Damn right AB. All very well her saying "we got it wrong". DC Bills needs to now take accountability for her actions. Hopefully she will when she answers a civil case.
The more I watch this video, the worse it gets , they could barely string a coherent sentence together between them . I think the four of them are beyond retraining and frankly I doubt they could be trusted with traffic duties . Keep up the fantastic work you're doing AB 😎
AB should have filmed through the front enters door when he came outside the police station so we can see what it looks like in the police station and to see the police officers inside the police station.
A Detective? She couldn’t detect her own arsehole. AB tied her up in knots. She didn’t like it and pulled out the I’ve got a bigger gang than you card. Doesn’t know the law. Has no credibility and wings arrests accordingly. She is an utter disgrace to all decent cops, retired and serving.
She and all of them there who thought they did not need any real legislation to arrest a free man engaged in a lawful activity and had no clue what they were doing but feeding their own ego's SHOULD be charged for their abuse to this auditor under the colour of law. They committed a criminal act and should pay for it with prison. They are all a disgrace to our country.
What a disgrace. Basically they will arrest you if you don’t do as they say. Shocking. You’re doing a great job, thank you for sharing this video. I appreciate you 😊
They just make it up as they go along,do not really know the law just hope you get frustrated and say something or do something that they canthen use to hold you.
From moment one of your interaction you could see who the aggressor was going to be. It’s written on their faces, utter contempt for members of the public and a complete lack of regard for the rights their unlawful actions will ignore.
this comment caught my attention. A simple oneliner and yet, it basically captures the whole policing problem in the UK. This is truly disgusting and sad.
This is the worst one yet. They didn't even bother try and abuse a specific power they just abused their entire position. Disgraceful and should be subject to immediate disciplinary action. Hold them to account AB
The police (brotherhood) law is the gift that keeps on giving. “I’ll simply arrest you, no problem” - main problem here when can’t state law, section or articulate a crime. “I’m giving you enough” “You don’t need to challenge me”…just on a relentless mission or shall I call it power trip to obtain details “as simple as that”… “because I work in the building”. Alarm and distress?! I don’t think the police acting lawful under capacity of their duties can use section 5 of the public order act 1986 on themselves, please correct me if I’m wrong.
These guys haven't got the first clue. All the gear, no idea. Police have have recruited some lemons here. Were I that cop: "Filming eh? I knew we should have washed the cars this morning. Ah well, have a nice day sir"
Only sacked? That is a bad example to set. So if I keel someone, I just lose my job? If I kidnapsomeone I just lose my job? Or if a judge imprisons an innocent person for many years, should just get sacked? No. No. No. They have with force, taken the highest authority over us. If they as much as harm a hair on an innocent person there is close to death penalty - cause of their position.
@@anderslarsen4024 You are correct. Given they committed false imprisonment and assault (Section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988) they should be arrested and charged just as anyone else would. The Police are no immune from prosecution for breaking the laws that they take an oath to uphold.
"Policing Law" Ahh, thanks for clearing that up for us, detective. How these officers passed their GCSE's, let alone the intricate structure of sections of law for their exams in the force is something I can't fathom. They think we're all stupid. They think if they throw threats around like "you're detained under the terrorism act" then we'll fall over ourselves in fear. If a cop can't explicitly describe the particular law under which they're claiming you may have breached, they really need to hand in their badges and go work at McDonald's or something.
Some years ago someone thought to lower the Education Standards for Police Force would encourage more recruits,but we have recently seen the evidence that it actually recruited lots of Thugs & Imbeciles into the Force which we can see on youtube videos,idiots who quote laws that do not exist in order to harrass people and thugs who go out in order to incite violence at peaceful rallies,some of which have seen police brutality and pepperspray being used on innocent bystanders as seen by the recent Tommy Robinson court case where Bodycam Footage going accidentally missing afterr having Tommy banned fromentering london for the past 4-5 months just to cause inconvenience to Tommy and his Family at great cost too.
According to police these days you cannot take pics/film public buildings,fly your Countries Flag,stand with your hands in your pockets or wear a face covering on cold days,where do they find these imbeciles?.
@@tafawarw In fact she made it worse because she said AB was being arrested for not giving his name. That's only applicable under s50 or when driving a car.
As part of your settlement agreement you must demand a public statement and acknowledgment that the DC and officers did not know what they were doing. And used the terrorism act unlawfully.
i 100% agree with this. you MUST demand a public apology. we do NOT employ Police officer to arrest someone for "acting suspiciously". that is the most retarded reason ever. oftentimes i can not understand how can you keep so calm when presented with this made up nonsense. because i wouldn't. couldn't. those cops you film make me want to scream on my monitor. these are the people charged with upholding the law. pathetic..
Doesn’t she realise that stating she doesn’t believe you’re a terrorist and then arresting you under terrorism law is stupid and unlawful? This is the easiest claim you’ll ever make. Half baked officers making half baked apologies for abusing the law is not something the public wants to pay for. This is a simple abuse of the law. If the police want to maintain a shred of public trust, sack these idiots. We pay these clowns and then taxpayers also foot the bill for the claims made against them. It’s time for this to stop.
He was detained under S101 of the Terrorism Act: Asking too many questions while wearing brown skin. She will be sued under $$$,$$$ of the AB gets a new car act.
And here we have the perfect example of why auditing is a thing. Audits are precisely to identify this abhorrently poor policing… from a DC of all people?? Everything about her conduct was wrong; pathetically poor knowledge of the law, a condescending and patronising demeanour throughout, and an inability to listen. At no point would her ego allow her ears and brain to work alongside each other. Surely she has to wonder what’s going on when the ‘suspect’ knows more about the law than she does. I hope this one ends up in court, as that officer needs to learn some painful lessons if she is going to improve as an officer.
@@kevinjukes8515 It's absolute panic stations at West Mercia right now. They know this DC has dug them right in it. Expect her to be pensioned off ASAP.
DC knows the laws and knew who he is,from the get go. Pure and utter retaliation against the auditing community of the plods and they absolutely hate the concept. It’s all about putting auditors on notice to mitigate the “auditing Profession”. As push comes to shove , it will only get worse for police as they are ultimately on the losing side.
If she`s a detective, then she should be ashamed of herself for not knowing the law, as for being alarmed and distressed, she should stay in doors then and keep away for any nasty criminals that she might encounter. Oh sorry they seem to be inside with her. Get the claim in AB.
So alarmed and distressed by someone looking through a back gate she followed them for a long distance. How brave. Then went into brain fog because they took a picture of a car. Needs to be relieved of duty because if she encountered someone actually commuting a crime she may go into a catalytic state.
Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 A section 5 offence comprises two elements: A person must (a) use threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or (b) display any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting; and The words or behaviour, or writing, sign of other visible representation must be within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby. Not sure I saw any of that in AB's video really! LOL
@@mikeowen1819 agree Mike,, often misused quoting only the secondary element ,, with using words or behavior ""likely""" to cause ... which is NOT the offence . The offence is ,,,,Causing harassment, alarm & distress ,, BEGINS with ""threat of unlawful violence "" --- without is , there is no offence committed all the best Will
That DC has probably never been challenged before. Expecting AB to be a good boy and do as he's told, or else! An entitled and nasty piece of work that one. She was so angry she could barely talk. Really glad you stood your ground and hope all the officers involved get what they deserve
I hadn't realised before, but at 8:51 when she says "under policing law", the woman stood with her shakes her head and looks at her like she's a Muppet 😂 she knew she was wrong!
When i first watched your videos i thought you needed to get a life and stop harassing the Police. However now im totally behind what you do. You are a legend. Ive literally binge watched all your videos and it really has opened my eyes to the way police officers and security officers behave. Thankyou for making certain officers think before going into attack mode. ❤️❤️❤️
So anyone who wishes to become an auditor or even a photographer needs to get a life? Look up the definition of an auditor, they can keep people in check but as you can see, it doesn't always work. I think you may be far behind (lacking) for the definition and concept of 'work', especially.
