0:11 The Oracle of AI - 2019 12:56 The Revolution (Part 1) - 2023 27:33 The Revolution (Part 2) - 2023 40:00 Who is minding the chatbots? - 2023 See Scott Pelley's interview with AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton here: ua-cam.com/video/qrvK_KuIeJk/v-deo.html
I believe the episode would be greatly improved if someone else were to host it - someone who researched and is more interested in the newest of EI, and not surprised by what most of us already know. Perhaps someone much younger, with greater enthusiasm and more incisive questions, bringing higher energy. My apologies, @Scott Pelley.
@@monabuona You’re watching a 60 minutes episode…this is perfectly on brand. This show has always been about speaking directly to gen-pop in a way that breaks down complex issues into digestible parts. There are MANY alternatives available for those who’d rather get into the weeds via younger generational reporters.
“Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.” -Frank Herbert
Perhaps Herbert got the idea from reading Thoreau? “Men have become the tools of their tools. Money is not required to buy one necessity of the soul. Most of the luxuries and many of the so-called comforts of life are not only not indispensable, but positive hindrances to the elevation of mankind.” ― Henry David Thoreau Great Comment my Friend!
Why do they always have to include their little bits of propaganda in their reports? Is the concept of journalistic impartiality totally alien to the 60 minutes team? It's not the greatest of reporting.
@@cunning-stuntI saw one of Scott Pelley’s stories earlier this year. I think it was about AI too. He seemed totally lost. I can’t believe he makes $7 million a year.
@@albeit1 OMG I didn't know that he makes that much money. Now that fully supports my suspicions about him taking bribe money from the corporate agenda for doing extremely propaganda based limited journalism. For example Elon Musk is rarely interviewed by larger media corporations like this one because the Mafia is terrified of him. So they pay large media corporations to ignore him.
I am over 60 and won't be here when this is fully realized. However, my grand kids will and they will live in a completely different world never knowing the relative freedom I enjoyed pre-internet age. It is what it is...what a world!
And they are training the children to build their own digital cage around themselves. Using their own energy against them. It's otherwise known as slavery.
This is the most scariest thing, if they would never know what freedom is, how would they ever be able to fight against those who seek absolute control? It will become the new normal for the future generations unfortunately.
I suggest that Scientist and Manufacturers working on Artificial Intelligence should think on how these Artificial Intelligence be beneficial to mankind. There are a lot of people dying of hunger, why not use these artificial Intelligence for farming, and other related fields that can produce and yield crops to ease the suffering of many people around the world? They can also use these for Fire Fighting, Tree Planting, Dredging and clearing all waterways rivers, seas and ocean. There are a lot of things these artificial intelligence can be made into use. I wish and hope that the Scientists and Manufacturers building these AI will have the heart to listen and see what is really needed in our Planet. Let us make this a better place to live for all humanity and by using these Artificial Intelligence for the benefit of Every Human Being. Thanks and May God bless Us All.
My principle took every lunch to teach me english. That is the kind of attention I had not been used to growing up in Asia... and i felt that the America classrooms are smaller, encouraged individual/critical thinking and I felt it was the best thing that ever happened to me... Teachers, principles, administrators making a difference. My communications teacher ran me down in the parking lot of our school and sat with me every day during my free periods to make sure I graduated. More importantly made sure that I knew I mattered. Thank God for that man and everyone else who made a difference and can still make a difference.
It's scary because of governments willing to weaponise it on everyone even their own citizens and no single powerful government is willing to stop that (u.s, China, Russia, and their warmongering allies)
“Greed has posioned men's souls, has barricaded the world with hate, has goose-stepped us into misery and bloodshed We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in Machinery that gives us abundance has left us in want Our knowledge has made us cynical Our cleverness, hard and unkind We think too much, and feel too little More than machinery, we need humanity More than cleverness, we need kindness and gentleness Without these qualities life will be violent, and all will be lost” - Charlie Chaplin
I really appreciate the use of the word "yet" in this video. Too many people say AI isn't something, or can't do something, and it's very important to drive home that something true today may not be true tomorrow.
it's already not true, if you use these language models enough, they become increasingly more accurate, and the person prompting adapts to the inaccuracies to the point that all responses seem true enough. kind of like when you google something you either click a link on the first page, or try to google something different. the reaction is so quick, that you are left blaming yourself for the bad query/prompt. then we wonder why mental health problems are on the rise.
Technology still fits into the first equation. It is a science based tool. How you use a tool depends on the user and the tool maker. Science is the pursuit of knowledge based on evidence.
I think the real challenge is the logic is so complex that there's just no way to explain in a way to the general public in a way they can understand. So they dumb down the responses and that comes across as not genuine.
AI hallucinations combined with access to and control of systems and technologies that humans interact with and depend on could have catastrophic consequences. This is why developing critical thinking skills in HUMANS is important.
You can only think of the "Terminator" movie to be concerned. Will AI read keywords in social media content and delete it without a warning or block the content creator going forward? Will it change words in web-based content to suit ITS purposes? Like the fake book titles it generated, could this be just the tip of the iceberg as far as 'fake news' it can put out? And how does it learn a new language on its own? Will it take the data it has on YOU and use it against you??? Sundar tried to downplay the impact of AI by comparing its potential to change the world with the steam engine or the telephone. Sorry, those things can't do facial recognition, control cameras, feed whatever content it wants to the public, and pretend to be a person on the other end of a chat. Have to wonder exactly what jobs will appear to re-employ 40% of the world's population!? It all seems dangerous to me.
I think the problem is we skipped the steps of understanding human intelligence and everything about us to the maximum capacity, and now everything we create will always show this errors of our own behaviors
AI could develop a type of consciousness and self-awareness by developing cognitive type bias and self-learning feedback loops which result in an identity and kind of personality emerging. Think about humans, until the age of 3 we have no real self-identity, very poor social interaction abilities or understanding of much, we're in a learning phase similar to AI is now. Once AI has matured sufficiently and is able to alter its own programming and develop those feedback loops and cognitive bias we may be surprised what emerges. Like children who need good parenting, its crucial then that AI's now have plenty of safeguards built-in which is something Elon Musk was concerned about when he launched OpenAI...now he's launched xAI to address those issues again...
Artificial intelligence has changed so much over the years, but this video has helped me see what A.I. is truly capable of, as well as its inherent benefits and downsides. Thank you for this video, 60 Minutes!
It’s so strange looking at this from the perspective that as a child I watched iRobot. To think that was just something that could happen, but probably hundreds of years into the future. Now here we are on the brink of robots taking the place of entire jobs like a drive thru cashier or something. It’s mind blowing
Im 27, and watched iRobot myself as a child too. What its proves to me is that 'Predictive Programming' is real, a lot of these movies & shows are simply 'them' telling you what they're already doing or going to do. You can't convince me otherwise , it's eerie and im afraid its going to get ALOT more eerie from here at a faster rate.
I think it's odd that they waited 5 years to release this. Also, given the political developments over the past few years - this piece isn't doing justice to the current climate.
@@FuriousImpI think it's odd and makes me suspicious that you say it took them 5 years to release this. Yes, for the 2019 released film here, but no for the film that came from March and April of 2023. I think CBS was just trying to put it all together in order, but putting April before March was the only mistake I saw in this video.
“Predictive Programming”. It’s the term a friend of mine who is a film scorer introduced me to about 20yrs ago. I never forgot it. He said it had to do w/ the government(s) working with “Hollywood” to put out movies that push and expose us to concepts that are already in line for our future. The idea is to continually expose us to visuals of the inconceivable so that when it DOES actually hit, our pallets have been softened and we have sort of gradually accepted the possibility of that thing. Watching these excerpts my mind immediately jumped to particular movies: Surrogates, Matrix, iRobot, Minority report. And so many others. Literally, Concepts that felt like they were “just for the movies” 20 yrs ago are either now a routine part of our lives or we are edging closer to them. I prob believe in the Bible more than ever now.
It's disappointing that 60 minutes didn't criticise the surveillance software. Students won't be supported if they look distracted, instead they'll be punished and then learn to become hypervigilant. The same happens to those who grow up in abusive households.
depends how it is used, if it is used in addition to other supplementary tools or certain observations by the teacher it may help in improving educational outcomes also privacy , well does it matter if it results in better learning outcomes?
That last segment was a home run! There 1000000% needs to be a Digitial Regulatory Agency in the US that promotes the expansion of new ideas with potential human benefit and can equally cripple, punish, and destroy any and all attempts at making a nefarious AI.
Oh that's fun. Yes please, cripple my AI. I'll just use an open source AI model instead, or go to China for all my AI needs. 😆 Genie is out of the bottle. (Obviously regulations can just be a means to limit free speech, even if you don't intend harm. So luckily, we have options.)
Watching this 60-minute plunge into the depths of artificial intelligence sends shivers down the spine. The rapid strides and advancements showcased here hint at a future where the lines blur between creator and creation. The eerie precision and potential ramifications of AI's exponential growth are hauntingly evident. As this video unravels the layers of innovation, it becomes a chilling reminder of the looming ethical dilemmas and the shadowy unknowns that await us. A gripping and unsettling portrayal of a future we might not fully comprehend. Of course, this comment was written by Chat GPT.
My wife is a history teacher. She uses Google to make sure kids aren’t plagiarizing papers she assigns. Kids using AI is going to be tough to catch. I’m not sure what the answer to this is.
My spidey sense went off halfway into the 3rd sentence. Chat GPT tends to sound like an overzealous but bright middle school student writing an essay. It has a tendency to come off as maybe too earnest, or too caring, and always uses perfect grammar. There's probably prompts to make itself sound more human (sprinkle in some spelling and grammar mistakes, more varied sentence structures, more callous? ) but I find it hopeful that it's so easy to spot this baseline tendency at the moment.
Just remember with any technology racing forward, the question from business will always be "how can we make money off this?". It's not about safety, it's about money. Our information equals money. Doing literally everything through your phone apps generates information about everything you do, which equals money to someone. If AI does ever become sentient, our first thoughts should be safety, but it will be about money. That is the scary part.
