HBO’s Crazy, Not Insane: Alex Gibney and Dr. Dorothy Otnow Lewis Talk with Clive Stafford Smith
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 лис 2020
- Your support helps us continue creating online content for our community. Donate now: www.92Y.org/Donate
Join Academy Award-winner Alex Gibney and psychiatrist Dr. Dorothy Otnow Lewis in conversation with London-based human rights attorney Clive Stafford Smith about Gibney’s new documentary, Crazy, Not Insane-a provocative exploration of Lewis’ long career studying the psychology of murder. Gibney’s deft portrait of Lewis and her work expertly looks beyond the cold facts of crime and into the hearts and minds of killers themselves-including Arthur Shawcross, Ted Bundy, Mark David Chapman, and more. Clive Stafford Smith has represented over 400 death row inmates in legal cases in the US and around the world, and is the founder of Reprieve, a charity focusing on the direct representation of prisoners facing the death penalty. The conversation will focus on the making of the documentary, Lewis’ groundbreaking research, and why her testimony often played a part in criminal convictions and sentencing. The film will be available on HBO and to stream on HBO Max on November 18.
Subscribe for more videos like this: bit.ly/1GpwawV
Facebook: / 92ndstreety
Instagram: / 92ndstreety
Twitter: / 92y
Tumblr: / 92y
Archives: www.92y.org/archives - Розваги
I just watched Dorothy testify for a cold-blooded sane murderer. She called Gannon the victim THAT BOY and wouldn't say his name while she testified with empathy for the murderer. She couldn't answer any questions and was completely unethical in interviewing the murderer. She had her son and the murderer's lawyer in the room with her while giving the murderer an evaluation. She was leading the murderer during the evaluation so she could say the murderer was insane. It's pretty scary this is what's going on in our mental health system. These are the people we are supposed to trust with our lives. The system is a joke.
I watched it too, so sad. No way Laticia is insane.
Me too! You are spot on!
Agree 💯 i just posted some about her here as well
I agree she was cross-talking to LS lawyer and to see her son in the room, I shook my head!! How did the jail allow this or the lawyers?? Totally unprofessional, yet she helped the prosecution 100% and the defense looked absolutely foolish. Mr Cook laughing with LS and this doc referring to Gannon as the body, the boy and it has brought so much disgrace to the case. The judge is great!!
This documentary has parts in it that are almost exact transcripts of what she said in trial. Ridiculous
She was an absolute disgrace today and yesterday. She never gave any solid reasoning for saying that LS was legally insane when she murdered Gannon. She was very articulate in all of her fluffy answers, but would not commit to anything to the questions that actually mattered. It made her seem like she knew nothing about the case at all, like she didn't do her homework, she was very disorganized, came late and sometimes HOURS late, every single time she was to be at court. I hope to god she will never be an expert witness ever again. Please retire.
I agree.. i posted a comment just now basically saying this same thing. She needs to retire.
Her son was busted smoking pot in the courthouse hallways... maybe that is why she is always late.. her stoned son is always stoned.
Oh and word on the street is Letecia has decided NOT to testify.
It was a disgrace this doctor was deemed an expert and yet had no respect for this poor little Gannon and referred to him as the boy, the body, and it. She was not prepared for the stand and she was all over the place and had no respect for the court or case. When she acted confused as to seeing her son in the video with LS that did me in or any shred of respect I was trying to have for her just as a person. Seeing this video and then her on the stand her mind has gone done hill 100%. IMO
I agree late 3 times. Phone on and rang in court. Not answering questions judge actually shouted at her. I was very disappointed . I thought she was going to be a great witness.
Not true at all. She’s not easy to follow, but she’s legitimate.
@@Jenn_80 That is a harsh accusation. It being her son in the stairways. Where did you get that from?
But I agree with, dr Lewis should have never done this case. Her whole legacy gone. Big mistake.
People haven't seen the documentary 'Crazy, but not insane'. Just saw an old lady babbling on the stand. I felt embarrasment, while I admire her work and devotion from the past. She was an icon/pioneer for the difference between chair and life. But Colorado doesn't have DP any more since March 23th 2020.
Letecia's 2 lawyers are having a 'vacation' whole trial. And evidence is obvious, that Letecia killed Gannon. Because being in Florida and suitcase found in Florida.
Otherwise, she could have gone away with it.
Dorothy should have never given her opinion, without EEG/MRI, talking with Letecia's mom, aunt, sisters, about the past.
Lady retired and wanted to shine once more and a 'puzzle'. Doing what she loved most. And she messed up, big time. Nobody told her, it not being a good idea.
How can you give an opinion, only on 14 hours talking within 3 days?
Letecia deserves life, because Gannon is also gone.
But her 2 lawyers do also lack, explaining why and how. Nobody on the defense list. Only a dr. Niederhausen. Whom Letecia visited 2 times, Dec 5th and Dec 13th 2019. For apparently Hydroxyzine and a letter to quit a job/break contract for anxiety. And 6 weeks later, Gannon dead.
It stays just unbelievable, that click in people's head, how you can lose it like that. That rage. Extreme rage.
