It's like a German novella I read when studying at the university (I'm a Swede but fluent in German). The story told about a colonel who had had power over a million km2 in the occupied parts of the Soviet Union "but that had now shrunk together to a couple of barracks in northern Mecklenburg".
i am genuinely surprised their range finder isn't just cardboard tubes from paper towel rolls, and their towed anti-tank gun isn't just cardboard and plywood and paper mache.
There was an actual joke that was in circulation among troops in German-occupied France in 1944 that was similar. It went something like... "If the planes are black, it is RAF. If they're white, it's the Americans. If you don't see anything, it's the Luftwaffe!"
"Hey Commander, you know how that one tank is shooting at us? Well I have an excellent idea.. why don't we just walk off to the side of the road here where they can't hit us with that machine gun of theirs." Commander: "What? No that's a stupid idea, we must go directly at it. It's the fastest way." Solider: "But won't we get shot at?" Commander: "Oh yeah never thought about that..."
Yeah, once the tank breaks down in the middle of the road, the movie just becomes fantasy. As soon as they found out the tank was manned and just mobility killed, the germans could have used so many routes to just flank the thing and kill it with no or very low casualties, instead they decide to stand in the open and just get shot. It broke immersion for me.
didn't you see the arial shot at the end? even though it was immobile and could only shoot forward, it was still surrounded at all sides by dead germans and in very even dispersion too. Miracle-gun, I tell you
To be honest it’s when the film has its first major action sequence that I lost interest and realised just how foolish it was. That Pak40 would have destroyed all those Shermans, as would the tiger that they magically surrounded and bounced rounds from (whichever came first). It was just a bad film from beginning to end, inglorious bastards was more realistic than Fury.
@@joebloggs7514 To be at least a tiny bit fair ( only a tiny bit mind you ) The first bounce was off a Jumbo. A Sherman field modded to be more resistant to incoming fire. And Fury itself was an Easy 8...A Sherman purpose built to kill Tigers. And the bounces were at point blank range on the rounded armour of the turrets. Which contrary to popular opinion decreases the damage a shell would do. Especially from something as big as an 88mm. It's still a little too much but honestly it wasn't the worse offender by far.
There isn’t a man with a pulse or millilitre of testosterone in the world who wouldn’t like to have a go driving a tank. This is is also true of most women.
"...uh, sir, there's a man under this tank." LMFAO I always thought that scene was oddly placed, but I could never have communicated how hilariously slapstick it was as eloquently as that one single line. Bravo Squire, bravo
All that was missing was the perspective of the Tiger commander during the Sherman ambush and his "logic" in leaving his concealed position to close with a faster, more agile Sherman, cuz that ended well for him...
I absolutely loved the ending bit with David Willey, what an amazing bloke. The best part was trying to pretend that you're running away from what he has to say, I'm pretty sure literally everyone here including you guys could listen to what he has to say for ages.
Yeah, the reality (yes it's based on a supposedly real event. The book it's known from had many inaccuracies, so... yeah.) was FAR fewer casualties, and didn't have them walking into the tank in broad daylight (it was night, so they didn't see it), retreating and attacking several times. It was, like, one prolonged fight against one unit that were totally unprepared for a surprise tank.
Yeah I mean the movie features a panzershreck (which could pen it from the front from a couple hundred metres) bouncing from the back at point blank range.
@@tony-te7gd Indeed. And if the Sherman could reliably actually do that, then maybe the author of the book wouldn't have UTTERLY HATED the sherman as much as he did.
@@tyrongkojy Problem with Shermans is there are so many variants that radically change the vehicle that talking about them as one model of tank will always result in a mess.
@@lokenontherange Still, apparently the author of the book HATED them. Like, ALL of them. And was criticized for some of the things he said about them, which I guess were, according to critics, "grossly inaccurate".
There was a real story which is maybe familiar to author of the book. Only it was a soviet tank on the crossing. KV-2. It destroyed 12 supply trucks which were then followed by two 50mm anti-tank guns. An 88mm gun was knocked out at a range of over 900 meters. The germans then mounted a night raid in which two satchel charges were attached to the Russian tank. They were blown but the tank continued to fire. The next morning a feint attack was made by light panzers while another 88mm gun was brought up to finish the tank off. The tank was finally silenced when two assault engineers pushed stick grenades through a hole at the base of the turret.
