I think Jordan Peterson was just on the brink of teaching at Harvard around the time of this interview. So your claim doesn't sound accurate. She just was recognized by MSM first. Peterson said the same thing for like 30 years before he got literal global attention around 2016
And yet the problem worsens on university campuses all across North America. The careerist bureaucrats have sunk their teeth deeply into the academy and it will be a hell of a fight to push them back.
She is very sexy in a profound way. I mean that she is smart, logical, strong, confident, bold yet gracious and engaging. She transcends pop culture orthodoxy on female sexual attractiveness.
@@thediggler5614 Denying reality as obvious as gravity is a sign of a weak mind. Slink back to whatever irrelevant corner of planet earth you come from and spare humanity your idiocies.
Charlie Rose is a clown. I like her and agree with her a lot but she is not beyond criticism. This is what a famous writer wrote of her book Sexual Personae. "The novelist John Updike wrote that Sexual Personae "feels less a survey than a curiously ornate harangue. Her percussive style-one short declarative sentence after another-eventually wearies the reader; her diction functions not so much to elicit the secrets of books as to hammer them into submission... The weary reader longs for the mercy of a qualification, a doubt, a hesitation; there is little sense, in her uncompanionable prose, of exploration occurring before our eyes, of tentative motions of thought reflected in a complex syntax."
I haven't read her but listening to her Updike's (no pun intented) criticism seems justified. Sometimes she declares everything and explains little of the process of how she got there. One feels that some of what see says skips the explanation and logic of how she got to her point, but of course, it might be there but I'm not educated enough. It's difficult to know if her single mindedness and focus on her idea that the world is a war between order and disorder, beauty and decadence etc etc is true. Wikipedia explains and I see some of Paglia's points that society airbrushes, sanitizes the decadence of art and misses the point of great paintings, literature, poetry (Emily Dickinson as an example). But she may take it too far once in a while. She's so bold and so positive and with that may come less introspection.
I remember this interview, I was blown away by her beauty and intelligence. Every single word she says is 100% right on and relevant today. Camille is still a force of nature and the epitome of feminine and feminist energy. Love her!
@@KR-nv3ru Yeah, she is a massive hypocrite who contradicts herself OFTEN. I would say like 90% of her appeal is that she exudes confidence and has a very infectiously eccentric personality. She is a character. People like characters. I enjoy watching Camille because of her deft oratory skills and her whimsy, but I still disagree with probably maybe like over 80% of stuff she says.
Camille sounds so haughty today when she says that she was 25 years ahead of her time. Yet here she is. Laying it down almost 30 years ago. So she's actually being modest hahaha God I love her confidence, her passion, and go figure, she's an Aries. I am also Aries. I relate to her obsession and hard headedness so freakin much
I'm quite sure she's referring to the horoscope in terms of the Greco-Roman archetype rather than personality as a tool. She was born on the 2nd of April.
@@acrylicqualia it's clearly a butthurt troll or a radical feminist. Don't waste your time, talking sense into them. Even jf they see their mistake, they'd never accept it.
In 1992 Camille says ”This male bashing that has been going on for the last 20 years has to stop” . So she is referencing 1972 almost 50 years ago! Over 50 years of males bashing! Do we have to leave it to good, intelligent and courageous women like Camille Paglia? Men have to start standing up for what is right or G-d help us all!
Men have practically no support to stand up currently. Everywhere men are bashed, told they are the problem, degraded, told they are toxic, told women are perfect and men are the problem. When a man can't so much as say "Hello" to a woman without being labeled a misogynist or rapist, there's only two real options: Give up and walk away, or take to the extremes to turn the tables. I can't imagine seeing a simple "stand up" or a mere push back... it's either going to be an explosive backlash or men will walk away from society and let it burn (as is currently occurring with men swearing off relationships and walking away from marriage and society).
Im 28 and my generation of mates all feel like we are the bad guys in the story. Only now some are realising it's bullshitting and the others are just depressed
Yes. Whenever someone tells says "It's just 3rd wave feminism, 2nd wave was fine!", tell them to read some history. The same goes for 1st wave. Feminism has always been insane because women's biology hasn't changed.
