Full Episode - To Catch A Killer - Ep 105 Cold Case: Nadine Gurczenski
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 тра 2024
- Two cyclists come across the body of a woman in a rural roadside ditch. For three weeks police struggle to uncover the woman’s identity, until someone recognizes the exotic dancer from a morgue photo released to media. Fourteen years later, the squad looks into her past for clues to help solve Nadine Gurczenski’s murder.
- Розваги
I googled the case and they recently solved it with genealogy
Thank you
Who was it ?
@@cathimummery6873 A truck driver who died in 2017
What I don’t like about this channel is they give a lot of scenarios but never solve the crime
Thank you for telling us. It saved me the time and frustration. I stopped watching it and won't try it again.
“It’s my job to make bad things happen to bad people.”
Damn… that’s powerful.
True
Sounds tough doesn't it?..😒
@@KrisCorby-iv8dg sounds fun, actually.
It’s powerful because it’s trie
Am I the only one who thought the suspect sketch looked a hell of a lot like the guy, Richard, they spoke to in that auto shop?... I'm not pointing fingers, but the resemblance is wild, IMO.
...And he was quick to be like, nope, doesn't look familiar.
Yes I thought so too!!
It absolutely did!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Me too 😂😂
I said out loud when he looked at the picture, “Damn. That’s me!”
She obviously just used Paul and then treated him like dirt, but it wasn't him who killed her. That's just the tunnel vision again!!
R.I.P.
Couldn’t get past the bully in the first minute - a real legend in his own mind
The fact that she was left with no hands makes me wonder if she had either stolen from someone or they at least thought she had..
It was probably an effort to prevent identification... A lot of killers removed their victim's hands and/or head to make it harder to identify the victim bc as a result it makes it harder to solve the case and identify the killer...
Jesus Christ buddy! This isn't India, or Iran!!! The hands are removed to avoid, or delay ident!, that's it usually!..🤦🏻♀️🤷🏻♀️
@@KrisCorby-iv8dg I know right!! I was reading that comment about she had stolen like, WHAT IN THE HAMMURABI😅
Um.... nooo😑
"To catch a killer" Have you ever succeeded?
I clicked on oxygen and full episode and this came up! Too strange UA-cam!!!!!
why can't we have a programme without all the Hollywood style hype and blx - god its exhausting
you think this guy wants us to see them biceps. pull them sleeves up a little more😮
He is so annoying and narcissistic and it makes sense that he would want a show. Look at allllll that we would miss otherwise.
The biceps are the main purpose & plot of the show.
God have mercy, sad.
Have they thought about genealogy dna like what they used to catch the golden state killer
My thought also
Ya we need an update on this case. I’m going to google her and see if they solved it yet
Looked it up and it was solved with genealogy
@@rosalynroberts4242 oh ok good to hear thx
Joseph Archie (Raymond) Brousseau of New Liskeard in northern Ontario.
How can someone say such a thing as no loss. What kind of person says that? The person that said that would you hurt so one like Nad? Makes me wonder?
They arrested a suspect from Montreal jusst 2 weeks ago.
Good to know! Tnx!..👍
I thought they used DNA, confirmed the match, but the man died several years ago....
@@EBB-kabExactly
So, just because they were getting a divorce, despite the fact that she was an absconding mother, you still think that the husband is a suspect when its clear he has nothing to do with it as she was involved with the seedier side of life.
The fact despite how their relationship went he was still wanting answers to her dead. He did wanted custody of his daughter probably knowing what she wanted to do. And the risks involved in the line of job she did. Criminals will take advantage of that and if she was killed at home and her daughter was there she would be the other victim.
Just a starting place.
Is this your first crime show??
“Everyone is a suspect”
Further women are disproportionately killed by partners, regardless of profession, race, socio-economic status. Don’t you want each case thoroughly investigated? 😂 Good thing this is not your area of expertise. “Absconding mother” doesn’t even make sense.