I loved Fury despite all its flaws, but the fact that that German soldier spared Norman after he helped killed like 200 of his comrades broke the immersion so much I never understood why they did that. The scene would have been as much tense if he just lay down playing dead while the Germans roamed around the tank afterwards.
It would have been so much better if he was captured and then at the end of the movie we see him being who got skewed from a liberated Pow Camp all beat up. It would have shown what often happened to two people who got captured
Your content keeps getting better and better. Love it! Keep up the amazing work.
2 роки тому+136
As a tank oriented youtuber, having this kind of access to the tank museum would be a dream. Nice of David Willy to agree to this :) I have only seen the first half or so of Fury, so this video was very confusing for me :)
Come to tankfest mate, you can teach me the correct pronunciations for all the German kit.
2 роки тому+12
@@SquireComedy Deal. First thing you can also tell the curator when he follows you the next time is that it is "Kanonenjagdpanzer" or "Jagdpanzer Kanone" and not "Jagdkanone" as he keeps saying. That should throw him of long enough so that you can make good youd escape. 😉 And your German as "Herr Leutnant" a few videos back, was already quite good.
Commander: This gun is your new home Gunner: This home sucks Commander: That's it, go to your room! Gunner: But.... Where's the room? Commander: Just go!
Loving the Hell Let Loose gameplay in the background brings back memories of getting my head caved in by a tank when I looked down the wrong road. 2:48 😅
Lol I loved this. I love how Fury went from being a sad war movie showing the horrors of war from The Americans point of view to being a comedic German film which it seemed like The Germans knew it was a film. I also love how the Germans used Fury lines. Question: Was the "Norman" on this film on The German side supposed to be German counterpart of Norman from the original film?
Brilliant! Love it how the Tank Museum works with you guys! All out there who haven't been in The Tank Museum in Bovington ... go there, it is amazing and worth the trip! For those coming from overseas - it is worth it!
"We Used To Have A Truck" lol i felt that The end where Norman got shot in this skit i felt should been the true ending, more harrowing and shows the bloodshed that WW2 was, and after a fierce battle i'm sure the germans would have offed him
"It's starting to become a little bit unbelievable out there!" My thoughts exactly when I watched this part of the movie, "Fury" as the 200 elite SS soldiers couldn't destroy a lone immobilized Sherman....great laughs :)
Let me paste my comment here also. Fury is probably based on a real story. Only it was a soviet tank on the crossing. KV-2. It destroyed 12 supply trucks which were then followed by two 50mm anti-tank guns. An 88mm gun was knocked out at a range of over 900 meters. The germans then mounted a night raid in which two satchel charges were attached to the Russian tank. They were blown but the tank continued to fire. The next morning a feint attack was made by light panzers while another 88mm gun was brought up to finish the tank off. The tank was finally silenced when two assault engineers pushed stick grenades through a hole at the base of the turret.
@@imperial387 This still makes no sense. As a retired infantry officer, 200 of my soldiers would take 3 minutes to destroy an immobilized tank by itself, without infantry support, and in the dark. Easiest kill possible
@@markc8401 There is a good reason why tanks were the kings of battlefield 70 years ago. Today we have human sized weapons that can sent those 60+ tons beasts to hell in a matter of minutes while in ww2 you had tanks who couldn't even penetrate enemy tanks.
Ironically, Audie Murphy did actually score a kill ratio of like 250 men (and some tanks) on his own. ...No one would ever have believed it if there weren't hundreds of witnesses on both sides.
Well, he was an undersized 20 year old from Texas, so you can’t expect him to perform like one of those full-sized Texas A&M football chaps. Give him a break, man!
With my life deciding exams this Saturday, things have been very stressful. So to start of my morning with a great laugh, was something I really needed. Thank you for this master piece! :D
Jeez it feels like last month you did if Fury was a British movie. Too think how this channel has changed. It’s just amazing. Soo glad to see the change.
I must say this has been the best one in a long while. Im not exactly sure why but for the longest of time your videos have felt a little stale? But this one made me laugh. Good pacing, jokes and timing!
Much brilliance. I downloaded Fury straight after the great Sony Hack of 2014 and have enjoyed it ever since. I'm glad I got to see the German version today...
Hush man, you've outed yourself to corporate Gestapo as a movie downloader! Don't you know that threatens a tiny, infinitesimal portion of their vast profits?
