Robert Mckinnon if you can’t logically debate someone because you lack the intelligence or the facts of the subject matter than ... I guess you just keeping cutting them off and speaking over them because you’re afraid they’re gonna ask you something you’ll have no answer for.. he’s controlling the argument by constantly speaking and asking the questions to guide Ben
look at the video once more. listen to the first 20 seconds. then come here and say the same. im not deffending any part in this debate but holy shit. why are you such a shapiro fanboy. ben interrupts him like 4 times in the first 20 secconds and the same does the other part. just because you like shapiro doesn't mean hes always right. they are both interrupting eachother all the fucking time because they're childish 75 IQ'd bitches.
ScarMafia Gaming I think Ben wanted to say what he needed to say to Piers in the first twenty seconds because he knew from his analysis of Piers’ previous shows, he knew that Piers Morgan would constantly cut him off the entire time as a misdirection to the conversation.
MrCornelioos really? Then i could just say the same that piers knew ben would constantly cut him off? That argument can go both ways? Our brain is made that you want to trust the person who looks more like you (in this case ben since you probably agree with him since you said that). Ben shapiro is soooo wrong in this debate. I agree with ben in some stuff and like his opinions but im no cuck following his fucking lifestyle because i agree with some of his debates. Some people get to locked up in that «im gonna agree with whatever you say» thing
I was given a copy of the constitution by a member of the US secret service when I lived in Cuba. I was immediately disappointed by how small it was. I went home and read all of it that night.
@@peregrinedalziel4999I don’t feel like that is much of a problem personally? Like shouldn’t it be simple and short? Would you rather 50+ pages of content. That’s what has happened now with laws and such with how long they’ve gotten. That seems to lead more into just hiding clauses into laws.
@@uhlnd-tnny2983 piers wasnt cut off in this video. Ben shapiro simply kept attempting to finish his statement/arguement. He was mid sentence, so he tried to finish his sente- "But Ben don't you agree with Ronald Reagan?"
@@woodyy1412 May I introduce you to China and what has been going on for over a year, where Hong Kong has been protesting and killed for protesting. where people get locked up for posting memes and then where your organs are indefinitely harvested once you land in prison... but the left wing media seemed to stop covering it once they started putting up photos of trump and the American flag as a form of power and Liberty. Maybe stop being a sheep for once
@Birgitta Nilsson Well in reality a tyrannic government never wants to eliminate the whole population because it needs people to rule over. Sure it might want to completely eliminate certain groups as a priority. But if the majority of the citizens were to organize as a militia the same way a military does then it would be almost impossible to make them surrender because like you said the only other option they would have would be to just kill all resistance indiscriminately which would be counter productive for them in the long run because humans are basically a commodity for tyrannical entities. But unfortunately the damage of decades & generations of divide & conquer tactics has been done, specifically to the American people so that they would be less likely to be as united & organized as they would need to be in a scenario like that. But if by some miracle people united & organized enough militias then fully automatic arms would make a huge difference even when dealing with military technology vs having no fully autos at all...
Ben: I think banning guns for the general population is stupi- Piers: Uh oh! A different opinion! Better cut him off ON EVERY SENTENCE AND THEN SAY WE’RE OUT OF TIME!
Some Weirdo on the Internet if you ever have to use an ar-15 against the gov you will either end being dead or in jail so what’s the point . I don’t understand why everyone follows this adderall head answering questions not even fully done being asked
Tooktoomuchmolly you're applying your current understanding of the government and social framework as you see now to the potentiality of what may happen down the road. I'm sure if there was a civil war 100 years from now in Amercia you would rather see your children's children have the ability to defend the rights and opprotunities you were born into (assuming you're from America). I would also bet that we could go back in time, every single person in Europe, especially Germany would love to have a gun in their hands when the unthinkable happened.
@@Yungtisa If it comes to the point where you have to use it against the gov then obviously shit has hit the fan. And if you don't want the constitution the leave this country. It's that simple. This country was founded on the constution! And millions of people died to make sure we had our freedoms. It is ignorant to pretend that history won't repeat it's self. It has happened time and time again. I think you need to ease up on the Molly bruh...
"Why does a citizen need an assault weapon?" - "To protect against the the possibility of an eventual government tyranny." "Yes, but why does a citizen need an assault weapon" "To protect against the possibility of an eventual government tyranny" "Okay, but why do citizens need an assault weapon" "To protect against the possibility of an eventual government tyranny" Yes, Yes, but Why do citizens need an assault weapon ...
@@mrsheep903 you can kill someone with a pen fuckboy. Brittain is banning pocket knives for "looking scary" y'all sure talk a lot of shit for countries that would be speaking German right now if not for the Russians and the US.
I think he is referring specifically to tyranny in western democracies. Hong Kong, whilst afforded many democratic privileges in the Joint Declaration, is ultimately an integral part of a repressive one-party dictatorship. Unless you were kidding yourself that the regime that okay'd the Tiananmen Square Massacre would respect democracy and freedom of speech in Hong Kong, a move towards tyranny was always a given.
Who started the violence and public/civil destruction in hong Kong?..........It was the protesters not the government. I'm sorry but it hard to buy that they're oppressed when they freely destroy bus stations, train stations, airports without the fear of being put down brutally
MrPumkinSlice you can’t be serious right? What ramble shit? He could take a while to get to his point but he destroyed this commie fuk. I’m guessing you want ARs banned?
MrPumkinSlice alex literally couldn’t come up with shit besides going back to other shootings. Then Ben went and explained his overall goal and how his argument was poor.
@@nikolaip5834 100%. He went on Ben's show 2 years ago and clarified his modern belief on guns. He now believes that guns are too much a part of the American culture to EVER adopt gun laws like the UK. Now he just advocates for background checks and responsible gun ownership
@@tristinjudd2595yes, people’s views change; that’s not really anything against piers. Frankly I agree with his cultural opinion, there are too many radical gun nuts that banning them would cause very deadly riots.
Every time Piers asks Ben a question, he interrupts Ben before Ben can finish his answer. Every. Single. Time. ...Okay, except the one time where Ben rebutted Piers so Piers changed the subject.
Hikaru Midomiya Actually if you paid any attention to the debate, Ben answered the question when it was first asked, rebutting that AR-15’s are necessary in case the government grows to be tyrannical an the citizens need to rise up against it. Morgan actually ignored Ben’s reply the first time and started accusing Ben of bullying him with the topic of “standing over dead children’s graves.” Ben then gave the same reply towards the end of the debate and provided historical examples to reinforce his position, which Piers provided no rebuttal to. Piers was purposely talking over Ben to avoid hearing the facts, which typical of CNN.
Hikaru Midomiya he dismissed the anecdotal because they are a small, albeit dramatic, set of instances that do not reflect the average of overall occurrences of gun violence in the US.
@rynex01 Bruh if you got a tyrannical gov against the entire population with assault weapons, the population is gonna win. Usually tyrannical govs have all the weapons and therefore the power. This will be fixed if more people have assault weapons.
yes, and how stupid he sounded for saying it. I think the Scottish Presbyterians who wrote the constitution made an error with that bit. I guess you have the Scotish enlightenment to thank for the constitution.
@@gingerindian1141 "..the Scottish Presbyterians who wrote the constitution made an error with that bit." You mean the same Scottish people who were DISARMED, subjected, oppressed, bullied, and terrorized by the English after the Stuart attempt to take back Britain in the 1740s? No, I think they knew what they were doing when they put that "bit" in.
@@andrealister3970 the never terrorised anyone - they were the subjugated - for several centuries of english abuse and control. As you might know - may be not - but the English army outnumber 10 times that of scottish - and English was the most powerful power in the world at that point. so your very much wrong - and lets not forget - if there was responses of agression - given the centruies of abuse and subjugation by teh english over scotland - do you expect any lesser a reaction? of course not. But - at this same time Scotland was the intellecutal capital of the world - hence its influence on the constituion - and we are talking of times of less human rights influenced morality - and scotland - despite its ferocious mentality - had plenty of morality in a time of immorality. You seem to have a dog in a fight - but never the less you can thank scotland for being the intellectual capital of the world and creating the modern world we live in.
