J-10 Vs F-16 Vs Tejas Mk2 (MWF) | हिंदी में

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лют 2022
  • This is a video on J-10 Vs F-16 Vs Tejas Mk2
    #F16 #J10 #MWF
    Website: thedefencematrix.in/
    Discord Link: / discord
    Instagram Link: / defence_matrix
    Instagram Meme Page Link: / defence_matrix_meme_page
    Twitter: / defencematrix1
    Music : Art of Silence - by Uniq" is under a Creative Commons license (Creative Commons - International Recognition 4.0 - CC BY 4.0)
    Intro Music : Credit Karl Casey @ White Bat Audio
    *FAIR USE*
    Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
    Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 635

  • @saumayaggarwal9690
    @saumayaggarwal9690 2 роки тому +112

    Re-upload of specification battle

  • @FLAME-ec4ob
    @FLAME-ec4ob 2 роки тому +98

    People should know that comparing fighter aircraft with Wikipedia stats is terribly incorrect. It neglects all the software and electronic capabilities of the aircraft.

    • @averagestudent5223
      @averagestudent5223 2 роки тому +1

      J10C wiki says it weights around 9.5 tons while Matrix reported it as 8.85 ton, doesn't look like he's relying just on Wikipedia. Naturally these figures are to be taken with a huge bucket of salt anyway cz even MK2 might have different specs which is closer to home.

    • @yixinmei5854
      @yixinmei5854 2 роки тому

      @@averagestudent5223 I can't say that 9,5 tons data is correct or not ,but 8.85 seems to be an outdated data from original J-10A series. As a major upgrade model, J-10C should be significantly heavier due to lots of additional sub systems installed.

  • @ImranKhan-ty6mx
    @ImranKhan-ty6mx 2 роки тому +52

    Exact weight, thrust, and fuel consumption values are never known. And these values vary depending altitude, payload, and even weather. Ultimately if a Cessna 140 could deliver a super sonic cruise missle, that would be good enough.

  • @AkashKumar-vc4nt
    @AkashKumar-vc4nt 2 роки тому +47

    We india's have a major problem of excessively dreaming,even project Tejas M2 have not been cleared by IAF,we should start living in reality,and reality is Tejas FOC variant.

    • @ImranKhan-ty6mx
      @ImranKhan-ty6mx 2 роки тому +18

      Exactly. Still lots of progress needed in the Tejas program and aircraft.

    • @prashanthb6521
      @prashanthb6521 2 роки тому +8

      Agree 100%

    • @moongee8706
      @moongee8706 2 роки тому +16

      Pehli bar kisi indian bhai ne sach bolny ki himat ki baki sab ankhain band ker k in youtubers ki jhoti videos dekh ker dil khush kerty hn 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @hardbraking4031
      @hardbraking4031 2 роки тому +4

      Absolutely Tejas program has taken of in serious program in last 5 years until which testing for IOC and FOC. See Airforce should trust this program and move fwd. Which surely they are doing but requires to churn out good production numbers at least 15 aircrafts per year. HAL should make sure to involve more pvt players and only then you will even be able to seek confidence from new buyers.

    • @Aryan_Kashyap
      @Aryan_Kashyap 2 роки тому

      I believe in Mk1a

  • @AliSherrr
    @AliSherrr 2 роки тому +21

    J10C doesn't use AL31 engine anymore. Newer J10 now use WS10B engine that has a maximum thrust of 145kn which gives J10C higher Thrust to Weight ratio than F16.

    • @direwolf7491
      @direwolf7491 2 роки тому +18

      Funny China claims their engines with such high thrust, yet the J20 can't supercruise. Makes you wonder why?🤔

    • @AliSherrr
      @AliSherrr 2 роки тому +16

      @@direwolf7491 J20 like many other Chinese fighters used AL31 until recently and just now are being fitted with WS10 engines but in any case you need alot more than just raw power to be able to supercruise. The original engine that's intended for J20 is not WS10 but WS15 which is in its testing phase. WS10 engines are a stop gap for J20 till WS15 are in production. Only then J20 will be able to super cruise. WS15 are designed for supercruise. WS10 are not.

