*REMATCH* Indian Brahmos Missile Strike vs China/Pakistan Carrier Group (Naval 34b) | DCS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 чер 2024
  • 0:00 Intro
    0:49 Details
    6:32 FIGHT!
    Original Vid: • Indian Brahmos Missile...
    Master Sheet: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...
    Playlist: • Naval Battles
    Mods: • Free DCS Mods
    SPONSORS
    Winwing: www.wwsimstore.com/STORE
    Winwing USA: fox2.wwsimstore.com/STORE
    Sponsor Reviews: • Sponsor Reviews
    USEFUL LINKS
    GRIM REAPERS(UA-cam): / @grimreapers
    GRIM REAPERS 2(UA-cam): / @grimreapers2
    GRIM REAPERS(Odysee): odysee.com/$/invite/@grimreap...
    GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
    DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
    DCS BUYERS GUIDE: • DCS World Module Quick...
    DCS OFFICIAL SITE: www.digitalcombatsimulator.co...
    ONE TO ONE LESSONS: grimreapers.net/one-to-one-le...
    DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
    MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
    PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
    PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
    SOCIAL MEDIA
    WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
    STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
    STREAMS(Other Members): grimreapers.net/gr-twitch/
    FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
    TWITTER: / grimreapers_
    DISCORD(DCS & IL-2): / discord (16+ age limit)
    DISCORD(TFA Arma): discordapp.com/invite/MSYJxbM (16+ age limit)
    OTHER
    CAP'S X-56 HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/open?id=1g7o...
    CAP'S WINWING HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/drive/folder...
    THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
    #DCSQuestioned #GRNavalBattle #DCSNavalBattle #GR #DCSWorld #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 889

  • @koustavjit912
    @koustavjit912 2 роки тому +578

    I live in in India, in Assam, a borderly state near Chinese southern areas and i wake up hearing SU 30MKI's going supersonic with a loud boom every morning and night.

    • @agentnoobz5588
      @agentnoobz5588 2 роки тому +68

      Lucky you,I see tejas A lot in banglore since HAL hq is over here.I had seen a su30mki once when some new equipment was being installed on a su30 to make it able to shoot astra

    • @koustavjit912
      @koustavjit912 2 роки тому +14

      @@agentnoobz5588 wow, dts fascinating

    • @kaustubhsingh16
      @kaustubhsingh16 2 роки тому +30

      Lol i live near hindon air base its mostly helicopters or a globemaster

    • @koustavjit912
      @koustavjit912 2 роки тому +10

      @@kaustubhsingh16 Hindon is not a forward AFS. Tezpur AFS is a forward base and key to air petrol.

    • @kaustubhsingh16
      @kaustubhsingh16 2 роки тому

      @@koustavjit912 did i say its a forward base

  • @HEILZEUS
    @HEILZEUS 2 роки тому +44

    I think the Indian Air Force saw this video of yours. So, they "accidentally fired" a Brahmos at Pakistan to test out the HQ-9.

    • @MMA-gb6to
      @MMA-gb6to 23 дні тому

      then, i bet Pak didn't use HQ-9 to protect those 2 farmers targeted by almighty Brahmos, LOL

    • @HEILZEUS
      @HEILZEUS 23 дні тому

      @@MMA-gb6to then how did they track the missile from the launch to impact? Because the flight path was released by Pakistan not India. And you would never not intercept a possible nuke.

  • @hyfy-tr2jy
    @hyfy-tr2jy 2 роки тому +201

    how did the Chinese Navy see the Indian planes (at 200 ft off the deck) at 200 miles? The defending jets would need about 30,000 ft altitude to get a 200 mi horizon. Does this sim assume the world is flat?

    • @andychauhan6544
      @andychauhan6544 2 роки тому +23

      Good point.

    • @abramar123
      @abramar123 2 роки тому +6

      There was an AWACS in the air.

    • @hyfy-tr2jy
      @hyfy-tr2jy 2 роки тому +32

      @@abramar123 was the AWACS at 30K feet? Their systems are line of sight as well

    • @vineetkaddu1214
      @vineetkaddu1214 2 роки тому +26

      The world is indeed flat in DCS from what I've read

    • @IndianArma
      @IndianArma 2 роки тому +5

      yes yes, the sim does indeed modelled flat, it leads to very weird radar los behavior.

  • @rakeshkrishnan1099
    @rakeshkrishnan1099 2 роки тому +183

    To all those in support of chinese weapons , on March 9 brahmos was "accidently " misfired towards pakistan and it went 124 km deep into pakistani territory without being intercepted by chinese hq9 sam's deployed by pakistan
    Same thing happened n feb 2019 when mirages went deep into pakistani territory without being detected or intercepted by chinese sams

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +50

      Wow. Ooops

    • @Asmit917
      @Asmit917 2 роки тому +13

      @@grimreapers what do you mean by opps. Is it some kind expression to show someone lack of common sense. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @rakeshkrishnan1099
      @rakeshkrishnan1099 2 роки тому +29

      @@Asmit917
      Chill dude, don't get offended 🙏🙏🙏🙏

    • @abhishekkuksal5700
      @abhishekkuksal5700 2 роки тому +1

      @@grimreapers
      Check this video that visualiz balakot strike. Also clarifies the reason of one bomb that was fired in forest. Authentication is not claimed yet.
      ua-cam.com/video/aZeea3Y_Gjo/v-deo.html

    • @abhishekkuksal5700
      @abhishekkuksal5700 2 роки тому +1

      @@rakeshkrishnan1099 hope you have seen the above video!

  • @etluxaeterna
    @etluxaeterna 2 роки тому +91

    wow you really know this russia/ukraine situation has escalated when india starts attacking pakistan in Crimea

    • @etluxaeterna
      @etluxaeterna 2 роки тому +13

      @SuperSukhoi 🤣🤣 good ol' CNN, america's "trusted news source"

    • @clownsallaroundyou
      @clownsallaroundyou 2 роки тому +3

      @SuperSukhoi And Hong Kongvin Brazil :)

    • @bodaddy6771
      @bodaddy6771 2 роки тому

      well well well how about now

    • @josephkool8411
      @josephkool8411 2 роки тому

      Best reply ever

  • @cyberwar5579
    @cyberwar5579 2 роки тому +57

    A little bit inaccurate bhramos they do extreme evasive manuvers at terminal stages

    • @no15neoshot70
      @no15neoshot70 2 роки тому +1

      wouldn't help much Brahmos were intercepted quite early on before getting into maneuver distance in this case Chinese missiles were too OP

    • @Stephen7344
      @Stephen7344 2 роки тому +3

      @@no15neoshot70 the actual speed of Bramhos is mach 3.1. IRL they're close to impossible to intercept and they can rip Ships in half (Without Warhead)

    • @humz99
      @humz99 Рік тому

      @@Stephen7344 ...sure

    • @Stephen7344
      @Stephen7344 Рік тому +3

      @@humz99 can u please just go watch the tests done? That thing does S maneuvers in its terminal phase.. and that too at mach 3. You'd prolly have to fire 3 or 4 missiles at it to take it down

  • @adhip0574
    @adhip0574 2 роки тому +183

    I did a little bit of googling and found the range of the brahmos ,when flying at 10 meters above sea level has a range of 290km or 156 nautical miles and also can perform an S maneuver just before impact but at this point i think it doesnt matter

    • @bestestusername
      @bestestusername 2 роки тому +63

      UA-cam takes it down if china looses. I have seen it happen to other videos

    • @gaiofattos2
      @gaiofattos2 2 роки тому +50

      @@bestestusername China lose to Taiwan 4 times in this channel.

