You need to carry a card on you that says "Congratulations! You've just abused Section 43" Their faces would be priceless when they pull that out of your pocket
Trust me as much as they are making us safe they also do alot of bulshit. Guess what I have on my criminal record I have ,15 offenses from criminal damage to wasting police time, I served remand jail for 90+days,just completed 2 years community order and I have to go on trial for a possession of a knife in public even though it was in my shopping and my clothes inside my suitcase whilst homeless.😢
@@romainreigns4639 lol whether he liked it or not, you could film him as long as you were in public. What evidence do you have that he's a nonce? Or did you feel like a big man saying those words from behind a keyboard? What a plonker
@@romainreigns4639 If a good cop, watches a bad cop, infringe on someone's rights or does not pull up another PC when they do something Illegal, then they too become a bad cop.
The women officers are always the most aggressive. She came at you straight away and knew what she was going to do. No answer could have satisfied her to not do a search. She is a disgrace and I hope you pursue this through the courts.
She should be fired as this flagrant abuse of Sec 43 puts every citizen at risk while she is at large. I would not even interact with such a corrupt cop and would demand an honest officer to deal with me if it was necessary. How many times has she abused people under the colour of law either through ignorance, egotism or because she thinks she can do what she likes without even a nod to the law. Her cases should be investigated just in case she has set some innocent person up to gain points. She cannot be trusted by her community, her colleagues who she will get into trouble or by any person she interacts with. Tax payers should not be forced to pay for cops like her.
Don’t think she was panicking. She said a “colleague” observed him filming and asked her to come out. My guess is the “colleague” was one of the fools that manage her so she is doing what the Nazis did by just following orders.
I think she thinks she has a 50 50 chance because she thought he said he's made 4 claims and won two but I think what he actually said was he's won 2 previously and there's 4 ongoing 😂
The frustrating thing is that woman will never understand how thick she is. Even after watching this video and listening to her words she will still not understand. So frustrating!
There was a dumb cop called Maguire Whose arrests were utterly dire 'She'd cry forty-three It's the law you see!' But now she's been warned to retire !
That's not how it works, they just need to show to a judge/superior that their believes were in good faith "justified". That's why the more you talk to the police the weaker your case gets. This is still an unlawful search.
@@TDHurley this statement is nonsensical. What are you talking about. This search is NOT lawful under the terrorism act. Do some research on the terrorism act and searching before commenting.
@@TDHurleyyeah i hear you, they can claim justification alll day long which is circumstantial evidence on paper but both videos, his and hers is hard evidence and shows nothing was justified to detain in the first place.
£3k this time because he gave them fair warning and they still proceeded. And next time it's £4k. And it will keep going up each time a constable abuses s43.
Absolutely totally stupid place for covert cars used in anti terrorism to be parked anyway, any terrorist with even peanuts for brains would use a covert camera to film whilst delivering doughnuts.
very well done once again, extremely well handled. you have my respect. in anticipation of these kinds of things, you should fill your bag and pockets with documentation of the outcomes of previous civil cases where illegal searches were performed and action was brought against the officers.
@@AuditingBritain Hi AB I hope you take further action against these corrupt poilce officers and making a civil claim at the back of Brighton police station keep up the good work and our free time in bringing us these videos
@@AuditingBritain Got yourself a new one now. Well not really new, but I haven't watched any of your videos for a long, long time. I unsub any auditor that doesn't follow up harrassment and unlawful arrests etc.
Strange how police use a terrorism legislation simply cos they’re worried about a perceived security risk. The security risk itself makes no sense - risk that can’t use the undercover cars which can clearly be seen from a public street. If so concerned don’t park them where can be seen in public. Clearly abuse of their powers. If they truly believed you were a terrorist the 4 coppers would have been much closer, would have surrounded you and would have handcuffed you and used force. No way would they stop a suspected terrorist so politely (at least I hope not)
Bunch of pussies, they kick off about a camera but the Manchester Arena bombing happened coz security and police where too cowardly to prevent a real terrorism threat. The CCTV showed the bomber struggling to carry his (oversized) back pack, walked past police officers and was even approached by security but they let him go and blow everyone up but they won't do that to someone with a camera, they kick a big fuss over that. Pathetic people.
She is a monster. She makes up her mind that you have commited an offence & even in the face of contrary evidence she proceeds. As she said herself my "suspicion is" & That's IT! Her tone of voice is so robotic, doesn't matter what you say it's like she's not responding to a human being but a prompter or taking an order in a cafe. She really does not care.
i would love to see more about the outcomes of this and any others you are aloud or willing to say i guess . love your work AB sending love from Western Australia :)
"let me finish, don't interrupt me" Then when it's AB's turn to speak, she interrupted him several times...so not only she abuse her powers but also she expect a respect that she doesn't give back...and she threw her colleague in the path of a civil claim ...nice job.
@@adamphillips5215 I usually prosecuted. Retired now. But UA-cam proves interesting, and still do the occasional case (for free) last year DWP … ten minutes to win £40,000. They were terrible. Fraudulent. Stupid. Easy work.
I bet the Male Officer was GUTTED when she dropped him right in it! What a nightmare to work along side her. it was all "I this, and I that and, I suspect"...etc etc ..until the search then it was "...My male colleague". She never asked him once for his opinion, his input, his thoughts, his beliefs or if indeed he had any grounds to believe... Great TEAMWORK from the Female Officer there. ...... NOT. She is the kind of Officer that gets OTHER people in trouble.
@@patthewoodboy My guess is he is on Probation or on his initial 'Street Duties' course straight out of training and she is his Mentor (a senior PC), hence why she was showing off and wouldn't allow her ego to take a back seat in front of this Junior Officer. She never included him in ANY of the basics of the initial contact and grounds. The male Officer is already picking up these terrible practices from her and sadly, will carry them forward in all of his future public interactions.
the male as guilty as her allowing it to happen when he know it was wrong. And now likely to face sexual assault allegation as well as false imprisonment and common assault battery. Silly boy.
To have your body autonomy and rights violated because of filming the back of a Police Station that does not even have a high wall or physically sectioned off area is absolutely absurd. you handled that very well and it was clearly an abuse of power.
