Imagine if that action alone created a temporal paradox or altered time resulting in perhaps a family buying or not buying the house and as a result time was altered by people either existing or not existing who had a massive effect similar to Einstein, Nelson Mandela, Adolf Hitler, Winston Churchill and they then had to go back to correct the timeline!
@WaterDrinker011 think it still messed with the stability of the foundation, if not that they'd find some disturbance if demolition and reconstruction were to happen, Plus o think the seal was only top level.
Older homes further inland where there is more topsoil you will find either crawl spaces or what are called "Garden Level" basements (half is above ground, notice the basement windows in the scene, and house is elevated on top of it). My Great Aunt lived in Alhambra and had one. Practically anything built after the Sylmar earthquake in 1971 was required to be Earthquake tolerant (built in a way to be able to take a shockwave), which meant no more basements. And besides, the topsoil/bedrock levels are very shallow in California along the coastal city areas. In order to have a basement you'll probably have to dig out a lot of bedrock and that is really expensive & hard.
I failed to see it feasible one family could afford a house in Los Angeles you have to sell a kidney to afford an apartment these days with the taxes overlords running California
My problem with Charly isn’t the fact that she is angry at Isaac or that she’s still in mourning. It’s the fact that she CONSTANTLY tries to undermine Isaac and gives those who are friends with him constant crap. Like when she told John he might be biased because of their friendship, but LeMarr pulled rank and stopped her in her tracks. Charly has the right to feel the way she does, but that does NOT give her the right to try and make it so those who already knew Isaac and have forgiven him to feel like shit for forgiving him. That’s what pissed me off, she keeps her feelings in check, but judges the others for being Isaac’s friend when frankly, she doesn’t have the right to do that.
The exact same arguments apply to people and their religions. It's perfectly valid for you to have faith in whatever version of God or Gods you like, but the moment you start trying to force someone else to believe the same way you do, you've crossed a line that shouldn't be crossed.
@@anirprasadd She was a human being grieving. Then one of the space robot nazis that killed her loved one is just chilling on the ship, consequence free and everyone keeps telling her to just get over it. Imagine if a jew from a concentration camp had to work alongside one of the nazis who defected (and thus is considered one of the good ones, but nonetheless, he participated in everything) and everybody was like "Man, you really need to let it go. Stop being such a narcissist and treating people like shit just because we're working with a nazi"
@@anirprasadd My problem is that she was never really called out for it. That she was never confronted with her total lack of empathy. Nobody ever asked her "Would you have turned on and betrayed everything and everyone you've ever known, including your precious girlfriend, to do what is right?" Because that is what Isaac did in his awesome moment of moral clarity and conscience, and I mean "awesome" in the original sense of the word, as in a moment of awe. And it's even more significant from his perspective because he's part of a hivemind, he not only turned against everything and everyone, he even turned against a part of himself. For love and friendship. Totally shredding the claims that Keylons don't have emotions in the process, which was already proven bullshit because the entire Keylon attack was solely motivated by fear.
@@RoonMian I mean, she *was* called out on it. I don't remember the exact quote, but in S3E1 when Isaac kills himself and Ed pleads to Charly to help re-activate she refuses with the same excuse and then he says something along the lines of "the whole monopoly on grief shtick you're pulling is getting tiring" and puts her right back in her place, not that she gets better at all.
Me too! ... I feel like seeing Isaac inside the simulator interacting with avsimulated Charly Burke would be an interesting idea. 💡 Just came from an interview with Anne Winters where she said, about coming back on the show somehow sci-fi wise "not just via the simulator but [other things]"
Honestly I’m pretty sure Isaac can feel. He doesn’t quite realize it but he’s been subtly experiencing emotions all the way since season 1. That’s why he remained loyal
@@jotunedasarchiv3819 That was genuine guilt. Plus look at the Primary, as much as he claimed to be logic based, he showed very clear, unreasonable malice towards organic life forms.