I don't know why, but Squire reminds me of Sturmtruppen, the WW2 Comics by Bonvicini. Great work fellas, you even made me laugh...and I'm German and immune to humor!
The tanks name was 'in the mood' and they had 3 of them.. kinda neat it was a true story but hollyweird had to sprinkle farry dust on it, the actual story is similar but even more amazing imo.
"Fury" is such a weird movie. Sometimes it's quite realistic and/or believable, that sucks me right into the middle, but then something very stupid happens, which takes me out completely. I do believe the director had good intentions though, it has emotional impact.
You are by far not the only one. It's very typical unnuanced pro-american drivel. The americans are superior in every way, even their warcrimes are moral in those movies. I dislike Inglorious Bastards too but at leas Tarantino has the self-awareness to turn it back on the audience.
They were intended as offensive grenades for use in trench fighting, I believe so they had the longer fuse and of course the long handle in order to throw them further to get them into an enemy trench or foxhole before an assault
Sweden had similar grenades, although we didn't take part in the war. There was also an extension that could be screwed on the top, so that it became a pretty powerful bomb with 1 or 1.5 kilos of TNT (the grenade itself "only" contains a couple of hundred grams),
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Squire and the Bovington Tank Museum have been a really great collaboration.
I love David’s collaboration with them 😂
David just gets it and rolls with it every time.
The tank museum does a really good job working with other UA-camrs and the gaming industry
David is such a great sport about it. What a legend!
@@somethingelse516 Gotta pay for the upkeep of all those machines some how
The "use a Panzerfaust, we had so many earlier when we were marching and singing" line is what EVERYONE thought when we watched the movie. Nice!
Same
It's like a German novella I read when studying at the university (I'm a Swede but fluent in German). The story told about a colonel who had had power over a million km2 in the occupied parts of the Soviet Union "but that had now shrunk together to a couple of barracks in northern Mecklenburg".
@@francisdec1615 Wie heisst das Buch, bzw. der Roman?
@@castrogonzalez614 Der Kranzträger.
It's a shit film. You like it? You are shat, then
i am genuinely surprised their range finder isn't just cardboard tubes from paper towel rolls, and their towed anti-tank gun isn't just cardboard and plywood and paper mache.
I too remember the good old days. But Squire seems to enjoy this so much.
he's gotten a better graphics card so he can crank the settings
Would've been more authentic. Guess they had to settle for those metal models
Card Board, Plywood and paper mache... Sounds like with a bit more glue you could build a jet plane out of it
They had cardboard Brad Pitt tho.
"What about air support or artillery?"
" Yeah, I'm surprised they're not using any."
"I mean, ours?"
"I'm surprised you think we have any."
🤣
LOL
That line killed me I almost fell off my chair
The one former Grenadier in the unit looks at you suspiciously as if you were an Allied spy.
FR THO
There was an actual joke that was in circulation among troops in German-occupied France in 1944 that was similar. It went something like...
"If the planes are black, it is RAF. If they're white, it's the Americans. If you don't see anything, it's the Luftwaffe!"
"they're so easy to use, a child could do it... And often does" killed me 💀
In ww2 children were forced to join the German army and they often did use em.
Its a line from Lord of war.
@@Challenger2MBT efficient soilders, small hit boxes and low production cost
@@kk7324 Lol
Same for the children
I like that you used Hell Let Loose as the background for the artillery gun.
Cheers mate - appreciate that.
Instantly noticed that lol Love it!
PTSD immediately kicked in, bad moments at Zerkall
@@SquireComedy Yuuussssss! Some HLL vidz please
I was gonna say the same thing
"Hey Commander, you know how that one tank is shooting at us? Well I have an excellent idea.. why don't we just walk off to the side of the road here where they can't hit us with that machine gun of theirs." Commander: "What? No that's a stupid idea, we must go directly at it. It's the fastest way." Solider: "But won't we get shot at?" Commander: "Oh yeah never thought about that..."
Good god man think of the films content, what would there be if they did that.
