Why Is The Right-Wing Winning?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 чер 2024
- real answer: the left has no rizz
-----
Join the community discord! ► / discord
Watch Us LIVE (And Click Dat Sub Button!) ► / shortfatotaku
SFO Arcade Archive Channel ► / gameboomer
Dev Kit Channel ► / @thedevkit
Dev & Friends Channel ► @DevAndFriends
Devonetized Channel ► @SFOBackups
-----
SUPPORT THE SHOW:
BTC:bc1q6udqgvfm9uaj59l24ut7f73wvsfu707kk6pn3m
SubscribeStar! ► www.subscribestar.com/shortfa...
Streamlabs! ► streamlabs.com/shortfatotaku
Patreon! ► / shortfatotaku
Paypal! ► paypal.me/shortfatotaku
Humble Bundle Affiliate Link! ► www.humblebundle.com/subscrip...
Amazon CAN Affiliate Link! ► amzn.to/322aFAa
Amazon USA Affiliate Link! ► amzn.to/30PLxgN
Amazon CAN Wishlist! ► www.amazon.ca/hz/wishlist/ls/...
Amazon USA Wishlist! ► www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls...
-----
SFO-CIAL MEDIA! HYUK HYUK
DA TWEETS ► currently banned lol
DA FACES ► / sfotaku
DA GABS ► www.gab.com/shortfatotaku
DA MINDS ► www.minds.com/shortfatotaku
DA PARLERS ► parler.com/profile/Shortfatotaku
DA STEAMS ► steamcommunity.com/groups/Shor...
The Democrat's border security bill was not at all what it claimed to be. It gave the administration powers it already had, only activated after a certain number of illegal immigrants crossed the border. i.e. It actually did the opposite of what it claimed to do. It would have made it so that future administrations could not take actions they currently can. Instead, they'd have to wait until a certain number of illegal crossings occurred before doing so. But, I'll forgive you, ShortFatOtaku, for being taken in by the misinformation on that scam bill. Canadians tend to have a blind spot when it comes to American mainstream media's propaganda.
no, you're actually just wrong about the bill. every rightoid comment under this video is. it sounds like none of you actually read the bill and all of you just picked up viral twitter headlines. republicans insisted in late 2023 that biden's request for funding for ukraine and israel also come with a border bill. crying that the bill included those funds is just stupid, considering that it was quite literally the negotiation that republicans agreed to. considering trump's whole thing about the "art of the deal", you guys should probably figure out that cutting a deal means giving the people you're negotiating with, something that THEY want too. the "omg it funds ukraine!!!" complaint is just nonsense. moreover, the 5000 illegal immigrants thing is not a TARGET, it is a CAP, lol. additionally, i know you guys think that america has a 'catch and release' illegal immigrant policy, but the situation, as always, is vastly more complicated than that.
but at the end of the day - yes, the bill wasn't passed despite republicans negotiating hard to get what they wanted in it, because if it passed now, it would given biden an optics win. that's the actual truth. the republican author of the bill said as much during an interview, lmao. ya'll gotta stop being delusional
@@ShortFatOtaku Trump's "remain in mexico" policy is better. so that's what right wingers are willing to accept. nothing less. also i hope Trump implements project 2025 fully. no cuck shid.
@@ShortFatOtaku Ok here's the Thing, how exactly would you have enfocred that cap. How would you have perfectly measured 5,000 people have crossed this massive cast border, most of which consists of emtpy uninhabited land in the middle of nowhere? Second even if you could perfectly measure that with information that was accurate up to the very minute, how would you quickly roll out a plan to get the border closed that would stop people coming in on this day?
@@ShortFatOtaku Dev, I know you have a hard time understanding this, but 500 people a day as a cap, viewed another way, means they're willing to let in 499 people a day before doing anything.
Furthermore, this all operates on the honor system. The supreme court has no real enforcement arm. They can say "No, this is illegal" to a Democrat administration refusing to activate those provisions at 500 people a day, and that administration can and will just say "That's nice" and keep refusing to do it. There's a fundamental problem with the way the system works with regards to all of this; it's culture that's the problem. Republicans do not represent their constituents because their constituents want criminal prosecutions for criminals, and Republican politicians do not want to criminally prosecute their coworkers, so they simply don't. This lets both parties in the inner circle of those parties rule like autocrats.
Trust in institutions is already shredded to bits because of this. There is no restoring it in one grand sweeping move, and sweeping that under the rug, which is what you're doing by hyperfocusing on the wrong subject, is ridiculous. Without changing the culture of our government at a fundamental level, the corruption will persist.
@@ShortFatOtaku No, you're wrong. The fact that you're disingenuously believing that the 5000 number is ONLY meant to be a cap and won't be used like miniumum wage (i.e. they'll continually allow 5000 in per day) proves it. Republicans didn't "agree" to the bill since they voted against it. No shit cutting a deal means giving something to those you're negotiating with, but you only do that on subjects you're willing to compromise on. What you continually fail to understand is the blatent disregard for statutory rulings and standards displayed by the Democrats anyway. It isn't a negotiable point because we already know it will be ignored anyway.
Vaush being a socialist and smugly commenting on other political parties "not working out last time" is incredible.
I think you mean Communist. Guy is a few ham sandwiches away from joining Antifa as a tank.
Tell a lie long enough until it becomes the truth.
Yeah no kidding 😂
Lol
Ah, but remember, "it wasn't real socialism."
A very unique sensation being told "Eat the Rich" from folks significantly more wealthy and well off
All they mean by "rich" is anyone they don't like.
Yea but they want to be more rich. Try to pay attention.
It’s not even a contradiction. They think they will be spared for turning traitor. They think it’s a virtuous statement
@@Agent_Cobaltno, they think everyone else is so stupid, they'll be the only ones smart enough to do nothing and get free government gibs.
Well, they’ve turned down the volume on that one and it’s just “Tax The Rich” these days, but even that doesn’t apply to Hunter Biden, or the designer who made AOC’s Tax The Rich” Met Gala gown.
The left: you turned them against me!
The right: you have done that yourself
It’s over left, I have the high ground
@@HALF_DAY you underestimate my power
@@amonyaesmith2867
Don't try it!
AHHHHHH! (Elections happen and they get CRUSHED)
Any form of right wing is deemed as "far right" to the left.
I might go so far as to say that anything to the right of Marx is "Far Right" to the left
anything not progressive is right wing which is good.
@FazeParticles not really. People need to be able to differentiate regular right wing people from actual ring wing extremists or else they'll all be bunched up together.
Nope
Any form of disagreement with a far leftist, on anything, is deemed as far right
not if its their "opposition". here in germany our leftist government has to keep up the appearance of having an "opposition" and so they dont call the more center right CDU/CSU far right.
but calling the Union an opposition is a disgrace to the word opposition. they are largely at fault for the situation germany is in and collaborate with the left all the time.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. When you become everyone's enemy, everyone becomes united against you.
Oh hey Shady, fancy seeing you here.
Nothing but straight up 🔥
Hey, hello, how do you do. An unexpected surprise, but a welcomed one.
And I just found another reason to like Shady.
This is not a crossover I was expecting, and yet, I do not find it surprising.
"Also he reversed the government ban on DragonBall Z" The hero we need.
true
I put the likes at 69, because this post is nice
@@metagen77Wasn't woke enough I guess
@@metagen77 im mexican, so im just guessing here, but back in the 90s, when EVERYTHING was satanic, there was also a push against anime claiming it to be inappropriate. a retard went on tv and showed hentai mangas as proof. this allegedly was enough for public tv to stop airing almost all anime (except for DBZ, because they werent stupid enough to kill the one show with the most audience ever)
i assume something similar happened in argentina and they actually passed laws about it
The fact that any government in Latin America would think banning Dragon Ball Z to be a popular idea is wild
It’s almost as if calling everything “far-right” makes everyone who isn’t ultra-left feel like they’re all on the same team.