Gee! What an odd comment..🤔 If it were me, I'd for sure tell the coppers, "pick me! Clear me 1st, so never, will you ever, wonder again, if I had anything to do w my "estranged" wife's brutal murder." I can tell though, from your comment, that you've had little, to nothing to do w violent crime, & for that, I'm beyond happy for you!....however, if you did, you would know how many times, percentage wise, that the nearest, & dearest to the murder victim, are their murders! So imagine this theory like a bullseye target, & the police begin in the centre, & work their way out, & around the sugject! I hope you're never in need of a homicide detective! Take care!..
The scarier thing is that 18 people, have "liked" his comment! Can you just imagine the hostility coppers have to deal with in these cases!...yikes!..🙈
OMG, this case isn’t solved? Thank God, I read the comments first…
I’m not a fan of experts shows that try to whip up drama with real cases, that involve family members. This feels like amateur hour, which makes the lack of sensitivity more egregious.
These wannabe detectives couldn't solve their own birth.
Just because they were getting a divorce doesn’t mean her husband killed her
Charlie’s angels squad is hard to watch 😂
My god Heather looks like her mom
Do you actually get results
Sometimes they do get results but often they can’t tell everything on the show due the fact it’s an ongoing investigation. Imagine they give everything for everyone to see, who says the killer won’t see it or his lawyer and say that the killer didn’t get a fair trail because it was all over the place and world? Here in Belgium there have been cases of trails to have to restart due the fact a jury member had seen things in the news or online. And the lawyer trying to go for mistrial but the judge only renewed all the jury members and started over to the anger of the gangster that killed people in a home invasion, because he thought he had the right address of a rival.
Def the husband..he said some odd things. Plus his partner at the time was only repeating what he had said..she didnt actually know if the facts were true
❤
This format is a bit dull.
Too much talking about what you are Going to talk about.
It is sad it was one of her lovers that killed her guaranteed.
Canadians are so odd
In what way? I'm Australian and didn't see anything odd so I'm wondering what you mean.
THAT'S why they r the CENTER of many JOKES made about our Northern neigbors 😮 there r even some pretty WELL-KNOWN series bout CANADIAN peculiarities + ODDITIES, of course, too 😂 check e.g.: 'How I met your mother' 😅 probably also got some series bout Aussie Auddities in da makin 😊
a@@carolcarol3938 😂 how funny 😅 Down-Under understatement⁉️🤗 Great sensa humor you folks exhibit 🤣
Husband did it. He copycated the first kill.
Too artificially dramatic with ham acting efforts.
this guy leading the investigation gives a lot of 'bro', power hungry, egotistical, agressive policeman vibes.
What a terrible show, you dramatise nothing, get nothing solved etc... this is terrible show business
Is this a Canadian channel? Regardless, seems very lame and the participants seem like they are 20.
Pretty sad here that although this is somewhat of a "tribute" to the victim, the producers don't have the respect nor the decency to spell her name correctly. Creepy for me is that she was found along the very road that I travelled so often when ski-diving out of Vineland in the 1970s. I have to laugh at some of this production. I've been involved with TV "Docs" in the past (BBC, "A&E") and this one is way "over the top" in silly, false drama. Asking that mechanic about whether he recognizes a suspect from 1999? He would have been maybe 15 years old in 1999? Was he even working there back then? HA! These "investigators" are rank amateurs....even the cop. These are the fictional "Hardy Boys" and "Nancy Drew" but with no skill. I can't stop laughing while watching this. And did they solve this? NO!!! Did this silly "investigative work" add one iota of assistance in terms of solving this crime? NO!!! So why put this together at all????
Sorry, but what's "ski-diving?"
@@KrisCorby-iv8dg , you jump from an aircraft while wearing a parachute.
Programa inútil.
Auto promoção.
Please change the title of your videos to "How We Did Not Catch A Killer" Waste of my effing time.
Format sucks !
This is a disappointing show and format. Slow. Repetitive. Offering hope to a family and then essentially doing subpar investigative work. How about using DNA to find the killer through a genetic database?
Exactly!..👍
They did and have solved the case last month I believe it was.
No loss
Same could b said of you & yours
How can someone say such a thing as no loss. What kind of person says that? The person that said that would you hurt so one like Nad? Makes me wonder?