Meta Quest 3 vs. Apple Vision Pro - Which is Better?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 тра 2024
- Is the Apple Vision Pro better than the Meta Quest 3? We'll take you through the top features of both headsets and which one we think is the better product right now. Sponsored by Pocket Casts. Make Pocket Casts your default podcast player today and download it for free: pocketcasts.com/6monthslater
Specifically in this video we’ll take you through how these headsets compare in several categories including gaming, weight and comfort, controller support, openness of OS, field of view (FOV), glasses compatibility, sound, passthrough, spatial videos and photos, immersive videos, hand tracking, aesthetics, and of course graphics, performance, and price.
🛒 Product Links (Affiliate Links):
👉Meta Quest 3: amzn.to/4bOrKRc
👉Vision Pro (non-affiliate): www.apple.com/apple-vision-pro/
👉 View all of our recommended products: www.amazon.com/shop/6monthsla...
💻 Get Deal Alerts on our Recommended Products
Plus a Recap of Everything We Publish Each Month
👉 Sign up for our free monthly newsletter: 6monthslater.substack.com/?sh...
🔗 Related Video links:
👉 Apple Vision Pro - Day 1 vs. Day 14: • Reviewing Apple Vision...
👉 Meta Quest 3 vs. Meta Quest 2: • Meta Quest 3 vs. Quest...
👉 Meta Quest 2 Review - 6 Months Later: • Meta Quest 2 Review - ...
❤️ Follow Josh:
👉 Threads: www.threads.net/@joshteder
👉 Reddit: / joshteder
👉 Instagram: / joshteder
👉 Mastodon: mastodon.social/@joshteder
👉 LinkedIn: / joshteder
🎥 Video Production Equipment we use 📹
amzn.to/3Ejc1JR
🕰️Timestamps:
0:00 - Weight and Comfort
1:28 - Controllers
2:18 - Immersive Gaming
3:37 - Operating System Openness
3:58 - Field of View and Lens Reflections
4:23 - Glasses compatibility
4:46 - Multiple Profiles
5:25 - Battery Integration
5:36 - Price Difference
6:00 - Download Pocket Casts for all your Podcast needs!
7:40 - Display and Performance Differences
9:39 - Apple Ecosystem and Vision OS
11:18 - Hand Tracking
11:37 - Sound
11:47 - Passthrough quality
12:09 - Spatial photos and videos
13:03 - Optic ID
13:33 - Aesthetics and Build Quality
14:23 - Which is Better?
📜 Disclosures 📃
Any music used is licensed from artlist.io: artlist.io/referral/1878516/Josh
All the products seen in this video were purchased by 6 Months Later. The channel has no relationship with Apple or Meta. This video’s sponsor is Pocket Casts.
Any Amazon links we provide in our descriptions are in conjunction with our Amazon partnership. The channel receives a small percentage of revenue from any sales generated by viewers clicking the links.
#Apple
#VisionPro
#MetaQuest3
#Meta
#VR
#AR
#SpatialComputing - Наука та технологія
Product links, related videos, social links and newsletter link:
🛒 Product Links (Affiliate Links):
👉Meta Quest 3: amzn.to/4bOrKRc
👉Vision Pro (non-affiliate): www.apple.com/apple-vision-pro/
👉 View all of our recommended products: www.amazon.com/shop/6monthslaterreviews
💻 Get Deal Alerts on our Recommended Products
Plus a Recap of Everything We Publish Each Month
👉 Sign up for our free monthly newsletter: 6monthslater.substack.com/?showWelcome=true
🔗 Related Video links:
👉 Apple Vision Pro - Day 1 vs. Day 14: ua-cam.com/video/bYASQfXrFKI/v-deo.html
👉 Meta Quest 3 vs. Meta Quest 2: ua-cam.com/video/G8gDfNDD4To/v-deo.html
👉 Meta Quest 2 Review - 6 Months Later: ua-cam.com/video/NEVVdQCgum8/v-deo.html
❤ Follow Josh:
👉 Threads: www.threads.net/@joshteder
👉 Reddit: www.reddit.com/user/joshteder/
👉 Instagram: instagram.com/joshteder/
👉 Mastodon: mastodon.social/@joshteder
👉 LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/joshteder/
Why is it that no UA-camr talks about the vr social space like vr chat, vr cinema and other vr experiences that can be shared together, the fact that you can't share what your doing on vision pro with other vision pro users but you can share a lot of experiences with other Meta Quest users
exactly dawg, us QUEST USERS NEEED TO SHINEEEEE
You know exactly why, go watch visual adventures
'apple fanboys' as he said, this is the first time i see Zuck Making sense
Uhhh apple vision pro facetime?
