The sad thing about the part where Rosita makes the machine is that what’s essentially happening is that her kids can basically replace her with a machine and no one would notice
to be fair she has 27 children so I could kinda see how they could not really be bonded to her much since she wouldn’t be able to give any of them much individual attention
They never even noticed she was gone if I remember correctly they said “bye mom” when leaving and the husband asked where his keys were and she played a recording of where they were and he said thanks
I thought Sing was an OK movie at best. Yes, It's not Zootopia, but when comparing it to other Illumination Movies, it could have been a whole lot worse.
Yeah. The main problem is that it has aged horribly due to using music that is only trendy at the time. The story itself is just generic, like Dazz said.
@@luftwaffebomber1340 No it was Lance cheating on her. Why would Ash, a punk rock girl, cry over doing pop? She didn't like it, but she did it anyway for the money. But Lance cheating on her, in their own apartment, caused her to have an emotional breakdown. Especially since she was singing "Call Me Maybe", a song that rubbed salt in the wound due to it's naive viewpoint of relationships.
Fun fact: Elton John liked Egerton's performance of Still Standing in Sing enough to approach the actor to play him in a movie. Sing is the reason Taron Egerton played Elton John in a bio pic.
I agree, I don't dislike the film. It was alright for its time and I really was interested in Johnny's story and some of the jokes/concepts of the characters, I think Sing has a lot of potential to be great but for me, it was okay but could've turned out a lot worse.
Johnny's or Ash's story would've been interesting. The other characters... no. Just no. Everyone else is dull and bland. I don't hate it, I'm just disappointed on how much potential the film had and how it wasted it.
"What's the point of them being animals if they're not going to play with it?" Well, as it turns out, bipedal animals are easier to animate then humans. So, the answer is essentially laziness.
It's not just ease of animation it's also a tactic used to make ethnically ambiguous characters, it's done alot in any media for children. We're actually pushed to use animals because kids like animals and "no one is excluded". Which is ironic because now everything is animals instead of kids seeing a variety of people in their media.
Yeah, I really hated how they were just animals in a human world. In human houses, human buildings, everything was bland. Remember in Zootopia they made the world unique to fit animals lifestyles instead of just putting them in a human like environment?
Ash wasn’t crying because she hated her style, she had caught her boyfriend cheating on her with a literal Becky. Also the car crash at 13:46 looks to be between a Bull and a baboon.
Agreed i really enjoyed it when I first saw it and there our flaws both there good moments and if illuminations learn from the flaws since this is the first moves in the franchise so it will be far from perfect but if they make those flaws not becoming a thing in the sequel its could be amazing and be a big hit im hoping thats what will happen and im hoping they won't screw it up
13:47 Johnny actually caused the crash that ended up stopping him from getting back to the heist. When he races to get to the theatre he makes a quick turn, causing the buffalo to crash into the monkey's car. I like that little detail, it's one of those 'blink and you'll miss it' moments.
I love how he was complain at 14:24 about how the characters are randomly placed, and completely missed the tortoise and the hare, one of the most well known stories.
I heard somewhere that the real reason they decided to have animals, when people in the movie would have not changed the plot one bit, was because Illumination takes shortcuts and cuts corners, and animals are apparently easier to animate than humans.
That's the dumbest part of the movie, is the world is boring. They just put animals in human houses, human jobs, and human life. They should have spiced it up to make it look more like a world really run by animals, like Zootopia did for its world.
@@mrknowhere6457 I agree. The least the could have done is that they could have made more animal related jokes, there were really only a few. There was literally no reason for them to be animals. They so underutilized the animal aspect of the movie
If there's anything I'll give Sing credit for, is that they did a surprisingly good job balancing all the separate plots. They didn't try to combine all of them and I was fine with that, although I feel like a tv show could've and still could (if Illumination plans to do tv shows) explore them more in depth.
Twp things I'd like to point out, regarding Johnny most of all. When he's rushing to his rehearsal, he actually causes the accident that he later gets stuck in. It's a quick scene but if you watch that sequence again, you can see that as he's racing to get to the theater he causes two cars to collide. These same cars are the ones that end up holding him up and getting the crew busted. Second, regarding the father doing a complete 180 upon seeing Johnny perform... I can assume you weren't a father at the time of recording this video. You might have understood the scene a bit better if you were, namely that was a scene of him realizing that his son had found something that made him happy, that he was good at. He sees the joy on Johnny's face, and he hears how well he sings. It's easy to see why he'd do a 180. What father wouldn't want their child doing something they're good at that they enjoy?
@@janejuly6661 disney paid tim for it to be tonally similar to the original, as in they didnt want to be dark. but if they stop clinging on to "family friendly fun" andmake a dark pinnochio, that would work
illumination: we need a name for this brilliant idea a random guy: Song! illumination: that's good but not great another and guy: Sing! illumination: Brilliant! theatre guy: scoffs illumination: you have something to say? theatre guy: Why not we make it about the trials and errors of the stage where the main characters learn from their mistakes and become better performers and even better people. illumination: that's awful. you're fired. security! a random guy: fat pig singing illumination: Brilliant!
I actually liked "Sing" when it came out in theaters a few years ago. I just hope the sequel doesn't take away much from what made the first one decent.
@@mochi4698 I agree. And I was actually looking forward to Despicable Me 3 back then, and I left out of the theater with a "WTF?" look on my face. Nice to meet you and I like your name.
Got to give Sing credit for tackling serious subjects like prison, cheating partners and marital stress. When done wrong these areas can come off as cheesy or unrealistically resolved. Even for a kids movie, I think Sing covered these pretty decently.
I definitely agree. They're also gonna dumb it down again when it comes to any of the more "complex"(?) characters like Ash or the Monkey guy. They both seem to have doubts and a slight bit of trauma.
FWIW, there definitely WERE animal “relationships” in this. Lions and buffalos are hardcore enemies and buffalos regularly “wreck” lions lol. For the jail scene, crocodiles eat antelopes (not a deer), the buffalo bull was talking to a buffalo cow, and then of course the tortoise and the hare.
