Do you want to date me? Then I have to shatter your dreams: I am in a relationship with two hot women! They are also loyal subscribers of me, YT Megastar AxxL! Please don't cry, dear nate
@@AxxLAfriku thought u sounded pretty crazy coming with this illogical and random comment, then i checked your videos and it turns out you simply are deranged.
Besides calling them “Assault Rifles”, when they are “Armalite Rifles”. And assault rifle is a high powered fully automatic weapon our military uses. I’m willing to forgive what he says though since he smashed Morgan.
Anyone who thinks shapiro did well in that interview is a small-minded idiot. He dodged the issue of assault rifles by bringing up hand guns. Morgan may stand on the graves of children but shapiro spits on them!
@@dynamicduck8777 well, let's be fair now; Ben could have just been smiling at how such an incredibly pompous ass like Morgan can believe his own bullshit.
So you should laugh hard in irony,as you should be crying as the damage those pieces of paper have done to human beings. Why is it ignorance usually blows it's own trumpet with an evil smirk. The second amendment was useful for the Times,it is an antiquated piece of legislation, than god they did not have an amendment for the right to bare arses what an ugly site, but Shapiro must think there is , he bares his character accordingly. SHAPIRO IS ONLY INTERRSTED IN PERPETUALLY INCREASING HIS LOT BY BEING OBNOXIOUS AND CONTRAVERSIAL, IT PROMOTES HIS IDEOLOGY OF SELF INTEREST, THE OLD EDICT APPLIES ,NO SUCH THING AS BAD PUBLICITY ,ALL PUBLICITY MAKES YPU RICHER.
@@idontlikewind.554 we dont have to agree with shapiro on everything. The views he has towards abortion are heavily influenced by his religion. I dont agree with him on his abortion views, but that doesnt mean he's not still an intelligent person.
@@johnfakester5527 actually yes. If you can't structure your long sentences in an understanding speed then what? Being slow and stuttering with ummms as your commas and periods? Freak outta here #ArabLivesMatter
ben: she was an irresponsible gun owner piers: so she was bad a person? ben: no she was irresponsible with her guns piers: right so she went from good to bad ben: no she was an irresponsible person piers: so she was bad? ben: no she was irresponsible piers: alright let’s take a break.
And for clarification, Ben said "we need to keep bad people from getting the guns" And Piers responded with "what about [she], was she a bad person?" And Ben illuded that she shouldn't be allowed guns. If you were to take a strong point Shapiro brang, why didn't you take one you wouldn't have to take out of context?
Silver Time he later clarified she wasn’t bad, but her child was “bad”, had several mental health issues but she still didn’t take the time to be responsible with her deadly weapons and perhaps put them in a very secure place, but since she didn’t do that she was very, as ben said, irresponsible. he alluded to the fact, and not really alluded, but outright said that she should be more responsible with her guns, since she knows that there is a very mentally ill individual in the house.
@@christiandaelemans but Ben said bad people shouldn't be able to get them, and says at the end of the video she shouldn't have had the guns. He could have easily fixed himself by saying "bad and irresponsible people" but instead he doubled down and got confronted on it.
@@nutnut9915 Shapiro claimed she went from responsible to irresponsible and failed to clarify where to even remotly draw the line and why the line should be drawn there. For example, if the line would be drawn at people who have any sort of mental issues, then that excludes roughly 1/3rd of the American population from the ability to own weapons, which would likely just extend to the families of said people, because there is no legal way for our system to accurately observe the responsibility (or lack there of) any person in the country.
I am afraid that Ben Shapiro's debate style is to interrupt with a thousand words per minute statements. So the fact that Peirs Morgan interrupted Ben can be forgiven.
@@user-jg7jn9ub8b Don't be afraid, cupcake. Shapiro is the guest!! What does Shapiro's style have anything to do with Pier's interrupting the answer to his questions??
"You stand in the graves of the children of sandy hook" "How dare you accuse me of doing that" "Well I've seen you do it repeatedly..." "Like I said how dare you" "Well you can keep saying that" 😂 I love Ben
I wouldn't say singlehandedly he would of lost his show eventually anyways. I think he should thank Ben because this is the only thing left of that show that anyone remembers.
Why do Republicans think this is a mind stumping question? Of course handguns are a problem-you don’t think we tried to fix this problem decades ago? What’s funny is that at the time of this clip, America’s *mass shootings* were happening every month. And that was shocking. Now they’re happening every week. No one has stopped Republicans from solving this problem. So why haven’t they?
I may not agree with his politics but the fact he had this guy on his show who clearly disagrees with him for an animated debate makes me believe free speech in our media isn’t yet dead
You logic is like saying, "Drugs help treat illnesses. What will you do if you don't allow people acces to drugs. Therefore there shouldn't be any restrictions on accessibility of drugs to the public".😂😂
considering the tyranny in America is at risk of being ushered in by Trump, with prophetic support from the convinced right, the argument that batches of militias could prevent a modern dictatorship is ridiculous. The militias have joined the tyrant in a sick detour from the 2A purpose. Against the US military, citizen militias wont stand a chance and that is why, like Europe drifting into the darkness of Fascism, you need educated voters and strong political institutions to keep a tyrant - like Trump - from rising to power
We literally fought his native country because of tyranny. Pierce is an idiot. and yes he gave you a reason, I think it was three times, about tyranny for having assault weapons.
I agree, they are wasting time with people like ben and alex jones that denies facts and believe everyone is out to get them, question though, if the americans have this low trust in their government, why do they elect them in the first place?
@@dariocarere8711 Imaginary threat ? The lootings in America is the biggest evidence that the threat is real . Yes I do disagree with ben about the assault rifles .But you think that banding all guns is a good idea ?
@@idenree8606 Yes, it is. I cannot see any good reason to own guns. If the reason of having a gun is your personal defense, a taser can perfectly do the job. If you have a gun in your house, close to your bed, you must hide it in a place where "no one can find it"; but, first of all, I'd like to know where such a place is, and secondly, even if you put it in a box with a code combination, how can you say you are using it to protect yourself from thieves? Can you really open such a box during an emergency? Just use a taser. We don't need guns, we just don't. Even police men and women don't need them. A taser can cover all the distance you need and it's not lethal (unless the person has a heart disease). If you want to argue that "in that case only criminals would have them" - well, one could never and ever understand if you are a criminal or not when you are buying a gun. I may perfectly buy a gun and look ok, but if I had bad intentions I could perfectly look like a nice guy, right? How may I understand I am ready to use a gun? How could I be sure I won't use it when enraged? Guns did not solve anything. The only use I can understand is: if you live in a large territory, or in an isolated farm or ranch etc, I can see why you want a rifle because you always fear your cattle may be stolen. But that's a totally different lifestyle. We don't live in a far west village. We live in apartments, we can call the police, we have cameras, we can stop a criminal without killing and avoid putting other people's life at risk.
You 143 people who thought this comment was brilliant should realize this is a response to the pro-gun response to every mass shooting: 'We have to grieve now, this is not the time to discuss the issue!" Ok... Sandy Hook, The Las Vegas shooting and the dozens of others... it has been a few years now. Can we discuss it now?
Part of the issue is that WE GIVE THE SHOOTERS PUBLICITY ON THE NEWS. And not just that. By enforcing gun control, we deprive the law abiding citizens of self defense, since the shooters are going to obtain guns illegally. They shot people, that's illegal, so what makes you think they'll decide to stop smuggling weapons and stop committing crimes?
@@Cabbage22927 well in my country some people call everyone at their right in the political spectrum a fascist Not that they're many, but they sure are loud
@@jakeb7864 reading comments like yours makes me realise what a waste of time spending time in the comment section is. off i go looking for an addon that removes all comment sections.
@@BlahstarRecords Actually I take that back. How are you gonna call something gay, then have a channel full of the most weeb shit on the internet. Lmfao, pretty alpha move from somebody as beta as yourself though, so I'll leave it alone.
@@BlahstarRecords dude, it's one thing to not be gay and another thing to worry so much about another man's sexuality. Are you closeted or has someone just wounded your egotistical masculinity?
AlxEm3 He ran away from an interview because the interviewer was asking difficult questions. All while proclaiming he was more popular therefore superior to the interviewer. How mature.
@@8bitdiedie “It’s hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it’s damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person.” A quote for you and Morgan
He does have quite the insufferable smirk, even when I’m agreeing with him sometimes I want to slap the smirk off his face and I’m not even a violent person.
@TheTemporary1970 this is why you shouldn't comment on something you don't know anything about. let me put this as simple as i can. I guarantee that more Americans legally own guns for the simple reason to protect themselves from the murderer/criminal who dont give a shit about a law. So would it therefore make sense to go after guns when its only the law abiding citizens whos going to be the only people giving there gun back..
10 years have passed. Pierce moved from being too far left, Ben speaks even faster, hundreds of questionings and hearings and we still don't know what do they mean when they say "assault weapons".
James Likes Memes - a personal attack may be a type of ‘actual argument’ but it is a very nasty horrible way to start one and not one which results in a productive debate, which is what happened
His problem is that he has no identity or his own opinion. He will say and do anything that he thinks gives him the moral high ground, regardless of how hypocritical and two-faced it makes him come across.
