Imagine being led to believe this was an interview at all, rather than an opportunity to attack you, simply for not sharing the same values as the biased media.
Never seen "Frost Vs. Nixon"? Although, this was even MORE SATISFYING, especially the bit where Daft Wee Benjamin Aaron "the JINO (if its' views on abortion are any guide) rage-quit because it was getting its' ARSE HANDED TO IT, on the WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL, by the MOST RIGHT-WING JOURNALIST CURRENTLY WORKING IN THE MAINSTREAM BRITISH MEDIA TODAY...
@M. Smith He did. He gave questions challenging Shapiro and his beliefs, that's what journalists are supposed to do. This was a news interview, not a daytime talk show interview. It's not Neil's fault that Shapiro didn't just answer the question, and instead decided to attack the question and the questioner. Really, that shows how Shapiro isn't really all that good at debating too, he can't focus on the topic, and instead seeks to discredit the opponent and invalidate the question rather than address it with real facts or logic.
@M. Smith Otvali, tovarisch - all Andrew did was, y'know, ask it to explain and justify some of the things it has said in the past, and COULD it? No, it COULDN'T - in fact, it, essentially, called a man who once said that, as HIV wasn't really a problem for straight men, it wasn't really a problem AT ALL and who USED TO WORK FOR RUPERT MURDOCH a LEFTIST. Are you REALLY this stupid, or are you just pretending? Just asking...
@M. Smith Also, most people who aren't Muscovite trolls tend to have at least SOME content on their UA-cam pages - nice try, tovarisch, but that was a bit of a schoolboy error...
Suggesting women should face imprisonment for getting and abortion is at best backwards, at worst stone age mentality. Human rights are not a matter of opinion.
@@ejl1000'Human rights' as of 5 minutes ago. Abortion has been illegal for most of human history across societies. Unfortunately, this even meant punishment for late term miscarriages - though exceedingly rare as they are. Maybe you can find exceptions to this rule, but it's a rule. Only very recently have we had the abortion pill, for example; risky cocktails were the choice before, and were generally illegal before the mid-20th century. It is a disservice to the wisdom of our ancestors to offhandedly disclaim them as ignoring 'human rights.' I would argue abortion is not a human right; and this is not a settled matter. Human rights, as we think of them in the West, come from God. This is from Voltaire, Locke, etc. So to use that argument in a secular way is ironic, to say the least. Medical abortion is a relatively new concept and the discourse on its humanity continues. Frankly, the science is clear: the DNA is unique to the 'fetus', and more and more we have better imaging and proof of life at very early stages of development, where historically we had to rely on when the baby could be felt kicking (known as "quickening.") And you know, many historical state laws used quickening as the benchmark for life, so the ways of some states today to allow elective abortions at any stage of life would be considered barbaric to them.
@@fm1615 Voting rights, segregation laws, a lot of things have not been part of the legal systems of the world for centuries. The concept of human rights was put on paper and oath to be followed by the nations of the world in the last century.
Samuel Díez well, plenty of people have called Shapiro a nazi, so that makes him a so called nazi. Just because the dude doesn’t agree with the far left about socialism, that doesn’t make him conservative. Do you consider either of the Bush presidents to be conservative? Because they were most definitely not. How about Nixon? Their labels don’t line up with the ideology of conservatism. Conservative doesn’t get to change from person to person; it’s about individual rights, so it doesn’t matter what label someone uses when their ideology doesn’t fit the definition
@Adrian Heath I have actually already seen a few of these window-licking morons attempting to defend Daft Benny's, piss-poor, performance. And it's absolutely HILARIOUS to watch, wasn't it?
"Youasanalarmclockandtheconcepofdistubingmyevolutionaryneededslumberisamodernconstruct,Iatthismoment,refusetoacknowledgerightnowinthisverymoment.We'lltalkaboutthisatalatertime.Nono.IfyouletmefinishI'minclinedtohighlightthatyoustartedthisconversation". *Hits snooze button for 5 more minutes.
That was not political discourse, that was a slew of leading questions and quotes taken out of context. I have serious doubts about your intellectual capacity if you think Shapiro “lost”
@@jlondono7 I think the thing is that, there is no one lost. The purpose of the interview is just one person asking questions and the other answers, so that people can know more about the topic, which can a person, a book, or an opinion. This is the purpose of the whole thing. There is no back and forth interaction, it's supposed to be only one way. The only thing Ben "lost" to was not the debate, he didn't lose to the debate or argument, cuz there was none. But he lost calm and lost the interview. Tbh, the one being attacked here is not Ben, it was the BBC interviewer the whole time. About questions taken out of context, these are perfect opportunity for interviewees to fill in the context and extend that context to resonate with audience. Elsewhere on the internet, people will literally encounter and read these quotes out of context in everyday life (because they are too lazy to do more research), and Ben would have no chance to explain it. But here Ben was given this very channel to show it. But first he had to take it as a debate, and then had to take it personally. If your opinions can't be confronted by an interview that you lose temper to, idk how i feel about that. Edit adds: In summary, he is not good at this interview thing and he lost calm.
@I am a STUD Well lots of reasons, mainly that I still have a lot to live for, but what about that comment made you want to shoot yourself? Or were you saying that the solution to not being able to pick a speed is to just shoot yourself?
This is one of my favourite US politics-focused interviews in the last 10 years. Andrew Neil completely exposes the growing anger and "coarsening of public discourse" through an interviewee slowly becoming aware of himself and getting unreasonably angry in the process.
He was provided a hypothetical and had a complete meltdown, then got mad because he wasn't allowed to monologue off his pre written talking points. The fact that he folded like a house of cards to a hypothetical is pretty indicative of his entire style of derailing any sort of reasonable discourse in a discussion. Turns out when he's an interviewee and can't deflect with rapid-fire questions of his own, his last resort is to storm out like a toddler. Kind of like Trump in the 60 minutes interview.
@@airinhewram8478 asking regular questions instead of softball questions doesn't make the interview an interrogation. Literally everything he asked was a valid and reasonable question. If Shapiro had managed to stick to his own doctrine of facts and logic, instead of making it an emotional personal battle it would have been a great interview.
Questions, questions, questions! Shapiro is there to answer questions, not the other way around. Ben Shapiro got it wrong big time. What makes me think that he is the kind of guy who would upset a chessboard rather than concede impending defeat...
@@Dundoril Actually Neill at the end around 15:00 says " .... And I did not know you before I _briefed_ myself on this ...." which was an elegant underhanded kick. Because Shapiro could have found out in 1 minute online search (wikipedia): Interviewer is staunch conservative. And with a little more research: Neil has grilled a lot of high profile politicians and some of them are skilled weasels too. I think Bo-Jo did not dare to be interviewed in the last election. In other words: Ben Grifter is so sure that his rhetoric tricks get him out of a tight spot in interviews that he did not bother to prepare. And he is used to softball questions to begin with. this is the _BBC_ and he wants to sell his book. A good interview could have helped him doing that. It was legitimate to look at his former positions. Unlike U.S. media you do not get a book promotion and free airtime (does he know what ads would cost at that spot ? With the BBC and one of their high profile interviewers). He will have to endure that it goes beyond polite questions about his book and the very recent past. And since a lot of the UK audience may not know him he should greet the opportunity to elaborate. If they google him they will come across his criticized statements anyway. If it is part of his ideology stand by it even if it is unpopular. If not admit it. (I should not have said that about all Palestinians, I applies to Hamaz, and I aploogize. I have evolved on that, the tweets are in 2012. Well he is paid to not evolve on that issue, that is why he got angry). He is a professional bullshitter, and Breitbart and the big donors behind them - pay him - and not for ideologcially consistent positions. that is why he got so defensive. 6 weeks heartbeat abortion ban. If you stand behind that and allegedly like a somewhat controversial spirited debate (free speech, no PC crap) - you do not play offended if that is called dark ages. You say: I disagree strongly and here is why 1) ... 2) ... 3) .... He didn't do that. He tried to deflect by attacking.
@@xyzsame4081 ". Because Shapiro could have found out in 1 minute online search (wikipedia" To be fair...In general there is no reason to brief yourself about the interviewer...The person interviewee is imporant after all... Unless you want to make sure that you do not make an ass of youself by "analysing the questions and being sure that the interviewer is left wing"... " Ben Grifter is so sure that his rhetoric tricks get him out of a tight spot in interviews that he did not bother to prepare. " Shapiro in a nutshell...
"There are not many bucks to be made on the BBC, unlike American broadcasting, Mr. Shapiro." Oh my word, this underrated zing really hits the mark, doesn't it?
stella Andrew Neil has been a hardcore conservative since he was like 5 years old. He was a proponent of every possible war that was ever on the agenda Iraq, Afghanistan etc, called Bush and Blair’s plan masterful, he denies climate change, he’s on the right when it comes to any issue you could possibly think of. I really don’t know what’s to the right of Andrew Neil. That’s what makes this hilarious.
@@jollyswagman4714 Being flustered is not the same as being angry. Ben was upset that this was not a real interview. "When you were a child you ate a cookie and claimed you did not eat the cookie. Are you a dirty no good stupid idiotic down right evil liar?!"
@@jollyswagman4714 How would you feel if I insulted you for no reason? Would you feel indifference? How about there any degree of confusion? If I were to push my unfounded statement (unfounded to me) would you be mad at me for talking where I have no grounds talking? If I were to attack your character when you expected a polite interview, would you be understandably upset? If no, then I guess you have been hurt some time in the past and are cynical.... or there is something wrong with you.
"you're just taking things that I've said that sound bad out of context" sir what context could possibly put "the Arab population is rotten to the core" in a good light
@idisplaypace2411 - so you think being able to listen and watch an interview and then think about it, and expressing what you think about it somehow requires you to be an expert? Why on earth would you think that? Where have you got such a stupid idea? And merely positing an opposing point of view to illicit the interviewee's full position on a matter doesn't make the questioner a member of that opposing point of view's political camp. You've seen too many chat shows masquerading as interviews. There's a real difference.
@Douglas Oh fuck OFF, you window-licking waste-of-an-ovum - just because your shero got her ASS HANDED TO HER,, REPEATEDLY, ON THE WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL, why not CRY-ME-A-FUCKING-RIVER, snowflake, and try to not leave TOO big a puddle when you eventually melt. Adios, cretin - missing you already! Like I'd miss, say, tertiary Syphilis.
Ben certainly didn't take down that hole. The guy reading his cue cards did - and on purpose. He is the poster child of how bad tv personalities, ie, fake journalist have become. It was meant as real attack and he knows it.
@@bestofthewes American interviews are very different from British ones. In Britain the interviewer asks questions and the interviewee is meant to be the only one answering, whereas in America there is more of a debate format in an interview. Andrew briefed himself for the interview. Ben clearly did not, not only did he not know Andrew was conservative, he also didn’t know the format of British interviews which he ought to have known before jumping into this interview.
@@bestofthewes Because it's an interview and not a debate. An interviewer should stay impartial thrugh at the interview and by all accounts Neil did exactly that.
The reporter wasn't a liberal, as a Ben Shapiro fan I feel that he could have handled the situation differently. As the interviewer stated that he was unbiased, he was asking such "leftie" questions because he's conservative.
To all of the Shapiro fans complaining that Neil is "digging up" all these old quotes to make Shapiro look bad: Shapiro was on the BBC to promote a book where he argues that one of the reason America is on the decline is that political discourse has gotten too toxic and laments the fact that the Left and Right cannot have a civil conversation anymore. A casual Google search will show that Shapiro has also spent his entire career belittling the Left as being overly sensitive little snowflakes who hate facts and argue with emotion. Neil was giving Shapiro the chance to explain the discrepancy between his previous inflammatory statements and the book he is currently selling. And he was doing this to try to help Shapiro, as bringing this talking point out in the open would allow Shapiro to explain himself on his own terms without the Left twisting his words to make him look bad. Instead of doing that Shapiro doubled down on his combative nature, ironically doing everything he is constantly accusing the Left of. Andrew Neil's final sarcastic quip of, "Thank you, Mr. Ben Shapiro for showing us that anger is not a part of American political discourse," wasn't just about how Shapiro got angry, it was about how Neil was trying to give Shapiro the chance to prove to the audience that his politics was not based on anger despite some of his previous comments, and Shapiro refused to take up the opportunity and instead spent over half the interview yelling at Neil. Shapiro could have avoided all of this by just being more honest about the fact that he's a controversial, intentionally divisive conservative firebrand and wrote a book about that instead of trying to pretend that he's this unbiased purveyor of facts and logic who treats both sides equally. I've seen Shapiro apologize for calling Neil a leftist, but I haven't seen him show any apology or sincere reflection or even acknowledgement on how he was called out for how disingenuous his book was, and how hypocritical it is for him to accuse the Left of being overly sensitive, and how he continues to accuse the left of this, given his performance here, which is the real issue. Also all of the things Neil "dug up" can be found on Shapiro's Wikipedia page. Neil did not have to dig deep to find these contradictions.
