Federer’s quality and strategy very much depends on his confidence. I think Novak and Rafa are a bit more resilient than Roger. They don’t get scared off their games as easily.
That and his return are his Achilles. His lack of mettle are why he's the only one of the 3 who didn't maximise his potential. If he held his nerve he'd have way more than 20 majors. It is a shame almost all his famous matches are losses
Federer was in great form throughout 2011 and perhaps the only player who stood tall against the invincible Novak that year. Yet, Novak beating him everytime except that insane FO SF speaks volumes about his level.
¿What the f? He wasn't at all except for some tournaments. Couldn't help shanking the ball with the backhand and his baseline game wasn't great either. He was called Federror for a reason.
Very nice match! I think I prefer Djoko-federer matches to Djoko-nadal. They just play so perfectly. Amazing balance, precision, technique, movement etc.
They are more diverse in shot-making, like Federer-Nadal, hence it gets much more entertaining to watch - please explain this to ATP genius' , instead of thinking about turning the game around with changing scoring systems, media crap, and other nonsenses. When people see a Sampras-Agassi match, everyone gets hyper-excited.
The difference in backhands and mental strength is clearly visible. Fed took too many years to get the neo backhand out and by then he had already lost 5-10 slams to Nadal and Djokovic.
@@johndohhe8153 this Novak outfits is superb and looks mutch better then boring clasic Federer outfit, this combo with red shoes looks like machine and this is color of his country after winnig Davis cup 3 months before, Legendary outfit when he have best season start ever in Tennis history, with 41 winning streak ..
@@johndohhe8153 2010-2011 Tacchini Djokovic style is my favourite by far, special mention to the dragon T-shirts, they were awesome. Uiqlo and Lacoste make boring and monotonous things.
@@98TheJackInTheBox he had mental issues much more often against them than against average players. They did hit his confidence in 2011, he never came back at the top consistently after this season, despite lots of victories against both of them, he was still losing more and ended up with a negative h2h. The weirdest stat is probably the fact that he improved his h2h vs Nadal at the end of his career, where he was no more at his prime, and same vs Murray, like if he was preparing specifically to play against the rest of the big 4 when he got older, but that's only my opinion.
Federer lost but I felt that he had the right execution to win. In AO 2011, I thought that he was too passive against Djokovic. He improved that in this Indian Wells and managed to adapt in French Open this year, and even in there Us open, where Federer lost.
I have to confess that I'm not a huge Djokovic fan, and I've always liked Federer, but, evidently, Novak is an incredible player and athlete. I was a player a few years ago, and I think people don't understand what it takes to get to these levels, so, as much as I congratulate Novak and admire him in so many ways, I still prefer Roger simply because of the grace and elegance with which he played the game, which is completely unmatched by any other player...
The world would be more peaceful if everyone has the mentality/attitude like you. Jesus teaching us to love even our enemies is something that most people think is impossible but it’s something we can apply in life. It doesn’t have to be exactly “enemy”, but in this case, something/someone you might not like but you need to learn how to appreciate, instead of hate.
In no alternate universe would any genius of Federer win in this match, reason - Novak looked determined like a hungry tiger. Everytime Roger came up with a genius shot, novak applauded but made changes. He is a Terminator making changes and becoming a new beast !
An even more underrated match was their 2014 final in IW. I was certain Fed was gonna win it, was shell shocked when Djokovic pulled out the third set tie breaker
Federer used to believe he was invencible, the best , and Djokovic humilliated him many times , he imposed over federer with category and contundence , Roger felt the best in the tennis history , nowadays its the third , down Nadal and mostly Djokovic .
@jonathanstirling7167 federer? Maybe. I think he's the goat but djokovic is close. Federer beating Sampras on grass is so overlooked by gen z and gen alpha fans. It's shameful
Amazing high quality match! What also caught my attention was how the commentators themselves (specially PatMac) used to gush so much about Federer. The commentary was rarely unbiased, mostly gushing towards Fed. No wonder Djokovic's repulsion towards entire media grew up over time.
Their matches were very close more often than not,while Dkokovic-Nadal stopped being a rivalry on hard/ grass courts since 2013: 10 -0 is not a rivalry ,is ..customer care!
Can't believe this guy Novak Dkjovic is 37 and about world number 2 and reached the Wimbledon final and won Olympic Gold. He unfortunately lost in the third round of the US open but hey his still 2 in the world higher than most player's on the tour .