Dr. Lewis's work is "defunct" and her role in Gannon Stauch's murder case is an act of desperation. As an expert witness she was paid well. However (like her client) lacks respect for the court and behaves as if legal procedure does not apply to her. The elder doctor was duped by her client and the prosecution already mutilated her expert report. Dr. Lewis's actions in the case are so deplorable and she lost all credibility.
Why would she throw her career away over LS? She’s 80! Retired! Use your critical thinking skills and wait until her testimony is done 😆😆
She was also being badgered by the prosecution attorney it was so sad to watch. He is a bully who knows if you make the witness nervous it's hard to think straight.
@@melanysmith3023 Are you serious? He was doing his job .. and his job is to not let LS get away with her BS claim of insanity. All this lady was concerned about was getting paid to say LS is not guilty by reason of insanity, with no back ground research on LS, no brain scans, no previous hospitalizations... But she did what she was paid to SAY. The prosecution called her out on her BS..
@@Stacy_SJA It's not her intention to throw her career because in her mind she believes she is right. Publishing a mainstream book is NOT the same as publishing for a medical journal where factual and quantitative data is required and findings are subject to peer review. If you understood the difference, you may agree that she is a fraud.
I've done my own research on Dr. Lewis so I don't need to wait until she is finished testifying to realize she is illegitimate. I resent that she is using her MD to defraud the judicial system. Justice for Gannon is at stake here.
@@melanysmith3023 Sadder to watch is jury believing Dr. Lewis's flawed findings. Dr. Lewis's only role in this case is to assist Letecia "winning" an easy out for brutally murdering an innocent Gannon Stauch.
Dr. Lewis has an incredible resume and she was a pioneer but as I watched the Colorado vs. Letecia Stauch case today it's clear (at least to me) it's time for her to stop testifying for the defense saying high profile murders have DID.
I can't believe what we witnessed today. Totally blown away! 🙏💙
Agreed... Not a stellar witness in her latter years... A lot of people said they felt sorry for her, I did not feel sorry for her, one of the things she was coherent about was her getting paid, didn't really know by who but she knew she was getting paid by claiming LS has DID.. nothing to back it up, no background research and also couldn't even get her a** to the courtroom on time, wasting peoples time.. all in all giving LS grounds for appeal... So no I don't feel sorry for her, I'm embarrassed for her... Time to retire Dorothy..
She was the worst expert witness I've ever heard and I heard a lot during my career in the legal field along with a long history of watching live trials on YT.
It was torture listening to her pedantic ramblings and 3 to 4 “uh”s every sentence in the LIEticia Stauch trial! Absolute torture.
Yes, agreed. I did not complete my doctorate nor my PhyD. However a few hours of interviewing Leticia and NOT getting to speak with her immediate family and friends is NOT NEARLY enough time to accurately diagnose her with ANYTHING let alone with D.I.D. ! It was as if she just took Leticia at her word and didn't at all entertain the idea that Leticia was malingering or fanning. Even IF Leticia legitimately has Bipolar disorder or hysteronic disorder or any other personality disorder doesn't mean she was "psychotic" during the murder. Her testimony went against almost everything we learn in university for psychology.
After watching this woman on the stand in the Leticia Stauch trial, I have no respect for her...
Same here. She did not do enough research on her case.
Ditto! Disgraceful, disrespectful, inappropriate, unprofessional, and imho some unethical behavior!
Same!!! Especially when she made the statement that Gannon maybe provoked Lie-tecia to kill him! She’s such a narcissist
Respect has to be earned and this quack earned none with her convoluted testimony.
@@Yahpah Yes, THAT!! she needs to be sentenced for all her lies and BS on the stand, and her punishment needs to be 5 yrs in solitary with T-BAG...
Watching this after Dorothy gave initial evidence at Letitia Stauch trial totally doubt her work. Diagnosing without researching talking to family and all those closest who
have information on Letitia supposed multiple personalities including her daughter because the attorneys said you can't interview them. This trial shows how nieve she is in chasing her glory for A place in psychiatric academic history. That's interesting re Russian connection when she says Letecia started talking in Russian. She's got lots of words that mean nothing when she sells her soul for money and keeping her questionable research alive. Loves to reference her daughter to back up her statements/beliefs in her now dubious research says a lot.
Dr. Lewis could have talked to family members, friends, etc.
She didn't for a very muddled reason which left me unable to figure out why she didn't. She did have access to the interviews of her daughter, etc. She had so little knowledge or memory of the case, I suspect her son read all the documents and provided her with a summary. He certainly sat in on her evaluation of the defendant and was typing up notes! It was on the video, although she tried to claim under oath not recognizing her OWN SON!!!
Shes an absolute nutcase.!
Please go and watch her all testimony about Gannon Stauch. She should loose all credibility about DID or being doctor. She isn’t credible - who give her that power should lose credibility also
She started off on the wrong foot with me by being late and continuing to be late in the morning, at every break, and after every lunch hour and a half!
I had a career (retired) in the legal field and cannot compute late to court as less than disrespect!