The problem is how exactly are you going to stand up? Have you ever argued with a radical feminist? They literally talk over you, shout at you, and every other uncivilized behavior you can think of. That's the problem with fighting or arguing with women, a woman will punch you without a thought and stand there like nothing happened because she knows that you can't hit her back. The regulating factor (threat of imminent violence) that motivates men to solve arguments amongst themselves is absent in women. So to be brief, yes you can stand up to women, but they'll just shout over you, pepper spray you, assault you or if she's crazy enough, just falsely accuse you.
@@mayanksharma3651 The act of standing up against a woman in is itself a loss from the start. By standing up to them you are conceding that they have some kind of power for you to stand up against, and that in itself robs you of your masculinity. The whole thing is a strange and unnatural situation, I don't have any immediate solutions off the top of my head.
Original thinker who was immensely courageous. Back in the early 1990s at the height of the first PC era, she'd happily walk into a auditorium full of jeering activists and rip them to shreds. Her super power was her knowlege -- activists could never do anything to her. Steinem and Sontag's attempt to wound her was purely trying to deny (ludicrously) that they weren't aware of her. She's smart and interesting, which is what public intellectuals should be. This impulse to be a part of a tribe and only support people you believe in totally is a characteristic of small minds.
Camille, my kind of feminist! Street smart feminism over feminazi all day everyday! The old gal is still as sharp as she was here with Charlie Rose. Camille Paglia is a phenom to the enth degree. Let the street smart feminist revolution begin!
One thing I've noticed about Paglia is for all the super-fast talking and tangential thinking, she listens extremely well and rarely if ever interrupts.
No. She defends pedophilia and trafficking. I don't think every women is a victim under the "patriarchy" but she is just taking it too far. She's also celebrity obsessed.
@@Lala-cw7ez Can you provide me a link directly to her defending sex trafficking and child sexual abuse? She's not celebrity obsessed, she's literally a scholar who studies pop culture, because it's the predominant form of culture in the US. And she's also a patriot.
@@augustgreig9420 She is celebrity obsessed okayyy? xd But in the best way possible. She did give money to NAMBLA is the early 90s, because she supported men having sex with boys, but later on she said she changed her mind, saying something like "I thought men were more resilient" or that they aren't anymore. Something like that. The sex trafficking thing has to be BS. I would still listen to her justification though xd
What a professional journalist! He is logical, not biased, sincerely interested. Not only Camille is interesting, but the journalist also was a discovery for me. And he has a sense of humour. I do not see such these days
Camille is and has always been a mighty warrior blasting through the bromides and laughable platitudes of contemporary PC dogma and ideology. Long may she harangue! Charlie Rose was a good interviewer, but his career and reputation ended in disgrace because (it is alleged) he used his position/fame to play some real office games with the ladies. Ironic, because in so many interviews across the spectrum he used to decry sexism and for all intents and purposes promoted himself as a doctrinarian liberal in that particular sphere. Beware of pedestals and those they uphold.
I think that she has the Italian ego...... No shortage of self esteem, but at the same time optimisitic, and encouraging, and engaged with life and the things that she has a passion for. Interestingly watching this interview, I got the feeling that because of her manner of speech, and her facial expressions, that she felt a bit intimidated being there at the table (In a classroom she's been on her own turf.) She appeared quite defensive. Charlie figured that out, and tried to put her at ease. Charlie has empathy for his guests, and truly was a gracious host. His questions were really good, too. I love listening to Camille talk. She has some unique conclusions. She is fascinating, even if I disagree with her. Lots of what she says is true, and enlightening. She's a one of a kind. Psychologically, I think that Camile resonates to aggresivenes, and contrarian positions. She has little tolerance for phoniness in people. She likes the aggresiveness of males, and the self reliance of many males, but she resents capitulation. She kind of de facto, wants to be one of the boys.
