Much Abrew: Heliod Combo Company (Modern, Magic Online)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лют 2020
  • How good is Heliod, Sun-Crowned backed by a bunch of different combos in Modern? Let's see!
    Today's video is brought to you by Card Kingdom. You can pick up some cards and support the show at www.cardkingdom.com
    ► Read more about this deck (full article): www.mtggoldfish.com/articles/...
    ► View this deck with the latest prices: www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/2690...
    ◼ Purchase this deck (paper): mtg.fish/dPwut
    ◼ Purchase this deck (Magic Online): mtg.fish/0fAva
    Match 1: 3:35
    Match 2: 9:42
    Match 3: 21:06
    Match 4: 32:56
    Match 5: 42:22
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 189

  • @MasterQuestMaster
    @MasterQuestMaster 4 роки тому +129

    Missed opportunity to make an Against the Odds with Heliod and call it "Against the Heli-odds"

  • @ameliaburton5313
    @ameliaburton5313 4 роки тому +36

    No one has mentioned it yet, but Veil of Summer is actually very strong against Storm imo. Gifts targets you, which means that Veil fizzles gifts. As a previous storm player, Gifts is probably the most important piece after a cost reducer
    Edit: I agree with your game 3 sideboard choice much more than game 2
    Edit 2: I personally think that the turn 2 Heliod was wrong against Humans in game 2. Playing spike feeder seemed better against a meddling mage deck since your opponent would have to name Heliod at that point. You then have 4 cocos to hit 3 Heliod, and 4 path as outs, as opposed to 4 coco for 1 feeder. Also, Spike Feeder has built in protection from Reflector mage, since you can gain 4 life and fizzle that 'can't be cast' trigger, which limits your opponent's outs. Just my $0.02 as a backseat driver

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +9

      Yeah, I might have underrated Veil at first. Wasn't really considering Gifts and thinking more of their win conditions, but fizzling Gifts is a big deal.

    • @UlfMTG
      @UlfMTG 4 роки тому

      How does Gifts Ungiven always give the Storm player the grapeshot? I understand why they can always get Past in Flames, because it has flashback so no matter if your opp choses it or not you can still cast it. But Grapeshot doesn't have flashback so what cards do you choose with the 2nd Gifts Ungiven to always be able to get your win condition?

    • @noice_4111
      @noice_4111 4 роки тому

      @@UlfMTG another past in flames

    • @mattd6244
      @mattd6244 4 роки тому

      girls dont play magic

    • @plasmawisp18
      @plasmawisp18 4 роки тому

      @@mattd6244 you're pretty wrong on that one bucko.

  • @arashinoguardianyeah9083
    @arashinoguardianyeah9083 4 роки тому +59

    45:00 tecnically, that isn't true. Infinite life beats infinite attackers, because when they actually attack they become a finite number, while you can still combo off with your feeder at any time. So, until they hit removal, you're gold.

    • @Sosroseno
      @Sosroseno 4 роки тому

      So the same applies to infinite damage? E.g. this deck vs infinite murderous redcap?

    • @theonlyjeff
      @theonlyjeff 4 роки тому +4

      Sosroseno ofc, you can gain more life as long you have the pieces out.

    • @An_Otter_Dennis
      @An_Otter_Dennis 4 роки тому +6

      421.3. If the loop contains at least one optional action controlled by each player and actions by both players are required to continue the loop, the active player chooses a number. The nonactive player then has two choices. He or she can choose a lower number, in which case the loop continues that number of times plus whatever fraction is necessary for the active player to “have the last word.” Or he or she can agree to the number the active player chose, in which case the loop continues that number of times plus whatever fraction is necessary for the nonactive player to “have the last word.” (Note that either fraction may be zero.)
      Example: One player controls a creature with the ability “: [This creature] gains flying.” Another player controls a permanent with the ability “: Target creature loses flying.” The “infinity rule” ensures that regardless of which player initiated the gain/lose flying ability, the nonactive player will always have the final choice and therefore be able to determine whether the creature has flying. (Note that this assumes that the first player attempted to give the creature flying at least once.)

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +10

      Yeah, as long as our combo pieces stick on the battlefield we can beat Copy Cat. If we have to combo first and lose access to the combo it beats us though. Mostly about keeping the combo on the battlefield.