One of the things I really hate about Charly is she never could see the flip side of the whole issue. Isaac did something wrong, yes. But he reversed course. Against all odds, he overcame his literal programming and acted selflessly to save the Union from the Kaylon threat, even being willing to sacrifice his own existence. He had no emotion but still chose to do the right thing against all odds, betraying his entire race to save people he considered friends. He was caught in a nearly impossible position, but somehow managed to rise above his very nature to do the right thing. If it wasn't for him, far more people would have died during the battle with the Kaylon and the war would have already been lost. So while I can understand Charly's hurt, I don't think she's justified in specifically blaming Isaac for the actions of his entire species, especially when he is the only Kaylon they know of at this point to have defended "biologicals" right to exist.
A sign of good writing (unlike certain other shows). She reacts like a human being. She is in grief. She blames Isaac, partly because he did bring the death and destruction, but also he is the only Kaylon she knows. She needs to have an target for her anger and grief but she's also professional enough to stop her emotions from affecting her job.
Logic does not apply to a person who is not only grieving but is also angry at herself for not confessing her love in time, she is transferring her anger onto him.
It's human nature, forgiveness is never easy especially with trauma and loss to the extent she went, emotions can easily cloud logic, and just bc isaac changed doesnt mean he is in the right or forgiven of his actions
Charly is disgusting seriously blaming others for her own issues. Issac was literally made and programmed for doing everything he did how is it fair to blame him for everything seriously pissed off.
So, why is Charly in the wrong? Let me give you a similar example from the game Skyrim. In the game, you are battling Alduin(who basically the lord of dragons) and his legions of revived dragons. Now quick lore about dragons from the Elder Scrolls universe, they are literally the children of the God of Time Akatosh, who in turn is the chief deity of the Divines(think the Greek pantheon for this universe). Basically, dragons were meant to rule EVERYTHING in the world, and all races were to be subjugated under their rule, something that Alduin is particularly adhered to. Now long story short, there was a war between the mortal races(think humans and humanoid creatures) and dragons, which the mortals won mainly because one dragon named Paarthurnax revolted against his own race and helped to teach the mortals how to kill dragons. Skip a few centuries later, Paarthurnax has a conversation with the Dovahkiin(main character) about his reason for betraying his kin and why he does not want to rule the mortals like his "nature"(literally what his soul desires) intended: Paar: "We were made to dominate. The will to power is in our blood. You fill it in yourself, do you not?" Dovahkiin: "Then why should I trust you?" Paar: "I have overcome my nature only through meditation and long study of the Way of the Voice. No day goes by where I am not tempted to return to my inborn nature. What is better - To be born good, or to overcome your evil nature through great effort?" Basically, this ancient dragon knows that his very SOUL'S desire is wrong, that his nature that he was born with, through no choice of his own, is wrong. He is telling us that he CAN be trusted because he was not born good, but with the passing of oceans of time he has acquired a greater understanding of good and evil that shows that his great struggle to fight off his evil existence makes for a more trustworthy friend and mentor. Now let's look at Isaac, the guy was born with the precise specifications to not trust biologicals, based on the experiences of his creators who were subjected to cruel slavery. Isaac did not have a choice in his creation OR his programming. As Ed puts it in an earlier episode "if it wasn't him, it would have been another Kaylon". Isaac, like Paarthurnax, fought against their very nature/programming to make the right decisions and ultimately betray their entire respective race for the sake of countless lives. Charly has a right to be sad for the loss of her friend, but to continue to blame Isaac without acknowledging the circumstances of his realization of the "greater good" is completely petty.
She isn't in the wrong. This is somewhat how some people are terrible treat them like dirt and then they claim they got religion, that they're better people now. Often It's a con job such as was demonstrate recently by a Jan 6 insurrectionist who acted remorseful in court and bragged he'd do it again when interviewed. They often revert to type. Even if their goals really do change, there is no undoing the damage that they caused by taking a life. If their victims choose to forgive them that's great for them but they aren't entitled to it.
@@HepCatJack Did you not read my reply? She is in the wrong BECAUSE she can't seem to understand that while what Isaac did is terrible, it is LITERALLY written in his programing. This is different from the insurrectionists BECAUSE being terrible human beings is not something they are intrinsically born with, and they themselves preach for fairness in democratic elections, but when it came time for them to accept said terms, they devolved to rabid voters. Isaac literally had to revolt against a concept of organics that he has had within him since he was created. No he is not entitled to forgiveness, but Charly(who is a very smart human with compression of AI) should get off her high horse and realize that what Isaac did in regards to saving the Union is noteworthy of forgiveness.