@@UltraEgoMc I found the Alex Jones one funny- but he didn't really let Piers debate. If he had've been more respectful then he still would've won + looked genius.
I love Ben! He owned Piers here! Piers is visibly shaken by it . Ben at such a young age has amazing verbal argumentative skills . While still remaining respectful !! #benshapiro❤
This was only part one of the interview thingy, he does say at the end of the video "we will talk more after the break" so maybe look for part 2 and he might bring it up. 🤷♂️
Your saying sorry for morgan lol I'm surprised they haven't said sorry for trump.. Cardasians etc there's a hell of a lot they should be saying sorry for
@@PabloRamirez-et5ci We don't want him back, he went to the US under a cloud of controversy over phone hacking as the US doesn't have a clue who he is. The only way he could rebuild his career.
ever notice how if you are in a argument bout something they interrupt you because your speaking facts and they want to silence you before they get verbally murdered? you see it all the time with football, baseball, sports really, as well as politics, etc.
Greta Thunberg goes on Piers Morgan's show. Piers Morgan: How dare you. Greta Thunberg: How dare you. Piers Morgan: How dare you. Greta Thunberg: How dare you.
Ok 1) Police in the UK don't carry guns and that works fine, BUT in America no that wouldn't work. It's true, an officer could become irresponsible (and do) but it's a lot less likely since they go through proper training... the odds are less. 2) The handguns thing frustrated me because Piers didn't point out that a handgun yes, kills and could kill a large number of people. BUT the difference is the fire rate, Stephen Paddock needed a high firerate to kill all those people in Vegas, you think he would get to 50+ people with a handgun? yea people will still die, but the issue for me is assault rifles are Pointless, I think in america I would own a pistol for protection, but thats because 1 on 1 you have a chance, assault weapons are literally made for killing multiple people in 1 go, not for 1 on 1 combat...
There’s a quote from an old Japanese general that says “you can never invade the mainland United States, there will be a rifleman behind every blade of grass”
Actually, this was a terrible debate by shapiro, his good people, bad people characterization was stupid and Morgan did a very good job using it against him at the end. D- at best.
@@stevenc9207 I’d disagree, Morgan tried to use that against Ben so Ben rephrased that to irresponsible vs responsible. And closed the debate with that. So to say Ben got the last word is a understatement.
@@peterf08 kids getting murdered in our schools less than in 3rd world countries schools were owning guns is banned... how interesting is almost like the problem is not the guns LMAO
Same. >< Gosh he's so proud. I can just imagine talking to Piers and feeling like shit afterwards. I'm glad Shapiro is also confident and didn't get shut down or anything, here.
Check out some of his videos on the Daily Wire. I don’t always agree with Shapiro, he’s too Republican for me. But he’s a master at debates, and he doesn’t accept bullshit, feelings-over-facts answers. It’s refreshing to listen to.
I agree, piers is obviously intellectually outclassed yet CNN still posted it. respect. I still dont respect mainstream media but this was nice to see.
@@mileshawthorne991 I'm assuming you are very young, and possibly also very stupid. A valuable life lesson to learn would be to actually look stuff up before you run your mouth. Most shootings happen with handguns. Mass shootings can and do happen with handguns. Virginia Tech was sort of a big deal so it's actually crazy how ignorant you are
Miles Hawthorne Are you daft? The deadliest school shooting in US history (Virginia Tech) was committed using only handguns. You need to do some research. Perhaps you should start here, an excerpt from Wikipedia’s article about US mass shootings: “Several types of guns have been used in mass shootings in the United States. A 2014 study conducted by Dr. James Fox of 142 shootings found that 88 (62%) were committed with handguns of all types; 68 (48%) with semi-automatic handguns, 20 (14%) with revolvers, 35 (25%) with semi-automatic rifles, and 19 (13%) with shotguns.”
During the break, Piers Morgan had lined up a little boy in a wheelchair who had suffered a gunshot wound and was left paralyzed to come and give his plea to Ben Shapiro. Upon realizing this would validate Ben's accusation, they wheeled the little boy away.
EscapadesofaBibliophile He accused Piers of "standing on the graves" of child victims talking down to those who disagree with his policies and here he was preparing to parade one in front of Ben. I don't have a link because this was during a commercial break, but Ben has talked about it during his interview with Dave Rubin regarding gun control.
@@lenni9669 using gun violence victims to further his agenda and bully ben he realized that ben called him out on it and realized he would be even more hated if he pulled that disgusting stunt
ben would of destroyed the kid too. but the difference is the kid would of left in understanding and him and ben would of left on a good note apposed to the cry baby piers
@@lenni9669 Maybe Mr Morgan would have actually stood on the boy in the wheelchair. I suppose Shapiros accusation means nothing without Morgan actually doing that.
"justified" to smirk at the idea of children being killed. Right. i swear, he better hope he never meets me, he won't be able to smirk for a long fucking time.
@@imcallingjapan2178 lol re-watch the video and actually try to comprehend what is being said. Shapiro was fully prepared for this conversation and your aggression is typical uneducated left-wing speak. You actually thought he was smirking about dead childeren. You sound just like those news reporters that are so narrow-minded on their reports and only continue with whatever narrative they imagined. Get real.
@@magno172 I love how you little losers CONSTANTLY bitch and whine about "cancel culture" whenever one of your paid demogogues is denied the chance to preach at some venue... yet you're fine with flagging my comments here to have them removed. Censorship is fine when your precious little feelings are in danger of being hurt, aren't they? Just like that smirking little streak of piss you idolize. It's embarrassing
@@imcallingjapan2178 ... but did you rewatch the video? Again, changing the subject of the conversation to fit your narrative. Also, I just woke up. I didn't flag shit and I'd be glad to continue this conversation on another platform since UA-cam is basically run by China now.
Rekaert ???? Piers had more facts than Ben did. Ben was just trying to make a mock out of him. Only reason he’s got so many dedicated 12 year olds standing behind him is because he does immature shit like this when he’s around the adults
@@mileshawthorne991 1:39, Piers literally says ask someone else to debate that statement because he can't 2:14, Ben brings up a factual statement and uses Piers' structure of argument against him and Piers simply runs away from the point again. Those are just two examples but everytime Ben brought up a point for debate, Piers avoided it, that's a clear sign of someone who knows they're on the losing side of a debate
If I was Piers there I would have been like "So you think we should get rid of hand guns too? Excellent idea!" Also he definitely did not dodge it. He pointed out that most mass shootings where many people were hurt by one person was done with an assault weapon, while the handgun killings Ben talked about were with one specific victim.
@@jackmansfield3004 no on all levels. He for sure dodged it he said “we’ll get to that” and then never did. Piers Morgan says he respects the second amendment so if you were him you wouldn’t call that an excellent idea😴Also Ben was not referring to “one specific victim” when talking about hand guns in Chicago, did we watch the same video or are you just flat out ignorant? Maybe a child who hasn’t seen much… anyways, there are plenty of instances where 2+ people die from someone firing a handgun, especially in Chicago. Yes the number of murdered people in an incident involving a hand gun is less than mass shooting w/ assault rifles like sandy hook but those instances happen far less than , idk say every single day across many US cities
@@Tiy51 Sir Imma need you to calm down. I am going to be very straight with you and try not to get too mad you called me ignorant for disagreeing with you. I fully support the second amendment. I fully support that people can own automatic rifles in this country. I don't think you should be able to get one at 18. I do not think you should be able to walk out with one without a wait period. I think there needs to be better background checks, more strict mental health screening not just for you, but for immediate family. I think guns need to be safely stored in a unreachable place when not in use to keep it away from others. I also thought it was hilarious when he handed him the Constitution. I think these restrictions need to be federally placed on assault weapons, not single fire handguns. Automatic handguns need some of the same supervision. Then there is other stuff like bullet proof vests and other things I don't really want to get into. I also think it should be a separate process to have a license for ARs. Feels like some common sense gun laws there, but you got states like Texas passing "constitutional carry" laws and you can't really be okay with that. As I said before though, I completely support the right to own these guns and the constitution as a whole, since that is the reason we can have this conversation and exercise our right to free speech. (Also that thing I said about Pier's comeback was a joke sorry if that wasn't clear but then I am ignorant and a child)
@@jackmansfield3004 Refraining from anger as you wish, but most of this information is irrelevant to what WE are talking about. It’s relevant to the video but not our discussion. Yeah I agree it should be harder to get an automatic weapon but what’s being discussed here is the fact that Piers never addressed the children of Chicago question. There are FAR more deaths by handguns than assault weapons so for him to dismiss that and bring up emotional events such as sandy hook to get people on his side is just manipulative. Clarifying his view on automatic rifles is not the same as addressing Shapiros Children of Chicago question, Piers doesn’t care about inner city blight, just making sure the world knows he’s a “good boy”
A smirk is markedly different from a smile; The dude knew he was smirking. Not that that is some horrible thing. Just admit to it if you’re called out.
Piers: You can smirk at me, and you can laugh at me, Ben: I'm not smirking 😏 Piers: and you can accuse me of standing on the graves of dead childre.... Ben: and being a bully, yes. Ben is the best
He has this ability to articulate his point in a way where you end up agreeing with him even if you disagree on the overarching philosophical point. He's certainly not someone you'd want to go toe to toe with.