    • @arashinoguardianyeah9083
      @arashinoguardianyeah9083 4 роки тому +6

      @@An_Otter_Dennis This doesn't matter in this case though. Once attackers are declared, there is an x number of creatures that's attacking, and it's impossible to increase their number. The infinite life therefore wins, unless there is a removal ready to ruin your day. But if that's the case you're dead anyway, cause op can use it before comboing of forcing YOU to gain an x amount of life, create whatever number of creatures he needs to win, and go attacking.
      Plus, this rules applies to paper. Online it's a matter of time. I'm pretty sure that unless you f6 you should be able to add your part of the combo to the stack and force op to do the same, resulting in an exausting marathon of 40ish minutes where whoever is faster at putting his ability on the stack wins by the clock.

  • @aaronavey3904
    @aaronavey3904 4 роки тому +20

    Finally a modern video, thanks Seth!!!!

  • @Atmapalazzo
    @Atmapalazzo 4 роки тому +20

    I'm glad to finally get some Modern back. I've wanted to see so many things from Eldraine and Theros Beyond get put through ringer.

  • @hankhill5616
    @hankhill5616 4 роки тому +23

    After playing Magic for a couple of years now, it's kind of cool to see how crazy the power of cards went up from the set I started in. Hour of Devastation had fairly tame cards for the most part, but seeing something like the new Heliod kind of blows me away. One of the strongest 3 mana white cards I 've ever seen

    • @mrbobtehbuildah
      @mrbobtehbuildah 4 роки тому +5

      Things used to be soooo broken lol

    • @fartface8918
      @fartface8918 4 роки тому

      Yeah

    • @arashinoguardianyeah9083
      @arashinoguardianyeah9083 4 роки тому +10

      That's because you clearly didn't play at the time jitte was not banned. Or skullclamp. Or eye of ugin. Or cloudpost. Nah, i'd say that heliod is pretty darn cute compared with some twisted ruthless decks i've seen in the course of the years that had you question your own capability of making good decisions in life. Heck, i almost think that even oko is fair compared with some of those strategies, especially in modern.

    • @mrbobtehbuildah
      @mrbobtehbuildah 4 роки тому +2

      @@arashinoguardianyeah9083 Urza block flashbacks

    • @rastrisfrustreslosgomez544
      @rastrisfrustreslosgomez544 4 роки тому

      More like poor white rarely gets any great 3 mana spells. From the top of my head I remember Brimaz, Council's Judgement, Teferi's protection, 3mana Thalia, maybe history of banalia if you're into knights and that's it, I can't remember another one

  • @unamusedpanda857
    @unamusedpanda857 4 роки тому +6

    God i love these thumbnails. Heliod looks stupidly proud of his metal boi

  • @KindlyAshe
    @KindlyAshe 4 роки тому +4

    In the match up against storm you can sideboard in Veil of summer because Gits Ungiven targets the opponent so if you cast veil in response to gifts it will fizzle

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +1

      Yeah, I think I underestimated Veil against Storm.

  • @jesselaplante1040
    @jesselaplante1040 4 роки тому

    Honestly great list! Once upon a time really brought it together and I expected more Ballistas! Great job!

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +2

      Yeah, Once Upon a Time is key. Ballista is really more of a backup plan to the infinite life in this build (thankfully infinite life was enough to beat most of our opponent).

  • @bryantan4228
    @bryantan4228 4 роки тому +19

    Since its combo Collected Company this deck should be named Heliod CoCoCo

    • @Stayner
      @Stayner 4 роки тому

      Or I am Heliod with the coco. (People who likes reggae will understand)

    • @theexaminer4906
      @theexaminer4906 4 роки тому +1

      Heliod Co-co-combo

  • @patrickbuerke1390
    @patrickbuerke1390 4 роки тому +14

    Seeing Abzan Company coming back into the spotlight is bittersweet for me. On one hand, seeing the deck exist after so many years is great. On the other hand, my Abzan company deck I built over 4 years got stolen this October, and that made me stop playing Modern.

    • @shawnhale2631
      @shawnhale2631 4 роки тому

      Sad to hear that.... Never fun.

