Thank you for watching! Please subscribe for more and don’t forget to hit the bell icon so you don’t miss our new videos. www.youtube.com/@PeopleProfiles?sub_confirmation=1 Watch our videos advert free and listen to audio only episodes on our website. www.peopleprofiles.com/join/ You can also watch marathon videos on People Profiles Extra www.youtube.com/@PeopleProfilesExtra Or follow us on Twitter! twitter.com/tpprofiles
People Profiles, you out done yourselves! This must be the most complete documentary of Queen Mary II to exist. Being a big fan and supporter of Mary II, even I gained more knowledge about this extraordinary (and more than often forgotten) Queen Regnant through this throughly researched documentary. All I can say is thank you People Profiles. Thank you for doing her justice!!!
I'm glad to learn about Maryll😊. She was an amazing woman and died before her time. I wish her and Elizabeth could have made friends and cousins. But when you have two queens that want to rule two places is not possible. Elizabeth was more ruthless than Mary. But in the end her son claimed both thrones 🤭😄. Which in reality was her endgame 😉🤗
As an American this reign is so central to who we are in terms of our psyche. It’s the beginning of merchant power in parliament. A small detail but essential to understanding our Revolution.
Merchants already had the power since Henry VIII in Parliament. The glorious revolution isn't really that central to your founder's psyche, as they didn't claim their English liberty from Protestantism, which people like the Confederates did.
Excellent summary. One note: Mary I and Elizabeth I were not coronated by the Archbishop of Canterbury. The same bishop, a conservative, that is, a Catholic, crowned both. Elizabeth told him not to raise the host at the coronation Mass since that action was a gesture affirming Catholic Transubstantiation. The Bishop raised the host. Elizabeth soon had him deposed from his position of bishop.
@@pedanticradiator TY f otr the correction. I watched a pretty good uyUA-cam on Elizabeth ! and it stsated that the bishiop of Carlyle also crowned Mary I. Should have checjked that. It did not seem entirely right to me.
Thoroughly enjoyed the story of Queen Mary ll. I knew she was responsible for finding the College of William and Mary but I did not know she involved herself in many other social issues. Mr. Johnson did masterful job with his narration.
I may have missed it, but I don't recall any mention of the fact that both William and Mary were grandchildren of Charles I and therefore William also had a claim to the throne (they were 1st cousins).
@@MC-yi3zpBut Mary’s claim was through the male line while William’s was through the female line. So even though both were grandchildren of Charles I, Mary and Anne were higher in the line of succession than William.
What a wonderful gap in history you eloquently rarated. Always wondered about the details of a Dutchman taking over England (always glossed over) Whatever their relationship (gay man forced to have sex with a lesbian woman) they knew what the roles of kingship and queenship were. .. and performed them heroically. The changes and ideas that were brought from holland certainly made a huge impact on the people for centurary to come.
Hi. That was such a very good and interesting documentary on Mary II. I hope the next one will be on King William III, which I hope won't be to far away. I've waiting long and hard for another documentary on a Stuart monarch for about 8 months now. These clips are always of great interest to me, as I've been a big fan of history for 25 long years now. I hope the next one will be up in the next few days to a week or so eventually. The following ones, I hope will be on William III and the battle of the Boyne, Queen Anne, George I, George II, George IV and William IV. Those six monarchs are the only ones missing from these fascinating documentaries right now currently. But fingers crossed they're coming up. What I find common but a bit unusual, is the fact that while William was just over 11 years older then Mary, but while he was about 5ft 6, she was about 5ft 10 in height which I'd say was a little strange really. But the most important main thing was that they were very loyal and highly devoted to each other throughout their marriage until Mary's death. I'm sure she was delighted to hear of her older husband's victory at the battle of the Boyne in Ireland on 1 July 1690. He had a very big army of 36,000 men, while his uncle and father in law James II had 25,000 men in his army. Do keep them coming through as often as possible please. Hope to hear from you shortly. Robert 17.2.24
When will there be a People Profile on Queen Anne? She was not only the last of the Line but also mended a lot of long-standing division on the British Isles. All while dealing with much personal pain.