No, Dev, the "border security bill" is effectively an attempt to make illegal immigration legal via amnesty. And giving them credit for this obvious attempt at importing illegals and justifying their inaction is laughable.
Dev's a leftist that tries to camouflage himself as a centrist. You shouldn't expect too much from him.
What is more, it started as a house bill for funding Veteran benefits, before it was gutted by the Senate via a single amendment.
Which ticks me off.
@@AtrusOranis yeah Dev pretty much refuses to take the L on this, which is just funny.
This seems to match his bud light boycott won't work bad take
You should see the reply in the Pin of Shame. The guy screams arrogance with it.
My beef with him is that he sometimes has this overwhelming arrogant streak to him when he might not entirely grasp or understand the situation at hand, especially if the "Rightoids" do discover a problem with him. I could understand if he disagrees with them or if he at least asks for sources to their claims to either reaffirm his case or draw a different conclusion, but he immediately goes: I AM RIGHT AND FUCK EM RIGHTOIDS.
Examples, he still to this day gives a pass to Kraut for what he did against the alt-right, despite the fact he couldn't uphold his arguments after being debunked by an actual biologist, lied his way to save face and worked with a group of people who were "skeptics" that were against doxxing to jumpstart a doxxing campaign, while also forcing the cancel of an event that was going to be a conjob. This situation was a factor that made me stop watching most anti-SJW content for a long time and caused me to lean more Right Wing Populist post-2017.
Or how Fetterman was some grassroots reasonable guy despite the fact he had been a career politician and a factor people didn't want to vote for him was the fact he was mentally unwell (but it was either this guy or a TV Doctor who wasn't from PA himself) and actually enacted Left leaning policies in PA that weren't going to help them in the long run.
If everyone who isn't your ally is an enemy, then your enemy will always win
If you always seek out enemies you won't have any friends.
Only a Sith deals in absolutes. I will do what I must.
You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you
There’s also the element that as far as persuasion tactics go, the Left operates entirely through negative conditioning. Negative conditioning works great… until it doesn’t. Once that spell is broken, people never go back.
@@konstantinosnikolakakis8125 Absolutely, positively, ONLY a Sith deals in absolutes. No exceptions.
Leftist purity spiraling makes them unapproachable. The Right becomes a relaxed, permissive alternative.
depends on which right we're talking about. the tradcons and evangelists are up their own asses about certain issues.
Unless you’re gay.
Leftists are morons.
The right is merely a set of normal people branded together under a banner that modernity has attempted & still is attempting to snuff into a position of "obscurity or obsolescence" for a "glorious future, comrade"; naw we ain't having that.
Except they aren't a relaxed or permissive alternative.
They are also purity spiraling.
Doesnt help that they NEED to see it as "the right is winning" and if you play the wrong sports team you're an enemy.
This isnt a game or war. It isnt "winning". People literally just adopt what makes sense and thats the end. Theres no score or tally.
The right is winning simply because they dont care about winning.
Because centrists are facing more aggression from the left, currently
and all that does is push us further to the right, and i’m not the only one
i mean it doesn't work that much
after all sure they're aggressive but if you point it out YOU'RE A BIGGOT !
man, it's honestly baffling how lots of people, most people are dumb and don't think much for themselves. so much so, i refused to believe it was that bad at first. but, 'been forced to face reality many times. just look at elections in western countries.
Which makes me go further to the right.
Doesn't matter, if they dare complain they're "biggots" ! So they stay in line. Most of them at least
Everything normal is far right.
nature is far right. it's called the Animal Kingdom for a reason not animal community.
Breathing is far right
Critical thinking is far right
One side is deliberately obnoxious and the other isn’t. It’s like Sargon once said; “all I wanted was to be left alone to play video games, and you wouldn’t let me.”
You mean before he became a grifting fraud?
@@theunknownatheist3815 It seems to me as though he simply changed his mind. He, like many other liberals, saw the reality that the things he thought he wanted or thought would be good for society, when they came to pass, were actually bad. So he changed his opinions accordingly, especially after he started really reading liberal philosophy.
@@DeusExMachina10001I agree. Sargon agreed with the sentiments of liberalism as an Englishman, for liberalism is derived from the traditional value of the English. But reject the abstract philosophy which liberalism is. He is not a grifter, but a man who saw the logical conclusion of abstract philosophy (liberalism), and embraced the Englosh tradition in which that philosophy was formed.
@@DeusExMachina10001 No. He saw that talking politics online is a better source of revenue than repairing cellphones as a college dropout. Nothing wrong with that but i won't go around pretending he is great when if broken to its basic components he is no different from breadtubers or Vaush.
@theunknownatheist3815
You don't know what a grifter is. I defer you to MentisWave's video on grifters.
More often than not, a conservative was once a liberal who got mugged by reality.
*ACCURATE.*
I view it more as if "Reality" a concept of natural forces, allows people to change things in specific ways, trying to change it in ways it doesn't like results in horrible side effects. Most undecided politically neutral dont normally think about it, the'll go with what sounds convincing until they're negativity effected. Leftism as an ideology tree came about when we discovered new ways Reality allows us to alter it, they became convinced that they can achieve utopia through bureaucratic organisation, in a sunk cost fallacy. Conservative category comprises people think they achieved the best system possible earlier in the bureaucratic chain of thought, or people who see the whole chain of thought as folly to begin with.
100% this.
For some reason this reminds me of the line, "A conservative under 30 has no heart, a liberal over 30 has no brain."
In my case an anarchist. It took awhile to realize that everything I watched, listened to was spoonfed to me including my views and opinions. The music and media that I consumed was not placed in my path by fate but was cleverly planted there like a trap. Before the realization it all seemed a part of my identity and integral to my self image. Afterwards it all seemed lame and cringe. I went from an anarchist in highschool to a libertarian in college then arrived at conservatism. I returned home to find that many others had also arrived at the same conclusion.
I am 14 years old. Last year, I made a presentation about gun rights in class (kind of dumb in hindsight) and was laughed off stage. Now, my friends are more and more agreeing with my takes
based
The reason the "far right" is currently advancing is a combination of two factors.
1. Most western nations have spent the last two decades openly lying to their voting populace when it comes to the problems of mass immigration and what that can do to public safety and the national budget. People KNOW that all manner of violent and non-violent crimes have been on a sharp rise and have seen the police do nothing because they can't act due to how the laws and lawmakers are behaving and yet all of the traditional parties in those countries are treading the same "there is no war Ba Sing Se" line on the issue, pretending the issue not only doesn't exist but that anyone who suggests it does might just be a fan of Austrian painters.
2. The parties in power have been calling anyone who opposes them extremist for so long that the name-calling has lost almost all of its power. People no longer care if the establishment calls a party extremist because they call ANYONE who doesn't play ball with them extremist and just about every citizen above the age of 12 has held some opinion or expressed some thought that would have gotten them labelled as such at some point in their lives.
They can look at themselves, see that they're not extremists despite fitting that category according to mainstream opinions and make the logical conclusion that maybe all those other people that got called extremists could be in the same boat.
The two combine so that people are voting for the one political party that acknowledged the very real and apparent problems while ignoring the labels MSM has given them. They lost credibility and are refusing to address problems so they're losing votes.
(2) addendum: even for people who tried, the definition of “good” changes so quickly that nobody can keep up. There is a point where the empathy of your average person runs out because they have to consider their own interest. Benign everyday things you do to survive are now the target of a lynch mob of trust fund babies with nothing better to do
Nope. None of that. It's actually an ongoing process that has been happening since roughly speaking 1980 in which the wealth holders have sought various political and cultural paths to withdraw power from the workers. Above all else, they realised how much people like you love to brownnose and offered it as a way to gain social cachet, which would otherwise be closed to you.
