Indian INS Kolkata Vs Chinese Type 52D Destroyer | विश्लेषण

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 сер 2024
  • This is a video comparing Indian Navy's INS Kolkata Destroyer and Chinese Navy's Type 52D destroyer.
    #India #Navy #INS #Kolkata #Type52 #Destroyer #Indo #China #Standoff

КОМЕНТАРІ • 476

  • @f581474x
    @f581474x 3 роки тому +94

    The biggest differences is that India using foreign parts and foreign contractors to integrate all the systems. Or as in China has integrated them on their own and has a continuous supply of spare parts and expertise.

    • @madhurisaxena5215
      @madhurisaxena5215 2 роки тому +9

      The most of the system which we equip we have tot for them so there is nothing to do with forgien

    • @soumajitdutta6328
      @soumajitdutta6328 2 роки тому

      We have most of the parts made indigenously

    • @thebigone6112
      @thebigone6112 2 роки тому

      @Varun choudary J hahaha
      Copy or not . China has got a fleet of strong destroyers.
      American even said that the Chinese copies 5Gs that the Yankees hasn't

    • @soumojitdas8632
      @soumojitdas8632 Рік тому +4

      But Chinese products r really bad, worst

    • @sachithkn6512
      @sachithkn6512 Рік тому

      China is copy country ... No quality

  • @saibala9399
    @saibala9399 3 роки тому +61

    One of the Top defense channel completely professional and not hype and bluffs.

  • @spxtfxre1
    @spxtfxre1 3 роки тому +40

    This channel deserves at least 100k more subs

    • @Pacifist-wf4dz
      @Pacifist-wf4dz 3 роки тому

      Check it now

    • @spxtfxre1
      @spxtfxre1 3 роки тому

      @@Pacifist-wf4dz Nope. Not yet. Maybe in another 3 months or so

    • @someon713
      @someon713 3 роки тому

      @@spxtfxre1 3 weeks lol.

  • @user-sc4te8gv6x
    @user-sc4te8gv6x 3 роки тому +23

    INS Kolkata VS Type 52D
    cost $600 million VS $500 million
    Number of active 3 VS 17

    • @JALEESAHMED-ct9ng
      @JALEESAHMED-ct9ng 6 місяців тому

      Type 52D may cost over 700 million USD

    • @zdm-e9g
      @zdm-e9g Місяць тому +1

      ​@@JALEESAHMED-ct9ng​China gave a price of 3.5 billion RMB ($500 million) for the 052D and 6 billion RMB ($900 million) for the 055.

  • @be07logical
    @be07logical 3 роки тому +25

    not to mention the type 55. along with type 52d they do have better stealth design. we need to up the quality of our vessels

  • @ayanforever
    @ayanforever 3 роки тому +18

    Communication system and stealth is the part in which both our airforce and navy needs to work on!

  • @abhishek-vlog3550
    @abhishek-vlog3550 3 роки тому +19

    CIWS effectiveness largely depends upon quality of 🔥 control Radar.

    • @joelau2383
      @joelau2383 3 роки тому +9

      CIWS effectiveness depends on many factors. The weapon itself is one of them. AK-630 is really old and it doesn't have APFSDS or AHEAD to increase interception efficiency. CIWS like RAM or HQ-10 is also a critical tool to intercept supersonic missile.

  • @sanjeevkumar-yy4fl
    @sanjeevkumar-yy4fl 3 роки тому +43

    Itseems Chinese destroyer is ahead in comparison with kolkata class destroyers

    • @bermosks
      @bermosks 3 роки тому +13

      Na I donot think so 😐 coz Made In China product as well 😴

    • @thepredator4711
      @thepredator4711 2 роки тому

      Because we have sufficient for defence

  • @trayambakkayal244
    @trayambakkayal244 3 роки тому +21

    Detailed comparison... Keep it up... 👍

    • @SPEARHEADGLOBAL
      @SPEARHEADGLOBAL 3 роки тому +6

      Nothing detailed ..just Wikipedia data scaling.. detailed comparsion wud be, actually comparing the radars systems and electronic reflexes with fire control system.. type of data link both vessel use. Tactical advantage wen both are pitted against each other..., Type of Armor both vessels use, how long does it takes for the FCS to respond ..the problem is that these information are not available on Wikipedia...u need to know real people, or will need to study war tactics thoroughly .. This is just basic comparsion...works for u guys I guess