She then was caught out by the prosecutor lying under oath, and I could go on and on and on...until she was left with ZERO credibility, imho! We had 8,000+ people on a channel watching the trial and maybe 1 or 2 felt sorry for her, and the rest of us were on the same page re her lack of credibility!
@Savannah Gary don't forget her son was busted smoking weed in the courthouse hallways and made the courtroom reek of weed.
That is probably why she is late, her stoned son is always stoned and is her driver 😂
She was a cringy embarrassment and only ensured that Morteecia is found sane and will get a life sentence thanks to this clueless quack. 🤣🤣
@@Jenn_80 how do you know it was her son?
@@Jenn_80 she probably has lived in a state of contact high for too many years
I really hope @dr.lewis reads this! The way you talked about "the boy" and never said his name definitely means you have depersonalized the person or victim in this case. It is my opinion that you yourself might have those urges to kill and maybe offset it by making this up on a case by case. 3 kids raised in the same household will not only have a mindset different of what happend but will take different paths. Leticia chose to kill period. 40 years old this is not her first murder she thought she could manipulate the system to do it again after her ex husband and that's only 1 that we know of.
In my opinion, I also believe she has fantasies about killing people. She was getting high telling those stories like it was a drug for her.
There were 4 of us abused, only 1 took a path of destruction. We the girls overcame and walk in a good path set before us, we daily cultivate God's spirit that help us daily to overcome our fleshly desires. We may have fell several times, lie, gossip, slander, drink to much, but that's what the righteous do, they fall many times, trying to do good to our neighbors, the wicked stay down and stay defeated and refuse to get up and learn and cultivate what is good.
I pray for my brother, he is been in prison for a long time, for killing a man, greed and coventness took over him. He is in for life. Just like him, I pray for many that have received mercy, and to recognize it and turn their life around and keep cultivating God's spirit as a way of life, while they spend their life locked in a prison owned by the state and must do as they say.
@@lisamounts6555 You touched my soul with your words, thank you. I will say a prayer for your brother and your family. I understand just because a loved one commits a crime you still love them dearly.
Dr. Lewis was one of my supervisors during my residency at Bellevue. She could obtain incredible information from patients at Bellevue without leading them. She taught me how to learn about a person's trauma and how they dealt with it and how they did not deal with it. I remember her interviewing a case that several psychiatrists thought may have dissociative identity disorder. We eagerly watched as she respectfully and impartially interviewed the person. Within 20 minutes, she looked at all of us in the room and the individual she was interviewing and said "you do not have dissociative identity disorder' and explained in plain terms the multiple reasons why. The person being interviewed let cried deeply in 'relief' that she did not have this diagnosis; yes she had a history of trauma, somewhat substantial trauma; had post traumatic stress; etc but not dissociative identity disorder. For what it's worth, as I listened, I agreed with Dr. Lewis. One of the main traits in her personality is that she has no preconceived opinion of a person or their condition prior to interviewing them. This is fundamental and is a prerequisite to being a good psychiatrist. You get much deeper and further in an interview without any bias, and if you have ever seen a psychiatrist of therapist, you know it is very easy to see and feel the interviewer's bias 'coming at you.' If that happens, either ask them about it to see if your hunch is true, or please go to a different doctor or psychologist. Some doctors enjoy being high profile experts in their field; the attention, admiration, etc. Dr. Lewis did her own thing, was a quiet and respectful person, and did not want fame or attention at Bellevue. She interviewed many more famous individuals and other killers that she does not talk about unless specifically questioned. There is a wealth of information stored in her experience that she earned. She also was one of several doctors that could show me how experienced she was by hearing a short case presentation and a couple of my questions on 'where should I go from here?" and suggest 3 or 4 open ended questions that would clearly (and sometimes shockingly) reveal a person's true nature, both good and sometimes horrific. When a person talks to you one on one on a certain level you will get goose-bumps/tingles all the way down your spine in a way no movie could ever achieve. You can dislike her or like her, but just be aware that she has an unprecedented ability to connect with individuals on a level that is rarely achieved in their entire life(the good, bad, and horrific at times). Her opinions are the collective summary of years of interviews that go very deep into a person's trauma, how they think, how they reason, etc. Most people don't ever communicate on this level with anyone, let alone sociopaths. I am glad she was one of about 20 supervisors of mine at Bellevue/NYU. She also taught me cognitive behavioral therapy along with others there.
As an expert witness, she is a disgrace. Unprepared, didn't know definition of insanity in state she testified. Couldn't state basic details of the case. Lied about knowing her son was in the room for her interview with the defendant. Rambled on about nonsense. Lied about her notes being available. Was late multiple times. Her cell phone went off. She is a damn SNL skit.
Well she either went senile between your time with her and the Stauch trial or you were duped, buddy.
Dr Lewis -> making excuses for vile, evil, low life murderers for decades. Her latest venture into teaching a child murderer how to behave to further her claims of DID has been disgusting.
Dorothy Lewis is full of BS.
Shutter to think what was done in that Newtown Connecticut Mental Hospital where she was employed for years.
