Experiment proposal about choice of attire and intersexual contact: 1- Prepare a dressing room with a variety of sexy and non-sexy pieces of clothing in all colors and sizes. 2- Gather three groups of women. Tell the first one that they're going to meet a group of men for informal conversation, tell the second one that they're going to meet another group of women. The third group is the control; don't tell them anything. 3- Note if those factors change how often every piece of clothing is chosen. 4- See if women dress for other women or for men.
@@dataexpunged6969 Sure, women dress for men but the fact is that men (straight) simply don't grasp the entire presentation the way another woman would. [A gay man here who has been watching the hetero circus all my life].
I can't seem to make my wife understand how I loathe to be bombarded by her when she gets home. I need a bit of solitude and down time before I can listen to every single thing someone said to her or the way this person was dressed. It is actually exhausting listening to her barrage of thoughts spoken in rapid fire succession. I have to remind her to occasionally take a breath. Camille Paglia absolutely nailed the differencees in gender communication. Loved it.
Shes treating you like a girlfriend. You need to separate yourself sincerely and learn to teach her how to treat you. AGree to check in with your facial expression approval. See tramwaypods.ca for civic optimism.
Ask a woman how her day went and she'll tell you more than you ever wanted to know, if a man attempts to tell another man how his day went his buddies will tell him to shut the fuck up and if he's in his right mind he will thank them for it.
Legend has it that she fell in a cauldron of red bull when she was a baby, just like Obelix fell into the cauldron of magic potion as a baby and was forever endowed with superhuman strength.
She remarked in another video that we HAD to get out of the fifties, but the feminists later (after second wave) took everything too far and began to screw everything up. I didn't live through the 50s so I don't know what was so awful that we had to put behind us. But from everything I hear it sounded like a golden age.
She takes her observations on men and women from soap operas and crappy staged TV shows... She's like a scientist who study the world by reading the Bible. This woman has a Dunning-Kruger syndrome, m'kay ?
My grandfather had 4 sisters. He'd watch them talk and shake his head and say, "Everyone is talking, and nobody is listening." They would pick up on each other's sentences so fast, and three of the four would be verbally reacting to the sentence fragment of the first.
If they weren't listening then they wouldn't be able to comprehend what the other is saying, which is obviously the opposite of what happens. Looks like it was your grandpa who wasn't listening and comprehending
The other day at my friends house, His young teenage daughter, with a few of her friends, and they just make noise, like I literally couldn't make out what they were saying
She had a great discussion on this topic with Jordan Peterson as well. When men speak to one other about anything important, there is always a physical component to the conversation... by that I mean there's the constant underlying understanding that if you say certain things, or say things in a certain way, it could result in a physical fight (or even lethal violence), there are some basic dominance things going on, men can actually communicate *through* violence or the threat of violence... the dynamic is totally different when men and women speak to one another.
Yes, I remember that, but here we are on a different level. This concept is true when two men have an altercation: "Beware dude, if you step out I have the ability to fuck you up". But in this video she was talking about confidentiality between men, which is different than the confidentiality between women. If we are friends I can, of course, vent out with you about my problems, but because I mainly want a solution, an opinion, and I will very rarely cry my eyes out with you for the sake of it. I will even end up cracking a joke about my shitty situation with my wife/gf/job/boss/mother/father/younameit. Women? They just want to vent out for the sake of being told "Oh honey, that's hard!" Which is completely nonsense for a man.
@@Kenar.E It may seem like that, but that’s because women want to feel heard and not just “be fixed” or have their issues figured out all the time because they most likely already know the solution to their issue. it’s not better or worse, it’s just different. Women don’t need to just accommodate or learn to think like men and men shouldn’t do the same, they’re uniquely different in their own ways and we should appreciate the differences.
@@renoldojeffrey4653 I know, and I know it's different, but since I KNOW it maybe THEY should too! I told my GF: if you want a solution come to me, if you want to vent, talk with your friends. But of course she doesn't and I am stuck in this eternal loop of listening-"I'm so sorry for your situation". Also: when I finally DID NOT tell her a solution but just listened she looked at me waiting for something. I said: "What?" She: "Well, tell me something." Me: "I'm sorry to heat that, it sucks..." and I believed it! She: "No I mean, tell me..." and she interrupted herself. Me: "ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT I HAVE TO GIVE YOU A SOLUTION!?!?" She laughed, I laughed, I threw her out the window.
Yeah when I got into boxing and I'd mention it in conversation with other guys there'd always be this very subtle shift in their body language and mannerisms toward me It made me realize how much fighting or physical dominance underlies male conversations when we're not even necessarily aware of it
I always experienced existencial anxiety, so when I found a woman that loved talking about every single trivial event that she experienced I felt as I had been blessed by god to have someone around me that kept my feet on the ground. I appreciate time alone, but I also love relaxing by listening the story about how her friend finally found the purse she was looking for. :)
ah ok, that is a more positive spin on it. I can understand that, maybe that's why the SOUND of a woman's voice seems to be so important to men... then they don't care what she is talking about so much LOL.. ? true, if I like someone's voice, I will listen to anything. but that's rare!
When asked about the difference between male and female soldiers in the Infantry, one Captain commented that two men can share a fox hole for two hours without speaking, and neither one will wonder if the other is mad at them.
Man she is so spot on in her observation of the differences in men and women when they "come home from work". I never really tought about it but I hardly tell anything about what happened in college to my family besides a funny anecdote. And my dad is silent as a rock and always has been. But my mom and sister go over it sometimes to the neurotic point of recalling whole conversations of minutes "so then I said and then she said so I said to her..."
absolutely! it's so often about what someone said, and you have to get the words exactly right and their facial expression and all of that.. so she says and HE said and then SHE.... and the women are completely engaged by it.. :) .... it can be social land mine talking to a woman... she wants you to trash everyone you know... and then put a smile on for them...
Her comment on Brazil is accurate, I've been living here for almost 3 years and a lot of women dress extremely sexy.. and us men? T-shirt and Jeans and that's enough, I never heard women here expressed the slightest concern about the way men dress.
I was raised in a household of 4 women and no men until I was 15. My mother taught me how cook, iron and keep myself clean. I could, and still can, chat with women. When my wife goes clothes shopping I go with her and give her my honest opinion. At times I find conversation with some other men boring, cars and sport are ok for a while but often that's the only conversation they have. I don't care what sort of car you've got, I only care that it's reliable, and sport is only a game. Having said that I'm a definite heterosexual with no yearning to wear my wives clothes. I'm a hunter gatherer who enjoys the company of like-minded men and women who don't treat me as some sort of toxic male.
