I wish if there was a open border instead of a heavy militarized zone between our countries like they have in the European Union. Things would be much better then.
@@rounaksinghbuttar9083 two countries pointing enough nuclear weapons at each other that if used, the entire world would fall into a nuclear winter leading to mass famines all over the world. So yeah, it's a bit more complicated than that😂
@Bilal Ahmed those so called nationalist always want something to play politics with. Else, how would they survive right? Honestly speaking, common people here are more interested in their daily lives rather than fighting over some land they might never step on to in the course of their whole lives.
Technically, the sun has still never set on the Empire. For one hour (12:00-1:00 UTC I believe), the Pitcairn Islands are the only Crown colony which sees sunlight, but with them, the sun is over the Empire at all times.
@@bigboijoni4328 in the scenario, they were talking about the british empire. Britan uses the pound. Therefore, you'd still say the pound despite talking about india
Are you forgetting the fact that The British Indian empire was made up of Pakistan india and burma. Yet with that population The empire thrashed india, Population does not mean everything.
What’s mad about the British empire is that the British empire was literally just created for trade not global conquest. Imagine if the brits just wanted sheer land mass! 😮
@Toni Ilievski I think it is, if it was about sheer strength and brutality with absolute monarchy no one in this comment would say against British Empire. For example Armenians speak against ottomans but they speak with fear till now.
@@toniilievski3934 The Brits often took control of areas by making trade deals and alliances that gradually gave them more and more power until they were effectively in charge. And even then, they often ruled through local proxies. They did use force at times, but they didn’t just militarily conquer all that land.
They all want to be ruled by the British again as they would be more stable for example look at Hong Kong there begging for the British to take them over again
What's interesting is that (unlike the Romans and Mongols) the British didn't conquer any other countries on their own continent. This map of their widespread global territories is largely a testament to the superiority of the Royal Navy.
Tom David right now there is a 77 pence difference between dollars and pounds. It may not seem like a lot, but a trillionaire could lose 25.4 billion pounds of the currency is different
Just curious, you guys ever read the Declaration of Independence? Seems England never wanted to grant citizenship to the increasing amount of foreigners entering the new world. Wouldn't exist without England? If I remember correctly, the first pioneers were religious exiles. Is this what you mean?
05:20 "The only question is: Would the United States allow this to happen?" As if all the other countries would be like "Yh sure, you can take over me"
@Shirshendu Das your country had so many muslims it needed to be partitioned for pakistan to be formed, pipe down, 15 years ago you had a higher gdp than you had population, 60% of your country lives on 3$ a month, have fun in your shithole and stay there
@Shirshendu Das Let these Britishers cry. They are jealous of our India and all it's glory. Jai hind. India has reached Mars while Britishers cannot reach Brexit deal even. Alas Britisher beggars do not even have a space agency.
@@darkhumour.9218 Factually untrue, Scotland havent had a vote so how do you know? N Ireland littreally started blowing up buses on the thought of a united ireland, please learn more about IRELAND before having some retarded take, N Ireland hates IRELAND
@Olivia Addison so how indian subcontinent's countries became more poor that many of the african countries after independence and also african countries who possess more than 30% of the entire world's economy became one of the most poor region in the world. You would probably say that thay hadn't industrialized their nation during the period of industrialization but thay were ruled by British during that period. So it was the duty of british that they think about the indian and african nation asuch as they think of their own nation . They just thrieve resources and wealth of indian and african nations and used it to industrialize their own country. I don't know enough about the how british rule the other countries but yes i know enough about the rule of british in india. Some major famines like 'Great Bengal Famine', 'Chalisa famine', 'Doji bara famine','Upper Doab famine of 1860-61','Orissa famine of 1866','Rajputana famine of 1869','Bihar famine of 1873-74','Indian famine of 1896-97','Bengal famine of 1943', all cause during british period. Can you think about famine in the world's most fertile region i.e. plains of indus and ganga? The cause of these famines are taking around 125% tax on crops. The farmers are forced to pay this tax. When they were unable to pay this then the british seize their house ,property,and crops leaving the farmers and their families to die. Also they massacred many people who were unviolently protesting against the british rule . Example of some massacre are jalianwalah bagh massacre ,amritsar massacre etc. And now England's government claim that british raj was the golden era for technology. You claim this because you have given railways tp us. But we don't need this railway if it costs 45 trillion $. Yes $45 trillion , this is the amount british thrieve from india. I'm not saying that you are bad but yea your ancestors were like a devil for us. Even till date they haven't even said sorry for these all. Now, you decide everything.
CreepinWhileYouSleepin the fact that they were an island actually helped them. this helped because it kept britian safe and forced them to make a powerful navy this is why they were such a dominent force. actually, britian had the nessesary resources for an industrial revolution .they were not behind in natural resources.
"actually, britian had the nessesary resources for an industrial revolution .they were not behind in natural resources." No they didn't. They ha to trade for those or create colonies. British people are simply strong people.
The united states is a well oiled machine on the other hand the empire is a bunch of small machines if they had time to make it a well oiled machine it would be a beast :p
Pretty much what Sordxyx said. The scenario states the Empire basically just magically gains all its old territory and the resources/population/military owned by whatever exists there currently. In reality this sort of thing would take decades to even begin, the Empire wouldn't just slap on the annexed nations pre-existing militaries/government structures/etc (way too expensive and inefficient) and nations would be more gradually integrated rather than all at once haphazardly. It certainly wouldn't want to just take on the money sink that is developing half the third world all at once. Once it was set up it could easily be the most powerful state on the planet, but it would take a while and lots of things could easily go wrong, not least the fact that even poor nations these days can effectively wound advanced ones with guerilla warfare thanks to modern warfare.
Ry well from the second it changes yes, don't forget that most of the countries that were in the Empire went down hill very quickly afterwards as they replaced those in positions with experience with those who had no experience but were native to the respective lands. Over time with structure imposed and a western level of efficiency gained, the figures would begin to shift in favour of the Empire. With that comes changes to the defence budget as, provided it stayed at the same percentage of GDP rate, it too would rise. The British would be able to take control of issues inside the borders which would lighten the load for the US military and as a pair we'd essentially have the world on absolute lockdown
@@BRITISHFURY_1664 Yeah after we forced them to pay us back for defending them from the French they got mad and sided with those goddamn baguette rooters lol.
Owais Shaikh just because the USA has a large economy doesn't mean it's rich. Keep in mind that the u.s is still nearly 20 trillion dollars in debt and has only been out of debt once in its history. A high GDP is just a measure of the total value of the goods and services produced in that country, not how wealthy the country actually is.
Once I see someone mention the 20 trillion dollar debt without its specifications, it's a tell-tale sign that this person has no idea what he's talking about.
IaughandpeeaIittle in this situation, the amount of debt that the us has is relevant. So even if I didn't know what I was talking about, the facts are still there and they say that the United States isn't simply rich.
Je Cr US debt is made by design. Thats how they oppress the lower class and get rid of the middle. More debt = more printing. More printing = more money.
@@stephandihead4516 I never said they were the greatest empire in India or ever heard that in any form of British media ever stop assuming the British care about that we only care about how fools wish to blame their current situation on rulers long since gone and that they state that the British were the most evil thing to hit the earth and the axis would’ve been kind saviours to Indians. It’s objectively not true.
I myself am working on a novel premised on the survival of the empire and its evolution into a federal super state, so I find these videos interesting and good for research. Under such a scenario (of survival not reunification), in calculating total and average imperial GDF, the difficulty is taking into account the cumulative multiplier of political unification. By that I mean the free flow of goods and people across imperial borders, as well as skills and expertise, over a period of decades, in a context of political stability. I assume this would have led to a much higher total and average GDP for the empire than that given here by (presumably) adding together the current GDPs of all 64 countries that would be reunited. The question would be postulating a magnitude for the multiplier.
