Pakistan Anti-Ship ToT Strike vs Russian Carrier Group: (Naval Battle Vid 31) | DCS WORLD

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 тра 2024
  • 0:00 Briefing
    7:27 Fight!
    Master Sheet: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...
    Playlist: • Naval Battles
    SPONSORS
    Winwing: www.wwsimstore.com/STORE
    Winwing USA: fox2.wwsimstore.com/STORE
    Sponsor Reviews: • Sponsor Reviews
    USEFUL LINKS
    GRIM REAPERS(UA-cam): / @grimreapers
    GRIM REAPERS 2(UA-cam): / @grimreapers2
    GRIM REAPERS(Odysee): odysee.com/$/invite/@grimreap...
    GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
    DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
    DCS BUYERS GUIDE: • DCS World Module Quick...
    DCS OFFICIAL SITE: www.digitalcombatsimulator.co...
    ONE TO ONE LESSONS: grimreapers.net/one-to-one-le...
    DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
    MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
    PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
    PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
    SOCIAL MEDIA
    WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
    STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
    STREAMS(Other Members): grimreapers.net/gr-twitch/
    FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
    TWITTER: / grimreapers_
    DISCORD(DCS & IL-2): / discord (16+ age limit)
    DISCORD(TFA Arma): discordapp.com/invite/MSYJxbM (16+ age limit)
    OTHER
    CAP'S X-56 HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/open?id=1g7o...
    CAP'S WINWING HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/drive/folder...
    THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
    #DCSQuestioned #GRNavalBattle #DCSNavalBattle #GR #DCSWorld
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 432

  • @aazanahmed8325
    @aazanahmed8325 2 роки тому +40

    As a Pakistani valued viewer I really appreciate this!! Excited for what the Indians have to offer.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +12

      copy

    • @brothergunns5055
      @brothergunns5055 2 роки тому +9

      Pakistan and India is nothing compared to Emma and her two moms.

    • @brothergunns5055
      @brothergunns5055 2 роки тому +9

      @@heatframe9923 Emma and her moms are just gonna click a photo of you and all their enemies and post it on social media and you're gonna get cancelled. What are you gonna do about that?!!!!

    • @heatframe9923
      @heatframe9923 2 роки тому

      @@brothergunns5055 what Emma hahaha 😆😂🤣 who the hell she gonna do huh, does she want to check her post letter or the email letter saying that the Emma and her 2 moms is not match against these missile. They would be extremely exterminated ,hahaha 😆.

    • @heatframe9923
      @heatframe9923 2 роки тому +1

      @@brothergunns5055 and yeah by the way I don't care who cares about the photo of other people anyway "only an hilarious person try to do it 🤣🤣🤣 hahaha", "try to sneak attack a childish way or what snake dance anyway", if Emma and her 2 mom try to click a wrong person of a photo as well as the wrong enemies saying that this people try to sneak, ohh sorry "snake 'dance' attack" in my garden, on my back yard 🤣🤣🤣. While the person "who the bl**dy hell are you saying". Hahaha 🤣🤣🤣 crossfight.

  • @robertsmith1768
    @robertsmith1768 2 роки тому +75

    I like the labels. It does make the screen a bit crowded but it's much easier to identify what is what

    • @kyriakos2706
      @kyriakos2706 2 роки тому +1

      No labels is more realistic but much harder to identify targets, especially ground targets

    • @LVRaven610
      @LVRaven610 2 роки тому

      Labels please!

    • @_tyrannus
      @_tyrannus 2 роки тому +1

      @@kyriakos2706 Let's pretend labels are information you'd have access to through other means.

  • @Decrepit_biker
    @Decrepit_biker 2 роки тому +76

    Tactical victory for the Russians. They beat the attack.
    Strategic victory for the Pakistanis. They effectively neutralised the carrier groups strike ability.
    Fantastic vid, felt very thematic. Well done Cap!!

    • @SeanMirrsen
      @SeanMirrsen 2 роки тому +23

      Small problem with that: A Russian "carrier group" is more of a heavy missile cruiser group with aircraft servicing capabilities. Anything within range of those cruiser- and carrier- launched heavy missiles is still getting wrecked.

    • @kshitijsharma6289
      @kshitijsharma6289 2 роки тому +13

      They still have cruise missiles to reck havok

    • @martinpalmer6203
      @martinpalmer6203 2 роки тому +12

      Yeah even the Adm. Kuznetsov CVGN itself has some offensive missile strike power as well as much stronger self defense capabilities than US Carriers.
      They were referred to has heavy missile firing aviation cruisers, because that's essentially what they are.
      A Russian Carrier group definitely more or less 60%-70% of its strike power from the ships themselves.... more soon
      Not to mention the SSGNs and SSNs.
      They aren't the same as US carrier groups , the Russian Carrier based aircraft are more defensive focused and less strike capable... the ships have significant strike power.
      Just a different way of thinking.

