@@adavidstroud the change of audio quality when you change from outdoor mic at 1:00 mark back to voiceover mic it is very noticeable. the voiceover mic sounds muffled and compressed and not nice.
@@mattbray_studio Yes, but that's actually the same mic - recorded in two different rooms on different days. I tried to make them sound identical but realise I didn't. Apologies!
I just commented this on another video about the Vision Pro. Once the 3D Video recording feature takes off, I can't imagine Apple or any other Cell phone Manufacturer for that matter, passing up the opportunity to implement 3D video recording and Holographic 3D Light Field screens on the cell phones themselves.
@@adavidstroud it’s a step above auto stereo glasses free 3D ua-cam.com/users/shortsSmOjJM5zqYY?si=KlWBxA-Gh9ekL8V5 I think the first phone company that comes out with truly holographic 3D maps could make trillions.
Man this video puts my thoughts into words. Haven’t seen anyone talk about this device in this way and It was driving me nuts. Keep up with the awesome work!
Thank you! 🙇 That means a lot. If you want to hear more along these lines, you can support me (for free, just by following) on my new website, which I'm literally just putting some finishing touches to as we speak. It's over at www.davidstroud.com 🙂
I don't see how entertainment would any different with this device as it exactly what the Meta Quest line of products does now but in a lower resolution
Hehe, they did add the ability to make stereoscopic video to iPhone 15 Pro I think. This is getting fun. And wow, the quality and content of this video is great. Hope to see more!
That ability is coming soon to iPhone 15 Pro, yes. Can't wait for it. I wonder what the playback/storage situation will be like... "spatial videos" will take up a lot more space, and I wonder how we'll be able to share them with others. Will UA-cam/Vimeo etc create separate "spatial video" offerings, kinda like UA-cam has UA-cam VR for VR-180 and 360 videos? (not that I'm a huge fan of how they've implemented it).
The biggest problem is the size of vision pro video files, streaming that quality would require massive bandwidth. video is already a problem on other headsets.
True, true @thumbjuggler3943 ... people's internet connections are gonna have to get a whole lot faster and more reliable for streaming mahoosive video files! I wonder how much bigger they'll be in practice? 🤔 Meantime, it'll be a "waiting to download" situation, but a lot of folk are used to it with game console downloads, etc.
I'm equally excited buddy. VR is going to be absolutely amazing and IMO will bring experiences only the ultra rich can enjoy to the masses. Like you live in a tiny crummy 1 bedroom apartment but you put on your headset and live in a massive castle with all the entertainment (but way more) of those multi million dollar homes. The virtual reality will become a great substitute for our real one. While I'll probably be waiting for the $2,000 standard vision pro release because this also needs time for more apps to develop so it has more use - I still think $4,000 can be considered a bargain for what the thing will replace and allow you to experience. I had a great time with the Quest 2 even just using big screen and the app that connects to your computer to bring that screen into all kinds of virtual environments. It is game changing tech for entertainment, but it needs a little more time and even just resolution upgrades - that the vision will provide. I might look at buying a Quest 3 in the mean time for $500 and enjoy that until the standard Vision comes out in 2025. Either way, I have no problem replacing my boring life with what a virtual one can offer and am excited to experience it. I do think in 2-5 years time, this will dominate entertainment. People drop 20-50K (five to ten times the cost) without thinking about it on a new car, so it's all relative. Spending 2-4k on an amazing, cutting edge piece of tech is hardly a bad purchase, IMO.
Agree with a lot of what you say @ryanguy6789 although as with any new tech, balance is the key. I don't think anyone should "replace" their life with virtual reality. I think Apple's approach -- emphasising how it blends digital content with your real world -- is the best way to consider and adopt a piece of technology like this. It'll take a while for the software ecosystem to mature, as with any tech... but getting in on the ground floor with this first iteration of the headset will be super interesting, given the advances in screens, sensors and computing power they've managed to fit into it. Exciting times indeed!
This hardware is likely many years away. Xreal and beam is the design that Apple and others will need to get closer to. Make it slim and around 1000 usd and people will buy it. I actually like the non battery onboard idea. Let’s you keep the hardware for years.