I didn't notice until watching this that Ash's sunglasses in her performance are the same ones that the other female porcupine left behind when she kicked her out. i kinda love that
I actually really like Sing. I thought, while the obvious Illumination problems are there, the actual movie was pretty cool, had a nice message, and I really liked most of the characters.
ikr??? It's a down-to-Earth, realistic setting with nice people and institutional/social problems, I think the movie fucking slaps. I watched it at the cinema when it came out, cried 6 times during it. Then rewatched it a few years later, cried just as many times. Who the fuck CARES if the characters are non-human animals?? They did a fantastic job with their designs and I think that each character's story is very charming.
Kinda makes you wonder if there's animal versions of all the artists whose songs they use. Like an animal Nikki Minaj or Elton John. And since they have "hallelujah" is there animal religion? What animal is Jesus?
Calling the elephant “Jumbo” is still witty. Jumbo was the name of a famously large African elephant, likely where dumbos name originated. I believe the elephant died in a rail accident as he was part of a travelling circus at the time
My take on Illumination is this: Despicable Me 1 and 2, as well as this movie (if heavily flawed) were fine in my book, the rest however were either mediocre (Pets 2, Lorax) or pretty bad (Minions, pretty much every other movie from them)
"it doesn't really make much sense the mum can randomly D.I.Y" Clearly never seen a mum in a push come to shove, get shit done mode. Would be surprised how macgyver a mum can be when you have no other options. A good shout out to the parents out there doing what they gotta do. Respect
@@xloisx4603 Yes, my mom has a garden and farm animals. We grow kale, cabbage, strawberries, blue berries, cherries, an apple tree in the making, and chili peppers. As for animals, chickens, goats, cows, and we have a dog to cattle the chickens (:
Imagine having a toddler with Rett Syndrome and difficulties eating and doing basic things. You become a straight up chameleon depending on the perceived need to get shit done.
Compared to a lot of their other crap, this is actually not a bad movie by Illumination's standards. I know they missed a lot of hits with jokes and opportunities to use the animals' distinct traits. But just because you have an elephant doesn't mean it has to be loud. I actually think a shy elephant is a good subversion of expectation. It would be just like Zootopia if it made use of all the stereotypical animal traits that we seem to expect from anthro animals. And not only would it get branded as unoriginal for copying Zootopia (which it already has been, but in this case it would just get worse), but it would also defeat the purpose of both movies combined. Everyone is unique in their own ways and shouldn't have to uphold society stereotypes and standards that were forced onto them unreasonably.
I thought Sing was alright. Not the best movie ever but not the worst either. The song Nana was singing was Golden Slumbers/Carry That Weight by The Beatles
What I wished for the singers: Johnny: Stays the same Rosita: Wanting to start a career as a singer, but stuggles to decide if her dreams or her family is more important and more joyful to pursue Mike: Be more daunting and takes it a bit more serious Mena: Have her wanting to do her passion, but her family is more so not sure about it because of some sort of tragedy she had as a kid Ash: Stay the same, but has more depth and more development Gunter: Wanting to have everyone else to have some happiness that he didn't get to have as a kid This is not amazing, but is honestly better than Illumination's take on these.
I do just want to point out that at 14:20 Dazz is saying all of the animal pairs are random and lazy, but at the very least there IS a Tortoise and a Hare which he missed.
14:06 actually all the animals correlating Tortoise and the hare A cow and a bull A croc and a gazelle A dog and a cat And johnny and his dad who are apes
the point of the crash in Johnny's scene was that his hurrying to the theatre is what caused the collision in the first place, the animals in question weren't a gag it was just a random Bull and Baboon.
okay with the starting thing, the gorillas could have driven past the mouse, who walks past the club, then something happens leading to the pig, then the pig father drives past the elephant
The one thing I really liked about Sing was that the world isn't at all adjusted for the different sized animals. For the most part at least. The elephants squeeze through doors, the giraffe has to duck his head to get through a doorway in the beginning, Moon and the mouse have to climb a lot to get to eye level. It's really subtle and I've always liked watching how they moved through a world set with a general size in mind, rather than how zootopia had a lotta places completely customized to the animals of specific sizes.
I don't know if anyone said anthing about this yet but at 14:06 there is a link between at least one pair of animals. The first booth has a rabbit and a tortoise. I'm pretty sure this is a refrence to the tortoise and the hare. I know that it was easy to miss but I wanted to point it out because when I first watched the movie I thought that it was a fun little refrence to the classic childrens story, and to everyone reading this I hope you all have a nice day :)
Honestly, the first Despicable Me and Sing are the only good illumination movies. While Despicable Me is good for how good the formula worked before they totally murdered it with the sequels, I think Sing is good because you can tell there is a form of heart in the movie. The songs with the sets fit beautifully, the opening scene is honestly one of my favorites. Some of the cuts they do with Buster I love, and that half camera shot with Buster and his friend on the phone is great as well. The story with Johnny, is my favorite part of it, which Buster's being a close second. You can tell the movie had a form of heart, but it doesn't exactly show it due to the jokes, some bad scenes, and things that just are weird or don't make sense. Overall, it's a good movie, but not a good movie. Like if it was rated, good movie wise, for me it'd be around a 7 out of 10 good movie, purely because it's a nice movie to watch from time to time.
I actually thought Angry Birds is a bad adaptation of the game that I used to play as a kid. When I actually watched it, I find it enjoyable but what I learned is that anger does not solve everything. That's relatable for me considering the fact that I have stress and anger issues and I think that kind of lesson really helped me a lot.
"A hedgehog talking to a fox.'' I see what you did there. Sonic the *HEDGEHOG* and Tails the *FOX*. Very funny. No seriously. I really like Sonic 2. Nice reference.
In this movie, the fact that they are animals has nothing to do with the story You could have all the characters be humans and nothing would be different
I don't get why people really insist of there being a reason for characters being animals. I can only see people complaining about it being really cliche if all the movie did was to play off their animal species all the time.