Yeah, once the tank breaks down in the middle of the road, the movie just becomes fantasy. As soon as they found out the tank was manned and just mobility killed, the germans could have used so many routes to just flank the thing and kill it with no or very low casualties, instead they decide to stand in the open and just get shot. It broke immersion for me.
didn't you see the arial shot at the end? even though it was immobile and could only shoot forward, it was still surrounded at all sides by dead germans and in very even dispersion too. Miracle-gun, I tell you
To be honest it’s when the film has its first major action sequence that I lost interest and realised just how foolish it was. That Pak40 would have destroyed all those Shermans, as would the tiger that they magically surrounded and bounced rounds from (whichever came first). It was just a bad film from beginning to end, inglorious bastards was more realistic than Fury.
@@joebloggs7514 To be at least a tiny bit fair ( only a tiny bit mind you ) The first bounce was off a Jumbo.
A Sherman field modded to be more resistant to incoming fire. And Fury itself was an Easy 8...A Sherman purpose built to kill Tigers.
And the bounces were at point blank range on the rounded armour of the turrets. Which contrary to popular opinion decreases the damage a shell would do. Especially from something as big as an 88mm.
It's still a little too much but honestly it wasn't the worse offender by far.
The part when the reinforcements were marching in kinda slovenly then one guy was goose stepping brought a chuckle!
POV: Me
That one true believer still holding on
@@kostakatsoulis2922 There's always one
I’ll be honest… I want to see Squire make an hour and a half movie about the Dieppe Raid of 1942, THAT would be an amazing film!!!
Please have mercy, sir.
@@SquireComedy The Canadians should be saying that. Well, not for very long anyway.
At least do a 10 minute video about it PLEASE
@@SquireComedy Have mercy man! Think of the Brexit!
That's would be amusing , if it wasn't so damn tragic !!
David Willey has such a great sense of humor. I hope you guys can involve him in some more sketches!
Every time he shows up is just an absolute delight
They lost me at the toy gun add. After Dave showed up I'm giving it a thumbs up.
I wonder what would happen if he'd be put in range of Lindy "TANKS!" Beige...
@@IVANGROZNEYGod forbid they want to monetize their work separately from UA-cam
The energy you gave off as the captain reminded me of the training staff when I was at basic always sarcastic,bloody hilarious
You got a good name
I was thinking the same, that was NCO quality sarcasm.
"thats one half track the americans will not struggle to replace" i love the clever lines so much
Rock of the Marne 🫡
"yeah, we can start up and drive that super awesome antique for your internet video."
Those tank museum guys just love driving their tanks. 😆
who wouldn't honestly
tbf they have the reproduction that was made for the movie
I volunteer at a different tank museum, can confirm we all love the tank ride days
@@SweetSniper5197 abso-f*cking-lutely. Lol 😆
There isn’t a man with a pulse or millilitre of testosterone in the world who wouldn’t like to have a go driving a tank. This is is also true of most women.
the Squire-Tank Museum partnership gets funnier every time, I wish I could get across the pond to visit Bovington
That updated graphics card is already paying off! You can really tell that they got the real Brad Pitt for this!
Wonderful work as always gents!
"...uh, sir, there's a man under this tank." LMFAO I always thought that scene was oddly placed, but I could never have communicated how hilariously slapstick it was as eloquently as that one single line. Bravo Squire, bravo
Production value seems to be on the rise. Script writing is top notch already as always. Great work!
Heh heh heh. Good one. Your mate really nailed it with the assistant gunner role.
Thanks 😅
I have no words for what a masterpiece this is.
Thanks Jez!
I always love these videos and your war thunder sketch videos. You incorporate comedy and history very well. Have a good rest of the evening lads.
Thanks, you cheeky monkey.
The Bond spoof was brilliant. Fastest I've cried laughing, well done!
All that was missing was the perspective of the Tiger commander during the Sherman ambush and his "logic" in leaving his concealed position to close with a faster, more agile Sherman, cuz that ended well for him...
competency issues does kind of make sense
@@justinpan1259nah if there were any tiger tanks operational with fuel, it would not be in the hands of an incompetent commander
Careful there lads, your production value is almost starting to look professional.
Can't have that happening can we my good sir, (or Ma'am idk)
@@SweetSniper5197 I don't know either.
Phwoah
@@SweetSniper5197 yes yes.. they need to be nerfed, arent we nigel?
I almost forgot this isn’t officially part of the movie. This is literally how they portrayed the Germans lmaoo
To be fair, all the smart Germans had already surrendered, deserted, or were killed by 1945.
@@wolfrainexxxnot exactly true
I absolutely loved the ending bit with David Willey, what an amazing bloke. The best part was trying to pretend that you're running away from what he has to say, I'm pretty sure literally everyone here including you guys could listen to what he has to say for ages.