These matches are there to remind us that these guys were different and almost on the same level with each other... every match is a chess match played on a tennis court...
This game just shows how much Federer struggled with his back hand before he made that racket change and adapted his game. Not his fault entirely because he came from a time when there wasnt a need for so many ground strokes in faster courts. I believe when people say that Fed didnt have mental mettle etc, which is true to some extent, they also underplay how much mental strength it was required to constantly adapt to the mental game and be a champion
I noticed the commentators expressions indicated he’s probably a Federer fan. Generally he was praising Federer’s great shots a lot more than Djokovic’s.
Take into consideration about their age differences. Roger was already 30 and Djokovic was 24. Six years might not seem a lot in age differences, but in this level of tennis it's a big gap.
@Alex1492-tp4xi really?? what about wimbledon 08 finals and Australian Open 09, 12 and 14? Nadal has also beaten Federer at Indian wells, Miami, Cincinnati, Dubai and WTF.
@@AS-js7kb Federer have bagelled nadal on clay bagelled him twice federer dominates in every other master 1000 finals wimblendon 2007-2006 then we have 2017 final agaisnt him then we have straight sets defeat on shanghai
@@Alex1492-tp4xi bro your original statement says Nadal was only achieving wins on clay against Federer so I laid out the facts. I don't know what bageling Nadal on clay has to do with this. I also never said he was undefeated against Federer. My statement is there to prove that Nadal won against Federer off clay also many times and in big matches.
yup, if he had changed racquets 5 years earlier and changed his backhand in 2011 instead of 2017, the heads to heads against novak and nadal would be way different and fed would have 28 slams now
Federer just needed to develop his 2017 backhand 10 years earlier lol. Even then, idk how he would have done vs Novak but he would have definitely been better vs Nadal.
absolutely, and if he had changed the racquet in 2010 insteadof 2016..he was very stubborn playing with a completely inferior small racquet for most of his career
@@cantwealljustgetalong2 In all fairness, I have and play with one sometimes, and they do everything amazingly except defense. They are a scalpel with loads of control and feel. His backhand with that racket, you could just see how the velocity of the ball drops so much. Its like his slice was more effective. Come 2017 though that freakin neo-backhand with the RF97 was a weapon, not a weakness.
This 'level' has yet to be achieved by Alcaraz and Sinner. They're just not in the same stratosphere as Federer, Novak and Nadal...it's that simple. These three geniuses are not the norm.
Man, what a high level of tennis! I miss Nole vs Roger matches, please comeback Federer once to play against Djokovic. PS. I hate when Roger win Nole at 2011 FO, that was worst lose...
Whom ever posted this match has a computer that was worth buying. The quality of the video was so clear. It gave a feel as if you were actually there watching the match. Thanks for sharing one of the most intense tennis matches in that year.👍🏾 Both players gave the people they're money's worth.
Once defending > attacking, and Novak being the greatest defensive player we've ever seen, Roger was pretty much cooked against him. The exceptions tended to be where that was less true, with Wimbledon being the most obvious. Even there, Novak's insanely great defending defeated Roger's great play in the 2019 final. Roger simply lost the consistency when it came to hitting ten shots vs two or three, and Novak rarely makes unforced errors. The result becomes rather inevitable, especially with Roger being five years older than Novak, too.
Sweet. Love it when Novak takes Rog to school and does in in front of the stupid-shit Federer crowd. Great stuff. Novak never beat just Federer alone but also beat the crowd, nearly every time.
Fed's groundies looked great for most of this season. The only time in the whole 2010s they looked better was 2017. He should have converted that into two wins at major's against 2011 djokovic. Would have been quite a flex
Djokovic took passing skill to a higher level, especially frombhis backhand side, compared to players during the 2003-2008 period, causing Federer hesitate to charge the net. Federer might hit a great inside out approaching forehand but Djokovic, with a great backhand and the ability to split to reach the ball quicker, could hit a low cross court passing shot that makes it hard for Federer to volley.
Exactly what Djokovic wanted - an endless loop of long grinding rallies, going to net or attacking with anything other than heavy topspin difficult to pull off
ever notice when fed makes a great shot nole acknowledges it...when nole hits a great shot not a peep from fed..sorry fed fans but fed is a arrogant poor sport....
@@flyingsaucer8199 he rarely applauds becaus he has the most dull personality...and hes too proud to acknowledge greatness..so relax on that and go back to your meds boy
I would love to have seen all the big three - playing during the ninety s era - using the equipment available at the time. I'd suspect the pecking order in mens goat would be greatly altered from what the conversation is today !!