AB you are tonight's new hero for me. I don't know much about the law but I know when my mouth drops open an something feels wrong. I feel a sense of outrage. The learning bit, that's coming bit by bit, and your videos help a lot. I hope you didn't suffer too much indignity at the hands of these fools. Did you sue successfully, may I ask? Did you get an apology? Subbed.
She said at the end (in so many words) that she percieved you to "obviously" be someone recording for reactions, which is totally incriminating because thats the moment she has let it slip that she didn't suspect you to be a terrorist in the first place. She was also very nervous. I don't like it when nervous people have weapons.
Plus she said she was concerned about "privacy" and about unmarked police cars being identified. 3 "grounds" which have absolutely Nothing to do with terrorism.
She was too busy talking to assert herself to permit any time for her brain to operate ... Clearly she had been let off the leash to go and 'deal with' another nuisance auditor and she not only knew it, but also admitted it ! Fail.
@@Jester-Riddle I absolutely agree. She didn't care what he had to say. She was sent to bully a citizen. The speed at which she escalated the encounter showed her original intent. She just blathered on and on with no effort to listen.
You were punished because she didn't like what you were doing, wether it was perfectly legal or not. How many members of the public has she done that to. Disgraceful. She cared less about you complaining as she knows she's untouchable. There's a change coming hopefully.
@@AuditingBritain surely actual covert surveillance would involve vehicles which dont park up at the local police station? they do have facilities elsewhere for their vehicles etc.
@Dreezy514 🔰 He allowed the illegal search because his civil claim then nets him a MINIMUM £1500. It's money for jam. That's why he asked her several times:- "Are you sure?"
So they use "covert cars !" that can be covertly recorded in Police car parks and leaving and arriving, for anti terrorism use? Well that sure is intelligent!
Hey AB... Great stuff... You know when they say "that's fine"? It is because generally dont do follow up civil claims and they know it. Here in North Amarica, the public has started to do just that and the criminals are scattering when exposed to the light of the camera and litigation. Keep up the great audits.
I can't afford to visit your country but would love to. Some of the buildings and streets are so beautiful. I live in a cement of stale cement buildings and horrible cookie cutter track homes.
Exactly...if they were that worried they'd have high walls & maximum security..NOT a barrier anyone can go under or around & these 'so called' under cover vehicles would be put of sight ..obvs ...idiots .total abuse of power
@@aumjohnfisher8181 look up ardmore police station newry, or crossmaglen police station. Police stations in ireland are like military outposts with 15ft high walls and watch towers some of them, probably down to security risk I presume
You are very much like myself in filing complaints and taking matters before the system to show that the pigs will not be allowed to get away with things. I am, laugh, well known to my pig force, and other forces, and banned from police response as my neighbour found out when she called the pigs over my being attacked outside my head, the culprits getting the worst of it and went away blooded and crying.
Making complaints is pointless, the complaints system is broken, even the IOPC says so. The only way to get some sort of action is to make a civil claim.
To be honest they won’t learn any lessons as they already know what law is .it is inconceivable that they don’t know of all the auditors in U.K. are doing it . They are knowingly harassing people with the aim of stopping a perfectly legal activity that they don’t like pretending it’s the law and that likes of you and others get so fed up of harassment you stop . Paying out occasionally compensation , it’s not there money it’s taxpayers. A bit like a parking ticket is to a taxi driver it’s just another expense that some one else pays
Wow, that escalated very fast. I found that really difficult watching when he searched you, im sorry you was put thru that. I salute you for how you remained throughout the search and i truly hope you win your case against them. Thank you for sharing and im sorry you had to go thru that. Take care AB and stay safe 💫🌟💙🌟💫 x
@@johnvienta7622 There's forever if's and but's with the law, circumstances alter cases, your can't case out a joint intending to rob it, you can film but you can't carry out surveillance on places or people.
@@marklittler784 , i believe that there is case law which set a precedent in the UK in regard to filming in public, including filming private property from a public place. My argument would be that the premises of a Police Station are not generally accessible by the public but not private, apart from areas that may be set aside for that purpose, which would be covered by tacit consent. It would be an interesting tactic by an auditor if they said ( when approached by the Police ) that they were lost and seeking help, as that is an acceptable reason for being on premises belonging to another person. As for the surveillance issue, are people who reside over the road from Police Stations restricted as to how long they can stare out the window?
@@paulwhitte It's the public servants that are antagonistic. Search and detain has not improved anything except in the minds of the uneducated and delusional who think communism works for the people!
Section 43 Section 43(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000 gives a police constable the power to stop and search any person they ‘reasonably suspect’ of being a terrorist, in order to determine whether that person has in their possession any object that could ‘constitute evidence’ that they are a terrorist. The officer’s reasonable grounds for suspicion should be based on a two-stage test: The officer must have formed a genuine suspicion in their own mind that they will find the object The suspicion that the object will be found must be reasonable In this case the officers misused Section 43 because the power doesn't give officers to search "in hopes" of finding an "object unknown to them" they must have suspicion of finding SPECIFIC OBJECT to use Section 43
Wow she was something else 😳 LOVES the sound of her own voice LOVES the power . Vile woman . If she puts this much effort into actual crime ( which I doubt ) she may be quite a good officer! It’s all about reputation and PR with the government police and its ‘agencies’ now not actual action just protect their own and their agenda
Years and years of box-ticking recruitment of every inadequate wannabe bully who will use the uniform and badge as a carte blanche licence to abuse the people they are meant to serve. The police all over the UK are now infested with these appalling creeps, and this endemic corruption is quite irreversible.
Her boyfriend is a stuffed cat on her pink bedding. A personality like that she’s likely a very lonely person, I bet any family members haven’t spoken to her in years.
She said she is searching you under the terrorism act, then she says one of the grounds are that her colleagues have the right to a private life as well 😂.
If you want your cars to be covert do not park them at the back of a police station all day every day where terrorists and other criminals can see them. Now having searched him, the same video is being uploaded so nothing has changed regarding covertness of the vehicles.
