100 Years of British Royal Fashion | Glamour
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 січ 2019
- Take a look at the last hundred years of British royal fashion, from Queen Mary's chokers in the 1910s and the utilitarian austerity period of the 1940s, to Queen Elizabeth's monochrome suits of the 1970s and Princess Diana's boundary-pushing fashion in the 1990s.
Still haven’t subscribed to Glamour on UA-cam? ►► bit.ly/2gYlQqe
100 Years of British Royal Fashion | Glamour - Розваги
The revenge dress is literally the best era of Royal fashion. Diana was so polished and sophisticated; her coming out in that dress was absolutely the greatest revenge.
I agree. By wearing that dress; Diana said to Charles "Up yours, jackass!"
Ikr
It’s really not
Not really.
i highly disagree. the worst era and worst woman alive😊😊
Princess Diana fashion all the way..sophisticated, classic, edgy, simple = all in one
Sora Sora I honestly don't see it.
And then there was her wedding dress... bloody awful
@@katiebayliss9887 YOu have to distinguish between nomarl fashion and royal fashion it is not the same! Dianas was praised for a good symbiose between these two.
kidaria if royal fashion is the boring stuff the queen and Kate wear, I prefer the look of “peasants”.
@@sazzieb1 that was decades ago duh
one royal wears an outfit once
glamour: that’s a decade
Lol
lol ikr
Ah, you know the pain too
Who cares
@@saxarlasamatar2516 I do?..
“...that featured strong shoulder pads” *squints at model’s dress* where they at tho?
Non-existent
congrats im ur 1000th like
They’re
Um
Basically making the shoulders not have much of a slope but don’t do anything else
I’m grasping for straws here 😂😅
They tried their best
Its honestly kinda visible in the picture but i cant see crap on the model, but its just an representation, so its fine i guess
Queen Elizabeth also wears the bright outfits so her security can spot her better against a crowd.
they said that in the video.
Neon green
@@MrMusickey lol no
@@iris3865 its a bright color tho. But not exactly cloth color that the queen would wear.
@@youreasimp7573a queen can’t really were neon...
3:36 THE ICONIC ROYAL REVENGE DRESS = BEST DRESS EVER.
That dress screamed "F*** you, Charles!"
Love it!
She looked so hot!
Really looking forward to seeing this next season in The Crown, since they'll be introducing Princess Di in the latter episodes of S3.
LoveLife do u know what is iconic?
Every Freddie Mercury outfit
That dress was so elegant and classy. I’d wish that they’d still be selling dresses like that today
What the title should say:
100 years of recreated looks we found in photos
Edit: Whoa I have 1.9k, thanks!
(with facts we didn't even bother to google)
@@lucia5227 Haha
is that..bad..? i mean, sure, takes out some of the creativity, but im far happier they did this rather than showing real pictures of the era and a model with a completely inaccurate look
@@theamydim I would definitely prefer for them to be accurate, so, I don't really mind, but you've got to admit, they were recreated
I know right
I don’t know why I was expecting Queen Elizabeth for every single decade
Her fashion is timeless like her sisters!
Not much of a fashion icon.
So did i
Particularly her First time Trousers.
Actually the woman in the 60s reference picture was Princess Margaret, they just didn't credit her. And she was much more fashionable than her in the 60s, so I'm not surprised...
Glamour did a big miss by not mentioning Princess Anne, Queen's daughter. She was quite a fashionista of her time, and even today
but including wallis”nazifuxker” simpson in when they weren’t married until after edward abdicated
Princess Anne is quite underrated
Couldn't agree more. Princess Anne has been seen wearing the same outfits decades apart, something I think many people can't appreciate. They also missed Sophie, the Countess of Wessex (now Duchess of Edinburgh) and Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie and Lady Louise.
They know they CAN hire older models for the more mature looks, instead of putting a gray wig on a young model.
Camilla Nyberg their cheapos
I was thinking the same
I know, right?!
Yeah, that really bothered me too. :(
Look at the model's face, even _she_ looks embarrassed by the choice...
