The real Red Bull-Honda concern beyond a strange F1 conspiracy theory

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 577

  • @rowan224
    @rowan224 Рік тому +440

    Honda is still involved in Dakar, Moto GP, Indy, and Super Formula. The old CEOs decision to leave F1 was just odd in regards to their environmental EV whatever claims.

    • @jordanclark4635
      @jordanclark4635 Рік тому +9

      Not as weird as it sounds with your rationale; they wanted the engineers for other projects, which the other series you mentioned don’t conflict with

    • @CharlesFreck
      @CharlesFreck Рік тому +39

      Honda wanted to leave F1 because it was more expensive then they were making returns. The profits for being involved in F1 are now ten times higher then in 2021. That's why they're coming back. In 2020, F1 was a very expensive money pit that burnt tens of millions a year for Honda and did nothing for them; F1 in 2022 is now actually profitable. It's as simple as that. It was a dying sport 2 years ago and now it's immensely profitable.

    • @thesamaffliction1572
      @thesamaffliction1572 Рік тому +3

      That’s because of a mix of emissions, costs and the US Honda branch being run separately. Moto GP costs considerably less and the emissions are too far less. Indy and Dakar from what I can tell are run by American Honda, technically a different division. But basically the cost and personal for F1s hybrid tech was being moved across to EV teams until the new CEO wanted back in

    • @kusanagi0
      @kusanagi0 Рік тому +2

      He probably just saw a spreadsheet and compared money spent and saw F1 as their biggest budget loss so decided to end it. I'm pretty sure they don't spend too much money developing engines for other categories

    • @Willbrse
      @Willbrse Рік тому +2

      Keep in mind that Honda North America (HPD) is not the same as Honda Japan. Honda JP manages the F1 part.

  • @Cakefield
    @Cakefield Рік тому +319

    Can be simplified by RB being winners at the same time as F1 viewership increasing a lot. Would be crazy for Honda to not try to get some branding back

    • @baskkev7459
      @baskkev7459 Рік тому +9

      nah even more simple. change of CEO. 1 wanted to pull money out of the sport, the other one into the sport.

    • @robertharrington703
      @robertharrington703 Рік тому +5

      @@baskkev7459 this, and Honda also works as a democracy within the board. It was supposedly 51-49 to leave, and they won a title since. All they needed is one or 2 people to change their minds

    • @daniblues
      @daniblues Рік тому +1

      Red Bull brand is also somewhat important here. When you associate with Red Bull in case of winning is Red Bull all credited for it and you don't get too much exposure. In case of losing you assume all your responsibility in it... and Helmut and Christian will make people aware of that.

    • @djoetma
      @djoetma Рік тому

      No, it was because Honda was already doing the engine while they weren't supposed to. And since RB was winning they though they should get some branding back.
      PR wise F1 doesn't do much, which is why they didn't care. But since they were already doing the work, they might as well change the original branding deal as qell.

    • @MrGamerxpert
      @MrGamerxpert Рік тому +2

      @@djoetma Did you not listen to the video?

  • @CarToneHK
    @CarToneHK Рік тому +1268

    It's simple, Honda changed CEO, so the new CEO decides to stay in F1 and overruled old CEO's decision

    • @ChristopherBuenviaje
      @ChristopherBuenviaje Рік тому +179

      Of course this reasoning won't be enough for the rabid Mercedes and Hamilton fans even though this is the most obvious answer.

    • @magicjack4076
      @magicjack4076 Рік тому +169

      @@ChristopherBuenviaje you are ruining the sport with your silly max Hamilton redbull/ merc tribalism

    • @adityawardanasujaya
      @adityawardanasujaya Рік тому +1

      @@ChristopherBuenviaje because merc and hamilton cults still live in 2021

    • @daniblues
      @daniblues Рік тому +19

      Besides, the withdrawal of Honda made Red Bull to invest heavily in its Powetrains division. Abandon this project and return to the previous status of being a full works Honda engine team without a massive blow to the Milton Keynes based was at that point impossible.

    • @oranjelicht
      @oranjelicht Рік тому +6

      Who saw second Brawn GP fiasco as that team now is Mercedes F1

  • @user-jb1rl7kh7j
    @user-jb1rl7kh7j Рік тому +327

    Would be funny if history reapeat itself with honda coming back then dropping off in performance and leaving just before the best season

    • @naufalpahlevi8976
      @naufalpahlevi8976 Рік тому +36

      Honda leaving F1 in 2008 after developing their best car in history.. The design is so good Brawn GP won the season with basically no development at all..
      So, yeah.. It happened before

    • @jraybay
      @jraybay Рік тому +9

      @@naufalpahlevi8976 Yeah we know. OP literally said it would funny if history repeat itself..
      Having said that, it's been a really impressive turn in performance for Honda, and they won't be rapidly declining anytime soon.

    • @mrsoisauce9017
      @mrsoisauce9017 Рік тому +1

      Lol if they get back together with McLaren for the 2nd time and that happens to them again, it’d be both sad and hilarious

    • @nehylen5738
      @nehylen5738 Рік тому +1

      And just to mention that too, the MP4/8 chassis in 1993 was probably as good or nearly as good as the FW15c, truly splendid. Just lacking a proper engine, as proved by the white McLaren tested by Senna & Häkkinen with a Lambo engine. Had Honda continued, after having its investments in which it investing in a changed architecture (1989-90: V10, 1991-92: V12 ?!), Prost might've had a worthy challenge ahead of him that year, and Honda another WDC title (but not constructors, because Andretti).

