Physics 3: Motion in 2-D (16 of 21) Circular Motion and Acceleration

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 62

  • @luket6405
    @luket6405 6 років тому +13

    I dont know what youre up to now professor, but your videos are still helping people trudging through the muck of college physics!. Thank you! You are one of many selfless online professors that are helping me get my EE degree.

  • @hamzasaleem2550
    @hamzasaleem2550 7 років тому +11

    Finally found my Physics Redeemer ... Love,respect and a lot of Prays for you from Pakistan .... May God grant you health and prosperity in life ... Thank you very much for every piece of your Knowledge

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  7 років тому +4

      Thank you and glad to be of help. Welcome to the channel!

  • @Nazimahmadi
    @Nazimahmadi 10 років тому +26

    We all know you are an amazing person on behalf of every viewers.

    • @jerrysmith9780
      @jerrysmith9780 4 роки тому +1

      Agreed Nazim. Seems like not only an amazing mind but so organized and clearly so generous. Solid man all around!

  • @MichelvanBiezen
    @MichelvanBiezen  10 років тому +6

    Nazim,
    Thanks for the feedback.

  • @JoseMendoza-kx1yk
    @JoseMendoza-kx1yk 11 років тому +20

    I love your work so much
    Thank you
    Sincerely a physics student

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  11 років тому +4

      Jose,
      Thanks for the feedback. It is good to see that students around the world are helped by these videos.

  • @riyaz8607
    @riyaz8607 6 років тому +5

    Hello, sir, the vector v2-v1 should originate from point 2. In the video at 2:16 it originated from point 1. according to vector addition, v2-v1 should have point 2 as the tail.

  • @JosephMotloung-d5j
    @JosephMotloung-d5j Рік тому +1

    wow this is the best channel out there my physics lecturer doesnt stand a chance ......thank you so much for making physics easy for me to understand

  • @cemberkecebi1164
    @cemberkecebi1164 8 років тому +2

    I am just working my midterm exam, Normally ı cannot understand physics but with you ı kind a like it :)

  • @Peter_1986
    @Peter_1986 9 років тому

    I like that you translated "centripetal" as "center-seeking" --- it makes more grammatical sense to translate it that way rather than the seemingly more common "seeking the center".

  • @Panagiotis2123
    @Panagiotis2123 2 роки тому +1

    Excuse me if I am wrong, but I think there is a small graphical misrepresentation in the drawn triangle at 1:30. Vectors v1 and v2 should have equal magnitudes which means that v1 should be drawn longer and not form a right triangle. That way v2 - v1 will point to the center of the circle and not above it which I think happens now if you put v2 - v1 in place "2" at the circle.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 роки тому +1

      No error here. You have to take the limit as the angle approaches zero. That is the principle of all of calculus. It is drawn bigger here so you can see it.

    • @Panagiotis2123
      @Panagiotis2123 2 роки тому +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen Ah ok, thank you for your reply sir.

  • @adeenarafiq391
    @adeenarafiq391 8 років тому +5

    Thank you so much sir, you are really great. May you live a happy life :)

  • @curtpiazza1688
    @curtpiazza1688 8 місяців тому +1

    " Center seeking ".......I like that! 😊
    .

  • @AlisaEgerton
    @AlisaEgerton 8 років тому +3

    Omg I finally understood it thanks to you!!!

  • @Simmons2358
    @Simmons2358 4 роки тому

    Consider this: When one is on a typical two wheel motorcycle and needs to make a right "turn" (right curve in the road) - which way does he turn his handlebars, to the right or left? If he is moving faster than a slow "crawl", he should turn his handlebars to the LEFT (just a little, but to the left none-the-less) to make a RIGHT turn.

  • @thatsnotme3235
    @thatsnotme3235 5 років тому +1

    You are INCREDIBLE

  • @Julia1Smith
    @Julia1Smith 7 років тому +1

    This is a very very nice explanation! Thanks! Greetings from Germany!

  • @joeyborja423
    @joeyborja423 4 роки тому +1

    Since it's average acceleration, is it wrong to think it emanates from between the two velocity vectors towards the center?

  • @debloated9589
    @debloated9589 5 років тому +1

    This videos are great! Thank u very much :)

  • @Nazimahmadi
    @Nazimahmadi 10 років тому +2

    Great videos thanks a lot.

  • @ersinsener1309
    @ersinsener1309 7 років тому +1

    hımm you have replaced old videos with new ones and these is quite good.but there is no upward throw motion, I hope you will add it thx :)... we generally encounter units from of (i,j,k) you know at university.

  • @ahmedal-ebrashy3691
    @ahmedal-ebrashy3691 6 років тому +2

    Sir, thank a billion again. I am having a problem with visualisation, as when you added vector v2 to v1 the direction is east and nit towards the center of the circle?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  6 років тому +1

      Note that v1 is subtracted (not added) from v2

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 4 роки тому +2

      @@MichelvanBiezen The drawing is wrong, Michael. Because the vectors have equal length the outcome can't be a horizontal line (2:01). Therefore, the difference-vector should be drawn at point 2 on the circle (pointing slightly downwards to the centre).