@@mrhatman675 Because most of encounters after Wim 2012, Djokovic won more crucial matches. For example, in 2015 all of Nole wins were in gs and masters final, while Fed's were in atp500 and atp finals round robin, or 2019 Fed won atp final round robin but lost Wim final earlier
Djokovic always seems to have a bit more mental strength then Federer that goes a long way. If you look at some pivotal points in Federer's career you would think Federer would have anywhere between 23-26 grand slams but he cracked under pressure
When Federer plays his forehand and rhythm as prime federer in some rounds, he can take advantage of the court, but these rounds are not long-lasting. Generally speaking, Federer still cannot escape the swamp of being constrained by his backhand. If it were Federer in 2005, who was more flexible and powerful, he could win. 05federer can rely on better movement and power to cut flatter and deeper slices, get rid of long-term backhand suppression, and find more offensive opportunities.
1-1, 15=40 Djokovic serving and Roger can't put a backhand return into the court. Ultimately, the shortcomings on the backhand are the main reason why he could not compete with Novak more successfully.
No matter how good you can do it, I can do it better , said commentor, but the truth was, no matter how many times you can break me, I can break you more
Feels like Federer definitely had his chances to win here…. Overall just not a good enough serving performance in the third set. He was sloppy during the first quarter of 2011.
Federer should have come to the net more often, he waited too much for Djokovic to make a mistake. You don’t do that against Novak, cause he won’t miss😂
This is the only reason I didn’t teach my kids single handed backhand. My son played a single handed BH, I asked him to use the same strategy, he won 6-0. There are more disadvantages being a single handed than benefits.
I am sure that very much in the tennis records and recent history would have changed if their age had been reversed. That is when Federer would have been 6 years younger than Novak and 5 years than Rafa.
Its strange but Federer didn't look as muscular and atheltic in his 30s as he did in his 20s its like he prioritised being slim and light, maybe for movement, over being powerfully built with a heavy shots I mean he looked more broad shouldered and imposing throughout the 2000s till about 2009, but its clear to me he had a different peak era to Djokovic. The 2004 to maybe 2009 Fed was overwhelming everyone except Nadal on clay.
Ur mind forces u to think what u desperately want.. Its a mirage.. There was nothing wrong in Fed's build here vis à vis 03-09..his strength didn't decrease at all.. Aren't u guys tired of convincing urself with such lies that has got no significance..Fed's game hadn't dipped at this point at all.. Infact many a times he has broached the topic of Novak and Rafa and signified how much his own game improved and evolved because of the other two. The fact here is Novak got to a different level at this point which hasn't got a precedence in the past.. The highs that he hit this year even prompted Rafa and his uncle to confess that the level that Novak is playing is unbelievable and unseen and He (Rafa) will always try to decode it and try to beat him.. U guys can come up with all excuses and make scenarios (fictional to say the least) as to why Roger got inferior to Novak from 2011 onwards... But the fact remains fact which u all know but pretend not to, that It wasn't Fed's level that dipped but Novak's level that raised and propelled him to GOAT status.
@@QuantumPsycheqpsych6969 he has some fishy arguments like talking about "ELO" in tennis which doesnt make sense, and comparing different eras also doenst make sense(different courts/rules/calendar's etc), for example in early-mid 2000s we had carpet courts, the wimbledon grass was faster and Hamburg was a masters 1000 instead of Madrid which had different play(Nadal and Novak didnt play as good there)
@@Saskobest 58 video's of the most detailed statistical analysis I've ever seen - it's all there maybe you should watch all of them - I have - your comparing era's comment is CLEARLY dealt with, but Yes your ELO comment has some merit, but check out the guy who created this particular algorithm and he explains how it can be used eg if you use this particular algorithm you will see that Andy Murray is possibly one of the unluckiest players in tennis history; you dont need the ELO to see that (11 finals and 10 against big 3) but it adds another statistical layer etc, but you need to look at how Goatkovic uses it (he explains EVERYTHING) - I'm not going to try and explain, you need to watch and UNDERSTAND what Goatkovic is saying - Start at the first video and you will see the painting and it's titled 'NOVAK IS THE GOAT AND IT"S NOT EVEN CLOSE" - Drink deep from the well of wisdom or not at all, for a little knowledge can be very dangerous ... over and out.