You failed to mention that William III was also a grandchild of Charles I. His mother was Charles I's eldest daughter. Thus, William and Mary were first cousins. He was the senior Protestant male heir to the throne of England and Scotland. This was the reason he was made King and not Prince Consort. This was a huge, and curious, omission on your part.
You’re exactly right and I wasn’t thinking about that because Charles II had a couple minutes versus and several illegitimate children in France before returning to England
The reason he was made king was that he came over with the Dutch army, had London occupied and was on a mission to protect his beloved protestantism against France. He would not accept anything else, whatever false legitimicay had to be made up in the process. He had no issue with rights for the parliament either, he was used to what had been the political situation in the Dutch Republic for over a century. He brought John Locke over from the Dutch Republic, where he wrote his important works, himself. He accompanied Mary on the crossing.
@@DenUitvreter Regardless, he he had a legitimate claim on the throne as the senior male grandson of Charles I. If James II had not had children, William would have been the next in line.
@@DenUitvreter He didn't "jump the queue." He was invited by Parliament. If he did jump it, then so did his wife and sister-in-law, as James Stuart came before them all. Are you by any chance a Jacobite?
"Usually with a Queen Consort or King Consort ....." It's a prince consort that will be coronated if the Queen is the monarch. Of course, before William and Mary the only Queens regnant were Mary I and Elizabeth (some argue Mathilda and Jane), neither of which was married at the time of their respective coronations. I did not know that Philip of Spain was considered a co-regnant with Mary. I've never heard that in history... Perhaps it is because he spent most of the time away from England anyway? Anyway, this was a fantastic video. One of your best yet!
@@pedanticradiator You're right. I should be more specific with my language. The male will be called the Prince consort rather than the King consort is my point.
Some of the images of Mary II are mistaking identified. Those images are of her paternal aunt and mother of her husband, Mary, Princess of Orange. Mary II and William III were first cousins, both grandchildren of Charles I. William III was also in the royal line of succession after Mary II sister Queen Anne and heirs. Otherwise great work!
She’s actually my least favourite Queen, for a multitude of reasons, but nevertheless a most interesting documentary! Let me just say that Mary I and Philip weren’t equals, their marriage contract was actually made public and stated that he was to have no power as King, merely the name. She was advised by him, but he didn’t hold any legal power over England.
I've not read the contract so pardon me if I transgress. Given that all documents were done under Philip AND Mary's names, and that Philip was king regnant as well, kind of gives the impression he had power. However, he was only king while Mary was queen legally
Have you watched the Dutch historical drama The Admiral, here on youtube? It paints a very different picture of the man in your video. It is believed that William brought about the invitation to rule, as seen in a different documentary.
31:03 This is the great moment in history . When William of Orange and Mary II ascended the throne , during their Coronation Oath , they swore to recognize the sovereignty of Parliament . " Will You solemnely Promise and Sweare to Governe the People of this Kingdome of England and the Dominions thereto belonging according to the Statutes in Parlyament Agreed on and the Laws and Customs of the same? " The King and Queene shall say, " I solemnly Promise soe to doe. " As Parliament was an elected body , this is the beginning of democracy in the modern world . However , at the time only wealthy land owners had the vote . So James II ( VII ) was the last absolute Monarch , and William III and Mary II were the first Constitutional Monarchs . John Locke's Enlightenment ideas influenced the 1689 English Bill of Rights - which was passed in Nov of that year . .
@@landsea7332 What ahaha? I was making a comment about the Whig ideology you're presenting, not your person. I'd have every right to accuse you of ad hominen attacks, as you assume I've nothing to present after reading dozens of books on the Dutch coup
@@Wallace43266 writes " I was making a comment about the Whig ideology you're presenting, not your person. I'd have every right to accuse you of ... " Suggest reading your comment and figuring out the contractions . Its good that you acknowledge that you have rights , that means you support the Enlightenment ideal of Classical Liberalism - which the promotion of the Rights of the individual - So you support the Whigs . .
@@landsea7332 Well my friend it's very difficult not to, considering they won and basically created the whole social and political environment of my country
In my opinion her decision to follow her husband’s lead to reform the British Parliament is strong and independent from her family (Father)! I think 🤔 she’s a very influential leader and historical!
