Mary Poppins (1964) VS Mary Poppins Returns (2018)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 лип 2024
- Mary Poppins (1964) VS Mary Poppins Returns (2018) // Subscribe: ua-cam.com/users/MsMojo?sub_c...
The original film is practically perfect in every way, but how does its long-awaited sequel stack up? We’re evaluating a wide-range of categories to determine which film is the most timeless and all-around magical. There’s a spoiler alert in effect here.
Check out these other great videos:
Top 10 Things You Missed in Mary Poppins Returns: • Top 10 Things You Miss...
Top 10 Fascinating Things You Didn't Know About Mary Poppins: • Top 10 Fascinating Thi...
Top 10 Best Mary Poppins Moments: • Top 10 Best Mary Poppi...
Check out the voting page for this list and add your picks: h www.watchmojo.com/suggest/Mar...)
Special thanks to our user TheMichaelCityMaker for suggesting this idea!
MsMojo's Social Media:
Facebook►► / mswatchmojo
Twitter►► / mswatchmojo
Instagram►► / mswatchmojo
Snapchat ►► / mswatchmojo
Get MsMojo Merchandise at www.watchmojo.com/store
Shop: shop.watchmojo.com/collection...
WatchMojo is a leading producer of reference online video content of Top 10 Lists, Origins, Biographies, Commentary and more on Pop Culture, Celebrity, Movies, Music, TV, Film, Video Games, Politics, News, Comics, Superheroes. Your trusted authority on ranking Pop Culture.
#MaryPoppins #MaryPoppinsReturns #Disney - Розваги
Julie Andrews had a pure , clear soprano voice. Nothing could compare. She was offered a cameo, but turned it down as not to distract from Emily’s performance
Original Mary Poppins is better, iconic and memorable. I love Emily Blunt so much, she did a amazing job, but Julie Andrews is just magnifcent, she has all my childhood and my heart!!! 💗
My childhood before yall
Not to mention Dick Van Dyck was amazing too. These actors are just so iconic to me since I grew up with the original.
I was thinking the same thing, Dick Van Dyck is amazing actor.
Mary poppins (1964) = practically perfect in every way
Well actually this is wrong. We all know the spoon full of sugar song right? Well when Mary popins sings the song and meets the robin the robin is an American robin NOT a British robin which is much smaller and has a smaller red spot on its belly. Search it up
As if that matters.
I Agree
Yes that’s right🥰
@@lemonlemon4816 maybe the American robin was on holiday?
Feed the Birds gives me chills and makes me teary-eyed every time.
i read somewhere that Feed The Birds made Lin cry, he could never get to it
A Conversation and Where the Lost Things Go also made me cry because of just how true it is to my own story. My mom died when I was 6, and my sisters and I really had to grow up a lot. My dad lost his job soon after and has never really gotten better after her death. My heart breaks for him everyday. I wish that this movie had come out when I was younger, but it is still a bittersweet reminder that I don't have to work so hard all the time, and I wish my dad could see that, too. I can relate to both films :)
Me,too. (I wish the great Jimmy Durante, singer of FROSTY THE SNOWMAN special, and still alive and working back then, had sung the song) It's Walt Disney's AND P.L.Traver's favorite. Walt loved it, made the last years (till his 1966 death,. and his ashes in the grav,e or spirit)), of his life bearable. He told whichever Sherman Brother wrote it, "That'll replace BRAHM'S LULLABYE".
I always sang Feed the Birds once I learned the lyrics
Feed the Birds is one of my favorite song including Let's Go fly A Kite.
It's a sequel, not a remake! It's a homage to the first film. You could hear bits of the original score within the sequel's score.