You're attributing logic to an emotional response. She was basically widowed because she'll never know if it would have worked out. Unfortunately her opportunity to reflect and grow was robbed by other circumstances. On top of her irrational emotional response, she had to stuff that down and actually save the "monster". She has every right to be angry at this point, it's just too bad she didn't have time to grow past this. Everything you said is right, it's just monthes or even years early in her grieving process. She needs counseling, badly.
@BouncingTribbles Irrelevant, she isn't dealing with a being that can understand or act upon the emotional spectrum that humans can. Does she need psychological help, yes. But she does not have the right to recent Isaac given that he needed to fully act against his technological PROGRAMING in order to help the galaxy. My point stands, she doesn't comprehend how difficult Isaac's choice was regarding his "betrayal" of his entire race.
@@HepCatJack She is wrong BECAUSE she is attributing Isaac's choice as just another run of the mill bad guy acting like a double agent. This was not the case, Issac literally had to make himself understand WHY his programming was incorrect in regards to biological beings. She let her anger cloud her logic regarding Issac and his existence as a MACHINE.
@@user-mu8ok5xf8d well he was still partly responsible. He gathered the info on the Union and organics which lead to his betrayal and the war that cost the lives of so many.
Well that's what happens when you stereotype a entire group that you don't belong to... If only they were trying to teach you something here... Wish TV shows tried to give you lessons.
Burke's actress exemplifies "I'm young and I hate you for what your people did" extremely well, regardless of how destructive it could be to her career. Good thing they bumped her off, makes the arch more believable.
Evaporated and either sucked by the surounding more porous soil, hardened in a denser glass on the wall of the hole or temporary collected in the device a a superdense puck to be redeposited back as soil when they plugged the hole.
It started out as something between a parody and an homage to the original Star Trek. It tried to invoke a brighter, more optimistic Science Fiction as a counterpoint to the current dark-and-gritty trend. But, over time, it really took on a n identity of its own. It's still a bit uneven in tone, but it can be a lot of fun to watch,
@@nicktitus4374 It never was a parody. It had a bit more humour in it, but it also was always serious in its undertones, in the world that was presented, in how the characters behaved. It's "Star Trek", but different. It really, REALLY feels like being made by someone who wanted to get good Trek back, and thought "well I'm just gonna do it myself then."
The show is called the Orville. It started out as a parody of Star Trek but really it was more of a homage to the franchise. In fact some say its even more Star Trek, then Star Trek today.
For much of the third season I just felt like slapping the taste out of Charly's mouth. But, by the end of the season I actually started to like her once it is made clear why she was so unlikable at first.
sexuality is a spectrum. no such thing as 100% anything. So yes, you could argue that everyone's at least a little bit bi. But that doesn't mean that her friend would have reciprocated Charly's feelings. Like she said, she didn't get a chance to tell her how she felt, or if she felt the same way.
Doesn't say. Just that Charley was attracted to her. Part of that annoying "best friend attraction" trope. For all we know Charley could have got friendzoned hard or even lost a friend when asking. Some people, gay or straight, don't appreciate that sort of crossing of a line. A person who is not attracted to the gender of the friend asking even more so annoyed by it.
man, this show is really really good and has amazing characters, but Burke is just shitty. She doesn't have to be best buds with Isaac but come on, showing the emotional range of a high school angsty 'bad girl'. Gives me icky flashbacks when I used to watch pretty little liars.
This wasn't a gay scene. This was a scene about guilt, grief and duty. You seriously limit yourself when you decide to be offended and so refuse to look past a single facet of a scene.
I love that even out of costume the actor still inhabits the mannerisms of Isaac as a mechanical being.
I know right? it's so genius that I recognised him immeditely even if I didn't understand exactly who played Isaac
He and Brent Spiner need to have scenes together.
“Sorry we can’t buy this house, there’s a big eff-off magma hole in the basement that wasn’t on the disclosure report”
Imagine if that action alone created a temporal paradox or altered time resulting in perhaps a family buying or not buying the house and as a result time was altered by people either existing or not existing who had a massive effect similar to Einstein, Nelson Mandela, Adolf Hitler, Winston Churchill and they then had to go back to correct the timeline!