This is SO GOOD. I understand exactly where she is coming from because most of what she is talking about are pretty much across the board generalisms that we as people often dispute the specifics (like, two actual guys who have a fight and get a beer after. Not likely, however, I do think that attitude is the EXACT sentiment that heterosexual men have about maybe conflict [?]), but it's understood to us that we act this way. So, this is good.
"Men don't need to communicate." It's even worse. When men come home from a stressful day at work the often urgently need their calm and peace to decompress, to reduce tension that build up during the day. So not only don't they need to communicate, they need to not talk or listen. They need to be deprived from input and verbal interaction for a while. In such a situation pressing a man into listening to machine gun blablabla can be extremely stressful for a man. In fact so stressful that they flip out. This is even more the case because men communicate very differently. Men speak less words, the story is compact and in order and filled with facts. No side stories, nothing unnecessary, few emotions. Men tell summaries. If a have to listen to a woman's story and I am in a stressed mode it feels like diving through a pipe holding my breath desperately hoping for the end of the pipe.
Fato, irmão - a mulherada parece que fala pelos cotovelos e se veste como se fosse pra um baile de gala, já os homens se vestem casual e quando falam parecem que ficam entre show de comédia e um campeonato de ofensa...
In fairness I should express a caveat to the diatribe I feel I’m about to launch into, i.e., I should admit to being somewhat provoked by what I perceive as propagation of terrible male stereotypes which I have long since overcome as models of my world view, and also I have only begun to listen to Camille Paglia’s presentations. In any case, to be alive is to be provoked, it can’t and shouldn’t be avoided - could lead to insight of some merit to me. Anyway for what it’s worth here is my somewhat reactive response, meant to support men like myself who don’t subscribe to stereotypical male self-image) (By the way I sure hope she has an oxygen canister close by...and paddles) Enough. In my experience not all heterosexual men are relegated only to grunting and expressions of machismo and braggadocio. Many of us read excellent authors, appreciate fine and creative music, are versed in the philosophies of various art movements, are lovers of jazz and classical music, attend art shows, are creative and artistic ourselves and are not threatened by gay men or women. (and could you recognize such an Epicurian if you lurched headlong into one?) Many of us “guys” know that a well developed sense of humour and solid self-confidence are perhaps the male attributes which women, those who like men, find most attractive. [please indulge a brief outburst if you will but my god! you get paid to disseminate (de-seminate) these male stereotypes? C’est tres ordinaire] For a woman to appreciate the aforementioned qualities in a man requires, however, an environment where they can both stop and breathe. Otherwise how are they going to know there’s anyone else there? How are they going to experience and appreciate the otherness of each other? Certainly not by philibustering and riding rough over the other. (That would be an attribute of the male stereotype you appear to purvey in so obdurate a manner, wouldn’t it ?) I would never have found myself trapped at the receiving end of such a philibustering diatribe. I’d have left abruptly as soon as I witnessed the trip I’m supposed to take. Because, I regularly engage in heathy and mutually respectful conversations with women and men whom I encounter. There are emotionally intelligent men in this world and really, I bother to respond (even though I experience this presentation as a browbeating while I’m trying to keep an open mind.) ...I bother to respond so as to encourage them to pursue the authorship of their own lives and to eschew the tyranny of ersatz authority at any speed. Authorship over authority and dialogue over lecturing every time. Steady on men! And as for me I believe I should continue to explore the further thinking of Camille Paglia. There must be more to her than this, she is so widely honoured and celebrated.
I hope she's healthy and strong we need her continued insights in both academia and in sex/gender discussions to continue far into the future- to figure out and elucidate- one of the greatest mysteries of Woman/Mankind in regard to dialogue involving "Viva la différence".
How does she explain heterosexual men who are writers, or talk show hosts, or newsmen? I think that she accurately portrays a blue collar version of men (of course not all blue collar men, but generally true.) She doesn't seem to acknowledge the articulate heterosexual male. Her analysis is interesting, as always (I love listening to her speak.) However, it's pretty one dimensional as it pertains to males (probably in terms of females, too.) I think that there is a continum, of heterosexual men that ranges from the cro magnon men, to the more sensitive, more articulate males. Her brush is broad. However, I think that she overly generalizes for sake of making a point.
If you aren't going to talk in generalities how could you talk at all about the genders? There are billions of members of both genders and there is of course fantastic variability, but that doesn't mean that there are also statistical and obvious trends on both sides. Also people adapt to the general not the exceptions. So when you meet a new woman or man, you will have generalized expectations and procedures when you initiate conversation. You will realize that every individual is unique and as you get to know them you will adapt to there personality, but that doesn't mean there is a general reality that men and women are different in this way. These generality also become obvious when you put groups of people together, because a group of 100 random women will most certainly act very different together than a group of 100 random men, even with the outliers in the mix. To think otherwise is borderline insanity.
@@DeltaflashSeven You are effectively saying that you have to generalize about each genders behavior, I say bull shit. There are guys who like sports, other guy don't. There are women who like to work in a shop, others don't. The generalizations don't work, and are a disservice to people who don't reside within the generalizatioins.
@@joeschmoe6802 You're effectively saying that the practice of making a point by using generalizations is BS.........and that's BS. It's actually totally non-logical to focus on the generalization rather than the point, and attempting to negate the point by turning the attention toward all the ways generalizations are not universal. Hey, guess what....NO generalization is universal.
@@joeschmoe6802 Men exist on a more diverse spectrum so I definitely hear what you're saying but typically there's a personality type that the average man can fit into as long is it isn't too specific.
Right, if there's a problem brought to my attention that I must fix, I want to know symptoms, details specific to solving the problem -- I really don't need to know or care about the emotions that were elicited by the problem or all the inaccurate surmises that didn't hold water, it's confusing, distracting, counterproductive -- no offense, but call your mother for that bit, I need to get on about fixing the problem
Did you ever watch chickens. The hens walk around going cluck cluck cluck constantly, and every now and then the rooster will let out a loud COCK A DOODLE DO. Us humans are so much like chickens it's embarrassing. And chickens aren't even mammals.
I passed a primary school this morning where there was about 6 boys aged 11-12 hanging around outside. One greeted a new arrival with a kick in the belly. It was hilarious. That's. What. Boys. Do.
When women get together to talk about a problem, they talk about the problem. When men get together to talk about a problem, they talk about the solution.
@@brandonvandyck pretty much this: men apply the "the smallest distance between 2 points is a straight line" principle in COMMUNICATION, going like this: Men see problem -> men analyze problem -> IF he can solve problem by himself, then he solve the problem -> IF NOT, talk to someone who knows and solve the problem -> ONLY THEN you b*tch and moan about the problem, but during that, you TEACH how to solve the problem.