MR. Right the pure joy on bens face while he’s slowly destroying this man is the greatest thing ever. Everything Morgan says Ben straight up turns around and smiles and humiliates him
Piers Morgan is so insecure in his ability to debate Ben Shapiro that his entire defense was to talk over him so that Ben’s logic and honesty couldn’t be heard. Very mature.
fordzy it’s tit for tat there both doing it but it’s unfair to say it’s just piers cause if you think about it there just trying to getting an upper hand on each other
fordzy your right that’s because piers was talking then when piers was about to deliver the fact that would make he’s point them Ben would jump in btw are you American?
@@scarmafiagaming1598 just because pier cut him off every 3 seconds repeating the same thing and not hearing him , Means he's ignorant, Not a debate winner.
Dustin Stephens dude how fucking dumb are you? Ben talked over him atleast 4 times within the first 20 sec of the interview. Ben also didnt think about shit before the interview incase he got the AR question and he fucking said incase the government is gonna fuck him over? And again he said maybe it wont happen to him or 2 generations from now but maybe after that. Why tf should he have an ar then if it wont be used in 60 fucking years. He just pull shit out of his ass because hes a childman who cant tolerate to lose. Go to school kido
Yea, conservatives are turning the U.S. to shit. Trump talks about possibly not accepting the outcome of the election, he wants to become the first dictator of the United States. Everyone who actually cares about this country and isn’t some racist idiot conservative should most definitely get ready to protect it from trump and his idiot followers
@Griffin Masseur why don't you just buy one of those assault weapons and go hunt Hikaru down then wait till your government turns on you and be like yeah man that Ben was a true preacher he , he did right. 😝
Piers Morgan is an excellent example of why courses in logic should be mandatory for any college degree. People are going to think and believe what they want at the end of the day but they should at least be able to frame their arguments in a logically consistent manner
@@zucchinibundle5339 The mayor of Minneapolis is a deep state democrat, He allowed his city to burn for 2 whole days before trump intervened and called in the national guard. Democratic states are also purposefully trying to stay shut down as well while MSM reports spikes in cases and are trying to instill the fear of a "Second Wave" of covid-19, Please watch @Young Pharoah channel he has all the knowledge!
I was watching the Rubin Report interview with Ben and apparently Morgan was going to bring out a shooting victim in this segment but didn’t because Ben already called him out on standing on the graves of children. You can’t make this up it’s hilarious,
@I don't get the joke well - intead of me telling you 'why' the learning for you my 'pal' is to do some homework - engage your logic and reason as to why you have knowledge gaps - as - 'telling someone' is not effective learning, and since you have a lot of room to improve - empower yourself to grow.
The final few seconds “ the public will make up their own minds” they did Piers - you got kicked out of America for your stance on the 2nd amendment. How funny...
@@sammylpt9076 It didn't happen... and Piers was a clown back then but he's one of not-so-many public Liberals left who are showing signs of sanity as their party goes completely bat shit.
Let’s not forget that piss supported vaccine passports, a papers please society is pretty tyrannical if you ask me but what else would you expect from piss Morgan?
Well when the constitution was first written they experienced a wider range of government extending waaay past what the average citizen experiences nowadays. They witnessed a revolution and considered all possibilities like rational folks should, and considered irrational possibilities like a government made by the people for the people, overstepping its boundaries towards the people. TLDR: I'm also realizing the knowledge spoken here and wisdom carried through the ages.
Left Marxism, yes you can protect yourself from Communism. Are people really that gone from reality. We are fighting for freedom that millions of people died for and there like here Government take away my first and second Amendment. I’m not going to listen to the trolls that hate Americans and don’t even live here. But yes we need to protect ourselves, why do you think the Left wants to make the Government bigger and bigger it’s so they become your parents and if you go against what they say you will disappear. Watch China in Focus where they have cameras everywhere, they don’t have it for safety they have it to spy on people and make sure they are not going against the regime, they want to bring this everywhere, the right it fighting for freedom and people are to dumb to realize it. If the Left won last election millions would be dead right now, guns would be gone, freedom of speech would be gone and they claim that the right are the enemies. Trust me if you give up your freedoms you will never get it back it’s not like the ole days where people rebelled and they had swords and guns. It’d be people against, tanks, bombs, ect. There’s no winning against that, if Trump would’ve lost we’d be dealing with that right now, if he was so evil he’s been in office for 4 years things could’ve of happened no he’s fighting the people that want to do harm to us and that’s why he’s hated, they want to enslave us like the Pharoahs did in Egypt he wants us to have Freedoms. Defund the police, ya right so if Biden gets in office they can escort the military on every street. People need to wake up and step away from the brainwashing. I was brainwashed for years but things started not adding up, the people screaming the loudest showed their true colors.
Piers: “you really believe your government would turn against you?” Me: isn’t that why Americans are allowed to buy guns because if there wasn’t a possibility of your government turning against you, buying guns wouldn’t be allowed I’m sure Ben said that was one of the reasons.
The government has tanks, advance military planes, equipment, endless resources. How does my 3 guns stop all that? I have guns but it isn't because I want to fight the U.S. There's absolutely no chance of winning with the type of weapons at their disposal. Every single U.S citizen who has declared war on America has either died or went to prison. Such a silly defense people impose.
@@ejkk9513 "Oppressors can tyranize only when they have achieved a standing army, an enslaved press, and an unarmed populace." - James Madison The founding fathers won against the Largest Empire on Earth at the time. James Madison wrote your bill of rights.
@@c8h8e8c8k8m8e8o8u8t You're right... what part of the modern weaponry did you not read in my comment? They didn't have the technology, weapons and resources that they have now. They also had TERRIBLE strategic planning when it came to warfare. The military is very refined today and the citizens are not. You are comparing Apples to dildo's. If the U.S government declared war on the citizens, we would stand zero chance no matter how many pistols or rifles we have. We might beat a person here and there but the entire government?? Let's be realistic please.
@@ejkk9513 Yes we've all heard this talking point a million times. Taliban soldiers stood their ground and so did the vietnamese by using guerilla warfare. Whether militias have a chance if winning or not is besides the point. People have the god given RIGHT to defend themselves and their country from a tyrannical government and have the right to die for it and protect themselves and their families. This is written in the Constitution as I said earlier by James Madison along with our other rights.
@@ejkk9513 Look dude if you want to be a slave to the elite and have them bully you and put you in a camp and take your rights. BE MY GUEST. That's your right as well. I will be on the side with the people who die fighting evil.
Piers has heard many coherent reasons as to reasons people need guns. And after watching most of these piers morgan gun control videos Ive noticed these: When asked a question he doesn't know, like, or knows he's wrong he buries it under another question. He talks over every single one of his guests. He asks another question right after asking one and like ben said he bullies people into submission.
It is true - you dont need an assult rifle - there is no possible reason? none. Only thing that ever happens is mass executions every 2 months. Handgun gives adequate protection - there is no rational argument for anything but.
"one of your guys agreed with me, that must mean I'm right!" -Piers Morgan "You have made your point crystal clear" I couldn't hear anything past you rudely talking over him the entire time.
Not to mention present day Iraq, I don't think those Iran back militias would be nearly as audacious in murdering protesters if they were armed with something more deadly than rocks.
The military doesn't use the full auto mode except in special circumstances. So for the majority of situations they function as the military uses them. It is a weapon of war.
@@edubogota1 did you not watch the video? Morgan didn't have anything somewhat factual to say and just used his feelings to justify taking away people's rights.