@@cadejust6777 - Passive Aggressive much? Hitler also used to scream with great fervor and somehow manipulated the masses. Clearly you have a general hate for people as you automatically identify me (without meeting me, or speaking with me, etc) as transphobic (or any other phobic for that matter) Clearly another shill / troll. To rebut - I dare to say what I will, because - guess what - freedom of speech/expression. And my comment has no "phobic" undertones at all. Clearly, because I did not jump on the BBC bandwagon - you make great assumptions - one of the signposts of troubled thinking. I hope you get help. Please stop spreading your misguided hate and false words. Try to live well ... and if possible - in peace with the world... but with yourself first.
@Sam Jones Yea it is a socialist policy. Just like having a police force, firefighters and a military. Those are all things which are publicly owned just like the UK NHS.
"Thank you for showing that anger is _not_ part of American political discourse" the _absolute_ level-headed snark with which that was delivered lmaoooo
The best part is seeing boiben - struggling to unmic in the face of someone who isn't going to be derailed by his still-waiting-for-his-balls-to-drop-talk-so-fast-no-one-can-say-anything-whataboutism-bullshit- realise at some fundamental level that he *CAN'T* get the last word because he already said "We're not playing anymore because it's my ball and I'm going home!" *impotent footstamp*
If you ever visit england or meet someone from there, it is part of their language and norms to actually have a private inner life, which means all snark and mic drops must be delivered with veiled charm instead of outright attacks
"You're awful, Andrew Neill..." "Oh me, I'm awful? How am I awful?" "You invited me on this show, you just wanted to make fun of me. You’re just like the rest of ‘em..."
I think this shows the difference between US and UK interview bias. When Neil challenges him, Shapiro assumes he's from the left. In the UK Neil is considered to be right of centre. No interviewer worth his or her name should 'go soft' on anyone, even if they hold the same opinion.
To be honest, I've never seen Andrew Neil fail an interview Left or Right. Ben Shapiro spat the dummy. I agree with him on very little (especially free speech) but Neil caught him imo.
Neil is right of center in the UK, because the UK is much more left politically than the US. Which, follow me now, would make him left of center in the US. As seen by his blatant politically leanings (to the left) in his questions.
But Sean, Neil was challenging Shapiro because it's his job to do so. If he's being challenged, he should defend his position without making childish assertions about the interviewer's political bias.
@@swanson671 Even if Neil agrees with shapiro it is his job to challenge it as it gives a fair argument, he asks questions and gives counters to there response but doesnt usually give his opinion or make statements
That's just it tho, the interviewer got to the heart of the issue and exposed Ben as the angry little boy he is. You can see the embarrassment on his face at the end there as he realizes he has lost control of his emotions.
If I were Ben, I'd have done the same thing!! The interviewer wasn't just asking pertinent questions, he was making snide insinuations, as Brits love to do!! 😮
*"I'm a journalist that will ask (politically motivated) questions (in order to subconsciously project my views on the low IQ individuals that watch BBC)." Fixed it for yuh bub
Maia Waive, wow you liberals are mental. You obviously didn’t listen to a thing Ben said. He’s not talking about that kind of anger. Like he said he enjoys a heated debate which things are chatted about. He was referring to how people are practically evil such as Neil who is twisting Ben’s words and shouldn’t even be the one interviewing him.
Hamsterking101 it speaks to Your own ignorance to assume that I’m Liberal, no wonder you side with Ben in this video. I happen to agree with Ben’s perspective in many issues including His Pro Life stance but EVEN BEN HIMSELF ADMITTED that he did not conduct his due diligence in this matter. Unfortunately, a highly polarising approach in journalism has become a hallmark of US reporting and that is simply untrue in many other news outlets across the globe. When this notoriously right wing conservative reporter is inquiring an OPPOSING VIEW to Ben’s narrative, he allows Ben to showcase his beliefs as juxtaposed against contradiction, which is excellent journalism. Instead of calmly explaining his views and addressing reasonable opposition he chose to be emotional and take the questions as a personal attack. Isn’t Ben the one who said that “facts don’t care about your feelings” and yet he treated an interview as a debate.
Hamsterking101 Also, it speaks to Andrew Neil’s maturity and professionalism that he is able to remove his own beliefs in the equation and instead ask questions that challenge the guest’s beliefs regardless of what those are. Honestly, your Fox News, MSNBC, CNN etc. Should take notes!
I've seen Andrew Neil debate with leftists, and he does indeed do the same thing with them. He puts difficult questions to them. To me this just demonstrates the polarity of US journalism; you're either a leftwing or rightwing journalist. No room for the middle.
@@inflorire I don't know about that - have you seen the recent Axios interview with Das Orange Anus? If you haven't, it is utterly brilliant and well wort watching...
The "you're either with us or against us" mentality is deeply rooted into American culture. Left vs right, north vs south, republican vs democrat, capitalism vs communism, why can't they just find a middle ground?
You clearly do not have a clear basis to how an argument is structured: Andrew consistently attempted to make cornering point to jab at Shapiro, to which Shapiro answered. However in a part i didn't even have to search for I clicked randomly, I found at 5:30 where Ben answered then he failed to reflect his own view. This happened repeatedly with jabs and attempts at corning that failed and Ben had none of it. This was the mature decision; I neither would sit in an 'interview' meant to pin me that can't even do it properly. Have a good day
I can just hear him thinking: "Wait. What does that mean? Is there something I should know here? Ack. Maybe I should have done some research on this guy before I accepted to do the interview." Bwahaha.
@@mikeburke3576 exactly, the window of acceptable political discussion in the US has shifted so far to the right that anyone left of Reagan is considered "Radical left".
@@mikeburke3576 exactly, the window of acceptable political discussion in the US has shifted so far to the right that anyone left of Reagan is considered "Radical left".
So, let me break down the word assume as it was done in Nursing school. This is what happens when you assume: ASS - U - ME You make an ass of yourself and the person you assume against.
Shapiro is so obsessed with the culture wars all he sees is bias against him. Hes so used to being in an echo chamber he can't fathom the idea of being asked a question from the opposite perspective.
@@banquetmeal663 ben shapiro is the debate equivalent of those teenage hacking groups that take down gaming platforms on christmas, in that they clearly have a maddening amount of talent and potential yet waste it on being just petty and shitty
@@leonardobji You're correct, this was an interview, conducted by the most right-wing journalist working in the mainstream British media today - I don't know how things work in Russia but, here in the United Kingdom, our journalists challenge their interviewees to discover whether their ideas actually hold any water or if, like Silly Wittle Benjamin Aaron Sh1tpiro, they re so full of crap it's completely unsurprising that they have brown eyes. Now, cry-me-a-river, snowflake and try to not leave TOO big puddle when you eventually melt - blgodaryu vas, kretin...
Casey M BEN GETTING MADE FUN OF FOR TELLING THE TRUTH. I GUESS ITS NOW ILLEGAL TO SAY FACTS. HUH...SOUNDS LIKE A LIBERAL POLICY. LIBERAL BBC REPORTER GOT DESTROYED.
@@AntonioLopez-bc6qg It's a sarcastic/British way of pointing out that anger is very much a part of American political discourse. I.E. Ben Shapiro embarrassed himself by losing his cool during a perfectly reasonable interview. (By British standards at least)..
It means that Ben Shapiro's credibility is questionable. He can't accept criticism. He rataliates with insults if trapped with a question which he can't answer sensibly eventually making him irrelevant in mainstream American political discourse.
"Are you a commie?" "Dude, it's part of the game. These aren't necessarily my opinions, I'm supposed to question you so you may provide arguments." "Ok, you are a commie."
Not to mention that Andrew Neil is so right-wing that he once suggested that, as HTLV-3/HIV WASN'T, REALLY, A PROBLEM FOR STRAIGHT MEN, IT WASN'T REALLY A PROBLEM AT ALL. Just reminding everyone...
"How do you feel about the abortion laws proposed in Georgia?" "How are the abortion laws proposed in Georgia NOT barbaric and taking us back to the dark ages?" one is a question that ben can respond to and one is picking a side.
Tyler Seel im pretty sure in bens book he wrote something about how abortion was barbaric and taking us back to the dark ages. The phrasing of the question comes from bens phrasing in the book
It highlights either one of two things, both equally concerning: 1. Ben Shapiro, the leading figure and voice in recent conservatism, UCLA PolySci and Harvard Law graduate is that politically illiterate and dumb that he considers Andrew Neil a leftist. 2. American politics and the overton window is SO far to the right that someone like Andrew Neil is considered a leftist.
@@dnw009 then that means Ben is just really dumb and doesn't comprehend or understand different politics culture. Even separate from that, assumes a person's political stance just because they scrutinise your position
The insult about ‘making a quick buck’ on a publicly and charity funded news network, as well as his comment on Andrew Neil being on the left, demonstrates how little Ben knows about anything outside of his rigid and polarised opinions.
American Politics is like "you're either with us or against us." Andrew Neil's description of American media in comparison to the media in the UK seems to support that.
@@miketerele1584 Absolutely, although none of the right-wing "news" channels are allowed to market themselves as "News" organisations -ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC and CNN all are, but Fux Noise, Breitbart and OANN? Nope. Just saying...
@Bradley Tuttle may be that opinion is formed based on her own personal experience of coming across a lot of American people who do that throughout her life
@Bradley Tuttle when I was in America most people used sir and ma'am whereas here in Canada I hear people use Mr. or Miss. could be wrong but those are just my personal experiences
@@justusforrster9264 😂😂called common courtesy.. does not become professional until you get to the military, folk have been corrected after calling sergeants “sir”.
that's out of context. But I guess that's what you expect right? He was referring to the point that they just wanted him on the show to ask gotcha questions because he is famous and were not actually interested in civil discourse or philosophy discussions.
@@tagus100 Actually, they are based off SOMEONE ELSE'S RELIGIOUS BELIEFS because, in Judaism, a FOETUS ISN'T EVEN CONSIDERED A PERSON UNTIL IT HAS BEEN DELIVERED. Just saying...
I feel like Ben wakes up every morning and is haunted by the memory of this for a few minutes. It helped me stop watching him as a late teen, it made me realise how shallow he actually is
You're exaggerating _a little_ bit. We're all having a bad day, we're all human no? If you ditched him after that, you weren't quite interested to begin with I'll suppose. No doubt. It is often more interesting to listen Peterson's politics takes personally. But after all, this is all worldly politics. Mari Emmanuel is a real servant | and life is not about politics, which is fleeting and will always be: distraction.
The fact you can admit change in your own views after making a mistake shows great growth. Whether you're conservative, liberal, or anything in between, I hope you continue to form your own opinions on the topics that matter most, and continue to see the charlatans for who they are.
@@EncourageLegacyor maybe you could stop speaking for the guy you replied to and reflect on yourself for trying to change his truth just because you're too offended by what he said.
@@RedceLL1978 how am I offended? Or maybe you could stop projecting emotions unto my genuine comment without giving any reference, still less knowing, seeing me. A wording where I went astray, can you be more precise? I am not trying to change “his Truth“ ('nice postmodernism by the way'), it is simply immature to shame the guy for a bad interview, and cancel his other great efforts. Modern times. Well... Are you not doing the same? If that is how someone personally approaches matters, may feel free to do so. This is not how the world holds together. I am not the judge. Still having an opinion apparently is the same as being offended, if that is not shallow I don't know what is. God bless you! 🕯
Yes. Andrew did take a beating. He was sweating badly after Mr Shapiro danced around the ring and got the old man on the ropes. Ben stopped the contest by politely leaving before Andrew got too badly hurt. We all have our off days. Andrew probably had jet-lag.