The public have a right a right to a private life too, but they don't get it. You or your vehicle can't go more than a few metres from your house without being captured on film somewhere! They seem to think they are entitled because they are cops.
Police proving over and over that they cannot be trusted with the powers given to them. She actually thinks she can assume you are guilty, demand you provide evidence that you are not, and if you refuse to provide that evidence, then she has reasonable grounds to detain and search you. Is it because they are thick or do they just think they are untouchable? Both probably.
@@pocolol8424 It does not matter if AB is the BIGGEST BELL END in the UK, its not illegal to be a douche bag. The majority of Police are power tripping low lifes and the women are so aggressive as they have the slightest bit of power.
It's because they think that they are the law and don't realise they only represent the law hence they became officers but used to be constable, their as corrupt untrustworthy as the government corporation
If they're so bothered (EVERY TIME) about their personal vehicles being filmed, should they not have garages or a place to hide them away from public view? Good job AB - keep going!
Just a couple of points; If they have 'TOP SECRET' vehicles they use for covert operation in that parking area, why are they in full public view? If she is concerned about the safety of their rear parking lot, why are they not making a request to the Chief Constable to put in a wall or a fence to protect it? She states just before they carry out the search that it is to satisfy 'HER' suspicion and belief, but the legislation clearly dictates that it needs to be 'objective' and not merely 'subjective'.
Don't know why the auditor mentions the cases he's won to female cop , she's not botherd nothing comes out of her pocket, it's taxpayers that pay for it.
She said, "And when you leave, you can....." She was talking as if she knew that you would be leaving without arrest!! She KNEW they would not find anything!!!
Please take this further, and win once again . The police must be stopped from abusing their powers to harass members of the community carrying out LEGAL activities.
I'm never quite sure how searching someone determines whether they are a terrorist or not. To determine that surely you would have to get into their heads.
I always think they’re looking for loose wires hanging out of two mobile phones taped together, never happens though it’s always a pouch of tobacco and a bus ticket
When WPCs & PCs start paying out of their OWN pocket they will realise the mistakes of their judgements and unlawful detainments Respect to you AB This witch will be presenting herself to Professional Standards if not they should come for her
Everytime you say "I shall be sumbitting a civil claim against you" their response is always "thats absolutely fine". There needs to be more consequences for these tyrants
1. They have illegally searched him 2. They have sexually abused him 3. They have use section 43 of the terrorism act. 4. Haven’t asked to film him 5. They have wrongly asked him for his details These officers need to get a life. He should put in a civil complaint
1: Yes 2: Come on.... 3: Yes 4: They don't need his permission, though they do need to make him aware. Also yes, he should sue for that pathetic search.
@@MrJonny2324 Dude, I want replies on my comment to be kind, respectful and safe. I do not want people judging my comments! Please remove this comment as soon as possible.
COVERT CARS , PARKED IN THE STATION CAR PARK , IN FULL VIEW OF THE PUBLIC . What a ridiculous statement , that wpc saw the windows , and saw it as an opportunity to flex her muscles to her colleagues at the station . A disgrace to the force , her ego and her desire to make a name for herself were the reason for this infringement on your rights .
Yo! AB! I admire the way you cleverly use your wording and know how powerful wording is within a court of law. Your careful dissection of what she was saying, little did she know that you are building up a strong case against them. Big respect to you our freedom fighter and tyrant destroyer, peace and love bro.
"I'm using the Anti Terrorism Act." She says. If he was planning some terrorist activity is it likely that he would risk attracting all this Police attention in broad daylight? The answer is no, he wouldn't.
They can not do such deep logical thinking. They are just territorial bullies. If they do not want their cars seen, build a wall. Anybody can go there and have a look - and film with a hidden camera.
Did they realised their mistakes. If yes then how citizens those who are watching this video know about it ? Please do some follow up videos too ( AB ) my man 💜☮️ I luv ur channel.
The unmarked cars are public vehicles! They get spotted in public as soon as they are used to respond to an emergency. Hardly 'covert' filming, ABUSE of section 43 plain and simple.
The female officer really does talk a lot…expressing her thoughts and conclusions before investigating the situation. She also makes up law as she delivers her speech and continually interrupts to make her points.
@Sir Scofferoff she at no point really thought he was a terrorist nor did her lacky and if the pigs really thought you were a terrorist they would have an armed response team show up if they had any sense at all!
I think them officer's knew exactly who, what and why he was there !! The main concern for the Police is what she was trying to explain that some of her colleagues and unmarked car's are involved in COVERT operations and he is opposing a risk to them by filming with no concidaration for that fact !!. It will not matter how high wall's and fencing is , the police will still be having their cars and faces filmed entering and exiting. If the police are investigating someone for instance spiking people's drinks at a club , they have to put officers undercover and also have to use unmarked car's in other types of investigation to blend in. If they are videoed by someone auditing then that officer and car will be useless to the investigation. Also imagine if you was a police officer and wanted to better your career in this line of policing you wouldn't be able too because of having your face on a UA-cam video for everyone to see . I think the police will win this one again and make it three two , because of the lack of concidaration for covert operations angle that will be argued .
@@originalherdsman3524 So they have "covert" operations running out the back of the police station. Now let's think what could possibly go wrong with that...
6:58 AB: "So basically you think anyone with a camera - you can search them. Witch: "No, filming the back of the police station, yes". So why has the witch not charged Google under the terrorism act? Google have photos of the station, from above and at the back, and the Google Streetview car even went into the car park.
i was what we call ragging in Ipswich many years ago its collecting clothes for charity on the way back home to Kettering when i thought i saw a body on a bridge tied to the railings my mates said you must have been seeing things the next day on the news some poor guy had tied himself to the bridge railings and set fire to himself i will always remember that day
Amazes me how they will question every passerby with a camera but won’t put a solid fence up. If it’s so secure they are that worried spend some tax payers money on a fence. Security risk is so funny, if you were really gathering evidence you would do it covertly to stay longer and get more info. The investigative skills of modern policing.
It shows the incompetence of the police that they can't even pass on the info to all police stations to not approach AB as they always lose and make themselves look like fools. Correction: Act like fools.