    • @dilpreetsinghjawandha8070
      @dilpreetsinghjawandha8070 3 роки тому

      @@SPEARHEADGLOBAL macho mat kuch kro

  • @anshul___soni5713
    @anshul___soni5713 2 роки тому +5

    Bro par china k paas aise 18 destroyers h aur hamare paas bas 3😢😢

    • @toastdc2109
      @toastdc2109 11 місяців тому +2

      There are 25 of them in service as of now. 2 more are launched, 4 more under construction. And there are rumours about more under construction inside some dry docks under roof cover so they are not visible to satellites and nearby people. Around 40 of these will be constructed and last one of them will be commissioned arround 2025.

  • @avijitbasak8837
    @avijitbasak8837 3 роки тому +43

    You haven't talked about helicopter these destroyers are using, neither you talked about torpedoes nor sonar, therefore it is incomplete comparison! Keep improving!

    • @biswajitpattanaik9331
      @biswajitpattanaik9331 3 роки тому +2

      I think the reason is, both ships are stacked against each other and in that scenario the sonar and torpedo comparison becomes unnecessary, as sonar is for submarines warfare and torpedo don't posses that much range compared to anti-ship missiles.

    • @avijitbasak8837
      @avijitbasak8837 3 роки тому +2

      @@biswajitpattanaik9331 You haven't talked about helicopters!

    • @biswajitpattanaik9331
      @biswajitpattanaik9331 3 роки тому

      @@avijitbasak8837 both type 52D and INS kolkata heavily armed by surface to air missiles so it does not matter which aircraft they are stacked up against, yes here INS kolkata has a advantage of having barak8 defence system, compared to chinese surface to air missiles defence system. As barak8 can literally intercept anything where as Chinese SAM can't, I am talking about the helecopter launched anti-ship missiles which rarely exist. One can have such configuration but it's not a practical concept to be told.

    • @avijitbasak8837
      @avijitbasak8837 3 роки тому +3

      @@biswajitpattanaik9331 Helicopters can provide information about beyond the horizon existence of a destroyer, first attack can be launched, it can guide missiles to its target, INS KOLKATA can carry 3 such helicopters!

    • @extremegamer4782
      @extremegamer4782 3 роки тому +5

      Already losed guys china lauched type 055 class destroyers which are more powerful than united states navy's arleigh burke class destroyers and ticonderoga class cruisers

  • @sandeepraut8061
    @sandeepraut8061 3 роки тому +3

    One key diffrence is INS Kolkata is our front line and most potent warship where as Chinese have Type 55D, even INS Vishakhapatnam destroyers would be no match for that. Even INS Vishakapatnam will have only 48 VLS and same AK630 guns. Only ship matching type 55 in Indian arsenal would be Project 18, which is long way to go.
    Reason why the indian ships have lesser VLS is may be they want space for future weapons like Nirbhay LACM, navel version and directed energy weapons....

  • @skmgamer8214
    @skmgamer8214 3 роки тому +9

    T52D is more advanced as compared to kolkata

  • @parthabiswas6510
    @parthabiswas6510 3 роки тому +1

    Aap ki comparison joh hai woh bilkul biased nehi hai or puri tarha scientific , reliable hai.well done , keep it up.

  • @the_fabulous_p14
    @the_fabulous_p14 3 роки тому +7

    We need to have: (all are my opinions)
    Better CIWS (like Phalanx or Goalkeeper, or else make our own[ making our own is better]). AK-630 is old (in active service since 1976).
    Layered defence system (CIWS+ rolling airframe missile+ Long range [Barak 8])
    More Brahmos in our destroyers (atleast 40)
    More number of destroyers (I say 25). 10 destroyers are too less. Rajput class destroyers are old and will retire soon. so we need to acquire Project18 destroyers fast, and increase pace of ship building also.
    More submarines (atleast 40)
    Our frigates should have minimum 24 Brahmos missiles
    China operates 25+ Type 52D destroyers. We should have 3 more INS Kolkata class destroyers, 8 Vishakhapatnam class, and 10 Project 18 destroyers. So total would be 6 Kolkata class+ 8 Vishakhapatnam class+ 10 Project 18 class+ 3 delhi class= 27 Destroyers.
    China also plans to get 10 Type 55 destroyers which will have 112 VLS systems. so we need to think about this too. This destroyer will have more SAMs and Land attack/Anti ship missiles than our destroyers.

