Nature wants you to be FAT !! FRUCTOSE is the reason and how to REVERSE it ! - Dr Richard Johnson

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8

  • @felipearbustopotd
    @felipearbustopotd Місяць тому +2

    0:06 Wait, animals exercise 😂- do they even know the concept of it.
    We is anthropomorphism being used here?
    In good jest.
    04:02 if they have evolved to eat this way - how can be classed as, out of control?
    They eat to pack on fat - so they can then hibernate during the winter.
    Predestination.
    Nutrient definition: a substance that provides nourishment essential for the maintenance of life and for growth.
    This seems to go against what fructose is used for, to be hyperbolic; it is a fat promoting nuisance, unless you are a bear. lol
    22:54 eating them at the end of the meal ( treat them as a dessert - after all, they are a SUGAR BOMB ) - apparently can lessen the BS spike and could further be reduced by drinking ACV 20 mins before hand.
    What about exercising before and then afterwards to staunch the spike?
    Active muscles are primed to soak up glucose.
    No doubt the worst thing to do would be, to eat them at the start of the meal and then be sedentary.
    Big no,no!
    Why is allulose banned?
    Allulose is banned in Europe and Canada, possible carcinogen.
    What fruit has allulose in it?
    Allulose, a low calorie sweetener, occurs naturally in small amounts in foods like wheat and dried fruits such as figs and raisins, making it a rare sugar.
    ***
    Thoroughly enjoyable - thank you for featuring Dr Richard Johnson.
    😀 👍

  • @dionysosvaden3509
    @dionysosvaden3509 2 місяці тому +1

    One has enough time to grow old and get white hair until the solutions are revealed. A perfect example of bloated presentation. Useful, anyhow!

    • @happyhabitpodcast
      @happyhabitpodcast  Місяць тому +1

      It's about context and developing important points for the audience, especially those who haven't heard these views before.

    • @dionysosvaden3509
      @dionysosvaden3509 Місяць тому

      @@happyhabitpodcast That mutch, I do understand but, alas, most people become rather impatient and lose interest. Surely, the whole thing can be summarized and thus become more palatable. The thing is that those who do have some prior knowledge and thus do not need the detailed analysis and who would benefit the most, being in a position to appreciate it, are those who will skip it. Those without prior knowledge are, most probably, people who are not exactly fond of learning. Well, that's my "theory" which, judging from the number of "likes" so far, does appear not to be so "arbitrary" and wrong. Thank you for answering, by the way!