    • @lolasdm6959
      @lolasdm6959 2 роки тому +10

      @@bestestusername What?

    • @cassius_eu5970
      @cassius_eu5970 2 роки тому +20

      @@bestestusername You are delusional.

    • @Life_isstrange
      @Life_isstrange 2 роки тому +6

      It have 290 km range because india was not in MRCTR

  • @game_maniac2404
    @game_maniac2404 2 роки тому +11

    So on 9th march 2022 An Indian Brahmos missile "accidently" made its way in pakistan to 124 km inside. You see here, game doesn't do justice with Brahmos missle and Joint Pakistan and chinese defense system at the border of parkistan.
    Good thing is no life was lost and both countries handled it very maturely.

  • @Mobius118
    @Mobius118 2 роки тому +128

    Quite intriguing. Have a new found love for those Brahmos missiles

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +13

      agree

    • @direwolf7491
      @direwolf7491 2 роки тому +6

      It's a very versatile missile. A hypersonic Brahmos II is being worked on by Russia-India collaboration.

    • @killvish5111
      @killvish5111 2 роки тому +28

      Just yesterday brahmos entered 120km inside Pakistani airspace guarded by hq9 SAMs without being detected.

    • @jahanzaibkhan2004
      @jahanzaibkhan2004 2 роки тому +1

      @@killvish5111 nope it was detected as you said at about 120km within Indian territory, how ever it wasn’t intercepted

    • @prakashtendlya7517
      @prakashtendlya7517 2 роки тому +7

      @@jahanzaibkhan2004 why wasn’t it intercepted?

  • @MrAmritendu
    @MrAmritendu 2 роки тому +92

    Just couple of questions for my own understanding?
    1. Why any Indian destroyer not in the vicinity wth more than 16-32 brahmos in the inventory?
    2. Why Rafael's were not using Meteor to save themselves?
    3. Why India has not used other Antiship missiles including sore based Brahmos to over whelm the defence?

    • @anmolsharma2266
      @anmolsharma2266 2 роки тому +6

      Meteors have issue in game

    • @munindramohanta2584
      @munindramohanta2584 2 роки тому +8

      also the brahmos can be fired from 200nm away, did not have to come that close!

    • @krishanughosh6535
      @krishanughosh6535 2 роки тому +22

      the real question is from when does pakistan has a carrier? all the fighters and missiles used are totally chinese then whats the point of Chinese/pakistan in the name of the video?

    • @eucenor4171
      @eucenor4171 2 роки тому +5

      @FuckUtube simple question, how does money make a missile useless?

    • @deniedchirst
      @deniedchirst 2 роки тому +5

      @@eucenor4171 In Adobe creative cloud

  • @valayilabraham1713
    @valayilabraham1713 2 роки тому +192

    Can the Chinese AA missiles intercept a low RCS sea skimming missile flying in an S pattern 5 meters above the water at a speed of mach 3.5 in it's terminal phase? Even the famed US Aegis radars will struggle to detect these low flying missiles against sea clutter and give adequate warning of such an attack. I doubt the Chinese have reached such levels of electronic sophistication.

    • @agentnoobz5588
      @agentnoobz5588 2 роки тому +42

      DCS is not real combat,The brahmos in this game does not work like the actual one tweaking is required

    • @randallsanchez3161
      @randallsanchez3161 2 роки тому +16

      Note that the Brahmos like all other missiles need to be guided onto target first as they can't see anything either. At 5 meters off of the deck it is effectively blind to anything below the horizon. The taller radar boons will detect it before it detects the ship. This is where things get crazy as the missile will have to start making course corrections. If there is no AWACS then it has a chance of reaching its terminal phase. If there is an AWACS on station then it will be detected and intercepted long before it ever "sees" the ship. A brahmos fired even a few degrees off target may be miles off target and will have to make large corrections. This is why it's not seen as a threat much larger than other anti-ship missiles.

    • @thomaszhang3101
      @thomaszhang3101 2 роки тому +12

      Chinese are the first and currently the only nation to field s+x dual band radars on its destroyers, so I don’t see why not. I think the more important issue is whether hhq-9 and HQ-16 can maneuver hard enough to get the Brahmos doing evasive maneuver.

    • @daicoloureee20
      @daicoloureee20 2 роки тому +26

      @@randallsanchez3161 well the real brahmos has an independed radar once they've fired . It's a fire and forget weapon plus the GPS guidance makes it 5 metres accurate. And in this video the brahmos was travelling at Mach 2 at an altitude of 40metres from the sea level when the actual capability is about 3.2+ Mach at an altitude of 10 metres from the sea . 10 metres is extremely difficult or maybe even impossible to intercept . And it is designed to do hard maneuver such as s maneuver on those extremely high speed . That missile doesn't have any moving parts .

    • @valayilabraham1713
      @valayilabraham1713 2 роки тому +27

      Brahmos uses midcourse inertial navigation and in the terminal phase uses active radar homing along with a combination of GPS/GLONASS/GAGAN making it very difficult to jam and very accurate with a CEP of 1 meter. (videos showing its accurracy are available online) Because of the curvature of the earth a ship radar will not really see a sea skimming missile before 20 kilometres… (AWACS may pick it up further but the chinese dont have any ship borne awacs) the speed of the BrahMos is 970 metre per second. When it is about 20 kilometres away, the enemy gets only 22 seconds to react. It is very difficult to engage a projectile coming with so much speed. The sheer kinetic energy of the missile travelling at nearly three times the speed of sound and the high explosive warhead will break ships in half on impact. Videos showing it do that are also available online.

  • @tanusreemukherjee1344
    @tanusreemukherjee1344 2 роки тому +76

    The Brahmos and Mica missiles are underperforming in the game. Meteor and Python 5 missiles were not used by Indians which is surprising. Derby is not Indian, It's Israel's missile. India has the Astraa.

    • @Maverikm73
      @Maverikm73 2 роки тому +1

      Derby is very much present. Astra is not yet operational.

    • @MrSdsok
      @MrSdsok 2 роки тому +3

      A girl interested in dcs how is that possible?

    • @tanusreemukherjee1344
      @tanusreemukherjee1344 2 роки тому +4

      @@MrSdsok Where are u from dear?

    • @asmitoghosh2193
      @asmitoghosh2193 2 роки тому +1

      @@MrSdsok wtf?