@@seriascannain6675 “…Oh no I’ve gone crosseyed…” %(
They patched it up before they left
@WaterDrinker011 think it still messed with the stability of the foundation, if not that they'd find some disturbance if demolition and reconstruction were to happen,
Plus o think the seal was only top level.
The subtle little eyebrow raise Isaac gives the real estate agent after Charly says they broke up, like even he’s susprised by what she said 🤣
What surprises me about this scene is the fact that the house had a basement since almost no single family home in Los Angeles has one.
Older homes further inland where there is more topsoil you will find either crawl spaces or what are called "Garden Level" basements (half is above ground, notice the basement windows in the scene, and house is elevated on top of it). My Great Aunt lived in Alhambra and had one. Practically anything built after the Sylmar earthquake in 1971 was required to be Earthquake tolerant (built in a way to be able to take a shockwave), which meant no more basements. And besides, the topsoil/bedrock levels are very shallow in California along the coastal city areas. In order to have a basement you'll probably have to dig out a lot of bedrock and that is really expensive & hard.
Power of plot.
@@STho205 ISWYDT 😏😄👍
I failed to see it feasible one family could afford a house in Los Angeles you have to sell a kidney to afford an apartment these days with the taxes overlords running California
@church_world_domination9357 Profit via rent-seeking is actually the problem; that is in fact the highest tax anyone pays.
My problem with Charly isn’t the fact that she is angry at Isaac or that she’s still in mourning. It’s the fact that she CONSTANTLY tries to undermine Isaac and gives those who are friends with him constant crap. Like when she told John he might be biased because of their friendship, but LeMarr pulled rank and stopped her in her tracks.
Charly has the right to feel the way she does, but that does NOT give her the right to try and make it so those who already knew Isaac and have forgiven him to feel like shit for forgiving him. That’s what pissed me off, she keeps her feelings in check, but judges the others for being Isaac’s friend when frankly, she doesn’t have the right to do that.
The exact same arguments apply to people and their religions. It's perfectly valid for you to have faith in whatever version of God or Gods you like, but the moment you start trying to force someone else to believe the same way you do, you've crossed a line that shouldn't be crossed.
She was a narcissist and that's what such people always do. They leverage their rage and sorrow to treat others like shit
@@anirprasadd She was a human being grieving. Then one of the space robot nazis that killed her loved one is just chilling on the ship, consequence free and everyone keeps telling her to just get over it.
Imagine if a jew from a concentration camp had to work alongside one of the nazis who defected (and thus is considered one of the good ones, but nonetheless, he participated in everything) and everybody was like "Man, you really need to let it go. Stop being such a narcissist and treating people like shit just because we're working with a nazi"
@@anirprasadd My problem is that she was never really called out for it. That she was never confronted with her total lack of empathy. Nobody ever asked her "Would you have turned on and betrayed everything and everyone you've ever known, including your precious girlfriend, to do what is right?"
Because that is what Isaac did in his awesome moment of moral clarity and conscience, and I mean "awesome" in the original sense of the word, as in a moment of awe. And it's even more significant from his perspective because he's part of a hivemind, he not only turned against everything and everyone, he even turned against a part of himself. For love and friendship. Totally shredding the claims that Keylons don't have emotions in the process, which was already proven bullshit because the entire Keylon attack was solely motivated by fear.
@@RoonMian I mean, she *was* called out on it. I don't remember the exact quote, but in S3E1 when Isaac kills himself and Ed pleads to Charly to help re-activate she refuses with the same excuse and then he says something along the lines of "the whole monopoly on grief shtick you're pulling is getting tiring" and puts her right back in her place, not that she gets better at all.
Oddly enough, when watching this at the time, I got the distinct feeling that, with time, they might have become the best of friends.
So sad....
they sort of did. Before well you know....
Honnestly i think you are right
Me too! ... I feel like seeing Isaac inside the simulator interacting with avsimulated Charly Burke would be an interesting idea.
💡 Just came from an interview with Anne Winters where she said, about coming back on the show somehow sci-fi wise "not just via the simulator but [other things]"
@@asmrelief4914 The [other things] being a different timeline. Gordons sandwich is the harbinger of death.
