These are the guys at the top our society. They're the most charismatic, the most energetic, the most 'human' a human can be, and they're absolutely electric to watch. A part of something greater than ourselves we can watch from the outside.
Two wrongs don't make a right in this case. Even in a worst case scenario where Dogpack is a "disgruntled employee" that doesn't remove the fact that Mr.Beast (both the person and the brand) are shady af and are allegedly guilty of *gross negligence* in a *best case scenario* Hell, the fact that Soggy is out here defending him by trying to debunk Dogpack instead of Jimmy actually doing it himself and instead just forwarding the former's video around is shady in of itself. And if it turns out to be true this video was paid for and sanctioned by Jimmy, then this is the definition of propaganda trying to not so subtily discredit a dissenting voice. (I mean, friendly reminder that Coffezilla couldn't even get an employee to *talk to him* without getting messages that felt like they were drafted by a laywer, but Soggy got all this free access...) Honestly, it really should be as simple as *Did they do something wrong?* If yes, then they should get in trouble for it. If not, no harm done. If Jimmy *has* done some shady sh!t, he *should* get in trouble for it. If Dogpack made up some serious *bullsh!t* he *should* get in trouble for it.
Trying to defend yourself never works out on the internet cause most people have already decided to not take you seriously, but having a "unrelated" person defend you is more likely to get people to listen. Dream is a prime example of that.
"allegedly guilty" is a hilarious term but no, there is not evidence at all that he has done anything wrong. There is absolutely no point in him wasting his time. Imagine if every big person wasted their time on baseless accusations. They'd have no time to do anything at all. Just because a fake video blew up because of people being stupid doesn't mean he should. If there was a single piece of evidence, then I would say he probably should address it. But in all of these accusations from dogpack, and many other people, the accusations are completely baseless. Imagine I make 500 claims about you, are you gonna provide evidence that you didn't do each and every one of them?
Who here doesn't have a discord message they sent or been apart of that would be considered racist or immoral at some point with the boys.... May my old messages from when I was a teen never come to light 🙏
Well let's face the facts Jimmy knows theses people and has alotta money to throw around to fix what he's done somthing notta alotta people can do an he knows how media works and how to prolly skew public opinion jimmy right know doesnt talk alot and trys to keep his emotion on it buried hoping people forgot but there not they keep pushing and pushing his friends will get annoyed play bating cage for his horrible marketing decisions and separate from it or hell learn from this and move on also jimmy has always been a shit just look at cdawg situation
I mean....to be fair, a lot of people have a discord persona that deals with pretty fucked up jokes. As long as they didint act on said jokes by escalating with anything regarding minors zexually, its not an actual crime. I would argue parents are more at fault than jimmy, since you cant expect him to control a huge corporation that his brand became. Now, he is a piece of s@#$...but not as much as people were making him out to be On another note, when i first saw that first guy interview saying that jummy hired a ex offender, i kinda knew he was lying, since he cant keep a straight eye lvl connection. Thats a clear indicator of a liar.
Mr Beast paid this guy to come over and make a youtube video about this, doing so he also revealed confidential documents to him that he shared in the video. Not sure if it's in Asmon's video (I haven't watched it yet), but Mr Beast also immediately commented on the video saying "finally someone isn't lying about me" and also messaged many creators to talk about the video. Scummy.
And then the "finally someone isn't lying about me" was deleted lmao. Mrbeast has a track record of not being able to shut up when he needs to because of his massive ego, and I will always find it suspicious that when it came to dogpack's videos, he went completely silent. They knew that shit hit the fan.
Plus mrbeast himself didn't fund it, it was an disgruntled employee after the dog pack stuff. Finally soggy denounced Mr beast for using his video to clear his name.
So let me get this straight are you not gonna believe in it just cause its sponsored by mister beast, even if he's literally just showing receipts. You can just take this as Mr Beast's official debunk
Just because he said that he didn't trust some of what dogpack had said about mrbeast , doesnt mean that he believes mr beast to be innocent . Asmon hates gambling and scamming kids
this is damage control. The truth is somewhere in the middle. You don't think these people working for Mr. Beast wouldn't lie to protect their livelihood?
and i would be more inclined to trust this soggy guy if he wasnt so smug and sarcastic as he lays out his claims. its hard to listen to someone about something serious when they themselves aren't being serious at all.
FUN FACT: Soggy himself confirmed that the Mr.Beast team paid to fly him to America, and to cover all costs for his interviews with Mr.Beast employee’s.
What a brain dead take. The creator of the video says several times he thinks Beast is guilty and needs to be held accountable. That doesn't mean this Dogpak isn't a scumbag and clout chasing liar. Both can be true
So Soggy accepted gifts in the form of paid airfare, set up interviews, and promotion from Mr. Beast. The bias here is insane. Let's not forget that all coffeezilla got was a PR statement and was refused interviews.
So if that hypothetically did happen, that automatically refutes every debunks soggy made towards dogpack including every single person interviewed in the video? Do you know who also does that for money? Lawyers. Guess if you ever need a lawyer, you better find one that doesn't work in your best interest. 🤦♂️ Not to mention, soggy literally said multiple times that he doesn't take any side and this wasn't to defend jimmy, but to show that the angel everyone made dogpack out to be isn't an angel at all. Guess people just ignored the part where dogpack THREATENED soggy FIRST for not wanting to spread his lies. Sheep. 🤦♂️
@@JustADudeDoingSomething Growing up and realizing many people can't think outside the box, and straight up making themselves oblivious to everything is funny. I love how people are straight saying soggy was paid. was he also paid to say that mr.beast is not a good person, neglectful, and does shady buisness practices? because last time I checked soggys video wasnt being bias at all.
@@JustADudeDoingSomething Lawyers do try to work for their client's best interest cause they are paid, but guess what, there are usually two sides with paid lawyers and one of them is on the right side. Being paid doesn't inherently mean you are wrong. That is why we still look at the evidence they present and judge things based on that, no matter how clear the bias there is.
One thing i noticed about the chocolate part is that Dogpack actually shows the correct information, he actually shows the difference in portion size (43g) for hershey and (60g) for feastables. And although per gram the sugar content is lower for feastables the calories are actually higher, with a Hershey bar of similar size of a feastable (60g) coming out to 307 calories compared to the 320 of the feastables. even then although speaking per bar is a bit misleading it still has some merits as most people wil just eat the entire thing. So in conclusion both sides manipulated the way they presented the information on this topic in my opinion. But on this one Soggy definitely was the one who did it more and worse in my opinion.
@@jamespadgett8660 Comparing per bar is the most dumbest thing if you want to compare which one is healthier. Companies would just compare their regular bar to competitor's xl bar and then market it as healthier when that's a fully scummy move. Your comment also proved you did not even watch the video. Literally there's a king size and standard size. So why didn't dogpack compare the standard hershey bar to the standard feastables bar?
Ofc you should compare serving sizes because you are comparing numerical values and percentages, if I argue french fries dipped in shit is healthier than french fries dipped in KFC gravy, I better mention I mean a serving of 1 gram of french fries dipped in 0.1 gram of shit vs a serving of 10 tons of french fries dipped in 1 ton of KFC gravy.
The simple fact that Chris and Mr. Beast were caught on camera looking at Shadman content then builds an entire empire of content creation targeting children’s attention will always be creepy.
Am I mistaken or didn’t Chris or Mr beast actually own a shadman piece of art or something like that? I could be wrong but I feel like I heard it before
Mr beast is no longer 19. He figured out his employee was an offender years ago and yet he didn't fire him on the spot which means he knowingly employed an offender
Funny how easily swayed people are even after got multiple time gaslight by MrBeast. MrBeast literally shove it in their face by collab with paul and ksi and people still keep on eating shit. Just my opinion, I would still support MrBeast if he didn't collab and gaslit people instead just do his usual content. That is so unnecessary.
@IceBioshock because having a registered offender anywhere near minors or content catering to minors is a gigantic liability and risk to your reputation and can easily be construed as gross negligence on part of the employer as the employer has the duty to vet his employees and make sure they are no risk to themselves or others in the role they are employed in. An arsonist would also instantly get fired from the fire brigade for that very reason.
Asmon IMMEDIATELY switching sides before he even watches the video. Sorry lil bro but due to you trying to convince us that hasan is a cool dude for half a year. I'm not going to belive the new opinion you got from the memo that "mr beast good now react to paid video"
@@draemdaed idk asmongold enough but i know changing opinions is perfectly normal and no one cares if we all understand why these opinions changed... I dont get why hes all of the sudden like "people dont like him cause his success" is such a basic logan paul cope... but idk his reason for the sudden glaze
@@rexrex429 *UNDENIABLE PROOF THAT SOGGY WAS PAID OFF*: 1) Soggy admits in interview with Chud Logic that Dustin, one of the Beast employees he interviewed, paid for his flight and hotel. He also stated that Mr. Beast was aware of the upcoming interview with Dustin prior to it taking place. This does not prove but obviously implies that Mr. Beast reimbursed Dustin after he paid Soggy. Soggy also stated in the same interview that he refuses to disclose his financial connection to Mr. Beast and Dustin in the description of the video even though it would take two seconds. 2) Mr. Beast commented on the video when it first came out, saying "Finally a video about me that isn't slander" which is just an awful look if you want to make this video look organic and not like a paid for puff piece. In addition Mr. Beast has been shilling the video to various creators to boost its visibility, and advising that he would "rather not" have these DM's shown to each creator's audience. Why doesn't he want them to show the DM's? 3) During the interview with Emily (The co-worker lady), she calls the Chef and says "Hey I've got soggy on the phone". The Chef immediately knows who Soggy is and doesn't ask any questions, despite supposedly having no prior knowledge of this interview. 4) Finally this isn't proof Soggy got paid but Mr. Beast's team says in the video that it's Dogpack's fault that "people wont walk again" referring to charities not wanting to work with them anymore. That is one of the wildest things I've ever heard if that isn't slander I don't know what is. Anyway TL;DR: Soggy Lyed People Dyed.
