4:48 He’s been there for 37 years. Makes me wonder if he was one of the people that created my 1994 Les Paul Classic Premium. So cool to see the faces of the people behind my guitar.
Yeah, watching this I suddenly feel a connection to my instrument and also all the stories behind it, how it's been passed down the line with the devotion of all those excellent craftsmen. Will they wonder too, say, who's gonna be playing that guitar they're holding?
Hat's off to the guys and gals that show up at the factory everyday; you're the backbone of this iconic brand. If you grew up with these guitars then you understand how much of the community wants you to succeed!!
It's very inspiring to see traditional American craftsmanship & manufacturing! I hope the recent restructuring at Gibson keeps the company on track. I bought my first new Gibson in 1997, and continue to be a loyal customer to this day.
Love my Gibson collection and it continue to grows monthly! Last great find was my 1996 Gibson Hawk. Fantastic player with pickups that have a lot of boom!
4:47 Make Gibson Great Again. Yes, give Henry Juszkiewicz the boot. Always room for improvement, because 1959 will always be the benchmark. We are not even 95% there.
No just no. For example PRS innovated on the Gibson headstock design and greatly improved tuning stability by not having the D and G string go through the nut at an angle. That's what I'd call progress.
@@2und2sind4 Gibson are damned if they do, damned if they don't. If they try to innovate by changing the headstock angle or adding different tuners or using weight relief - then people complain about it. But at the same everybody complains about broken Les Paul necks, unstable tuning on their G-string etc. If Gibson made the kinds of innovations that PRS does, they would be crucified for it.
@@pronumeral1446 Yeah, you're probably right in many ways. But on the other hand, somebody at Gibson gave those robotuners a go. It's a weird dilemma. Now they're pretending to innovate while staying exactly where they've been forever... Running in place
They invented the Humbucker, the Truss Rod, the intonatable bridge. I wouldn't necessarily say they are the "leading edge" of innovation, but they are VERY innovative company
I know a guy who works at Gibson and he said most employees make around $12/hour. Not sure about the health insurance situation, but I do know saw dust is a carcinogen.
Do you think that other guitar-manufacturer employees work under better conditions in asia? most esp ltd for example come from indonesia now and i bet they have worse working conditions for less money and i don't even want to talk about china.. And this is the reality when we as customer demand more and more quality for less and less money, well guess who suffers, the employees and the environment because a company has to stay economical and you have to make decisions as a CEO or leader to be able to deliver quality for "reasonable" price to stay competitive so you can secure the jobs and homes of everyone of your employees and make a healthy grow and well if you can't get the resources, equipment, facilities, transport etc. cheaper, then the employees will be the ones getting impacted by it (less salary, worse conditions, etc.). I do not want to insult your friend or any other person but i have no idea about your friend's level of education or his job at gibson, but maybe this is reflected in the different salaries and i can't imagine that everybody earns the same amount in such a company, because the salary usually depends on factors like work experience, education and occupied roles in the company. I hope my bad english is still understandable. Have a nice day and greetings from germany.
@@arsalino1116 blaming consumers for corner cutting, penny pinching corporate greed that is prevalent all over America because you like a company is weird
They tried twice: Volute in the 70's Apex headstock in 2017 The boomers moaned about it being different than 50's guitars so Gibson stopped doing both and we're back to square 1 on innovation.
@@LinhNguyen-im4uu Gibson and Fender are relegated to chasing the past due to consumer demand. Innovation is a small part of these companies. Everyone wants a 59 Les Paul.
@@sharonraizor2839 So true Sharon. Add a 54 Strat or a 52 Tele to the list. Maybe it's because some of the best music ever written/recorded was using those vintage instrument. You are very much correct stating the demand for vintage style guitars is Consumer driven. Myself, I like all guitars.
I have 7 Gibsons, LP classic and standard,65 Melody Maker, Moderne, Flying V, Explorer and Firebird. Every one of them is a tribute to the great work the employees perform at Gibson. I have never had even one problem with any of them. Except for the nut on the LP classic was so high that it seemed like a guitar made for slide playing only. But we have a company called Breedlove here and one of their guys shaved the nut down and slotted it and it is now perfect.