Mary II would have been criticized regardless of whether she supported her father or her husband - that would have been a hellish situation to be in. I think she was a woman who did the best she could as she saw it. One study that would interest me very much, if it would be possible, would be a medical one. She, her mother, and her sister all struggled so much to bring healthy children into the world - was there a genetic predisposition to something that would cause it?
Well they claimed that James II had syphilis or something, as most of his children died stillborn as well. But, the health of James Francis and his sons seems to dispell any ideas of poor genetics. Especially the health of Charles' II many children haha
It is a possibility if bisexuality but also just common child/teenager behaviour if referring to husband and wife because in thise days there wasn't wife and wife in their world view. I am bisexual but would have jokes with friends about someone being wife or husband or so forth and this was before I knew I was bisexuak but all my friend groups had this growing up as a teenager.
An ancestor: Rev. John Rattray Son of David Rattray and Isobel Ramsay, baptised on the 14th of May 1643 in Alyth Died Feb 1712 M.A. St Andrews 1667. Chaplain to Bishop of Dunkeld 1679. Minister of Aughterairder (Auchterarder) in 1687a (1686-1688). Ousted for not praying for William & Mary The family were staunch Jacobites.
Lots of anglocentric nonsense. Capitalism didn't emerge from London in the early 17th century, it emerged from the Dutch Republic. That's why the English couldn't compete in the European trade and moved to Asia and the America's where their gun ships mattered, while the Dutch did more than half of all European sea trade. That's what made the Dutch filthy rich, they went to Asia and the America's too but initially for the war and it was peanuts to the Dutch economy when it started to return a profit first in the 1630's. No, William asked to be invited while the Dutch parliament already had a huge fleet and invasion force build for this goal, not for France. William taking the inititiative and contacting the immortal 7 is well documented by primary sources and even British historians know about it for years now. William had no army himself he was commander because he was appointed stadtholder by those same Dutch parliaments.
It's just your typical Whig history account. Whiggery dies only from exposure to any country outside England and America. Let them fear a Dutch Scottish or Irish account of this revolution
I think had not Mary and William taken the throne things would been far worse and I get a feeling a civil war simmiler to the one happening to Charles 1 would have been outcome and that would been far worse
I’m quite surprised they named her after Mary, Queen of Scots, given the anti-Catholic sentiment of the time. But I guess it was a nod to her Stuart roots
ARTEMIS was the GREEK goddess of the hunt. DIANA was her ROMAN counterpart. Makes it hard to believe anything you say in this video if you can't get basic facts right.
Very unfair of you to regurgitate the contemporary smear against William III without at least briefly explaining that he had a long term mistress, Elizabeth, Countess of Orkney. William was not only foreign but Dutch. There was animosity towards him as the leader of the country that Britain had fought 4 wars against and had continuing commercial & naval rivalry with. He only spoke English poorly at 1st and was naturally more at ease speaking his native Dutch with trusted friends. At 27 years old, it seems that he wasn't attracted to his 15 year old bride.
I hope that one day Scotland will be independent from the UK and the Scottish Monarchy will be restored, even if only in name… I really wonder who would crowned King/Queen of Scotland if we follow the Stuart’s Family tree ❤
Can we more videos on socialism (collectivism in any of its form really) seems like the entire western world is pursuing collectivist policies, we need to wake them up.
It's difficult to credit, in our modern, scientific, logical age, that so must pointless fuss could be provoked by the lingering belief in Stone Age superstition about a mythical superbeing. Even the most powerful in the land, it seems, can fall prey to the blandishments of fairy stories. What a sad state to get into.
Let me translate this into Newspeak for you. "Breaking News. James, Mayor of York, is attempting to repeal laws banning freedom of speech!! Worse than that, he is ANTI-VACC and ANTI-SCIENCE. Please, BlackRock, sell all housing shares in the British market, to start the revolution against these ANTI-SCIENCE man!"