Exactly. I could care less about the the world not playing on animals and what not. Ive seen alot of animal cartoons and many of them juat had them acting like regular humans like Arthur
Him: I was planning to do a terrible review for that one but I guess... People kinda liked it..? Me: *this movie is legit my favorite animated movie ever*
@@miserirken I mean I get that but also think of age groups this one I feel like is for 2-5 years old Zootopia is for older kids like 5-10 yrs because it uses more thought process. Also the dude was saying he hated the singing part of sing but like the whole movie is about signing and it’s for children 😂
@@axesandrabbits7226 The very nature of that scene and potential for jokes means they wont be original, If the joke is that its a common animal pairings its not gonna be original is it?
Sing hit home for me, especially with Johnny because the period it came out and I watched it is when my dad was deployed. So I've kinda just had biased nostalgia to it, and it makes me happy fellow comment section dwellers also enjoyed the movie.
FINALLY it seems like everyone wants to scream that this movie is bad just bcus its illumination and EVERYONE knows illumination movies just SUCK right? but all i've gotten from these reviews and opinions is absolutely nothing but nitpicking :/
Sing holds a significant meaning to me because it was a film I watched on the plane during an international trip and it was one of the funnest times of my life before life got harder. But I agree, its not the best and I don’t think it needs a sequel
sing has great placements for the animals. the mouse is a trickster, yet so small you can barely catch him as portrayed in this movie. the elephant is very wise and in line, but can't seem to find one place where they won't rock everybody's boat spilling water. the koala is sharply eyed, and like the elephant, very in line and organized but constantly placing others in that one single line that he wants them to be
Two things i loved from this movie, both related to the same scene: 1) i learned the song I'm still standing, which summarizes my feelings towards my abusive mother. 2) The VA of the gorilla impressed Elton John enough he handpicked him to play as him in Rocketman
14:06 - Rabbit talking to turtle is reference to the story of Rabbit and Turtle racing. - Cow is talking with bull, cuz cow is female and bull is male - kitty and beaver... well, you can guess what it refers to
I hope this doesn't do well, so Illumination actually fucking learns. But, of course, they will make a shit load of money, because it's basically Zootopia but it's a crappy musical.
I mean, Dreamworks honestly is a great company. Yeah, they have piles of trash but they have some real gems like HTTYD, Kung Fu Panda, Shrek 1, 2 and 4, Megamind, Rise of the Guardians and Prince of Egypt and at least Dreamworks tries new ideas despite how ridiculous they are and I’d rather have that than a safe piece of entertainment that does nothing new
I really hated how the world was basically just a human world. Why make the main characters animals if your just gonna put them in a bland, basically human environment
Its generic and boring, being decent shouldn't make it not be able to be criticized. Animated movies can be so much more but sing feels like it was made for cash
@@courier_06 We are talking about Illumination here, but still it's not as bad as it is made out to be. People talk about it like it's a 4/10, but it's a kid movie, and I personally would give it a 6/10. Not excellent, but still good.
@@mrknowhere6457 I do agree with that point. A lot more could have been done with the characters and the animals they were chosen to be, and that opportunity was just completely missed
@notcoolG Well, a lot of American movies do. While overall this is not great, it really doesn't change much about the movie. But a lot of movies over in England use the American stereotypes of the "we're all fat," "we all have neckbeards," and "we like guns" so it's a mutual thing. Besides, it's just a kids movie.
Also, idk I don't see why there has to be a point. Character design can benefit a lot from animal characters, as well as allowing more creativity. Animal character designs can be fun, I don't know why it has to default to humans.
@@Styxintheriver right?? I never understand the argument of "why is this character this??" well... why is the character human?? you dont see human characters always having jokes and personalities written around them being humans
@@Styxintheriver" Default to humans" Idk where you got that from, almost every somewhat succesfull or succesfull animated movie nowadays seems to completely forget that humans exist and they'd rather use pink and orange blobs with eyes than a human
14:07 If you look at the first animals you can see that they are a hare and a turtle. Ever heard of that story before? And the ones next to them are just a bull and a cow, that’s an obvious relation.
At 14:24, there's actually a good reference with the turtle and the hare from the fairytale, where a hare and a turtle decide to race to establish who's faster but the turtle keeps cheating, thus winning the race. It's actually quite nice as well, it cheated to win, and -if you grew up with another version- killed the hare but doing so, making his heart beat so fast from all the running that it exploded
I really didn't like _Sing._ Wasn't the worst animation ever to hit theaters but definitely one of the least original. _Cats Don't Dance_ did it better.
In my opinion, a movie's job is to be entertaining. After watching a movie, I simply ask myself : "Was I entertained ?". If the answer is yes, then it's a good movie and it does it's job to me.
@Joshua Vigneau [Student] TIL, odd considering the word Utopia itself kinda has a double meaning of "perfection doesn't exist", which is very fitting to Zootopia's story.
Illumination just keeps on chugging...
And if you wanna join the Just Chatting stream in 2 hours time, it's here: www.twitch.tv/dazzvideos
:)
Second!
no wait this is second
Do you have a discord??? Btw love your stuff
Hi
The sad thing about the part where Rosita makes the machine is that what’s essentially happening is that her kids can basically replace her with a machine and no one would notice
Oh that is depressing
to be fair she has 27 children so I could kinda see how they could not really be bonded to her much since she wouldn’t be able to give any of them much individual attention
Yeah to be fair
They never even noticed she was gone if I remember correctly they said “bye mom” when leaving and the husband asked where his keys were and she played a recording of where they were and he said thanks
Her own fault.
I thought Sing was an OK movie at best. Yes, It's not Zootopia, but when comparing it to other Illumination Movies, it could have been a whole lot worse.
press x to doubt
True
Yeah. The main problem is that it has aged horribly due to using music that is only trendy at the time. The story itself is just generic, like Dazz said.
@@nexusyeen1481 i feel like that music wasn't even trendy at that time maybe a few years earlier
@007 megaoof don't get me started
Fun fact, the wreck that slowed Johnny's arrival to the heist was caused by him speeding over to the theatre!
That’s surprising attention to detail coming from Illumination
666 likes
Dude no shit idiot
Ash wasn't crying over her style, it was her cheating boyfriend.
And her style
@@luftwaffebomber1340 I read about this movie. It said it was Lance, not the style.
