Not quite a trial...it's a hearing, ostensibly to determine if the defendants can plead "self-defense." If they can't use that phony excuse, there may not be a trial. We'll see.
My wife and I used to go for walks, strolling through houses being built. We found quite a few interesting ideas that we used in the house we were going to build. We never ran across a builder that was offended by our interest in their designs.
I just want to say that the empathetic, humane, rational people in our society have nothing in common with those that think there’s any good reason to hunt and execute a man like they did Ahmaud. We watched that young man’s murder and there’s beings that think that he deserved it. Don’t bother fellow human beings arguing with soulless vile beings.
@UCL73MND1gzLn7-Ic5EEK0Kg Oh, shut up. They murdered someone in cold blood that wasn’t a danger to the community. The fact that they felt this was their right makes them out to be the dangers to the community.
At least the attorneys don’t have them all wearing glasses and sitting super low in the chair , or have them in oversized suits to make them look smaller...
43:00 this defense attorney is basically saying he had no right to be in the neighborhood, he should have stopped when two gun carry men were chasing him. imagine that
Stay where you're at with almost certainty of getting killed? Of course he ran...smh he was running for his life! I wish they could've gotten the death penalty.
Yes you can clearly see that for her it's all about justice she don't see color only right or wrong and she knows that they all were wrong and she is gonna fight tooth and nail to prove her case we need her on this I believe with her we have a chance to get justice for him and his family
This was straight up murder Racially motivated No getting around it The rittenhouse case is nothing like this one but is getting much more attention This is the real deal here
100%! I feel like the media is ignoring this case bc they believe they will be convicted so there is no reason to cause division over it I also feel they knew Kyle would be found not guilty bc the video is clear so they used his case to cause more division.
Rittenhouse should've been locked up. It amazes me that people can voluntarily show up with guns to a high tension event and then claim self defense when something occurs, just silly. The difference between judges was night and day aswell, the Rittenhouse judge was an angry grump who let his emotions factor into it and was throwing tantrums throughout to the prosecutor, he was very bias and already decided he was siding with Kyle. In this case the judge was extremely calm and peaceful, was not bias at all, and just straightup made judgement based on the facts of the case.
Imagine walking down the street and strangers start chasing you like a wild animal to hunt you because they believe they saw you looking inside a building under construction the previous night,yet the owner of the property told them to leave it alone. Lock them up
Uh he wasn’t “walking down the street”. He was out jogging staying healthy. You just assume he was wandering around like he had nothing better to do, you’re a rac*st.
@@Codiea I understand what you're saying, but he also had the right to walk down the road aimlessly and not be harassed, let alone murdered. They're public streets.
@Jeebroy Lenkins exactly he’s an elite athlete obviously wearing weighted boots and running dozens of miles, just more proof that he’s an athlete, the guys that shot him were obviously just jealous.
@@llovellmiller ...and that’s the way the law works. The thing is, the past of the defendant isn’t on trial. THIS incident, a murder that was filmed and publicly shared, is the only thing on trial. My issue is not with this law or the rulings. Mi issue is with the way it is applied unequally based upon melanin content of skin.
I’m not an attorney but is it in any way legal for a defense attorney to request the initiation of a comprehensive internal review of the prosecutor’s office going back years looking for corruption for which there is zero evidence?
welp technically they can request anything, you cant tell them it is illegal to call for investigate into the public prosecutor, that is their amendment right, but whether or not the judge or anyone take it seriously is another question
Defense makes sure person testifying can see time line board and as soon as hes called out he says its for him to keep the time line straight but when told to make sure witness cant see it suddenly he doesnt need it...
@@LOLI1079 And Atty Sheffield always tries to bamboozle the Judge with ludicrous objections and suppositions. He and Atty Gough tried the Judge’s patience. You can see they are both condescending to Prosecutor Linda D. She keeps her cool and walks all over them.
