Arma 3 Long Range Sniping - 2.1km using ACE Advanced Ballistics
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
- 2.1km sniper shot using the Advanced Ballistics system in ACE3 for ARMA 3.
Takes into consideration:
-Gun characteristics (realistic)
-Bullet characteristics and trajectory (realistic)
-Wind, air pressure, humidity and much more!
Shot done using M200 Intervention with Nightforce scope.
Vector 21 used as range finder.
Kestrel for wind information, the AtragMX and the DAGR
![Arma 3 - ACE 3 Sniping Tutorial [2017]](/img/n.gif)
title of this video should be "I spend 5 minutes doing random calculations only to miss 5 times"
exactly XD
LMAO
Good of the targets to stand there all that time, while you sorted out your settings and blazed away at them!!!😂
belive it or not some jobs require sitting in one place for more then 3 minutes while gunshots happen 400 meters into the distance
@@JuneTheCapybara this is how you spell believe
“Sitting in one place”
In a cover. No one is going to stand in an open field when they are aware an enemy is trying to kill them.
Forced hold fire and Careless be like
@@JuneTheCapybara facts. For example i remember at a police station if u shoot somone, the guard will not leave front gate no matter what...thats his job, to stay close to main gate.
4:14 is the actual shot.
thanks
thanks
Not gonna say it was terrible shooting... but this could certainly be refined.
Those 5minutes felt like 15
So, a bunch of measurements and data input, only to end up missing 3 or 4 times and doing some Kentucky windage corrections based on observed bullet impact. Ok.
It's almost as if sniping isn't that easy
@@JadeHollows It's almost as if in a video titled "...using ACE Advanced Ballistics" one would expect the shooter to know what they're doing...
Don’t be a prick. Where’s your all’s one shot videos
Nobody in the world is getting first round impacts at that range. The math is all to get your impacts close enough to your POA to where you can accurately judge corrections. If you never see where the first bullet hits, how do you make adhustment? People that get their information about long range marksmanship from movies and video games need to realize how this shit actually works and how close to reality this actually is. Meh, what would I know though, not like I was an Army sniper for like, 6 years or anything........
@@Microwave_King your sniper school should hire this guy. He can do it. ua-cam.com/video/5sYa2eVX3GQ/v-deo.html&pp=ygUVYnJ5YW4gbGl0eiBmaXJzdCBzaG90
I love the part where he did all those calculations just to miss 4 times... at that point just zero to 2.1km and adjust. 1 minute engagement vs 4 minutes of failed math.
Dude, he’s showing all the cool shit you can do, stop being a party pooper
For all the critics, .. this is not as easy as it looks. Solid skills here.
Bro, nobody cares about, that game its boring.
4:37 Neo is beginning to believe...
The direction of wind is 5 not 10
4 actually :D
@@The_Tank_Destroyer69420 that is true xd
@@Black-kn9gt :D
because your measuring the direction the wind is coming from not where it's blowing to?
@@bandrea610 that's correct
One word, kestrel #moa 😉👍🏻
i expected that bot going prone to onetap you with a pistol
i shoot 3 km on iron sights of a pistol to a person inside jet
XD nice bro , i was inside that jet
@@jayanitilalshah6116 no i am the jet...
Its impossible bro jjdjdjsb
Battlefield yea? Lol
its true i was the jet
"1$ Sniper men vs 1,000,000 $ Sniper men" ahh montage (I actually love this lol)
Do you ever wonder if the Taliban watch these videos?
So cool
Increase zero and hold for windage
Congratulations, you made a mountain out of a molehill
Dude.. so many things wrong. Pretty much everything you did for windage was wrong. First, you didn't even take the wind speed, simply looked at the direction and estimated?
On the target screen, Wind 1 and 2 are for two different wind values to be entered; primary is Wind 1 which is you main windage, secondary is for gusts so you can estimate. You.. left 7 m/s in 2 and never used it, went off Wind 1 which was 0 so you only adjusted for coriolis and spin drift. Also, wind direction is in the direction it's coming from not going to.. 4 o'clock not 10 o'clock.
I think the worst part is to top it all off, is that when you went to actually set your scope, the atrag read wind of .7L you proceeded to set your scope to .7R for a reason that I couldn't even begin to comprehend. Dude.
2:20 i geiger counter feeling kicked in...
Probably just played too much S.T.A.L.K.E.R and Metro...
Do you taste metal? What is that ?
He messed up the wind. It's 4 o'clock full value, not 10 o clock wind. There's a damn' arrow showing you wind direction ffs.
Just….. HOLD FOR WINDAGE
One shot one kill
Respect
You could have just increased the zeroing mate.
all of this for one shot.. omg bro
Pretty cool about 5-6 second flight time. In the future maybe the end of this century 2100 I could see energy weapons or rail gun type weapons shrunk down enough for infantry to carry and if so this could literally revolutionize warfare. Picture this if you could get a laser or energy projectile you might be able to fire at 5-50 km/s I know this is far fetched now but if you had a gun that could fire at those speeds it would be instantaneous at massive distances.
