The most precious memories we have from the 1980s and 1990s are the videos that our dads shot with handheld camcorders at birthdays and other family events. A dad in 2024 filming a 3D video with a Vision Pro is not crazy at all. Imagine looking at those video memories for years and years later.
Apple Vision is so isolated though, at least when you watch a TV you can hug the person next to you and still focus on what's around you. But VR/ Apple Vision seems like it's going to make people even more distracted and anti-social. I'm a kid and I don't want Apple Vision. I'm thinking crazy, but what do you think about: Cancel Apple Vision
You made a very good point. The video VCR recorder back in the 1980s was huge. It was so big, you had to use your shoulder to support the weight. However, the prestige of using one was massive almost as big as the recorder itself.
@@Stanley-px3bt The price $3500.00 is nothing, if you can afford it. I personally would pay 5K because at that the price point its the same as I would pay for a new PC/Mac but I won’t drop that cash on a gen zero - one product. However, I am temped on this one.
I disagree. That screen on the front is a feature for the user. If you have vr you know when someone walks in to come talk to you. You lift the headset off. This now makes it’s easier to talk to people without taking the headset off
Also, the 2 hour battery life is normal for standalone VR Headsets, BUT you CAN use it ALL DAY just by having it plugged in! You don't need to rely solely on the battery packs 2 hour limit.
Regarding the high price tag, Palmer Luckey, the founder of Oculus VR, made the following statement: "VR has to become something that everybody wants before it can become something that everyone can afford. You can't reverse those two steps and expect mainstream acceptance."
Apple had to knock it out of the park or else it’ll be like the Quest or Vive. No one really cares except the enthusiasts. But now, VR/AR is in the view of the mainstream. It’s something that the Everyman can use as long as they can pay for it.
Exactly, the stakes were high, so Apple knew it had to err on the side of overwhelm, not underwhelm, therefore they threw they whole f'ng kitchen sink at it. I think they rightly focused on the productivity, entertainment angle, as it will really attract the masses, not the game heads. I for one, have not an iota of interest in playing games, never thought about using one of those stupid headsets, but now all of a sudden, I can't wait to try this thing. And this is just the tip of the iceberg as to what it, or developers, can put this thing to use.
I do think they will. I’ve been a tech and hardware enthusiast but I’ve never been interested in vr or ar products but this reignited the fire in me. Gonna try to get one if I can secure it.
I think this sort of tech has really great accessibility for some people with disabilities to be able to stay in touch with people and have access a computer they wouldn't be able to use easily
I really think this tech would make people more isolated and cause extreme mental health issues, especially for Gen Z. People are already addicted to the iPhone, and people's natural human interest in talking to real people is already critically low. I'm just a kid and I'm doing my best to speak out about this. I can't do much, I'm just a kid. Are you adults tired of glass screens yet? Can we have a Nature focused culture that values natural humanity over tech so we have the best *balance* of technology? I want real friends, and I want to have real fun and I want to live my life. (in real life). But I need neighbors that WANT to be real friends in real life to make it possible!
@@peach1516 oh I agree. But if someone is unable to move or bedridden due to disabilities or illnesses, it's a way they can stay in contact with friends and family who are unable to be with them in person. But I agree about this tech being isolating for certain groups of people. I don't think this is going to replace phones any time soon, but for people who can't move well and are already isolated by medical issues it could help. People need to get involved in their communities, but I think people don't know where to start
I know this is random, but I'm a Gen Z kid, and I think Gen Z has enough mental health issues and Apple Vision would be mentally terrible for humanity. People already aren't interested in talking in real life. Can we go back to a balanced use of tech? Can we be more real life, real friends focused? I know what the popular opinion is, but does anyone else have the "courage" to Think Different? Cancel Apple Vision.
@@peach1516 I get where you’re coming from, but life in general is ALL ABOUT balance. Canceling a product like this to prevent tech from moving forward, is ridiculous. Instead, we as people should focus on our mental wellbeing and balance our lives so this kind of thing can be a part of it without taking over or being unhealthy.
You can decrease the weight of the device by making it out of magnesium or a magnesium\aluminum alloy. This will allow it to keep the metal looks while dropped the weight significantly.
True, I'm excited to see what it can do when it's fully released and for the future models of it! It really does seem like great innovation that I feel like the tech world has needed for a long time since the foldable touch screen phones and smart phones in general.
Carbon fibre isn’t the best material, carbon fibre is strong/lightweight but way more expensive and would not be great if people kept dropping it, if it was carbon fibre that would probably make the VR itself almost 10 grand, plus it wouldn’t be cheap either if people want it to get fix.
Apple knows what they are doing, they’re a multi billionaire company so of cause they can think of other solutions like using plastic inside the VR as it’s foundation and not it’s exterior
@@Sub13Guy realistically, if you drop it, a big protruding curved glass dome is much more of an issue than carbon fiber (I already know that part will give me a lot of anxiety), not to mention that aluminum they use is a relatively soft material as well, it won't break but it will deform. Cost is a valid point though, plus carbon fiber, as premium as it is, is not the look they're going for.
They needed a baseline feature set that all future headsets will have. Gave the full framework for developers to focus on. Meanwhile at Meta they roll out eye tracking with QP. Then remove eye tracking on Q3. Fragmenting the features that developers should be focusing on.
"Future headsets"? I think VR is a bad future. Can we Make a Good Future with balanced tech? Things like eye tracking would turn into companies being more and more invasive about our thoughts, and they would probably use Apple Vision to try to 'read people's mind' by guessing your emotions through tracking eye movement and face movement detection. I think AR/VR is severely damaging for humanity and I know I'm crazy, but I think Apple Vision will be canceled eventually.
@@peach1516 I can agree with this. But it won’t be canceled. Far from it. There’s no stoping it. Only thing we can do is not get involved and get one of these.
@@peach1516t won’t be cancelled. This is matured product not a prototype. If there’s any company you can trust with privacy it’s Apple, hate it or not.
i initially thought that this apple vision is for general consumers. if you think about it, its for their potential business partners and they are making a statement that they are now gonna take over the VR market and set the trend their way. once its all been tested and the development is good, hopefully they might get a general consumer version of the product for a reasonable price so the experience of people will not be buggy because it has been worked on before and apps has been catered to it.
Hey, I remember the old Steve Jobs Apple that was about Think Different. Why are almost none of the adults considering VR is a bad future for kids like me? Are some of you paid to promote Apple Vision and paid to comment on UA-cam? Because it feels like not enough people strongly Think Different.