    • @wacky1018
      @wacky1018 2 роки тому +18

      15 minutes later all of pakistan navy and karachi in fire .

    • @Decrepit_biker
      @Decrepit_biker 2 роки тому +3

      Yes the ships still have offensive capability, but at the end of this simulation they are pretty defenseless. No air cover to speak of, and most of their defensive armaments exhausted. Tactically they would have no choice to withdraw, as a second wave of aircraft could do serious damage to the group. Yes they could launch at the Pakistani homeland, but if the Pakistanis were smart they would have a second wave inbound. They do have enough aircraft to do this, and they would effectlively enjoy complete air superiority. The Russians would know that this would be a distinct possibility and already be turning to escape. They only have 1 carrier, and would be keen to keep it afloat.

  • @vicedrn
    @vicedrn 2 роки тому +69

    What if you guys did a slightly different carrier group fight: a US carrier group vs a Russian ground-based defense system? The US would get all its Hornets, mixed for CAP, SEAD, and bombing missions vs a SAM net and a wing of MiG-29s and Flankers ready to fight, with a set of bombing objectives for the US to complete. We've done a lot of attacking carriers, but we've yet to see the striking power of a carrier group.
    Edit: a perfect objective is Russian anti-ship installations, as a simulation of prepping for an amphibious invasion. So the carrier group's job would be to take out the anti-ship missiles, with other hostiles being secondary objectives.

    • @kierandavis4930
      @kierandavis4930 2 роки тому

      Yea I really like this idea. Would love to see the striking capability of the carrier group.

    • @baron7562
      @baron7562 2 роки тому +2

      If you're really going to do that, I would suggest mixing the High Digit SAMs mod with the vanilla SAMs

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +15

      Roger, will finish carrier vs carrier series, then look further into this :)

    • @Struktualnyj
      @Struktualnyj 2 роки тому +2

      Good idea, except for the part with US amphibious invasion into Russia. I mean really, what outcome do you expect from this endeavor? 😀
      Edit: If Cap will read it -- please consider that coastal defenses and other such installations are probably subjects to protection of the territorial Air-Defense Forces, i.e. S-300, Tunguskas, and Iglas + MiG-31/Su-27. Russian Army Air-Defense Forces are charged with protecting the ground forces, and would probably consist of S-300 (no V variant in DCS so P variant), Buk, Tor, Shilka, Strela-10 and Igla, with less cooperative support of Russian AF in form of MiG-29 and Su-27.

    • @baron7562
      @baron7562 2 роки тому +1

      @@Struktualnyj that is why I suggested using HDS mod as it has most modern Russian SAMs including V and VM

  • @1994fishboy
    @1994fishboy 2 роки тому +12

    It is really just absurd how much firepower (offensive and defensive) the Kuznetsov has. Over 200 SAMs, 6-AK-630s, 8-Kashtans, and 12 Shipwrecks. Its a friggin beast. Too bad it is so unreliable.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      Just watch what happens in tomorrow's vid :)

    • @dinodude7290
      @dinodude7290 2 роки тому

      that's part of the reason why it's so unreliable, cramming that many weapon systems into one ship gets really difficult to repair really quickly

  • @Justineexy
    @Justineexy 2 роки тому +25

    I like labels on. Russia is getting so strong.
    ( Russian fleet Vs 100 Boghammers? I'd like to see what the kashtens will do to those poor souls. )

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +5

      atomised boghammers...

    • @Justineexy
      @Justineexy 2 роки тому +2

      @@grimreapers 🤣 Instantly turned into atoms.

    • @PhoenixT70
      @PhoenixT70 2 роки тому +1

      Russian surface ships are designed to be overpowered in order to compete with NATO air power. NATO surface ships are designed to be cheaper and less capable in a gunfight to support that air power. Hence why RUS stronk.

    • @marcs990
      @marcs990 2 роки тому +1

      @@PhoenixT70 is that the new word of the day “stronk” ?

  • @prinzya.4538
    @prinzya.4538 2 роки тому +7

    Watching those kashtans firing dozens of missiles in a short period of time bever gets old, The kashtans literally said, "You shall not pass!"

  • @lightbenderga2017
    @lightbenderga2017 2 роки тому +20

    “I wonder if the Americans could do that”
    Considering the fleet has stopped twice that many harpoons from different angles, yeah I think it could.

  • @paultankersley8215
    @paultankersley8215 2 роки тому +17

    Since the PAF has enough JF-17's, try the same attack, but with two waves of JF's.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +4

      rgr

    • @usmanfasih
      @usmanfasih 2 роки тому +2

      Second wave of attack with no air defence would be the end for the fleet

  • @Struktualnyj
    @Struktualnyj 2 роки тому +11

    "But how many Grumbles are there?" -- there are 96 naval Grumbles + 128 naval Tors + 144 naval Tunguska missiles on Peter the Great CGN.

