Couldn't agree more. As a transplant into American culture, I was shocked ate the total lack oc solidarity amongst wpmen here, as well as the level of loneliness I experience as a stay at home mom. Months pass between meaningful interactions with other females. This is a uniquely American thing. When I go overseas I witness a totally different behaviour.
It’s deep stuff no doubt. Try some of her books. They’re a fun read, full of bite and humour, as well as wondrous rabbit holes that peel back the layers of psychology and human identity that lead to the kinds of revelation and insight you can’t seem to find in mainstream education today. A tour de force of knowledge and classical education. Love Paglia. What an Amazon.
Men need to be men, and women need to be women... everyone is happier that way, it's so obviously true. Men and women are not equal, we are not the same, we will never be the same, and we do not want to be the same. Men are being told that their masculinity should be suppressed, so they're unhappy... women are attracted to masculinity, so when it's suppressed they're also unhappy. Western society has become terribly feminized, and it's bad for everybody... except those who want to see the West destroyed.
What do you mean by feminized? Men are still men, as far as I can see. Transgender people are still a small minority, even though we talk about them more. Also nobody is saying that men should suppress their masculinity. They just no longer have the obligation to be the strict “pater familias” who the children barely see and, when they do, it is only to receive punishment. A man who hugs his child, takes the child to the doctor or helps with the homework is not somehow less masculine. It’s his child. A man who earns less than his wife, because she has a higher-paying job is not somehow less masculine. A man is not a walking wallet. His value is not limited to the money he earns. Of course, if a woman wants to be a housewife and marry a man who is the sole breadwinner, well, she can do that. It hasn’t been outlawed. It is a bit risky, but a good savings/investment account and life insurance can mitigate the risks. But some people are definitely not happier that way.
Of course men and women are not the same, but they should be equally respected. Not one dominant over the other whether it be men or women in the dominant role.
Evelina Dimova "his value is not limited to the money he earns" tell that to all the women on dating apps who won't give the low totem pole men any chance. Let's be honest, 80% of the women want 20% of the men at the top of the socio-economic ladder.
@@superasper what Burial means is that men don't behave like men. Feminists tell us that masculinity by default is bad and men should show feelings etc
She’s so intelligent! She is a maverick that thinks apart from the all too common sheeple of today. She’s one of our great minds that are much needed presently
"most feminists can't think their way out of a wet paper bag" --Professor Paglia.. :) she is really on to something... most people are afraid to think anything different.. not just feminists, but it's a great example..
Hence you get MGTOWs, celibate bachelors, who aren't interested in being in servitude to a female. In the end, the essential question is "What's in it for me"
Men are happier and more powerful in "traditional" men's roles, women are happier and *more powerful* in "traditional" women's roles. I say "traditional" because to think of the gender roles as arising merely from tradition (and therefore society) is just silly... men and women are best suited for certain roles because of their very *nature* as men and women, and based on their actual *biology* .
now women are competing with each other and more separation, and often time dont like each other where as Camlle stated, back then they were are tight group helping each other... together they are more happier than the isolation of trying to out do each other
I am not saying this to be rude, but she is better than JP. Her books "sexual personae" (first and foremost) and (secondarily) "glittering images" should be required reading in schools.
So many women in our Western culture act like men. As a heterosexual male, I am in no way interested in "masculine" females. Hell, I avoid them like the plague. I don't want or need a female in my life, it's easier and better to just hang out with the guys. When my best friend got divorced many years ago, I noticed he was feeling down, so we sat down and talked about his divorce and how his future might look like. Yeah, we 2 men talked. For maybe 15 minutes and then we got back to normal stuff. We never spoke about his divorce again, and we have a close friendship that has lasted for 32 years even though we see each other maybe only 4 times a year. That's how most men do things. I cannot (and will not try to) morph myself into a "politically correct" or a "semi-man" because I am who I am, the way I was born.
I respect what you say, but I also find it a bit odd that you only talked once, for 15 minutes, to your close mate of 32 years about his divorce. I have 5 close mates and have spoken to all of them numerous times about my divorce. It is normal for us to talk about our family lives, as well as sport, politics, music, literature etc.