It's not piers' fault hes been born into a country with a bad history. He has no control over englands past. The debate is focusing on the actions of the individual
@@backyardengineering816 It's not Shapiro's fault he's been born into a country with a disproportionate number of mass shootings. He has no control over the actions of irresponsible/mentally ill gun owners. The "debate" is focusing on whether or not law abiding people such as himself should have their rights infringed upon because of the drastic actions of mentally deranged individuals. Timothy McVeigh used a Ryder truck, fertilizer and dynamite to commit the Oklahoma City Bombing. Last I checked you can still rent trucks. Hell, that dude in New York rented a pickup truck at Home Depot and managed to kill 8 people with it before he got shot and arrested. The consequences of idiot's actions shouldn't be taken out on innocent people, just for a sense of false security.
Blackheart_007 Also Piers: *Interrupts almost every explanation Ben gave* Piers acted like a child. No respectable journalist interrupts the interviewee, especially when talking about a sensitive topic like gun violence and gun control.
Blackheart_007 Nowhere did I claim that they didn't, nor did I claim that it's only the left either. I never said anything about either side or anyone other than Piers, who indeed did perform just as bad as Bill or Tucker. Do not put words into my mouth my friend.
As a left-wing liberal, this interview actually had me agreeing with Ben Shapiro. Watching Trump and Hong Kong has shown that a perfectly reasonable government can turn tyrannical. He's made me rethink my position on gun control.
The irony of an Englishman trying to tell an American that he doesn’t need guns to defend against the government is overwhelming. Someone should tell Piers that we stopped caring about his opinion on guns in 1776.
Brianna Carmona There’s plenty of examples of an armed civilian population resisting a government with handheld rifles. I’ll give you a few off the top of my head: the Vietcong defeated the US in Vietnam. And Cliven Bundy and his buddies won a standoff with federal agents in Nevada, using AR15s. And wait there was one more, let me think....umm...somebody defeated Britain in the late 1700s, I can’t quite remember who....Oh yeah it was us.
Brianna Carmona Ben Shapiro isn’t saying HE needs HIS rifle so that HE can fight the government NOW. He’s saying that WE(Americans) need OUR rifles in case we have to fight A government SOMETIME in the future.
Brianna Carmona yeah I mean it could be our government. The thing about government is that it’s made of up a changing body of people, so yeah OUR government could easily turn tyrannical, like Nazi germany. I know you’re like 12 so you still trust the government implicitly but that’ll wear off in a few years.
Watching this again today and hearing Piers say how absurd it sounds that the US government could become tyrannical. Would like to hear him comment on that today!
@The Pianist boi I have never listened to either man until tonight and i could plainly see the younger fellow won the debate. His answers made me think and consider, something the old guy was unwilling to do. I am not a republican or democrat. I don't even know what a conservative is. But I believe this discussion proves to me that wisdom does not necessarily come with age.
Piers...a guy who never lets you answer the question he's just asked. He constantly talks over his guests. Love to seem him getting flustered because he's getting owned. Someone comes back at him as hard as he hits and he's all upset and offended. You couldn't make it up. He's so precious.
I think one of the biggest reasons people call it that is for the left to understand it best, because their so one track minded that when they hear AR they think assault rifle when real AR owners know it stands for armalite. I think its just a way for them to dumb it down for the people who get offened when you start spittin fax
I think more than 80% of people think AR stands for " assault rifle". Morso than those who say it stands for " Armalite Rifle ". But yes, it is a sporting rifle and is not an assault rifle, like the Kalashnikov for example.
Hard to swallow pills: AR-15 is not an assault weapon. Assault weapons are fully automatic where AR15 is a semi automatic. So frankly, I side with Shapiro.
He did come out on top. Now everyone realized school shootings gotta keep happening bc you clowns believe you have to defend yourselves against future government tyranny. Yet you did nothing about government tyranny when your government participated in genocide, slavery, segregation lmao.
@@cavegrl that is the dumbest shit I've ever heard do you realize how many times governments have went tyranical when people can't defend themselves? do you realize that almost everytime there has been a gun ban in history, very bad things proceed to happen to civilians? Clearly you don't know jack ab history. It is literally included in the second ammendment that we have the right to bear arms should a tyranical government rise. Have fun waiting for the police when someone is kicking in your fuckin door lmao. wHy dO yoU NEed aN aR-15????? Its not about why, its about the peoples rights! A school shooting happens that should make people want to defend themselves better not give away their only defense! And I would have to be alive quite a while to try and stop genocide, slavery, AND segregation. Its people like you who will lead the rest of the sheep to slaughter. The gun is an inanimate object. People need to acknowledge the fact that all these school shooters are on heavy psyc medsand the fact you think school shootings are a direct result of people wanting to defend themselves leaves me just feeling sorry for how fucking stupid you are lmao.
Funny how he said that Ronald Reagan agrees with him, but they never really talked about why Reagan wants assault riffles to be banned? For a Brit, he has such bad manners--always cutting in when others are still speaking.
It's his job lol he makes bank off of people reacting to him they way they do. He gets paid a fuck load of money to piss people off. Then the clips go viral which make him more popular. It's all business. He may believe every word he says but he's not in it for the debate or to get his points across, it's all money.
I find it very amusing how upset rude people get when you just flat out ask them: "Why are you interrupting?" Rude behavior, call it out and let them know every time.
Ben Shapiro: * Valid argument * Piers Morgan: * Talks over him * The only thing i took away from this is that if you want to win an argument/debate all you have to do is talk over the other person
Please tell me someone else noticed the last sentence in this video!!!! "You have made your opinion crystal clear. People aren't stupid and they can make their own decision." Americans have made their decision! Own it Piers!
When has a government become tyrannical Ben? Me: uhmm, your British, do you remember a little war between a certain few colonies and England back in the 1770s?
@Tripstrump abused his power and therefore should be removed from power simple as that. And how on earth do antifa install chaos, they fight for simple rights and equalities and if that 'installs chaos' then somethings wrong with your country not the 'globalists'. and instead of starting wars he created a tax cut that will add 200 billion dollars to the annual federal deficit whilst Obama decreased the deficit
Yeah back when the gov didn’t have missiles you dumb twat. Wtf is an AR15 gonna do against tanks and missiles coming from some jets? You all sound like morons with your dumb ads rhetoric.
I can't fathom how anyone could possibly think Piers won this debate. Ben kept answering his same question repeatedly. And Piers kept asking the question, not satisfied with Shapiro's perfectly logical answer. It's mindblowing.
Me here in Feb. 2023: Re-watching this after watching the Sky News Aus interview between these two. What a change between them! Piers admitted how he acted was absurd & the two men had a wonderful discussion about the current world at this time.
I used to think Piers Morgan was an idiot and wished for him to go off the air. Many times he begins an argument by saying, "I don't understand," which is the fundamental problem. I still think he's an idiot but I now welcome his programs. What I appreciate is Piers brings other people in to debate with him, giving many people an opportunity to completely disassemble Pier's stance on issues. It is a good platform for anti-Piers which I hope continues.
The big problem is that he just cuts people off with further questions while they're speaking to try to make it look like they don't have an answer because he's too afraid they might be able to answer if allowed to talk. You can see that clearly here.
No, he didn't. You're letting your dislike of him cloud your judgment. Ben finished with the absurd point that we need assault rifles to protect ourselves from the American government, i.e. the Army, Navy, Air Force. Paranoia is the reason behind the right to own such weapons.
@@cptpepper7731 The militarys dutie is to uphold and protect their countries based on the constitution. 2A is for them too. They can deny orders from the government if they are deemed unconstitutional.
This how many times Piers interrupted Shapiro
I
I
V
Why do you still do these types of comments?
way more than 18
Get a life
Dude wants to hit 10k Likes or something, leave him/her alone lol
@@casmartin790 its annoying
As a Brit, I can confirm that Ben’s accent was spot on.
02:30
😂
Init
You must be joking. Spot on, how? A nasal voice that grates on my nerves. Like his politics, but I'll leave it there.
