Відео

Thank you for your support!

Photo*. Yes but they're from the Sabean Script. They might be from Ethiopia because Ethiopia (Axum) conquered the Himyarite Kingdom (Jewish Kingdom in Yemen)

@@CheLanguages the photos are not might they are from Ethiopia you can see those exact stone if you visit Aksum and their are more in easter corner of Addis Ababa which is not known by the foreign world as a local Addis Ababa resendant i can confirm it and most of it predate the axsumite conquest of yamen it is not the purpose of your video but I want to tell you Ethiopian use sabian alphabet more than yamen

It's a possible link to Turkic, nothing is proved. The future of these languages is unclear, Kalmyk and Buryat are probably very safe, but the ones in China I can't say for sure. Moghol, if it isn't extinct already, will probably be lost forever soon with the Taliban in Afghanistan and Kangjia, Bonan, Dagur, Yugur etc. are probably going to all be on their way out without proper political efforts to save them

Not all Indo-Iranians are Kurds lol, but they're all related. I hope you enjoyed the video

LOL I'm sure 96,000 is more than 3

@CheLanguages here at playing096 department we're having a major demographic and mathematic stepback because the only person responsible for those (the spider on the top left corner of the room) was fired yesterday by the broom

Interesting, glad to hear your perspective

Real

Je suis désolé mais cette théorie est proposée, ne pas prouvée. Une famille des langues qui est tellement grosse est presque impossible pour exister dans la réalité

@@AvrahamYairStern I'm glad, see you in the next one!

@@CheLanguages sure

The people are still there I hope, just possibly not the language. The fact that Mongolic people live in Kalmykia also blows my mind, it's near Georgia and Azerbaijan!

Yeah I need a new microphone, thank you for the feedback

@@CheLanguages no probs. I enjoy your videos - keep up the good work.

@SionTJobbins will do, next video will hopefully be of higher quality, always trying to improve

That's cool! Probably from just one Mongol guy who I also have ancestry from....

Thank you very much, glad you enjoyed it

It's another dialect of Greek, not sure if it'd quite its own language and sadly I couldn't find too much on it

You're welcome, enjoy!

Some. But Indo-European stands a lot more firm than Altaic

I hope you enjoyed the video!

Glad you enjoyed

I mentioned it, it's not entirely proven but it would be nice to know where Khitan came from once and for all

@@CheLanguages It is pretty well established that Khitan is related to Mongolic and that it can't be part of Mongolic proper actually

@@CheLanguages There is some confusing terminology, but as far we know Khitan IS related to Mongolic. Some just call it Macro-Mongolic, the "Para-Mongolic" label can be misleading. Shimunek goes with the term Serbi-Mongolic and puts Khitan, Tuyuhun and Taghbach into the Serbi grouping. For Taghbach there is too little language data to make a good estimate, but Khitan is now being deciphered more and more, its position within the larger family of Mongolic becomes clear. There is however another language, the language of the Khuis Tolgoi and Bugut inscriptions, which has been worked on by Vovin, Maue and Ölmez in the last years and dubbed Rouran. It is definitely Mongolic and probably closer to core-Mongolic as Khitan is, but its state of decipherment beyond that is still lacking.

@@Flozone1 thank you for the information. I need to look into it more

I need to look into it more. The similarities between Altaic in general are crazy, but it's been disproven time and time again. I think it's more than likely Proto-Uralic had contact with Proto-Turkic, Proto-Mongolic, Proto-Yeniseian (Burushaski moment lol), Proto-Tungusic (maybe) which could explain certain similarities but it's just too far back to say if they're all related. Maybe DNA studies and further study of these languages might bring some new information to light in the future

@@CheLanguages They’ve all spent an extremely long time next to each other so any relationship that they have (language wise) is due to the loanwords. There may have been some kind of connection between them but it was so long ago that any evidence is speculative at best. I’m not a Linguist but I was wondering what your opinion is. Uralic languages and Yukaghir languages definitely have some kind of relationship especially Yukaghir and the Samoyedic branch of Uralic. But that could just be because they shared a boundary before the Yukaghir peoples are believed to have moved Westward across North Asia. If there is any relation, it happened so long ago that we may never know sadly.

