Understanding the paradoxical language of quantum mechanics does enable the ability of mental time traveling, because language is a pointer to a memory (individual or universal) and a memory has time attached to it. In this case, I see language as a time traveling tool, especially because we know that memory is not local. Not even in the digital realm, where it's just highly probabale for the 1 and 0 to stay in their place due to the architecture that was meant to be as limiting as possible. Lots to talk about this, but sometimes I do have prescient dreams or thoughts or signals, and it's through any means possible in a multidimensional "fractal" kind of unuverse where time is not linear because... As below, so above. So pointing... Is like always interogating memories in time through a different kind of universal wave function.
Also, if you have the time. What do you believe is the difference between platonic and abstract in the model you showed? Wondering if there’s a significance behind it as platonic seems to have a different meaning to me.
Everything that is similar is also different. If things are not different, there is only one thing that is itself. We do not say one is similar to itself -- one is itself. When we talk about universality among things, we already imply it's the universality among *different* things since one does not talk about the universality of one thing with itself. Thus, whenever there is universality there is something not universal.
Interesting that Language of the Birds, the Word, Aum, and so many other Religious and Mystical traditions explain how language creates, shapes, molds reality, and has emerged from humanity to reflect a Truth of higher planes, namely for the Egyptian Ma’At (Math).
Thank you for discussing language in relationship with consciousness and physical reality--love it! And in a remarkable synchronicity, I just posted a video yesterday, "Eight Key Ideas in Quantum Physics and Indigenous Philosophy," covering some of the key points of agreement found between scientists David Bohm & David Peet and indigenous philosophers including Leroy Little Bear, and linguists, including Dan Moonhawk Alford. My video is based on a paper written by Dan Moonhawk Alford, and it strikes me as being one of the hidden gems of information that is not well known, yet truly fundamental. These dialogues matter a lot to me because I got to participate in some of them, once they were opened up to the public--and the ideas covered in those dialogues transformed me, and continues to transform me. Both David Bohm and Dan Moonhawk Alford were deeply influenced by the work of Benjamin Lee Whorf, and the idea that language shapes our way of thinking and knowing the cosmos.
AFAIK there is at least one language where the "past" is in front, because we can see/know it, and the "future" is behind us, because we cannot/don't see it.
I would think because some people think solely through pictures and others linguisticaly that language would have been created through Both an intent to communicate and an intent to thoughtfully understand our reality. I’d like to hear your thoughts. I think it’s easy to accidentally be too reductionistic.
Have you seen how those AI researchers were able to probe ChatGPT to make a map of the earth purely out of its knowledge of words and their relationships to each other? I think the reason why large language model A.I.s like ChatGPT are so powerful is because language itself is so powerful.
The thesis of this video, as i understand it then, is a blow to the Ockam nominalist philosophical tradition, that ends up all the way on the postmodernists and Deleuze and his 'rhizome'; and a victory confirmation to the tomist scholastic theory that 'words have a metaphysical inherentness' (rather than bein mere artificial arbitrary constructs).
Wow brother. This page is brilliant. That’s awesome u went to Berkeley. My boy used to live at Casa Zimbabwe for a few years. Used to hang there all the time lol. Unfortunately, virtually overnight, the coop went from all international phd’s of super diverse majors to Californian freshman that studied political science and thought it was 1969 in the most cringe fashion. It was so cap the scene died overnight
I like how you touch upon Paradoxical Ontologies over things being both infinitely arbitrary and universal. I feel like a lot of this maps onto the Nominalist (Arbitrary) vs. Realists (Universalists) dynamic.
Can I send a message to myself from future? I can send a message to myself from future! Meyer's anagrams effected if souls mount! Daniel refuse offstage, sums commentary! Melodee transmogrify USA an effects sum! Mea marry Dan outguns Moses effects Leif! Mysteriousness, forceful fame tag me Dan! Yes I can memo datum offer's gratefulness!
Understanding the paradoxical language of quantum mechanics does enable the ability of mental time traveling, because language is a pointer to a memory (individual or universal) and a memory has time attached to it.
In this case, I see language as a time traveling tool, especially because we know that memory is not local. Not even in the digital realm, where it's just highly probabale for the 1 and 0 to stay in their place due to the architecture that was meant to be as limiting as possible.