Thanks, Squire. Getting a new video from you is always a good thing.
That was hilarious, the Fury script was just insanity.
Yeah, the reality (yes it's based on a supposedly real event. The book it's known from had many inaccuracies, so... yeah.) was FAR fewer casualties, and didn't have them walking into the tank in broad daylight (it was night, so they didn't see it), retreating and attacking several times. It was, like, one prolonged fight against one unit that were totally unprepared for a surprise tank.
That is wild.
Yeah I mean the movie features a panzershreck (which could pen it from the front from a couple hundred metres) bouncing from the back at point blank range.
@@tony-te7gd Indeed. And if the Sherman could reliably actually do that, then maybe the author of the book wouldn't have UTTERLY HATED the sherman as much as he did.
@@tyrongkojy Problem with Shermans is there are so many variants that radically change the vehicle that talking about them as one model of tank will always result in a mess.
@@lokenontherange Still, apparently the author of the book HATED them. Like, ALL of them. And was criticized for some of the things he said about them, which I guess were, according to critics, "grossly inaccurate".
„They’re so easy to use, a child could do it… and often does“
🤣🤣🤣
Brad Pitt probably prefers the Normandy cider farms 😄
I've always wondered what the Germans where doing when they gave the sherman a few minutes to breathe
Lunch break
There was a real story which is maybe familiar to author of the book. Only it was a soviet tank on the crossing. KV-2. It destroyed 12 supply trucks which were then followed by two 50mm anti-tank guns. An 88mm gun was knocked out at a range of over 900 meters. The germans then mounted a night raid in which two satchel charges were attached to the Russian tank. They were blown but the tank continued to fire. The next morning a feint attack was made by light panzers while another 88mm gun was brought up to finish the tank off. The tank was finally silenced when two assault engineers pushed stick grenades through a hole at the base of the turret.
@@imperial387 Ярость
... the Germans were* doing
That ending for some reason felt like the darkest humor you've done 🤣and its so indirect, applause!...
Sausage?
Please
@@SweetSniper5197 You're welcome mr tough guy.
I love how the tank museum does so much with UA-cam creators and gaming
I loved Fury despite all its flaws, but the fact that that German soldier spared Norman after he helped killed like 200 of his comrades broke the immersion so much I never understood why they did that.
The scene would have been as much tense if he just lay down playing dead while the Germans roamed around the tank afterwards.
It would have been so much better if he was captured and then at the end of the movie we see him being who got skewed from a liberated Pow Camp all beat up. It would have shown what often happened to two people who got captured
“Have you been to tank school or not?”
“No I never even finished normal school mate.”
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Sadly, that was more fact than fun on numerous occasions.
This gentlemen is how you properly do a satirical critique of a highly rated film. Bravo 😆
Outstanding skit......
Loved the curator section as well, great sense of humour....
Good job boys.....
This is such a high budget and genius production. Loved every second.
Aw man, the folks at Bovington always seem like such good sports, live to see it
James Holland top, a legitimate historian and stuff.
I've never seen anyone look worse in German uniforms than you two, suits the videos perfectly.
Thanks Chris, we try!
@@SquireComedy it's your overwhelming Britishness that does it, love the channel guys keep it up
@@christ4032I think he is jewish not british.
Your content keeps getting better and better. Love it! Keep up the amazing work.
As a tank oriented youtuber, having this kind of access to the tank museum would be a dream. Nice of David Willy to agree to this :)
I have only seen the first half or so of Fury, so this video was very confusing for me :)
Come to tankfest mate, you can teach me the correct pronunciations for all the German kit.
@@SquireComedy Deal. First thing you can also tell the curator when he follows you the next time is that it is "Kanonenjagdpanzer" or "Jagdpanzer Kanone" and not "Jagdkanone" as he keeps saying. That should throw him of long enough so that you can make good youd escape. 😉
And your German as "Herr Leutnant" a few videos back, was already quite good.
Don't bother watching the rest of Fury, it is just like this but with SS and more Germans dying.
Great video! Keep up the good work!
Thanks! We'll try!
@@SquireComedy Do or do not. There is no try weehehehoo
"...I don't know why, most of their character development was cut."
“If they offer you a chocolate bar, for god sakes don’t take it” 😂
Commander: This gun is your new home
Gunner: This home sucks
Commander: That's it, go to your room!