    • @MrSdsok
      @MrSdsok 2 роки тому +2

      @@tanusreemukherjee1344 I am from India and I can guess which state you are from. Girls don't play that many games on steam, maybe just the most popular ones like pubg,candy crush, etc. I haven't met single girls who play these kinds of games.
      So, why are you interested in all these? Aren't you focused on studies n all?

  • @Archer89201
    @Archer89201 2 роки тому +25

    maybe working Meteors on rafales, an indian awacs and exocet/Kh-35/sea eagle/harpoon support via Jaguar/Rafale/MiG/P-8 to mix it up or an indian carrier and destroyer group to increase the missiles to pose a challenge

  • @wardaddy7124
    @wardaddy7124 2 роки тому +25

    Great Video Cap , I have installed dcs mod myself for the MKI mod and i figured out that the astra mk1 is the most effective AA missile in its package and for the fight that engagement would force the CGS to leave the area rearm

  • @off_grid_javelin
    @off_grid_javelin 2 роки тому +94

    Theoretically, defence analysts have calculated that a dozen brahmos can saturate the defense of a USS gerald carrier group, so I'm highly assured that a Chinese carrier group won't walk away, the in-game mechanics aren't upto the mark and looks more like insult 😂.
    It's the fastest cruise missile out there, and recently upgraded to 1000+ km range since India became an mtcr member.

    • @rougeangle1
      @rougeangle1 2 роки тому +1

      Hah Brahmos will reach CGs if MKI,s aren't shot like they got on Feb 27

    • @anky_but_on_steroids3750
      @anky_but_on_steroids3750 2 роки тому +4

      @@rougeangle1 cope

    • @off_grid_javelin
      @off_grid_javelin 2 роки тому +6

      @@rougeangle1 yeah cope 😂

    • @youtrep9199
      @youtrep9199 2 роки тому +12

      @@rougeangle1 I'll believe you when your DG-ISPR can figure out which of his 3 stories are correct even though they have nothing in common, your air force can finally figure out which jet shot which, and which one of your license less, banned over Europe, 10 F-16 crashing pilots got which jet, your Prime Minister can decide how many jets his air force shot down, Kaiser Tufail openly admits he made a mistake in his blog where he said not a single IAF Su-30MKI was shot down. On one hand we have IAF and India sticking to one story, while the PAF legends can't for the life of them get their stories right. It's been 3 years and I've heard 15 different stories. However one thing remains constant. Your tea. It must be proud for you to know that after 70 years and 4 consecutive, humiliating losses, at least your army can make a good cuppa. Of imported Darjeeling tea :)

    • @rougeangle1
      @rougeangle1 2 роки тому

      ​@@youtrep9199 Let me wrap it up for your tiny brain to comprehend the facts:
      a. Bison shot down and wreckage at display;
      b. SU 30 MKI shot down and evidence was shown to international observers and defense analysts;
      c. We never claimed any other kill i.e., your rescue sortie for SU 30 shot down by your own SAMs.
      Dont know where you're getting different versions from :) but all our jets are accounted for ... !

  • @itsrocketscience9795
    @itsrocketscience9795 2 роки тому +14

    some issues i found
    wouldn't the rafales be equipped with meteors which india have ?
    the indian missile is astra ,not i-derby er
    also indian fighters also have kh 35 ,useful for saturation attack
    some info_
    another is actually indian fleet of brahmos air version isn't much
    40 su30mki is known to be have done structural changes for the brahmos
    thankfully a new version of brahmos known as brahmos ng is coming up with just 1.5 ton weight it would remove any need for any structural changes for the su30,and each would be able to carry 3-5 of em compared to just 1 now

    • @HEILZEUS
      @HEILZEUS 2 роки тому

      If brahmos ng is really that light, then each one of those planes would be carrying the brahmos

  • @georgewoody4177
    @georgewoody4177 2 роки тому +13

    Use drone swarm in conjunction with with air strike on carrier group, essentially using drone swarm for wild weaseling.

  • @TheValkerez
    @TheValkerez 2 роки тому +26

    Hey cap, an idea I’ve had for a series is that I have always enjoyed the ace combat series but they’re obviously not particularly realistic.
    Could be interesting to see how some of the missions would play out in a more realistic way with things unchanged and maybe to see what would need to be changed to complete the mission

  • @AT-bq7vl
    @AT-bq7vl 2 роки тому +3

    Ahhh, just as I'm heading to bed you drop this. Good job

  • @SemiPro_Nub
    @SemiPro_Nub 2 роки тому +8

    Seen alot of these mki's making frequent low fly over our area here at the Assam - Bhutan - Arunachal border.
    There were also times when they do dog fights without you know actually shooting, only trying to point their nose towards the other, while the other tries to evade and counter.
    Sound is so loud that our glass windows start rattling.

  • @thechoicemakers7128
    @thechoicemakers7128 2 роки тому +5

    Why no meterors, no anti radiation missiles, no Astra?

    • @kshitijsharma6289
      @kshitijsharma6289 2 роки тому +2

      These are mods... I personally tried using them in scenarios... Maybe i was doing something wrong but-
      Rafale won't fire the meteor (AI)
      The su-30 is firing the astra at a close range even though i asked for a max range launch...
      And lastly anti radiation missile against ships question mark

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +3

      Meteor not working

    • @vyomaexplorer3630
      @vyomaexplorer3630 2 роки тому +1

      @@grimreapers what about Astra instead of mica ng?

    • @subhankardey8713
      @subhankardey8713 2 роки тому

      @Grim Reapers then why you made this stupid video?😂😂😂

    • @charteredtelugu5234
      @charteredtelugu5234 2 роки тому

      @@subhankardey8713 bcz he is 😂😂

  • @sarthakshrivastava1646
    @sarthakshrivastava1646 2 роки тому +17

    Chinese navy hq 7 with (10km range) can intercept sea skimming missile flying 50 m above surface, next is Hq26 ( modified hq16) range of 40 km , can intercept missile 15 m above surface, HHQ9 can intercept missile 10 m above sea ,. Brahmos has capability to fly only 5 m above sea, and if somehow hhq9 intercept Brahmos it has only 6 sec to respond

  • @utkarshdwivedi6600
    @utkarshdwivedi6600 2 роки тому +20

    It amazed me when a huge pl15 shot down a rafale outside its No escape zones. Indians have Python 4 & 5 have Asram , iderby , mica, meteors, pretty much best missile from BVR & VR still can't get through HQ9s which are actually copy of s300 of russian their pl12s are copy of python 3 their pl15 is huge i dont think it can shoot spectra enabled Rafale 60 miles away man these simulation are so messed up.

  • @monalpatel2009
    @monalpatel2009 2 роки тому +37

    Lmao.. they shot brahmos like it's nothing. I don't think these carriers can even react to the speed of brahmos. It's a knightmare to any target it acquires.

    • @cmn8352
      @cmn8352 2 роки тому

      Yes 😂
      Chutiy🅰️ DCS

    • @manishpatil4661
      @manishpatil4661 2 роки тому +1

      Ys ..they cannot target it until its 30 nm close...it gives them not more than 30 sec to 50 sec...to react....that sam...😂its not possible to target bramhos...ciws can ...