Thanks for the comment. Yep I'm also a fan of the separate battery, allowing you to plug in via the battery also and just have the cable to the headset (much like running a cable to your laptop while using it and not wanting to run down the battery). It'll hopefully do what the rest of tech has done -- get smaller, lighter, and more useful... and cheaper. Can't wait to see what Apple's version of the AR/XR/VR headset will bring with it in terms of software, entertainment and other use cases.
At this price it should be wearable all day, variable focus, field of view and resolution indistinguishable to human eye. Now this shouldn't cost no more than 1500€.
Well, this is where we're heading. You could say similar things about the first car, computer, flatscreen tv, mobile phone, etc. When you say "for this price" just look up the original price (in today's money) of any piece of tech that you now consider "normal" 🙂 Thanks for commenting 🙂
It's so promising. It's the future we've always wanted, and though VR headsets have laid the groundwork, it's back to Apple's focus -- to only enter a market if they think they can do it better. If this ends up delivering what they showed (and the invited press and vloggers said it did), then it will be the next iPhone -- albeit, at a much higher price point; it'll replace Macs before iPhones, but it's still an incredible avenue of technology. The iPhone 15 Pro able to take Spatial Videos later this year means content being created by the consumer is an entire new platform. Looking forward to Vision Pro's release and subsequent versions that are more affordable. No longer can naysayers say that Apple isn't innovating. They've not only built something years ahead, but they built an amazing ecosystem to go with it. The new AirPods Pro 2 with USB-C has a better H2 chip that will work with Vision Pro for lossless audio. Having all the OS systems integrate to be able to view content seamlessly between platforms could only be done with vertical integration of systems. Is it perfect? Nope! I can't get my old Apple Watch connected to my new iPhone. lol. But having hardware, software, and services integrated is a sound business strategy. Think of all the new types of content AppleTV+ will be able to produce! Live Sports, live concerts, interactive immersive games. I'm sure there will be some backlash that continues to get people out of virtual worlds and into the real world, but think of the other possibilities tech can be used for good -- the medical field, environmental simulations, etc.
Haha, thanks for the comment! Reminds me of Phil Schiller's comment, "Can't innovate any more, my ass!" 😉 And yes, absolutely sign me up for a virtual seat at a concert with HIGH QUALITY spatial audio as well as video -- which hasn't ever been done. Yes, there are 180 or 360 videos of concerts on UA-cam VR but the quality is pretty sketchy. Meanwhile, spatial audio on iPad/iPhone with AirPods is already very impressive. Apple is skating to where the puck is going. When you can record AND deliver spatial audio AND video in an immersive way... 💥
it comes with a worthless battery.. only 1 hour, can't even watch a movie.. pretty stupid, the quest 3 have been pretty mind blowing, im already watching 3d movies on it and the mix reality is pretty crazy, and for 3k less, i hope it brings back a resurgence in 3d movies
3D movies and entertainment will have a resurgence when it's "virtually lifelike" and that hasn't happened yet. Quest 3 resolution is OK but not a game-changer. It can't be, because they also need it to be cheap for mass adoption. Apple is coming at it from a different angle, and that's OK. Both are valid. But high quality/resolution immersive video AND audio will be needed for a true resurgence. I can't wait to get there either!
Apple Vision Pro is just a overpriced Meta Quest 3 on steroids and Apple even stole the name vision off of Huawei as Huawei already has products called Vision like their AR glasses called wait for it Huawei Vision Glass and apparently Huawei also own the trademark for the name Vision Pro also so Apple has to pay Huawei some money for the name 😂😂😂😂😂😂
bro is buggin if he thinks a headset with all that tech is going to go down to $150, iphones are being sold for over $1000 every day and macs are being sold for $1500+ lol
Remeber when 3d tv came out ?.... Yea this is that. If the so called metaverse didnt make it this wont eather its still to bulky and dosnt fit into normal every day life like slippin a phone into ur pocket
It's easy to dismiss new tech @SantaAnaCreations but it all depends on the software being developed and how it integrates digital content with the world around you. Given it's essentially a full Mac computer (with the M2 chip), this device could already replace a lot of people's laptops (any MacBook Airs currently available) for a lot of casual use. In terms of '3d tv', the Vision Pro will deliver an experience as good, if not better, than the cinema in some ways -- remember it's full-brightness 3D (not the darker picture you get as a result of having to wear glasses at a 3D cinema screening). And as for not fitting into everyday life, neither did the television when it first came out, and look what happened! It'll be interesting to see what happens, for sure 🙂
This isn't a 3DTV, it's full virtual reality AND 3D that's brighter and higher definition than any 3D IMAX movie you have ever seen with the added ability to record you own 3D memories just as you experienced them.