    • @Willbrse
      @Willbrse Рік тому

      Rules are being simplified and can have the current stuff as a base. I doubt anyone will be far off, even Audi could be close if they can carry any LMP1H experience into this (power level is very close to LMP1H cars at least).

  • @oliverwilson999
    @oliverwilson999 Рік тому +267

    I swear the race has the most random upload times

    • @GARBO96
      @GARBO96 Рік тому +25

      As an American always thought this was a normal time for England never even bothered to look at the clock 😂😂

    • @oliverwilson999
      @oliverwilson999 Рік тому +26

      @@GARBO96 its not just that, sometimes they upload at 10 am Australian, sometimes 7pm (like today) and sometimes 4am. They definitely don’t have a schedule!

    • @byron1745
      @byron1745 Рік тому +13

      Random and very differing topics

    • @bfapple
      @bfapple Рік тому +7

      It’s ~8am in UK and ~9am in Sweden where Scott lives. A normal time here.

    • @khebazzz
      @khebazzz Рік тому +2

      @@oliverwilson999 maybe just upload once video is finished. Why wait after?

  • @GregoryPrzybyl
    @GregoryPrzybyl Рік тому +188

    I think by now we’ve learned that Honda doesn’t like to leave the sport even when they say they are! 😂😂😂

    • @lild3838
      @lild3838 Рік тому +7

      They hit gold with that engine+adrian newey and his crew genius aero

    • @cl_0ud470
      @cl_0ud470 Рік тому +16

      honda changed CEO after they said they would leave, so the new CEO basically want to stay in F1

    • @hamishgaffaney5323
      @hamishgaffaney5323 Рік тому +3

      @@cl_0ud470 I really hope they do stay

    • @Randomvideos-zi7pe
      @Randomvideos-zi7pe Рік тому

      Glad they did "left" the sport once, because Honda eventually became Mercedes

    • @HoBBLeCooKiE
      @HoBBLeCooKiE Рік тому +2

      @@cl_0ud470 or they changed CEO to cover their ass.

  • @Salomundo
    @Salomundo Рік тому +49

    So Red Bull paid Honda's annual cost against naming it a RB Power Unit to keep them going.

  • @mderepository4147
    @mderepository4147 Рік тому +44

    I hope they bring the Honda livery in Japan this year… absolutely loved the red and white

  • @VigneshBalasubramaniam
    @VigneshBalasubramaniam Рік тому +54

    Honda power!
    Red Bull gave Honda its wings, Honda powered Red Bull's dreams.

  • @TheZanzaroni
    @TheZanzaroni Рік тому +8

    The new team controversy has already started. Some sites claim that Ferrari has not signed up for the 2026 engines because RBPT are currently considered a new entry and they even missed one of the initial meetings regarding the technical regulations because of that.

  • @fsfaith
    @fsfaith Рік тому +15

    Honestly, I’m just glad the Honda brand is still going to be present in F1.

  • @ralffe3465
    @ralffe3465 Рік тому +8

    I think maybe Honda might enter a factory team too if conditions are right in 2026. Seeing the success from it's partnership with RBPT, it would at least keep the company interested in another shot in F1 as a factory team.

  • @mrwhatever9025
    @mrwhatever9025 Рік тому +5

    As mentioned in the video the power unit is split into 2 parts - The hybrid electric system and the combustion engine with both companies saving money in a co-lab and a lot easier to sell to the HONDA board of directors plus just working on the electric system is the future of there car company and is relevant to there road car division technology.
    If Honda was to enter as a full team again ( i doubt this ) they would just lease alpha Tauri from Red Bull or buy it on the condition they sell it back to Red BULL and use HONDA RBPT engines.

  • @Dorlan2001
    @Dorlan2001 Рік тому +11

    Well Honda messed up, so Red Bull had to make the most out of nothing to survive. If they gain a strong advantage in the end, it is not their fault as they could also slump back severely.

  • @y_fam_goeglyd
    @y_fam_goeglyd Рік тому +17

    It's Brawn GP all over again. Honda spent a lot and left F1, only for the team with a different engine to become champs, but the car development was mostly Honda's.
    After the disastrous return of the engine - and a repeat of the global financial situation - they decided to leave again, but once burned, decided to keep a foot in the door in case things changed back in their favour. All of that was done under the auspices of saving face by assisting Red Bull who would be engineless because of Honda's decision.

    • @junsengjs
      @junsengjs Рік тому +2

      It does help a lot that RB was a much more pleasant partner than Mclaren. Its certainly easier to justify an amicable split given the pleasant relationship and the results that have come from that relationship.

  • @sheldoniusRex
    @sheldoniusRex Рік тому +7

    I wish/hope RBR and Honda were actually that good to pull off a deception of this magnitude.

    • @HoBBLeCooKiE
      @HoBBLeCooKiE Рік тому

      Deception? If this is true, it's pathetic. They ensured rule changes based on lies.