![[UA] Team Vitality проти NAVI | IEM Cologne 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wttO1zVRTC0/mqdefault.jpg)
"We have vehicles we need to use on a covert basis" No one knew that they were there untill she told the world
Typical numpty plod!
@@bazsnell3178 Shouldn't be in public view then should they.
@@soaruk3697 Exactly the egotistical morons never fail to enlighten us to their stupidity.
If they wanted a vehicle to be covert, why would they park it outside the very building they want it to have no apparant connection with 😂
Its nonsens
You need to carry a card on you that says "Congratulations! You've just abused Section 43" Their faces would be priceless when they pull that out of your pocket
YES! 😂
😎👍
That would be priceless
😏👍
Good one! 👏🏻🤣
She’s so smug!! It’s unreal. I’m sorry you had to go through this
Her arrogance of her abuse of power is beyond her IQ.
She doesn't have. And I haven't seen her for a while in Ipswich. I think she has been transferred
@@MrSigmundJung
Same, I’m always about town and haven’t seen her in a long time. Shame we haven’t had an update on the vid yet though.
Trust me as much as they are making us safe they also do alot of bulshit. Guess what I have on my criminal record I have ,15 offenses from criminal damage to wasting police time, I served remand jail for 90+days,just completed 2 years community order and I have to go on trial for a possession of a knife in public even though it was in my shopping and my clothes inside my suitcase whilst homeless.😢
Jeez, You need to sue them, DONT let them get away with it ! !.
After the Wayne Cousins debacle filming police private cars is a necessity.
@@romainreigns4639 someone shit in your cornflakes hun
Absolutely, and good on him for showing up the pigs
@@romainreigns4639 lol whether he liked it or not, you could film him as long as you were in public.
What evidence do you have that he's a nonce? Or did you feel like a big man saying those words from behind a keyboard? What a plonker
@@romainreigns4639 If a good cop, watches a bad cop, infringe on someone's rights or does not pull up another PC when they do something Illegal, then they too become a bad cop.
Agreed. Interesting observation that had passed me by.
The women officers are always the most aggressive. She came at you straight away and knew what she was going to do. No answer could have satisfied her to not do a search. She is a disgrace and I hope you pursue this through the courts.
It's a white knight and simp problem. You cut that out. You cut everything out.
Judging by that thumb ring she satisfies others as well. 😄
A witches job
@@barrysims9906 Is that a symbol for something?
@@barrysims9906 How else will she gain promotion?
Keep us updated on the outcome of the civil action mate 👍
Love you work peace ✌️
Harassing someone filming in public while the UK is absolutely full of actual criminals.
She started panicking when he said he’d win cases !! She’s going to regret this . Wow what nasty piece of work
She should be fired as this flagrant abuse of Sec 43 puts every citizen at risk while she is at large. I would not even interact with such a corrupt cop and would demand an honest officer to deal with me if it was necessary. How many times has she abused people under the colour of law either through ignorance, egotism or because she thinks she can do what she likes without even a nod to the law. Her cases should be investigated just in case she has set some innocent person up to gain points. She cannot be trusted by her community, her colleagues who she will get into trouble or by any person she interacts with. Tax payers should not be forced to pay for cops like her.
Don’t think she was panicking. She said a “colleague” observed him filming and asked her to come out. My guess is the “colleague” was one of the fools that manage her so she is doing what the Nazis did by just following orders.
I think she thinks she has a 50 50 chance because she thought he said he's made 4 claims and won two but I think what he actually said was he's won 2 previously and there's 4 ongoing 😂
The frustrating thing is that woman will never understand how thick she is. Even after watching this video and listening to her words she will still not understand. So frustrating!
Dunning Kruger effect. It's well worth googling that one, it sums Ms Maguire up perfectly.
So sad because it’s so true. Sarah was killed by the police yet this stupid bint lives and works for the police. Oh the irony
Ignorance is bliss .. poor deluded girl.
@@studogskoff5034 She is Dunning and Kruger's poster girl.
She is thick.
She obviously hasn’t read the National Police Chief Constables Associations memo. Obviously knows more than those very senior officers.
We the public love this.... keep it up..good work
AB is the underdog who stands up to the school bully…. and knocks him out 👊🏻💥
There was a dumb cop called Maguire
Whose arrests were utterly dire
'She'd cry forty-three
It's the law you see!'
But now she's been warned to retire !
🤣🤣🤣
There’s a copper who acts like a witch ,
In fact she’s a bit of a bitch ,
They abused 43 ,
Violating AB ,
Her career she really should switch.
@@therealdeal9698 haha Quality 👏👏👏
If you go walking down black horse lane,
Watch your back it's a bit of a pain
But if you come across PC MAGUIRE
Know your rights cos he's a liar
@@traceypace92 beautifully put 👌
The belligerence of this female officer is the most shocking thing.
Pair of power crazy Muppets. Well done AB for keeping your cool 👍
Complete abuse of power. No grounds. Her beliefs is not the law.
That's not how it works, they just need to show to a judge/superior that their believes were in good faith "justified". That's why the more you talk to the police the weaker your case gets. This is still an unlawful search.
@@TDHurley this statement is nonsensical. What are you talking about. This search is NOT lawful under the terrorism act. Do some research on the terrorism act and searching before commenting.
@@scottyscotty4558 I said it was unlawful you muppet. learn to read.
@@TDHurleyyeah i hear you, they can claim justification alll day long which is circumstantial evidence on paper but both videos, his and hers is hard evidence and shows nothing was justified to detain in the first place.
Well that's another £1500 compensation.
it should be 15k
£3k this time because he gave them fair warning and they still proceeded. And next time it's £4k. And it will keep going up each time a constable abuses s43.
It should be paid by the CRIMINALS like MaGuire who broke the law. Not the taxpayer.
@@TheSadButMadLad sad tbh... in the USA they get 100ks+.. UK give you fuck all... says it all really.
Yes , another good spend on the homeless !!! AB number one !!!