  • @alikamran6414
    @alikamran6414 2 роки тому +6

    Take these Pakistani aircraft with mix of Indian aircraft (Su 30, M-2000 and a whole lots of Mig 21s) against Russian fleet. Everyone knows these two nations are against each other but "what if" they join their hands together. It'll be fun experiment :D

    • @A7XKoRnRocks1
      @A7XKoRnRocks1 2 роки тому

      That would be a very interesting scenario.

    • @godzilaa8395
      @godzilaa8395 2 місяці тому

      India will never attack Russia with beggers

  • @jakobole
    @jakobole 2 роки тому +13

    Coming from F4 BMS with about 3000 hours in all variations of Falcon 4 since 1999, it WARMS my heart to see the F-16 Caps have 3 fuelt tanks and an all Slammers loadout, and then hammering it in at angels +35. You have the fuel up there! :) Use it! And sending 1 or 2 guys in front to wreak havock, is a great tactick. But - dont get dragged in that's bad ;) Love your vids!

    • @sidv4615
      @sidv4615 2 роки тому +3

      Flying viper above Angels 30-35k feels like it makes fuel.

    • @jakobole
      @jakobole 2 роки тому +1

      @@sidv4615 it's super cerial :) ')

    • @sidv4615
      @sidv4615 2 роки тому

      @@jakobole wait you a real pilot? what does bms mean?

    • @jakobole
      @jakobole 2 роки тому

      @@sidv4615 No. BMS is a new community- driven version of Falcon 4 An old F-16 sim....

  • @_tyrannus
    @_tyrannus 2 роки тому +6

    Keeping the labels on is definitely helpful, helps focus more on the action rather than keeping track of what is where on the map. Knowing which aircraft and missile is what in such a hodgepodge is equally nice.

  • @edilbertorivera3467
    @edilbertorivera3467 2 роки тому +7

    I'm really waiting for the developers to update Russian warships, gunships, weapons and equipment based on what they have today.

  • @martinpalmer6203
    @martinpalmer6203 2 роки тому +7

    Very mooooooved by the brave sacrifice the cow made

  • @kenhelmers2603
    @kenhelmers2603 2 роки тому +3

    Nice twist to the plot :) Thanks GR

  • @Anarchy_420
    @Anarchy_420 2 роки тому +10

    @Grim Reapers Request- Two Iranian Gunboat Fleets, Thirty Silkworms, Two UH-1 Hueys (protecting The Silkworms), and Eight Iranian F-14A Tomcats Flying in Two formations of Four! In Each Fligh of Four, Three F-14's will be air to air protecting the Gunboats and One from each flight will be anti ship!!👍
    For The U.S. Carrier Group can you please give them a few F-35's PLUS F-18's On The Same Carrier and The additional F-16's you included in last Gunboat Vid Replaced With A-10 Thunderbolts! Additionally Two Cobra Attack Helicopters taking off from The Carrier if possible👍

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +2

      copy

    • @Anarchy_420
      @Anarchy_420 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers Awesome! 😁✌

    • @Anarchy_420
      @Anarchy_420 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers feel free to mess with numbers if need be, for instance you can add more or less F-14's and or Silkworms for balancing and entertainment purposes. You can mess with numbers however please do use all requested vehicles/weapons👍

  • @cshader2488
    @cshader2488 2 роки тому +22

    Cap please set the AI pilots skill level to the highest settings, “Veteran” is way to dumb.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +7

      will do on next battle

    • @cshader2488
      @cshader2488 2 роки тому +3

      @@grimreapers Cap, we appreciate all you do. I donated to your Patreon! Thank you!

  • @arra_24s33
    @arra_24s33 2 роки тому +3

    Seeing as they were off the coast of Pakistan there should be some Pakistan Naval units. They use varianta of Chinese ship so you could put the type 054a and 53

    • @arra_24s33
      @arra_24s33 2 роки тому

      They have two ex-british destroyers so you could use some cold war era ships to fill in for them

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому

      thx

  • @HarisMalik
    @HarisMalik 2 роки тому +7

    Amazing 😄 especially when cap finally uses PAF livery in a PAF mission haha.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      :)

    • @ashishbhatt6874
      @ashishbhatt6874 2 роки тому +1

      Bhai . Ande tamatar ka intezam karo...the real fight is Pak vs hunger.

  • @muhammadzohaib2923
    @muhammadzohaib2923 2 роки тому +2

    Great fight cap, Thanks.

  • @mvcybron
    @mvcybron 2 роки тому +6

    In reality, if the Russian navi is in Indian Ocean, you can bet that the Indian assets are tagging along as well. Also, the Indian western border front will go hot and it wil be very difficult time for Pakistan.