Just for the record in Jake Wedle's video with the AI recording: Soggy cuts him off just as he was about to explain that he was sent that video by someone claiming to be a former Mr.Beast employee with the intention to decieve him and how he was lucky to have the foresight to have the video double and triple checked & ask the person for more info (they ghosted him btw) The whole point was to bring attention to how there ARE people straight up fabricating evidence to either support the narrative against Mr.Beast or to discredit Wedle & Dogpack (ironic) and that you shouldn't take stuff at face value because the water has been muddled too much. Not saying it wasn't stupid and clickbaity the way Wedle presented this info/warning, but context matters and I think he got his point across.
ikr the point of the video was to say about ai generate stuff are getting scarier but soggy just brush it off like Weddle was a lying scumbag It felt more like soggy just salty for getting clickbaited.
I live in a one party consent state (you only need the consent of one member of a conversation (that can include yourself) to record it) and any meeting I have with bosses or HR, I always record to protect myself. The company has fostered this attitude though. TLDR; HR is not there to protect the employees of a company, just the companies PR and bottom line. Always do what you can to protect yourself if you are having issues at work.
I've tried to come up with something to say as a reply but I can't... I'm just too stunned by the thought of finding someone in the comments who's capable of using their brain.
0:10 Post-drama, I hate Mr. Beast cause he wouldn't spare one tweet to reassure his multi millions of followers that everything is okay and he'll clarify the truths soon.
Yeah i dont know why he didnt We didnt need a full on defense, but a "He is saying many things out of hate, things that are not true. I am a young guy with too much to do and too little experience, i made errors" "After all the allegations against me are out, i Will officially reply to them" Thats it
Yeah, it's not like the people watching a video that's shows all the lies that were told would STILL have comments saying they STILL believe the lies...... wouldn't happen... A tweet would have definitely worked and not look defensive.
Blame his lawyers. They probably told him to keep his mouth shut. That's how it works. Way I see it, the video goes pretty far debunking all the bullshit, so I really see no need to hate the guy.
I don't think MrBeast will ever sue dogpack simply because that would open him to Discovery and that would mean opening himself up to any crimes he may have committed. Dogpack and his lawyers would be able to go through every claim with a fine-tooth comb and Jimmy would legally be required to give them ALL the old footage, everything that is archived on their own systems. Also it's way harder to prove defamation against a public figure (MrBeast).
@@TheThunderKeki he was sent a cease and desist which he ignored and didn't get sued because discovery would be a real bad day for MrBeast who couldn't destroy any evidence and have to hand over all unfiltered group chats and records for years, implicating him for being a peice of shit and more.
I've thought about this for a long time. China was at one point, brought to their knees and controlled through manufactured mass addiction. That deeply affected their national and cultural identity. Now let's look what American businesses have large amounts of Chinese funding: TikTok/social media, lobbyists who fight for legalized sports gambling, gacha/gambling based games, and porn. And let's not forget where the fentanyl epidemic originated. All of these things are highly addictive. And all are categorically banned in China, yet they're pouring their money into these industries in the US...
People have gambled since the stone age... A coin flip is a gamble. Stop dramatizing it! Society has no business lecturing a kid about gambling, that's the parents job.
@@aftermodesmusic7440 You assume that in a court of law justice is being spoken XD Cute - no the only thing you get is sentence. And in America that depends on what lawyer you can pay and what the public scrutiny is like..
Asmongold Soggy absolutely debunked a lot of Dogpacks allegations but he was both paid and give access by Jimmy to make this video. Just think about it MrBeast employees have an NDA and have not talked to anyone for months because of it but now that Soggy is asking questions they are fine breaking the NDA to answer his questions. Isn't that a little strange to you? On top of that Dustin a MrBeast employee reached out to him and invited him to come to NC to interview Beast Employees (travel was paid for and he didn't disclose this the video but did in a livestream with Chud Logic) but Jimmy obviously gave the all-clear for Soggy to come to NC to talk to his employees and make his video.There's a good chance it was actually Jimmy's idea based on Soggy's previous work on Airrack. Jimmy most likely hired Soggy after the 3rd party investigation that came out sounded more like a lawyer defending his client which didn't look good or convince anyone. Every single content creator and mainstream journalist covering the MrBeast drama that reached out to Jimmy and MrBeast employees were stonewalled or given a nothing burger response from the MrBeast lawyers or PR team. Soggy was the first content creator covering the MrBeast Drama given direct access to Beast HQ and was given complete access to documents, images and audio files and most importantly he was granted access to interview current MrBeast employees that no one else had access to.
First off, why did soggy get a interview when there is Tom dark and Nicolasd who have way more anti dog pack vibes? Plus dog pack already denounced Mr beasts shouting out his vid in fear it would seem like he was directly paid off (which now it's happening). Finally this still goes to show that dog pack is far more malicious than previously precived and honestly probably gonna get sued.
1:02:53 I'm sorry but Soggy got this one twisted a bit. It doesn't matter what the show is ACTUALLY about, but what Jimmy/Mr.Beast *thought* it was about and why he would say Chris would like it to a third party as a joke...
How does anyone know what Jimmy was thinking at the moment though? The fact is no one knows apart from jimmy himself , you can paint this point to whatever you want as an outsider, this one is probably a whatever floats your boat thing
I thought it was obvious in the original vid that Pewdiepie wasn't reacting to Mrbeast but Dogpack was editing it in a way to make a point about UA-cam giveaways by showing that people like Pewdiepie would call stuff like phone or whatever giveaways to subscribers a UA-cam scam. Do people really think he was trying to make it look like Pewdiepie was reacting to beast when it was so obvious in the DogPack video?
No one sane would think that dogpack was unbiased and fair, he said from the start that he's a disgruntled employee. But the fact that MrB is a pos, doesn't change much. You can try and discredit him as much as you want, but the fact that Jimmy is working with confirmed scammers, or that has employed predators or had nfs stuff on discord are facts.
Just because a group of people with opinions is capable of forming a circle doesn't make the statement true. This has been the long-time strategy of mainstream media where everyone source each others articles to form a sense of legitimacy. Perhaps you just haven't lived long enough to see it. And where is the predator? Watching hentai or chatting with teens isn't a crime.
Saying keeping people locked up is a war. Crime is the dumbest thing ever That's like saying any civilian that carries hollow points in their gun is a war criminal because hallow points are banned in the Geneva convention, but civilian and police use them all the time
@@Heretic_of_the_State I feel like his point of the video was to disprove the false information and give us more information about Mr. Beast situation. The way I see it now we wait to see if anyone uses evidence to disprove the evidence soggy cereal provided. Not to say Mr. Beast isn't still in a lot of trouble with the other allegations.
You didn't even watch the video and I can tell. This video was about disapproving half of the allegations DogPack made. Atleast watch half of the video before you make a comment
@@Syncphony Bragging about watching a one-hour and 40 minute video about influencer drama on top of the other Asmond videos plus the other UA-cam videos today is a seriously sad flex.
TL;DR: Claiming that Feastables is better for you/healthier than Hershey's is incorrect, as the macros of the bars are almost the same. Full macros for Hershey's vs Feastables standardized to 43g(H=Hershey's, F=Feastables): Calories: H=220cal, F=233,4cal. Total Fat: H=13g, F=14,7g. Saturated fat: H=8g, F=8,6g Total sugar:H=25g, F=22,1g(video said 21,5g) Cholesterol: H=10mg, F=12,2mg. Sodium: H=35mg, F=30,7mg. Protein: H=3g, F=3,6g. Not going to list the rest, as almost all of them are only listed in % values on Feastables. Where does the number 21,5g of sugar come from? total sugar in the 35g Feastables bar is 18g, (18/35)*43=22,1142...g, so either Soggy was looking at the wrong thing, is bad at math or he is lying about .6g of sugar? Considering that the calories are higher gram for gram and Feastables have more total fat saturated fat, if anyone is a contender for the "healthier" option, it is the Hershey's bar IMO, although by a very small margin. If the claim was made that Feastables are better for you/healthier was made today, I would personally consider it false advertisement.
The real healthy option is not to eat either. I would still sue Mr. Beast for saying that Feastables is healthy, which qualifies as false advertisement.
46:09 This part revealed this SoggyCereal guy is being as disingenuous in his "debunking" as Dogpack404 seems to have been to begin with. It starts out fine with him discussing that the comparison isn't a fair one, 60g vs 43g and like Asmon says Hersey's and Feastables both have other sizes, with Festables coming in a 35g "one serving" bar and Hersey's having many larger and smaller. But then at 46:35 he talks about recalculating to compare them gram for gram and that Feastables has less sugar and then follows up by saying Feastables has less calories. But not less calories than Hershey's, he says "less calories than the previous formula" meaning the previous formula of Feastables. Gram for gram it still has more calories than Hershey's and it's very scummy of Soggy to not mention that. It makes me think of the same issue that is coming up with Dogpack: if he presents one thing in bad faith what else is he presenting in bad faith and skirting the facts on? The claim made by Dogpack was that the new Feastables formula has more sugar and more calories per bar and in his video he displays a 43g Hershey's bar and a 60g Feastables bar with them labeled as such. It is somewhat dishonest but he is prominently displaying what he's comparing so not as dishonest as it could ahve been. If you compare them gram for gram it ends up mostly a tossup. Hershey's milk chocolate candy bar (43g): 220 calories, 25g sugar Feastables king size milk chocolate bar (60g): 320 calories 30g sugar Standardized to 43g Feastibles has 9.33 more calories and 3.5g less sugar.
Tell me you didn't watch the actual video without telling me you didn't watch the actual video. That's covered in the video. He points out how scummy Jimmy is for the cryptocurrency stuff at the end. The point of the video is not to exonerate. Jimmy, it's to show that dog pack is also scummy.
@@blackmartini7684he bearly criticised Mr beast in the video, Mr beast paid to fly him out, gave him access to staff something coffee can't get even a response from, Mr beast sent soggys video to creators, he left a positive comment on soggys video, Mr beast has won by manipulative measures even fooling asmodgold
So many accusations without any repercussions, both sides just hammering each other without stakes. It’s starting to feel like a TV show at this point. The next one will probably be murder, and we’ll just brush it off, thinking, "Oh, just another UA-camr drama."
Didn't soggy say his vid has affected some of the employees lives which led to the interviews? Or how dog pack ( eventho he is a shitter person in my eyes) opend the doors on the questionable ethics happing at Mr beast co.?