This is really alarming. Can't believe how uneducated these police officers are. I think she's taking all the "knowledge" from the detective movies where they just coming in and arresting people as they please. Bloody hell. Hope she gets demoted or fired. She's a disgrace to police force. AB- hope you win a lot of 💰 for this.
AB you are a hero i been watching your videos for a few days now and ive laughed cried and nearly shit myself... you are the true voice of the free world ive seen you saving the kids being respectful to the elderly giving your cash to the needy ive seen so many acts of random kindness from you in these videos it has blown me away... apart from exposing the pathetic people who call themselves police and educating all of us on how to protect ourselves from these tyrants... your videos are a true eye opener... i honestly could not beleive what i have been seeing the complete stupidity and arrogance of the people who are supposed to be protecting us is almost overwhelming ... so many thing i wish to say but you are doing very important work and as i see you are actually making a difference ,,, full respect boooooooooooooooooom......
AB At the sharp end of the transfer from TRAIN SPOTTING to under worked over paid EWOK PLOD WOMBLE for life on the edge kool with a "K" volk with "V"who need blow the nose on a rota system
Take it from a seasoned veteran ex detective - all of these so called 'cops' are a downright embarrassment to British policing. Clueless, entitled, inept, impotent and very very dangerous. People with as little knowledge as them should NEVER be allowed to police our streets. Disgraceful.
This is why real criminals get away with not guiltys at court because they lie and don't know what they are doing these type of police today are frightening and dangerous above the law do as they like not acountable to anybody
Agree completely bud. I too am an ex Police Officer who served for 33 years. I recently used my camera to film from the public car park and street at the rear of Blairgowrie Police Station. It was for a totally different, but lawful , reason not an audit. I was approached by two Police Scotland officers and despite giving them an explanation of why I was filming they prevented me from going about my lawful business, assaulted me ( causing injury ), Illegally detained me and threatened me. All now subject of an official complaint. Absolutely disgusting behaviour and unfortunately the few good Police Officers left out there get tarred with the same brush. They have totally lost contact with the ordinary law abiding members of the public. They do not know how to talk to them and see themselves as better and above the law. Just for info they did not lock me up and simply allowed me to walk of without me giving them my details and them allegedly suspecting me of being a terrorist.
As a reasonably seasoned ex uniformed cop (I never had enough brains to be a detective) from a land far from England I cannot help but agree with you. The two uniforms I would give a bit of slack to as they are obviously young and immature and were caught up in the group mentality/seniority thing. The PC in plains clothes didn't say much at all so that leaves the so called detective (who wasn't at all keen on identifying at first) and I think you've said it all there is to say about her. Is there some sort of selection process to become a detective in England because if there is it failed miserably in her case.
@@robinrodger9566 I'm ex Police Scotland too - I tried to whistleblow after a PPU enquiry was essentially swept under the carpet and it ended up costing me my career.
@@cmb2934 know what you mean bud. They are using public money to defend themselves and will draw things out in the hope that you disappear from either ill health or lack of funds. If you somehow manage to keep going they will then give you a totally false apology and use public money to pay you off and claim to gave learned lessons before continuing to do the same over and over again .
• Refused to advise you which section they were using for the detention • Confirmed that your actions were legal • Confirmed that they didn’t have suspicion that you were a terrorist and yet used the Terrorism Act • Arrested you for not providing your ID when you are not required to under the section used • Remained dismissive and rude throughout They need to be tweeted at non-stop; and anyone who doesn’t like what they saw should submit a complaint via the West Mercia Police site
I believe it was the absolutely appalling conduct of the West Midlands police that forced the government to introduce the Police And Criminal Evidence - PACE- act. It seems it didn't work after all. Still populated by semi literate criminal vermin.
Even after confirming his I.d via another cop via previous interaction. They still wanted to carry on with the worse thing ever. TAKING YOUR FREEDOM! THEY got so used to doing it. They actually think it's legal. They actually think they're aloud. They think they can willy nilly. Without no questions. No eyelids. But oh no. Wait. Thousands of views to our abuse of power position and law. Fabrication and conspiration. Better make a video. No we as the public don't accept it. Because it's the minute by minute norm and standard police procedure
Every time someone comments, if they sent a letter or an email via the police website it would have more impact. It would also show them that people are watching these videos and concerned about the abuse if power or lack if knowledge of their officers.
Their ignorance and arrogance are breathtaking. But more importantly, it is genuinely alarming that they treat the public with so much contempt. And then they wonder why people distrust police so much. Honestly, whenever a police officer or car is around, a lot of people feel intimidated, not feel defended or ‘safe’.
5 Hours of unlawful imprisonment, looks like they will be paying you quite a lot of money, Keep up the great work AB, It's laughable that they don't know the law that they arrested you under.
If it's true that they didn't notify his "notified person", and there wasn't an impeccable reason for that, then it would seem to me that he wasn't even arrested so much as he was *disappeared*. The right not to be held incommunicado is one of the more important ones. I hope he keeps us updated on this.
She was more clueless than those below her! What contempt and arrogance on display here, simply because you’re exercising your completely lawful rights and her ego couldn’t deal with that. Tyrants. And to top it off, she arrests completely unlawfully, given the detention under section 43. Kerching!! Yet more reason for the good work you’re doing AB, keep it up! Thanks!
funny, it's literally the same start to the conversation every time. "why are you filming?" you're doing the community a great service AB, keep up the good work.
I understand why officers get stabbed and killed now, this power trip with the wrong person will land them dead, I don't feel any empathy for cops that get killed any more if they are all acting like this.
She behaves like this on camera to a man who clearly knows more about the law than her. I can only imagine how she treats the average person who has a basic understand of the law!
I honestly feel sorry for her husband who may have to climb on it occasionally to make her feel human. Let's hope he has a nice dolly bird on the side to help him regain his humanity for such a filthy deed!
I'm just happy you managed to get out without being beaten, brutalised and assaulted by them AB . .. Now use the real powers of the law and sue the shite out of them . Stay save and keep up the good work ! 👍
@@ryanfleming6833 more than likely .. " he threw his head at my fist and tried to bite my boots" your honour ! so I no choice but to choke him out to protect my partner sat in the car park .😉
Nobody is required by law to provide the Police with their details unless arrested (Rice v Connelly 1966). In fact, according to RvC1966 a person is not even obliged to talk to the Police at all. And, every court in the land has agreed that refusing to give details when not legally obliged (again, RvC1966) is not reasonable grounds for suspicion that a person has or is about to commit an offence. Even PACE section 24(5)(a) which gives an Officer powers of arrest if they believe the wrong details have been given, is presupposed on PACE section 24(1), 24(2), 24(3) and 24(4) which states that there must already be a presupposition that a person has or is about to commit an offence. The DC acted unlawfully by using a threat of arrest to procure a members of the public's details. The detainment was false imprisonment; which, is a criminal offence. Further, they commit assault under Section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 by making physical contact and cuffing AB. In conclusion, all 4 officers have very kindly provided AB with grounds for a civil case, the consequence of which will be a large compensation payout for AB.
The public are more aware of the poxy laws than these buffoons I cannot comprehend how people defend them when they act like this how are they not clued up on AB and other it cracks me up keep taking them to court mate
Oh dear, how very embarrassing. They struggled to string together a coherent sentence let alone conduct their enquires within the realms of their powers. This has to be one of the worst examples of poor policing captured in film for a very long time.
Stop suing the POLICE CORPORATION (PUBLIC PURSE) and sue them for their PERSONAL PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE and they will never get insured again so they lose their jobs!!!
