I remember in your original test of the RTX 4090 in Warzone two years ago or so, it got around 180-200 FPS in Warzone. Now it's getting 115-120. Unbelievable.
They just prepare the audience for the upcoming rtx 5000 series card that will get you back to the fps you were used too. For just 2000+ bucks or so, just some pocket change.
@@Pearloryx 2tb nvme is dirt cheap, if they want to thay can make it 1tb who cares, some brokeboys that wont spent money in game so they dont generate renevue.
@@erisium6988 An SSD cloner is 150 dollars that would cost more then my 1TB and a 2TB combined who wants to pay that or lose all their data because game devs are vomitting up UE5 garbage
COD has been plateauing graphics wise since MW2019 while only getting bigger and more demanding. MW2019 was amazing, but after half a decade, youd kind of expect changes justifying the ever increasing requirements.
I mean even looking back to 2017s WW2, it looked incredible, wtf has changed since then lmao. All they’ve done is ruin each game more and more, and then with each game, each update that comes out ruins it more and more😂😂
yea from day one and just a week later on my gtx 1660ti intel i7 107500h (mobile cpu and gpu btw) i was a ble to get around 125 and under. now i just get aroung 84 to 102 fps.
fr i got a 7900gre i5 12600k and a 1440p oled 240hz and i was running 400 fps on the small maps like the other japan or what ever and resurgence now its under 240
@@AcidKiller83 those are suspicious numbers i have a vega 56 and i was getting 120ish fps on warzone 3 but getting like 180-200 on warzone 4 turns out for some reason it had frame generation on by default and there was no way to disable it in game u have to either disable it through the campaign or the game files so might have to check that cuz that delay is horrible
this guy just make video about bug fps on steam platform , only steam users have fps problems ... ive got 9800x3d with 4080 super , 1440p and im getting 230-370 fps depends from map location
The performance is so bad for the new Warzone. I've seen a ton of people on reddit complaining about it too. They need to change something, because this is unacceptable.
Unoptimized games unfortunately sell expensive GPUs and CPUs. I runned Warzone 1 in 4k medium-low @ 70fps with an RX580 back in august 2021 (and I have video proof of that), which soon couldn't do even 1440p with those fps. My friends still using a 580 complained that warzone 3 struggles even with 1080p, imagine this one... It's insane, no reason for that other than forcing people to spend more money in hardware.
@@foxskyful So is the engine they use to make COD games, its why they all look the same. Go load up COD Infinite Warfare or Black Ops 3 and tell me, have the graphics changed that much? Lol
@zWORMSz Gaming In my experience, they increased LOD/Player LOD distance, so it is simulating player actions and map physics and whatnot out farther. So that could explain the CPU issues/bottleneck. The bots might have been easier for the cpu OR the render distance was the old value in the bot game, not sure.
also, haven't checked, the last update had foveated rendering by default, if that is still active, comment above is still very relevent, but if they got rid of that, there's your perf difference...
This Warzone/Bo6 integration has been hella bad. No footstep audio, horrible performance, and they removed so many QoL features that we got throughout the year.
This is exactly why I don't understand the people who argue the CPU doesn't matter as much. I feel like Linus tech tips is a big part of why so many people hold this opinion when it's just flat out wrong. It's just as important as the GPU, and it's been this way for years. A R5 3600 just doesn't cut it anymore, unfortunately. Stop cheaping out on the CPU in your builds. You will thank yourself later
In 4k a cpu don’t matter… bandwidth at system level and a Gpu that can process it fast enough.. you need high speed ports, motherboard, ddr5 high frequency, low latency and fast bridge between chipset on mobo and inside of cpu like intel ring vs chip let’s on amd
Hey Kryzzp, I found out that it’s pretty dependent what version of windows you’re on, it works best on 24H2, and after downloading shaders you have to restart your pc for the most frames otherwise your gpu won’t be used properly.
No bad advice… windows. 24h2 is the worse windows with so many unwanted things loaded as services monitoring you and taking raw hardware resources don’t use it, use windows 11 22h2 or 23h1 and nvidia. 556.12 older drivers, works a treat
I thought I was going insane. Before the season 1 update I was getting solid 240 at 1080p with a 7800x3d and a 4070 with no issues. Now I get barely 150 with all my settings at the lowest WITH frame generation and FSR 3.0. I cannot even pass 240, I knew I wasn't tripping. Thank you zWORMz.
Actually try to disable the voice audio in game( the one that let you hear the enemies talking each other), is in the top right corner. MY rtx 4070 super was doing 90 fps at each resolution but after disdabling it 200+ fps suddenly...magic!
