USS Reliant: The Original Design - Wrath of Khan

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 гру 2019
  • Did you know the Reliant in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan was originally designed in reversed orientation?
    The nacelles were above the dish and there were two torpedo launch pods below the dish.
    I wanted to see how this original design would have looked on screen. So I edited the following together. Enjoy!
    Don't forget to like this video and subscribe to my channel if you want to see more videos about Star Trek, modding and AI upscaling.
    You can also check out my website, with more of this kind of stuff:
    captrobau.blogspot.com/
    You can follow me on Twitter: / leaufai
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 87

  • @themadoneplays7842
    @themadoneplays7842 4 роки тому +32

    Yeah glad they reversed it as in this orientation the Reliant looks silly as opposed to intimidating.
    Placing the nacelles at the bottom was the correct choice

  • @paulicke9838
    @paulicke9838 4 роки тому +24

    You should have khan and crew upside down as well 😂

  • @shadowxneo
    @shadowxneo 4 роки тому +21

    it gives an idea, but the saucer and nacelles would be flipped back over, with pods where the phasers are on the sides. overall tho, the nacelles on the bottom looks WAY better. the other brass loved it also, cause you could clearly see which ship was which, one had them on top, one had them on bottom.

    • @scottgamble7767
      @scottgamble7767 3 роки тому +1

      Maybe... but this way looks pretty cool too.

  • @mattdawg83686
    @mattdawg83686 2 роки тому +2

    The Reliant looks more menacing in its original right side up configuration. This was well done!

  • @tjf7101
    @tjf7101 4 роки тому +12

    Prefer the original but this is amazing work.

  • @andysahs1599
    @andysahs1599 4 роки тому +8

    I heard that the Reliant was at first before this was a older Constitution class with a little difference in the script . But the producers felt the audience would not be able to tell the difference between the two ships in battle you had to see which ship you were looking at so they changed the Reliant to Miranda class .

    • @markplott4820
      @markplott4820 4 роки тому +1

      they Also gave Reliant RED Running lights , while the Enterprise had White/Blue lighting.

    • @andysahs1599
      @andysahs1599 4 роки тому +1

      @@markplott4820 they did that so you can tell it was no longer a friendly ship anymore .

    • @thegreenmanofnorwich
      @thegreenmanofnorwich 3 роки тому +1

      I read somewhere that the constitution refit model was a pain in the arse to set up, move, etc, whereas the Miranda class model was a lot lighter and easier. I expect the special effects crew was relieved.

    • @doqas
      @doqas 21 день тому

      Watch “Wolf 359 and Beyond: A Preview” by JTVFX, it has the original (Constitution class) Reliant’s encounter with the Enterprise

    • @andysahs1599
      @andysahs1599 20 днів тому +1

      @@doqas Just seen it .

  • @camd6102
    @camd6102 10 днів тому

    The original orientation of the Enterprise was with the nacelles and secondary hull "underneath" the saucer section and bridge located in front of the main deflector. This made more sense since the model with mounting bar on the secondary hull (side opposite the camera) would be bottom-heavy and thus more stable for filming. Roddenberry liked the inverted version as did the NBC executives so that was that.

  • @sundance7328
    @sundance7328 Місяць тому

    Both look fine. Obviously being similar we prefer the version we are used to. That said, I actually lik ethe way the used version differs from \enterprise. It differentiates the two opponents. Awesome film. And well done to CaptRobau for making this edited version. Lays the matter to bed for me.

  • @stratfordbaby
    @stratfordbaby Місяць тому +1

    Although the nacelles are upside down compared to how they would be in the reverse orientation. So with that change, the design would be much improved. Same with the bridge and other saucer section components.

  • @jackpym5932
    @jackpym5932 3 роки тому +1

    I think the design was very nice and cool and very effective in the clip. I have the model and I was also thinking of placing the nacelles on the top as well. Nice work.

  • @netzvamp
    @netzvamp 4 роки тому +24

    Reliant look way more aggressive, i like it.

    • @CaptRobau
      @CaptRobau  4 роки тому +3

      Thanks!

    • @scottgamble7767
      @scottgamble7767 3 роки тому +1

      @@CaptRobau : I like it too. Though Reliant isn't supposed to be... with Kahn at the controls, there is a pretty sinister look to it here. Very nice job on this. Thanks for doing it.

  • @marsflatblack
    @marsflatblack 4 роки тому +6

    I love it. I had hear this story, too. Thanks for giving us a glimps of what might have been. Does anyone know if there's a kitbash of this online somewhere?

  • @capacamaru
    @capacamaru 4 роки тому

    Excellent! Love your work! Remako is amazing!