80s looks like a Halloween costume version of Diana
It does
Lmao i can't unsee that now
fr!
Truee cause her real dress had more effort
WDYM??
First of all: Queen Elizabeth *II*.
And next, (just so u know) the Queen wears her vibrant colours so that her bodyguards can spot her in a large crowd. (I'm British xD)
Right!!
Unearned titles shouldn't exist. Mrs. Elizabeth Windsor is her name
@@KateeAngel huh 👁👄👁
@@KateeAngel bruh, just stay quiet
@@KateeAngel what
What about Princess Margaret and Princess Anne? Very stylish in their time.
Princess Margaret is shown as the 1960s and when she was young was definitely fashionable, but Princess Anne has never been considered stylish (shown as the 1970s). In fact, she's probably the one in the family least bothered about fashion and is known for keeping clothes for decades to rewear. Even when it comes to Royal weddings she rarely wears something new. She's ultimately practical when it comes to clothes, but not fashionable. She's kept her hair the same all her adult life. She was truly beautiful on her wedding day though when she married Mark Phillips and glowed as every bride should.
@@wilmaknickersfit Fair enough on Princess Anne. They still dissed Princess Margaret, though!
@@margaretyates3925 I agree! I thought they could have made so much more effort to show Margaret's style. Until Diana came along Margaret was the best dressed.
Princess Margaret’s style was and will always be better than the Queen’s. I’m not saying the queen has the worst or excellent style, however adequate. If the US had Marilyn Monroe & Audrey Hepburn as a fashion icon during their times, the UK had Princess Margaret
@@tristangeneral4839 Margaret actually wore Dior's New Look...instead of having it replicated by dull British designers.
The "choker" was invented far before. The "Collier de chien" or "Collier d'esclave" was a gift French noblesse gave to their mates as a symbol of loyalty , it was popular in 17th century. Marie Antoinette wears it in some of her famous portraits. :)
@African Princess In fact, I didn't say it was invented in France. I said it was invented far before. And then I gave an example. We found something that looked like a choker, made of shells in eastern Africa in -40 000. So I assume it's even older than that.
Interesting that they were called 'dog collars" or "slave collars" in French
They really look like that, but prettier when worn with dresses
The scary thing is- "esclave" means slave and "chien" means dog in french.
@@fakename3440 Yes ! But we also know jewelry featuring dogs were gifted as a symbol of loyalty to your loved one, since 14th century, so it gives a context. As for the "slave" thing. It's a really old theme, far before slavery. History is contexts ! :)
4:00 reminded me of Dolores Umbridge.
Hahahahahahahahaha
Yuck
HAHAHAH
ngl sometimes i like umbridge-- (minus her torturing students)
I hate Umbridge with all my life
Glamour: Hey can I copy your homework?
Allure: Sure just dont make it obvious
You guys kept jumping between formal and non-formal royal fashion and that’s really irritating lol
Yeah they should have showed examples of both
Leanne G at least the outfits were accurate... as apposed to they’re previous vids which tried to get away with inspired outfits
Yasss
yeah, that's the problem with almost all of those 100 years of... videos. They'll rarely consistent.
Plus adding Diana's scandalous little black dress. So what's that, "how people dressed in the decade" or "what captured most attention in the decade"?
Kate Middleton deserves her own category tbh
HNP her style is boring af
She is gorgeous and refined. Love her style. Keeps to the dress restrictions and adds her own signature pizzazz.
Always like the way she dresses too.
She literally wears the same clothes in different colours
@@ailasomething1209 that's called "having a style", you're welcome.
Me waiting for the puffy gowns be like: 👁👅👁
When I realized there was no puffy gowns: 👁💧👄💧👁
....
They have a name
@@Pharaoh_Tutankhamen who is they? Lmao. There's only it.
@@celineeeey You mean the creepy clown?
@@Pharaoh_Tutankhamen bro wut
@@celineeeey I guess not then...
Lady Diana had an amazing fashion sense ❤
Her clothes look terribly dated now, but she had the figure to carry them off.