That video saved me from questioning my old setup and react buy / upgrade my PC - apparently the performance is shit across the board :) even for highend GPUs etc … well; expected something different
I saw another video out there where the guy turned off prox chat and/or made the voice channel the party instead of all lobby and you gain ~50fps. Wild. I tested it with the 4070ti super and can confirm
Warzone has always suffered from horrible CPU optimization since the beginning so I'm not surprised it performs this poorly on a high-end setup like this
When it first came out I had an i7 4770k and it could hold about 80fps on average. It’s probably unplayable on that cpu now. I don’t even get much better fps than that now using a 13600k.
It's not just Warzone. When BO6 first came out, i was getting around 110/130fps with my 5600x/RX6600. Now im barely hitting 100. I just run Balanced with CAS at 85. Yes drivers up to date. Yes chipset drivers up to date. Yes i wiped, and reinstalled shaders. So I fired up MW3 to make sure something wasnt wrong. I was getting 140-170fps depending on the map like it always did. I REFUSE to use FSR because developers dont want to optimize games. Especially since its the same engine as always. Like all the youtubers are saying...
Time is changing some games. Unfortunately, we can't hear what those companies are talking about and what their intentions are with so-called "improving" the games, but the only thing that matters is that if you don't like it, put it aside. Don't play it. I hope you get to play some games you like with this legendary card. Great effort you put into this video. I hope this card will last you long enough so you can enjoy it.
I thought I was going crazy, Im getting 90-100 FPS with constant drops to 40-60. Its wild. I have an RX 7800 XT + i5-13400f and play on 1440p. I used to get a constant 130-140 FPS on extreme settings.
@@JZZKEE Dang how? Seems like the FPS did get better today tho. They mightve silently updated it. I play on Extreme setting and was getting 150-130 FPS 1440p what about you
Yup. I play in a slim PS4 and Blops6 was surprisingly smooth since launch, after the update it’s been super buggy and glitchy. Things take way longer than normal to load, and after finishing a multiplayer match I don’t even get to see anything level up because it glitches and goes back to the multiplayer menu. Every time.
damn, just checked 7 months old 7800X3D HUB benchmarks with the old version and it was 357 with 297 1% lows... They should design competitive games for 120 FPS on consoles that they can run with 240+ on good PCs imo.
Agree, it's a fkn joke tho why should we have to dig into the config files and change core counts.... the layman should not have to spend hours researching config file tweaks. Broken dogsht game.... I spend more time in the menus, afterburner, bios and config files tweaking settings now than playing the game
if anyone playing in steam, change the voice channel in the sound settings to only friends its, the "all lobby" is bugged, uses high cpu and takes a lot of fps
I play warzone 1 on my old i5 6500 and I got a stable experience at 70-90 frame i m sure if I try now with the new warzone it gonna be unplayable, that so sad … (sorry for the spelling my English is not amazing) love u video ❤🇧🇪
also have a 4090 rig with well optimized settings and was getting quite big drops in 4k. Dropping resolution to 1440p performance has been better for me than before the update which is strange, pretty much steady 237fps
Do you happen to have the game installed on Steam? There is currently a bug on the steam version that is essentially halving fps. I had to switch to battlenet to get the fps I had last season.
If you disable voice chat you get 40+ fps boost for idk what reason, but this bug occured again on this version and it appears that it had happened before!
This one is the Asus Rog Strix version of the card. We are running it with the latest Nvidia drivers and I'm not manually overclocking it. You can see all of its specs right here in TechPowerUP's GPU-Z. Resizable bar is also enabled and over on the left, I'm pairing it with a Ryzen 9 7950X3D CPU with half of its cores disabled, making it pretty much the same as a Ryzen 7 7800X3D; and 32 gigabytes of DDR5 6000 mega-transfers per second RAM in dual channel, CL30. Let's get into it! SHALL WE? Eminem sweating profusely in the corner...
The whole game is like it. Even MP and Zombies. Ever since Nvidias new driver I get less frames and more stutters. When I never got it before. It seems to have smoothed out after season 1 update.
This isnt the best solution but dynamic resolution is helps so much in this game (not upscaling) it got my 3070 and 12400 from 110fps at 1440p minimum to 130-170fps on area 99 (190-200 in multiplayer, note that im on old drivers because they work the best for me. I set dynamic resolution to target 200fps and it doesn't drop past 1080p. if you use fixelityfx CAS it makes the difference really hard to notice.
nvidia image sharpening enables in experience and driver panel (there calls scaling) and works in any game, even browser video. i use it with default setting already 3 years since reliese, it gives dsr effect without performance loss, looks great, even old games are like a remaster 4k hd
according to my personal observations of the system behavior, the CPU latency increased by more than 2 times, before the update, my CPU latency was 7-15 ms, now it has become 25-35 ms
Adding on top from the base code is very hard to do especially if you didn't work on the original release. Just look at how GTA O runs on PC in a full session compared to an empty session, it's like putting ductape for years, one day the whole thing will collapse, meanwhile you lose performance even with new hardware.
