Apparently the origin of the "-minx" suffix came from when Meffert was originally marketing the Pyraminx, he already had the pyramid thing going so he decided to keep an Egyptian theme and put "Sphinx" at the back of the name, and then that just transitioned over to the dodecahedral puzzles. The more you know.
@@infiniteplanes5775 There are some, like the Skewb Diamond, the Face-Turning Octahedron, and the Dogic, the regular Skewb also counts as it has an octahedral core construction. I assume the reason is those shapes are just harder to make good twisty puzzles with, and the Dogic from what I can find only comes in 10-color, perhaps all 20 was too much for the average user.
@@TNTFour If they used stickers, then they could put each color twice, but with a dot in the middle. There also may be technical limitations, and I'll look at those later.
I just bought that same gigaminx a week ago, I also solved it on my own based on 5x5 and megaminx knowledge, although I did do all the centers, then all the edges and I can confirm, it takes a really long time. I actually really enjoyed solving it, because you can solve almost the entire thing intuitively it felt less formulaic and more immersive than a cube. I think the reason it's more intuitive than a cube is because any turn you make on a cube affects 4-5 of 6 sides, whereas on a dodecahedron a turn only affects 6/12 or 50%, so there's a lot more room to move pieces around without affecting anything else
3x3 is the standard knowing how to solve it makes a really good base for solving other cubes he even mentioned in the video that he has already solved 5x5 so he pretty much has all the knowledge he needs considering megaminx isn’t even a difficult cube
@Kuber Kid hate to break it to you but a scramble like that wouldn’t be approved for actual WCA use. I would recommend using CHAOTimer it gives actually correct scrambles!
We're no strangers to love You know the rules and so do I A full commitment's what I'm thinking of You wouldn't get this from any other guy I just wanna tell you how I'm feeling Gotta make you understand Never gonna give you up Never gonna let you down Never gonna run around and desert you Never gonna make you cry Never gonna say goodbye Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you We've known each other for so long Your heart's been aching but you're too shy to say it Inside we both know what's been going on We know the game and we're gonna play it And if you ask me how I'm feeling Don't tell me you're too blind to see Never gonna give you up Never gonna let you down Never gonna run around and desert you Never gonna make you cry Never gonna say goodbye Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you No, I'm never gonna give you up No, I'm never gonna let you down No, I'll never run around and hurt you Never, ever desert you We've known each other for so long Your heart's been aching but Never gonna give you up Never gonna let you down Never gonna run around and desert you Never gonna make you cry Never gonna say goodbye Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you No, I'm never gonna give you up No, I'm never gonna let you down No, I'll never run around and hurt you I'll never, ever desert you
I learned, from this channel, how to solve a 3x3 not even a year ago. And then afterwards I got interested in a lot of non-WCA puzzles. And nowadays it just feels weird to see a puzzle that I solved months ago and J Perm is tackling it for the first time.
Impressive. It takes me about an hour to solve this but I always solve all the centers first and do not do F2L/S2L. I'll try edge pairing with only half the centers done next time. Very cool.
This was a lot of fun to watch. I basically did the same about two weeks ago (got a Gigaminx and tried to do it without help). I was afraid of: a) having to do commutators and b) parity on the last edge. But on a 5×5 you can always get the last two centres without commutators and for some reason, odd-size dodecahedra don't have parity! yay
This was super helpful, thanks! If anyone's lost, I'd suggest you practice with a 3x3, then a Megaminx, then a 5x5. Like...for a while. Months. Then come back to this video and it'll make more sense.
@@m.reichmann7192 It simply means that you can get cases on odd-layered puzzles which resemble a parity error and are often called a parity error, but are actually not. Think about a 5x5. You’ve solved the centers and edges, but one edge has the outer wings flipped over so they’re opposite to the middle piece. It’s essentially the same as a 4x4 edge flip parity case, but with the hidden middle layer exposed. To solve it, you use the same parity algorithm you use to flip an edge pair on a 4x4, so it’s often called parity, but it isn’t one, technically. Now think about the 4x4. When you’ve got a flipped edge on a 4x4, if you had stickers on the hidden middle layers, it might look just like the 5x5 edge, with the middle edge piece sitting backwards between the flipped outer wings. In practice, we’ll never know, of course, because the hidden middle layers of a 4x4 are fixed in position on some axis, so it doesn’t behave the same. It would be like solving a 5x5 whilst never turning the middle layers at all, which technically isn’t possible. All this just means that there technically isn’t any possible even-layer parity on an odd-layered puzzle like the Gigaminx, but you can still run into cases where you’ll need a parity algorithm, just like on 5x5/7x7 etc. Looks and behaves like parity, but isn’t.
