Physics 3: Motion in 2-D Projectile Motion (15 of 21) Example 4: Motorcycle Jump

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @alecfrosh1135
    @alecfrosh1135 3 роки тому +20

    You just got me unstuck on my engineering problem and probably saved me hours of my life. Thank you so much for the video!

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  3 роки тому +3

      You are welcome!

    • @Skywalker-yr3rm
      @Skywalker-yr3rm Рік тому

      Engineering problem?wtf I'm just in high school grade-9 and we need to study this sh*t

  • @faithekanem
    @faithekanem 6 років тому +5

    Hello, I am a college student dying from physics and I just wanna say that you saved my life.

  • @Peter_1986
    @Peter_1986 10 років тому +2

    I remember a very similar problem in the book University Physics With Modern Physics.
    I used to hate that problem, for some reason I got stuck for a really long time until I finally realized that I should do like you do in this video.

  • @davidcruz3400
    @davidcruz3400 6 років тому +3

    So great! I come to your channel for physics, chemistry and calculus! Awesome videos nothing but respect!

  • @ahmedal-ebrashy3691
    @ahmedal-ebrashy3691 5 років тому +5

    I had my answer 18,9 m/s, I want my 1 m/s back. Thank you so much.

  • @MrMakeItRain.
    @MrMakeItRain. 2 роки тому +1

    Thankyou sooo muchh!!! Teacher gave projectile problem just like this, apart from it wasnt a motorbike, and we had to calculate the inital velocity. This video is the reason why I was the only one in my whole class to be able to solve that problem!! Thanks for all the videos! Keep up the good work!👍

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 роки тому +2

      You're welcome!

    • @MrMakeItRain.
      @MrMakeItRain. 2 роки тому +2

      @@MichelvanBiezen Hey Michel, any chance you got any videos on solving trigonometric equations without graphing please. For example sin2x=-1, and some more complex examples please.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 роки тому +3

      sin(2x) = -1 Therefore 2x = sin^-1(-1) or 2x = 270 degrees ( = 3 pi / 2) Then x = 135 degrees or 3 pi / 4 We have several playlists on trigonometry. Take a look there.

    • @MrMakeItRain.
      @MrMakeItRain. 2 роки тому

      @@MichelvanBiezen thanks so much!! ,I'll have a look 😁

  • @madniraa
    @madniraa 9 років тому +17

    Professor, did you try out the motorcycle stunt for real?
    Wow, you are a real physicist. And also a very good teacher.
    You motivate me a lot!
    Thanks
    Arin

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  9 років тому +32

      +Arindam Bortamuly
      I did used to ride motorcycles, but I was not that crazy to try a stunt like that. I will leave that to others......

    • @goodman5836
      @goodman5836 8 років тому +2

      +Michel van Biezen loool

  • @PravKathi
    @PravKathi 3 роки тому +2

    i was struggling for so long till i came across this video, thank you so much!

  • @curtpiazza1688
    @curtpiazza1688 8 місяців тому +2

    Wow! I remember Evil Knlevel! My dad worked for a chain mfg. plant....Evil visited the plant and endorsed the quality of the chain! 😊

  • @mrhayes538
    @mrhayes538 8 місяців тому +1

    Sir you are the GOAT of all GOATS.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 місяців тому +2

      Thank you. Glad you find our videos helpful.

  • @ozgedurgut
    @ozgedurgut 6 років тому +3

    You are a incredible teacher, thank you so much for all videos.

  • @insevanhouts
    @insevanhouts 6 років тому +3

    Hey Michel, I just wanted to let you know that a university in the Netherlands is prompting your online lectures! I'm watching all of them, they are amazingly helpful to us! Thanks :)

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  6 років тому +2

      Thank you for the feedback. Where is that university? (Ik was geboren in een klein dorpje in Belgie. )

    • @insevanhouts
      @insevanhouts 6 років тому +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen Ahha! Aan uw naam te zien dacht ik al dat u waarschijnlijk uit de Benelux komt. Dit betreft de TU eindhoven, waar bent u professor?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  6 років тому +1

      Op een universiteit in Los Angeles. (Loyola Marymount University).

  • @CVSirPHYSICS
    @CVSirPHYSICS 8 років тому +4

    it's simple if u use R=square of u × sin2@ upon g

  • @jawbkk
    @jawbkk 8 років тому

    top quality video Mr Michel. I can make use of these examples immediately

  • @Upscgirl2024
    @Upscgirl2024 6 років тому +1

    How to solve if angle not given...and motorist jumps from certain heigth?

  • @SSSJ0014
    @SSSJ0014 7 років тому +1

    👍🏼👍🏼Professor I been learning a ton from you ! Thank you✌🏼✌🏼

  • @jonwilbur3838
    @jonwilbur3838 3 роки тому +1

    Way freaking awesome. You are a math wizzard.

  • @ShantanuAryan67
    @ShantanuAryan67 8 років тому

    thanks for uploading. u really deserve appreciation sir.