@@PodcastCentral333 You're so kind. I appreciate you taking the time to compliment me on my writing, but there's really no need. Thanks anyway. Cheers.
And Andrew roasted him back in the same manner😂 This is what happens when trying to interview someone from the same side of the political spectrum but using the opposite point of view so the person being interviewed can justify their beliefs. It’s a serious problem in the US by both the left and right unlike the UK where we are generally prepared for those sorta interviews
When Americans think they know it all but are ignorant of the rest of the world's views. So self- righteous about their own bias and incapable of rational debate. Talking fast and over others means you are not listening and are avoiding supporting your point of view against questions or criticism. Andrew Neil asks the questions on his programme. (He is well versed and very adept at his job - I say that not being his greatest fan).If you have not got sound means of proving your point, don't meet with him. If you do not know who you are up against, be wise and do your homework first! I don't care if you've written a book, Mr Sadler; viewing you here you are just so much rattle and noise with poorly argued substance.
... not ALL Americans think like Shapiro...I guess the people with more sense stay clear of opinionated nonsense. The wonderful interviewer was giving Shapiro an opportunity to defend his position. Instead he attacked the interviewer like an angry school child.... and spoiled and entitled to boot!!
Ben's schtick is speaking so fast and so confidently that people get flustered trying to keep up with him. Andrew knows his role as interviewer well enough that there was no shaking him in his duty to ask questions.
"Now I'll ask again. What size would you like your meal?" "Sir, I'd be happy to answer your question as long as you answer mine. Is Wendy's a politically impartial establishment?"
@@blackknightjack3850 Absolutely - it's a real shame that all of these Rethuglicans have never travelled as far as, say, the United Kingdom or even Canada...
There is a moment you can pause the video right after Neil says that, where he is looking straight into the camera and Shapiro is bowing his head in defeat and shame. Makes for a great screenshot.
@@jud6ment And it was only on, y'know, the World's BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL, so it's not like tens-of-millions of people will have seen it is it? Oh, hang on...
@stephen noonan It's a bit much to assume a creature like Ben Shapiro is capable of love. He probably just saw something he could throw around as a status symbol.
@@reils5436 Why the hell did he accept an interview from the best-known interviewer in the UK without doing his research on him? Anybody who has seen any Andrew Neil interview knows that he plays devil's advocate, knows that he is not a liberal (although, the US Democrat party is to the right of the British Conservative party, so perhaps that's where Benny-Boy got that impression), and knows that he will press the question until it is answered.
Andrew: "Then why the hell did you accept this interview?!" Stupid game for that lad to play, Neil is a 70 year-old professional political journalist with a healthy income, he won't give the slightest toss about how many hits Shapiro's website gets or how many viewers he has.
Yeah, he comes home and his wife asks him what he wants for tea. Ben: what are you really asking? Lets just be clear what you mean here. Are you sughesting that.... blah, blah blah
@@ThatDogBarkz Not to mention that I would LOVE to see these two run for elected office somewhere, as neither of them could get elected as dog-catcher, considering "he" is Jewish and "she" is black...
Those so-called ‘facts’ were merely out-of-context quotes trying to be used to discredit Shapiro before he could even speak. Shapiro was annoyed that he had to deal with yet another leftist, lying, hack in the establishment media who was more interested in trying to attack and malign him personally, rather than hear the things that he had to say. An honest media in a free society provides all sides of an argument and allows the viewer to discern for themselves what the truth is. Frankly, I’m shocked the BBC hasn’t taken this down after 13 million views as it makes them look so bad.
Fax no printer. Man goes to college campuses and "debates" people who's frontal lobes are still developing and then gets mad when someone way smarter than him makes him look dumb
@@logandate4303 not to mention that Andrew "if HIV isn't a problem for straight men, it isn't a problem AT ALL" Neil is about as far as it is possible to get from being a "lefty" or a college student - having said that, Andrew Neil graduated the University of Glasgow, which was founded in 1451...
@@Baraa.K.Mohammad Absolutely - I mean, if I were going to be interviewed on the WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL, I would, perhaps, at least watch a couple of my interviewer's previous conversations. But Daft Wee Benjamin Aaron Shitpiro DIDN'T, and this glorious, slow-motion car-crash was the result...
@@saulgoodman9188 That was the point. This interview, unlike Shapiro's college tours, isn't a one-sided "debate" with unprepared undergrads still feeling themselves out that he can easily "destroy". He's facing in informed interviewer who points out his hypocrisies and it angers him.
@@saulgoodman9188 The format/platform is one sided QandA rather than discussion and its mostly one or limited responses especially with college students that probably have no idea why they are even there. A lot different when hes actually pressed like in this video.
Well.. kind of hard to do that if you insult a person and have strong opinions against the group he represents. Apparently being the moderator and the attacker has a lot of advantages.
@@toph8298 uh huh.. so are you claiming Shapiro used that here? Cause he didn't. He did however question the bias since he gave his opinion and literally made insults. So.. you are wrong. Want proof? Watch the damn video.. smh. If I claim abortion law are barbaric and medieval.. am I giving an opinion and an insult or am I asking a journalistic question? Seems like an insulting opinion to me. There is a way to ask that question in a less emotional way. Without triggering insults. See these are called facts. You can look them up. Got any?
@@rayfish007 You ARE aware that Daft Wittle Benny-the-Bitch's attitude towards abortion renders "him" a, now, what's the term? Ah yes - JINO. Go away, Google "abortion in Judaism" then come back and try again - blagodaryu vas, KKKretin...
@@steveparsons2575 If you are attempting to suggest that Andrew Neil is some sort of closet lefty, perhaps avail yourself of Google, then come back and apologise for having been so stupid. Mucho gracias, amiga!
Absolutely - and it's NOT like Andrew is so right-wing that he once stated that, as HIV wasn't really a problem for straight men, it wasn't really a problem at all, is it? Oh, hang on...
@@Julius-77777 Absolutely - you would have thought that, if you were going to be interviewed on the WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL, that you might have done at least a wee bit of research into your interviewer, but it DIDN'T, and this, utterly glorious slow-motion car crash was the result.
B Bailey You think so, because I think this shock value interview is going to boost Ben Shapiro in Europe a lot more, even if Neil was hilariously trolling Ben.
B Bailey the bbc did not “win” here. The basis for any argument that Shapiro was schooled/owned/etc. here is that the interviewer wouldn’t answer any of Ben’s questions, defaulted to the predictable mantle of “I’m the interviewer, you’re the guest; I ask the questions, you answer them,” allowing for the “plausible deniability” that since the interviewer wouldn’t attest to any bias, that perhaps he isn’t biased and is just doing his job, and that the interviewer got under Ben’s skin. “I’m the interviewer, you’re the guest” is fine when it’s a straightforward interview, not when it’s one that includes politically biased questions, such as “the dark ages of the republican platform” or the “popularity of a $15/hr minimum wage” or “the left are the only ones with new ideas” or plenty of other biased, false premises. Then it becomes a political debate. But the interviewer wanted to present these biases AND have Shapiro follow the protocols of a straightforward interview. That’s not an argument, it doesn’t work that way, and that’s why Shapiro was pissed off
@@user-mv3xz1ki2c Except Daft Wee Benjamin Aaron Shitpiro probably DOESN'T even count itself as "American", despite being a, y'know, JINO when it comes to its' views on pregnancy and abortion.
@@DarkHallwayz If "he" HAD mentioned "his" Jewishness, "he" might have had to explain WHY "HE" HOLDS EXTREME, RIGHT-WING "CHRISTIAN" VIEWS WHEN IT COMES TO, SAY, ABORTION, mightn't "he"?
@Vail Marsh it’s an interview, he asks questions that people want answers to lmao that’s what an interview is. To get answers and that’s all, he voluntarily said yes to it and now he must answer unless he doesn’t want to but would make him look bad
I'm amazed at how he gave Shapiro the chance to say "no, these policies are not barbaric, here's why" and instead got buttmad that he said the word "barbaric"
spot on, and that’s most of the Republican party leadership, except that a reminder of their past doesn’t offend them nor effects their popularity among their supporters.
He gets so pissed off when asked the most basic questions about his own viewpoints. Why does he think an interview is a debate? Is he unable to politely and civilly defend his own views?
"Why does he think an interview is a debate?" Maybe because the question was loaded with an opinion, which automatically turns it into a debate instead of a mere interview.
Stelcio lol Andrew Neil agrees with Ben Shapiro, he’s the biggest conservative journalist in the UK. he’s wording the questions in the way of the opposition to see how well your views hold up. he does the same to every person on the show.
Come on that's not nice, don't talk about Andrew like that. Even though the only thing he can do is attack Ben by digging up old crap that has been corrected a long time ago by Ben and trying to label having good values and preferring facts and data as being wrong.
@@kevincarter103 Do you realize how ridiculous you sound? Ben said that he was "clearly a leftist" but if he did ANY research, he'd know that Andrew is quite conservative.
@@kevincarter103 Ben is an idiot, he called a hardcore conservative a leftist lol and then he told him you're just tryinna make a quick buck haha and Andrew was like there are no bucks to be made on the BBC! He is such an idiot, he didn't even know how the BBC works! Ignorance at its finest!
@@kevincarter103 He dug up Ben's hate filled rhetoric to prove the point that he's a hypocrite when he says in his book at people shouldn't hate each other for their beliefs. Proved the point pretty well I think!
Ben Shapiro :- destroys unprepared college students in "debates" Also Ben Shapiro when an interviewer asks questions:- wa wa you hurt my feelings, imma run to my mummy
@@wesleytietz4506 What do you think counts as winning a debate? Because Ben Shapiro wins debates only in the eyes of the audience through the employment of shady debate tactics, rather than winning because he's got better arguments. As a matter of fact, they routinely get thoroughly debunked by people online, like his claim on the suicide rate of transgender people being unaffected by whether or not other people recognize the transgender individual as the gender they identify as LITERALLY being debunked in the first page of the study he cited to make that claim
@@mattclayer6541 you say this, but where is the proof? what makes him snowflake? because he got irritated that the host brought up old stuff that he explained like 50 times alreadY?
User Name he couldn’t answer most of the questions, he got anger and left because someone was saying his own words back to him and he was cornered with facts.
Ben shapiro in his book: why are American so angry. Ben shapiro in real life: Gets angry at the conservative British journalist after he proofs that he has added to political divide and anger.
Come on that's not nice, don't talk about Andrew like that. Even though the only thing he can do is attack Ben by digging up old crap that has been corrected a long time ago by Ben and trying to label having good values and preferring facts and data as being wrong.
@@kevincarter103 1) It wasn't corrected, really. 2) Once it's out there, it doesn't matter that you apologize. Retractions and apologies rarely are as loud as the first charges, accusations, and proclamations. It still promotes the anger and divide. 3) Why pretend you hate the anger in America when you finally benefit from that divide you've actively promoted for over a decade? So, he's the disease AND the cure, now? He wrote a book whining about the political divide he helped exacerbate. What he doesn't do is introspection to include the fact that HE has helped to promote this divide, and not only his loudness, or his zealotry, but his ignorance. He's a dishonest person.
@@aperson-ep8rl Which simply demonstrates that Daft Wee Benjamin Aaron "the Jewish Nazi" Shitpiro doesn't even do basic research on a man who is going to be interviewing it, on the WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL - what a cretin, eh?
@@richardpierpoint588 if it was designed to be a debate, then yes he should have done some research. If it was designed to be a journalist asking questions, you do not need to research the jour alist because the focus is on the questions being asked. Btw, I think it was stupid for Shapiro to assume his political views, but we all mistakes from time to time
@@aperson-ep8rl Well, if it HAD done a wee bit of research, it would, probably, never have taken the interview. However, its' overbearing arrogance meant that it didn't, and ended-up getting its' ASS HANDED TO IT, repeatedly, by the most right-wing journalist currently working in mainstream British journalism today - what a cretin, wouldn't you agree?
Imagine losing a debate to someone who is not even trying to debate you.
you can't debate a moderator, because they control the questions, tone and when you can talk. why moderator v. guest debates are silly.
@@u235u235u235 This WASN'T a debate - it was an INTERVIEW.
Just saying...
@@u235u235u235 Then he should not have argued and simply should have answered the questions...He lost a debate he was not having
@@bensmith5581 Absolutely - and it was utterly GLORIOUS to watch wasn't it?