Also, it uses several things from the original. One character especially
@@margojohnson4224 3 characters actually
It's sad that the original past tho if she was still alive they could have made her to be the sister of the original I bet that would have been cool
... so you are saying they are trying to gain new audiences while maintaining the old ones... wow what a unique and crazy and new idea.. truly inspiring, and not a money grab !!!! INSANE!!!.. still a remake fyi. Once it's past most of the originals content.. but.. you know.. who cares for details.. you gave none in your excuse/explanation... right HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA...the internet, no reason to make sense.. HAHAHAHAHAHAAA LIFE IS A JOKE .. ... -_-
Para mim acredito que cada um tem o seu próprio brilho, cada um ao seu próprio tempo 🙋💖🌹🌻🌞💚❤💛💜🌸🧏♀️💗🧏♂️🎹💯
Look we all know which Mary Poppins won...Yondu
DJTV2 I’M WHEEZING
@@drama_king_august7974 "Well, i'm Mary Poppins y'all"
Best comment of 2019. Give this man an award.
@@DJCMORE I see what you there...
Obviously
I'm 26 about to be 27 years old and I still love the original Mary Poppins. Plus Mary Poppins taught me how to say supercalifragilisticexpialidocious even though it isn't a real word
Joseph Mendoza I’m 25 about to be 26 myself. I used to sing the song with the lyrics messed up when I ride the bus home from kindergarten.
@@manuelorozco7760 you know now that you think of it and the way how you see Julie Andrews now she doesn't age at all even though she's like 83 years old she still looks young and not just that but she was practically perfect in every way as Mary Poppins
Joseph Mendoza Amen. Still beautiful
Actually, it is a real word. Look in the Oxford English Dictionary.
FEED THE BIRDS is wonderful too (in a melachony way). Walt Disney certainly thought so...really made his day (the way those sad songs do.)
May nothing top the original, but they both are fantastic films!
ɐuuɐʎɥs these are the kinds of films that everyone can watch over and over again, and never get tired of watching them!
ya
Most sequel is better than original films but I love original better always like The Gate 1987 A Nightmare on elm Street
Emily Blunt did a magnificent job, but Julie Andrews IS Mary Poppins.
Walt Disney himself personally picked Julie to play the role, so how can you beat that? Julie won an Oscar for this movie!
They're really two independent films that stand beautifully on their own. It's not really a sequel so much as a new film that has some very nice nods to the 1964 classic. Both of them have very touching elements. I can't count how many times I've cried listening to "Feed the Birds." I had a similar reaction to "Where the Lost Things Go." I love that they both have important lessons about kindness and love. I think both were released at a time when we all needed something to help us feel good and remind us that there is a bigger picture and story. My own personal feeling is I love both films.
There are plenty of things set in place for Mary Poppins Returns that gives us subtle nods that it is the '64 film's official sequel.
You remember near the end of MPR that "Mr. Dawes Jr." was telling the children about their father's account money; the whole thing was about the relationship between the children and their father to tie up the loose ends that established their own father's relationship towards their Grandfather who was in the first film.
I could understand why Julie Andrews would not want to cameo in MPR and aside from the fact that she was also too old to play the lead part anyway; We haven't seen her in a new film since "The Princess Diaries 2". The only thing that really bothers me and every other 'Poppins fans is why they did not bother recasting the role of the birdwoman?
11:09....Poppins, my dear Ms. Mojo. Its Mary Poppins. Never ever JUST Mary.
I’m just gonna guess that the OG Mary Poppins will win due to its impact and pure nostalgia 👌🏽
GØDLY I agree !
For me it will always be the original Mary Poppins, because i grew up with the movie and to this day it still means a lot to me.
Hello Geronimo Are you kidding? It was the first live action movie musical I ever enjoyed
For me too, the first Mary Poppins is the best! I also grew up with it and it's still precious for me, with all the good songs and the performance of Julie Andrews and Dick Van Dike!
Mary popins returns are a sequal, not a new version. I think Emily Blunt did an amazing job reeding the books and make her own version. She sings so well, but Both Mary Poppins movies are goood. I’m born in 1999 so I can understand how people from 1940+ likes the old one. Mary poppins was the original and always will be. And mary poppins return is and always will be the best sequal
Rachel Svindal Well I am a 93 baby first of all. Secondly I did enjoy the sequel but not as much as the original.