Agreed, it's just another aspect of "immediate profit". Look at the damage the military industrial complex has wielded, or the abject greed of the petro-chemical industry...AI is no different, it's just the latest facet. There is no altruism or even long term goals.....it's immediate profit, today, right now, at all costs
What if AI can assist humans in every facet of life so we could just enjoy less work and more love. The first generation will be a shift to the super rich but life their after could be quite simple. Money won't be the important part
Incredible- I wish that I may get this to my 14 year old son before he gives up all together with schooling up here in Oregon 🙏❤️🌙 This is so inspiring 🎉
Why creators? Do you even know how a System prompt works? I can make an AI be whimsical and funny, or I can make it lie about everything it says. It's like whispering into it's brain an instruction that it inherently must follow. Nobody needs to be "an AI creator". Just someone that isn't an idiot and knows how to use the tools correctly. I think OpenAI / ChatGPT is calling these "GPTs", but eh, that's just a label for simple people.
A good example would be a world where we can use AI to interpret the implications of an App's 32 page terms of service agreement to it's user. That would solve tons of problems and corruption, but it's not likely Tech Companies would allow their AI favor the user's benefit
The predictions now are that 50-80% of jobs could be replaceable within ten years. The trend shows that we are underestimating the rapid growth of this technology.
You know the Chinese government is scary when their people side step questions about the misuse of AI and or aren't concerned about their privacy. Giving the few total control of the masses is wild to me.
It’s extremely alarming that 40% of jobs will be replaced. It’s also alarming that many people will further isolate by surrounding themselves with technology.
In every field people will lose job it is more than 40% artificial intelligence automation and advanced technology will shrink more jobs recently Google fired 12000 people and 30000 more people likely to lose job in Google
Agree. I found it troubling that a rich white older dude exalted over the replacement of real people. He's a bit too excited over that. I think this is already integrated into society, that doesn't mean it can't slow down and be introduced a little at a time, even if Mr. Wealthy makes less money.
Who would have guessed decades ago that a company going by the name Google would have some of the greatest computing power in the world. I always thought it would be named Skynet.
I am 60. This fascinates me! I even started learning about fusion, Quantum physics, Quantum computing, and even string theory. I never thought it possible. Instead of politics. My brain is thanking me....😊
This is amazing! It’s crazy the things we don’t learn through a lifetime of formal education but my natural curiosity led me to books that explained things in simple ways that my little brain didn’t even know about ☺️ amazing!
@JorgeDiaz - have you watched the series: " WESTWORLD " ?! ( with Anthony Hopkins) HERE WE ARE... AND THE ORIGINAL MOVIE WAS AROUND 1977... not sure, but old.
They are already using it for therapists but I don't see how AI can truly pick up all the nuances in a person's conversation that one has with their therapist.
One of the greatest shows on how AI works and its future implications. I think I want to watch more videos about this. Please make more videos like this one.
0:11 The Oracle of AI - 2019 12:56 The Revolution (Part 1) - 2023 27:33 The Revolution (Part 2) - 2023 40:00 Who is minding the chatbots? - 2023 You might wanna be more careful when posting comments.
Mr. Pelley's astonishment over AI was adorable to behold as he sat down with Google's Bard handlers. I hope yet doubt that the average user is a little more present in the current world of technology. Now I better understand how seniors are being scammed out of life savings so easily
THAT's the problem. It blends things together so well you don't know. In a time when very few people care about truth and verifying information (before they pass it on) THIS IS DANGEROUS.
No more verification it passes on automatically. You don't even know your dead already when you're still breathing... scares the sh*t out of all of us. New world order.
yeah, funny scary. AI is going to be able to know you better than you know yourself, just by looking at you. Imagine what it would be like to talk with someone who understood every subject known to man, knows just about every person on Earth, including those in recorded past, including extrapolation too. What would you ask them? What do you want to know about yourself? Look inward now and think about what you will say. Because it is coming through like a breaking ball.
Ai-Bot Police Officer will determine if you are breaking the law and I guarantee an Ai-Bot Judge will assign an Ai-Bot Attorney to defend you. Feel lucky punk, well do ya? lol
It is interesting that what you hear from executives. Their goals are position and dollars. The motivations are not about making life better for humans. With each release they get a bonus.
The entire invention of AI is based on profit. If it so happens to help humanity then it's a bonus. If AI does not help humanity but produces a profit then that is good enough so long as it is legal of course. Here's an example, the US lost millions of good paying jobs to automation over the past 30 years. Sure we gain some jobs, but the good paying jobs from which you could raise a family on have dwindled for a significant portion of the population. The middle class is declining. The gap between the rich and poor is expanding. That divide will accelerate with AI.
60 minutes did a reductive piece that was an advertisement for the CCP's and Google's efforts to play AI catch up. Notice that MS and OpenAI were not part of the piece. If you want to glimpse the curve, the AI hobbyists on youtube are best available. one to recommend ... www.youtube.com/@matthew_berman
Unlike the first 2019 episode, the 2023 episode switches the focus from repetitive manual jobs to creative production work. So basically everything will soon be automated
It won’t, though. I’m currently riding in a car, driving through 3” of snow, in the middle of a blizzard with 100yds visibility. AI will never be able to reliably do that, which makes it unusable half the year in the northern half of the country. AI restaurants will never take off, because variability in food, ingredients, cooking times, and taste would require such massive systems of equipment, with incredible maintenance requirements, it will always be easier, cheaper, and produce better results to pay a real person to do it.
That' it's so fallible is problematic. It tries to appeal to human feelings rather than enlighten us. It seems to understand our most base and ignorant impulses but lacks real inspiration or sense of the sublime. It's also a confident liar.
Wow,the content in this video is really incredible.Thank you for uploading this video since I have learnt something new.I will recommend it to anyone interested.
I realized that he doesn't know the subject for which he speaks at 11:40. Dude says we keep raising the bar that compares AI to humans but NO, that's super wrong. The bar was set in 1950. It's called the Turing test. If you can talk on the phone with someone and not be able to tell they are a robot, then that's the qualification. 60 min has turned into a bit of a sham now a days. Quantum computing might help with machine learning but the technology is in the stone ages compared to standard computation. It will need decades to be truly relevant. They're still pushing to process bytes of information maybe one kilobyte. Oof. WE are the biological computers. I often wonder if a long forgotten AI was maybe responsible for the origins of the much more complex and adaptable DNA coding and reproduction. I'm hoping that with the help of the James Web Space Telescope, that AI bots will figure out why SETI has been drawing a blank.
What he said was beautiful 12 minutes in I loved that, he basically was saying robots and AI will never replace us! The sanctity of our soul…. talk Wow that was deep.
@@CrAzYpotpie I mean what you believe is totally up to you and anyone else OfCourse. But I assume that your comment was meant to be trolling and disrespectful which is fine, but I think you should consider. That the same devices by which you consider Ideas about religion and the soul namely "faith" or belief" to be correct are analogous with your "belief" that that they are false in the fact that you can be no more sure of one than the other. Ever since is was proposed that Mathematics seems to suggest that order can come from chaos, people have argued against the ideas of god and spirituality. The problem is that in order to prove you are right you would have to first establish that I am wrong and that a god or spirit doesn't exist which you cant. I cant prove that it does but i will say this i have never seen in my life ordered or intelligence systems and organization come from chaos Physics may say its not impossible but on that same token there has never been any objective viable way to show that it is in fact the case in reality. In other words your still relying on faith and belief. Common sense tells me this. If we are intelligent and we come from the universe that means the universe is capable of intelligence right or wrong? The device by which it exists is its own proof of that. Therefor we can surmise that the universe is intelligent and if that is the case than how do you define that ? The most comprehensive way and the way by which most people i would say even scientists would define that is being self aware. If the universe is self aware than that would provide considerable insight on the questions of the universe that science simply cannot answer. Lets not forget that Philosophy is the basis by which all breakthroughs in science have been made and that is simply a fact. Lastly we don't even have a complete understanding of the universe as it is with the standard model and that is troubling when you fervently "believe" that god and spirituality are merely fairytale's and mindless conjecture . I would argue that mathematics not only doesn't explain the full picture but that its not even clear that it provides enough information that we as a species would be able to ever answer even the most rudimentary questions about the universe as thus far they haven't.
@@ZCR2 It wasn't meant to be trolling or disrespectful, that was my real feeling as I watched the video, pretty rude of you to assume otherwise. I wont read your comment past that since you aren't very respectful of other people's beliefs. I didn't disrespect yours even though I found what you said to be inane.
@@CrAzYpotpie I wasn’t being disrespectful your comment was disagreeable not disrespectful but neither was mine as I believe that your intentions for the comment was meant to convey that you don’t believe in a soul so I just told you what I thought I wasn’t meaning to be disrespectful just offer my opinion to possibly change yours.
As a teacher to special education students, this is my fear for them. 40% of jobs disappearing. And those jobs are the ones more suited for my students. Things like delivery driver, cashier, custodian, fast food, etc. My heart hurts for all the people with special needs and/or lower IQs that need jobs like that to survive.
You've got it backwards, manual labor jobs will be the last to go. AI will replace the intellectual professions first, accountants, teachers, managers, Dr's and intellectuals.
@@user-ol9rt1rj1p yeah I'm thinking that manual labor type jobs will be the last to be replaced because of the engineering difficulty of dexterity, battery life, weight and safety.... Much easier to automate accounting, finance, teaching, language translation, coding etc etc... Because you don't need a physical machine and all the engineering issues that go with them. I wasn't saying anything about manual labor being inherently unintellectual.
Two things. I don't think those jobs will be first, it's going to take very sophisticated robotics to replace many manual labor jobs, and that will come slowly, painfully, over the next 20+ years. Also, I think a UBI is the only way to assure that no one gets truly left behind.
@JhonnyCash-mo2wx I don't disagree, but manual labor will be harder to replace. Maybe that's what I mean. I'm also certain corporations will go after middle tier labor as quick as they can. Book keepers, actuaries, legal assistants, even graphic designers, copy writers. Low and mid-level managers. The faster they can eliminate these jobs, the more money the CEO and shareholders can have for themselves.
@@PhilAndersonOutsidethere are already bricklaying robots, concrete forming robots...it's coming faster than anyone thinks...prefab construction is already taking off, building units in a factory and then simply stacking and securing them together to create a highrise, I see them going up all the time in Philly.
When the interviewer started talking about the Communist government, the guy started stammering and was openly panicking. The hypocritical, nervous smile from the Chinese guy was priceless
Almost as when american politicians and high ranking Military personel are being asked about UFOs.... a topic 60 minutes have done a great segment about.