I’m a girl and I’ve often thought the same. Many girls seem to compliment to make themselves look better rather than because it’s their honest opinion. Honestly makes me a bit disillusioned.
Haha I keep seeing posts about how fast she talks. She says “okay” instead of uh or um...you all do that and you speak slower. Her brain to mouth connectivity is superior.
All I hear from her is how women are awful to men because they want to talk. Interesting she never mentions that it is compromise between both. What she says is that men don't need to communicate. A woman at home with kids or a woman who works want to talk to their partner. But somehow that's her problem and she needs to be silent. That drive home, men, that's your alone time and be prepared to hear your partner when you walk in the door, because her psyche can't take holding all the information in. At the same time, women, give him some time before the conversation, because his psyche can't handle it. Respect seems to be needed when talking about this issue. It is not just a one sided problem amd most of us don't live in a traditional hunter/gatherer society. Men may think women are tedious because they want to talk but women think men are just as tedious because they don't. To the women dress for other women...they do AND they dress for men. Men may not compliment but they LOOK.
Problem: Our biology (neural architectural arrangement) DID NOT advanced as fast as our technology - we are still with the same brains our species have 20 thousand years ago, and no amount of demanding now can change this. We still are caveman hunters, we just became VERY good in making tools to obtain food faster and easier... Also, on the dress: men look at the "whole picture", not the details - if it looks good, its good. If not, than it is not. Yep - we men are still APES...
long nails Means don't have to work. anything difficult is better. in Africa its fat. here is high heels and thin. also purses are so your belongings don't ruin the shape of your body makeup is an extreme copy of what happens to their faces during the bang bang. it's all programmed
@@VengefulPolititron There is an idea that the elites tend to differentiate themselves from the masses. The increasing speed of change in fashion, which has been occurring since the 19th century, would occur because the masses began to enrich and copy the elites, leading them to look for new ways to differentiate themselves.
Interesting how she mentions that she noticed gay men having "female social abilities". I know there were studies done where they found certain brain structures differing between the sexes and gay men and women held the same brain shape differences as their opposite sex. So I would venture to say that it could very well be "nature" as well as societal pressures that give gay men the gift of "feminine" levels of perception and conversation.
Gift of feminine levels of perception and conversation. I don't mean to be rude here but from what i've seen that socalled gift is something that make the process of achieve equality between genders ect. Much more difficult and slow.
when I was a young feminist I was so fascinated by her, but also triggered !! now I just love her. and I don't have to agree with everything she says, I'm just glad she is saying it.
I wonder if having grown up in a house full of women is why I find it difficult to communicate with guys. I have very few guy friends. Women on the other hand are drawn to me like a magnet.
@Austin Kalkins The nature v. nurture argument has certainly been responsible for some abominations, like eugenics and conversion therapies. It does rather seem that we are what we believe we are in our mind. Forcing a person to change what they are is only going to lead to mental health issues. I think the best way to deal with children is to give them unbiased information, and let them sort out what they want to believe. Enforcing a political or religious ideology on kids is a form of abuse. Encouraging them to form a set of principles that they feel are theirs and are high level principles is best. Unfortunately what usually happens is parent teach their children their own prejudices. Children are also very susceptible to trends and fads, but there is a great deal of danger in making irreversible changes to a child's body to embrace their current fad as any ephemeral beliefs that they may have in preteen or adolescence are subject to change very rapidly. I am very much in favour of showing a child the path, holding their hand as they walk it if necessary and waiting to see what happens I just made sure that my sons were given an abundance of unbiased knowledge, the ability to differentiate between good and bad information by researching, a reasonable level of formal education and support in any chosen path. If we simply teach them how to learn without forcing our beliefs on them we have fulfilled our role as parents.
Emotions are often unresolved feelings and feeling how women get their charge which is why they more often hold grudges. men often see these feelings as some of explosive dynamite and either put them aside for mutual self preservation or keep their distances in order not to get into fight or flight conflicts. Or there others who relish this conflict to assure their dominance. In sum men fight over strength and women over beauty. And they both fight over money.
Camille Paglia has never had a conversation with me. There are men that CAN HAVE WONDERFULL CONVERSATIONS, those of us (straight guys) that can, are just not inclined to do so with everybody, nor, especially on command. I do have to say, that she really reminds me of me when i get all wound up because I'm interacting with somebody that i feel is worth my time. I do it then i pay the penalty, almost as if it's a hangover. One of the biggest traits of being an Introvert (INTJ variety).
As a straight male I have met a lot of younger girls like her and had in depth conversations that lasted for hours but around other men my thought process changes but I tend to mirror people I'm around but still preserve my core beliefs. I'd actually love to sit down and talk to her.
@@LordOfTheWhores As would I. I have deep conversations with anybody that can hold them. Sometimes they assume the status if a student and i the teacher. In other cases, we are peers. In rarer cases, i am the student, and they are the teacher. When Camille says that men aren't that way, i really take it as many or most are that way. I tend to agree with her. But some of the most profound conversations ever had been with others my age, both male and female, that i happen to meet by chance. In fact, that is how my spouse and I fell in love. Talking while sitting in the sauna at the Austin, Texas Townlake YMCA. She and i have some of the most wonderful conversations. Camille generalizes and it is true enough to resonate with people. There are differences between the sexes. But It is not as all-encompassing as many would believe. Cas in point: you and I both have had long deep conversations with women. I've learned about as much from women as i have from men. The only difference i have noticed is straight guys generally expect or think I want to get them in the sack. Straight women are typically surprised, some vocally disappointed when they learn I wish to just talk with them and not take them to bed. But, for the most part, they tell me that they can say things to me that they would not be able to say to most other guys. All because I'm particular about who I'll have sex with.
I would say that for males aesthetic perception of clothing on women especially is too closely linked to sexuality and thus it results in them not daring to give such compliments as they dont want to show attraction towards them too directly (you might be rejected after all) and are scared of misleading unattractive women (or fellow men) into the conclusion of them being perceived as sexually attractive. We dont have a sufficiently unmisleading way of separating the persons attractiveness from the beauty of their clothes in both our perception and our speech
I think most men don't focus on the clothing a woman is wearing. Instead they are focused on how the women looks, particularly from a sexual aspect. In short, women focus on fashion, men on beauty.
This is all mostly true but something of a gross generalisation. There are plenty of straight men who are great conversationalists in the right time and place and there are of course plenty of women who rise well above talking about minutiae of looks, relationships and clothes.
Men don't care about words because they read emotions, words just get into the way of the useful comunication. The only thing words can give its facts and information. Emotions can be red in other ways
Women being the voice of the community, who doesn't belong, who needs to go etc make me realize a new view on what I've always noticed with them.. When saying anything negative about someone else they OFTEN finish with "Oh, but she/he is a nice person though." I'm starting to think it's their speech patterns that are along the lines of condemning but reassuring others that she doesn't mean to oust this individual, just that is trivial slander.