    • @patrickbuerke1390
      @patrickbuerke1390 4 роки тому +1

      @@shawnhale2631 Yeah. On the plus side, I've started playing Standard, which is, at least at my LGS, pretty fun

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      Ugh. I"m sorry.

  • @cameronbrake8215
    @cameronbrake8215 4 роки тому +8

    I put 2 x Heliod and 1 x Ballista in my Martyr Proc deck, but haven't been able to get to an event yet to see how it goes. Can't wait to try it out.
    Great video. The kids got to feast! Well done.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +2

      Yeah! Martyr Proc and Soul Sisters are another good home for Heliod for sure. Sounds sweet!

  • @shionkreth7536
    @shionkreth7536 4 роки тому +11

    Playing modern today you don't even need to bother sitting down for the match. :P

  • @123456789moification
    @123456789moification 4 роки тому +4

    I love/hate how everytime Saffron wins he says "And thats the power of the deck! " or "And thats what the deck can do"
    EVERY
    SINGLE
    TIME

    • @SirDerpinmire
      @SirDerpinmire 4 роки тому +1

      and screams any time anything remotely bad happens haha
      Oh nOoOoooo

  • @benjaminrolnick3439
    @benjaminrolnick3439 4 роки тому

    Really like seeing more modern gameplay again.

  • @adavidavis2762
    @adavidavis2762 4 роки тому

    Good to see some modern content :)

  • @AdamKeeton
    @AdamKeeton 4 роки тому +22

    Modern's back!

  • @manyothersRDGU
    @manyothersRDGU 4 роки тому

    your storm opponent scooping to ballista with shenanigans in hand cracks me up

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      Yeah, Shenanigans is a sorcery though, so they were just dead ;)

  • @brendanerickson2363
    @brendanerickson2363 4 роки тому +3

    yay!! modern!! what a sweet deck! thanks for the content!

  • @itzchungus6073
    @itzchungus6073 4 роки тому +20

    Missed the modern content :')

  • @jacobdachauer4377
    @jacobdachauer4377 4 роки тому +3

    good old uninteractive modern! I am glad pioneer exists.

  • @jessedorval7051
    @jessedorval7051 4 роки тому +1

    Such a great deck

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      I was super impressed!

    • @jessedorval7051
      @jessedorval7051 4 роки тому

      @@MTGGoldfish Well you are a great player as well so that helps too

  • @zacheryjacques3973
    @zacheryjacques3973 3 роки тому

    @MTGGoldfish is there any chance this deck has had any updates of the modern deck heliod combo company?...

  • @jrjamesson
    @jrjamesson 4 роки тому

    I might be missing something - but if you have the infinite life combo on board during your main phase, and your opponent has some of their land tapped, why would you then wait until their turn during their attack step (after they've untapped a couple more lands and drawn an additional card) to activate the combo?

  • @crovax1375
    @crovax1375 4 роки тому +5

    Heliod combo will probably not be as solid when the other decks adjust for changes to the meta and update their sideboards

  • @SirDerpinmire
    @SirDerpinmire 4 роки тому +1

    41:46 "We should win unless our opponent has a sneaky surgical extraction". You could have made sure you wouldn't lose against surgical by sac'ing captain of eos before starting the loop, making it impossible for them to surgical your kitchen finks

  • @bryantan4228
    @bryantan4228 4 роки тому

    9:48 6 lands
    “That is just not enough lands to do anything” Saffron Olive 2020

  • @mushwar5455
    @mushwar5455 4 роки тому

    What would happen if the opponent doens't concede to the infinte life? Timeout?

  • @Relisysification
    @Relisysification 4 роки тому +1

    Does genesis chamber with kitchen finks infinite life make infinite MYR, and because they don't have haste that saves you from a saheeli cat combo because you get infinite blockers everytime they try and make infinite attackers?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +1

      Genesis Chamber would make infinite Myr. Technically we don't need it to beat Copy Cat though, as long as our combo is on the battlefield. We can wait until they make like a million Felidar Guardians and go to attack, and then we can gain a million +1 life.
      The problem is basically if we have to combo first, then it works the opposite way. We can gain a million life, but then our opponent can make a million +1 damage and we lose. It's mostly about keeping our combo on the battlefield.