SHE WENT THERE!!! The old "Section 43" move aka "I am the police, you will obey me" move
Beautiful buildings thanks for showing...love the history
It's scary how casually they abuse their powers!
If there were a genuine fear for security, the back of the police station would be fenced and gated.
Absolutely totally stupid place for covert cars used in anti terrorism to be parked anyway, any terrorist with even peanuts for brains would use a covert camera to film whilst delivering doughnuts.
Suspicious how they place those cars in plain sight and then violate people who see them.
@Sir Scofferoff I think it was a bitch?
very well done once again, extremely well handled. you have my respect.
in anticipation of these kinds of things, you should fill your bag and pockets with documentation of the outcomes of previous civil cases where illegal searches were performed and action was brought against the officers.
She is a joke , he is a little lamb,
Cars cannot be traced online
Sue the shit out of them, then go back again and thank them for the money 😂😂
Kerching
Like he did with the bully boy officer
Absolutely fantastic audit. They were bang out of order.
Of course if you go filming at the back of a police station there going to “ bite” rightly or wrongly
@@tonyjlorns1727 yep.
Her ignorance is shocking
A blatant abuse of Police powers. We must find a way to hold these thugs accountable.
Half a million soon and you're verified now, congrats AB
Thank You🙏🏼
@@AuditingBritain Hi AB I hope you take further action against these corrupt poilce officers and making a civil claim at the back of Brighton police station keep up the good work and our free time in bringing us these videos
@@AuditingBritain Got yourself a new one now. Well not really new, but I haven't watched any of your videos for a long, long time. I unsub any auditor that doesn't follow up harrassment and unlawful arrests etc.
Strange how police use a terrorism legislation simply cos they’re worried about a perceived security risk. The security risk itself makes no sense - risk that can’t use the undercover cars which can clearly be seen from a public street. If so concerned don’t park them where can be seen in public. Clearly abuse of their powers.
If they truly believed you were a terrorist the 4 coppers would have been much closer, would have surrounded you and would have handcuffed you and used force. No way would they stop a suspected terrorist so politely (at least I hope not)
Even if they know who these terrorist's are they let them kill sir David springs to mind! 👍🙏✌️
I totally agree. If someone wanted to do this incognito, a drone would suffice and likely, satellite/Street View images contain the same data.
@@NoName88837 Absolutely
To me they are perverts. What if someone was rapped or something and they put their hands all over them without consent. Fucking disgusting.
Bunch of pussies, they kick off about a camera but the Manchester Arena bombing happened coz security and police where too cowardly to prevent a real terrorism threat. The CCTV showed the bomber struggling to carry his (oversized) back pack, walked past police officers and was even approached by security but they let him go and blow everyone up but they won't do that to someone with a camera, they kick a big fuss over that. Pathetic people.
She is a monster. She makes up her mind that you have commited an offence & even in the face of contrary evidence she proceeds. As she said herself my "suspicion is" & That's IT! Her tone of voice is so robotic, doesn't matter what you say it's like she's not responding to a human being but a prompter or taking an order in a cafe. She really does not care.
i would love to see more about the outcomes of this and any others you are aloud or willing to say i guess . love your work AB sending love from Western Australia :)
"let me finish, don't interrupt me"
Then when it's AB's turn to speak, she interrupted him several times...so not only she abuse her powers but also she expect a respect that she doesn't give back...and she threw her colleague in the path of a civil claim ...nice job.
Well said. That annoyed me too.
she really was the height of ignorance and rudeness
@@michaeldavies9533 If you are a barrister I truly pity your defendants if the above level of literacy is anything to go by.
@@adamphillips5215 ditto - I've just offered a rather more lengthy version of what you said!
@@adamphillips5215 I usually prosecuted. Retired now. But UA-cam proves interesting, and still do the occasional case (for free) last year DWP … ten minutes to win £40,000. They were terrible. Fraudulent. Stupid. Easy work.
I bet the Male Officer was GUTTED when she dropped him right in it! What a nightmare to work along side her. it was all "I this, and I that and, I suspect"...etc etc ..until the search then it was "...My male colleague". She never asked him once for his opinion, his input, his thoughts, his beliefs or if indeed he had any grounds to believe... Great TEAMWORK from the Female Officer there. ...... NOT. She is the kind of Officer that gets OTHER people in trouble.
no way will the male pc be gutted he is to thick
If I was the male officer I would have said .."its all yours , you do the search" or is she the station bike ;-)
@@patthewoodboy My guess is he is on Probation or on his initial 'Street Duties' course straight out of training and she is his Mentor (a senior PC), hence why she was showing off and wouldn't allow her ego to take a back seat in front of this Junior Officer. She never included him in ANY of the basics of the initial contact and grounds. The male Officer is already picking up these terrible practices from her and sadly, will carry them forward in all of his future public interactions.
He's whipped. He is her puppy.
the male as guilty as her allowing it to happen when he know it was wrong. And now likely to face sexual assault allegation as well as false imprisonment and common assault battery. Silly boy.
To have your body autonomy and rights violated because of filming the back of a Police Station that does not even have a high wall or physically sectioned off area is absolutely absurd. you handled that very well and it was clearly an abuse of power.
AB you are tonight's new hero for me. I don't know much about the law but I know when my mouth drops open an something feels wrong. I feel a sense of outrage. The learning bit, that's coming bit by bit, and your videos help a lot. I hope you didn't suffer too much indignity at the hands of these fools. Did you sue successfully, may I ask? Did you get an apology? Subbed.
She said at the end (in so many words) that she percieved you to "obviously" be someone recording for reactions, which is totally incriminating because thats the moment she has let it slip that she didn't suspect you to be a terrorist in the first place. She was also very nervous. I don't like it when nervous people have weapons.
Plus she said she was concerned about "privacy" and about unmarked police cars being identified.
3 "grounds" which have absolutely Nothing to do with terrorism.
She was too busy talking to assert herself to permit any time for her brain to operate ... Clearly she had been let off the leash to go and 'deal with' another nuisance auditor and she not only knew it, but also admitted it ! Fail.
Well noticed. Just authoritarian ego, infused with the corruption that is within that filthy sow.