It shows how Federer is far from his prime, played well against the joker in this match, beat him at the French Open and had match points in the semi-finals of the US Open
@@GF-hg7op You can make an argument that Federer had "nobody" until 2007. That's why I don't accept arguments about competition. You can even make an argument that Nadal had the toughest competition in his career.
Every single match between those two is a gem.
mainly in 2011 :)
and the semi at RG ???
what a level !! :)
@@antoinev9733 and US 2011
Federer’s quality and strategy very much depends on his confidence. I think Novak and Rafa are a bit more resilient than Roger. They don’t get scared off their games as easily.
That and his return are his Achilles. His lack of mettle are why he's the only one of the 3 who didn't maximise his potential. If he held his nerve he'd have way more than 20 majors. It is a shame almost all his famous matches are losses
Exactly
@@Tesla_Death_Ray His movement was also the weakest of the three
@@fakecomedyandtheabsurd2527 Hahaha!
@@fakecomedyandtheabsurd2527wtf
Federer was in great form throughout 2011 and perhaps the only player who stood tall against the invincible Novak that year.
Yet, Novak beating him everytime except that insane FO SF speaks volumes about his level.
¿What the f? He wasn't at all except for some tournaments. Couldn't help shanking the ball with the backhand and his baseline game wasn't great either.
He was called Federror for a reason.
@@masters.1000 Djokovic was B- in this match. He doesn't need his top game to win big titles. Federror here was just business as usual.
Rafa played in bunch of finals against Novak in 2011, so he was definitely a fair challenge
That semifinal was insane from Roger. Honorable mention to Murray who managed to beat him in Canada and battled with him in that crazy Rome semifinal.
😂@@vijayla21
Unbelievably high level from both Djokovic and Federer
Was watching the USO SF between Fritz and Tiafoe, kept falling asleep and zoning out, then decided to watch this.
🤣
Very nice match! I think I prefer Djoko-federer matches to Djoko-nadal. They just play so perfectly. Amazing balance, precision, technique, movement etc.
They are more diverse in shot-making, like Federer-Nadal, hence it gets much more entertaining to watch - please explain this to ATP genius' , instead of thinking about turning the game around with changing scoring systems, media crap, and other nonsenses. When people see a Sampras-Agassi match, everyone gets hyper-excited.
@@alepian79 what was exactly different between Djoko-Federer matches as opposed to Sampras-Agassi ?
The difference in backhands and mental strength is clearly visible. Fed took too many years to get the neo backhand out and by then he had already lost 5-10 slams to Nadal and Djokovic.
One of Federer's cleanest outfits.
one of many. He's had some fire fire outfits over the years. Novak on the other hand, kinda terrible all throughout
The funny thing is that he once said "You won't see me in yellow for example..." And went on to wear this and the AO one that year lol
@@johndohhe8153 this Novak outfits is superb and looks mutch better then boring clasic Federer outfit, this combo with red shoes looks like machine and this is color of his country after winnig Davis cup 3 months before, Legendary outfit when he have best season start ever in Tennis history, with 41 winning streak ..
@@dzonib9595 haha bro u don’t know style. Classic is stylish, novaks outfit is completely terrible to me
@@johndohhe8153 2010-2011 Tacchini Djokovic style is my favourite by far, special mention to the dragon T-shirts, they were awesome.
Uiqlo and Lacoste make boring and monotonous things.
given the current quality of tennis all matches from 2011-2012 seasons are criminally underrated
Mora se kapa skinuti velikom Federeru! Kako se samo čovjek bori protiv najvećeg svih vremena, svaka čast Fed!
The entire highlights, many great shots from both players, but I saw only one time a player applauded the other.
I feel Federer's level in 2011 is kind of underrated, he played extremely well, but Nadal and Djokovic were just in a different league
His 2011 struggles were definitely more mental than anything physical
@@98TheJackInTheBox His struggles were Djokovic and Nadal actually.
@@Steevy84 not really, it was always in federers hands he decides who wins and loses practically, so yes it was a mental issue
@@98TheJackInTheBox he had mental issues much more often against them than against average players.
They did hit his confidence in 2011, he never came back at the top consistently after this season, despite lots of victories against both of them, he was still losing more and ended up with a negative h2h.
The weirdest stat is probably the fact that he improved his h2h vs Nadal at the end of his career, where he was no more at his prime, and same vs Murray, like if he was preparing specifically to play against the rest of the big 4 when he got older, but that's only my opinion.