Incorrect, this version won’t be used outside, sure, but spatial computing will replace your phone eventually. Maybe by version 3, it will be a size and weight that can be used all the time. They won’t use plastic and they will lean into the external puck and move the SoC on it, leaving only the co-processor on the display. They can have better heatsinks without having to put the weight on your head. The thing is, you won’t have your phone, you will use this with the puck. That’s why the front display is so important. When the headset is small enough, showing your face will be way more natural and you won’t need to take it off to interact with people. I don’t think it will ever get as small as glasses, not because it’s impossible, but because the user experience starts to suffer when your goal is to make the device that small. I can see it getting as small as the Balenciaga Mask Rectangle Sunglasses, maybe a little smaller than that, but once you go too small there are too many trade offs. You aren’t seeing the future of this product very clearly. It won’t be glasses sized, it won’t get rid of the puck, it will replace your phone, it will show your face externally so you don’t have to take it off, and it will have full day battery life. Also, I think the control of the device will expand beyond just pinching with your fingers, they have full skeletal hand tracking. I don’t think you’ll wave your hand in front of your face for the majority of controls, but it won’t be limited to just finger pinching.
Supposedly, Sony can make between 800 and 900 thousand screens the first year. So that means maybe 400 to 450 thousand headsets in the first year. They will sell every one. I’m going to try to get one, but with that limited supply, and a large number for developers and enterprise, which is interested, I don’t know if I will be able to. Yes, they will get the weight down. They will get the price down, but not to the $500 level. People will buy them. I’ve used industrial models that cost two to three times as much, need to be tethered to a powerful computer, and aren’t nearly as good as what the Vision Pro seems to be from the demos and from people who have tried it.
Hey, I appreciate you making a video; I'm just a kid but, are any adults thinking Apple Vision would cause severe mental health problems for a lot of people? People would just stay inside even more and be isolated. I haven't been hugged in 3 years because people prefer focusing on glass screens instead of real people. I'm just a kid so I can't do much, but are any adults Thinking Different about Apple Vision? I'm a Gen Z kid, please help. I'm stupid. Cancel Apple Vision.
they should have made the battery pack wirless charging so you can wirlessly connect it on the desk you're working, but when you have to move you can just pick it up and will keep the vision pro operating for 2hrs whlie being mobile, and if you go back to desk/couch you can put the battery pack back on the wirless charger... this is a connected headset, the battery back is just for temporary mobile use.
That's a great idea! They just have to put a Qi coil on one side of the battery pack, they would need to use something other than metal for the case or make a cutout with glass or something but yea that's interesting!
Wireless charging simply isn’t fast enough. Wireless charging can barely charge an iPhone an acceptable speed, you expect it to work on a battery for something that’s like a Mac on your face??
works for my macbook pro :) made a wireless charging coil which is inside my table and if i work on it it's getting charged while i use it (wireless) no issue. just comfort. @@extra4542
@@XCenturionX I've watched 3d movies in VR in Big Screen Beyond (the software, not the headset) and in apps like VRChat. It's actually really awesome, and people do it all the time. The way AVP is doing it, with near 4k per eye; the people who actually tried the AVP, literally ALL of them said the movie experience of Avatar in 3d was breathtaking and could easily see watching movies in it. Once they get co-watching or partner with Big Screen, all the arguments of "you can't watch with your family like you do with your TV" will go away.
@@vivalingua9377 literally every VR headset is capable of playing 3d movies. I've watched many 3d movies in my Quest 2; it's pretty fucking awesome. All based on Android.
Because it’s more exciting when it’s a mainstream product like the iPhone, iPad, or even the MacBook Air. This is at least 1-2 tiers above MacBook Air which is already an expensive laptop for most people. Just like how no one talks about Mac Pro’s. Not exciting if only a few people in the world use it.
I believe the 3D photos can be taken other family members who are less significant in that event😂 or! Just give you glasses to your photographer so he can take 3D memories for you!
So, you don't think people have been using Camcorders and phones to record moments during their kids BDay parties and the kids were playing with other kids and wanted fuck all to do with their parents, since like.... forever? This is such a weird argument about this aspect of the AVP that have people just reacting emotionally and completely lacking social self awareness. Really think it through LMAO!!!
Who thought it was weird to walk around with airpods?? Wired earphones had been a thing for a while before then and people walked around in those??? 12:49
Yeah, I never thought they were weird, I just thought it was the next step past wired ear buds. In my opinion it's more unintuitive to use and weird to see those foam metal strap headphones from the 80s/90s/00s that people used with walkmans & MP3/CD Players
People use to say they looked like electric toothbrush brush heads sticking out of your ears 🤷♀️ anything to bash a new apple product design (the long stems instead of just “buds) haha
Apple Vision Pro is for Pros, they will release a more consumer friendly version with cut down features. Pros include content creators and filmmakers who will use it to record 3D content (Films, Music Videos, Concerts, Sports Events, 'Adult' Content). The Pro users Apple is targeting are game developers. Eventually the apps we love to use most will offer some level of 3D experience. What is the storage capacity of the Vision Pro? Is the storage local or in the cloud?
I think it is hard to argue that the amount of technology and features that apple put into this headset isn't impressive. Despite the really incredible technology, I just don't see a practical use that makes it worth $3,500 for most consumers, even wealthy ones. Gaming is likely not a huge use case because of the lack of controllers. Movie watching is probably not a huge use case because it's uncomfortable, large, has a short battery, and if you have $3500 to spend on a vr headset you likely already have a great tv. There is also absolutely no way most people will be willing to wear this bulky headset to watch a movie on a plane. The same applies to work, monitors are substantially cheaper and more practical than a vr headset. Really the only use case I think is somewhat strong is socializing with people remotely. The front screen while innovative, also seems like an almost entirely unnecessary feature that significantly increases the cost for little benefit. When the iPhone came out, the value was obvious to me immediately, with this it seems like a really expensive, really cool tech gimmick.
Are you paid to promote Apple Vision and paid to comment on UA-cam? "Cheaper and better over time" like you're already trying to get the public to think about buying the next version of the product... Is anyone allowed to say Cancel Apple Vision?! Because I'm just a stupid kid and even I can see that AR is a bad future. Will you make a nature focused future where people don't walk around with screens at all? Let's make real life forums where people can enjoy real life conversation; Let's plant gardens of fruit trees in public parks so more people can be fed. Let's improve this reality, the real reality. A real love-your-neighbor focused future with real friends who WANT to talk in real life. I want to change the REAL world for better. I'm just a kid so I can't do it by myself. Please Cancel Apple Vision. Make a Good Future. a REAL good one.
@@peach1516Then get off youtube kid, you are literally not living your utopian dream right now while commenting online, and let others geek over the new tech
I don’t think Apple looks at this product as something that’s going to be a massive money maker. This product is an investment into the ecosystem to show developers where they are headed and to get developers working that direction. Future iterations of this product where it gets smaller and more appealing to the masses is where they are looking to make money.
People forget that iPhones have a LIDAR sensor. 100% you’ll be able to take 3D videos on your iPhone and play it back through the headset in the future.
I think LIDAR is cool, but I don't like the VR headsets. I'm a kid and I think kids and adults are already tech addicted enough. This culture is isolated and emotionally cold - it's extremely difficult to make friends in real life as of 2023. Apple Vision would cause severe mental health problems for a lot of people. People would just stay inside even more and be isolated. I seriously draw the line at Apple Vision, we've gone too far and it's bad. Are you adults tired of glass screens yet?