I enjoy these behind the scenes of the process vids. Especially hearing from the old guard/employees who have been around 3 - 4 decades. How awesome that must be! And for Gibson company!
Worried about wasting wood? Then use a 'scarf joint' at the end of the neck. Save wood and make that 'weak spot' Gibson is known for stronger by keeping the grain going the same way. Or bring back the neck volute. Hope Gibson are back.
Luis Coll.. Martin’s got a point. And it’s a good one. To add to that, it’s for added peace of mind. If you’re a customer, spending your hard earned money, It’s a no brainer. Hey, for those player who spends a lot of time playing, no matter how careful you are, it will eventually happen at some point. And who hasn’t ACCIDENTALLY dropped or brushed off their guitar before???!!! Luckily for me it’s a strat or a Tele!!! And for Gibson, it’s the Achilles heel of their guitars. Having a set a neck, makes it almost impossible on your own to change the neck if the headstock breaks in a way that the whole neck needs replacing. If Gibson does something with it, it’s called innovation! If not it’s just stubbornness and maybe they did just don’t care, couldn’t be bothered as long as the company is still profitable. But hey, PRS USA single cut is the BETTER option. They’re not just keep getting better each year but they actually give a damn about their product! Coming second is the Godin Summit, cheaper alternative, and its Canadian made.
@@lelov1392 man I've met guys that have spent 30 years with the same guitar and have never dropped it, and they've played it every night, and personally know a guy that owns 64 Gibsons and none of them have headstock repairs. Adding a big chunk of wood there is uncomfortable, if you play a 70's Les Paul with the damned volute you'll notice. For me, adding more wood there is like adding a big bumper to a Ferrari, you don't need it if you use it right, and the people that actually asking for it are frequently not Gibson fans. There are definitely more options out there for other players, nothing is better or worse, i personally never liked much PRS, and i've played a few American made through the years. Changing your product every year doesn't make it better, it just makes it different, and some things are better as they are.
ozzie houser good for you bro. Real players, honestly, don’t give a hoot about the name on the headstock. It’s not about the brand name that really matters. If it sounds and it feels good to play, then it’s good regardless of the brand. Be a fan of the style of the guitar like the strat or Tele or 335. But It doesn’t need to be fender or a Gibson. Cheers
Luis Coll you met guys, you know someone blah blah blah. How do you know FOR SURE, they haven’t accidentally dropped or bang their guitar??? Were you with them the whole time??? With regards to volutes on a guitar. It doesn’t bother me! For gods sake, it’s only on the headstock part of the guitar, it doesn’t go all the way to the entirety of the neck. Man up, and adapt! But adapting to a splitting headstock is another story!
since the 80's when i saw kirk hammet playing a black les paul i fell in love with this guitar unfortunately i can't afford to buy one maybe one day ......
I had a Gibson 2008 faded flying V and I spent a lot of money on it as a teenager in 2010 on making payments on it, and I was sad it had tuning instability, electrical problems too from what the technician said when I kept bringing it back in to the shop that sold it to me in payments, but after awhile they took it back and let me pick 2 guitars and call it even and I truly miss that red flying V but I'll just wait for a epiphone used before I buy a Gibson because I was disappointed in it, I loved that guitar and it didn't want to work out for me. I still have the case for it
How can it have electrical problems that are not easy to fix? It's a pot, cap and pickup. V's tend to stay in tune well due to the inline tuners. Because you can't understand basic electronics in the guitar I'm inclined to think you also don't know how to set up your nut to match your strings and thus tuning issues.
@@Les537 straight out the case the Nut by the headstock was needing to be replaced because when I Bent the G string a full step any where down from the 7th note it would slide off the nut slot on G. So actually, yeah I did know a little basic anatomy of what I was going into with that guitar. The built in neck was actually rolled really awkwardly which is why it got sent back the 2nd time when I had it for a good half year playing it a lot but then it got sent back for good. I have a shecter with a floyd rose special and Mammoth slinkys tuned to A# standard right now loaded with EMG 81-85 and I haven't had to tune the tuners at all. But this shecter puts up a lot honestly
I love Gibson products. I have many. I was wondering, what does Gibson do with all of the wood chips and saw dust? There has to be a lot of it based on their production numbers.