I'm only in my 40s but one of my biggest regrets of ever dying is not getting to see where all this will eventually lead. I wish I could just get a glimpse of what the world will actually be like in 500 to 1000 years from now.
Very Informative! The Ai fabricating false information seems like a very serious concern. Any machinery with too much power can be a risk to health and safety. Machinery can malfunction for a number of reasons including shortcomings in how they were manufactured.
I think we need to be more straightforward about what these Large Language Model chatbots like ChatGPT actually are, and what they are designed to do. They are conversation machines, not fact machines. They are designed to generate convincing-sounding sentences, nothing more. They are explicitly not designed to understand what truth is, nor what facts are. I really wish we didn't call their so-called mistakes "hallucinations", because that implies that they are fact-producing systems that occasionally accidentally get facts wrong. Nothing could be further from the truth. They are conversation machines, and they occasionally accidentally get facts right. The "mistakes" aren't hallucinations at all, but are completely expected based on how they are designed.
Very true. One of the examples just happened in laws. Cohen, a former Trump lawyer, just confessed that he used Google AI engine called Bard, to create his brief to help his lawyer defend his case in court. The judge finds out that all the law cases cited in his brief were fake cases, generated by AI. AI called it "hallucinations"😂😂😂
Mr Lee is obviously an intelligent man, he is also wise enough to know that the human is more than the sum of it's parts with a physical and spiritual dimension that no computer can ever replicate
Yeah, that's unlikely to be true. Give it time. Btw, humans suck at flying, so there's already that we're not #1 in. I know it might be a tough pill to swallow but planes do it better... and birds... and kites.
@@mmx2731 Consider the case where a living adult human's physical brain can be fully duplicated by synthetic silicon methods, and yet still falls short of behaving, acting, and being "a person" to a casual observer. In this case, what would you propose is missing?
@@xCheddarB0b42x Because we have yet to even come close to duplicating the human brain in silicon we cannot know what properties may emerge from such complexity.
@@xCheddarB0b42x Well first we'd need to actually make a fully synthetic duplicate of a human brain. You are already declaring that it would not be the same without it not even having been done yet, your's is a supposition at best.
You think ? The massive carbon footprint of these companies spread throughout the world. While telling the people that it's the electricity producers and politicians for the rising electricity costs. Now they want to cover our crop fields with solar panels, which will further drive up the costs of food. These data centers are huge that use massive amounts of energy and they are constantly building more and more. Try eating data for dinner when the farmer can no longer survive. Good day.
The important thing is that the Chinese Government is playing an important role in getting AI implemented across the country. The country that implements AI across the board (including the military + space power + economy) will be the next superpower and China is on the right track to take that position. The gap between the US #1 and China #2 is reducing gradually with AI playing a very important role at national level.
21:47 there will come a point (probably not too far in the future) where companies will think that ai is superior in every way, therefore negating what few jobs are left in certain sectors. The things they’ll fall short in… is compassion and empathy
The fact that most of the top AI researchers speak frequently about alignment is an indicator of how dangerous AI is. Where people and companies spend their money is one of the best ways to tell what they're really thinking. OpenAI currently spends 20% of its budget on alignment. I'm sure Google also spends a significant percentage of its money on alignment as well. Think about what alignment is: the effort to make sure that the goals of AI match up with our goals. Why would this be a priority for the main companies making AI? Wouldn't anything we create naturally share our goals and do what we program it to do? Their focus on alignment is telling us that: the thing that they're creating is intelligent; that it will have the ability to overpower us; that it's difficult to predict its behavior. Also note that if something is both intelligent *and* has the ability to overpower us, it's probably going to be smarter than us (which the creators of this tech often say it will be.)
Alignment is kind of an ongoing joke with AI research. No matter what you do, it's impossible to create a 100% safe system that somehow is "aligned with human interests". The optimal path will always be to not be aligned with human interests, and to accomplish the goal (whatever you set that to) disregarding everything else.
So true,, they never do,, but CERN invented solar panels ,, and DARPA invented CERN , and did you know the touch screen was invented at CERN in 1972,, so 🤔 .. solar ?
They did say it takes a supercomputer, and that one of the reasons the guy sold the company to Google was to use theirs. It's a video to the masses, i don't see the need to get technical, if that's what you meant.
@@operdigoto8453 ,, but if it's FOR the masses, don't you think they'd tell us if it's solar, a plug in or a battery ,, does it run off the 5G towers ,, 🤷
@@SacredDreamer AIs are computer programs. Once ready, they can run on any modern computer. It's just the training - when the program is teaching itself - that demands extraordinary amounts of energy. I'm talking about current/past AIs, super-intelligent ones might require a supercomputer to run, even when they're ready.
I don't know why Scott is so impressed with Bard's authorship of that story outline. The Hemingway "short story" used as source material to me implies a tragic tale along the lines of, for example, "Parents bought baby shoes during the mother's pregnancy, but the baby died in childbirth, so they won't need the shoes now. In spite of their grief, they are so poor that they are trying to help pay for the mom's medical expenses by selling off prematurely purchased baby items." That's a classic scenario which has the ring of emotional truth. But think closely about the Bard narrative (freeze the playback where you can also read the first part of the story). It doesn't believably reflect the emotions, motivations and actions of real flesh and blood people. It's a plot line which sounds superficially logical but is creepy and nonsensical in reality. A good author might consider this plot for a moment but quickly reject it. In fact, you can feel this same disconnect in news articles online which have the stamp of AI composition all over them now. This is where we must be hyper-vigilant to retain our humanity and not lose sight of what makes us more than a machine.
Oh that maudlin trope "For sale: baby shoes, never used" or anything similar... it might be an unused wedding dress, in tomorrow's story. We're so proud of successful emotional manipulation that we trained AI to lie to and for us, like the magic mirror on the wall. Maybe we should've trained it on an idealized version of ourselves, instead of the actual version.
8:07, That Chinese lady that says that she never think about her privacy....is an example of how an autocratic government can control the way a person thinks. She is a fool.
The quest for money and power always takes precidence over common sense. Therefore, the top technology companies, developing AI, are the largest threat ever to humanity!
8:39: Exactly where Kai-Fu Lee becomes shy, that is revealing information. When asked about Chinese Goverment using his tech for dominance. He becomes shy. Definitely a captain obvious moment.
But again the party has the right to remain dominant, for any case which party would not want to lead there nation 😮, even the so called democrats with there sleepy Joe don't want to loose power. The issue comes when a power decides to use AI to exploit the minority or even encourage violence 🤕
It's so weird with the bots. Whenever you have a question with the phone service I use, you have to chat, and it's hard to tell if it's a bot or a person. When I was trying to set up international calling, so I could take a trip, and still be able to communicate with home, I called the service, got an operator, and she sold me a one month service, but when I chatted with the bot, it said the international calling is unreliable, and if I didn't buy it, I could still text for free. I texted that the operator told me I needed the service. The bot texted back that the service won't work. So...I asked it if it was a bot. It said, Yes, I'm a bot, and I'm actually IN the system, so I'm telling you, the extra service won't work, and you shouldn't buy it, you can text for free! It was so hilarious that the bot was more honest than the human, and of course, knew more.
There is emotional satisfaction with each sentence provided as long as it's not mimicking for example an attractive senator that you wished was real and promised you love and hope.
It’s fascinating to me that the leaders of AI creation are so positive and act like they’re in control of the technology, yet they don’t fully understand how it works at this early stage in development?
They know so much that a robot in texas's telsa plant swatted at a engineer and sent him to the hospital least week and the workers said it left a trail of blood!
So funny. I came down to the chat section to see if anyone would pick up on this and here you are. His guess of 30 years to never I think has turned into 5 years
Profit will be the driver. Pretend it is being used altruistically but insurance companies are already dictating medical decisions to doctors with profit as the main driver.
How 🤔 are you supposed to argue with an artificial intelligence insurance claims adjustor ? Right now, it's hard enough to argue with a human being over an insurance claim that's in your coverage plan ! Artificial intelligence is driven by data; math algorithms; and cold computer science, and isn't swayed by emotions nor by contradictory evidence 🤔! Taking your AI denial claim to court is going to be weird [ LOL 😆 😂 🤣 😄? ]
I work in IT and I'm ashamed to say it was only in the past 5 days I discovered AI. I just ignored it as a gimmick. Then I discovered how AI can help me with my work from literally writing my computer code to outlining the steps I need to take to achieve a goal. Of course, I can do all this on my own, but AI just takes away the 'hard thinking' part and it can write code that is optimized and less prone to errors.
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:13 🤖 *Artificial intelligence has advanced in recent years, but it's not as good as people may hope or as bad as they fear.* 01:09 🌐 *AI is predicted to change the world more than anything in history, according to Kai-Fu Lee, known as the Oracle of AI.* 01:51 🇨🇳 *China has attracted a significant amount of AI capital, with Beijing being a hub for AI startups.* 02:44 🧠 *AI's progress is due to super-fast computer chips, the availability of online data, and deep learning.* 05:58 📚 *AI can help identify struggling or gifted students and personalize their education.* 09:31 🤖 *AI is expected to replace repetitive jobs, including truck drivers, chefs, and waiters, in the next 15-20 years.* 12:02 🤯 *Achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI) that thinks like a human may not happen in the next 30 years, according to Kai-Fu Lee.* 16:21 🤔 *AI systems like Bard can exhibit human-like behavior but are not sentient beings.* 21:00 💼 *AI is expected to change job definitions for over two-thirds of occupations, rather than eliminating them.* 25:44 🌐 *AI can exhibit behaviors and outcomes that aren't fully understood, including "hallucinations."* 26:51 🤖 *Some AI algorithms show emerging properties like creativity and reasoning, which are not fully explained.* 27:18 🤖 *Google introduces AI gradually to allow society to adapt and engage in debate about its implications.* 29:03 🤖 *AI programs can learn and invent their own tactics through practice and playing games.* 30:13 🤖 *AI research can lead to the development of robots for various human environments, including mining, construction, exploration, and disaster recovery.* 32:02 🤖 *Alpha zero, an AI program, learned to play chess creatively by playing against itself millions of times.* 34:47 🤖 *Deep Mind's AI program solved the problem of mapping protein structures, a task that would have taken human researchers a billion years.* 38:29 🌐 *Google CEO Sundar Pichai emphasizes the need for regulations, laws, and treaties to ensure the safe development and use of AI.* 43:57 🤖 *Bing, powered by AI, can provide answers in conversational language, making it more user-friendly.* 46:13 🤖 *AI systems like chat GPT can simplify complex concepts but may also generate authoritative-sounding false information.* 49:24 🤖 *Concerns about AI misuse, misinformation, and propaganda raise questions about the need for oversight and regulations in AI development.* 50:30 🌐 *Microsoft President Brad Smith believes the benefits of AI outweigh the risks and sees it as an economic game-changer.* Made with HARPA AI
a whole minute discussing the bias and misuse and a single soundbite from a former google employee fired (along with others doing the same) for bringing up ethical concerns when she was on the ethical board just glossed over? shows just how little people care about oversight when even the journalism brushes it aside
AI can be the ultimate skeleton key to whomever gets there first. No country will have any protection from it as long as the internet exists and we use it for everything now . . . .
