Ahmaud Arbery Hearing Day 2 Part 2
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 лис 2024
- The three defendants in the Ahmaud Arbery murder case are scheduled for court Friday morning. You can watch it in the player above at 10 a.m. ET. The Law&Crime Network’s Brian Buckmire will host live coverage.
Gregory McMichael, 64, son Travis McMichael, 34, and neighbor William Bryan, 50, are accused of chasing down the victim in a tragic confrontation on Feb. 23 in Brunswick, Georgia.
The question before the court is: Is this murder? Prosecutors and attorneys for Arbery’s family say yes. The McMichaels chased the victim in a Ford F-150, while Bryan drove a Chevy Silverado pickup truck, authorities said. Bryan filmed while father and son confronted the 25-year-old Arbery, and Travis shot the victim with 12-gauge shotgun, according to the indictment obtained by Law&Crime.
At the time of the killing, Gregory McMichael allegedly told police that they believed Arbery was involved in several burglaries in the area. But there was only one reported burglary in the area in recent weeks: a January 1 alleged theft in which a gun was stolen from a pickup truck outside Travis McMichael’s home.
911 audio from shortly before the shooting showed a caller reporting a black man in a white T-shirt at a nearby house under construction.
#AhmaudArbery
Defence is Reaching, Reaching, Reaching.....a lot of what they want to present needs to be Thrown Out🤬
why not consider all the evidence in its entirety?
How come you don't want to hear the facts?
An RN cannot make a diagnosis. Not anywhere at anytime..
Only in a MURDER TRAIL IN GEORGIA
Yeah...I was thinking 🤔....he was never seen by a DR.
Let's ask him..oh wait..we can't
You’re correct that an RN cannot diagnose. However, I believe the victim was seen by an NP. They, under the direct supervision for a licensed physician, make varying diagnosis of patients that are under their care.
@@Voyager-dz7dr You would be wrong. Not only was she only an RN but she wasn't even a practicing nurse. Her only "qualification" an online class.
The fact that this judge is even allowing this strategy of a so called diagnosis by a nurse to go this far is troubling.
Very troubling
And I don't know of any hospital in the U.S where nurses can make an official diagnosis. Thats comical
NPs (not RNs) may, under the direction of a licensed physician, make varying diagnosis of patients.
He cannot stop a legal argument in the middle. That isn't how a court of law works. The judge listens to the ENTIRE Argument and then rules.
Thank God,, the prosecutor sounds very able and capable!!
If any body needs a physic evaluation, its the defense team. lol
So this is less about the defendant and more about the victim who was killed? The who is on trial here? What a circus.
he wasn't killed. he was MURDERED. huge difference.
When you say victim you presuppose that Arbery was innocent, which is whar this trial is about. If Arbery was innocent then the man who shot him was wrong. If Arbery wasn't innocent then the man who shot him wasn't wrong.
@@notme3686 arbery was innocent. the men that took part in his hunt and MURDER are wrong. what did arbery do to them for them to get their guns jump in their trucks and chase after him? what did arbery do to them for them to keep cutting him off and hit him with a truck? what did arbery do to them for travis to get out of the truck with a rifle point center mass and MURDER HIM. the young man was running for his life for almost 10 minutes while being chased and cut of by the MURDERERS. I CAN'T get my gun and just go after a man with ivory skin color that's walking down my street with a child just because i think he's going to take that child someplace and mess with them in their private parts even though i know that most children are messed with that way by men with ivory skin color. i've read the stats as a former L.E.O. if i have a suspicion i have to call and wait for the POLICE.
@@KevinP32270
You're delusional
@@notme3686 is that all you got? an unarmed man was chased down by 3 other men in trucks with guns and they murdered him because they thought he committed trespassing at a construction site that they DID NOT SEE him do that day. you call it ok and i'm delusional? HAAA LOL. It seems like that you are the one that's delusional.
Why is the prosecutor allowing the victim being put on trial. Nothing but misdemeanor charges, 6 deputies . A waste of time and taxpayers money.
it's the game that has to be played. the judge in charge.
Why don't you want to talk about the facts?
@@blmtrejureydepourtment5899 FACT: a lynching caught on camera by one of the perpetrators of the crime.
He's a violent Psychopathic crook that attacked two Good Samaritans... he didn't want to go back to jail so he was going to hurt people to escape
@@blmtrejureydepourtment5899 everyone is starting to see through all the lies you are sharing. smgdh. how can you attack someone that you are running away from for almost ten minutes?
Right or wrong these two men took the law into their own hands they did not get a court to judge like they are getting. They took it upon themselves to confront this man and kill him. They should have called the police and stayed out of it. When they picked up their weapons they had every intention of using them.
Totally agree
They did call the police though. What you are really saying is people have no right to do anything when the community they and their families live in are being terrorized.