They do have insurance covered by Police federation (like a union) established in 1919 The Insurance premiums is paid by , yes the taxpayer , but it is your local tax = council tax the costs they occur comes out the insurance but the following year the premiums will go up , so when the cost arise the following year , those higher premiums , your council will increase the council tax for policing funds to pay for those premiums My council tax in 2020 was @ 3.9% ,, 2021 increased to 6.7 % the fire authority get the a raw deal where 2020 @2 % 2021 remained same @2 % but I do agree what you say "personal liability" the only way to that is,, get rid of the Federation all the best ,,,Will
@@TheBILLANDERSON individual constables do not have insurance . The chief Constable pays the damages from the funding of the police . It would be impossible to get insurance because the premiums could never cover the payouts. If a Constable commits a criminal act he could be made to pay you compensation directly if the force dismisses him. The police federation does not hold insurance for constables in cases of misconduct. The chief constable is vicariously responsible for the constables in his force.
When they ask why, you really should say something like "because my 160,000 subscribers enjoy watching the massive overreactions to totally legal actions from police who don't know the law".
Its not a matter of if, but when somebody knocks her out. She can't continue to act like that. People have lawful excuse written in legislation especially when it comes to self defence. Many people would feel severely threatened by her irrational behaviour.
ABSOLUTELY shocking... they literally don't even understand their own job and the laws they are trying to enforce. Ladies and Gentlemen, quit your jobs you power tripping bums!
Wow... the officer who arrested you had no offence. Then the officer who put cuffs on you used illegal force as they had no powers of arrest. Then the custody officers authorised detention although no offence was stated, an offence which the arresting officer did not provide but drummed up by the custody officer. All involved need to be dealt with by their professional standards
All four of them should have been sacked. They acted beyond their powers (Common Purpose training). I would say this constituted malfeasance in public office, since they clearly did not know the law and continued to intimidate you, denying you liberty with the potential to create punishable crimes of which you were clearly not guilty. Personally, I don't think the compensation you received was enough, but it should be paid out of their own pockets or, at the very least, by personal professional insurance policies. A couple of those and they'd be unemployable. As it stands, yet again, the public pays out, so they don't care and will probably continue to do exactly the same to other innocent members of the public.
Oh dear me.... thats a clear breach of law on so many levels. I am ex job (28 years). The problem now is that 60% of police officers have less than 4 years service. A further 20% have less than 2 years service. An experienced skilled Custody Sergeant would have de-arrested you on the spot and taken the arresting officer aside for a quiet chat. It would have ended with a sincere apology and a tour of the police station in my day. I could cry what has happened to the job I loved so much. 😭. My advice is to issue proceedings for wrongful arrest, false inprisonment and common assault and battery. The arresting officer has also likely commited criminal offences by abusing her powers in this manner. 😳 A DC should know that taking pictures in a public place does not constitute an offence and that there must be aggravating circumstances to warrant use of s43 (your conduct and demeanour clearly did not warrant arrest). Refusing to provide details in this instance does not warrant a PACE arrest. I think her senior officers and that of the Custody Sergeant won't be at all happy with the manner you were dealt with. Keeping you locked in a cell for 5 hours is plain wrong onso many levels. It looks to me like these tyrants need a stiff lesson given. Good luck with your County Court form N1. 👍 As for lame timid officers claiming to be harrased alarmed and distressed (POA 1986), that is an affront to most serving police officers in these circumstances. Retired officers (real thief takers) will agree with my opinion here as will many serving officers. Not all are bad officers just a minority but these need taking out the equation pronto. All those officers you had the misfortune to meet that day need to rethink their career path. In my day we joined the job to lock the bad guys up, now the British policing model has changed and many officers think they are revenue collectors and tyrants. The police needs to return to its former policing model which was admired worldwide. Policing by consent isnt what happened here.
@me me : Lack of experience is not a barrier to promotion now. The "graduate entry" program means having a degree overrides everything else. Newbies can do basic training and then go straight into plain clothes work. Gone are the days when newbies had to do uniformed work for a couple of years before becoming a detective.
Where do they get these people from. 🙄. That standard of policing and their defective interpretation of the law is an utter disgrace. What is more concerning is that the Custody Sergeant failed to recognise it was a wrongful arrest on the basis no crime had been disclosed. The police do NOT possess powers to walk up to the general public in a public place without first having reasonable grounds to believe a crime has occured or is being comitted is about to occur (Criminal Law Act 1967). This kind of lame lazy use of s43 and PACE s1 is astonishingly stupid and reckless behaviour by clearly inept officers who should know better. The Police Chiefs Council has published guidelines stating clearly public photography is NOT a crime. I value your claim in excess of £10,000 when you consider you were deprived of your liberty for 5 hours. It was also an assault and battery the moment the cuffs were used. Im sure this willresult in a part 36 offer to settle once the facts are looked at closely.
You'll have to take it to court, kidnapped and held in a cell for 5 hours, what would happen to you if you did that to someone, they have to be held accountable.
Filming anywhere near a police station is immediately presumed as terrorism by most police. They need to ‘get a grip’ and stop using S43 (or the “policing law” 🤣) to arrest members of public on a whim. My blood was boiling watching this but I did calm down once you said you’d won the case. Good work 👏
She is one of the most incompetent I have seen. The others not far behind. They should be disciplined or sacked for this. As you were locked up for 5 hours you should get a lot more this time. Don't accept less than 4k, AB 👍
AB, I think you are wonderful for all the work you do cleaning up the British Police……. If you ever complete this work in Britain……. Could you come to Melbourne Australia, we need a classy person as yourself…… much respect RosieJay 🌹
Wow, the standard of joining the Police has dropped, the woman hadnt a clue what section she was detaining you under, very worrying, disgusting behaviour by all the officers.
It's the same, old, 'you're under arrest because you won't do exactly what I tell you to do, under the, 'terrorism act', that sounds good, but haven't a clue what it's actually for', manoeuvre.
Despite what the official line is they now welcome thuggish unintelligent brutes on the premise that when it kicks off they'll be better able to deal with it
This is the standard they want. I don't know why people still believe it's a mistake that so many officers are like this?! They want immoral robots who obey orders without question. How else can a corrupt government enforce nonsensical immoral legislation if they employ honest, good people?
What awful tyrannical policing. It's hard to believe this happened on a street in the United Kingdom. They all need to be disciplined but you know, they feel they can punish anyone they want to without any accountability at all. Disgusting.
I feel sorry for any innocent person that is forced to sit in those cells for 5 hours. I've dealt with the same treatment myself back in 2008. I was dragged out of bed at 3AM, after the cops kicked the front door open. They interrogated me for hours, gave me vile food, then released me with no way home at the age of 16-17. I was never compensated or charged with anything and lost over a day of my life, sitting in cold cell with those itchy blankets. From that moment onward, I've had no respect for the police.
@@Pulled-Pork i was in those cells in that station in 1989 for 16 hours all because i was talking to a guy i'd lodged with, in the street at 1am. we were "routine" questioned and searched and cuz he had a bunch of old cars keys on him we were both arrested for "going equipped!. i cought scabies in the cell of the filthy infested blankets and saw made a complaint on my release for unlawful arrest, catching parasites etc. i knew very little then about any sort of complaints procedure and was fobbed of with the "1st stage of complaint a chat with the duty sargant". they also gave me an illegal beating in 1980 there, i was in for TWOC and they believed i was withholding information so they got the burly sarg in who was bitch slapping me on and off for 15 minutes. got them nowhere.
