Відео

@@Th0rOS Yeah, i think so too!

@@nikolayyordanov8105 Thanks for your comm! Yes, i will, in the near future.

Da, probabil o sa-l fac public cat de curand

@@aidan1585 it probably does 😜

@@redaceFR hmm... i think i (probably) did some customization for this MySense mode, that's why it was active, otherwise there would be no reason to choose it over Sport mode. But believe me, from my experience of almost 100 cars tested, Sport mode does almost nothing to improve acceleration vs Normal mode. I perform acceleration runs in Normal/Comfort mode from time to time (although i don't post it in my videos) for fun/reference but the improvement that Sport mode gives over Normal mode is 0.2 sec at maximum for a 0-100 kmh test, which is negligible (you would not be able to tell the diff between a 7.8 sec and a 7.6 sec to 100 for ex).

@@dragospahontu i haven't tested a 2.5 Skyactiv X, but Skyactiv G (in the Mazda 6 sedan). I have tested 2 Skyactiv X models of Maxda CX30, but that was a 2L engine with 150 and 186hp. For these 2 versions, the 186hp variant was somewhat faster, but not impressive. I personally would never go for the 150hp.

Hi, thanks for your question! Well, it's been some good 3-4 months since i've driven this car so my memory could play tricks on me, but i think it was pretty straightforward: hold the brake firmly and press the acceleration at the same time. I don't remember exactly if you have to press some DSC/ESP off button.. 🤔

@@Froggerballer thanks for the suggestion! If i can find one, i will 😉

@@ChrisCanadianHusky multumesc! Dispozitivul GPS chiar ESTE profi, nu doar aparent :-)

​​@@BenPower123 yes, they are! At 214k km at the moment and daily driving the car. I had to replace the EGR some months ago though. For extra info, i had the engine tune done about 5 and 1/2 years ago, at about 95k km and i have done an oil change for the gearbox at about 115k km.

@@marcojsf4557 hi! It's been quite a while since i drove the car so my memories of this are not that fresh but i don't think there's a specific launch control button. If i remember right, you gotta put the gearbox in Sport, activate DSC off and then you are able to build boost while holding the break.

@@aidan1585 that hoarse sound at start is because i was trying to break-hold the car for the launch, but the gearbox didn't allow it. Otherwise the sound is more refined.

@@AcceleratingCars 👍 sounds about right They have dual clutch automatic, they don’t like brake boosts. Good video

Glad it was helpful! Regarding that consumption number, it is what it is, all cars have a consumption of 30L+ when flooring it hard. I remember i quite enjoyed the car. Pretty spacious for it's exterior size, decent handling and quite good rolling acceleration (like when you have to overtake).

Exactly, I ordered Captur 2024 by the end of July and this is the only real review I have found since then. Only full hybrid reviews, when this is the best (from my point of view) and most powerful engine for this model.

@@Marco13271 it's been quite a while since i drove this car, but i don't remember any funny/annoying sounds coming from the engine 🙂

@@jackperisson thanks for the suggestion! I'll try to dind one.

@@FactsAwareTV I'll try to find one, thanks for the suggestion! 👍

@@movsar93mn i would personally say it's just ok 🙂

@@AcceleratingCars how is the consumption overall

@@movsar93mn unfortunately i cannot say. I only drove the car for like 100 km, a lot of which was accelerating it :) so i can'y really say.

@@mikekos7606 no, it's not slow. And i don't think there are stock X3 M40d that can do 4.7 sec to 100. As for 0-200 or 100-200, i did not test this.

@@AcceleratingCars I have G01 40d stock pre LCI without mild hybrid, 0-100 = 4,65, 0-200 = 19,12.

@@mikekos7606 i 100% don't believe this. Did you measure GPS times, no 1-ft rollout or some other shit? You are commenting on another video too (the X5 40i) where you claim that it's "real" 0-100 time should be 5.6 sec but you have no problem stating here that a car with 60hp less (moreover, a diesel) is a full sec faster to 100. And bare in mind that this X3 is a heavy car, it's not like it's 300kg lighter than the X5.

@@mikekos7606 what do you mean by "Real 0-100"? What is "real"?

@@AcceleratingCars The real dynamics of the 40i with 380HP Mild Hybrid.

@@mikekos7606 so what's unreal about the data in this video?

@@davefellows yes, indeed it is! 😉 Besides, imagine what a simple stage 1 could do...around 400hp, 800Nm could take this car to low 4 sec to 100 and a 12 sec 1/4 mile. And this is a diesel suv we're talking about

@@AcceleratingCarsST1 430 hp 0-200 15,8.

@@mikekos7606 extra 90hp is probably a bit optimistic for stage 1.

@@AcceleratingCarsThis has been a regular firmware for a long time, just through the power, not through the moment. On the ST2, the car produces 460-480 hp and 0-200 for 14.2.

I'll try to find one 😉

@@patacagugurel8662 O sa incerc sa gasesc unul 😉

@@AcceleratingCarsRespect și succes în continuare!!!

@@patacagugurel8662 Multumesc! 👍

Mi-e greu sa raspund. In primul rand, cu Toyota nu am mers, deci nu pot face comparatia. In al 2lea rand, Mazda asta e diesel, deci nu as compara masini cu propulsie asenanatoare. Oricum, presupun ca pe tehnologie hybrid Toyota e (clar) peste.

@@AcceleratingCarsMazda hybrid nu intră în discuție. Nu au un sistem eficient.