Sure! Give me a lifetime supply of oil, i can drink oil everyday, I could consume bigger numbers than the 0's on my math test's and i could consume more oil than the entire population of new york
@ Indian subcontinent was richest asshole read history
4 роки тому+15
@@ShubhamGaikwad-wf1dg But did they have any innovations though? Britain had the industrial revolution and were a strong country. I am an Asian too but Asia was a shithole back then. Why couldn't India kick out the Brits if they were rich?
@ don't comment unless you know the history India was one of the Richest countries in the world at that time. Indias gdp was 23%. at that time India was divided major part of India are ruled by marathas. they are dominant power on subcontinent. Brits have better weapons in compared to marathas.brits fought 3 Maratha Anglo wars to defeat Marathas. Having not modern weapons means not poor shit hole. Brits looted 43 trillion dollars at that time in India and reduced GDP to 3%
Historically, the British people who just wanted to stay at home and have trade and friendly relations with the world were called "Little Englanders". Today that term is used as a slur to describe people who want the UK be a separate sovereign nation from the EU, and who wish to curb mass immigration and not get involved with wars that are usually only for the benefit of the US special interest groups.
And that's bad for the UK but it's good for me northern ireland if it leaves its joining ireland and northern Ireland should leave the UK dosent want it and Ireland wants it but its the fucking people who still want to be protestant and be with the uk like if they want to be in the European Union then they can vote for unification to join ireland I live in ireland and this should happen
Dude, just cuz you're from 'Murica doesn't mean you show bias to them. I mean WTH? The US was a part of the british empire, you can't be like, "Will America Allow them?"Did anyone allow UK to take over Africa? It's a hypothetical eg, you have to get the facts right. BTW I'm not British, I'm actually Indian
I agree that you get a shout out, but shouldn't the facts include the US as a part of the British Empire? Also by the logic that it was a part of the "second "british empire then Canada, SA Aus should also be not included
how so? Canada, SA, and Aus were still under full or partial British control until well into the 20th century. Canada only got full control of it's self in 1982 Australia wasn't fully independent until 1986 South Africa became independent of Britain in 1931 (you're probably thinking of the formation of the local governments in these countries.. for instance Canada got home rule in 1867.. but Britain still had to approve all their laws, could call upon them at any time, and could pass laws for them. IE they were still within the British Empire)
Sidhant Sinha they ask that question cause the US is a country that could fight them for that territory and probably win. And of course the US would say no not only cause of the economic strategy, but also cause of the Constitution that legally binds all the states together. If the states that made up the 13 colonies left the US, they would essentially be calling treason.
As an African, I must protest. What do the British ever do for us? Em...well apart from the roads, the railways, the telegraph, telephone, irrigation systems, canals, streets, sewer systems, power systems, electricity, courthouses, universities, new crops, new methods of farming, new medicines, literacy, law and order, concept of democracy, concept of individual freedom which has led to the increase in life expectancy and decrease in infant mortality rates. .really what have the British done for us?
Abdul Turay we have a similar saying in Britain...what did the Roman Empire do for us...hot water, sanitation, central heating, fresh water, architecture etc etc
Jordan the fact that the US can compete with countries with 4 times the population but still is the most influential country in the world and the strongest army and the biggest economy while basically being a unchallenged superpower shows you how big the US is.
Firstname Lastname even Eu combined can only match the US economically but still behind 1 trillion and military is a no contest and us citizen will have a higher per capita that Europe combined... this why the US is the greatest country right now despite its major flaws
I wonder why they do not include the United States as part of the British Empire as since we were once a Colony of the British Empire. Not just the Colonies.
As mentioned in the video, the majority of the United States was not even a colony of British Empire. Spanish Empire would be the biggest, followed by French as the second. Also, there are other countries too that has stepped their feet on the US such as the Netherlands. British people is not even the biggest ethnicity in the US. It comes third after German and Irish.
***** I don't think most Americans would agree with that. The US is just so ethnically diverse to even agree to be considered one of the British Empire colony. Only about 10% of them has British ancestors and the country is built by immigrants from all over the world. Unlike other British colonies, American independence is not given to them. They fought against the UK because their policies are just stupid and they won eventually with the help of French people. Why the fuck would you ever consider to be a part of their empire ever again? They can be allies, but "reunited"? That's just ridiculous and against what all of their founding fathers fight for.
***** Are you stupid or something? You explicitly said your agreement with the guy in the main comment, "I wonder why they do not include the United States as part of the British Empire as since we were once a Colony of the British Empire." by saying "True". Yeah, American share many common cultures with British people, just as they share common cultures with French, German, Irish, Dutch, and other people from other European countries. Also, what is your point exactly if you don't say that the US should be a part of British Empire? Like, what the fuck do you want to point out? Even if the US will be one of the British Empire, American's massive ego and narcissism won't let them to be under the rule of the British Empire. If anything, the US would be the one who rule and control everyone else in the empire, since the US whole GDP is bigger than the entire British Empire's GDP. Furthermore, why would the US want to invade the British Empire in the first place? It's not like they have much oil that they need to be invaded with all of the mighty freedom and democracy.
Taking a hypothetical discussion a bit to serious and personal. Our Nation Originated from the Original 13. So I figure we hold the same connections as the 13. Not who came here after the fact. People give our so called founding father way to much credit like they were flawless saints or something.
Christopher Knox Just replying to the original comment, it would not be logical to include the entire US because the original 13 where the only colonies Britain ever controlled, after the revolutionary war Britain never controlled The US again, so it wouldn't make sense to say that any part of the US besides the 13 states that where the original 13 colonies should be included in the British empire
Shashi Tharoor in his book "An Era of Darkness: The British Empire in India" said: "I know why the sun never sets on the British Empire: God wouldn't trust an Englishman in the dark."
@Mohammed Patel Because at the end of the video, RLL included the original 13 colonies, which were part of the British Empire before independence. So would the US allow the New British Empire to take the 13 states?
@Mohammed Patel I could also argue that the land was never British land, and rather Native American's land, and the British just stole it. So what's your point?
@Mohammed Patel The "Americans" you speak of were originally British citizens who created America. Americans did not steal the colonies. British people got mad at their own government, rebelled and created the United States, and started calling themselves American.
@Mohammed Patel Yeah so the British got mad, started a war, and lost to Americans. After losing the war, the British Crown formally recognized American independence and ceded most of its territory east of the Mississippi River to the United States in Treaty of Paris. The British literally gave the land to the US after the US won the war.
Gone are the days. Now India more powerfull. Our GDP greater than Britain. Indian army can beat the British army with ease. Your forefathers invaded a different India then today. Jay hind.
If you were intertwining with aliens you too would appear smart and ingenious about the ones stripped ugly from glory and alienated them in space influencing technology 1g thru 7g.
I was born in Fiji and tbh after we gained independence we went downhill in-terms of development. Our neighbors Australia and Newzeland reaped the benefits of still being a British colony. All the good things in Fiji was done by Britain.
