Radiation Levels Exposed on Brain Wearables! (Muse 1&2, Muse S, Dreem 2, NeoRhythm, HaloSport 2)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 чер 2024
- In this video, Dr. Cody looks into EMF Radiation of the brain devices.
NeoRhythm Affiliate link: tidd.ly/3q8wNom (10% discount code is "drcody" at checkout)
►►► GET YOUR FREE MEDITATION GUIDE HERE: bit.ly/2XIRDNa
►►►Muse Headband 15% off Discount (applied at checkout): choosemuse.com/codyrallmd
►►► INSTAGRAM (Behind The Scenes with Cody Rall MD): / codyrall_techforpsych
Cody Rall, M.D., is a United States Navy trained Psychiatrist who specializes in neurotechnology wearables. He is a co-founder of Stanford Brainstorm, the world’s first academic laboratory dedicated to transforming brain health through entrepreneurship.
Dr. Rall also served as a board member of the psychiatry innovation lab, an annual national competition at the American Psychiatric Association that works as an incubator for groups developing technological solutions to problems in mental health care. He is the founder of Techforpsych, a media and relations company that covers advancements in technology related to neuroscience.
=============================================================
To apply for Dr. Cody's Brain Circuit Training program head to this link:
►►► www.techforpsych.com/coaching - Наука та технологія
Thank you very much for this video, this was my own main hesitation with these devices, especially the stimulating ones like Neorhythm. This really dispels those fears and concerns.
great video, thank you so much this is what i wanted the emf ratings for them so much you deliver excellent material and you deserve so many more subscribers than you get
Thanks so much for your support! I'll keep working on the subscribers ;)
Hey Cody, thanks for the video! Would love to see Table of Contents section in your video descriptions. Cheers.
Im glad u did this video as its a question i had for all devices
Thank you, Cody, for this well thought presentation about EMFs for those brain devices.
You are the best! Its the same way I would do a review or video. Exactly whats on my mind. Thanks!!!
Thanks Alex! Glad you liked it.
You’re the best!!!!! EXCELLENT VIDEO. THANK YOU
Thanks Matteo!
Hey Cody! Have you testes the brainbit headband?
interesting video, thank you. I noticed you didn'''t measure MFT for Muse S from the side actually touching the skin. Can you do that, please?
Did you try measuring radiowaves in mW/m^2? Or V/m?
I was planning to buy focuscalm, but I had concerns about the radiation from bluetooth, just on my brain. I don't own a bluetooth headset or a smartwatch. So I connected my phone to my tablet via bluetooth to check with my emf-meter device. It shows magnetic, electric and radio frequencies. When doing connection(pairing) and when sending/receiving a file the radio frequency went ridiculously high on my tablet (I was pretending the tablet be the focuscalm). Magnetic and electric parameters were stable. And when nothing is sent or received RF was low. As a result I quit buying the focuscalm, because it would be sending info by bluetooth to the phone (app) constantly, and on my forehead. I assume the radio frequency would be going high like that, as a nature of bluetooth connection. I don't want to buy to try. I wish they made the connection via cable. I hope some inventers read this and make some devices without bluetooth.
Yess! Bluetooth is not the best way. I've never had any airpods and never will only wired earphones still there is Bluetooth.. I was really interested with this EEG thing but same as you waiting for cable connection
Are there any eeg sensors that are wired i.e do not use bluetooth?
Great video sir!! Have you ever try reading EMF on Mendi?
Not yet! probably worth testing!
did you ever end up testing the Mendi?@@CodyRallMD
What about those of us who use muse s all night to track sleep cycle? Thanks
Complain to the company Muse, so they make a device that's more like Dreem, where it records to local storage on the headset, then only uses RF when you wake up to transfer the data. If they don't hear people complain, they won't know that it's important to consumers. Dreem seems like a failed company, so definitely complain to Muse.
Did you test the Dreem 2? I don't see it in the video.
Test it for what? RF emissions or magnetic emissions? He didn't test RF emissions at all in this video, apparently! 😆
next time you use a device can you please put the link in the description
It's not hard to find. He said it's on Amazon. It took me two minutes to find. (I guess it might take longer if you're using a tiny phone to do search queries.)
LiTMS and rTMS do not have the same mechanisms of action and cannot be compared. As such, comparing LiTMS to the safety of TMS is not appropriate. Furthermore, unlike rTMS, LiTMS cellular and biochemical underpinnings mechanisms are currently known to be poorly understood.
Thanks R.M. !