@@greenlantern7959 The people you are talking about have close to no cultural impact outside of rightist commentators like Dev whining about them.
@@ardentspy
And there is nothing you can do about it.
You will own nothing in the future.
"You can't negotiate with leftards"
I wish Javier was my president, i swear to god this man is a gem.
I still need to know what Spanish word is being translated as “Leftards”.
@@DeflatingAtheism I think he said "izquierda de mierda" which can be trabslated as "the left of shit" or "the shit left". He could have also said "Izquierdistas" which you can swap.
Other countries need to invite him to join their governments after he has served his homeland for as long as possible.
@@DeflatingAtheism he said shit leftists. but if you wanna say leftards in Portuguese you can say "esquerdalha", pretty sure in Spanish it's pretty similar
No, its "retardados esquerdistas"@@uIteriormotives
Turns out excluding anyone who isn't a socialist extremist and calling everyone else far right leaves few people on your side and a lot of people under a nebulous umbrella of 'right wing.'
Underrated comment. 👍
Turns out that the far right is inclusive, tolerant, and multicultural.
There’s a skit I heard where two Afrikaaners are talking to each other. “Hey, Piet, I saw you having a braie with that Zulu fellow the other day. I thought you were a racist?” “Oh, of course I’m a racist. But so is he, so we get along.”
The way Dev pronounced Nachtwächter was... something.
Nacho watchers
I don't really discuss politics with customers, but sometimes they bring it up, and I had a customer that moved in from Australia, he was very very left, pro immigration, all the usual stuff. After the huge wave of immigration that happened here (Sweden) his daughter was walking home after a student party. When she passed through the park (parks have always been perfectly safe here) one of the new arrivals showed up to offer her some grapes. She just barely got away because she had a bottle in her handbag and managed to hit the perp on the head with it, she did lose her pants in the process though.
That Australian guy is now one of the stronger voices in the local SD right wing party speaking out against uncontrolled immigration.
It's really sad that it has to come to this for people to realize that the free rider problem exists, and if you offer leniency for any crime, criminals will come en masse.
How do people become so stupid to have a childish view that everyone is the same, population has no effect on demand, everything is infinite, and vetting people coming into your home is heinous?
The old tale of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" certainly applies to this. Congrats, leftoids.
The left is full of crazy people who endorse crazier people.
You folks lost the argument decades ago.
We've been living in leftist chicken little's "the sky is falling" era for decades and people are recognizing that the sky has yet to fall.
Seriously. They even eat their own for stepping out of line.
@@TrickyMario7654 ah just like when leftoids achieved a mass abortion ban waves across several US states which resulted in an increased infant death rate...oh wait
Ah just like all the leftoids who supported trump's immigration policies, found out that they apparently are considered "undocumented migrants", and are now facing possible exodus...oh wait
Just like when leftoids wanted the US to withdraw from the TPP which resulted in the US losing considerable financial influence and giving it away to China...oh wait
Let's not look into actual history and stay happy in our ignorance instead! Go right!
Why is it that with the right the "facts" are only facts when they support their views, and said "facts" always crumble under any iota of scrutiny? NO LET'S NOT EVEN THINK ABOUT THAT
yeah, and yet they’re STILL trying the “Trump’s a fascist who will imprison us all!!!” routine… AGAIN.
When everything good is called far-right, then people might just vote for those good things, so proudly advertised by the far-left.
That's what happens when your ideology is about destroying the current structures.
Surprisingly, some people like structure.
Or,.as I put it, "It's okay to be reactionary when the revolution is dog shit."
Racist is a badge of honor now. I am also a misogynist btw
"Who radicalised you"
"You did"
Overton window and ridiculous regressive lefties etc.
I love it when the Left cedes all morality and competency to the Right by their own argumentation.
My workplace tried to strong-arm all staff into wearing progress pride badges for this month. They where quietly not happy when people refused and started "we want a united front" pressure
Did you unionize against them?
@lithunoisan its was more a general "no thanks" one of the more outspoken guys a work might have hinted his union ties.
go and be united in the unemployment line!
Those woke people that is, sometimes I am so obtuse that I even surprise myself dammit
Wear your “Sodomy is evil” badge
the progress flag i think has nothing to do with inclusion of lgbt people anyway. that's the classic rainbow flag. the progress flag is just the gramscian communist / woke version of it and strongly political.
When you constantly tell people "you're not being replaced" to "you're being replaced because your an -ism" to "you're being replaced and its a good thing" and your surprised people are getting more and more angry.
You are or you're, not your.
"We need slaves, otherwise who will pick the vegetables?" - democrats circa 1800s
"We need illegals, otherwise who will pick the vegetables?" - democrats in 2024
@@Based_Comment they want whites to mix so 60IQ is average, read why
@@5.99USDright??? Like it's not that hard ffs
“Destroying your life is good actually” is radicalizing people, thank goodness.
When I was growing up in the 90s, I was centre-left. Against the middle east wars, fine with same sex marriage, okay with some taxes but not too much, okay with some regulations but not too much, defer to free speech over censorship (even if I didn't like what I heard), tough on crime but emphasis on rehabilitation etc.
Nowadays? Seeing the past ten years?
Yeah, I feel like this is what it felt like to live in the twilight of the Roman Republic before it transitioned to the Roman Empire. Whenever you read those fantasy stories or histories about great nations and people that accomplished wonders but whom became arrogant and self-indulgent at the apex of their power only to then collapse in upon themselves...I feel like that's where we are at the moment.
The left/right have always pendulum swung back and forth with dominance over culture, and I foresee the right wing coming to such dominance within the next decade. And you know what? The way things are going, I won't even be mad.
So here in Germany there was a terrorist attack days before EU elections and as a result most parties were like "think of the innocent immigrants who will face unfounded hatred because of this isolated incident". Which, in a vacuum, isn't a terrible stance to have but was incredibly tone-deaf given the situation. I'm not advocating for the AFD but they were one of the few parties not blaming their own country for getting murdered, so I wasn't surprised at all when they got 2nd place.
I studied German in college (in the USA) in the mid 2010s. Very interesting to see my left wing professors talk an out them as this fringe political group in the east and then watch them become more and accepted across the country.
I think there is this sort of self blame complex in many older German political institutions as a consequence of WW2. But now as time is passing more and more younger people are like “but I didn’t do that” and we are starting to see this manifesting in political ideologies besides the most bland form of progressive liberalism (in the true sense of that word not the American sense). This take could be based on my American perspective though… German and the USA have very different opinions on national pride, and while I would never say “I am proud of being born in the USA” as that’s a silly sentiment… the complete lack of any national pride was jarring when I lived in Germany for a little while.
@@tainicon4639 Oh absolutely, you're 100% right. Concerning that incident I mentioned most parties were more concerned about denouncing xenophobia than talking about safety or prevention. I used to think that taking responsibility for our country's past and being ashamed of it was a good thing but the older I got the more I realized it's being taken to an unhealthy level.
As for national pride, it's still often seen as a dangerous thing. Like, "you know who else was proud of Germany, and what he did because of it?" The only time you ever see people display our flag's colors is for EU or world championships in soccer. And even then you're guaranteed to see articles pop up everywhere discussing if it's a right-wing dog whistle or something.
And I think that's exactly what's driving many voters into the arms of more conservative parties. Dictating that you have to feel ashamed of your country's past even though you had no hand in it is just stupid. Letting it influence every little thing you say or do almost a century later is stupid. People here need to stop being so obsessed with proving how anti-nationalist they are, as if showing even the smallest appreciation for their country would make them bad people.