"This male bashing that's been occurring for the last 20 years has to stop." Wow, she was saying that back in 1992, and continues to say it today, 2020. The message is consistent.
Fierce indeed but she's also fair - she even calls Woolf and her contemporaries "intelligent women", even though she absolutely lambasts their feminism & education.
I've been watching her lectures from the 2010s, and thinking how she's getting older. However, I realized she's Italian, so she's going to live forever. I heard her name back in the 90s, but I never got it. If I had listened to this interview in 1992, I would have been completely puzzled. Now, I'm around her age at the time of the interview, and she makes plenty of sense.
So ironic, I just finished writing my paper on Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morality, and I'm currently reading de Beauvoir, The Second Sex. I'm on the rite path.
Omg, I have just realized that Rupaul has the exact same speaking pattern, gestures; Rupaul has a little sexiness to his tone, though. The way they talk are so similar lol
She really makes me feel joyful when I listen to her. I've had Sexual Personae on my shelf for years and I'm kicking myself for not reading it sooner than now. It is a masterpiece!
Does anyone find her really attractive in this interview? Dare I say sexy? I’ve only seen her current interviews. She is something else. You know Charlie’s got a little chub hidden beneath that table. Lol nothing but love. But crazy how these problems have only expanded and gotten more twisted.
Paglia has something that very few people on the left today have. She has principles and integrity. Everything she is saying in this 1992 interview are the same things she says today. You have to respect her regardless of your political ideology.
From 12:02 to 14:34 I think you can actually faintly hear what they talked about during commercials, I think something about Susan Sontag first, called her a hypocrite, but can't understand the rest.
It's pretty obvious that anyone who doesn't like her is just intimidated by her. Hell, I'M intimidated by her but I also adore her. She's bold and deft and classy and very astute.
She is absolutely correct- women should be aiming for the great heights that men have achieved. Not pulling men down to a third rate standard of achievement due to women’s lack of historical achievement. Women should be learning from the great men of history! Women like Margaret Thatcher, Golda Meir, as well, but to trash male achievement or denigrate it is not the way to achievement for women
"To me, gay men are ultimately more masculine than straight men." YESSS! I've been feeling this for years as a young gay male adult. Finally someone else shares my perspective.
From the gays I've been around, most are physically and essentially masculine, they are robust and agressive, therefore suitable to be military trained; but most are not culturally masculine, i.e. they're not into beer, guns mechanics, sports, etc. (not all straights are either). It is the gay colorful drag queen culture they project which causes opposition nowadays.
It seems to me that she is presenting herself as more of a public personality here than she does now. I find her tact now more appealing, more effective- I like that she has shed some of the “fashion” of this interview.
“…she says she doesn’t even know you.” “Even though there’s a picture of us in 1973 😏 and her son attacks me in Vanity Fair 😏” I actually love her ahahaha
PC was novel then. It's maintream now. I see it every day in leading newspapers. By the way, let me introduce myself--I'm the Camille of history--you can meet me and learn about me here: ua-cam.com/video/zhvLKG-vkp8/v-deo.html
@Chad Dexter Political correctness is a label used to demonize and shame fashionable patterns of thought that look ridiculous and sophomoric when armed with any more than a cursory understanding of history, literature, anthropology, biology, and psychology.
Interesting to see Camille Paglia before she had fully thrown off leftist orthodoxy - when she realized that almost none of it was in fact separable from identity and victimhood politics. Also interesting to see Charlie defending the thinking that ultimately canceled him.
I always loved her views on many things, like politics, feminism, art and history. But when she's off base, she's really off base. Her praise of Madonna and so-called gay culture is ridiculous, since both of those things are empty and shallow and small-minded and narcissistic. They are both just warmed-over recycled bits of Pop culture past. And they both have a very small range of taste which never extends beyond themselves. Which is probably why even though I'm gay myself, I always found the "gay" and Madonna type tastes really banal and obvious and limited, and very homogeneous. I'm surprised that Camille Paglia would mistake it for something other than that . And her opinion that all women "should be bisexual" is absurd in every possible way. But this interview was in the 90s, when a lot of people were going around saying things like "I believe everyone is bisexual". And her view on drugs is also totally absurd.