There are no energy or laser projectiles. Thats fundementally wrong, you could argue a particle could count as a projectile sure but the only technology we have to send a particle flying at a speed is a particle accelerator. They require extreme amounts of power, take an insane amount of space and the particle isnt likely going to travel straight without the acceleration chamber containing it. There has also been an instance of someone being hit in the head by that particle fired from a proton beam and surviving without any severe effects.
As for light/laser we already have that, but the energy needed for it to actually do damage to something is very high and you need a lot of supporting technology to focus that light into a singular location. We can do that with for example laser cutters, but variably focusing the light to a far away location is difficult. Laser weapons exist but are mostly for anti air and anti munitions use. They are also countered by smoke or anything else obstructing the light. So simply drop a smoke grenade or have a reflective layer and it would render the weapon useless or less effective. The light would hit the smoke particles and reflect/bounce around reducing its focused area and diluting the concentration of light.
Having it handheld would also require direct view of the target and a heavy battery pack. It would be way heavier than modern rifles and is counterproductive for the average soldier as it can't destroy cover, shoot through walls without first burning a hole through it. With modern weapons like the rifle in this video you can load the munitions with a payload that explodes on impact and destroys any cover and can spread bullet fragments around the impact area. Lots of soldiers get injured by fragments of bullets hitting the cover they're next to, even with normal munitions. You can't do that with a laser and keeping the laser active long enough to burn that hole would require a constant source of electricity. You'd basically need a miniature nuclear reactor to even get close which would pose its own challenges.
Lasers aren't really affected by gravity either so you can't shoot over the horizon or any cover the enemy might hide behind and have the bullet still hit the intended target.
So while it would be fancy, it would not in any way revolutionize warfare even if you did manage to build a rifle capable of shooting an "Energy projectile" or a laser capable of doing enough damage over a variable distance. Vehicle defense is plausible, exists and being actively researched but is still too big for anything other than a base installation or ship.
If we have space wars lasers would be more useful, instant hit and theres little to no cover. No clouds and way easier to vent the heat of the weapon. Lasers produce a ton of heat that needs to be extracted or it would just melt itself which is another reason its not really viable for the average soldier.
Nice reply, I was throwing around obv a few weapon system that don’t exhist I guess I was more of the realm of rail guns as they are fielded on naval vessels. The only real laser practically is defensive anti missile defense systems however the government has alluded to being able to fit these on jets either were the targeting pods go or defensive ews anyway. The real application currently would be defense of hypersonic missiles having a pod that could heat up the hypersonic as it closes in melting a fin or scrambling the sensor enough for a miss or catastrophic failure idk. Thanks for the reply love throwing ideas around.
@@TheCraigHudson Yeah rail guns and laser missile defense is more viable, fitting anti munitions lasers on jets right now would likely be too heavy and impractical at this point with current technology limitations. The power required for the laser systems currently in use from what ive seen from publicly available information is too high for a military jet. An awacs could probably house it but we're way of from an f-35 or similar housing one. Not to mention it would be bulky and take lots of space.
Most viable uses would be aircraft carriers, other ships and base installations. Using radar means you can lock on to the incoming target and have the laser need less detecting systems, only something that can improve accuracy once in line with the locked target.
I work in industrial automation and electric systems so i don't think im the worst person to voice what i think :P
@@Navilicous There are some military uses for lasers to disable spacecraft like satellites
@@oddursigurdsson9637 Not practical as the atmosphere and clouds will cause the photons to bounce around and not be as concentrated as is necessary to take down a satellite. To hit a target moving at the speed a satellite is moving at the range a satellite is orbiting at you would need technology way more advanced that what is currently feasible.
INL that dude would have taken a bullet in the eye after all those failed attempts
practicing mathematics in lecture before any shooting
Need applied ballistic mods for kestrel or rangefinder xd.
lol all of that just to miss bruh of course in real life you might get one shot then target flees but in arma you have a giant puff of dirt and usually people have the situational awareness of a worm so this is ridiculous to use that scope calculator even with ace3
Hurry up my Deliveroo is getting cold in the back of your bike
What name is that mod?
Wind?
mission link?
all that just to miss the first 4 shots lmao
Wich scope is this?
You can use M85A41 name should have been like this, I don't remember exactly.
Nightstalker
I just make my adjustments using the crosshairs. dont need all that other bs.
All those calculations 😂😂😂
tem que fazer um doutorado pra atirar
This is some Call of Duty 4 shooting Zahkaev shit lol
taliban also watch youtube ?
It's cool even change all the stuff but really here to play a game not calculus and also get is a military SIM
Buy a kestrel 5700 elite and save you half of the job lol
معاذ بركه جاب اعلى منك
The first
Nobody cares
@@youdontseeanoldmanhavinatw4904 I believe he was asking what the name of the first scope was, and I think it's a nightforce.
bro is the worst sniper ever