Even if both headsets were at the same price. I’ll be still buying the Quest 3
same here
same quest has better games
I'm an apple guy, every device I use is apple. I would buy a quest 3 if I was in this market. The price, weight and utility seems better.
If you buy mq3, you'll have 3k worth of tech gadget to buy as additional items.
@SimpleLife2.000 100$ would get you all you'd ever need.
And I'm talking a better headstrap with powerbank, hand ties for controllers, and a long cable for pcvr.
None of which is necessary, mind you. A powerbank isn't needed when using a cable. A cable isn't needed with a good wifi connectivity, hand ties are mostly for sport-type games.
Only the headstrap is a significant improvement, because the default one isn't exactly comfortable. Somehow Apple managed to make theirs even worse than Meta's
Just be frank with yourself, if you were truly in the market there is absolutely no way you'd be using vision pro over any of the quests (or other headsets, for that matter). And I mean any. Not because of build quality, value or anything else, no. But because of software support and quest's better input method for the available software.
Zuckerberg was right. Q3 is not only cheaper. It's better.
Strictly for gaming and pricing. Vision Pro wins all other categories.
@@B.D.F. on you mean these categories...
- Comfort
- Mobility
- App Library
- User Base
- Battery Life
- Durability
- 3rd Party Accessories
The only categories Vision is a clear winner on is display resolution and onboard speaker quality. Well, also it does look cooler.
@@Stone815 If the priority is quality not only does the Vision Pro win there is literally no equivalent. Good luck catching up.
The Q3 is plastic. What durability? 😂
User base - Metaquest is a success? 😂 most of the headset are collect dust in the attic.
Accessories - why do you want to walk around with controllers and potentially losing them?
App libs - aside from games, what else do Q3 have and where are their vast library of productivity apps? 😂
Apple ecosystem isn’t a thing? Did you event watch the video bruh?
Found a Apple hater 😂😂
@@RunForPeace-hk1cu I like how many ppl keep mentioning 'productivity' with AVP yet none of the youtubers found a good productivity use case yet. Like you're always more productive spending less money on monitors+pc/mac setup than with AVP. In the end there's not much to do on AVP after a few days besides watching movies, which again doesn't seem too productive does it.
To his point, Zuck actually told no lies. The problem is, "better product" is kinda subjective. And what he _didn't_ say was that the Quest 3 was "more technologically advanced". And I highly doubt anyone is cross-shopping the two.
I am. But as I see it Q3 seems to give practically the same experience, with a bit less shine, but also offers a number of other experiences the AVP isn't able to do yet. So the Q3 with 1.5 grand placed in each Apple & Meta stock is a better option than buying the AVP. At least, that's the conclusion I'm coming to
He said "better overall product". I don't think that's subjective. Unless you subjectively weigh display resolution and processing power over a number of other factors.
@@Stone815 When students would argue over which was "better" between Xbox & PlayStation, I'd ask them what their favorite games were. Regardless of specs, a PlayStation wouldn't be "better" for the Halo player, and vice versa for the God of War fan. If we're to consider the Quest 3 as a gaming-first device, and the AVP a productivity-first device, the question _should_ be "which is better at its intended purpose?" And that answer is arguable either way.
@@ThisIsJayEveryday if anything, compare them to Operating systems and Monitors. When You do that, it makes way more sense.
Would you say Windows is a gaming first product while macOS is productivity first?
Which is more productive, three 1080p Windows monitors vs one 4k Mac monitor?
Not everything is equal. Some products are better than others overall. But that may change in future generations.
I get your point, but disagree with the analogy. When it comes to the Quest vs AVP, it just makes sense to ask which is best for gaming, and which is best for productivity. Then, we can evaluate how well they each accomplish that goal. What's "best" for the consumer is what fits their needs.
That said, at this time, I wouldn't buy a Quest 3 for productivity, and I wouldn't buy an AVP for games.