Except mrbeast has billions and good lawyers, if those were false accusations, he could just sue dogpack into oblivion. But he paid this shill instead to "debunk" it.
I believe that the slavery sourced chocolate was mischaracterized. The 'Slavery Free' tag was removed because the company's own official statement claims 'as much as possible' meaning that, though actively minimalized, sourced slavery is still present.
A "slave" is defined as someone working for free against their will, forced labor. You're not a slave if you work for free. And if someone did work for free against their will, why didn't they leave? And if they left, how's it still slavery?
I dont hate Mr Beast, but i recall when he was cheering for and advertising PewDiePie to become the first channel to 100M subs before T-Series. Since those times, he definitely feels much less authentic and more corporate. Its changed a lot and i no longer enjoy his content the way i used to.
Yeah... that part makes me alittle sad, but still shouldn't be crucified for the the entirety of a disgruntled employee, nevertheless all i can hope for is Jimmy makes a behind the scenes channel to help clarify things in the future.
Nothing changed, his goal since the very beginning was to get as many views and subscribers as possible, and he was relentlessly researching the "algorithm" on how from when he was by himself to when he had a crew to when he had an empire. And if he appeared more "authentic" to you, however that means, it just means given his resources and UA-cam trends at the time based on his research he was doing that kind of content to generate the highest possible attraction to his channel and brand.
On the chocolate, feastibles (single serving size) 35g 190 cal bar is 5.43 calories per gram where as hersheys 43g 220 cal bar is 5.12 calories per gram so as a technicality feastibles do have more calories.
Exactly. Servings is a useless metric to use as a serving is defined as what's usually eaten at once. Who the fuck only eats half a bar. Considering it's only 13 grams heavier is that enough to warrant only eating half? Asmongold is being a disingenuous
This feels like a guerilla strike back from Mr beast. With the easily accessible employee statements and the difference in tone in those statements and that one guy saying that “I had a lot of emotional and financial damage” that’s sounds like what you would say with a lawyer
Does it change that he was recorded without his consent, or are you implying he was paid to lie and say the recording was without his consent? The tone he answered his videos more just feel like he is being clear in no uncertain terms.
@@nikoforsyth514bro, they mr beast employers, their lifehood directly depends on how well is mr beast doing. All they say being aware of recording is a straight up lies crafted to protect their own money.
recording someone without consent isn't always a rat move, like when a cable or Internet service calls you and lies about new deals they offer and then the next month they pretend they didn't say it. or when i job fires you over the phone and then when you go get unemployment, they lie and say you just never came back to work and try to stop your unemployment (i got done that way by 2 companies)
They wanna pick and choose who gets the benefits or not. It's just lame asf of them to already try and bag on Dogpack the first minute of the video when in reality, mb and the other dude were sending nudes to little kids or wait why didn't the cover the truth in the video instead of little shit? Who cares about the amount of sugar in a candy bar. THEY are talking to little kids. Like wtf did everyone just forget? It's so wild that they're so rdy to jump in Dogpack instead of the actual molesters
@@Quintessence4444 Because he has to grasp as straws to keep his mr.beast hate. Since he is already on the train. It is easier than admitting he was an idiot for believing a bunch of allegations based on a video of a fired employee
@@Quintessence4444we clearly know what he meant and call bullshit on it. Employer's lifehood depends on how well mr beast is doing. No way in hell they say any truth while knowing about a recording.
Yea I don't take this guy from another country credible either. His whole starting point is weak language games. Someone might not be "banned" from a state but there are tons of reasons someone might not be able to go to the state without serious issues this a defacto ban. Arguing about the words someone uses doesn't exactly instill confidence. Also when you are trying to undercover bad behavior and people covering up criminal acts and against you, recording someone is warranted. Is that supposed to prove something to me? 🤦♂️
What i learned from this vid: Delaware: "Nobody cared until I put on the mask" Dogpack: makes crazy cod montage cut out videos Asmon: still cant watch his streams live so bless these vids
@0:30 No, we don't hate Mr Beast because of what Asmdumbo thinks it is. We hate Mr Beast, because he is annoying; and he keeps showing up in our feeds to annoy us more. I have never watch a single one of his videos, unless it was via another person's video. I was originally annoyed by this horrible person who exploits children, exploits charities, etc to make huge profits. This is a level worse than a used car salesman. Just like I avoid used car salesmen, I want to avoid this creep even more.
Asmondumbo: Recording a person without their permission is a rat move. Social Media: Literally recording innocent citizens without their permission 99% of the time.
@nbricks7 and I literally explained that his opinion is based on other people's opinions. Telling me he watched it on a commentary channel, while some guy is repeatedly pausing the video to give his opinion, doesn't change that. Learn to think bro.
I'm no UA-camr, but can't you edit descriptions? If so, then mrbeast just edited the description to say "free entry", after Dogpack's video came out. Dogpack didn't seem scared of legal action, and my guess is because he found all evidence needed to not be libel/slander.
Yeah, if all this is true Jimmy needs to sue. But he won't, that'll require opening his records to discovery. That's why he paid this guy to make this video instead. Asmon is pretty easily manipulated.
@@hectornieves537 who cares, i got people to record me but guess what, i have nothing to hide, some people however (especially a pedo i exposed) are really scared of bein recorded
For the mask detail, I'd imagine that might've been Delaware's decision, trying to keep himself anonymous online as he knew that his registration was public and could be found rather easily
Yeah but then there’s this claim that Delaware never interacted with kids, how do they even know that??? That’s cause they knew and they prohibited him from directly being in contact with minors, otherwise they would have never even paid attention to that It wasn’t just him unilaterally deciding to wear that mask
Wouldn't that make people sus as hell thus leading them to find out? What videos is he wearing a mask in anyway? I don't remember ever seeing some random guy wearing a mask for no reason in his videos though.
I think this just highlights holes in both DogPack’s argument but also Soggy’s one too. Both cherry picked to get their point across and ignored points that weakened their argument. Be interesting to see if Mr Beast take DogPack to court or not as that’s what is really needed to separate the truth from the lies.
he wont, thats how weak Jimmy is, he hides to his minions to fight for him. And if this goes to court, everything he hides behind the scenes will be subject for investigation.
Many people knew for quite a while that MrBeast is like Wrestling. Fake but also not. However the video about the Eye Surgery was quite disturbing (Mission Flight). MrBeast is clearly lying about how much is fake and how involved he really is solving issues.
The reason mr beast done this is because he knows if your told by the streamer you look up to, you will MINDLESSLY follow his opinion. It's a somewhat clever tactic. Contact the heads of church and all the peasants will follow
This video is starting off with a gigantic cope. Why did they not fire the guy is the real question. Also, you can embroider nicknames on a Best Buy polo. I worked there for nearly 10 years; happened literally all of the time. This doesn't disprove anything lol.
24:27 this whole goneva thing (over past 5-10 mins) is dumb. How can no one understand. It’s a statement to allow you to understand how bad it was. How are people so dumb to intentionally misunderstand this just so it fits their narrative. It’s like an analogy/joke/description when bringing up said “war crime”
Man gets locked into solitary confinement, goes insane and has his friend come out on video and pretty much say he was too weak to tough it out. Not a war crime, just a really dick move.
It doesn’t make sense no matter how you spin it. The very fact that there’s no consent makes everything much worse, and no one is seriously expecting prisoners to be tortured 24/7. It’s like if someone did a challenge where they could only eat bread for 48 hours and someone else says “wow, we feed prisoners better than that!” Yeah no shit, it’s a voluntary challenge, not a sustainable lifestyle.
im suprised by the comments. Usually you guys just blindly belive asmon but it seems some of you are questioning things rather than blindly believing the famous internet guy
@ChristianON96 fair enough, I just want a reason to believe he did not do all those awful things because I used to love watching Mr beast but at the same time I don't see any reason not to believe he did those awful things. If that makes sense
Its possible to consent to a contract that is not lawful and it will not magically make it lawful. So the whole torture thing being ok because he consented is a mute point.
The pedo sa guy mr beast hire knowing their past hiding him behind a mask and saying he wasnt allowed around kids. Even if not true given the context my opinion is i do believe it mr beast knew to a degree. Everything else i dont really care about.
The chocolate bars Dogpack404 showed in the video, show the correct serving size... He shows the amounts for each FULL bar... The calorie count that Dogpack404 shows for a single Feastable bar, is 320 Calories (160 x2 servings per Feastable).... The label shown in the video playing at 46:38, is 2 servings per Feastables bar, and shows the stats are PER SERVING. 160 calories per serving in feastable bar. Two servings are in the bar, so you multiply everything by 2. Dogpack404, showed the correct values for a single Feastables bar compared to a single Hersheys bar. It is not hard. This was not a lie... LMAO Asmon literally just took what was being told to him and didn't pay any attention to what is actually being shown in the video. This is why ppl are dumb these days.
I'm thinking out loud here. What if Delaware is the one that came up with he mask idea and sold it as a "novelty / character" idea, but his true motive was trying to limit his own facial exposure on UA-cam knowing eventually people who DO KNOW about his RSO would figure out who he is, and then as a result those people would contact his employer (aka Mr Beast) and out him, and then he'd lose his job? I dunno the real reason he wore it, but this seems as good a reason as any and it tracks logically. What do you all think?
It would be possible if there wasn’t this claim that he never was in contact with kids. How would anyone know that if they weren’t monitoring him? And why would they be monitoring if he gets close to kids? They knew
The candy bar thing isn't a lie. Hersheys: 220 calories, 43g total weight = 5.12 kcal per gram Beastables: 320 calories, 60g total weight = 5.33 kcal per gram Beastables is more calorie dense. They're both garbage chocolate but it's not a lie.
The youtube UI argument is really dumb. Dogpack made very clear that these live streams were all removed from youtube. Nobody has access to them anymore. he had to get clips of them from elsewhere. He just tried to add back the youtube UI to make his video more presentable. he was very up front about the source of those videos not being the original livestreams.
28:22 Yeah, it doesn't even have to be for a sanctioned combat sport. Many states have laws that specifically allow for adults to agree to, and take part in, mutual combat. For example if 2 people both actually want to fight over a traffic dispute, that's literally legal. Very stupid, but still legal.
??? There are smaller bars of every type of chocolate. There are one serving bars of Hersheys and a two serving bars. They then compared them gram for gram afterwards?? Are you thinking?