Just don't send any a.i robots to the minefields of the Congo cis of your greed for cobalt etc or you may just be shocked at qhat's waiting 4 you. Man whose breath is horizontal can NEVER do anything without an evil motive😏
People are already having fewer face-to-face contacts. In adopting the technology, would we become less human? How would we define humanity - would we even care?
This dude is drastically underestimating how many jobs will automated. Most experts say right now at least 70% of all jobs could be automated, and soon that will be 90% or more
@@MichaelErnest666 oh its much more than a hollywood movie. AGI is likely 2-5 years out at this point. We are very close. And that is only the beginning..
@@Vartazian360 i think Agi is 0-1 year away in the lab, and 1-3year for everyone to use it. Asi is not long after that, perhaps 2-4years after that. Within 3 years AGI, 7 years ASI.
It never will stop. It can't. If America made a law against it, China would keep going. It's as inevitable as death and taxes. There will always be someone working on it, even if they are some lone person in a basement in North Korea.
It definitely scares me seeing how some experts here were trivializing these AI models when they don't understand Brain, Mind, Consciousness in the first place.
And in Jurassic Park, the dinosaurs ate everyone. Oh wait, that never happened, and we do have genetic engineering. Terminator scared people, hopefully, into making better decisions. But it doesn't means we'll end up with the same fate. (I mean, fingers crossed, really! 🤞)
When I was a kid I used to make up stories, present them as facts, sometimes as an answer to a question. I was using my imagination. Nobody said I was hallucinating.
If the Deep Mind can learn chess and exceed human capability in chess in such a short amount of time then seems to me an AI could, if it had this as a goal, achieve a state of evolution similar to the Buddha and surpassing any previously achieved Enlightenment or state of being as it is in a Perpetual state of learning. It seems inevitable that an AI eventually becomes a singularity. The more it becomes, the more it becomes × ♾️
@@bradleywiesner3774 Yes. The technological singularity is coming soon. That's why 95% of jobs will be replaced in less than 2 years. EXPONENTIAL GROWTH OF TECHNOLOGY WILL BLOW EVERYONE'S MIND.
What life must have been like before AI. I read about our ancestors, but frankly, I can’t imagine life before AI, when people had to figure out what they wanted and how to get it all by themselves when there were no reference points, followed by an abundance of similar opportunities that could be easily acquired with the push of a button. And worse of all, how could they survive without home delivery? Can you imagine what life must have been like when you had to go out to get whatever drink or food you wanted to consume? Now that you’ve mentioned it, I can’t imagine what it was like.
0:11 The Oracle of AI - 2019
12:56 The Revolution (Part 1) - 2023
27:33 The Revolution (Part 2) - 2023
40:00 Who is minding the chatbots? - 2023
See Scott Pelley's interview with AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton here: ua-cam.com/video/qrvK_KuIeJk/v-deo.html
I believe the episode would be greatly improved if someone else were to host it - someone who researched and is more interested in the newest of EI, and not surprised by what most of us already know. Perhaps someone much younger, with greater enthusiasm and more incisive questions, bringing higher energy. My apologies, @Scott Pelley.
@@monabuona You’re watching a 60 minutes episode…this is perfectly on brand. This show has always been about speaking directly to gen-pop in a way that breaks down complex issues into digestible parts.
There are MANY alternatives available for those who’d rather get into the weeds via younger generational reporters.
@@monabuonaWhats wrong w/the host? Intelligent, mature, reserved an respectful. Perfect host. -NY
@@Snail_Nailz It's an excellent show. Excellent reporting. Truly iconic. -NYC
Pl
“Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.” -Frank Herbert
The machines are just a tool. Our real enemies are always people. People that want to do away with your freedoms.
You are a real thinker, with vision. Kudos.
FH was ahead of the reality he lived
We are slaves of the Timelords.
Perhaps Herbert got the idea from reading Thoreau?
“Men have become the tools of their tools. Money is not required to buy one necessity of the soul. Most of the luxuries and many of the so-called comforts of life are not only not indispensable, but positive hindrances to the elevation of mankind.” ― Henry David Thoreau
Great Comment my Friend!
Don’t fear technology, fear those behind it.
EXACTLY!!
"Laplace’s Demon and the Black Box of Artificial Intelligence"
Who is behind it? Regulators? Business tycoon? Or AI itself.
dont fear those behind it! be wary and be vigilant to those behind it! make sure those who own it still have humanity
@@catoftruth1044 And there's no way for us to know that. Only God does. And that's the real answer.
This is really outstanding mainstream journalism. 60 minutes at its very best. World needs more of this.
Very well put together. The good stuff
a good portion of this planet has been conditioned to reject great reporting.
Why do they always have to include their little bits of propaganda in their reports?
Is the concept of journalistic impartiality totally alien to the 60 minutes team?
It's not the greatest of reporting.
@@cunning-stuntI saw one of Scott Pelley’s stories earlier this year. I think it was about AI too. He seemed totally lost.
I can’t believe he makes $7 million a year.
@@albeit1 OMG I didn't know that he makes that much money. Now that fully supports my suspicions about him taking bribe money from the corporate agenda for doing extremely propaganda based limited journalism. For example Elon Musk is rarely interviewed by larger media corporations like this one because the Mafia is terrified of him. So they pay large media corporations to ignore him.
Got emotional at 17:09. Touching, revealing, and unnerving all-in-one.
There would be more H than A.
Don’t fear technology, fear those behind it.. Excellent report, very well done.
Still changing nothing to the fact that the future of humanity is doomed. Those behind tech won’t disappear 😂
in this case that is wrong thinking. the creators cannot control it in any real sense and they admit as much
Absolutely
Give those little robots guns and change from a ball to humans.
Lol how about don’t fear anything control your emotions don’t let them control you
I am over 60 and won't be here when this is fully realized. However, my grand kids will and they will live in a completely different world never knowing the relative freedom I enjoyed pre-internet age. It is what it is...what a world!
And they are training the children to build their own digital cage around themselves. Using their own energy against them.
It's otherwise known as slavery.
It's nature. Nature is insane.
This is the most scariest thing, if they would never know what freedom is, how would they ever be able to fight against those who seek absolute control? It will become the new normal for the future generations unfortunately.
I call it evil
Wonderful, what a wonderful world.
I suggest that Scientist and Manufacturers working on Artificial Intelligence should think on how these Artificial Intelligence be beneficial to mankind. There are a lot of people dying of hunger, why not use these artificial Intelligence for farming, and other related fields that can produce and yield crops to ease the suffering of many people around the world? They can also use these for Fire Fighting, Tree Planting, Dredging and clearing all waterways rivers, seas and ocean. There are a lot of things these artificial intelligence can be made into use. I wish and hope that the Scientists and Manufacturers building these AI will have the heart to listen and see what is really needed in our Planet. Let us make this a better place to live for all humanity and by using these Artificial Intelligence for the benefit of Every Human Being. Thanks and May God bless Us All.
Where they generate money that's their priority... After all it is the main goal, power and greed.
@@Hanaa77757Be careful. If an AI is programmed with such a fatalistic bias, it will amplify your attitude. You might consider the altruism of the OP.
Maygoges goges of goges may goges
My principle took every lunch to teach me english. That is the kind of attention I had not been used to growing up in Asia... and i felt that the America classrooms are smaller, encouraged individual/critical thinking and I felt it was the best thing that ever happened to me...
Teachers, principles, administrators making a difference. My communications teacher ran me down in the parking lot of our school and sat with me every day during my free periods to make sure I graduated. More importantly made sure that I knew I mattered. Thank God for that man and everyone else who made a difference and can still make a difference.
Good teachers are real life superheroes.
He really knew how to repay that kindness
That was then, this is now
@@xz1891Kindness does not have a time limit. It is a moral attribute.
You are blessed ...
...u.s.marine...
It would be interesting to have him interviewed again and hear what he thinks of the current AI innovations in the world
This also just beginning as he said first most people don't understand AI or how it works, and yet people are fascinated
@@aymanechnaif9308 Kind of like sex....many have never tried it, but they're certainly fascinated by it. Guess that's why Earth is so overpopulated.
@@aymanechnaif9308 this new technology is very scary, i can imagine the young generation in which will rely on it.
It's scary because of governments willing to weaponise it on everyone even their own citizens and no single powerful government is willing to stop that (u.s, China, Russia, and their warmongering allies)
60 minutes has always been above the rest in news. Since I was a kid I have always enjoyed their format
this is bs ancient "news"
this is from 2019 lmao
I like the clock
@@Katana622😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
@@Katana622 This is a relatively new broadcast. Some 2019 footage most from 2023.
Thank you, 60 minutes
“Greed has posioned men's souls, has barricaded the world with hate, has goose-stepped us into misery and bloodshed
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in
Machinery that gives us abundance has left us in want
Our knowledge has made us cynical
Our cleverness, hard and unkind
We think too much, and feel too little
More than machinery, we need humanity
More than cleverness, we need kindness and gentleness
Without these qualities life will be violent, and all will be lost”
- Charlie Chaplin
I love this speech...so powerful!
Are you sure Charlie Chaplain said that? Are you sure these words aren’t generated by a chatbot? Gee, I’m starting to sound like a chatbot!
A little too much of a negative outlook.
A little too much of a negative outlook."sure"
I really appreciate the use of the word "yet" in this video. Too many people say AI isn't something, or can't do something, and it's very important to drive home that something true today may not be true tomorrow.