Djokovic was in 2011, Nadal wasn't. They were 1-1.
Federer lost but I felt that he had the right execution to win. In AO 2011, I thought that he was too passive against Djokovic. He improved that in this Indian Wells and managed to adapt in French Open this year, and even in there Us open, where Federer lost.
I see him here playing much more topspin backhands against Djokovic's impenetrable two-hander. It seemed working.
Federer had beautifull shots, but he lost because of counting points. He was about to have beatufull win, but, he lost at the near end of the game.
Superbly cut, thanks a lot!
I have to confess that I'm not a huge Djokovic fan, and I've always liked Federer, but, evidently, Novak is an incredible player and athlete. I was a player a few years ago, and I think people don't understand what it takes to get to these levels, so, as much as I congratulate Novak and admire him in so many ways, I still prefer Roger simply because of the grace and elegance with which he played the game, which is completely unmatched by any other player...
The world would be more peaceful if everyone has the mentality/attitude like you. Jesus teaching us to love even our enemies is something that most people think is impossible but it’s something we can apply in life. It doesn’t have to be exactly “enemy”, but in this case, something/someone you might not like but you need to learn how to appreciate, instead of hate.
In no alternate universe would any genius of Federer win in this match, reason - Novak looked determined like a hungry tiger. Everytime Roger came up with a genius shot, novak applauded but made changes. He is a Terminator making changes and becoming a new beast !
Great match! Thank you raz for this!
I love the fast pace between these two
Novak was so good this year, great upload!
An even more underrated match was their 2014 final in IW. I was certain Fed was gonna win it, was shell shocked when Djokovic pulled out the third set tie breaker
he aint pulled much, fed was trash in the tb
The Federer-Djokovic RIVALRY is criminally underrated.
It produced more quality and drama than the Federer Nadal rivalry
Federer used to believe he was invencible, the best , and Djokovic humilliated him many times , he imposed over federer with category and contundence , Roger felt the best in the tennis history , nowadays its the third , down Nadal and mostly Djokovic .
This is masterpiece... what a beauty of skills from both of them
These are definitely the 2 greatest players to grace the game
2 of 3*
@@mrlalalaelmo7454 Thanks for luck, there are (relatively) plenty more
1 of 3
He was the best. The other two weren’t even close
@jonathanstirling7167 federer? Maybe. I think he's the goat but djokovic is close. Federer beating Sampras on grass is so overlooked by gen z and gen alpha fans. It's shameful
Amazing high quality match! What also caught my attention was how the commentators themselves (specially PatMac) used to gush so much about Federer. The commentary was rarely unbiased, mostly gushing towards Fed. No wonder Djokovic's repulsion towards entire media grew up over time.
This is why I say 2017 was so epic, his backhand is just so different bk then.
I would argue that Djokovic and Federer had the better rivalry than Nadal, whom both (Novak and Roger) consider as their biggest rival..
Their matches were very close more often than not,while Dkokovic-Nadal stopped being a rivalry on hard/ grass courts since 2013: 10 -0 is not a rivalry ,is ..customer care!
Can't believe this guy Novak Dkjovic is 37 and about world number 2 and reached the Wimbledon final and won Olympic Gold. He unfortunately lost in the third round of the US open but hey his still 2 in the world higher than most player's on the tour .
These matches are there to remind us that these guys were different and almost on the same level with each other... every match is a chess match played on a tennis court...
What is incredible is Djokovic game improve so much since 2011, he was only 23 years old in this match.
This game just shows how much Federer struggled with his back hand before he made that racket change and adapted his game. Not his fault entirely because he came from a time when there wasnt a need for so many ground strokes in faster courts. I believe when people say that Fed didnt have mental mettle etc, which is true to some extent, they also underplay how much mental strength it was required to constantly adapt to the mental game and be a champion
I noticed the commentators expressions indicated he’s probably a Federer fan. Generally he was praising Federer’s great shots a lot more than Djokovic’s.
Take into consideration about their age differences. Roger was already 30 and Djokovic was 24. Six years might not seem a lot in age differences, but in this level of tennis it's a big gap.
Federer had already accept the fact that Nadal will always have the upper hand but he despised it when djokovic started beating him regularly
federer haved the upperhand agaisnt nadal, nadal only really was achieving wins through clay
@Alex1492-tp4xi really?? what about wimbledon 08 finals and Australian Open 09, 12 and 14? Nadal has also beaten Federer at Indian wells, Miami, Cincinnati, Dubai and WTF.