Right from the start the defense attorneys case is flawed by trying to compare the McMichaels verbal commands and use of firearms to law enforcement officers involved with Ahmuad Arbery in 2013 there is no connection between the two what so ever. Law enforcement officers making an arrest and the McMichaels chasing Ahmuad Arbery because Greg McMichael seen him running down the street. Even under questioning the school police officer is being indifferent about what constitute a misdemeanor charge, because he knows Greg McMichael as current officer, but he can't remember much except he was in no condition to chase Ahmuad Arbery. That's why he stayed in his car trying to catch him. His physical appearance speaks volumes about his conditioning as a law enforcement officer.
I understand the need for name recognition in covering the trials that you do, but isn't there some way you can change the title of these videos (I see that you have left them as is on at least the next two videos as well)? Mr Arbery is not on trial here, and these videos should not be labeled the way they are.
@@BellaLeoLicorice I think you’re right. I was just worried that once the defense was told their motions were all denied (which they will be), they’d offer the guy who filled it a deal to testify & then the father & son might plea. But Dad is former cop, so there’s no way he’ll willingly take a plea. Bc he’ll know the state won’t allow them to plead it down to minimal charges/sentence, so they have nothing to lose.
Personally, I’ve never bothered to know these defendants by name. Whereas, I definitely recognize the victims name. So titled any other way, I wouldn’t be watching. Just my opinion though.
@@maryb6672 both names need to be in the title so that people who aren't informed understand the context of the trial. "the trial of McMichael/Bryant in the killing of Ahmaud Arbery." (sp)
Type in: “Ahmad Aubrey trial opening statements.” It’s interesting that EVERYONE is labeling this the Ahmad Aubrey trial. Usually the trial is categorized or named with the name of the DEFENDANT (s)! Why have they labeled this trial with the deceased victims name?????
I like how the chief set up the ‘ reached in is waist band ‘ story. Pretty sure we’re going to hear that a few more times later in the trial from the McMichaels. Nice play , officer wimsby
I'm amazed he is still there - didn't he say his client was as thick as pigsh*t? (Admittedly in different words) Guess the fact he wasn't sacked means Bryan isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer.
He broke into a house and attacked the guy that confronted him that's the facts. Where do you get your info at because he was no innocent jogger like some fake news media loves to spew
@@79tazman I get my info from various sites not just one , please enlighten me and direct me to where I can actually see the”facts” you so vehemently state.
Has anyone tried to clear up this audio yet?? Its so blurry..... I know its the court's footage and they are usually lacking in the technical department but this is a video for youtube.... Why does no one bother cleaning up the background noise its sooooo annoying. Can't find a single stream without it sounding like a leaf blower is constantly running in the background.
Ive been on both. But my interest is on this one. I cannot comprehend how these idiots thought it was ok to chase this young man to ask him questions. Dont they know that noone has to answer questions to anyone, including the police. 5th amendment!!!!
Actually this trial is moving at break neck speed if you compare it to others-The family in Ohio that killed 8 people in a family (blanking on their name?), Markeith Lloyd,, Nicolas Cruz. Could go on & on about trials that haven’t begun for YEARS. Like many many years.
@@maryb6672 You're correct but I was comparing it to the George Floyd case. That was quick. It seems that the defense, in this case, is throwing out there a lot of stall tactics.
@@AngelaShawWestoven Oh I agree! That trial happened shockingly fast! Definitely shows they can move things quickly when desired. Now that you mention it, in the 3 cases I mentioned, the defense attorneys have all been engaged in massive delay tactics.
The defense: can we avoid as much evidence as possible to get these coward MURDERERS the least accountability possible🤥🤫🙈🙉🙊 Prosecutor: can we get a fair trial for the actual victim who cannot speak for himself 🤨 The judge: sure sure we will figure something out🤔😏😉😈 😒
@@79tazman first he didnt break in. He trespassed. 2nd he didnt steal anything so you calling him a burglar is ignorant when it comes to this case. Third Arbery was going to college to go after his best life. Guess what he was going to become... AN ELECTRICIAN! So he was probably admiring the progress of the house and that would give him visuals to what he was going to learn and become.