From an anarchists perspective, a gun owners perspective, a collage educated persons perspective, a socialists perspective, and a christians perspective, I must say I disagree with Ben on a lot of shit but Jesus he just owned them. 😧😧😧
What I like about Ben Shapiro is that he never dodges the question. He will always answer what is asked in an intelligent and articulate way and will have his views challenged with sense. I haven’t yet seen anyone who has a valid counter argument. Here in the uk no ones gets a word in with piers Morgan if they disagree with him so it’s great to see his views challenged
Piers: “How dare you accuse me of standing on the graves of dead children” *three minutes later* Piers: “Do you not care about the children that died at sandy hook...”
@@willmiskovich359 No it wasn't😂. Piers didn't even seem to know where he was going with his points. Just a standard the last few mass shootings were assault rifles. I mean really, its such a basic arguement and makes no sense if he agrees with the second amendment.
@Benjamin Walker Did he claim that it was okay to label left wingers as communists for you to call him an hypocrite or you just assume right wingers are a monolith and hive-minded, and therefore if a couple of them do something, everyone agrees or does as well? You can't blame an individual of hypocresy for something you saw someone else do, that's not how it works.
@@enrath4078 the stupid Shapiro counter argument..I believe that a tyrannical government is going to come and we need semi automatic rifles to defend ourselves against this tyrannical government I believe is coming. Even though this tyrannical government I believe will come and have fully automatic arms I support those very arms should be banned from owning these guns. Brilliant! Lol what a thinker! The guy is actually too stupid to see the falacy of his own argument
@@dougk5 what's stupid is believing in a gun fight that full auto beats semi auto. Dont get me wrong, no civilian weapons will stop our government when they have drones, tanks, and airstrikes. But to say "oh well since we would be out matched, preparation is futile" is an equally foolish retort.
@@enrath4078 a modern army would crush any armed civilians. And your hero Shapiro actually supports civilians being out matched. He's so incredibly stupid. I also wonder if hes mentally not all there. He clearly has delusional ideas of a tyrannical government coming. Also it's laughable left or right. He is clearly over his head in this debate..he doesn't even see the flaws within his position. As far as Piers he's got every industrialized country supporting his position..facts to back it up. It's easy to check gun violence stats USA vs you name it
There are 30,000 gun related deaths per year by firearms, and this number is not disputed. U.S. population 324,059,091 as of Wednesday, June 22, 2016. Do the math: 0.000000925% of the population dies from gun related actions each year. Statistically speaking, this is insignificant! What is never told, however, is a breakdown of those 30,000 deaths, to put them in perspective as compared to other causes of death: • 65% of those deaths are by suicide which would never be prevented by gun laws • 15% are by law enforcement in the line of duty and justified • 17% are through criminal activity, gang and drug related or mentally ill persons - gun violence • 3% are accidental discharge deaths So technically, "gun violence" is not 30,000 annually, but drops to 5,100. Still too many? Well, first, how are those deaths spanned across the nation? • 480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago • 344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore • 333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit • 119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase over prior years) So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities. All 4 of those cities have strict gun laws, so it is not the lack of law that is the root cause. This basically leaves 3,825 for the entire rest of the nation, or about 75 deaths per state. That is an average because some States have much higher rates than others. For example, California had 1,169 and Alabama had 1. Now, who has the strictest gun laws by far? California, of course, but understand, so it is not guns causing this. It is a crime rate spawned by the number of criminal persons residing in those cities and states. So if all cities and states are not created equally, then there must be something other than the tool causing the gun deaths. Are 5,100 deaths per year horrific? How about in comparison to other deaths? All death is sad and especially so when it is in the commission of a crime but that is the nature of crime. Robbery, death, rape, assault all is done by criminals and thinking that criminals will obey laws is ludicrous. That's why they are criminals. But what about other deaths each year? • 40,000+ die from a drug overdose-THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THAT! • 36,000 people die per year from the flu, far exceeding the criminal gun deaths • 34,000 people die per year in traffic fatalities (exceeding gun deaths even if you include suicide) Now it gets good: • 200,000+ people die each year (and growing) from preventable medical errors. You are safer in Chicago than when you are in a hospital! • 710,000 people die per year from heart disease. It’s time to stop the double cheeseburgers! So what is the point? If Obama and the anti-gun movement focused their attention on heart disease, even a 10% decrease in cardiac deaths would save twice the number of lives annually of all gun-related deaths (including suicide, law enforcement, etc.). A 10% reduction in medical errors would be 66% of the total gun deaths or 4 times the number of criminal homicides......Simple, easily preventable 10% reductions! So you have to ask yourself, in the grand scheme of things, why the focus on guns? It's simple: Taking away guns gives control to governments. The founders of this nation knew that regardless of the form of government, those in power may become corrupt and seek to rule as the British did by trying to disarm the populace of the colonies. It is not difficult to understand that a disarmed populace is a controlled populace. Thus, the second amendment was proudly and boldly included in the U.S. Constitution. It must be preserved at all costs. So the next time someone tries to tell you that gun control is about saving lives, look at these facts and remember these words from Noah Webster: "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword, because the whole body of the people are armed and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. A military force at the command of Congress can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power." Remember, when it comes to "gun control," the important word is “control," not “gun."
AshVsTheDeadite I don’t think he has the intelligence of an 18 year old, he has an IQ of 140. Also you can’t just say he’s stupid just because of his views. You can still acknowledge the fact that he’s very good at debates and very good at retaining information to support his views.
Ben had this all planned out. Attack Morgan directly with his words and expose his lack of reason. He'll get angry and try and rebuke his own words, but then Ben would switch to the actual politics, throwing Piers off his game. Morgan will try his little "what weapon was used" skit, but that's easily defused by handgun statistics, essentially disarming Morgan. Then just string him along until exposing his hypocrisy. It's like one of those Pokemon power draining moves lol
I like how two grown men can have a conversation and disagree on alot of things and not disrespect eachother and keep having a conversation or walk off the set like other immature ppl have
Funny you say that because Piers quite literally cannot do that. He attempts to bully and ridicule anyone who disagrees with him without ever addressing the merit behind the points raised. Does so several times in this very video
@anonymousn5292 funny you should say that cause i know he did say "how dare you" to Ben and other things but they both took it like grown men without disrespect despite they different opinions..they kept it respectful. Even when piers tried to push at Ben he didn't do it in disrespectful manner and Ben replied the same way too, even if they had words that offended eachother they didn't disrespect eachother, it was like a slapping eachother with a white glove, it's business and they kept it that way
“How dare you” that is the sound of the least intimidating human being on the planet.
He said 🤨😮😥😞
I never thought I'd see someone use a pic of linus
Greta
DammitCarl108 and Ben is so intimidating with his 14 year old boy voice💀
Brianna Carmona never claimed he was. Just pointing out that piers’ attempt at being intimidating was a total fail and hilarious.
"We're going to take a break"
*Last online 6 years ago*
😂😂😂
Do you want to date me? Then I have to shatter your dreams: I am in a relationship with two hot women! They are also loyal subscribers of me, YT Megastar AxxL! Please don't cry, dear nate
@@AxxLAfriku thought u sounded pretty crazy coming with this illogical and random comment, then i checked your videos and it turns out you simply are deranged.
@@AxxLAfriku I’m sorry to admit the truth, but those women are not hot.
Piers morgan literally disappeared😭
“I’m not smirking” - Only thing Ben said that wasn’t a fact
Technically, it is a fact, since it can be proven right or wrong.
@@snakey934Snakeybakey Ok, you got me :'(
Besides calling them “Assault Rifles”, when they are “Armalite Rifles”. And assault rifle is a high powered fully automatic weapon our military uses. I’m willing to forgive what he says though since he smashed Morgan.
And even then, he still didn’t care about his feelings
Facts!
Shapiro: "I'm not smirking 🙂"
He almost smirked more when he said it too 🤣🤣
I need a debate between Piers and Greta Thunberg.
Piers: HOW DARE YOU
Greta: HOW DARE YOU
Peter Stewart 😱😱😱🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🔥🔥🔥🤣
There actually is....not with Piers Morgan, but a you tuber named Mike the cop.... funny channel
😂 😂
😂😂😂
You didn't spell "How deah you!" correctly.
Only thing that Ben was wrong on - "I'm not smirking"
@@TWKWSAAL WOW HAHA WOW I TOTALLY KNEW IT WAS A JOKE
The weird kid who sits alone at lunch lmfao
The weird kid who sits alone at lunch There was no joke. Wtf?
True
@@bobross4616 he smirkily said he was not smieking do you not get it ? it is not that hard.
Last I checked, “How dare you!” isn’t an argument...
He didnt stand a chance
*Greta wants to know your location*
How dare you
John Doe,
Ben Shapiro took the first shot and knocked Piers Morgan off his High Horse, called him out for what he was.
It was a good rebuttal though.
This was Ben Shapiro's first big exposure by far, and it did wonders for his career
Amen to that.
