WOTM: Low Bar Bill Destroys Christianity
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 лип 2024
- Did people perceive Jesus with their senses? Do mosquitos demonstrate God's transcendence?
For ad-free videos, become a patron at...
/ mrdeity
For one-time donations...
venmo.com/BrianKeithDalton
or simply @BrianKeithDalton on the Venmo app
paypal.me/MrDeity
Or use the tip jar on my channel page:
/ misterdeity
To purchase my kindle e-book called, "Atheist Fundamentalist":
www.amazon.com/Atheist-Fundam...
Other links...
/ mrdeity
/ mrdeity
www.skeptic.com
The amazing thing is that so many people actually respect this guy. Apparently, he is not the only one with a low bar.
He's King of the Land of Low Bar!
Yeah, I really don't get how he has such a good reputation among christians
@@ARoll925 Well it definitely tells us some things about his fans. 😔🤦♂️
@@misterdeityStarting Jesus power❤ spread it like a web.
Hahahahahahaha
Ohh it will last 7 days an 7 hours .could be long term it's always been yr choice.
@@misterdeityLimbo Bill?
Low Bar Bill: “God is undetectable.”
Also Low Bar Bill: “God left traces of his existence.”
also, human being have the gift of staring in a campfire for entertainment, we're very easily put in a state of awe for the universe.
@rboland2173 How do you know any god exists to leave traces to begin with?
Bill established that Adam and Eve were just a metaphor.
And now Jesus.
I can't imagine having such contempt for the intellect of someone that I felt I could get away with telling them the product I'm selling is invisible and imperceptible, and expecting that they'll fall for it. It's the laziest scam ever.
Satan's Guide to the Bible has some cracking Low Bar Bill snippets. It's well worth a watch.
This is gold. This is William Lane Craig denying all Bible stories where God speaks to anyone or manifests physically. He might as well just come out and say that he's not a Christian and he made it all up.
"God must be spaceless, timeless, immaterial, etc in order to be the creator of the universe!"
"Ok, so its not a real thing then and has no impact on reality."
"Oh, God is real, personal and conscious, he must be!"
"So then we can detect your god and study it scientifically?"
"Uh no, didn't you hear me say immaterial?"
*headdesk*
I word it like this. If God is a supernatural being (ok "above" supernatural to cover all metaphysical bases) then such God cannot have anything to do with the natural. It (God) can't create it, can't even think about it.
Theologians/Philosophers may try to explain that since God is a 'super-natural' God the word itself is the clue containing the descriptor 'natural' therefore the descriptor itself is the explanation (ie made up) thus enabling God to do what is natural and so on. However this would require the supernatural god to reduce itself to a natural god and that cannot work because it (God) could only reduce it's own super-natural-ness and cannot divorce/subtract etc the natural from the 'super.'
One's imagination on the other hand is the creation of the brain so that the organism can navigate its world (for the sole purpose of reproduction). The brain is not one's own brain because no one is at home.
I hope this all makes sense because a lot of Theists (and even Atheists) seem to quickly skim over the contradiction that comes up between the natural and supernatural.
Because God can is simply not an explanation for anything.
@@Firestorm12345678910Yep, it's a fairly common problem in theology. Yet apologists, even those who are supposed to be theologians, seem fairly quick to simply dismiss this glaring issue with the mere act of Creation.
A common cope from actual theologians who bother to think about it is to propose that the Cosmos 'emanates' from God, but this view immediately prevents any subsequent attempt to put God behind a truly untouchable curtain, since it immediately cast the material world as a divine emanation, thus annihilating any supernatural cop-out.
Another move consists in framing the 'supernatural realm' as some primordial state of affairs governed by its own set of physical laws, with God as its sole resident. In the meantime, our cosmos is then framed as some kind of fully artificial construct governed by its own set of physical laws as well as God's default laws.
An analogy to this particular move would put God as the admin of some kind of cosmic simulation, its powers being in fact its admin privileges, our physical laws being merely simulation rules. This cosmos would be simulated on some contraption obeying the laws of God's reality level, whereas our reality level would obey the simulation's laws.
If Low Bar Bill's words are inspired by a holy ghost, he needs a new, better ghost.