  • @whassupg89
    @whassupg89 Рік тому +15

    I’d like to see Honda come back on their own

  • @Javadamutt
    @Javadamutt Рік тому +26

    I think as you say everything has been what it is on the surface, Chaos and U Turns.
    The engine freeze was always coming, Ferrari made a massive push for it, Merc were complacent and got caught with their pants down.
    The bit that doesn't sit right with me is using a Honda engine with Honda assistance and claiming to be a new entry for 2026. I can see both sides of the argument and love the operating in the grey area (why I love F1) but do feel the mental gymnastics are a stretch to be classified as a new entry. Can't wait to see this play out

    • @Jay-nk6dm
      @Jay-nk6dm Рік тому

      merc didnt get caught with their pants down. most reliable engine on the grid by far, and had it detuned starting the season to confirm everything with the new regulations

    • @Javadamutt
      @Javadamutt Рік тому +3

      @@Jay-nk6dm Merc have stated "They were surprised by the rapid development of other manufacturers" and have also said they played it conservative.
      Yes it resulted in great reliability but even with the engine turned up Red Bull has surpassed them and Ferrari are there abouts performance wise.
      It has been noted too that the last couple of seasons the power unit has remain fairly stagnant with only a handful of minor changes at best because they were so far Infront.
      They made huge changes for the E10 and it sounds like the loss of power caught them by surprise resulting in heavy redesign. The choice of words strongly hints at them saving face because they were very much caught with their pants down
      Yes Merc have done a phenomenal job but they have said it themselves that they were caught out by quite a few things and have been complacent. Again doing a phenomenal job in the first place allowed that but things are tighter than Merc would have liked going into the engine freeze and they allowed it to happen

    • @Jay-nk6dm
      @Jay-nk6dm Рік тому

      @@Javadamutt i agree that they are relatively on the back foot but i disagree with the pants down situation. in mercs most recent sit down they also said they were conservative with the tuning and were able to get even more out of the engine by the end of the year, and also had to stop the full potential because the porpoising and bouncing were causing physical damage to the engines.

    • @petiertje
      @petiertje Рік тому

      I bet the 'FIA' will implement some kind of rule past the deadline again which will cripple the rbpt efforts somewhat.

    • @vitreo1363
      @vitreo1363 Рік тому

      Yes, the engine freeze was coming… because RB used their patented "take my 2 teams out of the pram" card to force it and get it accelerated, to coincide with the delivery of their upgrades and lock their improvements in.

  • @garythefishable
    @garythefishable Рік тому +58

    Not bad for a GP2 engine.

  • @Apater6076
    @Apater6076 Рік тому +13

    'Christian, would you spend £100m to lock in an Engine advantage for potentially 3-5 years?' 'Absolutely!

  • @haynesatteh4463
    @haynesatteh4463 Рік тому +111

    Great video, have always known there’s more to life than meets the eye, I feel like in this life i am supposed to be doing more than i am doing for the people i love. been seeking for an eye opening enlightenment, a way to be more influential, powerful and protected`!

    • @bartholetbay412
      @bartholetbay412 Рік тому +1

      oh well you can achieve that by being a part of the illuminatus brotherhood, i know it sounds like a mystery but there are ways you can actually get in contact with them

    • @haynesatteh4463
      @haynesatteh4463 Рік тому +1

      @@bartholetbay412 hi, isn't the brotherhood a myth??

    • @bartholetbay412
      @bartholetbay412 Рік тому +1

      @@haynesatteh4463 Well it is not and you can't actually expect it to be open to everyone, but if you want to know more you can look up ANTHONY MARK SZYMON online you will find something interesting.

    • @haynesatteh4463
      @haynesatteh4463 Рік тому

      @@bartholetbay412 oh really, i just saw his website, interesting.i will leave him a message.

    • @ddirtdid
      @ddirtdid Рік тому

      yeah i kinda do feel that way too sometimes

  • @ol7926
    @ol7926 Рік тому +10

    The history tells us that Honda has left the F1 more than one time. But time will tell

  • @Angel-fz8dr
    @Angel-fz8dr Рік тому +5

    At least one thing is for sure, Honda always leaves F1 in the worst possible moment for them.

  • @randyadams03
    @randyadams03 Рік тому +5

    I listened twice🤔, got massive headache both times. Step off wait for 2023

  • @Visual_Ghoul
    @Visual_Ghoul Рік тому +25

    Aramco: Powered by blood.

    • @flopre9213
      @flopre9213 Рік тому

      socail credit +2

    • @soundscape26
      @soundscape26 Рік тому +1

      There's no Aramco to be seen in this video.

    • @sam-nariman6236
      @sam-nariman6236 Рік тому +1

      Actually Aramco powered by ISLAM and Islam powered by blood.

    • @soundscape26
      @soundscape26 Рік тому +3

      @@sam-nariman6236 Ah yes, gimme some Islamophobia. Is Shell Islamic as well?

    • @Visual_Ghoul
      @Visual_Ghoul Рік тому

      @@soundscape26 the Aramco point isn't specific to this individual video.

  • @magnanova
    @magnanova Рік тому +1

    I reckon the engine RBPT produces for 2026 will be lacking compared to Merc/Ferrari/Renault unless they partner with Honda.

  • @britishfilmguy
    @britishfilmguy Рік тому +2

    Interesting few years ahead for both, even though Honda are still lurking about still makes a fascinating couple of years ahead.

  • @ryanjordan1083
    @ryanjordan1083 Рік тому +8

    If true, im sure the fia will respond swiftly and harshly with a small fine.

  • @sandalf647
    @sandalf647 Рік тому +16

    This can be best summed up in a few words:
    "And the old CEO was probably panicking"...

  • @joeswift403
    @joeswift403 Рік тому +13

    I just thought that it was a creative way to play the cost cap rules, that there was a greater advantage to saying you were developing your own engines than being a customer, maybe with money being moved around operations to provide a more flexible setup

    • @rishithbhowmick5701
      @rishithbhowmick5701 Рік тому +1

      But do the cost cap rules include Engine development costs?