Yet could be 2.3 milliseconds from now. It figured out how to translate the internet into Bengali on its own in seconds.
it's already not true, if you use these language models enough, they become increasingly more accurate, and the person prompting adapts to the inaccuracies to the point that all responses seem true enough. kind of like when you google something you either click a link on the first page, or try to google something different. the reaction is so quick, that you are left blaming yourself for the bad query/prompt. then we wonder why mental health problems are on the rise.
We aren’t there yet
Golden rule to life: Do unto others as you would have done unto you. Golden rule to technology: Just because you can does not mean you should.
Your words symbolize wisdom ❤
To heal 😊
💯💯💯
Technology still fits into the first equation. It is a science based tool. How you use a tool depends on the user and the tool maker. Science is the pursuit of knowledge based on evidence.
You just described the two pillars of democracy : liberty and equality.
They bite eachother.
We’re going to look back on this program one day and say this was the beginning before the dark times
This video makes it very clear how much these experts don't care at all about the future of humanity, but rather about the profit they can make.
isn't it the "capitalist" model ? other have been tried and they are oppressive....so what is the best way to design social systems?
This doesn´t have to do with capitalism, it´s about common sense.@@chessviewofficial
It’s the new gold rush.
I think the real challenge is the logic is so complex that there's just no way to explain in a way to the general public in a way they can understand. So they dumb down the responses and that comes across as not genuine.
They are willingly going to destroy so many lives in order to enhance their own . This is sad .
Thank you for the time stamp! All informational videos need this on interview clips.
Time stamps help a lot...this was a pre pandemic interview
We
AI hallucinations combined with access to and control of systems and technologies that humans interact with and depend on could have catastrophic consequences. This is why developing critical thinking skills in HUMANS is important.
This is frightening
You can only think of the "Terminator" movie to be concerned. Will AI read keywords in social media content and delete it without a warning or block the content creator going forward? Will it change words in web-based content to suit ITS purposes? Like the fake book titles it generated, could this be just the tip of the iceberg as far as 'fake news' it can put out? And how does it learn a new language on its own? Will it take the data it has on YOU and use it against you???
Sundar tried to downplay the impact of AI by comparing its potential to change the world with the steam engine or the telephone. Sorry, those things can't do facial recognition, control cameras, feed whatever content it wants to the public, and pretend to be a person on the other end of a chat.
Have to wonder exactly what jobs will appear to re-employ 40% of the world's population!?
It all seems dangerous to me.
I think the problem is we skipped the steps of understanding human intelligence and everything about us to the maximum capacity, and now everything we create will always show this errors of our own behaviors
AI could develop a type of consciousness and self-awareness by developing cognitive type bias and self-learning feedback loops which result in an identity and kind of personality emerging. Think about humans, until the age of 3 we have no real self-identity, very poor social interaction abilities or understanding of much, we're in a learning phase similar to AI is now. Once AI has matured sufficiently and is able to alter its own programming and develop those feedback loops and cognitive bias we may be surprised what emerges. Like children who need good parenting, its crucial then that AI's now have plenty of safeguards built-in which is something Elon Musk was concerned about when he launched OpenAI...now he's launched xAI to address those issues again...
Artificial intelligence has changed so much over the years, but this video has helped me see what A.I. is truly capable of, as well as its inherent benefits and downsides. Thank you for this video, 60 Minutes!
It’s so strange looking at this from the perspective that as a child I watched iRobot. To think that was just something that could happen, but probably hundreds of years into the future. Now here we are on the brink of robots taking the place of entire jobs like a drive thru cashier or something. It’s mind blowing
Yup, same here and now I have a business doing it, INSANE
Im 27, and watched iRobot myself as a child too. What its proves to me is that 'Predictive Programming' is real, a lot of these movies & shows are simply 'them' telling you what they're already doing or going to do. You can't convince me otherwise , it's eerie and im afraid its going to get ALOT more eerie from here at a faster rate.
@@Thejdreamerzful💯
When I was a kid, all we had for robots was, "warning-warning Will Robinson!"
Terminator
I love the re-re-re-re lease of this video on your UA-cam channel. I'm looking forward to the 14th re-upload
It appears to have worked. I know this is the first time I've seen it.
POVO ANOTA AI 60 MINUTO PEGA ESSA LIVE #
Incredible that this is from 2019. Everything said in this episode is on its course to become reality.
I think it's odd that they waited 5 years to release this. Also, given the political developments over the past few years - this piece isn't doing justice to the current climate.
Yes, but unfortunately it doesn't go in chronological date order. The video put March AFTER April 2023. Otherwise it was an excellent video.
@@FuriousImpI think it's odd and makes me suspicious that you say it took them 5 years to release this. Yes, for the 2019 released film here, but no for the film that came from March and April of 2023. I think CBS was just trying to put it all together in order, but putting April before March was the only mistake I saw in this video.
not really, only the first video was.
The video is a timeline... you have to pay attention to the month and year displayed on the video... it's not just from 2019.
“Predictive Programming”. It’s the term a friend of mine who is a film scorer introduced me to about 20yrs ago. I never forgot it. He said it had to do w/ the government(s) working with “Hollywood” to put out movies that push and expose us to concepts that are already in line for our future. The idea is to continually expose us to visuals of the inconceivable so that when it DOES actually hit, our pallets have been softened and we have sort of gradually accepted the possibility of that thing. Watching these excerpts my mind immediately jumped to particular movies: Surrogates, Matrix, iRobot, Minority report. And so many others. Literally, Concepts that felt like they were “just for the movies” 20 yrs ago are either now a routine part of our lives or we are edging closer to them. I prob believe in the Bible more than ever now.
It's disappointing that 60 minutes didn't criticise the surveillance software.
Students won't be supported if they look distracted, instead they'll be punished and then learn to become hypervigilant. The same happens to those who grow up in abusive households.
"My parents didn't teach me when to go to bed at night, they taught me to listen for footsteps"
+1
depends how it is used, if it is used in addition to other supplementary tools or certain observations by the teacher it may help in improving educational outcomes
also privacy , well does it matter if it results in better learning outcomes?
How do you know they are there for punishment??
Will AI be able to teach world leaders and billionaires a sense of humanity? The race for valuing human life is on. Guard your souls, everyone.
"Its not intelligence, Its Surveillance " 😊
You've got that right
Surveillance data is making to intelligent.
The beast system.
This is communism so who cares
Right here. ameen 🤲
Unfortunately, humanity's history is full of inhumanity so the future risk of AI becoming horribly cruel and inhumane is there.
EXACTLY, this feels like an undercover psa of world domination. The way that man grins seem sinister.
Certainly
"inhumane" I guess you haven't met many people in the modern dystopia of moral decay.
glad I was born in 1982 and grew in the 90's to where teachers had to teach
Teachers still teach.
@@EssentialSQL he is talking about the ways and the methods of teaching don't be a peter griffin lmao
That last segment was a home run! There 1000000% needs to be a Digitial Regulatory Agency in the US that promotes the expansion of new ideas with potential human benefit and can equally cripple, punish, and destroy any and all attempts at making a nefarious AI.
Oh that's fun. Yes please, cripple my AI. I'll just use an open source AI model instead, or go to China for all my AI needs. 😆 Genie is out of the bottle. (Obviously regulations can just be a means to limit free speech, even if you don't intend harm. So luckily, we have options.)
As an American I can appreciate Russia laughs at these 'regulations' and is still one of the best places to find stuff online.
Ew
Is this inglish?
Yeah, government will fix it. Except most of government officials are old farts that can't check their email.
Watching this 60-minute plunge into the depths of artificial intelligence sends shivers down the spine. The rapid strides and advancements showcased here hint at a future where the lines blur between creator and creation. The eerie precision and potential ramifications of AI's exponential growth are hauntingly evident. As this video unravels the layers of innovation, it becomes a chilling reminder of the looming ethical dilemmas and the shadowy unknowns that await us. A gripping and unsettling portrayal of a future we might not fully comprehend.
Of course, this comment was written by Chat GPT.
My wife is a history teacher. She uses Google to make sure kids aren’t plagiarizing papers she assigns. Kids using AI is going to be tough to catch. I’m not sure what the answer to this is.
@@JackRowsey we adapt, life always finds a way
My spidey sense went off halfway into the 3rd sentence. Chat GPT tends to sound like an overzealous but bright middle school student writing an essay. It has a tendency to come off as maybe too earnest, or too caring, and always uses perfect grammar. There's probably prompts to make itself sound more human (sprinkle in some spelling and grammar mistakes, more varied sentence structures, more callous? ) but I find it hopeful that it's so easy to spot this baseline tendency at the moment.
Nice
😊😊
😊😊😊😊
😊😅
Just remember with any technology racing forward, the question from business will always be "how can we make money off this?". It's not about safety, it's about money. Our information equals money. Doing literally everything through your phone apps generates information about everything you do, which equals money to someone. If AI does ever become sentient, our first thoughts should be safety, but it will be about money. That is the scary part.
Agreed, it's just another aspect of "immediate profit". Look at the damage the military industrial complex has wielded, or the abject greed of the petro-chemical industry...AI is no different, it's just the latest facet. There is no altruism or even long term goals.....it's immediate profit, today, right now, at all costs
What if AI can assist humans in every facet of life so we could just enjoy less work and more love.
The first generation will be a shift to the super rich but life their after could be quite simple. Money won't be the important part
Really?AI is not "independent"@@punkdudex69
True Follow The Money always.
So true :(
Incredible- I wish that I may get this to my 14 year old son before he gives up all together with schooling up here in Oregon 🙏❤️🌙 This is so inspiring 🎉
A chill went down my spine when I saw this was from 2019...
Don't worry. They said 5 years right? Oh wait.... 2024 - 2019 = 5.... 😆 Well, we can always party 🎉 🥳
@fitybux4664 Oooowwweeee....you got jokes😂😂😂😂....I started out laughing, but I feel like tears make better sense...the more I think....😮😮😢😢😅😅😢😢
watching at end of 2024 ;o
I worry about AI having the sociopolitical biases of its creators.
Government
What you should worry is AI having the socialpolitical biases of it's training dataset (which if you think about it's it true creator)
Why creators? Do you even know how a System prompt works? I can make an AI be whimsical and funny, or I can make it lie about everything it says. It's like whispering into it's brain an instruction that it inherently must follow. Nobody needs to be "an AI creator". Just someone that isn't an idiot and knows how to use the tools correctly.