Maybe one with less holes
At this point, low bar Bill should be called No-Bar Bill
This is the "Douglas Adams paradox".
In "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy", Douglas introduced the Babel Fish. An animal so useful it could not have possibly evolved naturally. Thus proving the non existence of god.
God - " I refuse to prove my existence, for proof denies faith, and without faith I'm nothing".
Man - "what about the Babel Fish though, thats a dead givaway".
God - "Oh dear, I hadn’t thought of that". God then vanishes in a whiff of logic having simultaneously proving he does and therefore does not exist.
What these people need, is to definitively prove god doesn’t exist thus proving that he does.
I miss Douglas!
Low Bar Bill: You cannot have a direct sensual experience of God.
Moses, Job, David : WTF are on about, mate?
As usual, Low Bar Bill is full of it.
Billy's argument is basically
If you have evidence for God's existence then god doesn't exist.
If you have no evidence for God's existence
Then God definitely exsits.
Which ipso facto makes no sense at all ... that's WLC!
I'm amazed that apologists can say such stupid things with such supreme arrogance.
Just more apologetics blathering from Low Bar in the name of The Almighty Revenue Stream.
Hey! Don’t go knocking my hobbies. Those revenue streams are nothing to sneeze at. 😉🤪
*Low Bar Bill : **_"God can't be detected by using your senses"_** ;*
_Detecting the undetectable._ lol
Apparently Bill missed all those Bible passages where God/Jesus physically reveals himself to his believers.
WLC is so far into his lies that he doesn't even know when he's lying anymore.
Well, he definitely is a narcissist, so the perpetual lying makes sense.
If God could not be heard with ears or brain, just who was speaking to Moses and all the Old Testament prophets?
And exactly how did Bill get that witness of the Holy Spirit. Is it just a... burning in the bosom?
@@misterdeity A bit lower down, actually. Near the end of the lower intestine.
@@condorboss3339 LOL!!!
@@condorboss3339 He should get some suppositories for that.
"Well actually the fact that it can't be detected in reality at all totally proves it's real and exists in reality. I'm probably the biggest professional religious philosopher of my time."
I guess it's a good thing WLC dismisses the Adam and Eve story as a fairly tale, or else he'd have to explain how an incorporeal God could go walking through the Garden looking for the miscreant couple and calling out for them the morning after they ate of the forbidden fruit.
Lo-Bar Bill is simply the gift that keeps on giving! 😂👍
" _Lo-Bar Bill is simply the grift that keeps on grifting_ "
FIFY
@@condorboss3339That's what I was gonna say!!!
@@condorboss3339 😂🤣 Yes, sorry, misspelled. Damn you, autocorrect. 😜
Boy, do I have a whole bunch of imperceptible bridges to sell LBB's audience.
Then a personal relationship with said god would be impossible. It would be like me, having a personal relationship with any one of the billions of neutrinos passing through my thumbnail as I write this.
Is it me or did that Photo of Lowbar Biil look a lot like David Lee Roth (without the makeup)???
How does low bar bill know so much about god? Why should I believe him...I see no reason to.
And while I'm at it...why does the War God of Abraham ALWAYS need human spokesmen to get his word out, or human intervention to get anything done? That doesn't sound very all-powerful to me for some reason.
1:27 In the Bible God speaks directly and audibly to Adam & Eve, Noah, Abraham, and Moses.
Exodus 33:11 “The LORD would speak with Moses face to face, just as a man speaks with his friend.”
So this omnipotent God is incapable of making his existence known to us in any sensible (in every meaning of the word) way?
That’s quite the accomplishment, to hold two contradictory thoughts as equally valid: the Scriptures describe a God who speaks from burning bushes and appears as a pillar of flame, and yet is so transcendent as to not manifest Himself in these ways. The Bible is to be understood literally and metaphorically. Black is white and round is square,
So according to Low Bar Bill, god has limitations?
In memoriam, Christianity & TWG of Israel. Thanks, Bill.
So WLC is basically saying he knows god exists because he's hearing voices and seeing hallucinations? I've sure there are other known mental afflictions that also have the same symptoms.