Did You play on steam version or Batlenet? What i see many people has problem with FPS in BO6, is a user of Steam version. I personaly using r9 7900x3d + RX 7900XTX, and don't have any issue with stutters, bottleneck etc., playing on battlenet
There's some bug going on with wz, specially with Urzikistan. Area 99 would work fine. Urzikistan lags for the first 10mins after that, at least for me I get the same fps as bo6 multiplayer around 90avg on high-ultra settings on my rtx3070ti. Really appreciate the benchmarks sir, I thought its my rig but I am glad to know its bloody Activision, again! 😂
I recently bought new 5700x3D (and RTX 4070S) and CPU is getting pretty hot in CoD BO6 Multiplayer. Around 75 C degrees. Is it normal or something is wrong?
Bro i have an amd gpu(rx 6700), in call of duty mwiii, warzone, black ops 6 there are no reflections. Even on ultra/extreme preset there is no reflection on water and they look so bad. Haven't found any fix to this bug more than 1 year later.
My gpu usage was stuck at 60% and only pushing about 70 frames on my 6800 and Ryzen 5800x. This was on the steam version. I decided to download the game pass version and I’m back to 99% usage again. 🤷🏻♂️
People forget that even though the 7800x3d is "best gaming CPU" (or maybe second best CPU since 9800x3d is released) most people use either R5 5600x, 5700x3d or 7600x and these CPU's are still capable gaming CPU's specially the R5 7600X so the devs should optimize it for these CPU's instead we get this
Gotta love it when one of the biggest game-developing studios in the world creates a game that looks and performs worse than Cyberpunk 2077 at minimum settings. 😐
I have 14900k and 4080 Super @1440p, playing with competitive settings, the GPU stays at 75-80%, the previous Warzone didn’t do that. They broke something.
im on a 6700xt and 13400f so not ultimatly bad, on 1080p competitive settings i lost like 50 fps and this game feels horrible. how tf can they fuck up that much when its the same map as before lol
omg same thing happened to me with 6900XT + 5600X the performance is very bad on warzone 75-80fps with insane Low GPU usage uninstalled the game and download DMZ work like Charme
try getting one of the new 9000x3d cpus... apparently they perform so good that it eliminates any cpu bottleneck there was previously in any game including jedi survivor eliminating the stutters complletely
Playing BO6 with a 4070 super and a 5900x. With 1440p resolution, medium-low settings. I get about 140-170 fps. Personally I see lower fps with bigger maps. If you have seen merkmusics videos you will know exactly what I’m talking about. There are assets outside of the map that can’t be seen that are being rendered by the cpu and gpu. This game is absolutely broken if you aren’t playing it on a console
Hey worms huge fan bro please could you help me answer two questions first why does my series s feel and performs better in warzone black ops 6 than my pc which has a gtx 1080 and ryzen 7 2700
in MW3 I had almost double the fps I have now, even though it's literally the same game with some changes. If they don't fix it, I just won't play it, because 40-50 fps dropping to 30 for such a dynamic game is a disaster. Although I have a 3060, not the worst GPU
@@CaptToilet Unlucky ? i bought a 285k, and OC the e cores to 5.0 ghz, and p cores to 5.8 ghz ( Temps are around 60-70 c ) And power utilisation is just insanely good ( 110 watts )
@@sahxe Energy wise yeah it is a win but gen on gen performance is lackluster based on the benches I saw. Plants it even worse than the 14900k in some cpu bound scenarios. Intel even made a statement that they were going to send out microcode updates in the future to fix them.
When did it become okay to release a game before it is ready!?! lighting and shadows are occasionally glitchy in M/P, guess they still not fixed it for Warzone I see! and the CPU optimization is terrible! the 7800x3d should not be getting bottlenecked! does call of duty use the 3dvcache? maybe the update stops utilizing it, by accident, just guessing here. Still losing 100 fps in 2 hours is a bit insane!
i want to try this game on my pc with 7800x3d and 7900xtx but i have 50gb of updates ,after update remember i getting arround 200fps max even at low settings
Hey crispy, bo6 was a rushed krap shoot when they just introduced it with warzone to force you to play this krap that’s like a muddy iPad game oh wait it is though
This game has been on a regular downward spiral since the Cold War integration.. so glad I finally uninstalled it for good, coming from someone who used to play 10 hours a day for years
You need to listen to what you're saying... you should NEVER have to change config files to play a damn video game. Totally unacceptable behaviour from such a big studio.