Imagine being led to believe this was an interview at all, rather than an opportunity to attack you, simply for not sharing the same values as the biased media.
Ben Shapiro DESTROYS The BBC’s schedule by LEAVING The Interview Early.
😂🤣😂
Best comment
Retitle this video. Your comment has won the right.
It was pre-recorded
Shapiro can not reason very well at all
I've seen many people lose debates. This is the first time I watched someone lose an interview.
Never seen "Frost Vs. Nixon"?
Although, this was even MORE SATISFYING, especially the bit where Daft Wee Benjamin Aaron "the JINO (if its' views on abortion are any guide) rage-quit because it was getting its' ARSE HANDED TO IT, on the WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL, by the MOST RIGHT-WING JOURNALIST CURRENTLY WORKING IN THE MAINSTREAM BRITISH MEDIA TODAY...
@M. Smith He did. He gave questions challenging Shapiro and his beliefs, that's what journalists are supposed to do. This was a news interview, not a daytime talk show interview. It's not Neil's fault that Shapiro didn't just answer the question, and instead decided to attack the question and the questioner. Really, that shows how Shapiro isn't really all that good at debating too, he can't focus on the topic, and instead seeks to discredit the opponent and invalidate the question rather than address it with real facts or logic.
@M. Smith Otvali, tovarisch - all Andrew did was, y'know, ask it to explain and justify some of the things it has said in the past, and COULD it?
No, it COULDN'T - in fact, it, essentially, called a man who once said that, as HIV wasn't really a problem for straight men, it wasn't really a problem AT ALL and who USED TO WORK FOR RUPERT MURDOCH a LEFTIST.
Are you REALLY this stupid, or are you just pretending?
Just asking...
@M. Smith Fuck off, cretin - many thanks!
@M. Smith Also, most people who aren't Muscovite trolls tend to have at least SOME content on their UA-cam pages - nice try, tovarisch, but that was a bit of a schoolboy error...
Ben Shapiro called an Iraq war supporter and climate change denier a leftist because he asked him a fair and tough question…
Fair is “aren’t you taking us back to the dark ages?” Come on.
Suggesting women should face imprisonment for getting and abortion is at best backwards, at worst stone age mentality. Human rights are not a matter of opinion.
@@ejl1000'Human rights' as of 5 minutes ago. Abortion has been illegal for most of human history across societies. Unfortunately, this even meant punishment for late term miscarriages - though exceedingly rare as they are. Maybe you can find exceptions to this rule, but it's a rule. Only very recently have we had the abortion pill, for example; risky cocktails were the choice before, and were generally illegal before the mid-20th century.
It is a disservice to the wisdom of our ancestors to offhandedly disclaim them as ignoring 'human rights.' I would argue abortion is not a human right; and this is not a settled matter. Human rights, as we think of them in the West, come from God. This is from Voltaire, Locke, etc. So to use that argument in a secular way is ironic, to say the least. Medical abortion is a relatively new concept and the discourse on its humanity continues. Frankly, the science is clear: the DNA is unique to the 'fetus', and more and more we have better imaging and proof of life at very early stages of development, where historically we had to rely on when the baby could be felt kicking (known as "quickening.") And you know, many historical state laws used quickening as the benchmark for life, so the ways of some states today to allow elective abortions at any stage of life would be considered barbaric to them.
@@fm1615 Voting rights, segregation laws, a lot of things have not been part of the legal systems of the world for centuries. The concept of human rights was put on paper and oath to be followed by the nations of the world in the last century.
@@fm1615 Well that is just shite, isn't it?
Seriously, do you even Google, cono?
This isn’t what I meant when I looked up “Ben Shapiro destroyed by BBC”
That hit a funny bone I didn't know I had
@@rushikesh2320 lol
He did get his bussy wrecked in this video though
@Abby's Stuff happy holidays
Ben Shapiro left GAPED and BUTTHURT by BBC is more like it.
Shapiro: you’re clearly left wing
Andrew Neil: *laughs in conservative*
lol
Ben rekt himself so hard by saying this.
You mean republican, not the same as coservative
Samuel Díez Shapiro is a so called nazi; that doesn’t mean his values actually lineup with hitler’s now does it?
Samuel Díez well, plenty of people have called Shapiro a nazi, so that makes him a so called nazi. Just because the dude doesn’t agree with the far left about socialism, that doesn’t make him conservative. Do you consider either of the Bush presidents to be conservative? Because they were most definitely not. How about Nixon? Their labels don’t line up with the ideology of conservatism. Conservative doesn’t get to change from person to person; it’s about individual rights, so it doesn’t matter what label someone uses when their ideology doesn’t fit the definition
The beautiful thing is that this interview is never going to go away.
Absolutely - and "he" got OBLITERATED by an old, Scottish Tory, which makes it even more fantastic, doesn't it?
@Adrian Heath I have actually already seen a few of these window-licking morons attempting to defend Daft Benny's, piss-poor, performance.
And it's absolutely HILARIOUS to watch, wasn't it?
@@richardsmart5532 cheerio!
@@nationalstudyacademykim5030 Adios, amiga, adios...
@Adrian Heath It certainly was, wasn't it?
Ben Shapiro won this debate. Not this day during this interview, but every morning in the shower when he relives it.
lmao! This comment needs more likes!
Lmao!!!
Only debate he lost was against a bigger badder conservative
I like how you correctly call it an interview too
Looks like this guy wakes up every morning and immediately starts debating with the alarm clock.
lmfao. Ben will do anything to win a debate, even lie in your face. The guy is a hack.
Right. He looks like a drone prepared to spout instructions. I have never been this guy looking like he hadn't a stick shoved up his ass
"Youasanalarmclockandtheconcepofdistubingmyevolutionaryneededslumberisamodernconstruct,Iatthismoment,refusetoacknowledgerightnowinthisverymoment.We'lltalkaboutthisatalatertime.Nono.IfyouletmefinishI'minclinedtohighlightthatyoustartedthisconversation". *Hits snooze button for 5 more minutes.
☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@detnemt9571 lies like what
"Thank you for your time, and thank you for showing us that anger is not a part of political discourse"
He shot at a corpse
Omg he did.
That was not political discourse, that was a slew of leading questions and quotes taken out of context. I have serious doubts about your intellectual capacity if you think Shapiro “lost”
@@jlondono7 even shapiro said he lost. lmao, nice try.
@@microwavecoffee no, you tool.
@@jlondono7 I think the thing is that, there is no one lost. The purpose of the interview is just one person asking questions and the other answers, so that people can know more about the topic, which can a person, a book, or an opinion. This is the purpose of the whole thing. There is no back and forth interaction, it's supposed to be only one way. The only thing Ben "lost" to was not the debate, he didn't lose to the debate or argument, cuz there was none. But he lost calm and lost the interview. Tbh, the one being attacked here is not Ben, it was the BBC interviewer the whole time.
About questions taken out of context, these are perfect opportunity for interviewees to fill in the context and extend that context to resonate with audience. Elsewhere on the internet, people will literally encounter and read these quotes out of context in everyday life (because they are too lazy to do more research), and Ben would have no chance to explain it. But here Ben was given this very channel to show it. But first he had to take it as a debate, and then had to take it personally. If your opinions can't be confronted by an interview that you lose temper to, idk how i feel about that.
Edit adds:
In summary, he is not good at this interview thing and he lost calm.
I don't know whether to make the playback speed faster because of Neil or slower because of Ben
@I am a STUD why?
@I am a STUD Well lots of reasons, mainly that I still have a lot to live for, but what about that comment made you want to shoot yourself? Or were you saying that the solution to not being able to pick a speed is to just shoot yourself?
@I am a STUD Ok then lol, I guess that's technically true
I am a STUD You shot yourself in the head and are still alive *_and_* typing? Wow, impressive! 👌🏾
Shapiro needs to lay off the helium.
This is one of my favourite US politics-focused interviews in the last 10 years. Andrew Neil completely exposes the growing anger and "coarsening of public discourse" through an interviewee slowly becoming aware of himself and getting unreasonably angry in the process.
"you've failed to answer a single one of my questions"
said the interviewee to the interviewer.
He was provided a hypothetical and had a complete meltdown, then got mad because he wasn't allowed to monologue off his pre written talking points. The fact that he folded like a house of cards to a hypothetical is pretty indicative of his entire style of derailing any sort of reasonable discourse in a discussion. Turns out when he's an interviewee and can't deflect with rapid-fire questions of his own, his last resort is to storm out like a toddler. Kind of like Trump in the 60 minutes interview.
@@voigto I think its even worse than that - he was totally free to go off on his talking points as long as he kept it relevant to the question at hand
That's how interviews work in US of A
this was not an interview, It was an interrogation
@@airinhewram8478 asking regular questions instead of softball questions doesn't make the interview an interrogation. Literally everything he asked was a valid and reasonable question.
If Shapiro had managed to stick to his own doctrine of facts and logic, instead of making it an emotional personal battle it would have been a great interview.
He literally played the "i'm more popular than you" card like he was in a high school argument.
Well his bubble hardly contains anyone who has the mental capabilities beyond a high schooler.
Questions, questions, questions! Shapiro is there to answer questions, not the other way around. Ben Shapiro got it wrong big time. What makes me think that he is the kind of guy who would upset a chessboard rather than concede impending defeat...
Too much exposure to college freshmen
Rat-tat-tat blarney sans the gift of the gab, I'd say...@@ciarangallagher9330
Ben Shapiro is a loser.
"You're just jealous because I'm popular and you're not?" Did he really just go Mean Girls on him?
And then whines when Niel tells him the same thing..
Boxer529 lol
Yeah, to a man working for the WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL - absolutely priceless, wasn't it?
@@Dundoril Actually Neill at the end around 15:00 says " .... And I did not know you before I _briefed_ myself on this ...." which was an elegant underhanded kick. Because Shapiro could have found out in 1 minute online search (wikipedia):
Interviewer is staunch conservative. And with a little more research: Neil has grilled a lot of high profile politicians and some of them are skilled weasels too.
I think Bo-Jo did not dare to be interviewed in the last election.
In other words: Ben Grifter is so sure that his rhetoric tricks get him out of a tight spot in interviews that he did not bother to prepare. And he is used to softball questions to begin with.
this is the _BBC_ and he wants to sell his book. A good interview could have helped him doing that.
It was legitimate to look at his former positions. Unlike U.S. media you do not get a book promotion and free airtime (does he know what ads would cost at that spot ? With the BBC and one of their high profile interviewers). He will have to endure that it goes beyond polite questions about his book and the very recent past.
And since a lot of the UK audience may not know him he should greet the opportunity to elaborate. If they google him they will come across his criticized statements anyway. If it is part of his ideology stand by it even if it is unpopular. If not admit it. (I should not have said that about all Palestinians, I applies to Hamaz, and I aploogize. I have evolved on that, the tweets are in 2012. Well he is paid to not evolve on that issue, that is why he got angry).
He is a professional bullshitter, and Breitbart and the big donors behind them - pay him - and not for ideologcially consistent positions. that is why he got so defensive.
6 weeks heartbeat abortion ban. If you stand behind that and allegedly like a somewhat controversial spirited debate (free speech, no PC crap) - you do not play offended if that is called dark ages.
You say: I disagree strongly and here is why 1) ... 2) ... 3) ....
He didn't do that. He tried to deflect by attacking.
@@xyzsame4081 ". Because Shapiro could have found out in 1 minute online search (wikipedia"
To be fair...In general there is no reason to brief yourself about the interviewer...The person interviewee is imporant after all... Unless you want to make sure that you do not make an ass of youself by "analysing the questions and being sure that the interviewer is left wing"...
" Ben Grifter is so sure that his rhetoric tricks get him out of a tight spot in interviews that he did not bother to prepare. "
Shapiro in a nutshell...
"There are not many bucks to be made on the BBC, unlike American broadcasting, Mr. Shapiro." Oh my word, this underrated zing really hits the mark, doesn't it?
Andrew Neil: "I am a climate change denier and neoconservative."
Ben Shapiro: "Nice try, leftist."
im crying is that true
stella Andrew Neil has been a hardcore conservative since he was like 5 years old. He was a proponent of every possible war that was ever on the agenda Iraq, Afghanistan etc, called Bush and Blair’s plan masterful, he denies climate change, he’s on the right when it comes to any issue you could possibly think of. I really don’t know what’s to the right of Andrew Neil. That’s what makes this hilarious.
fizwizzle1989 crying “fake news” has become the default fallback position of the US political right. Wonder where they learned that.