Camille was the first Anti-PC academic; long before Jordan Peterson.
She's 20 years older than JP!
She was just praising the drag queens. I'm all set.
I think Jordan Peterson was just on the brink of teaching at Harvard around the time of this interview. So your claim doesn't sound accurate. She just was recognized by MSM first. Peterson said the same thing for like 30 years before he got literal global attention around 2016
She's still around. I'm in the process of reading all her books now. It's a lot, but she's got tons of interesting insights.
I just watched a video of them together and it seems they get along pretty well.
My jaw is hitting the floor, I feel like this interview could have happened yesterday, but it was 30 years ago. The message still stands
Because the truth will cut through it all. I don't agree with everything but she is on it
People don’t change over the centuries. We will always have kind people, liars, hot heads, cowards, stupid people, and on and on it goes….
And yet the problem worsens on university campuses all across North America. The careerist bureaucrats have sunk their teeth deeply into the academy and it will be a hell of a fight to push them back.
There's not much of a message, and certainly nothing resembling arguments or evidence.
Wow she looks gorgeous
She is very sexy in a profound way.
I mean that she is smart, logical, strong, confident, bold yet gracious and engaging. She transcends pop culture orthodoxy on female sexual attractiveness.
Wrong. She IS GORGEOUS, inwardly and outwardly!
Wrong! You ARE a dipshit inside and out! 🖕🖕🖕
@@thediggler5614 Denying reality as obvious as gravity is a sign of a weak mind. Slink back to whatever irrelevant corner of planet earth you come from and spare humanity your idiocies.
@Sad u know she fine fuck outta here
Everyone gives her a hard way to go because she speaks so quickly. Explanation: She thinks quickly. Bravo to her! Try to keep up!
Charlie Rose is a clown. I like her and agree with her a lot but she is not beyond criticism. This is what a famous writer wrote of her book Sexual Personae. "The novelist John Updike wrote that Sexual Personae "feels less a survey than a curiously ornate harangue. Her percussive style-one short declarative sentence after another-eventually wearies the reader; her diction functions not so much to elicit the secrets of books as to hammer them into submission... The weary reader longs for the mercy of a qualification, a doubt, a hesitation; there is little sense, in her uncompanionable prose, of exploration occurring before our eyes, of tentative motions of thought reflected in a complex syntax."
I haven't read her but listening to her Updike's (no pun intented) criticism seems justified. Sometimes she declares everything and explains little of the process of how she got there. One feels that some of what see says skips the explanation and logic of how she got to her point, but of course, it might be there but I'm not educated enough. It's difficult to know if her single mindedness and focus on her idea that the world is a war between order and disorder, beauty and decadence etc etc is true. Wikipedia explains and I see some of Paglia's points that society airbrushes, sanitizes the decadence of art and misses the point of great paintings, literature, poetry (Emily Dickinson as an example). But she may take it too far once in a while. She's so bold and so positive and with that may come less introspection.
Paglia without the "ok" thing? I'm confused and scared.
I don't know if it's m'kay or not xd
I'm wondering if she adopted that after seeing her fellow aries Tarantino say it all the time
Ok? Ok? Ok? HEPNEHEBEBLEBENL-
Brilliant!!!!
@@TheAnhedonicOne HAHAHAHHAHAA
Kinda ironic Charlie Rose himself got taken down for vague sexual harassment accusations about 30 years after this.
I remember this interview, I was blown away by her beauty and intelligence. Every single word she says is 100% right on and relevant today. Camille is still a force of nature and the epitome of feminine and feminist energy. Love her!
Her facial expressions!! 👌😂
She's amazing in the way she communicates her point, with words and gestures.
I no longer like Paglia. She's disgusting. She misrepresents herself.
K R Disagree with you on this one.
That is what Italians do!