  • @MichelvanBiezen
    @MichelvanBiezen  9 років тому

    Since g = - 9.8 m/sec^2

    • @cht5086
      @cht5086 8 років тому

      Professor,I have a question. lets say we had 40 m width of canyon instead of 20 m. Then does V initial would be the same amount?

  • @maggiekolokotronis1620
    @maggiekolokotronis1620 6 років тому +3

    Can you solve this using the range equation? and setting 20 meters as your range?

  • @abdalrahman9687
    @abdalrahman9687 8 років тому +1

    also you can solve it by one move using
    x= v(square) sinθ / g

  • @marziarahimi7038
    @marziarahimi7038 7 років тому +1

    Thank you so much, you have saved my life!

  • @danbednarski9531
    @danbednarski9531 8 років тому +1

    What would the correct ignition timing be on a 1955 Bel Air Chevrolet, with a 327 cubic-inch engine and a four-barrel carburetor?

    • @EmitRelevart
      @EmitRelevart 5 років тому

      it's a trick question! 'Cause Chevy didn't make a 327 in '55, the 327 didn't come out till '63. And it wasn't offered in the Bel Air with a four-barrel carb till '64. However, in 1964, the correct ignition timing would be four degrees before top-dead-center. ;)
      great movie!

  • @stapler40
    @stapler40 5 років тому +1

    what would the initial speed need to be, if the angle is 0, to make the 20 meter gap?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  5 років тому +1

      At a zero degree angle you cannot clear any gap. (the speed would have to be infinite)

  • @zareyK
    @zareyK 2 роки тому +1

    How does the 20 feet apply to this? I'm trying to do this same equation with 10 feet

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 роки тому +1

      Then replace the "20" with "10" in the second equation for the horizontal component. Everything else will remain the same.

  • @luizvictorsq
    @luizvictorsq 5 років тому

    Do you have a spreedsheet where I can put the values, weight of vehicle, distance of jump, speed, etc to calculate it?

  • @key-ux8lx
    @key-ux8lx 3 роки тому +1

    thankyou sir, it so much help me for doing my task😆

  • @danielmeneses4938
    @danielmeneses4938 Рік тому +1

    the y equation has v initial and t as unknown same as x equation. Why were you able to use the v initial for the x equation but not for the y equation?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Рік тому +1

      We found both the x-component of the initial velocity and the y-component of the initial velocity and used it in both the x and y equations.

    • @danielmeneses4938
      @danielmeneses4938 Рік тому +1

      @@MichelvanBiezenOh I misread things. Thank you!

  • @ricardo4fun922
    @ricardo4fun922 7 років тому +6

    I don't know how, but I got exactly 14 as the result.
    Sometimes physics is tricky...

  • @antoinettedevries7819
    @antoinettedevries7819 7 років тому +2

    thank you so much for these videos.

  • @selinhaberal9179
    @selinhaberal9179 Рік тому +1

    I could not understand that how we get x and y times are equal? for y, delta y is zero okey but at this point range is longer than 20. Isn't y still a positive value when x is 20 as motorcycle is still in the air? thank you for your great videos it helps me so much

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Рік тому +1

      The time spent in the air is the same when the object lands. The time for the object to go up and back down MUST be the same as the time it takes for the object to reach the distance.

    • @selinhaberal9179
      @selinhaberal9179 Рік тому +1

      thank you so much sir:)) @@MichelvanBiezen

  • @dora3171
    @dora3171 9 років тому

    Can you please help me with this problem ??
    * In what corner of launch to the horizontal the projectile reaches 10times greater height than the maximum horizontal distance, in which falls to the ground ?

  • @jezzanabong9428
    @jezzanabong9428 3 роки тому

    why is time in the air in x direction equal to time in the air in y direction?

  • @shadannawawng5726
    @shadannawawng5726 2 роки тому

    Sir finding velocity of decline in different high of start point and final point

  • @Thirst4livingwater
    @Thirst4livingwater 10 років тому

    how would you approach this problem?
    A stone is thrown at an angle of 30˚ above the horizontal from the top edge of a cliff with an initial speed of 12 m/s. A stopwatch measures the stone's trajectory time from top of cliff to bottom to be 5.6 s. What is the height of the cliff? (Assume air resistance is negligible.)

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  10 років тому +1

      Fester MP
      The time in the air (5.6 sec) is determined by the vertical component only. Thus find v initial in the y direction and plug everything into the equation of kinematics:
      Y = Yo + Voy * t + (1/2) g * t^2

    • @Thirst4livingwater
      @Thirst4livingwater 10 років тому +1

      thank you. I did this however, what makes me not confident about my answer is my initial v is the same v initial from when it was thrown, on the y-direction. so what my calculations states is, that if you throw an object with an initial speed toward the air, then the final speed of the ball, when returned to your hand, will be the same as from when it left your hand. only in the negative direction. is this true.

    • @dora3171
      @dora3171 9 років тому +1

      yes,that's true

  • @gusl3995
    @gusl3995 9 років тому

    Why do you have a + before the 1/2gt^2 and then you use minus?