Sounds like what happened was this is mrbeast's discrediting video to mitigate financial losses since anything coming out of his mouth would have a Streisand Effect on Dogpack's video. Guaranteed this video is produced by mrbeast at lawyer's advice. If the video of delaware at Best Buy was never released, then how did this guy get the footage and/or even know about it? Also, why tf does he even give af about defending jimmy unless he's some simpleton celebrity worshipper?
I said all this stuff was bullshit and most was just how business works. Excedpt for one or two things the rest is pure clout chasing, and i suspect it will have serious legal ramifications
I have one Beef with the guy about 15 minutes in. Even if you didnt know you were recorded you still made it a point to say exactly how you felt about Delaware. I do get" I didn't agree to be involved in this bullshit". but that is really how you feel about that guy meaning everything in the recording is in fact your true opinions, so you can back peddle just because you are also pissed at the guy who recorded you. Why would he say it didnt happen now "my life has ben devastated emotionally and financially"
Then he tried claiming he went through a mental breakdown during this situation “Oh they can recognize my voice” but I don’t recall anyone until now saying “That sounds like Garret”
0:22 didnt MrBeast literally had a child pred on his video once? People have always hated him for those sort of reason, but he wasnt unniversally hated until that level of accusation rose up, that and lunchly... Because if that claim isnt debunked then i have no idea why you would group "people who hate mrBeast" under those description
It's a messy situation and this guy has had enough misleading evidence that it looks like he is also operating in bad faith as well as Dogpack404. Specific example: Feastables chocolate being "healthier" gram per gram of chocolate Hershey's at 43 grams has ~4 grams more sugar, but has ~9 more calories than Hershey's. He only compares total calories to the previous Feastables calories and not the Hershey's which is misleading and Dogpack is correct in saying that it is misleading that Jimmy says Feastables is healthier than Hershey's. Honestly I feel both of them are pretty misrepresentative of the situation. I would like to see his evidence of the lotteries where he does random short giveaways in the middle of the Livestream where there is literally no way for someone to have time to make a free entry option, as well as fake Mr. Beast signatures. Just because Dogpack exaggerated a lot of things doesn't mean there aren't real issues with a lot of stuff that Mr. Beast has done that was brought up in Dogpack's videos.
This situation isn't that complex anymore. The fact is simple: Mrbeast has an edge on dogpack for one and only one reason: Money. He gets to hire the best teams, the best lawyers, the best people to cover up everything, etc. He even gets to hire people like soggycerealz to make a video about how good he is. This is not the first time a fraud or criminal with a shit ton of money bullies a "smaller" person into submission. Look at clear cases like Billy Mitchell who can play the law game over and over, and bully others into always winning. And of course Asmon is going to agree with him, he's been a Mrbeast shill since the first dogpack video like all these other content creators. There's been a plethora of massive W's from Asmon recently but this is a huge L.
Dogpack was clearly lying about a lot though, if you say a pit and car are fake and they are just not like that has nothing to do with Mr Beast being rich or Asmon being a shill, thats just a lie. Lying about CP has nothing to do with bullying either, or cutting out the part of the video that shows Mr Beast made it a free to enter lottery so it seems illegal. Or comparing a 20g bar to a 40g and saying see this one is unhealthier! When gram for gram its actually healthier. Like tell me what you specifically disagree with that Asmon agreed with. Calling out lies is not "defending Mr Beast", its like if someon says Hitler treated animals bad and you say no he didn't doesn't mean you are "defending Hitler" such 1 dimensional thinking by Mr Beast haters.
More like situation is very simple at this point. Mr beast can hire any lawyers he want, but cant do anything legal against allegations. Which mean absolute majority of what dogpack said is true.
to look at this from a common sense standpoint if he didnt want to be involved he should have not told dogpack anything on a call. Basically its a few drama influencers who are who ride and die Mr Beast stans trying to paint everything dogpack has said as false. At the end of the day MrBeast is still a horrible person because alot of the accusations were proven true, dogpack did some shitty things for content. Big whoop
He says he went to an ancient city underground. Turns out, it's a amusement park underground. This guy is the fakest you can find he'll say and do anything to look good
You can be amoral on it, but promoting gambling to little kids should definitely be illegal.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The definition is the issue though.
As Asmon himself brought in another video, packs of pokemon trading cards are technically gambling.
It is surely a Complex issue with nuance nothing is black and white.
you'll live
No
I think I'm getting old. I give 0 fucks about millionaire content creator drama.
You can always click off
You not caring is making them more of a millionaire. If you are salty about it you should care.
These are the guys at the top our society. They're the most charismatic, the most energetic, the most 'human' a human can be, and they're absolutely electric to watch. A part of something greater than ourselves we can watch from the outside.
If you stayed for even a second after commenting then that's obviously not the case
@@KoongYe why would that dude care about how much money that youtubers do or do not have?
Oh my goodness. A liar calling out a liar for exposing another liar.
This is the most fitting description.
What’s your proof for any of that though? How do you know what is lies and what isn’t?
Liarception
@@iamgoo Common sense would heavily point towards everyone lying
Are you implying the soggy guy is a liar or am i misunderstanding? what did he lie about?
Two wrongs don't make a right in this case. Even in a worst case scenario where Dogpack is a "disgruntled employee" that doesn't remove the fact that Mr.Beast (both the person and the brand) are shady af and are allegedly guilty of *gross negligence* in a *best case scenario*
Hell, the fact that Soggy is out here defending him by trying to debunk Dogpack instead of Jimmy actually doing it himself and instead just forwarding the former's video around is shady in of itself. And if it turns out to be true this video was paid for and sanctioned by Jimmy, then this is the definition of propaganda trying to not so subtily discredit a dissenting voice. (I mean, friendly reminder that Coffezilla couldn't even get an employee to *talk to him* without getting messages that felt like they were drafted by a laywer, but Soggy got all this free access...)
Honestly, it really should be as simple as *Did they do something wrong?*
If yes, then they should get in trouble for it.
If not, no harm done.
If Jimmy *has* done some shady sh!t, he *should* get in trouble for it.
If Dogpack made up some serious *bullsh!t* he *should* get in trouble for it.
Obviously MrBeast is still in the shades, but what dogpack did was comparable to accusing a Walmart thief to a mass murder crime.
@@JustADudeDoingSomething Its why its best to use "allegedly" on both ends. The water has been muddled so much its tough to say at this point.
Trying to defend yourself never works out on the internet cause most people have already decided to not take you seriously, but having a "unrelated" person defend you is more likely to get people to listen. Dream is a prime example of that.
"allegedly guilty" is a hilarious term
but no, there is not evidence at all that he has done anything wrong. There is absolutely no point in him wasting his time. Imagine if every big person wasted their time on baseless accusations. They'd have no time to do anything at all. Just because a fake video blew up because of people being stupid doesn't mean he should. If there was a single piece of evidence, then I would say he probably should address it. But in all of these accusations from dogpack, and many other people, the accusations are completely baseless.
Imagine I make 500 claims about you, are you gonna provide evidence that you didn't do each and every one of them?
Most whistleblowers are "disgruntled employee"
Asmon immediately acting like Jimmy wasn't in the discord where all that weird shit went down is crazy 😂
Probably has his own questionable discord messages
The editor will block you for this if they see it
Who here doesn't have a discord message they sent or been apart of that would be considered racist or immoral at some point with the boys....
May my old messages from when I was a teen never come to light 🙏
Well let's face the facts Jimmy knows theses people and has alotta money to throw around to fix what he's done somthing notta alotta people can do an he knows how media works and how to prolly skew public opinion jimmy right know doesnt talk alot and trys to keep his emotion on it buried hoping people forgot but there not they keep pushing and pushing his friends will get annoyed play bating cage for his horrible marketing decisions and separate from it or hell learn from this and move on also jimmy has always been a shit just look at cdawg situation
I mean....to be fair, a lot of people have a discord persona that deals with pretty fucked up jokes.
As long as they didint act on said jokes by escalating with anything regarding minors zexually, its not an actual crime. I would argue parents are more at fault than jimmy, since you cant expect him to control a huge corporation that his brand became. Now, he is a piece of s@#$...but not as much as people were making him out to be
On another note, when i first saw that first guy interview saying that jummy hired a ex offender, i kinda knew he was lying, since he cant keep a straight eye lvl connection. Thats a clear indicator of a liar.
Mr Beast paid this guy to come over and make a youtube video about this, doing so he also revealed confidential documents to him that he shared in the video. Not sure if it's in Asmon's video (I haven't watched it yet), but Mr Beast also immediately commented on the video saying "finally someone isn't lying about me" and also messaged many creators to talk about the video. Scummy.
I mean if the evidence is real it does show how scummy dogpack is too? Obv both dogpack and soggy have agendas they’re likely getting paid for.
And then the "finally someone isn't lying about me" was deleted lmao. Mrbeast has a track record of not being able to shut up when he needs to because of his massive ego, and I will always find it suspicious that when it came to dogpack's videos, he went completely silent. They knew that shit hit the fan.
Plus mrbeast himself didn't fund it, it was an disgruntled employee after the dog pack stuff. Finally soggy denounced Mr beast for using his video to clear his name.
Literary cope, I think if you think you're a genius you are
gonna attract another genius to challenge you.. This seems to be what's happening
So let me get this straight are you not gonna believe in it just cause its sponsored by mister beast, even if he's literally just showing receipts. You can just take this as Mr Beast's official debunk
I would put a lot more trust on dogpack than mrbeast if my life depended on trusting one of them, coffeezilla also did a new vid on mrbeast...
its not much on him tho
Just because he said that he didn't trust some of what dogpack had said about mrbeast , doesnt mean that he believes mr beast to be innocent . Asmon hates gambling and scamming kids
@@IamLikely It is actually, since he blames a team, but later on states he orders them to do so. So yeah.
Coffeezilla literally didn't offer a shred of evidence against Mr Beast LMAO. His entire opinion was "it's complicated".
@@AnarchySystem not entirely tho, thats only on 1 things the rest r invalid no?
this is damage control.