@@peach1516 they are not glass screens. I'm 52 and I'm an introvert. I actually use VR to be so much more social then I've ever been in real life, and it's translated to me being more open to talking to people in public. VR/XR is actually a promise of taking us AWAY from looking at screens. Have you ever tried VR, and thought seriously about the possibilities on the POSTIVE side, or are you only being biased to towards the negative consequences? Technology is going to come my young friend and it will not stop; its all about how we decide to use it that matters. You're a bit too young to being this cynical about what technology has to offer and what it has already done to lift literally millions out of poverty. I've worked in tech all my life, and I'm old to enough to have lived a LOT of my life without even the internet.
I think that everyone who's trying to figure out what Apple needs to *cut* from this device to make a more affordable version is barking up the wrong tree. That's not how Apple rolls. The current Vision Pro will become the mass-market device at a $2K price point in three years or so when Apple rolls out an updated Vision Pro. That's how the product life of iPhones is managed these days, and I don't see any reason why they wouldn't use that model here.
For that model to work, you need to make it a fashion item as well. I can't see this being a fashion item for a long time and until it's a lot smaller.
@scottmartin5492 ---- Agree with you on how Apple rolls. They will sell this version device later at a lower price. However I disagree that it will happen as late as 3 years after version 1. The M3 processor is already being fabbed. That processor will be much faster, much cooler, with better battery life, so it makes sense for Vision Pro 2. My guess is September 2025, which will be 18 months after V1 ships.
@@TroublesomeOwlwhy would it need to be a fashion item? Nearly every scene of the demo was the person at home by themselves. I don’t think this item is meant to be used out in the public, at least until GPS-based features like AR Yelp ratings for restaurants or deals at clothing stores pop up in your view and become available in the AR world
@@supa28 In order to get people to upgrade every year like they do with the i-phone, it needs to have a fashion component to it. People aren't updating unnecessarily on an annual basis for anything else i can think of. A 4 - 5 year upgrade cycle i can see though as it seems to be more of a pc replacement.
The battery is external, so it won't be difficult for a user to buy an aftermarket larger capacity version. If it was an internal one, it would have been heavier, uncomfortable and harder to service when it's time to replace it.
Come on my dear apple fanboys, please jump on it and make it cool. Please! So then we can have proper cool vr headset in normal prices. Im getting bored of my index. 🤣
Mark Gurman himself a few days ago on Bloomberg called the apple vision pro and I quote “fake AR” he said apple “from a technological point of view this headset, like you said is VR virtual reality!. What they’ve done is essentially make a fake AR glasses” that’s a direct quote from Mark Gurman on Bloomberg. So that’s it the vision pro is not an AR headset it’s a glorified VR headset with a high price. Hence today apple has cut the production to 400,000 units and was the reason for thr bloomberg interview with Mark!. Another quote from Mark “they’ve made fake glasses or quasi AR glasses with a screen and outside cameras to create a fake AR effect”. Disaster out disastrous product!.
Who will make 3D content for expensive system propably using some proprietary codec? One big downside of 3D Tv's was lack of content and requirement of expensive glasses for everyone - with AR/VR glasses the price per user is tenfold and with this Apple AR 30-fold.
APPLE didn't develop this tech!! 🤬🤬🤬 the sheer intentional salesmanship of youtubers is absolutely absurd. This is existing tech. Refined. But existing.
I wonder if we're going to get to a point where you can create the 3D video content using the iphone so you can be present at "the kid's birthday party" instead of de-immersing yourself from reality and watching the party though screens so you can record it like that. It's no doubt awesome to be able to do that, but I think most people would rather witness the event with their eyes. Wearing the computer on your whole face just comes off kind of rude, as opposed to recording with an iphone or a camcorder like years past. Although I imagine this will evolve into eventually using a pair of glasses that use prisms to display content and privacy glass to fog out the glass to enter more VR like immersion.
Also - This is not a new invention... Just like Apple didn't invent the tablet (Microsoft Tablet PC anyone? Also - Palm! etc.). This is a tech demo which Apple decided to make a main stream sales campaign for - for some reason... And that 2 hours of use.... eeeehhhhhhh
I think it's going to sell hundreds of thousands of this version. I don't think it's the next iPhone. But the original iPhone wasn't the iPhone yet. Compared to the first iPhone this is far more developed. What this is, is the next iPad. A lot of people thought the iPad was a ridiculous product. It was just a big iPhone without the phone. And you didn't really need an iPad. But the iPad had the advantage of being able to run iPhone apps from day one, so you didn't have this new high tech device that had no software to run on it. I bought the first iPad, and I loved it. Just after I got it, I was in England, where it wasn't being sold yet. A woman I was working with said she couldn't wait to tell her husband she had seen one in person. She said he had clipped out a magazine picture of the iPad, and was pretending to use it. I gifted her the box that mine came in, which had an actual size image of the iPad on the front. She told me he was ecstatic. A couple of years later I visited a sister who lived in China. When I asked what we could bring them from America, the thing they wanted was the latest iPad, which wasn't yet for sale there. For an item that people just don't need, it was very popular, and still is. I see similar levels of excitement for the Apple Vision Pro that I saw for the iPad when it was released. The high price will definitely keep many from buying, but if Apple sells only 10% as many AVP units as they sold iPads the first year, that would mean over 700,000. If they sell only 1% as many AVP units as they sell iPads today, that would still be over 400,000/year.
Yuo change the aluminium for good cheap Abs (density is the half),removed the crepy screen , put the batery inside , 2000uss, Vision Poor (just for the rest of us)😊😅😊
If any other brand made a 3.5k device with the flaws that this has, it would be absolutely bombed, no matter how beautiful it would be. But since it's Apple, everything is forgivable. F this world.
On one hand we got people saying “wearing stuff on your face is inherently disconnecting because people can’t see your eyes, blah blah blah technology bad” and on the other hand people saying “is the screen on the outside showing your eyes TOO MUCH???” People saying “it’s pointless and too expensive no one will want it” and then saying “plus with everyone wearing one of these nobody’s gonna be paying attention to each other.”
I think the press is underestimating how many people will blow $3500 on far dumber shit than a Vision Pro. Just look at a pay-to-win mobile game, or lootboxes or whatever lmao.
They should have made it out of plastic. It would have been fine. The back of the iPhone 3G was made of plastic. This is like Back to the Future II where they had VR goggles on at the dinner table. That will be us pretty soon.