Under the terms of Feminism, mens behaviour is required to accord with women's requirements. I constantly hear how "self-focussed" men are, how about we all recognise men's right to communicate how they feel comfortable to communicate.
Women dress not for other women, but because they don't want to be underdressed, because even though a man does not notice in detail why a woman looks nice to him, he will surely be unconsciously turning his head after the best dressed women in the room. Women praise each other for good style in the same way men do for good work,but they are competing with each other as well as enjoying having a good opponent next to them. A lesbian woman can't pick up on this, the same way a gay man can't inherently feel the purpose of the fist fights.
She is generalising a little though. I agree that women notice the nuances of other women's dress but some are way more interested than others. I will notice another woman's clothes and comment on something that looks nice but do not want to spend overly long talking about clothes etc. I want to talk about more cerebral things - except talking about emotions and relationships is also a big one. Some women want to talk about clothes, shopping,hair , nails ( !!!) ad nauseam and I think more tom boyish women are bored by this.
6:29 - That part could be really scary. "Look at her necklace!!".... Is that a person being nice or are they inviting group based mockery and bullying? Mmmmmmmmmmm..... Scary. We'd need to know more about how was saying it, who it was about, the people who were there, the group dynamic, and past events to know.
*It's not that men are oblivious to women's fashion, scattered thought process, and broken sentence structure. It's that we don't care to waste our time obsessing over childish frivolities that contribute nothing to meeting and overcoming the challenges of life and maintaining a functioning civilization.* *We've got work to get done; we don't have the luxury of sitting around talking about our feelings all day. And when the work day is done, all we want to do is relax and recharge our batteries (in whatever manner befits each man) because we know we have to get up tomorrow and do it all over again.*
I was definitely a better conversationalist when I was younger but if you don’t surround yourself with great conversationalist you lose it, start internalizing, and on the outside your just like all the other cis men.
I dated a girl who used to talk about her feelings all the time. She had feelings about every damn thing. One day I gave up listening and just watched tv till the ads. Then I looked at her, listened for a minute, asked her how about the last thing she said, asked her how it made her feel, then turned back to the tv when the ads were over. She talked non-stop for 4 freakin' hours. I no longer care about your freakin' feelings, I've had enough. I know women always comment on how others dress, and those comments are always different when the other person is in/out of earshot, but I only look at other men like they are competitors in the ring. I don't care how they dress, just how they handle themselves.
I think women should stop being petty and trivial and when they are being that way, and taking up ALLLL the air in the room it should be pointed out to them. I don't think men should have to listen to them constantly when they act that way and men should find a woman they're actually compatible talking to...dreamy, I know, but turning off your brain while someone prattles on four hours sounds like a dysfunctional relationship...
Well, when your in the woods and the Grizzly is heading your way you don't have much time for chat, and those who did probably did not survive - I think community style is a case of natural selection.
Experiment proposal about choice of attire and intersexual contact:
1- Prepare a dressing room with a variety of sexy and non-sexy pieces of clothing in all colors and sizes.
2- Gather three groups of women. Tell the first one that they're going to meet a group of men for informal conversation, tell the second one that they're going to meet another group of women. The third group is the control; don't tell them anything.
3- Note if those factors change how often every piece of clothing is chosen.
4- See if women dress for other women or for men.
That's a genius idea. I'm a woman and I would actually love to see the results
@TheyCallMe Doug "Proven" is essentially a meaningless word without a source.
@@xeno2752 exactly. And that's bs anyway, because I know for a fact that many women dress up for men 😂😂😂
@@dataexpunged6969 Sure, women dress for men but the fact is that men (straight) simply don't grasp the entire presentation the way another woman would. [A gay man here who has been watching the hetero circus all my life].
@@Mrariesdave lmao "hetero-circus". That's the most accurate description I've ever seen 😂🤣 Sometimes I thank the world that I'm bi
Be prepared, OK? To listen, OK? At 100 miles an hour, OK?
OK!
Instruction not clear enough. Ended up mind boggled
more like 100 words a second
She's one of a few people who actually talks fast enough that I'm not bored or disinterested
Actually laughed out loud to this haha
I can't seem to make my wife understand how I loathe to be bombarded by her when she gets home. I need a bit of solitude and down time before I can listen to every single thing someone said to her or the way this person was dressed. It is actually exhausting listening to her barrage of thoughts spoken in rapid fire succession. I have to remind her to occasionally take a breath. Camille Paglia absolutely nailed the differencees in gender communication. Loved it.
Shes treating you like a girlfriend. You need to separate yourself sincerely and learn to teach her how to treat you. AGree to check in with your facial expression approval. See tramwaypods.ca for civic optimism.
You just dislike your wife. This isn't some complicated gender issue.
@Sugar 100% agree.
I dont ever want to hear that shit. I DONT CARE WHAT SOMEONE ELSE DOES!!!!
Ask a woman how her day went and she'll tell you more than you ever wanted to know, if a man attempts to tell another man how his day went his buddies will tell him to shut the fuck up and if he's in his right mind he will thank them for it.
Great info but Camille don't EVER start drinking Red Bull..
She's have an instant heart attack. lol
Legend has it that she fell in a cauldron of red bull when she was a baby, just like Obelix fell into the cauldron of magic potion as a baby and was forever endowed with superhuman strength.
😂😂😂
Red Bull was modeled after her, ok...
Red Bull may give you wings, but it would give Camille Paglia a jet pack.
I just love her when she goes into art and psychology, really brilliant remarks, no wonder she's a professor.
She's much more attuned to gender issues than Jordan Peterson.
I love this women. She is so SPOT ON in her theories and observations!
You meant to say woman. Women is the plural of woman. Got it?
She remarked in another video that we HAD to get out of the fifties, but the feminists later (after second wave) took everything too far and began to screw everything up. I didn't live through the 50s so I don't know what was so awful that we had to put behind us. But from everything I hear it sounded like a golden age.
@@peteroehring695 Sorry, you are correct. I should have said "woman". Thank you kindly.
She takes her observations on men and women from soap operas and crappy staged TV shows... She's like a scientist who study the world by reading the Bible.
This woman has a Dunning-Kruger syndrome, m'kay ?
She totally left out that men usually talk with a lot of humour, even when complaining about things. We entertain each other the whole time :D
@@lorenecingala9580 "If you want to tell people the truth, you better be funny. Otherwise, they will kill you." - George Carlin
Good point - it might have arisen as a coping mechanism for trauma.
wasn't George. it was... a different guy I forget.