3:45 I know Isaac can't feel, but he looks so darn remorseful here 🥺
Honestly I’m pretty sure Isaac can feel. He doesn’t quite realize it but he’s been subtly experiencing emotions all the way since season 1. That’s why he remained loyal
@@klein2042 yeah i think this too, hes like an autist, and he killed himself in episode one series 3
@@jotunedasarchiv3819 That was genuine guilt. Plus look at the Primary, as much as he claimed to be logic based, he showed very clear, unreasonable malice towards organic life forms.
@@klein2042 i totally agree, thanks for let me realising it
I’m sure he feels some way
One of the things I really hate about Charly is she never could see the flip side of the whole issue. Isaac did something wrong, yes. But he reversed course. Against all odds, he overcame his literal programming and acted selflessly to save the Union from the Kaylon threat, even being willing to sacrifice his own existence. He had no emotion but still chose to do the right thing against all odds, betraying his entire race to save people he considered friends. He was caught in a nearly impossible position, but somehow managed to rise above his very nature to do the right thing. If it wasn't for him, far more people would have died during the battle with the Kaylon and the war would have already been lost. So while I can understand Charly's hurt, I don't think she's justified in specifically blaming Isaac for the actions of his entire species, especially when he is the only Kaylon they know of at this point to have defended "biologicals" right to exist.
A sign of good writing (unlike certain other shows). She reacts like a human being. She is in grief. She blames Isaac, partly because he did bring the death and destruction, but also he is the only Kaylon she knows. She needs to have an target for her anger and grief but she's also professional enough to stop her emotions from affecting her job.
@kettch777 finish watching the whole season and look at Charlie as character as a whole. You might think otherwise.
Logic does not apply to a person who is not only grieving but is also angry at herself for not confessing her love in time, she is transferring her anger onto him.
It's human nature, forgiveness is never easy especially with trauma and loss to the extent she went, emotions can easily cloud logic, and just bc isaac changed doesnt mean he is in the right or forgiven of his actions
Charly is disgusting seriously blaming others for her own issues. Issac was literally made and programmed for doing everything he did how is it fair to blame him for everything seriously pissed off.
1:20 By the way, that status screen is a diagram of Penn Station's tracks and platforms.
I guess that's why they didn't want the stability to be compromised
well, if it's any consolation, i don't harbor any negative sentiments toward you
Hmm ! Perhaps this is why Charly couldn't forgive Isaac. Hmm! Much to consider!
We just broke up. 😄
I hate The Orville and harbor negative feelings toward it bro. 🤐🤨😪😔😬😒😶🌫🤕🤒😷🥵🥶🥴😵😵💫🤢
One thing is sure: Seth prefers blondes.
Mark jackson looks great as Issac i so love his accent how cute.
She was really an interesting charicter
I know. I was really starting to like her.
She comes across as being too much like a 21st-century figure.
Was.
@@ShamrockParticle they sort of make gordon like that too in this season
So, why is Charly in the wrong?
Let me give you a similar example from the game Skyrim.
In the game, you are battling Alduin(who basically the lord of dragons) and his legions of revived dragons. Now quick lore about dragons from the Elder Scrolls universe, they are literally the children of the God of Time Akatosh, who in turn is the chief deity of the Divines(think the Greek pantheon for this universe). Basically, dragons were meant to rule EVERYTHING in the world, and all races were to be subjugated under their rule, something that Alduin is particularly adhered to. Now long story short, there was a war between the mortal races(think humans and humanoid creatures) and dragons, which the mortals won mainly because one dragon named Paarthurnax revolted against his own race and helped to teach the mortals how to kill dragons. Skip a few centuries later, Paarthurnax has a conversation with the Dovahkiin(main character) about his reason for betraying his kin and why he does not want to rule the mortals like his "nature"(literally what his soul desires) intended:
Paar: "We were made to dominate. The will to power is in our blood. You fill it in yourself, do you not?"
Dovahkiin: "Then why should I trust you?"
Paar: "I have overcome my nature only through meditation and long study of the Way of the Voice. No day goes by where I am not tempted to return to my inborn nature. What is better - To be born good, or to overcome your evil nature through great effort?"