Dr Lewis needs a psych Eval. She is cuckoo for cocoa pops.
I’ve always found it really interesting that we can disregard a person that has been tortured as a child, do little to offer the help and support they need and then shocked when they do outrageous things. Then ignore what drove the person there and prosecute them instead 🤷🏽♀️
I think it's because of the historical disdain for human nature which the powers that be have for us all - they've long used our human blueprint to use and abuse us - but after that consider us totally dispensible whereby life has zero sanctity.
or loudly and performatively condemn the abuse of children but look at them as unexplainably evil once they grow up and become offenders themselves.
ua-cam.com/video/TEqft2jmLQw/v-deo.html
The problem is, how do we know when the abuse is even happening from the outside I grew up in what was considered a really great, "close" neighborhood where the families had lots kids close in age and we all grew up together. There was emotional and physical abuse in 4 out of 5 of the families on out culdesac. Also child sexual abuse was occurring in at least one of those households as well. I realized when I found out about the sexual abuse of my friend that THAT was wrong, but had yet to realize that the emotional and physical abuse occurring within my own home was not normal. It is horrifying and yet fascinating, but sadly what happens behind closed doors rarely sees the light of day. Sadly.
Yes and it's even more crazy that we can't say this without being judged or someone saying " how on earth can you try and defend an abuser "
Letecia Stauch trial brought me here.
Same.
Same!
Same
Same
Same. Not impressed here either!
Am I the only person who hated the dynamic of this interview….. they hardly let dr. Dorothy speak and when they finally did she was constantly interrupted. It honestly felt more like the two interviewers were having a separated discussion and Dorothy was listening politely
Absolutely. It was embarrassing and annoying to watch this.
I was here to listen to her, yet the English lawyer just kept interrupting her. He is very full of himself. I will just look up videos that she narrates.
I completely agree with you he was bullying her and the judge allowed if
Trust me, you don't want her to speak. Watch her testimony today and tell me if you feel the same way
Well, she’s a narcissistic, lying, quack.
After seeing her testify for leticia stauch... I'd question everything this woman ever did.
Your dog didny feel GUILT
He was afraid of punishment
What a group of bizarre people
Fascinating documentary. I keep wondering what became of "max"
Oh man...
This interwiewer flies all over the place. He comes across as a very needy person. I kept wanting to hear the end-thoughts of those he was interacting wth but it was not to be because he seems unable to allow people to finish their thoughts. He brings things back to himself constantly... Hard listening to this discussion...
ua-cam.com/video/pZ5h3V-QXMU/v-deo.html
He was hospitalized soon thereafter and subsequently died. She did get to see him and reconcile with him.
A scientist needs to be fully informed with OBJECTIVE information to formulate a true diagnosis.
With her work for the Leticia Stouch defense she had the preconceived opinion that LS has DID, improperly interviewed her with her (Dorothy) son in the room and discussed her interviewing with the lawyer. She never once interviewed anyone that has lived with LS and knows her well She failed!!!
With psychiatrist like her no wonder the mental health system is such a mess.
These 3 seem to enjoy their own voices and think too highly of who they think they are.
Mr. Stafford is a brilliant lecturer, but not as good an interviewer... too often he doesn't let his colleagues finish their sentences....a pity.
Thank you! This bothered me so much.
His comments and jibes grated me! What an idiot
He really should use the two ears one mouth rule
The British lawyer doesn't understand things like Internal Family Systems and D.I.D. etc
Afy3r her performance at Gannon Stauchs murder, this woman should be ashamed of herself...
This was such a great documentary and it was the very first time that I have come across anything where Bundy doesn’t say his family was normal or great when he was growing up. He admitted to his grandfather having a horrific temper. He got so scared one time that he tried to run away. I truly think he experienced some kind of trauma as a child. It’s just sad no matter how you look at this case.
Maybe if he would have had a good upbringing in his earliest years it’s possible that he might not would ever have killed anyone. So many women and children died and because of that we should be digging deeper on why he turned out the way he did.
Psychosis
So even though Dorothy is in a documentary that draws a very clear distinction between “Crazy” but “Not Insane”, shes throwing her reputation out the window by trying to claim Letecia Stauch IS Crazy and Insane.
I really don’t get why some therapists (psychologists, psychiatrists, psychotherapists) want to just invite ridicule and tarnish their reputation
I plan on listening closely to Dr Lewis’ testimony during the Stauch trial, but I’ve listened closely to the States forensic mental health examiners & I know the evidence so well I have a very hard time understanding how Lewis is going to defend Stauch and her ridiculous self diagnosis.
Also, why was Dr Lewis allowed to be communicating w Letecia Stauch and writing something down that the videotape could not capture while she was interviewing Stauch.
Very shady behavior on the part of Lewis imo
cateellington4801...I watched Dr. Lewis both yesterday and today. Her behavior was unbelievable, unethical (imho), unprofessional, unprepared (she knew next to nothing about the case which led many of us to suspect her son read and summarized all the docs), rambling, and she got caught out by the prosecution lying under oath! It was torture to listen to her twist words, excuse, rationalize, and deflect both days.