    • @RohanSingh-jc9ns
      @RohanSingh-jc9ns 3 роки тому

      India ship building and design are based upon Russian technology and they ideology and another thing is trust till 1964 IN was suffering from brtish syndrome when brtish refused to they destroyer to India. Then India focused Soviet patya class anti-submarine shop and LST.. So it would be difficult to come out from Russian influences..

    • @the_fabulous_p14
      @the_fabulous_p14 3 роки тому

      @@RohanSingh-jc9ns navy is already out of Russian influence a long time before.

    • @RohanSingh-jc9ns
      @RohanSingh-jc9ns 3 роки тому

      RBU ASW are from Russia, Talwar class frigates are from Russia, Delhi class destroyer also made from designed from mixture of Russian destroyer.. Many other naval technologies are from Russia only

    • @RohanSingh-jc9ns
      @RohanSingh-jc9ns 3 роки тому

      Western countries are manufacturing ships which have both qualities of frigate and destroyer to save money. Now Russia is focusing on submarine and small surface vessels.. They are having old 90s destroyers..

    • @abcdefgh-hz6pk
      @abcdefgh-hz6pk 2 роки тому

      40 brahmos is useless, rather we have 16 brahmos and 16 nirbhay .

  • @atc459
    @atc459 3 роки тому +18

    Buddy, the chinese warship in your vid is type052-c but not 052d. 052d got great upgraded on the basis of 052c...

  • @somnituxx7039
    @somnituxx7039 2 роки тому +3

    The fact is Every single NATO frigate is more capable then both the destroyers you mentioned.

    • @mohamedoraby580
      @mohamedoraby580 2 роки тому +1

      Fun fact indeed .. that is not true .. type 052 and type 055 destroyers compared only with American destroyers ..

  • @AbhinandanShinde-hp6uo
    @AbhinandanShinde-hp6uo 3 роки тому +7

    Chinese navy have better ships
    And it's true

  • @siddharthbhagra6412
    @siddharthbhagra6412 3 роки тому +21

    Barak series is very effective against YJ 18 kind sub sonic missiles .. and it helps INS Kolkatta to have a radar with -20 elevation capability.

    • @easonhuang7117
      @easonhuang7117 3 роки тому +10

      YJ-18 has two cruising stage. Subsonic cruising in low altitude, and drop turbo fans to enter supersonic in the last few miles.

    • @AB-media15
      @AB-media15 3 роки тому +2

      @@easonhuang7117 brahmos idhar bhi hai chini .

    • @haikaloronsentnel138
      @haikaloronsentnel138 2 роки тому

      F0R SAFETY AND PR0SPER!TY IND!A PE0PLES, IND!A MUST WITHDRAW AND RELEASE ZANGNAN 0R ARUNACHAL PRADESH IT'S S0UTHERN PART 0F T!BET CH!NA PR0V!NCE BACK T0 CH!NA AND LATER THAN MAKE PERMANENT PEACE AGREEMENT WITH CH!NA!!!
      IND!A MUST AV0!D AN0THER GREAT BL0WS AND C0MPLETE ANN!H!LATE FR0M M!GHTY CH!NA!!!
      WITH CH!NA IN IND!A S!DE, S0 IND!A CAN EASILY CAPTURED THE P0K FR0M PAK!STAN!!!

  • @sahil__10
    @sahil__10 3 роки тому +4

    Please Compare sir Ins Shivalik to Chinese type 054 frigates.

  • @YHT-fn8ib
    @YHT-fn8ib 3 роки тому +7

    052C is displayed most of the time, is it impossible to find the detailed details of the 052d weapon?