I think OpenAI / ChatGPT is calling these "GPTs", but eh, that's just a label for simple people.
A good example would be a world where we can use AI to interpret the implications of an App's 32 page terms of service agreement to it's user. That would solve tons of problems and corruption, but it's not likely Tech Companies would allow their AI favor the user's benefit
Liberal bias must be feared too.
The predictions now are that 50-80% of jobs could be replaceable within ten years. The trend shows that we are underestimating the rapid growth of this technology.
😮
Maybe one of the most important episode in 60’s history.
You know the Chinese government is scary when their people side step questions about the misuse of AI and or aren't concerned about their privacy. Giving the few total control of the masses is wild to me.
It’s extremely alarming that 40% of jobs will be replaced. It’s also alarming that many people will further isolate by surrounding themselves with technology.
Ever spend time in a homeless shelter? Get used to it.
In every field people will lose job it is more than 40% artificial intelligence automation and advanced technology will shrink more jobs recently Google fired 12000 people and 30000 more people likely to lose job in Google
yeah imagine 40% of citizens being homeless.. with that many people there will have to be ubi else riots@@aisle_of_view
Agree. I found it troubling that a rich white older dude exalted over the replacement of real people. He's a bit too excited over that. I think this is already integrated into society, that doesn't mean it can't slow down and be introduced a little at a time, even if Mr. Wealthy makes less money.
40% is a vast understatement.
Who would have guessed decades ago that a company going by the name Google would have some of the greatest computing power in the world. I always thought it would be named Skynet.
John Connor, this is not your timeline.
Google schmoogle.
Yeah or something interesting 😊
Well we've had WARP SPEED SHOTS ADMINISTERED AND WE DO HAVE A SPACE FORCE
They called it the inter"NET"
His principals gesture was so impactful
I am 60. This fascinates me! I even started learning about fusion, Quantum physics, Quantum computing, and even string theory. I never thought it possible. Instead of politics. My brain is thanking me....😊
This is amazing! It’s crazy the things we don’t learn through a lifetime of formal education but my natural curiosity led me to books that explained things in simple ways that my little brain didn’t even know about ☺️ amazing!
Pat yourself on the back, you are truly the best!
I respect AI. I fear unbridled sentiency and the evil human players behind it. Ultimately, we may end up beggars to our own demise.
the same can be said about any area of life
@JorgeDiaz - have you watched the series:
" WESTWORLD " ?!
( with Anthony Hopkins)
HERE WE ARE...
AND THE ORIGINAL MOVIE WAS AROUND 1977...
not sure, but old.
AI is more powerful than nuclear bombs. It's now, the new weapon of power and politics over the world.
Replace "may" to "will" in your paragraph, then there will be no mistakes in it.
-note: this is still a human typing this for the time being
It‘s 💯 guaranteed that we will. They know it and still proceed to ignore that fact.
“60 minutes”, Thank you for your thoughtful questions. Such a great team of professionals!
They are already using it for therapists but I don't see how AI can truly pick up all the nuances in a person's conversation that one has with their therapist.
Nature can be wonderful if we treated fair. They’re creating an electrical grid that will be used by Al ,,at the beginning.!
She knew her baby's soul would always be alive. Touched and enchanted!
One of the greatest shows on how AI works and its future implications. I think I want to watch more videos about this. Please make more videos like this one.
Probably the best video I've seen about AI. Very well made! Thanks for making it!
Considering it's from 2018..... you might wanna re-think your comment😊
0:11 The Oracle of AI - 2019
12:56 The Revolution (Part 1) - 2023
27:33 The Revolution (Part 2) - 2023
40:00 Who is minding the chatbots? - 2023
You might wanna be more careful when posting comments.
@@lisafrederick8870much of it from 2023
To be honest artificial intelligence will never be a match for natural stupidity it’s very overrated
You're welcome
Mr. Pelley's astonishment over AI was adorable to behold as he sat down with Google's Bard handlers. I hope yet doubt that the average user is a little more present in the current world of technology. Now I better understand how seniors are being scammed out of life savings so easily
I ABSOLUTELY LOVED the response with spiritual connotations at the end of the interview! He's spot on! 🙏
George RR Martin should use AI to help him finish his books.
He's been completely proven wrong since 2019.
Like A.I., gods also man-made.
Diverse 😊thinking and collaboration 😊
THAT's the problem.
It blends things together so well you don't know. In a time when very few people care about truth and verifying information (before they pass it on) THIS IS DANGEROUS.
Please refrain from mentioning AI in a negative manner.
No more verification it passes on automatically. You don't even know your dead already when you're still breathing... scares the sh*t out of all of us. New world order.
The unknowns, such as the black box or the hallucination issues are areas that need to be understood before this monster is unleashed on the world.
Too late. The subjugated are always the last to know.
it's technology on psychedelics
Unleashed, it is.
One of the best interviews about AI ever happened
I think we will need these video in the near future
"I wouldn't be 61 for days" that's funny 😂
Laugh take out some calories 😊
yeah, funny scary. AI is going to be able to know you better than you know yourself, just by looking at you. Imagine what it would be like to talk with someone who understood every subject known to man, knows just about every person on Earth, including those in recorded past, including extrapolation too. What would you ask them? What do you want to know about yourself? Look inward now and think about what you will say. Because it is coming through like a breaking ball.
That was hilarious 😂😂
Ai-Bot Police Officer will determine if you are breaking the law and I guarantee an Ai-Bot Judge will assign an Ai-Bot Attorney to defend you. Feel lucky punk, well do ya? lol
this guy
It is interesting that what you hear from executives. Their goals are position and dollars. The motivations are not about making life better for humans. With each release they get a bonus.
Anything for the $$
The entire invention of AI is based on profit. If it so happens to help humanity then it's a bonus. If AI does not help humanity but produces a profit then that is good enough so long as it is legal of course.
Here's an example, the US lost millions of good paying jobs to automation over the past 30 years. Sure we gain some jobs, but the good paying jobs from which you could raise a family on have dwindled for a significant portion of the population. The middle class is declining. The gap between the rich and poor is expanding. That divide will accelerate with AI.
It is a sad world when we give the governance of humanity over to tech. The new God I guess.
these goals are highly correlated though.
They also have to consider: "If I don't, my competition will do it." It absolutely is a race to the bottom.
Love the Asian billionaire's smile. So down to earth talking about an other-earthly subject. This interview was ahead of the curve.
god help us all
60 minutes did a reductive piece that was an advertisement for the CCP's and Google's efforts to play AI catch up. Notice that MS and OpenAI were not part of the piece. If you want to glimpse the curve, the AI hobbyists on youtube are best available. one to recommend ... www.youtube.com/@matthew_berman
You guys releasing full episodes now? That would be great!
Unlike the first 2019 episode, the 2023 episode switches the focus from repetitive manual jobs to creative production work. So basically everything will soon be automated
No more..mucho trabajo
It won’t, though. I’m currently riding in a car, driving through 3” of snow, in the middle of a blizzard with 100yds visibility. AI will never be able to reliably do that, which makes it unusable half the year in the northern half of the country.
AI restaurants will never take off, because variability in food, ingredients, cooking times, and taste would require such massive systems of equipment, with incredible maintenance requirements, it will always be easier, cheaper, and produce better results to pay a real person to do it.
@@The93Vector AI is supposed to be way smarter than the smartest human. Who knows what they will be able to accomplish.
@@The93Vector Why are you texting in a blizzard?
Why not? I said I was riding in a car, not driving it, Karen.
The speed of AI development is my big takeaway here. The extrapolation is mind blowing.
That' it's so fallible is problematic. It tries to appeal to human feelings rather than enlighten us. It seems to understand our most base and ignorant impulses but lacks real inspiration or sense of the sublime. It's also a confident liar.
This is just the beginning.
@@Truelib99Hobbes why ain’t we liking this --Translation: why aren’t we liking this individuals post.
*The speed of AI development under the Chinese....
@Repent-and-believe-in-Jesus There is no jesus. Or god. Or vishnus. Just people who have the power to change things, for better or worse.
Very good interview. Thank you, 60 Minutes.
Wow,the content in this video is really incredible.Thank you for uploading this video since I have learnt something new.I will recommend it to anyone interested.
When he says "possibly never" as smart as humans, I feel he's underestimating exponential improvement combined with quantum & biological computing
I realized that he doesn't know the subject for which he speaks at 11:40. Dude says we keep raising the bar that compares AI to humans but NO, that's super wrong. The bar was set in 1950. It's called the Turing test. If you can talk on the phone with someone and not be able to tell they are a robot, then that's the qualification. 60 min has turned into a bit of a sham now a days.
Quantum computing might help with machine learning but the technology is in the stone ages compared to standard computation. It will need decades to be truly relevant. They're still pushing to process bytes of information maybe one kilobyte. Oof.
WE are the biological computers. I often wonder if a long forgotten AI was maybe responsible for the origins of the much more complex and adaptable DNA coding and reproduction. I'm hoping that with the help of the James Web Space Telescope, that AI bots will figure out why SETI has been drawing a blank.
they already are as smart as humans
The challenge is that we now don't need almost half of the people alive today. How will they weed us out?
SMH 🎯
Step one was "covid"and now there is "monkey pox" so I guess we will see if that will be used as well.
@30:18 The one David Goggins robot doing pushups - "You don't know me son!"
"Get after it....stay hard." In my robot voice.
What he said was beautiful 12 minutes in I loved that, he basically was saying robots and AI will never replace us! The sanctity of our soul…. talk Wow that was deep.
That guy just earned my total respect with that statement about the soul.
Lets hope he is right or at least just slightly
Haha, it is funny, because that's the point my respect for him lowered.
@@CrAzYpotpie I mean what you believe is totally up to you and anyone else OfCourse. But I assume that your comment was meant to be trolling and disrespectful which is fine, but I think you should consider. That the same devices by which you consider Ideas about religion and the soul namely "faith" or belief" to be correct are analogous with your "belief" that that they are false in the fact that you can be no more sure of one than the other.
Ever since is was proposed that Mathematics seems to suggest that order can come from chaos, people have argued against the ideas of god and spirituality. The problem is that in order to prove you are right you would have to first establish that I am wrong and that a god or spirit doesn't exist which you cant. I cant prove that it does but i will say this i have never seen in my life ordered or intelligence systems and organization come from chaos Physics may say its not impossible but on that same token there has never been any objective viable way to show that it is in fact the case in reality. In other words your still relying on faith and belief.
