3060Ti here, I expect to run any game at 1440p high at 60+ fps with or without DLSS quality. If I can't do that, the game is poorly optimized. I should be able to run anything I want with a modern mid range GPU that I spent $400 for. A lot of money.
@@zWORMzGaming This is why 4060Ti 16GB is worth it and is not as bad as people say- the 4060 cards are 100% made to be used with DLSS and or FG obviously. The poor game optimization is the big take away here.
I want to say that the first Stalker game, Shadow of Chernobyl, was launched in 2007. The 8800 GTX was the most revolutionary GTX of its time. It was the first GTX with unified shaders and was launched in 2006. Two of them in SLI barely reached 90-100 FPS at maximum details. The scale of performance is still the same. If you tried an 8600 GT or 8600 GTS back in the day in the first Stalker game, it would have had the same performance. This test you see today is awesome because it's showing the scale at which the gaming industry is moving forward. I think this game, with a few updates, will become awesome.
@ReEnaCtCky brother it's a miracle this game even released. It was literally being developed in a warzone at one point. If any game gets a pass on having issues it's this one.
This comment is for your video from the other day in regards to BO6 performance on steam launcher. I bought it on steam and have been having lower than expected fps with a 4070 super. I installed from pc game pass, and I get 30-40 fps more! Thank you so much for finding and having a video on that issue!
Hey! Glad I could help 🙂 And thanks for the information, I actually didn't know the performance on the xbox app, it seems like only steam has lower performance then. Have a good day!
I love your content but bro please bring back older gpu benchmarks .Your older amd's 6000 series gpus benchmarks were awesome . Would like to have those benchmarks back
It stutters because it stutters. 4K with 4090 user here. Stutters like crazy. Deinstalled the game today after playing it. FPS are good with DLSS and FG but the stutters are insane! Will wait half a year or so and give anomaly another playthrough.
Damn that's bad really bad rtx 4090 realying on dlss and fg means todays developers doesn't give crap about optimization anymore. Dlss and fg should only helps low tier gpu not top of the line 1000$+ gpu
Add these Tags in your MSI OSD %CPU% Displays CPU %GPU% Displays GPU Displays Screen Resolution. Example 1920x1080 No need to change MSI OSD settings when changing CPU's on the Same System, or GPU's on the Same System.
I am playing on a 4060 and would highly recommend turning on DLSS frame gen without lowering the resolution with DLSS, the reflection quality and genera;l image will be better and the input lag isn't awful. I got solid 60 experience on high with this and about a 60 fps average on Epic settings.
@@ВикторПетров-я1в That's not a hard and fast rule, just try it in this game instead of going off of how DLSS3 performs in other games with worse implementation
The gloomy, or outright stormy weather in this game is amazing, the debris in the air, the wind sounds, the lightning, they're so good. GPU wise the game doesn't seem to run all that badly but it's way too CPU intensive, I don't have much hope patches will fix it sadly. Will probably play it once Zen 6/Zen 6X3D is out lol.
Hey Krizzp! Do you have the Intel Arc A770? You can test all of the games you had tested recently with that GPU. It'd be interesting to see its performance
Played like 5 hours of stalker 2 and i can say i left for work verry hard ,had to take friday off just to have 3 uninterupted zone dayz ,love it and i am sure i will play it 2-3 times so i can make diferent decisions and get diferent endings 😁
I have an rx 6700xt and ryzen 5700x with 32 gb ram ,and the game runs on epic with 45-50 fps ,with fsr 3 runs like 60 fps ,but i disabled it used frame generation on high settings and i get 80+ fps
İts normal because The texture rendering resolution is quite high in UE4, entry-level graphics processing units like the 4060 are weak in graphics engines like UE5
And it is very popular nonetheless. It's basically a 4050 maybe ti, the 8gb of vram hurt as well. Energy consumption is very low though. The low profile 4060s are great. Just too expensive.
I hope you do more benchmarks for this as patches arrive, since the general narrative around the game sounds like the game isn't completely finished yet.
This game is beautiful. Too bad UE5 always runs like garbage. Babies who say this game looks bad are wrong. I remember Crysis from 2007, we have come a long way. Cyberpunk 2077 is still the best looking game in the world, no recent game tops it. Love your videos Kryzzp.
Could you do a video using the recommended specs? Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti / Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 / AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT Graphics Preset: HIGH / Resolution:1440p / Target FPS: 60. 32 GB Dual Channel RAM. SSD required. The above specifications were tested with TSR, DLSS, FSR and XeSS.
The game has a vram leak, makes the game unplayable on 4gb cards that othervise can achieve 60fps for a few minutes, but people with high and systems also reported the same problem
@@dmytrosoboliev935 maybe because it's just as powerful as a 1060, gow ragnarok also had 6gb of vram as minimum yet it ran at 60fps medium-low with upscaling🤔
@@itvAlex Same with me, i can maintain 60-40 fps with a mix of medium and high for about 20 mins before it becomes a slideshow Frame gen gives me insane stutters
@ I guess. I didn’t really ask tho. And it’s clearly not fallout. Chornobyl is a real place bud. Happens to look like a nuclear disaster zone. BECAUSE IT IS.