@@Jester-Riddle I absolutely agree. She didn't care what he had to say. She was sent to bully a citizen. The speed at which she escalated the encounter showed her original intent. She just blathered on and on with no effort to listen.
Does carrying literature make you likely to commit a terrorist attack? God where are we going
Can’t wait for the camera club to visit this station and show every part of it online !
Got be time for a weekly audience,
We all need to go together one day 🤣🤣🤣
Brilliant idea that get the camera club down and about 20 auditors at the same time
The arrogance of the woman copper 👮♀️ unreal,
@@georgeduncan5719 Where do you think she parks her Nimbus2000 ?
You were punished because she didn't like what you were doing, wether it was perfectly legal or not. How many members of the public has she done that to. Disgraceful. She cared less about you complaining as she knows she's untouchable. There's a change coming hopefully.
Those two need to get a room chuckled to myself the same time u did 😂😂
Don't interrupt me, she says and then interrupts him when it's his turn to speak. I've never liked the police.
That’s Policing by consent 🤣
All the policy do that.
It's amazing how searching AB helped secure those vehicles. They almost had to cancel all of their covert operations.
👍
@@AuditingBritain surely actual covert surveillance would involve vehicles which dont park up at the local police station? they do have facilities elsewhere for their vehicles etc.
@Dreezy514 🔰 He allowed the illegal search because his civil claim then nets him a MINIMUM £1500. It's money for jam. That's why he asked her several times:- "Are you sure?"
So they use "covert cars !" that can be covertly recorded in Police car parks and leaving and arriving, for anti terrorism use? Well that sure is intelligent!
What they looking for, poisonous door knobs, Bulgarian umbrellas, radioactive wine ?
Hey AB... Great stuff... You know when they say "that's fine"? It is because generally dont do follow up civil claims and they know it. Here in North Amarica, the public has started to do just that and the criminals are scattering when exposed to the light of the camera and litigation. Keep up the great audits.
I can't afford to visit your country but would love to. Some of the buildings and streets are so beautiful. I live in a cement of stale cement buildings and horrible cookie cutter track homes.
if filming is such a security risk, maybe they should build 10 meter high walls around every police station
Exactly...if they were that worried they'd have high walls & maximum security..NOT a barrier anyone can go under or around & these 'so called' under cover vehicles would be put of sight ..obvs ...idiots .total abuse of power
On their values, they'd rather gouge out the eyes of everyone from birth.
Lol northern ireland theres a reason theres not many auditors in Ireland
@@BiteWise65 I'm curious to know, the reasons.
@@aumjohnfisher8181 look up ardmore police station newry, or crossmaglen police station. Police stations in ireland are like military outposts with 15ft high walls and watch towers some of them, probably down to security risk I presume
Yo AB, keep making the claims and filing complaints against pathetic power abusers until they learn their lessons. Love your work,
🙏🏼
You are very much like myself in filing complaints and taking matters before the system to show that the pigs will not be allowed to get away with things. I am, laugh, well known to my pig force, and other forces, and banned from police response as my neighbour found out when she called the pigs over my being attacked outside my head, the culprits getting the worst of it and went away blooded and crying.
Making complaints is pointless, the complaints system is broken, even the IOPC says so. The only way to get some sort of action is to make a civil claim.
To be honest they won’t learn any lessons as they already know what law is .it is inconceivable that they don’t know of all the auditors in U.K. are doing it . They are knowingly harassing people with the aim of stopping a perfectly legal activity that they don’t like pretending it’s the law and that likes of you and others get so fed up of harassment you stop . Paying out occasionally compensation , it’s not there money it’s taxpayers. A bit like a parking ticket is to a taxi driver it’s just another expense that some one else pays
On another side note : recent high court judgement about bell / camera is harassment and data breach , could this affect you?
Please don’t let this go, take it to the top and as far as you can go through this witch doesn’t do it again
I am not from Britain but I love when AB gets a pay day. Stand up for your rights!
They are so thick. She was on a proper power trip
Wow, that escalated very fast. I found that really difficult watching when he searched you, im sorry you was put thru that. I salute you for how you remained throughout the search and i truly hope you win your case against them. Thank you for sharing and im sorry you had to go thru that. Take care AB and stay safe 💫🌟💙🌟💫 x
Thank You Jen.❤️
@@AuditingBritain Money in my pocket and I just can't no love. Dennis brown. Keep going A.B. 😂😂😂
Let AB speak! Imagine going forward forever know as the "Witch of Ipswich".
Hows the claim on this one going AB?
She openly admits she would search ANYONE with a camera 🙈
She said “My Police Station” as well …she admitted to a lot of things.
Would that include speed camera vehicles and CCTV which film private vehicles every day.
@@johnvienta7622 There's forever if's and but's with the law, circumstances alter cases, your can't case out a joint intending to rob it, you can film but you can't carry out surveillance on places or people.
@@marklittler784 she said she would search everyone
@@marklittler784 , i believe that there is case law which set a precedent in the UK in regard to filming in public, including filming private property from a public place. My argument would be that the premises of a Police Station are not generally accessible by the public but not private, apart from areas that may be set aside for that purpose, which would be covered by tacit consent. It would be an interesting tactic by an auditor if they said ( when approached by the Police ) that they were lost and seeking help, as that is an acceptable reason for being on premises belonging to another person. As for the surveillance issue, are people who reside over the road from Police Stations restricted as to how long they can stare out the window?
This female represents everything that's wrong with our public servants... we don't want her and big changes are coming!
@@SusanRoseArt That's just your twisted perspective but these public servants only have imagined power and it's coming to an end!
@@paulwhitte It's the public servants that are antagonistic. Search and detain has not improved anything except in the minds of the uneducated and delusional who think communism works for the people!
What changes are coming?
@@awraith4569Sadly things will only going to get worse.
One of my favourite YT channels. Hope someone in Ireland takes up this topic.
Section 43
Section 43(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000 gives a police constable the power to stop and search any person they ‘reasonably suspect’ of being a terrorist, in order to determine whether that person has in their possession any object that could ‘constitute evidence’ that they are a terrorist.