Basically, this ancient dragon knows that his very SOUL'S desire is wrong, that his nature that he was born with, through no choice of his own, is wrong. He is telling us that he CAN be trusted because he was not born good, but with the passing of oceans of time he has acquired a greater understanding of good and evil that shows that his great struggle to fight off his evil existence makes for a more trustworthy friend and mentor.
Now let's look at Isaac, the guy was born with the precise specifications to not trust biologicals, based on the experiences of his creators who were subjected to cruel slavery. Isaac did not have a choice in his creation OR his programming. As Ed puts it in an earlier episode "if it wasn't him, it would have been another Kaylon". Isaac, like Paarthurnax, fought against their very nature/programming to make the right decisions and ultimately betray their entire respective race for the sake of countless lives. Charly has a right to be sad for the loss of her friend, but to continue to blame Isaac without acknowledging the circumstances of his realization of the "greater good" is completely petty.
She isn't in the wrong. This is somewhat how some people are terrible treat them like dirt and then they claim they got religion, that they're better people now. Often It's a con job such as was demonstrate recently by a Jan 6 insurrectionist who acted remorseful in court and bragged he'd do it again when interviewed. They often revert to type. Even if their goals really do change, there is no undoing the damage that they caused by taking a life. If their victims choose to forgive them that's great for them but they aren't entitled to it.
@@HepCatJack Did you not read my reply? She is in the wrong BECAUSE she can't seem to understand that while what Isaac did is terrible, it is LITERALLY written in his programing. This is different from the insurrectionists BECAUSE being terrible human beings is not something they are intrinsically born with, and they themselves preach for fairness in democratic elections, but when it came time for them to accept said terms, they devolved to rabid voters. Isaac literally had to revolt against a concept of organics that he has had within him since he was created. No he is not entitled to forgiveness, but Charly(who is a very smart human with compression of AI) should get off her high horse and realize that what Isaac did in regards to saving the Union is noteworthy of forgiveness.
You're attributing logic to an emotional response. She was basically widowed because she'll never know if it would have worked out. Unfortunately her opportunity to reflect and grow was robbed by other circumstances. On top of her irrational emotional response, she had to stuff that down and actually save the "monster". She has every right to be angry at this point, it's just too bad she didn't have time to grow past this.
Everything you said is right, it's just monthes or even years early in her grieving process. She needs counseling, badly.
@BouncingTribbles Irrelevant, she isn't dealing with a being that can understand or act upon the emotional spectrum that humans can. Does she need psychological help, yes. But she does not have the right to recent Isaac given that he needed to fully act against his technological PROGRAMING in order to help the galaxy. My point stands, she doesn't comprehend how difficult Isaac's choice was regarding his "betrayal" of his entire race.
@@HepCatJack She is wrong BECAUSE she is attributing Isaac's choice as just another run of the mill bad guy acting like a double agent. This was not the case, Issac literally had to make himself understand WHY his programming was incorrect in regards to biological beings. She let her anger cloud her logic regarding Issac and his existence as a MACHINE.
Well, this explains those odd pipes coming out of the basement floor in old houses
it is unbelievable that some people use concrete blocks to build basements. It is simple the worst material to use.
If I remember correctly is was his race and not him personally
That's a distinction Charly eventually came to recognize.
@@danieldickson8591 I’m just surprised he didn’t point it out
@@user-mu8ok5xf8d well he was still partly responsible.
He gathered the info on the Union and organics which lead to his betrayal and the war that cost the lives of so many.
@@user-mu8ok5xf8d It would have been a distinction without difference. Isaac's hands are not clean in the matter.
Well that's what happens when you stereotype a entire group that you don't belong to... If only they were trying to teach you something here... Wish TV shows tried to give you lessons.
Burke's actress exemplifies "I'm young and I hate you for what your people did" extremely well, regardless of how destructive it could be to her career. Good thing they bumped her off, makes the arch more believable.
God she's pretty
I know. Shame we only saw her in this one small scene as a real estate agent.
@@peytonmac1131i meant burke
@@jamainegardner4193I believe Peyton was being sarcastic
@@jamainegardner4193 did he stutter ?
Would of been cool to have an issac for all of high school years smart guy
Extraaaaaaaa.........!!!!!!! 🌝😺🌛💐😃
I swear I watched every episode of this show but I don't remember this one at all
The one where Gordon got thrown back in time and they went back to get him.