    • @abn.berlin1310
      @abn.berlin1310 2 роки тому +5

      Goodi mind walon ko samaj ni ay gha

    • @direwolf7491
      @direwolf7491 2 роки тому +7

      @@AliSherrr The Rafale has 73KN engine and it can supercruise. So can Gripen and E Typhoon these are not even 5th gen aircrafts.
      You just claimed J10 has 140 KN engine so it should be able to supercruise right?

    • @direwolf7491
      @direwolf7491 2 роки тому +5

      @@abn.berlin1310 Tujhe samajh aya kuch?

  • @jawedmanowar657
    @jawedmanowar657 2 роки тому +1

    Great Video with Unbiased Comaprison its only genuine Indian defence news channel
    Great going kept it up...

  • @ZamanMangi
    @ZamanMangi 2 роки тому +5

    The major difference you forgot to mention that F16 and J10C are operational meanwhile even tejas mk1 is not fully operational mk2 is on paper yet 😇

    • @vishalkothari6965
      @vishalkothari6965 2 роки тому +6

      Bhai tune video dekha pura...woh pehle hi bol raha ki yeah abhi paper main specification hain abhi fly nahi kara🤦

    • @shamkay832
      @shamkay832 2 роки тому +2

      I think you need a hearing aid brother

  • @rafaqatmahmood9474
    @rafaqatmahmood9474 2 роки тому

    Good video bro ..
    Verry nice work bro

  • @Onoelo23gf
    @Onoelo23gf 2 роки тому +8

    Re Stormsquad’s post on CFTs. There is no change in the F-16’s internal fuel carrying capacity of 3,200 Kg/4,000L. CFTs are over-the-wing laterally mounted tanks that blend with the aerodynamic spinal config of the aircraft. Since nothing can be suspended from them as load, they are rather light. A set of two CFTs that provide a total of 1360 Kg (1,700L) or of additional fuel for the F-16 weighs 420 Kg. The extra fuel can significantly extend mission range, time on station or time engaged in combat. This range/combat presence enhancement is very valuable for countries that do not have tankers for aerial refuelling. There are certain penalties, however. Drag and RCS both increase. While 9G turns can still be executed given its monstrous engine, minimum radius turns are affected (~6G, 350-75 kts). Thus the ac will have to operate in a predictable oblique mode. No dogfight will see two ac pulling 9G each, except in transient maneuvres. Low speed high alpha maneuvres were banned earlier.
    The overall weight of the aircraft increases by 1,800 Kg; to stay within max T/O limit, ordnance/fuel tank weight has to be reduced by 1,800 Kg. CFTs increase the F-16's payload flexibility. For medium range air- to-surface missions, CFTs obviate wing tanks. This allows an increase in the F-16's primary weapon capacity and flying with two, rather than one, types of large weapons in a balanced configuration. An AAR tanker may change mission dynamics radically.
    Check out noelsramblings.blogspot.com/2017/02/india-to-set-up-f-16-block-70-72-plant.html

  • @prabhjotsiddu92
    @prabhjotsiddu92 2 роки тому +5

    An aircrafts capability strongly depends on three factors and we always ignore it or we we have very little knowledge about it...They are
    1) The radar range and type of the fighter aircraft.
    2)The Electronic counter measure systems and ECCMS.
    3) The range and number of Air to air missiles it's carrying. Its obvious who shoots and kills first is the winner. So we need a very strong AESA radar, A package of EW systems and Astra mk2 (160 km) and MK3(350km) missiles in Tejas mk2.Otherwise it will be failure.

  • @Shirish255
    @Shirish255 2 роки тому

    Nice & Informative.

  • @himeshshukla2833
    @himeshshukla2833 2 роки тому

    Very nice comparative analysis 👍

  • @Minato.Namikaze559
    @Minato.Namikaze559 Рік тому +3

    If Tejas mk2 get F414 EPE engine having thrust between 116-120 KN, Tejas mk2 can become more deadlier or atleast equal of F 16 block 70/72 bcoz and J10C bcoz of having smaller size and weight than both of them.

  • @aninsignificantman001
    @aninsignificantman001 2 роки тому +8

    What I found amazing in the whole video is that your analysis for J10 was based on the data officially provided by the Chinese . Seriously ?