    • @PG-24
      @PG-24 2 роки тому +1

      that is the thing about it russians cannot attack pakistan cause of china and they don't meddle again with same enemy

  • @tyronejackson002
    @tyronejackson002 2 роки тому +7

    WOW! It is certainly nice to see short-range missiles working to perfection. The Russian ships are performing as intended. Now we need an overhaul on the other ships. Great video as always guys,

    • @martinpalmer6203
      @martinpalmer6203 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah people forget the Kirovs had 3 or 4 different AA missile systems.
      The SA6, SA9 and SA4 and a CADS-N1 ciws missile also...
      more than 300 SAMs on one ship.
      Very crazy.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +2

      Clearly ED have been working on the Russian ships lately.

    • @Struktualnyj
      @Struktualnyj 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers They should also improve the AEGIS, to make it more realistic. I kinda get why you say many Americans are upset. Right now each ship acting on its own, which makes group defense against massive missile attack very inefficient and wasteful. ED should program the naval group AI logic what acts as one entity, distributing targets amongst the AEGIS capable ships. Soviet ships also have their combat management systems, but in their case its less critical, since they have more independent layers and varieties of air-defense systems onboard. In reality I would expect that at least 40 heavy supersonic missiles like P-700 would have been needed to disable a carrier group in the 80's, and since then US navy air defense capabilities only got better.

  • @Bigglesworthicus
    @Bigglesworthicus 2 роки тому +17

    one does not simply penetrate russian air defences

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +3

      Evidently so!

    • @natalijalaonar8187
      @natalijalaonar8187 2 роки тому +5

      Of course not. Air defence and missile tech is Russian speciality!

    • @ayushthosar6005
      @ayushthosar6005 2 роки тому +1

      It's never been done even in a training excersize lol

    • @northern_law738
      @northern_law738 2 роки тому +1

      They penetrate you!

    • @attari56
      @attari56 2 роки тому

      @@natalijalaonar8187 cough cough recent events may have pulled your comment back. blimey!

  • @whousley
    @whousley 2 роки тому +5

    Very impressive fighting by the Russians...and they would have done even better if they'd already had birds in the air, which would make sense especially since they are the aggressors in this scenario.

  • @PhoenixT70
    @PhoenixT70 2 роки тому +3

    I spat out my drink when the Russians started launching planes. It looks like those Flankers are gonna fall out of the sky!

  • @bashatz2237
    @bashatz2237 2 роки тому +5

    So the nexy geographicaly accurate video could be the Turkish airforce vs the Russian carrier group

  • @DCSWORLDPAK
    @DCSWORLDPAK 2 роки тому +2

    34:05 Your favourite guy, That's Mr. Khan, Cap. A Mr. Patel would in all probability be Indian :)

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +2

      lol sorry, I thought Patel was Pak!

    • @aeronaut1406
      @aeronaut1406 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers although there are Patels in Pakistan as well

  • @Davros-vi4qg
    @Davros-vi4qg 2 роки тому +2

    Oh Lordy, here we go again!

  • @thisisron7994
    @thisisron7994 2 роки тому +3

    PAF against indian CBG with mig 29k and barak 1 and barak 8 will be something good to see

  • @jhonterry2680
    @jhonterry2680 2 роки тому +8

    How about us carrier fleet doing a similar attack against the Chinese air force fighters

  • @johnedwards3198
    @johnedwards3198 2 роки тому +6

    Send in a forward group of F7 (Mig21) as sacrificial wild weasels to burn through as many SAMs as possible

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      agree

    • @johnedwards3198
      @johnedwards3198 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers if the Pakistani forces were full on Indepence Day desperate, they could probably dig out the A5 Fantan (maybe modelled by the Mig19) as Martyr Squadron to literally fly straight into missiles, then J7s and finally the F16 and JF fleet

    • @arhumzia6360
      @arhumzia6360 2 роки тому +1

      @@johnedwards3198 Bruh we would just fire our land based Anti ship missiles or using our navy JF17s

    • @johnedwards3198
      @johnedwards3198 2 роки тому +1

      @@arhumzia6360 my friend I love the JF17 and how it breaks up the usual monotony of fighters on the market but it has its limitations and apparently is prone to cracking up at the moment. I hope all the issues are resolved and it goes from strength to strength thoughm

    • @aeronaut1406
      @aeronaut1406 2 роки тому

      @@arhumzia6360 navy doesn't have JF-17s

  • @echoalpha9935
    @echoalpha9935 2 роки тому +3

    So in my free time I Try to mod navy ships for DCS because this game despite being air SIM can make make some of the best naval cinematic scenes and its to the point that you can almost make an whole mini movie well at least I try to mod it in my free time but its really hard even when I get free time because of my piss poor attention span but I can easily say that the hardest part for me at least is the 3D modeling and trying to get it to look like the models in the base platform of DCS and that's not even adding in the hell of trying to get the color scem right the hardest parti think I have ever had was when I was trying to get the model right for navy gunners for the cals this was made so hard because each 50 and 30 cal. Each had to have a team of three a gunner a loader and a ammo runner the gunners model would fire until the run out of ammo the would open the gun the loader would take a new belt from a ammo can and replace the ammo then shut the gun then the gunner you pull back the charging handle back three times but the problem came in when I added the ammo runners to fix a problem that happen when the ammo cans ran out so I added another modle to grab a new ammo can from inside the ship let's just say that pathing issue give me hell for 3 months but I am currently working on a fire nation warship from avatar the last Air bender the show not the movie when I complete that I might work on a Pakistan warship