You should’ve given him a hug and told him you love him. Nothing wrong with that. You don’t have to be hard and cold fro prove that you’re a strong man
I think her idea of Women in agrarian societies being 'happier' is really not totally correct. Just because the social systems were solid and we're 'ruled by older women' and 'seperate from men' does not imply that everybody was happy. Just because things are different now does not mean they were better before. It's really not as easy as retrograding society and then everything is better. A 'terrible loss' isn't all that terrible. She's good at talking from her viewpoints and she does it strongly, but I definitely think we need to hear her debate somebody on the opposite side.
Oh Camille I understand you and you are correct. Problem is that the younger ladies feel disempowered because they lack financial power because of following traditional female roles. If we could change that dynamic so that their natural power could be recognized and valued then maybe we could produce happier females. Now we have unhappy females and males.
I admire Paglia, but on the subject of the ability of straight men to converse she could expand a little. I know a number of straight men who are excellent conversationalists, perhaps not about fashion or feelings, but get them talking about politics, science, sport, history, literature etc, they are articulate and thoughtful.
Ask first I thought she was crazy nut job just listening to hoy she talks. But once you get past that she's good to listen to. I would liken her to a female version of Jordan Peterson.
The two are spiritual and intellectual kin. Jordan has even done an interview of Paglia, he was so fascinated by her knowledge and body of work. A lot of mutual respect there. Fun fact: the first time Paglia was introduced to who Peterson is was at one of her campus talks and a student asked what she thought of Peterson’s stance on refusing to be obligated to use woke gender neutral pronouns. Paglia didn’t know Peterson at all and had never even heard of him, but she immediately launched into a passionate defense of his position and the utter ridiculousness of the woke left’s agenda. When two hugely knowledgeable intellectuals independently arrive at the same conclusion, it’s hard not to pay extra attention.
I agree w/ you, LP. Paglia & Peterson are definitely similar. For starters, they're both reductive, opportunistic, blow hard, button pushing huckster dick bags.
Ok I agree with what she's saying Camile Paglia seems to make sense. But, what is the answer then? Easy to point out the problem, not so easy to come up with the solution. If she says it isn't men's fault, what are women supposed to do then?
Women will do nothing. They are programmed to be naturally hostile to the idea of being at fault (for anything). The fact is that men lead, women follow. If we men “man-up” and refuse to be bent by feminised society, if we develop standards of our own and enforce them, women will have no choice but to follow. Lead by example, I say.
Learn to read. She’s written tons on solutions. Geezus literally people here who whine about “how come there aren’t solutions to generational problems in a 10 min YT clip!” WTH
@@mensrea1251 Guess I have already been reading too many other kinds of books so didn't really go through hers. Was just wondering if someone happened to know a summary answer from her that I could glean something from
My ex gf has/ had a lot of guy friends - I don’t care what anyone says - this was annoying to me and of course an anxiety source as a potential problem. What if I hung out with successful beautiful women with peach butts 1-2 times a week or even month? You cool with that? Generally I bet most successful and respectful older married couples know this Men and women having 2 separate worlds feels better to me for relationships and speaking from experience in working in both male dominated vs a blend of primarily female work environment - I hated it. I’d rather work with the guys and then have my time with my gf after work. I get why women would want to have guy friends, women can be brutal to eachother with their slights and behind the back talking and some fakeness - not saying guys don’t do that but generally I feel it more from women because of their overall nature. Men are bigger and stronger more physically imposing - so, women have an adaptive advantage in other ways in their development to this.
She describes what David Deida refers to as the shift from first to second stage relationships. But she doesn’t, here, introduce that the solution is going forward to the third (and final) stage, not regressing to the first stage.
You can wave all the stage theories you want but nature and ten thousand generations of behavioural adaptations aren’t going away. Acknowledging and accepting the natural, instinctual parts of our identity and how those find expression in courtship rituals is not “regression” at all. Wth. You must enjoy filling out consent forms prior to holding someone’s hand.
But the thing is nothing can be done about the loss of close knit communities. This is the world we created for ourselves and we kind of just have to put up with it. I absolutely agree with her but it's kind of annoying that she has no solution at all.
Actually Paglia has a lot to say about solutions to the issues she raises. There’s tons of literature she’s written on those. Or did you think this one clip was all of what Camille Paglia has to say?