  • @belalehsen
    @belalehsen 2 роки тому +7

    Speaking totally on the basis of numbers and being impartial it seems the odds are still largely in favor of the Chinese. Before you, keyboard warriors start ranting hear me out.
    - While India plans to extend the Brahmos range to 800kms the Chinese have already developed a new version of YJ-18 with a 1000km range. A Type 52 destroyer could easily stay away from an Indian ship to engage them by a margin of 200Kms Brahmos range. That's a significant difference.
    - Giving all credits to the effectiveness of the Barak missile system Indian navy is still at a disadvantage given the higher number of VLS in the Chinese ship and the overall fleet of the two navies destroyers' fleet. India has a total of 3 Kolkata class and the Chinese have 27 Type 52.
    - Not bringing in the Type 055 to the mix, the Chinese could simply bring 2 or even 3 T52's for a single Kolkotta class and still have 21 or 18 Type 52's to defend other areas whereas India would have to go all-in with their Kolkotta class. That makes 2 or 3 Type 52's vs 1 Kolkotta. The Chinese ship could simply use these numbers to overwhelm the Barak air defense system.
    - 1 Type 052 houses 24 YJ-18s. If it's a pack of 3 52s' hunting 1 Kolkata that makes 72 missiles for 1 Barak system to defend against. Even if 1 out of 72 YJ18 gets through the air defense system that's enough to break the Indian destroyer in two halves due to its sheer kinetic speed and the explosives packing.
    1- India should get at least 3 more Kolkata class destroyers. To put a spin on the Chinese plans.
    2- Kolkata class needs to have a second layer of defense. Make Barak and the other system completely independent of each other.
    3- India should work to extend the Brahmos range to 1200 or 1500km range.
    As far as Pakistan is concerned, as a Pakistani, I am confident in saying India does not need to worry about Pakistan. Our navy is complete shit and a waste of space. It won't even last 2 days in the battle.

    • @SunriseLAW
      @SunriseLAW 2 роки тому

      Excellent analysis, thank you. As a Pakistani, can you explain why Pakistan would even have a navy? It really would not make much sense. Pakistan is an official 'nuclear nation' with open tests of nuclear weapons and significant stockpiles and appears to be militarily aligned with China (against India).

    • @haikaloronsentnel138
      @haikaloronsentnel138 2 роки тому +1

      PLEASE D0N'T G!VE THE TRUTH T0 IND!AN!!!
      MAKE THEM HAPPY, IT'S G00D F0R PLA NAVY!!!

  • @max2008abhi
    @max2008abhi 3 роки тому +1

    Kolkata class destroyer uses the Israeli CEC software for integrated cooperative engagement capability with p-8i and kalvari class submarines.

  • @nagendratiwari-xd7mv
    @nagendratiwari-xd7mv 3 роки тому +8

    Next on INS talwar

  • @arjit12thc19
    @arjit12thc19 3 роки тому +6

    Liked before watching 👍

  • @shrikantsalke5893
    @shrikantsalke5893 3 роки тому +1

    This channel will also get closer to defence sqaud..u should have stated this channel earlier..

  • @HARSHVARDHAN-bj4rw
    @HARSHVARDHAN-bj4rw 3 роки тому +1

    Bro ur videos r so informative 😃

  • @user-sx2we1xe5q
    @user-sx2we1xe5q Рік тому +1

    In Chinese vids they always compare Kolkata class to 052c…

  • @lavenderpro4730
    @lavenderpro4730 3 роки тому +4

    One thing you forgot to mention is that the INS KOLKATA is integrated with foreign assistance like surface to air missile (Israel), ciws and anti ship missile (Russia) and etc while the TYPE 52 D is a domestic ship which will give a advantage in war scenarios as they will be independent for their ammunition and such things while India has to rely on foreign countries if the war took place for a longer period of time. One more thing China has recently inducted a beast destroyed named TYPE 54 destroyer which is one of the most modern and deadly destroyer and even countries like USA show their concerns over this destroyer so it will be a bad situation for India cause I think they don't have any destroyer to match the Chinese 54 destroyer

  • @AM-ux8qq
    @AM-ux8qq 3 роки тому +2

    Hi, do you also have this in English? Seems to have good info, but do not understand Hindi. Thanks.