    • @maxime_j
      @maxime_j Рік тому +5

      @@rishithbhowmick5701 no

    • @cosminlesutan3574
      @cosminlesutan3574 Рік тому

      @@rishithbhowmick5701 Yes they are, for 2026 there is a set cap but "new" engine manufacturers get more even if the engines have nothing in common with the current ones ... besides the V6 every other spec is new

    • @naufalpahlevi8976
      @naufalpahlevi8976 Рік тому +7

      If you developing your engine from zero you would cost so much money than being a customer.. So even if it's included in the current cost cap rule, it's not creative, it's an idiotic way to play the cost cap rules..
      From the beginning of the season it was clear that The engine is still HRC's engine and Redbull Powertrains is not more than a badge branding name like Tag Heuer back then.. So no one except you believe Redbull develop their own engine in house for 2022 to 2025..
      And yes Redbull Powertrains projects is to Design 2026 engine specifications not the current engine

    • @vitreo1363
      @vitreo1363 Рік тому

      @@cosminlesutan3574 That's because the dispensation is there for new manufacturers -not new engines- who have never built an F1 PU before and wouldn't be able to know how to make it last a full season until it actually hit the track; that way they're not stuck trying to catch up for a decade, if at all. This was intended for manufacturers like Audi and Porsche… RBPT is just the rebadged Honda PU operation.

  • @roryevans4295
    @roryevans4295 Рік тому +2

    It was a simple ceo change, the old one wanted to focus on electric cars and the new guy likes and wants to be in f1, 2 different people wanted to do 2 different things, its not that deep

  • @joshn1678
    @joshn1678 Рік тому +2

    I think RedBull and Honda did some shady stuff to keep developing the engine.

  • @darrenmaharaj
    @darrenmaharaj Рік тому +2

    Red Bull being Red Bull these shenanigans are not surprising. Being a privateer and underdog you have to play these games to beat the powerful works teams. Some might say it's below the belt, but I have a bridge to sell them.

  • @PyreEntei
    @PyreEntei Рік тому +1

    ...gee, another controversy related to Red Bull in some way. Where have we heard this before? FIA aided Championship, Petty lead driver, cost cap breach, and now this? Red Bull needs to steer away from any more controversy, if they are not to be ridiculed. Red Bull wants to be a big boy team? Sure, but they need to clean up their act some.
    And this whole Honda leaving, not really, but actually... I'm so over it. There should be a new rule implemented, if a Manufacturer says they're leaving the sport, all affiliating elements should leave, not just a few sticker changes and continued support. How can F1 continuously refuse new teams/Manufacturers from entering, while letting Honda go wishy-washy and leave/return every so years. Either stay, or leave.
    Honda is a renown brand, and has a place in F1 for certain.... but they have to be 100% commited, if that's what prevents others from joining F1. If Honda can't make up their minds, F1 should honestly open up to allow other engine suppliers to take a crack at it, instead of a "We'll Join/Quit F1" in a cycle that Honda's been doing.
    This is my honest opinion from a fan's perspective that's trying to follow everything. If this doesn't follow anyone else's opinion, that perfectly fine. I just wish Honda would stop it's games, and pick one.

  • @bash83845
    @bash83845 Рік тому +1

    Honda have been building a new engine while theyve not been an engine supplier and as such havent been banned from developing last years engine which they'd no doubt have used as a starting point.
    Honda come back next year, new engine for Red Bull.. Everyone else adhering to the dev ban is on their 2022 spec engines.

  • @Lburt07
    @Lburt07 Рік тому +4

    Why do Honda leave F1 to come back a few years later in different ways?

  • @ausajax
    @ausajax Рік тому +12

    Not sure why the desperation to discredit any suspicion of RB foul play. Let's see how it plays out. It's okay to criticize RB when they misbehave.

    • @galarianmike283
      @galarianmike283 Рік тому +4

      I think for some, it stems from AD21.

    • @TheMrakic
      @TheMrakic Рік тому

      or perhaps their history of being dodgy cunts? :D or we keep going to pretend last 2 seasons didnt happen? :D

    • @gelmir7322
      @gelmir7322 Рік тому +4

      Its post season.
      there ain't really much to talk about.
      so anything available will be talked about.
      It is not a desperation to defend RB (or to discredit their critics)
      It is a desperation for the channel to put in content to keep their subscribers entertained and their channel active.

    • @petiertje
      @petiertje Рік тому +3

      well, as you say. it's okay to criticize rbr (and any other team!) when they misbehave in whatever form.
      Rumors and made up stories which some people choose to believe for whatever reason are no reason for criticizing and do need to be held against the facts that are present. otherwise you'll end up with an even bigger shitshow that the F1 'fanbase' currently is.
      I'm all for calling teams on their faults etc. but not when it's just rumors/made up stories which half the time are just posted for the clicks (aka money) without proper research and/or facts.

    • @_qwe_fk_1700
      @_qwe_fk_1700 Рік тому

      But they didnt here

  • @shanepearce1629
    @shanepearce1629 Рік тому +1

    honda was on the redbull 22 car at launch HRC Honda Racing Corporation so to say they came back in Japan was just a logo change

  • @lovemademan
    @lovemademan Рік тому +2

    HONDA was, is, and will be a GAME CHANGER in F1! As long as they will be here, F1 will be AMAZING! Go Max Honda RB!

  • @jonathansmith2407
    @jonathansmith2407 Рік тому +2

    They were still helping redbull develop the engine, they never left and are now "officially back"

  • @Arroganto
    @Arroganto Рік тому +4

    Ladys and Gentleman, this is how unsmart people get tricked into hating a team because of a f. theory...