If they were both $500, I would choose the quest
Considering the fact that a 700$ headset is able to be compared to a 3500$ headset makes it obvious which is better. I never even once thought about the Apple device because the price is insane, its locked into the apple ecosystem, and who knows if apple will even continue this line and you end up with a 3500$ paperweight. Mainly came here for the Quest 3 data
Tbf Meta's Hand tracking is perfectly accurate, it's just that our hands aren't designed to be that steady, when we pinch our entire hand moves slightly making the curser move, but technically speaking, the hand tracking detects those micro movements and the quest tracks it accurately as intended.
Tho, that doesn't make for a great user experience so Meta should move to eye tracking for the next headset, too.
@@JiajuChen It the lighting in your room, when the ISO on the camera is too high it adds grain making it harder for the hand tracking system, try it in a brighter room, makes a world of difference.
I'm not so impressed by the eyetracking. I'm used to do one things with my hands and look at another thing, which means that's almost a no-go with the VP: you have to pin your eye on the icon to activate it. It works well from what I have seen in the countless videos I watched, but it can lead to mistakes as well. Maybe the option to turn it off and just use the headset to pinpoint with a headmovement and activate it with a hand gesture or pinch would be better. You can do that while searching with your eyes the next icon. Improvements are on their way, so I've heard.
😂😂😂😂 hand tracking at a macro level. Lag is unacceptable
Eye tracking is shit
Pinpointing is so 1990s 😂😂 you guys still want to live in the old days
Apple has done what they always do, force you to do it their way. In a perfect world you would have the choice of both hand/eye tracking and controllers. META went with controllers because it is more accurate and cheaper than incorporating eye tracking. Sony PSVR2 has eye-tracking but it exists to center where the system focuses graphic quality. The AVP is a great flex to show where AR/MR headsets should be going but it is not the best device to get us there. I think META made he better decision on where to start with the device and the sales kind of prove that. They can create better UI experiences in the current device while figuring out how to keep costs down while bringing in as much functionality as they can fit. Apple's desire to control everything may be the thing that kills AVP. I just don't think this mindset is going to work well with MR headsets. There's to many ways in which only working in the Apple Ecosystem is going to hinder there ability to expand.
Rather have them do full face tracking like the Quest Pro, improve it, and make it affordable for the average consumer. But hey a guy can dream 💭
Every "advantage" the vision pro has isn't shit that I want on a VR headset, minus the graphics. But I can get that.
The people in the Apple Store won’t let you call it a VR headset, MedQuest is hands-down, the better VR headset, but the Vision Pro is a spatial computer. Apple wants you to think of them as apples to oranges no pun intended.
Paul davids
@@jarrodbarefoot4080 To be fair, I'm shopping around for a spacial computing device and current AR glasses seem too limited, whereas the Meta Quest 3 is pretty affordable, literally does everything the Vision Pro does, BUT I'm not tied down to just using the headset all the time, since I'll be connecting to a separate PC. Only issue is I was hoping to get a device that worked outside and I read you shouldn't use the Quest 3 outside. I would be buying the Meta Quest 3 as a spatial computing device first, VR headset second lol
He forgot to mention the haptic feedback u have on Quest 3 and the sensation of holding something like a pistol, racket etc in your hand, also that the Quest 3 has much less motion blur when moving the head from side to side in passthrough mode and that the handtracking of Vision Pro has a delay in games as its only tracked with 30hz, which u dont have on Quest.
And u notice the screendoor Effekt only on white backgrounds otherwise its basicly invisible on Quest 3. Also the immersive Videos are the same side by side 3d or 180°/360° 3d videos on both plattforms. Apple even baught the company NextVR who previously made 180° 3D Videos for Quest, besides 180° 3d VR P°rn Videos for Quest are some of the sharpest and most immersive Videos there are.
Priority's
Bruh 💀
Great review!
The thing with the Vision Pro though it’s really more made for working or watching videos/movies. The meta quest 3 is more fit for gaming and streaming, and being with friends, online.
Love Quest 3!
Thanks for sharing
How is you’re background so clear mines all blurry can anyone advise ?
I just want a Valve Index 2, when will project deckard release I want it
I have a Quest 3 and I don't see any pixels and I own multiple VR Headsets and I also use my Macbook Pro with my Quest 3 and for me and what i use my Quest 3 for the Vision Pro is not it as it doesn't have a headphone jack and I am a Music Producer and the Quest 3 is way far ahead compared to the Vision Pro in the field
FACTS DAWG
Hi there, Im running some research into peoples mixed reality experiences and opinions. If you were interested I am carrying out paid interviews next week, let me know if you would be happy to talk and I will add you to our study :)
I was impressed by the spatial video samples on my Quest3. I have many 3D movies, but those really looked good. Only downside, I couldn't change the size of the screen. Because of the better screen of the VP, I'm already looking forward to a Quest4 that might have that kind of screen.... even though so far, the Quest3 is the best headset I ever had.