You gotta wear your mask or your killing my grandparents how dare you. We’re all vaccinated but you can NEVER be too safe when it comes to a DEADLY PANDEMIC.
He was a jogger, health fitness enthusiast and an architect that’s the only reason he was in the building under construction. He took a break from his exercises routine to learn about his architecture passion.
53:01 Ahmaud was never “held” by them. Fight or flight right? ….what was preventing Ahmaud for continuing to fly?…such as away and towards a nearby house for help? Or what made him so sure they they wanted to harm him instead of simply stop and talk or detain him? Come on people…Ahmaud was a hot head who’d still be alive he he was smarter and controlled his thoughts and emotions.
He'd be alive if they would have left him alone. They had no right to approach him period. Your thinking is what's wrong. No matter what his demeanor was, they had no right to kill him. Your thought process is saying anyone that has a hothead can be killed. That's crazy....and how do you determine in this case that he was a hothead. He was running bothering nobody.
@@chuckkent5395 My thinking is what’s wrong? Listen, there’s weirdos in this world…and these guys shouldn’t have been acting like Neighborhood cops/vigilantes. My point is that Ahmed unfortunately lacked critical thinking skills and emotional control to make the decisions necessary to remain alive that day. He did precisely what “not to do” in that scenario.
@@Val_Halla777 So they continued to chase him and he was running for his life and your suggestion is to keep running, LoL? At some point, you will have no energy left to fight or run. They had pinned him in several times per their own admittance.....
@@johndoe-yy7my Ive never suggested the only solution was to keep running. Critical decisions to survival in circumstances like that is to NEVER attack a gunman unless you 100% believe it’s do or die. This clearly was not the case here..yet for whatever reason (cultural brainwashing?) Ahmaud couldn’t pickup the signs his life truly wasn’t in danger, they only wanted to stop him, wrong as that was. Also based on his history, there’s a good chance his temper, emotions and hubris just got the better of him.
@@Val_Halla777 The problem with your response is, they are in court and none of what you are talking about it the law or what the defense can use to get them off...not to mention what they have already admitted to. I agree with what you are saying, for the most part, but can't say what his perception was. I am sure if someone was chasing you with guns and had almost cornered you several times....you might come to the conclusion that your life was endanger. Either way, it's not good for the McMichaels and their friend. They already admitted in their statements what they did and what they were trying to do.
Ahmaud Arbery was not jogging like so many have said he broke into a house and the two went to confront him and were attacked by Ahmaud Arbery trying to take the gun away from the guy who shot him. Should they of confronted him no maybe they should not of they should of called the police but it's legal to make a citizen's arrest when someone witnesses a person breaking into a house now if Arbery did not run up and start attacking the guy he would of never had been shot but he choose to fight a guy armed with a gun and lost.
You are WRONG! The houses he went into were under construction and that still doesn’t give the POS a right to follow and kill someone! Please don’t start sharing fake news and EDUCATE yourself on the facts FIRST before saying anything! If someone was trying to shoot you, you wouldn’t attempt to take the gun??? You can’t be serious!
I seen the Mcmichaels on videos also they are Liars. They killed a man then lied. Ask Travis how could he see Ahmaud in that property if he was in his house on the couch. I guess he has X ray vision Then Gregory told the Police Officer on the scene he didn't know what Ahmaud had done. . Was that a lie then or is it lie now?
Ahmaud Arbery is not on trial- his murders are. The title should be changed.
Not quite a trial...it's a hearing, ostensibly to determine if the defendants can plead "self-defense." If they can't use that phony excuse, there may not be a trial. We'll see.
@@Kinkle_Z doesn’t matter if it’s not a trial or if it’s a hearing, unfortunately Ahmaud is not earthly present to participate in either.