  • @DarrenR84
    @DarrenR84 4 роки тому

    Booby Trap was an AtO but MTGO didn't recognize the correct card restrictions for naming the card. I remember you had to do the 2nd highest voted card instead for that week. So Booby Trap is up there with Sphinx's Tutelage thanks to MTGO bugs.

  • @andrewburger1019
    @andrewburger1019 4 роки тому +19

    Me: sees new mtg combo
    My bank account: *chuckles* I’m in danger

  • @SizeMcWave
    @SizeMcWave 4 роки тому +1

    The other matchup that super high life doesn’t win is Tron. If they take over the game they can restart with Karn.

  • @justinking215
    @justinking215 4 роки тому

    I heard they couldn't get out from under the double damping Spheres, and my first thought was they couldn't handle the double d's

  • @badmoon710
    @badmoon710 4 роки тому +3

    Thanks for bringing modern back. Pioneer kinda has run its course. Modern is as good as ever

  • @kevinschretter6068
    @kevinschretter6068 4 роки тому

    Hey shoutout to whoever is doing these thumbnails. Tbh they are at least 50% why i klick these videos

  • @andrewthomas5495
    @andrewthomas5495 4 роки тому

    What do you do against blightbeetle or tainted remedy?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      Lose most likely (although in general those cards aren't really played in Modern at this point, thankfully).

  • @gammie6062
    @gammie6062 4 роки тому

    Ouch playing into the meddling mage😬😬😬. Very nice league though 👍🏼

  • @ZerFayt
    @ZerFayt 4 роки тому +2

    Modern? Take my likes!

  • @psychotropican666
    @psychotropican666 4 роки тому

    Is there no other reliable sac outlet that would allow you to avoid splashing black for 2 cards mainboard, 2 cards sideboard?

    • @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303
      @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303 4 роки тому

      Maybe evo-leap, but not for free.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      There isn't a free, repeatable creature sacrifice outlet outside of Black I don't think. There are cards like Alter of Dementia, but you can't get them with Chord of Calling/Collected Company and then random cards that cost mana to sacrifice (which don't allow us to go infinite).

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      I do like Evolutionary Leap a lot. It doesn't really let us combo since it requires mana, but it's a sweet mana card.

    • @psychotropican666
      @psychotropican666 4 роки тому

      @@MTGGoldfish what about Blasting Station? Can't co-co for it though...

  • @lyszaod89
    @lyszaod89 4 роки тому +1

    This was a weird slice of modern meta you played. I don't think it's really typically like this at the.moment

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +1

      We dodges Primeval Titan decks somehow, which was surprising.

  • @IntegralKing
    @IntegralKing 4 роки тому +7

    Good to run into opponents that scoop to infinite life. The dredge guys could have totally made you sit there. With 4 amalgams and 4 bloodghasts, you would have had to gain 20 life per turn until they mill themselves out. And that's a net loss of time for you

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +1

      Yeah, if the opponent doesn't scoop it can get tedious. Thankfully most of our opponent's were good about it.

    • @Jonathan-qk5ed
      @Jonathan-qk5ed 4 роки тому

      I would never scoop, if you can't produce a win condition in a timely manner that's on you not me. You're wasting your own time not vice versa...

    • @adammat13
      @adammat13 4 роки тому +2

      @@Jonathan-qk5ed in a lot of the games there was a very clear and simple win condition called "you have less cards than me and can't win before you mill out"
      Playing it out is litteraly wasting both of your times

    • @mpepp9
      @mpepp9 4 роки тому +1

      I never scoop to infinite combos. They feel so cheap, I’m always going to make my opponent play it out if they want to win in that manner.

    • @Jonathan-qk5ed
      @Jonathan-qk5ed 4 роки тому

      @@adammat13 You should read what you comment on before posting... "if you can't produce a win condition..." If it is obvious I would mill out before you then that is a represented win condition, right?
      Now, if you're not gonna produce a win condition in a timely manner "you're wasting your own time" by commenting shit that is simply stupid and makes no sense to begin with.
      ;)

  • @malikismyname
    @malikismyname 4 роки тому +1

    Yay! Modern!

  • @NarffetWerlz
    @NarffetWerlz 4 роки тому

    Persephone's Calling
    (Because 'Heliod Eats The Peach' lacks subtlety.)