Masking their frustration
Camille I love you. One issue men have with female conversation is the endless repetition. They say the same thing over and over.
I recommend watching her videos at 0.75 speed.
Bloody hell!! You are right! She sounds normal at 0.75
Thank you.
Wow! It works. Wow...
Ok!
... good advice ...
My grandfather had 4 sisters. He'd watch them talk and shake his head and say, "Everyone is talking, and nobody is listening." They would pick up on each other's sentences so fast, and three of the four would be verbally reacting to the sentence fragment of the first.
If they weren't listening then they wouldn't be able to comprehend what the other is saying, which is obviously the opposite of what happens. Looks like it was your grandpa who wasn't listening and comprehending
The other day at my friends house, His young teenage daughter, with a few of her friends, and they just make noise, like I literally couldn't make out what they were saying
Vote UKIP on 6th of May
intellectual shorthand. but yeah
Italians
She had a great discussion on this topic with Jordan Peterson as well.
When men speak to one other about anything important, there is always a physical component to the conversation... by that I mean there's the constant underlying understanding that if you say certain things, or say things in a certain way, it could result in a physical fight (or even lethal violence), there are some basic dominance things going on, men can actually communicate *through* violence or the threat of violence... the dynamic is totally different when men and women speak to one another.
Yes, I remember that, but here we are on a different level. This concept is true when two men have an altercation: "Beware dude, if you step out I have the ability to fuck you up".
But in this video she was talking about confidentiality between men, which is different than the confidentiality between women.
If we are friends I can, of course, vent out with you about my problems, but because I mainly want a solution, an opinion, and I will very rarely cry my eyes out with you for the sake of it.
I will even end up cracking a joke about my shitty situation with my wife/gf/job/boss/mother/father/younameit.
Women? They just want to vent out for the sake of being told "Oh honey, that's hard!"
Which is completely nonsense for a man.
@@Kenar.E It may seem like that, but that’s because women want to feel heard and not just “be fixed” or have their issues figured out all the time because they most likely already know the solution to their issue. it’s not better or worse, it’s just different. Women don’t need to just accommodate or learn to think like men and men shouldn’t do the same, they’re uniquely different in their own ways and we should appreciate the differences.
@@renoldojeffrey4653 I know, and I know it's different, but since I KNOW it maybe THEY should too!
I told my GF: if you want a solution come to me, if you want to vent, talk with your friends.
But of course she doesn't and I am stuck in this eternal loop of listening-"I'm so sorry for your situation".
Also: when I finally DID NOT tell her a solution but just listened she looked at me waiting for something.
I said: "What?"
She: "Well, tell me something."
Me: "I'm sorry to heat that, it sucks..." and I believed it!
She: "No I mean, tell me..." and she interrupted herself.
Me: "ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT I HAVE TO GIVE YOU A SOLUTION!?!?"
She laughed, I laughed, I threw her out the window.
Yeah when I got into boxing and I'd mention it in conversation with other guys there'd always be this very subtle shift in their body language and mannerisms toward me
It made me realize how much fighting or physical dominance underlies male conversations when we're not even necessarily aware of it
I always experienced existencial anxiety, so when I found a woman that loved talking about every single trivial event that she experienced I felt as I had been blessed by god to have someone around me that kept my feet on the ground. I appreciate time alone, but I also love relaxing by listening the story about how her friend finally found the purse she was looking for. :)
That is so sweet 🥰
ah ok, that is a more positive spin on it. I can understand that, maybe that's why the SOUND of a woman's voice seems to be so important to men... then they don't care what she is talking about so much LOL.. ? true, if I like someone's voice, I will listen to anything. but that's rare!
When asked about the difference between male and female soldiers in the Infantry, one Captain commented that two men can share a fox hole for two hours without speaking, and neither one will wonder if the other is mad at them.
Man she is so spot on in her observation of the differences in men and women when they "come home from work". I never really tought about it but I hardly tell anything about what happened in college to my family besides a funny anecdote. And my dad is silent as a rock and always has been. But my mom and sister go over it sometimes to the neurotic point of recalling whole conversations of minutes "so then I said and then she said so I said to her..."
absolutely! it's so often about what someone said, and you have to get the words exactly right and their facial expression and all of that.. so she says and HE said and then SHE.... and the women are completely engaged by it.. :) .... it can be social land mine talking to a woman... she wants you to trash everyone you know... and then put a smile on for them...
Her comment on Brazil is accurate, I've been living here for almost 3 years and a lot of women dress extremely sexy.. and us men? T-shirt and Jeans and that's enough, I never heard women here expressed the slightest concern about the way men dress.
I was raised in a household of 4 women and no men until I was 15. My mother taught me how cook, iron and keep myself clean. I could, and still can, chat with women. When my wife goes clothes shopping I go with her and give her my honest opinion. At times I find conversation with some other men boring, cars and sport are ok for a while but often that's the only conversation they have. I don't care what sort of car you've got, I only care that it's reliable, and sport is only a game. Having said that I'm a definite heterosexual with no yearning to wear my wives clothes. I'm a hunter gatherer who enjoys the company of like-minded men and women who don't treat me as some sort of toxic male.
This is SO GOOD. I understand exactly where she is coming from because most of what she is talking about are pretty much across the board generalisms that we as people often dispute the specifics (like, two actual guys who have a fight and get a beer after. Not likely, however, I do think that attitude is the EXACT sentiment that heterosexual men have about maybe conflict [?]), but it's understood to us that we act this way. So, this is good.
Lol this is fantastic. This woman is wonderful.
Thank you for posting these lectures
She’s such a fearless, educated speaker. Love it.
"Men don't need to communicate."
It's even worse. When men come home from a stressful day at work the often urgently need their calm and peace to decompress, to reduce tension that build up during the day. So not only don't they need to communicate, they need to not talk or listen. They need to be deprived from input and verbal interaction for a while.
In such a situation pressing a man into listening to machine gun blablabla can be extremely stressful for a man. In fact so stressful that they flip out.
This is even more the case because men communicate very differently. Men speak less words, the story is compact and in order and filled with facts. No side stories, nothing unnecessary, few emotions. Men tell summaries. If a have to listen to a woman's story and I am in a stressed mode it feels like diving through a pipe holding my breath desperately hoping for the end of the pipe.
😳wow women should understand this... just wait a few hours on the story...
She is great!
I'm a man and I'm from Brazil, (lived here my whole life)
I'm a living witness of what she described memememd
Fato, irmão - a mulherada parece que fala pelos cotovelos e se veste como se fosse pra um baile de gala, já os homens se vestem casual e quando falam parecem que ficam entre show de comédia e um campeonato de ofensa...