No ,its totally fake.On the name of development they looted each and every product .The most precious and famous diamond KOH I NOOR of our Subcontinent was also taken from us and shifted to Britain
And this is why the age of empires will return and the third british empire will reign over the whole world, bringing peace and prosperity to all and then we can actually properly go to space. I truly believe the UK (Great Britian) island mass is shaped as it is, not by accident. It's just like a yale key don't you think? And keys are made to "unlock" things. So, maybe, just maybe the third british empire (as every "third" of something is their largest/biggest when speaking about empires) would span all across the globe and bring prosperity for all. I am not sure how this bloke got his numbers on everything, when its hypothetical idea. But I am guessing he is just trying to be patriotic to his own country, USA. When USA, in many regards still has segregation and other cultural inequalities which undermines its "figures" on average wage and GDP. ITT we have had Fiji, Jamacia, Malaysia. And when you go to ex colony countries and go on history guides or just speak to natives, they always speak of how the british were the best rulers. (Malta, Trinidad, Hong Kong etc) And I tell you the reason, it is because we are merchants (Englishmen) All we want to do is make money and prosper. This is why I say, slavery wasn't a "racist" attribute of the empire. It was just a "thing of the times" which you did to make money. Yes, a minority were racist to the blacks (as people are today) but an average trader working in the docks in london or kingston (Jamacia) or Bridgetown (Barbados) etc were just doing a job. Also, you have to take into account the government persistently tried to outlaw slavery during the 17th and 18th century and it was just due to the slow process of policymaking, lawmaking and economic recalibration that took time to enstill it in society. Just like working laws, just like human rights, things take time. Often people nowadays (especially the young) forget how long processes take, even the current fiasco with Brexit shows you even the policymakers themselves were clueless. Democracy takes time to make progress but when it does, it makes much more progress than a dictatorship (or communist) ever does for longer too. Again, this is also why jumping the gun and voting for a "new" creative neo-progressive party with "new" (even though they have been tried and tested 100 times before and failed) policies telling you if "only we put more money into xyz" fund and tax the rich more we can make it better for all does and will not EVER work. Socialism, freedom and scio-economic valuations take time to build. Please remember that when you vote for something that is too good to be true. Frank.
Barbara You do realise that pretty much every country has killed at least thousands, right?. The only reason Britain has killed so many is mainly due to how long it has been around and no Geneva Convention until 1949.
I was going to say: you have to include the American colonies, too. It doesn't matter if the rest of the States would resist or not. This is a hypothetical scenario about the Empire being at its most powerful, and that would include the American colonies, making it the undisputed global superpower. (P.S. Cool video. Thanks.)
The reason the 13 colonies weren’t included is because this is showcasing the British Empire at the height of its power (around 1922), which was centuries after the 13 colonies had declared independence. In other words when the British Empire had control over the 13 colonies they did not have the majority of the land they owned in Africa and Southeast Asia.
Actually you were forced to accept a declaration of independence because you invaded and were defeated in 2 battles, the battle of Lexington and another one, plus the french were supporting the US.
Funny thing is that the 13 colonies never actually faced the full force of the Empire. In '82 Britain sent an armada across the Atlantic containing the bulk of British military forces with the sole aim or retaking the colonies. However during the journey and Election was held in Britain and the balance of power shifted, the new government favoured peace over more bloodshed and thus recalled the Armada. In short, one election changed History.
Just think how many empires there have been in history .. Mongol French American Qing Mughal British Dutch Japanese Korean Russian Soviet Roman German multiple times Swedish ( Christ even Sweden 🇸🇪 Aztecs Incas Kongo empire Persian empire Again ! Multiple times Frankish empire Byzantine empire
@@arabiancuchulainn9729 oi, leave him alone, you can't process every empire now, there certainly are a lot of them, and it's most likely hard to go off of memory
Before proud americans start getting cocky about US being so huge: US has the largest GDP because US has the largest population in the developed world. Largest population of any developed country means largest economy meaning largest GDP and obviously a bigger military (and NASA, movie industry) budget.
The United States hasnt been United in over 12 years lol. Especially now, you shouldnt be boasting about a "United" America when America is the most likely country to come crumbling down
Like yourself, every member of the colonised parts of the world, were subjects of the Crown, and not subjects of "Joe public", who were barely literate and couldn't point to any of the countries listed on a map. Furthermore, the Queen is a figure head, and you're still her subject, whilst everyone from the Republics around the world, are free people. So, remain proud of being practically property, to a German monarchy. Daft pleb.
"It was the empire on which the sun never set, because somewhere in the empire the sun was always shining. But indeed it had to set at some point." Britain: *Laughs in overseas territories*
"Would the US allow this to happen?"
If you managed to reunite India and Pakistan then anything is possible...
I wish if there was a open border instead of a heavy militarized zone between our countries like they have in the European Union. Things would be much better then.
@@rounaksinghbuttar9083 lol yeah. That would solve the LOC problem😂
@@mobashshirkareem976 but it's not that simple isn't it?
@@rounaksinghbuttar9083 two countries pointing enough nuclear weapons at each other that if used, the entire world would fall into a nuclear winter leading to mass famines all over the world. So yeah, it's a bit more complicated than that😂
@Bilal Ahmed those so called nationalist always want something to play politics with. Else, how would they survive right? Honestly speaking, common people here are more interested in their daily lives rather than fighting over some land they might never step on to in the course of their whole lives.
Earth: *exists*
UK: it’s free real estate
Basically true
Basically Great Britain In the 18 hundreds...
It’s not real estate
They don’t use the term real estate
They use the term property
Rabiah abd rahman r/whooooosh
@Connor he is true though, lol.
Didn't the British Empire own the U.S. too, I mean that's how they got their independence.
Brooks Ikeh that was the 1700's, which was long ago... also this video is about the largest amount of land they controlled at one time
US was created under the early english empire, the purchase of the west by the us was a usa made, not a british thing
Cheeze Friez and they only owned a couple of states in the east
he's comparing with the Empire at it's 1921 size. US was not part of it anymore.
Brooks Ikeh only the 13 colonies
Technically, the sun has still never set on the Empire. For one hour (12:00-1:00 UTC I believe), the Pitcairn Islands are the only Crown colony which sees sunlight, but with them, the sun is over the Empire at all times.
Yes, I’ve seen a website with an Empire clock too! Just need to find it now. It’s interesting!
One day, there will be a total eclipse over that island, and then the sun would have truly set…
@@howiestillgamez5326 some day, yes, but no eclipse for the next century passes over the islands at the right time of day for that to happen.
@@richeybaumann1755 Yeah, It's gonna be a couple thousand years before that happens.
True
*Uses dollar in British video*
Me: *Laughs in pound sterling*
$❌£✅
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣😂 zimbabwe is rich botswana is rich AFRICAAAAAAA A A A A A AKI KILIMANJARO VS. EVEREST VS. TINY BURJ KHALIFA
😂😋😂🧗♂️😂😂🧗♂️😂🧗♂️🧗♂️😂🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️😋🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️😋🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️😋🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️🧗♂️😋🧗♂️😋🧗♂️😋🧗♂️😋🧗♂️
This girl is ugly -----> 🌬
Cairo, London, Baghdad, Alexandria
Actually, the sun still has not set. They still got a bunch of random islands.
Off yes
So does the US.
So many countries have random islands.
@@Kaledrone but nobody cares about the us
@@Kaledrone yeah but who gives a fuck about the islands of the us
When the aliens in endgame speak English, So the brits must’ve colonised another galaxy...
@Lynstaor nope
hahaha, mi6 go brrrrr
But they have an American accent lmao
@Mohammed Patel UK doesn’t own English?
Star Wars too
*aliens invade*
US: *turns to Britain* “it’s time to unleash you’re empire, get out of your slumber dad”
Britain:RELEASE THE LION
@@BRITISHFURY_1664 😂😂😂
Haha britain is even behind India in terms of military
@WilliamLi-nd4lz I think it was just a joke.
British Empire would have one hell of a rugby and cricket team! 😂
Hell yeee
So true tho
And no one to play against lol
And soccer team
@@adidonujoysautudina2925 Would still lose in football, as W.Europe and S.America generally better
A video about the British Empire:
“US Dollars”
My god this sparked a lot of disagreements. This was a joke lmfao.
haha
Well this is an american site
@@bigboijoni4328 but they're not talking about america.
@@literallygrass1328 that majority is American though if we talked about India should we use rupees?
@@bigboijoni4328 in the scenario, they were talking about the british empire. Britan uses the pound. Therefore, you'd still say the pound despite talking about india
"The empire would be incredibly diverse"
50% Indian
lol
Welcome to the indian empire boys
Lol
india is pretty diverse tho. india is a political entity, not an ethnic group
Are you forgetting the fact that The British Indian empire was made up of Pakistan india and burma.