In my testing of Black Ops 6 I found that Resizable bar has a huge hit on performance, with it on I only hit around 140 in the multiplayer and with it off I get around 220 with a ryzen 9 5900x. I had to disable rebar through the game's config file so i wouldn't have to disable it across all games. In warzone i was getting slightly better performance than you are too so definitely a bug.
I remember in your original test of the RTX 4090 in Warzone two years ago or so, it got around 180-200 FPS in Warzone. Now it's getting 115-120. Unbelievable.
They just prepare the audience for the upcoming rtx 5000 series card that will get you back to the fps you were used too. For just 2000+ bucks or so, just some pocket change.
So basically, we're getting nowhere in terms of performance. Similar visuals, same performance, more money.
CPU limited now. The 4090 isnt at 99-100%
Yes, but when it was GPU bound at 4K extreme (no upscaling or anything), it was getting 120, while the test Kryzzp did two years ago got around 200.
@@snakeplissken1754 Or 8000 series from AMD for the same price point for each equivalent GPU tier! 😂😂😂😂
2014 - blame the gpu
2024 - blame the game
Also they made the game size +300GB and that’s almost thrice as large as Microsoft flight simulator
@@Pearloryx 2tb nvme is dirt cheap, if they want to thay can make it 1tb who cares, some brokeboys that wont spent money in game so they dont generate renevue.
@@erisium6988 for me it would take 7 days to download 300gb maybe even more. Not all of us are in first world fast internet speed countries
@@erisium6988 not for everyone brother, the cheapest 2tb ssd here is 1/3 of the minimum wage
@@erisium6988 An SSD cloner is 150 dollars that would cost more then my 1TB and a 2TB combined who wants to pay that or lose all their data because game devs are vomitting up UE5 garbage
COD has been plateauing graphics wise since MW2019 while only getting bigger and more demanding. MW2019 was amazing, but after half a decade, youd kind of expect changes justifying the ever increasing requirements.
I mean even looking back to 2017s WW2, it looked incredible, wtf has changed since then lmao. All they’ve done is ruin each game more and more, and then with each game, each update that comes out ruins it more and more😂😂
I actually think mw2019 looks better than black ops 6 and the current warzone.
what graphics bro? what graphics did they improve? it literally runs on ps4 and xbox one..
MW 2019 was amazing graphics wise... but a shit game in gameplay lol
MW 2019 even looked really good on a PS4
I didn't expect Activision would ruin every Platform (PC, Console and Mobile) with Warzone on it by BO6 integration
didnt they break it previously with warzone + *insert last few cods*
Amen they broke it with woke bidenomics
@@NoobGuySomeGuyi didn’t expect anything from activision anyway
Can't wait for IW to integrate Sledgehammer's next CoD and completely tear apart the entire game as a result.
I was surprised by BO6's performance and they just ruined it...
yea from day one and just a week later on my gtx 1660ti intel i7 107500h (mobile cpu and gpu btw) i was a ble to get around 125 and under. now i just get aroung 84 to 102 fps.
fr i got a 7900gre i5 12600k and a 1440p oled 240hz and i was running 400 fps on the small maps like the other japan or what ever and resurgence now its under 240
The game since launch has horrible optimization.
i9 12900k rtx 4090 Mw3 200-300, Bo6 NUKETOWN gets 100-150fps it’s just very poorly optimized it’s not even ur systems fault
@ res?
I have a i5-13600k and a RTX 3060 ti. I went from 110+ fps. To 60-70 now. The bottleneck is too real😭.. FIX THE GAME
rx7900xtx and went from 190-240 to 320-390fps.. apparently it works well with amd
@@AcidKiller83i noticed a good increase to.
@@AcidKiller83in my rx7800xt fps went from 150-170 to 60-70 😢
@@AcidKiller83 those are suspicious numbers i have a vega 56 and i was getting 120ish fps on warzone 3 but getting like 180-200 on warzone 4 turns out for some reason it had frame generation on by default and there was no way to disable it in game u have to either disable it through the campaign or the game files so might have to check that cuz that delay is horrible
@phantomboi2112 what cpu are you using?
At this point not even the 9800X3D will be fast enough for the 5090
I think you're right
this guy just make video about bug fps on steam platform , only steam users have fps problems ... ive got 9800x3d with 4080 super , 1440p and im getting 230-370 fps depends from map location
it will.. just not for this game
The performance is so bad for the new Warzone. I've seen a ton of people on reddit complaining about it too. They need to change something, because this is unacceptable.