@@luftwaffebomber1340 No it was Lance cheating on her. Why would Ash, a punk rock girl, cry over doing pop? She didn't like it, but she did it anyway for the money. But Lance cheating on her, in their own apartment, caused her to have an emotional breakdown. Especially since she was singing "Call Me Maybe", a song that rubbed salt in the wound due to it's naive viewpoint of relationships.
@@heartless2147 it was a joke, I meant I dislike her style.
@@luftwaffebomber1340 😂
When the animals are talking to the prisoners, there's a tortoise and a hare talking to one another
It should’ve been the Hare in the prison for speeding.
"It's just all random and lazy" 😂😂😂😂😂
I think that was supposed to be a reference to “The Tortoise & the Hare”.
@@narottamcecil1803 that's why this comment pointed it out
ikr i can’t even stand this dude
Fun fact: Elton John liked Egerton's performance of Still Standing in Sing enough to approach the actor to play him in a movie.
Sing is the reason Taron Egerton played Elton John in a bio pic.
I did not know that. I freaking loved his preformance in Rocketman
That's amazing and wonderful! :D
Well, maybe Sing did create something incredible!
Kinda unrelated but in Kingsman: Golden Circle, Taron Egerton fought to Elton's Saturday Night's Alright for Fighting
Well, at least this movie did something right then!
Sing was a decent movie, if Johnny's story was the main focus it would have been better IMO.
I agree, I don't dislike the film. It was alright for its time and I really was interested in Johnny's story and some of the jokes/concepts of the characters, I think Sing has a lot of potential to be great but for me, it was okay but could've turned out a lot worse.
yeeee
Yeah, if the film focused on a single character it could have been much better.
but i really like the pigs story
Johnny's or Ash's story would've been interesting. The other characters... no. Just no. Everyone else is dull and bland. I don't hate it, I'm just disappointed on how much potential the film had and how it wasted it.
"What's the point of them being animals if they're not going to play with it?"
Well, as it turns out, bipedal animals are easier to animate then humans. So, the answer is essentially laziness.
Oh...
It’s illumination what did I expect
This explains so. much.
It's not just ease of animation it's also a tactic used to make ethnically ambiguous characters, it's done alot in any media for children. We're actually pushed to use animals because kids like animals and "no one is excluded". Which is ironic because now everything is animals instead of kids seeing a variety of people in their media.
Yeah, I really hated how they were just animals in a human world. In human houses, human buildings, everything was bland. Remember in Zootopia they made the world unique to fit animals lifestyles instead of just putting them in a human like environment?
Ash wasn’t crying because she hated her style, she had caught her boyfriend cheating on her with a literal Becky. Also the car crash at 13:46 looks to be between a Bull and a baboon.
I liked the Red Pandas and the elephant, can't remember her name rn. (Side topic, love your pfp)
@@420catboi thanks! I colored it myself on color therapy!
@@420catboi oh yeah the elephant’s name is Meena
@@kitkatcarebear7170 I realise that now. Just watched the movie again yesterday lol
I think sing is actually all right, obviously not the best, but allright
Yeah. It isn't something I would never watch again.
@@kanyewestlover-qy5mi yep
Agreed i really enjoyed it when I first saw it and there our flaws both there good moments and if illuminations learn from the flaws since this is the first moves in the franchise so it will be far from perfect but if they make those flaws not becoming a thing in the sequel its could be amazing and be a big hit im hoping thats what will happen and im hoping they won't screw it up
I enjoy it too
shhhh you're not allowed to like movies
13:47 Johnny actually caused the crash that ended up stopping him from getting back to the heist. When he races to get to the theatre he makes a quick turn, causing the buffalo to crash into the monkey's car. I like that little detail, it's one of those 'blink and you'll miss it' moments.
M
why are you tring to give structure to sing... its sing
Right. He didn't even put effort in the analysis
@King Wobbegong, Sea Urchin Farmer sorry to disappoint you, Dazz fanboy, but I care for this video as much as you do
I love how he was complain at 14:24 about how the characters are randomly placed, and completely missed the tortoise and the hare, one of the most well known stories.
Wether you liked Sing or not, admit that it ain't sequel material it's only good for a standalone movie.
Couldnt agree more
Exactly!
I agree
Yeah I honestly adore the movie (probably just the songs but it counts) but I see yet another terrible sequel coming our way.
There are some films that just don’t need sequels
And this movie is a good example of it
I heard somewhere that the real reason they decided to have animals, when people in the movie would have not changed the plot one bit, was because Illumination takes shortcuts and cuts corners, and animals are apparently easier to animate than humans.
I find some of the Illumination movies to be okay, but I can never unsee all the places that they’re cutting corners.
That's the dumbest part of the movie, is the world is boring. They just put animals in human houses, human jobs, and human life. They should have spiced it up to make it look more like a world really run by animals, like Zootopia did for its world.
And animals are more appealing to mom's on a Sunday afternoon with there kid that wants to see a movie
@@mrknowhere6457 I agree. The least the could have done is that they could have made more animal related jokes, there were really only a few. There was literally no reason for them to be animals. They so underutilized the animal aspect of the movie
@@mrknowhere6457 Well, anthropomorphic animals living like a human being is nothing new.
If there's anything I'll give Sing credit for, is that they did a surprisingly good job balancing all the separate plots. They didn't try to combine all of them and I was fine with that, although I feel like a tv show could've and still could (if Illumination plans to do tv shows) explore them more in depth.
Sing was fine, but the story is over. They’re beating a dead horse.
that could literally be a side plot.... a dead horse being beaten makes the news.
They could have another generation a new cast maybe another chance to make it better
@@Vixen-debo that could be interesting. Like the competition is an annual thing?
I agree.
No. There’s going to be a sequel.
The sequel will probably be everyone finding a love interest
Or the Slightly fat pig lady Idk how to spell her name: Turning into a peppa pig character.
What are you doing, step Johnny?
