (no one can play gto btw, just hope to approach it). That was my whole point. Including 86s as a 3b bluff pre + 3 barrel bluff post vs a tight ep opening range on dry non-scary boards is not gto, it's too loose and bluff heavy, which makes it exploitable by simply overcalling.
hey doug i know that in general you are targeting the weaker minded audience with yourthumbnails but this one is srsly an insult to my intelligence hope the video can hold up God Bless
Henry Mücke haha I was thinking the same but he's trolling Torelli here you know :D
true
Henry Mücke Please stop talking like that, you look like the weak minded when you do lol
Not to mention, taking youtube video titles too seriously is....beyond silly.
Henry Mücke He weaker minded? lmao. Stfu Albert Einstien, you're not cool and probably suck at poker.
That was so funny. Thx for all the awesome content!
glad i found your channel doug, thanks
Alec torelli and Doug polk my two favourite players a dream hand RESPECT i love both your channels two true poker legends of the game
Love the rounders reference. Great video.
Your explanations are the best, tnx for the vids!!
I LOL'd at the end. WOWWwW. Wooooowwwww lol.
Love that hand between Ivey / Dwan too. Announcers are epic lol.
On a serious note I just started browsing your free content on upswing poker and am thinking about purchasing more. Looks really good.
Always love seeing your bluff hands Doug. Way to own it up. Just like that 74 vs Antonius. Image have to go see if Alec did a video on this hand lol!
Hey Doug, I was just watching your tournament play n explain video of the mtt module in the lab. It was the Kilamanjaro part 3 video, and at around the 21st minute of the video you opened Ah7h utg and btn 3b you w 4h6h. Btn then went bet bet jam and you mentioned that he could've picked a better hand to barrel with ott. I know the board texture and run out was different from your hand vs Alec Torelli, but he took the exact same line as you did with 86s on an Ace high flop. What are the differences in these 2 hands?
part of what makes your channel so good is the chatter - your comment on the title and that reply about clickbaits 😂
Lmao! The trolling at the end was fantastic!!!
The ending skit is the best thing I've seen on this channel hahahahahah
As an AT and Polk fan I love this. Especially the ending with Alec's intro
great analysis...as usual...thanks
Always great stuff
And fun to see Alec feature the same hand (no surprise, but fun)
Yes, thank you! I felt nobody talked about how tight the 99s fold was!
Love the vids, one thing I struggle with being a new Lab member is when you say '"we have better hands to call with". For example in this spot isn't it the same decision if Torelli has A10? As you're representing a polarised range of 2 pair plus hands (maybe AQ). Or do you mean it in terms of card removal?
Thanks.
This was awesome, great explanation of how sometimes you just gotta go for it and not tilt yourself out of your next good play.
@dougpolkpoker I'd be curious as to what spades you believe Torrelli to have moving forward throughout this hand in order to believe it to be advantageous to have a hand which unblocks-- esp. considering only 100bbs deep (considering the straddle) in a 3 bet pot when he opens early... KQss exactly? Also, isn't unblocking the Ad a problem when including those rivers as bluff candidates for yourself? Agree, w/everything beyond how you're ranging him.
Best thumbnail and title ever lol
beautiful analysis, thnx
The comment about getting owned sometimes was very humble Doug, very impressed with that. My feeling is that he had a slight read on your bet sizing this time as they came across as a little defensive, in the sense that this fell into AT's behavioral profile of what to expect from you in this specific spot/ action line. Still, to listen to your gut feeling and still go with it takes courage. Credit to both of you though for creating this fascinating professional poker hand for us all to view and blow our minds. Big Fan :)
Does all this thought process go through your head while you're actually in the hand, including counting combos ? If so then you are pretty awesome dude, I don't know how you do it.
Doug, thanks for your instructive videos, can you please make one about how much should a good players decisions be based on blockers?
You seem to talk about blockers a lot more than other poker analysts and commentators on youtube. I'm no pro and know a lot less about poker but do you ever wonder if you overemphasize blockers in your decision making, like maybe in this hand? And are they more relevant a decision making tool in cash games than in tournaments? I play mostly online tournaments and find it hard to imagine sitting in a final table and making a big decision based on blockers instead of focusing just on the logic of the pot and the spot. But in cash games I somehow find it more comfortable to factor them in.
How different does the hand play out if you check back the turn and then fire the river?
Interesting analysis! Thanks! I initially thought the turn bet would be too wide, but yeah, it makes sense, it's actually a decent bluff, because 3-barreling with spades is not such a good idea. Nice.
You have the best memes, Doug.
wow that ending was legendary lmao
the edits are spot on. WOW
great stuff Doug
Phenomenal video and even better troll. Cant wait to see Alec's analysis as well of this hand, said he's doing it this week.
awesome hand - thanks for the tips! Cool term and point about if 4b w/AQ will "over-realize" value since it looks like AA or KK in this spot (to villains since neither of them have an A nor K).
i was very disapointed when i thought you were doing a different hand then the jj one lol doug deff got me for a second
One of the best videos you've made imo, Doug!
You say you're betting all A-K, A-Q and two-pair on the turn, if so what protects your check-back range with showdown value like K-K? As you said, weaker Aces are unlikely to 3-bet preflop. Can't Torelli overbet non-spade rivers with impunity when your check-back is always so weak?
That loud clang when you bet all three streets bluffing, and that commentary is on point damn
That hand of the day part was funny as hell 😂
Loooool such a fkin joker Doug. That ending was too much :D Keep it up
amazing, thank u doug!!
that's pretty funny. the two biggest poker vloggers headsup!
Oh man, you are too fun to watch. About the analysis UI have to watch it 2 more times to understand everything, haha. But my favorite part was def. what Alec was really thinking! LOL!
the fact that you have 86 of clubs and you wearing that shirt makes it even better!
Doug, your videos are tremendous.
Doug just has to throw in the clip where the announcer calls him the best player in the world. Doesn't need analysis but he has to throw it in there. Love it.
Given a certain spot, what determines whether the best way to balance a value-heavy range is to bet with more hands or check the bottom of the value range?
are u on bulk season doug?
I loved the rounders music at the end.
Hey doug the behind the scene thought looks eerily similar a scene from the movie rounders..... lol....