The justice for Ahmaud Arbery trial.
Just add "The" to the title to make the title of this video correct.
My wife and I used to go for walks, strolling through houses being built. We found quite a few interesting ideas that we used in the house we were going to build. We never ran across a builder that was offended by our interest in their designs.
I just want to say that the empathetic, humane, rational people in our society have nothing in common with those that think there’s any good reason to hunt and execute a man like they did Ahmaud. We watched that young man’s murder and there’s beings that think that he deserved it. Don’t bother fellow human beings arguing with soulless vile beings.
Im watching this for the first time. Feels almost like I know the future since I know how it ends even though it's really the past.🤯
They should've taken a Plead Deal..
I LOVE this prosecutor! She is very smart and gets right to the point!
Shut up fool.
@@russcd1 Exactly
@@natty4316 yep
Right....I like her too....
@Up Yuurs I bet lawyers know the difference between your and you're.
This is the 3 MURDERERS that killed Ahmaud Arbery Hearing, not Ahmaud Arbery Hearing. Correct the title.
So you would rather no one watch it, I guess.
@@shuddle82 Mr Arbery is not on trial. That’s just the fact!
@@selinadeloach6680 the BS they always try.
3 DEFENDERS OF THE COMMUNITY prove self defense case part 1
@UCL73MND1gzLn7-Ic5EEK0Kg Oh, shut up. They murdered someone in cold blood that wasn’t a danger to the community. The fact that they felt this was their right makes them out to be the dangers to the community.
Dressing up and haircuts don't change their souls.
Truth!
That was my first thought!
At least the attorneys don’t have them all wearing glasses and sitting super low in the chair , or have them in oversized suits to make them look smaller...
Right this is sicking and I have a son pray for him everyday
😂😂😂😂😂 Exactly
43:00 this defense attorney is basically saying he had no right to be in the neighborhood, he should have stopped when two gun carry men were chasing him. imagine that
Warranting murder! These are vile savages.
Stay where you're at with almost certainty of getting killed? Of course he ran...smh he was running for his life! I wish they could've gotten the death penalty.
Reality has set into view
The sense of entitlement in crazy.
That's about Whyte, I mean right?
Guilty! Guilty! Guilty!
49:50 The state prosecutor is a spitfire! Love it.
What Ahmad did in 2013 at a game got to do with this case it’s 2020 when this happened I’m glad justices got served
I like this prosecutor! She’s a firecracker!
Agreed!
Yes you can clearly see that for her it's all about justice she don't see color only right or wrong and she knows that they all were wrong and she is gonna fight tooth and nail to prove her case we need her on this I believe with her we have a chance to get justice for him and his family
Why is this titled Ahmaud Arbery hearing??? This is the McMichael trial.
that's the name everyone knows
It should be called the hearing on the murder of Ahmaud Arbery.
Well i always search it Ahmaud Arbery trial, who cares doesnt matter, we know Ahmaud is the victim and these idiots are murderers
She spit hella facts
This was straight up murder
Racially motivated
No getting around it
The rittenhouse case is nothing like this one but is getting much more attention
This is the real deal here
Right! Who just goes and chases a person down with trucks and shotguns
100%! I feel like the media is ignoring this case bc they believe they will be convicted so there is no reason to cause division over it I also feel they knew Kyle would be found not guilty bc the video is clear so they used his case to cause more division.
BS
Rittenhouse should've been locked up. It amazes me that people can voluntarily show up with guns to a high tension event and then claim self defense when something occurs, just silly.
The difference between judges was night and day aswell, the Rittenhouse judge was an angry grump who let his emotions factor into it and was throwing tantrums throughout to the prosecutor, he was very bias and already decided he was siding with Kyle.
In this case the judge was extremely calm and peaceful, was not bias at all, and just straightup made judgement based on the facts of the case.