Apple are gonna sell an external battery to easily double usage time for ridiculous prices because (1st…… they can) and also because (as far as I could tell from the keynote) it connects to the headset with a proprietary connector. Expect to pay hundreds of dollars for a jumped up powerbank with a fancy connector 😅
way to big, but ar glasses like rokid max are lighter and i just use the rokid max with own prescription glasses as second normal glasses outside together with the rokid station, so it feels more normal but i have still acsess to helpful infomation and some games to play everywhere without the need to take the phone out of the pocket and look down like a zombie all the time. i can keep eyecontact aand do the smartphone things, google stuff, watch videos,play games use apps and stuff while walking around and dont need this heavy device on the head. apple visiion pro also has only 2 hours battery, my rokid glasses have with the lil station 5 hours battery and are waay lighter and feel like normal sunglasses instead of a vr headset.
Also, can we stop acting like the 3-D camera on the headset is a big deal? Think obviously going to figure it all out a way to put it on the phone, again it’s Apple! Also, if you catch on video in 3-D and you could relive a moment, it’s not a big deal that it’s on my headset at the time..if it can do all that.
4:11 love how even though the Oculus Rift has been dead and has seen no updates in like 4 years, the Rift is still the buzzword when talking about PCVR headsets XD
the battery pack is the best thing THE BATTERY IS REPLACABLE unlinke an iphone it wont render the product usless when the battery degrades. THE THING IS 3500 like this is going to make its life last in the long run.
No product that has taken 10 years and over 5,000 patents can be considered a "gen 1" product. There have been many iterations of this product that we have not seen as the public.
based on the way Macs are popular. they will do the same, Showing this expensive one, and then releasing a less featured version, and 90% will say, ok I better get the expensive one... and you all just got owned by apple again. just see iPhone max/pro/plus, Apple Watch SE and watch pro, Mac air with Mac Pro
I almost never film on a concert anymore... First what hell??? I won't enjoy the real moment. Now... With a headset That costs more than a good car, f! That's a no.
She does sound like a fan girl no offense. Because for the cost the battery at least should be much better. Like I said at least. Since it's not truly made for gaming. But for productivity and entertainment.
For the test... I want to see a non apple fan, skeptical person. Emotions.. can cloud your judgement. Me... Once I test it at the store, I will be very calm and pay very attention at the details
The part where she talks about it "almost being weird" how real things looked and the being close to..... this is where at least 90% of all men (on the low end!) had the same exact thought.
In my opinion, it was a wrong decision to not use 120hz or higher refresh rate on the lens…many of my relatives and friends cannot tolerate 90hz VR lenses
They should remove that fancy, see through part in the front of the headset because to me it's not necessary. And doing that it should cut cost. The female guest is right the vision Pro is an alternate tech device for home not a replacement for all things computing.
Now that iPhone can record 3D videos to be relived on the Vision Pro it makes so much ore sense than going around awkwardly recording with the headset even tho we know that will become something normal too
I've checked out of apple's ecosystem since the iphone 6 release, but I think I'm going to save up for the vision. This really does seem like the first HMD that doesnt seem like a gaming novelty. It actually seems like it could be taken seriously as a computing device. Any negative discourse around the vision right now really reflects the sentiment people had about the iphone, the ipad, and airpods, but look at how they have shaped the tech space. Everyone has a full-screen phone and wireless earbuds and most at least know a couple people with tablets (ipads predominantly). Sure, those things had been made before, but it was apples refinement of those products that launch the widespread adoption of them.
This is not the future I was hoping for. I'm a kid, I'm stupid, I'm crazy, and I'm already tech addicted enough. Can we make a nature focused culture now? A real love-your-neighbor focused future with real friends who WANT to talk in real life. I want to change the REAL world for better. But I'm just a kid so I can't do it by myself. Please Cancel Apple Vision. Make a Good Future. a REAL good one.
Regarding the battery life and battery pack: I'm thinking maybe Apple purposely restricted it at 2 hours max for this iteration. It's their subtle way to stop you from wearing the headset for too long -- for reasons of health and safety. This is meant to be experienced for up to an hour or so, not something you leave on all day.
I think so too.. Apple I'm sure was thinking of the possible liabilities, issues of wearing this thing too long, specially for a company that heavily focuses on health as a whole
@@justinsane332bro u think too badly about consumerism and the people who make these products. their mind isnt just “money money” they care about their customers even if they dont always show it
The most precious memories we have from the 1980s and 1990s are the videos that our dads shot with handheld camcorders at birthdays and other family events. A dad in 2024 filming a 3D video with a Vision Pro is not crazy at all. Imagine looking at those video memories for years and years later.
Apple Vision is so isolated though, at least when you watch a TV you can hug the person next to you and still focus on what's around you. But VR/ Apple Vision seems like it's going to make people even more distracted and anti-social. I'm a kid and I don't want Apple Vision. I'm thinking crazy, but what do you think about: Cancel Apple Vision
@@peach1516dude .. put the display on a cabinet and record away. You don’t have to wear it.
You made a very good point. The video VCR recorder back in the 1980s was huge. It was so big, you had to use your shoulder to support the weight. However, the prestige of using one was massive almost as big as the recorder itself.
But is that worth $3500.00?
@@Stanley-px3bt The price $3500.00 is nothing, if you can afford it. I personally would pay 5K because at that the price point its the same as I would pay for a new PC/Mac but I won’t drop that cash on a gen zero - one product. However, I am temped on this one.
If apple can make a working duel disk I’m in
Sorry. Filming with an iPad isn't normal
Yeah I don’t know what they’re talking about. It’s never been normalized and people still mock anyone that does it, only old people do that
I disagree. That screen on the front is a feature for the user. If you have vr you know when someone walks in to come talk to you. You lift the headset off. This now makes it’s easier to talk to people without taking the headset off
Also, the 2 hour battery life is normal for standalone VR Headsets, BUT you CAN use it ALL DAY just by having it plugged in! You don't need to rely solely on the battery packs 2 hour limit.
Regarding the high price tag, Palmer Luckey, the founder of Oculus VR, made the following statement: "VR has to become something that everybody wants before it can become something that everyone can afford. You can't reverse those two steps and expect mainstream acceptance."
Classic quote
Apple had to knock it out of the park or else it’ll be like the Quest or Vive. No one really cares except the enthusiasts. But now, VR/AR is in the view of the mainstream. It’s something that the Everyman can use as long as they can pay for it.
Exactly, the stakes were high, so Apple knew it had to err on the side of overwhelm, not underwhelm, therefore they threw they whole f'ng kitchen sink at it. I think they rightly focused on the productivity, entertainment angle, as it will really attract the masses, not the game heads. I for one, have not an iota of interest in playing games, never thought about using one of those stupid headsets, but now all of a sudden, I can't wait to try this thing. And this is just the tip of the iceberg as to what it, or developers, can put this thing to use.
I do think they will. I’ve been a tech and hardware enthusiast but I’ve never been interested in vr or ar products but this reignited the fire in me. Gonna try to get one if I can secure it.
I travel with multiple 99wh batteries for laptops, iPad, etc. when traveling I would use it all the time. 75” display in a coach seat!!