Cesar Gueikian, Would you please consider my solution to greatly reduce the amount of Gibsons that get their headstock broken. Add two carbon fiber stiffening rods that go from the neck and into the headstock. Use continuous carbon fiber layer linearly and have the end angled to match the headstock. The holly veneer and the fingerboard will fully conceal them so it would not change the look at all. But would make the neck to headstock transition so much stronger. Please consider doing this, it would make every Gibson fan so happy and willing to buy new guitars that they can more safely take to gigs without having to worry someone might knock it over and break the headstock.
Don't forget the fat slob in Memphis stomping on 345 bodies then band sawing the necks . Instead of selling them off for people who can't afford full price for a Gibson
@John DiLoreto I built 3 identical guitars, my design. First one with Finnish birch, second mahogany and the latest one now on basswood. I moved the lot of hardware and electrics from one to the second to the third, they sound exactly the same mate, no difference besides the weight... Take Two Gibson's from the late seventies, one with the mahogany neck and the other with the maple ditto, also sound identical...
I found the tone deaf person. If you can't hear the wood then you maybe are using a muddy/distorted sound. For me it's clear as day. I own many guitar and I'm constantly swapping around pickups and such to see what they sound like in different shapes and sizes of wood. Anyone who argues the wood makes no difference is either deaf, confused or just fucking dumb as rocks.
Leading edge of innovation?? If you always do the same thing then you don’t make any advancement?? I love Gibson and own several, but Gibson rarely does anything new. And when they do something new they get scared and pull the product (Firebird X, robot tuners, etc...). They make great guitars. Some of the best. Just please don’t say they are pushing any new ideas.
Great product , built in America by people that are passionate about their craft , I have four now , a Firebird , a Les Paul TV Special , Les Paul Junior and A J45 Limited (Bozemen)…….I'll be buying more , that's for sure ………
the neck on LP Standard was so badly shaped it was returned for my money back shame on you Gibson and all Gibson said was "thanks for the info we value your input" what a crock of shit
I’ll never understand Gibson. Both Les Pauls I’ve owned needed to be shielded and the fret ends all needed dressed and rounded. The nut work was acceptable but could have been better. I have an Epiphone Paul that’s way better than my Gibson.
No you dont epiphones are garbage, you are poor that's fine. I could tell you blindfolded without ever strumming once if I am holding a trash epiphone. The necks on them are a joke.
Not a chance in hell. You are telling stories out of school. I've owned 3 gibsons and about 20 epiphones. I would trade 100 epiphones for a gibson. If you had a humbucker les paul then it didn't need shielding and it comes with it anyway.
This music is horribly distracting. It’s bad enough when it’s on its own, but why ffs would you have that noise still going on when people are talking? People watch something like this for the content, the factory filming - and the commentary. You don’t need shit music going all through all of that. Bummer. Can’t watch any more, although I’m really interested in the subject.
Adding "ears" is your "sustainable" approach? What a friggin joke. The amount of waste in your one-piece neck construction is much higher than whatever little gain you think "ears" get you, not to mention the source of Gibson's most famous characteristic: the broken headstock. How about make a real change to scarf jointed necks? The right glue will render that joint substantially stronger than your current process, and you won't need nearly such a thick blank for one neck.
Why do you have those STUPID raised nibs on the neck binding. I had to return two Gibson Flying V's because the finish was done so badly, that the E string would catch between the raised nibs and the frets all the way up the neck. I wanted a Gibson Flying V for 40 years, due to my guitar hero Michael Schenker but could not justify the obscene prices Gibson charges. It was my wife who eventually told me to buy one. Imagine my utter disappointment at the piss poor quality of the instrument when it arrived. The first one went back to Gibson Europe, who replaced it and the second example was just as bad. That was also returned.