The defense lawyer is filibustering he should be on Congress
All this evidence the defence is dushing out has nothing to do with the day he was hunted
Imagine walking down the street and strangers start chasing you like a wild animal to hunt you because they believe they saw you looking inside a building under construction the previous night,yet the owner of the property told them to leave it alone. Lock them up
Uh he wasn’t “walking down the street”. He was out jogging staying healthy. You just assume he was wandering around like he had nothing better to do, you’re a rac*st.
@@Codiea I understand what you're saying, but he also had the right to walk down the road aimlessly and not be harassed, let alone murdered. They're public streets.
@Jeebroy Lenkins exactly he’s an elite athlete obviously wearing weighted boots and running dozens of miles, just more proof that he’s an athlete, the guys that shot him were obviously just jealous.
@Jeebroy Lenkins haha good. People are performing astounding feats of mental gymnastics to make this case fit their bias.
AND YES your dreams have now come true.
So I wonder If they are going to talk about the murders background....
The murderers' backgrounds won't be allowed because they could unfairly prejudice the jury. Same old BS.
@@BellaLeoLicorice so Its not unfair when they show the victims criminal history. Its hard to get justice from a system that not just....
@@llovellmiller ...and that’s the way the law works. The thing is, the past of the defendant isn’t on trial. THIS incident, a murder that was filmed and publicly shared, is the only thing on trial.
My issue is not with this law or the rulings. Mi issue is with the way it is applied unequally based upon melanin content of skin.
It is unfair to not showcase the defendants background history, for the same reason its claimed to broadcast the victims background.
@@llovellmiller I agree - this whole circus is making me feel sick
Goff is such a goof...poor guy that has to depend on him as an attorney.
I think his strategy is to talk so much until something makes sense.
I’m not an attorney but is it in any way legal for a defense attorney to request the initiation of a comprehensive internal review of the prosecutor’s office going back years looking for corruption for which there is zero evidence?
welp technically they can request anything, you cant tell them it is illegal to call for investigate into the public prosecutor, that is their amendment right, but whether or not the judge or anyone take it seriously is another question
He is throwing poop against a wall and seeing what sticks! The conspiracy continues..................
I tried to write a comment saying the same thing... you nailed it.. I couldn't have said it better myself
Well, I certainly wouldn’t want to trade places with the McMichaels. Not for all the whiskey in Ireland.
Whew to get through those life sentences, one would need it!
Rittenhouse is so lucky he didn't get her and her team he'd be on Death Row
Defense makes sure person testifying can see time line board and as soon as hes called out he says its for him to keep the time line straight but when told to make sure witness cant see it suddenly he doesnt need it...
Yes - I know where I'd like to shove his time line board.
Tried to be slick 😆
@@LOLI1079 And Atty Sheffield always tries to bamboozle the Judge with ludicrous objections and suppositions. He and Atty Gough tried the Judge’s patience.
You can see they are both condescending to Prosecutor Linda D.
She keeps her cool and walks all over them.
How the defense thought he was going to slide that whiteboard trick past the prosecutor cracks me up. She’s not having it 🥳
She's a Rock Star
Did Goff actually say "I think, the current President" and question integrity of a person who supported a political party?
“Current President or I THINK the current President” Unbelievable!!!!🐢
If the Prosecutor every became a defense attorney I would ask her to defend me if I needed a defense attorney. She's good!
Right from the start the defense attorneys case is flawed by trying to compare the McMichaels verbal commands and use of firearms to law enforcement officers involved with Ahmuad Arbery in 2013 there is no connection between the two what so ever. Law enforcement officers making an arrest and the McMichaels chasing Ahmuad Arbery because Greg McMichael seen him running down the street. Even under questioning the school police officer is being indifferent about what constitute a misdemeanor charge, because he knows Greg McMichael as current officer, but he can't remember much except he was in no condition to chase Ahmuad Arbery. That's why he stayed in his car trying to catch him. His physical appearance speaks volumes about his conditioning as a law enforcement officer.
the prosecutor speaks authoritatively, that defense guy goes on and on and it makes him look weaker.