Oh, so now Low Bar Bill is entering the Schrödinger Goalpost era?
LOL!!! I like that! Is that yours?
@@misterdeity Yes, I'm actually going to take credit for that phrase. I mean, what's more absurd than just MOVING the goalpost? It's not even there, but it is! Wait......
OMG: DAVID LEE FRIGGIN ROTH!!!!!!!!
cant unsee it now.
Lmfao neither can I
I had to google Roth. Only then did I notice that he was in this video.
So, god isn’t playing hide-and-seek; he just has to be undetectable by humans in order to be god. How convenient.
I'm sure an all-powerful god could find a way to be perceptible to us humans and remain infinite. Either this being can do whatever it wants, or it can't and it isnt all powerful. It irks me how religious people flipflop back and forth between the two whenever it suits their arguments.
Their top level cope is to merge the two contradictory positions and say something like 'God is all powerful because He can do everything which is (logically) possible to do without contradicting His own nature'.
Here's the kicker:
_I, you, everyone_ can do everything which is logically possible to do without contradicting our own nature. It's obvious there's a glaring problem of scale in terms of capabilities between an alleged God and a human, but somehow they came up with a definition of Omnipotence that a human can fulfill 😂.
Low Bar Bill doesn't seem to realize it, but by saying there literally can't be evidence, he is essentially defining God as not interacting with observable reality.
He's basically declaring all non-deist concepts of God to be false, despite believing in a theistic God himself.
My immediate reaction to LBB was to wonder if he even listens to himself!?! By his logic unicorns must exist since we see no physical evidence for them. Likewise for Zeus, Odin and Amon Ra.
And leprechauns and the gold at the end of rainbows.
I had an argument with someone who took it a step further saying you need faith to get the correct answer but only a specific kind of faith can get you to truth. Bad faith gets you to other religions and the "gods" of those are demons. Obviously.
Amon Ra we do not have,
Aron Ra we have,
All hail the spaghetti monster!
@@GameTimeWhy there is mot a lot of evidence from the Bible that the God of the Bible isn’t a Demon. Drowning the entire world, attempting to deny people knowledge of morality , the Job thing, the entire crucifixion blood sacrifice thing. The people you were arguing with had a weak argument on their own terms.
@@francesconicoletti2547 yeah I remember as a Catholic hearing "what if the devil influenced the bible" and writing it off because obviously evil can't touch the book. Right?
So Bill's god is certainly not the god of the bible, gotcha Low Bar...🤨
"If there were perceptual, sensible, evidence of God, then it wouldn't be the God of the Bible."
No sentence has ever screamed "I've never actually read the Bible" than this claim right here. All through out the Bible, not just with Jesus but even before Jesus, God appeared to people through out every single Bible story. He was seen, heard, and felt. I don't recall any stories about anyone describing how God smelled or tasted but certainly 3 of the 5 senses are accounted for. So if the God of the Bible were real then we should easily be able to find evidence that he exists because there was clearly defined evidence of his existence through out all of the Bible's "history" If we can not find any of the same evidence in our present day then the logical conclusion is that the Bible is a work of fiction that does not in any way reflect our reality.
The God he describes which would be impossible to prove the existence of is not the God of the Bible and it would be impossible for anyone to make any claim about knowing anything about such a God since you admitted yourself that if God were real that he's impossible to prove the existence of. So if God exists or not wouldn't matter since we can't know anything about him. We can't know if he's good or evil, we can't know if this God is even a he, a she, or something else entirely, so by your addition any God that you can claim to know anything about inherently is not a God, it's a idle, and if it's not God then it shouldn't be worshiped. Of course even if it is a God it still shouldn't be worshiped because since we can't know anything about it there's no reason to worship it. We wouldn't even know how to worship such a being or even if it wanted to be worshiped, the very act of worship is to claim knowledge about a being which you admit we can't know. It's a very self defeating argument as almost all religious arguments are. And the ones that aren't aren't self defeating aren't really winning arguments either because the argument still applies even without a God. But according to what he just said literally nothing can support the existence of a God.
As per usual, Craig is completely ignoring the fact that the vast majority of Gods people believed in throughout history were, in fact, physical beings.
