Відео

Been following Hameroff and Penrose for sometime!

The guy creeps me out.... his gaze, his voice, his mannerisms....but i gotta see where how deep the interview goes cause I want to u understand 'Decorative Permitations' are ....cool story bro ik right.

Rupert Sheldrake Morphic Field.

Finally, an American accent. I was beginning to think narrators had to have novel European accents in order to have a UA-cam channel.

Thank you for sharing and inspiring. Your presentation has spawned so many ideas in my head which I would like to share as we are in the same field of neuromodulations and neuropsych.

Waiting for the next video. I binge all of your videos in just a week. Man you motivated me to learn about quantum science.

28:30 epigenetics

I have proof on my yt channel of telepathy and telekinesis

I would like to see your video presentation on idea of 'songs of life and mind' that is now developing by Richard Watson. :)

See Prof. Akira Furusawa's work on photonics, creating a fault-tolerant universal quantum computer architecture by generating a "2D cluster state", literally using a cylindrical 2d surface of entangled qubits.

Mystery 4: life after death 😢😂❤

Language did not evolve for communication WRONG it sure did. How can you so sure when you so obviously wrong.

Learn what fundamental means. Language is a human tool and thus not fundamental to the universe.

But hey, this seems to me to repeat Peirce's triad! What is the difference between Peirce's Representamen (physical), Object (i.e. perception or mental) and Interpretant (i.e. meaning or Platonic) and Penrose's worlds? I see perfect correspondence.

how is this different from freud or jung's theory of mind ?

THE REAL SYCHRONICITY IS MY NAME IS JUSTIN ALSO AND AT FIRST I KEPT IGNORING THIS VIDEO LOL UNTIL NOW

Your descriptions of Hoffman's thoughts are the best I have come across in several years now of viewing all of his stuff that was findable; with the exception of Hoffman himself of course.

What about ontogeny? Self definitely depends on learning and memory. Cf. Andy Clark's idea of error correction of prediction where the latter is tied up to learning and experience

Bro How is everything not deterministic?

Interesting.

Great explanation of this theory! Thank you!

Mutu kya bay teray moov par

I’d like to share a book. SYNCHRONICITY .. Dr. Kirby Surprise. Excellent exploration into this topic.

My middle name is Michael too haha

The driving force of synchronicity is to find our way out of your bullshit to your life path. Synchronicity adds some adventure to at times a very dull life experience. If we didn't have these mysteries to figure out life would be very boring and have no adventure in it. Our minds are made of puzzles and puzzles can preoccupy our minds and add an interesting curve to living our life. It's just part of the awakening experience like angel numbers and ayahuasca.

This ought to be taught in colleges and the mainstream. Tired of living in an unconscious America.

Great. Now I can't get Sting's voice out of my head 😂

343 guilty spark you are the oracle

Using the dream (in Carl Young's encounter) as an example of synchronicity is incorrect. Dreams are more than just synchronistic events. They are prophecies. There are clear and detailed explanations of dreams in religion (e.g. Islam) and the roles which dreams play in our everyday lives. If we will ignore religion altogether then we'd be trying to invent the wheel and waste tremendous amount of time in vein.

If they are meaningful, then they are not coincidences. So please refrain from using the term 'meaningful coincidences'.

With all these aligned incidences please stop saying the word 'coincidence'. A contradiction to what you are communicating.

What if both incidents are outside you in the physical world? Unlike many, it's not that I hear a word and think about it at the same time. I hear it being said by a person or on TV and I read it on a book or street sign at the same time. It's mindboggling and it happens in different languages as well.

There's no such thing as 'coincidence'. Everything is very carefully measured and predestined for a divine wisdom by God.

Wait til i tell u my experience its absolutely concerning. Alarming. On n on

What a pity you guys don't read each other's research! For example, there is very serious work going on in Russia. Konstantin Anokhin is in collaboration with a number of American labs. And his experiments are based on electromagnetism indeed. His theory is biologically supported (cf hypernetwork theory). Microtubules and Penrose - of course, that's how I got to your channel :). Here's a video from a conference in English www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=konstantin+anokhin+youtube#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:17efc8ac,vid:qcDTUeBCC6g,st:0

Well, cognitive philosopher Andy Clark's theory is based entirely on predictive processing (anticipation), check his latest The Experience Machine: How Our Minds Predict and Shape Reality (2023)

Thank you

Awesome research!

Biosemiotics deals with single-cell life, cf. Jesper Hoffmeyer and Claus Emmeche

Talk E8 to me bro.

Never heard the word ‘Spiritual’ used;but seems much of what’s being explained now,is.

Whai I understood from this that, In consciousness hierarchy, there are many thoughts, one thought becomes observer and he observes other thoughts.

I wonder whether you'll mention Peirce's semiotics and his triad Representamen, Object and Interpretant. They seem so similar to me to physical, 1st/2nd intention and Platonic respectively.

Next time I’m in the ‘zone’ and I ‘think’ I see an insane synchronicity… in need to write it down Most the time, I see/witness an intense one, I usually go low level crazy and start looking for them too much haha But other times when I am not ‘in the zone’ I see almost none Fun stuff if you don’t drive yourself crazy

In ignorance of natural intelligence we are creating artificial intelligence

Don't forget that natural selection is but one of the several mechanisms of evolution, hehe

FLT reference! Love it!!

We are living in an ancestor computer simulation

I like how you touch upon Paradoxical Ontologies over things being both infinitely arbitrary and universal. I feel like a lot of this maps onto the Nominalist (Arbitrary) vs. Realists (Universalists) dynamic.

Cosmic Censorship. The Trickster will not allow us to see how it does the tricks.