KrizzP If it helps Chernobyl is pronounced as ''CHR--NOBLE'' (American) Save you glitching out reading it in future vid's, I'm not picking holes, love your vid's and your English is better than a lot of English people I know! 😂🤣 Just trying to help.
RTX 3060ti user here. I get better frames in Wukong, but a lot more random stuttering. That said, ST2 needs more time in the oven. Waaaaay too many bugs rn on top of performance issues. I hate UE5
I'm waiting for 1080ti benchmark. It will be another evidence that it was the first ultimate graphic card. A full hd graphics card for eternity - there will never be a game released that is too demanding for the 1080ti in full hd.
I'd say even 1440p DLSS Performance looks better than native 1080p. At least that's what i've seen in every game i tested (not many). I sugest you add this to your benchmarks, especially with 4060 and 4060TI that is struggling a lot with native 1080p recently
In 2023 I bought a used Liquid Devil 6800 XT for the same price that new 4060s were selling for at the time. The card often approaches 2x the performance of the 4060 for the same money. Honestly, the 4060 feels like a scam product, and if I was an ignorant consumer who bought a 4060 and saw how it compared to similarly priced used GPUs, I imagine it would've been the last nVidia product I ever bought.
I played Sons of the Forest when it first came out and that game ran like butter compared to the later UE5 titles. I'm not sure what happened with later titles, but I'm not sure I'd put this one on the engine. I think we should be honest that it's currently just an underbaked, poorly optimized game. It doesn't have to stay that way though. Really hoping they delay the DLC and just focus on fixing what they have.
Thank you for taking the time to test this game and the useful info it provided ! If you please, as i know, DLAA and Native AA are not using upscaling yet they are available through DLSS or FSR therefore i wonder : why DLAA and NativeAA even exist in the first place since "native" is default as "resoution default" for any game ! Is "native" a magic word for marketing ?! I tried the game with no upscale and is ugly as in anti-aliasing ugly which is weird! With any upscale method and subsequent quality detail it looks better which is weird again. And, at least for me, overall it is not a "2024" game in terms of quality, sadly. With a rx6600xt and r5 2600 i can play at 1440p native res / Epic Settings at 30+ most of the time and it is not graphically impressive. With FSR AA Native+FG i get anything between 50-70+ fps at the same res/settings. Thank you for your input ! Crispy Critters, Kryzzp :)
Both native AA and DLAA still uses the DLSS 3 and FSR 3 image reconstruction algorithm and temporal jittering to make the image better with less aliasing. Just the image up-scaling part is omitted. As DLAA and FSR 3 have different image reconstruction techniques, hence the native AA and DLAA part is exposed to us users through their respective options and not available globally as a single option.
@@kishaloyb.7937 Thank you, it partially clarifies things for me since i understand your explanation partially :) Ultimately i am right, Dlaa and AA Native are less then "native" , why would i need "amd or nvidia native" since i have the native resolution already? Am i missing smth ? ...hmm ?...like vsr which is not really resolution and so on...
@@hollairis I'd say it's the opposite. Nvidia DLAA and FSR 3 Native AA is superior to "native", since those added image reconstruction algorithms and temporal jittering is actually making the final rendered image much better and superior compared to "native". Without those, a pure "native" image would be full of aliasing, shimmering and visual artifacts.
I have a xeon 2650 v4 (2.6 ghz), 32gb ram ddr4 2400mhz and a gtx 1080 8gb gdrr5 and it works with high/epic graphics with fg and fsr3 quality at 60-70fps at 1080p
This kinda makes me wanna go back and give the 2nd game a chance again. Call of Pripyat just didn't grab me as much as Shadow did. Not entirely sure why.
I love this game so far. Yes, it has issues, but I think the game is great. Im getting 72fps on average most settings at high reflections and shadows at medium. 1440p resolution FSR quality I7-12700k RX 7700xt 32gb DDR5-5600 Samsung 980 NVME. I had to down clock my ram speed my pc kept freezing at 6,000 on the windows log in screen.
people commenting that the visuals is not great (people who have not played the game who are just basing the graphics quality on a game recording and youtube which we all know changes the full graphics quality of the game recording) before you say the visuals are bad play the game first and see for yourself... ( then someone will comment i have played the game even though they haven't ) kids these days........ if you don't like the game very simple don't buy it and shut up if you think it is bad go elsewhere
Just trashing the game because of their card cant run the game I hate this Dont call it ugly Its the optimisation what should be the main topic Not the graphics One guy said it looks like 2013 game One said it looks worse that rdr I y My self have gtx 1650 I cant run this game on my little card And still can say this game looks awesome buy just looking it in videos
Wonder if my 6700XT will do OK at 4K Performance FSR (or TSR, depending) on medium settings. From what I've seen it still looks pretty great at medium, so I'm excited to try it out once it hits a sale or something.