Even the god of the bible used to be a physical being. During (imaginary) Moses’s time he was a volcano; cloud of smoke by day, fire by night.
And also had a backside and a face that he had to physically cover when he talked to Moses except for when he didn't
My girlfriend is so amazing that not only can you not meet her, you wouldn’t even be able to perceive her.
She’s that real.
She must go to another school - in Canada. Mine too.
@@InigoMontoya- Of course. She is also three people, but only one, simultaneously.
@@jeremysmetana8583 You can see her after you die. Not before. So when you die, you go to Canada. Yes, that’s it!
@@Nocturnalux "She is also three people" Be careful. You may get 3 mothers in law. 🤣😂🤣😂😜🤪
@@Nocturnalux😂
I hate to say this, but as WLC gets older he says more and more ridiculous things and he's not even aware of it.
Seems to be the Christian cult way…….
Maybe it’s time for his children to hide the car keys and look for a suitable retirement home.
I mean… it was all ridiculous all along.
Apart from LBB having a deft ability to stick a foot in his mouth, without removing the other one, theres this matter of revisionist theology that plays into fabrication of the most convenient narrative of the day.
Secular (and even some theist) biblical historians, recognise a trend in the gospels of each author consecutively ramping up the divinity of jesus. Gods generally begin with rather mundane human like properties and parochial concerns of the tribes that worship them. But those properties are far too conspicuous and prone to empirical verification. Church leaders and theologians can't readily lie about the gods with testable properties.
The less transcendent gods started out among humans. Some specially anointed shaman could go into the cave and comune with the god. But it was too easy to sneak into the cave, so succeeding holly men, had gods living on a mountain, then in the clouds, then some ethereal dimension inaccessible to humans called heaven.
Keeping god hidden also involved textual obfuscation. The main reason the Catholic church, opposed translating the Bible from Latin into the lingua franca of the masses was obviously for gatekeeping purposes; to control the narative.
Now our beloved LBB, employs the very same age old middle man, gatekeeping theological strategies, for people who don't read the Bible, or care if he contradicts it. The problem is the old testament god was much more like the ju ju up the mountain. In fact Moses goes up the mountain to get the commandments. So he has to ignore all that terrestrial interaction in the old testament, while also contradicting the trinitarian aspect that eventually makes Jesus out to be god in human form.
This is the problem with adopting the more anthropomorphic gods in the interest of trying to maintain a following from prior religious traditions. Any significant modificatios will eventually apear contradictory to their parent texts.
Christianity has never been able to escape the revisionist milieu of its Jewish legacy so poor LBB is left with having to saddle god with empirically undetectable properties while simply lying about the anthropomorphic legacy of god in his own book and its own revisionist trends, to continue this impossible trajectory of theological revision that describes god as identical a non-existent entity, while contradicting the biblical authors who's god began as far more human like and evolved much more transcend properties towards divinity throughout history.
I don't know where future generations of theologians can go, after having inherited a god concept indistinguishable from one that doesn't exist, while contending with texts that still attest to a god much more akin to the ju ju up the mountain.
A married ju ju too. Getting rid of Jahweh’s family was one of the first steps.
@@kellydalstok8900 Yeah, I'd heard he had a missus. He had quite a past; infinite they tell me.
Didn't Moses meet god face to face and hear him via a burning bush? My whole world just came crumbling down.
On top of a volcano. The smoke by day, fire by night and booming voice are a dead giveaway what god was to those ancient people. Though not to Moses, as he never existed.
According to George Smith, Craig is actually hitting on a key difference between skeptics and believers.
The supernatural, pretty much by definition, is undetectable by our natural senses and equipment.
Both sides can agree on this; but where the theist takes this as evidence for God's greatness, the skeptic thinks this removes the concept from rational consideration.
Awesome answer! I'm going to humbly latch onto a much smaller point:
1:51 "If you could have a direct sensible apprehension of god, this would be a finite, limited being unworthy of worship"
... So, that's what makes a being "worthy of worship"? Character doesn't even come into the picture?!