  • @random-person1
    @random-person1 Рік тому

    I find it strange that pretty much everyone else is saying that RBR have pulled a fast one and have been allowed to dev their ICE/PU despite there being an engine dev freeze. That's not ME saying that, but others have been talking about it since we found out that honda were staying.
    As for whether they should be allowed to call their 2026 rbpt new, sure, so long as honda aren't involved. If they (rbr) retain honda as part of their package for 26 and onwards, it would be a huge kick in the nuts for all the other 9 [currently] teams.

  • @mafiousbj
    @mafiousbj Рік тому +10

    Red Bull got lucky with the change of leadership at Honda at the right time

    • @_qwe_fk_1700
      @_qwe_fk_1700 Рік тому +2

      Well they were also terribly unlucky that honda wanted to leave when everything was fine

    • @mafiousbj
      @mafiousbj Рік тому +1

      @@_qwe_fk_1700 but in the end the way things turned put didn't affect them much if at all save qorryong for the future a bit (and of course "wasting" those 100 M in the RBPT factory, although they will certainly find a good use for it)

    • @vitreo1363
      @vitreo1363 Рік тому

      Yeah… "lucky"

  • @SleepySriracha
    @SleepySriracha Рік тому +17

    I think Porsche-Red Bull partnership was about to be agreed upon by RB and Volkswagen Group but Honda is there to support RB all the way and their partnership is legendary.

    • @redbadger2656
      @redbadger2656 Рік тому +9

      the rumours I have seen around the RB/Porsche deal was that Red Bull thought it was 50% of the PU manufacturing where as porsche wanted 50% of the full Red Bull Racing company so it was a 50/50 partnership but Red Bull decided against it because they were looking to bring Andreas Seidl in as TP replacing Horner and Horner basically told Dietrich Mateschitz to kill the deal. How much of that is the truth, I dont know but seen a lot of places (some quite credible) reporting that when it was announced the deal was dead

    • @naufalpahlevi8976
      @naufalpahlevi8976 Рік тому +9

      @@redbadger2656 Porsche wanted 51% stakes and demand control over Redbull's operation.. Which is ridiculous since we already know how good Redbull operates as a racing team, and we also already know how a car manufacturers executive absolute control can make a disastrous decision like Ferrari keeping Inaki Rueda just because he had connection with Ferrari executive

    • @Zeiss120
      @Zeiss120 Рік тому

      @@naufalpahlevi8976 Sounds like Porsche believes (and they have a VERY successful racing history) that they would be way better at racing operation vs RB.

    • @naufalpahlevi8976
      @naufalpahlevi8976 Рік тому

      @@Zeiss120 Did you really think Porsche would allow Redbull to waste a lot of money just to train their pit crew changing tyres in zero gravity?
      Not only F1 would never race in space, The crew they trained during those costly stunts is pit crew, which in their best form at 3 times 1 second faster pitstop on 45 laps race would only give 0.06 advantages per lap.. if the laps are more than 45 laps the advantages would be thinner and also if they did less than 3 pit stop the advantages would be thinner
      As a car manufacturers it would be a ridiculous waste of money, And they can say "Look at Mercedes, they didn't waste that much amount of money for pit crew"

    • @Zeiss120
      @Zeiss120 Рік тому +1

      @@naufalpahlevi8976 No, that's why should buy their spot and come in. Stop pussy footing for the past 50+ years, if not STFU and keep at GT racing, and let your sister company Audi be the only one in F1.
      And then your 2nd part.. what are you on about...

  • @SirGingerOfKnight
    @SirGingerOfKnight Рік тому +1

    It's a much simpler answer to the Porsche question, too!

  • @paddyplumber5532
    @paddyplumber5532 Рік тому +1

    So if Honda work / improved on the engine separately would this be away around the cost cap that red bull wouldn’t have to put down towards there spending

  • @georgiaguardian4696
    @georgiaguardian4696 Рік тому +2

    Honda is part of Formula 1 tradition. The company has to stay just like all others!

  • @mrj3217
    @mrj3217 Рік тому +2

    I feel bad for George Russell because Mercedes will be even slower this year than they were last year.
    4th or 5th is where Mercades might finish this year in the championship.
    0 wins and only a few lucky podiums.
    I am calling my shot right now.

  • @ebutuoyYT
    @ebutuoyYT Рік тому +4

    Red Bull are the new Benetton, that is not a compliment 😂

  • @crxdelsolsir
    @crxdelsolsir Рік тому

    Engine rule freeze is for all teams.
    What is the problem?
    No one is prevented from developing within that restriction.
    Also it is to manage the agreed cost cap and manage the financial uncertainties of civic.
    Whatever the case it did not give Honda any more advantage.

  • @The_Curious_Cat
    @The_Curious_Cat Рік тому +1

    One point Ferrari raised recently was the fact that for 2026 new rule change, RB is sat at the table with the other engine manufacturers (Ferrari, Mercedes, Renault and Honda) when they have been using Honda engines and will use some of their IP for their engine. But still they are at the negotiating table as a new engine manufacturer, which basically gives them two votes in five when it comes to rule changes for 2026.

    • @petiertje
      @petiertje Рік тому +1

      If they all sit at the table, they can do something about that if they don't like it I think?

    • @_qwe_fk_1700
      @_qwe_fk_1700 Рік тому +1

      „they will use some of their IP“
      Source?