0:43 "Gibson's always been the leading edge in innovation." Uhm, what? I mean the designs are great and all, but they've not been innovative since the 60s. If you want an innovative guitar you'll be looking at something like .strandberg*', Ibanez or Paul Reed Smith, not Gibson and Fender.
Right, let's see here, Strandbergs may be original but are fugly as yuck. Ibanez and PRS are copies of Fenders and Gibsons, so I guess I'll stick with my Martins, Fenders and Gibsons.
That's a shame to see such a great name as Gibson making today so much inconsistent quality guitars... Those guys should be way more humble when they talk about their products quality!!
I own four Gibsons. Every one is killer! Maybe you just need to find a well stocked dealer and play several different models and find one that suits you...or maybe just don’t be a twat. Just sayin’
![Epiphone Factory Tour in China [English Subtitles] - presented by Digimart](/img/n.gif)
I love all these factory shows.
4:48 He’s been there for 37 years. Makes me wonder if he was one of the people that created my 1994 Les Paul Classic Premium. So cool to see the faces of the people behind my guitar.
Yeah, watching this I suddenly feel a connection to my instrument and also all the stories behind it, how it's been passed down the line with the devotion of all those excellent craftsmen. Will they wonder too, say, who's gonna be playing that guitar they're holding?
dude not only you but these guys made the guitars of legendary musicians.
I am a luthier here in Brazil and I have a dream to work in the factory of the legendary Gibson who knows one day I realize
Good on you Gibson. Restore my Faith
Hat's off to the guys and gals that show up at the factory everyday; you're the backbone of this iconic brand. If you grew up with these guitars then you understand how much of the community wants you to succeed!!
It's very inspiring to see traditional American craftsmanship & manufacturing! I hope the recent restructuring at Gibson keeps the company on track. I bought my first new Gibson in 1997, and continue to be a loyal customer to this day.
Pretty cool the Agnesi Make Gibson Great Again hat made an appearance.
I could watch these being made all day. 👏
Love my Gibson collection and it continue to grows monthly! Last great find was my 1996 Gibson Hawk. Fantastic player with pickups that have a lot of boom!
Great people making great guitars
Nah, good people making overpriced guitars.
Best guitars ever made
@@doffendoffenson4917 not even close
I have a 2019 Gibson Les Paul Classic "Sweetwater Exclusive" - it is fantastic!
But surely the epiphone model is better? herp derp goes teh enternets
The "Make Gibson Great Again" hat doesn't exactly scream company pride...
4:47 Make Gibson Great Again. Yes, give Henry Juszkiewicz the boot. Always room for improvement, because 1959 will always be the benchmark. We are not even 95% there.
Atleast he is honest about the direction Gibson has taken and his love for the company cries to make it great again.
I love the pride that they have.
Finally some good content from Gibson!
Love my 2017 LP Traditional Antique Burst! About to acquire a LP Gold Top in the future! Keep up the great work guys!
They disabled the likes/dislikes but kept the comment section on
Rookie mistake
Gabe Williams Plot Twist: They actually are not Chinese!!!
They can delete comments.... but not dislikes....
These guitars play so nice.
I love my Les Paul. So cool to see how they’re made. Nothing else out there quite like a genuine Les Paul.
Where the factory is it's looks beautiful round there
This is cool.
I wonder if they test the neck wood for strength/stiffness before they use it?
Love my New V!
"Gibson has always been the leading edge of innovation"
Uh, I'm not a gibson hater by any means, but what?
No just no. For example PRS innovated on the Gibson headstock design and greatly improved tuning stability by not having the D and G string go through the nut at an angle. That's what I'd call progress.
@@2und2sind4 Gibson are damned if they do, damned if they don't. If they try to innovate by changing the headstock angle or adding different tuners or using weight relief - then people complain about it. But at the same everybody complains about broken Les Paul necks, unstable tuning on their G-string etc.
If Gibson made the kinds of innovations that PRS does, they would be crucified for it.
@@pronumeral1446 Yeah, you're probably right in many ways. But on the other hand, somebody at Gibson gave those robotuners a go. It's a weird dilemma.