Julie Andrews is a Legend, you want to compare Julie's voice with Blunt's?? Not saying E. Blunt didn't do a good acting,but she is not a match for Julie, no one will ever be. Hollywood 's, now, is a lobby, do you think the best films, actresses, producers are the winners??! Come on, anyway Mary Poppins will always be Julie Andrews
Ordem D'Avis I never said. I said mary poppins is the original and always will be. But I think Emily blunt did an amazing job, with both acting and singing. I did’t say I don’t like Julie Andrews. She is mary poppins because she was the first one. I liked her a lot, and in sound of music she was great. But anyway i love Emily blunt, and u cant deny that she did pretty awesome. It hard doing something someone already did amazing. Emily is a great actress, like in a quiet place she was sooo good. I like them both and both movies
@@rachelsvindal6760 I understand you point of view, Blunt is a good actress, I won't deny it. I liked the movie as well, but still I prefer Julie.
Ordem D'Avis yeah, I understand your point of view as well. Julie is mary poppins. She was the first one and she was great. I loved her in sound of music
To be honest, the first Mary Poppins movie beats out every round in that video and as much as I loved Mary Poppins Returns I can't help but feel like this video had Mary Poppins Returns win some rounds just for the sake of it to have a competition between the two, but, there is no competition Mary Poppins wins every round.
Andrea Smeelie I couldn’t have said it better myself.
Totally agree with you! I personally felt the theme in the original brought more impact and the animation, needless to say, older ones are always better. As much as I too adore the sequel, it is a weak comparison to the original
A Conversation and Where the Lost Things Go also made me cry because of just how true it is to my own story. My mom died when I was 6, and my sisters and I really had to grow up a lot. My dad lost his job soon after and has never really gotten better after her death. My heart breaks for him everyday. I wish that this movie had come out when I was younger, but it is still a bittersweet reminder that I don't have to work so hard all the time, and I wish my dad could see that, too. I can relate to both films :)
So glad I watched “Saving Mr. Banks” before watching “Mary Poppins Returns”. The author P.L.Travers disliked the Disney 1960s film adaptation that the majority of the public loved and approved. If P.L. Travers were still alive today, she would had approved more the sequel and the performance of Emily Blunt who did stayed faithful to the Mary Poppins from the books.
I didn’t see Mary Poppins before I was an adult, and I found it absolutely enchanting. A truly timeless film.🧡
I’m just glad that we were able to get a movie that was a worthy and faithful sequel to such a timeless classic like Mary Poppins 👍🏽
Well said!
Likewise, a rare case of the Sequel being just as amazing as the first installment!
Indeed!
it wasn't ....
seriously... it wasn't at all.. they took the serious approach with the sequel.. and it was still wrong. she never liked walt disney and his take on the book, only gave in because she was pressed on money .. REAL LIFE. She even left it in her will to not apply any remakes or sequels of her book pertaining to walt disneys movie.. she hated it that much..... ... anything you perceive is just your own perspective and sheep hitting the like. button. :) BUT HEY.. who am i.. just someone who doesn't sugar coat anything :-D ................................................... .............
Julie Andrews was much friendlier than emily blunt....
Chris Poon yeah but in the book it was nothing like the Disney movie
Michael Rooker: "Bitch, what am I? A roach?"
Emily Blunt mimics Mary Poppins’s rude personality from the books.
She sure was..(not taking anything away from Emily.I enjoy her in 2011's THE ADJUSTMENT BEREAU..)_
True but Emily’s take on the role is closer to the books
Julie Andrews is the best 😍😍
💯 Agree, no one will ever be Mary Poppins, but Julie
Marycielo Vlogs But Emily BLUNT is following in her footsteps
Marycielo Vlogs Factss
Let's not put Emily Blunt down. She did a wonderful job and had very big shoes to fill. I give Julie Andrews a thumbs up in saying NO in not accepting a cameo part. She knew that would cause problems for Emily.
Mara Pemberton Factss™️
I LOVED the songs from Mary Poppins Returns.
My personal faves are The Cover is Not The Book, Turning Turtle, Trip A Little Life Fantastic, The Place Where The Lost Things Go and Nowhere To Go But Up.