I won’t excuse bad optimization. Obviously DLSS has ruined game optimization for the rest of time, but if we consider DLSS as a baseline, isn’t this pretty on par with what one would expect? For the most demanding and graphical games, hasn’t the 60 series cards always been the 1080p to light-1440p card? Or am I misremembering? I always thought the 70 series was the secure 1440p experience and then anything beyond was bonus performance.
Nice video also poor rtx 4060 hahahahaa. I played yesterday as well 9hours straight firt run on my pc , i run R7 5800X3D and rx 7900GRE and game make 1080p preset for me with epic settings so i get into game and with 1080p epic prest and FSR native my systeam was able to give me good 75 to 83 fps max which was like damn with this spces in native 1080p i expected a bit more but its UE titul so i anable as well frame gen and since its fsr 3.1 game looks stunning and i get 144fps and that is limit of my monitor refresh rate and after i put it to unlimited i get from 125 to 153 fps really good with frame gen, I wanted to see how fps i can get in 1440p so i selected same settings for 1440p fsr native epic preset and i get 60 to 65 fps and in the town area even drops to 45fps which was brutal, after i anable again Frame gen my fps jump to 74 to around 110fps max and this is really good for me i like to play in 1440p epic preset with fsr 3.1 native and frame gen also VSINC on its makes this game very smooth and with those settings game run like charm very good very smooth and what is plus for people with a bit weaker gpus like rx 5700xt or even rtx 2060 in 1080p game looks almost as good as in 1440p but you have to anable epic settings and than anable FSR frame gen and it will work good also i got as well rtx 3070 and i have around 25 to 30 fps less with frame gen in this ttitul but that is expected cuz rx 7900gre is mutch stringer gpu but over all i expect to game run mutch worse and this is not bad visuals with FSR 3.1 or XESS or DSR are basicly same also no shimiring at all in FSR 3.1 what was hugge reliefe for me. I think the stalker devs really give us what they promise even tho performance in native could be better but well thats why we have those frame gen tech in game, overall 8,5 from 10 in my opinion also i have 0 game braking bugs 0 stuters and 0 crashes and this is something like seen dragon in game that came out in 2024 really good port in my opinion but you have to get very good CPU not gpu but CPU in this game thats main thing cuz game gonna eat your CPU alive , like my 5800X3D was yesterday pushed to limit basicly i saw 80% cpu utilization togeather with 100%gpu utilization perfect and temps of cpu was 77C max which for my air cooler was nice. I really like how devs implemented the FSR XESS and TSR and also DLSS really good job, i also have at home another of mine gpus rtx 3070 OC and that gpus for perform on avarage 15 fps more than this rtx 4060 and with FSR frame gen actually worked very well so i could use DLAA and frame gen and its around 105fps while running in the forest also i tested it at 1080p DLAA with frame gen and epic preset and also high preset and i would recomendet the epic preset at 1080p gpu give you abit more than rtx 4060 but not by a mutch its time when we say that owr good rtx 3070 is no longer midrange gpu for 1440p but more like excelent 1080p gpu damn, but back to that DLAA makes looks everything very nice more sharp very good on the other hand the FRS is more like over sharpen maybe too mutch for someone i quite like that but maybe XESS give you best out of the box cuz its lttle bit less sharp than FSR but bit more than DLAA perfect in the middle also difference between 1080p epic FSR native and 1440p FSR native are minimal same goes for DLAA,XESS and DSR also FPS all of those are evry close if you testing it on one same gpu but as always the amd frame gen give you a bit more fps but only around 10% more this time but over all great implenetation of all technologies in my opinion. If this game come out 3 days early maybe it would win game of the year but it came out a bit too late for that.
@@mehmet_alp_ktk_16 nah, dude, you definitely joking. Even gta 5 in 4k on 4090 can’t give you 120 fps ua-cam.com/video/wfcMbfPmYQQ/v-deo.htmlsi=gkheQE1ZJpfsmg23
I have a rtx 3080 12gb , 32gb of ram and a ryzen 5800x3d. How will this game run on my rig?? Specially my cpu, is its powerfull enough to run this without any problems?
I was playing last night and there are certain sections and interactions with NPCs that completely tank my fps. Im talking like 85 fps dropping down to 10 fps. I have no idea whats causing it.
@@strangeke7750 it's kind of annoying In my opinion, even if you barley walk past some ur screen will have the dots. Personally for me I think they should have just left it with the meter showing it and not add some static effect to your screen. But I get it, it's part of the games immersion.
@@Slowburnripz they have the meter but when the radiation is life threatening it shows the dots as a visual cue. It’s supposed to be annoying and uncomfortable and a great visual for radiation. In my opinion. I played metro exodus and it was the same. It was annoying but I felt like it was part of the experience. It made me feel like I was getting bombarded by radiation. lol. I just wanted to get away from it.