She had the defense attorney, investigator, and HER SON sit in on her interviews of the defendant! Then tried to claim she didn't know who that person was leaving the room until forced to admit it was her son...then her convoluted reason got her admonished by the prosecution and that may have been one of the times also by the Judge! She was late to court every day, after breaks, and after lunch! That got her 2+ admonishments by the Judge...which she ignored. She also claimed food poisoning as to being late. It's also suspect how she lost notes so they couldn't be turned over to the prosecution, then "found" them when the Judge had said she couldn't testify about docs the prosecution hadn't received.
I could go on...!!!
The scary thing to me is her reputation may impress the jury enough to believe her. Of course, audio was off during the questions of the jury (infuriating to 8,000+ of us listening on a stream) which we don't know if on purpose or not.
Imho, she destroyed her reputation by testifying in this trial! She was NOT credible, in the opinion of all 8,000+ of us watching/listening!
Please watch and comment...I'd be interested in your take on her testimony!💜
@@savannahgary6351you said it well enough for the thoughts of many of us.
@@cateellington4081 She must need that $350/hr very desperately.....Why do educated idiots think common sense thinkers can't see through their wordvomitbullsh*t...I've watched several videos starring this "doctor"....She never met a killer that she couldn't come up with an excuse for....Where I come from,murdering an innocent boy,and tossing him over a bridge across the country is inexcusable..I only wish Leticia was charged in Fla where they give people like her what they deserve.Shame on you "doctor"
Dr. Yeager is one of my favorite Doctors I’ve ever worked with. Great doctor and even greater person.
So y'all are saying a child that was beaten so badly they lost consciousness, had to drink through a straw for six weeks due to a fist to the jaw/cheek, and multiple other instances of a#use, including SA by a paedophile for years, several a#usive adult relationships, SA as an adult, several more head injuries, now in their late 60's and has NEVER murd#red a single person could become a serial ki#ler or a ki#ler? The most I've done is kill some flies, ants, and some other bugs in the house if couldn't get the bug out of the house.
I'm not a believer in the death penalty, except for in certain and specific cases, and I'm definitely a believer in accountability and punishment by prison for criminal behavior.
Absolutely!!!
Doctor. I have DID that I know of, and a good therepist who helps but has no medical training for DID. Is there any trained individuals within the KC, Topeka, Wichita, Tulsa to Springfield MO area that you know of? I do not murder, but I have come close. I am not afraid I would. I just wish to know us all. Thanks you
Does HBO let you use their videos with out copywriter clams?
Pathetic and Shameful Performance in Court
We will never fully understand what the mind is capable of doing, Trauma creates many doors, Many won't understand and many will.
An interesting watch.
The original documentary states its 2 hours, this is 1, so is half missing here?
People are sentenced to death not because they are crazy but because they have systemically planned and executed their dids for whatever reason, specially when you talk of serial-killers. If it would be better to lock them forever is maybe the real question here.
Yes. I.e. evil
Loved the cross examination in gannon stauch trial. Its clear you did zero preparation and cannot remember what you had for breakfast. Lying inder oath was the best part, though.
Well, the crazy train’s pulling outta the station! All aboard! 🚂
Dorothy Lewis says she is fascinated by "how can there be such different functioning within the same brain?".
It's a good question, but an even better question is: “how can there NOT be different functioning within the same brain?!” because the brain (mind) is a partially-connected network of neurons (beliefs), not a self-consistent collection of theorems deduced from a single set of axioms.
Her family goes ballistic if even mentioned. But Debbie gave him her number? I think he had run out of funds he was due in Standford on the 24th this was approximately June 5th 1967, I was twelve years 9 months. Debbie a friend was 12 years seven months. Why not just tell it?
Should have never testified on behalf of Letecua Stauch. RUINED your reputation. I’m glad I’m not the only one on here to recognize that. I think you need to truly apologize to Gannon’s family. You recognizing her as DID is an insult to those who truly suffer from that.
Let Dr. Dorothy speak!!!
No, please don't, she's a trainwreck.
Are you kidding all she has done is speak in circles, she never answers a question with a yes or no, she has to go.off on a tangent and I believe it's because she has no valid points.
Absolutely appalling biassed, and faulty reasoning. I work with DID she is way off the mark and seemed intent on diagnosing Letecia Stauch. Theoretical malpractice.
I wish americans would see norwegian jails and treatement of prisoners. And see the data about violent crimes and murder. Prisons are made to reform,and they do! With much better methods then inhumane treatement and death penalty.
To Dr. Otnow Lewis.... your work is ground breaking and what you do in the field of criminal behaviour is to be reevered and studied even more. You are an amazing doctor with a great insight of human pscihy. Changing things for the better.
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!
@@richardzellers ?
ua-cam.com/video/TEqft2jmLQw/v-deo.html
Eww the Norwegian injustice system disgusts me. Rewarding child rapists and murderers with five star hotels and free mental health. I would take flawed mob justice consisting of catfishing and murdering pedophiles any day.