How complex the intricacies of British Monarch truly are...A little girl, dethrones her father, who was only made king, because his brother, the then king had no children, people didnt like this brothers religion, so put his daughter on the teone instead, ahe winds up not producing children, so her sister, Anne is made Queen...and the people are told this bevy of relatives all rule by Divine Authority....its what God wants 😅 C'mon man, what a load of hrse shit....Oh, sure, C'mon King Charles, and Queen Camilla ??? Give me a break, time to get rid of all this hocus pocus British Monarchy 😮
do not marry white people is the moral of the story. They all have wetiko. every last one. THE NATIVE EUROPEANS and NATIVE AMERICANS went down the same way. Now both look indistinguishable from Caucasians.[🏰👑] and caucasians are in their castles now. as tribal leaders or queen. Caucasian only operate on Natural Law; everything is a tool } faith, war, love, friendship, politics, genocide. the messed up part is that all the true royals around the world knew this: because they share the same secret text. Scotland Ireland Wales knew when the real romans fell in 913AD. they know that the real Londoners were genocide ; they lost complete control of europe. They knew Germany had issue controlling who in coming in the kingdom. You have 2 dragons at the corner of Eurasia as a "stop gap" measure 1. Dragon🐲👱🏿♀ 🏰 in Wales + 1 Dragon🐲👱🏿♀🏰 in China they drop the ball. 🤴🏽👸🏾 💬 Portugal + 🤴🏽👸🏾 💬 Germany is the one that called the Moors up to Europe as back up security - because Moors have a fiduciary promise set in ancient Egypt. in the end they blamed Nepal/India and CANCELLED NEPAL from the Knights of the Rhune for the white invasion. the undoxxing of the America location is very problematic and show that the 𝓼𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽 𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓻 is fractured. - that was an act of war. King Charles, and Queen Camilla have no DNA or spiritual rights to that land. YOU CANNOT RULE without the blessing of the 3 tribes of the island. taking Scotland crowning ceremonial STONE and stuffing it under the throne🙄 = is not Blessing to rule. they have wetiko; which why its no problem for them to take out Diana or try to run over meghan Markel. The real reason Harry took her out is for safety. Wales is the only one that gave these people permission to rule but Wales also told the fake Roman they are ok too. spoiled + soft. terrible combination for a people; you can only use your bloodline for so long.
Thank you for watching! Please subscribe for more and don’t forget to hit the bell icon so you don’t miss our new videos. www.youtube.com/@PeopleProfiles?sub_confirmation=1
Watch our videos advert free and listen to audio only episodes on our website. www.peopleprofiles.com/join/
You can also watch marathon videos on People Profiles Extra www.youtube.com/@PeopleProfilesExtra
Or follow us on Twitter! twitter.com/tpprofiles
People Profiles, you out done yourselves! This must be the most complete documentary of Queen Mary II to exist. Being a big fan and supporter of Mary II, even I gained more knowledge about this extraordinary (and more than often forgotten) Queen Regnant through this throughly researched documentary. All I can say is thank you People Profiles. Thank you for doing her justice!!!
Hello i m from the Land of Venezia if you whant know Mary come ti old Repubblic of Venezia
I'm glad to learn about Maryll😊. She was an amazing woman and died before her time. I wish her and Elizabeth could have made friends and cousins. But when you have two queens that want to rule two places is not possible. Elizabeth was more ruthless than Mary. But in the end her son claimed both thrones 🤭😄. Which in reality was her endgame 😉🤗
@@reneehall7655 Are you referring to Mary Queen of Scots?
As an American this reign is so central to who we are in terms of our psyche. It’s the beginning of merchant power in parliament. A small detail but essential to understanding our Revolution.
No, it's export of merchant power from the Dutch Republic to Britain by force, not the beginning.
Merchants already had the power since Henry VIII in Parliament.
The glorious revolution isn't really that central to your founder's psyche, as they didn't claim their English liberty from Protestantism, which people like the Confederates did.
This is my favourite narrator on your channel! Could sleep to his voice.
I feel like Queen Mary II and Queen Anne get overlooked a lot in history, when both women were strong in their own ways.
If this guy's doing the voiceover then you know it's going to be good.