Honestly, best video on vision pro I have seen. You should make more.
Thanks so much! That's the plan 🙂
It's not that's its closer... it's also magnified.
I saw the quality on this video and was amazed. Then I saw your sub count. This is a 10 million sub worthy channel. Keep going
Some of the audio quality is total garbage
Thanks so much @JacobSmith-ur7cf - that means a lot ❤️ ...and I will - stay tuned! 🙂
Sorry you feel that way @815TypeSirius - please let me know what, specifically.
@@adavidstroud the change of audio quality when you change from outdoor mic at 1:00 mark back to voiceover mic it is very noticeable. the voiceover mic sounds muffled and compressed and not nice.
@@mattbray_studio Yes, but that's actually the same mic - recorded in two different rooms on different days. I tried to make them sound identical but realise I didn't. Apologies!
Great content
Thanks, I appreciate that 🙏 Have a great day!
WHY HASN'T THIS VIDEO GOT LIKE 3 MILLION VIEWS????
I just commented this on another video about the Vision Pro. Once the 3D Video recording feature takes off, I can't imagine Apple or any other Cell phone Manufacturer for that matter, passing up the opportunity to implement 3D video recording and Holographic 3D Light Field screens on the cell phones themselves.
I have no idea what a "holographic 3D light field screen" on a phone would look like, but you'd better believe I'm here for it! 😁
@@adavidstroud it’s a step above auto stereo glasses free 3D ua-cam.com/users/shortsSmOjJM5zqYY?si=KlWBxA-Gh9ekL8V5 I think the first phone company that comes out with truly holographic 3D maps could make trillions.
It’s not a flying car but it’s close! Love seeing this kind of technological breakthroughs! And the fact that it’s apple, takes the cake!
Well, where we're going, we don't need roads. Maybe...? 🙂 Thanks for the comment!
Man this video puts my thoughts into words. Haven’t seen anyone talk about this device in this way and It was driving me nuts. Keep up with the awesome work!
Thank you! 🙇 That means a lot. If you want to hear more along these lines, you can support me (for free, just by following) on my new website, which I'm literally just putting some finishing touches to as we speak. It's over at www.davidstroud.com 🙂
I don't see how entertainment would any different with this device as it exactly what the Meta Quest line of products does now but in a lower resolution
I think you just started to answer your own question there 🙂
Hehe, they did add the ability to make stereoscopic video to iPhone 15 Pro I think. This is getting fun. And wow, the quality and content of this video is great. Hope to see more!
That ability is coming soon to iPhone 15 Pro, yes. Can't wait for it. I wonder what the playback/storage situation will be like... "spatial videos" will take up a lot more space, and I wonder how we'll be able to share them with others. Will UA-cam/Vimeo etc create separate "spatial video" offerings, kinda like UA-cam has UA-cam VR for VR-180 and 360 videos? (not that I'm a huge fan of how they've implemented it).
The biggest problem is the size of vision pro video files, streaming that quality would require massive bandwidth. video is already a problem on other headsets.
True, true @thumbjuggler3943 ... people's internet connections are gonna have to get a whole lot faster and more reliable for streaming mahoosive video files! I wonder how much bigger they'll be in practice? 🤔 Meantime, it'll be a "waiting to download" situation, but a lot of folk are used to it with game console downloads, etc.
I’m thinking of things this can do with Ai. It’s blowing my mind.
Generative especially. We can literally experience a real MySpace with friends hopping over to enjoy content together from far distance.