@@archgirl Oh ok, now I understand. Thanks for your detailed explanation :D But still, that special case can not occur on a Gigaminx. You can only exchange three pieces of one kind on any puzzle. (you can combine those "three-cycles" to get bigger cycles, but all of them are made by swapping 3 pieces. Swapping two pieces is impossible.) The cubic puzzles are the big exception: on those you can combine a 3-cycle with a quarter turn, to make it look like only two pieces are swapped. (in reality, that quarter turn has still an effect on the rest of the puzzle. That is the reason, why every time you swap two edges on the 3x3, also two corners are swapped.) The cubic puzzles are special, because with each quarter turn, you move an even number of pieces: 4 edges and 4 corners. only on those puzzles, where you can move an even number of pieces, you can make it look like only two cubies are swapped. on the 4x4 and 5x5 the "flipped edge" is the result of two exchanged edge wings, like you said. in the case of the 4x4 and 5x5 the source of the parity is one deep quarter turn move. Doing this will destroy some of your centers, but the edge-parity is now easily solvable. The parity-alg is just an efficient way to fix those centers in one go, other wise you would need to solve them by hand Now to the Gigaminx: whenever you turn a side, an odd number of pieces are swapped: 5 edges, 5 corners, and a bunch of middle pieces, but 5 of each This means you cant even create something that looks like two pieces are swapped. If you have a Megaminx, you can try to exchange exactly two edges. It wont work, not even if the corners are messed up. (you can also prank your friends that way, its hilarious :P) like the normal turns, the deep turns also only swap an odd number of pieces, thus you cannot make it look like only two edge-wings are swapped and nothing else. Also on things like multi-layered pyraminxes, you cannot swap two edge wings, Because one turn always moves an odd umber of pieces. (On the pyraminx, it is also impossible to have only two edges swapped) there is still a chance, that we define "parity" in slightly different ways, so here is my understanding about it: ua-cam.com/video/ExVTKy0XOrw/v-deo.html and the part about only swapping three pieces at once: ua-cam.com/video/L57yx36Du-Y/v-deo.html [sry for the self-promotion] I hope this explanation was not too long and confusing, if I made any mistakes or you still have questions, please ask : )
@@m.reichmann7192 Strange. I have a Gigaminx and distinctly remember getting that exact case on more than one occasion. Perhaps I’m simply misremembering and confusing Gigaminx solves with Master Kilominx solves.
First off, damn this video is already 3 years old? That's insane, I remember watching this when it was new. Second, that first half music, is that the Relic Song? Meloetta, that Pokemon keeps coming back in weird ways, but im still not complaining! Didn't think her song would be in an old JPerm video, but here we are.
Guys i found out what minx means!! According to the dictionary it means: an impudent, cunning, or boldly flirtatious girl or young woman... Hmm interesting
I’ve never solved a 5x5, only 3x3 and 4x4 and I attempted this gigaminx today. Got pretty far on intuition, solved all the bottom centers and started solving the top ones, and now I feel like I can solve the rest after watching this video. Very informative!
I have never solved a megaminx before, but I can somehow solve it to the last layer. In the 2 next days, I attempted to solve it using the beginner method and it worked just well
The naming system follows digital storage measurement (Kilobyte megabyte gigabyte terabyte petabyte) which I doubt was the plan when the megaminx was made but it just happens to work out.