    • @manishpatil4661
      @manishpatil4661 2 роки тому

      But it will be tooo late...for...shoot them down...

    • @SKSports890
      @SKSports890 Рік тому

      you indians are so much deluded... Research some radar technologies as well... There is nothing impossible in world of technologies now a days...

    • @nakul1307
      @nakul1307 Рік тому

      Agreed. They are showing brahmos as a sitting duck.

  • @sneedsfeed757
    @sneedsfeed757 2 роки тому +1

    Nice to see you doing this and thanks for putting the effort.

  • @iamalimuhammad
    @iamalimuhammad 2 роки тому +6

    so Pakistanis were only in the title of the video.... good!!

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      they had 3 x OHP ships that played a role.

  • @srfsongs3041
    @srfsongs3041 2 роки тому +4

    Why indian aircraft not fire meteor. Rafale can detect j 15 over 200 km but chineas fighter cannot detect rafale more than90 km

    • @subhankardey8713
      @subhankardey8713 2 роки тому

      he is pakistani ...that is why he did not show it

  • @asitsahoo8485
    @asitsahoo8485 2 роки тому +8

    I'm from the future of this video
    And in future Pakistan(chinese) air defense system failed to stop bramhos
    And bramhos hit mia chanu , Pakistan
    There is no answer for bramhos in pak Or china
    So this video is just😅🤣😅🤣.....

  • @notificationguys5128
    @notificationguys5128 2 роки тому +11

    Mach 20 MICA NG ?
    That's straight up BS lmao

    • @hemendraravi4787
      @hemendraravi4787 2 роки тому +2

      Honestly could have just gone with the meteors as indian rafael’s use them

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +5

      AI does not fire Meteor from Rafale :(

    • @hemendraravi4787
      @hemendraravi4787 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers oh :(

    • @agentnoobz5588
      @agentnoobz5588 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers AI be like your too OP hax get out

  • @ojaspatki772
    @ojaspatki772 2 роки тому +5

    Amazing Video Cap! Love from India.

  • @vikkycb7948
    @vikkycb7948 2 роки тому +15

    I think you guys are missing the point.
    1. 16 Brahmos need to be last to arrive with a range of 200 kms.
    2. They would need to be accompanied by slower but more numerous subsonic antiship missiles.
    3. Rafales would probably don't need to be upfront but at back with meteor missiles.

    • @sparkly3989
      @sparkly3989 2 роки тому

      200 nm bruh

    • @pigmoonk2545
      @pigmoonk2545 2 роки тому

      The one missing the point is yourself actually. Indian pride is worthless in this case

  • @wilsonspicher6690
    @wilsonspicher6690 2 роки тому +3

    (as strike 2 comes in) Chinese weapons officer is commanded to shoot them down with hq16s and he asks which ones we just spammed them all

  • @operator_darkspartan
    @operator_darkspartan 2 роки тому +4

    India has been working on Anti Radiation Missiles " RUDRAM" and other Missiles. & its first test was a Success.

    • @xaviert7839
      @xaviert7839 2 роки тому +1

      India is also working on their first fighter jet as well.....for a million years...still not a single one in any air force in the world. Why though?

    • @operator_darkspartan
      @operator_darkspartan 2 роки тому +1

      @@xaviert7839 TEJAS is an Indian Aircraft. Which is in the Service of Indian Air force. Go and Watch.... You will easily get "TEJAS" Videos. You have very less knowledge....so please work on your knowledge.

    • @Life_isstrange
      @Life_isstrange 2 роки тому

      @@xaviert7839 40 years broo

    • @Life_isstrange
      @Life_isstrange 2 роки тому

      @@xaviert7839 even no other country uses Chinese flanker

    • @benudharmadhi4154
      @benudharmadhi4154 2 роки тому

      @@xaviert7839 bro you guys are still evacuating from the top of the building from Vietnam to Afghanistan, now shifting away embassy from Kyiv, why bro?

  • @adarshp6550
    @adarshp6550 2 роки тому +23

    i cant share the actual info, but i can tell you guys that those so called brahmos aren't even close to BrahMos. RADAR cant detect it long range due to Low RCS ,sea-skimming capability(water f-up with em waves due to high di electric char, ) only reaction time u get is less than 30s if u have energy-prioritized high probability bearing scan other wise its just 20s. not to mention its terminal velocity with high maneuverability combo...lol once engage its literally death sentence.

    • @abhishekkuksal5700
      @abhishekkuksal5700 2 роки тому

      Are you in defence research? Those bits of information is extreme.

    • @no15neoshot70
      @no15neoshot70 2 роки тому

      Brahmos is coded to have the proper RCS however the Chinese ships and missiles are OP here

    • @serpent5751
      @serpent5751 2 роки тому +1

      @@abhishekkuksal5700 The crucial bit is not what it does, but how it does it. In DCS, you can see the AIM-120 working(A-pole, M-pole, F-pole), however you won't ever know how it does it(internal electronic assembly, the missile thrust dynamics, the missile motor segment, its radar assembly, etc)

    • @abhishekkuksal5700
      @abhishekkuksal5700 2 роки тому

      @@serpent5751 yes that I understand completely and on top of that the physics model is not going to be same as that in DCS, like actual cornering ability etc.
      Btw where i can learn what is A-pole, M-Pole and F-Pole

    • @serpent5751
      @serpent5751 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@abhishekkuksal5700 Generally, the modern AIM120Cs have three stages to achieve a perfect track onto the target.
      HPRF = High Pulse Repition Frequency. Useful for long range(initial stages of the missile flight) radar guidance, when the relative velocity of missile and bandit is high(both heading roughly towards each other)
      MPRF = Medium Pulse Repition Frequency. Useful for short-medium range radar guidance - as the relative velocity is now lower than it was before, the enemy is most likely cranking or heading away from the missile - also consumes less electricity(the AIM-120s are supposed to self destruct after battery is gone, or they can't detonate within a set period of time)
      Assuming you fired the AIM120C onto a bandit;
      A-pole: Range from your airplane, to the enemy, when the missile goes HPRF active, or in combat terminology, your missile is in "husky" state. At this point the missile keeps updating its guidance state, to keep track of the enemy aircraft to the highest accuracy, through your aircraft's radar support.
      M-pole: Range from your airplane, to the enemy, when the missile goes MPRF active, aka "pitbull", or terminal guidance mode, when it can guide just it by it's own radar alone. Generally at this point, you don't lock up the enemy through your radar anymore, as you don't need to support the missile anymore.
      F-pole: Range from your airplane, to the enemy, at which your missile will hit the bandit.

  • @madopado
    @madopado 2 роки тому +2

    Maybe have Pak jf17 block 3 and f16 next time in the scenario…that’ll be more fun. Nice video- keep ‘em coming.

  • @user-wx6sb1ci2s
    @user-wx6sb1ci2s Рік тому +2

    DO YOU KNEW : 1) That speed of Brahmos Surface to Air speed is 2.8 mach BUT THE SPEED OF BRAHMOS 2 IS MACH 8 ? 2) Range of Brahmos is 490 KM 3) DO YOU KNOW -That brahmos when launched from sukhoi gets additional range and speed of the aircraft itself ? 4) Do you know that Brahmos goes for "S" maneuver before finally hitting its target making it near impossible to hit it mid air ?