@@emg8810 you do know there are different accents in britain
Anyone else find it annoying at how piers kept interrupting ben
Robert Mckinnon if you can’t logically debate someone because you lack the intelligence or the facts of the subject matter than ... I guess you just keeping cutting them off and speaking over them because you’re afraid they’re gonna ask you something you’ll have no answer for.. he’s controlling the argument by constantly speaking and asking the questions to guide Ben
look at the video once more. listen to the first 20 seconds. then come here and say the same. im not deffending any part in this debate but holy shit. why are you such a shapiro fanboy. ben interrupts him like 4 times in the first 20 secconds and the same does the other part. just because you like shapiro doesn't mean hes always right. they are both interrupting eachother all the fucking time because they're childish 75 IQ'd bitches.
ScarMafia Gaming I think Ben wanted to say what he needed to say to Piers in the first twenty seconds because he knew from his analysis of Piers’ previous shows, he knew that Piers Morgan would constantly cut him off the entire time as a misdirection to the conversation.
MrCornelioos really? Then i could just say the same that piers knew ben would constantly cut him off? That argument can go both ways? Our brain is made that you want to trust the person who looks more like you (in this case ben since you probably agree with him since you said that). Ben shapiro is soooo wrong in this debate. I agree with ben in some stuff and like his opinions but im no cuck following his fucking lifestyle because i agree with some of his debates. Some people get to locked up in that «im gonna agree with whatever you say» thing
I'm a big gun advocate and I agree 100% with what ben said
Piers really called the United States constitution "A little book"😂
Technically it is.
I was given a copy of the constitution by a member of the US secret service when I lived in Cuba. I was immediately disappointed by how small it was. I went home and read all of it that night.
@@peregrinedalziel4999I don’t feel like that is much of a problem personally? Like shouldn’t it be simple and short? Would you rather 50+ pages of content. That’s what has happened now with laws and such with how long they’ve gotten. That seems to lead more into just hiding clauses into laws.
Well if u look at it closely
It is
He is a Fascist
Is it possible for Piers to stfu for one second and let someone else talk before he raises his voice and cuts them off?
Is are were possiball?
Piers cut him off just as often as he got cut off ?
Jesse Pinkman from what I’ve seen tucker Carlson does it far less. He actually let that BAM looney talked out all her positions.
@@uhlnd-tnny2983 piers wasnt cut off in this video. Ben shapiro simply kept attempting to finish his statement/arguement. He was mid sentence, so he tried to finish his sente-
"But Ben don't you agree with Ronald Reagan?"
It's how all Liberal, Millennial, soft bellied pussies, debate. Overtalk the other guy!!
"You really believe your own government would turn against you?!" ...... Sounds like hes been living under a rock.
Xocotzin Xocotzin well no ur actually thick if you think that
I wish Shapiro asked him to explain what defines an AR-15, as a "military"" style" weapon .
@@woodyy1412 May I introduce you to China and what has been going on for over a year, where Hong Kong has been protesting and killed for protesting. where people get locked up for posting memes and then where your organs are indefinitely harvested once you land in prison... but the left wing media seemed to stop covering it once they started putting up photos of trump and the American flag as a form of power and Liberty. Maybe stop being a sheep for once
@Birgitta Nilsson Ohhh sweetie I think you forgot that the people are apart of the military...
@Birgitta Nilsson Well in reality a tyrannic government never wants to eliminate the whole population because it needs people to rule over. Sure it might want to completely eliminate certain groups as a priority. But if the majority of the citizens were to organize as a militia the same way a military does then it would be almost impossible to make them surrender because like you said the only other option they would have would be to just kill all resistance indiscriminately which would be counter productive for them in the long run because humans are basically a commodity for tyrannical entities. But unfortunately the damage of decades & generations of divide & conquer tactics has been done, specifically to the American people so that they would be less likely to be as united & organized as they would need to be in a scenario like that. But if by some miracle people united & organized enough militias then fully automatic arms would make a huge difference even when dealing with military technology vs having no fully autos at all...
Ben: I think banning guns for the general population is stupi-
Piers: Uh oh! A different opinion! Better cut him off ON EVERY SENTENCE AND THEN SAY WE’RE OUT OF TIME!
Some Weirdo on the Internet if you ever have to use an ar-15 against the gov you will either end being dead or in jail so what’s the point . I don’t understand why everyone follows this adderall head answering questions not even fully done being asked
Are you gonna use the gun then go to work next day ? Do you think you’ll have the opportunity to lawyer and plea your side
That's when he knew, he fucked up.
Tooktoomuchmolly you're applying your current understanding of the government and social framework as you see now to the potentiality of what may happen down the road. I'm sure if there was a civil war 100 years from now in Amercia you would rather see your children's children have the ability to defend the rights and opprotunities you were born into (assuming you're from America). I would also bet that we could go back in time, every single person in Europe, especially Germany would love to have a gun in their hands when the unthinkable happened.
@@Yungtisa If it comes to the point where you have to use it against the gov then obviously shit has hit the fan. And if you don't want the constitution the leave this country. It's that simple. This country was founded on the constution! And millions of people died to make sure we had our freedoms. It is ignorant to pretend that history won't repeat it's self. It has happened time and time again. I think you need to ease up on the Molly bruh...
"Why does a citizen need an assault weapon?" -
"To protect against the the possibility of an eventual government tyranny."
"Yes, but why does a citizen need an assault weapon"
"To protect against the possibility of an eventual government tyranny"
"Okay, but why do citizens need an assault weapon"
"To protect against the possibility of an eventual government tyranny"
Yes, Yes, but Why do citizens need an assault weapon ...
Zen Conservative he kept asking because it’s a completely stupid answer😂😂
@@mrsheep903 yes because governments never become tyrannical.
@@mrsheep903 if you'd pick safety over freedom you'll get neither and loose both.
The Colonel enjoy your shootings bro and your delusional excuses to feel power behind a lethal weapon. The American way
@@mrsheep903 you can kill someone with a pen fuckboy. Brittain is banning pocket knives for "looking scary" y'all sure talk a lot of shit for countries that would be speaking German right now if not for the Russians and the US.
"My little book that's the Constitution of the United States", this is honestly great
Arath Herrera my favorite part. Cant believe not more comments about it
People act like if it's said in the constitution, it isn't open to change. It is.
Jesus Christ
Yeah, I never said otherwise.
That's the point of debating.
In Shapiro hands it is a little book because he simplistically reduces everything he discusses.
Piers in 2013: "It's stupid to fear tyranny from government in the 21st century"
Hong Kong 6 years later: "am I a joke to you?"
Ugandan knuckles you're right!
It was Hong Kong in 2013, too. The protests are just starting to get big now.
I think he is referring specifically to tyranny in western democracies. Hong Kong, whilst afforded many democratic privileges in the Joint Declaration, is ultimately an integral part of a repressive one-party dictatorship. Unless you were kidding yourself that the regime that okay'd the Tiananmen Square Massacre would respect democracy and freedom of speech in Hong Kong, a move towards tyranny was always a given.
I'm from Hong Kong
And I approve this message
Who started the violence and public/civil destruction in hong Kong?..........It was the protesters not the government. I'm sorry but it hard to buy that they're oppressed when they freely destroy bus stations, train stations, airports without the fear of being put down brutally
Piers lost, he kept asking the same question that Ben kept explaining perfectly
It means he's stupid and he can't come up with any other question.
Wow you guys are far right
Piers lost? Ben just looked like a school kid in an argument,rambling shit.
MrPumkinSlice you can’t be serious right? What ramble shit? He could take a while to get to his point but he destroyed this commie fuk. I’m guessing you want ARs banned?
MrPumkinSlice alex literally couldn’t come up with shit besides going back to other shootings. Then Ben went and explained his overall goal and how his argument was poor.
Piers 2013: Ban guns
Piers 2022: I was wrong, keep your guns
i know his views are all over the place but did he really change his stance re guns?.....
@@nikolaip5834 100%. He went on Ben's show 2 years ago and clarified his modern belief on guns.
He now believes that guns are too much a part of the American culture to EVER adopt gun laws like the UK.
Now he just advocates for background checks and responsible gun ownership
@@tristinjudd2595yes, people’s views change; that’s not really anything against piers. Frankly I agree with his cultural opinion, there are too many radical gun nuts that banning them would cause very deadly riots.