@JUST ANOTHER CUBER you can tell he hasn't started youtube for the money and he's not still going just for money. And besides this guy has helped millions of people solve and become better at cubing he has been making content for YEARS. He deserves it, he worked hard for it
This video finally gave me the needed burst of energy and some advice on how to solve my megaminx, that I have owned but never got past the last layer of
yeah i’m surprised there isnt more of an effort to make the colours colourblind accessible, guess its hard when the pallets get larger to account for everyone but it is possible
What I love about the rubik's cube like puzzles is that if you know how to solve a 5x5 you can actually solve almost every other puzzle if you are smart enough to connect and generalize all the algorithms
You should scramble a 4x4 like a 2x2 & then scramble it like a 3x3. After that, solve the 4x4 into a 2x2(it can be done using only outer moves, obviously) & then solve it like a 2x2. I tried it just now & it was so fun that i thought it should be an official WCA event!
I did the megaminx first time I saw it with no help, and I barely knew how to solve a 3x3x3. The megaminx is basically just a rubik's cube with more sides.
When I first learned how to do a 3x3 my brother bought me a megaminx for my birthday with a jokingly smug 'solve this!' When I started it I found that up until the very last algorithm, I was able to solve it purely with my beginner's knowledge of a 3x3 without looking up any help, so when I hear all the comparisons between a gigaminx and a 5x5 I'm really not surprised.
Attempting to Solve a GIGAMINX (With NO Help) 5 minutes later: Thank you who ever gave me the advice Technically JPerm isn’t breaking the rules of this challenge because it is called attempting to solve it with no help. This means that he isn’t lying. He attempted to solve it with no help but needed help in the end.
i get an ordinary megaminx solve in aprox averagetime 10 minutes but i love center assembling and edge pairing it's so rewarding i get my kilo minx tomorrow and i look forward to the gigaminx you just solved
Aayush Waghmare when the video is first released, UA-cam tries to analyze the views to see if they are real, this takes a bit of time to complete, the likes however, take no time to be analyzed Sorry for bad English
Ive held a world record in video games, invented a mechanic that literally breaks and entire strategy game, and I am not stupid. Yet I have nothing but respect for people who can do Rubiks cubes. I cant even solve a basic one, let alone this giant mindshag of a puzzle.
Minx = Maybe any puzzle that's shaped like a platonic solid that isn't a cube? But in that case, why isn't the Dogic, a puzzle shaped like an icosahedron, a minx...?
Pleaseeee make the video on how to solve Gigamix please. I have seen your Megamix video and you teach very well now make on Gigamix also please no one has made ever on it .
Apparently the origin of the "-minx" suffix came from when Meffert was originally marketing the Pyraminx, he already had the pyramid thing going so he decided to keep an Egyptian theme and put "Sphinx" at the back of the name, and then that just transitioned over to the dodecahedral puzzles. The more you know.
I’ve still never seen a octahedral or icosahedral puzzle
@@infiniteplanes5775 There are some, like the Skewb Diamond, the Face-Turning Octahedron, and the Dogic, the regular Skewb also counts as it has an octahedral core construction. I assume the reason is those shapes are just harder to make good twisty puzzles with, and the Dogic from what I can find only comes in 10-color, perhaps all 20 was too much for the average user.
@@TNTFour If they used stickers, then they could put each color twice, but with a dot in the middle. There also may be technical limitations, and I'll look at those later.
Trajbers octahedron and trajber 4x4
the more you know
JPerm: “...with NO help.”
Also JPerm: “so this guy gave me this advice...”
JPern?
@@thevibingperson JPemm
@@thevibingperson YaySperm
Wynn Larga yperm
@@hey12yearsago21 E
"the hardest part is going to be finding pieces"
"Oh no sometimes it just doesn't turn!!"
Everything you need to know
Higher order minxes (is that right plural word?) in a nutshell.
69 likes 😞
200 th like
correct my friend
@Capt Alpha ...
I love how most of us are just watching this and don’t have a clue of what he is saying
yep, can confirm.
Yeah that’s me
Its like I ve read what his saying before and used to understand it but the second it starts im just entertained and watching.
I don’t necessarily understand everything but I do understand the concept of what he’s saying and what he’s doing make kinda of sense
Same
I just bought that same gigaminx a week ago, I also solved it on my own based on 5x5 and megaminx knowledge, although I did do all the centers, then all the edges and I can confirm, it takes a really long time.