@@AS-js7kb Federer have bagelled nadal on clay bagelled him twice federer dominates in every other master 1000 finals wimblendon 2007-2006 then we have 2017 final agaisnt him then we have straight sets defeat on shanghai
@@Alex1492-tp4xi bro your original statement says Nadal was only achieving wins on clay against Federer so I laid out the facts. I don't know what bageling Nadal on clay has to do with this.
I also never said he was undefeated against Federer. My statement is there to prove that Nadal won against Federer off clay also many times and in big matches.
@@AS-js7kb I say really of course nadal would win in other surfaces but the reality is most of their matches were on clay
Such a shame Roger waited so long to change rackets
Ready 2010-13 were just wasted years where he lost a lot of ground
Maybe..
yup, if he had changed racquets 5 years earlier and changed his backhand in 2011 instead of 2017, the heads to heads against novak and nadal would be way different and fed would have 28 slams now
I couldn't agree more, that Pro Staff 90 should have been retired back in 09.
@@pdiseris absolutely, meanwhile nadal was playing with a 100 square inch racquet and federer had an old tech 90 square inch one
Great video as always. First time I saw the full highlights of this match. I feel Rog's return game let him down here.
Federer just needed to develop his 2017 backhand 10 years earlier lol. Even then, idk how he would have done vs Novak but he would have definitely been better vs Nadal.
absolutely, and if he had changed the racquet in 2010 insteadof 2016..he was very stubborn playing with a completely inferior small racquet for most of his career
@@cantwealljustgetalong2 In all fairness, I have and play with one sometimes, and they do everything amazingly except defense. They are a scalpel with loads of control and feel. His backhand with that racket, you could just see how the velocity of the ball drops so much. Its like his slice was more effective. Come 2017 though that freakin neo-backhand with the RF97 was a weapon, not a weakness.
You've got to warn sensitive viewers when Fed is going to lose 😅
Nailed..wtf! He’s trying what.. kill us? This fuckin guy!
🥸😂
This 'level' has yet to be achieved by Alcaraz and Sinner. They're just not in the same stratosphere as Federer, Novak and Nadal...it's that simple. These three geniuses are not the norm.
Ese año djoko fue una bestia indomable ....tenia un hambre de triunfo que muy poca gente a tenido en la historia del deporte...
you can see how much federer’s backhand improved from here to 2017
Excellent 👍
After watching USO 2024 yeah this is different level
Not sure people fully appreciate how blessed we were to have 3-4 guys like this in a Generation.
Yes, but Sampras / Becker / Agassi were just as amazing in the 90s.
Man, what a high level of tennis! I miss Nole vs Roger matches, please comeback Federer once to play against Djokovic. PS. I hate when Roger win Nole at 2011 FO, that was worst lose...
Whom ever posted this match has a computer that was worth buying. The quality of the video was so clear. It gave a feel as if you were actually there watching the match. Thanks for sharing one of the most intense tennis matches in that year.👍🏾 Both players gave the people they're money's worth.
@@Validheart my pleasure 🙏
If only this Djokovic was at US Open this year
just another clear example why novak is a greater player than fed
Djokovic got AO & Dubai 2 wins in a row against Roger,his confidence was boosted
Once defending > attacking, and Novak being the greatest defensive player we've ever seen, Roger was pretty much cooked against him.
The exceptions tended to be where that was less true, with Wimbledon being the most obvious. Even there, Novak's insanely great defending defeated Roger's great play in the 2019 final. Roger simply lost the consistency when it came to hitting ten shots vs two or three, and Novak rarely makes unforced errors. The result becomes rather inevitable, especially with Roger being five years older than Novak, too.
6 years* 5 years older than Rafa.
So, basically, they win where conditions favour them.
Like if you also wanted Federer to win this match.
No. Only Djokovic. Only brain-dead fans wanted Federer to win.
😂😂😂
Pas du tout pourquoi?
Thanks I can’t watch it now. I’m high and all 😝
Wishes is one thing but reality is another.
Sweet. Love it when Novak takes Rog to school and does in in front of the stupid-shit Federer crowd. Great stuff. Novak never beat just Federer alone but also beat the crowd, nearly every time.
Djokovic's sneakers sounds cool when he drifts through the court.
Operator: 911, What's your emergency?
they need to make the courts a bit faster again!