@@highroller4230 I don’t think an unarmed guy jogging who had only been seen on camera looking at a building under construction and not by the men in question would classify as terrorising! Plus they only called the police After they had chased him down in 2 trucks and cornered him with a shotgun and pistol infact You can hear on the 911 call the rifle being shot!
@@karenhill5925 But he wasn't "jogging" he was sprinting from the scene of a burglery. Watch the trial and you'll find out that he only "jogs" late at night in neighborhoods far from his home where he has been seen breaking into homes.
@@highroller4230 you still can't kill him though even if you find him in your house
I find it very troubling that a person can be mentally ill by a nurse that became mental health nurse by ticking boxes on a computer,and by an NP...both only had a 2mins appointment...
It takes a qualified Psychiatrist months and months of appointments to make a diagnosis..
What if he only had a problem with law enforcement as they are only bring up when he was angry with the police....4 witness were 4 law enforcement...
So he's had 3 bad days in 3 years makes him mental ill..WoW!...
Actually if they want to go down the route he had an mental illness,I find it even worse they chanced down and kill a mentally ill person ..as a mental ill person would be more scared of 3 men chancing him with guns...they would have made his mental issues thousand times worse,they would have put I'm in a mental health crisis...
I see why Atlanta/ Georgia goes through so much, they have airheads for defense attorney that took up 2 or more days to talk about the victim school records than what happen on the day he was murdered and then it's the airheaded judge for me who is scared to tell him flat out no we not going to waste the court and tax payers time and that we need to talk about the actual day the victim was murder. How hard is it to talk about what happen on that day not when he found his high school sweet heart. Dayyyyyyyyum. Oh yea not to mention that the judge listen to a nurse diagnosis, that like a bank robber telling a surgeon how to perform open heart surgery. How more stupid can look in court. This also shows that the defense attorney knows both of his clients is guilty including soup bowl cut and his attorney Barney Pfeiffer.
This type of thing really educate common folk on how the court system works. The Defense attorney is arguing attempting to get Amaud Mental Health Records enter into evidence . So he can present it to the Jury. The Defense Attorney cant present it . If it is not approve by the Judge.
They have to decide what is going to be shown to the jury before the trial, like with his mental health and been on probation was not allowed to be presented to the jury as the defendants did not know anything about him when they hunted and killed him.
Seems you are the airhead. This isn't the trial, it was an evidentiary hearing.
Well said
Seems like the victim is on trial here and the judge wants to bend over backwards to help the defence.
You would be wrong. He is stopping them from winning any appeals.
wtf Ahmad is not on trial he is the victim! I feel like this is already sham. He DIDN'T DO ANYTHING
Luv this judge. What a pure blessing from God if we only had a half of million like him
I never watched the preliminary rulings until now. Watched every part of the jury trial.
It's disturbing that the judge ruled all this evidence as non admissable. This info certainly should have been put out to the jury during trial.
I hope they bring up the back ground of his KILLERS!!
i don't understand what something that happened years ago have to do with the man being murdered. those 3 murderers don't know his past and even if they did it does not justify them hunting down a man and murdering him for what they thought might be trespassing that they did not see that day.
They didn't hunt him down and murder him they stood still on the phone with 911 when he ran up and attacked them stupid
@@blmtrejureydepourtment5899 i realize you are looking for attention and a boyfriend little momma but i am not THE ONE. it's obvious you have not read and kept up with this brutal murder. just cause the facts are causing you menstrual cramps in your uterus is NOT going to change the facts. so TAKE YOUR LIES AND TROLLING SOMEPLACE ELSE LITTLE MOMMA.
McMichael/McMichael/Bryan Trial
This wasn't the trial lol
@@PatriotGamesROCKS okay ..."McMichael/McMichael HEARING" ..it wasn't Ahmaud Arbery's hearing OR trial. The titles are misleading and inaccurate.
@@DOLfirst It was an evidentiary HEARING hun lmao
@@PatriotGamesROCKS I was referring to the title ...and I'm not your "hun". Did you read my second comment. 🙄
Gateway is not a "reliable source". Only the licensed behavioral health practitioner is per the DSM.
You have got to be kidding me...blaming someone killed for no reason...for his past...we all have a past!!! Shame on you🙏
He got killed cuz he attacked two men who were holding guns
@@blmtrejureydepourtment5899 No he was killed because he was suspected of a crime he absolutely did not commit and was pursued\stalked and ultimately murdered because he chose to fight when flight was no longer an option.....