@@tristinjudd2595 "culture" so shooting kids is cultural now ?
2024?
“Yer ebserd yer stewped”
Shapiro is a straight savage!
If someone you didn't agree with started copying accents, you wouldn't be calling savage
@@skully366 wouldn't you be pissed off if someone's constantly interrupting while you're speaking
02:30
Better to be savage than average. 😉
@@danny18dk thank you
Every time Piers asks Ben a question, he interrupts Ben before Ben can finish his answer. Every. Single. Time. ...Okay, except the one time where Ben rebutted Piers so Piers changed the subject.
Hikaru Midomiya Actually if you paid any attention to the debate, Ben answered the question when it was first asked, rebutting that AR-15’s are necessary in case the government grows to be tyrannical an the citizens need to rise up against it. Morgan actually ignored Ben’s reply the first time and started accusing Ben of bullying him with the topic of “standing over dead children’s graves.” Ben then gave the same reply towards the end of the debate and provided historical examples to reinforce his position, which Piers provided no rebuttal to. Piers was purposely talking over Ben to avoid hearing the facts, which typical of CNN.
Lauren Moore that’s what piers does, no one in England likes him
Lauren Moore Piers does this every time he has a debate with someone
Ben tried to frame it as a left right debate than says so when he learns that president Reagan wanted them banned ...
So there’s that
Hikaru Midomiya he dismissed the anecdotal because they are a small, albeit dramatic, set of instances that do not reflect the average of overall occurrences of gun violence in the US.
Every time Piers loses an argument "I want to move on"
@rynex01 Bruh if you got a tyrannical gov against the entire population with assault weapons, the population is gonna win. Usually tyrannical govs have all the weapons and therefore the power. This will be fixed if more people have assault weapons.
rynex01 I don’t think your pea brain can quite grasp the amount of civilians that own weapons in the states my dude🤦🏼♂️😂
I’d just like to say that an AR-15 is not an assault weapon.
@@diablorises what does AR stand for
@@moonshadow7814 nice
Piers literally can’t debate he just changed the subject when Ben starts making actual good points
There were no good points
It was a pointless interview, they kept interrupting each other and got nowhere due to them falling out and picking faults in each other.
Changing the subject is ben’s only talent
Rkowen saying facts is bens talent
Rkowen I think you’re confusing the two. Ben is a literal genius and Piers is a load.
"Im not the one coming in here accusing you of standing on the graves of dead children" Ben: "thats because you're doing it, not me" LMFAO
Ben supports the Israeli Zionists who do it.
@@dhalsim-1 Wrong. Your opinions are not facts moron
This was not an "interview". It was another chance for Piers to be a bully.
But he didn't get to far with Ben 😂 I'm going to say but if your going to fight with Ben you better be wearing a helmet
Lmao Ben does this shit all the time to ppl. Ben got a taste of his own medicine big time.
@@eadaoinmalone503 I don't understand why Shapiro is still a thing. He's a jew trying to munipulate a white christian nation
@@abrahamlincoln5185 after the bbc interview with Shapiro, I don't understand why conservative pundits such as him are still a thing
Say what you want but Alex Jones put him in his place
Piers just talks over everyone. It's pointless watching any of his "interviews." No one ever gets a word in.
The Good's Gone laughs in Alex Jones
Then they're perfect for each other. Both childish pricks who only know how to interrupt instead of actually debate
Thats bc hes making shit points piers is a lot better now ill admit then he wasnt great
@@Noobmaster-mo1qm I can't hear anything Ben is saying, all I hear is Piers shouting.
Exactly he doesn't shut the fu*k up
Morgan got mad because he got confronted due to his careless opinions.
"You should read the second amendment again." 😂😂😂😂😂
yes, and how stupid he sounded for saying it. I think the Scottish Presbyterians who wrote the constitution made an error with that bit. I guess you have the Scotish enlightenment to thank for the constitution.
Fuck your second amendment.
B Williamson good luck protecting yourself
@@gingerindian1141 "..the Scottish Presbyterians who wrote the constitution made an error with that bit." You mean the same Scottish people who were DISARMED, subjected, oppressed, bullied, and terrorized by the English after the Stuart attempt to take back Britain in the 1740s? No, I think they knew what they were doing when they put that "bit" in.
@@andrealister3970 the never terrorised anyone - they were the subjugated - for several centuries of english abuse and control. As you might know - may be not - but the English army outnumber 10 times that of scottish - and English was the most powerful power in the world at that point. so your very much wrong - and lets not forget - if there was responses of agression - given the centruies of abuse and subjugation by teh english over scotland - do you expect any lesser a reaction? of course not. But - at this same time Scotland was the intellecutal capital of the world - hence its influence on the constituion - and we are talking of times of less human rights influenced morality - and scotland - despite its ferocious mentality - had plenty of morality in a time of immorality. You seem to have a dog in a fight - but never the less you can thank scotland for being the intellectual capital of the world and creating the modern world we live in.
No liberal can beat ben shapiro in a debate.
I don't know about that. Carl Benjamin ain't to bad in a debate.
Blackheart_007 nah they'd go to to toe and be a match besides they'd agree on a lot of shit.
Starats livevil Ben hasn't argued with every liberal in the world so I call bull shit
no human being can beat him in a debate.
MR. Right the pure joy on bens face while he’s slowly destroying this man is the greatest thing ever. Everything Morgan says Ben straight up turns around and smiles and humiliates him
Piers Morgan is so insecure in his ability to debate Ben Shapiro that his entire defense was to talk over him so that Ben’s logic and honesty couldn’t be heard. Very mature.
But Ben did it aswell 😂
@@SeriesofClu I mean how else would he get his point across
fordzy it’s tit for tat there both doing it but it’s unfair to say it’s just piers cause if you think about it there just trying to getting an upper hand on each other
@@SeriesofClu not really Ben was far more quiet than piers
fordzy your right that’s because piers was talking then when piers was about to deliver the fact that would make he’s point them Ben would jump in btw are you American?
Piers gives the most elementary level argument when he realizes hes wrong💀💀
I love how they cut out the part when Ben tells him what happened to his family in Europe.
Yes you're so right, but Ben has stink breath
the didnt cut it - it was in the interview. Of course, we all know the truth behind that malarky and the Devils that rule the world.
How can this be classed as an interview, this is just a guest being bombarded with opinions
IKR he wouldn't even let Ben answer in a whole sentence and would interrupt him with strawman fallacies.
I'd be a interesting guest, I'd say "Ok pier shut up and let me talk, you've said your piece and now it's my turn"
Ben Shapiro is sharp as a tack and his words just cut straight through....I applaud you sir
he lost though haha. ben shapiro fanboy
@@scarmafiagaming1598 just because pier cut him off every 3 seconds repeating the same thing and not hearing him , Means he's ignorant, Not a debate winner.
Dustin Stephens dude how fucking dumb are you? Ben talked over him atleast 4 times within the first 20 sec of the interview. Ben also didnt think about shit before the interview incase he got the AR question and he fucking said incase the government is gonna fuck him over? And again he said maybe it wont happen to him or 2 generations from now but maybe after that. Why tf should he have an ar then if it wont be used in 60 fucking years. He just pull shit out of his ass because hes a childman who cant tolerate to lose. Go to school kido
Lol dustin got so fucked he deleted his comments
@rynex01 say that to the people of hong kong
“Governmental tyranny is something of the past. It can never happen again.” Morgan is a genius.
Haha. Sarcasm. Piers a "Genius"
Piers doesn't agree on the explanations he is given so he dismisses them like a bitter child.
Well that's what a stereotypical Brit does
OH WELL SAID THAT PERSON!!!!!!!!!
Hikaru Midomiya uhh, that's different than dismissing ideas because you don't like them.
A true British brat go kiss your Queens ass while you get shanked lol
Children are cool
If that piers has so many problems with OUR constitutional rights, why doesn't he leave and go back to where he's from??? Problem solved....