After seeing the film twice (and loving it twice.) Where The Lost Things Go immediately brings me to tears, when I hear it
Even though Emily did great in Mary Poppins Return, but I love the 1964 Mary Poppins. So I cannot choose; there are both supercalifragilisticexpialidocious
I liked MARY POPPINS RETURNS. But I didn’t find the music as memorable as the music in the original MARY POPPINS.
Mara Pemberton True but having Richard M Sherman onboard as consultant was pretty forgiving.
FINALLY SOMEONE ELSE
Manuel Orozco, True.
Irene Acosta, I bet most people know just about know or name every song from the original MARY POPPINS. But will not be able to name one or be able to hum a tune from MARY POPPINS RETURNS.
Mara Pemberton But It was going to take a little more than a beat by beat storyline to ruin my enjoyment. Because it didn’t not so easily
Both great. Julie's an icon. She will live in my heart for the rest of my lost. I think her voice sounds exactly like love. Poppins and Sound of Music are the best!
Objection! Blunt's take on Mary Poppins, inspired by the version from the books is the superior Poppins. While not exactly like the literary Mary Poppins (that character would be hard to like on screen), her playing up of Mary's various flaws and eccentricities creates a good middle ground between Andrews's version and Travers's. The end result is a surprisingly complex character. She's strict, vain , haughty, sharp and a little batty but is also capable of showing surprising emotional depth at times (like when she's singing "The Place Where Lost Things Go"). Look, Julie Andrews is great and all. Blunt's Mary Poppins has more character, though.
I totally agree to you
No, JULIE! No, EMILY! No, JULIE! No,EMILY! It's both for me, but PREFERRED? JULIE!!
No, the best Mary Poppins is Yondu
No one will remember Blunt as Mary Poppins. Julie will always be Mary Poppins.
I prefer Julie's Mary, but to each their own.
1964 Mary Poppins will always be the number classic in every way-hands down. Mary Poppins returns is just that, a sequel and should be rated and understood for what it conveys; The Return of May Poppins and should be enjoyed for it's own worth and different kind of fun it brings to the audience. So enjoy!
I love Emily Blunt, but Julie Andrews IS Mary Poppins.
Not according to P.L. Travers!
I LOVE the original but I actually preferred Emily’s take of character better
4:25 “the costumes look as if they were painted on”
yeah. it’s because they actually were. the costume designer opted to hand paint them so they looked more cartoonish. mary’s ruffles aren’t ruffles, they’re painted on
As much as I love Mary Poppins Returns, let's face it, you can't beat the original Mary Poppins
I did not hit her, it's bullshit. I did not hit her. I DID NOT!
Oh hi mark
Julie Andrews is the only Mary Poppins.
True
Couldn’t agree more 👏🏼 Mary Poppins Returns is wonderful in its own way but nothing will beat the classic ❤️
Emily blunt terrific outstanding job as
Mary Poppins nobody can't replace Julia andrews
Mary poppins 1964 is the best i love this movie 🎥 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
That's why she's Dame Julie Andrews!
The original is a well established classic Disney film while "The return of Mary Poppins" has just been released this past year. I think we have to wait a few years to see how it gets old. If ten years from now the sequel is barely remembered...well, there you have your winner.
My kids think they are both equal because both of them have lovely songs and they are both magical.
No comparison
TBH I think this tried to make it a close call, I'm sorry but Mary Poppins Returns really paled in comparison to the original.
debatable
@@Gandellion I didnt like new one at all
Mary Poppins Returns made me cry more than Mary Poppins but Mary Poppins made me smile more... lol
Both fantastic movies, both INCREDIBLE actresses! No need to compare :)
the original!!!! i always get at the verge of tears everytime i hear feed the birds
Of course the sequel was never going to be as good as the original. We all knew this! But I still loved it and was super happy with the result. Nothing can beat Julie Andrews, but Emily Blunt was amazing and I loved her version. And I loved the music and the costumes and sets in the new one. It felt like a continuation story, which is what I wanted. You can love them both!