Hey Sjaak! I am running some research on people's experience with mixed reality, if you would be interested in being interviewed (paid) let me know and I'll add you to our study :)
Apple Vision Pro is cool but I have issues with it. The visuals on AVP are amazing! The passthrough almost feels like your looking directly through glass(in a well lit room). The eye tracking and pinching is like magic. That said the visuals are great but FOV is small. You notice this as AVP slides down your face and looking up or to the side gets uncomfortable. The passthrough gets crappy when not in a well lit room so using it around other people is an issue. The hand and eye tracking are great but from time to time you look at and pinch stuff on accident. Quest is also amazing. The hand tracking is difficult and feels inaccurate the further a window is from you. The passthrough is nice but it's like looking through a screen door. The FOV is nice and visuals are ok but it won't replace a TV. I love the spatial aspect of the apps in AVP, but I like the social apps in quest better. I like watching movies on AVP but I love big screen in Quest better due to the social aspect. The 180/360 "immersive videos" are amazing in AVP but Quest has been doing 180/360 VR videos from the beginning. Apple trying to rebrand it as if it's something new feels like a lie. The UI in AVP is best in class and after using it to be honest it makes using Quest UI depressing. If you use headsets often the weight of AVP won't bother you as much but the number of mods for Quest make it best in class when it comes to comfort. If quest refreshes the UI, upgrade the screens and allow more 2d or flat apps so we can multitask in a spatial environment I would stick with Quest. If AVP manages to come down in price to 1500 - 2000 for me quest is a dead product.
Yeah by that time the Quest 3 will be a dead product.... because of the Quest 4.
Hey Alan, im a researcher looking at people's experience in mixed reality, if you would be interested in a paid interview let me know and I will add you to our study :)
Even if vision pro cost 500 dollars it would still be a useless product compared to quest 3. There is no use for it and it is alone a worse product than the quest 3. Why would anyone watch movies from bulky and heavy headset which has a wire and a brick attached to it. Same goes for working, why would anyone use it if it's that uncomfortable, only 2h battery life and you can only have 1 mac screen which isn't productive at all for working. There isn't a single use case scenario which AVP would be useful. That's confirmed by the fact that everyone returned their AVP and the people who didn't never use it. Apple literally canceled all new models because nobody used it, bought it or developed any apps for it. Even youtube couldn't bother making a app for avp.
Tried the Vision Pro, and I was not impressed. I couldn't find any reason that would justify me paying that money. I will stick with the Meta.
Im thinking of getting the Ray Ban smart glasses. Waiting for your review before i pull the trigger.
its awesome dude, I tried. Mindblowing
One thing is for sure, the Q3 is a way better purchase for most people in the current time.
I am still shocked how meta quest 3 is almost as good as apple vision pro when is so much cheaper than apple vision pro
Yeah, I agree. Quest 3 is the better product overall. I like some of what Apple are pushing, but they need to rethink some elements berore it can really compete with Q3; Weight distribution and controlers are a much bigger deal than they gave credit for. Apple trying to distance themselves from VR gaming was a mistake as APV would have been a much more compelling product if, like a computer, it also supported game.
It's not competing with Q3
Give us Android apps on Quest (like VP can do with iPad apps), dual 4k screens and eye tracking on the quest and I'll buy the quest each and every day. I just ordered a quest 3 even and this is as a MASSIVE Apple fan. $3500 is FAR FAR Too expensive. Hell give me the BEST headset Meta can make for $999 with all that tech and it would still b the better buy. The software seems very polished and even more so as time goes on to mimic that of the VP interface. I had an OG Rift, Oculus Go, Quest 1, Quest 2,m and now, a Quest 3. Quest 4 I am really hoping will be the definitive version, and hopefully priced as such. $999 with ALL the features. DO NOT HOLD BACK.
Perhaps Meta and Apple know something I don't. but neither of these products have a wide appeal for me or most people. The Meta Quest at least lends itself to gamers, but I just do not see the advantage of the Vision Pro except that it's a really cool toy. Did you have any feedback on battery life for each of these?