The families act the same as the cops. Playing victim and labelling innocent people as the bad guy because their egos don't allow them (or their family members) to be in the wrong
Looks like you have another Civil Action. I won't say i cannot believe they actually arrested you because like i said before as A Criminal Appeals Paralegal i have seen many arrested, detained, taken to court, and in some cases special sittings held with bail refused and the person incarcerated with no evidence of what they would be accused of. Glad you are okay and thank you for all the work you are doing exposing the Misconduct of the Police that happens on a daily bases. God bless and protect you going forward AB
Iron clad win with either a claim filed with the police, they will settle this one fast, or in an actual court. Amazing footage. You captured some textbook police incompetence here and anyone who watches this can clearly see it.
NOT INCOMPETENCE THEY KNOW THEY ARE ABUSING POWERS , LAWS, AND POSITION.....Ego fueled actors acting upon emotion...Dis-respect, harassment, abuse, unlawful detainment, unlawful arrest, hostile intent, deliberate, false accusations, = basically terrorist activity by uniformed and plain clothed law abusers. No evidence of criminal activity. Nothing other than emotional ego. . Not fit for purpose. Which includes all officers involved from the street to the cell.
No grounds to reasonably suspect you of a crime, and an arrest which they admitted was to find out who you are, which is information they didn't have a lawful right to under the circumstances = unlawful arrest and improper exercise of Police powers.
She`s a Muppet. A child would make more sense. Incoherent sentence structure. You would have question how she passed any minimum standards of entry into the police.
Imagine if the police cared as much about actual crimes as they did about getting filmed from public land. I especially love when they get distraught over their patrol cars being filmed. Like a police car is top secret. 😂
This video is a great example of why we should never have a police. But - we use the police now to see who joins the police - they go automatically on the evil people list.
The terrorism threat level in the UK is currently substantial meaning an attack is likely and the fact that these officers don’t know the section or the law is frightening.
Apology not accepted !
fb.watch/axoEDAGeYe/
Your custody sergeant denied me the right to a phone call which caused a lot of stress to my dependant
I'm watching it now AB.
Thats very good, congratulations AB now we want the Kidderminster Redemption with a Christmas song 😂😂😂
Damn right AB. All very well her saying "we got it wrong". DC Bills needs to now take accountability for her actions. Hopefully she will when she answers a civil case.
The more I watch this video, the worse it gets , they could barely string a coherent sentence together between them .
I think the four of them are beyond retraining and frankly I doubt they could be trusted with traffic duties . Keep up the fantastic work you're doing AB 😎
That DC should be fired. She's not handling menopause well.
Ohhh.. that is rough!!!!
😀 lol
@@tafawarw but apt in the circumstances!
You may well have hit the nail on the head. 👍
🤣🤣👍
Absolute tyrants. Let’s get everyone down there filming outside.
My thoughts exactly, let's get that place audited
Let me kn ow the date and time
AB should have filmed through the front enters door when he came outside the police station so we can see what it looks like in the police station and to see the police officers inside the police station.
There not intelligent enough to to be tyrants. They’re just thick. Imagine this lot actually trying to investigate a real crime?
@@timtam6442 Tyrants can be dumb, as shown by the knuckle-dragging amoebas who made up the ranks of the NKVS or the Nazi goon squads.
A Detective? She couldn’t detect her own arsehole. AB tied her up in knots. She didn’t like it and pulled out the I’ve got a bigger gang than you card. Doesn’t know the law. Has no credibility and wings arrests accordingly. She is an utter disgrace to all decent cops, retired and serving.
She and all of them there who thought they did not need any real legislation to arrest a free man engaged in a lawful activity and had no clue what they were doing but feeding their own ego's SHOULD be charged for their abuse to this auditor under the colour of law. They committed a criminal act and should pay for it with prison. They are all a disgrace to our country.
compleatly agree
You owned that Statement to be honest Ste 👍👍👍👍👍
Couldn’t detect her own arsehole 😂😂😂
What a disgrace. Basically they will arrest you if you don’t do as they say. Shocking. You’re doing a great job, thank you for sharing this video. I appreciate you 😊
They just make it up as they go along,do not really know the law just hope you get frustrated and say something or do something that they canthen use to hold you.
From moment one of your interaction you could see who the aggressor was going to be. It’s written on their faces, utter contempt for members of the public and a complete lack of regard for the rights their unlawful actions will ignore.
agreed.... the silly smiling one always has the nastiest attitude...
this one got angry as hell,
The feeling is mutual. Anyone that thinks the FILTH are on our side, are at this point in time... BRAIN DEAD!
Yeah its obvious he's not a terrorist just look at him. Idiot's!
Always attacking innocent people while real criminals run wild looks like police at kiddmister scumbags above the law
"Do you think I am a terrorist?"
She answers "No".
That is the end of their case - there follows £££ for false arrest and detention
That's what I thought as soon as she said it, what a bunch of complete muppets
exactly!!!
Then why am I detained... coz we want your details that we arent entitled to.
She then went to say was using it for name and address. They are lower than the lowest scum
he needs to sue, sue, sue, then go back and do it again, lol
Uuuuuuunder policing law! The incompetence of these cops never fail to amaze me.
😆😂
If only children were as closely protected and guarded as police buildings. Disgusting and so sad.
this comment caught my attention. A simple oneliner and yet, it basically captures the whole policing problem in the UK. This is truly disgusting and sad.
This is the worst one yet. They didn't even bother try and abuse a specific power they just abused their entire position. Disgraceful and should be subject to immediate disciplinary action. Hold them to account AB
Police are the number 1 human rights abuser.
This is going to cost the police some serious $$$.
@@93pargo facts there suppose to help us and protect us instead they attack and abuse us
The police (brotherhood) law is the gift that keeps on giving. “I’ll simply arrest you, no problem” - main problem here when can’t state law, section or articulate a crime. “I’m giving you enough” “You don’t need to challenge me”…just on a relentless mission or shall I call it power trip to obtain details “as simple as that”… “because I work in the building”. Alarm and distress?! I don’t think the police acting lawful under capacity of their duties can use section 5 of the public order act 1986 on themselves, please correct me if I’m wrong.
@@93pargo Look at what the SpyCops got away with!
Those cops should be immediately sacked for abuse of powers.
Prime example of what misconduct in a public office looks like.
These guys haven't got the first clue. All the gear, no idea. Police have have recruited some lemons here.
Were I that cop: "Filming eh? I knew we should have washed the cars this morning. Ah well, have a nice day sir"
Not only sacked, for also arrested for false imprisonment and assault (Section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988).
Only sacked? That is a bad example to set. So if I keel someone, I just lose my job? If I kidnapsomeone I just lose my job? Or if a judge imprisons an innocent person for many years, should just get sacked? No. No. No.
They have with force, taken the highest authority over us. If they as much as harm a hair on an innocent person there is close to death penalty - cause of their position.
@@anderslarsen4024 You are correct. Given they committed false imprisonment and assault (Section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988) they should be arrested and charged just as anyone else would.
The Police are no immune from prosecution for breaking the laws that they take an oath to uphold.
"Policing Law"
Ahh, thanks for clearing that up for us, detective.
How these officers passed their GCSE's, let alone the intricate structure of sections of law for their exams in the force is something I can't fathom.
They think we're all stupid. They think if they throw threats around like "you're detained under the terrorism act" then we'll fall over ourselves in fear.
If a cop can't explicitly describe the particular law under which they're claiming you may have breached, they really need to hand in their badges and go work at McDonald's or something.
Maybe they were functioning better when they took exams.
Some years ago someone thought to lower the Education Standards for Police Force would encourage more recruits,but we have recently seen the evidence that it actually recruited lots of Thugs & Imbeciles into the Force which we can see on youtube videos,idiots who quote laws that do not exist in order to harrass people and thugs who go out in order to incite violence at peaceful rallies,some of which have seen police brutality and pepperspray being used on innocent bystanders as seen by the recent Tommy Robinson court case where Bodycam Footage going accidentally missing afterr having Tommy banned fromentering london for the past 4-5 months just to cause inconvenience to Tommy and his Family at great cost too.