  • @nicholasmorsovillo2752
    @nicholasmorsovillo2752 Рік тому +1

    3:03
    Now that would be impossible for the Reliant to fire her phasers from that position at the Enterprise' secondary hull where they were aiming for the engine room from it's position the phaser fire would most likely have hit the cargo bay area or the arboretum it would have been impossible for it to hit the engine room of the Enterprise if she was filmed upside down like this and the same with the photon torpedoes that was fired at the Enterprise hitting her on the underside of the saucer section that torpedo would have taken out the Reliant's bridge as the torpedo launchers were right behind the Reliant's bridge so technically Khan would have done a lot of serious damage to the Reliant in his twisted need for revenge.

  • @RojoFern
    @RojoFern 4 роки тому +4

    While I still prefer the Miranda's design, I must give the original design credit for intimidation. The original just looks scarier.

  • @nealsterling8151
    @nealsterling8151 2 роки тому +2

    I actually prefer this version. It looks way more Starfleet like.
    I think most ppl. prefer the official one, because they are just used to see it.

  • @Yora21
    @Yora21 Рік тому

    Having the engines mounted low certainly helps with making the two ships more distinguishable.
    Mounted high, I think they might be difficult to tell apart from certain angles.

  • @john316godlovesyou5
    @john316godlovesyou5 8 місяців тому

    Great video!

  • @afdave70
    @afdave70 4 роки тому +1

    definitely more aggressive this way; looks more like a harmless scientific vessel the way they did it nacelles-down. So I guess I'm glad to see this, but happy they chose the way they did

  • @messengerguardiansparanorm8606

    Just as exciting as ever. the music just kills me, especially when they pass each other within just 10's of metres.

  • @davemiller6055
    @davemiller6055 2 роки тому

    The nacelles down version is much better. Glad they went with it.

  • @jwckauman
    @jwckauman 2 роки тому

    Sir you did it!

  • @markplott4820
    @markplott4820 4 роки тому +1

    CaptRobau - Good Job. Excellent work.
    So the Rollbar and Warp Necelle placement is right, but the Megaphasers should have been Relocated to the Dorsal Saucer.
    and the Saucer Section flipped and the Bridge located ontop of the Saucer.
    Otherwise Great Job.

    • @CaptRobau
      @CaptRobau  4 роки тому

      Thanks. This is just a mirroring of part of the image. In the future it's be cool if someone could sub out the Reliant and add in an new custom model.

  • @firecriss1392
    @firecriss1392 Рік тому

    think in vonda mcintyre's novelization of the movie--reliant was actually in this configuration from the way it was described,

  • @nicholasmorsovillo2752
    @nicholasmorsovillo2752 Рік тому +1

    5:27
    And the same with the Enterprise if the Reliant was built to be shown upside down like this the Enterprise's phaser fire would be hitting the underside of the Reliant or it would have worked if Bennett wasn't looking at the drawings for the ship upside down.

  • @jwckauman
    @jwckauman 2 роки тому +1

    Have you heard the Reliant theme music that Horner composed but never recorded? Would love to see your Reliant footage with that music playing in the background.

    • @jwckauman
      @jwckauman 2 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/FMVu9niufMs/v-deo.html

  • @fawziekefli2273
    @fawziekefli2273 3 роки тому

    2:23 Kirk's wondering why the Reliant is approaching them upside-down... not that there's an up or down in space.

  • @fawziekefli2273
    @fawziekefli2273 Рік тому

    Interesting thing is, the same thing happened to the original 1960's _Enterprise._ Her original design had the secondary hull on top, with the narcells and the primary hull at the bottom.

  • @Phox345
    @Phox345 Рік тому

    At certain angles it kind of looks like a Romulan Bird of Prey

  • @DavidShepheard
    @DavidShepheard 4 роки тому

    I'm used to the USS Reliant the way they built it for the movie, but thanks for finding this out and taking the time to show what it would have been like the other way.
    The film clearly would have had the same drama both ways, but I think that the original upside-down design does make it easier to spot Reliant.
    Did you have any thoughts about what the Mutara Nebula damage would have looked like?
    The movie had Spock talking about "two dimensional thinking, but there seems to have been a basic assumption that blowing up the top of the ship does more damage.

    • @CaptRobau
      @CaptRobau  4 роки тому

      Glad you liked it. I don't know what the Mutara Nebula damage would've looked like. The specifics of that scene were probably planned way later than the design itself. I imagine that was step 1.

    • @docsavage8640
      @docsavage8640 3 роки тому

      Given that exposed bridge hitting the top is deadlier

  • @decam5329
    @decam5329 3 роки тому +1

    Nice, but I feel the nacelles look upside down on this rendering.

  • @borusa32
    @borusa32 Місяць тому

    I prefer the original but this is good work.

  • @matthewakian2
    @matthewakian2 Рік тому

    Excellent. I prefer the design that was used.