@@CheLanguagesThis is personally how I feel about PIE, but Altaic doesn't have the political & academic backing that the PIE theory does.

@johnronald9767 I think if we look at the Udmurt language, a Uralic language with strong (yet relatively recent in language terms) Tatar influence, it's possible to see how the Eurasian Steppe formed one big Sprachbund without all the languages necessarily being related to one another. A similar phenomenon existed in Mesoamerica where Mayan and Uto-Aztecan languages existed in a Sprachbund without being related per se

@@Afrologist yes, it does have bad connotations and that might ultimately be due to the historical motivations behind Altaic. Yet today it's still a bit crazy to claim Koreanic and Japonic part of the group too. I could maybe reconcile Turkic-Uralic-Mongolic, but not any wider language family than that and I still think a Sprachbund is more likely

Its pretty good

@justaduck1664 thank you

The video gave me a much better perspective on the Mongolic languages. I didn't know all the Southern Mongolic languages in China exist, I thought only about Inner Mongolian

@AvrahamYairStern I'm glad, I hope my videos will always continue to pique everyone's interest in learning new things about the world's languages

@@CheLanguages your videos certainly do!

Moghol moment

Glad you found it interesting

Gypsies had already moved by this point no, or was it not one migration?

I imagine nothing.

Sinti-Roma or more vulgarly "Gypsies" left the Punjab region en route to the West through numerous migration waves since at least the 13th century due to violent raids by Afghan Muslims.

@@jastermereel9773 yes, but the gypsies did not leave because of the Moghol people, I think you are confusing them with the Mughal Empire

You are confusing the Mughal Empire I think

No. The Turco-Mongol Mughal dynasty came to India from Afghanistan.

Seriously. The Mughal Dynasty of India was indeed founded by these imperialist and foreign Turco-Mongol Muslim rulers of Afghanistan.

@@jastermereel9773 but it was not the same as the small Moghol people who exist in Afghanistan today. The Moghol people in particular cannot be blamed for the Anti-Ziganism faced by the proto-gypsies in India

I never blamed them.

Yes

Real

@@metro9640 turan won

Now that's a name I haven't heard in a long time. Please please please tell me you're being sarcastic

@CheLanguages I'm always serious :-)

@@siyacer BRUH

HAHAHA they've even infiltrated my video ads.

Monsieur, ce sont juste théories, ne pas la réalité des langues Amazighiennes. Ils viennent de la famille linguistique Afro-asiatique, les langues Turcques sont une autre famille qui n'est pas liée

That is not what I said.

Real

Thank you for your perspective

Let's goooo

Rusyns are not Ukrainians!

@@CheLanguages Та не жванди ото. Русини - і є УКРАЇНЦІ. Русини - СТАРА назва українців.

@@polchuk1979 Ruthenians referred to Ukrainians and Belarussians, not just Ukrainians. These groups would eventually drift apart, the Rusyn people today are the only ones who kept the name instead of adopting a new one like the Ukrainians and Belarussians.

@@CheLanguages Та що ти верзеш то? Русинами називалися ЗАВЖДИ українці. Навіть до 1939 року. І цю самоназву зберегли УКРАЇНЦІ, які потрапили під окупацію інших країн - Польщі, сучасної Словаччини та Румунії. Хоча навіть ці українці в 1918 року проголошували свої республіки і мали стрімке бажання об'єднатися з Великою Україною - УНР. Та вивчіть вже історію питання то. Не несіть відверту брехню та дурню. так звані "русини" - то УКРАЇНЦІ.

@@polchuk1979 if you claim Rusyns are Ukrainians, then by the same logic Ukrainians are just Russians. Малыроссия

Absolutely. Thank you for your comment

Livonian moment

@@CheLanguages min izāmō moment

@@justaduck1664 real

I think gatekeeping a language is a bit dodgy. Sadly palawa kani isn't the only one to do it

No. Australia agrees. You can't copyright a language.

@@Ggdivhjkjl HAHAHAHAHAHA this is even better

¿Que?

¿Que?

¿Que?