According to police these days you cannot take pics/film public buildings,fly your Countries Flag,stand with your hands in your pockets or wear a face covering on cold days,where do they find these imbeciles?.
Well done AB. You stood your ground against these criminals
Earning the hate everyday.
Much Respect and Support to you AB.
Ha ha not enough for Detaining, Terrorist Act pop up. Well they do have no understanding :) So much Alarm & Distress with Police, should change jobs.
Is you suspecting I am a terrorist? And the policewoman answer NO. At that moment they should just let you go.
And they shot themselves in the foot and opened themselves up to a serious civil case
That's his case right there for false arrest made! No basis to arrest him under Section 43.
@@tafawarw In fact she made it worse because she said AB was being arrested for not giving his name. That's only applicable under s50 or when driving a car.
agreed mu it was definitely contradictory
Boom
That female had me in stitches, powers gone to the head and it's utterly ridiculous how she conducted that entire situation.
As well as botox to her crow claws
"Give us your details or you get arrested under the policing law"...... Wow, this is incredible.
As part of your settlement agreement you must demand a public statement and acknowledgment that the DC and officers did not know what they were doing. And used the terrorism act unlawfully.
i 100% agree with this. you MUST demand a public apology. we do NOT employ Police officer to arrest someone for "acting suspiciously". that is the most retarded reason ever. oftentimes i can not understand how can you keep so calm when presented with this made up nonsense. because i wouldn't. couldn't. those cops you film make me want to scream on my monitor. these are the people charged with upholding the law. pathetic..
If that woman with her 'policing law' is a detective, now I understand why crimes are never solved, she can't even detect her own BS !!
😄😄😄😄😄😆😆😆😆😆🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
What a disgrace.
Apparently they make them detectives as they are no good as being a pc plod ,!
Exactly and she could hardly breathe she was so excited she caught a man with a camera!
She would get it though lol
This is my favourite… under ‘policing law’ 😂
😂😂 the woman next to her was shaking her head like Wdf 😂
Just imagine the antics they get up to when no cameras are about.
Doesn’t she realise that stating she doesn’t believe you’re a terrorist and then arresting you under terrorism law is stupid and unlawful?
This is the easiest claim you’ll ever make.
Half baked officers making half baked apologies for abusing the law is not something the public wants to pay for. This is a simple abuse of the law. If the police want to maintain a shred of public trust, sack these idiots. We pay these clowns and then taxpayers also foot the bill for the claims made against them.
It’s time for this to stop.
He was detained under S101 of the Terrorism Act: Asking too many questions while wearing brown skin.
She will be sued under $$$,$$$ of the AB gets a new car act.
Great point there Pickle! 🍺
@@Black-Circle pickle? 😂😂
I don't know. I make that a least one hour of a solicitor's time. Mostly rolling on the floor laughing their heads off.
yet another £1500 easy money.
And here we have the perfect example of why auditing is a thing. Audits are precisely to identify this abhorrently poor policing… from a DC of all people??
Everything about her conduct was wrong; pathetically poor knowledge of the law, a condescending and patronising demeanour throughout, and an inability to listen. At no point would her ego allow her ears and brain to work alongside each other. Surely she has to wonder what’s going on when the ‘suspect’ knows more about the law than she does. I hope this one ends up in court, as that officer needs to learn some painful lessons if she is going to improve as an officer.
Exactly, well said.
Don't improve her, dismiss her asap she's a danger to the wider public, she's an ego cretin disgusting creater.
@@kevinjukes8515 It's absolute panic stations at West Mercia right now. They know this DC has dug them right in it. Expect her to be pensioned off ASAP.
What a waste of Police time no wonder we can’t get Police come when we need them.
DC knows the laws and knew who he is,from the get go.
Pure and utter retaliation against the auditing community of the plods and they absolutely hate the concept.
It’s all about putting auditors on notice to mitigate the “auditing Profession”.
As push comes to shove , it will only get worse for police as they are ultimately on the losing side.
Women,emotion, and a bit of power = power trip.
I literally had to watch this for the 3rd time,, that woman is seriously frustrated,,,, absolute DRAGON!!!!!
If she`s a detective, then she should be ashamed of herself for not knowing the law, as for being alarmed and distressed, she should stay in doors then and keep away for any nasty criminals that she might encounter. Oh sorry they seem to be inside with her. Get the claim in AB.
So alarmed and distressed by someone looking through a back gate she followed them for a long distance. How brave. Then went into brain fog because they took a picture of a car. Needs to be relieved of duty because if she encountered someone actually commuting a crime she may go into a catalytic state.
Detective? she couldn't find her arse with both hands.
@The reverend I don’t think it has though, and that there is the very problem! Mind you, who would want to?🤷♂️🤣😂😁
Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986
A section 5 offence comprises two elements:
A person must (a) use threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or (b) display any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting; and
The words or behaviour, or writing, sign of other visible representation must be within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.
Not sure I saw any of that in AB's video really! LOL
@@mikeowen1819 agree Mike,, often misused quoting only the secondary element ,, with using words or behavior ""likely""" to cause ... which is NOT the offence .
The offence is ,,,,Causing harassment, alarm & distress ,, BEGINS with ""threat of unlawful violence "" ---
without is , there is no offence committed
all the best Will
That DC has probably never been challenged before. Expecting AB to be a good boy and do as he's told, or else! An entitled and nasty piece of work that one. She was so angry she could barely talk.
Really glad you stood your ground and hope all the officers involved get what they deserve
My sentiments exactly. She behaved like AB owed her an answer.
I noticed she danced a lot, though.
@@Alex-bq3tj agreed. And great name btw 👍🏽
I hadn't realised before, but at 8:51 when she says "under policing law", the woman stood with her shakes her head and looks at her like she's a Muppet 😂 she knew she was wrong!
When i first watched your videos i thought you needed to get a life and stop harassing the Police. However now im totally behind what you do. You are a legend. Ive literally binge watched all your videos and it really has opened my eyes to the way police officers and security officers behave. Thankyou for making certain officers think before going into attack mode. ❤️❤️❤️
So anyone who wishes to become an auditor or even a photographer needs to get a life? Look up the definition of an auditor, they can keep people in check but as you can see, it doesn't always work. I think you may be far behind (lacking) for the definition and concept of 'work', especially.
@@pureChem1calz I think you missed everything past the first sentence there...
EVERBODY TWEET THEM
Done my bit!
How by there name I.e number or station?
@@moe791 screenshot picture of offending officer.
How ?
Kidderminster Police via twitter is your best bet!
Disgusting. Can't believe they're still behaving like this, as if their image isn't bad enough.
One police officer got arrested this week for a 10 year rape quest. Wtf
They don't care. They are too stupid to realise EVERYONE hates them.
@@AndrewFosterSheff69 😃😂😁😅😄😃😂😅😄😃😅😅
@@UKCHEEZ yes the public need protecting from them. He was one of Wayne Couzen's colleagues it seems.
They are dirty elitist tyrants...the REAL sovereign citizens...they just can't help themselves. Their egoes and feelings drive their ill behavior.
This is really alarming. Can't believe how uneducated these police officers are. I think she's taking all the "knowledge" from the detective movies where they just coming in and arresting people as they please. Bloody hell. Hope she gets demoted or fired. She's a disgrace to police force. AB- hope you win a lot of 💰 for this.
AB you are a hero i been watching your videos for a few days now and ive laughed cried and nearly shit myself... you are the true voice of the free world ive seen you saving the kids being respectful to the elderly giving your cash to the needy ive seen so many acts of random kindness from you in these videos it has blown me away... apart from exposing the pathetic people who call themselves police and educating all of us on how to protect ourselves from these tyrants... your videos are a true eye opener... i honestly could not beleive what i have been seeing the complete stupidity and arrogance of the people who are supposed to be protecting us is almost overwhelming ... so many thing i wish to say but you are doing very important work and as i see you are actually making a difference ,,, full respect boooooooooooooooooom......