@@alisonbryant5799 well, not really. 70s-80s-90s- fashion is becoming way more popular.
At least find a dress that drops below the knees for Queen Elizabeth, I don't think she approves being above lol
She wears the same styles all the time and only changes the colours. She has two styles of shoes and one style of bag. Been that way for probably at least 30 years now.
BuddyBontheNet so surely they would know what she wears otherwise where’s the research going?
@@frog7195 I'm not sure what you mean?
BuddyBontheNet since she wears the same style of clothing all the time the people, if they did their research, would know what clothes to put her in
it was also awkward that they had the floral skirt, when she exclusively wears monochrome
2:36 wow I forgot how pretty Princess Margaret was
Ø9 on no ø me no up
Yup. Her beauty was overshadowed the queen herself.
If she was still alive
I think Our generation (z) we would hype her like she was a baddass princess
@@saragalliard2532 But Queen Elizabeth, IMHO, always looks frumpy no matter what she wore.
The 1950’s dress was absolutely stunning! So many beautiful colors, looks like something someone would wear nowadays.
Telling people that Queen Alexandria "invented" the choker like African women haven't worn a choker for thousands of years is disrespectful.
The videos imply that it was believed she invented the choker, not that she actually did. There's no need to be offended by something so trivial.
It said she is “credited” for inventing it not that she actually did. also, I think it means popularized
@@elamplough1 On the other hand, it is a little offensive that people are credited with creating things they did not actually create. I still agree with you, though.
I felt the same way about the little black dress comment, too.
@@janamonji she really did make it popular tho?? wdym
I don't think Wallis Simpson should have been used as a reference, to be fair. They didn't consider her royalty, and I'm sure she didn't dress to appease the royals.
I was just about to leave a comment stating that Wallis Simpson was not a royal. But you beat me to it. 🙂
Fr
@@junealyea6761 Haha yeah... not that I meant it in a petty way, but it's not really any indicator of actual royal fashion :P
She was never given the HRH designation, so she was not royal.
I found that odd too. I do think there’s definitely a place for her when talking about fashion trends and influences, but I’d rather see her influence explored in a video about non-royal upper-class or socialite fashion.
You should've write 100 years of queen Elizabeth fashion 😏
She’s only in a few of the decades. Did you watch the same video I did?
Queen Elizabeth was crowned in 1953
…
I'm in love with the 1910s and 1930s looks. So beautiful
me too!! my favorites definitely.
Nobody:
Me: *vibing to the music*
Did you all just actually say that Queen Alexandra invented the choker? Did you all seriously sit down and say that? Please invest in a fact checker. Allow an intern to use Google. Anything.
i know right! i think maybe they meant popularized it? i laughed ALOT when they said that. then when and looked at egyptian queens, who also wore chokers lol
Euros will take credit for anything
@@Mai-sx3yf that's xenophobic.
i thought the same thing! she popularized it into western society way back in the late 19th centuries as well mainly to cover up a scar on her neck. but wtv i guess she “invented it”
@@mms2855 why because I’m telling the truth?
Who else was waiting for Princess Diana? 3:01
Me
Meeeeeee
Even with the rationing in the 1940s, the dresses were way more elegant than today.
yall screwed up the revenge dress. you did princess di dirty
The choker was around in the 18th century, so she definitely did not invent it.
Thank you! I thought I was the only one who noticed that.
yah its been around since Africa/Egypt but she popularised it as a symbol of rebellious femininity in a time where fenale independence was frowned apon.
come on guys its a slightly shorter necklace- why are we grasping at straws for "cultural appropriation"?
archaeology shows it goes back and LOT longer. Cross culturally. Makes sense folks would want to highlight the neckline for literally ever.
Black White been around before that buddy, earliest signs of jewelry dates back to ancient northern europe.
White people invented it, then took it with them when they went on conquest.
I think the right way of saying it is that Alexandra popularized it in Britain.
Sorry, isn’t Queen Elizabeth II the correct way her name should be written? not just Queen Elizabeth?