Anyone who thinks shapiro did well in that interview is a small-minded idiot. He dodged the issue of assault rifles by bringing up hand guns. Morgan may stand on the graves of children but shapiro spits on them!
The only lie Ben told Piers was "I'm not smirking".
How dare you!?
@@rauhal1266 how dare you?🤣
Good call
And that he watches Piers show. LOL
Thst wasn't a lie...That's Benny Boy when he faces bullies.
Everybody gangsta till ben pulls the constitution out of his jacket
Lel
Lmaoooooo
UNDERRATED 😂😂😂
At what time did he do that
@@rp101aquatics6 1:14
Ben: *aggressively smirks with the unbridled force of 1000 suns*
Ben: "I'm not smirking"
That's the only time he lied
"AgGrEsSiVeLy sMiRkInG"
@@foogan how do you do that I need to learn but then again that sort of look will soon be a hate crime hahahaha
he was so nervous lol did you see his face twitch
@@dynamicduck8777 well, let's be fair now; Ben could have just been smiling at how such an incredibly pompous ass like Morgan can believe his own bullshit.
I laughed way too hard when he gave him a copy of the constitution.
@mribbon89 DITTO 😂
So you should laugh hard in irony,as you should be crying as the damage those pieces of paper have done to human beings. Why is it ignorance usually blows it's own trumpet with an evil smirk. The second amendment was useful for the Times,it is an antiquated piece of legislation, than god they did not have an amendment for the right to bare arses what an ugly site, but Shapiro must think there is , he bares his character accordingly. SHAPIRO IS ONLY INTERRSTED IN PERPETUALLY INCREASING HIS LOT BY BEING OBNOXIOUS AND CONTRAVERSIAL, IT PROMOTES HIS IDEOLOGY OF SELF INTEREST, THE OLD EDICT APPLIES ,NO SUCH THING AS BAD PUBLICITY ,ALL PUBLICITY MAKES YPU RICHER.
@@benluchini7500 Sounds like you're the only one crying.
@@posadist681 why should I be crying I don't live in the USA,so I have the biggest reason to have a smile on my face😊😎
@@benluchini7500 You're here in this comment section crying. Keep proving my point
"How dare you accuse me of something I did"
LumberOne - LOL.
LMAO
LumberOne Killary says the same thing.
And something I’m about to
EXACTLY
HE DID IT HE PULLED THE CONSTITUTION FROM HIS SUIT
Don’t you carry one on you at all the time
It's kind of handy sometimes, you never know.
Dude came prepared
The Constitution was ratified in 1789... how applicable is it to 2020 values??
@@weeshirley5934 Mmm freedom of speech and religion isn’t relevant? Makes sense.
“You can accuse me of standing on the graves of children...”
“...and being a bully, yes.”
I’m 💀
Abbs Naudé I love this dude. He is brutally honest and is quick and is as smart as they come
Nobody gives a fuck.
Zachary _ss2000 ua-cam.com/video/PRF3r3zUGqk/v-deo.html
Watch this, not so smart is this one
@@idontlikewind.554 we dont have to agree with shapiro on everything. The views he has towards abortion are heavily influenced by his religion. I dont agree with him on his abortion views, but that doesnt mean he's not still an intelligent person.
Nodrog Mulac that has absolutely nothing to do with this video.
"Let's take a break... because I'm getting destroyed"
- Piers
😂 Piers talent
@fredfreddy8684 Lol, let's hope you're being sarcastic
@fredfreddy8684 you’re right. Just calling him smart is lacking. He’s brilliant. He kicked Puss Morons hiney.
Piers invites Ben to a debate and than gets angry when he actually has to debate
Piers never wants to debate. He does exactly what Ben stated. He climbs in his bully pulpit and berates anyone who is not a leftist
I'm your 400th like, what do I win
A high five🖐🏽
@@hotslice7704 awesome!! 🖐
@@malcolmmeer9761 that's actually a load of shit. Ben lost this argument.
I’m scared of getting on a plane with Ben Shapiro, he’d destroy that left wing.
Low key underrated
@@amyliu7065 😅
🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤣
Awesome comment 😂.
He was invited as a guest and made the place his home.
Turned the tables on the loony looting liberals.
Jeffrey Woods ok libtard
@Jeffrey Woods in India they call you librandu😂
@@iketanikoichiro3519 bro dont tell me u support trump?
@@dund614 I do because hes not a lying politician allied with criminals like in my country, Italy
"I brought you something here, it's the constitution"
hahaha. I know. Ben prepared himself well.
Greatest thing I've ever heard lmao
Rush1017 just letting you know that I got you to 300. Accept like number 300, you deserve it.
Yeah he brought something that he nor half of this dumb ass country understands...smh
I cracked uo at that 😂
I may not agree with everything that Ben says but Oh man I wish i could articulate things in my head like that...
fr doe
Don’t be envious... talking fast does not equal intelligence
@mr fantastic you're the leftist kind yes? Lol
@@johnfakester5527 actually yes. If you can't structure your long sentences in an understanding speed then what? Being slow and stuttering with ummms as your commas and periods?
Freak outta here
#ArabLivesMatter
John Fakester that’s true
ben: she was an irresponsible gun owner
piers: so she was bad a person?
ben: no she was irresponsible with her guns
piers: right so she went from good to bad
ben: no she was an irresponsible person
piers: so she was bad?
ben: no she was irresponsible
piers: alright let’s take a break.
And for clarification, Ben said "we need to keep bad people from getting the guns"
And Piers responded with "what about [she], was she a bad person?"
And Ben illuded that she shouldn't be allowed guns. If you were to take a strong point Shapiro brang, why didn't you take one you wouldn't have to take out of context?
Silver Time he later clarified she wasn’t bad, but her child was “bad”, had several mental health issues but she still didn’t take the time to be responsible with her deadly weapons and perhaps put them in a very secure place, but since she didn’t do that she was very, as ben said, irresponsible. he alluded to the fact, and not really alluded, but outright said that she should be more responsible with her guns, since she knows that there is a very mentally ill individual in the house.
@@christiandaelemans but Ben said bad people shouldn't be able to get them, and says at the end of the video she shouldn't have had the guns. He could have easily fixed himself by saying "bad and irresponsible people" but instead he doubled down and got confronted on it.
Silver Time he did bud rewatch the end
@@nutnut9915 Shapiro claimed she went from responsible to irresponsible and failed to clarify where to even remotly draw the line and why the line should be drawn there. For example, if the line would be drawn at people who have any sort of mental issues, then that excludes roughly 1/3rd of the American population from the ability to own weapons, which would likely just extend to the families of said people, because there is no legal way for our system to accurately observe the responsibility (or lack there of) any person in the country.
The fact that these two are friends now is very telling.
Piers is typical, asking a question, then interrupts the answer
@@thatguy22441 😂😂😂😂😂
He got interrupted several times by Shapiro.
4:45 Piers throws a chin-up, then eventually interrupts a short while after. And somehow, he's the one who gets to say, "Wait a minute." 😁
I am afraid that Ben Shapiro's debate style is to interrupt with a thousand words per minute statements. So the fact that Peirs Morgan interrupted Ben can be forgiven.
@@user-jg7jn9ub8b Don't be afraid, cupcake. Shapiro is the guest!! What does Shapiro's style have anything to do with Pier's interrupting the answer to his questions??
"im not smirking"
-Ben Shapiro smirking
Smirking*
@@BoblicaDavis yeah thanks man I'm not a native speaker
Piers Morgan is a piece of shit.
Ben shapiro-winning
Piers Morgan-losing
@Luka Moravcevic that's probably to anger them so he can test whether their emotions will take over.
As a Brit, I feel I speak for us all when I say we've disowned Piers Morgan
Thats for the best bro hes a sellout
@65 stoned pigs 😂 good one!
C Foster why?
He’s one reason why I hate itv
65 stoned pigs I’m sorry lol he is fucking hated in the UK
“I’m not smirking 😏”
He's not smirking, he has Resting Smirk Face
August Sawzak resting smirk face 😂😂
He totally does! 😂
Its a medical condition...
Him trying to not laugh made me laugh
"You stand in the graves of the children of sandy hook"
"How dare you accuse me of doing that"
"Well I've seen you do it repeatedly..."
"Like I said how dare you"
"Well you can keep saying that" 😂 I love Ben
Ben Is A Savage With Facts 😂😂
😂
No
Shadowtechnik yea
This wouldn’t be the only instance piers has gained of the death of a child
Ben shapiro is singlehandedly responsible for why piers morgan no longer works on CNN
And now he’s on Good Morning Britain. I know I’m a lefty but I despise him for not allowing for a civilised argument.
Fuck Piers Morgan
I wouldn't say singlehandedly he would of lost his show eventually anyways. I think he should thank Ben because this is the only thing left of that show that anyone remembers.
Alex Jones wrecked him too
Michael lol
Amen brother
You see how Mr Morgan didn't want to answer when Ben questioned him about handguns? Over 90% of the fatalities by gunshots are by handguns.
Why do Republicans think this is a mind stumping question? Of course handguns are a problem-you don’t think we tried to fix this problem decades ago?
What’s funny is that at the time of this clip, America’s *mass shootings* were happening every month. And that was shocking.
Now they’re happening every week.