  • @mn6334
    @mn6334 4 роки тому

    Should the Human player have named Ouphe with the Plague Engineer? Or am I just seeing that line because of hindsight? I they had named Ouphe you wouldn't have been able to combo off with the Finks because it would have died again after it returned before it got the +1/+1 counter.
    I suppose at that point with what you had on board you were looking to beat down but I'm not sure how much the Hierarch was even doing in that scenario.

  • @123Broney
    @123Broney 4 роки тому

    I’m so confused, why is there 0 copies of Eladamri's Call in this deck? Isn’t every combo piece in this deck a creature?

    • @TheEdgedCarbine
      @TheEdgedCarbine 4 роки тому

      Not legal in modern.

    • @123Broney
      @123Broney 4 роки тому

      TheEdgedCarbine it was printed in modern horizons
      www.mtggoldfish.com/price/Modern+Horizons/Eladamris+Call#paper

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      We already have Once Upon a Time and Collected Company, it's mostly just a matter of not having room (I think if I was going to play another tutor it would probably be Chord of Calling and then Eladrami's Call).

  • @colby3896
    @colby3896 4 роки тому +1

    Wait Modern still exists?

  • @jbvarghese1993
    @jbvarghese1993 4 роки тому +2

    Whoooo congrats, Seth!! Nice 5-0!

  • @BIGDTHEVILLAIN76
    @BIGDTHEVILLAIN76 4 роки тому

    We feast!!!! 5-0 hype!!!!

  • @foxokon94
    @foxokon94 4 роки тому

    stage is a 3 dollar card seth, that is not too bad!

  • @rpglover5955
    @rpglover5955 4 роки тому

    I'm genuinely surprised you didn't keep the hand at 7:12. Already 2 green sources, one combo piece and a free once upon a time to dig for 1 of 18 possible white sources(this is more in reference to the fetches being able to get you a white source, even if they aren't itself one)/the other combo piece, and at worst a turn 2 once upon a time after 2 draws. Not entirely sure what the odds was to get one, but it definitely wasn't that bad of a hand.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      Yeah, I think if it was a non-Dredge matchup I probably would have kept. It was a fine hand, but since we likely needed to cast multiple Once Upon a Times (and still get a little lucky) I don't think we could win until turn four at least, which just seems slow against Dredge on the draw (without any graveyard hate).

  • @MetalHeadMarc
    @MetalHeadMarc 4 роки тому

    VIS-err-ah. Like visceral, but without the "l"

  • @mattwakeford9060
    @mattwakeford9060 4 роки тому +1

    13:48 personally I would have waited till they actually cast conflagrate. If they for some reason didn't you would have won. 15:28 You could have sac'ed the ranger captain and bought an extra turn.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +1

      Hmm, I've been trying to avoid scooping early, the Conflagrate turn didn't feel early to me, but I guess maybe it was in some sense.

    • @mattwakeford9060
      @mattwakeford9060 4 роки тому

      @@MTGGoldfish I understand why you did it but I've learned to never scoop until they show their out since it might seem obvious to you, others might miss it. I hope you understand what I mean.

  • @melsonperos9566
    @melsonperos9566 4 роки тому

    Why spike feeder wen u have kitchen finks?

    • @TheWmubronco30
      @TheWmubronco30 4 роки тому

      Spike feeder doesn't need a sac outlet to accomplish the same thing

    • @melsonperos9566
      @melsonperos9566 4 роки тому

      yes, which he already has

  •  4 роки тому

    No consideration for Eladamri's Call over Once Upon a Time? I guess the freeness of OUaT is important tempo in a turn 3-4 meta

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      Yeah, I think being able to snag (and play) a mana dork on turn one is really important.

  • @coreysierchio4650
    @coreysierchio4650 4 роки тому

    Chest Day left me with a mental soreness. At least you didn't pay for them.

  • @JonathanHecht
    @JonathanHecht 4 роки тому

    I was very exited to see some modern again but when i see what kind of decks are often played in leagues these days i'm actually kinda concerned...

    • @JonathanHecht
      @JonathanHecht 4 роки тому

      its almost like removing oko the broko wasn't nearly enough

    • @adavidavis2762
      @adavidavis2762 4 роки тому

      @@JonathanHecht This wasn't representative of how the format is rn. I'm really enjoying modern.