Why is Dr. Lewis giggling and laughing in her interviews about hideous acts committed by these criminals.
Maybe that’s a coping mechanism . I served on a grand jury and heard some awful cases of childhood sexual abuse. The forensic child interviewers testify on behalf of the child victims in these cases. The ones who testified acted exactly like that, narrating a horrific incident with a giant grin on her face and even chuckles here and there. Needless to say we were all puzzled and creeped out
@@sarat8577 Maybe, but it would be strange to be her subject if this is her "go to" coping mechanism.
She giggles because she is a crazy crackpot like her subject Morteecia. It's why they got along so well.
I guess so many of us returned here, or maybe came over for the first time, to speak about the disturbing disregard for the court that we saw at the trial.
Dr Lewis seems like a sweet but creepy old auntie who would believe anything you say to her and any excuse you give.
Without even talking about poor little Gannon as if her was a real human being who didn’t deserve to be tortured but obviously was - it was as if Dr Lewis just wanted to advocate for Letecia under any and all circumstances.
I’m sure we all agree that LS has a broken brain - but we can’t fix it and she knew what she did because she worked so hard to cover it up and get rid of any evidence of what she had done.
She talked in circles in the same ways that LS does - it’s as if she loves being interviewed and in the spotlight. She’s an expert and can see things no one else can.
When she was confronted with the email that she sent withdrawing the request for the MRI and EEG, she really tried to talk that back until the judge finally had enough.
She thinks very highly of herself and yet didn’t really do any of the expert witness testimony correctly according to court procedure.
I’m a little surprised the judge allowed as much of this as he did.
Even the defense lawyers were trying to make her stop talking.
I think her son took out his cell phone and called her while she was up there on the stand.
It was like watching a sad, macabre circus.
She even said denigrating things about Gannon’s father and called him an awful man.
No one has ever said he was an awful man. Even his ex wife, mother of Gannon, never has called him an awful man.
Many, if not most, psychiatrists in the world today are not here to help make the world a better place. They don’t help take responsibility for the health of their patients, they medicate them and send them on their way.
Most mass murderers are on the same meds.
I would hardly call her sweet. She came off as a pompous jerk.
A man who fought in Vietnam when on returning to America had to see a psychiatrist as he struggled to live with the guilty that he enjoyed killing maiming and torturing. This was an ordinary person. I know that hurting people for some men is a sexual turn on. I am not that soldier, I heard it from a rugby player who said that when you go down in the scrum you try to hurt the man in front of you and it is a turn on.
There's an amazing book called " ordinary men"
Hm, turned this off after "dont you ever wonder why you dont murder?"🤦
Love her
She swallow every hook
Who is Max?
please add Turkish subtitles
Where in the law does it say we give the Death Penalty when we know a person is insane?
Isn’t it the exact opposite? In that we do not put to death those found to be insane?
A defense strategy of saying you’re “Not guilty due to insanity”, or “Guilty but, insane” does not equate to making it a fact the defendant is insane.
Im against the Death Penalty. But forensic psychologists and defendants & their lawyers insisting someone is insane becs there’s a paid defense expert willing to peddle the defense strategy is not something I can get behind. Even as someone opposed to the DP.
Exactly what she just did in the murder trial of a 9 year old little boy killed by Leticia Stauch. This good deceivers, I mean Dr's career is over. She's a quack.
There will be NO HUMILIATION when we look up the validity of the famous story of the adult eress woman, one that is the GO TO STORY pointed to, as the most beautiful of teachings of Jesus, and we realise that it is remo ved from modern translations because the story was A CONFIRMED INTER POL ATION, a froidd, AND NOT IN THE EARLY MANUSCRIPTS. Even though this story, is a big part of our faith, which we use to show Jesus was all love 🤦. We will not care. ( I mean the story itself contra bicted our beliefs, because we belive Jesus is si nless, and so should have st0n 3d the woman, but he didn't, meaning he was also a s1nner! But stop it. We don't use our brains and question nonsense. We says it's a mystery and blindly accept it)
So what if church and Paul teach DIRECTLY OPPOSITE TO WHAT JESUS TAUGHT.
So what if Jesus refers to himself as a prophet, and is called by all those close to him! We will change the meanings of words to remain upon falsehood. GOD is now also a prophet because Jesus bought a message, and multiple ano nee mous authors 4 centuries after Jesus told us Jesus is God ( in gospel of John), and so God can also be a prophet.
( again, don't bother pointing out that if Jesus was indeed God, then that means he was D3C3IV ING THE PEOPLE, letting them believe he was a prophet when he was actually their God!, because we won't care)
most of us haven't heard verses like john seven teen .3, 2wenty.7teen, unambiguous clear cut, not open to interpretation statements that clearly d35 troy our whole existence, because church pastors like to keep them quiet.
So what if most of the statements we depend on, are metaphorical, and clearly refuted by verses from Jesus, so what if Jesus saying he is " Alpha and omega" is removed from modern translations because its yet another fraudlent insertion. Rev1.eleven
john 5ive sev7 is one of our most famous frwdulent insertions, the trinity formula, johanine coma, it is also removed from all modern translations, because it is yet anothwer froid. Even though, all the inter pol ations, fraud and mi15 stranslations seem to be around who God is, and who Jesus is, alarm bells wont go off ringing.