I'm equally excited buddy. VR is going to be absolutely amazing and IMO will bring experiences only the ultra rich can enjoy to the masses. Like you live in a tiny crummy 1 bedroom apartment but you put on your headset and live in a massive castle with all the entertainment (but way more) of those multi million dollar homes. The virtual reality will become a great substitute for our real one. While I'll probably be waiting for the $2,000 standard vision pro release because this also needs time for more apps to develop so it has more use - I still think $4,000 can be considered a bargain for what the thing will replace and allow you to experience. I had a great time with the Quest 2 even just using big screen and the app that connects to your computer to bring that screen into all kinds of virtual environments. It is game changing tech for entertainment, but it needs a little more time and even just resolution upgrades - that the vision will provide. I might look at buying a Quest 3 in the mean time for $500 and enjoy that until the standard Vision comes out in 2025. Either way, I have no problem replacing my boring life with what a virtual one can offer and am excited to experience it. I do think in 2-5 years time, this will dominate entertainment. People drop 20-50K (five to ten times the cost) without thinking about it on a new car, so it's all relative. Spending 2-4k on an amazing, cutting edge piece of tech is hardly a bad purchase, IMO.
Agree with a lot of what you say @ryanguy6789 although as with any new tech, balance is the key. I don't think anyone should "replace" their life with virtual reality. I think Apple's approach -- emphasising how it blends digital content with your real world -- is the best way to consider and adopt a piece of technology like this. It'll take a while for the software ecosystem to mature, as with any tech... but getting in on the ground floor with this first iteration of the headset will be super interesting, given the advances in screens, sensors and computing power they've managed to fit into it. Exciting times indeed!
You just described the bleak ending of the Black Mirror episode. Men Against fire.
@@balthazarbratt8194 Why is it bleak? The actual world is miserable, don't kid yourself.
@@ryanguy6789 Then yeah, youll be in heaven
Did any of you experienced the Microsoft Hololens 1 (in 2015) or Hololens 2 (in 2020)?
This hardware is likely many years away. Xreal and beam is the design that Apple and others will need to get closer to. Make it slim and around 1000 usd and people will buy it. I actually like the non battery onboard idea. Let’s you keep the hardware for years.
Thanks for the comment. Yep I'm also a fan of the separate battery, allowing you to plug in via the battery also and just have the cable to the headset (much like running a cable to your laptop while using it and not wanting to run down the battery). It'll hopefully do what the rest of tech has done -- get smaller, lighter, and more useful... and cheaper. Can't wait to see what Apple's version of the AR/XR/VR headset will bring with it in terms of software, entertainment and other use cases.
Loved your take.
Thank you 🙂
Just a bit further and imagine a GPS system on it (i know it would be dangerous at the moment)
At this price it should be wearable all day, variable focus, field of view and resolution indistinguishable to human eye. Now this shouldn't cost no more than 1500€.
Well, this is where we're heading. You could say similar things about the first car, computer, flatscreen tv, mobile phone, etc. When you say "for this price" just look up the original price (in today's money) of any piece of tech that you now consider "normal" 🙂 Thanks for commenting 🙂
If they can set these up so you dont need glasses on (near/far sighted) while wearing it then it becomes more attractive.
It already has swappable lenses for those who have a prescription.
It's so promising. It's the future we've always wanted, and though VR headsets have laid the groundwork, it's back to Apple's focus -- to only enter a market if they think they can do it better. If this ends up delivering what they showed (and the invited press and vloggers said it did), then it will be the next iPhone -- albeit, at a much higher price point; it'll replace Macs before iPhones, but it's still an incredible avenue of technology. The iPhone 15 Pro able to take Spatial Videos later this year means content being created by the consumer is an entire new platform. Looking forward to Vision Pro's release and subsequent versions that are more affordable. No longer can naysayers say that Apple isn't innovating. They've not only built something years ahead, but they built an amazing ecosystem to go with it. The new AirPods Pro 2 with USB-C has a better H2 chip that will work with Vision Pro for lossless audio. Having all the OS systems integrate to be able to view content seamlessly between platforms could only be done with vertical integration of systems. Is it perfect? Nope! I can't get my old Apple Watch connected to my new iPhone. lol. But having hardware, software, and services integrated is a sound business strategy. Think of all the new types of content AppleTV+ will be able to produce! Live Sports, live concerts, interactive immersive games. I'm sure there will be some backlash that continues to get people out of virtual worlds and into the real world, but think of the other possibilities tech can be used for good -- the medical field, environmental simulations, etc.