No one has stopped Republicans from solving this problem. So why haven’t they?
I HATE Morgan. But ARs are how you kill lots of people, fast. And if you're surrounded by children, this is the method.
@@Captain-Obvious1ok
@@Captain-Obvious1 ok
@@Captain-Obvious1 Just like the simulations 😈
Ben is the only person allowed to have the constitution in his jacket
Hahaha that comment makes me want to start carrying one
@Adriel R Thanks for the idea now I'm going to carry it with me as well.
420 likes. Blazeeeeeee it
😑
Why is he the only one allowed to carry the constitution? That was a stupid ass comment 😒
"I'm not smirking."
*continues to smirk*
#Shapiro2024
@Lance Langley yass
@Lance Langley don't ruin my show you dickhead. use anything else other than my favorite childhood show.
*#JohnnySins2020*
@Oscar Vizard andddd...?
yes
“I brought u this, it’s the constitution”
I’m 💀
Enoch Levi yet Shapiro doesn’t understand what a well regulated militia is. He uses part of the 2nd amendment, but not the whole thing
Eric Webb seems like you are the one who doesnt understand. The 2nd amendment INCLUDES militias... not just militias arming themselves lmfao
@@borlonto2771 He wouldn't debate Shapiro if his life depended on it, lmao
@@BigDaddyTCG grammar is not your strong suit huh?
@@BigDaddyTCG he knows more than you apparantly
I may not agree with his politics but the fact he had this guy on his show who clearly disagrees with him for an animated debate makes me believe free speech in our media isn’t yet dead
10 years ago.
@@daedricjon1169🤣
This was in 2013. It’s dead now.
Ben: I think we can have a rational discussion
Piers: *HOW DARE YOU*
He did say something irrational.
😂😂
They made up and actually had one. Though they still disagree on gun laws
He is British people! It has a different meaning for them than it does for us!
When he pulled the constitution out, Piers thought it was an AR15.
Might've well been in his mind.
“Semi full automatic 45 acp AR M4”
It had the same effect
Fully semi-automatic assault constitution
Well the damage it does to people who dont know the constitution is certainly as powerful as an AR15
I refuse to believe 2013 was 8 years ago...
That's life, the older we get the faster time passes. Oh how time flys.
math moment
bruh i remember new years eve of 2012 vividly, to think that was 8 years ago was crazy
Yeah bc it's 7,5
@@maksymilian4000 lol
4:08 is the most compelling argument for the second amendment I’ve ever heard! 🙌🏾🙌🏾🙏🏾🇺🇸
Ya even as someone strongly against assault-type weapons I have no idea what someone could say to rebut that.
America is fcked up that's why you need guns for protection 😂
You logic is like saying, "Drugs help treat illnesses. What will you do if you don't allow people acces to drugs. Therefore there shouldn't be any restrictions on accessibility of drugs to the public".😂😂
considering the tyranny in America is at risk of being ushered in by Trump, with prophetic support from the convinced right, the argument that batches of militias could prevent a modern dictatorship is ridiculous. The militias have joined the tyrant in a sick detour from the 2A purpose. Against the US military, citizen militias wont stand a chance and that is why, like Europe drifting into the darkness of Fascism, you need educated voters and strong political institutions to keep a tyrant - like Trump - from rising to power
"Not fearing a government can go tyrannical is why my grandparents are now ashes." That was a spicy one!
PhenixSlayer yes!
We literally fought his native country because of tyranny. Pierce is an idiot. and yes he gave you a reason, I think it was three times, about tyranny for having assault weapons.
@Ben So now stating facts is trying to be edgy? lol ok
Martyrdom - Drop a live grenade when killed
Piers was fucked the moment Ben uttered that
“How dare you” like I said “how dare you” 😂😂😂😂😂
Alex Jones was like that when he was debating with Morgan.
Piers making a way for Gretha
Ahhahahahahahaah
damn CNN literally posted their own fail
I agree, they are wasting time with people like ben and alex jones that denies facts and believe everyone is out to get them, question though, if the americans have this low trust in their government, why do they elect them in the first place?
@@xxCrimsonSpiritxx " Why do they elect them in the first place " what kind of question is this?
I cannot see any fail here. I see a smirking kid stating that possessing guns could save a nation against an imaginary threat.
@@dariocarere8711 Imaginary threat ? The lootings in America is the biggest evidence that the threat is real .
Yes I do disagree with ben about the assault rifles .But you think that banding all guns is a good idea ?
@@idenree8606 Yes, it is. I cannot see any good reason to own guns. If the reason of having a gun is your personal defense, a taser can perfectly do the job. If you have a gun in your house, close to your bed, you must hide it in a place where "no one can find it"; but, first of all, I'd like to know where such a place is, and secondly, even if you put it in a box with a code combination, how can you say you are using it to protect yourself from thieves? Can you really open such a box during an emergency?
Just use a taser. We don't need guns, we just don't. Even police men and women don't need them. A taser can cover all the distance you need and it's not lethal (unless the person has a heart disease).
If you want to argue that "in that case only criminals would have them" - well, one could never and ever understand if you are a criminal or not when you are buying a gun. I may perfectly buy a gun and look ok, but if I had bad intentions I could perfectly look like a nice guy, right? How may I understand I am ready to use a gun? How could I be sure I won't use it when enraged?
Guns did not solve anything. The only use I can understand is: if you live in a large territory, or in an isolated farm or ranch etc, I can see why you want a rifle because you always fear your cattle may be stolen. But that's a totally different lifestyle. We don't live in a far west village. We live in apartments, we can call the police, we have cameras, we can stop a criminal without killing and avoid putting other people's life at risk.
You’d think CNN would’ve taken this down.
I mean... Morgan kinda destroyed ben so why not
@@dude6842 Man, people weren't kidding about how stupid CNN's viewers are. 😂🤣
@@dude6842 that’s not what I took from that at all.
@@dude6842 da fuk, how?
@@External29 That had me rolling😂
Never think you can go head to head with someone who actually cares about politics when you're simply a celebrity personality.
“How dare you accuse me of standing on the graves of children that died there.”
“I’ve seen you do it repeatedly “. 🤣
You 143 people who thought this comment was brilliant should realize this is a response to the pro-gun response to every mass shooting: 'We have to grieve now, this is not the time to discuss the issue!" Ok... Sandy Hook, The Las Vegas shooting and the dozens of others... it has been a few years now. Can we discuss it now?
@fuçk Thanks for your intelligent analysis of the topic
@@CentristDad155 Ok, let's discuss. Let's have an intelligent fact based discourse on guns and violence.
Part of the issue is that WE GIVE THE SHOOTERS PUBLICITY ON THE NEWS. And not just that. By enforcing gun control, we deprive the law abiding citizens of self defense, since the shooters are going to obtain guns illegally. They shot people, that's illegal, so what makes you think they'll decide to stop smuggling weapons and stop committing crimes?
@@brocanncox6213 Media restrictions? I do not think we can do this and have it be compatible with our way of life.
I lost it when Shapiro gave him a copy of the constitution hahaaha
Ben's facial expression at that moment was gold lol
The way he told Piers, it’s the constitution, like he had to teach him like a 1st grader
Lollll soo funny
It's literally kryptonite to the British people come TF on they still believe in a queen lol
That’s cockiness, I would rephrase to “I was lost when” they both suck during this discussion
It’s hilarious how in the USA, Piers is left wing but in the UK he’s right wing
@@aacgerman3264 nowhere in the world would joe be considered a fascist lol.
@@Cabbage22927 well in my country some people call everyone at their right in the political spectrum a fascist
Not that they're many, but they sure are loud
@@aacgerman3264 funny, it's not too different here
Democrats and Republicans are both Right wing parties, so in comparison yes Piers is left wing. But he's still a tool.
@@jakeb7864 reading comments like yours makes me realise what a waste of time spending time in the comment section is. off i go looking for an addon that removes all comment sections.
we can all agree ben shapiro is that type of guy you hate and like at the same time
I don't agree with most things he says but it's very entertaining to watch him discuss.
If you change the name in your statement to Piers Morgan, then I would agree. Ben Shapiro? I like him all the time.
I don’t understand the hate part I just like him.
You are not speaking for the rest of the nation, please only speak for yourself.
*pulls out the constitution*
"I brought this so you can read it."
Such a power move from daddy.
Dude it's one thing to admire someone but holy shit that gayest fucking thing I've ever read. Have some self respect fanboy
@@BlahstarRecords Actually I take that back. How are you gonna call something gay, then have a channel full of the most weeb shit on the internet. Lmfao, pretty alpha move from somebody as beta as yourself though, so I'll leave it alone.
Reed Demon lmao ur my new idol bro
@@BlahstarRecords dude, it's one thing to not be gay and another thing to worry so much about another man's sexuality. Are you closeted or has someone just wounded your egotistical masculinity?
@@RedHand47 he can't hear you. He's on day #9057 in the closet still trying to fuck the skeletons. They continue to pass. Lmao
Just love how he stands his ground and doesn’t let no one intimidate him. Not even when he’s a guest...lol
AlxEm3 He ran away from an interview because the interviewer was asking difficult questions. All while proclaiming he was more popular therefore superior to the interviewer. How mature.
