Відео

Got dangit

How do you make this videos? Content editor?

Broken needs a nerf

Yes but the Knights become a lot cheaper if built under the influence of the Keeps + Enlistment incentives. They are 25% cheaper than Japanese Knights, so the French can keep churning them out from stables a lot faster than the Japanese. Pair the Knights with Arbalests and the Japanese will lose.

My ingame practice as 1v1 diamond 2 says exact opposite. Alongside with mehter and few sipahi around they devastate my all sorts of cavalry in seconds. Ur tests shows nothin'.

They would fight with their naginata on horse back tho. Make more sense and better than katana and.... shield(seriously wrong). Lance charge is more of a western knight signature. And the reversed katanas are just ugly.

why you don't consider unit cost in your tests?

Japanese smaruais and mounted samurais stack their abilities making them stronger the more they are and there is not even the bannerman

MIX LANDS WITH MAA.

Need at least one mounted samurai tbh

Great vid!

mix landsknechts and its gg

I don't play AOE4, but isn't this just a case of units that are good against single entity vs units that are good against multi-entities?

This is very not expected. Musofari is anti heavy unit should easily kill samuray.

1. In 1v1, we see that it takes same shot to take down both knights IF japan can not recharge his deflective armor -> france knights MUST keep japan knights keep getting hit in order to DRAW 2. In 10 vs 10, I think it depends on whether the army focus on 1 target (multi knights focus on 1 knight) or not, that determine who wins, japan or france both got chance 3. In 100 vs 100, it's nearly impossible for france to keep japan knights getting hit, many recharged deflective armor absorb the damage thus obviously jp can win Both units has it's pros and cons considering it's price and ability (e.g., chivalry is useless in this battle) in every circumstance. The units are considered fair, but the civ macro abilities matters

Samurai? Where is

Shaolin Monk bro plz vs any

Shaolin Monk

Unbalance

Feel the glory of the east roman empire.

on the 100-vs-100, half the jans were dead after the trample. Seems that equal resources would make more sense, though

Janisarries got popped😂💥

I would like to see cataphract vs aoe3 jenizars

Horses were rare because Japan has always been an island country. Only high-ranking officials, such as lords and samurai, were able to ride horses, and even high-ranking officials saw horses only as convenient transportation, not as military service purposes. Compared to other continental countries, the quality of Japanese metal was not as good as that of other countries, so horses could not be dressed with metal armor, and there were no metal horseshoe to attach to their hooves. The Japanese archipelago, a Japanese territory, has long had more mountainous areas than flatlands, and because most of the common people made rice paddies to make ends meet, they always had to fill up the paddy fields before fighting. Japan has not been able to develop large-scale cavalry tactics for these reasons. How can these Japanese cavalry be stronger than the French Knights, who had the most powerful cavalry in the Middle Ages? This game series is based on real history, not on fantasy games such as Starcraft or Warcraft. Therefore, civilization bonuses should not be given to Japanese cavalry.

That Landsknecht charge is so powerful

ツクネ範囲攻撃強すぎw

It's hilarious, aoe series always have OP Japanese 😂

historically speaking , a medieval knight should defeat a japanese samurai and not lose

When the game was released, didn’t a lot of the melee units do this dramatic jump into a fight? Do they still do it?

I think Onna-bugeisha purpose are to raid villagers on relatively small group or as a anti-trash unit.

BULLSHIT ! Those big twohanded swords is difficult to maneuvre in combat, and not very effective. The area effect is overpowered imo. All the Japanese units would have won, no doubt.

graphics so bad

So in nutshell in AOE4 Japanese units are trash , when in AOE3 they was pretty good.

That's specifically a Japanese Yari *(Japanese Spear)* Samurai, it would be better if they were using Katanas *(Japanese Sword).*

test jannisary vs any other gunpowder units

Banzai！

Aryan Superman

Just like in real life Samurais are btfo by Western European Plate Armor

Lol. Renaissance era Janissaries using gunpowder rifles against medieval Byzantine armored cavalry. The result is Byzantine victory. Total bullshit.

I've watched some of your videos to comapare Japanese with other units....Japanese almost always wins agains anyone. They're too OP and unbalanced. I struggle everytime to win against a Japanese faction player.

It was as easy as making the Samurai more vulnerable in melee, but able to use bows while mounted. You know, like they did historically.

the last one was more about RNG collision, but pretty good comparisons

Can never believe that mongols a horseback civilization lost to japan an infantry civilization in a horse archer.

Great music choice

Yeah LOL! Japan got reflective armour.......... I like that the AoE4 devs have absolutely no clue?/idea about european plate armour. Its like it doesnt even exist. As usual the asian civs get all the cool techs

Cataphract HP got nerfed in the last patch.

I wonder why other civs don't get grenades

That trample damage...look how they massacred my boy

In real life the samurai would get destroyed 😂 but for marketing samurais was cooler fighter. The mongols proof it, they landed and destroy the army in every attack on land... but the winter came and mongols had to retreat... when they cameback a tiphon destroy the navy 😂

normaly janisarys should win , in history musket were used because counter of armored infantry and horse man