Now they're pretending to innovate while staying exactly where they've been forever... Running in place
They invented the Humbucker, the Truss Rod, the intonatable bridge. I wouldn't necessarily say they are the "leading edge" of innovation, but they are VERY innovative company
@@2und2sind4 Ha, PRS wouldn't exist if they didn't have a gibson template to work from.
The "Make Gibson Great Again" hat says a lot; I hope they succeed even though I'll never be able to afford one.
Yes you will.
Dude, I was able to scrape 2400 for my 2017 standard, you can too!
Maybe not right now, perhaps one day you might be able to more than just one.
Studios are quite cheap, you're looking around a 1000 for a higher end one, but gibson has made guitars that retailed at around 500 bucks new.
I have a standard from the year 2003, its neck is 50s but it is much thinner than my studio 2001 and LPJ 2014, both with 50s necks too.
I was never aware of the alignment dowels on the fretboard
I know a guy who works at Gibson and he said most employees make around $12/hour. Not sure about the health insurance situation, but I do know saw dust is a carcinogen.
Do you think that other guitar-manufacturer employees work under better conditions in asia? most esp ltd for example come from indonesia now and i bet they have worse working conditions for less money and i don't even want to talk about china..
And this is the reality when we as customer demand more and more quality for less and less money, well guess who suffers, the employees and the environment because a company has to stay economical and you have to make decisions as a CEO or leader to be able to deliver quality for "reasonable" price to stay competitive so you can secure the jobs and homes of everyone of your employees and make a healthy grow and well if you can't get the resources, equipment, facilities, transport etc. cheaper, then the employees will be the ones getting impacted by it (less salary, worse conditions, etc.).
I do not want to insult your friend or any other person but i have no idea about your friend's level of education or his job at gibson, but maybe this is reflected in the different salaries and i can't imagine that everybody earns the same amount in such a company, because the salary usually depends on factors like work experience, education and occupied roles in the company.
I hope my bad english is still understandable.
Have a nice day and greetings from germany.
@@arsalino1116 I have no idea about Asia :)
@@arsalino1116 blaming consumers for corner cutting, penny pinching corporate greed that is prevalent all over America because you like a company is weird
Have they addressed the headstock breaking problem? If not, why not? Surely the single best time to put in strength is during fabrication!
They tried twice:
Volute in the 70's
Apex headstock in 2017
The boomers moaned about it being different than 50's guitars so Gibson stopped doing both and we're back to square 1 on innovation.
@@LinhNguyen-im4uu
... boo, come on, Gibson! Suppose it gives the luthiers something to do!
@@LinhNguyen-im4uu Gibson and Fender are relegated to chasing the past due to consumer demand. Innovation is a small part of these companies. Everyone wants a 59 Les Paul.
@@sharonraizor2839 So true Sharon. Add a 54 Strat or a 52 Tele to the list. Maybe it's because some of the best music ever written/recorded was using those vintage instrument.
You are very much correct stating the demand for vintage style guitars is Consumer driven.
Myself, I like all guitars.
The solution is to not drop them. It's worked for me for the last 30 years or so.
I have 7 Gibsons, LP classic and standard,65 Melody Maker, Moderne, Flying V, Explorer and Firebird. Every one of them is a tribute to the great work the employees perform at Gibson. I have never had even one problem with any of them. Except for the nut on the LP classic was so high that it seemed like a guitar made for slide playing only. But we have a company called Breedlove here and one of their guys shaved the nut down and slotted it and it is now perfect.
I enjoy these behind the scenes of the process vids. Especially hearing from the old guard/employees who have been around 3 - 4 decades. How awesome that must be! And for Gibson company!
Worried about wasting wood? Then use a 'scarf joint' at the end of the neck. Save wood and make that 'weak spot' Gibson is known for stronger by keeping the grain going the same way. Or bring back the neck volute. Hope Gibson are back.