I am using the same video card, but from ASUS ROG. Stalker works so weakly with i5-8400, i have a bottlenecking, i guess i have to buy a new CPU. Any recommendations for this GPU to play Stalker 2 well?
I miss when games were actually optimized. An rtx 4070 as a recommended spec is absolutely insane
I have better specs than the "recommended" and I STILL need to upscale and turn on frame gen.
Dont worry about gpu even the rtx 2070super or rx 5700xt will work but game really eat your cpu for lunch
3060Ti here, I expect to run any game at 1440p high at 60+ fps with or without DLSS quality. If I can't do that, the game is poorly optimized. I should be able to run anything I want with a modern mid range GPU that I spent $400 for. A lot of money.
@@RecFL I have the Rx 6800 xt oc and i still have to use fsr + FG... Bad optimized game 😅
Why insane? Welcome to PC gaming bitch!
By far the best benchmark videos on the planet! Thanks 🔥
Glad you think so! Thank you :D
@@zWORMzGaming This is why 4060Ti 16GB is worth it and is not as bad as people say- the 4060 cards are 100% made to be used with DLSS and or FG obviously. The poor game optimization is the big take away here.
I want to say that the first Stalker game, Shadow of Chernobyl, was launched in 2007. The 8800 GTX was the most revolutionary GTX of its time. It was the first GTX with unified shaders and was launched in 2006. Two of them in SLI barely reached 90-100 FPS at maximum details. The scale of performance is still the same. If you tried an 8600 GT or 8600 GTS back in the day in the first Stalker game, it would have had the same performance.
This test you see today is awesome because it's showing the scale at which the gaming industry is moving forward. I think this game, with a few updates, will become awesome.
The game is a complete fucking mess. Stop normalizing it.
@ReEnaCtCky brother it's a miracle this game even released. It was literally being developed in a warzone at one point. If any game gets a pass on having issues it's this one.
the game sucks ass, whether or not it "gets a pass" because of the circumstances is irrelevant
i say this as a huge stalker fan
@@ReEnaCtCky make better.... ohh you can't. Try to develop anything during a war in your country, idiot.
@@Carrion-0409 that makes no sense but alright, why should producers problem be a understanding factor for the consumers
A game made with the mindset: why optimize when DLSS and FG are there for that?
Loving the Stalker 2077 content my man!
🤣🤣
This comment is for your video from the other day in regards to BO6 performance on steam launcher. I bought it on steam and have been having lower than expected fps with a 4070 super. I installed from pc game pass, and I get 30-40 fps more! Thank you so much for finding and having a video on that issue!
Hey!
Glad I could help 🙂
And thanks for the information, I actually didn't know the performance on the xbox app, it seems like only steam has lower performance then.
Have a good day!
Try disabling Steam overlay when playing BO6 on Steam. It might fix that performance issue.
Ill try that out. Thank you@kishaloyb.7937
For cards like 4070 or earlier gen, keep your global illumination and reflection at medium or low, else it will tank performance alot.
I love your content but bro please bring back older gpu benchmarks .Your older amd's 6000 series gpus benchmarks were awesome . Would like to have those benchmarks back
thank you for these benchmarks. Also yeah, there are various boxes that you can destroy even if u might think that u can't
A true stalker fan watching this in 144p. Cheeke breeke 😂
Shame shit bro 😂
Mobile network
Its cheeki breeki, get out of here stalker.
Come in don't just stand there 😂@@Suomiwimbula
It stutters because it stutters. 4K with 4090 user here. Stutters like crazy. Deinstalled the game today after playing it. FPS are good with DLSS and FG but the stutters are insane! Will wait half a year or so and give anomaly another playthrough.
Damn that's bad really bad rtx 4090 realying on dlss and fg means todays developers doesn't give crap about optimization anymore. Dlss and fg should only helps low tier gpu not top of the line 1000$+ gpu
@@KingfAce-qb9xk this mentality has to stop. DLSS and FG help always.
Add these Tags in your MSI OSD
%CPU% Displays CPU
%GPU% Displays GPU
Displays Screen Resolution. Example 1920x1080
No need to change MSI OSD settings when changing CPU's on the Same System, or GPU's on the Same System.
I am playing on a 4060 and would highly recommend turning on DLSS frame gen without lowering the resolution with DLSS, the reflection quality and genera;l image will be better and the input lag isn't awful. I got solid 60 experience on high with this and about a 60 fps average on Epic settings.
Frame gen with a low input frames feels horrible for most people
@PotatoeGamerLP It generally does but it's well implemented in this game. Even Kryzzp says it's not bad in the video itself.
@@PotatoeGamerLP frame gen can be turned on only in base of 60 fps or even higher
@@ВикторПетров-я1в That's not a hard and fast rule, just try it in this game instead of going off of how DLSS3 performs in other games with worse implementation
@@lyadh0451 okay
I recently got gifted a 4060 and been waiting for this vid to drop before buying stalker 2. Thank you Kryzzp !!!