I understand the need for name recognition in covering the trials that you do, but isn't there some way you can change the title of these videos (I see that you have left them as is on at least the next two videos as well)? Mr Arbery is not on trial here, and these videos should not be labeled the way they are.
I would appreciate them being called “Ahmad Arbery Murder Hearing...”!
Or the hearing on the Ahmaud Abery murder
THE CHIEF OF SCHOOL POLICE WANTED TO BE SO IMPORTANT. HE WAS DEFINITELY ON THE DEFENSES SIDE
Sounds like he was trying to do them a favor...good ole boy network.
I SO hope this goes to trial. Can tell already the attorneys are personally invested. Makes for a much more interesting trial experience!
Why wouldn't it go to trial? There is no way the 3 killers are going to plead guilty so of course it will.
@@BellaLeoLicorice I think you’re right. I was just worried that once the defense was told their motions were all denied (which they will be), they’d offer the guy who filled it a deal to testify & then the father & son might plea. But Dad is former cop, so there’s no way he’ll willingly take a plea. Bc he’ll know the state won’t allow them to plead it down to minimal charges/sentence, so they have nothing to lose.
The defense is trying to turn this into a circus...
That is what happens when there is no defense
SOOOOOO sad!!!! RIP young man
Yes, very sad. 😥😥
Be mindful, saying "Yes mame and no mame" offer no qualification of good character (i.e. defendants and witnesses).
Indeed, this is the McMichael/Bryan hearing...ya might want to correct the title.
Personally, I’ve never bothered to know these defendants by name. Whereas, I definitely recognize the victims name. So titled any other way, I wouldn’t be watching. Just my opinion though.
@@maryb6672 both names need to be in the title so that people who aren't informed understand the context of the trial. "the trial of McMichael/Bryant in the killing of Ahmaud Arbery." (sp)
Nobody knows who they are, for the most part. People know Ahmad Arbery. The hearing is regarding his murder, so it's aptly titled.
Anyone know where I can find the start of the trail ?
Type in: “Ahmad Aubrey trial opening statements.” It’s interesting that EVERYONE is labeling this the Ahmad Aubrey trial. Usually the trial is categorized or named with the name of the DEFENDANT (s)! Why have they labeled this trial with the deceased victims name?????
Prosecution is so knowledgeable and focused!
The prosecutor is right on point....She's cool with me
If how to go to jail was a person 👉Roddy
Rittenhouse case, for ALL witnesses, Judge did not allow previous encounters with police. Only stated the # (2, for example).
I like how the chief set up the ‘ reached in is waist band ‘ story. Pretty sure we’re going to hear that a few more times later in the trial from the McMichaels. Nice play , officer wimsby
@Tom Toms it’s called self defense , Einstein
HE ALSO USED THE STOP, PLEASE, STOP
haha more like life in prison , genius !
Wow, Bryan's lawyer just went full big lie conspiracy @ 24:10
Whoa he sure did!
I'm amazed he is still there - didn't he say his client was as thick as pigsh*t? (Admittedly in different words) Guess the fact he wasn't sacked means Bryan isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer.
Wowwww
I bet this is the only lawyer who would take his case
Such a sad case , how could they shoot someone just like that cause they thought bla bla bla are they in the brotherhood of the hoods
He broke into a house and attacked the guy that confronted him that's the facts. Where do you get your info at because he was no innocent jogger like some fake news media loves to spew
@@79tazman I get my info from various sites not just one , please enlighten me and direct me to where I can actually see the”facts” you so vehemently state.
You didn't see Mr Jogger grab the defendant's gun. That why he got shot. It's really that simple.
@Darryl Washington I guess I come from a different culture, when it comes to thieves, if the races were reversed I'd feel the same.
@@dottiscamprunamuck2830 You must come from that culture where you can steal without having stolen anything.