  • @angelarch5352
    @angelarch5352 2 роки тому

    Thanks for the vid, very interesting!

  • @melanicwhoosh
    @melanicwhoosh 2 роки тому +1

    You suggested a fun video I would watch. What planes can take off from a stationary Kuznetsov carrying mission load-out?

  • @thelungilife6057
    @thelungilife6057 2 роки тому +14

    Carrier with no J-15's left, Air Defence ships with no more HQ-16's, and one Air Defence Destroyer killed. That carrier is now a very expensive floating liability, and its battle group is now occupied with protecting a less than worthless asset. That's a pretty successful antishipping operation against a CBG. Also, you missed the Meteor missiles on the Rafale.

  • @upsc4125
    @upsc4125 2 роки тому +4

    We recently tested Pakistan’s air defence 🤣 ! Mia channu was fantastic

  • @markmarky1124
    @markmarky1124 2 роки тому +13

    A CBG is a high value prized asset of any country. The Indians would have thrown everything they had to sink every ship and annihilate the CBG. That would include shore based missiles, submarines and their naval assets. They would also have doubled the MKI with Brahmos. A US naval captain was once asked what would happen if his ship met an Indian destroyer in combat with Brahmos and he said 'we are not going home, if you see that missile on the horizon it's too late'.

    • @rakeshkrishnan1099
      @rakeshkrishnan1099 2 роки тому +1

      US with indian navy will be a nightmare for chinese that's why they r so against the formation of quad
      Don't think Australia will play ny major military role in this as well as Japan

  • @xenaguy01
    @xenaguy01 2 роки тому +7

    14:00 Seems to me the SU-30's are lagging too far. I think they should be up closer to their CAP, so the J-15's are distracted by the fighters, and if they attack the SU's, the Indian fighters can pursue them and shoot them down.
    21:50 Much enjoyed. Thx.

  • @EsportsSchool
    @EsportsSchool 2 роки тому +23

    Flopped in game...
    But, HQ9 failed in real life..... 😅😅😅
    (Unarmed BrahMos, accident fire hits multiple building in pakistan, all air defence failed to intercept) 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

    • @rashidwaseem4153
      @rashidwaseem4153 Рік тому

      same your SU 30 failed to dodge the AMRAAM AIM 120 And Had Shoted Down

    • @___ANONYM0US___
      @___ANONYM0US___ 2 місяці тому

      HQ9 never fails because they just watching the behaviourof brahmos and Pakistan calculated all the information of that missile like where from it launched where it was wanna go and how brahmos changes its direction towards HQ9 and actually brahmos got a glitch that he never go on his real destination 😂😂😂 actually brahmos failed 😂

  • @dohc22h
    @dohc22h 2 роки тому +2

    An Indian Aircraft Carrier is equipped with it's own Call Center for PC Repair Services...

    • @dohc22h
      @dohc22h 2 роки тому

      A Nuclear Powered Call Center... lmao. Cap, I won't get mad if you delete this... I never do. lol

  • @xaviert7839
    @xaviert7839 2 роки тому +12

    Haha..that was Brutal...Even though they fixed the Brahmos they still sucks.

    • @seaturtleOlympiads
      @seaturtleOlympiads 2 роки тому +5

      Right, so funny seeing them got so triggered over a game

    • @xaviert7839
      @xaviert7839 2 роки тому +3

      @@seaturtleOlympiads Brahmos is a good missile, no doubt. But it's not war proven yet.
      I see some extra unnecessary hypes on Brahoms in DCS. IDk why people take the game seriously.

    • @oladiedoo50
      @oladiedoo50 2 роки тому

      @@xaviert7839 maturity is lacked

    • @wardaddy7124
      @wardaddy7124 2 роки тому +1

      @@oladiedoo50 When you look at it keeping physics in perspective the brahmos is the most effective anti-ship missile in service but a carrier group costs 25 billion dollars , and if u could sunk 25 billion dollars with 15 missiles no one would make a Carrier Strike Group

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +3

      You need more than 16, even for a supersonic missile by looks of things.

  • @bohan9957
    @bohan9957 2 роки тому +4

    Ultra-hypersonic Mica missiles. WOW!

  • @tonyantonio8956
    @tonyantonio8956 2 роки тому +3

    It's strange that china and india is fighting in the black sea near crimea not in south china sea of the indian ocean.

  • @jamesvanderpoel2135
    @jamesvanderpoel2135 2 роки тому +3

    Cap can you do a battle of Leyte Gulf in which Admiral Halsley doesn't fall for the Japanese trick to lure him away from the area using their empty carriers, many believe that the entire Japanese Navy would have sunk that day ending the war had Halsley not took his fleet carriers and tried to intercept the Japanese carriers.

    • @rags417
      @rags417 2 роки тому

      And yet Halsey was made a five star Admiral at the end of the war and not Spruance !

  • @vardhanparth
    @vardhanparth 2 роки тому +2

    I don’t agree with the outcome, few days back India shot one Brahmos over Pakistan Chinese HQ9 missile defence systems were unable to take it down….it was mentioned by the Pak army ISPR as well…. 3,4 Brahmos will do the work…

  • @proudindian3582
    @proudindian3582 2 роки тому +3

    During balakot strike chinese hq 9 couldn't shoot mirage 2000 jets ..and here they're shooting rafales..
    And a brahmos missile was fired and it went 124 km deep inside pakistan..here they're shooting brahmos while in reality Pakistanis chinese radars couldn't even track it properly ..let alone shooting it..pak showed flight path of brahmos which was later dismissed by India which means they can't even track it.

  • @mwtrolle
    @mwtrolle 2 роки тому +4

    2:26 the Flopping Fish, can take off from the carrier with a full missile loadout or full fuel.

    • @totalnerd5674
      @totalnerd5674 2 роки тому +4

      Keyword: *or*

    • @MrCastodian
      @MrCastodian 2 роки тому

      It can’t take of with max load, but in air to air they can have full missile load because the missiles are much lighter then other weapons.
      So, full fuel load and full air to air missile load is not a problem.

    • @mwtrolle
      @mwtrolle 2 роки тому

      @@MrCastodian not if it got full fuel as well.
      For a carrier fighter range and time in the air per flight are extremely important.

  • @tipoomaster
    @tipoomaster Рік тому +2

    17:40 how terrifying would it be to see all those Brahmos's coming at you lol. It will be an increasing game changer.

  • @somnathmahale2718
    @somnathmahale2718 2 роки тому +2

    Bro did you know how brahmos cruise missile works??? It is unable to stop by s400 also??