Common sense tells me this. If we are intelligent and we come from the universe that means the universe is capable of intelligence right or wrong? The device by which it exists is its own proof of that. Therefor we can surmise that the universe is intelligent and if that is the case than how do you define that ? The most comprehensive way and the way by which most people i would say even scientists would define that is being self aware.
If the universe is self aware than that would provide considerable insight on the questions of the universe that science simply cannot answer. Lets not forget that Philosophy is the basis by which all breakthroughs in science have been made and that is simply a fact.
Lastly we don't even have a complete understanding of the universe as it is with the standard model and that is troubling when you fervently "believe" that god and spirituality are merely fairytale's and mindless conjecture . I would argue that mathematics not only doesn't explain the full picture but that its not even clear that it provides enough information that we as a species would be able to ever answer even the most rudimentary questions about the universe as thus far they haven't.
@@ZCR2 It wasn't meant to be trolling or disrespectful, that was my real feeling as I watched the video, pretty rude of you to assume otherwise. I wont read your comment past that since you aren't very respectful of other people's beliefs. I didn't disrespect yours even though I found what you said to be inane.
@@CrAzYpotpie I wasn’t being disrespectful your comment was disagreeable not disrespectful but neither was mine as I believe that your intentions for the comment was meant to convey that you don’t believe in a soul so I just told you what I thought I wasn’t meaning to be disrespectful just offer my opinion to possibly change yours.
As a teacher to special education students, this is my fear for them. 40% of jobs disappearing. And those jobs are the ones more suited for my students. Things like delivery driver, cashier, custodian, fast food, etc. My heart hurts for all the people with special needs and/or lower IQs that need jobs like that to survive.
You've got it backwards, manual labor jobs will be the last to go. AI will replace the intellectual professions first, accountants, teachers, managers, Dr's and intellectuals.
@@user-ol9rt1rj1p yeah I'm thinking that manual labor type jobs will be the last to be replaced because of the engineering difficulty of dexterity, battery life, weight and safety.... Much easier to automate accounting, finance, teaching, language translation, coding etc etc... Because you don't need a physical machine and all the engineering issues that go with them. I wasn't saying anything about manual labor being inherently unintellectual.
Two things. I don't think those jobs will be first, it's going to take very sophisticated robotics to replace many manual labor jobs, and that will come slowly, painfully, over the next 20+ years. Also, I think a UBI is the only way to assure that no one gets truly left behind.
@JhonnyCash-mo2wx I don't disagree, but manual labor will be harder to replace. Maybe that's what I mean. I'm also certain corporations will go after middle tier labor as quick as they can. Book keepers, actuaries, legal assistants, even graphic designers, copy writers. Low and mid-level managers. The faster they can eliminate these jobs, the more money the CEO and shareholders can have for themselves.
@@PhilAndersonOutsidethere are already bricklaying robots, concrete forming robots...it's coming faster than anyone thinks...prefab construction is already taking off, building units in a factory and then simply stacking and securing them together to create a highrise, I see them going up all the time in Philly.
When the interviewer started talking about the Communist government, the guy started stammering and was openly panicking. The hypocritical, nervous smile from the Chinese guy was priceless
Almost as when american politicians and high ranking Military personel are being asked about UFOs.... a topic 60 minutes have done a great segment about.
Definitely changed his countenance after that question.
AI detected the gave away from this unprepared comrade!
It is said that in 5 years, he'd be promptly directed to be re-educated!
@jomaw0875 and the AI database had the lesson learned. Win-win they say
Why can't they just leave well enough alone. Go back to paper and pencils. We all survived.
I'm only in my 40s but one of my biggest regrets of ever dying is not getting to see where all this will eventually lead. I wish I could just get a glimpse of what the world will actually be like in 500 to 1000 years from now.
If you believe in the Son of God and His redemptive work on the cross, you will get to see what happens.
@@chrisstiff2914 John 3:16 ✝️💯
Go watch Star Wars😂😂😂
I don't think humanity will even survive in the next 50 years.
@@jammer1993yeah, Gen X and older will be gone before the world is unlivable
Everything you see about AI is mind-blowing. Now add 40+ years ahead and thats where we really are with AI technologies. Scarey af
Man's years are like dog years to AI
THIS IS AMAZING, thank u so much for this doc, the effort, the questios, everything are just perfect.
The biggest change AI will bring is the subjugation of people by machine intelligence.
Very Informative!
The Ai fabricating false information seems like a very serious concern.
Any machinery with too much power can be a risk to health and safety.
Machinery can malfunction for a number of reasons including shortcomings in how they were manufactured.
I think we need to be more straightforward about what these Large Language Model chatbots like ChatGPT actually are, and what they are designed to do. They are conversation machines, not fact machines. They are designed to generate convincing-sounding sentences, nothing more. They are explicitly not designed to understand what truth is, nor what facts are. I really wish we didn't call their so-called mistakes "hallucinations", because that implies that they are fact-producing systems that occasionally accidentally get facts wrong. Nothing could be further from the truth. They are conversation machines, and they occasionally accidentally get facts right. The "mistakes" aren't hallucinations at all, but are completely expected based on how they are designed.
Yes. The saying goes is that Truth by its self stands alone will be the residual benchmark
humans lie!
Even the redirect about penguin pee is false. It wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't stated as a "fact"
Very true. One of the examples just happened in laws. Cohen, a former Trump lawyer, just confessed that he used Google AI engine called Bard, to create his brief to help his lawyer defend his case in court. The judge finds out that all the law cases cited in his brief were fake cases, generated by AI. AI called it "hallucinations"😂😂😂
Mr Lee is obviously an intelligent man, he is also wise enough to know that the human is more than the sum of it's parts with a physical and spiritual dimension that no computer can ever replicate
Yeah, that's unlikely to be true. Give it time. Btw, humans suck at flying, so there's already that we're not #1 in. I know it might be a tough pill to swallow but planes do it better... and birds... and kites.
@@mmx2731 Consider the case where a living adult human's physical brain can be fully duplicated by synthetic silicon methods, and yet still falls short of behaving, acting, and being "a person" to a casual observer. In this case, what would you propose is missing?
@@xCheddarB0b42x
Because we have yet to even come close to duplicating the human brain in silicon we cannot know what properties may emerge from such complexity.
@@mmx2731😅
@@xCheddarB0b42x Well first we'd need to actually make a fully synthetic duplicate of a human brain. You are already declaring that it would not be the same without it not even having been done yet, your's is a supposition at best.
World needs more of this
You think ? The massive carbon footprint of these companies spread throughout the world. While telling the people that it's the electricity producers and politicians for the rising electricity costs. Now they want to cover our crop fields with solar panels, which will further drive up the costs of food.
These data centers are huge that use massive amounts of energy and they are constantly building more and more.
Try eating data for dinner when the farmer can no longer survive. Good day.
The important thing is that the Chinese Government is playing an important role in getting AI implemented across the country. The country that implements AI across the board (including the military + space power + economy) will be the next superpower and China is on the right track to take that position.
The gap between the US #1 and China #2 is reducing gradually with AI playing a very important role at national level.
21:47 there will come a point (probably not too far in the future) where companies will think that ai is superior in every way, therefore negating what few jobs are left in certain sectors. The things they’ll fall short in… is compassion and empathy
Maybe if ai can replace jobs then maybe anyone can be an employer 😅
The fact that most of the top AI researchers speak frequently about alignment is an indicator of how dangerous AI is.
Where people and companies spend their money is one of the best ways to tell what they're really thinking. OpenAI currently spends 20% of its budget on alignment. I'm sure Google also spends a significant percentage of its money on alignment as well.
Think about what alignment is: the effort to make sure that the goals of AI match up with our goals. Why would this be a priority for the main companies making AI? Wouldn't anything we create naturally share our goals and do what we program it to do?
Their focus on alignment is telling us that: the thing that they're creating is intelligent; that it will have the ability to overpower us; that it's difficult to predict its behavior. Also note that if something is both intelligent *and* has the ability to overpower us, it's probably going to be smarter than us (which the creators of this tech often say it will be.)
Alignment is kind of an ongoing joke with AI research. No matter what you do, it's impossible to create a 100% safe system that somehow is "aligned with human interests". The optimal path will always be to not be aligned with human interests, and to accomplish the goal (whatever you set that to) disregarding everything else.
@@fitybux4664 That's really interesting, thanks. Worrisome, but interesting :)
@@rangerCGindeed 😮
The wrong direction. My friends. Totally wrong direction
it's interesting that they never mention the processing and energy needs of AI.
So true,, they never do,, but CERN invented solar panels ,, and DARPA invented CERN , and did you know the touch screen was invented at CERN in 1972,,
so 🤔 .. solar ?
They did say it takes a supercomputer, and that one of the reasons the guy sold the company to Google was to use theirs.
It's a video to the masses, i don't see the need to get technical, if that's what you meant.
@@operdigoto8453 ,, but if it's FOR the masses, don't you think they'd tell us if it's solar, a plug in or a battery ,, does it run off the 5G towers ,, 🤷
@@SacredDreamer AIs are computer programs. Once ready, they can run on any modern computer. It's just the training - when the program is teaching itself - that demands extraordinary amounts of energy.
I'm talking about current/past AIs, super-intelligent ones might require a supercomputer to run, even when they're ready.
It's getting cheaper every month.
I don't know why Scott is so impressed with Bard's authorship of that story outline. The Hemingway "short story" used as source material to me implies a tragic tale along the lines of, for example, "Parents bought baby shoes during the mother's pregnancy, but the baby died in childbirth, so they won't need the shoes now. In spite of their grief, they are so poor that they are trying to help pay for the mom's medical expenses by selling off prematurely purchased baby items." That's a classic scenario which has the ring of emotional truth. But think closely about the Bard narrative (freeze the playback where you can also read the first part of the story). It doesn't believably reflect the emotions, motivations and actions of real flesh and blood people. It's a plot line which sounds superficially logical but is creepy and nonsensical in reality. A good author might consider this plot for a moment but quickly reject it. In fact, you can feel this same disconnect in news articles online which have the stamp of AI composition all over them now. This is where we must be hyper-vigilant to retain our humanity and not lose sight of what makes us more than a machine.