The officer’s reasonable grounds for suspicion should be based on a two-stage test:
The officer must have formed a genuine suspicion in their own mind that they will find the object
The suspicion that the object will be found must be reasonable
In this case the officers misused Section 43 because the power doesn't give officers to search "in hopes" of finding an "object unknown to them" they must have suspicion of finding SPECIFIC OBJECT to use Section 43
Wow she was something else 😳 LOVES the sound of her own voice LOVES the power . Vile woman . If she puts this much effort into actual crime ( which I doubt ) she may be quite a good officer! It’s all about reputation and PR with the government police and its ‘agencies’ now not actual action just protect their own and their agenda
👍
*YES IT LOOKED LIKE A HIDEN MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEM YOU CANT HIDE THIS KIND OF ABUSE*
Years and years of box-ticking recruitment of every inadequate wannabe bully who will use the uniform and badge as a carte blanche licence to abuse the people they are meant to serve. The police all over the UK are now infested with these appalling creeps, and this endemic corruption is quite irreversible.
Do you have an update on your claim against the Witch of Ipswich?
Her boyfriend is a stuffed cat on her pink bedding. A personality like that she’s likely a very lonely person, I bet any family members haven’t spoken to her in years.
She said she is searching you under the terrorism act, then she says one of the grounds are that her colleagues have the right to a private life as well 😂.
😂😂😂
If you want your cars to be covert do not park them at the back of a police station all day every day where terrorists and other criminals can see them. Now having searched him, the same video is being uploaded so nothing has changed regarding covertness of the vehicles.
You couldn’t make it up
@@canyouwhenyourdrunk well she made it up. That's the problem
The public have a right a right to a private life too, but they don't get it. You or your vehicle can't go more than a few metres from your house without being captured on film somewhere! They seem to think they are entitled because they are cops.
They know ur not a terrorist, just flexing as always
In the new crackdown, she's one of the first for the chop.
Well done AB. Nice work.
Police proving over and over that they cannot be trusted with the powers given to them. She actually thinks she can assume you are guilty, demand you provide evidence that you are not, and if you refuse to provide that evidence, then she has reasonable grounds to detain and search you. Is it because they are thick or do they just think they are untouchable? Both probably.
@@pocolol8424 It does not matter if AB is the BIGGEST BELL END in the UK, its not illegal to be a douche bag. The majority of Police are power tripping low lifes and the women are so aggressive as they have the slightest bit of power.
Stanford experiment !
It's because they think that they are the law and don't realise they only represent the law hence they became officers but used to be constable, their as corrupt untrustworthy as the government corporation
The only way to stop this is to keep claiming and winning, excellent work AB.
If they're so bothered (EVERY TIME) about their personal vehicles being filmed, should they not have garages or a place to hide them away from public view? Good job AB - keep going!
You can spot an undercover car from a mile away
ABracadabra - AB the auditing wizard and Witch Finder General, casts his spell on the Witch of Ipswich.
Perfect comment.
👍👍👍
Just a couple of points;
If they have 'TOP SECRET' vehicles they use for covert operation in that parking area, why are they in full public view?
If she is concerned about the safety of their rear parking lot, why are they not making a request to the Chief Constable to put in a wall or a fence to protect it?
She states just before they carry out the search that it is to satisfy 'HER' suspicion and belief, but the legislation clearly dictates that it needs to be 'objective' and not merely 'subjective'.
I was thinking the same thing. They have lockups that they use for those kind of undercover cars.She was talking rubbish.
She's 007 mate - just needs a pair of stilts and a brain and she's halfway there...
In the late 90's all the unmarked police cars would park up together down Bramford Rd in Ipswich and I would go past and remember their number plates.
Don't know why the auditor mentions the cases he's won to female cop , she's not botherd nothing comes out of her pocket, it's taxpayers that pay for it.
Parking lot?i think you mean car park.
She said, "And when you leave, you can....."
She was talking as if she knew that you would be leaving without arrest!!
She KNEW they would not find anything!!!
Exactly. She was just trying to put one over on him to satisfy her ego.
Please take this further, and win once again . The police must be stopped from abusing their powers to harass members of the community carrying out LEGAL activities.
I'm never quite sure how searching someone determines whether they are a terrorist or not. To determine that surely you would have to get into their heads.
That has often occurred to me, what do they actually achieve other than inflating their egos ??
@@stevehurrell Harassment and fear: Fear is their currency.
Its if the backpack goes 'Bang' then they'll have ya 🧟♂️🧟♂️🧟♂️✌✌🇬🇧🇬🇧
I always think they’re looking for loose wires hanging out of two mobile phones taped together, never happens though it’s always a pouch of tobacco and a bus ticket
@Chris Oh you mean the ISIS Clubcard? That allows you to get three bombs for the price of two.
lol! love your videos! 😁😂
I never thought I would say this: Defund the police.
Cannot wait for another pass out of the cash video... Hope that WPC is on duty when you turn up with your winnings ! :-)
@@drdave4430 why do you say that ?
"your winnings".... 😂😂 Love this !!!
@@drdave4430 they said that last time. Good luck
When WPCs & PCs start paying out of their OWN pocket they will realise the mistakes of their judgements and unlawful detainments
Respect to you AB
This witch will be presenting herself to Professional Standards if not they should come for her
"Make sure our cars are secure?" Yes that's why you close and lock the doors I guess.
Everytime you say "I shall be sumbitting a civil claim against you" their response is always "thats absolutely fine".
There needs to be more consequences for these tyrants
4:30 AB gave them enough warning. And the witch still carried on. That means it's even worse for them.
1. They have illegally searched him
2. They have sexually abused him
3. They have use section 43 of the terrorism act.
4. Haven’t asked to film him
5. They have wrongly asked him for his details
These officers need to get a life. He should put in a civil complaint
Should get life for misconduct in public office.
they need to be fired thats what is the problem, idiots like this shouldn't be in the police force simple as
1: Yes
2: Come on....
3: Yes
4: They don't need his permission, though they do need to make him aware.
Also yes, he should sue for that pathetic search.