Your forgot to mention that the love interest will be anything but not straight so they appeal to LGBT community
✨Yes✨
Whatever it is, my siblings are gonna watch it and watch it until they drop, and It will burn into my brain like the first one did
Twp things I'd like to point out, regarding Johnny most of all. When he's rushing to his rehearsal, he actually causes the accident that he later gets stuck in. It's a quick scene but if you watch that sequence again, you can see that as he's racing to get to the theater he causes two cars to collide. These same cars are the ones that end up holding him up and getting the crew busted. Second, regarding the father doing a complete 180 upon seeing Johnny perform... I can assume you weren't a father at the time of recording this video. You might have understood the scene a bit better if you were, namely that was a scene of him realizing that his son had found something that made him happy, that he was good at. He sees the joy on Johnny's face, and he hears how well he sings. It's easy to see why he'd do a 180. What father wouldn't want their child doing something they're good at that they enjoy?
Eh Disney’s Pinocchio live action remake will be worse
Imagining what a live action Pinocchio looks like hurts my brain
I hope its a dark tim burton version
@@spooderman6312 Oh lord
@@spooderman6312 Well, in the OG story Pinocchio friking dieds, so maybe it wouldn't be a bad ide-
Oh right
*THE DUMBO LIVE ACTION*
(my english sucks)
@@janejuly6661 disney paid tim for it to be tonally similar to the original, as in they didnt want to be dark. but if they stop clinging on to "family friendly fun" andmake a dark pinnochio, that would work
14:24 I did notice there is actually a tortoise and a hare talking in the prison phone scene. So, at least you have that I guess.
Why is the tortoise the one in prison though???? Was it steroids or smth????
@@gwynethkamiya6252 how you think the tortoise won the race? (Answer-drugs)
Ngl, I liked this movie but the characters already finished their arcs. I don't think there's much to add- It's fine on it's own.
The crew during making this movie:
We need a movie.
Guy in the back: I can make a musical zootopia.
Brilliant!
illumination: we need a name for this brilliant idea
a random guy: Song!
illumination: that's good but not great
another and guy: Sing!
illumination: Brilliant!
theatre guy: scoffs
illumination: you have something to say?
theatre guy: Why not we make it about the trials and errors of the stage where the main characters learn from their mistakes and become better performers and even better people.
illumination: that's awful. you're fired. security!
a random guy: fat pig singing
illumination: Brilliant!
I have a theory that Sing and Zootopia exist in the same universe. The similarities are too striking.
@@samueld8413 lol Disney is gonna give you a lawsuit
@NotCoolBroski lol
@@samueld8413 He knows too much. Get him.
I actually liked "Sing" when it came out in theaters a few years ago. I just hope the sequel doesn't take away much from what made the first one decent.
We know how Illumination will mess this movie up.
Mr Forgotten I know what you mean and I agree on some of their films. But dear God, I really hope not on this one.
Idk they might do it the secret life of pets 2 was much better then the first one but I'm not getting my hopes up
Same, I like the movie, but assuming how they did despicable me 3-,
Hopefully, it has a more satisfying ending
@@mochi4698 I agree. And I was actually looking forward to Despicable Me 3 back then, and I left out of the theater with a "WTF?" look on my face. Nice to meet you and I like your name.
Got to give Sing credit for tackling serious subjects like prison, cheating partners and marital stress. When done wrong these areas can come off as cheesy or unrealistically resolved. Even for a kids movie, I think Sing covered these pretty decently.
If they make a sequel, either there's going to be missing details, too cartoonish models, or both.
I definitely agree. They're also gonna dumb it down again when it comes to any of the more "complex"(?) characters like Ash or the Monkey guy. They both seem to have doubts and a slight bit of trauma.
Probably gonna make ash gay lol
@@dudguys1194 Lmao
@@12s0ph back at ya
Sammmeee
FWIW, there definitely WERE animal “relationships” in this. Lions and buffalos are hardcore enemies and buffalos regularly “wreck” lions lol. For the jail scene, crocodiles eat antelopes (not a deer), the buffalo bull was talking to a buffalo cow, and then of course the tortoise and the hare.
I knew I wasn't the only one who saw that!
The Fox and the Heron too
I didn't notice until watching this that Ash's sunglasses in her performance are the same ones that the other female porcupine left behind when she kicked her out. i kinda love that
I actually really like Sing. I thought, while the obvious Illumination problems are there, the actual movie was pretty cool, had a nice message, and I really liked most of the characters.
ikr??? It's a down-to-Earth, realistic setting with nice people and institutional/social problems, I think the movie fucking slaps. I watched it at the cinema when it came out, cried 6 times during it. Then rewatched it a few years later, cried just as many times. Who the fuck CARES if the characters are non-human animals?? They did a fantastic job with their designs and I think that each character's story is very charming.
Kinda makes you wonder if there's animal versions of all the artists whose songs they use. Like an animal Nikki Minaj or Elton John. And since they have "hallelujah" is there animal religion? What animal is Jesus?
@@phlpcockrell Well... if you've seen Narnia...
@@athousandcopperbeesinawiza5576 hahaha forgot about him. Nice one
Calling the elephant “Jumbo” is still witty. Jumbo was the name of a famously large African elephant, likely where dumbos name originated. I believe the elephant died in a rail accident as he was part of a travelling circus at the time
foreshadowing perhaps?
@@localizeds *oh no-*
Jumbo was also Dumbo's mother in the Disney movie.
@@wurdnurd1 Father I believe, and Dumbo's real name is Jumbo jr
The real Jumbo literally derailed a train that he was run over with, and then dies minutes later.
My take on Illumination is this: Despicable Me 1 and 2, as well as this movie (if heavily flawed) were fine in my book, the rest however were either mediocre (Pets 2, Lorax) or pretty bad (Minions, pretty much every other movie from them)
despicable me 1 is kinda good
The sequel will probably be about a rival theatre that takes all the spotlight, but is ultimately overshadowed by the main cast.
lol probably gonna be a sing Off to determine who’s better 😂
Illuminatation reading this: WRITE THAT DOWN
That would actually make a cool plot.
Is this... Camp Rock?
@Ducky yes, that'll be the theater owners
"it doesn't really make much sense the mum can randomly D.I.Y"
Clearly never seen a mum in a push come to shove, get shit done mode. Would be surprised how macgyver a mum can be when you have no other options.