I wonder if you cooked a bowl of noodles in the microwave then measured to see if there was any residual radiation coming off of it lol.. that might be a stupid question but I'm kind of curious
Hmmm, I'm curious about that now too haha
Love what you do, truly appreciate the information. Question, is it true that non-ionizing waves heat up cells? When you microwave food, all the nutrients are depleted, gone, disappear, why wouldnt they cause harm to our biology?
Most of the nutrients are gone before you even put microwave meals into the microwave. This is due to using retort ovens to super heat food and make it safe for supermarket freezers. Also, lots of sodium (salt) is added, as a high heat retort oven typically removes flavor from the food.
Can you please use this on the V/m scale like it's intended then remake this video? (Maybe even pull down this false one. Or, leave it up as an example of terrible misinformation.)
Smart smart.
In my view all focus goes on EMF as if its the only problem and most things don't give off much EMF.
Its the RF Microwave frequency that you need to watch out for as it's very high on mobiles, Bluetooth, WiFi etc. RF offers more danger because its experienced in much higher levels!
To say WiFi and mobiles are safe is just insane!! They cause much biological damage and all studies are done by the industry and its all protected!
The Neo results are quite alarming :(
Its dangerous use muse headband?🙄
No, I don't think so.
Using my RF power meter, it's about 100x more dangerous (if RF = danger) to hold a cell phone to your head or to put your head up against a microwave oven than to use a low RF power bluetooth device. Now it might not be dangerous, but that doesn't mean it can't interfere with sleep. It *probably* doesn't. But that doesn't mean that at some higher RF power level that you can't cause disturbed sleep.
Hi, you just tested one value of the problematic fields. Mesuring µT for the phone, wifi, etc is ridicule, you just tested low frequencies. Also what about V/M and W/m² ! Also the recommended value of independant expert (not government!) for rest and school is more like 0,05 to 0,1, not 0,4 µT ! But, all device today are in a way bad for health... What I don't understand is that these "health" device don't propose even wire alternative to bluetooth. Who cares of a little cable when he meditate, even more if it's well integrated and designed.
You summarized it beautifuly. I can not believe how stupid and gullible people are and how irresponsible these doctors are. Lack of knowledge is truly alarming. MDs from community colleges.
I was wondering this exact same thing. He used the improper metric to measure the radiation that emits from those devices
It's almost as if all the smart people in the room are like "WTF!!!" I was thinking the same thing. Using uT instead of V/m and W/m^2? Hahahahaha. 😆 This UA-camr is losing credibility in my book.
I was planning to buy focuscalm, but I had concerns about the radiation from bluetooth, just on my brain. I don't own a bluetooth headset or a smartwatch. So I connected my phone to my tablet via bluetooth to check with my emf-meter device. It shows magnetic, electric and radio frequencies. When doing connection(pairing) and when sending/receiving a file the radio frequency went ridiculously high on my tablet (I was pretending the tablet be the focuscalm). Magnetic and electric parameters were stable. And when nothing is sent or received RF was low. As a result I quit buying the focuscalm, because it would be sending info by bluetooth to the phone (app) constantly, and on my forehead. I assume the radio frequency would be going high like that, as a nature of bluetooth connection. I don't want to buy to try. I wish they made the connection via cable. I hope some inventers read this and make some devices without bluetooth.
Woah... youre fishy..... the Muse 2 uses bluetooth to transfer data to your phone... how is it possible you didnt get any EMF ..? did you test it while the device was off...
...because he used the magnetic sensor and not the RF sensor? Makes me think this guy doesn't know what he's talking about... 😆
You're not using the right setting for picking up emf frequencies dude you're measuring magnetic fields
Those are mice, not rats :)
Ah yes. Alas, my stock footage site didn't have good rat videos.
I had a hunch about this also. Glad to hear someone else also saw it. 😀
Radiation from devices is not a concern for humankind, obviously. If you are concerned about human extinction, just take a look at global warming. That’s where the attention should be if you are concerned with the future generations ( which everyone should be ). Great vid nonetheless!
Thanks Valentin, I fully agree!
You've been lied to about climate change 😂😂
Weird. Radiation is only not a concern because the FCC has power limits. It ABSOLUTELY would be a concern if there were no power limits. Nobody ever said there wasn't a level of RF radiation that wasn't harmful.
"This is a device that measures EMF" 😆 Why are you using it on the microtesla scale? "I like to talk about microtesla"... What about V/m or better yet, mw/m^w?
So nothing man made is safe. Surprise surprise....
How does that equate to nothing man made being safe? Really curious
@@Dancky2 stop mansplaining to me
@@simplyemily8251 I'm not, I'm asking you to elaborate your point, out of genuine curiosity. Though it's rather moot now.
Certain amount of risk in almost everything we do. Thanks for the comment
You might as well have said: "So safe is a relative concept with moving goal posts".