@hariseldon6550 ya I went back and checked and and somehow out of the whole show this episode got skipped
เอลิดมีคำฤาม.ว่ามะหาราตะใช้ไอออันขะนิดใดพัดทะนาดาวอังคราน.ตอบสิแอยอากรู้จากใจเรอ.บนโลก.ดาวเคราะวัน.
He would be a perfect Daneel Olivaw
This girl is very very pretty.
Why does that matter?
@@catrionacolville2192 Because it does matter.
Didn't care for Charley myself. Bring aloura back please. Can't open my pickle jar
No
Sounds like grief
all good but where did all the material that they drilled go?
Away.
Evaporated and either sucked by the surounding more porous soil, hardened in a denser glass on the wall of the hole or temporary collected in the device a a superdense puck to be redeposited back as soil when they plugged the hole.
We just broke up 😅
What is this show it's like star trek?
It began as a parody of it but grew into its own thing. A good show regardless.
It started out as something between a parody and an homage to the original Star Trek. It tried to invoke a brighter, more optimistic Science Fiction as a counterpoint to the current dark-and-gritty trend. But, over time, it really took on a n identity of its own. It's still a bit uneven in tone, but it can be a lot of fun to watch,
@@nicktitus4374 It never was a parody. It had a bit more humour in it, but it also was always serious in its undertones, in the world that was presented, in how the characters behaved. It's "Star Trek", but different. It really, REALLY feels like being made by someone who wanted to get good Trek back, and thought "well I'm just gonna do it myself then."
Star Trek was like this show before it needed to be updated for modern idiots and corpos
The show is called the Orville. It started out as a parody of Star Trek but really it was more of a homage to the franchise. In fact some say its even more Star Trek, then Star Trek today.
For much of the third season I just felt like slapping the taste out of Charly's mouth. But, by the end of the season I actually started to like her once it is made clear why she was so unlikable at first.
Love is between a man and a woman.
I'm the 69th like. I'm immature lol
You sure are. I hope you get banned.
Was her friend even gay or is this just another everyone is bi in the future.....
sexuality is a spectrum. no such thing as 100% anything. So yes, you could argue that everyone's at least a little bit bi. But that doesn't mean that her friend would have reciprocated Charly's feelings. Like she said, she didn't get a chance to tell her how she felt, or if she felt the same way.
Doesn't say. Just that Charley was attracted to her. Part of that annoying "best friend attraction" trope. For all we know Charley could have got friendzoned hard or even lost a friend when asking. Some people, gay or straight, don't appreciate that sort of crossing of a line. A person who is not attracted to the gender of the friend asking even more so annoyed by it.
Seems she never found out. She waited too long to ask
Thank god for the writer purge/ strike.
man, this show is really really good and has amazing characters, but Burke is just shitty. She doesn't have to be best buds with Isaac but come on, showing the emotional range of a high school angsty 'bad girl'. Gives me icky flashbacks when I used to watch pretty little liars.
Ok you convinced me. I'm never watching this show.
She was the most useless cast member of Orville!
Who
Grow up.
She isn't. Watch Season 3 again.
So, Charley is a lez !? Yu huck !
Very woke for the ultra MAGA Fox. I love it.
Upside she dead and no woke bs, win win.
@@michaelreynolds9802 Excellent. I couldn't stand her toxic behavior
It's not on Fox anymore.
Anti-SJW's apply the word Woke to so many thing it literally has no meaning anymore.
What a shallow view point. I bet you have no friends outside of your own political bubble.
Another gay scene. That's all we ever get now. Gay Gay Gay.
This wasn't a gay scene. This was a scene about guilt, grief and duty.
You seriously limit yourself when you decide to be offended and so refuse to look past a single facet of a scene.
Like the male captain and his ex-wife first officer? Yeah dude totally ultra mega gay
@@NaatClark I mean, Ed did have sex with Darulio, even if he was under the influence of pheromones.
Your homoeroticism is showing... Project much?
You seem to have gay on the brain.....Always projection. "Eddie Diesel" eh? trying to overcompensate for something?
She should have either told the other chick she wanted to scissor her or scissor another chick. Not really Isaac's fault on that one.