That sentence doesn’t make sense in so many ways. I have a direct apprehension of the universe, which is either infinite or as close to as makes no difference, but my limited senses on sense a finite portion of that universe not its immensity. My sensing it doesn’t limit it , it still is vast.
People have and do worship gods other than ultimate creator gods. I don’t think it’s up to WLC to dictate what is worship worthy. Streams, trees, dead people, live people and a myriad other things have been worshipped.
Okay, lay off the bears, would ya? Those kids were mocking a bald guy. The G-man really had no choice but to smite them, did He?
it was a she bear .so we can blame the females since they always cause the problems and they just wont
shut up in church
Was He short of Lighting Bolts that morning ? Couldn’t he have induced some divine haemorrhoids ? Were all the Angels with flaming swords busy ? Why involve some innocent animals in the petty divine wrath ?
I’m told WLC is on the faculties of BIOLA and Houston Christian U and that these organizations require all teachers to sign statements of faith. I would think publishing his hypotheses that, for instance, his god is not able to be seen or heard or that Adam and Eve are mere metaphors would be considered heretical and in violation of his faith statements. He’s basically saying his Bible isn’t literally true, and that the doctrines of fundamentalist Christianity based there on are wrong. Is he getting some pushback from his own church?
Wow, I agree with Billy on something.
I also think it strange to think Jesus to literally be God.
Now we see Low Bar Bill agreeing with Jews and Muslims that Jesus is not God. Who would have thought such a day would ever be?
I never got as good at art as I would like but I always wanted to paint that classic painting of Christ where he's spreading open his wound with one hand and doing that two finger thing with the other but replace the wound with a vagina. He does have a "come hither" look on his face in the original after all.
Please do this and post the result somewhere!
@@HowBoutDemBoyzz I'll copy your name just in case.
I'm thinking it would be like nobody would really notice at first. That it's just a classic religious painting and then BAM! The "holy shit" moment.
@@theriffwriter2194 that's perfect. Subtlety can often add to the hilarity of something like that. Good idea haha
Funnily enough, as soon as Bill said the thing about if we could see or touch God, it wouldn't be God, I thought "But -but - Jesus."
No matter how consistently record-breakingly idiotic the world gets, misterdeity videos make me smile.
😢why does he demand God be hidden from his creation? I see no logical or philosophical reason for his hiddenness. I reject the nonsense that we couldn't bear to see his divine self. He's done it before, so why not now. How is faith better than certain knowledge? It's a very high bar to relationship.
It’s worse than a girlfriend in Canada; at least Canada can be proven to exist.
I'm surprised there's not a barrage of Christian commenters begging him to please just stop talking and enjoy his immense wealth in peace and retirement and to stop undermining core Christian dogma.
Sunk cost fallacy maybe? They've invested so much time and energy in promoting/defending that guy that they're now stuck with him.
Intuition comprehends the progressive expansion of brightness and wet birds never fly at night.
That still makes way too much sense... You need something like Chomsky's sentence: "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."
Another GREAT video. Keep it up.
How dare William Lane Craig reject Christ’s divinity!!!
You had me at " Bear assassins"
Bible guarantees the right to small Bear arms. 😄
And the bears had a bunch of children - for lunch!
Thanks so much! Blessings are headed your way.
It was nice of you to build that platform so people could see better. That safety rope was a nice touch...very considerate. 🙂
As usually, WCL, the world´s worst apologist and pseudophilosopher, wants to eat his cake and keep it. Because if you can find traces of god in the natural world, the transcendent being in some way must have interacted with the physical world, e.g. by reflecting photons.
I had to look in the fridge: No shiitakes, just baby bella's and oyster mushrooms!😋😜
Exodus 33:12-23 god shows his "backside" to Moses. Bible god isn't god. Way to go lowbar Bill.
Here we go again - god is incomprehensible, now listen while we tell you everything about him.
For the faithful to be logically consistent; All the infinitude of unfalsifiables deserve equal devotion.
2:32 wow, I see what you mean... In a normal universe this would pose a problem for a "professional photographer"... I'm sorry, I meant to say "philosopher". It's just that my brain has a hard time using that word to describe LBB. Anyways, back to the matter at hand. In a normal universe... but that's just it, these are apologists we're dealing with. These guys can literally imagine anything. You name it, they can imagine it and that's half the battle. I have no idea what the other half is.