@@EdMcF1 Who should get life, what are you talking about?
@@MrJonny2324 Dude, I want replies on my comment to be kind, respectful and safe. I do not want people judging my comments! Please remove this comment as soon as possible.
Keep up the great work. 👍
A 'chat' is a casual dialogue between consenting individuals. The Police have an entirely different interpretation of the word 'chat'.
COVERT CARS , PARKED IN THE STATION CAR PARK , IN FULL VIEW OF THE PUBLIC .
What a ridiculous statement , that wpc saw the windows , and saw it as an opportunity to flex her muscles to her colleagues at the station .
A disgrace to the force , her ego and her desire to make a name for herself were the reason for this infringement on your rights .
Yo! AB! I admire the way you cleverly use your wording and know how powerful wording is within a court of law.
Your careful dissection of what she was saying, little did she know that you are building up a strong case against them.
Big respect to you our freedom fighter and tyrant destroyer, peace and love bro.
Thank You Benji🙏🏼🤛
Yep, an auditor should always speak as if they are speaking to the judge.
@@AuditingBritain Thank you for the videos over the years AB. Loved it all!
@@TheSadButMadLad Exactly mate. Have knowledge, knowledge is power, know the rules, policies and laws that the police have to abide to.
@@benji.B-side The police get to abuse the law because they continually gaslight the public and the public don't know their own rights.
This video should be shown at basic training at every police college to show how not to abuse powers to infringe public rights.
Time we stopped paying our taxes funding these thugs …
Approximately £1200 guaranteed payout. That's what I usually get.
That much really could make a career out of that lol
@@CarlJones-in8pmorders camera 😂
@@Gustoking37 Too slow Gusto it's Ordered 😃
Less 25% conditional fee from your solicitor.
"I'm using the Anti Terrorism Act." She says.
If he was planning some terrorist activity is it likely that he would risk attracting all this Police attention in broad daylight? The answer is no, he wouldn't.
If only the police could intercept real terrorists en route, peculiar that
They can not do such deep logical thinking. They are just territorial bullies. If they do not want their cars seen, build a wall. Anybody can go there and have a look - and film with a hidden camera.
@@tohrasup When have your cops actually stopped a terrorist? Just curious.
@@waveman2952 Well. They managed to shoot a Brazilian tourist in the head because he had a backpack on.
They’ll never learn!!!,,,,
£26k per annum starting pay tells you everything you need to know!
Did they realised their mistakes. If yes then how citizens those who are watching this video know about it ? Please do some follow up videos too ( AB ) my man 💜☮️ I luv ur channel.
1 minute online and 52 likes + 22 comments!!!!!
AB you are going to be a star ⭐️
The Witch will
AB is a star and doesn't fully realise it .. modesty
Get some merch on the go
20 minutes online and 4000 views.and 550 likes.
The unmarked cars are public vehicles!
They get spotted in public as soon as they are used to respond to an emergency.
Hardly 'covert' filming, ABUSE of section 43 plain and simple.
@Auditing Britain
Genuinely; You have some next level patience. My hats off
Let them keep making themselves look petty and ridiculous. They’re doing the work for us. 😂
The female officer really does talk a lot…expressing her thoughts and conclusions before investigating the situation. She also makes up law as she delivers her speech and continually interrupts to make her points.
@Sir Scofferoff she at no point really thought he was a terrorist nor did her lacky and if the pigs really thought you were a terrorist they would have an armed response team show up if they had any sense at all!
I think them officer's knew exactly who, what and why he was there !!
The main concern for the Police is what she was trying to explain that some of her colleagues and unmarked car's are involved in COVERT operations and he is opposing a risk to them by filming with no concidaration for that fact !!.
It will not matter how high wall's and fencing is , the police will still be having their cars and faces filmed entering and exiting.
If the police are investigating someone for instance spiking people's drinks at a club , they have to put officers undercover and also have to use unmarked car's in other types of investigation to blend in. If they are videoed by someone auditing then that officer and car will be useless to the investigation.
Also imagine if you was a police officer and wanted to better your career in this line of policing you wouldn't be able too because of having your face on a UA-cam video for everyone to see .
I think the police will win this one again and make it three two , because of the lack of concidaration for covert operations angle that will be argued .
@@originalherdsman3524 So they have "covert" operations running out the back of the police station. Now let's think what could possibly go wrong with that...
@@Odysseuss. why you comment on what you don't know !!!
Imagine having to go home to that moose!
I was under the impression that they had to tell you exactly what they were looking for.
“You’re filming the back of the police station”
Well if you’ve got nothing to hide then you’ve got nothing to fear, right?
Another Karen...another pay cheque for you AB haha love it!!!!
6:58 AB: "So basically you think anyone with a camera - you can search them. Witch: "No, filming the back of the police station, yes". So why has the witch not charged Google under the terrorism act? Google have photos of the station, from above and at the back, and the Google Streetview car even went into the car park.
👍👍👍👍👍
It's part of their ego trip that they think their cars are special.
Great point
I think auditors should go and film The Cars purposely I think we should know the names of the police and there addresses
Send a drone up ,she can try and get it on her broom.
The police officer who searched ab looks like Tyler Herro
i was what we call ragging in Ipswich many years ago its collecting clothes for charity on the way back home to Kettering when i thought i saw a body on a bridge tied to the railings my mates said you must have been seeing things the next day on the news some poor guy had tied himself to the bridge railings and set fire to himself i will always remember that day
Amazes me how they will question every passerby with a camera but won’t put a solid fence up. If it’s so secure they are that worried spend some tax payers money on a fence. Security risk is so funny, if you were really gathering evidence you would do it covertly to stay longer and get more info. The investigative skills of modern policing.
Cost of fence, about the same as AB will get paid out from his civil claim.
Exactly, if they are concerned about security then secure the premises and not just have a boom gate
Nor will they come out when their is real crime afoot.
It's amazing how they still haven't got a clue it's him. Surely everyone police officer must know what he's doing.
It shows the incompetence of the police that they can't even pass on the info to all police stations to not approach AB as they always lose and make themselves look like fools. Correction: Act like fools.