Ha ha.. you know it’s true
I second this idea. 🤭
Thank you for sharing this beautiful documentary. It’s a period of history that I know very little about ❤
Very interesting
Excellent summary. One note: Mary I and Elizabeth I were not coronated by the Archbishop of Canterbury. The same bishop, a conservative, that is, a Catholic, crowned both. Elizabeth told him not to raise the host at the coronation Mass since that action was a gesture affirming Catholic Transubstantiation. The Bishop raised the host. Elizabeth soon had him deposed from his position of bishop.
@@pedanticradiator TY f otr the correction. I watched a pretty good uyUA-cam on Elizabeth ! and it stsated that the bishiop of Carlyle also crowned Mary I. Should have checjked that. It did not seem entirely right to me.
I live close to William and Mary college and its beautiful ❤️
More of the Stuarts! Thanks For this Guys 🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤❤
I think there is only one more English Stuart to cover (Queen Anne). Unless you are referring to the Scottish James I - V.
Thoroughly enjoyed the story of Queen Mary ll. I knew she was responsible for finding the College of William and Mary but I did not know she involved herself in many other social issues. Mr. Johnson did masterful job with his narration.
She was a big supporter of the LGBTQIA2+ community
I may have missed it, but I don't recall any mention of the fact that both William and Mary were grandchildren of Charles I and therefore William also had a claim to the throne (they were 1st cousins).
They were. William of Orange's mother was Mary Princess Royal daughter of Charles I.
@@MC-yi3zpBut Mary’s claim was through the male line while William’s was through the female line. So even though both were grandchildren of Charles I, Mary and Anne were higher in the line of succession than William.
That is a very flattering thumbnail of Mary II.
Just watched 'The Favourite' and wish there was more movies/TV shows about the Stuarts
What a wonderful gap in history you eloquently rarated. Always wondered about the details of a Dutchman taking over England (always glossed over) Whatever their relationship (gay man forced to have sex with a lesbian woman) they knew what the roles of kingship and queenship were. .. and performed them heroically. The changes and ideas that were brought from holland certainly made a huge impact on the people for centurary to come.
Hi. That was such a very good and interesting documentary on Mary II. I hope the next one will be on King William III, which I hope won't be to far away. I've waiting long and hard for another documentary on a Stuart monarch for about 8 months now. These clips are always of great interest to me, as I've been a big fan of history for 25 long years now. I hope the next one will be up in the next few days to a week or so eventually. The following ones, I hope will be on William III and the battle of the Boyne, Queen Anne, George I, George II, George IV and William IV. Those six monarchs are the only ones missing from these fascinating documentaries right now currently. But fingers crossed they're coming up. What I find common but a bit unusual, is the fact that while William was just over 11 years older then Mary, but while he was about 5ft 6, she was about 5ft 10 in height which I'd say was a little strange really.
But the most important main thing was that they were very loyal and highly devoted to each other throughout their marriage until Mary's death. I'm sure she was delighted to hear of her older husband's victory at the battle of the Boyne in Ireland on 1 July 1690. He had a very big army of 36,000 men, while his uncle and father in law James II had 25,000 men in his army. Do keep them coming through as often as possible please.
Hope to hear from you shortly.
Robert 17.2.24
When will there be a People Profile on Queen Anne? She was not only the last of the Line but also mended a lot of long-standing division on the British Isles. All while dealing with much personal pain.
In a week or so...
You failed to mention that William III was also a grandchild of Charles I. His mother was Charles I's eldest daughter. Thus, William and Mary were first cousins. He was the senior Protestant male heir to the throne of England and Scotland. This was the reason he was made King and not Prince Consort. This was a huge, and curious, omission on your part.
You’re exactly right and I wasn’t thinking about that because Charles II had a couple minutes versus and several illegitimate children in France before returning to England
The reason he was made king was that he came over with the Dutch army, had London occupied and was on a mission to protect his beloved protestantism against France. He would not accept anything else, whatever false legitimicay had to be made up in the process.
He had no issue with rights for the parliament either, he was used to what had been the political situation in the Dutch Republic for over a century. He brought John Locke over from the Dutch Republic, where he wrote his important works, himself. He accompanied Mary on the crossing.