The other half is emotional neediness and fear of death.
God has the ability to not be the thing you are looking for at the time. He is like a supernatural ghillie suit. It's one of his omni qualities; omni- not-here-now.
Yahweh is the chameleon of gods.
I'm sorry, is there a part 25.7 to this? I need some clarification. If we can't see nor hear god... then how are we writing stories about him? How are we suppose to follow his laws if he can't communicate them to us? If we can't confirm they are actually _his_ laws?
Bill seems to have actually converted to Deism here. With his advanced Godzhimers he just didn’t notice.
He says the stupidest things, but, I think he really means them.
ha has been corrected many many times over the last few decades. yet, he does this rant for a living.
I could give him the benefit of the doubt in any previous era, but not in the age of cheap and fast and accessible information. He KNOWS that he is wrong. And the only way to remain this wrong this long: Intentionally. craig lies for a living.
@@istvansipos9940 You are so right.
I have to wonder if he realizes he is saying Jesus couldn't be God, because he was supposedly visible, audible and touchable, and he just doesn't think his listeners are that smart.
@@dianarising7703 of course, he realizes all that. Some decades of experience with an audience helps a lot. He also knows that humans are humans: some very very smart. Even the indoctrinated ones. That's why he never presents ANY testable claim. And he never mentions any common thing our KIDS know these days. No rant about the density of water and why its density is its density by some fine tuning "cosmic low", for example.
he has to smuggle in something more vague. usually snippets of cosmology presented in deepak chopra w0rd salad style.
if it is not vague enough, nobody finds a gap for the g0d.
if it is vague enough, nobody has a chance to understand it. People come with jesus in their heads, hear all the confusing minutes from craig, they all fill those confusing minutes with jesus stuff, and then, at the very end, they hear a clean cut, well spoken "conclusion" about the jesus stuff.
that's why there is no complicated, metaphisical, woowoo word in his last sentence. It is the crossing of the t.
WLC's voice is hell on earth.
Bill posits an omnipotent being, and offers its inability to make itself seen or heard as evidence that it's real? Based on a book of stories that describe that being explicitly making itself seen and heard?
That's not a low bar. That's having no bar whatsoever. This doesn't even seem like a man earnestly defending his faith. He's just a man willing to say whatever he thinks meets the rhetorical needs of the moment, regardless of whether the words have any meaning or content.
The Godzhimers seems to be acting up with Bill again. An omnipotent god can reflect light and digest food if it chooses to. It can do anything. It may choose not to ( ineffable and all that ) but it wouldn’t give up its divinity as Bill implies if it does so.
Agent LBB reporting in - I continue to try destroying the cult from the inside but for some reason they swallow all the BS as "wisdom". Can I come back soon please Bri Bri?
Perhaps I'm too emotional, but at times I shed a tear for religious people.
Then again Blazing Saddles made me cry. You know, laughter.
Well, a horse got punched too.
If I said I "sense" Bigfoot keeps watching me when I sleep, someone would throw me into a padded room.
At least you would get fead and have someone hugging you all the time ( yourself with the help of a nice warm jacket ) ;-)
Signposts to a place you never get to Bill.
So... god is real because we can't see him... hear, smell or touch him? Right!
(though, according to Homer Simpson, god smells good)
Mmmm smells...
and with all the 0.0000 evidence all over the place, chrisssschunz are mental enough to pick a baby drowning g0d, not Artemis, for example. Something is very very wrong with chrissschunz, I think.
So how did Adam and eve see God?
Naked probably.
Special glasses.
Well, they were having a little game of hide and seek remember? It was just after they ate the fruit, and God was like, "Adam! Eve! Come out, come out wherever you are!" So he thought it wouldn't be fair to use supernatural invisibility and silence powers to cheat in his turn. He needed to chat with them about that fruit thing anyhow so...
Bless his heart. I knew he had it in him! ; )
Didn't God even wrestle with Jacob according to the Bible? Isn't God constantly speaking to people? Seems the Bible is just full of these lies.