The truth is somewhere in the middle. You don't think these people working for Mr. Beast wouldn't lie to protect their livelihood?
and i would be more inclined to trust this soggy guy if he wasnt so smug and sarcastic as he lays out his claims. its hard to listen to someone about something serious when they themselves aren't being serious at all.
@@Magnum_Expressthat's how I felt. I instantly got "hey look at me I'm a dushebag" vibes the first minute of the vid
They sure took their sweet damn time to debunk shit that anyone could've figured out with a quick google search.
@@Magnum_Express dogpack gives the same vibe too tho
Yeah this would be in court already if there wasn’t any truth in it. People are dumb not to see that
FUN FACT:
Soggy himself confirmed that the Mr.Beast team paid to fly him to America, and to cover all costs for his interviews with Mr.Beast employee’s.
ofc he did, his fixxers likely comissioned the entire video.
This comment was bought and paid for by DogPack404. Soggy denounced MrBeast and constantly critiqued him in the video. Next.
@@hectornieves537 almost like it would take away the speculation that this video was bought and paid for by MrBeast LMAO use your noggin
the fact that mrbeasts is contacting creators to watch it makes me not care about it.
What a brain dead take. The creator of the video says several times he thinks Beast is guilty and needs to be held accountable. That doesn't mean this Dogpak isn't a scumbag and clout chasing liar. Both can be true
@@jacosisaba I never cared about dogpack.
you will, eventually
@@BooleanDev when the "truth" is sus because it was all access journalism to begin with
Mrbeast should just man up and talk about it. Very apparent he has control and manipulation issues. Using YoTubers to do his dirty work.
So Soggy accepted gifts in the form of paid airfare, set up interviews, and promotion from Mr. Beast. The bias here is insane. Let's not forget that all coffeezilla got was a PR statement and was refused interviews.
So if that hypothetically did happen, that automatically refutes every debunks soggy made towards dogpack including every single person interviewed in the video? Do you know who also does that for money? Lawyers. Guess if you ever need a lawyer, you better find one that doesn't work in your best interest. 🤦♂️
Not to mention, soggy literally said multiple times that he doesn't take any side and this wasn't to defend jimmy, but to show that the angel everyone made dogpack out to be isn't an angel at all. Guess people just ignored the part where dogpack THREATENED soggy FIRST for not wanting to spread his lies. Sheep. 🤦♂️
@@JustADudeDoingSomething i think you're accusing the wrong person here of being a sheep lol , also dogpack being a scumbag fraud is irrelevant
@@JustADudeDoingSomething Growing up and realizing many people can't think outside the box, and straight up making themselves oblivious to everything is funny. I love how people are straight saying soggy was paid. was he also paid to say that mr.beast is not a good person, neglectful, and does shady buisness practices? because last time I checked soggys video wasnt being bias at all.
@@yanosan6232the guy calling out shady behavior of a UA-camr being proven a manipulative liar is irrelevant … ? Tf are you on lmao
@@JustADudeDoingSomething Lawyers do try to work for their client's best interest cause they are paid, but guess what, there are usually two sides with paid lawyers and one of them is on the right side. Being paid doesn't inherently mean you are wrong. That is why we still look at the evidence they present and judge things based on that, no matter how clear the bias there is.
One thing i noticed about the chocolate part is that Dogpack actually shows the correct information, he actually shows the difference in portion size (43g) for hershey and (60g) for feastables. And although per gram the sugar content is lower for feastables the calories are actually higher, with a Hershey bar of similar size of a feastable (60g) coming out to 307 calories compared to the 320 of the feastables.
even then although speaking per bar is a bit misleading it still has some merits as most people wil just eat the entire thing. So in conclusion both sides manipulated the way they presented the information on this topic in my opinion. But on this one Soggy definitely was the one who did it more and worse in my opinion.
Who eats half a chocolate bar? Europeans?
@@kazineverwind5267 literally no one. The serving size thing makes 0 sense.
correct, if you break it down to calories per gram, herseys has 5,1 and feastables has 5,3.
@@jamespadgett8660
Comparing per bar is the most dumbest thing if you want to compare which one is healthier. Companies would just compare their regular bar to competitor's xl bar and then market it as healthier when that's a fully scummy move.
Your comment also proved you did not even watch the video. Literally there's a king size and standard size. So why didn't dogpack compare the standard hershey bar to the standard feastables bar?
Ofc you should compare serving sizes because you are comparing numerical values and percentages, if I argue french fries dipped in shit is healthier than french fries dipped in KFC gravy, I better mention I mean a serving of 1 gram of french fries dipped in 0.1 gram of shit vs a serving of 10 tons of french fries dipped in 1 ton of KFC gravy.
The simple fact that Chris and Mr. Beast were caught on camera looking at Shadman content then builds an entire empire of content creation targeting children’s attention will always be creepy.
and all these content creators will continue to kiss his ass in hopes to make content with him one day. Money over morals.
Its just so weird that that is what people focus on.
mr beast looked at it, but that dosent mean that he likes it or anything else really, i dont find the creepy from mr beast side, but chris...
@@x-xPhobiawhy?
Am I mistaken or didn’t Chris or Mr beast actually own a shadman piece of art or something like that? I could be wrong but I feel like I heard it before
Mr beast is no longer 19. He figured out his employee was an offender years ago and yet he didn't fire him on the spot which means he knowingly employed an offender
Why would you fire somebody on the spot? Dafuq -
Funny how easily swayed people are even after got multiple time gaslight by MrBeast. MrBeast literally shove it in their face by collab with paul and ksi and people still keep on eating shit. Just my opinion, I would still support MrBeast if he didn't collab and gaslit people instead just do his usual content. That is so unnecessary.
@IceBioshock because having a registered offender anywhere near minors or content catering to minors is a gigantic liability and risk to your reputation and can easily be construed as gross negligence on part of the employer as the employer has the duty to vet his employees and make sure they are no risk to themselves or others in the role they are employed in. An arsonist would also instantly get fired from the fire brigade for that very reason.
Why does it matter he employed an offender? R u saying they no longer deserve to b employed?
@@KT-pv3kl thats a 12 yr old take
Asmon IMMEDIATELY switching sides before he even watches the video. Sorry lil bro but due to you trying to convince us that hasan is a cool dude for half a year. I'm not going to belive the new opinion you got from the memo that "mr beast good now react to paid video"
who is hasan?
Who is hasan?
Asmon switches opinions faster than anything
@@randomguy2210 some weird oligarch
@@draemdaed idk asmongold enough but i know changing opinions is perfectly normal and no one cares if we all understand why these opinions changed...
I dont get why hes all of the sudden like "people dont like him cause his success" is such a basic logan paul cope... but idk his reason for the sudden glaze
I feel like Jimmy paid a bunch of randoms to protect him
well he literally paid to have soggy flown over so.....
Even if this were true (and flying someone over is different from outright paying them), this doesn't disprove the evidence soggy shown.
@@rexrex429 *UNDENIABLE PROOF THAT SOGGY WAS PAID OFF*:
1) Soggy admits in interview with Chud Logic that Dustin, one of the Beast employees he interviewed, paid for his flight and hotel. He also stated that Mr. Beast was aware of the upcoming interview with Dustin prior to it taking place. This does not prove but obviously implies that Mr. Beast reimbursed Dustin after he paid Soggy. Soggy also stated in the same interview that he refuses to disclose his financial connection to Mr. Beast and Dustin in the description of the video even though it would take two seconds.
2) Mr. Beast commented on the video when it first came out, saying "Finally a video about me that isn't slander" which is just an awful look if you want to make this video look organic and not like a paid for puff piece. In addition Mr. Beast has been shilling the video to various creators to boost its visibility, and advising that he would "rather not" have these DM's shown to each creator's audience. Why doesn't he want them to show the DM's?
3) During the interview with Emily (The co-worker lady), she calls the Chef and says "Hey I've got soggy on the phone". The Chef immediately knows who Soggy is and doesn't ask any questions, despite supposedly having no prior knowledge of this interview.
4) Finally this isn't proof Soggy got paid but Mr. Beast's team says in the video that it's Dogpack's fault that "people wont walk again" referring to charities not wanting to work with them anymore. That is one of the wildest things I've ever heard if that isn't slander I don't know what is.
Anyway TL;DR: Soggy Lyed People Dyed.
@@rexrex429 Mr. Beast shill detected obviously he paid for it
@@rexrex429 soggy showed doctored shit :) give it a few months. hackers are gunna shred Mr Beast.
Meatcanyon displayed Mr. Beast perfectly.
Just for the record in Jake Wedle's video with the AI recording:
Soggy cuts him off just as he was about to explain that he was sent that video by someone claiming to be a former Mr.Beast employee with the intention to decieve him and how he was lucky to have the foresight to have the video double and triple checked & ask the person for more info (they ghosted him btw)
The whole point was to bring attention to how there ARE people straight up fabricating evidence to either support the narrative against Mr.Beast or to discredit Wedle & Dogpack (ironic) and that you shouldn't take stuff at face value because the water has been muddled too much.
Not saying it wasn't stupid and clickbaity the way Wedle presented this info/warning, but context matters and I think he got his point across.
ikr the point of the video was to say about ai generate stuff are getting scarier but soggy just brush it off like Weddle was a lying scumbag
It felt more like soggy just salty for getting clickbaited.
I live in a one party consent state (you only need the consent of one member of a conversation (that can include yourself) to record it) and any meeting I have with bosses or HR, I always record to protect myself. The company has fostered this attitude though. TLDR; HR is not there to protect the employees of a company, just the companies PR and bottom line. Always do what you can to protect yourself if you are having issues at work.
"BILLIONAIRE EARNS FORTUNE THROUGH SKETCHY BUSINESS PRACTICES!" omg really????
Lmao real
I've tried to come up with something to say as a reply but I can't... I'm just too stunned by the thought of finding someone in the comments who's capable of using their brain.
0:10 Post-drama, I hate Mr. Beast cause he wouldn't spare one tweet to reassure his multi millions of followers that everything is okay and he'll clarify the truths soon.
Yeah i dont know why he didnt
We didnt need a full on defense, but a
"He is saying many things out of hate, things that are not true. I am a young guy with too much to do and too little experience, i made errors"
"After all the allegations against me are out, i Will officially reply to them"
Thats it
Yeah, it's not like the people watching a video that's shows all the lies that were told would STILL have comments saying they STILL believe the lies...... wouldn't happen...