I can agree with some of this in principle but the fact is that we can't go back and I dont think that we would want to. So much interesting avenues would be lost to women. No opportunities to give well considered lectures to thousands of people Camille! ;) My opinion is that domestic work is mind numbingly boring and being lorded over by interfering older women sounds like torture.
@faultroy Well most people do not live on farms so only a hand-full of people can do that. Also, since when is working in a cubicle considered "masculine."?
@@aurorarose1296 But she didn't say go back either. You assumed that from your own insecurities. Honestly men and women aren't equal as a species. Biologically we are designed to compliment each other. Everything is a power struggle now and I think that is the only thing we go back from. Men and women need to accept themselves and their nature and stop trying to pretend we've evolved from it.
If a women decides she doesn't want to be with me because I have become sensitive to whats been going on with them.well that's Ok.I now see what a sacret thing that she would invite me.All I can say then is pass that ice cream over here.Thank You
@Wahrheit Siegt she doesn't support it anymore. Actually, she technically supported lower age of consent like 14-16. It's normal in Europe but most European nations have 16 as an age of consent. Now, she is in favor of more restrictions on it.
We do not want to be men we want to be ourselves. A lot of the things that are" womanly " are not consistent with that . I do not think about is this manly or womanly am looking for my place in this world . If there are hurdles in my way , I try my way through them or around them . She is wrong about a lot of things. Cooking and cleaning is not empowering it's nesecary . She is claiming women had power they did not an older was respected that is it. It reminds of game of thrones when little finger had his sigil and it was knowledge is power than cersay said power is power . That is what I believe too.
Someone gets cut and gushes blood, a woman will fuss and fret rushing to comfort the wounded, men will grab some duct tape, wrap it up and get back to work without a word about it.
This is extremely false. In the past, the sexes were very segregated across the world. But homosexuality was more prevalent in some societies and not others.
@Sabrina Shahab/ADMINISTRATIONBRAC like Eddy Essien said: some societies had more homosexuality than others (ancient Greece, ancient Japan). in both societies men and women lived in different "worlds".
okay she is absolutely right but the thing is this does not necessarily make feminism wrong. Hetero-normative standards dictate that men and women intermingle more than they should. Just an example is restaurants. Men with repressed homoeroticism want to look at pretty waitresses and tell their friends how good they are at judging female traits. Guys should absolutely have guy time, but the dominant social mechanism used is the "player" mentality that in order to be friends with other guys you need to show them how many bitches you can score, among younger generations, probably adopted from older generation variants like the restaurant example (i.e.. see Hooters). And if guys just want to hangout with each other that is seen as "gay" or a sausage fest. That's the problem that feminists have, at least traditional feminism.
"Men with repressed homoeroticism want to look at pretty waitresses". right. becuase the most plausible explanation for men looking a women is becuase they're secretly gay. C'mon, think through what you've been taught. deep down you know that's not the best explanation for the phenomena you're describing.
It's female sexual selectivity which determines what's "alpha" with respect to who gets to mate with the most women though. Becuase child rearing has a higher cost to females, they're more sexually selective than males with regards to mate choice. Thus we have a situation where there is two female ancestor for every one male ancestor. So even if that theory of why men comment on women's looks to each other (It could plausibly be part of the picture), the reproductive pressure on males to fit a certain "image" (it's actually a set of images, becuase what you're describing is high status males having more reproductive success. There's a multitude of ways to get status) comes from female selectivity. Note tat I'm just being descriptive here, I'm not using the science for some mgtow blame game shit. You're looking at things through a feminist lense, but feminism is ignorant of evolutionary theory. But everything about us is a product of evolutionary pressures.
I get hot for feminine men, both in action and appearance And I feel the attraction and heat and fervor So, erm I'm not sure where's she's getting this from
Tell that to all the women who got hot for a feminine man/fuck boy and then wonder why their relationship fails after 3 years. If not, that's the exception, not the rule. The same applies for nice guys, almost always does the relationship die and lacking in intimacy because all comes down to nature/biology. Bleed out? you die, simple. No matter how much you say or think you won't die if you bleed out. The fact is, you die.
U say this but it’s their masculine parts ur truly attracted to. It’s bold to be able to stay laid back and conversational when other men are likely very confrontational. It takes guts and physical confidence. It’s not such a radical idea that these men u say u are attracted to because of their feminine quality actually have an equal amount of masculinity as well. This is different from wimpy men who instead of having both feminine and masculine parts, lack masculinity at all. 99.99% of women don’t want to date a wimpy man who can’t take care and stand up for himself.