@@StummerVogel what I saw was atleast the younger (under 40) crowed was very much of the mind that “this is kinda silly”. AFD I think is appealing to both this more young reactionary crowed and older conservative types (who didn’t have a public voice). It’s a very interesting political movement. From an analysis perspective I find it a shame that you pretty much need to be able to read German news to know about it though haha. I feel like the English speaking world has many parallels to this but is entire unaware of it.
WAIT HE REVERSED THE BAN ON DRAGON BALL Z? THAT MAN IS A HERO.
The one we never deserve
what kind of monster bans DBZ in the first place?
@@stormstrider The progressive kind
He should have replaced the “Ministry of Women and Gender Nonsense” with a Ministry of Memes and Anime.
The Weeb Presidente. God speed you magnificent son of a bitch.
Because we're Right? Duh, it's there in the name. Come on Dev.
He just scammed us into watching this vid that canadian basstard
Incredibly real
so true bestie
There's a reason both "left" and "wrong" are the opposite of "right".
Based and right pilled.
Hä? As a german i can tell you "Nachtwächter" is just "night watch". It has nothing to do with stupidity.
9:28 you mentioned that your Canadian so it won't fault you for this but that "border" bill was atrocious. Most of the funding was going to Israel and Ukraine and the bill still allowed all the border crossing. All it was just funding to help disperse the immigrants and not actually stop it.
not true about the border crossing stuff, sounds like you read headlines and not the bill. funding israel and ukraine is based though.
@ShortFatOtaku "let's give tens of billions of dollars to foreign countries while not addressing any domestic concerns" is precisely the attitude that will lead to Trimp or worse rising to power here.
@@ShortFatOtaku The bill in question attempts to make the asylum seeking process at the southern border quicker. It also includes some immigration reforms that don't impact the crisis, like increasing the number of work and spousal visas processed annually. However, the bill itself does nothing to prevent or punish people who enter the country illegally on its own. If people are just entering the country and disappearing to sanctuary cities, this new process is functionally illrelevant to the underlying problem. We need to make it more difficult to apply for asylum when not entering the country through a port of entry.
Many Americans feel the bill was a half measure. An illusion of compromise to get uniparty republicans on board to printing billions of dollars to keep Ukraine in the fight through the general election.
@@ShortFatOtaku "The government forcefully sending your money away to other continents is based."
The fuck is wrong with Canadians?
@ShortFatOtaku nothing based about giving billions of dollars to foreign countries while your people are gasping for air because of the rapidly declining purchasing power of the dollar. Rather you like it or not Americans are tired of being told they have to support countries and conflicts that have nothing to do with them. And being told the are putin puppets, or terror supporters for not going along.
rip to all of the innocent people we've lost due to illegal aliens.
yeah i’m sure they’d be really happy ur using their tragedy to justify your hate
@wordoftheday7650 and what hate is that, exactly? all i want is for our people to be left alone. the real hate comes from the people doing this. i simply want them to stay home.
How are you to know if he just hates them and is justifying it, vs thinking it's a serious problem, because well damn... Kinda fucking is.@@wordoftheday7650
@@wordoftheday7650 Stop killing us and we'll stop hating you.
@@wordoftheday7650 Ironic.
Even a silent majority of alphabet soups are on the side of Milei, which has the progs, peronistas and kishneristas shitting bricks there.
Source?
@@Web720Not sure about NA, but in Germany the AfD is the second biggest party, maybe now even biggest party under gays.
Don't believe you. It is in the nature of the alphabet people, to sell out their nation for hedonistic depravity.
@@Web720They suffer under inflation like everyone else?
"Alphabet soup" is really quite misleading. What there is is a big lump of gays with a few other condiment groups sprinkled across. And with gay being relatively normal in my country for almost 20 years at this point, I know enough of them to know they are fairly normal people, working normal jobs. Of course they don't like political leftism. They, too, care about boring stuff like taxes and personal liberties.
Vivek was supposed to be our Mileli, maybe in 2028. He wanted to blanket bulk fire so many people in government, he's a millennial, and is charismatic.
He is WEF.
@@jgomo3877 Trump is bought and controlled
@@jgomo3877lazy psyop. Nobody in or openly associated with the WEF is intelligent enough to elaborate on conservatism or constitutional originalism without peppering in the leftist talking points or hinting to the strawman they think we are
3:31 Your german is terrible!
"Define woke."
"I dunno."
"Define far right."
"I dunno dammit!"
"Uhh, ohh- uh, I thi-"
Answer the question please
.
Guy: "Don't interrupt them! We have limited time!"
They stammered for 20 seconds, that was more than enough time 😂
In fairness, is there any stated principle for Progressives that they aren’t willing to stand on its head? It’s not an ideological cult, it’s a political cult with a command structure but no inviolable first principles.
My definition of woke: Anti-yt and forced equity.
Woke is a past tense of wake, right?
Far right is when something is on the far-right side of something, for example, the far-right side of a pool.
Thanks for listening to me talk about nothing.
Woke is just intersectional critical theory
Simple Explanation: *the pendulum swings.*
And gosh the past decade and a half or so of the pendulum going that way has been awful. Its about freaking time. Im excited.
@@Gulgathydra the last time the right wing got far was in 30s and 40s Germany. Humanity makes such blunders once in a while
@@Gamez4eveR And yet that blunder wasn't nearly as bad as the left's stranglehold in China, the USSR, and Cambodia. Between Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot they committed crimes the likes of which make the German mustache guy seem sane and rational.
@@Gamez4eveR Hitler was a socialist, he had socialist beliefs, he enacted socialist policies, he _said_ he was a socialist and discussed the socialist things he would enact, and he called his party a socialist party.
Which part of "seizing the means of production" was _not_ socialist in your perspective?
If I named a bunch of the stuff Hitler did, but didn't say what ideology it was, I guarantee you that socialists would be agreeing with those policies and Capitalist pigs would be disagreeing.
It just so happened that unlike Marx's class-based socialism, Hitler's was a nationalistic and oddly-specifically anti-Jewish one.
@@Gamez4eveR
Not at all. You forget McCarthyism in America, where neighbors were ratting out neighbors for being suspected communists. No Gulags, but many college professors lost their jobs.
It wasn't as far right as your example, but it was certainly closer to home. My greatest fear is that the pendulum usually swings about as far in one direction as it had in the other.
Whether it's left or right winged, you can vote your way onto a tyranny, but not out of it.
Sorry, "Nachtwächter" does NOT imply stupidity in German. Whoever told you this is flat out wrong.
Once you start coming for the kids people start noticing how disingenuous you are
Yes, when you come for people’s kids, “stop or we’ll call you racist” stops being an effective dissuasion tactic.
Like how the right wants to get rid of education funding?
This is the real life example of the meme "Who radicalised you?? You did!" I have been saying this from a long time, the left brought this upon themselves
It’s still hilarious to me that the “online radicalization” pseudoscience involves people becoming Nazis by watching Ben Shapiro videos.
The other answer is. I haven't changed but you got radicalized.
It's not that hard to win against a side that became a death cult.
The left is full of crazy people who endorse crazier people.
You folks lost the argument decades ago.
Do you mean Communisem or Nationel Socialisem?
Tell that to Islamists.
@@w4rd3n14 what's the difference?
@@w4rd3n14 Obviously Communism you rube.
Perhaps the biggest thing: left winger's promise nothing that benefits the nation or the individual. Right-wingers often promise things that benefit the individual.
And then neither deliver.
@@madsword19 yes but one will win the election during a financial recession and the other won't.
To steel man the left, the nation is made up of individuals so bolstering them raises the nation as a whole.
Simple Me ni frego. Si si si call me a racist, call me sexist, call me homophobic. Me ni frego
Based!
Meloni has done nothing to stop all the boat people.