A good shout out to the parents out there doing what they gotta do. Respect
It is possible for mums to magically fill up the fridge with food when you think all that’s there is a mouldy steak pie.
@@xloisx4603 I wish
@@xloisx4603 Yes, my mom has a garden and farm animals. We grow kale, cabbage, strawberries, blue berries, cherries, an apple tree in the making, and chili peppers.
As for animals, chickens, goats, cows, and we have a dog to cattle the chickens (:
Imagine having a toddler with Rett Syndrome and difficulties eating and doing basic things. You become a straight up chameleon depending on the perceived need to get shit done.
Compared to a lot of their other crap, this is actually not a bad movie by Illumination's standards.
I know they missed a lot of hits with jokes and opportunities to use the animals' distinct traits. But just because you have an elephant doesn't mean it has to be loud. I actually think a shy elephant is a good subversion of expectation. It would be just like Zootopia if it made use of all the stereotypical animal traits that we seem to expect from anthro animals. And not only would it get branded as unoriginal for copying Zootopia (which it already has been, but in this case it would just get worse), but it would also defeat the purpose of both movies combined. Everyone is unique in their own ways and shouldn't have to uphold society stereotypes and standards that were forced onto them unreasonably.
I thought Sing was alright. Not the best movie ever but not the worst either. The song Nana was singing was Golden Slumbers/Carry That Weight by The Beatles
This is the true final boss of 2020
No it's despicable me 4
No it's cats 2
No it's the emoji movie 2
The raid boss
No it’s Raid shadow legends
It's funny how the llama's name is Judith and it rhymes with Due Date..
This was a movie with a strange premise that could have been much much more but was a decent family movie in the end
This sequel we didn’t deserve or need
Or want
@@HolidaySpirit04 Exactly 😔
@EnderTime yes. Everyone else is irrelevant
it could serve as punishment for the annoying kids to get them to shut up
I agree, the movie's ok but I don't think we need a second version of this movie :/
What I wished for the singers:
Johnny: Stays the same
Rosita: Wanting to start a career as a singer, but stuggles to decide if her dreams or her family is more important and more joyful to pursue
Mike: Be more daunting and takes it a bit more serious
Mena: Have her wanting to do her passion, but her family is more so not sure about it because of some sort of tragedy she had as a kid
Ash: Stay the same, but has more depth and more development
Gunter: Wanting to have everyone else to have some happiness that he didn't get to have as a kid
This is not amazing, but is honestly better than Illumination's take on these.
Ngl... I actually like "Sing". Not the best one for sure, but there's a reason why I really liked it.
Me too
Agreed sing is definitely one of the better illumination movies
Same
@@bv0804 Why hello fellow Infinity Train passenger! It's a luxury seeing you here!
The only part of it that was good was the gorillas
a sad fact of life:
hollywood never learns
they didnt learn that Tobey Maguire was the best spiderman
@@smae98 yes but a Spider-Man 4 probably would've been worse than Spider-Man 3
@@spooderman6312 yeah your right
Its proven by the fact that citizen kane is still the best film of all time, and it came out in the 50s
No they learn a lot, they learn how to make money not art.
I do just want to point out that at 14:20 Dazz is saying all of the animal pairs are random and lazy, but at the very least there IS a Tortoise and a Hare which he missed.
Am I the only one who enjoy Sing? Not a favorite movie on my list but it was enjoyable to me
samee, 11 year old me is loving this movie
yeah same
Not me
Yeah, also have you watched Croods? It's pretty amazing.
@@ice-giant yes I watch croods , it a good movie but not in my favorites.
To be fair, the farting buffalo was the only fart joke they used in the movie
Still too many. 0 is the best number of fart jokes.
proud of them tbh
@@magicdawn1973 Ehhh, maybe. 0 is the best number of lazy fart jokes. They can be well-executed and come out really funny.
@@magicdawn1973 no fun allowed
Exactly
14:06 actually all the animals correlating
Tortoise and the hare
A cow and a bull
A croc and a gazelle
A dog and a cat
And johnny and his dad who are apes
the point of the crash in Johnny's scene was that his hurrying to the theatre is what caused the collision in the first place, the animals in question weren't a gag it was just a random Bull and Baboon.
The other day I said to myself “imagine if sing got a sequel, wouldn’t that be terrible” and here we are
Could be worse it could be a live action remake of sing
@@nomiflower9707 Why would you make me think of that 🤮
Your PFP fits this too well
you'd think Nana would've bought the theatre earlier since she apparently loves it.
I made a stupid Minecraft parody of I’m Still Standing around the time this movie came out and I was flooded with little kids looking for Sing
ok
ok
ok
Ok
Okay.
*”This is getting out of hand, now there are two of them!”*
KILL IT BEFORE IT LAYS MORE EGGS
Me: *Likes sing*
People: is this legal?
Me: I will make it legal
The "can you feel the sunshine" music in the background at the start made me have major nostalgia :)
okay with the starting thing, the gorillas could have driven past the mouse, who walks past the club, then something happens leading to the pig, then the pig father drives past the elephant
The one thing I really liked about Sing was that the world isn't at all adjusted for the different sized animals. For the most part at least.
The elephants squeeze through doors, the giraffe has to duck his head to get through a doorway in the beginning, Moon and the mouse have to climb a lot to get to eye level.
It's really subtle and I've always liked watching how they moved through a world set with a general size in mind, rather than how zootopia had a lotta places completely customized to the animals of specific sizes.
I don't know if anyone said anthing about this yet but at 14:06 there is a link between at least one pair of animals. The first booth has a rabbit and a tortoise. I'm pretty sure this is a refrence to the tortoise and the hare. I know that it was easy to miss but I wanted to point it out because when I first watched the movie I thought that it was a fun little refrence to the classic childrens story, and to everyone reading this I hope you all have a nice day :)
In the jail scene there is a tortoise talking to a hare/bunny.
That’s kinda neat Mr.Fishstick man
Ok
@@dumbflop2070 was that really necessary
@@faristurjman2134 I-
@@faristurjman2134 Just as necessary as 6:33 was in the movie. Your point?