I think this sort of tech has really great accessibility for some people with disabilities to be able to stay in touch with people and have access a computer they wouldn't be able to use easily
I really think this tech would make people more isolated and cause extreme mental health issues, especially for Gen Z. People are already addicted to the iPhone, and people's natural human interest in talking to real people is already critically low. I'm just a kid and I'm doing my best to speak out about this. I can't do much, I'm just a kid. Are you adults tired of glass screens yet? Can we have a Nature focused culture that values natural humanity over tech so we have the best *balance* of technology? I want real friends, and I want to have real fun and I want to live my life. (in real life). But I need neighbors that WANT to be real friends in real life to make it possible!
@@peach1516 oh I agree. But if someone is unable to move or bedridden due to disabilities or illnesses, it's a way they can stay in contact with friends and family who are unable to be with them in person.
But I agree about this tech being isolating for certain groups of people. I don't think this is going to replace phones any time soon, but for people who can't move well and are already isolated by medical issues it could help. People need to get involved in their communities, but I think people don't know where to start
Elly was a great guest host! And she made me really excited for the headset hearing about her experience. 🤩
I know this is random, but I'm a Gen Z kid, and I think Gen Z has enough mental health issues and Apple Vision would be mentally terrible for humanity. People already aren't interested in talking in real life. Can we go back to a balanced use of tech? Can we be more real life, real friends focused? I know what the popular opinion is, but does anyone else have the "courage" to Think Different? Cancel Apple Vision.
@@peach1516 I get where you’re coming from, but life in general is ALL ABOUT balance. Canceling a product like this to prevent tech from moving forward, is ridiculous. Instead, we as people should focus on our mental wellbeing and balance our lives so this kind of thing can be a part of it without taking over or being unhealthy.
You can decrease the weight of the device by making it out of magnesium or a magnesium\aluminum alloy. This will allow it to keep the metal looks while dropped the weight significantly.
True, I'm excited to see what it can do when it's fully released and for the future models of it! It really does seem like great innovation that I feel like the tech world has needed for a long time since the foldable touch screen phones and smart phones in general.
Or carbon.
Carbon fibre isn’t the best material, carbon fibre is strong/lightweight but way more expensive and would not be great if people kept dropping it, if it was carbon fibre that would probably make the VR itself almost 10 grand, plus it wouldn’t be cheap either if people want it to get fix.
Apple knows what they are doing, they’re a multi billionaire company so of cause they can think of other solutions like using plastic inside the VR as it’s foundation and not it’s exterior
@@Sub13Guy realistically, if you drop it, a big protruding curved glass dome is much more of an issue than carbon fiber (I already know that part will give me a lot of anxiety), not to mention that aluminum they use is a relatively soft material as well, it won't break but it will deform. Cost is a valid point though, plus carbon fiber, as premium as it is, is not the look they're going for.
They needed a baseline feature set that all future headsets will have. Gave the full framework for developers to focus on. Meanwhile at Meta they roll out eye tracking with QP. Then remove eye tracking on Q3. Fragmenting the features that developers should be focusing on.
Apple will win in AR meta will in VR.
"Future headsets"? I think VR is a bad future. Can we Make a Good Future with balanced tech? Things like eye tracking would turn into companies being more and more invasive about our thoughts, and they would probably use Apple Vision to try to 'read people's mind' by guessing your emotions through tracking eye movement and face movement detection. I think AR/VR is severely damaging for humanity and I know I'm crazy, but I think Apple Vision will be canceled eventually.
@@peach1516 I can agree with this. But it won’t be canceled. Far from it. There’s no stoping it. Only thing we can do is not get involved and get one of these.
They make it right first. Eye tracking is right. Pass through is right with hd and no latency. Then we will talk about features.
@@peach1516t won’t be cancelled. This is matured product not a prototype. If there’s any company you can trust with privacy it’s Apple, hate it or not.
i initially thought that this apple vision is for general consumers. if you think about it, its for their potential business partners and they are making a statement that they are now gonna take over the VR market and set the trend their way. once its all been tested and the development is good, hopefully they might get a general consumer version of the product for a reasonable price so the experience of people will not be buggy because it has been worked on before and apps has been catered to it.
Reasonable price? Did you notice the name of that thing? Vision PRO. Expect the Vision MAX & ULTRA in a near future.
@@deanx0r this is for coporation an devs, this is not for you. that price is peanuts compared to what corporations spend
@@dper727 I thought it was obvious but I guess I should have added the /s in the end.
@@deanx0r sarcasm doesn't go well through text
Hey, I remember the old Steve Jobs Apple that was about Think Different. Why are almost none of the adults considering VR is a bad future for kids like me? Are some of you paid to promote Apple Vision and paid to comment on UA-cam? Because it feels like not enough people strongly Think Different.
Incorrect, this version won’t be used outside, sure, but spatial computing will replace your phone eventually. Maybe by version 3, it will be a size and weight that can be used all the time. They won’t use plastic and they will lean into the external puck and move the SoC on it, leaving only the co-processor on the display. They can have better heatsinks without having to put the weight on your head. The thing is, you won’t have your phone, you will use this with the puck. That’s why the front display is so important. When the headset is small enough, showing your face will be way more natural and you won’t need to take it off to interact with people. I don’t think it will ever get as small as glasses, not because it’s impossible, but because the user experience starts to suffer when your goal is to make the device that small. I can see it getting as small as the Balenciaga Mask Rectangle Sunglasses, maybe a little smaller than that, but once you go too small there are too many trade offs. You aren’t seeing the future of this product very clearly. It won’t be glasses sized, it won’t get rid of the puck, it will replace your phone, it will show your face externally so you don’t have to take it off, and it will have full day battery life. Also, I think the control of the device will expand beyond just pinching with your fingers, they have full skeletal hand tracking. I don’t think you’ll wave your hand in front of your face for the majority of controls, but it won’t be limited to just finger pinching.
Supposedly, Sony can make between 800 and 900 thousand screens the first year. So that means maybe 400 to 450 thousand headsets in the first year.
They will sell every one. I’m going to try to get one, but with that limited supply, and a large number for developers and enterprise, which is interested, I don’t know if I will be able to.
Yes, they will get the weight down. They will get the price down, but not to the $500 level. People will buy them. I’ve used industrial models that cost two to three times as much, need to be tethered to a powerful computer, and aren’t nearly as good as what the Vision Pro seems to be from the demos and from people who have tried it.
Absolutely Properly Priced Luxury Experience- Tim cook, probably
Thanks for having me on as a guest! Good times!!
Hey, I appreciate you making a video; I'm just a kid but, are any adults thinking Apple Vision would cause severe mental health problems for a lot of people? People would just stay inside even more and be isolated. I haven't been hugged in 3 years because people prefer focusing on glass screens instead of real people. I'm just a kid so I can't do much, but are any adults Thinking Different about Apple Vision? I'm a Gen Z kid, please help. I'm stupid. Cancel Apple Vision.