Sad but true. Looks like the Brussel banksters scared her, or she was full of sheet the whole time.
unfortunately yes, some crafty deep staters have hog-tied Meloni into doing absolutely shite all about the migrants.
She met with Orban yesterday about migration. Maybe something will happen..
She was a WEF “young leader of the future”. She was planted as a subversive agent
There is a limits on what she is even able to do, winning a flat majority does give her total control over that state and it's policy.
9:30 Dev they axed it because it was a horrible bill that existed to entrap the republicans for media optics.
It genuinely doesn't matter what bill democrats come up with because what dev doesn't get is that nobody on the right implicitly trusts democrats like he does. They decided to ally with far-left racists and browbeat white people for decades. The most likely model of behavior for people like that when their alliance is driving away centrists is to lie to centrists. Dev chooses to believe the lie. If they won an election off of their border bill, they would simply turn around and ignore it, like Merrick Garland is currently ignoring a congressional subpoena.
There is literally nothing democrats can say or do at this point that the right would agree with. They could offer to set up a literal minefield immigrants would have to cross over to enter, and the right would believe democrats would instead give illegal immigrants free plane and boat rides into the US so they don't have to cross the normal way, and the truth is that they would probably be right about that.
Yup. It's most always the case that the dems will attach many strings to an otherwise good bill.
@@Clown_the_Clown It was a bad bill from the start. For every dollar spent on the border, something like a thousand was being spent on Ukraine, or various pet projects. There was so much pork in it that even a Texan would be like "Chill Ya'll Shit!"
Elaborate?
Yep. To be exact:
1. It was a Ukraine bill with some border sprinkled in
2. It would still let in 5000 per DAY, which would still amount to nearly 2 million per year. Before Biden, numbers were about 3x lower than that
3. Biden already has all the legislation he needs in the first place. The law currently states: no illegal entries. So in all optics, the law was about OPENING the border (going from 0 allowed, albeit not enforced, to 5000 allowed). Which would actually make it more difficult for a future president to deal with the border.
"AFD is right wing frfr"
The AFD is center left with a ton of their policies being stuff the left demanded years ago, and the most "right wing" thing they say is that we should care about Germany a bit more which ought not be counted as right wing in a sane world.
Dev gets its picture of the AFD from Kraut, who has severe Putin Derangement Syndrome and as a result pans everything and everyone that doesn't align with his PDS.
And the AFD is notoriously anti conflict and pro Nord Stream, more so from an economic than a moral standpoint.
Truth is, AFD is a liberal conservative party from the 90s or a social democratic party from the 70s.
In Australia there was an abc article about how young zoomer are going to Latin mass churches, you Could almost hear the condescension in her writing
In America, the FBI deems Latin Mass parishioners as a domestic terrorist high-risk group.
Can you please just admit defeat over the Canadian Trucker thing. Everytime I see your notifications I think about it, and it bothers the sh*t out of me that you still haven't addressed it. Please take the L so schizoids like myself can stop obsessing over it.
Oh and uh keep up the good work, thanks.
He stated, on the ArchCast with Raz0rfist, that’s it’s done but, at this point, he is waiting to release it for “when it would hurt Trudeau the most.”
Whether you believe he will follow through with this or not is up to you.
wtf do you specifically want me to say
@ShortFatOtaku
Forget what he wants you to say, listen to me. I need you to say: "what Trudeau did was real sussy, and the truckers were kinda pogchamp ngl (the acronym is spelt out by you). I think Trudeau should stop being sussy this election and that will only happen if you vent your votes and eject the imposter for this month's emergency meeting." Then you finish the message with an animation of you doing the griddy.
This was so unfunny, I think I just gave myself hemorrhoids.
@@ShortFatOtaku Whatever exactly satisfies what your critics want :^)
@johannesstephanusroos4969 trudeau obviously went too far in dealing with the truckers? i've said this multiple times
so many articles say far right. I'm thinking about that stonetoss comic where the guy says he wants less government and the other guy is thinking he is a nazi, despite it being the opposite.
Or that comic comparing detention centres to death camps, where the Nazi is chasing two Jews out, saying “and stay out!” And the one Jew says, “we’ll get in next time, brother”
its not "right wing" its common sense
Progressives be like:
Normal person: *breathes
Progressive: that's racist 😡😡😡
"Propaganda makes them all think this way."
- says the guy who agrees with the media, hollywood and corporations
The famous you burn your house down and wonder why you don’t have a house anymore
The part with the teacher minds me of a guy at work. He's not Catholic, but he sends his kids to a Catholic school because he likes how disciplined they are.
Catholic school isn’t as religious as it sounds.
Mine was, luckily I was only there for half of my primary school time@@theunknownatheist3815
It wasn't political purposes. It was a shit bill.
I am German, born and raised. And I have never heard the word "Nachtwächter" used to describe people as incompetent. It is more about the image of somebody basically just sitting or walking around doing nothing until something happens. Which is why minarchists readily adopted the term saying "exactly!"
I'm a real Nordic Aryan hyperborean viking warrior! (I have brown hair and brown eyes)
Literally me
Literally me
Literally me
💪
Aryanism is a state of mind and soul, DUH. don't let anyone tell you that you can't be aryan because of your race.
Thank you for that fair description of minarchists, Dev
For once, Dev doesn't fail to describe a lib-right ideology
@@Hoplibis that legal?
@@Hoplibyeah I like Dev but he is not as charitable to the right as he thinks he is.
Like it or not, you cannot “spare the rod” in perpetuity and have a functional society. There has to be some semblance of order and discipline.
It sounds like the pendulum is finally starting to swing back.
barely. politics is still progressive no real wins have been made yet. like at all. the phrase "meet the management same as the old one" is apt here.
It’s going to swing back towards the left again when the right starts another Satanic panic over video games, like it had in the 90s and the far left right now.
Looks like we're only gonna get a Truckers video when Pierre Poilievre becomes our PM.
So like, soon?
We'll get a trucker video when Dev moves, or when Canada hits 100 degrees Fahrehnheit
Dev just confirmed in the US presidential debate stream that the Trucker video is gonna be in time for Canadian federal election for maximum impact.
To be honest, there’s still lawsuits and whatnot going on around it. So if he put it off this long, he might as well wait until those are over in case more details come out.
Weimar conditions bring Weimar solutions.
Read is still a read, whether they are national or otherwise.
Oy vey
Stupid idiots post stupid posts. 🙄
BASED
We are in Weimar Germany :(
We are in Weimar Germany :)
The biggest reasons why the right-wing is "Winning" are:
1) The Left has purity-spiralled itself to an absurd degree, leading to the "Normal People Are Right Wing" video. Non-political people look at things like "Working out is right wing!", think "I like to work out... maybe I am right wing?", they look at the platforms of the Right Wing and see mostly normal stuff, and end up supporting that Right Wing party.
2) *The Left has no limits.* There is NOTHING that anyone can point at and say "That is too extreme - they won't go there." This includes genocide and slavery - one cannot look at the actions of the Left and the Rhetoric of the Left and say that Genocide and Slavery are too extreme for them. Particularly after October 7 and there are many on the Left who genuinely do not know if they are okay with the genocide of Zionists, and also genuinely don't know what the difference is between a "Zionist" and a "Jew". As for Slavery, the Left is moving towards making Services "Rights" - so I have the "Right" to Free Health Care. But Health Care requires someone to care for me - so there has to be a person who is providing that service for me. What will the Left do if there aren't enough Doctors to give me access to my "Right" of Free Health Care? What will happen if a Doctor decides they don't want to be a Doctor anymore, but our system needs more doctors? Effectively, forcing the doctor into performing health care services against their wishes. ie: Slavery.