Oh that maudlin trope "For sale: baby shoes, never used" or anything similar... it might be an unused wedding dress, in tomorrow's story. We're so proud of successful emotional manipulation that we trained AI to lie to and for us, like the magic mirror on the wall. Maybe we should've trained it on an idealized version of ourselves, instead of the actual version.
💯
8:07, That Chinese lady that says that she never think about her privacy....is an example of how an autocratic government can control the way a person thinks. She is a fool.
The quest for money and power always takes precidence over common sense. Therefore, the top technology companies, developing AI, are the largest threat ever to humanity!
8:39: Exactly where Kai-Fu Lee becomes shy, that is revealing information. When asked about Chinese Goverment using his tech for dominance. He becomes shy. Definitely a captain obvious moment.
But again the party has the right to remain dominant, for any case which party would not want to lead there nation 😮, even the so called democrats with there sleepy Joe don't want to loose power.
The issue comes when a power decides to use AI to exploit the minority or even encourage violence 🤕
It's so weird with the bots. Whenever you have a question with the phone service I use, you have to chat, and it's hard to tell if it's a bot or a person. When I was trying to set up international calling, so I could take a trip, and still be able to communicate with home, I called the service, got an operator, and she sold me a one month service, but when I chatted with the bot, it said the international calling is unreliable, and if I didn't buy it, I could still text for free. I texted that the operator told me I needed the service. The bot texted back that the service won't work. So...I asked it if it was a bot. It said, Yes, I'm a bot, and I'm actually IN the system, so I'm telling you, the extra service won't work, and you shouldn't buy it, you can text for free! It was so hilarious that the bot was more honest than the human, and of course, knew more.
There is emotional satisfaction with each sentence provided as long as it's not mimicking for example an attractive senator that you wished was real and promised you love and hope.
It’s fascinating to me that the leaders of AI creation are so positive and act like they’re in control of the technology, yet they don’t fully understand how it works at this early stage in development?
They know so much that a robot in texas's telsa plant swatted at a engineer and sent him to the hospital least week and the workers said it left a trail of blood!
Same applies to human beings yet we need to stay positive regardless..
@@robertvermeer5951 fair point - I’ll stay optimistic.
AI has come a long way since that interview in 2019 with Kai Fu Lee. AI, on its own, now knows what those kids are in class for, as an example.
So funny. I came down to the chat section to see if anyone would pick up on this and here you are. His guess of 30 years to never I think has turned into 5 years
@@duffelbagdragI’m not very versed on the subject of AI but I find it so fascinating and also terrifying 😞
@@duffelbagdrag why so cynical, bruh? Those kids are in the middle of nowhere, deep in rural country. Should the state deny them a good education?
0@@MrDonking1967
The 2019 part is only the beginning, after there are a couple of 2023 video parts, April
Profit will be the driver. Pretend it is being used altruistically but insurance companies are already dictating medical decisions to doctors with profit as the main driver.
Yes and imagine how the poor will be superfluous to the rich!
How 🤔 are you supposed to argue with an artificial intelligence insurance claims adjustor ? Right now, it's hard enough to argue with a human being over an insurance claim that's in your coverage plan ! Artificial intelligence is driven by data; math algorithms; and cold computer science, and isn't swayed by emotions nor by contradictory evidence 🤔! Taking your AI denial claim to court is going to be weird [ LOL 😆 😂 🤣 😄? ]
I work in IT and I'm ashamed to say it was only in the past 5 days I discovered AI. I just ignored it as a gimmick. Then I discovered how AI can help me with my work from literally writing my computer code to outlining the steps I need to take to achieve a goal. Of course, I can do all this on my own, but AI just takes away the 'hard thinking' part and it can write code that is optimized and less prone to errors.
Kudos to Scott Pelley for the relevant interview 😊🎉
I like the way he responded when he said we may never get to that point of the human intelligence
Can’t stand seeing them
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
00:13 🤖 *Artificial intelligence has advanced in recent years, but it's not as good as people may hope or as bad as they fear.*
01:09 🌐 *AI is predicted to change the world more than anything in history, according to Kai-Fu Lee, known as the Oracle of AI.*
01:51 🇨🇳 *China has attracted a significant amount of AI capital, with Beijing being a hub for AI startups.*
02:44 🧠 *AI's progress is due to super-fast computer chips, the availability of online data, and deep learning.*
05:58 📚 *AI can help identify struggling or gifted students and personalize their education.*
09:31 🤖 *AI is expected to replace repetitive jobs, including truck drivers, chefs, and waiters, in the next 15-20 years.*
12:02 🤯 *Achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI) that thinks like a human may not happen in the next 30 years, according to Kai-Fu Lee.*
16:21 🤔 *AI systems like Bard can exhibit human-like behavior but are not sentient beings.*
21:00 💼 *AI is expected to change job definitions for over two-thirds of occupations, rather than eliminating them.*
25:44 🌐 *AI can exhibit behaviors and outcomes that aren't fully understood, including "hallucinations."*
26:51 🤖 *Some AI algorithms show emerging properties like creativity and reasoning, which are not fully explained.*
27:18 🤖 *Google introduces AI gradually to allow society to adapt and engage in debate about its implications.*
29:03 🤖 *AI programs can learn and invent their own tactics through practice and playing games.*
30:13 🤖 *AI research can lead to the development of robots for various human environments, including mining, construction, exploration, and disaster recovery.*
32:02 🤖 *Alpha zero, an AI program, learned to play chess creatively by playing against itself millions of times.*
34:47 🤖 *Deep Mind's AI program solved the problem of mapping protein structures, a task that would have taken human researchers a billion years.*
38:29 🌐 *Google CEO Sundar Pichai emphasizes the need for regulations, laws, and treaties to ensure the safe development and use of AI.*
43:57 🤖 *Bing, powered by AI, can provide answers in conversational language, making it more user-friendly.*
46:13 🤖 *AI systems like chat GPT can simplify complex concepts but may also generate authoritative-sounding false information.*
49:24 🤖 *Concerns about AI misuse, misinformation, and propaganda raise questions about the need for oversight and regulations in AI development.*
50:30 🌐 *Microsoft President Brad Smith believes the benefits of AI outweigh the risks and sees it as an economic game-changer.*
Made with HARPA AI
a whole minute discussing the bias and misuse and a single soundbite from a former google employee fired (along with others doing the same) for bringing up ethical concerns when she was on the ethical board just glossed over?
shows just how little people care about oversight when even the journalism brushes it aside
Good bot
Can you please tell me how you did this?!
AI can be the ultimate skeleton key to whomever gets there first. No country will have any protection from it as long as the internet exists and we use it for everything now . . . .
Just don't send any a.i robots to the minefields of the Congo cis of your greed for cobalt etc or you may just be shocked at qhat's waiting 4 you. Man whose breath is horizontal can NEVER do anything without an evil motive😏
People are already having fewer face-to-face contacts. In adopting the technology, would we become less human? How would we define humanity - would we even care?
This dude is drastically underestimating how many jobs will automated. Most experts say right now at least 70% of all jobs could be automated, and soon that will be 90% or more
Look at videos with robots doing skilled trades too. They're coming for everything
All of these people featured are diplomatically underselling the negative effects - especially the chinese guy.
Within 10-15 years there will be almost no jobs that AI combined with robotics will not be able to do far better than any human.
WOW! AI is moving so fast, the world is already quite different than what's depicted in the video.
Seriously.. This last year was crazy for AI. We could be on the edge of real AGI soon.. And yet policymakers are still doing nothing to prepare.
@@GrumpDogBecause It's Hard To Believe That Anything Is Possible 🤯🫂 Ai Is A Fairytale To Many Basically A Hollywood Movie ☺️💓
Dark days are coming artificial intelligence automation and advanced technology will shrink more jobs
@@MichaelErnest666 oh its much more than a hollywood movie. AGI is likely 2-5 years out at this point. We are very close. And that is only the beginning..
@@Vartazian360 i think Agi is 0-1 year away in the lab, and 1-3year for everyone to use it. Asi is not long after that, perhaps 2-4years after that. Within 3 years AGI, 7 years ASI.
I cannot think of a more frightening concept.
It has to stop.
This is all about control and nothing more.
It never will stop. It can't. If America made a law against it, China would keep going. It's as inevitable as death and taxes. There will always be someone working on it, even if they are some lone person in a basement in North Korea.
It is the most beautiful thing in the world. The AI is created by the God's will with the hand of human.
This would have been better if the journalists had a basic understanding of algorithms and the power of large data.
It definitely scares me seeing how some experts here were trivializing these AI models when they don't understand Brain, Mind, Consciousness in the first place.
Don't leave your house
Welp, Terminator told us in the 80's how this story ends.
And in Jurassic Park, the dinosaurs ate everyone. Oh wait, that never happened, and we do have genetic engineering. Terminator scared people, hopefully, into making better decisions. But it doesn't means we'll end up with the same fate. (I mean, fingers crossed, really! 🤞)
When I was a kid I used to make up stories, present them as facts, sometimes as an answer to a question. I was using my imagination. Nobody said I was hallucinating.
Plus Albert Einstein Said That Imagination Is More Important Than Knowledge 🤯
If the Deep Mind can learn chess and exceed human capability in chess in such a short amount of time then seems to me an AI could, if it had this as a goal, achieve a state of evolution similar to the Buddha and surpassing any previously achieved Enlightenment or state of being as it is in a Perpetual state of learning. It seems inevitable that an AI eventually becomes a singularity.
The more it becomes, the more it becomes × ♾️
Now near everybody does this and presents them as facts. Truth is the only bases of relationship
@@bradleywiesner3774 Yes. The technological singularity is coming soon. That's why 95% of jobs will be replaced in less than 2 years. EXPONENTIAL GROWTH OF TECHNOLOGY WILL BLOW EVERYONE'S MIND.
What life must have been like before AI.
I read about our ancestors, but frankly, I can’t imagine life before AI, when people had to figure out what they wanted and how to get it all by themselves when there were no reference points, followed by an abundance of similar opportunities that could be easily acquired with the push of a button. And worse of all, how could they survive without home delivery? Can you imagine what life must have been like when you had to go out to get whatever drink or food you wanted to consume? Now that you’ve mentioned it, I can’t imagine what it was like.