  • @dkdk5486
    @dkdk5486 2 роки тому +1

    Good analysis

  • @muhammadwaqas9610
    @muhammadwaqas9610 2 роки тому

    This comparison is truly hilarious 😂

  • @drmap5194
    @drmap5194 2 роки тому +5

    J10C is now using Chinese WS10B engine which has a thrust of 137KN and after using this engine the thrust to weight ratio is more then 1 will be equal to or may be better then F16 block 70
    From last 1.5 yrs all new J10C are using Chinese domestic WS10B or C version engines not the Russian engines and J10C RCS is also around 1m2 similar to Rafale

  • @rryzzzi2026
    @rryzzzi2026 2 роки тому +16

    Tejas mk2's roll out will be on this year, right??

    • @omkenjale1902
      @omkenjale1902 2 роки тому +3

      Ha

    • @raghavmaheshwari7124
      @raghavmaheshwari7124 2 роки тому +3

      Hope so

    • @defence-zone7826
      @defence-zone7826 2 роки тому +4

      Yes this year or maybe it might be delayed to next year. It will be Rolled out in either late 2022 or early 2023.

    • @Manhwa_geek
      @Manhwa_geek 2 роки тому +1

      Prototype production dur hai abhi

    • @nilavtalukdar4426
      @nilavtalukdar4426 2 роки тому +1

      @@Manhwa_geek no bro offiicial info he, april se production start hoga

  • @drweb3
    @drweb3 2 роки тому +2

    I need open opinion from everyone…
    What joke ???? Tejas first badge is not fully operational,,, only 20 in service for trial period… tejas 2 still not born and sitting on papers 😂😂
    J10 and F16 V are active and full service to multiple nations..
    That’s comparison is totally waste of time 😂😂😂

  • @amiyaranjanjena8550
    @amiyaranjanjena8550 2 роки тому

    Wow nice topic

  • @alphasubscription6741
    @alphasubscription6741 2 роки тому +3

    J10C is an air superiority fighter. Pitching Tejas against it is stupidity. Tejas should be compared with Kohsar fighter as both are failed programs and rejected by respective airforces. Teja has no place in the triad of big brothers JF-17, F16 and J10C. Shoo Teju Laal 💥

    • @karanvarma4843
      @karanvarma4843 Рік тому +1

      Jf-17 is worse than tejas mk 1 forget mk 2 lmao

  • @Manhwa_geek
    @Manhwa_geek 2 роки тому +4

    Bhai agr Tejas mk 2 f 414 ep engine bhi laga le to bhi j 10 c ka wps 10 engine 140 kn produce karta hai whi rafale ke dono engine mila ke 150 kn aur Tejas mk 2 ka f 414 98 kn to hisab lga lo

    • @sigmachadtrillioniare6372
      @sigmachadtrillioniare6372 2 роки тому

      When making a medium or heavyweight, going for 2 engines is way better, for light combat only single engines should be used

  • @rishabhraj8233
    @rishabhraj8233 2 роки тому +8

    I think you should also have included Gripen NG in the discussion

    • @TrickyNomadic
      @TrickyNomadic 10 місяців тому

      Ky mtlb 😅 wo le n hi nhi h to ky karenge compare krke front m f16 or j10c h

  • @muneeb_132
    @muneeb_132 2 роки тому +20

    You've calculated Thrust to weight ratio of J-10C with AL-31FN engine whereas now it uses WS-10B which has more thrust than the russian engine.
    Othrerwise, a well researched video!
    Good work 👍

    • @nemesisgaming4795
      @nemesisgaming4795 2 роки тому +1

      This is a re-upload video

    • @direwolf7491
      @direwolf7491 2 роки тому

      And Tejas MK2 is not just on paper anymore

    • @niksri412
      @niksri412 2 роки тому +7

      @@direwolf7491 see defence matrix and defence squad are just channels telling civilian news regarding defence.
      Defence in general is classified.
      YES Tejas mk2 is not on paper but under testing , do you remember Bangalore sonic boom incident.... .... 🤫. 🤐

    • @kunalgawande6083
      @kunalgawande6083 2 роки тому

      Who say that it's video on ws engine specifications

    • @muneeb_132
      @muneeb_132 2 роки тому

      @@kunalgawande6083 it's not, that's what I said

  • @madridstas
    @madridstas 2 роки тому +5

    Like you said, we should wait for the actual aircraft to fly before comparing other parameters with rivals.... We don't want you to be like a Pakistani or Chinese UA-camr who talks on speculation 😂😂...
    Keep it up bro!!