Lots to talk about this, but sometimes I do have prescient dreams or thoughts or signals, and it's through any means possible in a multidimensional "fractal" kind of unuverse where time is not linear because... As below, so above.
So pointing... Is like always interogating memories in time through a different kind of universal wave function.
Great stuff
Love that intro song!!
(Yeah Im a simpleton)
Also, if you have the time. What do you believe is the difference between platonic and abstract in the model you showed? Wondering if there’s a significance behind it as platonic seems to have a different meaning to me.
Everything that is similar is also different. If things are not different, there is only one thing that is itself. We do not say one is similar to itself -- one is itself. When we talk about universality among things, we already imply it's the universality among *different* things since one does not talk about the universality of one thing with itself. Thus, whenever there is universality there is something not universal.
Love that "love is a journey" btw!
Interesting that Language of the Birds, the Word, Aum, and so many other Religious and Mystical traditions explain how language creates, shapes, molds reality, and has emerged from humanity to reflect a Truth of higher planes, namely for the Egyptian Ma’At (Math).
Thank you for discussing language in relationship with consciousness and physical reality--love it! And in a remarkable synchronicity, I just posted a video yesterday, "Eight Key Ideas in Quantum Physics and Indigenous Philosophy," covering some of the key points of agreement found between scientists David Bohm & David Peet and indigenous philosophers including Leroy Little Bear, and linguists, including Dan Moonhawk Alford. My video is based on a paper written by Dan Moonhawk Alford, and it strikes me as being one of the hidden gems of information that is not well known, yet truly fundamental. These dialogues matter a lot to me because I got to participate in some of them, once they were opened up to the public--and the ideas covered in those dialogues transformed me, and continues to transform me. Both David Bohm and Dan Moonhawk Alford were deeply influenced by the work of Benjamin Lee Whorf, and the idea that language shapes our way of thinking and knowing the cosmos.
AFAIK there is at least one language where the "past" is in front, because we can see/know it, and the "future" is behind us, because we cannot/don't see it.
I would think because some people think solely through pictures and others linguisticaly that language would have been created through Both an intent to communicate and an intent to thoughtfully understand our reality. I’d like to hear your thoughts. I think it’s easy to accidentally be too reductionistic.
Have you seen how those AI researchers were able to probe ChatGPT to make a map of the earth purely out of its knowledge of words and their relationships to each other? I think the reason why large language model A.I.s like ChatGPT are so powerful is because language itself is so powerful.
Lmao the intro okayyyyyy 💀
The thesis of this video, as i understand it then, is a blow to the Ockam nominalist philosophical tradition, that ends up all the way on the postmodernists and Deleuze and his 'rhizome'; and a victory confirmation to the tomist scholastic theory that 'words have a metaphysical inherentness' (rather than bein mere artificial arbitrary constructs).
Temes as themes?
👍👍
Wow brother. This page is brilliant. That’s awesome u went to Berkeley. My boy used to live at Casa Zimbabwe for a few years. Used to hang there all the time lol.
Unfortunately, virtually overnight, the coop went from all international phd’s of super diverse majors to Californian freshman that studied political science and thought it was 1969 in the most cringe fashion. It was so cap the scene died overnight
Teleology breaks the paradox
I'm sorry to have to point out that a most prominent use of language is to deceive. Deception, as such, is a universal truth.
isn't misunderstanding inherent to the motivation of spreading deception
I like how you touch upon Paradoxical Ontologies over things being both infinitely arbitrary and universal. I feel like a lot of this maps onto the Nominalist (Arbitrary) vs. Realists (Universalists) dynamic.
We live in a word built Uni-verse. Words are spellings. Spellings are spells. Speaking is spell casting.
never seen a model so elegant. thank you
Learn what fundamental means. Language is a human tool and thus not fundamental to the universe.
Too advanced for me, I'll do some research and come back later
Can I send a message to myself from future?
I can send a message to myself from future!
Meyer's anagrams effected if souls mount!
Daniel refuse offstage, sums commentary!
Melodee transmogrify USA an effects sum!
Mea marry Dan outguns Moses effects Leif!
Mysteriousness, forceful fame tag me Dan!
Yes I can memo datum offer's gratefulness!