Unoptimized games unfortunately sell expensive GPUs and CPUs. I runned Warzone 1 in 4k medium-low @ 70fps with an RX580 back in august 2021 (and I have video proof of that), which soon couldn't do even 1440p with those fps. My friends still using a 580 complained that warzone 3 struggles even with 1080p, imagine this one... It's insane, no reason for that other than forcing people to spend more money in hardware.
RX 580 is quite old now
@@foxskyful So is the engine they use to make COD games, its why they all look the same. Go load up COD Infinite Warfare or Black Ops 3 and tell me, have the graphics changed that much? Lol
@@foxskyfuland?
Rx580 😂😂😂😂😂
@@GideonGrim Not the same type of game where you have over 100 players and 50x bigger map
@zWORMSz Gaming In my experience, they increased LOD/Player LOD distance, so it is simulating player actions and map physics and whatnot out farther. So that could explain the CPU issues/bottleneck. The bots might have been easier for the cpu OR the render distance was the old value in the bot game, not sure.
also, haven't checked, the last update had foveated rendering by default, if that is still active, comment above is still very relevent, but if they got rid of that, there's your perf difference...
Don’t know why they thought halving the performance for something that most won’t notice was a good idea
The game is now, officially called “Call of Broken Duty”
It’s always been broken after warzone OG
graphics looks worse than mw2019 and performance is getting worse
This Warzone/Bo6 integration has been hella bad. No footstep audio, horrible performance, and they removed so many QoL features that we got throughout the year.
FAX
This is exactly why I don't understand the people who argue the CPU doesn't matter as much. I feel like Linus tech tips is a big part of why so many people hold this opinion when it's just flat out wrong. It's just as important as the GPU, and it's been this way for years. A R5 3600 just doesn't cut it anymore, unfortunately. Stop cheaping out on the CPU in your builds. You will thank yourself later
In 4k a cpu don’t matter… bandwidth at system level and a Gpu that can process it fast enough.. you need high speed ports, motherboard, ddr5 high frequency, low latency and fast bridge between chipset on mobo and inside of cpu like intel ring vs chip let’s on amd
100% fact keep preaching brother, so many people don't understand this thing called frametime...latency....wowzers.
@@skyhawk21 shows how little you know about PCs
@@Kk-wp5rl thanks troll
@@skyhawk21 not trolling
I was getting massive frame dips playing on my Xbox “120hz mode” as well as a little bit of input lag. WTF.
game is some assssssss
I'm agree with you kryzzp, game optimization is a big problem nowadays!
SO ANYBODY FACING FPS ISSUES IN WZ, JUST TURN VOICE CHAT TO PARTY. ALL LOBBY VOICE CHAT IS THE CULPRIT.
THANKS
Hey Kryzzp, I found out that it’s pretty dependent what version of windows you’re on, it works best on 24H2, and after downloading shaders you have to restart your pc for the most frames otherwise your gpu won’t be used properly.
In my case I went from 150 to 220 on a RTX 4070, and my 1% lows from 60-80 to 152 at its lowest
No bad advice… windows. 24h2 is the worse windows with so many unwanted things loaded as services monitoring you and taking raw hardware resources don’t use it, use windows 11 22h2 or 23h1 and nvidia. 556.12 older drivers, works a treat
lol
million dollar companies put in the least effort compared to a lot of smaller devs
And modders for free!
*billion
The reason for the performance is voice chat. Turn it off and your frames will go back to normal
Steam version is currently performing way worse than Battlenet by almost 100 fps
I thought I was going insane. Before the season 1 update I was getting solid 240 at 1080p with a 7800x3d and a 4070 with no issues. Now I get barely 150 with all my settings at the lowest WITH frame generation and FSR 3.0. I cannot even pass 240, I knew I wasn't tripping. Thank you zWORMz.
With BO6, I got a good preformance boost from disabling resizable bar.
Actually try to disable the voice audio in game( the one that let you hear the enemies talking each other), is in the top right corner. MY rtx 4070 super was doing 90 fps at each resolution but after disdabling it 200+ fps suddenly...magic!
That video saved me from questioning my old setup and react buy / upgrade my PC - apparently the performance is shit across the board :) even for highend GPUs etc …
well; expected something different
I saw another video out there where the guy turned off prox chat and/or made the voice channel the party instead of all lobby and you gain ~50fps. Wild. I tested it with the 4070ti super and can confirm
Warzone has always suffered from horrible CPU optimization since the beginning so I'm not surprised it performs this poorly on a high-end setup like this
When it first came out I had an i7 4770k and it could hold about 80fps on average. It’s probably unplayable on that cpu now. I don’t even get much better fps than that now using a 13600k.