@@peach1516 Just you. If someone hasn't hugged you in three years without Apple vision, maybe it's time to look at why. Hint: it's not the tech.
they should have made the battery pack wirless charging so you can wirlessly connect it on the desk you're working, but when you have to move you can just pick it up and will keep the vision pro operating for 2hrs whlie being mobile, and if you go back to desk/couch you can put the battery pack back on the wirless charger... this is a connected headset, the battery back is just for temporary mobile use.
that's an addon, another $3500 cost :p
That's a great idea! They just have to put a Qi coil on one side of the battery pack, they would need to use something other than metal for the case or make a cutout with glass or something but yea that's interesting!
You can already do it with a USB-C charger or battery brick.
Wireless charging simply isn’t fast enough. Wireless charging can barely charge an iPhone an acceptable speed, you expect it to work on a battery for something that’s like a Mac on your face??
works for my macbook pro :) made a wireless charging coil which is inside my table and if i work on it it's getting charged while i use it (wireless) no issue. just comfort.
@@extra4542
What people are missing is that Apple can release proper 3D vision pro movies.
The problem still remains...nobody wants to put on a diving mask for hours just to watch a movie
Obviously there will be 3D movies, which can only be seen with this device. Sorry Androiders.
@@vivalingua9377 could even be interactive with this software.
@@XCenturionX I've watched 3d movies in VR in Big Screen Beyond (the software, not the headset) and in apps like VRChat. It's actually really awesome, and people do it all the time. The way AVP is doing it, with near 4k per eye; the people who actually tried the AVP, literally ALL of them said the movie experience of Avatar in 3d was breathtaking and could easily see watching movies in it. Once they get co-watching or partner with Big Screen, all the arguments of "you can't watch with your family like you do with your TV" will go away.
@@vivalingua9377 literally every VR headset is capable of playing 3d movies. I've watched many 3d movies in my Quest 2; it's pretty fucking awesome. All based on Android.
I still don‘t understand why people keep banging on about the $3500 price tag. If you can‘t afford it, its not for you so move on.
Because it’s more exciting when it’s a mainstream product like the iPhone, iPad, or even the MacBook Air. This is at least 1-2 tiers above MacBook Air which is already an expensive laptop for most people. Just like how no one talks about Mac Pro’s. Not exciting if only a few people in the world use it.
I believe the 3D photos can be taken other family members who are less significant in that event😂 or! Just give you glasses to your photographer so he can take 3D memories for you!
So, you don't think people have been using Camcorders and phones to record moments during their kids BDay parties and the kids were playing with other kids and wanted fuck all to do with their parents, since like.... forever? This is such a weird argument about this aspect of the AVP that have people just reacting emotionally and completely lacking social self awareness. Really think it through LMAO!!!
Who thought it was weird to walk around with airpods?? Wired earphones had been a thing for a while before then and people walked around in those??? 12:49
It was weird because they still look ugly AF, it looks like you have electric toothbrush heads dangling from your ears
Yeah, I never thought they were weird, I just thought it was the next step past wired ear buds. In my opinion it's more unintuitive to use and weird to see those foam metal strap headphones from the 80s/90s/00s that people used with walkmans & MP3/CD Players
Something about mary vibes
People use to say they looked like electric toothbrush brush heads sticking out of your ears 🤷♀️ anything to bash a new apple product design (the long stems instead of just “buds) haha
@@EllyAwesomeTech Huh, wild
Apple Vision Pro is for Pros, they will release a more consumer friendly version with cut down features. Pros include content creators and filmmakers who will use it to record 3D content (Films, Music Videos, Concerts, Sports Events, 'Adult' Content). The Pro users Apple is targeting are game developers. Eventually the apps we love to use most will offer some level of 3D experience.
What is the storage capacity of the Vision Pro? Is the storage local or in the cloud?
I've been wondering about the storage capacity of the Apple vision as well.
I think it is hard to argue that the amount of technology and features that apple put into this headset isn't impressive. Despite the really incredible technology, I just don't see a practical use that makes it worth $3,500 for most consumers, even wealthy ones. Gaming is likely not a huge use case because of the lack of controllers. Movie watching is probably not a huge use case because it's uncomfortable, large, has a short battery, and if you have $3500 to spend on a vr headset you likely already have a great tv. There is also absolutely no way most people will be willing to wear this bulky headset to watch a movie on a plane. The same applies to work, monitors are substantially cheaper and more practical than a vr headset. Really the only use case I think is somewhat strong is socializing with people remotely. The front screen while innovative, also seems like an almost entirely unnecessary feature that significantly increases the cost for little benefit. When the iPhone came out, the value was obvious to me immediately, with this it seems like a really expensive, really cool tech gimmick.
i just gotta say this, austin looks like an alternate universe Logic. surreal
The thumbnail on the everyday music video looks so much like Austin
The battery life is nothing of importance I’m sure we can buy a bigger bank 3rd party or
dang austin got the new this is update where they removed matt and replaced him with elly awesome
What concerns me is the weight, but since this is a first gen device, I'm sure it will get cheaper and better over time.
Are you paid to promote Apple Vision and paid to comment on UA-cam? "Cheaper and better over time" like you're already trying to get the public to think about buying the next version of the product... Is anyone allowed to say Cancel Apple Vision?! Because I'm just a stupid kid and even I can see that AR is a bad future. Will you make a nature focused future where people don't walk around with screens at all? Let's make real life forums where people can enjoy real life conversation; Let's plant gardens of fruit trees in public parks so more people can be fed. Let's improve this reality, the real reality. A real love-your-neighbor focused future with real friends who WANT to talk in real life. I want to change the REAL world for better. I'm just a kid so I can't do it by myself. Please Cancel Apple Vision. Make a Good Future. a REAL good one.
@@peach1516we good
@@peach1516Then get off youtube kid, you are literally not living your utopian dream right now while commenting online, and let others geek over the new tech
2:05 and UA-camrs and reviewers who will buy it as a business expense and tax write off 👀
Catch on with a $3500 price point? I highly doubt that
The organ transplant market will do well in 2024😂
I'm getting sick of your click bateing 😕
I don’t think Apple looks at this product as something that’s going to be a massive money maker. This product is an investment into the ecosystem to show developers where they are headed and to get developers working that direction. Future iterations of this product where it gets smaller and more appealing to the masses is where they are looking to make money.
In ten years yes just not now. Otherwise the stock woulda shown movement lol.
First
I will wear it outside. Watch me.
First but I love these videos bro keep it up I look forward to watching these
People forget that iPhones have a LIDAR sensor. 100% you’ll be able to take 3D videos on your iPhone and play it back through the headset in the future.
I think LIDAR is cool, but I don't like the VR headsets. I'm a kid and I think kids and adults are already tech addicted enough. This culture is isolated and emotionally cold - it's extremely difficult to make friends in real life as of 2023. Apple Vision would cause severe mental health problems for a lot of people. People would just stay inside even more and be isolated. I seriously draw the line at Apple Vision, we've gone too far and it's bad. Are you adults tired of glass screens yet?