I actually really enjoyed solving it, because you can solve almost the entire thing intuitively it felt less formulaic and more immersive than a cube. I think the reason it's more intuitive than a cube is because any turn you make on a cube affects 4-5 of 6 sides, whereas on a dodecahedron a turn only affects 6/12 or 50%, so there's a lot more room to move pieces around without affecting anything else
Same I also enjoyed coz of the same reasons XD
"I can't move this"
1 sec later..
Does a dozen moves easily
69 likes. Nice
@@chillboard4904 thanks!
Cat??
According to google, minx means "an impudent, cunning, or boldly flirtatious girl or young woman."
Lmao
By that definition then I shouldn't be able to solve one
@@JPerm (Y) Same
If you read the beano then all is made clear
@@JPerm lmbo same
(Y) Same
Yet jperm has another task
Which is solving gigaminx like a megaminx
which he basically did but he ended up doing is differently
Nah you know what i mean
Actually every jperm subscriber knows what i mean
@@춤을추는꿈을꿈 yeah i know what you mean
@@춤을추는꿈을꿈 i know what you mean
Solving a gigaminx like a megaminx... Like a kilominx... Like a pyraminx... Like a dodecahedron?
I remember solving a gigaminx, they seem so wild when you hold them, but they are actually algorithmically simple to solve
Yeah it’s just a 5x5 but harder
Jperm: solves gigaminx with no help
Me: solves 3x3 by watching a tutorial 5 times
Lol
you and me are same
@@tanmaymall9548 I'm too dumb for the tutorials lol
3x3 is the standard knowing how to solve it makes a really good base for solving other cubes he even mentioned in the video that he has already solved 5x5 so he pretty much has all the knowledge he needs considering megaminx isn’t even a difficult cube
I memorized all the algorithms and now I feel like a god
“Looking like a little megaminx... with horns... and a tail”
“What am I doing”
-J Perm
Lol I just saw this comment at 1:58
it's satan
Quote of 2021 😂
Lol 🤣
@Kuber Kid hate to break it to you but a scramble like that wouldn’t be approved for actual WCA use. I would recommend using CHAOTimer it gives actually correct scrambles!
I love how he puts himself in so much pain just for us.
bruv, it's just for money :)
Money*
~~For money~~
@@pramay_21 well, this is basically his job, and everybody does their job for money
Yeah, but he also enjoys solving puzzles, and that is probably one reason why he started UA-cam, so I guess it is for money and because he enjoys ot
We all saw this coming, didn't we?
Absolutely 👌
yah
Yesss
Yessss we didddd!!!!!!
We're no strangers to love
You know the rules and so do I
A full commitment's what I'm thinking of
You wouldn't get this from any other guy
I just wanna tell you how I'm feeling
Gotta make you understand
Never gonna give you up
Never gonna let you down
Never gonna run around and desert you
Never gonna make you cry
Never gonna say goodbye
Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you
We've known each other for so long
Your heart's been aching but you're too shy to say it
Inside we both know what's been going on
We know the game and we're gonna play it
And if you ask me how I'm feeling
Don't tell me you're too blind to see
Never gonna give you up
Never gonna let you down
Never gonna run around and desert you
Never gonna make you cry
Never gonna say goodbye
Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you
No, I'm never gonna give you up
No, I'm never gonna let you down
No, I'll never run around and hurt you
Never, ever desert you
We've known each other for so long
Your heart's been aching but
Never gonna give you up
Never gonna let you down
Never gonna run around and desert you
Never gonna make you cry
Never gonna say goodbye
Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you
No, I'm never gonna give you up
No, I'm never gonna let you down
No, I'll never run around and hurt you
I'll never, ever desert you
"and you know what else doesn't make sense, pryamix. What does minx even mean?"
Sounds better then a mega dodecahedron tbh
Dodecahedron is an 3D shape. Megaminx has that shape.