  • @thomasjardine2108
    @thomasjardine2108 2 роки тому +3

    ah yes, my favorite Indian city. Novorossiysk 😅

  • @VAPOURIZE100
    @VAPOURIZE100 2 роки тому +4

    Niceee battle it would be more fun with AWACS for both sides.. pak navy has now gotten 2x type 54 AP frigates with a lot of HQ9s 2x more are on the way

    • @anmolsharma2266
      @anmolsharma2266 2 роки тому +2

      Not just awacs but ships from all sides but then again it's impossible

    • @HEILZEUS
      @HEILZEUS 2 роки тому

      But the HQ-9 couldn't stop the "accidentally" fired Brahmos at Faisalabad airbase.

    • @VAPOURIZE100
      @VAPOURIZE100 Рік тому

      @@HEILZEUS those systems are dormant until something more alarming occurs canr fire blind without ID targets too.. it's like having the safety on with an automatic gun until it's certainly needed.. FYI it was nowhere near an airbase it fell near a village

  • @RadecKZHF
    @RadecKZHF 2 роки тому +2

    Can you do a PAF TOT strike on an Indian carrier group? This time using the Jf17 with the CM400AKG/YJ12 supersonic ashm?

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      We only have the 802 missile or whatever it is called.

    • @RadecKZHF
      @RadecKZHF 2 роки тому +1

      @@grimreapers is there a mod which gives the yj12/cm400akg to the thunder?

    • @anmolsharma2266
      @anmolsharma2266 2 роки тому +1

      I don't think dcs have Indian ship models

    • @RadecKZHF
      @RadecKZHF 2 роки тому +1

      @@anmolsharma2266 they dont, but GR did do a PAF TOT strike on an Indian Carrier group before, but did it with cm802

    • @anmolsharma2266
      @anmolsharma2266 2 роки тому +1

      @@RadecKZHF yes GR might be able to use similar paf assests but in Indian Navy case there's no Barak 8 or something similar to it

  • @josephabrahamputhumana7355
    @josephabrahamputhumana7355 3 місяці тому

    IAF does have a Maritime Strike Squadron No 222 "Tiger Sharks" based in south india that covers the entire IOR with brahmos integrated Su 30 MKI ( 40 aircraft modified to carry Air launched brahmos)

  • @mwtrolle
    @mwtrolle 2 роки тому +28

    14:29 "India got the worst machines" The Rafale's and SU-30MKI's are much better than the J-15's, but maybe they didn't get it right in-game. When it comes to missiles the Chinese surely have got the advantage in-game, and probably also IRL, though there are lots of duds from what I have seen, possibly as high as 70%.
    But the J-15's have got far too many missiles loaded, they can't take off from the carrier with a full load.

    • @lolasdm6959
      @lolasdm6959 2 роки тому +5

      Lmao what? J-15 are actually superour to Russian machines in electronics and weight. Rafale is a light fighter and India doesn't have the top of the line upgrades, the Su-30's domestic variants would be worse than J-15s, how is the export variant supposed to compete with new Chinese hardware?
      If you don't know, the Russians only hold the advantage in engines now, China was able to acquire tech from the West during the 80s, such as avionics and composite technology.
      Even in the engines the Russians will soon be overtaken, apperently the Russians finally sold Su-35s to China because China will overtake them in engine tech in a couple years so they thought to get what cash they still can.
      Plus Chinese AA missiles are way better than the Indians too.

    • @ser43_OLDC
      @ser43_OLDC 2 роки тому +5

      @@lolasdm6959 in engine only? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Rusians are the best in misiles. I think that you don't know that the su35 that will be given to China will be export model, worst radar worst avionics and worst engine and China will pay for them like if they were domestic use su 35

    • @ser43_OLDC
      @ser43_OLDC 2 роки тому +1

      @@lolasdm6959 in terms of AA misiles the SD10 is very similar to the r77m but inferior

    • @lolasdm6959
      @lolasdm6959 2 роки тому +2

      @@ser43_OLDC No, in engine SD10 is inferior, but not in electronics to the r77m.

    • @lolasdm6959
      @lolasdm6959 2 роки тому

      @@ser43_OLDC Yeah, you know Russia for a long time refused to sell Su-35 to China because they know that 100%, China will reverse engineer the engines.
      You know why they did it anyways? Because the Russians believe that China will obtain parity with Russian engine tech in a couple years.
      So they can sell it now for hundreds of millions of bucks to help their struggling economy, or wait a couple years and China won't pay a penny for it. But will still get the tech somehow, as seen by the recent arrest of a Russian engineer selling papers to China last year. These budget cuts are hard to cope with.
      Yes, of course it's got crap avionics, Russian avionics are crap, China only needs the engine. Chinese engineers will have a field day scrapping the engines, probably will leave one untouched for the museam
      You should know that Chinese military takes radar, jamming and ir tech from the west, because Russian ones are crap.
      A Chinese J-11, J-16 or J-15 have better radar and jamming, as well as lighter but stronger composite material airframe too. China acquired western tech during the 80s.

  • @thomaszhang3101
    @thomaszhang3101 2 роки тому +3

    Do they not have 052D or DL in DCS? 052C has the old Soviet missile system that is not as god as vls.

  • @denieldwayne1939
    @denieldwayne1939 2 роки тому +2

    bro, could a philippine brahmos do anything against chinese fleet? pls make a ph vs china vid

  • @stuartholden2772
    @stuartholden2772 Рік тому

    Cap has got the best seat in the house! Love the commentary!

  • @rudrakshsinghkatal5609
    @rudrakshsinghkatal5609 2 роки тому +1

    Meanwhile you didnt even take into account the S maneuvering of the missile

  • @scramjet7466
    @scramjet7466 2 роки тому +3

    this is also assuming that India has only air launched brahmos. there is a ship lauched as well as a coastal brahmos.

  • @acidtalons
    @acidtalons 2 роки тому +1

    Would love to see the Grim Reapers roll into the new flight sim Tiny Combat Arena and smoke people as an organized squad.

  • @bussolini6307
    @bussolini6307 2 роки тому +1

    Cap can you a flotilla of types 055/052 vs Arleigh bukers and ticos?

  • @gbb7vc
    @gbb7vc 2 роки тому +2

    Enjoy the channel. Can you do a scenario if the US at Pearl Harbor would have gone on alert just before the Japanese attacked on Dec 7 1941?

  • @benjaminarnold2881
    @benjaminarnold2881 2 роки тому +2

    It would be interesting to see how a US CG would deal with this kind of situation, with the higher intercept aircraft launch rate

    • @killvish5111
      @killvish5111 2 роки тому

      In real life an US CG group is practically invincible at current times.

    • @anshulbhardwaj4038
      @anshulbhardwaj4038 2 роки тому

      For that India will use shaurya missiles and ultra long range torpidoes you can't beat uscg in air to air combat .shaurya is a hypersonic glide missile with a range of 1200km and those ultra long distance torpidoes have a range of 700 km. Uscg has f35s and f18s loaded with missiles India cannot take on them with 36 rafales or 36mig 29s. But 16 shaurya with hypersonic speed are a different ballgame. Also uscg is assisted with best ssn in the world so those 700km range torpidoes will be used once they fire tomahawks.

    • @azmolhossain9244
      @azmolhossain9244 Рік тому

      @@anshulbhardwaj4038 india can invade and take out us military.