  • @rounaksingh409
    @rounaksingh409 2 роки тому +3

    Hey Cap it would be nice to have these kind of naval attacks simulated on real life plots for eg. 1971 Indo-Pak War attack against Indian Aircraft Carrier, Falklands War attack against British carrier of that era, Vietnam War era attack by VPAF against US carrier.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      agreed BUT we'd need to get the relevant naval assets to make it worth while I think.

  • @bashatz2237
    @bashatz2237 2 роки тому +1

    But apart from that awesome video as always

  • @A7XKoRnRocks1
    @A7XKoRnRocks1 2 роки тому +6

    I really love the PAF paint job for the F-16, I think every airforce except the USAF has a better pain job for the F-16 haha

  • @user-wl5ip5nh8q
    @user-wl5ip5nh8q 2 роки тому +2

    I was the only one who noticed that now the s-300f uses different types of missiles, Peter the Great used 48n6, while Slava fired 5v55 missiles?

  • @Ronin_Gaijin
    @Ronin_Gaijin 2 роки тому +3

    Cap, you mentioned that the Russian Navy hasn't got a fox 3 capacity on the Kuznetsov air wing. In Syria the air wing was made of 18 × Su-33 and 6 × MiG-29K. Well apparently there is a workaround. You could have six MiG-29S with 6 R-77s (each) starting the mission already in the air. There is also a Navy skin available for them to make them look more realistic and immersive. I think this will provide quite an interesting dynamic to the simulation.

  • @Reactordrone
    @Reactordrone 2 роки тому +1

    Woof, those tunguskas were going off like a frog in a sock.

  • @SimplyVipin007
    @SimplyVipin007 2 роки тому +1

    Bcz most of Indian Navy warship are of Russian origin or have russian components
    So good to watch

  • @kentgoldings
    @kentgoldings 2 роки тому +3

    Reenact the Battle of Samar using the combined Axis fleet versus modern light carriers (not super carrier) and escorts. I’m thinking some Tarawa or equivalent. The Americans detected the Japanese fleet at only 10 miles. Good luck.

  • @raymondyee2008
    @raymondyee2008 2 роки тому +1

    Interesting indeed.

  • @John_SlideRule_Bullay
    @John_SlideRule_Bullay Місяць тому +1

    "...short and V-lent, like Simba's love making!" and he agreed! LOL! Video Valued by Valued Viewer - Fly Army! 🚁

  • @saurabhsingh5528
    @saurabhsingh5528 2 роки тому +3

    Defective missiles.. Probably realistic

  • @Fkk580
    @Fkk580 2 роки тому +1

    Do a repeat this time make the flankers airborne from before. And make sure the jeffs use as many anti ships they can once in range fire and run

  • @thenoobboi3236
    @thenoobboi3236 2 роки тому +2

    Russia : I have won but at what cost

  • @moedmechanics2983
    @moedmechanics2983 2 роки тому +5

    Sir, can you play a group of Tu-22M3M maritime attack bombers armed with the FULL Kh-35 missile combat payload -18- I think in total against anyone's Naval carrier group and why aren't the Su-33's don't use their weapons accordingly?
    Btw Indian Mig-27 action against Pakistan is also quite relaxing because Indian Airforce had the real -not downgrade- version Mig-27Flogger D, like East Germany!

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      Tu-22 can only carry Kh-22 in game. I think that's the correct missile name.

    • @moedmechanics2983
      @moedmechanics2983 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers yes originally it is, but i have read with pictures that it also is capable with the smaller missiles against ships, perfect video!
      I do some more research and then i let know! Thank you

    • @moedmechanics2983
      @moedmechanics2983 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers btw, do you have SIM that plays TU-16 Badger with AS-5/AS-6"Kingfish" in Egypt-Israel conflict and the Iraq-Iran war?

  • @gabilax2745
    @gabilax2745 2 роки тому +3

    Isn't there a mod with the French aircraft carrier ? Idk I'm asking because I think I saw one but I may have been mistaken. If there is it may be interesting to see (maybe) Anyway great video as always.

    • @92HazelMocha
      @92HazelMocha 2 роки тому

      There is, it’s the Charles de Gaulle and it’s on the forums.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому

      yes BUT can't find the support destroyers etc yet.

  • @anonymous17367
    @anonymous17367 2 роки тому +5

    Can you use a fleet of SU 30s (mods) with the supersonic Brahmos missiles against, say the Chinese carrier, and yes the PAF does use the C-5, might use 9ther variants too, also labels on the map are good

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому

      Can you msg me about this in Discord please?