@@shloksdd “is AN 3d shape”
It should really be a tri dodecahedron
Some of that chunky movement when the pieces weren't aligned gave me anxiety
Same
Imagine seeing you here. Hi :D
🥲🥲😵😵😵😵🥸😍🤪😍🤪🤨😛💕💕😎🤩😵🤢🤢🧐😘😁😁😋😊🤪😊😊
@@howtobeyouwantabiscuityesl1646 nice name
thank u for posting at my lunch time all the time
@Kuber Kid cool i checked it out the rubiks app has given me a solved cube before
J Perm: Solves a Gigaminx with no help
Me: Not even trying to solve 2x2 without help😂
Lol
😂
XD
you will also reach there some day......
I know its a very hard puzzle, but maybe try the 1x1
so like 2 minutes ago i remembered i used to be a cuber and ended up here, and i dont regret it at all
1:58“Lookin like a little megaminx…with horns… and a tail!……what am I doing?”got me dead!!!!🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂😂🤣😂👌👌👌👌
I love how much you're enjoying solving this puzzle in real time. 😁
I love i
I learned, from this channel, how to solve a 3x3 not even a year ago. And then afterwards I got interested in a lot of non-WCA puzzles. And nowadays it just feels weird to see a puzzle that I solved months ago and J Perm is tackling it for the first time.
Impressive. It takes me about an hour to solve this but I always solve all the centers first and do not do F2L/S2L. I'll try edge pairing with only half the centers done next time. Very cool.
Same here, I never thought about that before.
This was a lot of fun to watch. I basically did the same about two weeks ago (got a Gigaminx and tried to do it without help). I was afraid of: a) having to do commutators and b) parity on the last edge. But on a 5×5 you can always get the last two centres without commutators and for some reason, odd-size dodecahedra don't have parity! yay
11:02 "I already know what to do"
*proceeds to destroy pink center*
lol nice video btw
This was super helpful, thanks!
If anyone's lost, I'd suggest you practice with a 3x3, then a Megaminx, then a 5x5. Like...for a while. Months. Then come back to this video and it'll make more sense.
your gut instinct is correct, there are really no parities on this puzzle
But there’s still false equivocation like odd-layered cubic puzzles, which still resemble parity even if they’re not _technically_ parity.
@@archgirl I am sorry if my question is too obvious, but what do you mean with "false equivocation"?
@@m.reichmann7192 It simply means that you can get cases on odd-layered puzzles which resemble a parity error and are often called a parity error, but are actually not.
Think about a 5x5. You’ve solved the centers and edges, but one edge has the outer wings flipped over so they’re opposite to the middle piece. It’s essentially the same as a 4x4 edge flip parity case, but with the hidden middle layer exposed. To solve it, you use the same parity algorithm you use to flip an edge pair on a 4x4, so it’s often called parity, but it isn’t one, technically. Now think about the 4x4. When you’ve got a flipped edge on a 4x4, if you had stickers on the hidden middle layers, it might look just like the 5x5 edge, with the middle edge piece sitting backwards between the flipped outer wings. In practice, we’ll never know, of course, because the hidden middle layers of a 4x4 are fixed in position on some axis, so it doesn’t behave the same. It would be like solving a 5x5 whilst never turning the middle layers at all, which technically isn’t possible.
All this just means that there technically isn’t any possible even-layer parity on an odd-layered puzzle like the Gigaminx, but you can still run into cases where you’ll need a parity algorithm, just like on 5x5/7x7 etc. Looks and behaves like parity, but isn’t.
@@archgirl Oh ok, now I understand. Thanks for your detailed explanation :D
But still, that special case can not occur on a Gigaminx.
You can only exchange three pieces of one kind on any puzzle. (you can combine those "three-cycles" to get bigger cycles, but all of them are made by swapping 3 pieces. Swapping two pieces is impossible.)
The cubic puzzles are the big exception: on those you can combine a 3-cycle with a quarter turn, to make it look like only two pieces are swapped. (in reality, that quarter turn has still an effect on the rest of the puzzle. That is the reason, why every time you swap two edges on the 3x3, also two corners are swapped.)