So it's Gibson's fault if you drop your guitar, makes sense
Luis Coll.. Martin’s got a point. And it’s a good one. To add to that, it’s for added peace of mind. If you’re a customer, spending your hard earned money, It’s a no brainer. Hey, for those player who spends a lot of time playing, no matter how careful you are, it will eventually happen at some point. And who hasn’t ACCIDENTALLY dropped or brushed off their guitar before???!!! Luckily for me it’s a strat or a Tele!!! And for Gibson, it’s the Achilles heel of their guitars. Having a set a neck, makes it almost impossible on your own to change the neck if the headstock breaks in a way that the whole neck needs replacing. If Gibson does something with it, it’s called innovation! If not it’s just stubbornness and maybe they did just don’t care, couldn’t be bothered as long as the company is still profitable. But hey, PRS USA single cut is the BETTER option. They’re not just keep getting better each year but they actually give a damn about their product! Coming second is the Godin Summit, cheaper alternative, and its Canadian made.
@@lelov1392 man I've met guys that have spent 30 years with the same guitar and have never dropped it, and they've played it every night, and personally know a guy that owns 64 Gibsons and none of them have headstock repairs. Adding a big chunk of wood there is uncomfortable, if you play a 70's Les Paul with the damned volute you'll notice. For me, adding more wood there is like adding a big bumper to a Ferrari, you don't need it if you use it right, and the people that actually asking for it are frequently not Gibson fans. There are definitely more options out there for other players, nothing is better or worse, i personally never liked much PRS, and i've played a few American made through the years. Changing your product every year doesn't make it better, it just makes it different, and some things are better as they are.
ozzie houser good for you bro. Real players, honestly, don’t give a hoot about the name on the headstock. It’s not about the brand name that really matters. If it sounds and it feels good to play, then it’s good regardless of the brand. Be a fan of the style of the guitar like the strat or Tele or 335. But It doesn’t need to be fender or a Gibson. Cheers
Luis Coll you met guys, you know someone blah blah blah. How do you know FOR SURE, they haven’t accidentally dropped or bang their guitar??? Were you with them the whole time??? With regards to volutes on a guitar. It doesn’t bother me! For gods sake, it’s only on the headstock part of the guitar, it doesn’t go all the way to the entirety of the neck. Man up, and adapt! But adapting to a splitting headstock is another story!
since the 80's when i saw kirk hammet playing a black les paul i fell in love with this guitar unfortunately i can't afford to buy one maybe one day ......
You have been wanting a Gibson for 40 years but still are too poor? You should have started a savings account back then.
I had a Gibson 2008 faded flying V and I spent a lot of money on it as a teenager in 2010 on making payments on it, and I was sad it had tuning instability, electrical problems too from what the technician said when I kept bringing it back in to the shop that sold it to me in payments, but after awhile they took it back and let me pick 2 guitars and call it even and I truly miss that red flying V but I'll just wait for a epiphone used before I buy a Gibson because I was disappointed in it, I loved that guitar and it didn't want to work out for me. I still have the case for it
How can it have electrical problems that are not easy to fix? It's a pot, cap and pickup. V's tend to stay in tune well due to the inline tuners. Because you can't understand basic electronics in the guitar I'm inclined to think you also don't know how to set up your nut to match your strings and thus tuning issues.
@@Les537 straight out the case the Nut by the headstock was needing to be replaced because when I Bent the G string a full step any where down from the 7th note it would slide off the nut slot on G. So actually, yeah I did know a little basic anatomy of what I was going into with that guitar. The built in neck was actually rolled really awkwardly which is why it got sent back the 2nd time when I had it for a good half year playing it a lot but then it got sent back for good. I have a shecter with a floyd rose special and Mammoth slinkys tuned to A# standard right now loaded with EMG 81-85 and I haven't had to tune the tuners at all. But this shecter puts up a lot honestly
I love Gibson products. I have many. I was wondering, what does Gibson do with all of the wood chips and saw dust? There has to be a lot of it based on their production numbers.
Cesar Gueikian,
Would you please consider my solution to greatly reduce the amount of Gibsons that get their headstock broken. Add two carbon fiber stiffening rods that go from the neck and into the headstock. Use continuous carbon fiber layer linearly and have the end angled to match the headstock. The holly veneer and the fingerboard will fully conceal them so it would not change the look at all. But would make the neck to headstock transition so much stronger. Please consider doing this, it would make every Gibson fan so happy and willing to buy new guitars that they can more safely take to gigs without having to worry someone might knock it over and break the headstock.