    • @vitreo1363
      @vitreo1363 Рік тому

      @@petiertje
      LOL!
      You speak as if you can't tell what's wrong with that picture from a fairness and competitive aspect…

    • @josephf467
      @josephf467 Рік тому +1

      @@_qwe_fk_1700 do you expect them to start from scratch with a blank paper and pencil?

    • @halofreak1990
      @halofreak1990 Рік тому +1

      @@josephf467 Yes, I do, and so does Red Bull. They wanted to bring the engine freeze forward, so they wouldn't have to dedicate any capacity to maintaining it and could instead dedicate all their resources to the new engine.

  • @pef1960
    @pef1960 Рік тому +2

    I still think RB are shifty so and SO's.

  • @lagundafire
    @lagundafire Рік тому

    I'd Buy that Red Bull never really wanted to properly go it alone with RBPT. Instead maybe they wanted to sell Honda's IP to Audi or Porsche and let them take it over. This resulted in the deal falling through as Honda were none too happy for a direct competitor in VAG getting access to their IP. Makes sense. This meant that Honda didn't really have a choice except to come back into the field somewhat and actually maintain control of their own IP and benefit from winning the title and having increased advertising from that.
    What makes more sense is Marko didn't like Honda leaving. Threatened to sell off the IP, went a long way into the Audi deal before backing out as a bluff and eventually got Honda back involved. Just feels like the kind of thing that would have happened in that field.

  • @grantharriman284
    @grantharriman284 Рік тому

    When Honda decided to leave RedBull was not competing for race wins most weekends. Then they won every available title and most of the races. The costs are pretty much constant, but the value increased DRAMATICALLY. How far ahead they planned is up for debate, but the cost/benefit analysis is pretty obvious.

  • @Doubledeepfried
    @Doubledeepfried Рік тому +2

    I bought a Honda motorcycle due they winning the Championchip, so marketing works :)

  • @WRXMAN-ms2mm
    @WRXMAN-ms2mm Рік тому +1

    Anyone who follows F1 knows who designed and built the beast of an engine that has powered Red Bull for their past two winning seasons. Honda didn't lose any brand benefit for their efforts. Also F1 engines have no cross over as to why average customers buy their car. Any F1 engine feature or concept is cheapened down for mass production by manufacturers who are not involved in F1 at all. Which is terrific for the average consumer. Good tech is good tech.
    As for Honda being designated a new manufacturer for a 2026 entry if I heard that right, that is just silly. The FIA is all about intent in their rules and regulations so they adamantly claim. Even if Honda only did the electric side of the engine they are clearly not F1 novices.
    Regardless the more engine manufacturers of ICE engines the better I contend. Because after all is said and done the ICE engine is the true heart of any ICE car, personal or F1.

  • @remusmoo
    @remusmoo Рік тому +1

    Not surprised. Horner is cunning, or probably triggered due to Merc's previous dominance.

  • @joemercuri6242
    @joemercuri6242 Рік тому

    How is it that Honda never left the sport as they said they would?? If they are to continue as things are now they should be forced out with NO team contact for at least 3 years before being let back in. And RB should have to prove they are building their power units from the ground up without outside help for at least 3 years before they are allowed to make a change. They seem to have misinformed the FIA when pushing for an engine freeze (which they got) and now wants to get the benefit of new manufacturer rules when it looks like they have been in collaboration the entire time. Getting cake and eating it too?

  • @izwanisa8592
    @izwanisa8592 Рік тому +1

    Its just a Honda thing. At the end we all want Honda in F1.

  • @Ruylopez778
    @Ruylopez778 Рік тому

    Honda F1 (that wants to stay in the sport) and the parent company Honda Japan, have completely different mindsets. Honda F1 also didn't want to leave Red Bull in the shit, because they helped them save face as the McLaren mess. Since the FIA/F1 changed the PU regulations for 2026, and Honda Japan changed CEO, and VW entering, it's a different set of circumstances. It's the difference between what the CEO says publicly (for media and shareholders) and what the company actually do.

  • @AugmentedGravity
    @AugmentedGravity Рік тому +1

    8:38 RIP Porsche x.x

  • @arjancrazy2314
    @arjancrazy2314 Рік тому +1

    Red Bull gonna screw F1 with there RBPT engine!!! In 2026 or earlier the engine gonna be called with some teams Honda - Cadillac - Ford - Aston Martin!! So they have more control in F1 (2 teams F1 and as Engine manufacturer deliver to 4 teams or more)

  • @MSportsEngineering
    @MSportsEngineering Рік тому +15

    Feedback: the written segment transitions need to be changed to include audio. Everyone listening to audio only has no idea what they are.

    • @ankhayratv
      @ankhayratv Рік тому +1

      Indeed, The Race is not inclusive with those text headings.

    • @trevorfitzpatrick4181
      @trevorfitzpatrick4181 Рік тому +2

      Feedback. Get a screen!

    • @bipolarminddroppings
      @bipolarminddroppings Рік тому

      @@ankhayratv now people are bigots for having visual elements in a video? Holy hell...

    • @MSportsEngineering
      @MSportsEngineering Рік тому

      @@trevorfitzpatrick4181 I listen to UA-cam videos a lot when doing stuff around the house or walking. Most other channels do not have the issue The Race does with visual only headers. Yes, I know about podcasts and listen to those too.

  • @fredc9655
    @fredc9655 Рік тому

    Honda is clear winner here, keep names on cars while spend significantly less and get real RB needs a engine partner in 2026 RBPT is not gonna make it.
    It's pretty obvious to me, Honda is making the best of it while RB is just trying to gain the leverage negotiating with new partners.