Johnny’s arc is great, he’s my favourite character
Honestly, the first Despicable Me and Sing are the only good illumination movies. While Despicable Me is good for how good the formula worked before they totally murdered it with the sequels, I think Sing is good because you can tell there is a form of heart in the movie. The songs with the sets fit beautifully, the opening scene is honestly one of my favorites. Some of the cuts they do with Buster I love, and that half camera shot with Buster and his friend on the phone is great as well. The story with Johnny, is my favorite part of it, which Buster's being a close second. You can tell the movie had a form of heart, but it doesn't exactly show it due to the jokes, some bad scenes, and things that just are weird or don't make sense. Overall, it's a good movie, but not a good movie. Like if it was rated, good movie wise, for me it'd be around a 7 out of 10 good movie, purely because it's a nice movie to watch from time to time.
I honestly didn't mind Sing, but I'm scared at how the second can hold up to the first.
It can. It's even better.
This movie is a high "meh"
It's tolerable, better than Secret Life of Pets and maybe Angry Birds, but not deserving of a sequel.
Agreed!
Bro angry birds much better
yes
@@Minospw Agreed.
I actually thought Angry Birds is a bad adaptation of the game that I used to play as a kid. When I actually watched it, I find it enjoyable but what I learned is that anger does not solve everything. That's relatable for me considering the fact that I have stress and anger issues and I think that kind of lesson really helped me a lot.
The criticism about the jail phone scene just completely missed the Tortoise and the Hare talking to each other at the beginning of the row lmao
I'm guessing the idea for the Sing sequel was that they go on tour or something.
Or maybe they go on an international singing competition 🤦
Or maybe just everyone finding love interests
This movie is special for me, because I was watching it w/ my mom as my hamster died. We watched it four more times the same afternoon out of sorrow.
That's so sad!🥺😔
Awww I’m sorry
Sorry :(
Did you eat the hamster or did you waste it
LMAOOO THAT'S SO WHOLESOME
14:23 there is literally a Tortoise and a Hare speaking right there dude
"A hedgehog talking to a fox.'' I see what you did there. Sonic the *HEDGEHOG* and Tails the *FOX*. Very funny. No seriously. I really like Sonic 2. Nice reference.
You didn’t have to explain it, we know what you mean :/
Not all of us
In this movie, the fact that they are animals has nothing to do with the story
You could have all the characters be humans and nothing would be different
@marianne mccrank appartly its easier to animate then humans which i can belive
Isn’t that literally what The Greatest Showman is?
Just more appealing to children
In all fairness, many movies or cartoons with animals hardly ever make the fact that the characters are animals the main focus of the story.
I don’t mind that
The trailer for the sequel has just come out and it actually looks like it's going to be better than the first movie.
Did anyone else looked at the title and went *sighs* "nooooo, no, no, no, no:
all I could think was, ah shit here we go again
The exaggerated reaction of an unborn fetus
@@joshuaobryan4896 true
I don't get why people really insist of there being a reason for characters being animals. I can only see people complaining about it being really cliche if all the movie did was to play off their animal species all the time.
That’s like saying humans are cliche
You sound like cinemasins, throwing the word cliche around like it means nothing
Exactly. I could care less about the the world not playing on animals and what not. Ive seen alot of animal cartoons and many of them juat had them acting like regular humans like Arthur
The reasons they made them animals was out of laziness though. Bipedal animals are easier to animate than humans.
I think they did animals cuz it’s more appealing to kids
I love how when he talks about the animal matchups in the jail thing, he doesn't even mention the turtle and rabbit.
Okay listen, i actually really like this movie BUT, now i'm scared they might pull an alvin and the chimpmunks...
Him: I was planning to do a terrible review for that one but I guess... People kinda liked it..?
Me: *this movie is legit my favorite animated movie ever*
Surely not theres better animated movies with better plot lines
Quiet, trash
@@FireCaT- Let people like what they like-
@@FireCaT- they said it's their favourite movie. what does being the best have to do with that😭
@@redballoon9007 I could say the same thing. Let me have my opinion
The reason everyone likes Sing is that every main character is an archetype
13:45 The funny thing is that the crash was caused by Johnny himself
how
@@DragnYT when he was speeding to get to the theater
Illumination: Why did you save me
Koala: mmmmmmmmmmmm, Koale
I hate the singing part of sing, the character backstories (reason to sing) was interesting but that’s it
I mean it’s literally for children so
its ironic because its a movie about singing XD
IKR out of the 6 main singers, excluding the male pig and the mouse, they all were interesting.
_"I mean it’s literally for children so"_
And so it's Zootopia, and does way way WAY more with its premise...
@@miserirken I mean I get that but also think of age groups this one I feel like is for 2-5 years old Zootopia is for older kids like 5-10 yrs because it uses more thought process. Also the dude was saying he hated the singing part of sing but like the whole movie is about signing and it’s for children 😂
“no jokes”
A turtle and rabbit?
a cat and dog?
yep no jokes
How original
@@axesandrabbits7226 The very nature of that scene and potential for jokes means they wont be original, If the joke is that its a common animal pairings its not gonna be original is it?
Sing hit home for me, especially with Johnny because the period it came out and I watched it is when my dad was deployed. So I've kinda just had biased nostalgia to it, and it makes me happy fellow comment section dwellers also enjoyed the movie.
i unapologetically love this movie as a 20 yr old lol
FINALLY
it seems like everyone wants to scream that this movie is bad just bcus its illumination and EVERYONE knows illumination movies just SUCK right?
but all i've gotten from these reviews and opinions is absolutely nothing but nitpicking :/
@@yume5441 yea ikr
@@yume5441 Lol, right!?
I love this movie at 10-13
Here I am 21 years old singing the songs of the movie
Sing holds a significant meaning to me because it was a film I watched on the plane during an international trip and it was one of the funnest times of my life before life got harder. But I agree, its not the best and I don’t think it needs a sequel
It does now
sing has great placements for the animals. the mouse is a trickster, yet so small you can barely catch him as portrayed in this movie. the elephant is very wise and in line, but can't seem to find one place where they won't rock everybody's boat spilling water. the koala is sharply eyed, and like the elephant, very in line and organized but constantly placing others in that one single line that he wants them to be
Two things i loved from this movie, both related to the same scene:
1) i learned the song I'm still standing, which summarizes my feelings towards my abusive mother.