"God spoke verbally to several people in Scripture to tell them what He wanted them to do. Some of those include Abraham in Genesis 12:1-4 where God told Abraham to leave his own country to go to a land God would give him eventually. Moses and Aaron heard God speak in Exodus 7 with instructions about how to approach Pharaoh to demand he let the Israelites go from Egypt. God spoke verbally at Jesus’ baptism in Matthew 3:13-17 pronouncing blessing on His only begotten Son as Jesus began His earthly ministry. God also spoke verbally to Paul on the road to Damascus when Paul was converted (Acts 9:3-6). "
Awesome! Thanks for sharing that. It's a good resource! Of course, they'll have some bullshit excuse for why Bill's comments do actually line up with these verses. But that's just what excusegists do.
It seems Low Bar Bill's God is harder to detect than neutrinos !
Great video! ❤
Not only was this a great video, but the music on the outro was awesome!
I still love my new word that I learned from Mr Deity...ecsuseinist! 😂
Craig defines God as a fignmet of the imagination.
If god isn't perceptible then by which sense/s does low bar use to perceive the "inner witness of the holy spirit" he's always going on about?
It's a... burning in the bosom.
Unsurprisingly, LBB turns out to be his own worst enemy. The tactic has been to debate these people, but that's obviously a mistake. Just let the likes of Billy Boy do all the talking and don't even interrupt them, and their unfettered BS will come shining through
Always does!!!
Actually the "signposts to transcendence" all point to Frosty the Snowman being the ultimate being. Just look at all the snow and ice in this world. The polar ice caps are miles thick. That is impossible if Frosty the Snowman wasn't the ultimate being.
The guy who played Jesus in The passion of the Christ would disagree with Bill, he actual hugged jesus bedide his bed. Look it up on youtube.
So Bill, how do you tell the difference between a feeling sent by your god, and a feeling you created yourself because you want something to be true?
Aren't they always the same thing?
Or a feeling sent by Satan!
I think the God feelings come with candy sprinkles.
Thanks
OMG, has WLC forgotten about the times in the OT when god hung out with humans chatting with them quite often. "Not perceptible by the five senses = greatness?" Are you kidding me? In Genesis 18, god appears physically to Abraham ... obviously an imposter according to WLC. Joshua and Moses also saw god's physical being. Low Bar Bill is a modern day Paul, starting his own religion through his inner belief in his invincibility in apologetics and philosophy. If only WLC could hear his own voice with his ears and brain ...
Of course, WLC has Godsheimerz, don’t ya know? It’s a terrible affliction for Excusegists, who simultaneously believe that god is all-powerful or all-knowing, AND that god can’t/couldn’t do/did certain things.
William Lane Craig's whole argument is full of sh... shaving cream, shaving cream...
Be nice and clean. Shave every day and you'll always look keen.
Yep, if Jebus even existed, he was nothing more than a 1st Century Galilean cult leader.
Wait now I'm so confused. I though Yahweh was all powerful so able to do anything he wants.
Yeah… whoops(?).
I guess he blurred out while trying to lift that stone he created but couln't lift... disappeared in a puff of logic...
@@marcdc6809LOL!!!
@@marcdc6809 I assumed the sequence was
Turn off Logic
Lift stone he created he couldn’t lift
Put stone down
Turn on Logic
i can't help but wonder whose bathroom that telephoto lens is pointing. in the background.
Another good skewer for a man who's 'thinking' is in favor of self-enslavement in return for a forged promissory note of wealth and comfort (but not if you read carefully). And to think there was a time L B Bill aggravated me.
If he can't be perceived by the human faculties then how could God leave traces in the creation that make it apparent to humans that he is the creator. LMAO! WLC has lost it!
What can you expects from a man whose claim to fame is defending the Kalam? Poo old bill.
AronRa
The Kalam oncological argument.
Idolized god….. but worshiping a man made book & organizations that support & use the book, is Not idolatry? What a screwed up sense of reasoning.
🫶hey Sis 💕
@@pragmaticcrystal 💕🥰sis
That first pic looked like bill had had a bastard love child with swedish actor/singer Torsten Flick.