Where's your 4080 super
stalker 2 doesnt write the compiled shaders to disk, you need to compile them on every boot
Like they did with until dawn , besides that optimizations on these new games are really disastrous
As Slavic men I love how Kryyzp speak word VODKA, so much passion in it
Can you test the 4070 ti super as well? great benchmark as always
The gloomy, or outright stormy weather in this game is amazing, the debris in the air, the wind sounds, the lightning, they're so good.
GPU wise the game doesn't seem to run all that badly but it's way too CPU intensive, I don't have much hope patches will fix it sadly. Will probably play it once Zen 6/Zen 6X3D is out lol.
best benchmaker in the world
Surprised that little 4060 can provide quite playable experience at 4k
Hey Krizzp! Do you have the Intel Arc A770? You can test all of the games you had tested recently with that GPU. It'd be interesting to see its performance
4:15 is that the same Leshy that appeared in Clear Sky??? I cant even escape the spoilers even in a benchmark video 😂
You are the best benchmarker on youtube. Thanks for the 4060 videos.
That was better than i expected
Low 4K, 60 FPS
What? That was never shown in the video
@@Ku5hFi3nd Medium at 4K, DLSS
Wit low, DLLS, it can hit 60 FPS
I don'tknow why but I love this content
Played like 5 hours of stalker 2 and i can say i left for work verry hard ,had to take friday off just to have 3 uninterupted zone dayz ,love it and i am sure i will play it 2-3 times so i can make diferent decisions and get diferent endings 😁
On a vacation rn but can't miss ur vids, and please make a vid on Rx 6700 XT :)
I have an rx 6700xt and ryzen 5700x with 32 gb ram ,and the game runs on epic with 45-50 fps ,with fsr 3 runs like 60 fps ,but i disabled it used frame generation on high settings and i get 80+ fps
@kiurtosh thnx, I got the R5 7600x, and the other specs same as urs
There are already some mods on the nexus that fix some issues, like stuttering, the community of this game are crazy
The 4060 is nothing without dlss
İts normal because The texture rendering resolution is quite high in UE4, entry-level graphics processing units like the 4060 are weak in graphics engines like UE5
Too many games nowadays need DLSS and FG due to trash optimization so although you might be right, it is more appealing than a 3060
@@mehmet_alp_ktk_16 4060 is actually Labelled as a mid range gpu bro
Because it is mid range GPU what do you expect?
And it is very popular nonetheless. It's basically a 4050 maybe ti, the 8gb of vram hurt as well.
Energy consumption is very low though. The low profile 4060s are great. Just too expensive.
This 4060 performs almost exactly like my 7700XT in this game
Bro maybe cpu is slowing you down? What do you have?
@ymiround , I don't think I514600KF can slow down this GPU
this is what i was waiting for zwormz thank u so much now i dont have to spend my money
Can you run Rx 570 in Stalker 2 please? We want Rx 570 Stalker 2 benchmark
Love your videos btw ❤
Hey zwormz what is your opinion on rtx 4050..i hv decided to buy a laptop.. Should i buy it? 🖊️
I hope you do more benchmarks for this as patches arrive, since the general narrative around the game sounds like the game isn't completely finished yet.
When i heard a 7800x3d is getting bottleneckednim like yea....this needs optimization
Amazing textures ok i give it that.. the rest might aswell be like pubg
This game is beautiful. Too bad UE5 always runs like garbage. Babies who say this game looks bad are wrong. I remember Crysis from 2007, we have come a long way. Cyberpunk 2077 is still the best looking game in the world, no recent game tops it. Love your videos Kryzzp.
Could you do a video using the recommended specs?
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti / Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 / AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Graphics Preset: HIGH / Resolution:1440p / Target FPS: 60. 32 GB Dual Channel RAM. SSD required.
The above specifications were tested with TSR, DLSS, FSR and XeSS.
heart of chornobyl ❌
heart of chokobyl ✅
Final fantasy × Stalker collaboration 😊
the Holy THUNDER FPS BREAKER ! :)))))))
The game has a vram leak, makes the game unplayable on 4gb cards that othervise can achieve 60fps for a few minutes, but people with high and systems also reported the same problem
Typical 2024 optimization
@@lathrin sadly
Why should it run on 4gb card at all if the lowest settings mention gtx 1060, which has 6gb of vram
@@dmytrosoboliev935 maybe because it's just as powerful as a 1060, gow ragnarok also had 6gb of vram as minimum yet it ran at 60fps medium-low with upscaling🤔
@@dmytrosoboliev935 people with higher end cards also run into the same issue
soon we gonna have similar scenario in real life
My rtx 3060 laptop is crying in corner 😂
Literally me rn, trying EVERYTHING to get this game running
@@Froggy23442 me too, its run pretty good, but after a few minutes its disaster, 10-20 choppy fps
@@itvAlex Same with me, i can maintain 60-40 fps with a mix of medium and high for about 20 mins before it becomes a slideshow
Frame gen gives me insane stutters
I was naive when I thought AI upscaling gonna be a good thing.