@@dkupke which has become more common? For the right to say "fake news" or for the left to say "racist"
@@SD_yessir fake news
"Thank you for showing that anger is not part of American political discourse" LOL.
Ben was saying anger Is too much in American discourse. Der.
@@rajay777 by getting angry..?
@@jollyswagman4714 Being flustered is not the same as being angry. Ben was upset that this was not a real interview. "When you were a child you ate a cookie and claimed you did not eat the cookie. Are you a dirty no good stupid idiotic down right evil liar?!"
@@_-___________ he looked pretty angry to me
@@jollyswagman4714 How would you feel if I insulted you for no reason? Would you feel indifference? How about there any degree of confusion? If I were to push my unfounded statement (unfounded to me) would you be mad at me for talking where I have no grounds talking? If I were to attack your character when you expected a polite interview, would you be understandably upset? If no, then I guess you have been hurt some time in the past and are cynical.... or there is something wrong with you.
"you're just taking things that I've said that sound bad out of context" sir what context could possibly put "the Arab population is rotten to the core" in a good light
Intentionally being disingenuous. That's all he's good at doing.
He just doesn't want to take responsibility for what he said in the past . Big sign of immaturity
@@myusernameisnotuniqueeverybody in this comment section thinks they are experts 😅
@@idisplaypace2411 Only the Zionists
@idisplaypace2411 - so you think being able to listen and watch an interview and then think about it, and expressing what you think about it somehow requires you to be an expert? Why on earth would you think that? Where have you got such a stupid idea? And merely positing an opposing point of view to illicit the interviewee's full position on a matter doesn't make the questioner a member of that opposing point of view's political camp. You've seen too many chat shows masquerading as interviews. There's a real difference.
Ben: you haven’t answered a single question I asked.
Who’s the interviewer here? 😂 talking 100 miles an hours doesn’t make it right.
See how the zionists run from critique 😂
he also tilts his head forward like a bull, don't forget that
Ben didn't even ask any questions beyond "WHY DONT YOU ADMIT YOURE A LEFTY?!" over and over again... to a conservative.
@@nycsfinest4712
Nothing to do with Zionism everything to do with being a conservative debate bro who normally debates kids
Ben Shapiro, the guy being interviewed: "You've failed to answer a single one of my questions"
Well in a debate sometimes both sides get to ask questions.. just sometimes
Rafi Stefansky This wasn’t a debate, it was an interview, despite how much Ben Shapiro tried to turn it into a debate.
@@RosieAnims And it was utterly GLORIOUS to watch, wasn't it?
Richard Smart Sure was
@Douglas Oh fuck OFF, you window-licking waste-of-an-ovum - just because your shero got her ASS HANDED TO HER,, REPEATEDLY, ON THE WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL, why not CRY-ME-A-FUCKING-RIVER, snowflake, and try to not leave TOO big a puddle when you eventually melt.
Adios, cretin - missing you already! Like I'd miss, say, tertiary Syphilis.
When you finally debate someone who’s not an 18yo college student
So true
Except it's not even a debate! He somehow lost an interview!
@@joshuahuggins3359 fr lmao
@joshuahuggins3359 Because to Ben everything is and intelexual Boxing match so he went in ready to fight and made a fool out of himself lolol
Nah I'll give him props he's usually a pretty good debater, but this wasn't even a debate...
The thing I absolutely love about Ben Shapiro is that his voice sounds *EXACTLY* like he looks.
A small boy
snidelywhiplash ya like a fuckin GOOBER
MrStaano ?
Lol
Ben made that "journalist" look like a columnist for the National Enquirer.
Bro rage quitted irl 💀
quit*
zionists running away from critique 😂
@@encycl07pedia ☝️🤓
@@capnsalt7102"☝️🤓" - 🤡
lol
This isn't even political it's straight entertainment.
agreed
Ben certainly didn't take down that hole. The guy reading his cue cards did - and on purpose. He is the poster child of how bad tv personalities, ie, fake journalist have become. It was meant as real attack and he knows it.
@@bestofthewes American interviews are very different from British ones. In Britain the interviewer asks questions and the interviewee is meant to be the only one answering, whereas in America there is more of a debate format in an interview. Andrew briefed himself for the interview. Ben clearly did not, not only did he not know Andrew was conservative, he also didn’t know the format of British interviews which he ought to have known before jumping into this interview.
@@bestofthewes Because it's an interview and not a debate. An interviewer should stay impartial thrugh at the interview and by all accounts Neil did exactly that.
@@yokloj1503 it’s not the 1700’s, the world no longer cares what Britain thinks 😂
"Facts don't care about your feelings" right?
bill p THESE QUESTIONS WERE UNFAIR TO BEN LIBERAL MEDIA TRYING TO PAINT IT LIKE HE LOST. LIBERAL BBC REPORTER GOT DESTROYED.
@@exakdev2631 i would say r/wooosh but this seems like a trap
The reporter wasn't a liberal, as a Ben Shapiro fan I feel that he could have handled the situation differently. As the interviewer stated that he was unbiased, he was asking such "leftie" questions because he's conservative.
@@okcope6749 You don't know Andrew Neill at all do you...
@@garymorgan3314 I think he doesn't know much at all to be very honest.
To all of the Shapiro fans complaining that Neil is "digging up" all these old quotes to make Shapiro look bad:
Shapiro was on the BBC to promote a book where he argues that one of the reason America is on the decline is that political discourse has gotten too toxic and laments the fact that the Left and Right cannot have a civil conversation anymore. A casual Google search will show that Shapiro has also spent his entire career belittling the Left as being overly sensitive little snowflakes who hate facts and argue with emotion. Neil was giving Shapiro the chance to explain the discrepancy between his previous inflammatory statements and the book he is currently selling. And he was doing this to try to help Shapiro, as bringing this talking point out in the open would allow Shapiro to explain himself on his own terms without the Left twisting his words to make him look bad. Instead of doing that Shapiro doubled down on his combative nature, ironically doing everything he is constantly accusing the Left of. Andrew Neil's final sarcastic quip of, "Thank you, Mr. Ben Shapiro for showing us that anger is not a part of American political discourse," wasn't just about how Shapiro got angry, it was about how Neil was trying to give Shapiro the chance to prove to the audience that his politics was not based on anger despite some of his previous comments, and Shapiro refused to take up the opportunity and instead spent over half the interview yelling at Neil.
Shapiro could have avoided all of this by just being more honest about the fact that he's a controversial, intentionally divisive conservative firebrand and wrote a book about that instead of trying to pretend that he's this unbiased purveyor of facts and logic who treats both sides equally. I've seen Shapiro apologize for calling Neil a leftist, but I haven't seen him show any apology or sincere reflection or even acknowledgement on how he was called out for how disingenuous his book was, and how hypocritical it is for him to accuse the Left of being overly sensitive, and how he continues to accuse the left of this, given his performance here, which is the real issue.
Also all of the things Neil "dug up" can be found on Shapiro's Wikipedia page. Neil did not have to dig deep to find these contradictions.
Thank you for the full context, this has made this video even more of a delight to watch.
"Thank you for your time and for showing that anger is not part of the American political discourse" - Brilliant
Nailed it! We can always learn from the old...knowledge and wisdom never gets old!
Notwithstanding BBC's clear Passive Aggressive provocation. What a sham. There seems to be little unbiased interviewers anymore
@@EclecticEcentric
How Dare You Say That Dont Be So Raven Transphobic 🤬😡😠
@@cadejust6777 - Passive Aggressive much? Hitler also used to scream with great fervor and somehow manipulated the masses.
Clearly you have a general hate for people as you automatically identify me (without meeting me, or speaking with me, etc) as transphobic (or any other phobic for that matter)
Clearly another shill / troll.
To rebut - I dare to say what I will, because - guess what - freedom of speech/expression.
And my comment has no "phobic" undertones at all. Clearly, because I did not jump on the BBC bandwagon - you make great assumptions - one of the signposts of troubled thinking.
I hope you get help. Please stop spreading your misguided hate and false words.
Try to live well ... and if possible - in peace with the world... but with yourself first.
Cooked Shapiro’s entire “career” in one sentence
Shapario: 'You're clearly left wing'
Neil: *Laughs in Daily Mail*
Wennie Wowney mate universal healthcare is a socialist policy
@Sam Jones Yea it is a socialist policy. Just like having a police force, firefighters and a military. Those are all things which are publicly owned just like the UK NHS.
Wennie Wowney t is standard practise, but it is still a socialist idea.
Dylan Edwards yeah?
Wennie Wowney it is seen as leftist here in India also, you ass.
"Thank you for showing that anger is _not_ part of American political discourse"
the _absolute_ level-headed snark with which that was delivered lmaoooo
The best part is seeing boiben - struggling to unmic in the face of someone who isn't going to be derailed by his still-waiting-for-his-balls-to-drop-talk-so-fast-no-one-can-say-anything-whataboutism-bullshit- realise at some fundamental level that he *CAN'T* get the last word because he already said "We're not playing anymore because it's my ball and I'm going home!" *impotent footstamp*
Don't get me wrong, I thoroughly enjoyed this entire interview but that last line is undoubtedly the best part
If you ever visit england or meet someone from there, it is part of their language and norms to actually have a private inner life, which means all snark and mic drops must be delivered with veiled charm instead of outright attacks
@Minwon Jang Dude..I totally agree. I don't believe American presidents can endure that weekly in-person abuse.
Yes - he outsmarted Shapiro. Shapiro fell into the hole he did for himself.
"You're awful, Andrew Neill..."
"Oh me, I'm awful? How am I awful?"
"You invited me on this show, you just wanted to make fun of me. You’re just like the rest of ‘em..."
How about another joke neillll
@@chiz_dog1238 I think we've heard enough of your jokes, Ben
Underrated comment
@@chiz_dog1238
"OK, I've got a joke for ya... BEN SHAPIRO!"
I think this shows the difference between US and UK interview bias. When Neil challenges him, Shapiro assumes he's from the left. In the UK Neil is considered to be right of centre. No interviewer worth his or her name should 'go soft' on anyone, even if they hold the same opinion.
To be honest, I've never seen Andrew Neil fail an interview Left or Right. Ben Shapiro spat the dummy. I agree with him on very little (especially free speech) but Neil caught him imo.
Neil is right of center in the UK, because the UK is much more left politically than the US. Which, follow me now, would make him left of center in the US. As seen by his blatant politically leanings (to the left) in his questions.
But Sean, Neil was challenging Shapiro because it's his job to do so. If he's being challenged, he should defend his position without making childish assertions about the interviewer's political bias.
@@swanson671 Even if Neil agrees with shapiro it is his job to challenge it as it gives a fair argument, he asks questions and gives counters to there response but doesnt usually give his opinion or make statements
To call neil anything but the left is ridiculous.
Andrew Neil: "Are you promoting anger?"
Ben Shapiro: *Literally rage quits the interview*
Ben "Destroyer" Shapiro finally knows what the woke college students he publicly "DESTROYED" felt LOL
When you are very short, you yell a lot.
🤣
That's just it tho, the interviewer got to the heart of the issue and exposed Ben as the angry little boy he is. You can see the embarrassment on his face at the end there as he realizes he has lost control of his emotions.
If I were Ben, I'd have done the same thing!! The interviewer wasn't just asking pertinent questions, he was making snide insinuations, as Brits love to do!! 😮
“Are you an objective journalist or an opinion journalist?”
“I'm a Journalist that ask questions.”
*"I'm a journalist that will ask (politically motivated) questions (in order to subconsciously project my views on the low IQ individuals that watch BBC)." Fixed it for yuh bub
@@TheSemiRealSlimShady trippy
@@TheSemiRealSlimShady
Ahh, Ben and Trump claim another low wattage bulb.
That means he's leftist
@@TheSemiRealSlimShady Lol Andrew Neil is a known UK Conservative, get your facts straight idiot
Probably best interview of that decade. Sums up that decade pretty well.
zionists running away from critique 😂
It's kinda crazy how people can take Shapiro serious. He's just a child who can't take push back and believes he's always right.