2a) And let's be real, the Left has already proven that they have no intention of protecting Children. From transgender infants to looking to lower the voting age to 16 (and lower) to the growing support for MAP's, the Left has abandoned that ship. If you want to protect children *in any way* (which is almost a literal statement), you're voting for a Right Wing party.
These two things scare people away from the Left. In our political system, the only place these people have to go for legitimate political power is the Right. That's why the Right Wing is winning today.
Tomorrow...? Tomorrow may be different.
Northern Conservatives in 1860:
“It may be inferred again that the present movement for women’s rights, will certainly prevail from the history of its only opponent, Northern conservatism. This is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is to-day one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will to-morrow be forced upon its timidity, and will be succeeded by some third revolution, to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt hath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it he salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious, for the sake of the truth, and has no idea of being guilty of the folly of martyrdom. It always-when about to enter a protest-very blandly informs the wild beast whose path it essays to stop, that its “bark is worse than its bite,” and that it only means to save its manners by enacting its decent rôle of resistance. The only practical purpose which it now subserves in American politics is to give enough exercise to Radicalism to keep it “in wind,” and to prevent its becoming pursy and lazy from having nothing to whip. No doubt, after a few years, when women’s suffrage shall have become an accomplished fact, conservatism will tacitly admit it into its creed, and thenceforward plume itself upon its wise firmness in opposing with similar weapons the extreme of baby suffrage; and when that too shall have been won, it will be heard declaring that the integrity of the American Constitution requires at least the refusal of suffrage to asses. There it will assume, with great dignity, its final position.”
personally im happy with this right-wing rise
Denmark is also an exception, because they also cracked down pretty hard on immigration and they're not facing electoral oblivion, so there's more than just America.
America is going to flip unless it's another win by 9 counties mail-in BS. Dev just needs to smokescreen it in hopes that the back swing of the pendulum can be slowed so he can back pedal fast enough.
I'm a straight white Christian male 28 American, this November will be the only vote i will ever cast. The 2nd protects the 1st.
I'm german and i never heard that a "Nachtwächter" is associated with someone who is incompetent or stupid. But there seems to be a saying that goes "Von Tuten und Blasen keine Ahnung" or "Too stupid to blow in a horn" which was the only job of a Night Watchman in the middle ages.
If there's a Viking statue in town, it's right wing.
However, if you're a Norse pagan it's okay, because you aren't Christian.
I somehow suspect that to the current left Norse paganism might be even worse than Christian. You can't get any more white of a religion.
I remember when edgelords were proclaiming themselves to be Odinists just because it was anti-Christian. I was like, uh, you know those guys are ACTUAL white supremacists?
@@DeflatingAtheism
Norse Pagan -> Neo-Nazi pipeline.
I think neo pegans just like to larp a vikings, which is understandable since vikings are cool.
@@spacejunk2186
You should look more into it.
A lot of modern neo-natsoys are norse/neo-pagan. Definitely a dogwhistle.
I funnily had a similar experience where not voting for Biden was just as bad as voting for Trump, even if you choose neither.
Funnily for me at least, most of them weren’t in the US.
The other hilarity is watching people see the full mask off behavior far leftists have. It’s always been there.
They're so bad at lying too, you can see the "mask off" version of them even when their mask is on. They wear a uniform, it's extremely easy to spot the people who think the world sucks because of someone else, and nothing is ever their fault. The rest of us realized things suck sometimes when we were 13, and we got over it, and learned to enjoy the things that don't suck and craft our lives around that.
RFK Jr. 2024!
I remember the outcry when Chris Pratt didn’t attend a pro-Biden rally.
In the US, it is if you consider Trump bad. The spoiler effect is a thing in America and it is a scron on its politics.
Folks, if you do not vote for Trump or for Biden; guess what? You did not vote for Trump or for Biden.
You owe NO ONE your vote for president.
If both parties insist on putting up different temperatures of warmed up turds, don't touch it.
NOW, as long as the rest of you want to prop up the Turd makers by "THESE ARE OUR ONLY CHOCES *CHOOSE* " ... that's on ya'll, not those wise enough to not pick up turds.
But - keep feeding the trolls, and giving the turd makers what they want, someone who will pick their turd - and they will keep shitting on you and loving it.
The powers that be continually ignored reasonable requests from their voters so the voters turned to parties that listened.
It's not "far right" to suggest that mass immigration on an unprecedented scale might not be good for a nation.
no, dev, the democrats border bill wasn't an actual attempt to moderate their illegal immigration stance (and the republicans didn't kill it "just" as a political move). the bill was an increase in illegal immigration bill, pretending to be about securing the border. don't go telling that bullshit, unless you wanna do a full video where you actually read the bill and what it does, and explain how it is actually a good moderate bill that will reduce people illegally crossing the border (when in fact it gives (increases) amnesty for X aliens per day, something that doesn't exist in law atm).
i love your detailed videos on subjects, because you tend to do good research, get into the weeds a bit, and even if i disagree with your conclusions at times, at least you put in good effort and do a good job laying out the (currently known) facts.
Tbh, Meloni has done shit on any of the things that got her the presidency by the people, especially illegal immigration...
Italy got desperate, and Meloni took advantage of that. I feel bad for them.
Meloni is a traitor. She failed.
These "right wing" leaders are all shabbos goys
It's an unfortunate fact that most people in the political arena will make promises for votes only to not follow up on them. It's somewhat of a historical tradition in the US also, which is why I felt compelled to vote for Trump in 2020 as he was the first president to make a serious attempt to abide by his campaign promises in my lifetime.
At least, she stepped up. None other did before her.
Milei didn't fumble the bag so far, he didn't join BRICS losers or support their foreign policy agenda, he is keeping his promises so far and slowly introducing them(still faster than average Western government).
He's like perfect politician to represent normal Libertarians, the one's that can actually win if they try
The guy as an agent of Israel.
super charismatic as well, which is a problem most libertarian politicians have, like Ron Paul, he is just too "low energy"
@@moongoalie2410 agent of israel, how mysterious... the guy just is religious, nothing else
Thankyou we libertarians will claim him.
@@moongoalie2410you say that like it's a bad thing
So basically they are toddlers who haven't been told 'no'.
There's a reason it's not called the far wrong
I can attest to the teacher's reddit post. I never realized the importance of homework until schools stopped giving it. Forget further education. Actually giving students something to do, prepares them for what is expected of them after school. That being; doing ACTUAL work.
Kids don't know how to do anything and the "adults in charge" did that. When this generation becomes the majority in the workforce, it's gonna be a really scary time. My generation and especially the one before mine really let these kids down, and it's the kids that are gonna have to pay for it in the worst way. And all because a bunch of infantile, psychopaths wanted communism established in America for *SOME REASON.*
It's incredibly sad to hear as I had aspirations of becoming a history teacher right out of high school because I had such good experiences learning. Even spent a couple years of college to pursue it until I found out just how utterly fucked the education system was, i'd lose my mind trying to teach a class of today's kids, especially in history.
I've worked with 20-somethings, and they are clueless about how to work. They are especially clumsy, slow, entitled, and lazy. It is shocking.
@@MarvelousJoker. Ironically, the one history class i co-taught was the most normal one, cuz my co was a friendly guy with a good head on his shoulders.
The claims about life and politics the kids had though, were wild and it's not their fault.
I've seen it first hand, it IS a massive culture problem. There are people who have cordoned themselves off from everyone else, and their collectivism has caused nothing but trouble for them and the rest of the country for YEARS.
@@MarvelousJoker. By the way, if you love that, wait until you have to partake in a new teacher's staff meeting where you're told by other hwyte people that you're a hwyte ser pree ma cysts if you believe in timeliness or holding your students to any sort of standard.
In my short career, that's not even the worst thing I've seen. *MAN!* I wish I still had the picture of that powerpoint!