@@deshuisshort4827 It is, only of you add it to optimized games, not to unoptimized shit
You are mad about the symptoms, not the root cause
test 7950X3D with all cores
As always big thank you for your videos. Could you test this game with RX 6800 please?🙏
*_S.T.A.R.K.F.I.E.L.D._*
Could you do a vid testing multiple CPUs for this game?
Yes, 5600X and 7600 would be a good test.
The 4060 is running it better than I would have thought, not bad.
RIP BOB'S Friend
Trees looks really bad in this game
The textures are amazing. And those trees look like that in that part of the world.
@@strangeke7750to be honest the game looks like a heavily modded Fallout game. At that point I might as well just skip the $70 and go back to Anomaly
@ I guess. I didn’t really ask tho. And it’s clearly not fallout. Chornobyl is a real place bud. Happens to look like a nuclear disaster zone. BECAUSE IT IS.
@@strangeke7750 I visited Chernobyl area in real life trust me trees don't look like this
@@Simple_OG Everything look bad
KrizzP If it helps Chernobyl is pronounced as ''CHR--NOBLE'' (American) Save you glitching out reading it in future vid's, I'm not picking holes, love your vid's and your English is better than a lot of English people I know! 😂🤣 Just trying to help.
can you try some mid range cpu like r5 5600x or i5 12400 and pair it rtx 4060 ti??
Not worth buying until it gets optimized
Performance is not amazing, but isn't it running better than wukong and bodycam?
No. wukong on ultra settings + rt medium runs better than this shit.
RTX 3060ti user here. I get better frames in Wukong, but a lot more random stuttering.
That said, ST2 needs more time in the oven. Waaaaay too many bugs rn on top of performance issues.
I hate UE5
On my 4060 laptop body am and wukong ran smooth with dlss balanced and fg (didn’t use fg on bodycam)
Why are you mentioning bodycam xd?? You know that's a game made by one or two devs?
@ more actually, they a whole office
With vodka, even swamp got better colors 👍
I'm waiting for 1080ti benchmark. It will be another evidence that it was the first ultimate graphic card. A full hd graphics card for eternity - there will never be a game released that is too demanding for the 1080ti in full hd.
I'd say even 1440p DLSS Performance looks better than native 1080p. At least that's what i've seen in every game i tested (not many). I sugest you add this to your benchmarks, especially with 4060 and 4060TI that is struggling a lot with native 1080p recently
In 2023 I bought a used Liquid Devil 6800 XT for the same price that new 4060s were selling for at the time. The card often approaches 2x the performance of the 4060 for the same money. Honestly, the 4060 feels like a scam product, and if I was an ignorant consumer who bought a 4060 and saw how it compared to similarly priced used GPUs, I imagine it would've been the last nVidia product I ever bought.
Awesome. This should work with my 4k TV and my 3060 ti in DLSS performance. Upscaling ftw.
I played Sons of the Forest when it first came out and that game ran like butter compared to the later UE5 titles. I'm not sure what happened with later titles, but I'm not sure I'd put this one on the engine. I think we should be honest that it's currently just an underbaked, poorly optimized game. It doesn't have to stay that way though. Really hoping they delay the DLC and just focus on fixing what they have.
6700xt 👀
Thank you for taking the time to test this game and the useful info it provided ! If you please, as i know, DLAA and Native AA are not using upscaling yet they are available through DLSS or FSR therefore i wonder : why DLAA and NativeAA even exist in the first place since "native" is default as "resoution default" for any game ! Is "native" a magic word for marketing ?! I tried the game with no upscale and is ugly as in anti-aliasing ugly which is weird! With any upscale method and subsequent quality detail it looks better which is weird again. And, at least for me, overall it is not a "2024" game in terms of quality, sadly. With a rx6600xt and r5 2600 i can play at 1440p native res / Epic Settings at 30+ most of the time and it is not graphically impressive. With FSR AA Native+FG i get anything between 50-70+ fps at the same res/settings. Thank you for your input ! Crispy Critters, Kryzzp :)
Both native AA and DLAA still uses the DLSS 3 and FSR 3 image reconstruction algorithm and temporal jittering to make the image better with less aliasing. Just the image up-scaling part is omitted. As DLAA and FSR 3 have different image reconstruction techniques, hence the native AA and DLAA part is exposed to us users through their respective options and not available globally as a single option.
@@kishaloyb.7937 Thank you, it partially clarifies things for me since i understand your explanation partially :) Ultimately i am right, Dlaa and AA Native are less then "native" , why would i need "amd or nvidia native" since i have the native resolution already? Am i missing smth ? ...hmm ?...like vsr which is not really resolution and so on...
@@hollairis I'd say it's the opposite. Nvidia DLAA and FSR 3 Native AA is superior to "native", since those added image reconstruction algorithms and temporal jittering is actually making the final rendered image much better and superior compared to "native". Without those, a pure "native" image would be full of aliasing, shimmering and visual artifacts.