"thank you for showing that anger is not part of American political discourse" damn
The face Shapiro made when he heard that! He was disappointed in himself for a second.
Huge burn!
Maia Waive, wow you liberals are mental. You obviously didn’t listen to a thing Ben said. He’s not talking about that kind of anger. Like he said he enjoys a heated debate which things are chatted about. He was referring to how people are practically evil such as Neil who is twisting Ben’s words and shouldn’t even be the one interviewing him.
Hamsterking101 it speaks to
Your own ignorance to assume that I’m
Liberal, no wonder you side with Ben in this video. I happen to agree with Ben’s perspective in many issues including His Pro Life stance but EVEN BEN HIMSELF ADMITTED that he did not conduct his due diligence in this matter. Unfortunately, a highly polarising approach in journalism has become a hallmark of US reporting and that is simply untrue in many other news outlets across the globe. When this notoriously right wing conservative reporter is inquiring an OPPOSING VIEW to Ben’s narrative, he allows Ben to showcase his beliefs as juxtaposed against contradiction, which is excellent journalism. Instead of calmly explaining his views and addressing reasonable opposition he chose to be emotional and take the questions as a personal attack. Isn’t Ben the one who said that “facts don’t care about your feelings” and yet he treated an interview as a debate.
Hamsterking101 Also, it speaks to Andrew Neil’s maturity and professionalism that he is able to remove his own beliefs in the equation and instead ask questions that challenge the guest’s beliefs regardless of what those are. Honestly, your Fox News, MSNBC, CNN etc. Should take notes!
I've seen Andrew Neil debate with leftists, and he does indeed do the same thing with them. He puts difficult questions to them. To me this just demonstrates the polarity of US journalism; you're either a leftwing or rightwing journalist. No room for the middle.
andrew neil was thatchers pr goon wasn't he ?
Time for the Centricide
I specifically listen to the bbc because they inject less emotion and opinion into their reporting unless it’s specifically framed as opinion.
@@inflorire I don't know about that - have you seen the recent Axios interview with Das Orange Anus?
If you haven't, it is utterly brilliant and well wort watching...
The "you're either with us or against us" mentality is deeply rooted into American culture. Left vs right, north vs south, republican vs democrat, capitalism vs communism, why can't they just find a middle ground?
I can't believe that someone who spends his life being critical takes offence at someone throwing critical questions at him
You clearly do not have a clear basis to how an argument is structured: Andrew consistently attempted to make cornering point to jab at Shapiro, to which Shapiro answered. However in a part i didn't even have to search for I clicked randomly, I found at 5:30 where Ben answered then he failed to reflect his own view. This happened repeatedly with jabs and attempts at corning that failed and Ben had none of it. This was the mature decision; I neither would sit in an 'interview' meant to pin me that can't even do it properly. Have a good day
Stolze Herren He didn’t answer the questions he just got mad and accused Andrew of being left. Then he threw a fit and left lmao
Angel Scott the only thing the interviewer talked about was tweets from Ben Shapiro that happened years ago😂 a pretty shitty interviewer tbh😂😂😂😂
Stolze Herren Ben Shapiro attempts to “trap” the college students he debates with all the time as well.
MasterGenius he does more than debate ya know. 🤷♂️🤷♂️
It was like watching a father teaching a child on how to adult properly.
But in this universe the child can end the uncomfortable lesson before it’s sunk in.
@@washburj I agree on that lol .
Underrated comment
He flounced off like Harry Enfield's 'Kevin' character 😂
“If you only knew how ridiculous that statement was you wouldn’t have said it” the look on Shapiro’s face after that is hilarious.
I can just hear him thinking: "Wait. What does that mean? Is there something I should know here? Ack. Maybe I should have done some research on this guy before I accepted to do the interview." Bwahaha.
👏👏👏😂@@riczen6652
brilliant
@@riczen6652 exactly searching for people before interviewing with them is so cowardly movement 😂😂
I came here after listening to Ben the devil justifying the atrocities commited by the criminal government of isreal
Despicable individual!
"Why don't you just say you're on the left?"... That was really funny.
@Angry it's a gift Andrew Neil who now works for the right wing spectator ?
@@mikeburke3576 exactly, the window of acceptable political discussion in the US has shifted so far to the right that anyone left of Reagan is considered "Radical left".
@@mikeburke3576 exactly, the window of acceptable political discussion in the US has shifted so far to the right that anyone left of Reagan is considered "Radical left".
@Angry it's a gift I"m assuming ypu don't know who Andrew Neil is.
So, let me break down the word assume as it was done in Nursing school.
This is what happens when you assume:
ASS - U - ME
You make an ass of yourself and the person you assume against.
this is a perfect demonstration of why the 'if you're not with me, you're against me' mindset is so limiting
Anakin skywalker mf’s be like:
Shapiro is so obsessed with the culture wars all he sees is bias against him. Hes so used to being in an echo chamber he can't fathom the idea of being asked a question from the opposite perspective.
@@banquetmeal663 ben shapiro is the debate equivalent of those teenage hacking groups that take down gaming platforms on christmas, in that they clearly have a maddening amount of talent and potential yet waste it on being just petty and shitty
@@mattdekonty7012 That was not a debate. That old man had no good will with Ben.
@@leonardobji You're correct, this was an interview, conducted by the most right-wing journalist working in the mainstream British media today - I don't know how things work in Russia but, here in the United Kingdom, our journalists challenge their interviewees to discover whether their ideas actually hold any water or if, like Silly Wittle Benjamin Aaron Sh1tpiro, they re so full of crap it's completely unsurprising that they have brown eyes.
Now, cry-me-a-river, snowflake and try to not leave TOO big puddle when you eventually melt - blgodaryu vas, kretin...
I still enjoy dropping by to see this video from time to time lol.
Yeah this one is for the history books.
dafuq is it you
I don’t have a problem with Ben or Andrew it’s just funny to watch
It makes my naughty parts tingle. 😅
Same....one of my annual revisits
"I'm popular, and no one has ever heard of you" PISSED
Casey M lmao 😂
Casey M BEN GETTING MADE FUN OF FOR TELLING THE TRUTH. I GUESS ITS NOW ILLEGAL TO SAY FACTS. HUH...SOUNDS LIKE A LIBERAL POLICY. LIBERAL BBC REPORTER GOT DESTROYED.
shut up brilliant move you niga
@@okcope6749 ur a weird, weird person
@@meredithleavitt5815 he's an angry American boy who has a crush on Ben Shapiro.
"Thank you for showing that anger is not part of American political discourse."
Epic burn!
What did he mean by this?
@@AntonioLopez-bc6qg It's a sarcastic/British way of pointing out that anger is very much a part of American political discourse. I.E. Ben Shapiro embarrassed himself by losing his cool during a perfectly reasonable interview. (By British standards at least)..
@@mrgennaro232 its the irony that Ben is way to sensitive. and his slogan does not make sense.
It means that Ben Shapiro's credibility is questionable. He can't accept criticism. He rataliates with insults if trapped with a question which he can't answer sensibly eventually making him irrelevant in mainstream American political discourse.
This was worth all those years of paying for a television licence.
It certainly was...
Conor Murphy 🤣
licence
Conor Murphy imagine living in a country that makes you buy a television license
"quick buck on the BBC" really got me
Ben is the only man who could make me like Andrew Neil
"Facts don't care about your feelings"
More like "Lies don't care about your feelings" amirite
@@roby1251 sure, good thing Ben tackles lies every day.
@@roby1251 ok muris
Facts are only part of our reality. There are many influences which are beyond the reach of fact. It's a dangerous mantra that is all but useless.
Lifeless web user then he should stop believing in being a Jew because the facts say religion is all shit . Ben is a hypocrite
"Are you a commie?"
"Dude, it's part of the game. These aren't necessarily my opinions, I'm supposed to question you so you may provide arguments."
"Ok, you are a commie."
Iron clad argument
Not to mention that Andrew Neil is so right-wing that he once suggested that, as HTLV-3/HIV WASN'T, REALLY, A PROBLEM FOR STRAIGHT MEN, IT WASN'T REALLY A PROBLEM AT ALL.
Just reminding everyone...
"How do you feel about the abortion laws proposed in Georgia?"
"How are the abortion laws proposed in Georgia NOT barbaric and taking us back to the dark ages?"
one is a question that ben can respond to and one is picking a side.
Tyler Seel im pretty sure in bens book he wrote something about how abortion was barbaric and taking us back to the dark ages. The phrasing of the question comes from bens phrasing in the book
@@xXMaJ3StYXx Ben can respond to either just fine.
I love how he called Andrew Neil, chairman of the conservative students association, a "leftist"
It highlights either one of two things, both equally concerning:
1. Ben Shapiro, the leading figure and voice in recent conservatism, UCLA PolySci and Harvard Law graduate is that politically illiterate and dumb that he considers Andrew Neil a leftist.
2. American politics and the overton window is SO far to the right that someone like Andrew Neil is considered a leftist.
@@Saoirse_don_Phalaistín it's more number 2 honestly
@@Saoirse_don_Phalaistín Differen't politics culture simple as that and Andrew always goes hard against whomever he interviews.
@@dnw009 then that means Ben is just really dumb and doesn't comprehend or understand different politics culture. Even separate from that, assumes a person's political stance just because they scrutinise your position
@@nicklaine5203 its definitely #1 lol
The insult about ‘making a quick buck’ on a publicly and charity funded news network, as well as his comment on Andrew Neil being on the left, demonstrates how little Ben knows about anything outside of his rigid and polarised opinions.
*how little he knows about British politics and media
the shade at the end lol
"...and for showing that anger is not part of American political discourse..." xD
The interviewer has only asked questions in bad faith lol
@@FUnzzies1Weird stance to take when bad faith is kinda conservatives' entire thing, guy.
@@FUnzzies1 if the interviewer doesn't challenge the guests views and comments then what's the point of the interview?
^ Wait, are you telling me Fox News journalists aren't doing their jobs right? Color me surprised.
@FUnzzies1 he simply exposed the hypocrisy of Ben shapiro 😂
Imagine accusing one of the most right wing journalists in the UK of being “on the left” 😂
The look on Andrew's face when he said that had me in tears haha
@@olivergolding8927 Strangely enough, the entire interview almost had Benjamin Aaron Shitpiro in tears - on the WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL...
I guess once you're far enough to the right evryone is "left" lol
American Politics is like "you're either with us or against us."
Andrew Neil's description of American media in comparison to the media in the UK seems to support that.
@@miketerele1584 Absolutely, although none of the right-wing "news" channels are allowed to market themselves as "News" organisations -ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC and CNN all are, but Fux Noise, Breitbart and OANN?
Nope.
Just saying...
“It’s hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it’s damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person.”
Ben is a smart person, so this doesn’t apply.
@@alsid3 it can when andrew is the stupid person :)
Daylyt Hahahahahahahaha good one mate 😂😂
Daylyt You seem to have misspelled "Ben is a blithering idiot."
Sebastian Gonzalez The fact that you’re deriving my intelligence off of this one comment of mine makes your comment arrogant and flat out witless.
Calling Andrew Neil a leftist lmao
It's like calling George W. Bush a "woke person"
Calling people 'Sir' aggressively is such a funny American trait
@Bradley Tuttle may be that opinion is formed based on her own personal experience of coming across a lot of American people who do that throughout her life
@Bradley Tuttle when I was in America most people used sir and ma'am whereas here in Canada I hear people use Mr. or Miss. could be wrong but those are just my personal experiences
It's a form of respect. So is ma'am. Learn professional courtesy lol.
@@justusforrster9264 😂😂called common courtesy.. does not become professional until you get to the military, folk have been corrected after calling sergeants “sir”.
Drill sergeants*
“I’m popular and no one has ever heard of you” damn that's a huge snowflake there!
Ironically anti-sjws are the biggest snowflakes.
14:23 is the time stamp but you have to look at the context
that's out of context. But I guess that's what you expect right? He was referring to the point that they just wanted him on the show to ask gotcha questions because he is famous and were not actually interested in civil discourse or philosophy discussions.
@@jakemetcalf2049 Ah, the classic "Buh.. but they took it out of context!!11!1!1" excuse.
@@brazu9864 Because that's all these idiots are capable of doing. Screw being objective journalists.
You people are disgusting.