Both are around the same - about 2 hours, but if you need to use them longer you can plug them into a wall outlet.
There’s an extra appeal to people working on computers professionally. Designers and coders for example could (in theory) increase their productivity by working in VR. Now, I haven’t actually tried this but the idea is intriguing.
@@psisis7423as a "coder", there's no way I would use that instead of a screen. IT brings nothing to the table and just adds discomfort.
And what it is with the spatial video is that Apple uses foviated rendering and why it would look better on the Vision Pro bit if you wanted a the best screen them I would go for the immersed visor headset as it is going to offer a higher resolution screen and looks like a pair of sunglasses 🕶 all for $950 and it alsonhas apple TV plus on it also so why would you buy apples over priced device
The the only thing i thing is the big difference is the display others are not a big problem
And multi task
Guys that has meta 3
👇
Apologies for the edits - Try the Quest 3 with a PC and play Half-Life Alyx. It is truly a better experience than what you get with these inferior built-in mobile chipsets. If you ask me, it is the only VR experience worth the money, hassle and time.
While HF-Alyx is amazing, Asgard's Wrath 2 is evidence that standalone is at least worth a look
@@tagg8233 The good thing about having a Quest 3 and a gaming PC is that you don't have to choose. You can have your cake and eat it too. One of the best things about having a Quest 3 and a gaming PC is that it turns the Q3 into a nitnendo switch like VR device. I can play high end PCVR games like half life alyx wirelessly. And then after I'm done I can take the headset to a buddies house and play some contractorsVR. And whats even better is that many games like contractorsVR are crossbuy. I don't have to choose which version I want. I have both. I can have the higher graphic experience or the to go experience.
So def dont get the avp just get a quest and a 4090 pc lol.@@chan13153
Typical Apple product. Overcharge , charge for multiple extra add ons, same or lower quality than the cheaper competition.
i really dont see how the battery is an issue, if your gaming your not gonna be walking around your house, your stationary so put it next to you, on anywhere and your good i also think everyone would rather carry it around they add another 350 grams on there head that would make the product unusable. i dont see any issue with an external battery just resting in your pocket
You do realize that there are now really good mixed reality games on the Meta Quest where you do run around your house ... games like "the Cabin" where you fight zombies breaking into your home from your own windows and doors! And with regards to the battery and the wire... once you go full wireless, it's hard to be tethered again.
@@covertpuppytwo3857 i have both and understand some games require that but we have not seen much in that form on the vision pro then again like i said throw the battery in your pocket and your good. id mich rather have it on my person then adding the weight to my head. im not saying oculus is bad i think this guy is making the battery out to be a larger issue than it actually is along with the weight. i could sit here for hours using it perfectly fine.
There's already quite a few post on the apple vision pro reddit of people that got their cable snagged in a door handle or the corner of a table, ofc this thing is already so heavy they can't really add the battery to it, but it'd be ideal if they managed to. Also you're not really gaming on the AVP it's mostly intended as an AR headset you're kinda meant to walk around with it otherwise what's the pont of having an amazing pass-through, so the cable is a small annoyance.
It's the same difference between wired and wireless headphones. The wire is an annoyance enough for most people to take on the disadvantages (battery, lower audio quality, more expensive). That should tell you how most people feel about having a dangling battery cable
You don't see any issues cos you're a certified fanboy.
People already voices out how bad the external battery is and yet you don't see any issues.
Wake up, lol
Got Meta3 for my birthday😂 should I sell them or keep ?😅
Keep unless you want to buy a vive or valve index
Speaking for myself, I see Both of them as Unnecessary products for spending time I simply don't have enough of as it is Now.
Thanks for sharing Josh 😊.
JaneLee - in Suburban Philadelphia
2/25/24
Now return the Apple like almost all other creators now that they have their clicks, annoying Apple.
Not surprised apple is trying to suck every dime out of people
Like your video but you’re incorrect. The iPhone camera can actually take videos that work properly with the Vision Pro you don’t have to just take them with the headset. There’s a special button when you start shooting a video.