    • @muhammadwaqas9610
      @muhammadwaqas9610 2 роки тому +1

      He's actually taking on the basis of speculations so if you're not blind and deaf you should think before comparing him to other UA-camrs

  • @F22raptor46
    @F22raptor46 2 роки тому +25

    I do think the F-16's internal fuel carrying capacity should be more than that since we are talking about the Block 70 here and you should also factor in the CFTs. Also the range needs to be more because of CFTs
    EDIT: Also I believe when coming to engines, the J-10C has WS-10 or 15 engines

    • @kkk2.077
      @kkk2.077 2 роки тому +2

      American engines have more efficiency so less fuel can provide same range as J10C

    • @sampadshyamal1739
      @sampadshyamal1739 2 роки тому +2

      CFT= Crystal Field Theory??😅

    • @flyingdaggers1690
      @flyingdaggers1690 2 роки тому +12

      @@sampadshyamal1739 Conformal Fuel Tank 😒

    • @prashantsinghsisodia6709
      @prashantsinghsisodia6709 2 роки тому

      WS15 engine has not been matured at and ws10 is at par with RDs

    • @nilavtalukdar4426
      @nilavtalukdar4426 2 роки тому

      @@sampadshyamal1739 are bhai yaha to chemistry mat ghusa, coordination compound samajh me nahi aa raha he kya?

  • @sanjayadhikari4800
    @sanjayadhikari4800 2 роки тому

    Yes we need another video please

  • @sreenivasv6557
    @sreenivasv6557 2 роки тому +1

    Many comparative videos are poor with the narrator talking something without displaying the relevant numbers. This Description is very good with the 3 fighters and the numbers of different parameters displayed.
    Keep it up.

  • @mindfulpop5624
    @mindfulpop5624 2 роки тому

    I love your 😊
    channel

  • @sardarahmad137
    @sardarahmad137 2 роки тому +1

    it's a big insult of F16 and J10C comparing with JUNK SAMOSA. Tejas is not a Aircraft. it's just Junk Just Samosa is Only good for Eating with a Cup of Fantastic Tea☕

  • @hemantyadav750
    @hemantyadav750 2 роки тому +3

    👍

  • @User86559
    @User86559 2 роки тому +3

    After MK2 we need to go for MK3
    We need a single engine jet matching the capabilities of J10 C in terms of payload and combat range

    • @HKarts_
      @HKarts_ 2 роки тому

      🙄

    • @averagestudent5223
      @averagestudent5223 2 роки тому +3

      J10C is flying today, when MK3 comes in, China will be selling a single engined stealth jet probably!

  • @sainirchobby
    @sainirchobby 2 роки тому

    Sir please make a comparison video on LCA TEJAS MKII and GRIPEN NG🙏🇮🇳

  • @Krishnendu792
    @Krishnendu792 2 роки тому +1

    Any updates on fund allocation for two additional prototypes of MK2?

  • @utpalmazumdar1537
    @utpalmazumdar1537 2 роки тому +3

    Bhai this is right to compare…because tejas mk 2 abhi bana v nhi…kavi apni enemy ko kam nhi dekhna chahiye…hope govt aur jyda HAl pe pressure dale and tejas mk 2 ka prototype jaldi nikale…uske baad mars me trial ke kiye v to bhejna he….

    • @anuparnoacharya5779
      @anuparnoacharya5779 2 роки тому +2

      Airforce utna trial nhi karta. Ur confusing iaf wirh indian army

    • @sigmachadtrillioniare6372
      @sigmachadtrillioniare6372 2 роки тому

      @@anuparnoacharya5779 indian army me ruskies ke agents hai. Indian equipment ko andar nhi ghusne dete jabtak govt. Thappad nhi lagati

  • @anirbanchoudhury6568
    @anirbanchoudhury6568 2 місяці тому

    Would like to see comparison on parameters like Armament, Radar, Avionics as well.