Where is the part where you run over the finished guitars with a great big truck?
Don't forget the fat slob in Memphis stomping on 345 bodies then band sawing the necks . Instead of selling them off for people who can't afford full price for a Gibson
Thanks slash
I do too!
Where can I get a Firebird x?
you need to have long arms to reach that far down into the dumpster
Ok you guys need to put this on actual TV you guys would get way more buyers and actual advertisement for your products and services and make more
There is no better feeling than owning a gibson les paul
0:34 nice dent in the back of the LP
Truss rods are a good thing.
🤘
Cool
Watch out they might run over those
4:22 Heartbreaker
I already see sharp fret ends 😂
I own a 2017 LP Standard t, Honeyburst. It's the Best electric guitar l have ever played when set up properly.
Really, The tonewood debate again??? it's an ELECTRIC guitar, please!!!
@John DiLoreto
I built 3 identical guitars, my design. First one with Finnish birch, second mahogany and the latest one now on basswood.
I moved the lot of hardware and electrics from one to the second to the third, they sound exactly the same mate, no difference besides the weight...
Take Two Gibson's from the late seventies, one with the mahogany neck and the other with the maple ditto, also sound identical...
Ignorant
@@tmitz73 Are you talking about the people that think tonewood makes a notable difference in ELECTRIC guitars?
I found the tone deaf person. If you can't hear the wood then you maybe are using a muddy/distorted sound. For me it's clear as day. I own many guitar and I'm constantly swapping around pickups and such to see what they sound like in different shapes and sizes of wood. Anyone who argues the wood makes no difference is either deaf, confused or just fucking dumb as rocks.
@@PetroLarsson If you can't hear the wood then why are you even building guitars?
great little series, but hard to listen with all the endless high pitched distorted guitar, to me it's just not needed, thankful for subtitles
"Gang Drills"!!! Sounds sexy
I wish I could have an
SG in my bedroom.
Leading edge of innovation?? If you always do the same thing then you don’t make any advancement?? I love Gibson and own several, but Gibson rarely does anything new. And when they do something new they get scared and pull the product (Firebird X, robot tuners, etc...). They make great guitars. Some of the best. Just please don’t say they are pushing any new ideas.
So you miss the robot tuners? Never should have happened in the first place.
Just a tip you guys should really change the angle of your headstocks
Great product , built in America by people that are passionate about their craft , I have four now , a Firebird , a Les Paul TV Special , Les Paul Junior and A J45 Limited (Bozemen)…….I'll be buying more , that's for sure ………
Thank You Gibson. I'm staring at my Firebird, SG, and LP double cut right now.
noice
Gibson Les Paul number one please send me one
headstock break
Make Gibson Great Again!!! Give that guy with MGGA hat a rise ;)
´ Paul Reed agrees to buy Gibson ´ man can dream …
Plot Twist: They are actually telling the truth!!!
For $3,000 I'd rather buy an ESP and still have $1,300 left over
No kidding! I play my ESP a hundred times more often than I play my Les Paul.
Lol esp cost the same you fucking assburger
Um did he say his first guitar was a Gibson?!
Rich boi
Make Gibson Great Again... LoL... Says a lot. 4:49
0:50 Howl - Beware of Darkness
Nope, that is NOT original music. By the way, check them out - I just love it!:
ua-cam.com/video/a9BCFWr53WU/v-deo.html
Innovation..
What a joke
No comparison between a Gibson and an Epiphone. Pick up an L P standard from both and you can feel the quality difference even before you play it.
I can't pay..but I want a 57 and 335...don't know why🌈
Should have never stopped the adjustable nuts , or atleast sell them. I’ll never sell my 15-16 standard and studio
the neck on LP Standard was so badly shaped it was returned for my money back shame on you Gibson and all Gibson said was "thanks for the info we value your input" what a crock of shit
Wheres the Brazilian stash looks like cheapo rosewood #playauthentic
0:40 wut ???????
Do the headstocks come pre-broken ?