Well said
AB At the sharp end of the transfer from TRAIN SPOTTING to under worked over paid EWOK PLOD WOMBLE for life on the edge kool with a "K" volk with "V"who need blow the nose on a rota system
This is like the good old days of auditing when the cops just made stuff up as they went along and had no clue what they were doing.
@Mr Happy I've been audited 😲😲
Yeah, it felt like a time warp
Take it from a seasoned veteran ex detective - all of these so called 'cops' are a downright embarrassment to British policing. Clueless, entitled, inept, impotent and very very dangerous. People with as little knowledge as them should NEVER be allowed to police our streets. Disgraceful.
This is why real criminals get away with not guiltys at court because they lie and don't know what they are doing these type of police today are frightening and dangerous above the law do as they like not acountable to anybody
Agree completely bud. I too am an ex Police Officer who served for 33 years. I recently used my camera to film from the public car park and street at the rear of Blairgowrie Police Station. It was for a totally different, but lawful , reason not an audit. I was approached by two Police Scotland officers and despite giving them an explanation of why I was filming they prevented me from going about my lawful business, assaulted me ( causing injury ), Illegally detained me and threatened me. All now subject of an official complaint. Absolutely disgusting behaviour and unfortunately the few good Police Officers left out there get tarred with the same brush. They have totally lost contact with the ordinary law abiding members of the public. They do not know how to talk to them and see themselves as better and above the law. Just for info they did not lock me up and simply allowed me to walk of without me giving them my details and them allegedly suspecting me of being a terrorist.
As a reasonably seasoned ex uniformed cop (I never had enough brains to be a detective) from a land far from England I cannot help but agree with you. The two uniforms I would give a bit of slack to as they are obviously young and immature and were caught up in the group mentality/seniority thing. The PC in plains clothes didn't say much at all so that leaves the so called detective (who wasn't at all keen on identifying at first) and I think you've said it all there is to say about her. Is there some sort of selection process to become a detective in England because if there is it failed miserably in her case.
@@robinrodger9566 I'm ex Police Scotland too - I tried to whistleblow after a PPU enquiry was essentially swept under the carpet and it ended up costing me my career.
@@cmb2934 know what you mean bud. They are using public money to defend themselves and will draw things out in the hope that you disappear from either ill health or lack of funds. If you somehow manage to keep going they will then give you a totally false apology and use public money to pay you off and claim to gave learned lessons before continuing to do the same over and over again .
Under the policing law ahahahhaha I had to rewind n watch that again. Thanks AB made my day sorry you got arrested😭
Under the policing of law😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.... I love you dude.
• Refused to advise you which section they were using for the detention
• Confirmed that your actions were legal
• Confirmed that they didn’t have suspicion that you were a terrorist and yet used the Terrorism Act
• Arrested you for not providing your ID when you are not required to under the section used
• Remained dismissive and rude throughout
They need to be tweeted at non-stop; and anyone who doesn’t like what they saw should submit a complaint via the West Mercia Police site
I believe it was the absolutely appalling conduct of the West Midlands police that forced the government to introduce the Police And Criminal Evidence - PACE- act. It seems it didn't work after all. Still populated by semi literate criminal vermin.
Even after confirming his I.d via another cop via previous interaction. They still wanted to carry on with the worse thing ever.
TAKING YOUR FREEDOM!
THEY got so used to doing it. They actually think it's legal. They actually think they're aloud.
They think they can willy nilly. Without no questions. No eyelids.
But oh no. Wait. Thousands of views to our abuse of power position and law. Fabrication and conspiration. Better make a video.
No we as the public don't accept it. Because it's the minute by minute norm and standard police procedure
Also caused him tremendous alarm and distress by following him. Throw that one in also.
She wanted you arrested from the start, no matter what you said. Blatant abuse of power, well done for not backing down 👍
Every time someone comments, if they sent a letter or an email via the police website it would have more impact. It would also show them that people are watching these videos and concerned about the abuse if power or lack if knowledge of their officers.
Had too much power for too long its gone to her head.
She must be sacked.
She's literally following him with her little friend. Bullies
Sack these design an arrest egos
"Under the Policing law"
Wow, Just WOW!!!!
Their ignorance and arrogance are breathtaking. But more importantly, it is genuinely alarming that they treat the public with so much contempt. And then they wonder why people distrust police so much. Honestly, whenever a police officer or car is around, a lot of people feel intimidated, not feel defended or ‘safe’.
5 Hours of unlawful imprisonment, looks like they will be paying you quite a lot of money, Keep up the great work AB,
It's laughable that they don't know the law that they arrested you under.
Yep, take take the earning from this 17minute video, multiply it until 5 hours, and claim for that as loss of earning as well!
If it's true that they didn't notify his "notified person", and there wasn't an impeccable reason for that, then it would seem to me that he wasn't even arrested so much as he was *disappeared*. The right not to be held incommunicado is one of the more important ones. I hope he keeps us updated on this.
It was under policing law idiot
@@siriusblack6325 Then complain to the government and the police force that abuse their powers. He has the right to compensation.
@@siriusblack6325 Just like the pigs in this old English colony, they pay the insurance company and they pay. Does not cost them anymore.
She was more clueless than those below her! What contempt and arrogance on display here, simply because you’re exercising your completely lawful rights and her ego couldn’t deal with that. Tyrants. And to top it off, she arrests completely unlawfully, given the detention under section 43. Kerching!! Yet more reason for the good work you’re doing AB, keep it up! Thanks!
remember, shes a detective aswell HAHAHAHAHAHA. who the fk promoted that stupid cretin to DETECTIVE HAHAHAHAHAHA
*MISS TYRANT BULLYASS WILL SOON BE BEFORE THE BEAK*
@@romeisfallingagain the quotas box ticking department!
under the anti-terrorism act .. what a joke
@@glenrichmond6260 yep
It’s scary what they got away with before people could record interactions
funny, it's literally the same start to the conversation every time. "why are you filming?"
you're doing the community a great service AB, keep up the good work.
It really is very, very worrying that the people who are supposed to know and uphold the law in this country have no idea of what that law is.
It's the policing law!
@@tomtricker792 😂😂
I understand why officers get stabbed and killed now, this power trip with the wrong person will land them dead, I don't feel any empathy for cops that get killed any more if they are all acting like this.
@@impulse2 they’ve got a bunch of criminals and power trip egos working for them. You know police training is only 6 weeks. Bloody joke
@@tomtricker792 that's the best one yet!!!
She behaves like this on camera to a man who clearly knows more about the law than her. I can only imagine how she treats the average person who has a basic understand of the law!
Her explanation of “which law” was “policing law”.
It doesn’t get worse.
Slam dunk.
A detective constable as well, surely someone who has been promoted to a higher rank would know the law.
I really hope she doesn't have kids. If she does, I feel desperately sorry for them. If she doesn't, then I really hope she never has any.
I honestly feel sorry for her husband who may have to climb on it occasionally to make her feel human.
Let's hope he has a nice dolly bird on the side to help him regain his humanity for such a filthy deed!
This police officer looks familiar in one of your other videos... Your amazing AB, keep up the good work
I'm just happy you managed to get out without being beaten, brutalised and assaulted by them AB . .. Now use the real powers of the law and sue the shite out of them .
Stay save and keep up the good work ! 👍
Thank You🙏🏼
Without the bodycams they probably would of then charged him for assault for hurting their hands and feet.
@@ryanfleming6833 more than likely .. " he threw his head at my fist and tried to bite my boots" your honour ! so I no choice but to choke him out to protect my partner sat in the car park .😉
Sueing them is way better then working for a living.