  • @bond7079
    @bond7079 2 роки тому +1

    thank you for making clear that TEJAS is a failure

  • @vasukochhar3958
    @vasukochhar3958 2 роки тому +2

    This is a re-uploaded video

  • @MuanaSuantak
    @MuanaSuantak 2 роки тому

    👍👍👍

  • @Tomahawk1999
    @Tomahawk1999 2 роки тому +3

    it will be a shame if MK2 is a poor aircraft compared to 40 year old F16. Problem with DRDO is they are obsessed with technology rather than its usefulness. Akash missile is a good e.g. where obsession with using a ramjet resulted in a heavy slow flying missile with only 20 km range. the same errors are made in the mk2 program. instead of building a fighter that can exceed performance of other single engine jets , these DRDO idiots are obsessed over the smallest lightest fighter. please privatize the defense industry because DRDO is clearly mismanaged or incompetent

    • @kkk2.077
      @kkk2.077 2 роки тому +4

      DRDO is not making jets , and F16 Block 70 is 2015 made

    • @anuparnoacharya5779
      @anuparnoacharya5779 2 роки тому

      Hal makes aircraft.

    • @HKarts_
      @HKarts_ 2 роки тому +2

      Dude, DRDO isn't any company to get privatized , it's an govt agency. 🙄
      Moreover, it can be over ambitious to build huge without smaller success.
      Mk2 are being designed for interception roles , smaller interceptors provides better dogfight capabilities once in the visual ranges.
      Those in the ADA are more experienced and knowledgeable than you and if u were more knowledgeable u wouldn't be in UA-cam texting lits without even knowing the difference between Govt agency and owned companies.

    • @hirentrivedi8607
      @hirentrivedi8607 3 місяці тому

      technology is everything in air power

  • @varungupta08
    @varungupta08 2 роки тому +3

    Sir i will always say its not fair to compare whats on paper with fighters who r already battle proven/exported...keep any type of comparisons till the LCA2 is nearing mass production

  • @ravikiranp5959
    @ravikiranp5959 2 роки тому +3

    @defencematrix, Should have included gripen in the list.

    • @asherkosmos4312
      @asherkosmos4312 2 роки тому +3

      Hmm that would be great but this video is about India and rivals next door

  • @aurodeeproy997
    @aurodeeproy997 2 роки тому

    we should make AHP on technical parameters and improve the quality.

  • @mensrightsactivist7014
    @mensrightsactivist7014 2 роки тому +2

    I don't think IAF would like to go with their main workhorse (literally) with a dismal 0.8 TWR. This doesn't make sense! Something is off with those numbers.

  • @gaanaadda4783
    @gaanaadda4783 2 роки тому

    I thought this was uploaded the second time?

  • @rowdyrathod1495
    @rowdyrathod1495 2 роки тому

    plzzz 1 more vedio..about=r.c.s,radar range..eachother traking distance,weapon pakage🙏🇮🇳❤️🇮🇳🤓

  • @humblesanalysis9790
    @humblesanalysis9790 2 роки тому

    Salute to your hypocrisy sir 👏 🤣😂😂

  • @ajaychawla1000
    @ajaychawla1000 2 роки тому +1

    Good morning everyone

  • @f581474x
    @f581474x 2 роки тому +1

    The GE F414 does not make the LCA a medium weight fighter. You cannot compare it with a modern F16. It will not have the same endurance or the weapons payload.

  • @kunalsinha2355
    @kunalsinha2355 2 роки тому

    Jai hind 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @utopia1480
    @utopia1480 Рік тому

    J10 c uses ws-10b
    Powerplant: 1 × WS-10B afterburning turbofan engines, 89.17 kN (20,050 lbf) thrust dry, 144[79] kN (32,000 lbf) with afterburner
    So the twr is over 1.25

  • @malangi31
    @malangi31 2 роки тому +1

    Only you can compare a plane from paper to two live jets in air to settle your ego!
    Next time try MK2-A...

  • @ramvishwakarma652
    @ramvishwakarma652 2 роки тому

    Sir, great work bur gripen missed.. Why?