Yet with that population The empire thrashed india, Population does not mean everything.
British indian empire or British Raj
What’s mad about the British empire is that the British empire was literally just created for trade not global conquest. Imagine if the brits just wanted sheer land mass! 😮
Trade ? Hahah u made my day :D
@Toni Ilievski I think it is, if it was about sheer strength and brutality with absolute monarchy no one in this comment would say against British Empire. For example Armenians speak against ottomans but they speak with fear till now.
@@toniilievski3934 It was about profits and resources, this was the main reason Europeans began exploration and colonization in the first place.
they did but culodnt mongaols n russia was alredy big also only 30 percent of india not whole place. w anker
@@toniilievski3934 The Brits often took control of areas by making trade deals and alliances that gradually gave them more and more power until they were effectively in charge. And even then, they often ruled through local proxies. They did use force at times, but they didn’t just militarily conquer all that land.
"would the US allow this to happen?"
As if the 64 other countries will happily give themselves to the UK on a silver platter
They all want to be ruled by the British again as they would be more stable for example look at Hong Kong there begging for the British to take them over again
@@user-jo1bs9hl5x
Hong Kong is a special case.. most of Africa was colonized just for the diamonds and gold mining or u can say *stealing*
@@vj9086 we didn't own most of Africa Spain and other European countries did to
@@user-jo1bs9hl5x
Yes but please stay in ur land we appreciate the effort but it's gone bad for us (Pelfor promise)
@@user-jo1bs9hl5x
And its plundery not ownship
Britian: reunite back in my empire?
U.S: no
Britain: I'll let you have Saudi Arabias oil
U.S: cowabunga it is
Deutchland thats actually innacurate but then again it is a joke lol
@ਅਰਜਨ ਸਿੰਘ I Think so.
@@locomotivesteam9334 lol hehe
@@millitarecho664 What?
k now lets revolt again
1:16 “64 different countries” ❌
“A stack of countries” ✅
Minecraft joke?
Hahahahaha
LoL
@@tifayotefani9851 r/wooshetywoosh
Minecraft meme
Awesome... The iconic figure must lead this great empire...salute...🌐🇬🇧❤️
“Would the United States let that to happen?”
Would any country let themselves to be colonized?
Miljaim Redzepi yes
Poland ww2
A lot of poorer countries actually want a return to their old system rather than independence. Lots of old ussr satellite states benefited as well.
America would most likely invade if the Empire reunited today
What the fuck? Who doesn't want to be british? The greatest nation in the world?
"Love knows no borders!"
"So does britain."
Britain is love
@@mastersamin9946 britain is life
@@mastersamin9946 2:12
ironically british are responsible for creation of many borders
@@anp1609 shitty borders that is.
*Looks at the moon at night time*
Hey look, it's the British Empire.
*half
You don’t even know the half of it lol
But what if we actually took the moon
@@boiledkettles6066 you called that alien invasion
Sanchit Kabra sorry, it’s just tea business
What's interesting is that (unlike the Romans and Mongols) the British didn't conquer any other countries on their own continent. This map of their widespread global territories is largely a testament to the superiority of the Royal Navy.
I think I may have started a war in the replies. The original comment was about the fact that they used USD when talking about the British Empire.
It is used like a neutral ground. Sort of like scientists use the SI system in physics
Literally it is *pounds*
Tom David right now there is a 77 pence difference between dollars and pounds. It may not seem like a lot, but a trillionaire could lose 25.4 billion pounds of the currency is different
Just curious, you guys ever read the
Declaration of Independence? Seems England never wanted to grant citizenship to the increasing amount of foreigners entering the new world.
Wouldn't exist without England? If I remember correctly, the first pioneers were religious exiles. Is this what you mean?
Ahh, the ignorant Americans back at it again, time to play 1 hour of patriotic British music...
*RULE BRITANNIA, GOD SAVE THE QUEEN*
England literally created The only thing that could defeat it.
Ikr lol
Jhonathan Cabrera Germany?
@@RomanOf-lo7zn US
This sounds like humans creating robots which later defeat them lol
Amel Camel lol think farther back before that timeline my friend. Hint it’s called the American Revolutionary war.
British people watching this: hmmmm good idea. Lets do that again.
05:20 "The only question is: Would the United States allow this to happen?"
As if all the other countries would be like "Yh sure, you can take over me"
I was thinking the same. Like other countries are a different breed and will allow themselves to be colonized lol.
Depends on democracy
We just built different.
India will destroy UK. JAI hind.
@@jannethart In your dreams.
I was born is India and now live in Canada. Therefore I can never escape the British Empire
Same, im Canadian
Do you live well within it?
@Star Emperor of Orion LMFAO SAME
my grandad was in the army.
@Star Emperor of Orion deadass tho if the british empire reunited i feel that would be a good thing.
I thought you meant Kannada 😂
land: exists
british empire: a fine addition to my collection
Yess
Britains rock collection includes the Falkland Islands
@lallideepmehak lol sucks to be the weaker country
@lallideepmehak no not UK. The colonized
Ah a man of culture
There were certainly no celebrations in Hong Kong when the lease expired…
Why?
The commenters point is that Hongkongers would rather be under the British Empire than the CCP@@c1ZEY
@c1ZEY The Hong Kongers largely rather choose to stay with the empire than with China.
@@c1ZEYlook at Hong Kong situation now, they are always in conflict with China
Love how Macau is perfectly fine after the Portugese left
British people in 1800's seeing a island : This is real free estate
Afdal Ridwan Uk still doing this in the 1950s (Rockall Island)
The UK's National anthem was the boss music of the world
@@Lonewolf14159 PFT no
It is in our blood
An*
if the British Empire Reunited Today
Queen : Headache
That would probably single handedly kill her
@ukasha sayaf shut up, those are not faults of citizens
@@sarthakiii bitch queen elizabeth
@ukasha sayaf Come on now stop fucking hating us. Asian hate is already increasing in the UK because of people like you.
@ukasha sayaf lol, blaming the past on the present, imagine being that vengeful
Therapist: British Moon does not exist, it can’t hurt you.
British Moon: 0:25
Lol
RLL guy: will US allow this to happen ?
Meanwhile,
India, Australia, Canada, etc: Are we a joke to you?
New Zealand: Am I a joke to you?
boooooo
@@jackorooney1469 Yes, New Zealand doesn't even appear on maps half the time lol
@@assadmuhammad5726 it's not our problem that you are blind, lol 😂😂
India will happen because india will have a constant civil war and a conflit.
"50% of the population would be Indians"
me - right now 50% of the comments section is Indian memes
BINOD
@@sanchitmehta6513 binod is an old trend stfu
Indians themselves are extremely diverse af
@@TheArijitBanerjee ikr
i am indian just like you
you're a bengali right?
@@meanmachine2003 exactly lol
"The sun never sets on the British empire" (: "Because even God couldn't trust the English in the dark"
-Shashi Tharoor.
😂🤣🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣
rule brittania🇬🇧🏴🇬🇧🏴
@Shirshendu Das your people dont even want to live in your shitey countries and migrate to the european ones
@Shirshendu Das your country had so many muslims it needed to be partitioned for pakistan to be formed, pipe down, 15 years ago you had a higher gdp than you had population, 60% of your country lives on 3$ a month, have fun in your shithole and stay there
@Shirshendu Das Let these Britishers cry. They are jealous of our India and all it's glory. Jai hind.
India has reached Mars while Britishers cannot reach Brexit deal even. Alas Britisher beggars do not even have a space agency.
UK then : I rule the World!
UK now : Don't leave me Scotland and N Ireland!