Lady’s and Gentlemen we have a racist
^ how the fuck is using perfectly reasonably logic racist
sodium_ ramen should have made it more clearly that this was a joke
@HUGE MonkaS No. Take him. Please. We beg you
As if Piers is the only one calling for gun control.
All Shapiro had to say was, " how was that constitution secured Mr. Morgan?"
Preach brother
SIunits idk why but when I read mr Morgan I thought of red dead 2
@SIunits Can you explain what you meant? I didn’t understand what you’re trying to say
Sockbringer69 Last name that game is the definition of the 2nd amendment
Brady Walton fax
It’s 2020, and Ben doesn’t sound so “absurd” anymore
Not really
Emre A I don’t agree Ben was 100 right the world is an evil place even here at home
Yea, conservatives are turning the U.S. to shit. Trump talks about possibly not accepting the outcome of the election, he wants to become the first dictator of the United States. Everyone who actually cares about this country and isn’t some racist idiot conservative should most definitely get ready to protect it from trump and his idiot followers
Hong Kong - Nuff said.
@@ElChuyonWiwi Support the SRA
little morgan got a spanking
Hikaru Midomiya says the person who can't legally own a firearm and is on the no fly list.
Sinsation oof
No chance. Shapiro looks foolish in the eyes of any sane person.
I hate morgan but it actually happened the opposite.
The kid looked like a flat earther next to him.
@Griffin Masseur why don't you just buy one of those assault weapons and go hunt Hikaru down then wait till your government turns on you and be like yeah man that Ben was a true preacher he , he did right. 😝
OMG LET HIM TALK
He’s talked enough in his life so far to last a life time I think it’s ok
Piers Morgan is an excellent example of why courses in logic should be mandatory for any college degree. People are going to think and believe what they want at the end of the day but they should at least be able to frame their arguments in a logically consistent manner
Well, Piers didnt go to University his low IQ shows that. He did go to a community college though 🤣🤣
@@heartcrafts3426your grammar clearly shows that you didn't either. How's that for irony?
@@leroyrosenior4300what was wrong with his grammer?
like those queers at the humanities can handle a logic course XDD
I would take a logic course
Piers in 2013: " you are stupid to think that a democratic government can turn into a tyranny"
Minneapolis: "you are stupid"
How is the minneapolis government a tyranny
@@zucchinibundle5339 He's talking about the rioters but you already know that.
Daaamn
@@godpilled9077 hes talking about those bitch ass cops killing people
@@zucchinibundle5339 The mayor of Minneapolis is a deep state democrat, He allowed his city to burn for 2 whole days before trump intervened and called in the national guard. Democratic states are also purposefully trying to stay shut down as well while MSM reports spikes in cases and are trying to instill the fear of a "Second Wave" of covid-19, Please watch @Young Pharoah channel he has all the knowledge!
I was watching the Rubin Report interview with Ben and apparently Morgan was going to bring out a shooting victim in this segment but didn’t because Ben already called him out on standing on the graves of children. You can’t make this up it’s hilarious,
Alex Schmidt SERIOUSLY!?!?!?!?😱😱😱😂😂😂😂😂😂
Gnu4886 yeah is right 😂
NO FUCKING WAY! LMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAO
Shapiro stood on a lot more graves than Piers Morgan was ever alleged.
@I don't get the joke well - intead of me telling you 'why' the learning for you my 'pal' is to do some homework - engage your logic and reason as to why you have knowledge gaps - as - 'telling someone' is not effective learning, and since you have a lot of room to improve - empower yourself to grow.
I finally understand the American obsession with the Second Amendment. Thanks Ben Shapiro
The final few seconds “ the public will make up their own minds” they did Piers - you got kicked out of America for your stance on the 2nd amendment. How funny...
Did that really happen? That's brilliant, Piers is a shit storm
@@sammylpt9076 It didn't happen... and Piers was a clown back then but he's one of not-so-many public Liberals left who are showing signs of sanity as their party goes completely bat shit.
Ben: "Governments can and have turn tyrannical"
Piers: "That's absurd"
Exactly what's happening now 10 years later 🤣🤣
Only a viewpoint of sheep who have been radicalized by internet BS.
Let’s not forget that piss supported vaccine passports, a papers please society is pretty tyrannical if you ask me but what else would you expect from piss Morgan?
Funny how the Govt thinks were stupid that we can fight back against them..and they were scared to death during Jan 6th.
And how does giving killing machines to every random person solve government tyranny?
@@mateidumitrescu238ummm maybe a fighting chance? How does having a gun protect you from a burglar? Well it will stop the threat?
3:57
It happened in Star Wars
“Order 66”
Right, they shouldn't have taken AR15s from the Galaxy
In Star Wars, the empire outlawed many weapons, such as the DL-44
Yeah, but the civilians didn’t need assault weapons. They had an organised Rebellion (and Resistance).
I don’t know whether I should like the video or not. I love Ben Shapiro but this is a video by CNN🤔
@BuckGreywolfe i like that
🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
agreed
So you're a Trumper? Must feel good these days
I never agreed with Shapiro when I first watched this a few years ago but now I see his point fully.
And what is that point? The government starting WW3 with their own people.
@@jamal245 I couldn't see initially why Shapiro would support gun ownership but now I can see his point
@@jamal245 It's possible but I doubt we will ever really know.
Well when the constitution was first written they experienced a wider range of government extending waaay past what the average citizen experiences nowadays. They witnessed a revolution and considered all possibilities like rational folks should, and considered irrational possibilities like a government made by the people for the people, overstepping its boundaries towards the people.
TLDR: I'm also realizing the knowledge spoken here and wisdom carried through the ages.
Left Marxism, yes you can protect yourself from Communism. Are people really that gone from reality. We are fighting for freedom that millions of people died for and there like here Government take away my first and second Amendment. I’m not going to listen to the trolls that hate Americans and don’t even live here. But yes we need to protect ourselves, why do you think the Left wants to make the Government bigger and bigger it’s so they become your parents and if you go against what they say you will disappear. Watch China in Focus where they have cameras everywhere, they don’t have it for safety they have it to spy on people and make sure they are not going against the regime, they want to bring this everywhere, the right it fighting for freedom and people are to dumb to realize it. If the Left won last election millions would be dead right now, guns would be gone, freedom of speech would be gone and they claim that the right are the enemies. Trust me if you give up your freedoms you will never get it back it’s not like the ole days where people rebelled and they had swords and guns. It’d be people against, tanks, bombs, ect. There’s no winning against that, if Trump would’ve lost we’d be dealing with that right now, if he was so evil he’s been in office for 4 years things could’ve of happened no he’s fighting the people that want to do harm to us and that’s why he’s hated, they want to enslave us like the Pharoahs did in Egypt he wants us to have Freedoms. Defund the police, ya right so if Biden gets in office they can escort the military on every street. People need to wake up and step away from the brainwashing. I was brainwashed for years but things started not adding up, the people screaming the loudest showed their true colors.
Piers: “you really believe your government would turn against you?”
Me: isn’t that why Americans are allowed to buy guns because if there wasn’t a possibility of your government turning against you, buying guns wouldn’t be allowed I’m sure Ben said that was one of the reasons.
The government has tanks, advance military planes, equipment, endless resources. How does my 3 guns stop all that? I have guns but it isn't because I want to fight the U.S. There's absolutely no chance of winning with the type of weapons at their disposal. Every single U.S citizen who has declared war on America has either died or went to prison. Such a silly defense people impose.
@@ejkk9513 "Oppressors can tyranize only when they have achieved a standing army, an enslaved press, and an unarmed populace." - James Madison
The founding fathers won against the Largest Empire on Earth at the time. James Madison wrote your bill of rights.
@@c8h8e8c8k8m8e8o8u8t You're right... what part of the modern weaponry did you not read in my comment? They didn't have the technology, weapons and resources that they have now. They also had TERRIBLE strategic planning when it came to warfare. The military is very refined today and the citizens are not. You are comparing Apples to dildo's. If the U.S government declared war on the citizens, we would stand zero chance no matter how many pistols or rifles we have. We might beat a person here and there but the entire government?? Let's be realistic please.