She seemed to start talking Chinese,a stuttttttttering form of Chinese anyway
Under the "policing law" you have to give your details, its scary how untrained these officers are.
Nobody is required by law to provide the Police with their details unless arrested (Rice v Connelly 1966). In fact, according to RvC1966 a person is not even obliged to talk to the Police at all. And, every court in the land has agreed that refusing to give details when not legally obliged (again, RvC1966) is not reasonable grounds for suspicion that a person has or is about to commit an offence.
Even PACE section 24(5)(a) which gives an Officer powers of arrest if they believe the wrong details have been given, is presupposed on PACE section 24(1), 24(2), 24(3) and 24(4) which states that there must already be a presupposition that a person has or is about to commit an offence.
The DC acted unlawfully by using a threat of arrest to procure a members of the public's details. The detainment was false imprisonment; which, is a criminal offence. Further, they commit assault under Section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 by making physical contact and cuffing AB.
In conclusion, all 4 officers have very kindly provided AB with grounds for a civil case, the consequence of which will be a large compensation payout for AB.
Hahaha literally paused the vid when she said that and come to the comments
@@chidryn7088 😅 makey upy laws
´Untrained´ lol, stupid you mean.
That copette cow was stupid so
were the rest of them.
The public are more aware of the poxy laws than these buffoons I cannot comprehend how people defend them when they act like this how are they not clued up on AB and other it cracks me up keep taking them to court mate
"The kind of ladies you would not look at twice" hilarious 😆
Great job A.B we see your work all the way over here in New Zealand. Keep.up the great work mate
Oh dear, how very embarrassing. They struggled to string together a coherent sentence let alone conduct their enquires within the realms of their powers. This has to be one of the worst examples of poor policing captured in film for a very long time.
Or one of the BEST examples of poor policing.
You can't educate pork! literally
Stop suing the POLICE CORPORATION (PUBLIC PURSE) and sue them for their PERSONAL PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE and they will never get insured again so they lose their jobs!!!
F@@k the Police
The chief constable of their force takes on the liability for all the constables on that force.
They do have insurance covered by Police federation (like a union) established in 1919
The Insurance premiums is paid by , yes the taxpayer , but it is your local tax = council tax
the costs they occur comes out the insurance but the following year the premiums will go up , so when the cost arise the following year , those higher premiums , your council will increase the council tax for policing funds to pay for those premiums
My council tax in 2020 was @ 3.9% ,, 2021 increased to 6.7 %
the fire authority get the a raw deal where 2020 @2 % 2021 remained same @2 %
but I do agree what you say "personal liability" the only way to that is,, get rid of the Federation
all the best ,,,Will
@@TheBILLANDERSON individual constables do not have insurance . The chief Constable pays the damages from the funding of the police . It would be impossible to get insurance because the premiums could never cover the payouts. If a Constable commits a criminal act he could be made to pay you compensation directly if the force dismisses him. The police federation does not hold insurance for constables in cases of misconduct. The chief constable is vicariously responsible for the constables in his force.
@@TheBILLANDERSON never paid CT 😉
I think these police officers slightly resemble a comedy show - Birds Of A Feather 😂
Gotta love that final piece of editing🤣
U nnn, U nnn, U nnn, U nnn, U nnn, Under the policing law.
Comedy fuckin' gold....
'do you suspect me of being a terrorist'
'no, but we are arresting you under the terrorism act'
wow, just wow...what a clown show
When they ask why, you really should say something like "because my 160,000 subscribers enjoy watching the massive overreactions to totally legal actions from police who don't know the law".
They wouldn't get it. Thick as it gets
best channel ever in youtube,so much to learn , AB keep the good work and drive goofy nuttyy coppers forever....love it
If she abused her powers in front of a camera imagine what she would be like without video evidence.
Absolutely 👍
She is probably one of the reasons why a lot of people around Kidderminster hate the Police.
Here here ! Well said I can assure you these people are the Criminals ! From personal experience!
Another - all be it female Wayne Couzines in waiting their.
@@pauledwards2547 There's a disturbing number of Police Officers being arrested for rape/sexual assault/indecent exposure.
She doesn't care if she unlawfully arrest you and takes you to the police station...wow it's like she does this thing on a regular basis
karen of the police
@@myvumvuvumhurts2128 All police are repressed karens
Its not a matter of if, but when somebody knocks her out. She can't continue to act like that. People have lawful excuse written in legislation especially when it comes to self defence. Many people would feel severely threatened by her irrational behaviour.
Maybe she does this all the time...she definitely does this all the time she is definitely single...... if she isn’t poor bloke...
" I have the power!" said the egotistical cop.
“I’m detaining you under the walking in front of the Police station policing law….and don’t challenge me for not knowing what section” embarrassing 😆
AB, great job, carry on doing your thing, top man!
Absolutely disgusting lack of knowledge and using police powers to feed their paranoia and ego .
ABSOLUTELY shocking... they literally don't even understand their own job and the laws they are trying to enforce. Ladies and Gentlemen, quit your jobs you power tripping bums!
Not ladies or gentlemen but a bunch of incompetant clowns that you and all of us are being increasingly be charged more for via our CONtax!!!!
Well said.
Wow... the officer who arrested you had no offence. Then the officer who put cuffs on you used illegal force as they had no powers of arrest.
Then the custody officers authorised detention although no offence was stated, an offence which the arresting officer did not provide but drummed up by the custody officer. All involved need to be dealt with by their professional standards
All four of them should have been sacked. They acted beyond their powers (Common Purpose training). I would say this constituted malfeasance in public office, since they clearly did not know the law and continued to intimidate you, denying you liberty with the potential to create punishable crimes of which you were clearly not guilty. Personally, I don't think the compensation you received was enough, but it should be paid out of their own pockets or, at the very least, by personal professional insurance policies. A couple of those and they'd be unemployable. As it stands, yet again, the public pays out, so they don't care and will probably continue to do exactly the same to other innocent members of the public.
Oh dear me.... thats a clear breach of law on so many levels. I am ex job (28 years). The problem now is that 60% of police officers have less than 4 years service. A further 20% have less than 2 years service. An experienced skilled Custody Sergeant would have de-arrested you on the spot and taken the arresting officer aside for a quiet chat. It would have ended with a sincere apology and a tour of the police station in my day. I could cry what has happened to the job I loved so much. 😭. My advice is to issue proceedings for wrongful arrest, false inprisonment and common assault and battery. The arresting officer has also likely commited criminal offences by abusing her powers in this manner. 😳 A DC should know that taking pictures in a public place does not constitute an offence and that there must be aggravating circumstances to warrant use of s43 (your conduct and demeanour clearly did not warrant arrest). Refusing to provide details in this instance does not warrant a PACE arrest. I think her senior officers and that of the Custody Sergeant won't be at all happy with the manner you were dealt with. Keeping you locked in a cell for 5 hours is plain wrong onso many levels. It looks to me like these tyrants need a stiff lesson given. Good luck with your County Court form N1. 👍 As for lame timid officers claiming to be harrased alarmed and distressed (POA 1986), that is an affront to most serving police officers in these circumstances. Retired officers (real thief takers) will agree with my opinion here as will many serving officers. Not all are bad officers just a minority but these need taking out the equation pronto. All those officers you had the misfortune to meet that day need to rethink their career path. In my day we joined the job to lock the bad guys up, now the British policing model has changed and many officers think they are revenue collectors and tyrants. The police needs to return to its former policing model which was admired worldwide. Policing by consent isnt what happened here.
🙏🏼
@me me :
Lack of experience is not a barrier to promotion now.
The "graduate entry" program means having a degree overrides everything else. Newbies can do basic training and then go straight into plain clothes work.
Gone are the days when newbies had to do uniformed work for a couple of years before becoming a detective.