N Ireland wants to stay and Scotland voted to stay in 2014
@@paisleyconnolly6570 N Ireland wanna join Ireland
And Scotland changed their decision after Brixit!
Be updated bro!
@@darkhumour.9218 Factually untrue, Scotland havent had a vote so how do you know? N Ireland littreally started blowing up buses on the thought of a united ireland, please learn more about IRELAND before having some retarded take, N Ireland hates IRELAND
If they leave ...
INVASION!!!!!
“The sun never set on the British because not even god could trust the British in the dark”
U guys arent bad, just the ancestors maybe did i bit bad. take this comment as a joke
@Olivia Addison so how indian subcontinent's countries became more poor that many of the african countries after independence and also african countries who possess more than 30% of the entire world's economy became one of the most poor region in the world.
You would probably say that thay hadn't industrialized their nation during the period of industrialization but thay were ruled by British during that period. So it was the duty of british that they think about the indian and african nation asuch as they think of their own nation .
They just thrieve resources and wealth of indian and african nations and used it to industrialize their own country.
I don't know enough about the how british rule the other countries but yes i know enough about the rule of british in india. Some major famines like 'Great Bengal Famine', 'Chalisa famine', 'Doji bara famine','Upper Doab famine of 1860-61','Orissa famine of 1866','Rajputana famine of 1869','Bihar famine of 1873-74','Indian famine of 1896-97','Bengal famine of 1943', all cause during british period. Can you think about famine in the world's most fertile region i.e. plains of indus and ganga? The cause of these famines are taking around 125% tax on crops. The farmers are forced to pay this tax. When they were unable to pay this then the british seize their house ,property,and crops leaving the farmers and their families to die. Also they massacred many people who were unviolently protesting against the british rule . Example of some massacre are jalianwalah bagh massacre ,amritsar massacre etc.
And now England's government claim that british raj was the golden era for technology. You claim this because you have given railways tp us. But we don't need this railway if it costs 45 trillion $. Yes $45 trillion , this is the amount british thrieve from india.
I'm not saying that you are bad but yea your ancestors were like a devil for us. Even till date they haven't even said sorry for these all. Now, you decide everything.
@@uniqueagent284 well done you are telling some one off for there ancestors, something which they have no hand in, well done
@Olivia Addison well that's enough for me
You are right we can do nothing except learn acknowledge history and show sympathy
@@uniqueagent284 Come on man, we did what was considered cool, the normal and the right thing to do at that time.
Their national soccer team would still be shit.
lmao
But still not as bad as the USA's...*Football* bitch please, it's hand egg
xD
Though they still invented the worlds most popular sport !
sadly, your right :)
Pretty impressive considering you guys originated off an island with probably a lot less natural resources than these other places.
CreepinWhileYouSleepin
the fact that they were an island actually helped them. this helped because it kept britian safe and forced them to make a powerful navy this is why they were such a dominent force.
actually, britian had the nessesary resources for an industrial revolution .they were not behind in natural resources.
"actually, britian had the nessesary resources for an industrial revolution .they were not behind in natural resources."
No they didn't. They ha to trade for those or create colonies.
British people are simply strong people.
Tespri they had the metals nessesary for the industrial revolution.... i am not talking about produce like cotten .
Tespri they have fuck tons of Metal
Ahmed Younus
Metal isn't only thing needed for it.
RIP Queen Elizabeth II ❤👑🕊
Only way England can win the World Cup...
Gagan Vs 😂😂😂😂
Gagan Vs the other countries barely play football. It would be the same squad
@@jrbb1837
Lol England could have Salah.
Lol the other countries in the British empire wouldn't even qualify so shut the fuck up u spoon
India aren't even in the World Cup
The United States STILL surpasses a theoretical modern day British Empire?! Good lord...
doesnt even surprise me
The united states is a well oiled machine
on the other hand the empire is a bunch of small machines if they had time to make it a well oiled machine it would be a beast :p
Pretty much what Sordxyx said. The scenario states the Empire basically just magically gains all its old territory and the resources/population/military owned by whatever exists there currently.
In reality this sort of thing would take decades to even begin, the Empire wouldn't just slap on the annexed nations pre-existing militaries/government structures/etc (way too expensive and inefficient) and nations would be more gradually integrated rather than all at once haphazardly. It certainly wouldn't want to just take on the money sink that is developing half the third world all at once.
Once it was set up it could easily be the most powerful state on the planet, but it would take a while and lots of things could easily go wrong, not least the fact that even poor nations these days can effectively wound advanced ones with guerilla warfare thanks to modern warfare.
Sordxyx no it fucking isn't. The United States wastes money hand over fast.
Ry well from the second it changes yes, don't forget that most of the countries that were in the Empire went down hill very quickly afterwards as they replaced those in positions with experience with those who had no experience but were native to the respective lands. Over time with structure imposed and a western level of efficiency gained, the figures would begin to shift in favour of the Empire. With that comes changes to the defence budget as, provided it stayed at the same percentage of GDP rate, it too would rise. The British would be able to take control of issues inside the borders which would lighten the load for the US military and as a pair we'd essentially have the world on absolute lockdown
What if the British Empire Reunited Today?...
Next day, everyone wants independence.
Sergio ManOwaR haha nailed it
hahah yes it's a good one thanks.
However no pun intended for brits, just joking.
I think many of the African countries would welcome British rule, since their new leaders have raped their countries for decades.
India first
Sergio ManOwaR Yeah from Europe xD
imagine if this empire and the us united, it just wouldn't even be fair they could easily fight the entire world and win at that point
We had the US in our empire the didn't like the taxes though
@@BRITISHFURY_1664 Yeah after we forced them to pay us back for defending them from the French they got mad and sided with those goddamn baguette rooters lol.
@@austrakaiser4793 yes lol
Yes, Germany learned that the hard way in the 1940s lol.
The Russians beg to differ
Well this taught me the British are powerful but the USA is rich af
Exactly! xD
Owais Shaikh just because the USA has a large economy doesn't mean it's rich. Keep in mind that the u.s is still nearly 20 trillion dollars in debt and has only been out of debt once in its history. A high GDP is just a measure of the total value of the goods and services produced in that country, not how wealthy the country actually is.
Once I see someone mention the 20 trillion dollar debt without its specifications, it's a tell-tale sign that this person has no idea what he's talking about.
IaughandpeeaIittle in this situation, the amount of debt that the us has is relevant. So even if I didn't know what I was talking about, the facts are still there and they say that the United States isn't simply rich.
Je Cr
US debt is made by design. Thats how they oppress the lower class and get rid of the middle. More debt = more printing. More printing = more money.
British empire: * reunties *
China: oh, sh*t here we go again.
British will be rich again
Stealing everything’s from their empire countries
That's never gonna happen british just looted every country and if it will pay it back its economy will be out of existence
@@jaibhavani6454 India will self destruct before any other related country
@@jaibhavani6454 bullshit, they didn’t loot everything they were a trade empire not like the mongols.
@@stephandihead4516 I never said they were the greatest empire in India or ever heard that in any form of British media ever stop assuming the British care about that we only care about how fools wish to blame their current situation on rulers long since gone and that they state that the British were the most evil thing to hit the earth and the axis would’ve been kind saviours to Indians. It’s objectively not true.
Just one more book
Just one more game
JUST ONE MORE COUNTRY
Country : *sweating intesenfies*
🐷
*Colony
@@ukisbeggar8462 well havent I seen you before...?
Island*
I myself am working on a novel premised on the survival of the empire and its evolution into a federal super state, so I find these videos interesting and good for research. Under such a scenario (of survival not reunification), in calculating total and average imperial GDF, the difficulty is taking into account the cumulative multiplier of political unification. By that I mean the free flow of goods and people across imperial borders, as well as skills and expertise, over a period of decades, in a context of political stability. I assume this would have led to a much higher total and average GDP for the empire than that given here by (presumably) adding together the current GDPs of all 64 countries that would be reunited. The question would be postulating a magnitude for the multiplier.