@@ejkk9513 Yes we've all heard this talking point a million times. Taliban soldiers stood their ground and so did the vietnamese by using guerilla warfare. Whether militias have a chance if winning or not is besides the point.
People have the god given RIGHT to defend themselves and their country from a tyrannical government and have the right to die for it and protect themselves and their families. This is written in the Constitution as I said earlier by James Madison along with our other rights.
@@ejkk9513 Look dude if you want to be a slave to the elite and have them bully you and put you in a camp and take your rights. BE MY GUEST. That's your right as well. I will be on the side with the people who die fighting evil.
Don't you just love how everytime someone gets piers on the ropes he just closes their opportunity to rebuttle
That's everyone on the left, not just Piers.
Hahaha "rebuttle"
Wasn't Ben constantly talking over Piers
Piers has heard many coherent reasons as to reasons people need guns. And after watching most of these piers morgan gun control videos Ive noticed these: When asked a question he doesn't know, like, or knows he's wrong he buries it under another question. He talks over every single one of his guests. He asks another question right after asking one and like ben said he bullies people into submission.
Like what Ben does except Piers was clearly a lot better at it and more articulated.
It is true - you dont need an assult rifle - there is no possible reason? none. Only thing that ever happens is mass executions every 2 months. Handgun gives adequate protection - there is no rational argument for anything but.
An AR stands for Armalite Riffles NOT Assault Riffle! So sick of hearing that!
Rifle, NOT Riffle! So sick of hearing that!
The AR-15 is an assault weapon, Morgan never said AR stands for Assault rifle you dumb fuck.
TheTruthTeller Right?
Allah Akbar right
@@Maxax16 Right
"one of your guys agreed with me, that must mean I'm right!" -Piers Morgan
"You have made your point crystal clear"
I couldn't hear anything past you rudely talking over him the entire time.
Venezuela, cuba, north corea and hong kong agrees with piers.
Not to mention present day Iraq, I don't think those Iran back militias would be nearly as audacious in murdering protesters if they were armed with something more deadly than rocks.
Eduardo FY did you really just spell Korea with a C...? Wtf
@@Slesaint17 lol.. my bad. We spell Korea with a C in my country.
And most successful European countries
@@avinashvaluveri3903 sshhh, don't mention the good examples, we're only allowed to talk about the bad examples here. Weapons good remember
Last time I checked AR 15s were sporting rifles.
used for hunting hogs but all the sudden they are horrible killing machines
@@tysonpruitt2252 The are just as powerful as any sporting weapon. People think they are more powerful because they look "military."
@@bobvillah827 I know i was making the point of the media making it appear to be some all powerful killing weapon
@@tysonpruitt2252 I've even heard idiots refers to them as weapons of mass destruction.
The military doesn't use the full auto mode except in special circumstances. So for the majority of situations they function as the military uses them. It is a weapon of war.
The day Shapiro stripped down Morgan with fact...... Love it!!
Please enlighten us.....which fact stripped down Mr Morgan?
@@edubogota1 did you not watch the video? Morgan didn't have anything somewhat factual to say and just used his feelings to justify taking away people's rights.
Andrew Eagle feelings?....he has documents and statistics to prove his questionings, where are shapiro’s documents.
@@edubogota1 The second amendment
what? what piffle. shapiro had no single reason other than 'consitution' as an answer = there is no way you need an assault rifle. what shite?
"Do you understand how absurd you sound?"
Says a guy whose own country has invaded 90% of all nations on Earth.
It's not piers' fault hes been born into a country with a bad history. He has no control over englands past. The debate is focusing on the actions of the individual
@@backyardengineering816 It's not Shapiro's fault he's been born into a country with a disproportionate number of mass shootings. He has no control over the actions of irresponsible/mentally ill gun owners. The "debate" is focusing on whether or not law abiding people such as himself should have their rights infringed upon because of the drastic actions of mentally deranged individuals. Timothy McVeigh used a Ryder truck, fertilizer and dynamite to commit the Oklahoma City Bombing. Last I checked you can still rent trucks. Hell, that dude in New York rented a pickup truck at Home Depot and managed to kill 8 people with it before he got shot and arrested. The consequences of idiot's actions shouldn't be taken out on innocent people, just for a sense of false security.
@@hellaciousharry I agree
You should look at the drop in gun crime and shooting in nations that banned guns... dont be a fool.
@@MrAkeatsYou should look at the rise in violent crime in nations that banned guns.... don't be a fool.
No-one can beat him in an argument he is the boss
randomthings 322 he talks utter shite, the only thing he has going for him is that he talks fast
Shapiro is awesome
And Hikaru, he very much did not. Piers got humiliated in front of hundreds of thousands of people, hence the hasty end to the interview.
Blackheart_007 Also Piers: *Interrupts almost every explanation Ben gave* Piers acted like a child. No respectable journalist interrupts the interviewee, especially when talking about a sensitive topic like gun violence and gun control.
Blackheart_007 Nowhere did I claim that they didn't, nor did I claim that it's only the left either. I never said anything about either side or anyone other than Piers, who indeed did perform just as bad as Bill or Tucker. Do not put words into my mouth my friend.
Blackheart_007 I agree completely. That would be a debate worth watching. Night!
fedoras are awesome
As a left-wing liberal, this interview actually had me agreeing with Ben Shapiro. Watching Trump and Hong Kong has shown that a perfectly reasonable government can turn tyrannical. He's made me rethink my position on gun control.
Juliana Morse Big respect to your kind. Long live the Second. AND our Bill of Rights.
Juliana Morse I agree, even as a liberal
Juliana Morse big props
Please, by all means, tell us what Trump has done that is on par with China. I mean real stuff, not made up CNN hyperbole. Ill wait......
Liberals with open minds do exist... Props ma'am.
Shapiro predicted the future.
I love how that a Brit thinks he knows more about the American government and constitution vs a man who lives and breath politics
Didnt stop americans doing the same to brits
ben literally went to Harvard law school hahah
According to Shapiro's logic, it is okay for an American to have an atomic bomb if he is concerned that his government may turn against him.
@@genki2705 You full well know how exaggerated of a claim that is. Don't be stupid
Genki tf are you talking about they are talking about firearms
The irony of an Englishman trying to tell an American that he doesn’t need guns to defend against the government is overwhelming. Someone should tell Piers that we stopped caring about his opinion on guns in 1776.
ConcealedCarry Daily so what Shapiro is gonna fight the whole government with his AR?
Brianna Carmona There’s plenty of examples of an armed civilian population resisting a government with handheld rifles. I’ll give you a few off the top of my head: the Vietcong defeated the US in Vietnam. And Cliven Bundy and his buddies won a standoff with federal agents in Nevada, using AR15s. And wait there was one more, let me think....umm...somebody defeated Britain in the late 1700s, I can’t quite remember who....Oh yeah it was us.
Brianna Carmona Ben Shapiro isn’t saying HE needs HIS rifle so that HE can fight the government NOW. He’s saying that WE(Americans) need OUR rifles in case we have to fight A government SOMETIME in the future.
ConcealedCarry Daily he said we need rifles to fight OUR government if it ever turns against us??? That’s literally what he said
Brianna Carmona yeah I mean it could be our government. The thing about government is that it’s made of up a changing body of people, so yeah OUR government could easily turn tyrannical, like Nazi germany. I know you’re like 12 so you still trust the government implicitly but that’ll wear off in a few years.
Ben's British accent had me balling on the floor 😂😂😂😂
Watching this again today and hearing Piers say how absurd it sounds that the US government could become tyrannical. Would like to hear him comment on that today!
Then go and start shooting to police
Piers got his tail handed to him!
Hikaru Midomiya i see you in so many comments. and no, ben did not look dumb in this.
@The Pianist boi I have never listened to either man until tonight and i could plainly see the younger fellow won the debate. His answers made me think and consider, something the old guy was unwilling to do. I am not a republican or democrat. I don't even know what a conservative is. But I believe this discussion proves to me that wisdom does not necessarily come with age.