He looked stupid on shows multiple times that he even left the room cause he was triggered.
@@8bitdiedie how did he run?????? Huh fucktard leftist? Explain!! Tell me how in any way shape or form he ran
Ellie By placing one foot in front of the other in rapid succession.
@@8bitdiedie “It’s hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it’s damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person.”
A quote for you and Morgan
"I'm not smirking"
Proceeds to smirk
Can't blame him really. Epic troll face.
I couldn't even keep a straight face watching it
He does have quite the insufferable smirk, even when I’m agreeing with him sometimes I want to slap the smirk off his face and I’m not even a violent person.
That is his normal face
Head Places Permasmirk
Love Ben and his sincerity. Hard to find ppl in politics who are as sincere. Sorry Piers. I’m a Ben fan!!
Same
The only lie Ben Shapiro said was "I'm not smirking"
@TheTemporary1970 Who is the one who is deluded, now? You clearly didnt watch the same video as we all did....
@TheTemporary1970 this is why you shouldn't comment on something you don't know anything about. let me put this as simple as i can. I guarantee that more Americans legally own guns for the simple reason to protect themselves from the murderer/criminal who dont give a shit about a law. So would it therefore make sense to go after guns when its only the law abiding citizens whos going to be the only people giving there gun back..
TheTemporary1970 because the whole point of the second amendment is to protect citizens from government tyranny
@@kyloren7070 just fucking destroid him
Kylo Ren uggghhhhh.... really dude?
Ben: breaths
Piers: *how dare you?*
robloxairpods 8 😂😂😂
No.
How dare you say how dare you
Deaaaad
@@anycolouryoulike8567 bruh, ur just saying that cause he had valid points
Ben Shapiro: "I'm not smirking."
Also Ben Shapiro: *Smirking*
He was smiling because his friend was making faces in the background
Just his resting bitch face 😆 I have one as well
@@grbgeslnger24 ur triggerd
piers said "stop smiling and smirking". Shapiro replied "I'm not smirking." Therefore he was smiling. get rekt kiddo
@pub g we have all become wrecked
10 years have passed. Pierce moved from being too far left, Ben speaks even faster, hundreds of questionings and hearings and we still don't know what do they mean when they say "assault weapons".
Ben: * *actual argument* *
Piers: how dare you.
James Likes Memes - a personal attack may be a type of ‘actual argument’ but it is a very nasty horrible way to start one and not one which results in a productive debate, which is what happened
Andrew Conaboy Probably because Piers is a little bitch. He could admit to it and move on.
Andrew Conaboy go to bitchute and search sandy hook superbowl. Trust me, you can't argue with what you'll find.
Ben Shapiro was in the wrong.
@Akshay Nuthanapati no u nigga
I'm English and I like Ben Shapiro, and I, like a lot of Englishman can't stand Pier's Morgan.
I fucking hate the prick. Getting booed on question time, and such, really shows the public disdain for this creature.
His problem is that he has no identity or his own opinion. He will say and do anything that he thinks gives him the moral high ground, regardless of how hypocritical and two-faced it makes him come across.
toasteh are you talking about Ben or Piers?
@@emmahamilton6413 Piers, although Ben is not free from being a hypocrite either. But he is a very good debater.
Well I mean yeah he’s a fuckin arsenal fan he’s wrong everywhere
The ONLY cnn video that I like.
Not the Alex Jones?
@@UltraEgoMc I found the Alex Jones one funny- but he didn't really let Piers debate. If he had've been more respectful then he still would've won + looked genius.
@@UltraEgoMc was about to say, that one was epic
I love Ben!
He owned Piers here! Piers is visibly shaken by it . Ben at such a young age has amazing verbal argumentative skills . While still remaining respectful !! #benshapiro❤
Are you delusional or retrded?
shapiro “ why don’t we talk about banning handguns”?
pierce “ we’ll come to that”
-never comes to that-
This was only part one of the interview thingy, he does say at the end of the video "we will talk more after the break" so maybe look for part 2 and he might bring it up. 🤷♂️
@Joseph Witten share the link for what happens after the break....
Just trying to figure out the definition of an assault rifle??!?!?!?
500th like
Matthew Michael well “AR” actually means armalite rifle
Dear America, we apologise for Piers Morgan.
It’s ok
Yell should take him him back uk
Your saying sorry for morgan lol I'm surprised they haven't said sorry for trump.. Cardasians etc there's a hell of a lot they should be saying sorry for
@@markoneill8188 sorry for a democratically elected politician. Fuck off Mark.
@@PabloRamirez-et5ci We don't want him back, he went to the US under a cloud of controversy over phone hacking as the US doesn't have a clue who he is. The only way he could rebuild his career.
Piers Morgan just interrupts people to make him sound smarter
i love him omg he's the best
elijah wartnaby I don't like him but I agree with him here 100%.
elijah wartnaby
Doesn't work!
ever notice how if you are in a argument bout something they interrupt you because your speaking facts and they want to silence you before they get verbally murdered? you see it all the time with football, baseball, sports really, as well as politics, etc.
But we love Tucker Carlson
This was 10 years ago and we're still dealing with these issues
Good ol usa
Yeah it’s so scary here, the rest of the world is petrified to show up at our borders.
It's good for politicians to use for votes
Greta Thunberg goes on Piers Morgan's show.
Piers Morgan: How dare you.
Greta Thunberg: How dare you.
Piers Morgan: How dare you.
Greta Thunberg: How dare you.
LMAOOOOOO
😂😂😂😂😂
👊🏿😅
That'd be some serious glitch in the matrix
Best Comment. I'm dying over here.
Wow this guy Ben Shapiro is sharp.
So sharp he needs to be corrected
Ok 1) Police in the UK don't carry guns and that works fine, BUT in America no that wouldn't work. It's true, an officer could become irresponsible (and do) but it's a lot less likely since they go through proper training... the odds are less. 2) The handguns thing frustrated me because Piers didn't point out that a handgun yes, kills and could kill a large number of people. BUT the difference is the fire rate, Stephen Paddock needed a high firerate to kill all those people in Vegas, you think he would get to 50+ people with a handgun? yea people will still die, but the issue for me is assault rifles are Pointless, I think in america I would own a pistol for protection, but thats because 1 on 1 you have a chance, assault weapons are literally made for killing multiple people in 1 go, not for 1 on 1 combat...
Ultra Man more like Ultra Pussy
There’s a quote from an old Japanese general that says “you can never invade the mainland United States, there will be a rifleman behind every blade of grass”
You are already a fan boy, Stop acting like you are not already
Ben Shapiro: wants to debate
Piers Morgan: "how dare you"
He would be a perfect victim for my imaginary arguments in the shower
Actually, this was a terrible debate by shapiro, his good people, bad people characterization was stupid and Morgan did a very good job using it against him at the end. D- at best.
@@stevenc9207 I’d disagree, Morgan tried to use that against Ben so Ben rephrased that to irresponsible vs responsible. And closed the debate with that. So to say Ben got the last word is a understatement.
@@stevenc9207 lmfao and I can say that is a terrible analysis.
@@ka-boom2083 same
All i can say is poor Piers , he didn't stand a chance against Ben
Best line: "Your passion on the issue doesn't really justify your rationale".
Exactly! The left argues with too much emotion and not enough rationale.
@@bigpapacheese7146 the rationale of kids getting murdered in schools
@@peterf08 kids getting murdered in our schools less than in 3rd world countries schools were owning guns is banned...
how interesting
is almost like the problem is not the guns LMAO
@@Dan_Kanerva
Look at the stats, countries were guns are banned have less mass shootings, that's a fact
@@peterf08 less mass shootings but still more murder with guns... so NO . i would rather have the gun :3
i didn't know CNN showed rape
God tier underrated comment
I'm surprised it hasnt been taken down
sUshipenn23 love this and love your comment!
lmao
El em aye owe
No idea who this Shapiro guy is but, I just love seeing Piers getting his own ass handed to him.
Same. ><
Gosh he's so proud. I can just imagine talking to Piers and feeling like shit afterwards. I'm glad Shapiro is also confident and didn't get shut down or anything, here.
Check out some of his videos on the Daily Wire. I don’t always agree with Shapiro, he’s too Republican for me. But he’s a master at debates, and he doesn’t accept bullshit, feelings-over-facts answers. It’s refreshing to listen to.
@TOP THINKERS +1
He has a really cool show on youtube, I encourage checking it out!!
Well piers is a not as bad right now as he was back then, he even stood up for president Trump. My mind was blown by it
Ben: No, she goes from responsible to irresponsible
Piers: yeah... lets take a break cause I have nothing to say to that.
Thank you for posting this, CNN.
Jonathan Michael IKR? Nothing like watching them getting fucked on their own platform
Love it
Go back to the UK, Piers
I agree, piers is obviously intellectually outclassed yet CNN still posted it. respect. I still dont respect mainstream media but this was nice to see.
I'm pretty sure they posted this because they think Piers won this argument. Shapiro for the win!