@@KR-nv3ru Yeah, she is a massive hypocrite who contradicts herself OFTEN. I would say like 90% of her appeal is that she exudes confidence and has a very infectiously eccentric personality. She is a character. People like characters. I enjoy watching Camille because of her deft oratory skills and her whimsy, but I still disagree with probably maybe like over 80% of stuff she says.
Love her. She is authentic, which is a rarity these days.
Camille sounds so haughty today when she says that she was 25 years ahead of her time. Yet here she is. Laying it down almost 30 years ago. So she's actually being modest hahaha
God I love her confidence, her passion, and go figure, she's an Aries.
I am also Aries. I relate to her obsession and hard headedness so freakin much
Haha I had a feeling she was an Aries! It's my rising and I love her too
I'm quite sure she's referring to the horoscope in terms of the Greco-Roman archetype rather than personality as a tool. She was born on the 2nd of April.
@@acrylicqualia it's clearly a butthurt troll or a radical feminist. Don't waste your time, talking sense into them. Even jf they see their mistake, they'd never accept it.
In 1992 Camille says ”This male bashing that has been going on for the last 20 years has to stop” . So she is referencing 1972 almost 50 years ago! Over 50 years of males bashing! Do we have to leave it to good, intelligent and courageous women like Camille Paglia? Men have to start standing up for what is right or G-d help us all!
Men have practically no support to stand up currently. Everywhere men are bashed, told they are the problem, degraded, told they are toxic, told women are perfect and men are the problem. When a man can't so much as say "Hello" to a woman without being labeled a misogynist or rapist, there's only two real options: Give up and walk away, or take to the extremes to turn the tables. I can't imagine seeing a simple "stand up" or a mere push back... it's either going to be an explosive backlash or men will walk away from society and let it burn (as is currently occurring with men swearing off relationships and walking away from marriage and society).
Im 28 and my generation of mates all feel like we are the bad guys in the story. Only now some are realising it's bullshitting and the others are just depressed
Yes. Whenever someone tells says "It's just 3rd wave feminism, 2nd wave was fine!", tell them to read some history. The same goes for 1st wave. Feminism has always been insane because women's biology hasn't changed.
The problem is how exactly are you going to stand up? Have you ever argued with a radical feminist? They literally talk over you, shout at you, and every other uncivilized behavior you can think of.
That's the problem with fighting or arguing with women, a woman will punch you without a thought and stand there like nothing happened because she knows that you can't hit her back. The regulating factor (threat of imminent violence) that motivates men to solve arguments amongst themselves is absent in women.
So to be brief, yes you can stand up to women, but they'll just shout over you, pepper spray you, assault you or if she's crazy enough, just falsely accuse you.
@@mayanksharma3651 The act of standing up against a woman in is itself a loss from the start. By standing up to them you are conceding that they have some kind of power for you to stand up against, and that in itself robs you of your masculinity. The whole thing is a strange and unnatural situation, I don't have any immediate solutions off the top of my head.
Original thinker who was immensely courageous. Back in the early 1990s at the height of the first PC era, she'd happily walk into a auditorium full of jeering activists and rip them to shreds. Her super power was her knowlege -- activists could never do anything to her. Steinem and Sontag's attempt to wound her was purely trying to deny (ludicrously) that they weren't aware of her. She's smart and interesting, which is what public intellectuals should be. This impulse to be a part of a tribe and only support people you believe in totally is a characteristic of small minds.
*Here is a Woman to Contend With.*
She gets better with time - love to listen to her speak!
Camille, my kind of feminist! Street smart feminism over feminazi all day everyday! The old gal is still as sharp as she was here with Charlie Rose. Camille Paglia is a phenom to the enth degree. Let the street smart feminist revolution begin!
She's no more phenom, than Ben Shapiro is. Both very smart and quick thinkers, who have done a lot for humanity, but no, they're no phenoms.
One thing I've noticed about Paglia is for all the super-fast talking and tangential thinking, she listens extremely well and rarely if ever interrupts.
Incredible. She is brilliant. If she had been listened to, as she should have been, we wouldn't be in the ridiculous mess we are in today.