  • @ammarali5007
    @ammarali5007 4 роки тому

    thank you very much Mr Michel
    but i have a question:is the velocity is still perpendicular to the path in a curve motion?
    if there any videos about that please tell me where it , because i need it very much

  • @aimei7737
    @aimei7737 5 років тому

    Amazing video sir! Thank you!

  • @iostream84
    @iostream84 11 років тому +1

    Thank you so much, really helpful!

  • @madscientist545
    @madscientist545 7 років тому +1

    I think v2-v1 is a resultant vector of v2 and v1 sir

  • @bertheukwishaka7145
    @bertheukwishaka7145 9 місяців тому +1

    Thankx lecturer but i have question about where minus sign in 4.9t2 is coming from

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  9 місяців тому +1

      When using the equations of kinematics, left and down are negative directions. Since the acceleraion due to gravity acts downward, we place a negative sign in front of that.

  • @Sofialovesmath
    @Sofialovesmath 3 роки тому

    Thank you for educating us

  • @Intellects0
    @Intellects0 Рік тому +1

    sir bring a series of jee advanced 2023

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Рік тому +2

      Yes, we need to work on that. Thanks for the reminder.

  • @62331023
    @62331023 10 років тому

    Maybe a stupid question but if the acceleration is always to the center of curvature why do you experience a force opposed to the center of curvature when you take a sharp bend in a car for instance?
    F = m a, so the force should have the same direction as the acceleration.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  10 років тому +2

      Duranium,
      That is a very good question.
      That "force" that you feel pushing you to the right when you make a sharp left turn is not really a force.
      We call it the "centrifugal force", because it appears to be a force.
      What is actually happening is that your body wants to obey Newton's first law and continue in a straight path motion. The car moves to the left (because the friction on the tires push the car to the left (centripetal force)), Your body wants to keeps going straight, but the seat belt pushes you to the left which your body interprets as being pushed to the right.

    • @62331023
      @62331023 10 років тому

      I think I understand what you mean with the centrifugal force not being a force. Because the observer is in a non inertial frame of reference this force appears to be a force. But when you look at the car from the side you'll notice that this force is a reaction force to the centripetal acceleration.
      But I dont really understand the following thing:
      "Your body wants to keeps going straight, but the seat belt pushes you to the left which your body interprets as being pushed to the right."
      Do you mean that if there is a force on your body in a certain direction that you will interpret it in the opposite direction?
      Thanks for your response by the way

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  10 років тому +1

      Duranium
      The seat belt provides the centripetal force by pushing towards the center of the circular motion.
      You experience the sensation of being pushed into the seat belt. (because your body obeys Newton's first law

    • @62331023
      @62331023 10 років тому

      thanks it's clear to me now

    • @shreytripathi5683
      @shreytripathi5683 8 років тому

      interia

  • @gentlemancat4196
    @gentlemancat4196 4 роки тому +1

    How can we prove that v2-v1 is perpendicular to circle
    Its not obvious by diagram

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  4 роки тому +1

      If you use the definition of the derivative, dv/dt as dt approaches zero, v2 - v1 will be perpendicular to the circle. (See what happens when you make the angle smaller and smaller. )

  • @ScalpfxIn
    @ScalpfxIn 10 років тому

    really very great videos...

  • @ravisingh-tf2sj
    @ravisingh-tf2sj 3 роки тому +1

    It's great ...

  • @tiendoan7669
    @tiendoan7669 7 років тому +1

    What a min... The average acceleration formula is change in velocity over time and he just changed into sum of velocity over time????

  • @SuperGamestrategy
    @SuperGamestrategy 9 років тому +1

    come teach at ISU lol cause the proffesors here are just collecting a paycheck. i leave stupider than i walk in

  • @shreytripathi5683
    @shreytripathi5683 8 років тому

    nice

  • @batuhanbartu416
    @batuhanbartu416 4 роки тому

    you are a wonderful person with perfect bow ties i love you so much

  • @nakylaowens7622
    @nakylaowens7622 9 років тому +1

    He sounds like Gru from Despicable Me

  • @lillyzegarra8025
    @lillyzegarra8025 5 років тому +1

    Your video is so, so, so, so dark I have to assume that you work in some creepy basement and the other explanation would have to be that you don't have electric lighting despite the fact that it is the 21st century. From time to time you should watch your own videos and if you do you will understand why it is impossible to call the big board a white board instead we should call it a dark grey hard to see anything board. Would it kill you to turn on the background lights?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  5 років тому +1

      Yes, our earlier videos lacked the proper lighting. Something we learned and corrected along the way. Thanks for writing in.