We will instead, insist the bible isn't kurpted. We will get angry with the Qur'an and Muslims for daring for suggesting it.
Even though God says He doesn't accept human s4c rifice, we will insist Jesus the man, d13d for us. We know God is immortal, so we will reconcile by creating a second dimension of Jesus, where he is 100% man and 100% God, so we have a loophole.
When muslims tell us God is immortal, and so Jesus can't be God, we will be able to say "his human nature d1 3d".... and if the Muslims say that God hay 8s uman s4c rifice, we can say "He was God in flesh" and it was a divine s4c ri fice!
We appreciate when Jesus was asked the all important question about what was required for salvation, he didnt say believe i will dy for your sins, no, Jesus said to keep the commandments, most importantly that OUR lord God is one,...HOWEVER, we prefer the story paul and church taught us, this is much better for us as we don't have to s4c ri fice anymore, we just belive Jesus paid for our sins, and be sorry and bingo!
And as you have seen so far, we aren't very s1n seer, so we see no in just iss when an innocent pays for the s1ns of the guilty, or when children inherit s1ns for krymez that had nothing to do with them. Even though this goes against all the previous messages and teachings, and original s1n is only found in pauls work and the last gospel John, we will accept this 3 vil concept.
Again, we don't care that in Eze kiel 8teen .2wenty God tells us he hay 8s ORIGINAL S1N, BECAUSE HE IS JUST, and that we can be saved through repentance, not just forgiven, God says He will forget the sin through his mercy, WITHOUT BLuD. ( WE COMPELTELY IGNORE THIS BECAUSE IT IS ISLAM ) ....also we can point to our false pro pet paul, who said we can do away with the old covenant. ( even though Jesus said that not one JOT shouldn't be kept until heaven and earth disappear ) they don't call us paul followers for nothing.
We will insist Jesus is the only begotten son of God, even though David is called begotten of God by God in the Bible. And we will say that the title 'son of man' is a divine title ( don't remind us eze keel is called son of man more times than Jesus )
We will claim Jesus was a willing s4k rifice even though Jesus begs, and cries all day to be saved from the cruc fiction. Jesus 'will' was to be saved, but he said he would accept whatever was God's will.
We believe God DID NOT ANSWER Jesus prayers, and our God was stripped n4k3d, bee ten whyppd and kil d by men against his wishes.
Even though all the disciples deserted Jesus, and there were no historical eyewitness, we will argue there are ( we only have jos ephus, who wasn't an eyewitness, and reported on rumours )
We will point to eye zayya 53, where Jesus meets absolutely NONE of the criteria, and ignore salm 9one where Jesus is mentioned by name, and says not even a bruise or cut would come to Jesus as God will send angels to protect him and raise him up
We will ignore the letters of ignacious which writ to challenge the popular belief that the crucifixion of Jesus was an illusion. This proves in the 1st century, people were unsure if Jesus was crucified.
We will insist a plural godhead of 3 fully God's is PURE MONOTHEISM. even we know its absurd, but if we keep insisting, we can be at peace with it.
Our bible attributes much bad and f17th to Jesus that we wish it didn't, but we are good at spinning and miss represen tation of text, so we will twist our way out of it.
Although we believe Jesus is God and always was, we will run whenever people respond to our critique of Islam, by showing 10x worse stuff our God Jesus commanded in the o.t.
And for any of the bad stuff they show us from the n.t., we just say Jesus was teaching a parable 😉 always works 💪
We will continue spreading l13s about Islam, because it is the biggest thret to xtianity, many of our pristes, celebs, and in particular, our woman, are leaving paul anity for Islam by the fastest rate. The conversion rates are the highest, and most ree verts to Islam are white xtian woman!
But, as malcolm once said, the media can make the innocent the gylty and the gylty the innocent, and the sion media is on our side, look at how easily we made the world believe they did nine wane wan, look how we lyde about sad damn, ga daf, luted them countries and now we are helping the sionist juws carry out a g3n 0cide on the nay tivs. ( we don't care the ones we help LITERALLY belive our God Jesus is boil ing in x crement and sea men)...
You backed the wrong horse here Gibney,
What a disappointment in the trial. It was so embarrassing. Please retire!!
This lady lost ALL credibility with her disastrous testimony in the Gannon Stauch case. It was disgusting and clear she was being paid to say what she said
the interviewer is rude and will not stop interrupting.
All her credibility out the window after the Gannon Stauch case.
This is crazy to me that people actually think this way . I could not murder anyone . Even is self defense that would be the only reason I would do that 1 but but I’m not even sure then that I could .
She sounds just like the old lady as Rose in the Titanic.