@@blmtrejureydepourtment5899 they attacked him he was minding his business trying to avoid them
@@tonyabonds9234 how did they "attack" him by standing in the middle of the street? He ran them down and tried to beat the shotgun outa Junior after they chased him for a few min and let him run away. He had escaped but chose to return and attack after he realized the whole neibourhood was trying to catch him. Travis caught him tresspassing just a few days prior!!! He was wanted and got CAUGHT AGAIN "minding his business" robbing a house
@@blmtrejureydepourtment5899 we all saw the video with our own eyes
Can somebody please explain to me what do all this matter please somebody
This is a pre trial hearing were both defence and prosecution state to judge what they want or plan to present at trial their evidence the judge then decides on what he will agree can be presented after considering both sides arguments often based on previous trials. It is obvious that the route the defence is hoping or planning to use in trial is to portray the victim as mentally unstable that has previously been arrested for having a firearm and shop lifting and is known to police as aggressive they are doing this to say that he was shot in self defence . The prosecution is doing her best to say this is not relevant to the case in hand and the only evidence that be allowed be that of evidence of what happened on the day he was shot dead! We can only hope that the Judge sees Reason and sides with the prosecution as it is my honest belief that the defence is desperately trying to portray the victim in such a bad light that a jury would be very lenient and if found guilty given a light sentence! I hope and Pray that the son and father get life sentences to me that is justice
Hey Lawyer can you go check on your clients Mental Status now. Gregory said he couldn't sleep. I am quite sure Travis is having problems he thought he was going home to his Son that he left on the couch. Sorry bothering another Human Being who was not bothering you will get you a new address for Life. He doesn't have to worry about another person that look like Ahmaud running down the street. No more Being afraid of a person who never threatened you. You are now safely locked in day and night. I hope Travis keep saying the Totality of the Situation I had.
Anything that happened prior to February 23 should not be allowed. It is all irrelevant. These three defendants did not know the victim at all, did they?
The cops knew him and gave these guys the OK to go after Mr Aubrey.
A fox in the henhouse is a fox in the henhouse. Doesn't matter whether the farmer knows if that fox had killed before. He just needs to reasonably explain why he thought he was going after a fox. Maybe foxes in general had been eating his chickens. Maybe no fox had eaten his chickens. But he sees a fox in his henhouse, maybe he should take action. And if that fox turns on him and tries to bite him, maybe the farmer would instinctively shoot that fox.
@@bessieking3797 the cops claim they DID NOT tell the 3 men to use guns and chase A.A. down and then murder him. police can't give you permission to go after someone. police said they asked them to KEEP AN EYE OUT. meaning WATCH what's happening and call us.
@@notme3686 bad comparison. a fox goes in the henhouse to eat. that is a fox NATURAL instinct. A.A. went in that construction site to LOOK AROUND like all the other people did that went in there that's on camera. i have done the same thing in the past at houses i was interested in buying. why didn't those 3 murderers chase down those people with guns and try to illegally detain them and murder them? the only people that stole anything were TWO KIDS. should the 3 murderers chase them down with guns and murder them as well? A.A. did not attack those 3. they went after A.A. with there guns in their trucks. they kept cutting the young man of for almost 10 minutes and when he could not run and get away anymore he chose to stand his ground and fight for his life and they MURDERED HIM for it. nice try tho.
@@KevinP32270 Well said!
The defence is bringing up everything except what happened that day. All focused on Ahmaud's past.
There’s no defense to what they did so they’re blaming Ahmad fro getting killed. Shameful and disgusting!!! Karma is a mf
This isn't a trial, its an evidentiary hearing ABOUT his past lmao
@@PatriotGamesROCKS You're a bit late. All three are convicted and sentenced to life.
Right from the start the defense attorneys were trying to equate their clients with the duties of a police officer.
Interesting how the Judge allowed the defense attorneys to try and establish a reason as to their clients actions as to say Ahmuad Arbery dosen't comply to authorities,but the problem is the McMichaels and William R Bryant are not in any authorization of any legal action to contain Ahmuad Arbery. His mental record was not an issue he wasn't on any kind of medication, it was just a part of his probationary process that had nothing to do with The McMichaels and William R Bryant murdering Ahmuad Arbery.
ALSO WHEN YOUNG MEN GET INTO TROUBLE THEIR LAWYER WILL CLAIM MENTAL ILLNESS OR DRUG ADDICTION TO GET A LIGHTER SENTENCE.
This case meets the criteria for a Capital. Murder trial...
No it doesn't and is why it wasn't charged that way,
The Title needs to be changed, this is a Complaint
The amount of adverts in this is ridiculous and really distracting from trying to watch the trial!
Adblock for youtube.