Im scared to see what my power limited 13700k can manage if the 7800x3d is doing 90-130fps 💀
But he doesn't have 7800x3d, he has 7950x3d with 8 cores disabled
@@Flov-1 but at that rate arent they basically the same thing in terms of performance?
It's not just Warzone. When BO6 first came out, i was getting around 110/130fps with my 5600x/RX6600. Now im barely hitting 100. I just run Balanced with CAS at 85. Yes drivers up to date. Yes chipset drivers up to date. Yes i wiped, and reinstalled shaders. So I fired up MW3 to make sure something wasnt wrong. I was getting 140-170fps depending on the map like it always did. I REFUSE to use FSR because developers dont want to optimize games. Especially since its the same engine as always. Like all the youtubers are saying...
using fsr doesnt even help with performance at all the most i get is 5 more frames on balanced
I literally just got kick from THE CAMPAIGN! For a god damn update! WTF!
The real question is can it run Crysis at max settings
Ahh, reminds me of the good old days 😂
Now it's can it run COD or MHWilds 💀
Time is changing some games. Unfortunately, we can't hear what those companies are talking about and what their intentions are with so-called "improving" the games, but the only thing that matters is that if you don't like it, put it aside. Don't play it. I hope you get to play some games you like with this legendary card. Great effort you put into this video. I hope this card will last you long enough so you can enjoy it.
I thought I was going crazy, Im getting 90-100 FPS with constant drops to 40-60. Its wild. I have an RX 7800 XT + i5-13400f and play on 1440p. I used to get a constant 130-140 FPS on extreme settings.
i have a rx 7800xt and im getting 200fps on bo6 warzone in 1440p
@@JZZKEE Dang how? Seems like the FPS did get better today tho. They mightve silently updated it. I play on Extreme setting and was getting 150-130 FPS 1440p what about you
Yup. I play in a slim PS4 and Blops6 was surprisingly smooth since launch, after the update it’s been super buggy and glitchy. Things take way longer than normal to load, and after finishing a multiplayer match I don’t even get to see anything level up because it glitches and goes back to the multiplayer menu. Every time.
damn, just checked 7 months old 7800X3D HUB benchmarks with the old version and it was 357 with 297 1% lows... They should design competitive games for 120 FPS on consoles that they can run with 240+ on good PCs imo.
Running warzone on steam i got 60-70fps
Running warzone on battlenet i got 140-170 (ryzen 7 5800x)
Try doing a video trying different render worker counts in the config file
Agree, it's a fkn joke tho why should we have to dig into the config files and change core counts.... the layman should not have to spend hours researching config file tweaks. Broken dogsht game.... I spend more time in the menus, afterburner, bios and config files tweaking settings now than playing the game
shaders preload is required every time you change the settings for correct results
80Fps with everything set to normal on a 3080ti is just insane
Did you switch reflex to on plus boost?
20 gb of VRAM allocation? seriously? that too in 1080p? what an absolute joke..
Thats just allocation, it just caches the VRAM, it doesn't actually require that much
why wouldnt it? It uses resources you have, would you cry that game uses 12 cores and not 4?
@@erisium6988what a dumb comment
if anyone playing in steam, change the voice channel in the sound settings to only friends its, the "all lobby" is bugged, uses high cpu and takes a lot of fps
Warzone 1 looked better, this is 5 years ago. How is this possible?
I play warzone 1 on my old i5 6500 and I got a stable experience at 70-90 frame i m sure if I try now with the new warzone it gonna be unplayable, that so sad … (sorry for the spelling my English is not amazing) love u video ❤🇧🇪
also have a 4090 rig with well optimized settings and was getting quite big drops in 4k. Dropping resolution to 1440p performance has been better for me than before the update which is strange, pretty much steady 237fps
Do you happen to have the game installed on Steam? There is currently a bug on the steam version that is essentially halving fps. I had to switch to battlenet to get the fps I had last season.
From 130 fps i have 45/50 now
If you disable voice chat you get 40+ fps boost for idk what reason, but this bug occured again on this version and it appears that it had happened before!
This one is the Asus Rog Strix version of the card. We are running it with the latest Nvidia drivers and I'm not manually overclocking it. You can see all of its specs right here in TechPowerUP's GPU-Z. Resizable bar is also enabled and over on the left, I'm pairing it with a Ryzen 9 7950X3D CPU with half of its cores disabled, making it pretty much the same as a Ryzen 7 7800X3D; and 32 gigabytes of DDR5 6000 mega-transfers per second RAM in dual channel, CL30.