Commentators very baised towards Federer and crowd also😢😢but Djokovic is the goat he doesn't neend all of that
the arrival of Novak shook the two greats guarding their pedestal like saying ...i am coming and watch me climb that highest pedestal
Fed's groundies looked great for most of this season. The only time in the whole 2010s they looked better was 2017. He should have converted that into two wins at major's against 2011 djokovic. Would have been quite a flex
Think about which player would play a point to win if your life depended on it. Djokovic no question.
nole the goat...so inspiring
I might be in the minority here but, i love Roger vs Nole matches more than Nole vs Nadal
2-2 40-15 huge momentum, boom 2-6. damn.
yeah this was a nice match !
8:11 one of my favorite come ons what a rally to break
Djokovic took passing skill to a higher level, especially frombhis backhand side, compared to players during the 2003-2008 period, causing Federer hesitate to charge the net. Federer might hit a great inside out approaching forehand but Djokovic, with a great backhand and the ability to split to reach the ball quicker, could hit a low cross court passing shot that makes it hard for Federer to volley.
this yellow outfit is my favorite from all RF's career
Exactly what Djokovic wanted - an endless loop of long grinding rallies, going to net or attacking with anything other than heavy topspin difficult to pull off
djokovic went super saiyan
Goat vs former goat
ever notice when fed makes a great shot nole acknowledges it...when nole hits a great shot not a peep from fed..sorry fed fans but fed is a arrogant poor sport....
He rarely applauds. It's not Novak-specific. Relax.
@@flyingsaucer8199 he rarely applauds becaus he has the most dull personality...and hes too proud to acknowledge greatness..so relax on that and go back to your meds boy
all swiss are arrogant, not of charecter
@@flyingsaucer8199 he rarely applauds because he is too proud...hes not humble at all...facts
@@kevin-ty4nm Most players do not applaud shots. Are they all lacking humility too?
I would love to have seen all the big three - playing during the ninety s era - using the equipment available at the time. I'd suspect the pecking order in mens goat would be greatly altered from what the conversation is today !!
8:26 Can watch that all day long
That point on 10:36 was insane 😳 👏🏿 😊😊😊
2:52 beautiful rally
They were tied 11 games each in the 3rd set.
Fed always getting good ass beat by Novak unfortunately
Their h2h is 23-27 how is this considered ass beating?
@@mrhatman675 Because most of encounters after Wim 2012, Djokovic won more crucial matches. For example, in 2015 all of Nole wins were in gs and masters final, while Fed's were in atp500 and atp finals round robin, or 2019 Fed won atp final round robin but lost Wim final earlier
@@luftwaffle1402 Ok, so it's recency bias and a different statement.
@@luftwaffle1402 Cincy final, 2015.
@@flyingsaucer8199 In grand scheme of things, can not really compare to Wim and Us final that year
More than one replies the biased commentor (not to mention fans) yet too many praises killed a great player, GOAT wasn't born be praised 😎
Federer- the old Novak Customer 😎😀
I'm a huge Federer fan, but the choice of shirt color to utterly match all the ball kids is super dubious
Fédérer le plus grand un tennis super élégant et classe
The one and only his majesty Roger Federer!
Djokovic always seems to have a bit more mental strength then Federer that goes a long way. If you look at some pivotal points in Federer's career you would think Federer would have anywhere between 23-26 grand slams but he cracked under pressure
When Federer plays his forehand and rhythm as prime federer in some rounds, he can take advantage of the court, but these rounds are not long-lasting. Generally speaking, Federer still cannot escape the swamp of being constrained by his backhand. If it were Federer in 2005, who was more flexible and powerful, he could win. 05federer can rely on better movement and power to cut flatter and deeper slices, get rid of long-term backhand suppression, and find more offensive opportunities.
1-1, 15=40 Djokovic serving and Roger can't put a backhand return into the court. Ultimately, the shortcomings on the backhand are the main reason why he could not compete with Novak more successfully.
3:32 and 13:50 Again 15-40... yet another couple of missed opportunities. There's something reeeally strange about it 😮
No matter how good you can do it, I can do it better , said commentor, but the truth was, no matter how many times you can break me, I can break you more
to be fair, the older man did seem to tire first
Feels like Federer definitely had his chances to win here…. Overall just not a good enough serving performance in the third set. He was sloppy during the first quarter of 2011.
This Djokovic will eat the 37 yrs old one alive.