  • @ayaanmukherjee4701
    @ayaanmukherjee4701 2 роки тому +1

    Chinese are globally said as destroyer champions

  • @rahullahare2365
    @rahullahare2365 3 роки тому +1

    Next👉 indian navy future warships

  • @ALWH1314
    @ALWH1314 2 роки тому +1

    The picture you show is 052C not 052D.

  • @xnz6525
    @xnz6525 5 місяців тому

    most of weapons can not fire to proof their abilities in the whole life ,its a peace world,at this point,looks good is the best important thing. and I must say that INS Kolkata is the better one,love from China HY Province.

  • @RohanSingh-jc9ns
    @RohanSingh-jc9ns 3 роки тому +16

    Chinese navy don't have naval war experience, indian navy has fought with limited navy during 1971 war against Pakistan superior submarine fleet.. At last it depand how they are utlilzed..

    • @KisukeUrahara215
      @KisukeUrahara215 3 роки тому +1

      Anyway, Japanese navy Number 1 in Asia, Japan have most experienced navy in entire Asia, Japan is no. 2 in Destroyer power after USA

    • @RohanSingh-jc9ns
      @RohanSingh-jc9ns 3 роки тому +1

      Japanese and US pacfic fleet are most experienced navy in pacfic ocean. Basically Japanese operates under umbrella of US navy after devastating blow to imperial Japanese navy by US navy.

    • @XX-wn8xv
      @XX-wn8xv 3 роки тому +2

      India can only bully Pakistan. If you encounter a stronger enemy, India can only be beaten

  • @bubaibanerjee3539
    @bubaibanerjee3539 3 роки тому +6

    When I look at your defense analysis, Then got some different experience, great thanks🙏🇮🇳🙏

  • @kelvinkudirical1438
    @kelvinkudirical1438 3 роки тому

    Thanks for navy comparison i was bored from air force comparison

  • @user-du5dp3fs5j
    @user-du5dp3fs5j 3 місяці тому

    shall count how many vessl this type on service ,currently and per year new build

  • @madhumallarapu5384
    @madhumallarapu5384 3 роки тому +2

    Your intro lit

  • @soumyadeepmondal5973
    @soumyadeepmondal5973 3 роки тому +2

    Main problem Hain India ki economy, , China is mamle main humse aga Hain😐😑

  • @sambhavsharma227
    @sambhavsharma227 3 роки тому +2

    OP bhai 💪🏼🇮🇳🔥

  • @adityapratapsingh6737
    @adityapratapsingh6737 3 роки тому +2

    Nice man!

  • @prashantsinghsisodia6709
    @prashantsinghsisodia6709 3 роки тому

    Bhai p75i ko lekar koyi update hai kya uske liye bidding pricess suru hone wali thi na aur kab tak pheli submarine launch hosakti hai agar current progress ko dekhe toh please reply brother

  • @mkt2518
    @mkt2518 3 роки тому +1

    Indian destroyer aur submarine vs Chinese destroyer aur submarine ka vedio banao

  • @aayushc9116
    @aayushc9116 3 роки тому +2

    Sir we love ur honest and unbiased review ❤️

  • @saras102
    @saras102 3 роки тому

    Side by side comparision is better to understand.please this in all comparision videos.👍

  • @defenceshowhindi4204
    @defenceshowhindi4204 3 роки тому +1

    Make video on ins Visakhapatnam destroyer

  • @garvdutta5348
    @garvdutta5348 3 роки тому +5

    Sir, I'm a FINE Defense ENTHUSIAST.👍👍👍😍...
    INDIA DOES NOT NEED mig 35....💔💔💔
    1. Tejas Mk2 in pipeline research
    2. AMCA 6 SQ. Will enough for 5th GeN
    3. ADA Needs Funds For TEDBF R&D
    4. SU30MKI UttaM RaDaR and AsTra R&D
    5. Russian Missile Seeker is Well below Aim120D and Meteor.
    6. RD Engines POOR performance in INDIAN Sub continent.
    7. DRDO And ADA Needs Extra MONEY for DEVELOPMENT of Fly by Optics.
    8. 17 BILLION dollar investment in 4++ GeN Technology VS 6.372 Billion dollar I.A.F CasH Shortfall.
    9. Mig 29 UPG with ZukH update is Financially successful option.
    10. TOO much Dependence on RUSSIA.