@@DenUitvreter Regardless, he he had a legitimate claim on the throne as the senior male grandson of Charles I. If James II had not had children, William would have been the next in line.
@@JWRogersPS Waiting to be the first in line is what makes a claim to a throne legitimate. If you jump the queue it's illigitimate.
@@DenUitvreter He didn't "jump the queue." He was invited by Parliament. If he did jump it, then so did his wife and sister-in-law, as James Stuart came before them all. Are you by any chance a Jacobite?
Thanks.
Well done
Wonderful retelling of this piece of history.
Pleasant voice👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Queen Anne next please
Extremely enjoyable and fascinating. Very well presented.
@PeopleProfiles What is the name of the end credits music? Thx 🙏🏼
May you please do a series on the Ottoman Empire and/or the Sultanate of women? Thank you.
"Usually with a Queen Consort or King Consort ....." It's a prince consort that will be coronated if the Queen is the monarch. Of course, before William and Mary the only Queens regnant were Mary I and Elizabeth (some argue Mathilda and Jane), neither of which was married at the time of their respective coronations. I did not know that Philip of Spain was considered a co-regnant with Mary. I've never heard that in history... Perhaps it is because he spent most of the time away from England anyway?
Anyway, this was a fantastic video. One of your best yet!
@@pedanticradiator You're right. I should be more specific with my language. The male will be called the Prince consort rather than the King consort is my point.
Can you please make a video about Isabel I of Castile, the Catholic and another about Ferdinand of Aragon, the Catholic?? ❤
Some of the images of Mary II are mistaking identified. Those images are of her paternal aunt and mother of her husband, Mary, Princess of Orange. Mary II and William III were first cousins, both grandchildren of Charles I. William III was also in the royal line of succession after Mary II sister Queen Anne and heirs. Otherwise great work!
Yes, the fact that Mary married her first cousin who was also in the line of succession was a curious omission.
Is there a Catherine of Aragon video? I’m rewatching The Tudors and her miserable agonizing and humiliating treatment by Henry was just unbelievable.
Yes, it's on the channel.
She’s actually my least favourite Queen, for a multitude of reasons, but nevertheless a most interesting documentary!
Let me just say that Mary I and Philip weren’t equals, their marriage contract was actually made public and stated that he was to have no power as King, merely the name. She was advised by him, but he didn’t hold any legal power over England.
I've not read the contract so pardon me if I transgress. Given that all documents were done under Philip AND Mary's names, and that Philip was king regnant as well, kind of gives the impression he had power. However, he was only king while Mary was queen legally
Have you watched the Dutch historical drama The Admiral, here on youtube? It paints a very different picture of the man in your video. It is believed that William brought about the invitation to rule, as seen in a different documentary.
Will you ever do Queen Anne?
To be protestant was key,sad that she died so young😢
Indeed!
31:03 This is the great moment in history . When William of Orange and Mary II ascended the throne , during their Coronation Oath , they swore to recognize the sovereignty of Parliament .
" Will You solemnely Promise and Sweare to Governe the People of this Kingdome of
England and the Dominions thereto belonging according to the Statutes in Parlyament
Agreed on and the Laws and Customs of the same? "
The King and Queene shall say, " I solemnly Promise soe to doe. "
As Parliament was an elected body , this is the beginning of democracy in the modern world . However , at the time only wealthy land owners had the vote .
So James II ( VII ) was the last absolute Monarch , and William III and Mary II were the first Constitutional Monarchs .
John Locke's Enlightenment ideas influenced the 1689 English Bill of Rights - which was passed in Nov of that year .
.
Thank you for propagating Whig mythology, you should be proud of yourself
@@Wallace43266 Classic response from someone who has nothing to present , so they switch to making personal comments .
.
@@landsea7332 What ahaha? I was making a comment about the Whig ideology you're presenting, not your person. I'd have every right to accuse you of ad hominen attacks, as you assume I've nothing to present after reading dozens of books on the Dutch coup
@@Wallace43266 writes " I was making a comment about the Whig ideology you're presenting, not your person. I'd have every right to accuse you of ... "
Suggest reading your comment and figuring out the contractions .