Ashleigh Harris yes
It should be her majesty the queen. Officially, her first name isn’t included in her title. Either queen Elizabeth II, (II is pretty important there, cause there was a first) as in, when you’ll mention her in a book, like ‘queen Elizabeth II was also present on that day’ or ‘her majesty the queen is going fishing today’ when you mention her as in, in the present day.
I think the people commenting know more about the royals than Glamour does. :-D
Does it matter? You know who they're talking about and it's not anything official so who cares?
@@Firenzell01 157 people care till now
*I like how you always do the “100 years” of stuff, like makeup, lipstick, and hair and clothes.* LOVE IT!
"100 years of british royal fashion"
The queen knowing she's been here for, like, 60 of those years: *H-Hmmmm*
yeah, where's Queen victoria's son? he was the ruler until the 1950's
Can't wait for Karolina Zebrowska aka meme mom to review this
EDIT: Sure, most look fine but the 1910 is literally terrible and totally not accurate.
Also, thank you for the likes! Never had so many before lol
OMG same I literally love her
Yeeeees
We love our memaw
I thought the same thing, ha ha! Someone should post her a link.
Yes! Mom come review it!
Queen Alexandra wore her necklaces to cover a scar that she had on her neck. She had multiple disabilities and chronic illnesses and is a disabled icon
No, she is not. I'm pretty sure no disabled people are going around saying how Queen Alexandra is their hero for covering up a scar. There are hundreds of other disabled icons to look up to who have accomplished far greater things through their own ability than just having the luck to be born into a royal family.
News to me
A lot of royals all over Europe used to have chronic illnesses and disabilities in 18th and 19th century because of insistence to marry royals and they ended up marrying their distant cousins.
George V Queen Alexandria was also deaf. Alexandria was highly popular during her lifetime, she was very active in public life, and her deafness was also fairly well known. Although her father was later the King of Denmark at the time of her birth and throughout her childhood she was just a member of a minor branch of the royal family. Her family lived like minor nobles, while still better then most, was not the high life; she even made her own clothes. She was an incredible interesting, strong, and complex women and what she accomplished should not be dismissed because because she was royal.
George V she meant icon as in we stan 😀
Princess Diana was a fashion icon and I'm all for it. Loved the casual look!
3:23 now that's what we're talking
Sad that they used terrible cheap clothes for this segment.
Sean Go and yah know- inaccurate styling/jewelry.
Also notice how the makeup shade of lipstick is inaccurate to the historic time periods. Hot pink lipstick in 1910 didn't even exist.n periods after that. Other shades used in this video are unrealistic to the Era in time. I rather see no lipstick for 1910 vs hot pink. All that effort. N no one in the glam team realized this simple but major mistake. Frustrating how so many ppl who watch this video will have a false impression. Due to the mistakes made. No one did the research needed.
Right? You’d think a company like Glamour with over a million subscribers would know better.
Erin Grz. Just because 500+ people and myself hold certain things to a higher standard doesn’t mean we aren’t “relaxed”.
And those awful fake plastic pearls.
Ummm I personally have nothing against Wallace Simpson, but I’m pretty sure the Windsors never counted her as a royal, and they never will. That’s why King Edward aka Prince David was exiled. Please do better research next time.
Little Tooth Well she was denied Her Royal Highness status attached to her title. So she definitely was not made royal to her marriage to King Edward VIII.
To be accurate... he was not exiled because of Wallis (though she was not liked by the family at all) but because he was a former monarch and thus could be a threat to the current king, and because he had dubious ties with fascists (which by all accounts is the real reason he was pushed to abdicate- since Edwards hated the idea and actuality of being king, though he loved the perks, he saw Wallis as is ticket out).
M. S. And she never actually loved him, once he abdicated she was kind of forced into the marriage. Although she too loved the trappings, she just didn’t like the royals, her last husband included.
2:13
thats not a hat, thats a bowl!
BRO I WAS THINKING THE EXACT SAME THING
Very nice recreations!