    • @anonymous17367
      @anonymous17367 2 роки тому +1

      @@grimreapers I can sir

  • @poppet_55
    @poppet_55 2 роки тому +2

    I was going to say that..." it was easier, for me, to see and to follow the tactical nature of the fight with the labels ON...too chaotic to follow otherwise"...and then I watched a bit more.....and waited...then I was going to comment again..."Yes...it was indeed!...one of the best fights yet...interesting AI"...and I watched a bit more...and then I thought of your comment about Simba's "Violent Love Making"....hahaha...heard you chuckle a bit...hahaha...and wondered..."what was the context of your knowledge of his violent lovemaking....personal, maybe...or maybe that missle hit somewhere he liked a bit too much"..???...(smh, laughing now) ......" never mind, I really just don't want to know"....hahaha

  • @jcjammer8972
    @jcjammer8972 2 роки тому +1

    Definitely labels on. 👍

  • @martinpalmer6203
    @martinpalmer6203 2 роки тому +2

    One constructive criticism.. The Kirov class wouldn't likely be out ahead, not as the flagship of the fleet and given it is the backbone of the strike group.
    More likely the frigates would be pickets and the Slava classes would take flanking positions.
    Kirov would probably hold station more in the middle and screen the carrier, but in turn also be screened as a high value target.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому

      Copy, yeh have been playing with different options.

  • @sanskartiwari2785
    @sanskartiwari2785 2 роки тому

    You could have had someone spawning in the aircrafts in the Russian sides too.......
    That would have definately helped.

  • @dictatorenvy472
    @dictatorenvy472 2 роки тому +1

    Pretty sure the Russian aircraft would need to aerial refuel soon after launch in order to take off with ordinance. I believe US Navy counts on that fact should we surprise attack their carrier group.

  • @slavicstriz8715
    @slavicstriz8715 2 роки тому +1

    There was no 🐻 Bears in game? Thats the real mascot...

  • @marcs990
    @marcs990 2 роки тому +2

    Judging from recent similar events I’m REALLY surprised 😮 that CAP would think this would be a walkover? A mere 40 missiles, from 1 shot aircraft n how many of them (the F16s now) could keep at bay a constantly respawning of the carrier the 24 SUs off the carrier to meet them PLUS they have an AWACS,! SMH 🤦‍♂️ CAP, especially the fact of the very recent carrier wars u should of been well aware that that barrage of missiles would be easy pray for the SM2s etc.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      I keep calling these wrong :(

    • @marcs990
      @marcs990 2 роки тому +1

      @@grimreapers Chin up mate, I just think that your main issue is putting WAY too much faith in the abilities of Simba lol 😂

  • @max2008abhi
    @max2008abhi 2 роки тому +2

    I would request a indian air force strike package. 20 su-30mki with 3 supersonic anti ship missiles each, 10 mirages with the latest mica em missiles and 20 Rafale f3r with long range meteor missiles and mica ir missiles vs a chinese carrier group.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      working on it.

    • @max2008abhi
      @max2008abhi 2 роки тому +1

      @@grimreapers and please make sure that the rafales get the meteors coz the indian rafales have them.

  • @VaibhavShete1981
    @VaibhavShete1981 2 роки тому +1

    Very true charactrisics of pakistanis

  • @karanchettri5198
    @karanchettri5198 2 роки тому +1

    please create one on India and Pakistan team up with China one fleet .. would love to see how Our Indian Naval force do with them...

  • @new_comment
    @new_comment 2 роки тому +1

    REQUEST CSAR........
    To bad real wars aren't fought in DCS

  • @mertergene9240
    @mertergene9240 2 роки тому +1

    Russians would probably send few dozen land-attack cruise missiles to that airbase where all the JFs are trying to land...

  • @timallison8560
    @timallison8560 2 роки тому +1

    it seems throughout several of these battles that it would be better a far better strategy to send in hundreds of lower cost drones in front of the fighter squadrons. take away the grumbles and then go in. also, gotta get closer, limit that missile response time. lastly instead of six squadrons from one direction, two squadrons from three directions and why do they never go after the awacs?

  • @ser43_OLDC
    @ser43_OLDC 2 роки тому +3

    The Rusian fleet is near the coast of Pakistan because the is a war between India and Pakistan and TE russians are full aliades of the Indians so you know how this work

  • @naveedeusophzai2892
    @naveedeusophzai2892 2 роки тому +2

    So to say that a carrier group is nothing more than chest thumper...

  • @Pillow_Cat
    @Pillow_Cat 2 роки тому +1

    We love labels, also 'not nato icons' are shows vehicle direction what is useful too

  • @TonyL-gw4qx
    @TonyL-gw4qx 2 роки тому +2

    Why not try to attack the American carrier group? If politics gets in here it sad.
    American here and know this is a game.