She's right about the older women being powerful and repositories of knowledge. I've observed the same in other 3rd world countries.
we created technology to make our lives easier but as a consequence, we sacrificed our humanity.
I’m glad we didn’t get away with it... we will suffer for our foolishness in order to regain our humanity
@@ryanjensen4692 That if we do it on time
She is hypnotic, and poetic
And a button pushing, simplistic moron.
Couldn't agree more. As a transplant into American culture, I was shocked ate the total lack oc solidarity amongst wpmen here, as well as the level of loneliness I experience as a stay at home mom. Months pass between meaningful interactions with other females. This is a uniquely American thing. When I go overseas I witness a totally different behaviour.
I think that our rugged individualist values has created that.
God bless
@Escape From Zombie Island 2 Bullshit.. You're trying to spin it to make the US look bad.
I keep clicking on these Paglia videos hoping to find a full lecture somewhere. This kind of revelatory psychology is my cup of tea.
It’s deep stuff no doubt. Try some of her books. They’re a fun read, full of bite and humour, as well as wondrous rabbit holes that peel back the layers of psychology and human identity that lead to the kinds of revelation and insight you can’t seem to find in mainstream education today. A tour de force of knowledge and classical education. Love Paglia. What an Amazon.
ua-cam.com/video/v-hIVnmUdXM/v-deo.html&ab_channel=JordanBPeterson
I sometimes wonder how different I would have been had I been born 100 years earlier. A lot less lonely--that's for sure.
Lmao live was very rough then. Certainly before 1920 it was a tough world. Then the Great Depression hit in 1929. Live was hard for a long time.
Men need to be men, and women need to be women... everyone is happier that way, it's so obviously true.
Men and women are not equal, we are not the same, we will never be the same, and we do not want to be the same.
Men are being told that their masculinity should be suppressed, so they're unhappy... women are attracted to masculinity, so when it's suppressed they're also unhappy.
Western society has become terribly feminized, and it's bad for everybody... except those who want to see the West destroyed.
Those that want to see the west destroyed own the media & politics.
What do you mean by feminized? Men are still men, as far as I can see. Transgender people are still a small minority, even though we talk about them more.
Also nobody is saying that men should suppress their masculinity. They just no longer have the obligation to be the strict “pater familias” who the children barely see and, when they do, it is only to receive punishment. A man who hugs his child, takes the child to the doctor or helps with the homework is not somehow less masculine. It’s his child. A man who earns less than his wife, because she has a higher-paying job is not somehow less masculine. A man is not a walking wallet. His value is not limited to the money he earns. Of course, if a woman wants to be a housewife and marry a man who is the sole breadwinner, well, she can do that. It hasn’t been outlawed. It is a bit risky, but a good savings/investment account and life insurance can mitigate the risks. But some people are definitely not happier that way.
Of course men and women are not the same, but they should be equally respected. Not one dominant over the other whether it be men or women in the dominant role.
Evelina Dimova "his value is not limited to the money he earns" tell that to all the women on dating apps who won't give the low totem pole men any chance. Let's be honest, 80% of the women want 20% of the men at the top of the socio-economic ladder.
@@superasper
what Burial means is that men don't behave like men. Feminists tell us that masculinity by default is bad and men should show feelings etc
"The more egalitarian a society becomes, the more different men and women become". -Jordan Peterson
Understanding something like the Nordic Paradox is beyond those who "think" at an emotional level, unfortunately. And that's everyone, these days...
I agree with her so much.
She’s so intelligent!
She is a maverick that thinks apart from the all too common sheeple of today.
She’s one of our great minds that are much needed presently
"most feminists can't think their way out of a wet paper bag" --Professor Paglia.. :) she is really on to something... most people are afraid to think anything different.. not just feminists, but it's a great example..
Hence you get MGTOWs, celibate bachelors, who aren't interested in being in servitude to a female. In the end, the essential question is "What's in it for me"
She is a great, brilliantly original person and about 99% right on everything.
She's Italian? Now I understand her hand motions.
Men are happier and more powerful in "traditional" men's roles, women are happier and *more powerful* in "traditional" women's roles.