Uk: We're taking back the east coast
US: Understandable, have a Great Day!
Land: *exists*
UK: You have 2 choices
*YES or YES*
We don't want it ! From your friends the royalists !!!!!
we will give you oil for it tho
I read great day as Green Day
@united gaming felt like I had a stroke reading that if your gonna try violate my country in our language at least use it properly
Great Britain:
The Empire strikes back
lol
Yes!
Soviet russia:нет to English
On neptune
British Empire 2: Electric Boogaloo
"The only question is would america let this happen" that's not even a question
We would
-What if- _How will_ the British Empire -reunited- _Reunite_ today?
We get 40m troops available to fight, get ready, fuck over Africa, boom. Corruption again
@Nick Gur I was joking mate
Nick Gur but wait a second Britain made India and Pakistan hate each other
@@tower7470 True
Yes,if all us Brits unite,we could gain back our empire and probably get some other small countries thrown in with it
British: let's reunite?
India: we don't do that here.
@vibhu sharma karma strikes back. They used to run our country and now Indians are running UK. The richest man in all UK is an Indian me thinks
lol eat grass then
@@stingy8029 if English ruled us again...we couldn't even have grass to eat
@@anticringepill1313 good
@@anticringepill1313 true man. Even they looted the word 'loot' from Hindi.
“Will the United States let this happen?”
Yes, just give them oil.
Brits can take anything but Canada, Canada will be American
@@rolloxra670 dude is independent Canada can’t be takej over if so it would already have been
Not unless you gave um all of Saudi Arabia a little oil ain't gonna bypass democracy
Sure! Give me a lifetime supply of oil, i can drink oil everyday, I could consume bigger numbers than the 0's on my math test's and i could consume more oil than the entire population of new york
people from new england stand up
The queen watching this be like, “Ah, the good old days.”
😂😂😂😂
England would be a city
Tristancam. ...
Lol
Tristancam. Yes it would be very small relative to the rest of the empire, so you might just call it a city
it's every day bro
The parliament would be called Team 10
Britain: colonized half the world
Half the world: *becomes independent*
Britain: am I a joke to you?
Ukraine and Belarus dissolve the USSR: Happens
Russia: Am I am joke to you?
My penis is embarrassingly small, and They became independent out of British government’s choice, what are you talking about *face palm*
Canada: Well, i was a joke for you.
Not half of the World but Just 23%
0:17 He said it
Poor countries.
UK: It's free real estate
Stonix Gaming what do you think india was poor it was richest
@@diya0716 they would no the same
@ Indian subcontinent was richest asshole read history
@@ShubhamGaikwad-wf1dg But did they have any innovations though? Britain had the industrial revolution and were a strong country. I am an Asian too but Asia was a shithole back then. Why couldn't India kick out the Brits if they were rich?
@ don't comment unless you know the history India was one of the Richest countries in the world at that time. Indias gdp was 23%. at that time India was divided major part of India are ruled by marathas. they are dominant power on subcontinent. Brits have better weapons in compared to marathas.brits fought 3 Maratha Anglo wars to defeat Marathas. Having not modern weapons means not poor shit hole. Brits looted 43 trillion dollars at that time in India and reduced GDP to 3%
Historically, the British people who just wanted to stay at home and have trade and friendly relations with the world were called "Little Englanders".
Today that term is used as a slur to describe people who want the UK be a separate sovereign nation from the EU, and who wish to curb mass immigration and not get involved with wars that are usually only for the benefit of the US special interest groups.
I love how this video is 4 years old dreaming about reuniting the British empire but today England is halfway to losing North Ireland and Scotland.
Yeah unfortunately but this is due to failure politicians of UK
not to mention how far in debt we are lol. id almost find if funny if i didnt live here
And that's bad for the UK but it's good for me northern ireland if it leaves its joining ireland and northern Ireland should leave the UK dosent want it and Ireland wants it but its the fucking people who still want to be protestant and be with the uk like if they want to be in the European Union then they can vote for unification to join ireland I live in ireland and this should happen
Wales be like:
@@jackfay1309That's pretty bold steps by those people.
Dude, just cuz you're from 'Murica doesn't mean you show bias to them. I mean WTH? The US was a part of the british empire, you can't be like, "Will America Allow them?"Did anyone allow UK to take over Africa? It's a hypothetical eg, you have to get the facts right.
BTW I'm not British, I'm actually Indian
the US was in the first British Empire.. it was independent before most of the second British Empire was conquered
Because America was declaring independence from the British empire before it was cool. We deserve props.
I agree that you get a shout out, but shouldn't the facts include the US as a part of the British Empire? Also by the logic that it was a part of the "second "british empire then Canada, SA Aus should also be not included
how so? Canada, SA, and Aus were still under full or partial British control until well into the 20th century.
Canada only got full control of it's self in 1982
Australia wasn't fully independent until 1986
South Africa became independent of Britain in 1931
(you're probably thinking of the formation of the local governments in these countries.. for instance Canada got home rule in 1867.. but Britain still had to approve all their laws, could call upon them at any time, and could pass laws for them. IE they were still within the British Empire)
Sidhant Sinha they ask that question cause the US is a country that could fight them for that territory and probably win. And of course the US would say no not only cause of the economic strategy, but also cause of the Constitution that legally binds all the states together. If the states that made up the 13 colonies left the US, they would essentially be calling treason.
What if the French colonial empire united today?
What if the EU united today?
Ognjen Garić French Empire is still Existing
YouCan'tAlwaysGet WhatYouWant nope they loose 98% of their territory outside seas they have only islands now
YouCan'tAlwaysGet WhatYouWant no! France is a socialist Republic
What if the french empire reunited?They would have more men to retreat!:D
Abrams124 well they had several empires napoleon and won ww1 so
are you stupid ?
Am getting addicted to these! They are so amazing!
_British empire:_ *Unites Again*
_The colonies:_ *Aww man! Time to get looted again*
That'll be one of the best news for the former colonies. An "unfinished business"
The friends of britian which is the whole British empire now take down Germany and France and Russia
My country being colonized, Singapore: Aw Fvck
Your pfp. 😭😭 stoppppppppp
@@genghiskhan.2265 its just among us. What the fvcking hell?
What if the Soviet Union reunited today
Yousuf Qazi yes please!!!!!
+Franziska von Karma why?
***** yea why?
Communism. That's why.
It existed so recently that it wouldn't be eye opening or astounding, therefore not worth making a video about.
This ancient history documentary really dives into the details, offering insights that I hadn’t come across before. It’s a real eye-opener!
As an African, I must protest. What do the British ever do for us?
Em...well apart from the roads, the railways, the telegraph, telephone, irrigation systems, canals, streets, sewer systems, power systems, electricity, courthouses, universities, new crops, new methods of farming, new medicines, literacy, law and order, concept of democracy, concept of individual freedom which has led to the increase in life expectancy and decrease in infant mortality rates. .really what have the British done for us?
Abdul Turay we have a similar saying in Britain...what did the Roman Empire do for us...hot water, sanitation, central heating, fresh water, architecture etc etc
I’m offended cuz I’m British REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 👏 👏 MEME REVIEW
Christoff8210 that just wasn’t funny
Colonialism
Britain just builds for Africa boreholes and wells while China builds for Africa real infrastructure
British : can't take france
also british : let's take the world
Why would we want France? Haha, England just beat them up regularly so they knew who was boss
Dylan Bowater the long standing rivalry between them that had been going on for centuries..?