Are they going to talk about the killers background
So what happened to the video why did it went on a computer screen that’s weird
What this man past have to do with him killed
Defendant is full of Bullsheeet! Has he not seen the video 🤬
The last cops knows the Defendant .he use to be a cop and worked with him.
Has anyone tried to clear up this audio yet?? Its so blurry..... I know its the court's footage and they are usually lacking in the technical department but this is a video for youtube.... Why does no one bother cleaning up the background noise its sooooo annoying. Can't find a single stream without it sounding like a leaf blower is constantly running in the background.
News Flash, dead man on trial, unbelievable
Judge needs to talk into his mike,
@57:20 "...objection!...err...hearsay?" ...,as if its a multiple choice answer
Couldn’t they get a bigger court room , looks cramped, compared to Chauvin case, all on top of each other🤨
I didn’t realize this case was going. Rittenhouse case is taking over.
yeah, the rittenhouse case is done with evidence now though. SO now everyone should catch up on this one.
@dangerzone that what I'm doing..
I've got to get caught up with this case now.
Ive been on both. But my interest is on this one. I cannot comprehend how these idiots thought it was ok to chase this young man to ask him questions. Dont they know that noone has to answer questions to anyone, including the police. 5th amendment!!!!
Why is this trial taking so long? The south.
Good Ol' Boy system in action. Only the Federal case will result in any adverse consequences for the killers.
Actually this trial is moving at break neck speed if you compare it to others-The family in Ohio that killed 8 people in a family (blanking on their name?), Markeith Lloyd,, Nicolas Cruz. Could go on & on about trials that haven’t begun for YEARS. Like many many years.
@@maryb6672 You're correct but I was comparing it to the George Floyd case. That was quick. It seems that the defense, in this case, is throwing out there a lot of stall tactics.
@@AngelaShawWestoven Oh I agree! That trial happened shockingly fast! Definitely shows they can move things quickly when desired. Now that you mention it, in the 3 cases I mentioned, the defense attorneys have all been engaged in massive delay tactics.
Because they are innocent.
The defense: can we avoid as much evidence as possible to get these coward MURDERERS the least accountability possible🤥🤫🙈🙉🙊
Prosecutor: can we get a fair trial for the actual victim who cannot speak for himself 🤨
The judge: sure sure we will figure something out🤔😏😉😈
😒
THEY GOTTEM LOOKING GOOD FOR COURT BUT IT AINT GONNA WORK 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Actor Henry Ford should play this Judge in the movie
This is the waste of time I am not an attorney and this has nothing to fo with this case. How do we know if any of this is true. Who is on trail here?
This is a pretrial hearing
Vigilantism
It's the old "Southern Slave Patrols" in the 21st century.
They confronted a burglar that broke into a home and he attacked the guy with the gun and lost Ahmaud Arbery got himself shot by what he did
@@79tazman first he didnt break in. He trespassed. 2nd he didnt steal anything so you calling him a burglar is ignorant when it comes to this case. Third Arbery was going to college to go after his best life. Guess what he was going to become... AN ELECTRICIAN! So he was probably admiring the progress of the house and that would give him visuals to what he was going to learn and become.
This title is trash!! Mr. Arbery is not on trial
If they wanted to kill the trespasser why chase him down the road he didn’t have that daddy talk.
I like the sounding of those ⛓⛓⛓ around they 👣 🤨 bling bling 🤬
What planet is this dude from? 45:22 Does he honesty think the crap he is speaking is legitimate?
56:15 so hostile
Irrelevant information
Just blah blah
It's good to see vaccinated people not wearing masks in court!! FINALLY!!
Oh grow up.
Also social distancing
You gotta wear your mask or your killing my grandparents how dare you. We’re all vaccinated but you can NEVER be too safe when it comes to a DEADLY PANDEMIC.
Talking about thevEducationslnsys
Talking about the Educational System which is the school for that leads kids to the prison pipeline.