In fairness I should express a caveat to the diatribe I feel I’m about to launch into, i.e., I should admit to being somewhat provoked by what I perceive as propagation of terrible male stereotypes which I have long since overcome as models of my world view, and also I have only begun to listen to Camille Paglia’s presentations. In any case, to be alive is to be provoked, it can’t and shouldn’t be avoided - could lead to insight of some merit to me. Anyway for what it’s worth here is my somewhat reactive response, meant to support men like myself who don’t subscribe to stereotypical male self-image)
(By the way I sure hope she has an oxygen canister close by...and paddles) Enough. In my experience not all heterosexual men are relegated only to grunting and expressions of machismo and braggadocio. Many of us read excellent authors, appreciate fine and creative music, are versed in the philosophies of various art movements, are lovers of jazz and classical music, attend art shows, are creative and artistic ourselves and are not threatened by gay men or women. (and could you recognize such an Epicurian if you lurched headlong into one?) Many of us “guys” know that a well developed sense of humour and solid self-confidence are perhaps the male attributes which women, those who like men, find most attractive. [please indulge a brief outburst if you will but my god! you get paid to disseminate (de-seminate) these male stereotypes? C’est tres ordinaire] For a woman to appreciate the aforementioned qualities in a man requires, however, an environment where they can both stop and breathe. Otherwise how are they going to know there’s anyone else there? How are they going to experience and appreciate the otherness of each other? Certainly not by philibustering and riding rough over the other. (That would be an attribute of the male stereotype you appear to purvey in so obdurate a manner,
wouldn’t it ?) I would never have found myself trapped at the receiving end of such a philibustering diatribe. I’d have left abruptly as soon as I witnessed the trip I’m supposed to take. Because, I regularly engage in heathy and mutually respectful conversations with women and men whom I encounter. There are emotionally intelligent men in this world and really, I bother to respond (even though I experience this presentation as a browbeating while I’m trying to keep an open mind.) ...I bother to respond so as to encourage them to pursue the authorship of their own lives and to eschew the tyranny of ersatz authority at any speed. Authorship over authority and dialogue over lecturing every time. Steady on men! And as for me I believe I should continue to explore the further thinking of Camille Paglia. There must be more to her than this, she is so widely honoured and celebrated.
my new fave word 'braggadocio'
lol easy to be bombastic behind a pen name. Get a grip
Dude, you did too much just to say "the stereotype is valid, but I choose not to abide to it".
I hope she's healthy and strong we need her continued insights in both academia and in sex/gender discussions to continue far into the future- to figure out and elucidate- one of the greatest mysteries of Woman/Mankind in regard to dialogue involving "Viva la différence".
How does she explain heterosexual men who are writers, or talk show hosts, or newsmen? I think that she accurately portrays a blue collar version of men (of course not all blue collar men, but generally true.) She doesn't seem to acknowledge the articulate heterosexual male. Her analysis is interesting, as always (I love listening to her speak.) However, it's pretty one dimensional as it pertains to males (probably in terms of females, too.) I think that there is a continum, of heterosexual men that ranges from the cro magnon men, to the more sensitive, more articulate males. Her brush is broad. However, I think that she overly generalizes for sake of making a point.
If you aren't going to talk in generalities how could you talk at all about the genders? There are billions of members of both genders and there is of course fantastic variability, but that doesn't mean that there are also statistical and obvious trends on both sides. Also people adapt to the general not the exceptions. So when you meet a new woman or man, you will have generalized expectations and procedures when you initiate conversation. You will realize that every individual is unique and as you get to know them you will adapt to there personality, but that doesn't mean there is a general reality that men and women are different in this way. These generality also become obvious when you put groups of people together, because a group of 100 random women will most certainly act very different together than a group of 100 random men, even with the outliers in the mix. To think otherwise is borderline insanity.
@@DeltaflashSeven You are effectively saying that you have to generalize about each genders behavior, I say bull shit. There are guys who like sports, other guy don't. There are women who like to work in a shop, others don't. The generalizations don't work, and are a disservice to people who don't reside within the generalizatioins.
@@joeschmoe6802 You're effectively saying that the practice of making a point by using generalizations is BS.........and that's BS. It's actually totally non-logical to focus on the generalization rather than the point, and attempting to negate the point by turning the attention toward all the ways generalizations are not universal. Hey, guess what....NO generalization is universal.
Those are jobs. Construction workers don't come home and start sawing and hammering
@@joeschmoe6802 Men exist on a more diverse spectrum so I definitely hear what you're saying but typically there's a personality type that the average man can fit into as long is it isn't too specific.
i'm overwhelmed by this video.
Right, if there's a problem brought to my attention that I must fix, I want to know symptoms, details specific to solving the problem -- I really don't need to know or care about the emotions that were elicited by the problem or all the inaccurate surmises that didn't hold water, it's confusing, distracting, counterproductive -- no offense, but call your mother for that bit, I need to get on about fixing the problem
🤣🤣🤣
Did you ever watch chickens. The hens walk around going cluck cluck cluck constantly, and every now and then the rooster will let out a loud COCK A DOODLE DO.
Us humans are so much like chickens it's embarrassing. And chickens aren't even mammals.
Pretty much.
What came first; the chicken or the egg?
Slang for female. CHICK. Ever seen just one go to the bathroom? To the store alone?
we, gay men, are here to correct the communication error between str8 men and women :P
..me..helping couples connect since i was out...
She keeps saying "okay?" and I zone out of her frantic hysterical speech after 30 seconds
I passed a primary school this morning where there was about 6 boys aged 11-12 hanging around outside. One greeted a new arrival with a kick in the belly. It was hilarious. That's. What. Boys. Do.
When women get together to talk about a problem, they talk about the problem. When men get together to talk about a problem, they talk about the solution.
Had not heard that. Rings true...
@@brandonvandyck pretty much this: men apply the "the smallest distance between 2 points is a straight line" principle in COMMUNICATION, going like this:
Men see problem -> men analyze problem -> IF he can solve problem by himself, then he solve the problem -> IF NOT, talk to someone who knows and solve the problem -> ONLY THEN you b*tch and moan about the problem, but during that, you TEACH how to solve the problem.
I'm a guy but often it seems to me that women's compliments for each other are not sincere.
I’m a girl and I’ve often thought the same. Many girls seem to compliment to make themselves look better rather than because it’s their honest opinion. Honestly makes me a bit disillusioned.
Women's compliments to eachother are ALWAYS laced with poison in their voice.
Men curse one another in jest.
Humans are WEIRD, man...
I truly enjoy this
When she talked about Brazil... Soooo true.
Haha I keep seeing posts about how fast she talks. She says “okay” instead of uh or um...you all do that and you speak slower. Her brain to mouth connectivity is superior.