Haha, thanks for the comment! Reminds me of Phil Schiller's comment, "Can't innovate any more, my ass!" 😉 And yes, absolutely sign me up for a virtual seat at a concert with HIGH QUALITY spatial audio as well as video -- which hasn't ever been done. Yes, there are 180 or 360 videos of concerts on UA-cam VR but the quality is pretty sketchy. Meanwhile, spatial audio on iPad/iPhone with AirPods is already very impressive. Apple is skating to where the puck is going. When you can record AND deliver spatial audio AND video in an immersive way... 💥
Great video, nice to hear a British voice on American Tech
Deslike
Thanks @TheRatty2e 😁 More on the way!
Yes, sure, even the keyboard is obtrusive to some, imagine covering your whole face with it... Just ...painful.
We will see in the near future the return of humans to the moon and later to mars being transmitted live via Starlink to the Apple Vision Pro 2 or 3
...and I'm here for it. Imagine! Even just having things like this recorded with the IMAX-equivalent of spatial cameras 🤯 - thanks for your comment!
it comes with a worthless battery.. only 1 hour, can't even watch a movie.. pretty stupid, the quest 3 have been pretty mind blowing, im already watching 3d movies on it and the mix reality is pretty crazy, and for 3k less, i hope it brings back a resurgence in 3d movies
3D movies and entertainment will have a resurgence when it's "virtually lifelike" and that hasn't happened yet. Quest 3 resolution is OK but not a game-changer. It can't be, because they also need it to be cheap for mass adoption. Apple is coming at it from a different angle, and that's OK. Both are valid. But high quality/resolution immersive video AND audio will be needed for a true resurgence. I can't wait to get there either!
You can use an external battery like other headsets.
QUEST 3 does the same things, costs 499$ and is available to everyone next month. 🤷🏾
Quest 3 doesn't have Eyetracking...
@@carlosb8130 not really useful as it tracks your hands
@@carlosb8130wow so you can click on an app a couple seconds faster? Who cares
you're right. no need for this overpriced trinket.
Quest still disoriented after a long use.
Apple Vision Pro is just a overpriced Meta Quest 3 on steroids and Apple even stole the name vision off of Huawei as Huawei already has products called Vision like their AR glasses called wait for it Huawei Vision Glass and apparently Huawei also own the trademark for the name Vision Pro also so Apple has to pay Huawei some money for the name 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Its not going to change anything until you can buy one for 150 dollars. Assuming our dollar dont collapse before then.
Yeah...
Yeah it's not like people will pay $1200 for an iPhone.
Not even an iPhone is $150 that’s way too low if anything it’ll be $600-$900
bro is buggin if he thinks a headset with all that tech is going to go down to $150, iphones are being sold for over $1000 every day and macs are being sold for $1500+ lol
Remeber when 3d tv came out ?.... Yea this is that. If the so called metaverse didnt make it this wont eather its still to bulky and dosnt fit into normal every day life like slippin a phone into ur pocket
It's easy to dismiss new tech @SantaAnaCreations but it all depends on the software being developed and how it integrates digital content with the world around you. Given it's essentially a full Mac computer (with the M2 chip), this device could already replace a lot of people's laptops (any MacBook Airs currently available) for a lot of casual use. In terms of '3d tv', the Vision Pro will deliver an experience as good, if not better, than the cinema in some ways -- remember it's full-brightness 3D (not the darker picture you get as a result of having to wear glasses at a 3D cinema screening). And as for not fitting into everyday life, neither did the television when it first came out, and look what happened! It'll be interesting to see what happens, for sure 🙂
This isn't a 3DTV, it's full virtual reality AND 3D that's brighter and higher definition than any 3D IMAX movie you have ever seen with the added ability to record you own 3D memories just as you experienced them.
@@filipmartinez1162 he's saying it will flop like the 3d tv flopped
@@mattbray_studio but, he’s wrong..
@@filipmartinez1162he’s very wrong. 3D tv were limited to one experience and never were working without feeling kicked out of the movie experience.