Let's get into it!
SHALL WE?
Eminem sweating profusely in the corner...
Even in the regular multiplayer the CPU is not optimised at all
The whole game is like it. Even MP and Zombies. Ever since Nvidias new driver I get less frames and more stutters. When I never got it before.
It seems to have smoothed out after season 1 update.
in voice chat and audio settings set
voice channel to party only
and disable enhanced audio
these helped with my fps issues.
Now I'm worried about what would my 5600 do
I have a question. Why do you disable half of the cores?
it’s now unplayable on my Core i5-4590 and GTX 1650 combo 😢
This isnt the best solution but dynamic resolution is helps so much in this game (not upscaling) it got my 3070 and 12400 from 110fps at 1440p minimum to 130-170fps on area 99 (190-200 in multiplayer, note that im on old drivers because they work the best for me. I set dynamic resolution to target 200fps and it doesn't drop past 1080p. if you use fixelityfx CAS it makes the difference really hard to notice.
i remember when this game used to be playable on a 1060 or 70
Its still playabe on 1070
nvidia image sharpening enables in experience and driver panel (there calls scaling) and works in any game, even browser video. i use it with default setting already 3 years since reliese, it gives dsr effect without performance loss, looks great, even old games are like a remaster 4k hd
according to my personal observations of the system behavior, the CPU latency increased by more than 2 times, before the update, my CPU latency was 7-15 ms, now it has become 25-35 ms
fx 8350 2060 30-40fps but theyre looking like 10-20fps any help?
Adding on top from the base code is very hard to do especially if you didn't work on the original release. Just look at how GTA O runs on PC in a full session compared to an empty session, it's like putting ductape for years, one day the whole thing will collapse, meanwhile you lose performance even with new hardware.
The same game engine being used today is from ten years ago
Did You play on steam version or Batlenet? What i see many people has problem with FPS in BO6, is a user of Steam version. I personaly using r9 7900x3d + RX 7900XTX, and don't have any issue with stutters, bottleneck etc., playing on battlenet
Steam. My most recent video compares the steam and battlenet versions, there's a 100 fps difference lol
@@zWORMzGaming Yeah, i saw that after i comment here. but in my case that was almost 200 fps difference
There's some bug going on with wz, specially with Urzikistan. Area 99 would work fine. Urzikistan lags for the first 10mins after that, at least for me I get the same fps as bo6 multiplayer around 90avg on high-ultra settings on my rtx3070ti.
Really appreciate the benchmarks sir, I thought its my rig but I am glad to know its bloody Activision, again! 😂
Same for me.... I7 12700k rx 7900xtx first 10 min. 110 fps, after 190 fps
I recently bought new 5700x3D (and RTX 4070S) and CPU is getting pretty hot in CoD BO6 Multiplayer. Around 75 C degrees. Is it normal or something is wrong?
dans votre bios activer Mod Curve en négatif -20 ou -30 et peut être s assurer que votre bios Carte mère est a jour
gains 5 a 10c
Try resizable bar off.
Turn if off from bios or with nvidia inspector on global settings.
yo zwormz, fortnite chapter 2 is back, i remember u saying weeping woods is the most intensive area in 2020
you should test the rx 7700 xt 12gb in games like cyberpunk, rdr2, gta v, etc in 1080p, 1440p, and 4k
interesting, my arc a750 ended up getting a massive boost with the new warzone, i went from 60-80 to 100-150
Bro i have an amd gpu(rx 6700), in call of duty mwiii, warzone, black ops 6 there are no reflections. Even on ultra/extreme preset there is no reflection on water and they look so bad. Haven't found any fix to this bug more than 1 year later.
50% + gpu utilization on 1080p for a 4090 is insane. that game engine is obviously not meant for competitive fps games
This makes me glad to be a Halo player. CoD is just...not good. Soulless. Generic. Copy pasted for 15 years.
the 5800x3d is still pretty good, its just the devs breaking their game
Why are you using NVIDIA Image Scaling nativ ? It eats up a lot of performance-when I use nativ, I always lose a ton of performance.
My gpu usage was stuck at 60% and only pushing about 70 frames on my 6800 and Ryzen 5800x. This was on the steam version. I decided to download the game pass version and I’m back to 99% usage again. 🤷🏻♂️
People forget that even though the 7800x3d is "best gaming CPU" (or maybe second best CPU since 9800x3d is released) most people use either R5 5600x, 5700x3d or 7600x and these CPU's are still capable gaming CPU's specially the R5 7600X so the devs should optimize it for these CPU's instead we get this
your videos always make my day
Gotta love it when one of the biggest game-developing studios in the world creates a game
that looks and performs worse than Cyberpunk 2077 at minimum settings. 😐
I have 14900k and 4080 Super @1440p, playing with competitive settings, the GPU stays at 75-80%, the previous Warzone didn’t do that. They broke something.