Gunner: But.... Where's the room?
Commander: Just go!
Flippin' heck.
David's appearance and his role cracked me up!
Gotta love that man!
8:37 "So easy to use a child could do it... and often does" hahahahahaha
Loving the Hell Let Loose gameplay in the background brings back memories of getting my head caved in by a tank when I looked down the wrong road. 2:48 😅
This was quite amusing, and to see the partnership with the tank museum is amazing!
It’s awesome to see Fury in use for the video! The Tank Museum must be great to work with. I laughed when squire shot his pistol while open his flask!
Lol I loved this. I love how Fury went from being a sad war movie showing the horrors of war from The Americans point of view to being a comedic German film which it seemed like The Germans knew it was a film. I also love how the Germans used Fury lines.
Question: Was the "Norman" on this film on The German side supposed to be German counterpart of Norman from the original film?
obviously
Very obviously, since Norman is an extremely rare name in Germany.
@@francisdec1615 Oh I didn’t know that
I wonder what the equivalent German name would be. Probably Conrad, though technically that's based on Charles.
I wish we got to hear more about differentials from the museum curator!
Fun Fact: There’s no tiger scene because the tiger’s transmission broke and it’s too expensive to repair.
Watch this space. Tiger video coming featuring real Tiger :)
I really need to visit the UK just to go to that tank museum.
Amen
Brilliant! Love it how the Tank Museum works with you guys!
All out there who haven't been in The Tank Museum in Bovington ... go there, it is amazing and worth the trip! For those coming from overseas - it is worth it!
I watched this before I watched fury, and now rewatching it I now get all the perspectives
"We Used To Have A Truck" lol i felt that
The end where Norman got shot in this skit i felt should been the true ending, more harrowing and shows the bloodshed that WW2 was, and after a fierce battle i'm sure the germans would have offed him
You need to watch films from the regular German army perspective
EXCELLENT - and David W was so funny at the end. Brilliant work as ever 🙂
"It's starting to become a little bit unbelievable out there!" My thoughts exactly when I watched this part of the movie, "Fury" as the 200 elite SS soldiers couldn't destroy a lone immobilized Sherman....great laughs :)
Let me paste my comment here also. Fury is probably based on a real story. Only it was a soviet tank on the crossing. KV-2. It destroyed 12 supply trucks which were then followed by two 50mm anti-tank guns. An 88mm gun was knocked out at a range of over 900 meters. The germans then mounted a night raid in which two satchel charges were attached to the Russian tank. They were blown but the tank continued to fire. The next morning a feint attack was made by light panzers while another 88mm gun was brought up to finish the tank off. The tank was finally silenced when two assault engineers pushed stick grenades through a hole at the base of the turret.
@@imperial387 This still makes no sense. As a retired infantry officer, 200 of my soldiers would take 3 minutes to destroy an immobilized tank by itself, without infantry support, and in the dark. Easiest kill possible
@@markc8401 It's Hollywood. They tend to exaggerate.
@@imperial387 That they do! But occasionally a movie gets it right...or close enough to being right, that brings a smile to my face
@@markc8401 There is a good reason why tanks were the kings of battlefield 70 years ago.
Today we have human sized weapons that can sent those 60+ tons beasts to hell in a matter of minutes while in ww2 you had tanks who couldn't even penetrate enemy tanks.
This one had me laughing out loud every few minutes. Great work, guys!
Ironically, Audie Murphy did actually score a kill ratio of like 250 men (and some tanks) on his own.
...No one would ever have believed it if there weren't hundreds of witnesses on both sides.
Actual COD protagonist in real life.
Well, he was an undersized 20 year old from Texas, so you can’t expect him to perform like one of those full-sized Texas A&M football chaps. Give him a break, man!
Like… in one day?
@@cinder1667yup and all he had was a radio and the .50 cal mounted on top of a burning M10 Tank destroyer
Where did he even got all that .50 ammunition from to kill 250 people?
This was absolutely entertaining through and through. If you get the funny bits, it's even better.
These guys are seriously funny, they smack of Monty Python if you ask me. I love their stuff.
With my life deciding exams this Saturday, things have been very stressful.
So to start of my morning with a great laugh, was something I really needed.
Thank you for this master piece! :D
The captain is quickly becoming my favorite character in any war movie.