Ben Shapiro: *states how majority of gun deaths are from handguns*
Piers Morgan: *lists only shootings with assault rifles*
Anthony Morris
Exactly it’s like what? Huh? Lefties are always looking for ways to make their illogical points based upon emotion
Because you can’t have a mass shooting with a handgun. Please go away
@@mileshawthorne991 I'm assuming you are very young, and possibly also very stupid. A valuable life lesson to learn would be to actually look stuff up before you run your mouth. Most shootings happen with handguns. Mass shootings can and do happen with handguns. Virginia Tech was sort of a big deal so it's actually crazy how ignorant you are
He accidentally mentions Virginia Tech the second time. The US’ deadliest school shooting. During which the attacker only had 2 handguns.
Miles Hawthorne Are you daft? The deadliest school shooting in US history (Virginia Tech) was committed using only handguns. You need to do some research.
Perhaps you should start here, an excerpt from Wikipedia’s article about US mass shootings:
“Several types of guns have been used in mass shootings in the United States. A 2014 study conducted by Dr. James Fox of 142 shootings found that 88 (62%) were committed with handguns of all types; 68 (48%) with semi-automatic handguns, 20 (14%) with revolvers, 35 (25%) with semi-automatic rifles, and 19 (13%) with shotguns.”
Piers: Don't smirk at me
Ben: I'm not smirking 😏
🤣
@@AmanSingh-qn3mw 🤣🤣
That was simply an allergic reaction to B.S.
@@davidh4374 bro said he was standing on the Graves of dead children, nd then called HIM a bully 😭😭 like bro wasn't even arguing politics 😂
@@igotadildoinmyassrnbut8104 you mixed up the chronology, and the characteristics too.
Ben , you are awesome !
During the break, Piers Morgan had lined up a little boy in a wheelchair who had suffered a gunshot wound and was left paralyzed to come and give his plea to Ben Shapiro. Upon realizing this would validate Ben's accusation, they wheeled the little boy away.
Matal Heard about this. Ben calls it like he sees it.
EscapadesofaBibliophile He accused Piers of "standing on the graves" of child victims talking down to those who disagree with his policies and here he was preparing to parade one in front of Ben. I don't have a link because this was during a commercial break, but Ben has talked about it during his interview with Dave Rubin regarding gun control.
@@lenni9669 using gun violence victims to further his agenda and bully ben he realized that ben called him out on it and realized he would be even more hated if he pulled that disgusting stunt
ben would of destroyed the kid too. but the difference is the kid would of left in understanding and him and ben would of left on a good note apposed to the cry baby piers
@@lenni9669 Maybe Mr Morgan would have actually stood on the boy in the wheelchair. I suppose Shapiros accusation means nothing without Morgan actually doing that.
"I'm not smirking"
He was, and was completely justified in doing so.
I’m starting to think that that is just how he looks
"justified" to smirk at the idea of children being killed. Right. i swear, he better hope he never meets me, he won't be able to smirk for a long fucking time.
@@imcallingjapan2178 lol re-watch the video and actually try to comprehend what is being said. Shapiro was fully prepared for this conversation and your aggression is typical uneducated left-wing speak.
You actually thought he was smirking about dead childeren. You sound just like those news reporters that are so narrow-minded on their reports and only continue with whatever narrative they imagined. Get real.
@@magno172 I love how you little losers CONSTANTLY bitch and whine about "cancel culture" whenever one of your paid demogogues is denied the chance to preach at some venue... yet you're fine with flagging my comments here to have them removed. Censorship is fine when your precious little feelings are in danger of being hurt, aren't they? Just like that smirking little streak of piss you idolize. It's embarrassing
@@imcallingjapan2178 ... but did you rewatch the video?
Again, changing the subject of the conversation to fit your narrative. Also, I just woke up. I didn't flag shit and I'd be glad to continue this conversation on another platform since UA-cam is basically run by China now.
Talk about coming out the gate swinging, Jesus Christ Shapiro did not give him a moment to process that
Its part of his debate strategy, very effective
It’s ALL of Morgan’s strategy, talk over the guest and get more words in.
Yea. I don't know if Morgan was prepared for that...I like how Shapiro puts things. He just comes right out and isn't afraid to say what he wants
Taylor Mcgarry facts don’t care about your feelings is his saying
Piers got stuck on the "how dare you" NPC dialogue loop.
"Im not smirking smirks harder " lmao love ben
Well that didn't age well.
Shapiro: "I have these facts."
Piers: "I have these feelings."
Rekaert ???? Piers had more facts than Ben did. Ben was just trying to make a mock out of him. Only reason he’s got so many dedicated 12 year olds standing behind him is because he does immature shit like this when he’s around the adults
Miles Hawthorne he gave little to no faces Bens who argument was facts
Miles Hawthorne libtard detected.
@@mileshawthorne991
1:39, Piers literally says ask someone else to debate that statement because he can't
2:14, Ben brings up a factual statement and uses Piers' structure of argument against him and Piers simply runs away from the point again.
Those are just two examples but everytime Ben brought up a point for debate, Piers avoided it, that's a clear sign of someone who knows they're on the losing side of a debate
@@calebd9863 Moron detected
Peirs : "You've accused me of standing on the graves of those who were killed at Sandyhook "
Ben: "And being a Bully, yes."
Piers really dodged that children of Chicago question
Fr
If I was Piers there I would have been like "So you think we should get rid of hand guns too? Excellent idea!"
Also he definitely did not dodge it. He pointed out that most mass shootings where many people were hurt by one person was done with an assault weapon, while the handgun killings Ben talked about were with one specific victim.
@@jackmansfield3004 no on all levels. He for sure dodged it he said “we’ll get to that” and then never did. Piers Morgan says he respects the second amendment so if you were him you wouldn’t call that an excellent idea😴Also Ben was not referring to “one specific victim” when talking about hand guns in Chicago, did we watch the same video or are you just flat out ignorant? Maybe a child who hasn’t seen much… anyways, there are plenty of instances where 2+ people die from someone firing a handgun, especially in Chicago. Yes the number of murdered people in an incident involving a hand gun is less than mass shooting w/ assault rifles like sandy hook but those instances happen far less than , idk say every single day across many US cities
@@Tiy51 Sir Imma need you to calm down. I am going to be very straight with you and try not to get too mad you called me ignorant for disagreeing with you. I fully support the second amendment. I fully support that people can own automatic rifles in this country. I don't think you should be able to get one at 18. I do not think you should be able to walk out with one without a wait period. I think there needs to be better background checks, more strict mental health screening not just for you, but for immediate family. I think guns need to be safely stored in a unreachable place when not in use to keep it away from others. I also thought it was hilarious when he handed him the Constitution. I think these restrictions need to be federally placed on assault weapons, not single fire handguns. Automatic handguns need some of the same supervision. Then there is other stuff like bullet proof vests and other things I don't really want to get into. I also think it should be a separate process to have a license for ARs. Feels like some common sense gun laws there, but you got states like Texas passing "constitutional carry" laws and you can't really be okay with that. As I said before though, I completely support the right to own these guns and the constitution as a whole, since that is the reason we can have this conversation and exercise our right to free speech. (Also that thing I said about Pier's comeback was a joke sorry if that wasn't clear but then I am ignorant and a child)
@@jackmansfield3004 Refraining from anger as you wish, but most of this information is irrelevant to what WE are talking about. It’s relevant to the video but not our discussion. Yeah I agree it should be harder to get an automatic weapon but what’s being discussed here is the fact that Piers never addressed the children of Chicago question. There are FAR more deaths by handguns than assault weapons so for him to dismiss that and bring up emotional events such as sandy hook to get people on his side is just manipulative. Clarifying his view on automatic rifles is not the same as addressing Shapiros Children of Chicago question, Piers doesn’t care about inner city blight, just making sure the world knows he’s a “good boy”
They were both so much more reserved and polite back then lol. 10 years later this conversation seems so civil on both sides.
Did we watch the same interview? If anything, there was nothing but hostility here from Piers. The two of them actually get along better TODAY.
"I'm not smirking" now now Ben. that's the only straight lie I've heard you say.
Camille Pango No even then he was correct he wasn’t smirking he was smiling
Its arguable, only Shapiro knows if his smile was a smirk or his normal smile. But it did look like a smirk haha.
He smirks all the type.
It’s just his face he has a resting smirk face like I have a resting bitch face
A smirk is markedly different from a smile; The dude knew he was smirking.
Not that that is some horrible thing. Just admit to it if you’re called out.
Piers: You can smirk at me, and you can laugh at me,
Ben: I'm not smirking 😏
Piers: and you can accuse me of standing on the graves of dead childre....
Ben: and being a bully, yes.
Ben is the best
smirking because the conversation is exactly how he planned it will go after he hijacks it.
And being a bully 😁😁😁
Why is ben the best?
R Parker
Heh
Didn't deny laughing tho
This is so satisfying to watch. You can dislike Shapiro all you want, but damn he is articulate and knows what he is talking about.
I know right
I don’t like him much but this had me in tears😂😂. I love this interview and him shutting down Piers
He has this ability to articulate his point in a way where you end up agreeing with him even if you disagree on the overarching philosophical point. He's certainly not someone you'd want to go toe to toe with.
I tend to disagree with him. He was probably neutered at birth.