The cubic puzzles are special, because with each quarter turn, you move an even number of pieces: 4 edges and 4 corners.
only on those puzzles, where you can move an even number of pieces, you can make it look like only two cubies are swapped.
on the 4x4 and 5x5 the "flipped edge" is the result of two exchanged edge wings, like you said. in the case of the 4x4 and 5x5 the source of the parity is one deep quarter turn move. Doing this will destroy some of your centers, but the edge-parity is now easily solvable. The parity-alg is just an efficient way to fix those centers in one go, other wise you would need to solve them by hand
Now to the Gigaminx:
whenever you turn a side, an odd number of pieces are swapped: 5 edges, 5 corners, and a bunch of middle pieces, but 5 of each
This means you cant even create something that looks like two pieces are swapped. If you have a Megaminx, you can try to exchange exactly two edges. It wont work, not even if the corners are messed up. (you can also prank your friends that way, its hilarious :P)
like the normal turns, the deep turns also only swap an odd number of pieces, thus you cannot make it look like only two edge-wings are swapped and nothing else.
Also on things like multi-layered pyraminxes, you cannot swap two edge wings, Because one turn always moves an odd umber of pieces. (On the pyraminx, it is also impossible to have only two edges swapped)
there is still a chance, that we define "parity" in slightly different ways, so here is my understanding about it: ua-cam.com/video/ExVTKy0XOrw/v-deo.html
and the part about only swapping three pieces at once: ua-cam.com/video/L57yx36Du-Y/v-deo.html
[sry for the self-promotion]
I hope this explanation was not too long and confusing, if I made any mistakes or you still have questions, please ask : )
@@m.reichmann7192 Strange. I have a Gigaminx and distinctly remember getting that exact case on more than one occasion. Perhaps I’m simply misremembering and confusing Gigaminx solves with Master Kilominx solves.
Your f2l tips videos are the best
Best comment of the video
fr, his f2l tips help a TON
8:30 a it of a "I did some mining off camera" moment
@glass of juice that just means original
“With no help”
“thanks to whoever that told me that it saved me so much time”
hMMMM
@Kuber Kid Hey dude, I sure don't care
@@aaaaa-n8l LMAO
*no help atm
@@_dayee2388 I think he was self promoting iirc
You Know When A Cube Is Hard When You Can't Remember It's Name....
Lol
Uwe Meffert, the person who named the Pyraminx and Megaminx was into Egyptian stuff and the "minx" part was supposed to be like "sphinx"
UwU Meffert
@@julienblue8457Uwu has been a thing for three years?
him when he gets a terraminx: "cAn YoU sOlVe A tErRaMiNx LiKe A gIgAmInX??//????/?"
“tHeN lIkE a MeGaMiNx?????????///????/
Can I,solve an examinx like a megaminx?
19:03 As soon as he said done, I had just finished coding the Power loss and Power surge in my game.
First off, damn this video is already 3 years old? That's insane, I remember watching this when it was new. Second, that first half music, is that the Relic Song? Meloetta, that Pokemon keeps coming back in weird ways, but im still not complaining! Didn't think her song would be in an old JPerm video, but here we are.
1:59 something about this tells me jperm will be a great and wholesome parent
Guys i found out what minx means!! According to the dictionary it means: an impudent, cunning, or boldly flirtatious girl or young woman... Hmm interesting
._.
There is an interesting challenge: Solve a 5x5 (or another big cube) layer by layer
Its just so exciting solving new puzzles on your own! Also, SO CLOSE TO 500K SUBSCRIBERS!!!!!!
its 1.4M subs
I’ve never solved a 5x5, only 3x3 and 4x4 and I attempted this gigaminx today. Got pretty far on intuition, solved all the bottom centers and started solving the top ones, and now I feel like I can solve the rest after watching this video. Very informative!
I have never solved a megaminx before, but I can somehow solve it to the last layer. In the 2 next days, I attempted to solve it using the beginner method and it worked just well
I love how you explain the steps, love your videos!
The naming system follows digital storage measurement (Kilobyte megabyte gigabyte terabyte petabyte) which I doubt was the plan when the megaminx was made but it just happens to work out.
Next: Attempting to solve the 1x1 with no help!