  • @therealdebater
    @therealdebater 2 роки тому

    I think---people, tell me if I'm wrong---in the middle of a melee like this, you'd be afraid to fire Fox-3 type missiles, such as the AIM-120, for fear of shooting your own aircraft down by accident.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      yes that is absoutely correct

  • @jyralnadreth4442
    @jyralnadreth4442 2 роки тому +1

    The Royal Navy are eyeballing the Naval Strike missile, RBS 15 mark 4, An Israeli Missile and Raytheons Long Rang Anti ship missile to replace their old Harpoons for an interim period. Naval Strike Missile is the Cheapest hint hint

  • @thisismossop
    @thisismossop 2 роки тому +4

    Labels = 👍

  • @edilbertorivera3467
    @edilbertorivera3467 2 роки тому +1

    You should have comserved your fighters and let Russian air defense exhaust or thin down those F-16s. Conserve your fighter/bombers for late game.

  • @tacohubbeling4457
    @tacohubbeling4457 2 роки тому

    Please have the labels on at all time. Much easier to follow for the viewer IMHO.

  • @airteamimages
    @airteamimages 2 роки тому +1

    Nooooooo, a cow with my name 😲😲😲! But it's great idea that will be replicated in the future, I can guarantee that!

  • @Samsungnote-ip6gu
    @Samsungnote-ip6gu Рік тому

    The thing is PAF is not alone on the naval front as Mirage 3 and 5 are also for Naval role. They are armed with exoset missiles. Flying at 50 feet over the deck.

  • @nickkung8041
    @nickkung8041 2 роки тому +1

    29:13 now if US CSG can launch other missiles like Sea Sparrow, RIM-116, RIM-162 might have a better chance to intercept AShM from previous sims

  • @VaibhavShete1981
    @VaibhavShete1981 2 роки тому +1

    DCS needs to add Indian military planes

  • @tomd3264
    @tomd3264 2 роки тому

    Labels on!!!

  • @jimmywan87
    @jimmywan87 2 роки тому +1

    Labels on. A more realistic scenario would be India v. Pakistan. JF's, F16 Fox 1 v. Su, Mig 29 carrier variants and Rafales

    • @brothergunns5055
      @brothergunns5055 2 роки тому

      Sukhois doesn't have carrier variants mate. India doesn't have Rafale Ms and Indian MiG-29Ks are armed with Fox 2s and Fox 3s. Alamos are only used by the Indian Air Force.

    • @jimmywan87
      @jimmywan87 2 роки тому

      @@brothergunns5055 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-33
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dassault_Rafale

  • @jpaulc441
    @jpaulc441 2 роки тому +2

    Mongolian navy carrier strike group vs Swiss navy Carrier group

  • @aeronaut1406
    @aeronaut1406 2 роки тому

    Russians to JF-17:
    back stabber! using our engine yet attacking us

  • @CMFL77
    @CMFL77 2 роки тому

    Elkin The Cow. Gone but not forgotten. #NEVERFORGET

  • @josephschager365
    @josephschager365 2 роки тому +3

    What computer should I buy to set up missions like this in DCS? What version of DCS should I buy? Do you have a referral code?

    • @antongrahn1499
      @antongrahn1499 2 роки тому

      DCS is free, with aircraft bought as modules individually. You get the su25t for free. Make sure you get 32 GB of ram.

    • @anonymous17367
      @anonymous17367 2 роки тому

      32 GB ram for max graphics and 16 for lower graphics, with a preferred GPU

    • @salmanmajeed6420
      @salmanmajeed6420 2 роки тому

      @@anonymous17367 meplaying on on 4gb ram (screams)

    • @anonymous17367
      @anonymous17367 2 роки тому

      @@salmanmajeed6420 well....

    • @salmanmajeed6420
      @salmanmajeed6420 2 роки тому

      @@anonymous17367 ( do you want hear the screams of my pc)

  • @drfaisalsaeed2331
    @drfaisalsaeed2331 2 місяці тому

    In reality even us carrier group has no chance, they did naval exercises with Pakistan in real time and carrier were destroyed in every scenario, with out JF 17 or F- 16

  • @fizzulf8677
    @fizzulf8677 2 роки тому +2

    Can A full Indian Air Wing beat A China Carrier group?

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому

      nice

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому

      what would the indians use? Plz Discord me.

    • @fizzulf8677
      @fizzulf8677 2 роки тому +1

      Combination of Su 30MKIs, Rafales, Mig 29s, Mig 21s, Mirages and Apaches attacking Chinese carrier group.