@@dragospahontu Dar nu cred ca Toyota Highlander are versiune diesel, deci sa comparam chestii asemanatoare cu Mazda tot nu se poate 🙂 Pe mine Mazda asta testata nu m-a dat pe spate... La cat de putin am interactionat eu cu masina, nu as putea spune chiar multe chestii. Imi place forma generala exterioara (mai putin "evacuarile" alea deosebit de fake), interiorul nu m-a dat pe spate, nici prin design, nici prin calitate/lux. Nu e slab, dar nici wow. Un lucru pe care il tin minte precis e ca sunetul cand inchizi portiera seamana cu sunetul unei usi glisante de la un Dokker Ca dinamica, se misca binisor spre bine. Nu poate face fata unui X3 30d sau unui Q5 de 3L, dar merge respectabil, are reprize bune.

Hi! I do not know what the combined torque is, that's why i did not mention it. What i know is that the combustion engine has a torque of around 220Nm and the electric motor (which is integrated in the transmission) has 200Nm, but you can't just add those 2 up to get a system output.

Engine is 220nm & 178hp (PS), electric motor is 120hp (ps) & 200nm. Toyota doesn’t quote the true figure as it depends on % of battery, oil temp of engine, altitude, odometer, fuel level, many different factors. The true figure would be around 380-400nm combined if the battery is at 75% or more

@@aidan1585 Correct figures. Now the combined true figure is still something open to debate... I did some extensive calculation and comparison but I can't find the paper anymore with my results. But from the top of my head it was something around 270 Nm combined torque, which is rather disappointing. The acceleration figure of 8.3 sec from 0 to 100 kph isn't all that good to begin with. Toyota could have gone ahead and released at least a torque interval. Remaining completely silent about it is imo not okay. 218 hp (EU spec) and 270 Nm could be compared to a mildly turbocharged 2.0 gas engine, that is tuned for constant toque rather than peak torque. Do you drive a Camry hybrid? Sorry for my late reply btw.

@@Abszurdista-fatalista I do not, the true figure is north of 400nm, I have driven them and been in these cars over one hundred times. They drive as if they have the same torque as a BMW 520d mild hybrid. The Camry has that type of torque that feels like you are being hit by a train from behind. It is very powerful. This is the inferior Russian built Camry. Japanese built Camry hybrids do 0-60mph in 6.5 seconds and 0-100km/h (62mph) in 6.9.

@@aidan1585 Mine is "Made in Japan". Frame number also begins with a "J". I don't know with what letter the Russian built Camrys begin. I agree with you: Especially in "Sport" mode the car goes like a rocket, yes it feels like being hit by a train from behind. I never clocked acceleration on mine, but I can tell you, It sure feels quicker than 8.3 sec 0-100 km/h. I occasionally drove the Mercedes E 320 CDI with 470 Nm back in the days (rated at 8.3 sec 0-100), and there's one thing I am sure of: My Camry hybrid is a LOT quicker. May I ask for the source of your numbers (6.9 sec)?

Hi! Yes, it is, thanks for mentioning it. 😉

Hi, good question! No, it's actually not. What happens is that i use an external antenna for the GPS device, which is by wire, so the passenger window is down like 3-4 mm for the antenna wire to pass. That's where that hissing sound comes from 😉

@@AcceleratingCars ahh gotcha, thanks!

For the unpretentious driver, yes, it's enough! 🙂

For a 1.7x ton diesel sedan with only 190hp i would not call a sub-7 sec 0-100 slow. Once the speed gets higher, OK, you can feel it's starting to suffer and that diesel torque is no substitute for top end power, but again, looking at the stats, i would not call this car slow.

Absolutely no stock GLC 220d can get under 7 sec for 0-100 on flat ground. As for your E220d (nice car btw) being MUCH faster... I mean, how much faster? Tbh i'm not sure if it's faster at all...

I own a Mercedes and I am a fan of Mercedes, but a E220d can't be faster than this BMW. Gearboxes from BMW are one of the fastest.

Put some numbers: 0-100? 80-120? Otherwise is just talking

But the GLC 220d and e220d sound like my tractor. BMW diesel is refined

@@AcceleratingCarsthe e220d feels slower when driving and it also is as loud as 1.9 TDI on idle

Pleaca foarte bine de pe loc, 0-60 e chiar respectabil. Dupa ce trece de 100, 110 se vede ca sunt doar 190 de cai, nu prea mai face senzatie.

@@AcceleratingCarsla mine e exact invers, fiind manuala si tractiune spate. 325d lci, 2016, 218 cai. 0-100 7 sec best time, 80-120 in 4.3 si 100-200 in 20.49, best time. Pentru un biturbo de 218 cai, e domol pana in 100 la ora

@@VladVVT 200+ cp cu manuala si tractiune doar spate nu e chiar usor de lansat 😉 masina din video pleaca f bine pt ca are xDrive si cauciucuri noi si bune. Valorile la startul de pe loc sunt importante la 0-100 si 1/4 mile, dar in viata de zi cu zi sunt mai importante reprizele 60-100 si 80-120. Am mers si eu cu un BMW cu motorul de pe masina ta, desi o versiune mai noua a lui (cea de 231 cp), un X5 25d. Vreau sa spun ca reuseste sa miste ditamai caroseria/masina chiar decent. Nu faci senzatie, dar merge cat de cat. Daca te intereseaza, e printre primele video-uri de pe canal, cred ca al 2lea sau al 3lea.

Hi Cedryc, thanks for the question! It is that way because in the table i put the best value recorded while doing that particular test. So although i got a better 0-100 time while doing the 1/4 mile run, the best time when doing 0-100 accelerations was 9.94 sec 😉

@@AcceleratingCars hi! Thanks for the reply! Good job btw 👍

@@cedrycdota6901 thanks, i appreciate this! 👍

Hi! What about that? 🤔

Asa e, dupa 40 incepe sa se miste cat de cat

Thanks for your input, man! Nice to see some Mazda owners sharing some insight 😉