    • @BuriedFlame
      @BuriedFlame 4 роки тому

      @@adavidavis2762 yes, you just need 52 cards. Buy them at any gas station and play solitaire!

    • @adavidavis2762
      @adavidavis2762 4 роки тому

      ​@@BuriedFlame Modern is pretty interactive dude.

  • @FlawlessRythym
    @FlawlessRythym 4 роки тому

    51:23 the opponent shows their hand. They needed red and white mana to play their hand. #rekt

  • @theexaminer4906
    @theexaminer4906 4 роки тому

    Where can I vote for Booby Trap ATO? ;)

  • @Nvenom8.
    @Nvenom8. 4 роки тому

    I appreciate modern being back. That was far too much of a break.

  • @mattd6244
    @mattd6244 4 роки тому +2

    tormods crypt baby

  • @cz19856
    @cz19856 4 роки тому

    Do you still enjoy modern Seth?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +1

      I enjoyed this deck quite a bit. I liked Pioneer more for a while since it was less turn three combo heavy, but now Pioneer is starting to look a bit like Modern.

    • @BuriedFlame
      @BuriedFlame 4 роки тому

      Of course he enjoys it. He doesn't have to buy any of his cards, and any cards he does get he brags them up to inflate the market and makes a fat profit!

  • @Nerovere
    @Nerovere 4 роки тому +4

    3:39 for first game

  • @huot2012
    @huot2012 4 роки тому

    i feel like heliod is going to become the new splinter twin and get banned, it's just so easy to turn 4 kill and turn 3 isn't too difficult either. and the fact that heliod is indestructible makes the combo that much harder to deal with than splinter twin.

    • @patrickbuerke1390
      @patrickbuerke1390 4 роки тому +2

      Counters Company has a pretty consistent turn 3, and old Abzan Company could theoretically turn 3, and neither are a ban. As long as your deck interacts, the combo aspect of Company decks is handleable

  • @rastrisfrustreslosgomez544
    @rastrisfrustreslosgomez544 4 роки тому +1

    YES!! Modern!
    Edit: List needs a couple Meliras in the side for the infect MU

    • @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303
      @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303 4 роки тому

      Yes and no. It works with finks, but infect can still just beat you down so you're better to just use removal

  • @dun77741
    @dun77741 4 роки тому

    Wow modern, finally, I thought this was a Pioneer only channel.

  • @0331ball
    @0331ball 4 роки тому +8

    Oof, combo league.

  • @frankcastle9691
    @frankcastle9691 4 роки тому

    is heliod banned now?

  • @Msev99
    @Msev99 4 роки тому

    needs more beard cam for recordings.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      Yeah, so far they are just for the deck tech and wrap up since they get sort of jumpy after we edit down the gameplay footage, would be sweet to figure out a way to use it during games too though.

  • @donalds2378
    @donalds2378 4 роки тому

    Wtf does spectacular mean? Is that a weird way to say amayzing

  • @noofdavy
    @noofdavy 4 роки тому

    Infinite life beats cats, because they make 100 cats then they have to stop, you then make infinite life, they can't kill you

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      Yeah, as long as we can keep our combo on the battlefield you're very right.

  • @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303
    @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303 4 роки тому

    No GY hate really hurts to see

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      Oddly, we might not really need it. We beat Dredge both times without it somehow. Still feels weird to not have any though.

    • @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303
      @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303 4 роки тому

      @@MTGGoldfish fair enough

  • @SaintRazo
    @SaintRazo 4 роки тому

    Honestly watching modern again comparing it to other formats it just reminds me that modern is more competitive and super fast paces and just doesn’t seem fun anymore in my opinion

    • @zapsdiputs
      @zapsdiputs 4 роки тому

      There was a time, before modern horizons and the London mulligan, when it was my favorite format. Now EDH has found its way back to the center of my heart.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +1

      Yeah, the combo of MH1 and London mulls has really cemented Modern as a fast combo format, that's for sure.

    • @adavi5417
      @adavi5417 4 роки тому

      I still love modern as a format.
      It isn't actually just a pile of combo decks if you look at the overall meta, even though Seth playes against all the most degenerate decks in the format (dredge and storm) fair decks like Jund and UW are still good and tempo decks like deaths shadow are also top tier.
      I think modern has been treated unfairly and I have been loving playing BW eldrazi and taxes and death and taxes.
      But hey, that's my opinion and you're entitled to yours.