I say "traditional" because to think of the gender roles as arising merely from tradition (and therefore society) is just silly... men and women are best suited for certain roles because of their very *nature* as men and women, and based on their actual *biology* .
She described one of my favorite scenes in "Butterfield 8."
now women are competing with each other and more separation, and often time dont like each other where as Camlle stated, back then they were are tight group helping each other... together they are more happier than the isolation of trying to out do each other
She makes too much sense like JP
I am not saying this to be rude, but she is better than JP. Her books "sexual personae" (first and foremost) and (secondarily) "glittering images" should be required reading in schools.
So many women in our Western culture act like men. As a heterosexual male, I am in no way interested in "masculine" females. Hell, I avoid them like the plague. I don't want or need a female in my life, it's easier and better to just hang out with the guys. When my best friend got divorced many years ago, I noticed he was feeling down, so we sat down and talked about his divorce and how his future might look like. Yeah, we 2 men talked. For maybe 15 minutes and then we got back to normal stuff. We never spoke about his divorce again, and we have a close friendship that has lasted for 32 years even though we see each other maybe only 4 times a year. That's how most men do things. I cannot (and will not try to) morph myself into a "politically correct" or a "semi-man" because I am who I am, the way I was born.
I respect what you say, but I also find it a bit odd that you only talked once, for 15 minutes, to your close mate of 32 years about his divorce.
I have 5 close mates and have spoken to all of them numerous times about my divorce. It is normal for us to talk about our family lives, as well as sport, politics, music, literature etc.
You should’ve given him a hug and told him you love him. Nothing wrong with that. You don’t have to be hard and cold fro prove that you’re a strong man
What is the name of the movie?I didn't understand!
What was that old commercial: "It's not NICE to fool Mother Nature!"
There is nothing motherly about nature. Don't blame mom.
I think her idea of Women in agrarian societies being 'happier' is really not totally correct. Just because the social systems were solid and we're 'ruled by older women' and 'seperate from men' does not imply that everybody was happy. Just because things are different now does not mean they were better before. It's really not as easy as retrograding society and then everything is better. A 'terrible loss' isn't all that terrible. She's good at talking from her viewpoints and she does it strongly, but I definitely think we need to hear her debate somebody on the opposite side.
Not a bad idea
When exactly is everybody happy?
Oh Camille I understand you and you are correct. Problem is that the younger ladies feel disempowered because they lack financial power because of following traditional female roles. If we could change that dynamic so that their natural power could be recognized and valued then maybe we could produce happier females. Now we have unhappy females and males.
We have idiots.
Your natural power is to channel your divine femininity and love yourself. In that way you will love and empower others
@@oscardriver no. Don't touch my money. I am not touching your money don't touch mines. You can take your new age thinking some were else.
she is the real life Mrs. Mackie. Drugs'r'bahd M'kay?
so... how do you fix it?
I admire Paglia, but on the subject of the ability of straight men to converse she could expand a little. I know a number of straight men who are excellent conversationalists, perhaps not about fashion or feelings, but get them talking about politics, science, sport, history, literature etc, they are articulate and thoughtful.
Love Camille
The loss of community life is a common theme among conservatives.
Ask first I thought she was crazy nut job just listening to hoy she talks. But once you get past that she's good to listen to. I would liken her to a female version of Jordan Peterson.
Paglia's been in the public sphere a lot longer than Peterson. Personally I prefer her explicitude to Peterson's long-winded sophistry.
The two are spiritual and intellectual kin. Jordan has even done an interview of Paglia, he was so fascinated by her knowledge and body of work. A lot of mutual respect there. Fun fact: the first time Paglia was introduced to who Peterson is was at one of her campus talks and a student asked what she thought of Peterson’s stance on refusing to be obligated to use woke gender neutral pronouns. Paglia didn’t know Peterson at all and had never even heard of him, but she immediately launched into a passionate defense of his position and the utter ridiculousness of the woke left’s agenda. When two hugely knowledgeable intellectuals independently arrive at the same conclusion, it’s hard not to pay extra attention.
I agree w/ you, LP. Paglia & Peterson are definitely similar. For starters, they're both reductive, opportunistic, blow hard, button pushing huckster dick bags.
What movie is she referenceing?
Butterfield 8 (1960)
Give 'em hell, Camille!