Had the same issues on the first warzone.
im on a 6700xt and 13400f so not ultimatly bad, on 1080p competitive settings i lost like 50 fps and this game feels horrible. how tf can they fuck up that much when its the same map as before lol
omg same thing happened to me with 6900XT + 5600X the performance is very bad on warzone 75-80fps with insane Low GPU usage uninstalled the game and download DMZ work like Charme
try getting one of the new 9000x3d cpus... apparently they perform so good that it eliminates any cpu bottleneck there was previously in any game including jedi survivor eliminating the stutters complletely
battle royale mode has horrible cpu/gpu utilization atm, note that it does not affect bootcamp and area99 from my testing
The stuttering in warzone right now is completely unacceptable
I’m running an i9 14900k with a 4070 Ti Super hitting 300 FPS on high settings why is your rig struggling so much?
Playing BO6 with a 4070 super and a 5900x. With 1440p resolution, medium-low settings. I get about 140-170 fps. Personally I see lower fps with bigger maps. If you have seen merkmusics videos you will know exactly what I’m talking about. There are assets outside of the map that can’t be seen that are being rendered by the cpu and gpu. This game is absolutely broken if you aren’t playing it on a console
It seems issue is steam version, if you play on battlenet it will give 2x the performance
Hey, love your videos!
Hey, thanks!
Hey worms huge fan bro please could you help me answer two questions first why does my series s feel and performs better in warzone black ops 6 than my pc which has a gtx 1080 and ryzen 7 2700
You should try overclocking the 4090 and attempt to run 16k
in MW3 I had almost double the fps I have now, even though it's literally the same game with some changes. If they don't fix it, I just won't play it, because 40-50 fps dropping to 30 for such a dynamic game is a disaster. Although I have a 3060, not the worst GPU
i actually thought this was just me i was getting nearly 200 fps on warzone 3 with my 4060 ti ryzen 7 5800x3d now struggles to get 140 fps
so the rtx 5090 will bottleneck every cpu :)
Especially for the unlucky bastards who bought the new Intel chips
User optimization is at fault as well as poor dev optimization tbh but when talking about out of the box experience then yes it will.
@@CaptToilet Unlucky ?
i bought a 285k, and OC the e cores to 5.0 ghz, and p cores to 5.8 ghz ( Temps are around 60-70 c )
And power utilisation is just insanely good ( 110 watts )
@@sahxe Still under performs vs other chips lol
@@sahxe Energy wise yeah it is a win but gen on gen performance is lackluster based on the benches I saw. Plants it even worse than the 14900k in some cpu bound scenarios. Intel even made a statement that they were going to send out microcode updates in the future to fix them.
Yesteday 250fps in s6 now under 100 fps on 1080p DISASTER
When did it become okay to release a game before it is ready!?!
lighting and shadows are occasionally glitchy in M/P, guess they still not fixed it for Warzone I see! and the CPU optimization is terrible! the 7800x3d should not be getting bottlenecked! does call of duty use the 3dvcache? maybe the update stops utilizing it, by accident, just guessing here.
Still losing 100 fps in 2 hours is a bit insane!
i want to try this game on my pc with 7800x3d and 7900xtx but i have 50gb of updates ,after update remember i getting arround 200fps max even at low settings
Hey crispy, bo6 was a rushed krap shoot when they just introduced it with warzone to force you to play this krap that’s like a muddy iPad game oh wait it is though
This game has been on a regular downward spiral since the Cold War integration.. so glad I finally uninstalled it for good, coming from someone who used to play 10 hours a day for years
disable voice chat in the settings and you'll get an FPS boost. Its a weird bug in the game currently.
should try with rebar off and heaps off in cfg file
You need to listen to what you're saying... you should NEVER have to change config files to play a damn video game. Totally unacceptable behaviour from such a big studio.
Oh brilliant, turn rebar off to reduce performance in every other title just so you might get a bit more in this piece of shit lmao
In my testing of Black Ops 6 I found that Resizable bar has a huge hit on performance, with it on I only hit around 140 in the multiplayer and with it off I get around 220 with a ryzen 9 5900x. I had to disable rebar through the game's config file so i wouldn't have to disable it across all games. In warzone i was getting slightly better performance than you are too so definitely a bug.