  • @souocesar
    @souocesar 4 роки тому

    With only two basics??? aren't you afraid of blood moon?

    • @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303
      @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303 4 роки тому

      BM isn't really played at this point

    • @souocesar
      @souocesar 4 роки тому

      @@drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303 I play it... don't know what you're talking about :/
      Oh wait... that's right. NETDECKERS EXIST xD

    • @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303
      @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303 4 роки тому

      @@souocesar you're missing the point. Right now you can be more risky with mana bases because it's not really played, plus we have a slew of dorks that tap for any colours

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      We also have the mana dorks, so it's a little easier to make mana though a Blood Moon (as long as we get our Forest before it comes down) than it looks.

  • @bariltrailette
    @bariltrailette 4 роки тому

    Poor anafenza no?

  • @friendo6257
    @friendo6257 2 роки тому

    Visceeeeera?
    It’s pronounced like Visceral.

  • @ningyounk5978
    @ningyounk5978 4 роки тому

    14 games, 8 of them finished in 4 turns or less, none of them lasted more than 6 turns. It's purely personal but I didn't find it much more entertaining to watch than a rock-paper-scissors contest at this point ^^" Anyways, I'll stop complaining and let people who enjoy Modern have fun with it now, but I still wanted to mention how tired I felt with how fast the format has become.

  • @girlhunter2102
    @girlhunter2102 4 роки тому

    And then I go 1-4 with it in league...😕

  • @zacharysampson6215
    @zacharysampson6215 4 роки тому

    Ceo of getting ballista banned

  • @solarfyre2136
    @solarfyre2136 4 роки тому

    19:50 actually, simple enchantment removal would have been enough as Heliod was not a creature (lack of devotion to white) at that time. Giver of Runes does not give protection to non-creatures

    • @WebOfStuff
      @WebOfStuff 4 роки тому +1

      well, simple enchantment exiling, which there isn't much of. Heliod is indestructable.

    • @solarfyre2136
      @solarfyre2136 4 роки тому

      @@WebOfStuff true! I wonder if anybody plays enchantment exiling in modern, guess too few people are using game winning enchantments to make such cards sideboard viable at the moment

    • @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303
      @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303 4 роки тому

      @@solarfyre2136 the green force exiles

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +1

      Indestructible does make it a big harder. I'm not sure there are many cards that actually see play that can deal with Heliod in non-creature form (I can't think of any, outside of bounce spells like Cryptic Command).

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому

      @drake actually it just destroys. I played it on God week on Commander Clash thinking that it exiled, but realized I was wrong :)

  • @mpepp9
    @mpepp9 4 роки тому

    Infinitely less cool than that stifle + Titan company deck you never played.

  • @stephenhousman6975
    @stephenhousman6975 4 роки тому

    Note that infinite life out combos copycat.

  • @zapsdiputs
    @zapsdiputs 4 роки тому

    I get that "that's how storm works in modern", but I've watched so many times as my opponent messed up their storm run and had I scooped I woulda lost to a fizzle. Just sayin, no matter what, quitting early is purely giving up too early. Make them kill you.

  • @juannenna2293
    @juannenna2293 4 роки тому +1

    white cards are just the worst

  • @blueredlover1060
    @blueredlover1060 4 роки тому

    Copy Cat is "fair." Yeah sure. Got banned out of Pioneer and Standard. Then again, for modern, it is more fair than many decks.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 роки тому +1

      Lol, yeah. It's weird to considering it fair, but it sort of plays like a midrangy control deck with a combo finish (compared to decks that kill you on turn two or three it feels fair-ish).

  • @zacharybraverman4870
    @zacharybraverman4870 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks for making me glad for abandoning Modern, aka MTG’s worst format.

  • @rodrigodepaula4198
    @rodrigodepaula4198 4 роки тому

    Modern is so boring. zZ

  • @germanyjones2700
    @germanyjones2700 4 роки тому

    Modern is just so awful

  • @BuriedFlame
    @BuriedFlame 4 роки тому

    Heh, thousand bucks for a little pile of cardboard.