  • @naveediqbal21
    @naveediqbal21 2 роки тому +4

    The good thing about this analysis is that 2 aircraft are in existence and one is in dreams ... Taijasssss

  • @gauravtiwari8163
    @gauravtiwari8163 2 роки тому +1

    saab gripen e vs tejas mk2 par ek detail video please

  • @taseerulhaq8146
    @taseerulhaq8146 2 роки тому +1

    In short your samosa fighter is a failure even on paper. Thanks for acknowledging 👍

  • @pradeepsaral6944
    @pradeepsaral6944 2 роки тому

    Compassion of weaponry is also Important

  • @pankajbijalwan6435
    @pankajbijalwan6435 2 роки тому

    Yes

  • @muhammadishaq561
    @muhammadishaq561 3 місяці тому

    Comparison of F16, J10C with a non existent Tejas MK2. This seems to be for soothing Indian ego 😂😂😂😂

  • @muhammadashmeelrafi2928
    @muhammadashmeelrafi2928 2 роки тому +1

    tejas mk 2 will come in approximately in 40 years
    as it predecessor

  • @paul.shubham
    @paul.shubham 2 роки тому +1

    Compare to previous videos your voice seem different 🤔🤔🤔...

  • @shredder3055
    @shredder3055 2 роки тому +1

    You would have compared thier total cost and flying cost per hour.

  • @tut7345
    @tut7345 2 роки тому

    How does one compare existing aircrafts to an aircraft that doesn't even exist at the time of the comparison?
    My countrymen: Hold my beer!

  • @gajendrasbhanot6259
    @gajendrasbhanot6259 2 роки тому +1

    Jai hind

  • @haiderarshad6297
    @haiderarshad6297 2 роки тому +9

    It's like comparing emptiness with real boys

    • @HKarts_
      @HKarts_ 2 роки тому +5

      On Paper, do u guys go deaf when said and cleared it at the beginning and end .

    • @DeepakSharma-rt3um
      @DeepakSharma-rt3um 2 роки тому +5

      Yeah just like u guys ride 70 cc mopeds n call them bike n beg for each n everything to other countries

    • @gourav4672
      @gourav4672 2 роки тому

      @@DeepakSharma-rt3um bro khatarnak comment, lol

    • @Umairy76470
      @Umairy76470 Рік тому

      @@DeepakSharma-rt3um tejas is failure xD

    • @DeepakSharma-rt3um
      @DeepakSharma-rt3um Рік тому

      @@Umairy76470whether tejas is a failure or not, doesn't matters but ur country is a big failure.. Haven't seen premiers of any other nation going around the world with a begging bowl d way pakistani ones does! Have u found a way of paying ur exorbitant debt?

  • @gulsherkhanchandio90
    @gulsherkhanchandio90 2 роки тому

    The people of India will have to wait another 40 years

  • @anuragupadhyay1302
    @anuragupadhyay1302 2 роки тому +1

    At least 280 no. Of MK2 should be orders for IAF

  • @hatishsharma2115
    @hatishsharma2115 2 роки тому +1

    isliye ORCA BEST THA PAR THIKK HAI

  • @vimalkumar3815
    @vimalkumar3815 2 роки тому +1

    USA aur Russia ke biech me Ukraine pich gaya...

  • @vishalmhetre2316
    @vishalmhetre2316 2 роки тому

    Thanks brother... But where is griffin

  • @durranishaheer1538
    @durranishaheer1538 2 роки тому +3

    sir jee kindly do comparison between ................BAJAJ AUTO N TEJAA lAAL

    • @defenceasylum8323
      @defenceasylum8323 2 роки тому +4

      Compare jf Sitara vs Thanos spaceship

    • @durranishaheer1538
      @durranishaheer1538 2 роки тому

      @@defenceasylum8323 COMPARE iNDIAN OCCUPIED JAMMU N KASHMIR WITH AZAD KASHMIR

    • @Raz1969
      @Raz1969 2 роки тому +2

      @@durranishaheer1538 all jk is part of India bby don't bark here try to capture whole kashmir.

    • @durranishaheer1538
      @durranishaheer1538 2 роки тому

      @@Raz1969 JK IS NOT AT ALL A PART OF INDIA....IT BELONGS TO KASHMIRIS ........

  • @AjayTiwari-en9nz
    @AjayTiwari-en9nz Рік тому

    India should spend on long and medium range kamikaze drones. Most of the modern aircrafts can be countered by SAM systems.