When you’re capable of critical thinking and you’re articulate and intelligent wow that’s power.
Okay JP ;)!
Yeah. Its too bad Ben Shapiro are none of those though
Grown up man calling an AR-15 assault rifle 🤨. Really?
Ig the point is because thats what all the lefts are calling it so he's using the terminology that they know best😂
Piers...a guy who never lets you answer the question he's just asked. He constantly talks over his guests.
Love to seem him getting flustered because he's getting owned. Someone comes back at him as hard as he hits and he's all upset and offended. You couldn't make it up. He's so precious.
ben shapiro developing a british accent to mock piers is gold
Every single effing time piers interrupted Ben I’ve never wanted to punch some one soooo badly🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
Sockbringer69 Last name I feel you
Violence is not the answer. So...believes the Portland PD.
niko spencer is eveeyone has a gun it would be hella hard i
An AR-15 doesn't even meet the classification of an assault weapon, it's not even called that.
TrashMutt Reviews its name should be changed. All these idiots think the AR stands for assault rifle.. it stands for
Armalite Rifle
I think one of the biggest reasons people call it that is for the left to understand it best, because their so one track minded that when they hear AR they think assault rifle when real AR owners know it stands for armalite. I think its just a way for them to dumb it down for the people who get offened when you start spittin fax
So if I go to a gas station with a AR-15 to assault them and still it still doesn’t counts as a assault weapon right ? Bc it’s not classify for a law
@@Josafit torque converters?
I think more than 80% of people think AR stands for " assault rifle". Morso than those who say it stands for " Armalite Rifle ".
But yes, it is a sporting rifle and is not an assault rifle, like the Kalashnikov for example.
Morgan: so tell me y
Ben: starts to explain y
Morgan: alright, alright *ENOUGH*
2:45 onwards, flawless take down by Shapiro, RESPECT!
Piers should remember the reason American citizens have weapons to defend against tyranny are the actions of his ancestors. 1776.
1776 also the year Illuminati 👁️ was formed.
Boston loves tea parties 😉🇺🇸♥️
Hard to swallow pills: AR-15 is not an assault weapon. Assault weapons are fully automatic where AR15 is a semi automatic. So frankly, I side with Shapiro.
When he called an AR-15 an assault weapon, I went to the comments to see who else caught on to that.
AcTioneer do I get a cookie?
Oof Piers slipped. Ben asked him something about bullying and then he changed the topic lol😂😂😂🤭🤭🤫🤫🤫
I like how piers morgan actually thought he came out on top at the end
He did come out on top. Now everyone realized school shootings gotta keep happening bc you clowns believe you have to defend yourselves against future government tyranny. Yet you did nothing about government tyranny when your government participated in genocide, slavery, segregation lmao.
@@cavegrl that is the dumbest shit I've ever heard do you realize how many times governments have went tyranical when people can't defend themselves? do you realize that almost everytime there has been a gun ban in history, very bad things proceed to happen to civilians? Clearly you don't know jack ab history. It is literally included in the second ammendment that we have the right to bear arms should a tyranical government rise. Have fun waiting for the police when someone is kicking in your fuckin door lmao. wHy dO yoU NEed aN aR-15????? Its not about why, its about the peoples rights! A school shooting happens that should make people want to defend themselves better not give away their only defense! And I would have to be alive quite a while to try and stop genocide, slavery, AND segregation. Its people like you who will lead the rest of the sheep to slaughter. The gun is an inanimate object. People need to acknowledge the fact that all these school shooters are on heavy psyc medsand the fact you think school shootings are a direct result of people wanting to defend themselves leaves me just feeling sorry for how fucking stupid you are lmao.
How you gonna ask Ben a question, then interrupt him with another question 🤦🏽♂️
A million times
Funny how he said that Ronald Reagan agrees with him, but they never really talked about why Reagan wants assault riffles to be banned? For a Brit, he has such bad manners--always cutting in when others are still speaking.
It's his job lol he makes bank off of people reacting to him they way they do. He gets paid a fuck load of money to piss people off. Then the clips go viral which make him more popular. It's all business. He may believe every word he says but he's not in it for the debate or to get his points across, it's all money.
I find it very amusing how upset rude people get when you just flat out ask them: "Why are you interrupting?" Rude behavior, call it out and let them know every time.
I love Ben when he debates😂😂👍👍
Morgan was taken straight to school by Shapiro
Ben Shapiro: * Valid argument *
Piers Morgan: * Talks over him *
The only thing i took away from this is that if you want to win an argument/debate all you have to do is talk over the other person
I just started watching Ben today and I already love his roasts 😂
Please tell me someone else noticed the last sentence in this video!!!! "You have made your opinion crystal clear. People aren't stupid and they can make their own decision."
Americans have made their decision! Own it Piers!
"Oh I'm losing this argument, time to stop this segment."
You guys should watch Ben Shapiro and Andrew Yang conversation
When has a government become tyrannical Ben?
Me: uhmm, your British, do you remember a little war between a certain few colonies and England back in the 1770s?
Well bro America is pretty tyrannical Rn and the last thing they need is more guns you clown
@Lockie Shimmen
Tyrannical in what ways? Give specifics.
@Trips saving the world hahahahaha good joke, hows the virus and raids going ahah can't even save his own country
@Tripstrump abused his power and therefore should be removed from power simple as that. And how on earth do antifa install chaos, they fight for simple rights and equalities and if that 'installs chaos' then somethings wrong with your country not the 'globalists'.
and instead of starting wars he created a tax cut that will add 200 billion dollars to the annual federal deficit whilst Obama decreased the deficit
Yeah back when the gov didn’t have missiles you dumb twat. Wtf is an AR15 gonna do against tanks and missiles coming from some jets? You all sound like morons with your dumb ads rhetoric.
I can't fathom how anyone could possibly think Piers won this debate. Ben kept answering his same question repeatedly. And Piers kept asking the question, not satisfied with Shapiro's perfectly logical answer. It's mindblowing.
Yamika powers activated!
I like how Shapiro caught him on his crap and he immediately tried to change the subject
Me here in Feb. 2023:
Re-watching this after watching the Sky News Aus interview between these two. What a change between them! Piers admitted how he acted was absurd & the two men had a wonderful discussion about the current world at this time.
Lmao I loved when Ben impersonated him
I used to think Piers Morgan was an idiot and wished for him to go off the air. Many times he begins an argument by saying, "I don't understand," which is the fundamental problem. I still think he's an idiot but I now welcome his programs.
What I appreciate is Piers brings other people in to debate with him, giving many people an opportunity to completely disassemble Pier's stance on issues. It is a good platform for anti-Piers which I hope continues.
The big problem is that he just cuts people off with further questions while they're speaking to try to make it look like they don't have an answer because he's too afraid they might be able to answer if allowed to talk. You can see that clearly here.
Wow, owned him like a rifle.
Ben Shapiro Thank you!
This is too good, Ben Shapiro 👏👏
Shapiro is amazing
Ben: says something right
Piers: SPEAKS BRITISH LOUDER
English#
Peirs: I have been debating for along time
Ben: and you’re still very shit at it
you’re
@@ruthless1129 You are rather bad....awful really.
@@Thejbirdy wdym?
Imagine if they had this debate in 2019
I don't think Piers ever debated him again. Let me know if I"m wrong, I'd love to see it.
3:05
Piers: 👁️👁️ "..." "Let me ask you again"
Piers got his ass handed to him. Even with the fact that Ben had short, interrupted sentences the entire time. 😂
No, he didn't. You're letting your dislike of him cloud your judgment. Ben finished with the absurd point that we need assault rifles to protect ourselves from the American government, i.e. the Army, Navy, Air Force. Paranoia is the reason behind the right to own such weapons.
@@cptpepper7731
The militarys dutie is to uphold and protect their countries based on the constitution.
2A is for them too. They can deny orders from the government if they are deemed unconstitutional.
Piers Morgan's favourite band is The Interrupters