The original's songs are used in the score of the new film and they easily upstage the new material. They're moving in a way the newer ones will never be.
@@jcrum417 well thats your opinion
Older one BETTER
Pour Mary poppins c'est et ça restera pour moi . La Mary poppins de 1964.
C'est elle qui malgré les années me donne toujours autant.
Mary poppins est à peu de près parfaites en tous points.🥰😍
I don't care about what anyone says about any of the topics, the original will always be the best for me in every way. Don't get me wrong, the sequel is good but it will never be as special to me as the original.
Mary Poppins is by far the greatest film ever released. The fact that this sequel at least comes close is a source of great comfort and joy. Looking forward to the next life-affirming instalment.
I took my grandkids to see Mary Poppins Returns. They had already seen the original many times before. Their initial impression was that they liked Mary Poppins Returns better, but when asked again after some a few years have passed, they couldn't remember much about Mary Poppins Returns or sing any songs from it. But they could sing any song from the original Mary Poppins easily when prompted and knew the story intimately. It seems that the original has a certain magic and soul that RETURNS lacks
Grief is a important topic, especially in a kids film, but if you don't care or connect with the characters or the love one they've lost.... it's doesn't mean a thing
Julie is a Legend... but Blunt should also take credit from the author’s (Travers) perspective... :)
Original Mary Poppins was of the heart, and convinced Mr. Banks that money isn't everything, rather to fly a kite, feed the birds, and spending time with his family. Mary Poppins Returns centered around money, and the savings of the house. It also had threads that had little, if anything to do with moving the plot along. I see no comparison at all. The writing in MP Returns gave nearly opposite messages, one towards altruism and the other towards materialism.
I think both are practically perfect in every way.
I have the 64 movie on VHS and I have seen the new one two I love both a lot they are soo good big time and I love the songs in the 64 movie and the new one they are very good and I cant wait to get the new one on DVD then it comes out this year and I love your videos guys a lot they are soooooo good on here big time and keep up the hard work making your videos on here guys you rock hard
There is no comparison. The 1964 Mary Poppins is far and away the best of the two.
The original Mary Poppins is my favorite movie of all time, I finally got my 8 year old cousin to watch it and told her that the songs will be stuck in her head all day, two hours later I hear her yell “ Oh No, The Songs are stuck in my head!”
Honestly, I can’t pick! Mary Poppins means so much to me sentimentally but I’ve fallen in love with the new one, particularly the new songs. *A Cover Is Not The Book* is a bop.
I love both movies as most everyone does (those who loved the first one, seem to also enjoy and love this new one too). However; being totally honest with myself, as hard as it is for me to say it, I have to go with Emily Blunt's, Mary. She portrays a character that's more in line with the one described in the original books, she's more blunt/"frank", more stern, more vein, and has a more complex personality. Also; for me the number one reason I like her portrayal of this character better is, her ability to embrace the magic she possess. In the first movie, Burt has to practically beg her to do her magic, at times she seems almost embarrassed by it, and of course denies it all together when confronted. The "new" Mary, really seems to enjoy the fact that she has magic powers, and does not have to be begged by anyone to use them. Take for example her actions and reactions in the scene where she introduces us to the song: "Can you imagine that?!" As she sings the song, she sets up the magical adventure they're about to have by tossing in several items into the bath tub, after the children fall into the bath and disappear; she says with a wide heartfelt smile, "and away we go!" She's totally into it! I love that about her, and for me, she beats out Julie Andrew's version of Mary Poppins. Hard to admit, but true. IMO.
Agree with this. Only problem with this is that you said when she dived into the bath that she said,"Away we go." She actually says,"Off we go."
I have to say though that I was impressed by Mary Poppins Returns. However, you can't compare the two because the original is one of the greatest movies and still holds up.
If being "timeless" was the biggest challenge, then no remake or sequel will top the original.
Emily Blunt lived up to her name in Mary Poppins Returns. She sounded & looked blunt there.