From an anarchists perspective, a gun owners perspective, a collage educated persons perspective, a socialists perspective, and a christians perspective, I must say I disagree with Ben on a lot of shit but Jesus he just owned them. 😧😧😧
Piers absolutely destroyed by Ben here
What I like about Ben Shapiro is that he never dodges the question. He will always answer what is asked in an intelligent and articulate way and will have his views challenged with sense. I haven’t yet seen anyone who has a valid counter argument.
Here in the uk no ones gets a word in with piers Morgan if they disagree with him so it’s great to see his views challenged
Piers: “How dare you accuse me of standing on the graves of dead children”
*three minutes later*
Piers: “Do you not care about the children that died at sandy hook...”
@@willmiskovich359 No it wasn't😂. Piers didn't even seem to know where he was going with his points. Just a standard the last few mass shootings were assault rifles. I mean really, its such a basic arguement and makes no sense if he agrees with the second amendment.
The Random King The amendment is stupid
TheUKNutter oh here we go. You’re from the UK so you would understand
@@TheUKNutter Yeah... So stupid that the US is the most powerful nation in the world. Just stick to your business in the UK.
John Patrick And do you have any proof of that, or is it just blind patriotism? There are many, many stronger colonies in Europe.
Ben wiped the floor with Piers.
Absolutely! If anything he turned Piers more conservative in the decade to follow. 😂😂
Ben : says anything
Leftwing : NAZI
Ben : ima Jew
Leftwing : *completely disregards this*
Sub 2 Me for Good luck 🤣
Sub 2 Me for Good luck pierce Morgan is not left wing
@Benjamin Walker Did he claim that it was okay to label left wingers as communists for you to call him an hypocrite or you just assume right wingers are a monolith and hive-minded, and therefore if a couple of them do something, everyone agrees or does as well? You can't blame an individual of hypocresy for something you saw someone else do, that's not how it works.
It’s disgusting to call a Jew a Nazi
@Benjamin Walker you're implying these things which makes you worse then the people who do say these things.
Piers style of debate is "I have made my point once without being interrupted, so therefore I am right."
Considering Shapiro got thumped on this debate don't think so
@@dougk5 oh ha. For sure. Sent Shapiro packing
@@enrath4078 the stupid Shapiro counter argument..I believe that a tyrannical government is going to come and we need semi automatic rifles to defend ourselves against this tyrannical government I believe is coming. Even though this tyrannical government I believe will come and have fully automatic arms I support those very arms should be banned from owning these guns. Brilliant! Lol what a thinker! The guy is actually too stupid to see the falacy of his own argument
@@dougk5 what's stupid is believing in a gun fight that full auto beats semi auto. Dont get me wrong, no civilian weapons will stop our government when they have drones, tanks, and airstrikes. But to say "oh well since we would be out matched, preparation is futile" is an equally foolish retort.
@@enrath4078 a modern army would crush any armed civilians. And your hero Shapiro actually supports civilians being out matched. He's so incredibly stupid. I also wonder if hes mentally not all there. He clearly has delusional ideas of a tyrannical government coming. Also it's laughable left or right. He is clearly over his head in this debate..he doesn't even see the flaws within his position. As far as Piers he's got every industrialized country supporting his position..facts to back it up. It's easy to check gun violence stats USA vs you name it
There are 30,000 gun related deaths per year by firearms, and this number is not disputed. U.S. population 324,059,091 as of Wednesday, June 22, 2016. Do the math: 0.000000925% of the population dies from gun related actions each year. Statistically speaking, this is insignificant! What is never told, however, is a breakdown of those 30,000 deaths, to put them in perspective as compared to other causes of death:
• 65% of those deaths are by suicide which would never be prevented by gun laws
• 15% are by law enforcement in the line of duty and justified
• 17% are through criminal activity, gang and drug related or mentally ill persons - gun violence
• 3% are accidental discharge deaths
So technically, "gun violence" is not 30,000 annually, but drops to 5,100. Still too many? Well, first, how are those deaths spanned across the nation?
• 480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago
• 344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore
• 333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit
• 119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase over prior years)
So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities. All 4 of those cities have strict gun laws, so it is not the lack of law that is the root cause.
This basically leaves 3,825 for the entire rest of the nation, or about 75 deaths per state. That is an average because some States have much higher rates than others. For example, California had 1,169 and Alabama had 1.
Now, who has the strictest gun laws by far? California, of course, but understand, so it is not guns causing this. It is a crime rate spawned by the number of criminal persons residing in those cities and states. So if all cities and states are not created equally, then there must be something other than the tool causing the gun deaths.
Are 5,100 deaths per year horrific? How about in comparison to other deaths? All death is sad and especially so when it is in the commission of a crime but that is the nature of crime. Robbery, death, rape, assault all is done by criminals and thinking that criminals will obey laws is ludicrous. That's why they are criminals.
But what about other deaths each year?
• 40,000+ die from a drug overdose-THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THAT!
• 36,000 people die per year from the flu, far exceeding the criminal gun deaths
• 34,000 people die per year in traffic fatalities (exceeding gun deaths even if you include suicide)
Now it gets good:
• 200,000+ people die each year (and growing) from preventable medical errors. You are safer in Chicago than when you are in a hospital!
• 710,000 people die per year from heart disease. It’s time to stop the double cheeseburgers! So what is the point? If Obama and the anti-gun movement focused their attention on heart disease, even a 10% decrease in cardiac deaths would save twice the number of lives annually of all gun-related deaths (including suicide, law enforcement, etc.). A 10% reduction in medical errors would be 66% of the total gun deaths or 4 times the number of criminal homicides......Simple, easily preventable 10% reductions!
So you have to ask yourself, in the grand scheme of things, why the focus on guns? It's simple:
Taking away guns gives control to governments.
The founders of this nation knew that regardless of the form of government, those in power may become corrupt and seek to rule as the British did by trying to disarm the populace of the colonies. It is not difficult to understand that a disarmed populace is a controlled populace.
Thus, the second amendment was proudly and boldly included in the U.S. Constitution. It must be preserved at all costs.
So the next time someone tries to tell you that gun control is about saving lives, look at these facts and remember these words from Noah Webster: "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword, because the whole body of the people are armed and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. A military force at the command of Congress can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power."
Remember, when it comes to "gun control," the important word is “control," not “gun."
Underrated comment right here
You my sir, are a genius.
@@tekaxer2454 anyone notice ben looks like jeff gordon and debates like dale Earnhardt lmao
Brilliant work. Well done!
thats some deep shit
Ben: u get offended when people disagree with u
Piers: *proceeds to get offended*
Gosh Ben looks like an 18 year old in this interview.
Im sure he has the intelligence of an 18yr old for sure.
@@ashvsthedeadite6091 and you're like 12 right?
@@middle11 12 is the new 20 fuckface my stepkids are smarter than you!
@@ashvsthedeadite6091 I'm glad they're not your kids xD You seem too immature to be with such a responsibility. Grow up first for their sake
AshVsTheDeadite I don’t think he has the intelligence of an 18 year old, he has an IQ of 140. Also you can’t just say he’s stupid just because of his views. You can still acknowledge the fact that he’s very good at debates and very good at retaining information to support his views.
Ben had this all planned out.
Attack Morgan directly with his words and expose his lack of reason. He'll get angry and try and rebuke his own words, but then Ben would switch to the actual politics, throwing Piers off his game.
Morgan will try his little "what weapon was used" skit, but that's easily defused by handgun statistics, essentially disarming Morgan. Then just string him along until exposing his hypocrisy.
It's like one of those Pokemon power draining moves lol
A Pokemon power draining move 😂 Best comment yet 😂
@@alanmooreisrasputinreincar8106 yes!
So in short Shapiro activates his trap card.
Ben is tricky, smart and cunning.
I would never want to be on the opposite side of an argument with him.
Fucking Drain Punch
One of Morgan’s biggest mistakes of his life is inviting Ben Shapiro on his show.
@Robert Vaughn he didnt like Shapiro made a valid argument and morgan couldnt awnser one question
He won the argument what r u talking abt
Jack Evans ur such a bootlicker
Robert Vaughn No, he did not.
Miles Hawthorne You have seriously horrendous analysis skills if you think Piers won this argument.
I like how two grown men can have a conversation and disagree on alot of things and not disrespect eachother and keep having a conversation or walk off the set like other immature ppl have
Funny you say that because Piers quite literally cannot do that. He attempts to bully and ridicule anyone who disagrees with him without ever addressing the merit behind the points raised. Does so several times in this very video
@anonymousn5292 funny you should say that cause i know he did say "how dare you" to Ben and other things but they both took it like grown men without disrespect despite they different opinions..they kept it respectful. Even when piers tried to push at Ben he didn't do it in disrespectful manner and Ben replied the same way too, even if they had words that offended eachother they didn't disrespect eachother, it was like a slapping eachother with a white glove, it's business and they kept it that way
@@abrahamrivers4250Are you retarded. Piers wasnt doing that at all
“Why they’re now ashes in Europe”
Gave me goosebumps
Never thought something could give Prison Mike the gooseys
Lol what is he talking about
@@georgbergsten6050 the holocaust
@@georgbergsten6050 hes twisting history to suit his agenda, incel mindset.
A TC >incel
>has a wife and kids