Wallis Simpson was never given an HRH. Technically, she wasn't royal.
Ingrid Dubbel came here to say the same thing.
Thank you! Was gonna put this too
Every time an american gets involved with our royal family, trouble happens
@@edmundprice5276 *smirks* Isn't that the truth? Maybe if you all would relax about Americans getting involved with your royal family, there wouldn't be as much trouble. ;D
She married one (ditto with the Queen Mum, Kate Middleton, and Meghan Markle), so I guess that's what qualifies her. I take issue with her inclusion b/c she and her husband were (to put it mildly) personas non gratas (sp?) with the Royal Family.
I really wish the stylists would get the undergarments right. So annoying to see ill-fitting vintage...
Since when has Glamour ever done anything right in these 100 years of fashion videos
You can't do vintage fashion correctly without the correct undergarments, full stop. Without proper support and shaping, outer garments are going to look like crap.
I personally love the UK fashion. I like a lot of different cultures!
I love UK dresses, Indian food yum, Korean v-line chin, German hair, ect
its only about royal family, bruh. and korean v line chin is not even a fashion you know people have different face types?
The model they used at 4:51. They did her so wrong by putting on the wrong foundation shade.
Omg soooo real
Have to be honest my favourite was the 1910’s one
Well sure, the rest were wretched. The inaccuracies in these videos really irritate me. They need a real historian to be on these, it’s so low budget.
Cerys Winchester I agree! At the least that outfit looks royal
Princess Diana's look is my favorite!!!
Wonderful to see all this fashion through the years. Super subscribed to the channel. I love dresses and I have a collection of them.
Great video. I really enjoyed this ⭐️
Kate's fashion is timeless and elegant
I think that would be Princess Margaret!
it's timeless but it's been kind of boring recently. most of what i've been seeing are the same outfits in different colors. i feel like her style changed a ton during covid and she started dressing in solid colored clothing. it's pretty and all but after a while, it feels kind of repetitive.
1950's model was the only woman who knew how her hands are meant to be positioned like. All the others had their hands flopping everywhere.😂😂😂
I was looking for someone to say this or similar. Or what about their moves?? Was non royalty at all. If your are representing a princess or the Queen of England, act like that.
Me : * sees the title thinking it said 1500s *
* video starts in 1910 *
* my dumbass realizing * : ooooh nevermind..........
* casually goes back to playing don't lose your head *
I love princess diana's style. It's so elegant.
My bet is Queen Elizabeth doesn't die until everyone else does. 😂 She won't give up that crown period.
Lol you guys seriously considering Wallis as a trendsetters among royal?? 😂 😂 😂 Princess Margaret and Princess Royal is
Aulia A Wallis Simpson wasn’t even considered a royal
Thank you! It looked like Glamour's shot at the royals.
@@user-mv9tt4st9k Isn't Glamour an American publication?
Well, she wasn't born in royal but she had royal husband.. so literally, she is "royal.. in law.." ?
Aulia A So much for the fashion history you know. Wallis WAS a trendsetter and many fashion designers acknowledged her as such, it's not just their impression. It doesn't matter if you like her or not or what she did, she was highly fashionable and sophisticated (her jewellery collection is especially admired)
Every time I watch one of these videos the 1950’s are always my favorite
Love videos like this! Thanks!
I remember when I was sitting on the carpet, watching the TV of princess Diana's Wedding. My lil' sister was like "HER DRESS IS SO PRETTY!! MOMMY I WANT ONE!" I still laugh at that..
She looked like an angel on that. Really sad what happened to her after this wedding
Opp Loppppp pppp 0
padabatang batang P pada p
Learning that Princess Diana's wedding dress had a train that was a dizzying twenty-five feet in length left me wondering "How on earth did she not end up having to bunny hop her way down the aisle of St. Paul's Cathedral?"
0:28 queen Alexanderia created the choker...lol!Chokers have been in the royal fashion for centuries in India and the Brits took whatever looked good to their eyes when they colonised,and they used to rebrand it for the western society.