  • @shubhamsagar8233
    @shubhamsagar8233 8 років тому

    i just want to say thankyou very very much

  • @LakeishaSantasha
    @LakeishaSantasha 8 років тому

    cant you just use the horizontal range equation (delta x=Vi^2 x sin2theda/g) and rearrange for Vi

    • @LakeishaSantasha
      @LakeishaSantasha 8 років тому

      +Lakeisha Shakes because you already have the range and angle + you already know what the force of gravity is

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 років тому +4

      +Lakeisha Shakes
      Sure can. However rather than trying to remember certain equations that don't always work (depending on the situation), I rather teach the student how to work with the basic equations and develop the answers that way. They gain better understanding of the material that way.

  • @suhailhakeem9372
    @suhailhakeem9372 10 років тому

    This one definitely is brilliant!!!!

  • @justinmeram2837
    @justinmeram2837 9 років тому +1

    Why is the displacement zero?
    0=5.3-2100/V^2

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  9 років тому +1

      +Justin Meram
      In what direction?

    • @justinmeram2837
      @justinmeram2837 9 років тому +1

      +Michel van Biezen
      Oh my bad, you mentioned it was the initial height

  • @kommanavenimanoj6967
    @kommanavenimanoj6967 4 роки тому

    Sir when landing plane make an angle how will u find sir

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  4 роки тому

      Find the inverse tangent of the ration of the final horizontal velocity and vertical velocity components.

  • @hayaalrawashdeh4545
    @hayaalrawashdeh4545 10 років тому

    Thank You ,, Thank You ,, Thank You ,,"))
    U are So Perfect Sir ..'')))))

  • @garethm3171
    @garethm3171 10 років тому +2

    Couldn't you have just used the Range equation and solve for u (the initial velocity)
    That is u = Square Root( 20 X 9.81/ sin 30deg) = 19.8m/s
    You can use the Range equation if the take off and landing heights are the same.

    • @rumpelforeskin8461
      @rumpelforeskin8461 8 років тому +1

      I see this was posted two years ago lol but that is actually incorrect. Your answer would not give you 19.8m/s but 28m/s

    • @garethm3171
      @garethm3171 8 років тому

      Kai Evans Hi The above calculation gives 19.8m/s

    • @sammybeard5076
      @sammybeard5076 4 роки тому

      @@rumpelforeskin8461 you brains it bruh

  • @Sharpened_Spoon
    @Sharpened_Spoon 2 роки тому +1

    Very interesting that 15º just so happens to produce a distance of almost exactly the speed value in m.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 роки тому +1

      I can assure you that it is purely coincidence, interesting, but coincidental.

  • @Thirst4livingwater
    @Thirst4livingwater 10 років тому

    what if you only have the acceleration. how would you find ax and ay

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  10 років тому

      Fester,
      In projectile problems it is assumed that the acceleration is constant. (the acceleration due to gravity)
      There is no acceleration in the x direction.
      If there is, then you have to apply the equations of kinematics in both directions.
      If you have a particular problem in mind in may be easier to let me know what the problem is.

    • @Thirst4livingwater
      @Thirst4livingwater 10 років тому

      ok so a car is at rest and then it accelerates at 2.0 m/s^2 on a inclined road of 5.5 degrees.what are the distance for the x coordinate and y coordinate.? so what I was confused about was finding the components of acceleration for ax and ay. what I did was find ax with acos5.5 and ay with asin5.5

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  10 років тому

      Fester MP
      Find the distance as a function of time along the incline first.
      d = (1/2) a t^2
      Then find the x and y component by multiplying d with the cos 5.5 degrees and then with the sin 5.5 degrees

    • @Thirst4livingwater
      @Thirst4livingwater 10 років тому

      thank you!!!!!!!!

  • @tommann4978
    @tommann4978 5 років тому +2

    I must of did a Ditch Day. I am still in pain because of it ...

  • @marlisoccilant641
    @marlisoccilant641 4 роки тому

    where he got the 4.9 from? it it 9.8?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  4 роки тому

      the constant of the acceleration term = (1/2)g = (1/2) * 9.8 m/sec^2

  • @doodelay
    @doodelay 6 років тому

    Sometimes I think we should solve for (x+1) instead of x so that the characters in these problems don't clip the edge of the cliffs or walls they're trying to hurdle lol

  • @samraeburn8403
    @samraeburn8403 4 роки тому

    How does -5.3=-2100/v^2 become v^2=-2100/-5.3

  • @rolandweinberg
    @rolandweinberg 6 років тому

    That's a lot of math.......... Maybe that's why Evel made jumps by the seat of his pants?? Haha

  • @badboy40430
    @badboy40430 10 років тому

    tnx it helped me alot

  • @occif2023
    @occif2023 5 років тому

    About 48 mph should do it

  • @petereziagor4604
    @petereziagor4604 2 роки тому +1

    Actually you have 😃

  • @dahyunfanmgabhie4607
    @dahyunfanmgabhie4607 2 роки тому +1

    this is killing me but ty

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 роки тому +1

      Don't give up. Keep at it. The technique is similar to many other projectile motion problems.