  • @subodhjangave2681
    @subodhjangave2681 3 роки тому +1

    Please make a video on HAL SPORT Based on Tejas & DRDO air launched E bomb

  • @abdulhaadisworld6140
    @abdulhaadisworld6140 8 місяців тому

    You didn't talk about sonar and anti submarine capabilities

  • @shadowfury7068
    @shadowfury7068 3 роки тому

    Please make video on Indian Navy's project P-18 class destroyers 🙏🙏

  • @blasphemy619
    @blasphemy619 3 роки тому

    Indians got the edge. They got tech support on standby.

    • @xint8493
      @xint8493 3 роки тому +1

      Yes. Indian warships are always equipped with call centres off Bangalulu. When things happen they will tell you to reboot.

  • @futureparasfcommando971
    @futureparasfcommando971 3 роки тому +1

    Bro.... brahmos sea version is 650 km. Not 450 km

  • @jonathansingson2397
    @jonathansingson2397 3 роки тому +2

    Most of the Indian ships still use Ak630 why ?

    • @devashisdas5024
      @devashisdas5024 3 роки тому +1

      INDIA has the intellectual property share rights & technical know how from the USSR. It can mass produce it locally & under it requirements. Since it has a satisfactory option, so it chooses not to acquire more modern & sophisticated CIWS from the west or, develop an indigenous one.

  • @SGT_HAWK_YT
    @SGT_HAWK_YT 3 роки тому +2

    Chinese Navy is the biggest navy of the world

    • @anonymouswizard5535
      @anonymouswizard5535 3 роки тому

      Yes it's true

    • @easonhuang7117
      @easonhuang7117 3 роки тому

      @@anonymouswizard5535 No, it is not. Small baby ships like Type 022 don't make any sense in a naval combat.

  • @aj777mc8
    @aj777mc8 3 роки тому +1

    most of the picture you use is 052C not 052D

  • @GauravKumar-ut4gk
    @GauravKumar-ut4gk 3 роки тому

    Very nicely explained...

  • @adityaawasthi1748
    @adityaawasthi1748 3 роки тому

    Chinese type 52d is defensive destroyer and it's length is 156m and can operate only one helicopter

  • @skull99crusher16
    @skull99crusher16 Рік тому

    We needs to invest heavily on our millitary specially navy

  • @annusingh7708
    @annusingh7708 3 роки тому

    Mujhe aap ke video bahut ache lagte h

  • @papadelta5906
    @papadelta5906 3 роки тому

    Is there any development regarding the SDO's that were ordered?
    Can those be used in our warships toi?

  • @user-pe1qz3rt3f
    @user-pe1qz3rt3f 3 роки тому

    Indian is our friend not enemy!

  • @sankalpkishore8054
    @sankalpkishore8054 3 роки тому

    Best describes.

  • @indianguy5866
    @indianguy5866 3 роки тому +24

    Why our warships are under powered?

    • @Chimera_0990tfr
      @Chimera_0990tfr 3 роки тому +26

      @Siddesh Gannu 🙄matlab kuch bhi

    • @Aswitigaming
      @Aswitigaming 3 роки тому +25

      Our warship are not underpower but Chinese equipments sound only overpower

    • @prashantaryan3477
      @prashantaryan3477 3 роки тому +5

      Soumo Das cause space is saved for hypersonic missiles

    • @prashantaryan3477
      @prashantaryan3477 3 роки тому +4

      Siddesh Gannu bhai matlab hawa mein kuch bhi baat kar rahe ho

    • @the_fabulous_p14
      @the_fabulous_p14 3 роки тому +17

      @@Aswitigaming never underestimate your enemy. saare chinese stuff bakwas nahi hote

  • @nureao5626
    @nureao5626 3 роки тому

    Very good work

  • @vishalnenual3119
    @vishalnenual3119 3 роки тому +1

    Network Centric Warfare Capabilities are Added in Vishakhapatnam Class Destroyers and Short Range SAM is Under Development and would be ready by end of 2021 and can be deployed in future, With few more Upgrades in Vishakhapatnam Class, Indian Destroyers have a Upper Hand over Type 52 D, One more factor which will be in Favour of Indian Destroyers is that if in future they face each other it would be in Indian Ocean and Faceoff in Our Own Water Brings its own Advantage, Type 055 is More of a Cruiser Rather than a Destroyer so Purposed Indian Destroyers of 12000 tons would be a match for them.