  • @AdityaPoonia_Bishnoi
    @AdityaPoonia_Bishnoi 2 роки тому +1

    I am resident of Punjab and beauty is there is 260ft canal in my village that also serves as boundry to Rajasthan so often there is Ariel show up on skies as Su 30 MKI from Bathinda and Sirsa Airforce base and MiG 21Bisons and Mig 29 from Suratgarh Airforce station practices over village and canal serves as identical boundry for piloting skills, unfortunately youtube doesn't allow to share images if so i get stills and video of dog fighting of these birds and beauty of Su 30mki is beast in its own, huge bird seems to paint itself on hostile radars to make sure its presence, MiG 21 is agile bird।
    Cherry on the top is sometimes Apache 64 and Mi 25/35 also flex there muscles।

  • @zubinalias1722
    @zubinalias1722 2 роки тому +3

    Why didn’t you give meteors to the rafael

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому

      do not work in game.

    • @dad-ms8mz
      @dad-ms8mz 2 роки тому +1

      @@grimreapers That meas this isn't real ryt?

    • @zubinalias1722
      @zubinalias1722 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers oh shit

    • @vyomaexplorer3630
      @vyomaexplorer3630 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers Instead of Mica ng give them Astra missiles

  • @glenproctor1999
    @glenproctor1999 2 роки тому +2

    Definitely needs more missiles or a combined surface/air attack. I wonder if tyhe Indian navy is practising combined attacks?

    • @death_parade
      @death_parade 2 роки тому +1

      Yes they are practicing combined attacks. The TROPEX series of exercises, among others, are designed as joint-service exercises at the Theater level.

  • @Maeyanie
    @Maeyanie 2 роки тому +4

    Your comment near the start about an F-14 or F-18 having the power to take off made me wonder... I know you did do a "what can take off from a Kuznetsov" video already, but IIRC for that you took off unloaded starting from the back of the ship, which was valid data but still kind of cheating.
    So if you run out of better suggestions (haha, right) it'd be interesting to see if you're right about the F-14 and/or F-18 being able to take off _properly..._ i.e. with a full combat loadout and starting from the front launch stations, just like those planes were.
    Probably both with the carrier moving as well as stationary where the Su-33 can't... I guess it'd also be worth making _sure_ the Su-33 can't, in DCS, with those same takeoff parameters, otherwise it doesn't really prove anything.

    • @etluxaeterna
      @etluxaeterna 2 роки тому +1

      the comment didn't make sense to me considering the su-33 thrust to weight ratio is BETTER than both the F-14 and the F-18 so ...how is it that they would take off when they have the worse engines? If you don't believe me just check the wiki's of each plane. For instance both Su-27 (which the Su-33 is a variant of) and F-14 have engines rated at about ~28,000lbf (each engine). Yet the Su-27 gross weight is 51,000lbs and F-14 gross weight is 61,000lbs which means objectively that the Su-27 has greater thrust to weight ratio cus it weighs less and has the same thrust. Same goes for F-18

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      It's because they have ski ramp. US planes have powered catapults.

    • @Maeyanie
      @Maeyanie 2 роки тому +1

      @@grimreapers Well, the _planes_ don't, but I get your point... I was just misinterpreting your comment being about the planes themselves instead of the whole infrastructure around them. Fair enough. :)

  • @cyberwar5579
    @cyberwar5579 2 роки тому +1

    Once the indegenious engine is done we can have aircrafts in spades

  • @nathannakaji970
    @nathannakaji970 2 роки тому +3

    8:50 "I suspect a tomcat or a hornet would have the power to take off of a Kuznetsov"
    Test it. Do a video where you test which planes can take-off of the ski jump.

  • @krishna-hindu
    @krishna-hindu 2 роки тому +9

    Just 8 days ago a brahmos missile entered 125 kms into pakistani airspace and hq9and hq16 missile defence systems didn't even detect it

  • @lutfullahkarahanl2998
    @lutfullahkarahanl2998 2 роки тому +2

    Cap, i love you man. You are a gift for this world. Best entertainer in history! And Simba, i want to be your cat ^-^

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +2

      That's a nice thing to say :)

  • @jimbroottygaming8824
    @jimbroottygaming8824 2 роки тому +2

    Well on March 9 2022 a brahmos missile went ( miss fired)to Pakistan territory, Around 144 km deep in to Pakistan but Chinese SAM failed to intercept it. 🤷🤷

  • @broclibby75
    @broclibby75 Рік тому

    i have this game but instead of flying how do i set a fight up like this???

  • @lightbenderga2017
    @lightbenderga2017 2 роки тому +23

    Im sure it’s a competent missile irl…maybe 30-40 years ago, combining high speed with a very low flight level, but against a modern CG with *hundreds* of very advanced interceptor missiles and absurdly powerful radars you just can’t win with 16x birds and having 1 BRAHMOS per, especially against that ungodly amount of Chinese SAM’s that were launched.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +9

      agree

    • @lightbenderga2017
      @lightbenderga2017 2 роки тому +3

      @@grimreapers Do you plan to redo this with more different Anti-shipping weaponry? Maybe a Time on Target attack with harpoons (or any other anti shipping missile) to act as basically decoys for the much smaller in number brahmos coming in behind them?

    • @lenn55
      @lenn55 2 роки тому +1

      not too mention all the countermeasures ships have these days.

    • @dad-ms8mz
      @dad-ms8mz 2 роки тому +1

      🤣😅🤣😆🤣😂🤣😅🤣😅🤣who said brohmos is 30 years old do u have even any idea of what ur saying?
      U don't think India upgraded bromosh and for ur knowledge it's the best supersonic missile.

    • @lightbenderga2017
      @lightbenderga2017 2 роки тому +2

      @@dad-ms8mz I’m saying it would have been good 30-40 years ago when air defenses weren’t as sophisticated, at least in DCS.

  • @dipanshu4807
    @dipanshu4807 2 роки тому

    I have quick question. I am new to DCS, not new but been here from sometime but never got much chance to play. I wanted to know, what's difference between DCS steam version and standalone?? I have steam version, should I move to standalone??
    It would be helpful if someone can tell more about this. 😅

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +1

      Standalone superior. Please use that.

    • @dipanshu4807
      @dipanshu4807 2 роки тому

      @@grimreapers so will I be able to move my modules from Steam to standalone? Cuz if not, DCS really isn't that cheap to be real 😄

  • @killvish5111
    @killvish5111 2 роки тому +2

    Who is here after brahmos mk1 travelled 120km inside Pakistani airspace guarded by HQ9 without being tracked?

  • @BobH809
    @BobH809 2 роки тому +1

    This is not going to be good... Did someone drop the Mica.... I said it was going to be bad. Will you run this again with more planes?

  • @anonymous-uf8us
    @anonymous-uf8us 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks for doing

  • @ojaspatki772
    @ojaspatki772 2 роки тому +1

    There were just too many SAMs......we need saturation Cap......would love to see the Brahmos again!