@@anonymouscausewhynot A rivalry doesn't equal a desire to conquer their lands
@@dylanbowater5986 Well actually France did kick britains rear in the american revolution so technicly britain didnt kick France's rear in every way
LocomotiveSteam actually France didn’t fight in the American revolution,they supplied the Americans then fell to a revolution them self’s
Lol I'm from new Zealand but this video makes me feel so proud
COMMENT RATIO
60% Indian Nationalists
20% American Nationalists
10% British Nationalists
10%Relevant To Video
mr ms paint and 1% this comments
Diversity means being mostly Asian... as an Asian, I am confused.
Diverse just means "not white".
Melon Lord and the world slowly opens its eyes
Dildo Shwaggins
M8, I've already been hating keffiers for years, don't start your bullshit.
The British Empire was mainly Asian.
why would diverse be "not white"?
This just put in perspective what an economical monster the USA is...christ...
Jim Hope dude fuck you the USA is our closest allie
America is the best preforming developed economy and China is slowing down.
Jordan the fact that the US can compete with countries with 4 times the population but still is the most influential country in the world and the strongest army and the biggest economy while basically being a unchallenged superpower shows you how big the US is.
It's 3rd world countries bringing The Kingdom down
Firstname Lastname even Eu combined can only match the US economically but still behind 1 trillion and military is a no contest and us citizen will have a higher per capita that Europe combined... this why the US is the greatest country right now despite its major flaws
The British Empire couldn’t have gotten any bigger without starting another empire as you can only stack up to 64 colonies.
underrated
Is this some game reference?
@@jannethart in minecraft blocks only stack to 64.
put them into shulker boxes and carry them around in your ender chest. Us brits would have all the countries and plently more space for our tea
Haha funny
Hong Kong and Malta would love this to happen
Fun fact: The philippines was a british colony for 20 months.
Edit: Yeah im gonna ignore this comment.
When?
Started at 1762
Ended at 1764
So weird that british reject philiphines commonwealth invitation🤔
@@Liam-iv7wk 1762 - 1764 I remember....
I wonder why they do not include the United States as part of the British Empire as since we were once a Colony of the British Empire. Not just the Colonies.
As mentioned in the video, the majority of the United States was not even a colony of British Empire. Spanish Empire would be the biggest, followed by French as the second. Also, there are other countries too that has stepped their feet on the US such as the Netherlands. British people is not even the biggest ethnicity in the US. It comes third after German and Irish.
***** I don't think most Americans would agree with that. The US is just so ethnically diverse to even agree to be considered one of the British Empire colony. Only about 10% of them has British ancestors and the country is built by immigrants from all over the world. Unlike other British colonies, American independence is not given to them. They fought against the UK because their policies are just stupid and they won eventually with the help of French people. Why the fuck would you ever consider to be a part of their empire ever again? They can be allies, but "reunited"? That's just ridiculous and against what all of their founding fathers fight for.
***** Are you stupid or something? You explicitly said your agreement with the guy in the main comment, "I wonder why they do not include the United States as part of the British Empire as since we were once a Colony of the British Empire." by saying "True".
Yeah, American share many common cultures with British people, just as they share common cultures with French, German, Irish, Dutch, and other people from other European countries. Also, what is your point exactly if you don't say that the US should be a part of British Empire? Like, what the fuck do you want to point out? Even if the US will be one of the British Empire, American's massive ego and narcissism won't let them to be under the rule of the British Empire. If anything, the US would be the one who rule and control everyone else in the empire, since the US whole GDP is bigger than the entire British Empire's GDP. Furthermore, why would the US want to invade the British Empire in the first place? It's not like they have much oil that they need to be invaded with all of the mighty freedom and democracy.
Taking a hypothetical discussion a bit to serious and personal. Our Nation Originated from the Original 13. So I figure we hold the same connections as the 13. Not who came here after the fact. People give our so called founding father way to much credit like they were flawless saints or something.
Christopher Knox Just replying to the original comment, it would not be logical to include the entire US because the original 13 where the only colonies Britain ever controlled, after the revolutionary war Britain never controlled The US again, so it wouldn't make sense to say that any part of the US besides the 13 states that where the original 13 colonies should be included in the British empire
Shashi Tharoor in his book "An Era of Darkness: The British Empire in India" said: "I know why the sun never sets on the British Empire: God wouldn't trust an Englishman in the dark."
Ya I read that
This line was too good
Copied!
But not all indians consider British as dark
He must've been thinking for a long time lol and finally got a legendary linr
@@rome316ae3 yea the landlords absolutely loved them. They got a lot of money from them. The moderates thought British was ok but not ruling properly.
Talks about British Empire
AND STILL uses Dollars
I would rebel. I'm Irish and there's no way I would let this happen
But they will never take our freedom!
Mister Sister Fister Den sort sin mo liathroidi
Sean O Dwyer I like how you people pretend you aren't British , your like the Scottish but more proactive
Ireland is a shithole anyway so you can keep your land
Irish men are superior to English men. You pussues reliy on technology alone, Irish warriors are deadly. Like Conor McGregor.
"would the U.S. allow this to happen"
U.S.: sure UK just take away $6 trillion worth of my GDP
@bob joe *Rule Britannia intensifies*
@@deusvultpictures6550 India can beat the UK with laughable ease. Jai hind.
@@jannethart no
@@jannethart shut up about it. That's all you say. You're just jealous that they would end up winning in the end.
@@jannethart stfu nationalist
Imagine if the whole world u United into on country. We will have such a powerful army that no one can beat us.
I guess your right
Justin Norman you're *
Yeah with our massive army we would be able to beat everybody else in the world... idiot
Matthew Randall I'm American btw. That's why I'm so stupid...
amoxford 2 At least you admit it ;)
"Would the US Allow this to happen?"
George Washington Rises From His Grave
"Would us allow this to happen"
Uk : "just give them the damn oil"
@Mohammed Patel Because at the end of the video, RLL included the original 13 colonies, which were part of the British Empire before independence. So would the US allow the New British Empire to take the 13 states?
@Mohammed Patel I could also argue that the land was never British land, and rather Native American's land, and the British just stole it. So what's your point?
@Mohammed Patel The "Americans" you speak of were originally British citizens who created America. Americans did not steal the colonies. British people got mad at their own government, rebelled and created the United States, and started calling themselves American.
@Mohammed Patel Yeah so the British got mad, started a war, and lost to Americans. After losing the war, the British Crown formally recognized American independence and ceded most of its territory east of the Mississippi River to the United States in Treaty of Paris. The British literally gave the land to the US after the US won the war.
@Mohammed Patel Yeah so they left the British Empire by beating them in a war.
UK: reuniting the empire
The world: "Why do i hear rule britannia?"
( boss music )
Gone are the days. Now India more powerfull. Our GDP greater than Britain. Indian army can beat the British army with ease. Your forefathers invaded a different India then today. Jay hind.
jannethart you’re an idiot mate the state of Indian army
@@georgeamos1271 Jealous much.
@@jannethart Nukes Much?
Next thing you know it he’s gonna do a video of what would happen if all empires reunited today
British Empire: Do you want to do it the easy way or the hard way?
Zimbabwe: no, let's do it the Zimbab-way!
Get out.
@@andymadden8183 No u.
yo bro im eating cake rn bye
*Rhodesia forever*
@Omar B. Omar The native africans had a better life in Rhodesia, Zimbabwe is a Socialist bullshit nation
Portugal: I have Brasil
Netherlands: I have Indonesia
British empire: I have all the world
True 😂
Are you from Hong Kong by any chance?
@@ryanbradley8917 i am
@@BLACK_ actually, Now you are from Hongkong, China.😭
Us oil u need "freedom"
@@surajprakash3181 it will be like that in July 1st 2047
Land: *Exists*
Britain: Do you want to join us?
*Yes Or Yes*
He says bigger than Africa but they owned the majority of Africa
they are adding up all the territory the empire had and taking it all into one piece
Adogface Stolen land.
@@tamikajackson3419 it's free real estate
If you were intertwining with aliens you too would appear smart and ingenious about the ones stripped ugly from glory and alienated them in space influencing technology 1g thru 7g.