I must be weird. I have both and use both daily for completely different reasons. I actually prefer the comfort of the avp over the quest 3. And I wear it usually for 7+ hours a day. (My eyes are going to fail me one day 🤣)
get a good strap for Q3 and then we talking dawg
It seems like it really doesn't matter since there is barely any software to use on either of them. They should really stop trying to upgrade the hardware and give instead give incentives to software companies to focus on developing VR software.
lmao a light seal is 200$?? Apple never disappoints
im not interested with vision pro 😢
Just be honest and say we are just too broke to buy the Apple vision pro
Who buys a VR to workband watch TV? It's all about the games.
Cost over $3499 but is still the same level as Meta Quest 3 that mean apple product suck.
they need to come out with glasses and not these big ass face shields
❤❤❤
This was a great comparison! Although you should have acknowledged your inability to tolerate the weight is NOT the norm. The problem I have with most of these comparisons is that the AVP didn’t FIX the Quest 3. The main barriers to mass adoption of VR headsets were motion sickness, the warped, trippy pass through, laggy responses, overall general pixelation and blurriness when in VR. They sat on the shelves of Best Buy, Walmart, Target and Amazon so were readily available. The Apple Vision Pro does not have these issues while many other headsets do. They can be fixed but they are MAJOR obstacles. These issues have not been mentioned since AVP release. The conversation has shifted exclusively to the AVP’s weakest capabilities. The possibility of throwing up wearing the Quest still exists and should not be ignored.
The fact the the comparison is between a $500 dollars head against a $3,449 should tell you right away apple didn’t get it right .
The mistake everyone is still making includes you is that Apple didn’t say they’re making a game headset, you guys keeping comparing a gaming headset to productivity headset, let’s think about it for a second if Apple really wanted you to just be playing games on the Vision Pro why didn’t they just make a controller
As good as Vision Pro is, it is no where close to a real productivity machine. With $3500, you can have a PC with RTX 4090 with a multi monitor setup and a Quest 3 to add if you need some 3D modelling type workflow, which is going to you several times the productity use cases of a Vision Pro. Constant VR headset usage for work that may take hours at a stretch and relies on your eyes is a sure fire way to end up with chronic headaches. Till, we have real AR with the same level performance in smart glass type of devices, it won't really be an option.
I get it but meta is focusing more towards making a gaming headset and Apple isn’t, that’s what I’m trying to say
I am a hard-core apple fan, I used to be a windows guy when XP was out, now I'm just an apple guy. I love everything Apple and I'll be the first want to say that Marc 👼👱 Zuckerberg is right, his meta-quest 3 is 1000 times better than the Apple Vision Pro.....period
I just bought the AVP and it's coming this Wednesday!! Im sooo anxiously excited
Start doing some neck exercises!
Why did you buy apple vision ?
Because it’s from apple 🤪
this is an apple fan boy channel 😂.
I guess most of you are still riding bicycles
Shhhhhhhh people
H 11:27 11:27
The vision pro literally doesnt do anything, they put a whole mac m2 in it but forgot to make software to match so it just web browses and uses ipad apps, stuff thats more convenient on an ipad. Its not even a competition, its either the quest, a video game console with alot of other features that are fun and productive, or an ipad you wear on your face with no vr and no games and no controllers and no software. Oh, and ut cost 7 times as much. Apple products are a stoopid tax for the rich
I still say if you want to do an honest product comparison review you would select the Quest Pro to compare with the Vision Pro. They both have eye tracking and were designed for the Professional market. There’s a reason that car reviewers don’t compare a F150 to a Smartcar, it’s a pointless comparison.
If you really want to know what the better product is, give each to 100 normie users for 1 hour and ask them to rate them. I don’t have the data but I’m confident that the Apple would be rated far better (but they wouldn’t want either, yet). The seed would be planted though and I think that’s Apple’s plan. Create hardware with the best displays and high resolution eye tracking available today, layout the UI design so it’s intuitive and doesn’t make users nauseous so you can give them a good first experience (they want it but can’t afford it or it’s too uncomfortable). Now you have something to convince app developers, premium content providers, live sports and entertainment providers to develop content for. They know they can drive down the price and make them smaller (more comfortable) in the future. In the end the VR/AR industry wins or loses based on Apple’s success. I don’t understand the Question fans willing the Vision Pro to fail.
I’ve demonstrated the Quest 2/3 to many family and friends. They kind of think it’s cool but they either get nauseous, can’t stand the comfort or think the game graphics are lame. Many Quest 2/3 users liked them for a bit but gave up on them. Meta has tried for years to make a compelling product and failed. I’m hoping Apple’s strategy succeeds even if I don’t buy a Vision Pro.
nah, quest pro is a failed product, Q3 is da kiiiiiiing and princeeeeeeee and princesssssssss
Very obvious that you're a fanboy, lol.