  • @martinpalmer6203
    @martinpalmer6203 2 роки тому

    If this was WOWS the Carrier would have all its planes back in 5 minutes 🤣🤣

  • @rajatkumarmukherjee5437
    @rajatkumarmukherjee5437 2 роки тому +1

    And secondly russian growler is very dangerous, they maneuver high g . But in this game they are moving like a rocket from MBRL..haha

  • @bobbuergermeier8022
    @bobbuergermeier8022 2 роки тому +2

    I'm pretty sure the Indian navy only uses mig 29Ks if anyone knows if they GOT SU-33

  • @natalijalaonar8187
    @natalijalaonar8187 2 роки тому +10

    Prediction: Russians kick ass AGAIN
    EDIT(after watching): I love how you keep underestimating them, and "accidently" not letting them have any Flankers in the air (yea riiiight it was an accident, suuuure), and they still win.
    Glory to Russia!

    • @keithdonaldson4623
      @keithdonaldson4623 2 роки тому +2

      congrats bro russia defeated pakistan lol

    • @Decrepit_biker
      @Decrepit_biker 2 роки тому

      @@keithdonaldson4623 why the lol?

    • @keithdonaldson4623
      @keithdonaldson4623 2 роки тому +2

      @@Decrepit_biker because beating pakistan is not a hard thing to do if your a superpower

    • @natalijalaonar8187
      @natalijalaonar8187 2 роки тому +2

      @@keithdonaldson4623 No i ment this guy keeps underestimating Russia, and in each scenario he makes they win. Last one they beat the USA, even after he stacked the deck in USA favor.

    • @aeronaut1406
      @aeronaut1406 2 роки тому +1

      @@keithdonaldson4623 but what if Pakistan is being backed by supah powah like it happened in Afghan war?

  • @arhumzia4087
    @arhumzia4087 5 місяців тому

    I love how missiles are so badly moddled

  • @blizzerdff7946
    @blizzerdff7946 2 роки тому

    One of my favorite video

  • @ryanpayne7707
    @ryanpayne7707 2 роки тому

    The problem is DCS does not track missile expenditures across scenarios. Those ships would have to return to port to rearm, but they'll be far more defenseless if a second attack is launched before then.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому

      Yes that is a problem can;t d anything about it :(

  • @rubiconnn
    @rubiconnn 2 роки тому +1

    I'm not familiar with DCS server, but does it have an "attach to" command like in Arma? If so you could use that to attach your mascot to the gunboat so she doesn't immediately sink.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      I did use attach, but still no work.

  • @JUPITER69966
    @JUPITER69966 2 роки тому +1

    Just after this clash Taliban enters in Russia 😂 . Pakistan be like we don't do anything .

  • @usamakhalid2227
    @usamakhalid2227 2 роки тому +2

    Grim reapers make a video on real senerio INDIAN Carrier grp vs PAF

  • @rikuurufu5534
    @rikuurufu5534 2 роки тому +1

    "I'd love to see a paper bag"

  • @andrewmitchell402
    @andrewmitchell402 Рік тому

    Holy Cow, Capman

  • @MichiG85
    @MichiG85 2 роки тому +3

    Why is it bad going up if the missile isn´t burning anymore? Its the fastest way to bleed its energy, isnt it?

    • @Teknophreak
      @Teknophreak 2 роки тому +2

      Because the air is thinner the higher you go, which reduces drag. Apparently, the airspeed lost to gravity is offset by the reduced drag. Seem counter-intuitive, but I've heard actual fighter pilots say the same thing.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      Air breathing engines get weaker and weaker as they go up. A missile, even without power, improves as the drag gets less higher up.

    • @Struktualnyj
      @Struktualnyj 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers Fighter engines are optimized for different altitudes, usually not for 0 altitude. I would assume something like MiG-29 or MiG-31 will be much more energetic at higher altitude than near ground.

    • @MichiG85
      @MichiG85 2 роки тому

      ​@@grimreapers Yes, but only as long as they are burning? The missile has then to fight gravity without any acceleration - so the thinner air shouldn´t be any adventage?
      I mean driving a car without an engine downhill will make it faster as driving it uphill?
      More so, when you drive to cars uphill - one on full power the other on idle.
      Maybe its worth a test?

    • @MichiG85
      @MichiG85 2 роки тому

      @@Teknophreak I think it depends on the initial airspeed of the missile (M) in comparison to the plane (P). If M is at 2000 knots it will be hard to outrun. But if the speeds nearly match I could imagine that a plane in AB pulling up 30°+ up would burn a lot of energy off the missile?

  • @quinnparker8770
    @quinnparker8770 2 роки тому +1

    Cap could you make a video on how to add mods to a server? I can’t find anything out there that explains how to do that. Me and my friend would like to dog fight each other in F-22’s, and other mod planes.

  • @pakmilitarypowerinfo1782
    @pakmilitarypowerinfo1782 2 роки тому

    Love 💕💕💕 from Pakistan for honestly review

  • @Mojje42
    @Mojje42 2 роки тому +1

    Labels on please
    and i do believe that AI will land at Neutral airports if closer then friendly base

  • @commiccannon592
    @commiccannon592 2 роки тому +1

    To get the cow to work set them to be linked to unit whatever the boat js