Camille Paglia gives feminism a good name. The best kind. Said by a man. tired of all the PC garbage and rampant hysteria and victimology of 2018
There are more and more of us pushing back. Don't give up.
No. She defends pedophilia and trafficking. I don't think every women is a victim under the "patriarchy" but she is just taking it too far. She's also celebrity obsessed.
@@Lala-cw7ez Can you provide me a link directly to her defending sex trafficking and child sexual abuse?
She's not celebrity obsessed, she's literally a scholar who studies pop culture, because it's the predominant form of culture in the US. And she's also a patriot.
@Ben Shapiro didn't she later change her mind about that?
@@augustgreig9420 She is celebrity obsessed okayyy? xd But in the best way possible. She did give money to NAMBLA is the early 90s, because she supported men having sex with boys, but later on she said she changed her mind, saying something like "I thought men were more resilient" or that they aren't anymore. Something like that.
The sex trafficking thing has to be BS. I would still listen to her justification though xd
"No one has thought about nature for 20 years in contemporary feminism" absolutely brilliant and accurate point
Yes they did; she merely ignores it and creates broad categorizations.
La Paglia was way ahead of her time. Twenty years ago she was talking about things that have only now come to be.
What a professional journalist! He is logical, not biased, sincerely interested. Not only Camille is interesting, but the journalist also was a discovery for me. And he has a sense of humour. I do not see such these days
The great Charlie Rose! The days when a high-profile TV interviewer like him could talk to controversial people at all. Now it's Joe Rogan and....?
Camille is and has always been a mighty warrior blasting through the bromides and laughable platitudes of contemporary PC dogma and ideology. Long may she harangue! Charlie Rose was a good interviewer, but his career and reputation ended in disgrace because (it is alleged) he used his position/fame to play some real office games with the ladies. Ironic, because in so many interviews across the spectrum he used to decry sexism and for all intents and purposes promoted himself as a doctrinarian liberal in that particular sphere. Beware of pedestals and those they uphold.
Love Camile. Magnificent thinker!
I think that she has the Italian ego...... No shortage of self esteem, but at the same time optimisitic, and encouraging, and engaged with life and the things that she has a passion for. Interestingly watching this interview, I got the feeling that because of her manner of speech, and her facial expressions, that she felt a bit intimidated being there at the table (In a classroom she's been on her own turf.) She appeared quite defensive. Charlie figured that out, and tried to put her at ease. Charlie has empathy for his guests, and truly was a gracious host. His questions were really good, too. I love listening to Camille talk. She has some unique conclusions. She is fascinating, even if I disagree with her. Lots of what she says is true, and enlightening. She's a one of a kind. Psychologically, I think that Camile resonates to aggresivenes, and contrarian positions. She has little tolerance for phoniness in people. She likes the aggresiveness of males, and the self reliance of many males, but she resents capitulation. She kind of de facto, wants to be one of the boys.
what a very good summation!
Camille intimidated? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
God I love her!!! Since 2019 when I found her through Jordan Peterson …. 24 years old now. She’s still my idol!
Paglia's dream of the 21st century *GOD IF ONLY*
i think it's still gonna happen. the status quo isn't working
Her dream was to legalize child pornography and allow men to molest children in order to return to the "height of Western civilization".
I nominate Camille Paglia as General Manager of the universe!
"This male bashing that's been occurring for the last 20 years has to stop." Wow, she was saying that back in 1992, and continues to say it today, 2020. The message is consistent.
This conversation could be taking place today (it is) Camille's intellect is formidable.
Just found a pristine copy of 'Sex, Art, and American Culture' in the corner of a small thrift store for $0.99, Christmas came early!
Miss this show😞
As a Libra, a polar opposite of an Aries, I absolutely LOVE and ADMIRE Aries women and their fierce character.
It’s ironic she’s also a libra rising !
@@salmachouqair2763 u can see that on her hair
Fook ur stars
She has enormous confidence! Really inspiring!
She is SO FIERCE about the "shoddy" Yale and Harvard feminists!!! Go Camille!