Mq3 is a better product, period. 😅😂
How funny that a very expensive vr is being compared to just $499 vr and yet the latter is more useful than the 3.5++K vr.
That alone is proof that mq3 is a winner.
Go buy your avp and do your work wearing it just stay close to an outlet so you could complete your work.
Repeat it until you'll realize that working on laptop is way better.
Lol 😂😂😂
@@SimpleLife2.000 lol 😂 You’re obviously correct the Quest 3 is obviously the better product. That’s why in NVIDIA’s keynote they decided to announce that their Omniverse Cloud would now be streaming to the Meta Quest 3 and everyone applauded. Everyone intuitively understood that Mark Zuckerberg was correct and the Quest 3 is the best product….
Oh wait, that was the Apple Vision Pro. Hmmm 🤔 I wonder why…
“Apple Vision Pro is the first untethered device which allows for enterprise customers to realize their work without compromise,” said Rev Lebaredian, vice president of simulation at NVIDIA.
fanboyyyyyyyyy@@bobwitmer2492
Yeah and it's 6x the price
You are either an Apple person or everyone else
If you want to play games only the Quest….for little kids
Tell that to battle talent lol
Promo sm 🌷
Vision pro doesn’t track your every move but quest 3 does lol
This is like comparing a PS5 to a MacBook
aint no one making games for apples overpriced headset
It aintva competition avp sucks and is horribly over priced
MQ3 is a game console been out for a few years | VP is a productivity computer released this month… MQ3 is NOT even in the same LEAGUE, especially Build Quality;
CPU: M2+R1 is Superior > Snapdragon XR2 Gen2 is anemic |
RAM: 16GB > 8GB |
Ar | Mr | Vr: 2 Micro OLED 36 PPD > 2 RGB LCD 18 PPD |
Display: 3660x3220 > 2064x2208 |
Tracking Cameras: 6.5mp (x6) > 4mp (x4) |
Total Cameras: 12x > 6x |
Microphones: x6 > x3 |
Battery (Productivity): 120 min. > 60 min. |
Optical ID > Zero |
Eye Tracking > Zero |
LiDAR > Zero |
Plus: VP has a ton of Accessibility features to help people with disabilities. Not to mention fully compatible with a myriad of Keyboards | Trackpads | Gaming Controllers too…
🤔
Every advantage you listed was mentioned in the video. And it should not even be a debate that a 3500 dollar product is better than a 500 one. But because how garbage apple is its comparable to a product 7 times cheaper than itself and even worse in some aspects.
@@mrnorthz9373The comparison of this video is analogous to reasons why a suit off the rack is better than one that is custom tailor made, and considerably more affordable. Also, curious, what makes APPLE garbage, when their influence literally moves society technologically forward…
🤔
@@superzero4250 i disagree. Apple contributes to waste and pollution, unethical worker conditions as much as every other company does. Especially with planned obsolescence. And id argue apple has prevented society and technology from.moving forward. For example if it not for touchscreens on phones tons of things you need a laptop to do couldve been done on a phone. Apple has also made lots of people waste tons of money on a product they know that its useless. Especially in 3rd world countries, its seen as a status symbol. I even had a friend which was a child worker because his disabled father wouldnt work, and he used most of his salary to buy new iphones.
@@superzero4250 also, its not analagous to an off to shelf product to a tailored suit. Both are off the shelf products, both do almost the same thing only apple has better ar and thats it. Its just a toy, apple knows this and so does everyone.
@@mrnorthz9373 You are correct, maybe I should have said, a ONE size fits all to a customer tailored one. That is why MQ3 is cheaply made and has profiles, and you can wear glasses with it. APPLE obviously chose a different route, with custom fitted Light Mask and Seals, and Prescription Lens inserts, and only GUEST user mode. The optical elements automatically adjust as needed…
It’s just that you don’t often hear people comparing and complaining about how a luxury performance sport sedan is not as affordable as an economy class sedan. Realistically, why spend over a hundred dollars on an electric toothbrush when a five dollar drugstore one can obviously do the trick…
Is there an actual difference between OAKLEY Sunglasses and the ones off the rack at the local convenience store….
🤔
Hi 6 Months! I send you an email for a collab, hope to get your answer soon. Best