Yes, Mary Poppins Julie Andrews is incomparable. She was firm but her happy disposition (which we hardly see in Mary Poppins Returns' Emily Blunt) was and is so lovable & adorable, especially to kids &/or the kids at heart. 😊
Thank you for crediting me and making my another suggestion.
Who else has been keeping track of which songs from the original have counterparts in the sequel?
A Spoonful of Sugar - Can You Imagine That?
Feed the Birds - Where the Lost Things Go
Step in Time - Trip a Little Light Fantastic
and so on. My personal favourite is by far Cover is Not the Book; yes, that means my favourite song from both movies. What's yours?
Yes I know it was established near the beginning of MPR that Bert was taking a trip around the world; he could've been on his last leg by midway through the film's events. Judging by the movie's story's timing I'd say he'd been back for the first few days of the second week Mary Poppins had been in her charge with the children since he landed that last saturday of the previous week; that would've given Bert plenty of time to set up that little charade.
Love how this “which is better” video was unbiased as and only focused on which movie did something that is in both of them the strongest.
I like both, but the firat one feels more magical and the songs are better
Mary Poppins Returns also makes references to the original!
So cute. Altlough I watched Mary Poppins since I was a Child, I love the version of the 1960s But seeing the new version I guess I like both.
The Mary Poppins Returns soundtrack is the best film score of the 2010's imo.
I am only 12 years old. But In my opinion, I loved or prefered the original and the one and only Julie Andrews. Even though, Emily Blunt did such a great acting on being a Mary Poppins. By the way I loved both of them.
I’ve loved the first film from childhood - in fact a large reason I wanted to work with children is because being like Mary Poppins seemed so fun - but I love the second one too. You can never sing too much in an situation!
Both are awesome movies but I prefer 1964 version. Emily did her best but her voice is a bit..... Ms Andrews voice is a gem.
The first one is better.
I agree
Julie Andrews is Mary Poppins.🥰😍😘🤩I Love her.
Both are very good. Just finished watching both! It's its 60th anniversary this year.
It's 50 - 50 for me. Both has its own merits. This is like comparing Nolan's Batman and Reeve's Batman. To me, both shined as a film.
I didn’t like Mary Poppins Returns as much as the first film, but I am still thankful that it exists.
Can you also do a comparison between the movie & the Broadway musical please Emily? Great video. I equally enjoy both Jolly Holiday & The Cover Is Not The Book.😊
I say it should be a tie cause the original and sequel have same meaning plot (family bonds and magical adventure), their own songs, the sequel respects the 1st, and both Marry's personas r the same; kind, caring, well-mannered, stern, and no-nonsense but most of all classy.
I agree that Julie is a better Poppins than Emily Blunt, but I actually liked the songs of the sequel better than the original, as I found them more joyful overall, whereas the original had a melancholy sound to it at times, which to me, permeates the film too much. Overall, I like the tone of the sequel much better. The only thing I like a bit better about the original was Julie Andrews- and I was going to say Dick Van Dyke too- but he makes an appearance here during a very pivotal moment. So, to me, the remake is better overall, though they are both very special films.
I love Emily Blunt 😍😍
Julie Andrews was , is & always shall remain my Mary Poppins.Flawless in every way❤️
I went to see the first one tday personally I think the songs in the first one are better! But I can’t pick a winner
Stop trying to compare which is better. The original is always going to be on top as it’s a classic. Every kid even in this generation has watched Mary Poppins.
Mary Poppins Returns did what many sequel of old classics couldn’t do, it shines in its own success.
Blunt played her role for Mary Poppins to the way she was in the books and in a way it didn’t steal the limelight away from the original. They didn’t strive to make Mary Poppins Return to be better than the first one. They aimed for it to keep the magic of Mary Poppins alive and which they all did very well.
The sequel was great.
They kept the magic of the original but they gave it a fresh new energetic feel. As for those that says there was no connection to the music, I call bullshit. If you stop trying to compare them to the original score, you’ll see the connections and the meanings for each song.
I was blown away by how well the movie flowed and the messages it brings. Grief, depression, lost, failure, strength, loss of innocence. I felt that in every song. No it’s not going to be better than the original but they weren’t trying to.