Ok I agree with what she's saying Camile Paglia seems to make sense. But, what is the answer then? Easy to point out the problem, not so easy to come up with the solution. If she says it isn't men's fault, what are women supposed to do then?
Women will do nothing. They are programmed to be naturally hostile to the idea of being at fault (for anything).
The fact is that men lead, women follow. If we men “man-up” and refuse to be bent by feminised society, if we develop standards of our own and enforce them, women will have no choice but to follow.
Lead by example, I say.
Recognize the true source of their misery and quit blaming men. Collect gewgaws and talk to them.
Learn to read. She’s written tons on solutions. Geezus literally people here who whine about “how come there aren’t solutions to generational problems in a 10 min YT clip!” WTH
@@mensrea1251 Guess I have already been reading too many other kinds of books so didn't really go through hers. Was just wondering if someone happened to know a summary answer from her that I could glean something from
@@mensrea1251 where has she written them? I really want to know !
Truth✌️
My ex gf has/ had a lot of guy friends - I don’t care what anyone says - this was annoying to me and of course an anxiety source as a potential problem.
What if I hung out with successful beautiful women with peach butts 1-2 times a week or even month? You cool with that? Generally I bet most successful and respectful older married couples know this
Men and women having 2 separate worlds feels better to me for relationships and speaking from experience in working in both male dominated vs a blend of primarily female work environment - I hated it. I’d rather work with the guys and then have my time with my gf after work.
I get why women would want to have guy friends, women can be brutal to eachother with their slights and behind the back talking and some fakeness - not saying guys don’t do that but generally I feel it more from women because of their overall nature.
Men are bigger and stronger more physically imposing - so, women have an adaptive advantage in other ways in their development to this.
"More sexes blend ,less interested they will be in each other !" ..hmmm..A roundabout way of saying islam has gotten it right
yes was just coming to here to say, us Muslims have kept that barrier between public/private world separate.
She describes what David Deida refers to as the shift from first to second stage relationships. But she doesn’t, here, introduce that the solution is going forward to the third (and final) stage, not regressing to the first stage.
You can wave all the stage theories you want but nature and ten thousand generations of behavioural adaptations aren’t going away. Acknowledging and accepting the natural, instinctual parts of our identity and how those find expression in courtship rituals is not “regression” at all. Wth. You must enjoy filling out consent forms prior to holding someone’s hand.
But the thing is nothing can be done about the loss of close knit communities. This is the world we created for ourselves and we kind of just have to put up with it. I absolutely agree with her but it's kind of annoying that she has no solution at all.
The first step in coming up with a solution is to understand the problem.
Actually Paglia has a lot to say about solutions to the issues she raises. There’s tons of literature she’s written on those. Or did you think this one clip was all of what Camille Paglia has to say?
I can agree with some of this in principle but the fact is that we can't go back and I dont think that we would want to. So much interesting avenues would be lost to women. No opportunities to give well considered lectures to thousands of people Camille! ;) My opinion is that domestic work is mind numbingly boring and being lorded over by interfering older women sounds like torture.
At wich point in the video did she suggest that we should "go back"?
@faultroy Well most people do not live on farms so only a hand-full of people can do that. Also, since when is working in a cubicle considered "masculine."?
Maceta well she didn’t provide an alternative mode of action did she?
@@aurorarose1296 But she didn't say go back either. You assumed that from your own insecurities.
Honestly men and women aren't equal as a species. Biologically we are designed to compliment each other. Everything is a power struggle now and I think that is the only thing we go back from. Men and women need to accept themselves and their nature and stop trying to pretend we've evolved from it.
Yup.
If a women decides she doesn't want to be with me because I have become sensitive to whats been going on with them.well that's Ok.I now see what a sacret thing that she would invite me.All I can say then is pass that ice cream over here.Thank You
Marshall Martin 1 brainwashed. Not sensitive.
I think I just lost half my testosterone reading that.
Annette Benning...Lol. Stick figured woman. No thank you even though she was a pretty woman.
Still is, I like to look at it as a parent child relationship on steroids.
okeey
2:26
music is too loud maan
I would gladly have her children.
She's a lesbian.
@Wahrheit Siegt she doesn't support it anymore. Actually, she technically supported lower age of consent like 14-16. It's normal in Europe but most European nations have 16 as an age of consent. Now, she is in favor of more restrictions on it.