Great post. Please take them to the cleaners
Great comment
Where do they get these people from. 🙄. That standard of policing and their defective interpretation of the law is an utter disgrace. What is more concerning is that the Custody Sergeant failed to recognise it was a wrongful arrest on the basis no crime had been disclosed. The police do NOT possess powers to walk up to the general public in a public place without first having reasonable grounds to believe a crime has occured or is being comitted is about to occur (Criminal Law Act 1967). This kind of lame lazy use of s43 and PACE s1 is astonishingly stupid and reckless behaviour by clearly inept officers who should know better. The Police Chiefs Council has published guidelines stating clearly public photography is NOT a crime. I value your claim in excess of £10,000 when you consider you were deprived of your liberty for 5 hours. It was also an assault and battery the moment the cuffs were used. Im sure this willresult in a part 36 offer to settle once the facts are looked at closely.
You'll have to take it to court, kidnapped and held in a cell for 5 hours, what would happen to you if you did that to someone, they have to be held accountable.
Keep up your good work the police officers don't know the law half the time
This work actually helps to protect us all
DC looks like the actress from Birds of a Feather 😂🤣Linda Robson
The breathtaking ignorance of a so called detective demonstrates just how broken policing in England has become
Filming anywhere near a police station is immediately presumed as terrorism by most police. They need to ‘get a grip’ and stop using S43 (or the “policing law” 🤣) to arrest members of public on a whim. My blood was boiling watching this but I did calm down once you said you’d won the case. Good work 👏
They just keep on providing the evidence to repeal s43 because they don't know how to use it. S50 should be next.
But abdul who screams kill the west is left alone 😂
I don't think a police station was ever attacked in Britain ever.
That was a previous case he won
@@UKCHEEZ No he isn't, stop posting bigotry.
''We'll just arrest yaa'' lol
please, go to the court. we, as citizen, must have our freedom to walk and film and you are our best representant 😉
Appreciate all you're hard work Bro.
🙏🏼
Here here.
She is one of the most incompetent I have seen. The others not far behind. They should be disciplined or sacked for this.
As you were locked up for 5 hours you should get a lot more this time. Don't accept less than 4k, AB 👍
It doesn't surprise me that the police are so thick.🤣
AB, I think you are wonderful for all the work you do cleaning up the British Police……. If you ever complete this work in Britain……. Could you come to Melbourne Australia, we need a classy person as yourself…… much respect RosieJay 🌹
I hope you sue again AB! These cops are ridiculous.
Wow, the standard of joining the Police has dropped, the woman hadnt a clue what section she was detaining you under, very worrying, disgusting behaviour by all the officers.
It's the same, old, 'you're under arrest because you won't do exactly what I tell you to do, under the, 'terrorism act', that sounds good, but haven't a clue what it's actually for', manoeuvre.
Despite what the official line is they now welcome thuggish unintelligent brutes on the premise that when it kicks off they'll be better able to deal with it
This is the standard they want. I don't know why people still believe it's a mistake that so many officers are like this?! They want immoral robots who obey orders without question. How else can a corrupt government enforce nonsensical immoral legislation if they employ honest, good people?
WTF,,, UNDER THE POLICEING LAW,, What a classic
Ugh ugh ugh ugh under the policing LAW!!!!! 😂😂😂
What awful tyrannical policing. It's hard to believe this happened on a street in the United Kingdom. They all need to be disciplined but you know, they feel they can punish anyone they want to without any accountability at all. Disgusting.
I feel sorry for any innocent person that is forced to sit in those cells for 5 hours. I've dealt with the same treatment myself back in 2008. I was dragged out of bed at 3AM, after the cops kicked the front door open. They interrogated me for hours, gave me vile food, then released me with no way home at the age of 16-17. I was never compensated or charged with anything and lost over a day of my life, sitting in cold cell with those itchy blankets. From that moment onward, I've had no respect for the police.
@@Pulled-Pork i was in those cells in that station in 1989 for 16 hours all because i was talking to a guy i'd lodged with, in the street at 1am. we were "routine" questioned and searched and cuz he had a bunch of old cars keys on him we were both arrested for "going equipped!. i cought scabies in the cell of the filthy infested blankets and saw made a complaint on my release for unlawful arrest, catching parasites etc. i knew very little then about any sort of complaints procedure and was fobbed of with the "1st stage of complaint a chat with the duty sargant". they also gave me an illegal beating in 1980 there, i was in for TWOC and they believed i was withholding information so they got the burly sarg in who was bitch slapping me on and off for 15 minutes. got them nowhere.
Absolutely disgusting. Massive abuse of power I’ll take comfort in their families seeing this video
None of them knew the law and they all need to go to prison
And friends
@@philip9668 You think they have friends? I doubt that!
Yep they must be so proud
The families act the same as the cops. Playing victim and labelling innocent people as the bad guy because their egos don't allow them (or their family members) to be in the wrong
That's how they get you, "We had a report of someone acting suspiciously." That's how they invent a crime to investigate.
She done you there AB. It's under the policing law and that's serious!!!!
...."and which of these actions is illegal?"
Next step for her was unlawful arrest, next step for AB file yet another Police claim.
Unbelievable how thick these pigs are, you couldn't make it up.
Looks like you have another Civil Action. I won't say i cannot believe they actually arrested you because like i said before as A Criminal Appeals Paralegal i have seen many arrested, detained, taken to court, and in some cases special sittings held with bail refused and the person incarcerated with no evidence of what they would be accused of. Glad you are okay and thank you for all the work you are doing exposing the Misconduct of the Police that happens on a daily bases. God bless and protect you going forward AB
They abuse all powers all the time they are simply full of shit
I really hope that all four clowns get sacked for incompetence for the publics safety.
Teaching the Police the law as usual, great work AB 👌👌 Civil claim number 2 to West Mercia police coming up!
Iron clad win with either a claim filed with the police, they will settle this one fast, or in an actual court.
Amazing footage. You captured some textbook police incompetence here and anyone who watches this can clearly see it.
NOT INCOMPETENCE THEY KNOW THEY ARE ABUSING POWERS , LAWS, AND POSITION.....Ego fueled actors acting upon emotion...Dis-respect, harassment, abuse, unlawful detainment, unlawful arrest, hostile intent, deliberate, false accusations, = basically terrorist activity by uniformed and plain clothed law abusers. No evidence of criminal activity. Nothing other than emotional ego. . Not fit for purpose. Which includes all officers involved from the street to the cell.
No grounds to reasonably suspect you of a crime, and an arrest which they admitted was to find out who you are, which is information they didn't have a lawful right to under the circumstances = unlawful arrest and improper exercise of Police powers.
She`s a Muppet. A child would make more sense. Incoherent sentence structure. You would have question how she passed any minimum standards of entry into the police.
Imagine if the police cared as much about actual crimes as they did about getting filmed from public land. I especially love when they get distraught over their patrol cars being filmed. Like a police car is top secret. 😂
AB. 'Under what laws?'
Dc. 'Police laws'
This is a detective, what hope is there from the police.....
This video is a great example of why we should never have a police. But - we use the police now to see who joins the police - they go automatically on the evil people list.
DC is an appropriate label for that witch…..
If this is the standard of policing in England today...... We're all in trouble. Well done AB, you are a star. Keep it up, We're all right behind you.
You mean the UK as a whole
@@idaslpdhr I've always been led to believe it's always been worse in Scotland. Not sure about Wales and Northern Ireland.
Oh yes there's a standard. it is scraping the bottom of the barrel for the dregs i say ..
This is the standard for the area. They will find any reason to arrest or to subdue.
The terrorism threat level in the UK is currently substantial meaning an attack is likely and the fact that these officers don’t know the section or the law is frightening.
Started out like you were being stalked by a stupider version of them out of "Birds of a Feather"