A tweet would have definitely worked and not look defensive.
Blame his lawyers. They probably told him to keep his mouth shut. That's how it works. Way I see it, the video goes pretty far debunking all the bullshit, so I really see no need to hate the guy.
I don't think MrBeast will ever sue dogpack simply because that would open him to Discovery and that would mean opening himself up to any crimes he may have committed. Dogpack and his lawyers would be able to go through every claim with a fine-tooth comb and Jimmy would legally be required to give them ALL the old footage, everything that is archived on their own systems. Also it's way harder to prove defamation against a public figure (MrBeast).
Why do companies even have NDAs then?
Didn't dogpack say he was getting sued. OH SHOOT he was lying about that too??
@@TheThunderKeki I think he said only threats. he was getting threated to be sued.
@@TheThunderKeki he was sent a cease and desist which he ignored and didn't get sued because discovery would be a real bad day for MrBeast who couldn't destroy any evidence and have to hand over all unfiltered group chats and records for years, implicating him for being a peice of shit and more.
Unfortunately people do not care about underage gambling. Imo, gambling is major cancer in society.
I've thought about this for a long time. China was at one point, brought to their knees and controlled through manufactured mass addiction. That deeply affected their national and cultural identity.
Now let's look what American businesses have large amounts of Chinese funding: TikTok/social media, lobbyists who fight for legalized sports gambling, gacha/gambling based games, and porn. And let's not forget where the fentanyl epidemic originated. All of these things are highly addictive. And all are categorically banned in China, yet they're pouring their money into these industries in the US...
People have gambled since the stone age... A coin flip is a gamble. Stop dramatizing it!
Society has no business lecturing a kid about gambling, that's the parents job.
UA-camrs are becoming the same mainstream media associates covering for each other, which I despise.
MrBeast is guilty of safety violations for the contestants. End of discussion.
I assume you are a certified safety inspector?
@@sh0kerever heard of OSHA??? He has multiple lawsuits against him and you dare defend him
@@jointhefun4lawsuits prove nothing, you can sue anyone at anytime for anything so long as you file the paperwork.
@@jointhefun4any can make a lawsuit
How many were successful
@@aftermodesmusic7440 You assume that in a court of law justice is being spoken XD Cute - no the only thing you get is sentence. And in America that depends on what lawyer you can pay and what the public scrutiny is like..
Asmongold Soggy absolutely debunked a lot of Dogpacks allegations but he was both paid and give access by Jimmy to make this video. Just think about it MrBeast employees have an NDA and have not talked to anyone for months because of it but now that Soggy is asking questions they are fine breaking the NDA to answer his questions. Isn't that a little strange to you?
On top of that Dustin a MrBeast employee reached out to him and invited him to come to NC to interview Beast Employees (travel was paid for and he didn't disclose this the video but did in a livestream with Chud Logic) but Jimmy obviously gave the all-clear for Soggy to come to NC to talk to his employees and make his video.There's a good chance it was actually Jimmy's idea based on Soggy's previous work on Airrack. Jimmy most likely hired Soggy after the 3rd party investigation that came out sounded more like a lawyer defending his client which didn't look good or convince anyone.
Every single content creator and mainstream journalist covering the MrBeast drama that reached out to Jimmy and MrBeast employees were stonewalled or given a nothing burger response from the MrBeast lawyers or PR team. Soggy was the first content creator covering the MrBeast Drama given direct access to Beast HQ and was given complete access to documents, images and audio files and most importantly he was granted access to interview current MrBeast employees that no one else had access to.
They've had months to fabricate evidence. These interviews should have happened on the first few days of the allegations.
First off, why did soggy get a interview when there is Tom dark and Nicolasd who have way more anti dog pack vibes? Plus dog pack already denounced Mr beasts shouting out his vid in fear it would seem like he was directly paid off (which now it's happening). Finally this still goes to show that dog pack is far more malicious than previously precived and honestly probably gonna get sued.
It's been many months since this whole thing started, Mr.Beast has had plenty of time to fabricate evidence.
It is too obvious to pick someone who is completely on your side. And soggy as a "middle side" will be more believable. @@BucketWasTakenTwice
1:02:53 I'm sorry but Soggy got this one twisted a bit. It doesn't matter what the show is ACTUALLY about, but what Jimmy/Mr.Beast *thought* it was about and why he would say Chris would like it to a third party as a joke...
How does anyone know what Jimmy was thinking at the moment though? The fact is no one knows apart from jimmy himself , you can paint this point to whatever you want as an outsider, this one is probably a whatever floats your boat thing
Pewdiepie was reacting to fazerug giving away ps5s, not Mr Beast
I thought it was obvious in the original vid that Pewdiepie wasn't reacting to Mrbeast but Dogpack was editing it in a way to make a point about UA-cam giveaways by showing that people like Pewdiepie would call stuff like phone or whatever giveaways to subscribers a UA-cam scam. Do people really think he was trying to make it look like Pewdiepie was reacting to beast when it was so obvious in the DogPack video?
No one sane would think that dogpack was unbiased and fair, he said from the start that he's a disgruntled employee. But the fact that MrB is a pos, doesn't change much. You can try and discredit him as much as you want, but the fact that Jimmy is working with confirmed scammers, or that has employed predators or had nfs stuff on discord are facts.
Just because a group of people with opinions is capable of forming a circle doesn't make the statement true. This has been the long-time strategy of mainstream media where everyone source each others articles to form a sense of legitimacy. Perhaps you just haven't lived long enough to see it.
And where is the predator? Watching hentai or chatting with teens isn't a crime.
Correct me if im wrong, but i dont think it's possible to ban someone from an entire state due to a crime.
It is possible but not probable. You’d probably have a higher chance to be struck by lightning.
You can be a wanted criminal in one state but not another. Maybe he has a warrant in Delaware, so he just can’t go back.
@nikoforsyth514 at that point he'd be wanted by the feds.
@@nikoforsyth514 if he has a warrant in Delaware and crossed state lines, it becomes a federal issue. So that definitely isn’t the case.
Saying keeping people locked up is a war. Crime is the dumbest thing ever That's like saying any civilian that carries hollow points in their gun is a war criminal because hallow points are banned in the Geneva convention, but civilian and police use them all the time
An hour and 40 minutes on Mr. Beast? This is like 2/3 of a Lord of the Rings movie. We get it, he sucks!
The video was about disproving false info not more things bad about Mr. Beast
@@FateVA- looks alot like access journalism to me. were you asleep when the veilgaurd drama happened? same damn thing
@@Heretic_of_the_State I feel like his point of the video was to disprove the false information and give us more information about Mr. Beast situation. The way I see it now we wait to see if anyone uses evidence to disprove the evidence soggy cereal provided. Not to say Mr. Beast isn't still in a lot of trouble with the other allegations.
You didn't even watch the video and I can tell. This video was about disapproving half of the allegations DogPack made. Atleast watch half of the video before you make a comment
@@Syncphony Bragging about watching a one-hour and 40 minute video about influencer drama on top of the other Asmond videos plus the other UA-cam videos today is a seriously sad flex.
Apparently this dude was paid by mr beast to make this video and beast is dming popular creators telling them to react to it
Gotta love the 1 hour 40 minute reaction covering only half the video
TL;DR: Claiming that Feastables is better for you/healthier than Hershey's is incorrect, as the macros of the bars are almost the same.
Full macros for Hershey's vs Feastables standardized to 43g(H=Hershey's, F=Feastables):
Calories: H=220cal, F=233,4cal.
Total Fat: H=13g, F=14,7g.
Saturated fat: H=8g, F=8,6g
Total sugar:H=25g, F=22,1g(video said 21,5g)
Cholesterol: H=10mg, F=12,2mg.
Sodium: H=35mg, F=30,7mg.
Protein: H=3g, F=3,6g.
Not going to list the rest, as almost all of them are only listed in % values on Feastables.
Where does the number 21,5g of sugar come from? total sugar in the 35g Feastables bar is 18g, (18/35)*43=22,1142...g, so either Soggy was looking at the wrong thing, is bad at math or he is lying about .6g of sugar?
Considering that the calories are higher gram for gram and Feastables have more total fat saturated fat, if anyone is a contender for the "healthier" option, it is the Hershey's bar IMO, although by a very small margin.
If the claim was made that Feastables are better for you/healthier was made today, I would personally consider it false advertisement.
Both are terrible. Comparing shit to puke is not useful.
Even when looking at what Soggy showed and claimed. The "healthier" one is barely any better. Like yeah 99 spoons of sugar are better then 100.
The real healthy option is not to eat either. I would still sue Mr. Beast for saying that Feastables is healthy, which qualifies as false advertisement.
46:09 This part revealed this SoggyCereal guy is being as disingenuous in his "debunking" as Dogpack404 seems to have been to begin with. It starts out fine with him discussing that the comparison isn't a fair one, 60g vs 43g and like Asmon says Hersey's and Feastables both have other sizes, with Festables coming in a 35g "one serving" bar and Hersey's having many larger and smaller. But then at 46:35 he talks about recalculating to compare them gram for gram and that Feastables has less sugar and then follows up by saying Feastables has less calories. But not less calories than Hershey's, he says "less calories than the previous formula" meaning the previous formula of Feastables. Gram for gram it still has more calories than Hershey's and it's very scummy of Soggy to not mention that. It makes me think of the same issue that is coming up with Dogpack: if he presents one thing in bad faith what else is he presenting in bad faith and skirting the facts on?
The claim made by Dogpack was that the new Feastables formula has more sugar and more calories per bar and in his video he displays a 43g Hershey's bar and a 60g Feastables bar with them labeled as such. It is somewhat dishonest but he is prominently displaying what he's comparing so not as dishonest as it could ahve been. If you compare them gram for gram it ends up mostly a tossup.
Hershey's milk chocolate candy bar (43g): 220 calories, 25g sugar
Feastables king size milk chocolate bar (60g): 320 calories 30g sugar
Standardized to 43g Feastibles has 9.33 more calories and 3.5g less sugar.
I believe Coffeezilla.
Tell me you didn't watch the actual video without telling me you didn't watch the actual video. That's covered in the video. He points out how scummy Jimmy is for the cryptocurrency stuff at the end. The point of the video is not to exonerate. Jimmy, it's to show that dog pack is also scummy.