  • @jaleesawan9376
    @jaleesawan9376 2 роки тому

    sir there is news coming that Pak navy might order upto 6 of these ships by 2023/24

  • @aryanyadav3690
    @aryanyadav3690 3 роки тому +2

    BrahMos is enough to destroy any 💯

  • @spectre3954
    @spectre3954 3 роки тому +2

    I am sorry but why is Ak-630 inferior to the chinese Type 1130........The Indian Navy uses the latest Ak-630M2.....no offenec just a doubt

    • @DefenceMatrix
      @DefenceMatrix  3 роки тому +2

      More muzzule velocity, hence better range, better fire rate, 360 degree coverage, EO sensor slaved .

    • @spectre3954
      @spectre3954 3 роки тому

      @@DefenceMatrix So it is better than US phalanx CIWS as well??....

    • @DefenceMatrix
      @DefenceMatrix  3 роки тому

      @@spectre3954 no.

  • @sheilyaoinam8423
    @sheilyaoinam8423 3 роки тому

    Let's to upgrade to/acquire superior ones.

  • @kiyotakaaynokoji9387
    @kiyotakaaynokoji9387 3 роки тому

    Please compare ins Kolkata class vs chinese T55 destroyers

  • @digvijaysandhu4688
    @digvijaysandhu4688 3 роки тому

    Make a video on s 70 ucav and compare it with india ucav ghatak.

  • @jiangxusheng2633
    @jiangxusheng2633 3 роки тому +2

    我居然堕落到了看印度人发的这种对比视频。

    • @wintertum
      @wintertum 3 роки тому

      我是从龙腾过来的~~

    • @wintertum
      @wintertum 3 роки тому

      过来直接看评论~~

    • @user-md1em2tg3q
      @user-md1em2tg3q 3 роки тому

      同样龙腾过来的,吃饭的时候当然要看一些笑话啊

    • @temujinborjikin7223
      @temujinborjikin7223 3 роки тому +1

      我也是,感觉在一堆粪蛆里

  • @tejasraj8317
    @tejasraj8317 3 роки тому +1

    60 k hone Wala hai bhai 😃

  • @ranjitsarkar8370
    @ranjitsarkar8370 3 роки тому

    Better kon hai ..

  • @abhinavanand4262
    @abhinavanand4262 3 роки тому +1

    Aapko cough and cold hai??

  • @ompagar26
    @ompagar26 3 роки тому

    More videos on navy please

  • @burung81
    @burung81 2 роки тому +3

    Not sure why this was recommended. But i would guess INS KOlkata will win out in UA-cam. The brahmos is all good holy missile, can hit warship, plane and land at supersonic, nothing can stop it.

  • @Chimera_0990tfr
    @Chimera_0990tfr 3 роки тому +1

    Anti sub capability kaha gaya?🙄🙄....

  • @wernerzikeli7606
    @wernerzikeli7606 3 роки тому

    All will be aquestion of who will detect the other party earlier - Bramos and Zircon like hyperspeed missiles will terminate the looser!

  • @AkshayK7722
    @AkshayK7722 3 роки тому

    Is it only about numbers ?

  • @satyakumarikatakam2496
    @satyakumarikatakam2496 3 роки тому +1

    Chinese Copy makes more sense to me!!

    • @huiliu6353
      @huiliu6353 3 роки тому

      So Indian P-18 is copied from Chinese type 055. But I still doubt whether India's industrial strength supports their mouth?