Kes Mangkuk it’s a joke XD
I was born in Fiji and tbh after we gained independence we went downhill in-terms of development. Our neighbors Australia and Newzeland reaped the benefits of still being a British colony. All the good things in Fiji was done by Britain.
When I was in Jamaica a local man told me allot of people there would rather return to being a British colony
No ,its totally fake.On the name of development they looted each and every product .The most precious and famous diamond KOH I NOOR of our Subcontinent was also taken from us and shifted to Britain
@@whoami30204 Europe has lost all the moral and religious values on the name of so called SECULARISM
And this is why the age of empires will return and the third british empire will reign over the whole world, bringing peace and prosperity to all and then we can actually properly go to space.
I truly believe the UK (Great Britian) island mass is shaped as it is, not by accident. It's just like a yale key don't you think? And keys are made to "unlock" things. So, maybe, just maybe the third british empire (as every "third" of something is their largest/biggest when speaking about empires) would span all across the globe and bring prosperity for all.
I am not sure how this bloke got his numbers on everything, when its hypothetical idea. But I am guessing he is just trying to be patriotic to his own country, USA. When USA, in many regards still has segregation and other cultural inequalities which undermines its "figures" on average wage and GDP.
ITT we have had Fiji, Jamacia, Malaysia. And when you go to ex colony countries and go on history guides or just speak to natives, they always speak of how the british were the best rulers. (Malta, Trinidad, Hong Kong etc)
And I tell you the reason, it is because we are merchants (Englishmen) All we want to do is make money and prosper. This is why I say, slavery wasn't a "racist" attribute of the empire. It was just a "thing of the times" which you did to make money. Yes, a minority were racist to the blacks (as people are today) but an average trader working in the docks in london or kingston (Jamacia) or Bridgetown (Barbados) etc were just doing a job. Also, you have to take into account the government persistently tried to outlaw slavery during the 17th and 18th century and it was just due to the slow process of policymaking, lawmaking and economic recalibration that took time to enstill it in society. Just like working laws, just like human rights, things take time. Often people nowadays (especially the young) forget how long processes take, even the current fiasco with Brexit shows you even the policymakers themselves were clueless. Democracy takes time to make progress but when it does, it makes much more progress than a dictatorship (or communist) ever does for longer too.
Again, this is also why jumping the gun and voting for a "new" creative neo-progressive party with "new" (even though they have been tried and tested 100 times before and failed) policies telling you if "only we put more money into xyz" fund and tax the rich more we can make it better for all does and will not EVER work. Socialism, freedom and scio-economic valuations take time to build. Please remember that when you vote for something that is too good to be true.
Frank.
@Freedom Memes doesn't work
Not bad for a small island of fishermen and miners.
Neil Harrison Shopkeepers iirc
It's really impressive. Only hyper power and best navy of its time.
And Walpole
neil. not bad to murder and butcher billions of people you pompous german queens brexit brit
Barbara You do realise that pretty much every country has killed at least thousands, right?. The only reason Britain has killed so many is mainly due to how long it has been around and no Geneva Convention until 1949.
I was going to say: you have to include the American colonies, too. It doesn't matter if the rest of the States would resist or not. This is a hypothetical scenario about the Empire being at its most powerful, and that would include the American colonies, making it the undisputed global superpower. (P.S. Cool video. Thanks.)
The reason the 13 colonies weren’t included is because this is showcasing the British Empire at the height of its power (around 1922), which was centuries after the 13 colonies had declared independence. In other words when the British Empire had control over the 13 colonies they did not have the majority of the land they owned in Africa and Southeast Asia.
You forget that the US was part of the British Empire, until we decided to give you your freedom
ii Prosperous so the entire mainland United States was part of the British Empire?
Only the thing east coast was ruled by England :)
Actually you were forced to accept a declaration of independence because you invaded and were defeated in 2 battles, the battle of Lexington and another one, plus the french were supporting the US.
MLG anime tits the british took that massive L
Funny thing is that the 13 colonies never actually faced the full force of the Empire. In '82 Britain sent an armada across the Atlantic containing the bulk of British military forces with the sole aim or retaking the colonies. However during the journey and Election was held in Britain and the balance of power shifted, the new government favoured peace over more bloodshed and thus recalled the Armada.
In short, one election changed History.
6 trillion dollars just on the us east coast damn
All that money and no proper healthcare...disgrace.
Wall Street dude
America the Great
A shit tonne of gold lays inside the bank of New York, the Queen would probably try and stuff it into a animal and eat it, but, damn...
my drem is one large invasion of 10 contrys in east cost of US
What if EVERY huge empires reunited? How many overlaps would there be?
A lot !
Just think how many empires there have been in history ..
Mongol
French
American
Qing
Mughal
British
Dutch
Japanese
Korean
Russian
Soviet
Roman
German multiple times
Swedish ( Christ even Sweden 🇸🇪
Aztecs
Incas
Kongo empire
Persian empire Again ! Multiple times
Frankish empire
Byzantine empire
@@Valencetheshireman927 America does not have an empire...
Wow You didn't put Ottoman empire or ummayed caliphate shame on you
@@arabiancuchulainn9729 oi, leave him alone, you can't process every empire now, there certainly are a lot of them, and it's most likely hard to go off of memory
Australia will forever remain loyal to her majesty
So you are puppet.
No We are the commonwealth
Cucked mentality
@@adiabdul2502 it’s not at all being a “puppet” it’s just having a bit of respect for the country that made you exist.
Care to rejoin the empire, good sir?
*PLEASE DO THE PORTUGUESE EMPIRE NEXT!*
Lusitani Mendes Spain is better
Gabriel Palma mmmm no thanks
lol patriotic fuck
Portugal, Brazil, Mozambique, Angola, Macau, East Timor. Boom. That's the portuguese empire.
Not exactly the greatest?
Minus Mapping and Cabo Verde, Guiné-Bissau, São Tomé e Princepe, Goa, Damão. Diu...
this video in nutshell
50:english
50:indian
100:cricket
Before proud americans start getting cocky about US being so huge: US has the largest GDP because US has the largest population in the developed world. Largest population of any developed country means largest economy meaning largest GDP and obviously a bigger military (and NASA, movie industry) budget.
China and India are not part of the developed world, they are only partly developed. "Developed world" means US, Germany, UK, Japan etc
Nathan Shea: How am i hating? i am stating a fact? i am not even British either way
Kyle Mylo hehehe DOESN'T CHANGE THE FACT THAT WE'RE THE BEST
London secretly runs USA it is all a conspiracy!
The United States hasnt been United in over 12 years lol. Especially now, you shouldnt be boasting about a "United" America when America is the most likely country to come crumbling down
The empire is still United just smaller
God I'm proud to be British
dafuq. seriously?
Don't be a colonist
+Raj S
What, can't he be proud of his country now?
Like yourself, every member of the colonised parts of the world, were subjects of the Crown, and not subjects of "Joe public", who were barely literate and couldn't point to any of the countries listed on a map.
Furthermore, the Queen is a figure head, and you're still her subject, whilst everyone from the Republics around the world, are free people.
So, remain proud of being practically property, to a German monarchy. Daft pleb.
where's my commenwealth citizenship brits???my welfare my free housing
"It was the empire on which the sun never set, because somewhere in the empire the sun was always shining. But indeed it had to set at some point."
Britain: *Laughs in overseas territories*
*LAUGHS IN FALKLANDS*
@@miscellaneous_man756
WE ARE BACK IN CONTROL,
FORCE THEM TO SURRENDER,
TAKE WHAT IS OURS,
RESTORE LAW AND ORDER!
@Rajeev Vij Who, me?
*LAUGHS IN GIBRALTAR*
LAUGHS IN SOUTH GEORGIA AND SOUTH SANDWICH ISLANDS