Fierce indeed but she's also fair - she even calls Woolf and her contemporaries "intelligent women", even though she absolutely lambasts their feminism & education.
If you crank the volume during the comercial break you can hear Charlie trying to set her up with another woman backstage.
Camille doesn’t mince words.
She has an incredible mind. Her way of being able to explain her position is flawless and shows such a complicated and well-versed disposition.
I also appreciate her passion for what she speaks about.
'I'm not going away.'
Please, my lady, never leave us alone. 😢
This is really some comedy gold. I love Sontag with all my heart but 17:10 onwards is so damned funny. Paglia’s whimsy is just… it’s excellent
As ever, respect and gratitude for all the work Paglia has done. Feminism needs more Paglia!!!
She was the whistleblower on the downfall of modern feminism, I wish it actually improved after this interview instead of spiraling ever-downward.
YES UA-cam YES, you are finally starting to understand my taste... at last
This is 28 years ago. Its like we learnt nothing
I weep for the world that could have been, had Paglia won the war for Feminism.
Fantastic content, thanks for posting
Camille Paglia is a powerhouse of critical thinking outside the box.
At 2.45. She's talking about Anita Hill. Now fast forward to 2018 and the Kavanaugh Hearings.
holygoos exactly what I was thinking!
Archaic Red Scare
Imagine how fast she'll speak in 2025
I've been watching her lectures from the 2010s, and thinking how she's getting older. However, I realized she's Italian, so she's going to live forever.
I heard her name back in the 90s, but I never got it. If I had listened to this interview in 1992, I would have been completely puzzled. Now, I'm around her age at the time of the interview, and she makes plenty of sense.
Hurricane Camille !!!
So ironic, I just finished writing my paper on Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morality, and I'm currently reading de Beauvoir, The Second Sex. I'm on the rite path.
i bought Second Sex a couple of days ago, looking forward to read it.
Read 'the manipulted Man' by Esther vilar. It's a great book .
Omg, I have just realized that Rupaul has the exact same speaking pattern, gestures; Rupaul has a little sexiness to his tone, though. The way they talk are so similar lol
I was thinking how much her tone and rhythms reminds me of Thomas Sowell...
Star struck!❤
these hunks going all the way to Greek art
One thing I wish Camille would do is speak faster.
If this is feminism then I'm a feminist.
She really makes me feel joyful when I listen to her. I've had Sexual Personae on my shelf for years and I'm kicking myself for not reading it sooner than now. It is a masterpiece!
Does anyone find her really attractive in this interview? Dare I say sexy? I’ve only seen her current interviews. She is something else. You know Charlie’s got a little chub hidden beneath that table. Lol nothing but love. But crazy how these problems have only expanded and gotten more twisted.
She’s a very sexy lady.
Same! Her intellect and unbridled pace and then she ends it with a raised eyebrow.... sexy!
I had the same response. Her intelligence paired with her banter, snark, and charisma make her a VERY attractive woman.
Beautiful, brainy, assertive woman.
Remarkable that this is from 1992.
Paglia has something that very few people on the left today have. She has principles and integrity. Everything she is saying in this 1992 interview are the same things she says today. You have to respect her regardless of your political ideology.
Paglia was not then nor now a leftist.
What a great woman.
"if it were left to women to create civilization,we'd still be living in grass huts!"-camille paglia
I wonder what she meant by that!
@@SliszMeisterGeneral She was talking about the innate creativity of men.
I'd love to live in a grass hut !
A fine example of a strong, fierce woman.
From 12:02 to 14:34 I think you can actually faintly hear what they talked about during commercials, I think something about Susan Sontag first, called her a hypocrite, but can't understand the rest.
It's pretty obvious that anyone who doesn't like her is just intimidated by her. Hell, I'M intimidated by her but I also adore her. She's bold and deft and classy and very astute.
She is absolutely correct- women should be aiming for the great heights that men have achieved. Not pulling men down to a third rate standard of achievement due to women’s lack of historical achievement. Women should be learning from the great men of history! Women like Margaret Thatcher, Golda Meir, as well, but to trash male achievement or denigrate it is not the way to achievement for women
she was right then and precisely right now! On the spot!