@@kishaloyb.7937 Alright, thanks for the effort !
I have a xeon 2650 v4 (2.6 ghz), 32gb ram ddr4 2400mhz and a gtx 1080 8gb gdrr5 and it works with high/epic graphics with fg and fsr3 quality at 60-70fps at 1080p
First again zwormz thanks for all the benchmarks hope you're healthy and happy in your life
Thank you, everything's going well 🙂
Have a great day!
This kinda makes me wanna go back and give the 2nd game a chance again. Call of Pripyat just didn't grab me as much as Shadow did. Not entirely sure why.
Can you do 3060ti? Probably the same
Sure, it'll come :)
I love this game so far. Yes, it has issues, but I think the game is great. Im getting 72fps on average most settings at high reflections and shadows at medium.
1440p resolution FSR quality
I7-12700k
RX 7700xt
32gb DDR5-5600
Samsung 980 NVME.
I had to down clock my ram speed my pc kept freezing at 6,000 on the windows log in screen.
9:18 даже топы х3д не справляются с этим не оптимизированным шедевром)))
So unstable engine like UE5 give devs balls to ignore the basic capabilities of existing hardware and push the graphics to meaningless insane
people commenting that the visuals is not great (people who have not played the game who are just basing the graphics quality on a game recording and youtube which we all know changes the full graphics quality of the game recording) before you say the visuals are bad play the game first and see for yourself... ( then someone will comment i have played the game even though they haven't ) kids these days........ if you don't like the game very simple don't buy it and shut up if you think it is bad go elsewhere
Just trashing the game because of their card cant run the game
I hate this
Dont call it ugly
Its the optimisation what should be the main topic
Not the graphics
One guy said it looks like 2013 game
One said it looks worse that rdr
I y
My self have gtx 1650
I cant run this game on my little card
And still can say this game looks awesome buy just looking it in videos
There are russian comments😂
These comments are at least 50% of rus swamp citizens.
I wish i could watch this video but my glasses broke so im blind as a bat. My vision looks like N64 graphics.
Wonder if my 6700XT will do OK at 4K Performance FSR (or TSR, depending) on medium settings. From what I've seen it still looks pretty great at medium, so I'm excited to try it out once it hits a sale or something.
I won’t excuse bad optimization. Obviously DLSS has ruined game optimization for the rest of time, but if we consider DLSS as a baseline, isn’t this pretty on par with what one would expect? For the most demanding and graphical games, hasn’t the 60 series cards always been the 1080p to light-1440p card? Or am I misremembering? I always thought the 70 series was the secure 1440p experience and then anything beyond was bonus performance.
Nice video also poor rtx 4060 hahahahaa. I played yesterday as well 9hours straight firt run on my pc , i run R7 5800X3D and rx 7900GRE and game make 1080p preset for me with epic settings so i get into game and with 1080p epic prest and FSR native my systeam was able to give me good 75 to 83 fps max which was like damn with this spces in native 1080p i expected a bit more but its UE titul so i anable as well frame gen and since its fsr 3.1 game looks stunning and i get 144fps and that is limit of my monitor refresh rate and after i put it to unlimited i get from 125 to 153 fps really good with frame gen, I wanted to see how fps i can get in 1440p so i selected same settings for 1440p fsr native epic preset and i get 60 to 65 fps and in the town area even drops to 45fps which was brutal, after i anable again Frame gen my fps jump to 74 to around 110fps max and this is really good for me i like to play in 1440p epic preset with fsr 3.1 native and frame gen also VSINC on its makes this game very smooth and with those settings game run like charm very good very smooth and what is plus for people with a bit weaker gpus like rx 5700xt or even rtx 2060 in 1080p game looks almost as good as in 1440p but you have to anable epic settings and than anable FSR frame gen and it will work good also i got as well rtx 3070 and i have around 25 to 30 fps less with frame gen in this ttitul but that is expected cuz rx 7900gre is mutch stringer gpu but over all i expect to game run mutch worse and this is not bad visuals with FSR 3.1 or XESS or DSR are basicly same also no shimiring at all in FSR 3.1 what was hugge reliefe for me. I think the stalker devs really give us what they promise even tho performance in native could be better but well thats why we have those frame gen tech in game, overall 8,5 from 10 in my opinion also i have 0 game braking bugs 0 stuters and 0 crashes and this is something like seen dragon in game that came out in 2024 really good port in my opinion but you have to get very good CPU not gpu but CPU in this game thats main thing cuz game gonna eat your CPU alive , like my 5800X3D was yesterday pushed to limit basicly i saw 80% cpu utilization togeather with 100%gpu utilization perfect and temps of cpu was 77C max which for my air cooler was nice. I really like how devs implemented the FSR XESS and TSR and also DLSS really good job, i also have at home another of mine gpus rtx 3070 OC and that gpus for perform on avarage 15 fps more than this rtx 4060 and with FSR frame gen actually worked very well so i could use DLAA and frame gen and its around 105fps while running in the forest also i tested it at 1080p DLAA with frame gen and epic preset and also high preset and i would recomendet the epic preset at 1080p gpu give you abit more than rtx 4060 but not by a mutch its time when we say that owr good rtx 3070 is no longer midrange gpu for 1440p but more like excelent 1080p gpu damn, but back to that DLAA makes looks everything very nice more sharp very good on the other hand the FRS is more like over sharpen maybe too mutch for someone i quite like that but maybe XESS give you best out of the box cuz its lttle bit less sharp than FSR but bit more than DLAA perfect in the middle also difference between 1080p epic FSR native and 1440p FSR native are minimal same goes for DLAA,XESS and DSR also FPS all of those are evry close if you testing it on one same gpu but as always the amd frame gen give you a bit more fps but only around 10% more this time but over all great implenetation of all technologies in my opinion. If this game come out 3 days early maybe it would win game of the year but it came out a bit too late for that.