All I hear from her is how women are awful to men because they want to talk. Interesting she never mentions that it is compromise between both. What she says is that men don't need to communicate.
A woman at home with kids or a woman who works want to talk to their partner. But somehow that's her problem and she needs to be silent. That drive home, men, that's your alone time and be prepared to hear your partner when you walk in the door, because her psyche can't take holding all the information in. At the same time, women, give him some time before the conversation, because his psyche can't handle it.
Respect seems to be needed when talking about this issue. It is not just a one sided problem amd most of us don't live in a traditional hunter/gatherer society. Men may think women are tedious because they want to talk but women think men are just as tedious because they don't.
To the women dress for other women...they do AND they dress for men. Men may not compliment but they LOOK.
Problem:
Our biology (neural architectural arrangement) DID NOT advanced as fast as our technology - we are still with the same brains our species have 20 thousand years ago, and no amount of demanding now can change this.
We still are caveman hunters, we just became VERY good in making tools to obtain food faster and easier...
Also, on the dress: men look at the "whole picture", not the details - if it looks good, its good. If not, than it is not.
Yep - we men are still APES...
Fashion probably has more to do with status than beauty.
yes, personally, i always wear a black shirt with grey pants because i wanna look like rich
long nails Means don't have to work.
anything difficult is better.
in Africa its fat.
here is high heels and thin.
also purses are so your belongings don't ruin the shape of your body
makeup is an extreme copy of what happens to their faces during the bang bang.
it's all programmed
@@VengefulPolititron There is an idea that the elites tend to differentiate themselves from the masses. The increasing speed of change in fashion, which has been occurring since the 19th century, would occur because the masses began to enrich and copy the elites, leading them to look for new ways to differentiate themselves.
Its both.
Thank G-d for subtitles!
Truly a national treasure The Keith Richards of feminism.Love you camille.
I find that link in your comment hilarious.
she would LOVE that compliment.
Goddamit I have to take my precalculus final tomorrow
Why am I here
Interesting how she mentions that she noticed gay men having "female social abilities". I know there were studies done where they found certain brain structures differing between the sexes and gay men and women held the same brain shape differences as their opposite sex. So I would venture to say that it could very well be "nature" as well as societal pressures that give gay men the gift of "feminine" levels of perception and conversation.
Gift of feminine levels of perception and conversation. I don't mean to be rude here but from what i've seen that socalled gift is something that make the process of achieve equality between genders ect. Much more difficult and slow.
Woman: Blah blah blah talk talk talk.....
Man: Does any of this have anything to do with me?
Woman: No
Man: eh, I’ve lost interest
Refreshing to see someone think for themselves by looking around for themselves without a sexist woke lens.
when I was a young feminist I was so fascinated by her, but also triggered !! now I just love her. and I don't have to agree with everything she says, I'm just glad she is saying it.
I wonder if having grown up in a house full of women is why I find it difficult to communicate with guys. I have very few guy friends. Women on the other hand are drawn to me like a magnet.
@Austin Kalkins The nature v. nurture argument has certainly been responsible for some abominations, like eugenics and conversion therapies. It does rather seem that we are what we believe we are in our mind. Forcing a person to change what they are is only going to lead to mental health issues.
I think the best way to deal with children is to give them unbiased information, and let them sort out what they want to believe. Enforcing a political or religious ideology on kids is a form of abuse.
Encouraging them to form a set of principles that they feel are theirs and are high level principles is best. Unfortunately what usually happens is parent teach their children their own prejudices. Children are also very susceptible to trends and fads, but there is a great deal of danger in making irreversible changes to a child's body to embrace their current fad as any ephemeral beliefs that they may have in preteen or adolescence are subject to change very rapidly. I am very much in favour of showing a child the path, holding their hand as they walk it if necessary and waiting to see what happens
I just made sure that my sons were given an abundance of unbiased knowledge, the ability to differentiate between good and bad information by researching, a reasonable level of formal education and support in any chosen path. If we simply teach them how to learn without forcing our beliefs on them we have fulfilled our role as parents.
explain fast and slow twitch muscles.
Emotions are often unresolved feelings and feeling how women get their charge which is why they more often hold grudges. men often see these feelings as some of explosive dynamite and either put them aside for mutual self preservation or keep their distances in order not to get into fight or flight conflicts. Or there others who relish this conflict to assure their dominance. In sum men fight over strength and women over beauty. And they both fight over money.
Weirdly enough when I get into a passionate topic I tend to enter near lightspeed speech like she does.
Bill Burr illustrates the differences quite well in some of his stand up routines
the ikea piece is gold
Camille Paglia has never had a conversation with me. There are men that CAN HAVE WONDERFULL CONVERSATIONS, those of us (straight guys) that can, are just not inclined to do so with everybody, nor, especially on command. I do have to say, that she really reminds me of me when i get all wound up because I'm interacting with somebody that i feel is worth my time. I do it then i pay the penalty, almost as if it's a hangover. One of the biggest traits of being an Introvert (INTJ variety).
As a straight male I have met a lot of younger girls like her and had in depth conversations that lasted for hours but around other men my thought process changes but I tend to mirror people I'm around but still preserve my core beliefs. I'd actually love to sit down and talk to her.
@@LordOfTheWhores As would I. I have deep conversations with anybody that can hold them. Sometimes they assume the status if a student and i the teacher. In other cases, we are peers. In rarer cases, i am the student, and they are the teacher. When Camille says that men aren't that way, i really take it as many or most are that way. I tend to agree with her. But some of the most profound conversations ever had been with others my age, both male and female, that i happen to meet by chance. In fact, that is how my spouse and I fell in love. Talking while sitting in the sauna at the Austin, Texas Townlake YMCA. She and i have some of the most wonderful conversations. Camille generalizes and it is true enough to resonate with people. There are differences between the sexes. But It is not as all-encompassing as many would believe. Cas in point: you and I both have had long deep conversations with women. I've learned about as much from women as i have from men. The only difference i have noticed is straight guys generally expect or think I want to get them in the sack. Straight women are typically surprised, some vocally disappointed when they learn I wish to just talk with them and not take them to bed. But, for the most part, they tell me that they can say things to me that they would not be able to say to most other guys. All because I'm particular about who I'll have sex with.
What is true at the population level doesn't not necessarily apply to the individual.
I would say that for males aesthetic perception of clothing on women especially is too closely linked to sexuality and thus it results in them not daring to give such compliments as they dont want to show attraction towards them too directly (you might be rejected after all) and are scared of misleading unattractive women (or fellow men) into the conclusion of them being perceived as sexually attractive. We dont have a sufficiently unmisleading way of separating the persons attractiveness from the beauty of their clothes in both our perception and our speech
As a bisexual man I always compliment women on their clothes and accessories.