He wasn't jogging. 🦘
Yes, he was. He was running before they even started chasing him.
@@gabrielleroberts7064
He was casing the neighborhood. 🦘
@@imthebadguy3225 Because you said so? You’re just as dumb as the three on trial.
He was a jogger, health fitness enthusiast and an architect that’s the only reason he was in the building under construction. He took a break from his exercises routine to learn about his architecture passion.
How do you know? Did he make a left turn at your cobblestone bridge?
53:01 Ahmaud was never “held” by them.
Fight or flight right? ….what was preventing Ahmaud for continuing to fly?…such as away and towards a nearby house for help? Or what made him so sure they they wanted to harm him instead of simply stop and talk or detain him? Come on people…Ahmaud was a hot head who’d still be alive he he was smarter and controlled his thoughts and emotions.
He'd be alive if they would have left him alone. They had no right to approach him period. Your thinking is what's wrong. No matter what his demeanor was, they had no right to kill him. Your thought process is saying anyone that has a hothead can be killed. That's crazy....and how do you determine in this case that he was a hothead. He was running bothering nobody.
@@chuckkent5395 My thinking is what’s wrong? Listen, there’s weirdos in this world…and these guys shouldn’t have been acting like Neighborhood cops/vigilantes. My point is that Ahmed unfortunately lacked critical thinking skills and emotional control to make the decisions necessary to remain alive that day.
He did precisely what “not to do” in that scenario.
@@Val_Halla777
So they continued to chase him and he was running for his life and your suggestion is to keep running, LoL? At some point, you will have no energy left to fight or run. They had pinned him in several times per their own admittance.....
@@johndoe-yy7my Ive never suggested the only solution was to keep running.
Critical decisions to survival in circumstances like that is to NEVER attack a gunman unless you 100% believe it’s do or die.
This clearly was not the case here..yet for whatever reason (cultural brainwashing?) Ahmaud couldn’t pickup the signs his life truly wasn’t in danger, they only wanted to stop him, wrong as that was.
Also based on his history, there’s a good chance his temper, emotions and hubris just got the better of him.
@@Val_Halla777
The problem with your response is, they are in court and none of what you are talking about it the law or what the defense can use to get them off...not to mention what they have already admitted to.
I agree with what you are saying, for the most part, but can't say what his perception was. I am sure if someone was chasing you with guns and had almost cornered you several times....you might come to the conclusion that your life was endanger. Either way, it's not good for the McMichaels and their friend. They already admitted in their statements what they did and what they were trying to do.
Self. Defense.
Ahmaud Arbery was not jogging like so many have said he broke into a house and the two went to confront him and were attacked by Ahmaud Arbery trying to take the gun away from the guy who shot him. Should they of confronted him no maybe they should not of they should of called the police but it's legal to make a citizen's arrest when someone witnesses a person breaking into a house now if Arbery did not run up and start attacking the guy he would of never had been shot but he choose to fight a guy armed with a gun and lost.
You are WRONG! The houses he went into were under construction and that still doesn’t give the POS a right to follow and kill someone! Please don’t start sharing fake news and EDUCATE yourself on the facts FIRST before saying anything! If someone was trying to shoot you, you wouldn’t attempt to take the gun??? You can’t be serious!
wow
Murder period no excuses
Shut up 🤫
This guy just wanted notifications smh
Arbery was nasty guy I've seen him on videos
I’ve seen these three on video, and they’re FAR worst than anything I’ve seen of arbery
Really? You've seen a video of Ahmaud trapping someone 'like a rat' and shooting them three times? Wow. Who knew?
I seen the Mcmichaels on videos also they are Liars. They killed a man then lied. Ask Travis how could he see Ahmaud in that property if he was in his house on the couch. I guess he has X ray vision Then Gregory told the Police Officer on the scene he didn't know what Ahmaud had done. . Was that a lie then or is it lie now?
How can a dead person have a hearing?
???