@@peach1516 they are not glass screens. I'm 52 and I'm an introvert. I actually use VR to be so much more social then I've ever been in real life, and it's translated to me being more open to talking to people in public. VR/XR is actually a promise of taking us AWAY from looking at screens. Have you ever tried VR, and thought seriously about the possibilities on the POSTIVE side, or are you only being biased to towards the negative consequences? Technology is going to come my young friend and it will not stop; its all about how we decide to use it that matters. You're a bit too young to being this cynical about what technology has to offer and what it has already done to lift literally millions out of poverty. I've worked in tech all my life, and I'm old to enough to have lived a LOT of my life without even the internet.
@@WigganNuG Bingo.
This is literally already a thing in iOS 17 on newer iPhones lol
I think that everyone who's trying to figure out what Apple needs to *cut* from this device to make a more affordable version is barking up the wrong tree. That's not how Apple rolls. The current Vision Pro will become the mass-market device at a $2K price point in three years or so when Apple rolls out an updated Vision Pro. That's how the product life of iPhones is managed these days, and I don't see any reason why they wouldn't use that model here.
For that model to work, you need to make it a fashion item as well. I can't see this being a fashion item for a long time and until it's a lot smaller.
@scottmartin5492 ---- Agree with you on how Apple rolls. They will sell this version device later at a lower price. However I disagree that it will happen as late as 3 years after version 1. The M3 processor is already being fabbed. That processor will be much faster, much cooler, with better battery life, so it makes sense for Vision Pro 2. My guess is September 2025, which will be 18 months after V1 ships.
@@TroublesomeOwlwhy would it need to be a fashion item? Nearly every scene of the demo was the person at home by themselves. I don’t think this item is meant to be used out in the public, at least until GPS-based features like AR Yelp ratings for restaurants or deals at clothing stores pop up in your view and become available in the AR world
@@supa28 In order to get people to upgrade every year like they do with the i-phone, it needs to have a fashion component to it. People aren't updating unnecessarily on an annual basis for anything else i can think of. A 4 - 5 year upgrade cycle i can see though as it seems to be more of a pc replacement.
@@TroublesomeOwl yeah i think a full on redesign would be like every 4-5 years, but slight improvements like better chip every 1-2 years.
The battery is external, so it won't be difficult for a user to buy an aftermarket larger capacity version. If it was an internal one, it would have been heavier, uncomfortable and harder to service when it's time to replace it.
Come on my dear apple fanboys, please jump on it and make it cool.
Please!
So then we can have proper cool vr headset in normal prices.
Im getting bored of my index. 🤣
Mark Gurman himself a few days ago on Bloomberg called the apple vision pro and I quote “fake AR” he said apple “from a technological point of view this headset, like you said is VR virtual reality!. What they’ve done is essentially make a fake AR glasses” that’s a direct quote from Mark Gurman on Bloomberg. So that’s it the vision pro is not an AR headset it’s a glorified VR headset with a high price. Hence today apple has cut the production to 400,000 units and was the reason for thr bloomberg interview with Mark!. Another quote from Mark “they’ve made fake glasses or quasi AR glasses with a screen and outside cameras to create a fake AR effect”. Disaster out disastrous product!.
Who will make 3D content for expensive system propably using some proprietary codec?
One big downside of 3D Tv's was lack of content and requirement of expensive glasses for everyone - with AR/VR glasses the price per user is tenfold and with this Apple AR 30-fold.
APPLE didn't develop this tech!! 🤬🤬🤬 the sheer intentional salesmanship of youtubers is absolutely absurd. This is existing tech. Refined. But existing.
I wonder if we're going to get to a point where you can create the 3D video content using the iphone so you can be present at "the kid's birthday party" instead of de-immersing yourself from reality and watching the party though screens so you can record it like that. It's no doubt awesome to be able to do that, but I think most people would rather witness the event with their eyes. Wearing the computer on your whole face just comes off kind of rude, as opposed to recording with an iphone or a camcorder like years past. Although I imagine this will evolve into eventually using a pair of glasses that use prisms to display content and privacy glass to fog out the glass to enter more VR like immersion.
Also - This is not a new invention... Just like Apple didn't invent the tablet (Microsoft Tablet PC anyone? Also - Palm! etc.). This is a tech demo which Apple decided to make a main stream sales campaign for - for some reason... And that 2 hours of use.... eeeehhhhhhh
I think it's going to sell hundreds of thousands of this version. I don't think it's the next iPhone. But the original iPhone wasn't the iPhone yet. Compared to the first iPhone this is far more developed.
What this is, is the next iPad. A lot of people thought the iPad was a ridiculous product. It was just a big iPhone without the phone. And you didn't really need an iPad. But the iPad had the advantage of being able to run iPhone apps from day one, so you didn't have this new high tech device that had no software to run on it.
I bought the first iPad, and I loved it. Just after I got it, I was in England, where it wasn't being sold yet. A woman I was working with said she couldn't wait to tell her husband she had seen one in person. She said he had clipped out a magazine picture of the iPad, and was pretending to use it. I gifted her the box that mine came in, which had an actual size image of the iPad on the front. She told me he was ecstatic. A couple of years later I visited a sister who lived in China. When I asked what we could bring them from America, the thing they wanted was the latest iPad, which wasn't yet for sale there. For an item that people just don't need, it was very popular, and still is.
I see similar levels of excitement for the Apple Vision Pro that I saw for the iPad when it was released. The high price will definitely keep many from buying, but if Apple sells only 10% as many AVP units as they sold iPads the first year, that would mean over 700,000.
If they sell only 1% as many AVP units as they sell iPads today, that would still be over 400,000/year.
Yuo change the aluminium for good cheap Abs (density is the half),removed the crepy screen , put the batery inside , 2000uss, Vision Poor (just for the rest of us)😊😅😊
If any other brand made a 3.5k device with the flaws that this has, it would be absolutely bombed, no matter how beautiful it would be. But since it's Apple, everything is forgivable. F this world.
1 minute wow
On one hand we got people saying “wearing stuff on your face is inherently disconnecting because people can’t see your eyes, blah blah blah technology bad” and on the other hand people saying “is the screen on the outside showing your eyes TOO MUCH???” People saying “it’s pointless and too expensive no one will want it” and then saying “plus with everyone wearing one of these nobody’s gonna be paying attention to each other.”
I think the press is underestimating how many people will blow $3500 on far dumber shit than a Vision Pro. Just look at a pay-to-win mobile game, or lootboxes or whatever lmao.
They should have made it out of plastic. It would have been fine. The back of the iPhone 3G was made of plastic.
This is like Back to the Future II where they had VR goggles on at the dinner table. That will be us pretty soon.
Man, there's too much info with all these devices. Not about learning about them, just the amount of info they all give off makes me freeze.