Ez
@@fluffy2688 wtf? I hope that is a joke, we all know the 1x1 is the hardest puzzle ever, in fact, no one ever solved it
@@farbencut yeah, its very hard to do cause of all the party's
Once I tried to solve a 1x1 for 72 hours straight and hadn't finished it
At 1:58 lol
"...looking like a little megaminx..WITH HORNS..AND A TAIL.. WHAT AM I DOING.. Let's do red..."
2:57 thats how u know that cubing is really awesome skill that everyone will be impressed by
J Perm: Solves a Gigaminx with no help
Me: *I thought this day would never come*
Bruh I was just about to go do my hw but he posted
SAME
Hey dude done with your homework?
@@utkarshsharma9563 not yet
@@jacktophono1 okay then cool
@@utkarshsharma9563 see you in 4 years
Yesterday I solved the teraminx :D
I solved it exactly the way you did!
Jperm:speedsolving gigamix time: 3mins
Jperm after 5 secs after soving
Hand: shaking 5mph
Wow, watched the entire video, had very little idea of what was happening, but truly amazing. Thanks for sharing. John. New to cubing.
Definition of “Minx”
Noun: an impudent, cunning, or boldly flirtatious girl or young woman
✨Noice ✨
"I Already know what to do!"
"Its just..."
"ᵢₜₛ ⱼᵤₛₜ"
Old days: Rubix cube
Present: gigaminx
2030: gigantaminx
Examinx*
i read "gigantamax" for a second
@@1unar_eclipse THIS IS NOT POKEMON SWORD OR SHIELD YOU HEAR ME lol
@@1unar_eclipse same lol, I’ve been playing too much Pokémon
@@Musicube. remember the old days (3 months ago) when we shiny hunted ahhhhh what a fine moment
7:13 WISHIERD
In the title “with no help” the 3x3 technically helped him 😆
Here he goes again putting himself through unmeasurable pain, just to give us content
And himself money
@JUST ANOTHER CUBER you can tell he hasn't started youtube for the money and he's not still going just for money. And besides this guy has helped millions of people solve and become better at cubing he has been making content for YEARS. He deserves it, he worked hard for it
@@volcaniccubing6940 Of course! Just let the haters(Like this guy) to be aside.
@@volcaniccubing6940 absolutely agree
Every 60 seconds a minute goes by in Africa.
I didn’t know this
Thank you for telling me this
Together, we can stop this
But every minute in Africa,people run out of water
:(
jperm: light blue
me: cyan
everyone has a unofficial WORLD RECORD!!!
One of the pleasures in life is watching someone acting cocky about something, while being completely justified in it.
This video finally gave me the needed burst of energy and some advice on how to solve my megaminx, that I have owned but never got past the last layer of
UA-cam: No views 54 comments
Me: UA-cam, You have to stop drinking
ahahahahah I'm laughing so hard
Your CUT OFF youtube
XD
@Kuber Kid its not even more than 4 moves and you should use cstimer it has real wca scrambles
Cant wait for you to solve it like a megaminx
I think i am speaking for the rest of the color blind community when I ask "what the hell am I looking at"
yeah i’m surprised there isnt more of an effort to make the colours colourblind accessible, guess its hard when the pallets get larger to account for everyone but it is possible
J PERM IS ONE OF MY FAVOURITE CHANNELS AND I ALREADY SUBSCRIBED
I nearly slapped your hands to help you avoid messing the other centers ☺
Just waiting for J Perm to solve an Examinix :)
What about a yotaminx
@@Thedestroyer-hj8kc solve a yottaminx, he must.
We need layer by layer gigaminx
Jperm, you failed. You should have done Meyer for gigaminx
@Kuber Kid stfu
You are a god amongst men. Been a fan since the 3x3! =)
"what even is a minx!?"
And
"Mega minx. With horns. And a tale."
Alright, you got a sub. Well done.
video idea: solve a 9x9 like a 3x3 And solve the 3x3 using only j perms
One word. PAIN
Yay im early this time!