Why wasn't Lin-manuel Miranda mentioned?
Sharkz_73 he’s the best! Not gonna lie, he’s my favourite character!
@@elvispresleyfanforever6898 same
Sharkz_73 EXACTLY THEY THREW AWAY HIS SHOT
Tilly Vlogs I KNOW RIGHT?!?!
I only watched Mary Poppins returns and I’ve heard good reviews of the original. Since I have no context on it yet since I only watched the sequel. But hey, maybe the original might be good.
I love the insight it gives me great confidence to watch it when I get the chance.
Mary Poppins is one of my favorite movies. I was hoping the sequel would be alright (knowing that it can't compare.)
If I didn't have kids with me, I'd have walked out. It wasn't good. Not gonna go into comparing actors and whatnot, the main letdown for me what that the original didn't fall into the tired 'heroes and villains' trope. Yes, there were the bankers but it was minor. Much like 'my neighbor totoro' for example, where the crux is the family.
The remake on the other hand is simply derivative. Racing against the clock so not to lose the house... Come on. Anyway, the new movie will be forgotten in a few years and the original will still be popular decades from now.
The original Mary Poppins is "practically perfect in every way" as a musical, but as Mary Poppins, not even close. Yes, we all enjoyed the movie and songs (especially "Chim Chimeree" and "Feed the Birds," but to any child raised on the Mary Poppins books, I could understand P L Travers' horror at the smiling, bouncing, singing nanny. The second movie was good, if still too cheery, and at least, captured more details from the books. Both good movies, neither one a true Mary Poppins, which I reread periodically, all four, at an age I won't disclose. Needless to say, I'm well familiar with the grumpy, gruff magical nanny. Never offered a spoonful of sugar, but gave the Banks' children far more. Always enjoy your videos!
We all know that no one can replace Julie Andrews. Emily Blunt was amazing but there is no question that the original was 1000% better
Emily Blunt was great, but I don’t think ANYONE would ever beat iconic Julie Andrews.
My kids (6y and 3y) did not like the music from the new movie. We actually left the movie listening to the original soundtrack.
They were both fantastic...
But original is 💖
While I appreciate the effort of the sequel it's not even in the same league. The original is warm with scenes full of emotional impact. The sequel is a bit tedious from it trying too hard to be a Broadway style musical,with lame attempts to add hip hop style rhymes, instead of being small and intimate.
You also have the major difference between the two Mary Poppins. The original is warm and endearing. The sequel is much colder and in some cases a touch menacing. The original is always confident and self assured. The sequel shows her to have moments of insecurity especially under pressure like when the father is yelling at her and the kids.
I personally just feel they tried to put their own nuance to things too much on a character that was played so well that it's impossible to recapture. That being said, I did appreciate the effort they made in the face of such a hard and difficult task to accomplish.
Emily, was this the first video where you guys tagged who narrated the video? Or was it just the first time I saw the tag
Ammm… Emily is really great and I love her💝, but only Julie Andrews can make me believe that Mary Poppins is "Practically perfect in every way"✨…
For me the storyline of the MP1 is better than MP2. The graphics from the MP1 is better as it holds sentimental worth. The songs of the MP1 are better than those in MP2 although Emily Blunt did a great job!
You have no idea how pissed I was whenever Julie won but same would’ve happened if she didn’t cuz I’m lowkey obsessed with both of them 😂❤️❤️
Very very great list I like it a lot and a lot of fun too and both movies are great movies
Actually both of these movies are great
I wish that my childhood Nannies were like Mary Poppins, my mother did had english Nannies, but they sure weren't as Mary Poppins bummer lol!
I think the best way to do a comparison would be to have people who didn’t grow up watching the original 1964 film watch both and then rate it. Have half watch Mary Poppins returns first then the original film and the other half watch the original film and then Mary Poppins returns. Unlike most of us they are not going to be clouded by nostalgia
So much happy tears, thanks for that
Did you just compare the animation of a movie from 1965 to one from 2018?! That's not really fair, is it?
I like both movies but the original is a classic and magical! ❤️