Apple are gonna sell an external battery to easily double usage time for ridiculous prices because (1st…… they can) and also because (as far as I could tell from the keynote) it connects to the headset with a proprietary connector.
Expect to pay hundreds of dollars for a jumped up powerbank with a fancy connector 😅
way to big, but ar glasses like rokid max are lighter and i just use the rokid max with own prescription glasses as second normal glasses outside together with the rokid station, so it feels more normal but i have still acsess to helpful infomation and some games to play everywhere without the need to take the phone out of the pocket and look down like a zombie all the time. i can keep eyecontact aand do the smartphone things, google stuff, watch videos,play games use apps and stuff while walking around and dont need this heavy device on the head. apple visiion pro also has only 2 hours battery, my rokid glasses have with the lil station 5 hours battery and are waay lighter and feel like normal sunglasses instead of a vr headset.
Also, can we stop acting like the 3-D camera on the headset is a big deal? Think obviously going to figure it all out a way to put it on the phone, again it’s Apple! Also, if you catch on video in 3-D and you could relive a moment, it’s not a big deal that it’s on my headset at the time..if it can do all that.
4:11 love how even though the Oculus Rift has been dead and has seen no updates in like 4 years, the Rift is still the buzzword when talking about PCVR headsets XD
the battery pack is the best thing THE BATTERY IS REPLACABLE unlinke an iphone it wont render the product usless when the battery degrades. THE THING IS 3500 like this is going to make its life last in the long run.
No product that has taken 10 years and over 5,000 patents can be considered a "gen 1" product. There have been many iterations of this product that we have not seen as the public.
based on the way Macs are popular. they will do the same, Showing this expensive one, and then releasing a less featured version, and 90% will say, ok I better get the expensive one... and you all just got owned by apple again. just see iPhone max/pro/plus, Apple Watch SE and watch pro, Mac air with Mac Pro
Itnhas NEVER and will never be normal os smart to film anything with an ipad. go to kamrt and buy a $30 digital camera if you are doing this.
I almost never film on a concert anymore... First what hell??? I won't enjoy the real moment. Now... With a headset That costs more than a good car, f! That's a no.
She does sound like a fan girl no offense. Because for the cost the battery at least should be much better. Like I said at least. Since it's not truly made for gaming. But for productivity and entertainment.
For the test... I want to see a non apple fan, skeptical person. Emotions.. can cloud your judgement. Me... Once I test it at the store, I will be very calm and pay very attention at the details
The part where she talks about it "almost being weird" how real things looked and the being close to..... this is where at least 90% of all men (on the low end!) had the same exact thought.
Amazing guest ❤
In my opinion, it was a wrong decision to not use 120hz or higher refresh rate on the lens…many of my relatives and friends cannot tolerate 90hz VR lenses
They should remove that fancy, see through part in the front of the headset because to me it's not necessary. And doing that it should cut cost. The female guest is right the vision Pro is an alternate tech device for home not a replacement for all things computing.
Elly!!! :D
Hi 😊
If i buy nba tickets, boxing, concerts…i would get the vision pro…you would save thousands a year and get best seat in the house
Decided as I was watching this I’d revisit your time after a bunch of friends helped you after the fire. I cried many times.
Did Matt quit after having to make the previous infomercial video for the Fire Tablet? 😄
just buy a xreal and beam video headset that lets you watch movies. in 5 years when it's cheaper, sure but it's a tech demo rn
1:13 yes I can save you time with the “catch on” shit and no there’s a reason why Google lens didn’t work 😂😂😂
Now that iPhone can record 3D videos to be relived on the Vision Pro it makes so much ore sense than going around awkwardly recording with the headset even tho we know that will become something normal too
3:05 😂😂😂😂 inspiring and beautiful, please that’s 2 funny that shit is uglier than me!!!
apple do 2 hour battery life, and people like dude that's not enough.
quest, what's the battery life again?
You didn’t think about the accessibility for vision impaired people like me.
I've checked out of apple's ecosystem since the iphone 6 release, but I think I'm going to save up for the vision. This really does seem like the first HMD that doesnt seem like a gaming novelty. It actually seems like it could be taken seriously as a computing device.
Any negative discourse around the vision right now really reflects the sentiment people had about the iphone, the ipad, and airpods, but look at how they have shaped the tech space. Everyone has a full-screen phone and wireless earbuds and most at least know a couple people with tablets (ipads predominantly). Sure, those things had been made before, but it was apples refinement of those products that launch the widespread adoption of them.
i lost so much respect after i noticed the hibiscus la croix. why not just chase that with some carbonated lysol?
Well I guess that why she was selected to test it, saying this like the future is here😂😂 compared to what?
I still dont see what this is actually used for. I think how we do things will need to be changed for this to be a go to device.
Really nice video but what's up with that fake british accent ? LOL
Yes the future of the incredibly wealthy and the top one to two percent of the human population is truly here.
What about if I wear glasses? They are going to make lenses for me? Or was that just for her demo
overhyping this apple product, and no one uses tablets to record anything unless youre a boomer
Vision pro is first step toward future of computing
This is not the future I was hoping for. I'm a kid, I'm stupid, I'm crazy, and I'm already tech addicted enough. Can we make a nature focused culture now?
A real love-your-neighbor focused future with real friends who WANT to talk in real life. I want to change the REAL world for better. But I'm just a kid so I can't do it by myself. Please Cancel Apple Vision. Make a Good Future. a REAL good one.
It’s not any costlier than a small car. There will be enough people who will want it.
Aussie! Aussie! Aussie!
The 3d stuff.. like a fucking hologram? As in a hololens?
It will be like minority report. I can see dispatchers using this.
Nor rich nor developer, but I’d definetly safe money for it.
Do you know many youtube content creator out there?? Just that alone will sell out the headset
La Croix hi biscus tastes like crap. It tastes nothing like hibiscus
I’m ordering 2 but only opening one of them! Excited!
Regarding the battery life and battery pack: I'm thinking maybe Apple purposely restricted it at 2 hours max for this iteration. It's their subtle way to stop you from wearing the headset for too long -- for reasons of health and safety. This is meant to be experienced for up to an hour or so, not something you leave on all day.
Basically every VR headset on the market has approximately 2hr of battery life. There are power-hungry technologies.
They could make a battery with more capacity and it would still be pocket-able. I agree with the idea that it was due to health and safety concerns.
I think so too.. Apple I'm sure was thinking of the possible liabilities, issues of wearing this thing too long, specially for a company that heavily focuses on health as a whole
no. the com0any doesnt care about the consumers health. what workd do you live in, lol.
@@justinsane332bro u think too badly about consumerism and the people who make these products. their mind isnt just “money money” they care about their customers even if they dont always show it
this channel belongs to matt... this should have been matt and elly not austin
I never seen anyone taking photos with a tablet in the uk 🇬🇧
No, sir, they did not go too grand.. they went 3.5.
Mat looks different today /j
I still don't care about the vision pro