    • @xxwrattxx4450
      @xxwrattxx4450 3 роки тому

      @@huiliu6353 china airforce should change its name to Xerox airforce

  • @edwardtang1977
    @edwardtang1977 2 роки тому +3

    The Indian warship has sub-par export version equipments and weapons no matter how much Indians lies to itself. Chinese ship is something even the US says is the best. The two ships are in different leagues. 🤣

  • @tejasindianairforce3215
    @tejasindianairforce3215 3 роки тому +2

    👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼❤❤❤❤

  • @chandrachurniyogi8394
    @chandrachurniyogi8394 2 роки тому +2

    Indian Navy ko chahiye a fleet of 8 - 13 brand new Project 15F class 8,200 ton (13,000 ton loaded) stealth guided missile multi warfare destroyers powered by cutting edge (non-hydrogen based) FuelCell2® & Li-ion intelli-MARINEHYBRID™ e-propulsion system . . . IN should have a good inventory of Scalp EG land attack cruise missiles & SM39 Exocet II anti-ship missiles . . .

  • @dilpreetsinghjawandha8070
    @dilpreetsinghjawandha8070 3 роки тому

    Luv u bro

  • @Hassankhan-cn9wu
    @Hassankhan-cn9wu 3 роки тому

    Please compare with Type 55

  • @s.r.d5510
    @s.r.d5510 3 роки тому +3

    F22 rapator vs amca ..

  • @abirbo
    @abirbo 3 роки тому +1

    @ Defence Matrix, it is absolutely necessary that we start manufacturing destroyers similar in firepower like Arleigh Burke class, with 96 VLS. We cannot match the Chinese in terms of number of vessels. But, we can definitely have ships with huge firepower to stop them. Just like Kaiserliche Marine did during the First World War.

  • @MathhackAssam
    @MathhackAssam 3 роки тому +12

    Actually we need 10 more ships of this class.Even China was looking on it for its class and power.Last year China invited this ship for drill.Chinese media praised this Indian warship.Means,China is more confident in this ship for copying technology from it.

    • @backupphone8642
      @backupphone8642 3 роки тому +9

      Built toilets first

    • @soldsoul416
      @soldsoul416 3 роки тому +7

      @@backupphone8642 we already made it in 1947 & named it pakistan

    • @Késin_10.136
      @Késin_10.136 3 роки тому +1

      @@soldsoul416 oooohhhhhh... You burnt him... 😂🤣😂🤣

    • @tanjiladitya9610
      @tanjiladitya9610 3 роки тому +5

      CNN: Tejas is a good fighter plane .
      INDIA: Don't you dare to copy technology from it. 😅

    • @soleil2816
      @soleil2816 3 роки тому

      @@soldsoul416 ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

  • @vishal4904
    @vishal4904 3 роки тому

    Indian ins Kolkata me 67 to 68 missile ki samata h per 48 isliya kyoki bout space chod rakha h taki future ki technologies install ki ja sake 052D m asa nahi h

  • @Ironman-pm6pk
    @Ironman-pm6pk 3 роки тому

    Kolkata is best but Chinese destroyer is fully indigenous

  • @kunalsinha2355
    @kunalsinha2355 3 роки тому

    Jai hind🙏🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @VaibhavShete1981
    @VaibhavShete1981 3 роки тому

    Why do India use only 48 vls

  • @Mynewmusic24
    @Mynewmusic24 3 роки тому

    What about anti submarine weapons

  • @ashishajay3085
    @ashishajay3085 3 роки тому

    Jai Hind🙏🇮🇳💪❤️

  • @pkumar1509
    @pkumar1509 3 роки тому

    As such there is no such weapon to take on Brahmos . The speed and the kinetic energy is devastating further it does not follow a determined trejectory and therefore very difficult to intercept

  • @jayaprakashnaik9069
    @jayaprakashnaik9069 3 роки тому

    More space is reserved for NIRBHAY missile in Kolkata class destroyer

    • @pkumar1509
      @pkumar1509 3 роки тому

      I have seen the Kolkata class . The main space is occupied by brahmos missile silos

  • @studioofart2037
    @studioofart2037 3 роки тому

    when s4 and s4* SUBMARINE will launch

  • @rutvikbrahmbhatt818
    @rutvikbrahmbhatt818 3 роки тому

    What's the intro name?