Another great skit, well done boys! I also want to give a shout-out to the tank museum guy for playing along, just great stuff!
I have to know; how did your relationship start with the Tank Museum and how you were able to get them in your skits?
They forced them to listen to their 12 hours long tour.
definitely historically accurate! at the end the Kar jams after one shot, incredible work squire!
"We used to have a truck!"
Bloody killed me 😂😂
Jolly good work chaps! Always delighted watching your videos while drinking my tea!
8:20 it’s like a site manager giving a tool box talk
Love how Norman's theme plays only to abruptly stop when he gets shot.
I'm so happy they let you do this
Jeez it feels like last month you did if Fury was a British movie. Too think how this channel has changed. It’s just amazing. Soo glad to see the change.
I must say this has been the best one in a long while. Im not exactly sure why but for the longest of time your videos have felt a little stale? But this one made me laugh. Good pacing, jokes and timing!
Production value is going through the roof. Just look at all the extras you were able to hire.
Much brilliance. I downloaded Fury straight after the great Sony Hack of 2014 and have enjoyed it ever since. I'm glad I got to see the German version today...
Hush man, you've outed yourself to corporate Gestapo as a movie downloader! Don't you know that threatens a tiny, infinitesimal portion of their vast profits?
@@weldonwin I could be a deep agent, luring out others to confess their crimes...bet you didn't consider that, you Pirate sympathizer!!
This Hell let loose gameplay in the backround is amazing
I love the Tank Museum cameos. They obviously love Squire and co, wonderful to see the crossover.
I like the energy of the dude just butt stroking the tank and shrugging his shoulders. You tried
Nice use of the range finder!!! I’m impressed
Great video. I especially loved the curator at the end. What a great sport taking it all in stride.
Great video, but the curator at the end. He is so funny. Well done chaps 👍🏻
Great escape from that know-it-all guy! I was worried!
2:47 RIP. Guy got absolutely shredded.😂
I loved that tank museum bit at the end!!! Outrageously funny!
I don't know why, but Squire reminds me of Sturmtruppen, the WW2 Comics by Bonvicini.
Great work fellas, you even made me laugh...and I'm German and immune to humor!
Damn, that product placement was Perfect. Actually made me want to buy it.
I know the Germans were short on menpower in 1944. I did not know they resorted to cloning 7:20. Pretty advanced technology for the 1940ties.
"We found a panzerfaust and luckily it's very easy to use, a child can do it and often does" Damn, a sad reality
God bless the volkssturm! 😂
@@scottanno8861 The Soviets really had hard time dealing with those things lol
Amazing series of videos thank you all so much!!!!
Hahaha “ I think we got one I can hear them crying I don’t know why almost all the character development was cut.”
“This gun is your home, until we retreat in about half an hour.” 😂
So... I'm not the only one who thought Fury was idiotic.
The tanks name was 'in the mood' and they had 3 of them.. kinda neat it was a true story but hollyweird had to sprinkle farry dust on it, the actual story is similar but even more amazing imo.
@@markrix nope
@@memonk11 lil bro said “nope” fym ☠️
"Fury" is such a weird movie.
Sometimes it's quite realistic and/or believable, that sucks me right into the middle, but then something very stupid happens, which takes me out completely.
I do believe the director had good intentions though, it has emotional impact.
You are by far not the only one.
It's very typical unnuanced pro-american drivel.
The americans are superior in every way, even their warcrimes are moral in those movies.
I dislike Inglorious Bastards too but at leas Tarantino has the self-awareness to turn it back on the audience.
SFX are getting better and better ! Great stuff Squire !
Great video man, very funny 😂👍🏻
Another great video. I'm always happy when one pops up in my feed.
Actually , those potato masher grenades really did have extended fuses . So that part was a bit accurate !!
Maybe, but I don't know why you would use them in that particular scenario with a fuse that long.
They were intended as offensive grenades for use in trench fighting, I believe so they had the longer fuse and of course the long handle in order to throw them further to get them into an enemy trench or foxhole before an assault
Sweden had similar grenades, although we didn't take part in the war. There was also an extension that could be screwed on the top, so that it became a pretty powerful bomb with 1 or 1.5 kilos of TNT (the grenade itself "only" contains a couple of hundred grams),
The bit in the tank museum in the end was just icing on the cake, nice to see they have a sense of humour :)