@@blackmartini7684he bearly criticised Mr beast in the video, Mr beast paid to fly him out, gave him access to staff something coffee can't get even a response from, Mr beast sent soggys video to creators, he left a positive comment on soggys video, Mr beast has won by manipulative measures even fooling asmodgold
@@blackmartini7684 It was an assertion. Coffeezilla is the only one I believe because he wasn't trying to cash in on this. That's it.
@@jayceecee8651 Agreed
Coffeezilla is the only trustable source rn
@@jayceecee8651lord have mercy please actually watch the video
So many accusations without any repercussions, both sides just hammering each other without stakes. It’s starting to feel like a TV show at this point. The next one will probably be murder, and we’ll just brush it off, thinking, "Oh, just another UA-camr drama."
Couldn’t have worded it better myself
And then you'll have asmon's reply: "When you think about it, nobody cares about murder"
Didn't soggy say his vid has affected some of the employees lives which led to the interviews? Or how dog pack ( eventho he is a shitter person in my eyes) opend the doors on the questionable ethics happing at Mr beast co.?
Except mrbeast has billions and good lawyers, if those were false accusations, he could just sue dogpack into oblivion.
But he paid this shill instead to "debunk" it.
Keep in mind Amongold's friend group is full of Mr.Beast types. This guy can't spot a creep to save his life.
I believe that the slavery sourced chocolate was mischaracterized. The 'Slavery Free' tag was removed because the company's own official statement claims 'as much as possible' meaning that, though actively minimalized, sourced slavery is still present.
A "slave" is defined as someone working for free against their will, forced labor.
You're not a slave if you work for free. And if someone did work for free against their will, why didn't they leave? And if they left, how's it still slavery?
I wonder how he got all those videos and interviews :^)
It's still not philantrophy.
He's just investing and gets a higher return out of it.
I dont hate Mr Beast, but i recall when he was cheering for and advertising PewDiePie to become the first channel to 100M subs before T-Series. Since those times, he definitely feels much less authentic and more corporate. Its changed a lot and i no longer enjoy his content the way i used to.
Yeah... that part makes me alittle sad, but still shouldn't be crucified for the the entirety of a disgruntled employee, nevertheless all i can hope for is Jimmy makes a behind the scenes channel to help clarify things in the future.
Nothing changed, his goal since the very beginning was to get as many views and subscribers as possible, and he was relentlessly researching the "algorithm" on how from when he was by himself to when he had a crew to when he had an empire. And if he appeared more "authentic" to you, however that means, it just means given his resources and UA-cam trends at the time based on his research he was doing that kind of content to generate the highest possible attraction to his channel and brand.
On the chocolate, feastibles (single serving size) 35g 190 cal bar is 5.43 calories per gram where as hersheys 43g 220 cal bar is 5.12 calories per gram so as a technicality feastibles do have more calories.
Exactly. Servings is a useless metric to use as a serving is defined as what's usually eaten at once. Who the fuck only eats half a bar. Considering it's only 13 grams heavier is that enough to warrant only eating half? Asmongold is being a disingenuous
@@malohn2068honestly how I felt.
This feels like a guerilla strike back from Mr beast. With the easily accessible employee statements and the difference in tone in those statements and that one guy saying that “I had a lot of emotional and financial damage” that’s sounds like what you would say with a lawyer
Does it change that he was recorded without his consent, or are you implying he was paid to lie and say the recording was without his consent?
The tone he answered his videos more just feel like he is being clear in no uncertain terms.
@@nikoforsyth514bro, they mr beast employers, their lifehood directly depends on how well is mr beast doing.
All they say being aware of recording is a straight up lies crafted to protect their own money.
It wasn't Beast tho it was Soggy. I don't see how this throws anything he said out the window.
recording someone without consent isn't always a rat move, like when a cable or Internet service calls you and lies about new deals they offer and then the next month they pretend they didn't say it. or when i job fires you over the phone and then when you go get unemployment, they lie and say you just never came back to work and try to stop your unemployment (i got done that way by 2 companies)
They wanna pick and choose who gets the benefits or not. It's just lame asf of them to already try and bag on Dogpack the first minute of the video when in reality, mb and the other dude were sending nudes to little kids or wait why didn't the cover the truth in the video instead of little shit? Who cares about the amount of sugar in a candy bar. THEY are talking to little kids. Like wtf did everyone just forget? It's so wild that they're so rdy to jump in Dogpack instead of the actual molesters
And? You clearly know what he meant so why argue exceptions?
@@Quintessence4444 Because he has to grasp as straws to keep his mr.beast hate. Since he is already on the train. It is easier than admitting he was an idiot for believing a bunch of allegations based on a video of a fired employee
@@Quintessence4444we clearly know what he meant and call bullshit on it. Employer's lifehood depends on how well mr beast is doing. No way in hell they say any truth while knowing about a recording.
Yea I don't take this guy from another country credible either. His whole starting point is weak language games. Someone might not be "banned" from a state but there are tons of reasons someone might not be able to go to the state without serious issues this a defacto ban. Arguing about the words someone uses doesn't exactly instill confidence.
Also when you are trying to undercover bad behavior and people covering up criminal acts and against you, recording someone is warranted. Is that supposed to prove something to me? 🤦♂️
What i learned from this vid:
Delaware: "Nobody cared until I put on the mask"
Dogpack: makes crazy cod montage cut out videos
Asmon: still cant watch his streams live so bless these vids
@0:30 No, we don't hate Mr Beast because of what Asmdumbo thinks it is. We hate Mr Beast, because he is annoying; and he keeps showing up in our feeds to annoy us more. I have never watch a single one of his videos, unless it was via another person's video. I was originally annoyed by this horrible person who exploits children, exploits charities, etc to make huge profits. This is a level worse than a used car salesman. Just like I avoid used car salesmen, I want to avoid this creep even more.
Asmondumbo: Recording a person without their permission is a rat move.
Social Media: Literally recording innocent citizens without their permission 99% of the time.
"I have never watched"
Then you have opinions based on other people's opinions. You're not a smart guy 😂
@@Fredman5551he literally explained that he’s watched it through other people bro learn how to read
Yeah you hate him cause you want to not for anything logical
@nbricks7 and I literally explained that his opinion is based on other people's opinions.
Telling me he watched it on a commentary channel, while some guy is repeatedly pausing the video to give his opinion, doesn't change that.
Learn to think bro.
people. Did we really not learn anything from the screeching we had to endure in the past decade?
Blindly supporting a side is STUPID.
I'm no UA-camr, but can't you edit descriptions? If so, then mrbeast just edited the description to say "free entry", after Dogpack's video came out. Dogpack didn't seem scared of legal action, and my guess is because he found all evidence needed to not be libel/slander.
I bet the Mr. Beast drama has generated more ad revenue than most cable TV channels at this point. Very lucrative business to be in these days.
Exactly.
This whole thing is a psyop by Jimmy
Yeah, if all this is true Jimmy needs to sue. But he won't, that'll require opening his records to discovery. That's why he paid this guy to make this video instead. Asmon is pretty easily manipulated.
19:51 he never said he was not a rso, they were saying that they didn't know he was a so at the time he hired him.
Wake up babe, Asmon dropped a feature length movie
Also yall are idiots, Mr beast would sue asap and smash the bug and he hasn’t. But they don’t want anything uncovered in court
Yeah I think if he was truly innocent this would be over a long time ago. At least in the public eye
didnt dogpack say he was sueing
@@TheThunderKekidogpack is broke, mr beast has billions and good lawyers. That makes all the difference.
Soggy as bad as the rest of the journalists. " Do you feel", "So do you think you could say". Leading questions, trash.
Let me guess you're a trump supporter who calls himself a free thinker, trying to cancel a straight white man?
Ikr asking all the wrong questions that got nthn to do with sht.
yea its the same words that are used in religious cults, in complete disregard of evidence
soggy is just insulting without any proof
So also like what DogPack asked the employee that was recorded without his consent. Nice one.
@@hectornieves537 who cares, i got people to record me but guess what, i have nothing to hide, some people however (especially a pedo i exposed) are really scared of bein recorded
For the mask detail, I'd imagine that might've been Delaware's decision, trying to keep himself anonymous online as he knew that his registration was public and could be found rather easily
Yeah but then there’s this claim that Delaware never interacted with kids, how do they even know that???
That’s cause they knew and they prohibited him from directly being in contact with minors, otherwise they would have never even paid attention to that
It wasn’t just him unilaterally deciding to wear that mask
Wouldn't that make people sus as hell thus leading them to find out? What videos is he wearing a mask in anyway? I don't remember ever seeing some random guy wearing a mask for no reason in his videos though.
I think this just highlights holes in both DogPack’s argument but also Soggy’s one too. Both cherry picked to get their point across and ignored points that weakened their argument. Be interesting to see if Mr Beast take DogPack to court or not as that’s what is really needed to separate the truth from the lies.
he wont, thats how weak Jimmy is, he hides to his minions to fight for him. And if this goes to court, everything he hides behind the scenes will be subject for investigation.
Many people knew for quite a while that MrBeast is like Wrestling. Fake but also not.
However the video about the Eye Surgery was quite disturbing (Mission Flight).
MrBeast is clearly lying about how much is fake and how involved he really is solving issues.
This feels like a crazy guy calling out a crazy guy that's calling out a crazy guy.
The reason mr beast done this is because he knows if your told by the streamer you look up to, you will MINDLESSLY follow his opinion.
It's a somewhat clever tactic. Contact the heads of church and all the peasants will follow
This video is starting off with a gigantic cope. Why did they not fire the guy is the real question. Also, you can embroider nicknames on a Best Buy polo. I worked there for nearly 10 years; happened literally all of the time. This doesn't disprove anything lol.
They fired him 5 years ago, what really matters is when they found out, if it was 5 years ago they did nothing wrong if it was before they did.
24:27 this whole goneva thing (over past 5-10 mins) is dumb. How can no one understand. It’s a statement to allow you to understand how bad it was. How are people so dumb to intentionally misunderstand this just so it fits their narrative. It’s like an analogy/joke/description when bringing up said “war crime”
Man gets locked into solitary confinement, goes insane and has his friend come out on video and pretty much say he was too weak to tough it out. Not a war crime, just a really dick move.