This is the guy who claims to be “Facts over Feelings”? 😂
'Facts don't care about your feelings' whilst his core political and social beliefs are based off his religious beliefs...
@@tagus100 Actually, they are based off SOMEONE ELSE'S RELIGIOUS BELIEFS because, in Judaism, a FOETUS ISN'T EVEN CONSIDERED A PERSON UNTIL IT HAS BEEN DELIVERED.
Just saying...
@@richardpierpoint7515 Thank you for proving my point.
@@tagus100 Sorry, Chlamydiamist3r, but what-the-fuck WAS your point?
That you are a Jewish-Nazi ballswasher?
You're extremely welcome!
@@richardpierpoint7515 No, that Ben is a hypocrite and doesn't abide by his mantra. Your first comment illustrated that.
I feel like Ben wakes up every morning and is haunted by the memory of this for a few minutes.
It helped me stop watching him as a late teen, it made me realise how shallow he actually is
You're exaggerating _a little_ bit. We're all having a bad day, we're all human no? If you ditched him after that, you weren't quite interested to begin with I'll suppose.
No doubt. It is often more interesting to listen Peterson's politics takes personally.
But after all, this is all worldly politics. Mari Emmanuel is a real servant | and life is not about politics, which is fleeting and will always be: distraction.
The fact you can admit change in your own views after making a mistake shows great growth. Whether you're conservative, liberal, or anything in between, I hope you continue to form your own opinions on the topics that matter most, and continue to see the charlatans for who they are.
zionists running away from critique 😂
@@EncourageLegacyor maybe you could stop speaking for the guy you replied to and reflect on yourself for trying to change his truth just because you're too offended by what he said.
@@RedceLL1978
how am I offended?
Or maybe you could stop projecting emotions unto my genuine comment without giving any reference, still less knowing, seeing me. A wording where I went astray, can you be more precise?
I am not trying to change “his Truth“ ('nice postmodernism by the way'), it is simply immature to shame the guy for a bad interview,
and cancel his other great efforts.
Modern times.
Well...
Are you not doing the same?
If that is how someone personally approaches matters, may feel free to do so. This is not how the world holds together.
I am not the judge. Still having an opinion apparently is the same as being offended, if that is not shallow I don't know what is.
God bless you! 🕯
That wasn't fair!!!
I mean look at him! This college student is way too old!
Yes. Andrew did take a beating. He was sweating badly after Mr Shapiro danced around the ring and got the old man on the ropes. Ben stopped the contest by politely leaving before Andrew got too badly hurt. We all have our off days. Andrew probably had jet-lag.
@@martynhunter3542 andrew won, ben raged quit.
@@martynhunter3542 third cope comment
@@PodcastCentral333 You're so kind. I appreciate you taking the time to compliment me on my writing, but there's really no need. Thanks anyway. Cheers.
@@a357 Yes, that's right. Ben won quite easily in the end. And he's someone who never gets angry or gets into a rage. He was brilliant, as usual.
“If you only knew how ridiculous that statement is, you wouldn’t have said it”
yes it ooo
*have
@@karlhungus888 thanks 🙏
That gives him far too much credit.
Keep in mind that conservatism is relative to the country you're living in.
I love how Ben's last defense is "I've never heard of you before, and you're criticizing me??!"
And Andrew roasted him back in the same manner😂
This is what happens when trying to interview someone from the same side of the political spectrum but using the opposite point of view so the person being interviewed can justify their beliefs. It’s a serious problem in the US by both the left and right unlike the UK where we are generally prepared for those sorta interviews
To the United Kingdom's most right-wing journalist, on the WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL - brilliant, wasn't it?
When Americans think they know it all but are ignorant of the rest of the world's views. So self- righteous about their own bias and incapable of rational debate. Talking fast and over others means you are not listening and are avoiding supporting your point of view against questions or criticism. Andrew Neil asks the questions on his programme. (He is well versed and very adept at his job - I say that not being his greatest fan).If you have not got sound means of proving your point, don't meet with him. If you do not know who you are up against, be wise and do your homework first! I don't care if you've written a book, Mr Sadler; viewing you here you are just so much rattle and noise with poorly argued substance.
Ben is right to say that, he is way bigger and more popular than this loser of a reporter.
... not ALL Americans think like Shapiro...I guess the people with more sense stay clear of opinionated nonsense. The wonderful interviewer was giving Shapiro an opportunity to defend his position. Instead he attacked the interviewer like an angry school child.... and spoiled and entitled to boot!!
Ben throwing his pen at the end was some sissy sht because he knew he got destroyed here. Funniest part is the old dude wasn't even trying lmao
Dude was trying to throw Shapiro a rope, help him out of the hole he dug but shapiro kept wrapping it around his own neck.
Ben's schtick is speaking so fast and so confidently that people get flustered trying to keep up with him.
Andrew knows his role as interviewer well enough that there was no shaking him in his duty to ask questions.
@@marceldefreitas860 The phrase "Hoist by his own petard" springs to mind...
Ben Shapiro: "You're being dishonest with your argument and you're just parroting views from the left"
"Sir, this is a Wendy's"
"Now I'll ask again. What size would you like your meal?"
"Sir, I'd be happy to answer your question as long as you answer mine. Is Wendy's a politically impartial establishment?"
@@blackknightjack3850 Or are you a "SOCIALIST"?
I agree, The BBC has the mental capacity of a Wendy's employee.
@@richardpierpoint7515 "Sure. I wouldn't mind 15$ an hour to make ends meet"
.
"IF YOU HATE CAPITALISM SO MUCH THEN WHY DON'T YOU MOVE TO VUVUZELA?"
@@blackknightjack3850 Absolutely - it's a real shame that all of these Rethuglicans have never travelled as far as, say, the United Kingdom or even Canada...
"Thanks for showing that anger isn't a part of american political discourse, goodbye." Damn that was a cold cut off
Classic anglo shade on the US
@@jibran_0_0 Absolutely - although Andrew Neil is, actually, Scottish...
There is a moment you can pause the video right after Neil says that, where he is looking straight into the camera and Shapiro is bowing his head in defeat and shame. Makes for a great screenshot.
lol, the look on his face was like, dang, I screwed that up for sure
@@jud6ment And it was only on, y'know, the World's BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL, so it's not like tens-of-millions of people will have seen it is it?
Oh, hang on...
Ben’s girlfriend: “I love you so much Ben”
Ben: “Do you have evidence?”
i seen this comment before
@stephen noonan It's a bit much to assume a creature like Ben Shapiro is capable of love. He probably just saw something he could throw around as a status symbol.
Ben’s wife: “I’m not his girlfriend” 😄
😂😂😂😂😂 i like ben but he kinda messed up with this
@@Mr.Miniguy do you have evidence?
The most frustrating part is the interviewer was giving him easy questions before it escalated. All he had to do was explain his stances.
The interviewer is objective.. Liking your own posts is a bit sad
Because he has NEVER had to explain his own stances
@@davedmusic3598 Why do you defend Shapiro on a debate he has with himself?
Exactly
All the interviewer did was repeat his own beliefs at him and he got angry and stormed out, he obviously has never questioned his own beliefs
Ben: “I've never heard of you!”
Andrew: “And I've never heard of you.”
Ben: *surprised pikachu face*
My favorite moment
destroyed his ego in one simple sentence.
Ben: "Then why the hell are you interviewing me, sir?"
Maybe that's why he's surprised
@@reils5436 Why the hell did he accept an interview from the best-known interviewer in the UK without doing his research on him? Anybody who has seen any Andrew Neil interview knows that he plays devil's advocate, knows that he is not a liberal (although, the US Democrat party is to the right of the British Conservative party, so perhaps that's where Benny-Boy got that impression), and knows that he will press the question until it is answered.
Andrew: "Then why the hell did you accept this interview?!" Stupid game for that lad to play, Neil is a 70 year-old professional political journalist with a healthy income, he won't give the slightest toss about how many hits Shapiro's website gets or how many viewers he has.
At this point, I'm 100% sure Ben Saphiro turns every occasion into debate.
"Debate"
Yeah, he comes home and his wife asks him what he wants for tea.
Ben: what are you really asking? Lets just be clear what you mean here. Are you sughesting that.... blah, blah blah
Candace Owens tries to do the same thing. It's conservative GRIFT at it's weakest. Yawn : D
@@ThatDogBarkz Not to mention that I would LOVE to see these two run for elected office somewhere, as neither of them could get elected as dog-catcher, considering "he" is Jewish and "she" is black...
poor little guy is always defensive about everything, he probably was bullied for being a dumbass
It's been 3 years since this beautiful interview and it never gets old
came back to visit it after shapiro came out again against civil rights lol
Just like Matt Gaetz' dates...
It's forever young
@@richardpierpoint494 :)
@@ChereraTaguato what did he do this time
For a man who claims “facts don’t care about your feelings” he seems very angry and upset when confronted by facts
"Facts" according to leftists aren't facts
The elderly interviewer (whoever he was) got eaten alive in a way that was very painful to watch. He got his a## handed to him
Those so-called ‘facts’ were merely out-of-context quotes trying to be used to discredit Shapiro before he could even speak. Shapiro was annoyed that he had to deal with yet another leftist, lying, hack in the establishment media who was more interested in trying to attack and malign him personally, rather than hear the things that he had to say. An honest media in a free society provides all sides of an argument and allows the viewer to discern for themselves what the truth is. Frankly, I’m shocked the BBC hasn’t taken this down after 13 million views as it makes them look so bad.
Yeah, bens pathetic 😂
He wasn't confronted with facts. It was a baseless distasteful interview, and he did a good job of putting the bald fart in his place.
“I’m popular and no one has heard of you” Jesus Christ how narcissistic can you get
More brutal than narcissistic. Youths don't take prisoners.
@@robertcarter8600 Brutal? lol, it was a pathetic response
What he meant to say is "I'm popular with half-wits and no one in my intellectually limited circle of influence has ever heard of you"
@@epheezzy7628 no, you dont get to explain what he said. He said what he said.
Treasure M She’s not wrong
He made his name by cleverly avoiding anyone with a brain. He started to believe his own myth and look what happened.
Fax no printer. Man goes to college campuses and "debates" people who's frontal lobes are still developing and then gets mad when someone way smarter than him makes him look dumb
@@logandate4303 not to mention that Andrew "if HIV isn't a problem for straight men, it isn't a problem AT ALL" Neil is about as far as it is possible to get from being a "lefty" or a college student - having said that, Andrew Neil graduated the University of Glasgow, which was founded in 1451...
@@richardpierpoint7515 so in other words, Ben Shapiro didn't even have THE SLIGHTEST idea about who he was "debating"...
@@Baraa.K.Mohammad Absolutely - I mean, if I were going to be interviewed on the WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL, I would, perhaps, at least watch a couple of my interviewer's previous conversations.
But Daft Wee Benjamin Aaron Shitpiro DIDN'T, and this glorious, slow-motion car-crash was the result...
@stefan matvei swietoniowski
I hope you are joking because this wasn't even a debate
Tfw you aren’t debating college kids in a one sided format
I don’t see how it’s one sided. They ask him questions and he says what he thinks.
Ok snowflake
@@saulgoodman9188 That was the point. This interview, unlike Shapiro's college tours, isn't a one-sided "debate" with unprepared undergrads still feeling themselves out that he can easily "destroy". He's facing in informed interviewer who points out his hypocrisies and it angers him.
@@saulgoodman9188 The format/platform is one sided QandA rather than discussion and its mostly one or limited responses especially with college students that probably have no idea why they are even there. A lot different when hes actually pressed like in this video.
@Fred Freddy don’t think he ever said that
"There aren't many bucks to be made on the BBC unlike American broadcasting, Mr. Shapiro." This vid keeps me warm at night.
"Thank you for your time and for showing that anger is not a part of the American political discourse". That one there was a violation...
Well.. kind of hard to do that if you insult a person and have strong opinions against the group he represents. Apparently being the moderator and the attacker has a lot of advantages.
....personally I wouldn't have it
@@rayfish007 The only person who tried to use insults was Shapiro with his whiny ‘I’ve never heard of you’ routine.
@@toph8298 uh huh.. so are you claiming Shapiro used that here? Cause he didn't. He did however question the bias since he gave his opinion and literally made insults. So.. you are wrong. Want proof? Watch the damn video.. smh. If I claim abortion law are barbaric and medieval.. am I giving an opinion and an insult or am I asking a journalistic question? Seems like an insulting opinion to me. There is a way to ask that question in a less emotional way. Without triggering insults. See these are called facts. You can look them up. Got any?