This is a parental failure, not a schooling failure.
Dev I was completely dancing to your tune until you brought up the border bill, I'm a left leaning centrist American who wasn't even political until recently and I agreed with axing that bill once I realized it was just an attempt from the Democrat party to swindle the Republican party while making themselves look like the heroes and I don't care which side it is they do not get to make lopsided deals like that. There is one specific thing that is driving me farther to the right and that is the left TALKING as if they're better than the right but not ACTING any better the left grandstand as if they're the paragons of morals and virtues, yet I see stories of hypocrisy, corruption, and ineptitude surrounding the left almost every day, I'm almost 30 years old, lived most of my life in the 2000s, grew up in Bush era, and I never thought I'd see the left/democrat party mutate and de-evolve into what they've become especially so quickly.
We were told for the four years of Trump’s term that any attempt to stem the tide of people over the border was white supremacy. Now, three years into Biden’s term that so far has seen a New York City’s-worth of illegal immigrants imported through our borders, we’re told that the Democrats have the solution in hand, if only they weren’t stymied by that evil Bonald bLumf! You don’t even need to get into the particulars of the “border bill” (which is as mendaciously named as the “inflation reduction act”) to know it’s naked horseshit.
Do you know which specific statutory provisions of the border bill lay out the ill effects right wing commentators have been talking about? Dev has been having a fit at people who have been merely repeating commentary talking points (though Dev himself hasn't been providing direct evidence either).
@@SuperGamerMiner No but plenty of these other commenters you're talking to do besides I don't need to, the Democrats tried to strongarm the Republicans into agreeing to a deal that HEAVILY favored them while also acting like the heroes about the whole thing that alone is enough for me to disagree with it. Yes deals are struck and compromises are made however allowing roughly 70% of a bill's funds to go to other things is not a compromise it's a surrender.
I was a Republican til Bush drug out a needless war far longer than it was needed for 'democracy'. once I started seeing the writing on the wall and came to the conclusion both sides were dumb, I started drifting left.
Now I'm in this comfy place just right of center where I see just how retarded the government is but acknowledge necessity in having a unifying force to prevent monopolies.
Socially, I'm a libertarian
governmentally, I'm fiscal conservative
I think the problem, from the Dem side, is likely that they courted the then young radicals, thinking they were useful idiots and could help them win elections. Turned out the opposite way, the radicals used the dems, to the point they dumped and abandoned their original voter base, while still occasionally paying it just enough lip service.
3:00 Nope, Milei explicitely identifies as an anarcho-capitalist. But his policies are more moderate for what he deems practical purposes.
„Nachtwächter“ isn’t and from what I can gather also historically never was synonymous with a stupid person in German. I wonder where he got this from?
maybe he or the person he got it from conflated it with "rent-a-cop" which does have a negative connotation?
While this is all encouraging, I've learned never to celebrate too soon. We'll have to see if the polling is reflected in the voting, if the voting is reflected in the results and if the new leaders are permitted to exercise their mandates once in office.
exactly. 7rump got in, yet was sabotaged and impeded at every turn. Lord know how good things could have gotten if there were no meddling in his plans during his term.
I live in Buenos Aires, and you would not believe how butthurt the left is right now, I'm so glad that Milei is making kind of a new movement in the continent, but I'm sad those same words were used to justify a coup attent in Bolivia today
It was bound to happen anyway, sadly. Bolivia has never been a very politically stable country. Even less so with people like the pedo Morales stirring the pot.
Ive heard argentina's on the verge of collapse. Which would make sense since its seemed to defund anything public now.
With or without foreign meddling or influence; Bolivia and instability are inexorably linked.
@@sergpieYou can't have SA without some flavor of braindead leftists and military coup d'etat. Frankly, Milei win is a miracle
Shame Milei has a very strange alliance with Israel…
Just like in the 1930s, scaring away small property owners (i. e. "petit bourgeois") and calling them "fascists". Guess what, they thought it was a good idea to become just that.
I'm from the UK and when I was younger I desperately wanted Labour to get in and now it looks like they're going to and I cannot celebrate it, the city I live in has had it's traditional culture mostly destroyed and replaced with alien culture that is antithetical to the culture of the indigenous people. Meanwhile Labour seems poised to enforce strict 'hate speech' laws like they have in Scotland making it illegal to be critical of ideologies that are extremely incompatible with the average moderate english person's culture. I imagine after a terrible few years with Labour we'll get a Reform party government who will also be terrible in a different way, really depressing politics.
The fact that you commented on the current US border policy debate the way that you did saddens me. Read and study what was on the table. "Axing it" was not "political". It was stopping a horrible policy.
Dev fell for the optics.
Wasn’t that the bill that was like 10 gazillion dollars for Israel/ukraine and a footnote about border security being able to mobilize if more than 10k people crossed in a day? Lol
@@Augrills I heard 5,000, but pretty much.
@@Devin_Stromgren I was just going off memory. Either way it’s ridiculous!
Really, and why do we even need a bill to enact laws we already have?
In Swedish parliament, there is unfortunately not any right wing parties. There’s parties that call themselves right, but really they’ve drifted so far into centre-left over the years.
We thought we voted a right-wing government into power but not only do they have no interest in limiting government (just like American GOP) but they pushed through the “make it easier to switch gender” law recently. They’re also doing the rainbow flag thing. Regardless of whether you’re for or against that, it’s not really a conservative position is it?
Furthermore, SD is economically left even by Swedish standards.
Sure, they’re pro family, military and police, and anti immigration (kind of - really they’re against immigrants not assimilating, or against multi culture, which naturally means anti islam), but they’re also pro big government social programs, even more than the centrist government we have now.
Honestly man, all I care about is immigration; taxes and gay stuff isn't even on my radar at this point, especially since alot of our economic issues are downstream of that.
It's true that there's no true right wing/libertarian party in sweden and there will never be one either without a total societal collapse as every current party support the idea of redistributing wealth theough taxes, as an example: you and some friends can start a club (ngo) about anything (any hobby ANY, even whiskey drinking) and get money from the state...
None of those bloodsuckers will ever vote for someone to remove that extra income.
Look up Paternalistic Conservativism.
Unless a very conservative party gets an incredible amount of votes, no one is gonna do anything against the gay stuff. It's such a hassle.
based, gay marriage is good
Dev's German pronunciation is so bad I can only assume he's doing it because someone corrected him once.
Yeah 5k a day coming across the border would be the political purpose for which the republicans axed that horse crap
you know that's a cap not a target, right? lmao
@@ShortFatOtaku So what was the target? Why is it that they have discretion not to close the border at 4000 crossings?
do you know what kind of encounters trigger the cap? do you know what happens when 'the border is closed' vs not? do you think it's just a big open door and after 5000 illegals go through they close it or what
@@ShortFatOtaku
"do you know what kind of encounters trigger the cap?"
According to Theresa Cardinal Brown of the Bipartisan Policy Center, it is "not a number that is ‘allowed in.’ It is a threshold of ARRIVALS that triggers a new authority". The issues being that 1) it does not include the many people sneaking in that are never encountered and 2) those people are not properly processed and kicked back over the boder. They are being allowed into the interior.
" do you know what happens when 'the border is closed' vs not?"
Now quoting NBC "If the border were shut down, at least 1,400 migrants per day who tried to enter at official ports of entry would still qualify". 1) Why do 1,400 people who likely have no right to entry still get to come in? 2) why not be more restrictive all the time?
"do you think it's just a big open door and after 5000 illegals go through they close it or what" No, it's worse than that, it's a pretty well wide open door and when they hit 5000 they still let 1400 people a day committing immigration fraud in.