  • @tipoomaster
    @tipoomaster 11 місяців тому +1

    Why aren't the meteors on the Rafale? Only mica ng which didn't work in this simulation anyways. Why are the BrahMos being launched from ground level from 100nm when it's range is 300 nmi and the enemy craft can't shoot the sukhois that far out, so why not fly high and give it the full speed and range? Rematch part 3 incoming!

  • @kentl7228
    @kentl7228 2 роки тому +1

    How about trying A6M Zeroes instead of Messerschmitts in the Battle of Britain?

  • @Value_Pilgrim
    @Value_Pilgrim 2 роки тому +2

    Also the Indian Rafales are armed with Meteor missiles which have a no escape zone of 100 kms or so. So this is going to be a BVR combat where the Chinese jets will be wiped out from a distance. I am sorry your Sim is pretty inaccurate.

  • @nibinkoshy8902
    @nibinkoshy8902 Рік тому

    Woah! That was really cool to watch.. especially all those HQ16 missiles raining down on the brahmos and that 1 brahmos that got through and hit the ship! thank you so much for the content! if possible, give us a full scale air invasion of Pakistan air space by Indian air force, with India's 36 raffales, 284 Su-30 MKI's against Pakistan's 75 F16 falcons and 134 JF 17 thunder and whatever anti air land defense Pakistan army has!

  • @kunaalsharma1039
    @kunaalsharma1039 2 роки тому +2

    Vegetarian Curry vs Halal Curry

  • @max2008abhi
    @max2008abhi 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you cap.

  • @sidv4615
    @sidv4615 2 роки тому +1

    Hypothetical wars maybe cool but only real peace can bring us all together. love from 🇮🇳 cap. Even tho i dont play dcs youve made me fall in love with this game. i bought a $3k laptop last year so cant get my parents to get me a gaming pc but when i grow up im gonna get the best pc and play dcs with you.
    btw werent the rafales equipped with meteors with a better range than their chinese counterpart?
    also I think you sent a wayyy smaller number of aircrafts, like in the Pakistani attack against Russian carrier group, Pakistan had 20 Jeff’s and india here despite having a fleet of MKIs 2 times larger than the Jeff had a smaller number of aircraft. and also you sent 20 Vipers which is almost 1/4th of Pakistan’s fleet, send 1/4th of India’s MKI fleet and the outcome would probably be somewhat different.

    • @hemendraravi4787
      @hemendraravi4787 2 роки тому

      What was the 3k $ laptop lol ? I think you will be able to run dcs in that and they could have used meteor missiles .

    • @sidv4615
      @sidv4615 2 роки тому

      @@hemendraravi4787 it was a high-end MacBook

    • @lolasdm6959
      @lolasdm6959 2 роки тому

      @@sidv4615 you can get the same performance in windows based laptops for half the price.

    • @hemendraravi4787
      @hemendraravi4787 2 роки тому

      @@sidv4615 oof why did u get a Mac book ? It’s literally a scam u could have gotten a PC with the same specs for 1/3 or half the price

    • @hemendraravi4787
      @hemendraravi4787 2 роки тому

      @@sidv4615 but I think you can still run dcs on low graphics and DCS is pretty expensive itself some of the iconic jets cost like 3.5k ₹ and to play the game competitively you need a joystick and stuff like that , you can try war thunder it’s a free game and can run on potato PC but there is a lot of grind in that game unless u pay some money ,but there are 2000 vehicles (tanks,planes,ships and helicopters) ww2-cold war era

  • @sanu1231000
    @sanu1231000 2 роки тому +1

    Well, now we have a real life example.
    Google 'India Pakistan Brahmos Mian Channu incident '.

  • @gargadas721
    @gargadas721 2 роки тому +3

    Brahmos NG has a range of 600kms & can cover the distance at mach 3.2 at max 5mins & any career grp be it US or russia gets a max time of 2mins to react & intercept a highly manueverable ASM,during jt exercises with foreign navies brahmos has nvr been exercised because of this reason that it bares the career grps vulnerability wide open & such exercises become futile,with such a range & satl guidence even shore based launchers can attk career groups su30 s wont be needed to take off,its a good exercise but shooting down B with hq6 & 9 it wont happen only chance of survival is if j15 can shoot down su30s b4 they can release their pay load

    • @anmolsharma2266
      @anmolsharma2266 2 роки тому

      isnt Brahmos ng under development

    • @gargadas721
      @gargadas721 2 роки тому

      @@anmolsharma2266 its a long story but bottomline is its ready...due to non signing if mtcr India couldnt get any missile abv 300kms rg,Brahmos always had the propellant to go more than 450kms but the on brd cmptrs & lnchr veh software were not able to tgt anything beyond 290kms once the mtcr was signed this clause was removed & post that u hv seen sudden surge in 'upgradation' of the system which is actualy validation of the system...i hv said it in lay mans terms🙏🙏...hope it quenches your query bro

    • @anmolsharma2266
      @anmolsharma2266 2 роки тому

      @@gargadas721 I think you are confusing brahmos A(equipped on su30) with Brahmos NG as far as I know brahmos ng is way lighter than the current version so that tejas can carry it

    • @gargadas721
      @gargadas721 2 роки тому

      @@anmolsharma2266 brother i wont discuss any further in open forum🙏🙏...just suffice to know even shore based launchers can now tgt career grps 300 nautical miles off the coast & it will tk precisely 4mins 43 secs to impact...sukhois need not take off

    • @anmolsharma2266
      @anmolsharma2266 2 роки тому

      @@gargadas721 bro the lastest was around 700km with increased speed

  • @ajaypal14121
    @ajaypal14121 2 роки тому +1

    Now PAF AIR STRIKE vs Indian Naval Group

  • @Nikhilsj33
    @Nikhilsj33 2 роки тому +6

    Hey cap, why were meteors not used? I think they work better than the MICA…

    • @SirAMG63
      @SirAMG63 2 роки тому

      Are they MICA RF’s? They are BVR Micas

    • @wardaddy7124
      @wardaddy7124 2 роки тому

      Meteors are bugged in game at the moment and the Pl-15 ingame are stupidly OP , imagine a missile doing 4500+ knots at 115,000 feets XD

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 роки тому +4

      AI refuse to fire them, so could not use :(

  • @spiritualbites695
    @spiritualbites695 2 роки тому

    P800 based Missile, Now I can understand your analysis

  • @BaBa_YaG4
    @BaBa_YaG4 2 роки тому +3

    Relax it's just an simulation.

  • @vipuldave9909
    @vipuldave9909 2 роки тому +2

    Why Rafale doesn't carry Meteor?

  • @pavanpav3697
    @pavanpav3697 2 роки тому

    It's real fun for Chinese to watch Indian supersonic brahmos touch by some low powered missiles it's not just a missile it's called destination providing energy divided ships...

  • @lovedeepsingh6923
    @lovedeepsingh6923 2 роки тому +1

    Love you bro from India 🔥

  • @abhishekgiri1201
    @abhishekgiri1201 2 роки тому +1

    Where are the meteors , R 27 EA , Astras??