Its good that you acknowledge that you have rights , that means you support the Enlightenment ideal of Classical Liberalism - which the promotion of the Rights of the individual - So you support the Whigs .
.
@@landsea7332 Well my friend it's very difficult not to, considering they won and basically created the whole social and political environment of my country
In my opinion her decision to follow her husband’s lead to reform the British Parliament is strong and independent from her family (Father)! I think 🤔 she’s a very influential leader and historical!
Mary II would have been criticized regardless of whether she supported her father or her husband - that would have been a hellish situation to be in. I think she was a woman who did the best she could as she saw it. One study that would interest me very much, if it would be possible, would be a medical one. She, her mother, and her sister all struggled so much to bring healthy children into the world - was there a genetic predisposition to something that would cause it?
Well they claimed that James II had syphilis or something, as most of his children died stillborn as well. But, the health of James Francis and his sons seems to dispell any ideas of poor genetics. Especially the health of Charles' II many children haha
The eyes of three childrem of Prince WILLIAMS are the same eyes of all kings and queens of all england. Are Diamond.
Great italian Queen 😊
💙💙Remember 1690 king Billy’s on the wall .💙💙
Just remember to have your photo took
@@daviethomson5707 haha 🇬🇧🇳🇱
Remember 1910, where Carson gun ran thousands of weapons from Germany to fight the Irish and the British
I'm still confused on how it went from James II to Mary II and William III.... I've got to watch this again
It is a possibility if bisexuality but also just common child/teenager behaviour if referring to husband and wife because in thise days there wasn't wife and wife in their world view. I am bisexual but would have jokes with friends about someone being wife or husband or so forth and this was before I knew I was bisexuak but all my friend groups had this growing up as a teenager.
I think Mary2nd was very brave!❤
0:00:00
I hope a Queen Anne biography will follow shortly.
❤
More handsome abd beautifull king of england, not in other place, what beautifull.
Luckily 1688 gave protestant Englishmen the right to keep and bear arms in the declaration of rights. I maintain this right can never be removed.
The House of Hanover lasted until the 20th Century (just). Victoria was the last monarch of the House of Hanover.
An ancestor: Rev. John Rattray
Son of David Rattray and Isobel Ramsay, baptised on the 14th of May 1643 in Alyth
Died Feb 1712
M.A. St Andrews 1667. Chaplain to Bishop of Dunkeld 1679.
Minister of Aughterairder (Auchterarder) in 1687a (1686-1688). Ousted for not praying for William & Mary
The family were staunch Jacobites.
Lots of anglocentric nonsense. Capitalism didn't emerge from London in the early 17th century, it emerged from the Dutch Republic. That's why the English couldn't compete in the European trade and moved to Asia and the America's where their gun ships mattered, while the Dutch did more than half of all European sea trade. That's what made the Dutch filthy rich, they went to Asia and the America's too but initially for the war and it was peanuts to the Dutch economy when it started to return a profit first in the 1630's.
No, William asked to be invited while the Dutch parliament already had a huge fleet and invasion force build for this goal, not for France. William taking the inititiative and contacting the immortal 7 is well documented by primary sources and even British historians know about it for years now. William had no army himself he was commander because he was appointed stadtholder by those same Dutch parliaments.
It's just your typical Whig history account. Whiggery dies only from exposure to any country outside England and America. Let them fear a Dutch Scottish or Irish account of this revolution
I think had not Mary and William taken the throne things would been far worse and I get a feeling a civil war simmiler to the one happening to Charles 1 would have been outcome and that would been far worse
I’m quite surprised they named her after Mary, Queen of Scots, given the anti-Catholic sentiment of the time. But I guess it was a nod to her Stuart roots
@@pedanticradiator That makes much more sense
ARTEMIS was the GREEK goddess of the hunt. DIANA was her ROMAN counterpart. Makes it hard to believe anything you say in this video if you can't get basic facts right.
Artemis Greek Godess Diana her Roman counterpart, Minor error ibut not important as content as always excellent.