I love this woman.
God bless her. Completely rational and realistic.
Camille is one of the last purist academics/intillectuals. No fucks given. Give 'em hell, Camille!
oh she is aries like .
"To me, gay men are ultimately more masculine than straight men." YESSS! I've been feeling this for years as a young gay male adult. Finally someone else shares my perspective.
From the gays I've been around, most are physically and essentially masculine, they are robust and agressive, therefore suitable to be military trained; but most are not culturally masculine, i.e. they're not into beer, guns mechanics, sports, etc. (not all straights are either). It is the gay colorful drag queen culture they project which causes opposition nowadays.
An explosively brilliant mind. Love listening to her. Constantly stuns me into nodding. Gotta love her.
Che robba questa intervista
She looks like a character from the Golden Girls.
Madonna didn't want to raise Camille's cultural awareness at her own cost or expense.
It seems to me that she is presenting herself as more of a public personality here than she does now. I find her tact now more appealing, more effective- I like that she has shed some of the “fashion” of this interview.
“…she says she doesn’t even know you.”
“Even though there’s a picture of us in 1973 😏 and her son attacks me in Vanity Fair 😏”
I actually love her ahahaha
What a woman! And what an interviewer!
What a powerhouse.
CR: “Susan Sontag’s got another book out”
CP: “Oh it’s a novel. It’s a very poor novel too. A dull novel.”
I absolutely love her energy! A very attractive mind & individual ♈️💜
This is crazy, they spoke about political correctness in 1992 and it is still here. Has nothing changed for the better?
It's still in the minority. Most of us are normal people just living our lives
PC has gotten much worse.
@Chad Dexter huh?
PC was novel then. It's maintream now. I see it every day in leading newspapers.
By the way, let me introduce myself--I'm the Camille of history--you can meet me and learn about me here: ua-cam.com/video/zhvLKG-vkp8/v-deo.html
@Chad Dexter Political correctness is a label used to demonize and shame fashionable patterns of thought that look ridiculous and sophomoric when armed with any more than a cursory understanding of history, literature, anthropology, biology, and psychology.
"At a time when I was very outspoken"
Her obsession with Madonna in the 90ies 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
An interview with her and Madonna never happened.
Camille would read her to filth today!
MY SPIRIT ANIMAL.
Now THERE’S a strong woman! 😍 mouthy and brainy!
As an Italian American Aries I can relate to Paglia 100%
Interesting to see Camille Paglia before she had fully thrown off leftist orthodoxy - when she realized that almost none of it was in fact separable from identity and victimhood politics. Also interesting to see Charlie defending the thinking that ultimately canceled him.
Charlie Rose arguing on behalf of female victims of sexual pressure in the workplace.
GOD DAMN SHE IS ON FIRE. I LOVE THIS WOMAN
she was so ahead of her time
Oh, this aged like winemilk.
9:40 Camille Paglia said "okay"
23:12 that didn't age well
For non-native speakers, play in 0.75×
Is there any correlation with hormones and "compulsory heterossexuality"?
Wow what an individual
Ironic considering what came to light about Charlie Rose 20 years later. Either way I love me some Camille.
I always loved her views on many things, like politics, feminism, art and history. But when she's off base, she's really off base. Her praise of Madonna and so-called gay culture is ridiculous, since both of those things are empty and shallow and small-minded and narcissistic. They are both just warmed-over recycled bits of Pop culture past. And they both have a very small range of taste which never extends beyond themselves. Which is probably why even though I'm gay myself, I always found the "gay" and Madonna type tastes really banal and obvious and limited, and very homogeneous. I'm surprised that Camille Paglia would mistake it for something other than that . And her opinion that all women "should be bisexual" is absurd in every possible way. But this interview was in the 90s, when a lot of people were going around saying things like "I believe everyone is bisexual". And her view on drugs is also totally absurd.
"I believe in Greatness".... CP..... she´s Great....