Am waiting for rtx 3070 test in this game :)
one thing is for sure, this game needs 32 GB of RAM, in my case it used here 2:03 25 GB of RAM
"Churnobial"😂 I like that pronounciation
Should i even get the game if i only have an 8700K and RTX 2070? Will it even run in 1080p at 60?
In 8:30 yes ram usage go from 17700 to18500
Howw the hell maaaaannnn ?..my rtx 3050 6gb gives around 65 to 70 in epic settings (FG+DLSS On)...I am super duper lucky like u ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Sir Kryzpo the Third,
May I request of you that you test the Graphics Processing accelerator more widely know as the RX 6800?
Best regards,
Cesar
I wonder is pripyat is gonna be super cpu demanding considering it's a major town 🤔
What do recommend on 1080p?
Medium + FG ?
I guess you did run out of VRAM at 2:17, 'cause the RAM usage went up by 500 megabytes for a second, and then went back to normal...
Why do you disable cores on your cpu? Also compiling the shaders take me around 3-5 minutes EVERY TIME
To play this game at 4k 120 fps without dlss you need at least rtx 5080 and above sadly :/
Hm, and what u need to play in any UE5 title in 4k120 without dlss?
Why only 4k, why not 16k360fps without dlss, bruh
@@anatolii6375 You're too funny you idiot. 🥵
@@anatolii6375 OK
@@mehmet_alp_ktk_16 this games doesnt even run 4k 120fps with dlss and fg enabled.
@@mehmet_alp_ktk_16 nah, dude, you definitely joking. Even gta 5 in 4k on 4090 can’t give you 120 fps
ua-cam.com/video/wfcMbfPmYQQ/v-deo.htmlsi=gkheQE1ZJpfsmg23
Whoever saying graphics is bad, don’t confuse rainbow shiny worlds like Horizon and brutal Soviet post apocalypse graphics. It looks amazing.
You should try MSI Afterburner/Riva Tuner with its framerate limit and see how it fixes all the erratic frametimes.
game has software raytracing by default. thats why its heavy on the GPU
Yeah, my xeon e5-2660v3 just dying in Zalissya...hope that they optimize CPU load at some point
If ur planning to make a Sunday video i recommend u wait cuz a bunch of games are releasing
I have a rtx 3080 12gb , 32gb of ram and a ryzen 5800x3d. How will this game run on my rig?? Specially my cpu, is its powerfull enough to run this without any problems?
I was playing last night and there are certain sections and interactions with NPCs that completely tank my fps. Im talking like 85 fps dropping down to 10 fps. I have no idea whats causing it.
About the same fps i get with the 5800x3d/1080ti combo in 1080p High . Also FSR 3 FG works out to about 80- 90fps.
waiting to know how the 7900xt performs
Stalker 2 "The heart of CherNOBIAL" 🤣🤣.. Love the accent...
Are those white little dots apart of the game
Yes that’s an effect of radiation
Yeah it's kind of annoying, even if you get the tiniest ammoit of radiation, ur whole screen will be covered in it.
@@Slowburnripz it is supposed to be. You’re not supposed to like radiation. The point is to avoid it.
@@strangeke7750 it's kind of annoying In my opinion, even if you barley walk past some ur screen will have the dots. Personally for me I think they should have just left it with the meter showing it and not add some static effect to your screen. But I get it, it's part of the games immersion.
@@Slowburnripz they have the meter but when the radiation is life threatening it shows the dots as a visual cue. It’s supposed to be annoying and uncomfortable and a great visual for radiation. In my opinion. I played metro exodus and it was the same. It was annoying but I felt like it was part of the experience. It made me feel like I was getting bombarded by radiation. lol. I just wanted to get away from it.
2k monitor, rtx 3060. should I even try to run it?
I am using the same video card, but from ASUS ROG. Stalker works so weakly with i5-8400, i have a bottlenecking, i guess i have to buy a new CPU. Any recommendations for this GPU to play Stalker 2 well?
My 5700x is bottlenecking my 7700xt lol