Also whats next? Solving an examinx with no help? Lol
Yep XD
Watch as he does the same thing but with teraminx next
Then the petaminx
examinx :flushed:
What I love about the rubik's cube like puzzles is that if you know how to solve a 5x5 you can actually solve almost every other puzzle if you are smart enough to connect and generalize all the algorithms
oh hi partition
@@goutgueule9197 hello there
@@TheZudik I see I'm not the only cuber who also enjoys geometry dash :) after all it's about cubes
You should scramble a 4x4 like a 2x2 & then scramble it like a 3x3. After that, solve the 4x4 into a 2x2(it can be done using only outer moves, obviously) & then solve it like a 2x2. I tried it just now & it was so fun that i thought it should be an official WCA event!
I did the megaminx first time I saw it with no help, and I barely knew how to solve a 3x3x3. The megaminx is basically just a rubik's cube with more sides.
Yes
I got the first 3 layers on it with no help,but got stuck on the fourth I'm so bad compared to u lol
Imagine getting a heart from j perm
Incase this does get a heart,im here before it
Here before the heart.
❤️ you have my heart at least bro
@Emad The Shark why it's not like he's hurting someone
Yottaminx: hold my drink
When I first learned how to do a 3x3 my brother bought me a megaminx for my birthday with a jokingly smug 'solve this!' When I started it I found that up until the very last algorithm, I was able to solve it purely with my beginner's knowledge of a 3x3 without looking up any help, so when I hear all the comparisons between a gigaminx and a 5x5 I'm really not surprised.
I'm at that point right now with a megaminx and 3x3 algs but the last layer is taking a sec to figure out
11:00
J Perm: I already know what to do!
30 secs after: he messed up.
Me: *Wants To See How He Solves A Gigaminx
Him: *Teaches me how to solve it
Me:
Today : Solving a Gigaminx
Next week : How to be sub 5 on gigaminx
Next month : Should Gigaminx be a Wca event?
These comments are irrelevant now lol
@@sherwin-speedcuber2060 hmm lol
Lol
that's new merch idea: "what is a minx!?"
it will turn into a bad idea, when people realize that minx means a "flirty young girl"
I actually learned some 5x5 skills from this video, and I still remember them. Thanks Jperm
Minx probably just means puzzle.
Pyraminx=pyramid puzzle
Megaminx=puzzle with 12 sides with each side being a 3 layered pentagon
Lol your hands
lol
This man has gone insane...
Attempting to Solve a GIGAMINX (With NO Help)
5 minutes later: Thank you who ever gave me the advice
Technically JPerm isn’t breaking the rules of this challenge because it is called attempting to solve it with no help. This means that he isn’t lying. He attempted to solve it with no help but needed help in the end.
Time taken =4hours or 4 minutes tell me
@Kuber Kid sure guy
This guy tortures himself for his viewers.
Mad Respect! 🥵
i get an ordinary megaminx solve in aprox averagetime 10 minutes
but i love center assembling and edge pairing
it's so rewarding
i get my kilo minx tomorrow and i look forward to the gigaminx you just solved
The worst one in Maths is YT. 2 views and 30 likes😂
Aayush Waghmare pretty sure you don't know how it works
@@stellasibley5534 True though😅
Aayush Waghmare when the video is first released, UA-cam tries to analyze the views to see if they are real, this takes a bit of time to complete, the likes however, take no time to be analyzed
Sorry for bad English
@@stellasibley5534 Thank you for this helpful information 🙏👍
Aayush Waghmare np
What makes even less sense
Pyraminx
Man u made my day 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
“For the most part this will be very easy” video still has 11 minutes left
Ive held a world record in video games, invented a mechanic that literally breaks and entire strategy game, and I am not stupid. Yet I have nothing but respect for people who can do Rubiks cubes. I cant even solve a basic one, let alone this giant mindshag of a puzzle.
Great job again and love the horns and tails part.
Please do a pyraminx or skewb totorial
Minx = Maybe any puzzle that's shaped like a platonic solid that isn't a cube?
But in that case, why isn't the Dogic, a puzzle shaped like an icosahedron, a minx...?
3:10 How can it not turn? if it is a cube of something of low quality
Pleaseeee make the video on how to solve Gigamix please.
I have seen your Megamix video and you teach very well now make on Gigamix also please no one has made ever on it .
Watching him trying to solve the gigaminx made me question my existence..