Very unfair of you to regurgitate the contemporary smear against William III without at least briefly explaining that he had a long term mistress, Elizabeth, Countess of Orkney. William was not only foreign but Dutch. There was animosity towards him as the leader of the country that Britain had fought 4 wars against and had continuing commercial & naval rivalry with. He only spoke English poorly at 1st and was naturally more at ease speaking his native Dutch with trusted friends. At 27 years old, it seems that he wasn't attracted to his 15 year old bride.
I hope that one day Scotland will be independent from the UK and the Scottish Monarchy will be restored, even if only in name… I really wonder who would crowned King/Queen of Scotland if we follow the Stuart’s Family tree ❤
Can we more videos on socialism (collectivism in any of its form really) seems like the entire western world is pursuing collectivist policies, we need to wake them up.
It's difficult to credit, in our modern, scientific, logical age, that so must pointless fuss could be provoked by the lingering belief in Stone Age superstition about a mythical superbeing. Even the most powerful in the land, it seems, can fall prey to the blandishments of fairy stories. What a sad state to get into.
Let me translate this into Newspeak for you.
"Breaking News. James, Mayor of York, is attempting to repeal laws banning freedom of speech!! Worse than that, he is ANTI-VACC and ANTI-SCIENCE. Please, BlackRock, sell all housing shares in the British market, to start the revolution against these ANTI-SCIENCE man!"
Protestand went because the church said dont divorce. But Jesucrist gived divoece card. Only for that. Dont separed our unique faith.
How complex the intricacies of British Monarch truly are...A little girl, dethrones her father, who was only made king, because his brother, the then king had no children, people didnt like this brothers religion, so put his daughter on the teone instead, ahe winds up not producing children, so her sister, Anne is made Queen...and the people are told this bevy of relatives all rule by Divine Authority....its what God wants 😅 C'mon man, what a load of hrse shit....Oh, sure, C'mon King Charles, and Queen Camilla ??? Give me a break, time to get rid of all this hocus pocus British Monarchy 😮
do not marry white people is the moral of the story. They all have wetiko. every last one. THE NATIVE EUROPEANS and NATIVE AMERICANS went down the same way. Now both look indistinguishable from Caucasians.[🏰👑] and caucasians are in their castles now. as tribal leaders or queen.
Caucasian only operate on Natural Law; everything is a tool } faith, war, love, friendship, politics, genocide.
the messed up part is that all the true royals around the world knew this: because they share the same secret text. Scotland Ireland Wales knew when the real romans fell in 913AD. they know that the real Londoners were genocide ; they lost complete control of europe. They knew Germany had issue controlling who in coming in the kingdom.
You have 2 dragons at the corner of Eurasia as a "stop gap" measure 1. Dragon🐲👱🏿♀ 🏰 in Wales + 1 Dragon🐲👱🏿♀🏰 in China
they drop the ball.
🤴🏽👸🏾 💬 Portugal + 🤴🏽👸🏾 💬 Germany is the one that called the Moors up to Europe as back up security - because Moors have a fiduciary promise set in ancient Egypt.
in the end they blamed Nepal/India and CANCELLED NEPAL from the Knights of the Rhune for the white invasion.
the undoxxing of the America location is very problematic and show that the 𝓼𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽 𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓻 is fractured. - that was an act of war.
King Charles, and Queen Camilla have no DNA or spiritual rights to that land. YOU CANNOT RULE without the blessing of the 3 tribes of the island.
taking Scotland crowning ceremonial STONE and stuffing it under the throne🙄 = is not Blessing to rule. they have wetiko; which why its no problem for them to take out Diana or try to run over meghan Markel. The real reason Harry took her out is for safety.
Wales is the only one that gave these people permission to rule but Wales also told the fake Roman they are ok too. spoiled + soft. terrible combination for a people; you can only use your bloodline for so long.
If you're not British why do you care?
Now replace any mention of royals with politicians and any mention of religion with commitment to LGBT rights
We dealt with the divine right nonsense a fair while ago.
Or ppl😅
No music needed, it takes away from the story.
NEW FOUND WEALTH ( SLAVERY 😮)
I find religion too divisive that is why I do not partake.
❤