@@ShortFatOtakuYou realise that number effectively achieves two goals for the left; 5000 a day pass through uninterrupted, and potentially increases the rate of crossings by almost 3 times what it was 5 years ago, right?
no one deradicalizes me like you do. maybe we'll all be fine
he's arguing from the start that some people can't be reasoned with
what the fuck are you talking about
The Right has moved left and the Left has left the planet
Actually the right never really changed. It's just the left has gone that far left.
@@Perroden Thoughout most of the west the right has definitely moved to the left, at least socially. You go back 30 years and there would be no chance of having a republican enter government who is pro-gay marriage.
@Perroden
We can give a little bit of credit; the right is more accepting of gay folk and progressive ideals than they were decades and centuries ago. The right is simply adapting to how prosperous we have become and have become relaxed on the need for tradition and survival.
@@Drako9823 On a very technical note, no. See, left v right is mainly an economic difference - collectivism vs capitalism. What we're seeing is the progressive right rising over the conservative right. The progressive right supports capitalism and also accepts many of the necessary freedoms that conservatives usually suppressed like gay rights.
What might even seem funny is that the progressive right is further to the right of the conservative right, at least its the case in Argentina. They're closer to libertarian positions than right wing conservatives.
@@Perroden Well the right HAS changed. Right used to not be accepting of alternative lifestyles. Now? Now they dont care what you do just dont shove it down their throats or force them to participate. You know that stance that those on the left used to have when it was the Religious Right that was inserting itself into every aspect of your life?
Would say Star Wars: Acolyte be as bad as it is without every interview being about how gay the writer wanted to make the story or how we need to disrupt the patriarchy? Yes yes it would, BUT would it get as many videos slamming it as it does? No, youd just get the normal Star Wars channels saying how bad the writting is without the added BS of Disney or the writer trying to hit us over the head and tell us "think like we do or your a piece of shit".
The right has adopted the old Live and let Live motto of the left of 30 or 40 years ago.
My gf is a leftist working for a school district and she has yet to make the connection between the politics she shares with the school administration and EVERYTHING she hates about how things are run. She's a teacher for the alternative class (i.e. the delinquents and "students that struggle with emotional disregulation") and they aren't allowed to do anything to these kids.
One kid got caught with several stolen pairs of airpods, a couple iphones, and a couple ipads in his backpack... The kid wasn't even so much as suspended and my gf was furious.
She hates all the policies that she herself endorses and is too ideologically blinded for introspection, but even she sees how it's all kinds of messed up, which I guess is the first step to 'waking up' so to speak.
If you leave out Argentina, migration (combined with low birth rates) is *by far* the biggest driving force behind this. It really has become that much of a problem in Europe.
Non-right wing parties have allowed this to happen when they deemed the completely normal desire to have borders and a national identity to be outdated and 'racist'.
Right-wing parties too. 14 years of Tory rule in the UK and the immigrant number has exploded.
@madsword19 That's the thing tho, even parties that employ a strong anti-migrant rhetoric probably won't be able to actually stop mass-migration into Europe or start deporting on a large scale. It's a logistical nightmare and probably not realisticallt possible. A lot EU countries have had right or even far-right governments before and nothing's changed.
It’s almost like people don’t know fascism was created as an over correction to communist uprisings. What you’re seeing now is a less extreme example. Without the full blown armed counter culture revolution you won’t have the rise of armed counter revolutions (black shirts, etc). The reason we’re getting a polarized balanced Mexican standoff. Is the counter culture is not aggressive enough to cause a forced resolution. The passive aggressive moral superiority simply isn’t threatening enough to justify violence as a response.
It’s essentially like if some was being passive aggressive and poking you constantly. But you would be an asshole if you beat their ass. The counter culture just got smarter and instead inches passively. Whereas in the past they were violent and easier to rally support around openly fighting. And counter culture is more accurate as it’s not just commies. The commies might have the biggest balls and be the only decent fighters in the general cluster. And will inevitably subdue the rest after their use has ran out. But it’s important to recognize there’s a blend of left leaning people.
i'm pretty curious if you could launch a classical fascist party and if anyone would really notice. Basically a workers union made party, focussing on the wellbeing of labouring people with a strong emphasis on not just their wellbeing and influence through local syndicates and unions up into national level. It would of course be nationalist to enhance that air of 'we're getting this done'. Fascist as a word has been so abused and spread out that i wonder if people would notice a genuine fascist movement in this day and age.
Marine Le Pen. This is basically Marine Le Pen after Front Nationale got beat by Macron in the last big election.
That would be Nationalist, not Fascist. Fascism is the sort of collectivism that holds that the individual is dispensable like the cells of a body, and that only the collective matters.
They'd only shout it down through sheer coincidence because they call everything Fascist.
Depends on what you mean by 'noticed'. You'd get called a Fascist by the Left the same way you'd get called a Fascist by the Left if you commit the cardinal sins of being white and heterosexual. So you'd be called a Fascist, but I don't think the people calling you one would have any sort of framework to differentiate you from the 'fake' Fascists that they call everybody that they don't like.
That's why they go hard after everything nationalistic, fascism plays their game better.
When you spend all your time making enemies, eventually you will find yourself surrounded on all sides.
there is a natural equilibrium, the left has pushed the pendulum too far left, when it swings back it will not be nice....
Which is why they'll ironically keep trying to push harder farther left. Somewhere subconsciously they have to know if and when it swings back, it's not going to be pretty. Instead of trying to slow the rebound, they push harder ensuring an equal opposite reaction. It's like they literally can't stop themselves, even if it could be demonstrated that by doing so it would be in their collective best interests.
@@thegrimharvest yup, worked in a corporate, alphabet people allways were there in the shadows pulling strings and pushing the agenda but post 2010 or 12 they went off the charts and covid accelerated it to a rabid frenzy, I am afraid it might bite them in the ass and the world turns into sort of handmaids tale like dystopia...being almost 50 after a stroke do not give a shit anymore, it just makes me sad, like watching a slow motion crash test or train wreck.....you know what happens because of history and common sense but cant do a thing about it
"Far right" simply means "freedom, meritocracy, liberty and treating each other as individuals" in today's day and age. So by that metric, yes, I'm unashamedly "far right".
Freedom, Honor and Truth. Keep it simple
@@wiritpollapcharoenporn3168 Courage. Duty. Honor.
And for all that is holy do not bring equality onto the list of core values that's how liberalism mutated into progressivism.
@@wiritpollapcharoenporn3168honor is too subjective
@@wingsoffreedom3589
No that's equity. Equality of opportunity =/= equality of outcomes (equity).
Literally everything that woman said is Far-Right at the end is wrong. Like, literally everything she listed off.
of course it is
it always is
TBF we do want to repeal the 19th amendment so that's not false. but that's a mild position as everything else we want to do is far more extreme such as restoring a Bretton Woods system of sorts, abolishing the FBI, ATF, NSA, DoE, and the NFA.
All of the things they claim are “anti-woman” and “misogynist” are done for the benefit of women. Restricting abortion, for example. Half of the children who are murdered are girls, who would grow into women if they weren’t murdered.
@@FazeParticles I'm not sure what "we" you're talking about, majority of right-wingers do not wish to remove Women's right to vote
@@ohnoes3084 well that's not true. those "right wingers" are not right wingers. trumpers are usually 90's liberals, i used to be a trumper myself. a 90's liberal would be seen as conservative/right wing in the eyes of a progressive but that's an indictment on them and your understanding of "right wing". so when i say "we" i mean God's honest right wingers from a historical sense not a 90's liberal POV which is what you call right wing. yes that even makes people like Jorden Peterson a 90's liberal if you compare his policies to a 90's liberal politician. so i will maintain my original point with this clarification.
The American political system is designed to not swing too far in either direction which is a good thing. Everyone hates centrism, but it serves as a needed check on political extremism.
Better far right than far wrong.
Ts corny bro