Defense witnesses,one hour,all for nothing, driving me mental
Why I have a feeling they will be receiving a light sentence
Probably cuz they were standing in the middle of the road in broad daylight on camera on the phone with 911 defending themselves from violent Psychopathic crook who was trying to murder his way out of a simple trespass charge that would have sent him right back to jail because he was on probation
@@blmtrejureydepourtment5899 yeah calling 911 to cover their tracks
@@kelvinjohnson6490 LOL so they called 911 just before they murdered a guy to "cover their tracks"
Pretty slick waiting for him to run up and start punching them so they could use self-defense!
these guys are legit criminals yo
HAHAHAHA
@@blmtrejureydepourtment5899 at the end of the day the truth will come out
@@kelvinjohnson6490 yeah, the truth always "comes out" LOL
How is the defense team funded? Those two seem very high priced
Pro Bono
Brought to you by ADIDAS jogging apparel.
Wypipo love to make jokes about absolutely nothing
Staged drama..... If the video didn't come out they don't even had to stage this drama..
looks like Judge, Prosecutor n Defence all acting on same script. will anyone talk about the killer?
the video didn't "come out" it was intentionally released by the men Who the criminal attacked because they knew it proved self-defense...they just didn't count on all you idiots being so stupid that you couldn't see the forest because of the trees
@@blmtrejureydepourtment5899 3 armed killers cornering and gunning down one individual who is running away from them (on public road), u call it a self defense? U r color blind. Hate runs in ur blood nothing else.
@@niceboy9806 you got Vaseline rubbed on your eyes because all that happened was a criminal ran up on two men on the phone with the police and try to beat one of their guns. nobody got cornered stupid boy they let the criminal run away and then he ran back up on them and try to attack
If somebody runs up on you and tried to beat you up for your gun are you going to give it up and grab your ankles?
@@blmtrejureydepourtment5899 "....ran up on two men....."
Enter "Imgur arbery video" into your search box. You will see a loop of Ahmaud approaching Travis's truck and Travis standing at driver side of truck. Yep, Travis pointed gun at Ahmaud.
@@Ifihadaclue NOPE HE DIDN'T...he shouldered it and that NOT ASSAULT
if a criminal wanted for multiple felonies who I had been chasing was now bearing down on myself and my elderly father it would be pretty reasonable to ready your firearm
I am surprised all those people get to read from electronic devices but I don't see defendants doing that.
They are in jail. lmao
the judge has some personal interest with this defence lawyer.
who is in trial? how about mental health status of the judge or lawyer? TOTAL INJUSTICE.
FIRST U MURDER THE GUY, THEN PROVE HIM CRAZY AFTER DEATH ?
Prosecutor is not objecting enough either. I clearly see what they r going to do. Its just DRAMA. STAGED DRAMA for aquatal.
No he doesn't
(Ir) regardless?! Mr. Sheffield is simply IGNORANT and a poor Jewish attorney. Not to mention he lost this case on NATIONAL TV. 😂😂😂😂😂😂🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
He was actually a good attorney. He set up the perfect appeal.
@@PatriotGamesROCKS Perfect appeal based on what?!
@@mysteriousmystery6960 Several different things, such as his appeal could actually change state law around automatic lwops when there was not even an attempt to kill anyone.
These guys were so clearly trying to protect their neighborhood and a criminal attacked them leading to his death. This whole thing is a terrible miscarriage of justice.
your delusional perspective is sad.
@@suzannemurray8284 you don't need to know a fox has eaten hens in the past when you spot one in your henhouse
Hope that's sarcasm
@@jfraserfisher
Tell me objectively what they did that was wrong. Forgo the feelings the media told you to feel. Be objective.
@@notme3686 let’s read this really slowly and with little words to help you out.
THEY FILMED THEMSELVES KILLING A MAN, BRAGGED ABOUT IT, AND SHARED IT IN SOCIAL MEDIA!
I’m sorry but who in their RIGHT MIND chooses to attack someone holding a shotgun, unless they are 1000% certain it’s a do or die scenario?
It should have been totally evident based on the facts of what occurred that these nuts were not out to kill him (at least to anyone rational and of average or higher intelligence )
Their decision to take the law into their own hands and threaten, attempt to detain using firearms is what they will likely be found guilty of leading to Ahmaud’s death.
But the truth also exists that Ahmaud’s mental health also played a large role in what ultimately caused the action which resulted in Travis having no choice but to defend by shooting Ahmaud…otherwise obvious risk of being shot if Ahmaud was successful in removing Travis’s shotgun.
I’m really surprised how many don’t comprehend that two things can be true here.
Since they were claiming that they were carrying out a citizen's arrest, Mr. Arbery's mental health was irrelevant. Whether his actions when "trapped like a rat" the defendants own words were affected by his mental health was irrelevant since they were responsible for him being in that position initially. I am glad the jury was able to see that.
Wow none of that is even remotely true. Perhaps you should watch the trial.
I am really surprised that Travis was in fear for his life but had the weapon. I am surprised he got out the car with weapon if he was in such fear. Now he will be safe every night when they lock his cell door for the next 30 years plus
So it's OK for them to chase him? They had no right they didn't even own a house in that area they got what they deserved I would love to see them do that🎉to someone in jail