Go faster and faster and faster.
We do not want to be men we want to be ourselves.
A lot of the things that are" womanly " are not consistent with that .
I do not think about is this manly or womanly am looking for my place in this world .
If there are hurdles in my way , I try my way through them or around them .
She is wrong about a lot of things.
Cooking and cleaning is not empowering it's nesecary .
She is claiming women had power they did not an older was respected that is it.
It reminds of game of thrones when little finger had his sigil and it was knowledge is power than cersay said power is power .
That is what I believe too.
Someone gets cut and gushes blood, a woman will fuss and fret rushing to comfort the wounded, men will grab some duct tape, wrap it up and get back to work without a word about it.
Uh, no, anyone with an ounce of common sense will stop the blood and bandage the wound first. It’s first aid basics.
Sex segregation just develops homosexuality
This is extremely false.
In the past, the sexes were very segregated across the world. But homosexuality was more prevalent in some societies and not others.
@Sabrina Shahab/ADMINISTRATIONBRAC
like Eddy Essien said: some societies had more homosexuality than others (ancient Greece, ancient Japan). in both societies men and women lived in different "worlds".
Evidence?
@@frankbeane1071 that'd be you LMAO
okay she is absolutely right but the thing is this does not necessarily make feminism wrong. Hetero-normative standards dictate that men and women intermingle more than they should. Just an example is restaurants. Men with repressed homoeroticism want to look at pretty waitresses and tell their friends how good they are at judging female traits.
Guys should absolutely have guy time, but the dominant social mechanism used is the "player" mentality that in order to be friends with other guys you need to show them how many bitches you can score, among younger generations, probably adopted from older generation variants like the restaurant example (i.e.. see Hooters). And if guys just want to hangout with each other that is seen as "gay" or a sausage fest. That's the problem that feminists have, at least traditional feminism.
Weiss Grimoire how is that a problem? Wanting to be successful with women is not differnt than wanting to be successful in the work place.
"Men with repressed homoeroticism want to look at pretty waitresses". right. becuase the most plausible explanation for men looking a women is becuase they're secretly gay. C'mon, think through what you've been taught. deep down you know that's not the best explanation for the phenomena you're describing.
It's female sexual selectivity which determines what's "alpha" with respect to who gets to mate with the most women though. Becuase child rearing has a higher cost to females, they're more sexually selective than males with regards to mate choice. Thus we have a situation where there is two female ancestor for every one male ancestor. So even if that theory of why men comment on women's looks to each other (It could plausibly be part of the picture), the reproductive pressure on males to fit a certain "image" (it's actually a set of images, becuase what you're describing is high status males having more reproductive success. There's a multitude of ways to get status) comes from female selectivity. Note tat I'm just being descriptive here, I'm not using the science for some mgtow blame game shit. You're looking at things through a feminist lense, but feminism is ignorant of evolutionary theory. But everything about us is a product of evolutionary pressures.
This says more about you than society. Lmao
And that because women don’t collect themselves trophies from every single guy that took advantage of.
It's in women's best interest to be a sister wife.
That goes for lesbians,too..
being some man's quiet and obedient wife.
No it's not in my best interest. It's in your best interest not mine as a woman or we won't have women rights movement. So don't speak for me.
Lmaooo
Ok
I get hot for feminine men, both in action and appearance
And I feel the attraction and heat and fervor
So, erm
I'm not sure where's she's getting this from
Tell that to all the women who got hot for a feminine man/fuck boy and then wonder why their relationship fails after 3 years.
If not, that's the exception, not the rule.
The same applies for nice guys, almost always does the relationship die and lacking in intimacy because all comes down to nature/biology.
Bleed out? you die, simple.
No matter how much you say or think you won't die if you bleed out.
The fact is, you die.
U say this but it’s their masculine parts ur truly attracted to. It’s bold to be able to stay laid back and conversational when other men are likely very confrontational. It takes guts and physical confidence. It’s not such a radical idea that these men u say u are attracted to because of their feminine quality actually have an equal amount of masculinity as well. This is different from wimpy men who instead of having both feminine and masculine parts, lack masculinity at all. 99.99% of women don’t want to date a wimpy man who can’t take care and stand up for himself.
Smart woman. She represents what Feminism could become.