2) The VA of the gorilla impressed Elton John enough he handpicked him to play as him in Rocketman
Woah, what? Abusive mother?
In the film, it is revealed that the squids were all okay when they play the news scene after the flood.
You even see that they escaped down the drain with Mike.
14:06
- Rabbit talking to turtle is reference to the story of Rabbit and Turtle racing.
- Cow is talking with bull, cuz cow is female and bull is male
- kitty and beaver... well, you can guess what it refers to
GUYS I'M SEEING A GIANT HEALTH BAR IN MY HOUSE WHAT DO I DO
Run
Pull out the diamond sword
Pull out the terra blade
Delete the game
Close the tab
At least this time our hopes will be lower.
YEAH!
I hope this doesn't do well, so Illumination actually fucking learns. But, of course, they will make a shit load of money, because it's basically Zootopia but it's a crappy musical.
"Don't understand the random pines though"
I mean, it's what you've been asking the entire review for? It's a gag about an animal's feature.
My parents only like Dreamworks and Illumination films; not Pixar nor Disney.
I afraid
(Yes, I like Some of Dreamworks)
I feel you. My mom took the family to see Secret Life of Pets 2 instead of Toy Story 4, because she genuinely thought it looked like a better movie.
@@sorrybarley7509 how old is she? Because toy story came out 25 years ago so she might know it if she's young
I mean, Dreamworks honestly is a great company. Yeah, they have piles of trash but they have some real gems like HTTYD, Kung Fu Panda, Shrek 1, 2 and 4, Megamind, Rise of the Guardians and Prince of Egypt and at least Dreamworks tries new ideas despite how ridiculous they are and I’d rather have that than a safe piece of entertainment that does nothing new
@@sorrybarley7509 Maybe she thought that the animation for Toy Story didn't improve...
Why does this movie get so much fire, it's perfectly ok
I really hated how the world was basically just a human world. Why make the main characters animals if your just gonna put them in a bland, basically human environment
Its generic and boring, being decent shouldn't make it not be able to be criticized. Animated movies can be so much more but sing feels like it was made for cash
@@courier_06 We are talking about Illumination here, but still it's not as bad as it is made out to be. People talk about it like it's a 4/10, but it's a kid movie, and I personally would give it a 6/10. Not excellent, but still good.
@@mrknowhere6457 I do agree with that point. A lot more could have been done with the characters and the animals they were chosen to be, and that opportunity was just completely missed
@notcoolG Well, a lot of American movies do. While overall this is not great, it really doesn't change much about the movie. But a lot of movies over in England use the American stereotypes of the "we're all fat," "we all have neckbeards," and "we like guns" so it's a mutual thing. Besides, it's just a kids movie.
I personally love "Sing",my opinion.
But I don't think it needed a sequel
"Why would they be animals if they aren't going to play with it?"
Me: Because kids love animals, and better mc donalds toys I guess
@marianne mccrank I’d much prefer gru as plushies rather than fuckin minions
Also, idk I don't see why there has to be a point. Character design can benefit a lot from animal characters, as well as allowing more creativity. Animal character designs can be fun, I don't know why it has to default to humans.
@@Styxintheriver right?? I never understand the argument of "why is this character this??" well... why is the character human?? you dont see human characters always having jokes and personalities written around them being humans
@@Styxintheriver" Default to humans" Idk where you got that from, almost every somewhat succesfull or succesfull animated movie nowadays seems to completely forget that humans exist and they'd rather use pink and orange blobs with eyes than a human
14:07
If you look at the first animals you can see that they are a hare and a turtle. Ever heard of that story before? And the ones next to them are just a bull and a cow, that’s an obvious relation.
They could at least have a cat and a dog instead of a cat and beaver, or something else instead of a croc and deer, which have no relation...
@@TheGoldenDunsparce the fact is that this review guy or whatever he is supposed to be is nitpicking hard time, but still can't nitpick good enough
@@bungiecrimes7247 lol okay?
Actually, I never have heard the story of the haze and the turtle.
Haze? You mean The Hare and the Turtle
At 14:24, there's actually a good reference with the turtle and the hare from the fairytale, where a hare and a turtle decide to race to establish who's faster but the turtle keeps cheating, thus winning the race. It's actually quite nice as well, it cheated to win, and -if you grew up with another version- killed the hare but doing so, making his heart beat so fast from all the running that it exploded
I really didn't like _Sing._
Wasn't the worst animation ever to hit theaters but definitely one of the least original. _Cats Don't Dance_ did it better.
In my opinion, a movie's job is to be entertaining. After watching a movie, I simply ask myself : "Was I entertained ?". If the answer is yes, then it's a good movie and it does it's job to me.
It just has that cringe effect…
I don’t know how to explain it, but it sure doesn’t pass the, “Turn off the tv as soon as someone walks in” test…
"zooptropolis"? are you talking about zootopia?
@Joshua Vigneau [Student] TIL, odd considering the word Utopia itself kinda has a double meaning of "perfection doesn't exist", which is very fitting to Zootopia's story.
@Joshua Vigneau [Student] I find it funny how they redone all the voices just to say something slightly different
@Joshua Vigneau [Student] Wow didn’t know that..
@Noah Tabraham oh ok! thanks for telling me!
Yeah, I live in Ireland so it was released as Zootropolis here too, but nobody I know calls it that. We all just call it Zootopia.
Oh
Oh no...
The first one was already pretty lackluster 😬 it was “okay” but not a great movie
"What about a hegehog and a fox? ... ots all random!"
*skips over the turtle and the rabbit*
Sing 2 theory: Rosita gets a divorce and gets to do whatever she wants because her husband gets her kids. Also Bacon.
OH GOD!!!!
Oh my FUCKING GOD
doubt the dude would get the kids in a case tho, never see that in rl
@@tbone551 true that