I don’t get this guy he asks, “if they’re so insane why the death penalty?” How about to keep society at large safe from having someone so dangerously insane from ever taking anyone’s life again? Maybe the death penalty isn’t a deterrent, but it will certainly deter the person receiving it from ever killing again. I am interested in this subject matter because I want to understand what makes a person able to kill and or torture another and how society may be able to intervene to prevent those circumstance, possibly recognize if someone is a danger and aid in identifying and capturing these killers. To investigate them for they’re own sake as an excuse to the death penalty is ridiculous.
Because the death penalty is moronic and the money wasted on it would be better spent on improving policing and community programs that actually do deter crime.
@Christine Mills I’m so sorry about your friend. I also had a friend murdered so I understand that type of grief and anger. I’m so sorry you had to go through that. 🙏🏻
The studies say there are higher murder statistics in states with the death penalty, it doesn't work. We have to seek alternatives. Prevention is better than cure.
The risks these guys take in the name of compassion. Check out california and their insane desire to give second chances to murderers. Spend more money on victims not criminals
this all starts in childhood.
I was looking forward to the remote possibility of something important being explored. Massive disappointment! Instead I was treated to a Liberal Circle Jerk pointless and a clear waste of time.
Dr. Dorothy Lewis, needs to retire she clearly has dementia she is bias on such an incredible level she was so disrespectful to the family members of the victim/ deceased Gannon stauch, repeatedly referring to him as " that boy" instead of referring to him in a respectful manner saying his name, Gannon stauch which clearly not only shows blatant disrespect and disregard for a deceased child who was brutally murdered. That was extremely unprofessional by the doctor and shows tremendous bias on her part as well as a complete lack of empathy. This woman/doctor it's completely off of her rocker totally incompetent. Sure at one time she might have Ben the right person in might have known exactly what she was talking about, but those times have past. She is long gone and is not coming back. This was hey absolutely brutal testimony. This doctor might want to be evaluated herself
I would so like to meet Dr.Lewis. I am studying Psychology with Developmental Disorders. We are discovering more and more about brain damage and psychopathic traits.
She's a fraud
I thought it absurd they brought up Trump and Juliani in a conversation about serial killers and psychopathic behavior. It was interesting Dr. Smith needed to take notes, because she would forget to make a point, later. She needed to take notes when she watched the videos of her examining Leticia Stauch during her testimony. So she has documented memory problems. She appeared to have difficulty responding to questions during both the examination and cross.
This is a horrible interview LOL
You are correct ... they cut her off almost everytime!
Serial witness!!
Debbie's mom was troubled bipolar manic depressive with EST electric shock divorcing a commander at NASA Debbie didn't talk then because she said Well get in big trouble we hitchhiked and he displayed a gun
Dr D =Yada Yada
She should have never been on the stand of GANNON.... Thats all I need to say!!
She helped the prosecution. That was the upside.
I’m not sure if this woman has Alzheimer’s or dementia or is just off but it’s time for her to retire. After watching her in the Leticia Stauch trial I have absolutely no respect for this woman. She may have at one time had some sense but obviously she is no longer able to decipher when an offender is pretending to be crazy to get off. It was obvious to everyone but this woman.
Im not sure if in letecias trial if she really is that narcissistic and condescending or just simply old
Dr. Lewis was looking for another subject to get back in the limelight. Sure she wants to be LS treating physician and make another documentary about it due to how famous this horrid case is. Her testimony testimony and diagnosis was disgusting.
30:08 ow, condescending
Ted bundy dad was his own grandfather.
not according to dna
Dot its time to retire for good. BTW greezy T is guilty AF
Dr lewis appears to have her own agenda
I can’t wait, til she realizes is ☝🏻IN FACT ONLY A DOCTOR ALTER of someone with DID. I suspect and she herself hints, that she projects and has interest in this because it’s what’s inside HER.
… and thanks for uploading this.
Has anyone ever tested HER mental issues? Definitely narcissistic, does a lot of gaslighting, lying, blames everyone else and seems to be losing a grip on reality for sure.
Complete denial of the spiritual component of all of this. The brain issues can be a measurement of the impact of spiritual “things” going on. This is not to say that frontal lobe damage and other brain injuries don’t make the human body more susceptible to being open to such crimes.
Your biased and out of left field comments on Guliani makes your work, which has basis, come across weaker to those just touching this topic.
THIS WOMAN IS A GENIUS......I REALLY BELIEVE HER WHEN SHE SAYS THAT WE HAVE NOT COME ANY FURTHER FROM THE DARK AGES WHEN THEY WOULD BURN WITCHES AND PEOPLE STOOD ON THE CORNER AND CHEERED.....I AWAYS GET THE FEELING PEOPLE GET FAR MORE EXCITED BY MURDERS RATHER THAN GETTING TO THE ROOT TO PREVENT THE MURDERS FROM HAPPENING TO SOMEONE ELSE AGAIN
Clearly you haven't seen her testify yesterday and today
She clearly has you under her spell.
I wouldn’t trust this woman to diagnose a houseplant with dehydration. She’s a quack.
This comment didn't age well.
@@jjets8775 😂😂💀
So many naive people.
Wdym
@@doggo7514watch her testimony in Gannon Stauch trial. She will say whatever you need for a buck. But she has dementia so don't expect it to go well.