  • @meejinhuang
    @meejinhuang Рік тому +1

    Honda had to pay RB millions to use their engine. Now RB is going to pay Honda millions to come back.

  • @eddietai4156
    @eddietai4156 Рік тому

    Just simple. Honda is commercial product company and profit oriented. Red Bull just pay Honda USD100mil/yr or other amount that don't make Honda feel lost then case closed. I think with the frozen rule of engine from 2022 till 2025, basically there will be almost zero development cost impact but only manufacturing cost mostly.

  • @sebulbathx
    @sebulbathx Рік тому

    I don't fault Honda for sticking around since it went pretty well for RB recent seasons.

  • @Squilliam-Fancyson
    @Squilliam-Fancyson Рік тому

    I just do not get the hassle. Honda should have just canceled their plans to leave F1 after Max became wc with the Honda powered RB. Pretty sure, Honda now appreciates the positive image effects it's F1 project has on the brand. After all with the engine rules being freezed, there is no real financial risk by just continuing their campaign until 2026.

    • @fadedexile
      @fadedexile Рік тому

      Honda changed the company CEO. One wanted out, the other wanted back in

  • @finhaigh4063
    @finhaigh4063 Рік тому +1

    I think they gave up then 2021 happened and they did a 180

  • @Quayleman
    @Quayleman Рік тому

    OMGF YALL FINALLY SPEAK ON THIS. I BEEN BITCHING ABOUT THIS SINCE LAST YEAR...

  • @felixchuah2854
    @felixchuah2854 Рік тому

    Instead call Honda RBPT, just Honda Red Bull only. No need put Powertrain on it.

    • @felixchuah2854
      @felixchuah2854 Рік тому

      Well Alpine-Renault need an new customer team instead return as Andretti Team in next year, 2024.

  • @Staleyboi12
    @Staleyboi12 Рік тому

    My theory was them going to Porsche engines switching from RBPT to them so it's a new engine. Don't think that will happen now

    • @arapaimagold8088
      @arapaimagold8088 Рік тому +2

      The most important thing about the deal with Porsche, is on the hybrid system. Porsche own Rimac, and Rimac hybrid engineering alone can create huge difference.

  • @jitumuniya
    @jitumuniya Рік тому +2

    2026 engine suitable for HONDA

  • @mpolinsk22
    @mpolinsk22 Рік тому +1

    I like when you put up the stream of potential other engine partners, there's a big red "X" over Porsche. Hah.

  • @geniferteal4178
    @geniferteal4178 Рік тому

    Everybody built extreme engines with less regard for reliability. They knew the freeze was coming and adapted.

  • @SomeYouTubeGuy
    @SomeYouTubeGuy Рік тому +6

    I'm surprised you didn't mention that in creating RBPT they poached some very skilled talent from other teams which regardless of the direction Honda and RBPT goes will obviously have an effect on the teams those people left.

    • @arapaimagold8088
      @arapaimagold8088 Рік тому +4

      Even if they didn't poached head engineers from other teams. They still gonna knock the door and asking for a job. That turbo alone, is masterpiece of engineering from HondaJet. Even IHI engineers are in awe when they was sent the blueprint to manufacture it.

    • @givemeabreak8784
      @givemeabreak8784 Рік тому +1

      They lost some engineers too. Look at the Aston Martin aka green red bull. The aero engineers are red bull. I don't buy your story. Engineers move around a lot in F1. With the cost cap teams are forced to pay less.

  • @kieferclarkf1674
    @kieferclarkf1674 Рік тому

    Porsche wanted to come into Red Bull and basically buy the team and all of the ip. We all know Porsche want to go into F1 as a manufacturer, but they should just do what Aston Martin did with Red Bull prior to them buying a whole team. They should just be the title sponsor. Ya it was weird it being Aston Martin Red Bull Racing Honda, but somehow it worked. No reason it couldn't be Porsche Red Bull Racing Honda. All the marketing benefits without dropping hundreds of millions buying a team.

  • @johniooi3954
    @johniooi3954 Рік тому

    2021 Honda pull out of F1. Red Bull set up their own power train division gaining 150 million on the cost cap as they become a supplier of power trains, despite no one using them. Poach staff from other engine suppliers. Honda still supply RB & work on the engine. 2022 Honda announce they are coming back & supply will RB in 2023. Yet their name has never left the car.

  • @jarigustafsson7620
    @jarigustafsson7620 Рік тому +1

    Old F1 cars look odd with their tiny wheels.

  • @DaftPanda1
    @DaftPanda1 Рік тому

    Honda are such an incredibly irritating manufacturer. They have clear, proven talent and ability; their engines are immensely powerful, bulletproof, and their leadership and management clearly gels perfectly with Red Bull. But they always drop out right before they win big; they make consistent and rapid progress towards the front and then decide at the eleventh hour they don't want to continue, whilst everyone screams "BUT YOU'RE SO CLOSE" from the sidelines.

  • @davestrider2045
    @davestrider2045 Рік тому

    The footage from the Honda board meetings is so weird. Way too much of the color white.

  • @jgonzalesm6
    @jgonzalesm6 Рік тому

    What RedBull-Honda did was find the loophole in the system. That's it.
    Finding loopholes in F1 is nothing new.

  • @MrNanoPlankton
    @MrNanoPlankton Рік тому +1

    Somewhere here you forgot to have Porsche

  • @Aintyourbuddy_guy
    @Aintyourbuddy_guy Рік тому

    Thank God Honda is staying.. as a Honda fan, they are why I love f1.. been that way since the 90s

  • @peterfighter
    @peterfighter Рік тому +18

    Finding loopholes in regulations is something what teams do since 1950.