Shouldn't joke about that shit seeing as I have an SG ..
Never learned. Sigh
why don't you copy the PRS machine head ? after all is designed by a gibson disciple....
I’ll never understand Gibson. Both Les Pauls I’ve owned needed to be shielded and the fret ends all needed dressed and rounded. The nut work was acceptable but could have been better. I have an Epiphone Paul that’s way better than my Gibson.
No you dont epiphones are garbage, you are poor that's fine. I could tell you blindfolded without ever strumming once if I am holding a trash epiphone. The necks on them are a joke.
Not a chance in hell. You are telling stories out of school. I've owned 3 gibsons and about 20 epiphones. I would trade 100 epiphones for a gibson. If you had a humbucker les paul then it didn't need shielding and it comes with it anyway.
I want the entire Les Paul® Standard solid-body electric guitar built from quarter-sawn lumber!
4:17
the edges of the holes look terrible, in my opinion this guitar should not cost more than the one made in a Chinese barn.
What an utter fool you are , go buy a Chibson you fool, Its all you can afford anyway...idiot.
Piece of crap, I’d rather buy a tokai.
Spiral Architect Buying a higher quality product for less money means rationalism.
This music is horribly distracting. It’s bad enough when it’s on its own, but why ffs would you have that noise still going on when people are talking? People watch something like this for the content, the factory filming - and the commentary. You don’t need shit music going all through all of that. Bummer. Can’t watch any more, although I’m really interested in the subject.
Most generic riffs
Adding "ears" is your "sustainable" approach? What a friggin joke. The amount of waste in your one-piece neck construction is much higher than whatever little gain you think "ears" get you, not to mention the source of Gibson's most famous characteristic: the broken headstock. How about make a real change to scarf jointed necks? The right glue will render that joint substantially stronger than your current process, and you won't need nearly such a thick blank for one neck.
Got 4 Les Pauls and everyone is great, three V's and an Explorer ...all awesome guitars.
Haters be like 'can only afford Chibson'
Suck it.
"Gibson is the leading edge of innovation"
Lol Same designs for 70 years. Same head stock angle.
Why do you have those STUPID raised nibs on the neck binding. I had to return two Gibson Flying V's because the finish was done so badly, that the E string would catch between the raised nibs and the frets all the way up the neck. I wanted a Gibson Flying V for 40 years, due to my guitar hero Michael Schenker but could not justify the obscene prices Gibson charges. It was my wife who eventually told me to buy one. Imagine my utter disappointment at the piss poor quality of the instrument when it arrived. The first one went back to Gibson Europe, who replaced it and the second example was just as bad. That was also returned.
Shoud be cheaper since they aren't really doing shit
The necks are horrible
Chemtrails where ever I look.
Loyal staff to have on board 🪵
0:43 "Gibson's always been the leading edge in innovation."
Uhm, what? I mean the designs are great and all, but they've not been innovative since the 60s. If you want an innovative guitar you'll be looking at something like .strandberg*', Ibanez or Paul Reed Smith, not Gibson and Fender.
Funny how all those guitars use gibson invented pickups.
@@Les537 like I said, they haven't been innovate since the 60s
he said that and immediately followed up with "they always do the same thing, you know we dont make any advances" got my scratching my head
@@waynepayne864 I guess the worst people to trust if you want the objective facts about Gibson is, well Gibson.
Right, let's see here, Strandbergs may be original but are fugly as yuck. Ibanez and PRS are copies of Fenders and Gibsons, so I guess I'll stick with my Martins, Fenders and Gibsons.
I hate gibson guitars.
(Laughing) thanks for watching!
Make Gibson great again is a really bad look.
cringy music
That's a shame to see such a great name as Gibson making today so much inconsistent quality guitars... Those guys should be way more humble when they talk about their products quality!!
alex Aragorn you are full of shit
I own four Gibsons. Every one is killer! Maybe you just need to find a well stocked dealer and play several different models and find one that suits you...or maybe just don’t be a twat. Just sayin’
It's a shame to see people parrot nonsense on the enternet. How many gibsons have you bought recently? I'm going to guess - none, ever.