  • @johnkhan3259
    @johnkhan3259 2 роки тому

    So clever
    30 saal pehly hi sab clear kar dia
    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @fahadali807
    @fahadali807 2 роки тому +1

    How can you compare a paper plane with real-world operational planes? What will be the development time of MK-2, another 40 years?

  • @vishalnayak3966
    @vishalnayak3966 2 роки тому +1

    Actually tejas mk2 ka comparison banta hai gripen ng se.. Q k wo b same engine use karta hai aur same size ka hai

  • @Asif-bh1st
    @Asif-bh1st 2 роки тому +1

    J-10C is used WS-10B, not Russian engine.

  • @Prince-nv5fw
    @Prince-nv5fw 11 місяців тому

    Dimenstions are not everything. Only Performance matter. Rcs matter, combat radiius matter, quality of weapons matter. Tejas has chosen best from the world.

  • @biology_mcqs3037
    @biology_mcqs3037 2 роки тому +2

    Compare F16 with J10....... Abhi bacha paida b nahi hua aur tum chalne ki baat krte ho....... And i remember you used to mock pakistanis they compare these things what are you comparing today......

    • @sigmachadtrillioniare6372
      @sigmachadtrillioniare6372 2 роки тому

      J-10c - cheap russian and American hybrid
      F-16 - reliable and trustworthy platform but only downside is that it's aging.
      Tejas mk 2 - still on papers, which company may or may not make it I future is not known, specifications might change it, but currently can't really compare
      Done comparison

    • @biology_mcqs3037
      @biology_mcqs3037 2 роки тому

      @@sigmachadtrillioniare6372 😂😂😂😂😂 aviation analyst

  • @AmongUs-qt3uo
    @AmongUs-qt3uo 2 роки тому

    admin aap apne store me Burnol bhi becho.. Idahr bohot jarurat hai comments section me XD

  • @danpakistani6964
    @danpakistani6964 2 роки тому

    Ye cheezain paper per hi rhain gi 500 sal tk.....🤣🤣

  • @rishabcharak8896
    @rishabcharak8896 2 роки тому

    Please next video 🙏🙏

  • @user-yr3zn5nw2b
    @user-yr3zn5nw2b 4 місяці тому

    Sorry to say indians me ye video 2.5 year bad dekh rha hn .lekin abhi b tejas mark 2 on papers hi he 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @weeklyvlogs8171
    @weeklyvlogs8171 2 роки тому

    amca ka speed vs f35 and tejas mk2 speed vs rafale ka speed compare karna please.

  • @akil412
    @akil412 2 роки тому +4

    Comparing an in service fighter with a fighter still in CG 😂

    • @HKarts_
      @HKarts_ 2 роки тому

      Well he mentioned that at the beginning.
      And compared with only the available details provided by OEM which are basic .

    • @sigmachadtrillioniare6372
      @sigmachadtrillioniare6372 2 роки тому

      Comparing American jet with tofus was the disrespect here

  • @rameshpanwar7245
    @rameshpanwar7245 2 роки тому

    जो चीज अभी अस्तित्व में है ही नहीं उसकी तुलना किसी और से भी क्या करना

  • @utkarshdwivedi6600
    @utkarshdwivedi6600 2 роки тому

    We should select EPE engine

  • @bilalmughal6455
    @bilalmughal6455 2 роки тому

    Ye paper per hi rahe ga agle 300 Saal😂😂

  • @abn.berlin1310
    @abn.berlin1310 2 роки тому

    On paper like samosa

  • @danishjaved864
    @danishjaved864 2 роки тому +6

    You mentioned tejas mk2 will use 98kn engine which weight to thrust ratio is 0.8 but you mentioned 1.+ With the engine which will not used while J10C actually using ws-10 engine 140kn but you mentioned AL31 123 kn engine spec weight ratio 0.97 than you say your unbiased

    • @kkk2.077
      @kkk2.077 2 роки тому +6

      Most of J10s still not flying with WS-10

    • @darkace0387
      @darkace0387 2 роки тому +2

      @@kkk2.077 Like Tejas mk2s are flying with full specs? It's literally on a paper board right now