    • @mvh996
      @mvh996 Рік тому +8

      ya exactly ! its something thats a characteristic of F1. everybody has and will do it.

    • @HeavyMetalGamingHD
      @HeavyMetalGamingHD Рік тому

      @@mvh996 not just f1. motorsports in general.

    • @giuseppemaggio5894
      @giuseppemaggio5894 Рік тому +1

      @@mvh996 The thing is that when a British or German team does it, nobody complains. When Italians or Japanese teams do it, everyone freaks out. Do you remember everyone's reaction when Ferrari found a loophole regarding the engine in 2019?? Talking about double standards.

    • @mvh996
      @mvh996 Рік тому +1

      @@giuseppemaggio5894 though i do agree with wat ur trying to say generally, in that particular case of 2019 ferrari engine issue, i dont think that was a loophole, it was a rule break.they clearly broke the rule regarding fuel flow.

    • @vitreo1363
      @vitreo1363 Рік тому

      Yes, teams will do as they do and try to game the rules. And calling them out on it… is what fans of the sport will also do.

  • @joekilega
    @joekilega Рік тому

    so basically ford can pull out while all along honda has been developing for the 2026 regs for 4 years through an engine freeze.

  • @Dragonson575
    @Dragonson575 Рік тому

    I could have sworn that a video on this topic was posted some time ago by these guys

  • @oponamikwe5011
    @oponamikwe5011 Рік тому

    Its all about profit margins. If redbull offered a lucrative deal, then there would be no honda leaving. Whom ever offers a great deal has their engine. Nothing about feelings. Pure business move. Honda is a 74 year old BUSINESS. Money is their guide

  • @davidworthington9118
    @davidworthington9118 Рік тому

    Red Bull threatened to sell the F1 team to VAG (Porsche), so Honda stayed! I wonder why.?

  • @nikomoin7604
    @nikomoin7604 Рік тому

    I would totally believe red bull would do that, but not Honda. They have to much respect

  • @1987jaffa
    @1987jaffa Рік тому

    We can all look at Red Bull. But Honda would look REALLY bad if they're caught gaming the system.

  • @francescocorona1183
    @francescocorona1183 Рік тому

    Ferrari the only one trying to stop this, they were forced to sign. They should leave the sport and focus on their WEC campaign honestly

  • @johnzapper1652
    @johnzapper1652 Рік тому

    Well this hypothesis hasn't dated well now that RBR has picked up Ford as an engine partner.

  • @cpcxgsr
    @cpcxgsr Рік тому +3

    After the 2021 a season, for all we’re concerned Honda left f1. Even though RB/Honda rebranded the team as HRC, it’s 100% not the same as Honda F1. Most of Honda’s team management had left… just a skeleton crew from Honda F1 to maintain the connection with the personnel from Japan and with the factory team in MK. With all the wins, Honda never gotten the full recognition that they once had when Honda logos were plastered on their cars…
    I’m sure Honda corporate was beating themselves in the ass for walking away after the 2021 season… and now they are scrambling to find a way to get back on the nose cone of RBs cars… Hopefully things change and Honda decides to stay in the sport stick with Red Bull. The combination can rival Mercedes for years to come

  • @MikeM-so3je
    @MikeM-so3je Рік тому +1

    Hard to take The Race's journalism seriously, when their main sponsor murdered a journalist...

  • @therobbinsnest45
    @therobbinsnest45 Рік тому

    Yet all of these people complaining were totally fine with Mercedes being 2 seconds a lap faster than the rest of the grid for years. Hypocrisy

  • @kgriff5537
    @kgriff5537 Рік тому

    Doesn't Honda have an Indy car engine? Aren't they benefiting from their Indy car participation for their internal combustion component of the engine. I can see them gaming the system that way. I'm sure there is way they can transfer knowledge from that series to F1 without it showing up on the budget.

    • @tyler_bt3326
      @tyler_bt3326 Рік тому

      Indycar engines are less sophisticated. Anything they’re using in Indy will already be common knowledge on an F1 Powertrain, but the systems work so differently you’d gain no benefit from doing that

    • @kgriff5537
      @kgriff5537 Рік тому

      @@tyler_bt3326 Just referring to the ICE component. Both series are V6 turbo.

    • @cornishcat11
      @cornishcat11 Рік тому

      @@kgriff5537 nothing like each other totally different engines

    • @petiertje
      @petiertje Рік тому

      All engine manufacturers currently participate in other series. There will always be knowledge which can be used for multiple disciplines. Every racing series is quite specific in it's needs though so I doubt there will be much to be gained by it. Otherwise it would have been discussed for years already.

    • @kgriff5537
      @kgriff5537 Рік тому

      @@petiertje It's different though in a world of limited spending.
      If another manufacturer is participating in a similar series with almost the same ICE, you can't tell me there's no benefit for that manufacturer compared to the others. They could could do the research with the Indy series and that cost wouldn't be counted on the F1 team budget.

  • @jeroenarets3226
    @jeroenarets3226 Рік тому

    Now do a video about Merc and their investments just before the cost-cap

  • @iamarobotninja
    @iamarobotninja Рік тому +1

    This would imply that Honda, one of the largest companies on the planet, would have committed fraud by misleading shareholders. A calamitous crime all to help an energy drink company win a few races? Grow up lol

  • @UGRRetribution
    @UGRRetribution Рік тому

    Honda should have pulled a Mugen. They already did that.