@@rayfish007 You ARE aware that Daft Wittle Benny-the-Bitch's attitude towards abortion renders "him" a, now, what's the term?
Ah yes - JINO.
Go away, Google "abortion in Judaism" then come back and try again - blagodaryu vas, KKKretin...
"I'm popular and no one has ever heard of you" says the guy to the world's oldest and largest national broadcasting company.
And a guy who's in charge of one the oldest English language political magazines.
British Biased Crap
Steve Parsons probably bias.. yes... but still the largest broadcasting organisation in the world.. so..
Steve Parsons bbc is ten million times more known then ben shapiro just saying
@@steveparsons2575 If you are attempting to suggest that Andrew Neil is some sort of closet lefty, perhaps avail yourself of Google, then come back and apologise for having been so stupid.
Mucho gracias, amiga!
Andrew Neil won in a debate he wasn't even participating.
Absolutely - and it's NOT like Andrew is so right-wing that he once stated that, as HIV wasn't really a problem for straight men, it wasn't really a problem at all, is it?
Oh, hang on...
Oh my such a clever and original comment haven’t seen this one before...
@@loganc3667 Why not, perhaps, otvali, tovarisch?
Blagodaryu vas!
Hands down he destroyed Ben anyone can win against Ben he’s idiot like Fox News and trump
Back to school, stick to debating college kids.
Imagine interupting someone and then acting like you were interupted.
Apparently Trump’s a big fan of him
You mean the interviewer? Yeah he was a jackass
@@jlondono7 Simp harder for Trump daddy
@@jlondono7 typical castrated virgin lol
@@jlondono7 found the tier 3 Trump sub.
Shapeeno : "I like a robust debate"
*Debate gets a little bit robust*
Shapeeno : *leaves*
Its even funnier that this wasn't even a debate. He essentially lost an interview
@@dannygomez6196 Absolutely - the last person I can remember losing an interview was Richard Nixon...
Andrew Neil is famous all over the world , this extremist Zionist asks him who he is 😂😂😂 Neil was doing what you trying to do 40 years ago
@@Julius-77777 Absolutely - you would have thought that, if you were going to be interviewed on the WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL, that you might have done at least a wee bit of research into your interviewer, but it DIDN'T, and this, utterly glorious slow-motion car crash was the result.
Richard Pierpoint he called Andrew Neil a left wing 😂😂😂. This is the problem when you watch faux news 24/7. Everyone is left wing 😂😂😂
Wow BBC...comments not disabled....BRAVO!!
666SunTzu666 only when they win 😅
B Bailey You think so, because I think this shock value interview is going to boost Ben Shapiro in Europe a lot more, even if Neil was hilariously trolling Ben.
Ri2nonerok boost the amount of people thinking he’s a moron more like.
B Bailey the bbc did not “win” here. The basis for any argument that Shapiro was schooled/owned/etc. here is that the interviewer wouldn’t answer any of Ben’s questions, defaulted to the predictable mantle of “I’m the interviewer, you’re the guest; I ask the questions, you answer them,” allowing for the “plausible deniability” that since the interviewer wouldn’t attest to any bias, that perhaps he isn’t biased and is just doing his job, and that the interviewer got under Ben’s skin.
“I’m the interviewer, you’re the guest” is fine when it’s a straightforward interview, not when it’s one that includes politically biased questions, such as “the dark ages of the republican platform” or the “popularity of a $15/hr minimum wage” or “the left are the only ones with new ideas” or plenty of other biased, false premises. Then it becomes a political debate. But the interviewer wanted to present these biases AND have Shapiro follow the protocols of a straightforward interview. That’s not an argument, it doesn’t work that way, and that’s why Shapiro was pissed off
@@lifeisgoodskt
If he is a Conservative, I would like to see the liberals working for them.
He wasn’t even trying to debate him and he won 😭
" Anger is not part of american discourse " ohh that sweet burn
Sherpa Dai cry liberals cry
Rob Austin what? He was referring to America as a whole including Ben lmaoo
@@robaustin4193 U mad bro? Watching the a dishonest, lying alt-right hero self-destruct in a rage? Yeah, you're mad. So mad.
@@user-mv3xz1ki2c Except Daft Wee Benjamin Aaron Shitpiro probably DOESN'T even count itself as "American", despite being a, y'know, JINO when it comes to its' views on pregnancy and abortion.
KrK007 typical liberal coward did you wake up a 12 year old girl?
I don't think that's the real Ben Shapiro. He never mentioned his wife is a doctor.
samborlon Or the fact he’s an Orthodox Jew
Hahahaha Hahahaha.
But seriously is his wife a doctor???? Lol
@@DarkHallwayz If "he" HAD mentioned "his" Jewishness, "he" might have had to explain WHY "HE" HOLDS EXTREME, RIGHT-WING "CHRISTIAN" VIEWS WHEN IT COMES TO, SAY, ABORTION, mightn't "he"?
@@richardsmart5220 Israel are pro LGBTQ i guess there not real jew according to Ben Shapiro
😂😂😂😂
This is like having UA-cam at .5x speed and 2x speed
TRUUEE omg.
When Ben spoke i thought i hads my speed up xDDD
This made me laugh so hard. Thank you.
LMAO
@Vail Marsh it’s an interview, he asks questions that people want answers to lmao that’s what an interview is. To get answers and that’s all, he voluntarily said yes to it and now he must answer unless he doesn’t want to but would make him look bad
Best comment x2 😂
I'm amazed at how he gave Shapiro the chance to say "no, these policies are not barbaric, here's why" and instead got buttmad that he said the word "barbaric"
Imagine having a discourse so distasteful that someone reading those things back to you offends you
@@scottiebarnes7417 sMe
@@scottiebarnes7417 same
spot on, and that’s most of the Republican party leadership, except that a reminder of their past doesn’t offend them nor effects their popularity among their supporters.
@@scottiebarnes7417 Shut. Up. Cretin.
Mucho gracias, amiga!
@@richardpierpoint3006 damn
He gets so pissed off when asked the most basic questions about his own viewpoints. Why does he think an interview is a debate? Is he unable to politely and civilly defend his own views?
When people are so used to debating every little thing, it's almost second nature to them.
"Why does he think an interview is a debate?" Maybe because the question was loaded with an opinion, which automatically turns it into a debate instead of a mere interview.
Its the way the questions are asked. The questions is filled with an opinon and worded to create a debate.
Not the kind of debate where u attack the interviewer instead of the actual question asked...
Stelcio lol Andrew Neil agrees with Ben Shapiro, he’s the biggest conservative journalist in the UK. he’s wording the questions in the way of the opposition to see how well your views hold up. he does the same to every person on the show.
You can see the realization in his eyes when he realizes this isn't some stoned college kid
Come on that's not nice, don't talk about Andrew like that. Even though the only thing he can do is attack Ben by digging up old crap that has been corrected a long time ago by Ben and trying to label having good values and preferring facts and data as being wrong.
@@kevincarter103 Do you realize how ridiculous you sound? Ben said that he was "clearly a leftist" but if he did ANY research, he'd know that Andrew is quite conservative.
@@kevincarter103 dude, Ben was clearly butthurt, he was asking a conservative interviewer questions and saying that he was clearly a leftist lol
@@kevincarter103 Ben is an idiot, he called a hardcore conservative a leftist lol and then he told him you're just tryinna make a quick buck haha and Andrew was like there are no bucks to be made on the BBC! He is such an idiot, he didn't even know how the BBC works! Ignorance at its finest!
@@kevincarter103 He dug up Ben's hate filled rhetoric to prove the point that he's a hypocrite when he says in his book at people shouldn't hate each other for their beliefs. Proved the point pretty well I think!
Ben Shapiro :- destroys unprepared college students in "debates"
Also Ben Shapiro when an interviewer asks questions:- wa wa you hurt my feelings, imma run to my mummy
This is the first time I've seen someone rage quit an interview.
We got Trump on 60 minutes now lmfao
It's an American Fascist hallmark. Always paint yourself as the victim if someone asks "tough" questions.
I guess you never seen the R Kelly interview
Are you kidding? People are famous for it
Good to see you've finally come out of your hole. Were you born yesterday?
This wasn't what I was looking for when I looked up Ben Shapiro destroyed by bbc.
Lol :D
ROFL
I haven’t laughed in a while. Thank you!
Because he hasn't been...
You are awesome 😁
He lost a debate to a man who wasn't even debating
Still has never lost a debate though.
@@wesleytietz4506 uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Are you being sarcastic...lol
@@BDUB-vo6pl no he lost hard core in a interview which ben turned into a debate then lost it cuz he isn't good at free style debating
@@wesleytietz4506 What do you think counts as winning a debate? Because Ben Shapiro wins debates only in the eyes of the audience through the employment of shady debate tactics, rather than winning because he's got better arguments. As a matter of fact, they routinely get thoroughly debunked by people online, like his claim on the suicide rate of transgender people being unaffected by whether or not other people recognize the transgender individual as the gender they identify as LITERALLY being debunked in the first page of the study he cited to make that claim
Imagine losing an interview to someone who is falling asleep.
imagine getting pwned in a one sided argument you started
Ben could argue with an apple tree and somehow lose.
What is pwned?
@@youpretty5343 completely owned/defeated
@@moodygrapes are you a female?
@@youpretty5343 Are you?
I would think that, being called "Catherine", Catherine would be female.
Also, why does it matter, tovarisch?
Facts don’t care about your feelings: Uno reverse card
Garbage
what are the facts that don't care about ben's feelings, or you just say stuff that sound funny but has no meaning? :D
@@user-name-1 The fact is that he is an hypocritical snowflake.
@@mattclayer6541 you say this, but where is the proof? what makes him snowflake? because he got irritated that the host brought up old stuff that he explained like 50 times alreadY?
User Name he couldn’t answer most of the questions, he got anger and left because someone was saying his own words back to him and he was cornered with facts.
Ben shapiro in his book: why are American so angry.
Ben shapiro in real life: Gets angry at the conservative British journalist after he proofs that he has added to political divide and anger.
Come on that's not nice, don't talk about Andrew like that. Even though the only thing he can do is attack Ben by digging up old crap that has been corrected a long time ago by Ben and trying to label having good values and preferring facts and data as being wrong.
@@kevincarter103 Then he should have calmly answered how he has changed. It's an interview not a debate
@@kevincarter103 Go. Away. Kretin.
Blagodaryu vas!
Neil didn't prove anything. He just asked him a question about it. And Ben had no idea how to answer, tried to waesel around it and couldn't.
@@kevincarter103 1) It wasn't corrected, really. 2) Once it's out there, it doesn't matter that you apologize. Retractions and apologies rarely are as loud as the first charges, accusations, and proclamations. It still promotes the anger and divide. 3) Why pretend you hate the anger in America when you finally benefit from that divide you've actively promoted for over a decade?
So, he's the disease AND the cure, now? He wrote a book whining about the political divide he helped exacerbate. What he doesn't do is introspection to include the fact that HE has helped to promote this divide, and not only his loudness, or his zealotry, but his ignorance. He's a dishonest person.
Fast talk can't win over a seasoned veteran
Never argue with a Scotsman!!!!!
To suggest Andrew Neil is on the left shows he didn’t do his homework.
Into the void sure seems like it
Well of course he didn't. He literally said twice that he has never heard of him.
@@aperson-ep8rl Which simply demonstrates that Daft Wee Benjamin Aaron "the Jewish Nazi" Shitpiro doesn't even do basic research on a man who is going to be interviewing it, on the WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL - what a cretin, eh?
@@richardpierpoint588 if it was designed to be a debate, then yes he should have done some research. If it was designed to be a journalist asking questions, you do not need to research the jour alist because the focus is on the questions being asked. Btw, I think it was stupid for Shapiro to assume his political views, but we all mistakes from time to time
@@aperson-ep8rl Well, if it HAD done a wee bit of research, it would, probably, never have taken the interview.
However, its' overbearing arrogance meant that it didn't, and ended-up getting its' ASS HANDED TO IT, repeatedly, by the most right-wing journalist currently working in mainstream British journalism today - what a cretin, wouldn't you agree?