    • @kkk2.077
      @kkk2.077 2 роки тому +7

      @@darkace0387
      This video began with the message "Tejas MK2 paper specs ". I don't understand how Defense matrix is biased. At least India is honest enough to not inflate specs like some countries do. MK2 will use 110KN thrust engine in future with Snecma as partner
      And infact , WS10 Authentic paper specs aren't available either. They just estimates

    • @kkk2.077
      @kkk2.077 2 роки тому

      @John Hero
      Do you pakistan people need everything spoon feed ??
      Listen what he saying at 0:40 again !
      He made it clear , these are "planned" specifications of MWF

    • @kkk2.077
      @kkk2.077 2 роки тому +3

      @John Hero
      Well, India's plans doesn't seems very ambitious . It's just about technologies they or their allies already have .
      Better than people who were claiming JF17 B3 = 5th gen
      J10C= Rafale, can breach S400 etc

  • @curiouscaesar6813
    @curiouscaesar6813 2 роки тому

    Should have included Grippen E in the comparison

  • @mayank2234
    @mayank2234 2 роки тому +1

    Pta nhi hmare upcoming fighter(TejasMk2, amca, tedbf) me GE-414 epe use krne me kya problem aa rhi h... Uska thrust 116kn tha jo Inka thrust to weight ratio improve krta.. fa18 block3 me use kia b h ise..
    Hm ge-414 ka use kr rhe h uska thrust - 98kn h bs.

  • @AbhishekKumar-bk9xz
    @AbhishekKumar-bk9xz 2 роки тому +2

    Why you compare j 10c & F 16 Vs Tejas Mk2. They are operational fighter jets and Tejas Mk2 yet to be developed.A really time waste comparison total bullshit. Pls compare next time between same category jets. Jai Hind

  • @Nausar1
    @Nausar1 2 роки тому

    Bhai aap ek video banao is channel me jisme aap Russia aur Ukrain jitne fighter jets, tanks, drone, missiles ya aur koi war tactic use kar rahe h uske bare me batao

  • @sangeetbhatia5994
    @sangeetbhatia5994 2 роки тому +1

    Pehle aa to Jane do Tejas mk2 ko

  • @ImranKhan-ty6mx
    @ImranKhan-ty6mx 2 роки тому +7

    Fantasy league!
    Tejas Mk1A hasn't flown yet, here you go again with comparing real aircraft with one that will probably never enter service.

    • @astecinternational6545
      @astecinternational6545 2 роки тому +5

      Video kk shruwaat dekh le kathmulle🤣🤣🤣

    • @darwinhubc7481
      @darwinhubc7481 2 роки тому +1

      @James Bond jali na teri jali na 🤣

    • @reviewinside5027
      @reviewinside5027 2 роки тому

      @@darwinhubc7481
      Fantacy Dream acha Hota Ha Ap jasa Logo Ka Liya
      So Keep It Up😂😂😂

    • @darwinhubc7481
      @darwinhubc7481 2 роки тому +1

      @@reviewinside5027 ok😭😭😭😭

  • @bebyfun
    @bebyfun 2 роки тому

    IOR petroling ke liye extra P8I deal na kr shyad c295 modify kiya jyga..
    Kya C295 ke bdle kisi airlines ke long range aircraft ko modify nahi kiya jaa skta jysa natra2 me kiya jaa rha

  • @adityanegi2004
    @adityanegi2004 2 роки тому +7

    Sir can India make aircraft like c17 globe master and p8i ?
    Jai Hind 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @defenceasylum8323
      @defenceasylum8323 2 роки тому +3

      C17 ka to pta nhi par p8i ka alternate ban skta h c295 par based

    • @rialdaksda9743
      @rialdaksda9743 2 роки тому +4

      @@defenceasylum8323 correction c295 nhi exactly, a320 par based bana rhe h

  • @malangi31
    @malangi31 2 роки тому

    Only you can compare a plane from paper to two live jets in air to settle your ego!

  • @newsreporte3645
    @newsreporte3645 2 роки тому

    Ye sirf paper pr hi acha jahaaaaaaaaaaz h

  • @bond7079
    @bond7079 2 роки тому

    as per ur analysis..
    TEJAS MK2 is a paper plane n other planes are reality n have coustomer.