  • @Colin_
    @Colin_ 9 місяців тому

    I prefer the look of that we got in the movie. It doesnt look bad the other way but i think looks best the correct way.

  • @rudolphguarnacci197
    @rudolphguarnacci197 12 днів тому

    It's cool. I like it.

  • @anthonylowder6687
    @anthonylowder6687 3 місяці тому

    Should have done a CGI model of the Reliant

  • @quattro4s
    @quattro4s 2 роки тому

    Reliant's alternative design looks more aggresive than the one selected and shown in the movie as a scientific starship . Watching Reliant attacking the Enterprise passes the message not to underestimate the enemy by its size

  • @Wildstar40
    @Wildstar40 2 місяці тому

    The original designer was like: " No no no no NO NO NO NOOOOO ! They fucked up my ship ! The bastards read the blueprints upside down." For some reason I hear this in Walter Matthau's voice.

  • @tonbopro
    @tonbopro 4 місяці тому

    well done,🎉

  • @blueballbag3588
    @blueballbag3588 3 роки тому

    Good work! Thanks! I am glad they screwed it up and did it upside down,. Maybe they should have done Spock's ears upside down too!

  • @seanm4095
    @seanm4095 3 роки тому

    I think I like the other way cause it looks more balacned. And here is something people forget, while in space you don't to worry about aruodynamics these ships do occationally land, and they do have battles in the atmosphere at these times aurodynsmics come in to play heavily.

  • @gregthompson3823
    @gregthompson3823 4 роки тому +2

    It looks ridiculous upside down.

  • @willyorgy4677
    @willyorgy4677 3 роки тому

    That design would make an excellent design if cbs decided to make a show in that era and needed kitbashes

  • @ctg6734
    @ctg6734 3 роки тому

    The inverted Reliant reminds me of a TOS Romulan warbird.

  • @jeffmunoz3285
    @jeffmunoz3285 9 місяців тому +1

    The nacelles need to be flipped upside down to look.right.

    • @stratfordbaby
      @stratfordbaby Місяць тому +1

      Correct. This way it's still not 100% correct.

  • @thegreenmanofnorwich
    @thegreenmanofnorwich 3 роки тому

    Somehow it looks smaller in the originally intended orientation.

  • @tmc3494
    @tmc3494 3 роки тому +3

    I see no alternate design. Just flipped over and reversed film clips.

  • @danielpascoe9638
    @danielpascoe9638 4 роки тому +3

    The original from the movie is best.

  • @Edax_Royeaux
    @Edax_Royeaux 2 роки тому

    It does certainly look like a weaker Constitution class when inverted and I believe that's what they're going for. But that exactly why I don't like it, the ship looks more balanced and combat capable with the nacelles down and the torpedo launcher overlooking the ship.

  • @ex0gen
    @ex0gen Рік тому +1

    I think reliant looks way better the way they did it in the movie. This way makes it look stupid. So much more bad ass with it inverted from the origional design they sketched. It was stroke of luck they gave him the design upsidown like that.

  • @docsavage8640
    @docsavage8640 3 роки тому +1

    Looks better the way it ended up. The original concept is too similar to the Enterprise.

  • @garyhill2740
    @garyhill2740 2 роки тому +1

    This is a poor indication. This merely flips the existing design upside down. The original had the nacelles sweeping back in swan like Federation fashion, no roll bar, and twin weapons pods. Along with the Phase II Enterprise, the Reliant concept is another example of a concept I like better than what was used.

  • @mrandrossguy9871
    @mrandrossguy9871 3 роки тому

    Good thing it was changed because it represents the Enterprise Upside down 🤷‍♂️

  • @startrekiscool_123
    @startrekiscool_123 Рік тому

    It’s upside down

  • @thomasvaldez8566
    @thomasvaldez8566 4 роки тому +1

    The alternate looks very graceful. Far less blocky than the Miranda class we got.

    • @reugeot9058
      @reugeot9058 4 роки тому +1

      That looks WAY BETTER. More aggressive, more Starfleetish. I like it a lot!

  • @nelson21570
    @nelson21570 3 роки тому

    Still Like the original

  • @timwhite9255
    @timwhite9255 3 роки тому

    I like it this way better but the roll bar has to go.

  • @soopahsoopah
    @soopahsoopah 2 роки тому

    Not sure what the big deal is, there's no up or down in space anyway. Spock even criticizes Khan's "two-dimensional thinking".

  • @anjawendland4681
    @anjawendland4681 2 роки тому

    So ein Unsinn!

  • @fhoneman
    @fhoneman Рік тому

    I don't like it 👎

  • @JeremyHannay
    @JeremyHannay 9 місяців тому

    Star Trek ships are so 2 dimensional. Space is is 3 dimensional