I think most men don't focus on the clothing a woman is wearing. Instead they are focused on how the women looks, particularly from a sexual aspect. In short, women focus on fashion, men on beauty.
This is so interesting 🧐
Spread the info to other woman, I BEG YOU!
Women do dress for men too, but to COMPETE with other women. We are all animalsz
DOh! I wanted to hear the whole lecture.
How bloody relieving! Thank you for saying the truth and not ramming bullshit ideology into me. Get real, women!
Oh my god do watch it at 0.75 speed!!!
This is all mostly true but something of a gross generalisation. There are plenty of straight men who are great conversationalists in the right time and place and there are of course plenty of women who rise well above talking about minutiae of looks, relationships and clothes.
Yeah, the gay ones
@@fuckeverybodyonhere i'm not gay
@@mementomori286 Who would ever think you're gay with all the sex scenes in your books?
I fucking hate it when people complain about generalisation.
Trends exist, and its implied that their are exceptions.
Yes, but men who are great conversationalists tend to viewed as a bit odd and unconventional.
Men do notice the micro particulars of a woman's hot outfit - we just don't blurt it out in micro detail.
Pretty much - its almost "cavemen" the thought process:
Woman pretty? I feel good, so is good.
Woman not pretty? I feel no good, so is bad.
she's like the Tarantino of the academics
Men don't care about words because they read emotions, words just get into the way of the useful comunication.
The only thing words can give its facts and information. Emotions can be red in other ways
Women being the voice of the community, who doesn't belong, who needs to go etc make me realize a new view on what I've always noticed with them.. When saying anything negative about someone else they OFTEN finish with "Oh, but she/he is a nice person though."
I'm starting to think it's their speech patterns that are along the lines of condemning but reassuring others that she doesn't mean to oust this individual, just that is trivial slander.
ahahahah this is so funny! i am laughing so hard!
Ben shapiro italian mother
He'd be smart if she were his mom.
@@SebastianJArt were? Is it not "was"?
3/4 speed is the answer.
hehe just saved by this woman westen girls!! i thaught u didnt exist long time ago. bravo Camille
Look for "Mark Gungor Tale of Two Brains Full" in UA-cam. He talks about men and women communication, and does it with humour. Awesome.
Under the terms of Feminism, mens behaviour is required to accord with women's requirements. I constantly hear how "self-focussed" men are, how about we all recognise men's right to communicate how they feel comfortable to communicate.
How on earth did she come to understand men so well?!?
paying very close, unbiased attention... she is fascinated by this stuff and willing to look at it as truthfully as she can.
This woman understand men better than the brainwashed college boys I meet
Women dress not for other women, but because they don't want to be underdressed, because even though
a man does not notice in detail why a woman looks nice to him, he will surely be unconsciously turning his head after the best dressed women in the room.
Women praise each other for good style in the same way men do for good work,but they are competing with each other as well as enjoying having a good opponent next to them.
A lesbian woman can't pick up on this, the same way a gay man can't inherently feel the purpose of the fist fights.
Russel Brand is not gay. Just an example
Give her a glass of water
This was far fetched and just a little ridiculous
Im not familiar with the housewives what exactly is the referring to?
0.75 speed good
Kind of reminds me of Ken Burns
Heterosexual men conversate its just that we dont talk to women. Cause men and women dont talk about the same shit.😁
She is generalising a little though. I agree that women notice the nuances of other women's dress but some are way more interested than others. I will notice another woman's clothes and comment on something that looks nice but do not want to spend overly long talking about clothes etc. I want to talk about more cerebral things - except talking about emotions and relationships is also a big one. Some women want to talk about clothes, shopping,hair , nails ( !!!) ad nauseam and I think more tom boyish women are bored by this.
She is the only female understanding men!
6:29 - That part could be really scary. "Look at her necklace!!".... Is that a person being nice or are they inviting group based mockery and bullying? Mmmmmmmmmmm..... Scary. We'd need to know more about how was saying it, who it was about, the people who were there, the group dynamic, and past events to know.
Ummm..... Have you ever seen guys in drama club?
Exception to the rule...
I don‘t know why I don‘t recognise myself in the way she described women
*It's not that men are oblivious to women's fashion, scattered thought process, and broken sentence structure. It's that we don't care to waste our time obsessing over childish frivolities that contribute nothing to meeting and overcoming the challenges of life and maintaining a functioning civilization.*
*We've got work to get done; we don't have the luxury of sitting around talking about our feelings all day. And when the work day is done, all we want to do is relax and recharge our batteries (in whatever manner befits each man) because we know we have to get up tomorrow and do it all over again.*
The Bible" A man sharpens a man like iron sharpens iron" The friction between us brings out the edge in both.
Feminists, please stop demanding that men express their feelings the same way women do.
So they objectify themselves, but it's still men's fault.
Any sources? Where is this clip from.
Yes there is something essential, it's called biology and MGTOW.
The difference in the IQ chart for men and women is not genius and psychopath; it's genius and idiot.
Play this back at 0.25 speed, so funny.
I was definitely a better conversationalist when I was younger but if you don’t surround yourself with great conversationalist you lose it, start internalizing, and on the outside your just like all the other cis men.
My husband is a good conversator. This is a little reductionist.
Maybe he is bisexual.
there are always outliers
Can we not point out general trends without elaborating all the asterisks anymore?
It is well known anthropologically that language was developed by women.
Someone had to tell the man the trash was piling up in the cave.
Its like she has to cover three curriculums but has the time for one.
ok
I dated a girl who used to talk about her feelings all the time. She had feelings about every damn thing. One day I gave up listening and just watched tv till the ads. Then I looked at her, listened for a minute, asked her how about the last thing she said, asked her how it made her feel, then turned back to the tv when the ads were over. She talked non-stop for 4 freakin' hours. I no longer care about your freakin' feelings, I've had enough. I know women always comment on how others dress, and those comments are always different when the other person is in/out of earshot, but I only look at other men like they are competitors in the ring. I don't care how they dress, just how they handle themselves.
It sounds like you both had a lovely evening.
I think women should stop being petty and trivial and when they are being that way, and taking up ALLLL the air in the room it should be pointed out to them. I don't think men should have to listen to them constantly when they act that way and men should find a woman they're actually compatible talking to...dreamy, I know, but turning off your brain while someone prattles on four hours sounds like a dysfunctional relationship...
She can see it because she's outside of it.
1:50 she was interrupting herself and almost talking over herself
Okay
Well, when your in the woods and the Grizzly is heading your way you don't have much time for chat, and those who did probably did not survive - I think community style is a case of natural selection.