Nithya Shree exactly
You know that it’s not queen Alexandra’s fault that this video is dumb, do you?
YES!
Maria Theresa Laurent
Eh Brits arrived in India in 1612, two hundred years before you are suggesting. That may change the outcome if you consider Europeans generally wearing chokers in the 18th century
Some british lady came to india then the indians started wearing it to, in fact the indians copied
Look Very beautifull fashion
Thank YOU So much for great sharing
Queen Mary SLAYED with all that jewellery, I adore her looks
This was actually super neat to watch o love stuff like this
That lady D blue choker necklace is so iconic
Imagine the power of Princess Catherine and Meghan Markle together as friends. So sad that the British Media had to pit them against each other.
woah, thank you for making this video. Now I know how to define which era is!
I'm not an expert but I don't think that Wallis Simpson is the best example of the fashion norm in the royal family
I miss Diana
We all do..she was an angel.
We all miss the princess.
Lady Di was fantastic! The only really noble soul in the royal family in 80-s....
We ALL do.....😢🌹
I often wonder what she would be doing now if she were still here.
That last photo of Megs wearing a leather skirt -- that was Hugo Boss, not a Brit. Megs is not know for wearing British fashion.
Why would she? She’s American.
@@DGsWorldByBigD exactly
@@DGsWorldByBigD yeah but put her on a video about british fashion was a quite dumb
@@DGsWorldByBigD because it was her duty as someone who has a british peer title
So what it it's Hugo Boss - it's still royal fashion and her signature style, that was the point.
1:02
1930s
This fashion looks very good on a British lady. She's elegant and it's nice.✨✨
And The 1970s one where Queen Elizabeth 2nd wore Trousers for the first time to Modernise her style.
She’s an American but has nice fashion senses
First Lady fashion would be AWESOME!!
My favourite was 1960s. Simple, comfy yet elegant.
Maybe I'm an old lady at heart but I REALLY liked the 2000s monochromatic pastel suit...with my hair down, no hat, I would love to rock a beautiful vintage-inspired outfit like that! I also loved the 40s outfit and 60's as well.
3:13 what you order and what you get
*Wow just Wow*
1950’s royal fashion is my favorite!
🔴 thank you so much for your video, it brought me inspiration to make my own video about Princess Diana fashion style 🎥🎞
1950 dress is sooooo cute. Also, Princess Diana style is timeless. Love ❤❤
You know you're a fan of British Royal History if you can correctly predict which outfit went with who.
2:03 it's like a barbie but not so pink
2:25 lemon hair :]
loving all the tiara and bags here
50's fashion was so classy and ethereal UGH i want it.
It was Audrey Hepburn who popularized LBD ❤️
It's like they totally ignore the effect Hollywood and films have on fashion.
It was actually Coco Chanel
Evolution of Queen Elizabeth's clothing throughout the decade
Its a Lovely video ^^
I loved the thumbnail girl😍😍
I love full length dresses the best and it doesn't matter which decade. Everyone has their own particular style and it was not uncommon for me to wear full length dress to high school-the only ONE wearing this length. I still love this length better than any available today for "modern dressing".
they made it look like modern people should wear short skirts, dresses etc. i agree with you.
The first style was my favourite.
The 50s style was to die for 😍
The best one was the 1950s Dior look... Beautiful, classy, feminine, floral yet powerful. And who can forget Princess Diana! Her black dress was the most stunning photo ever. No other model could have looked more beautiful than her!
Cries bc Queen Elizabeth II is 💀
I always love watching 100 years of fashion....... 😀😀❤❤
N my favorite definitely is Kate Middleton 😃😃😃
I really love british royal fashion
i love how Glamour’s 100 year of fashion goes like this
normal
normal
normal
normal
normal
*crazy punk metal style*
normal
normal
I met Sophie the countess of wessex before, she’s a very beautiful and lovely person.
Loved the 1920s look!
Awesome. Queen Elizabeth has been alive for so long!!!!! She has seen so much!
I’m in love with the 1930s dress.