It doesn’t make sense no matter how you spin it. The very fact that there’s no consent makes everything much worse, and no one is seriously expecting prisoners to be tortured 24/7. It’s like if someone did a challenge where they could only eat bread for 48 hours and someone else says “wow, we feed prisoners better than that!” Yeah no shit, it’s a voluntary challenge, not a sustainable lifestyle.
im suprised by the comments. Usually you guys just blindly belive asmon but it seems some of you are questioning things rather than blindly believing the famous internet guy
all i need to see is proof that Mr Beast did not do those things
You saw the discord messages. It's real. Point blank. Who gives af about the sugar in a candy bar.
@ChristianON96 fair enough, I just want a reason to believe he did not do all those awful things because I used to love watching Mr beast but at the same time I don't see any reason not to believe he did those awful things. If that makes sense
MrBeast's only evidence is "I would never do that bruh". That tells you all you need to know.
@nightelfuser fair
Its possible to consent to a contract that is not lawful and it will not magically make it lawful. So the whole torture thing being ok because he consented is a mute point.
Someone uses their head!
oh no, Jimmy locked the door with so much money I can't get out. Open the door money will gone, what a nightmare
The pedo sa guy mr beast hire knowing their past hiding him behind a mask and saying he wasnt allowed around kids. Even if not true given the context my opinion is i do believe it mr beast knew to a degree. Everything else i dont really care about.
The chocolate bars Dogpack404 showed in the video, show the correct serving size... He shows the amounts for each FULL bar... The calorie count that Dogpack404 shows for a single Feastable bar, is 320 Calories (160 x2 servings per Feastable).... The label shown in the video playing at 46:38, is 2 servings per Feastables bar, and shows the stats are PER SERVING. 160 calories per serving in feastable bar. Two servings are in the bar, so you multiply everything by 2. Dogpack404, showed the correct values for a single Feastables bar compared to a single Hersheys bar. It is not hard. This was not a lie... LMAO Asmon literally just took what was being told to him and didn't pay any attention to what is actually being shown in the video. This is why ppl are dumb these days.
for a debunking video it was horrible work, paid for by mr beast, full of opinions from people currently on mr beasts payroll....
This comment section coping so hard lmao
I'm thinking out loud here. What if Delaware is the one that came up with he mask idea and sold it as a "novelty / character" idea, but his true motive was trying to limit his own facial exposure on UA-cam knowing eventually people who DO KNOW about his RSO would figure out who he is, and then as a result those people would contact his employer (aka Mr Beast) and out him, and then he'd lose his job? I dunno the real reason he wore it, but this seems as good a reason as any and it tracks logically. What do you all think?
It would be possible if there wasn’t this claim that he never was in contact with kids.
How would anyone know that if they weren’t monitoring him? And why would they be monitoring if he gets close to kids?
They knew
some suits in a video were designed by shadman so yea
The candy bar thing isn't a lie.
Hersheys: 220 calories, 43g total weight = 5.12 kcal per gram
Beastables: 320 calories, 60g total weight = 5.33 kcal per gram
Beastables is more calorie dense. They're both garbage chocolate but it's not a lie.
What i learned during all this. Don't believe anyone until Court proves it.
Like they did with O.J. Simpson?
@rattntattn778 pretty much
What I learnt is soggy was paid and so was asmod to protect mrbeast
Yup..
@@michealrosen No one asked you though
Dogpack is bad
Mrbeast is bad
Logan Paul is Worst
how is exposing a criminal bad, dogpack has done nothing wrong
@ trust me bro I support dogpack more than mrbeast..
Soggy was pissing me off this whole video, not gonna lie
Can't wait for the defamation suit
10:53 ain't that same label on every manager from that shop in Delaware?
Should have been obvious, I thought this too
The youtube UI argument is really dumb. Dogpack made very clear that these live streams were all removed from youtube. Nobody has access to them anymore. he had to get clips of them from elsewhere. He just tried to add back the youtube UI to make his video more presentable. he was very up front about the source of those videos not being the original livestreams.
28:22 Yeah, it doesn't even have to be for a sanctioned combat sport. Many states have laws that specifically allow for adults to agree to, and take part in, mutual combat.
For example if 2 people both actually want to fight over a traffic dispute, that's literally legal. Very stupid, but still legal.
Bring back duels
@@ZbxncWndbdbd I second this.
Asmon telling someone "try to think" is so ironic when the comparison was made bar for bar on the chocolate not on serving as he's saying 😂
Ikr, I swear I agree with him on a lot of stuff but then he goes out to say dumb stuff like this.
Well he isn't wrong ?
??? There are smaller bars of every type of chocolate. There are one serving bars of Hersheys and a two serving bars. They then compared them gram for gram afterwards?? Are you thinking?
@@nikoforsyth514 exactly
Like wtf are these guys talking about
Yeah if you do calories/gram. Feastables is worse
Sounds like what happened was this is mrbeast's discrediting video to mitigate financial losses since anything coming out of his mouth would have a Streisand Effect on Dogpack's video. Guaranteed this video is produced by mrbeast at lawyer's advice. If the video of delaware at Best Buy was never released, then how did this guy get the footage and/or even know about it? Also, why tf does he even give af about defending jimmy unless he's some simpleton celebrity worshipper?
Why do I look ugly ? Why did god make me ugly?
Trials and tribulations for your personal character development
Population control. So you dont breed.
hard mode bro :(
Some of us begin the game in Give Me God Of War.
'e were just 'avin' a giggle.
I said all this stuff was bullshit and most was just how business works.
Excedpt for one or two things the rest is pure clout chasing, and i suspect it will have serious legal ramifications
I have one Beef with the guy about 15 minutes in. Even if you didnt know you were recorded you still made it a point to say exactly how you felt about Delaware. I do get" I didn't agree to be involved in this bullshit". but that is really how you feel about that guy meaning everything in the recording is in fact your true opinions, so you can back peddle just because you are also pissed at the guy who recorded you. Why would he say it didnt happen now "my life has ben devastated emotionally and financially"
Then he tried claiming he went through a mental breakdown during this situation “Oh they can recognize my voice” but I don’t recall anyone until now saying “That sounds like Garret”
0:22 didnt MrBeast literally had a child pred on his video once? People have always hated him for those sort of reason, but he wasnt unniversally hated until that level of accusation rose up, that and lunchly...
Because if that claim isnt debunked then i have no idea why you would group "people who hate mrBeast" under those description
yeah but soggy was paid so....
let's be honest, this is just a crowdsourced netflix drama series at this point
hey man,you should make your camera larger and put it in the center of the screen so i cant see nothing,thanks
Why did he wear the mask?
Maybe he's trying to be bane from the dark knight
"Nobody cared who I was until I wore the mask"
Lmao, that's all I was thinking about when they were talking about him
The downfall of mr breast is gold
It's a messy situation and this guy has had enough misleading evidence that it looks like he is also operating in bad faith as well as Dogpack404. Specific example: Feastables chocolate being "healthier" gram per gram of chocolate Hershey's at 43 grams has ~4 grams more sugar, but has ~9 more calories than Hershey's. He only compares total calories to the previous Feastables calories and not the Hershey's which is misleading and Dogpack is correct in saying that it is misleading that Jimmy says Feastables is healthier than Hershey's. Honestly I feel both of them are pretty misrepresentative of the situation. I would like to see his evidence of the lotteries where he does random short giveaways in the middle of the Livestream where there is literally no way for someone to have time to make a free entry option, as well as fake Mr. Beast signatures. Just because Dogpack exaggerated a lot of things doesn't mean there aren't real issues with a lot of stuff that Mr. Beast has done that was brought up in Dogpack's videos.
This guy was paid by Mr Beast to make a video.
still dont like mr beast
28:41 but how do you know if the recording is ai tho?
This situation isn't that complex anymore. The fact is simple: Mrbeast has an edge on dogpack for one and only one reason: Money. He gets to hire the best teams, the best lawyers, the best people to cover up everything, etc. He even gets to hire people like soggycerealz to make a video about how good he is.
This is not the first time a fraud or criminal with a shit ton of money bullies a "smaller" person into submission. Look at clear cases like Billy Mitchell who can play the law game over and over, and bully others into always winning.
And of course Asmon is going to agree with him, he's been a Mrbeast shill since the first dogpack video like all these other content creators. There's been a plethora of massive W's from Asmon recently but this is a huge L.
Dogpack was clearly lying about a lot though, if you say a pit and car are fake and they are just not like that has nothing to do with Mr Beast being rich or Asmon being a shill, thats just a lie. Lying about CP has nothing to do with bullying either, or cutting out the part of the video that shows Mr Beast made it a free to enter lottery so it seems illegal. Or comparing a 20g bar to a 40g and saying see this one is unhealthier! When gram for gram its actually healthier. Like tell me what you specifically disagree with that Asmon agreed with. Calling out lies is not "defending Mr Beast", its like if someon says Hitler treated animals bad and you say no he didn't doesn't mean you are "defending Hitler" such 1 dimensional thinking by Mr Beast haters.
@@aturner488 The funny bit is that the pit was fake in that shot, soggy even says it later in the video talking about safety procedures
@@cyk658 Fair enough but alot of other lies by dogpack and pointing them out doesn't make you a shill or defending Mr Beast.
More like situation is very simple at this point. Mr beast can hire any lawyers he want, but cant do anything legal against allegations.
Which mean absolute majority of what dogpack said is true.
462 views in 2 minutes, the editor fell off
Bro needs a guinness world record for worlds most original comment.
@@gusc061 Bro needs a guiness world record for getting ratiod
@@cozyeti Liked his comment to help with your goal of being ratio'd :3
I am glad I adopted "wait until there is more info" mentality.
Makes life easier.
to look at this from a common sense standpoint if he didnt want to be involved he should have not told dogpack anything on a call. Basically its a few drama influencers who are who ride and die Mr Beast stans trying to paint everything dogpack has said as false. At the end of the day MrBeast is still a horrible person because alot of the accusations were proven true, dogpack did some shitty things for content. Big whoop
He says he went to an ancient city underground. Turns out, it's a amusement park underground. This guy is the fakest you can find he'll say and do anything to look good