Djokovic was hyper - aggressive. Federer was not as good as Nole at defense, tend to slice too often.
It's underrated because Novak won it,if Federer won it his fans would be all over it 😂
Novak's inside in is from diff planet. Pretty boy had no answers.
Federer should have come to the net more often, he waited too much for Djokovic to make a mistake. You don’t do that against Novak, cause he won’t miss😂
This is the only reason I didn’t teach my kids single handed backhand. My son played a single handed BH, I asked him to use the same strategy, he won 6-0. There are more disadvantages being a single handed than benefits.
In modern tennis, which is more physical than technical, 2HBH is the best choice, sadly.
I am sure that very much in the tennis records and recent history would have changed if their age had been reversed. That is when Federer would have been 6 years younger than Novak and 5 years than Rafa.
If I was 8 foot tall I could have played in the NBA.........
Its strange but Federer didn't look as muscular and atheltic in his 30s as he did in his 20s its like he prioritised being slim and light, maybe for movement, over being powerfully built with a heavy shots I mean he looked more broad shouldered and imposing throughout the 2000s till about 2009, but its clear to me he had a different peak era to Djokovic.
The 2004 to maybe 2009 Fed was overwhelming everyone except Nadal on clay.
Ur mind forces u to think what u desperately want.. Its a mirage.. There was nothing wrong in Fed's build here vis à vis 03-09..his strength didn't decrease at all.. Aren't u guys tired of convincing urself with such lies that has got no significance..Fed's game hadn't dipped at this point at all.. Infact many a times he has broached the topic of Novak and Rafa and signified how much his own game improved and evolved because of the other two.
The fact here is Novak got to a different level at this point which hasn't got a precedence in the past.. The highs that he hit this year even prompted Rafa and his uncle to confess that the level that Novak is playing is unbelievable and unseen and He (Rafa) will always try to decode it and try to beat him..
U guys can come up with all excuses and make scenarios (fictional to say the least) as to why Roger got inferior to Novak from 2011 onwards... But the fact remains fact which u all know but pretend not to, that It wasn't Fed's level that dipped but Novak's level that raised and propelled him to GOAT status.
@@vickyrajan5378 Right on! - see Goatkovic channel for ALL the stats
@@QuantumPsycheqpsych6969 he has some fishy arguments like talking about "ELO" in tennis which doesnt make sense, and comparing different eras also doenst make sense(different courts/rules/calendar's etc), for example in early-mid 2000s we had carpet courts, the wimbledon grass was faster and Hamburg was a masters 1000 instead of Madrid which had different play(Nadal and Novak didnt play as good there)
@@Saskobest 58 video's of the most detailed statistical analysis I've ever seen - it's all there maybe you should watch all of them - I have - your comparing era's comment is CLEARLY dealt with, but Yes your ELO comment has some merit, but check out the guy who created this particular algorithm and he explains how it can be used eg if you use this particular algorithm you will see that Andy Murray is possibly one of the unluckiest players in tennis history; you dont need the ELO to see that (11 finals and 10 against big 3) but it adds another statistical layer etc, but you need to look at how Goatkovic uses it (he explains EVERYTHING) - I'm not going to try and explain, you need to watch and UNDERSTAND what Goatkovic is saying - Start at the first video and you will see the painting and it's titled 'NOVAK IS THE GOAT AND IT"S NOT EVEN CLOSE" - Drink deep from the well of wisdom or not at all, for a little knowledge can be very dangerous ... over and out.
New match what do you think?
Federer fan talking a match being underrated when Federer lost it, especially vs Djokovic, haha! They have given up
8:26 YES!....😂😂😂 but 17:58 .|. 🤣
djokovic celebrates like an animal... despite all his records, the man has zero class
It shows how Federer is far from his prime, played well against the joker in this match, beat him at the French Open and had match points in the semi-finals of the US Open
If you are far from your prime at age 29-30, then maybe your prime wasn't that long of a time to begin with.
@@Ivanntuin sports, your 30s is absolutely out of your prime
@@initialize21 Federer was not 30 for most of 2011. And Djokovic achieved his best results after 30. So just more excuses for Federer.
@@Ivanntu yeh cause Federer had Rafa, Novak, Andy, Stan, Delpo, etc. after his 30 while Novak had no one ahahaha
@@GF-hg7op You can make an argument that Federer had "nobody" until 2007. That's why I don't accept arguments about competition. You can even make an argument that Nadal had the toughest competition in his career.